July 3, 2026 • 38 mins
Dan and Monse filling in for C&R as they discuss the World Cup and the controversial off-sides penalty. Jason Stewart and Monse disagree on a matter of the Green Jacket. Plus, Dan and Monse talk about theTaylor Swift and Travis Kelce wedding.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Hey, thanks for listening to the Cadino and Rich podcast.
Be sure to catch us live every weekday from five
to seven Eastern to the four.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Pacific on Fox Sports Radio.
Speaker 3 (00:09):
Find your local station for Comedo on Rich at Foxsports
Radio dot com, or stream us live every day on
the iHeartRadio app likee searching FSR.
Speaker 2 (00:19):
All right, Egypt didn't get jipped there until around.
Speaker 4 (00:24):
Sixteen Friday Friday Friday.
Speaker 5 (00:28):
I was like this, Oh, we're not.
Speaker 4 (00:29):
Gonna start like the Fellas do Friday Friday.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
I honestly, I have no idea what day of the
week it is. I am none.
Speaker 5 (00:36):
You know we're here.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
I thought Tuesday was a Wednesday, Yesterday was a Friday,
the whole deal because of the holiday.
Speaker 5 (00:43):
I only know when Tuesday is. That's the day, volleyball night.
That's the only day I know.
Speaker 2 (00:49):
You know, our as Manzi Blago, Si am Dan Beyer.
But we couldn't do it ourselves. We got our crew,
Chris Prophets here at the news desk. Hello, Chris, thought
it was Monday.
Speaker 5 (01:00):
Don't do this to us?
Speaker 3 (01:01):
Do this?
Speaker 2 (01:02):
So coming up, how do you pronounce Cape Verdy? So
you can either say just just how do you pronounce
cape Verdy. I like Cabo Verde, Cabo Verde. Jason Stewart,
our executive producer, how do you say it? How Chris
said it? And Alex ty shirt? What do you go by?
Speaker 6 (01:20):
Cap Verdi?
Speaker 2 (01:20):
Hot day? There, I'm cape Verdi. That sounds like very
very upper Midwest of my roots. I was gonna say
that's very Wisconsin, yes, but I then try to spice
it up with their day. But I do think it's
more Verdi. And I don't say the cobo like Chris does.
Speaker 5 (01:39):
There's Alex.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
I think it's French. So that goes from there. That's
that meme of that guy running up the canyon in
l A doing the jump rope with no shirt on.
Have you seen that?
Speaker 5 (01:49):
And he's France.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
Yes, have you seen? I'm sorry, Portuguese, not French. That's
that's that's Mancy right now when she's doing the pronunciations,
just lapping all of us while jump roping in.
Speaker 5 (02:01):
Such a good on.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
Cavino and Rich cracks me up. Final day of the
Round of thirty two.
Speaker 5 (02:06):
Very exciting.
Speaker 4 (02:07):
The Cup knockout round is now in Draft Kings. Has
you covered for every single match right now? Use the
promo code see our show to claim your special offer
at DraftKings. Again, that's promo code. See our show at
Draft Kings. The crown is yours.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
Two more matches and then we've got the Round of sixteen,
which will start tomorrow with matches on America's birthday. So
no stopping the World Cup. But Cape Verde is in
action today against Argentina. We just had Egypt and Australia.
Columbia in action as well against the Ghana as the
(02:45):
round of thirty two wraps up. Manta, you weren't here yesterday. No,
I listen. I know why this can't happen. I understand,
but I said, you know what I want World Cup
every two years, every two like this is great, It's
been awesome. I would rather have this one hundred times
than the Summer Olympics, I would, I think. And I
(03:05):
know it's like people love swimming and they love gymnastics,
and I'm not saying get rid of the Summer Olympics.
I'm just saying that in two years, the excitement and
we've got the Summer Games here in Los Angeles, But
I don't know if it's going to rise to the
level of the excitement that this has provided over the
last three weeks.
Speaker 4 (03:22):
Right, and the excitement I think anyone who's been tuning
in started because USA.
Speaker 5 (03:27):
They started and I mean Americans, Americans here.
Speaker 4 (03:30):
We started tuning into the World Cup because USA was winning.
But I think now the excitement is coming from all
the matches, all of the If you're paying, if you're
watching a match in the World Cup, you might be
at the edge of your seat by.
Speaker 5 (03:42):
The end of it. It doesn't matter if USA is
not playing.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
I when we just had Mark Medina in studios during
the penalty kicks as we're watching Egypt and Australia, and
whether you like it or not, you're watching it. You're
being drawn into it. And I think it was I
think it was great. I thought that what we saw
there tells you the pressure of the moment. I also
(04:05):
find something interesting. Oh, Chris Purfett, you got something, Chris.
Speaker 3 (04:08):
So it's not going to be the World Cup. But
I was just looking it up. And I know the
US was part of the last Copa America in twenty
twenty four, and I think they are going to be
part and will host games for the Copa America twenty
twenty eight. It's not the World Cup. But we do
have these like Interworld Cup years with euro Championship COPA.
Speaker 2 (04:27):
I wont the World Cup every two years. Yeah, and
I know it's not feasible. I know that there's qualifying.
I understand that. But my point is is this is
just too good of a thing to have every four years.
And I'm sorry if we sound ignorant in saying this,
(04:50):
because it took it to come back to the United States.
I remember when it was here in nineteen ninety four.
Monty doesn't again because she but I do remember when
it was here, and so it was a so to
have this sort of moment in the see how great
it's been in Mexico, to see you last night, you know,
the match in Vancouver, and all the matches that they've had,
(05:11):
the match in Toronto between Portugal and Croatia, all magnificent,
all awesome, and it's just great. And I'm going to
be really sad when it is gone.
Speaker 4 (05:22):
Yeah, I'm gonna be really sad that I don't get
to yell that was not off sides I.
Speaker 5 (05:27):
Am at on my TV.
Speaker 2 (05:28):
That's what leads us to something that I will I
will not miss people wanting to change off sides do
you want to change off side?
Speaker 4 (05:36):
No, I don't want to change off sides. If it's
yes or no, the answer is no. I think maybe
is there a way to slightly alter it?
Speaker 3 (05:45):
No?
Speaker 5 (05:45):
You can't. You know what I'm saying, Like no, it
would change the game of.
Speaker 2 (05:48):
Soccer completely completely. Alex teishert I think I know the answer.
Do you want to change off sides in soccer? I'll
try to do my best version of the job, how
he No? Hell no, are you kidding? That's the beauty
of the game is tacticality. Imagine if you could cherry
pick rinaldo would be the greatest. Then I don't want that.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Yeah, it builds like this strategy where you have to
like perfectly time your run, like you have to literally
look at your guy across the field, give him that
twinkle and dip as soon as he kicks the ball.
Speaker 4 (06:17):
You know.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
Great? That is to watch uh a big a hold
on a second, yes, mister soccer Fox Sports Radio, which
you could maybe challenge later on in the show. Chris
Purfett took down Mike Lingard in a showdown a few
weeks back on who was mister Soccer and uh Perfet
ended up winning because of the variety of jerseys that
he had. I think was ultimately the decider. But if
(06:40):
you'd like to challenge him, just let let us know.
Speaker 1 (06:42):
Well, I have a nineteen seventy two beer Loft Germany jersey.
Speaker 2 (06:44):
So this might get interesting. What this might get interesting?
Speaker 3 (06:48):
On Chris Purfet, I feel like arguing against off sides
is like arguing about like, oh, I should be able
to line a wide receiver up in the neutral zone
in American football.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
It makes no it may no sense whatsoever.
Speaker 3 (07:01):
Is like I want to have this guy, you know,
be able to jog in front of the line of
scrimmage before a play is off, Like what do we do?
I think the thing is, though, it's like, because we
have var because we see, oh he's just offside by
a bit of his toe, or or just in the
wrong place of the road, like just a little bit
of the foot, it makes people incensed and weird about it.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
I think Ronaldo is yesterday was a lean right, his
body was leaning a certain way, and so it ended
up being the difference. And then there's no more call
in that same match that made people furious than the
offsides that was called against Croatia but I want to
be fair. Jason Stewart, do you want offsides changed in
the in the game of soccer in the World Cup.
Speaker 6 (07:45):
I do need to qualify this. I do not care
about soccer. I never have. In fact, I've always found
it an annoying. Part of our job is to talk
about soccer, So I come from it from that perspective.
I'm absolutely loving the World Cup though, and I under like,
intellectually grasp this concept. If you took away the like
the five second count in basketball, in the center and
(08:07):
the power forward could just sit in the key or
sit down low the whole time, that would take away
the fun of the sports. So why would you take
away off sides. There's a reason why the rules in place.
Right at the same time, it's a major bus kill.
If you have money against the other team, it's a
major buzzkill.
Speaker 2 (08:23):
And that's where we get a lot of the Also,
I don't think people wanted Portugal and Ronaldo to win,
so they felt that Croatia was getting robbed. Yeah, with
how played out like there's there are rooting interests.
Speaker 6 (08:36):
Well, they did get robbed.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
They you thought on the deflection, did you think that
that is that the play that you're calling.
Speaker 5 (08:42):
Are you're saying that it should have been off sides
on the Portugal I.
Speaker 1 (08:44):
Think there was three off side goals Croatia had that
should have probably not totally been called if you think
about it, Like, I think they were the better team.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
They dominated.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
Modrich is like literally the best player I've seen on
a small standpoint besides MESSI. I don't know if he's
fourteen or forty, yeah.
Speaker 2 (08:57):
But I thought he's fifty eight? Is he? Yeah, it's insane.
Well he looks like a teenager who smokes.
Speaker 1 (09:04):
Yeah, and see, Like this is the thing that hurts
Ronaldo the most is like eighty minutes he was on
the field, nothing besides a PK. They take him off
a goal within five minutes. That kind of says something.
Speaker 2 (09:12):
To me that Ronaldo is not needed. We had Eric
Ronaldo on about a week ago, a week or so ago,
and he said that for as great as you know
Ronaldo has been, and as great as Ronaldo has been
to him, he commented that when you were watching Ronaldo
it looked like he was maybe being lackadaisical, and they're like, no,
(09:33):
that's just how fast he can run. Now, Okay, that's like,
that's where he was. So that was the point that
Weinalda made and that was his thing.
Speaker 4 (09:39):
He just was outrunning everybody and now you can't do
it because age.
Speaker 2 (09:44):
But he got his first PK goal of his of
his World Cup career. But to Alex's point, the game
winner came with him not on the pitch and him
on the bench. But that's not the play that people
are talking about the most. It's the one on the
deflection on the off side set had Croatia end up
(10:05):
losing their goal. And it's another element of off sides
that I love and it's because, yeah, it is. It
is a game of inches. You don't think, and I'm parafer.
I don't want to. I don't want to put words
in your mouth. Did you think that it was fair?
Did you think that offside should have been called on
Croatia on the goal that they had wiped out because
of the deflection.
Speaker 4 (10:25):
I thought it was not offsides because the defend the
defender touched the ball.
Speaker 5 (10:31):
I don't.
Speaker 4 (10:31):
I did not see the own Croatian player touched the ball.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
I don't.
Speaker 5 (10:37):
I don't. I didn't see it.
Speaker 4 (10:38):
I didn't see I know. Now you guys told me
there's a chip on the ball. I didn't even know
there was a chip on the ball, and that that's
but like when I watched the video, I did not
see that. I thought the defender with with his hat,
with his head had an intention.
Speaker 5 (10:49):
He tried to get it and hit it, and so
I didn't think it was off sides. I was. I
was very surprised.
Speaker 2 (10:54):
And not only is there a chip in the ball,
but FIFA even put the graphic up on their social
media pay if you can think of a of a
flat line, and it peaked when the ball was touched,
and so that tells you all you need to know.
And I say to myself, that is awesome like that
that is some people may hate it, and I think
(11:15):
that it is so awesome that I'm on a call
that I don't care how many HD cameras you have,
you cannot see it. But that technology allowed us to
see that there was a deflection and whether it did
or didn't have an effect on the goal, it still
affects the play. And that's part of the genius in
all of it. And I love that aspect of it.
(11:37):
And maybe it is because I'm newer to it, but
to be able to get screwed like that is a
part of sports, sure, and that's the part of it
that I know it's stun for Croatia, and I know
it's going to stick with them forever. But I felt
that it was an awesome play and what awesome technology
to be able to use, to be able to make
(11:58):
that sort of call. I want to see it in
the NFL in the ball. Well, yeah, there is a
chip in the ball now that we know, but to
be able to use that sort of thing, so like
on a pass interference call, you could say, like, hey,
so and so tipped it. Look did the ball move
or not? Did did the player get his hand on it?
Did he deflect it? On a field goal kick? You
would be able to get that information from this technology.
(12:19):
Did he missed the field goal? Did somebody get a
finger on it? Look it was touched right at that moment,
Because that's what we got last night. I think that
the NFL should use some of this stuff. How about
the NBA ball goes out of bounds? Did he touch
it last? Who touched it last? At this point? Like,
there's way that that technology could be used that could
be helpful. And while it didn't side with Croatia yesterday.
(12:40):
It gave a clear answer that in one way or
another it was touched by the player, so you can't
really argue about it. And that's what I think is magnificent.
I think it's great, Dan. I agree with you.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
You do in all sports because we always argue that
the human element makes sports sports. I disagree. It's the
game that makes sports. We love the game. How much
would it suck to know Croatia one but shouldn't have?
How is it awesome to knowe Ronaldo got that PK
because the defender pulled him down and after reviewing it,
they saw he infringe the play on the side or
the corner kick. So these things are gonna make sports better.
(13:10):
Like we're always afraid of technology, like, oh my god,
it's self driving cars. Oh no, what's gonna happen next?
But now think about sports in this aspect. Literally, the
best team is going to win.
Speaker 2 (13:18):
Let me go ahead, Manci, I'm sorry.
Speaker 5 (13:20):
Have any of you seen flubber?
Speaker 2 (13:22):
No? I didn't.
Speaker 6 (13:23):
That's a great pull.
Speaker 5 (13:24):
So we get there.
Speaker 6 (13:27):
The flubber that was made recently or the flubber from
like nineteen forties. I saw the original one from the
nineteen forties.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
Recently, what is recently the last twenty years? Right, the
last twenty years. They remade it with Robin Williams. Were
put stuff on your shoes and you bounce up and down.
Speaker 5 (13:44):
But then the ball and they put something on the
ball that was a remake.
Speaker 4 (13:47):
Yeah, okay, but you're saying recently it wasn't recently.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
How that's flubber two, rub a dub, rub a dub.
Speaker 4 (13:54):
I'm just like, are we that's I Alex. You make
a great point, you to Dan, it's you want it
to be right. You want it to be right.
Speaker 5 (14:03):
I just think, like technology, how far are we gonna go?
Speaker 4 (14:08):
And finding this out is like, oh, so no one's
controlling the ball. You're telling me that there's nothing swaying
the ball either way.
Speaker 5 (14:15):
Get out of my face.
Speaker 4 (14:16):
I don't like that there's a chip in it. But
you're right when you say you want it to be
the right call.
Speaker 5 (14:21):
So it's like, I don't have an argument. I just
don't like it.
Speaker 2 (14:23):
Can I pull them Medina here and give Manzi credit
on her point? Alex, I'm curious your thoughts, Chris, your
thoughts as well, because I brought this up yesterday. Sorry,
to take a shot at Mark Medina when he wasn't here.
But I'm going to kind of slide to herself. Yeah, Mark,
I'm gonna pull them Medina here. Okay, Manzi's got a point,
because I think the most famous call in soccer is
hand of God. Yes it is, yeah, which was a
(14:46):
goal that never should have happened and wouldn't happen in
today's game. So I think, you know, to Manti's to
Monti's point about that that is tough to argue. But
I still would side with Alex, and I still would
side with with Chris that I think that yesterday's play
was great. It's just that goal is the most popular
goal ever scored that shouldn't have been a goal, right, right,
(15:08):
So yeah, Chris.
Speaker 3 (15:09):
If I may, if I may positive Devil's advocate here,
if I said, because there's always I used to believe
when I was a lot younger that like I hated
instant replay in the NFL, I hated twenty minutes or
whatever it was when we would go to the monitors.
I think centralizing has made it better. We opened up
Pandora's box trying to adjudicate pass interference. But I always
(15:30):
think about people arguing. I think I was watching an
NFL films about people arguing on the immaculate the immaculate catch,
you know, the famous Pittsburgh Steeler play, and there were
rare I think there were old Raiders players in there
arguing that that should not have been a real catch,
that it was off the ground or something happened. I
just I sit here and I wonder if we had
(15:51):
had video replay back then, and if that had revealed
the immaculate catch, immaculate reception, immaculate reception. Excuse me, if
the immaculate hadn't been a reception, we just wipe out
that piece of our history. I I understand the poll
to get it right, But at the same time, I
saw what happened in the NFL for so long, where
(16:11):
it's been thirty minutes reviewing something. It slows down the game.
It kills some It kills a lot of emotion about
a game. And I wonder, for those one percent of
plays that we argue about all the time, is it
worth it?
Speaker 2 (16:24):
Is it worth it? At the end of the day,
you gotta say this. I actually thought the drama of
the goal was good mm hmm. For for that aspect
of it yesterday of seeing it now, does every single
goal need to be reviewed? I'm not sure. But in
that instance, it was so dramatic and it was so heartbreaking,
and I know what breaks up the rhythm, But there's
(16:44):
also I think a dynamic where it does add some
drama to it, which I think is is a positive.
So I would counter those as saying like it just
breaks up the rhythm of the game. But man, when
it goes to that, when when the ref comes out
and has to push everybody off and he does his
square thing, that judgment day, bring it, let's hear the decision.
Speaker 4 (17:02):
Which is what's crazy, because I feel like a lot
of Americans here find soccer boring, and that's been the
exact opposite of the World Cup.
Speaker 5 (17:08):
The World Cup has been so dramatic that goal.
Speaker 4 (17:11):
We were I was at the Dodgers yesterday because it
was a wild day. We'll get into that, but we
had the game on and every we instantly started arguing
with each other, whether.
Speaker 5 (17:20):
That was off sides or not. And again, we don't care.
Speaker 4 (17:22):
What was No nobody there was rooting for Croatia or Portugal,
you know what I'm saying, And instantly It created a
conversation within us in the office, and we weren't split.
We were arguing about it. And I love that because
I feel like a lot of people, a lot of Americans,
associate soccer is boring, and the World Cup has been
the last thing it's been has been boring.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
Imagine if a wide receiver on every touchdown got like
a five yard head start, right, we'd be like, yeah,
this is dumb. H this is ridiculous, Like that's what
would happen if you like got rid of off sides. Essentially,
it'd be terrible.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
And you know what's fun though, I love about this because,
like you're saying, drama, now, think about this, right, we're
playing the biggest game in US history. I could argue
again Belgium without our best score because of the drama.
I love it because everybody, I guess Yvonte in the
back shouts to him. He said, I'm like the only
person saying that was a red card and it was
the way. Yeah, if you really watch everything now, right,
we wouldn't have seen that with Madrik, we wouldn't have
(18:15):
seen the goal, callback we wouldn't have seen half of
these were a guy's toes off sides for it. I
love it, and think about it. If you pods on
that perfect angle, it looks like Belligan snapping this guy's angle.
Speaker 2 (18:26):
The same thing the other night, and he called a
mumbling thing about it.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
That be the best player in the world ten years,
maybe you'll get better calls. We're just yeah, I'm saying.
You know, if you look at Messi's side by side
with this, it's completely different. This guy attacks from the back,
steps on his ankle and slides down the back of
his whole calf. That's a red card in any aspect.
Just don't make that challenge. And I love it. I
love they got it right now. America is going into
(18:50):
this next game having to prove who they are and
it's beautiful.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
So I brought this up because I think, and I
think this is a little different like the part that
I think the show. The referee in the US Bosnia
Herzegovina match, he was given once it went to the review,
he was only given two options, either nothing or he
gets a red card. There was no middle ground on
the yellow card portion of it. If he was given
(19:14):
a yellow card in that moment, do you think there
would have been.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
A review for a red probably still you still think
so yeah, because the VR now whistles in and tells
him like, hey, dude, you have to look at this again.
So they probably saw something and told him like, it's
a it's a worse step he did than we thought.
Speaker 2 (19:28):
Okay, so fair enough. But then my point is is
if he was already given a yellow at that point,
would that official then say, well, I can't give him
a red. I don't think it would warrant him to
miss another match. I am good with him getting a yellow.
Like So that's so like when we were talking about
changing off sides, it's a or is there a chip
(19:51):
in the ball and should it counters offsides or not?
To me, that's a completely different VRA conversation than the
red card. Because the red card, the official was cornered
into a decision where it was you're in jail or
you're scott free. And if there was any sort of
punishment that was allowed to like if the foul was
called on the field to give him a yellow card,
(20:14):
I think everybody would have been cool with it. And
that wasn't the case. It was two extremes. You either
got away with it or you got penalized for it,
and I think that when we look at it, the
penalty was way too extreme for what we saw.
Speaker 4 (20:28):
Now.
Speaker 2 (20:28):
Alex may feel differently, but I think if you gave
him a yellow card and that the rules allowed you
to just keep the yellow card, I think everybody would
have been cool with it.
Speaker 5 (20:37):
Yeah, I think you're saying, by letter of the law,
that was the right call. But do you think it
was a soft call?
Speaker 4 (20:42):
Because I immediately texted my brother, the soccer player, and
he's like, to me, that was a soft call.
Speaker 5 (20:47):
But he didn't say it was the wrong crime. You
get what I'm saying. He didn't say that.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
Well, it's true without VR you could get away with it.
But again, when you pause at that one spot, that
guy's ankle could have been snapped if he stepped a
little too hard on it right there, that's a bad
don't you think it?
Speaker 4 (21:02):
If you don't stop it there, it doesn't look like
Baaligan knows that that guy's coming from that side.
Speaker 2 (21:08):
Well he's behind it.
Speaker 3 (21:10):
I think it's I think it was incidental there, And
to be honest, I feel like it only looks bad
in slow motion.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
And that's where we keep coming back to.
Speaker 3 (21:17):
This and this is the where video will lie to
you constantly, repeatedly all the time. It only looks bad
in slow motion because we're catching it in this moment.
And now because of that, the US had to play
for ten men for about sixty minutes and now won't
have their best player in the next game. It's a
call that I would never see done to a country
like France or England. It just it's it's ludicrous that
(21:41):
that's the kind of penalty it carries here.
Speaker 2 (21:42):
It is orange card, orange card. You missed the rest
of this stuff, but you can play in the next stop.
How about that? It's the middle of red and yellow. Yes,
orange card. It blends. It's got like a three D
glass and it's like, oh, it's like translucent. You hold
it like a cross a fross each Yeah, yeah, there
you go. We don't have him for the rest of
(22:03):
this match, but you do have him in the next match.
Speaker 1 (22:06):
Ye imagine the voice too, He's like orange yes, freaking holds.
Speaker 2 (22:11):
Both of them up? Could one go down? Could one
go up? Could they cross the Roman thumb in the day? Yes,
this is where soccer needs to go. Quit with the
I don't understand off side so I don't want it conversation.
This is where the conversation needs to go when it
comes to uh to uh the great the greatest game.
Is that what they call soccer beautiful, the beautiful game,
(22:35):
that's so beautiful.
Speaker 5 (22:36):
Yes, that's Lexi.
Speaker 4 (22:38):
In case you didn't know, we get both, you get
Alex Tycher and Lexi.
Speaker 2 (22:42):
So Lexington, thank you. Alex is in a couple of
hours earlier than before. Monty's here on weeknights. Chris can
be as well. Fox Sports Areadio weeknights here a completely
different animal like it is it is. There's names that
I've never heard of from people that I've known for years.
Oh uh, this is Covenent. This is Covino and Rich
(23:03):
here on Fox Sports Radio. Guys were in for Dan
Patrick wrapping up their Dan Patrick Haatrick earlier in the day.
So Moncey and myself are happy to sit along with
you as our Chris Profet, Jason Stewart and Alex Tyscher.
Speaker 7 (23:17):
Fox Sports Radio had the best sports talk lineup in
the nation. Catch all of our shows at Fox Sports
Radio dot com and within the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2 (23:27):
It's Covino and Rich here on Fox Sports Radio. She's
Moncey Bolango, So I'm Dan bayer Is the guys wrapped
up their Dan Patrick hat trick earlier today. I think
I can also say guys are going to need a
little break after doing the work this past week. So
you and I are going to be in for CNR
on Monday and Tuesday.
Speaker 5 (23:42):
Guess right, just right, find an ex.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
At Moncey Bolangho so you can find me at Dan
Byer on Fox.
Speaker 7 (23:49):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (23:49):
And you know, for over forty years, Tyrek has been
helping customers find the right tires for how, what and
where they drive. Ship fast and free back by free
road hazard protection with convenient installation options like mobile tar installation,
tyreq dot Com the way tirebine should be. And now
it's time for our Tyract play of the Day courtesy
of the World Cup on Fox TV, The Great Full.
Speaker 8 (24:09):
Egypt Days to Win It AGYPT sixteen.
Speaker 5 (24:26):
Again chills and I don't even care chills?
Speaker 2 (24:28):
You do you do? Gooselums, She's got chicken skin And
here's my thing, Like, it's the first time we've had
a round of thirty two. It's the first time we've
allowed forty eight countries. So there are a lot of firsts,
so winning this knockout stage isn't as much to me
as if they were to win in the round of sixteen,
and I would be like, oh, okay, now you've won
(24:50):
in the knockout stage. Right now, this is just kind
of phony. I hear what you're because it's a first of.
Speaker 5 (24:56):
Everything, right, but it is very well.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
It was enough to give Manzi goo.
Speaker 5 (25:00):
I really did, I really did.
Speaker 2 (25:01):
If you were wearing a green jacket, we would not
have been able to see those goosebumps.
Speaker 5 (25:06):
I would not take that green jacket off, and.
Speaker 2 (25:09):
Now that did Rory McElroy as earlier this week at Wimbledon,
he was spotted wearing his Master's jacket from winning a
second straight Masters and he wore it the All England Club.
In fact, Novak Djokovic said that he wanted one of
those green jackets. Everybody had a good time with it
except one person. I wonder who, Jason Stewart. Jason Stewart
(25:30):
was not down with the threads that Rory McElroy was wearing.
Earlier this week when taking in Wimbledon action on center court.
You had an issue with him wearing the master's green jacket. Well,
I mean to add some context here. I didn't know
that this was a thing. So the first time I
had ever seen anything like this was reporter Dan Wolken.
(25:52):
He was with USA Today. Don't know what he is.
Speaker 6 (25:54):
He put out a tweet with a screenshot that said
Rory wearing the green jacket to Wimbledon is the biggest
flex ever. So that Dan Wolkin was like drawing attention
to it as if this was some kind of a
unique thing. Further investigation, I guess it is a thing
where the current Master's champ will show up in public
(26:14):
with the green jacket, no matter what the facts are
of the case. Guys, I think it's douchey. I think
that if Rory McElroy had an honest wife, he would
be like, I'm going out to Wimbledon today, how about
this green jacket that I wanted at the Masters? And
she'd be like to douchey, And he'd be like, you know,
(26:35):
you're right. I'm gonna put it back in the trophy
case and aware it to Masters events, but I won't
take it out in public. It would be like if
Michael Phelps went to the USA game on Monday with
ten gold medals around his neck. I would say that's douchey.
It would be like when JJ Watt wins goes to
the Hall of Fame, he's gonna be a guy who
(26:56):
just shows up to like a an Applebee's with the
yellow jacket, and I'll say that's douchey, because JJ Watt
is a douche.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
I don't think that it was a douche move at all,
And I actually appreciate it because I feel like the
Masters and Wimbledon are on that same level, Like it's
the if you wanted to look at it this way,
like Wimbledon is the Masters of tennis, or the Masters
is the Wimbledon of golf, and how they're revered and
(27:25):
what comes with them, the honor of the prestige. So
I feel like it's it's even more even than it
would be, say Rory McElroy's showing up at the US
Open and wearing the green jacket, which I don't think
he would do.
Speaker 5 (27:40):
Rory McElroy can wear this jacket.
Speaker 4 (27:43):
Jason as the only golfer for a year outside of Augusta, right, Dan,
He's the only one. Again, if I had the screen,
if I won the Masters and it was my year.
I would I wouldn't take the jacket off. I would
wear it for your birthday, Alex's birthday, Bronch, Chris' soccer game.
Speaker 5 (28:03):
I don't know I'm wearing the green jacket.
Speaker 4 (28:06):
This is like, this is not him going to a
Spurs playoff game where everyone is wearing the same color
in each location and he's there wearing green.
Speaker 5 (28:17):
That is not what this is.
Speaker 4 (28:19):
And comparing it to the Michael Philips wearing all of
his gold medals. Everybody's got a bunch of gold medals. Literally,
Rory mcclroy is the only one to be able to
wear this jacket outside, and instead of wearing it every
single day as I would.
Speaker 5 (28:32):
He brings it out to Wimbledon, like I loved it.
I loved it.
Speaker 2 (28:37):
If Jack Nicholas went to Wimbledon, he would not be
able to wear the green jacket because he is not
allowed to leave the premises now because he is not
the current champion at the Masters. It is Rory McElroy.
So you have the three hundred and sixty five days,
or if you want to take the seven days out
of Master's week, the three hundred and fifty eight days
to try to live to its absolute fullest for you,
(28:59):
and then April it'll return to Augusta. And if Rory
doesn't win, then the jacket is going to stay in
his locker.
Speaker 6 (29:05):
And this this, this is basically just two opposite opinions. Like,
I think that it's your choice, it's his discretion. If
he could wear it, he doesn't have to wear it,
and he can wear it. I'm not saying he can't
do it, but I'm just saying the decision to do
it is douchey. So you think it's badass. I think
it's a douche move. What is prefet thing?
Speaker 3 (29:25):
So I would say two things. Number one, I'm curious
what your opinion would because I think one of the
stories this is where kind of how I learned about
that the green jacket you hold it for a year
and do whatever you want with it, was when Bubba
Watson talked about wrapping his newborn son in the green jacket. Yes,
so like that was that I thought was very heartfelt.
But according to Jason, that would be kind of kind
(29:45):
of douche.
Speaker 2 (29:45):
Yeah. Wow, I'm a jacket right, I'm that callist.
Speaker 6 (29:48):
I'm very much a callist first too.
Speaker 2 (29:50):
I would say This is extremely like.
Speaker 3 (29:52):
There's only one other thing like the green Jacket as
far as holding it and doing whatever you want with
it for a set period of time. And compare to
what happens to the Stanley Cup, to the teams that
win the Stanley Cup.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
This is tame. This is tame. It is still respectful.
Speaker 3 (30:07):
Whereas the things guys put in put in the Stanley Cup,
where they take the Stanley Cup and what they do
with the Stanley Cup, some of that probably can't even
go on the.
Speaker 2 (30:16):
Air, well they can. They give a jacket away when
you win the RBC Heritage, which is the week after.
It's kind of a plaid tartan pattern. Nobody's wearing it.
Speaker 5 (30:28):
Why even do it? That change the award?
Speaker 2 (30:32):
Nobody's nobody. Matt Fitzpatrick isn't showing up at the All
England Club with that jacket. As great as it is
to win the RBC Heritage, no doubt, great win. I've
played the course, it's magnificent, but there is something about
the Masters of Course and it's different and I'm there.
I appreciate you being so such a stunt supporter of
(30:53):
Rory Mackle.
Speaker 6 (30:54):
Let me ask you a question, Monsie let me ask. Okay,
so say you you go and you win a Marconi okay,
and that the award for a Marconi for Best Women
Broadcaster of the Year is a crown. Would you show
up to work with that crown and do all the
FSR shows?
Speaker 2 (31:11):
It shows up every day in it.
Speaker 5 (31:14):
Maybe on every day. That ends with why there?
Speaker 2 (31:17):
Yeah, there's your answer. Plus she does she has the earbuds,
so it would work for you.
Speaker 4 (31:22):
And I find that a little different. I find that
it's like a crown is a pageant queen. It has
a crown.
Speaker 5 (31:30):
There is something where the green jacket it stands.
Speaker 4 (31:34):
Out like in a way where it seems important and
it is. I see chicks wearing crowns at the bar
and they're on the cuckoo birds.
Speaker 5 (31:43):
So like, I don't love that example. I think you
should have said, but you.
Speaker 4 (31:46):
Win a a blade, I don't know, gold blade, I
don't know.
Speaker 2 (31:50):
And I'm not saying you wouldn't have earned it, But
the masters is earned one like an award would be
given to you. That's a really someone's like like Rory
beat everybody else. He had the best slowest score of anyone,
and he wanted himself. Yeah, and so I think there's
difference than someone maybe awarding you something right, right.
Speaker 5 (32:09):
Right, that's a great that's a great way to put it.
Speaker 4 (32:11):
And I really doubt that his wife was like, if
she's a good wife, which I'm sure she is, should
have been like, yeah, babe, wear that every day.
Speaker 5 (32:18):
What I'm saying, like, that's how it should be. Support
easily won the masters.
Speaker 2 (32:22):
Yes, support the team. Support the team, just like Puddy,
support the team. Chris Purfett giving us the latest of
what's happening today. Would you done that green jacket? Chris Prefett.
Speaker 3 (32:31):
I don't know if I would take it to like
I don't know, a tiki bar, but you know in
any place where I'm not going to get it just
utterly destroyed. Sure, absolutely, why not? Just it's a green jacket.
Some people might get it, some people otherwise it's it's nice,
but we move on.
Speaker 2 (32:47):
They got a lot more fans on their side, I'll
tell you that much. They have all the energy right now.
The day very popular. Also wearing the green jacket popular.
Even Alex Tyscher would wear that thing here, there and
everywhere as some guy was probably like, yeah, I was
out at Joshua Tree this past weekend, I saw some
dude with a green jacket and I swear it was
(33:07):
Master's Champion Alex Tye shirt. I think that's that was me. Yeah,
that's ripping balls. But in Green Bay the guy's like
I thought I was tripping, No, it was.
Speaker 5 (33:18):
He probably was tripping for other reasons. If you're a
Joshua Tree, h.
Speaker 2 (33:21):
Come on, Dan, right, wouldn't you wear it every day?
Speaker 4 (33:23):
If you wore one?
Speaker 2 (33:23):
Yes, I would wear it at a lot of occasions,
so much that ultimately maybe the Jason's point poopa would
be like, is he gonna wear it again?
Speaker 5 (33:30):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (33:31):
Yeah, is Dan gonna show up in his green jacket again?
Speaker 1 (33:34):
And then he trolls him has a jacket on top
of it, just kidding takes it off.
Speaker 2 (33:37):
It's still on.
Speaker 5 (33:37):
It's still on.
Speaker 2 (33:38):
This is my RBC heritage jacket.
Speaker 4 (33:40):
Suckers, please that jacket'd be like, where'd you get that?
Speaker 5 (33:44):
Where'd you can I get one of the.
Speaker 7 (33:45):
Host Fox Sports Radio had the best sports talk lineup
in the nation yet. Catch all of our shows at
Fox sports radio dot com and within the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2 (33:56):
Can you know what rich?
Speaker 7 (33:56):
Here?
Speaker 2 (33:57):
At Fox Sports Radio? If you missed any of today's show.
We should to catch the podcast, just search Cavino and
Rich wherever you get your podcast. Please follow the podcast
three at five stars and provide a review. Again, just
search Covino and Rich wherever you get your podcast, and
you'll find today's full show and a best of version
posted right after the end of the show. The Wedding
of the Year, Wedding of the century, however you want
to put it. Apparently going down to New York City,
(34:19):
Travis Kelsey, Taylor Swift about to say I do, and
Manzie Milanios, I'm dan byer Aper CNR. You're about to
say I don't or I can't.
Speaker 4 (34:30):
Y'all, there's no way that they're getting married.
Speaker 5 (34:33):
They're already married.
Speaker 4 (34:35):
There's no way that this is like this ceremony. If
you are telling me like, oh, they're doing this because
they want to keep it real private.
Speaker 5 (34:42):
I know everything.
Speaker 4 (34:44):
I know every detail because y'all keep telling me there
is no way that they are not already married and
that this isn't just like the party for everybody, because
I can't imagine Taylor Swift wanting to get married at
Madison's We're Garden.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
Isn't that every girl's dream.
Speaker 4 (35:02):
No, and also like maybe, but not not somebody that
has literally all of the resources necessary in order to
get married in a private island somewhere with a castle
like I just and it's just like.
Speaker 5 (35:17):
No, it's just because they want to keep it private. Literally,
you have told me when the food has arrived.
Speaker 4 (35:21):
You told me when the castle that they're building arrived,
You told me when she arrived, You told me everything.
Speaker 5 (35:26):
You told me that they had pizza, You told me this.
Speaker 4 (35:28):
There is no way that this is the actual wedding
ceremony that they're actually saying I do for the first time.
Speaker 2 (35:36):
No way, you think this is just a ten thousand
people party with all their celebrity friends.
Speaker 4 (35:41):
Yes, that's what I think. We're gonna find out that
that's what this says.
Speaker 2 (35:44):
You don't think that Taylor Swift, when she was nine
years old, said I want to get married where og
Nanobi tipped in the game winning shot to lead the
New York Knicks past the San Antonio Spurs.
Speaker 4 (35:56):
I think I don't think so. No, I don't think
she was thinking when she was nine years old. Oh yes, uh,
who was a who would be a New York Naga?
Speaker 5 (36:06):
Phil Jackson? He was a nick, right, Phil Jackson.
Speaker 2 (36:09):
I want to I want to be married in the
house that Ewing built. The Ewing built that he didn't
build it. But you know what we're talking.
Speaker 4 (36:17):
You get it, like I just there's no there's no way,
and I get the privacy aspect of being able to
have this party, but I think, like though, I think
they're already married, though the actual wedding has happened, and
this has to be a reception.
Speaker 2 (36:34):
I'll never forget when Mark Messier lifted that Stanley cup
that that's where I wanted to say, I do, That's
where I want to be in to the love of
my life.
Speaker 1 (36:43):
Right.
Speaker 2 (36:44):
I heard that they wanted to go to a like
a couple's resort in Arizona, but we're afraid of the
privacy that that was the right. You showed the clip
of Mike Vrabel and his wife going to the reception.
He showed me during the break like is that elephant
in the like elephant the room? Right?
Speaker 5 (37:00):
Absolutely, I'm surprised they're going.
Speaker 2 (37:03):
It was very interesting and very odd to see business
as usual. When I saw a clip with Matthew Stafford
being there, I also find it interesting. There's just a
lot of NFL people going. That doesn't seem to me
like that makes it seem like it's more of a
party than the actual special day.
Speaker 5 (37:20):
Right exactly.
Speaker 4 (37:21):
It's there's no I bet she got married on the
thirteenth of like June or something or like my why
thirteen is her favorite number. That's another reason I don't
think they're getting married today.
Speaker 2 (37:31):
Because it's it's number three.
Speaker 4 (37:32):
No, thirteen is her number. It's everywhere. It wouldn't surprise
me if they got married on the thirteenth of of
a month.
Speaker 5 (37:38):
Earlier this year.
Speaker 2 (37:40):
Yeah, I thought there would be some sort of Easter
egg numerology related to it, right, Honestly, when me and
my wife were given options for the wedding venue that
we had, that played a part in it.
Speaker 5 (37:50):
Yeah, of course.
Speaker 2 (37:51):
So we were married on May sixth of twenty seventeen,
so it was five six seventeen, but like like a
week prior, it was April two ninth. And there's nothing
against anybody who may have been born on April twenty ninth,
but there just wasn't any.
Speaker 5 (38:04):
Flowing significance or significance.
Speaker 2 (38:07):
Yeah, So we just liked, we liked five six seventeen,
and so that's when we ended up doing it. Yeah,
but man, to make you turn on T Swift, I'm
not turning T Swift.
Speaker 5 (38:16):
I'm not turning he's light. I'm saying, you're not doing it.
You're bigger than this
Hey, thanks for listening to the Cadino and Rich podcast.
Be sure to catch us live every weekday from five
to seven Eastern to the four.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Pacific on Fox Sports Radio.
Speaker 3 (00:09):
Find your local station for Comedo on Rich at Foxsports
Radio dot com, or stream us live every day on
the iHeartRadio app likee searching FSR.
Speaker 2 (00:19):
All right, Egypt didn't get jipped there until around.
Speaker 4 (00:24):
Sixteen Friday Friday Friday.
Speaker 5 (00:28):
I was like this, Oh, we're not.
Speaker 4 (00:29):
Gonna start like the Fellas do Friday Friday.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
I honestly, I have no idea what day of the
week it is. I am none.
Speaker 5 (00:36):
You know we're here.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
I thought Tuesday was a Wednesday, Yesterday was a Friday,
the whole deal because of the holiday.
Speaker 5 (00:43):
I only know when Tuesday is. That's the day, volleyball night.
That's the only day I know.
Speaker 2 (00:49):
You know, our as Manzi Blago, Si am Dan Beyer.
But we couldn't do it ourselves. We got our crew,
Chris Prophets here at the news desk. Hello, Chris, thought
it was Monday.
Speaker 5 (01:00):
Don't do this to us?
Speaker 3 (01:01):
Do this?
Speaker 2 (01:02):
So coming up, how do you pronounce Cape Verdy? So
you can either say just just how do you pronounce
cape Verdy. I like Cabo Verde, Cabo Verde. Jason Stewart,
our executive producer, how do you say it? How Chris
said it? And Alex ty shirt? What do you go by?
Speaker 6 (01:20):
Cap Verdi?
Speaker 2 (01:20):
Hot day? There, I'm cape Verdi. That sounds like very
very upper Midwest of my roots. I was gonna say
that's very Wisconsin, yes, but I then try to spice
it up with their day. But I do think it's
more Verdi. And I don't say the cobo like Chris does.
Speaker 5 (01:39):
There's Alex.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
I think it's French. So that goes from there. That's
that meme of that guy running up the canyon in
l A doing the jump rope with no shirt on.
Have you seen that?
Speaker 5 (01:49):
And he's France.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
Yes, have you seen? I'm sorry, Portuguese, not French. That's
that's that's Mancy right now when she's doing the pronunciations,
just lapping all of us while jump roping in.
Speaker 5 (02:01):
Such a good on.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
Cavino and Rich cracks me up. Final day of the
Round of thirty two.
Speaker 5 (02:06):
Very exciting.
Speaker 4 (02:07):
The Cup knockout round is now in Draft Kings. Has
you covered for every single match right now? Use the
promo code see our show to claim your special offer
at DraftKings. Again, that's promo code. See our show at
Draft Kings. The crown is yours.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
Two more matches and then we've got the Round of sixteen,
which will start tomorrow with matches on America's birthday. So
no stopping the World Cup. But Cape Verde is in
action today against Argentina. We just had Egypt and Australia.
Columbia in action as well against the Ghana as the
(02:45):
round of thirty two wraps up. Manta, you weren't here yesterday. No,
I listen. I know why this can't happen. I understand,
but I said, you know what I want World Cup
every two years, every two like this is great, It's
been awesome. I would rather have this one hundred times
than the Summer Olympics, I would, I think. And I
(03:05):
know it's like people love swimming and they love gymnastics,
and I'm not saying get rid of the Summer Olympics.
I'm just saying that in two years, the excitement and
we've got the Summer Games here in Los Angeles, But
I don't know if it's going to rise to the
level of the excitement that this has provided over the
last three weeks.
Speaker 4 (03:22):
Right, and the excitement I think anyone who's been tuning
in started because USA.
Speaker 5 (03:27):
They started and I mean Americans, Americans here.
Speaker 4 (03:30):
We started tuning into the World Cup because USA was winning.
But I think now the excitement is coming from all
the matches, all of the If you're paying, if you're
watching a match in the World Cup, you might be
at the edge of your seat by.
Speaker 5 (03:42):
The end of it. It doesn't matter if USA is
not playing.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
I when we just had Mark Medina in studios during
the penalty kicks as we're watching Egypt and Australia, and
whether you like it or not, you're watching it. You're
being drawn into it. And I think it was I
think it was great. I thought that what we saw
there tells you the pressure of the moment. I also
(04:05):
find something interesting. Oh, Chris Purfett, you got something, Chris.
Speaker 3 (04:08):
So it's not going to be the World Cup. But
I was just looking it up. And I know the
US was part of the last Copa America in twenty
twenty four, and I think they are going to be
part and will host games for the Copa America twenty
twenty eight. It's not the World Cup. But we do
have these like Interworld Cup years with euro Championship COPA.
Speaker 2 (04:27):
I wont the World Cup every two years. Yeah, and
I know it's not feasible. I know that there's qualifying.
I understand that. But my point is is this is
just too good of a thing to have every four years.
And I'm sorry if we sound ignorant in saying this,
(04:50):
because it took it to come back to the United States.
I remember when it was here in nineteen ninety four.
Monty doesn't again because she but I do remember when
it was here, and so it was a so to
have this sort of moment in the see how great
it's been in Mexico, to see you last night, you know,
the match in Vancouver, and all the matches that they've had,
(05:11):
the match in Toronto between Portugal and Croatia, all magnificent,
all awesome, and it's just great. And I'm going to
be really sad when it is gone.
Speaker 4 (05:22):
Yeah, I'm gonna be really sad that I don't get
to yell that was not off sides I.
Speaker 5 (05:27):
Am at on my TV.
Speaker 2 (05:28):
That's what leads us to something that I will I
will not miss people wanting to change off sides do
you want to change off side?
Speaker 4 (05:36):
No, I don't want to change off sides. If it's
yes or no, the answer is no. I think maybe
is there a way to slightly alter it?
Speaker 3 (05:45):
No?
Speaker 5 (05:45):
You can't. You know what I'm saying, Like no, it
would change the game of.
Speaker 2 (05:48):
Soccer completely completely. Alex teishert I think I know the answer.
Do you want to change off sides in soccer? I'll
try to do my best version of the job, how
he No? Hell no, are you kidding? That's the beauty
of the game is tacticality. Imagine if you could cherry
pick rinaldo would be the greatest. Then I don't want that.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Yeah, it builds like this strategy where you have to
like perfectly time your run, like you have to literally
look at your guy across the field, give him that
twinkle and dip as soon as he kicks the ball.
Speaker 4 (06:17):
You know.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
Great? That is to watch uh a big a hold
on a second, yes, mister soccer Fox Sports Radio, which
you could maybe challenge later on in the show. Chris
Purfett took down Mike Lingard in a showdown a few
weeks back on who was mister Soccer and uh Perfet
ended up winning because of the variety of jerseys that
he had. I think was ultimately the decider. But if
(06:40):
you'd like to challenge him, just let let us know.
Speaker 1 (06:42):
Well, I have a nineteen seventy two beer Loft Germany jersey.
Speaker 2 (06:44):
So this might get interesting. What this might get interesting?
Speaker 3 (06:48):
On Chris Purfet, I feel like arguing against off sides
is like arguing about like, oh, I should be able
to line a wide receiver up in the neutral zone
in American football.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
It makes no it may no sense whatsoever.
Speaker 3 (07:01):
Is like I want to have this guy, you know,
be able to jog in front of the line of
scrimmage before a play is off, Like what do we do?
I think the thing is, though, it's like, because we
have var because we see, oh he's just offside by
a bit of his toe, or or just in the
wrong place of the road, like just a little bit
of the foot, it makes people incensed and weird about it.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
I think Ronaldo is yesterday was a lean right, his
body was leaning a certain way, and so it ended
up being the difference. And then there's no more call
in that same match that made people furious than the
offsides that was called against Croatia but I want to
be fair. Jason Stewart, do you want offsides changed in
the in the game of soccer in the World Cup.
Speaker 6 (07:45):
I do need to qualify this. I do not care
about soccer. I never have. In fact, I've always found
it an annoying. Part of our job is to talk
about soccer, So I come from it from that perspective.
I'm absolutely loving the World Cup though, and I under like,
intellectually grasp this concept. If you took away the like
the five second count in basketball, in the center and
(08:07):
the power forward could just sit in the key or
sit down low the whole time, that would take away
the fun of the sports. So why would you take
away off sides. There's a reason why the rules in place.
Right at the same time, it's a major bus kill.
If you have money against the other team, it's a
major buzzkill.
Speaker 2 (08:23):
And that's where we get a lot of the Also,
I don't think people wanted Portugal and Ronaldo to win,
so they felt that Croatia was getting robbed. Yeah, with
how played out like there's there are rooting interests.
Speaker 6 (08:36):
Well, they did get robbed.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
They you thought on the deflection, did you think that
that is that the play that you're calling.
Speaker 5 (08:42):
Are you're saying that it should have been off sides
on the Portugal I.
Speaker 1 (08:44):
Think there was three off side goals Croatia had that
should have probably not totally been called if you think
about it, Like, I think they were the better team.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
They dominated.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
Modrich is like literally the best player I've seen on
a small standpoint besides MESSI. I don't know if he's
fourteen or forty, yeah.
Speaker 2 (08:57):
But I thought he's fifty eight? Is he? Yeah, it's insane.
Well he looks like a teenager who smokes.
Speaker 1 (09:04):
Yeah, and see, Like this is the thing that hurts
Ronaldo the most is like eighty minutes he was on
the field, nothing besides a PK. They take him off
a goal within five minutes. That kind of says something.
Speaker 2 (09:12):
To me that Ronaldo is not needed. We had Eric
Ronaldo on about a week ago, a week or so ago,
and he said that for as great as you know
Ronaldo has been, and as great as Ronaldo has been
to him, he commented that when you were watching Ronaldo
it looked like he was maybe being lackadaisical, and they're like, no,
(09:33):
that's just how fast he can run. Now, Okay, that's like,
that's where he was. So that was the point that
Weinalda made and that was his thing.
Speaker 4 (09:39):
He just was outrunning everybody and now you can't do
it because age.
Speaker 2 (09:44):
But he got his first PK goal of his of
his World Cup career. But to Alex's point, the game
winner came with him not on the pitch and him
on the bench. But that's not the play that people
are talking about the most. It's the one on the
deflection on the off side set had Croatia end up
(10:05):
losing their goal. And it's another element of off sides
that I love and it's because, yeah, it is. It
is a game of inches. You don't think, and I'm parafer.
I don't want to. I don't want to put words
in your mouth. Did you think that it was fair?
Did you think that offside should have been called on
Croatia on the goal that they had wiped out because
of the deflection.
Speaker 4 (10:25):
I thought it was not offsides because the defend the
defender touched the ball.
Speaker 5 (10:31):
I don't.
Speaker 4 (10:31):
I did not see the own Croatian player touched the ball.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
I don't.
Speaker 5 (10:37):
I don't. I didn't see it.
Speaker 4 (10:38):
I didn't see I know. Now you guys told me
there's a chip on the ball. I didn't even know
there was a chip on the ball, and that that's
but like when I watched the video, I did not
see that. I thought the defender with with his hat,
with his head had an intention.
Speaker 5 (10:49):
He tried to get it and hit it, and so
I didn't think it was off sides. I was. I
was very surprised.
Speaker 2 (10:54):
And not only is there a chip in the ball,
but FIFA even put the graphic up on their social
media pay if you can think of a of a
flat line, and it peaked when the ball was touched,
and so that tells you all you need to know.
And I say to myself, that is awesome like that
that is some people may hate it, and I think
(11:15):
that it is so awesome that I'm on a call
that I don't care how many HD cameras you have,
you cannot see it. But that technology allowed us to
see that there was a deflection and whether it did
or didn't have an effect on the goal, it still
affects the play. And that's part of the genius in
all of it. And I love that aspect of it.
(11:37):
And maybe it is because I'm newer to it, but
to be able to get screwed like that is a
part of sports, sure, and that's the part of it
that I know it's stun for Croatia, and I know
it's going to stick with them forever. But I felt
that it was an awesome play and what awesome technology
to be able to use, to be able to make
(11:58):
that sort of call. I want to see it in
the NFL in the ball. Well, yeah, there is a
chip in the ball now that we know, but to
be able to use that sort of thing, so like
on a pass interference call, you could say, like, hey,
so and so tipped it. Look did the ball move
or not? Did did the player get his hand on it?
Did he deflect it? On a field goal kick? You
would be able to get that information from this technology.
(12:19):
Did he missed the field goal? Did somebody get a
finger on it? Look it was touched right at that moment,
Because that's what we got last night. I think that
the NFL should use some of this stuff. How about
the NBA ball goes out of bounds? Did he touch
it last? Who touched it last? At this point? Like,
there's way that that technology could be used that could
be helpful. And while it didn't side with Croatia yesterday.
(12:40):
It gave a clear answer that in one way or
another it was touched by the player, so you can't
really argue about it. And that's what I think is magnificent.
I think it's great, Dan. I agree with you.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
You do in all sports because we always argue that
the human element makes sports sports. I disagree. It's the
game that makes sports. We love the game. How much
would it suck to know Croatia one but shouldn't have?
How is it awesome to knowe Ronaldo got that PK
because the defender pulled him down and after reviewing it,
they saw he infringe the play on the side or
the corner kick. So these things are gonna make sports better.
(13:10):
Like we're always afraid of technology, like, oh my god,
it's self driving cars. Oh no, what's gonna happen next?
But now think about sports in this aspect. Literally, the
best team is going to win.
Speaker 2 (13:18):
Let me go ahead, Manci, I'm sorry.
Speaker 5 (13:20):
Have any of you seen flubber?
Speaker 2 (13:22):
No? I didn't.
Speaker 6 (13:23):
That's a great pull.
Speaker 5 (13:24):
So we get there.
Speaker 6 (13:27):
The flubber that was made recently or the flubber from
like nineteen forties. I saw the original one from the
nineteen forties.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
Recently, what is recently the last twenty years? Right, the
last twenty years. They remade it with Robin Williams. Were
put stuff on your shoes and you bounce up and down.
Speaker 5 (13:44):
But then the ball and they put something on the
ball that was a remake.
Speaker 4 (13:47):
Yeah, okay, but you're saying recently it wasn't recently.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
How that's flubber two, rub a dub, rub a dub.
Speaker 4 (13:54):
I'm just like, are we that's I Alex. You make
a great point, you to Dan, it's you want it
to be right. You want it to be right.
Speaker 5 (14:03):
I just think, like technology, how far are we gonna go?
Speaker 4 (14:08):
And finding this out is like, oh, so no one's
controlling the ball. You're telling me that there's nothing swaying
the ball either way.
Speaker 5 (14:15):
Get out of my face.
Speaker 4 (14:16):
I don't like that there's a chip in it. But
you're right when you say you want it to be
the right call.
Speaker 5 (14:21):
So it's like, I don't have an argument. I just
don't like it.
Speaker 2 (14:23):
Can I pull them Medina here and give Manzi credit
on her point? Alex, I'm curious your thoughts, Chris, your
thoughts as well, because I brought this up yesterday. Sorry,
to take a shot at Mark Medina when he wasn't here.
But I'm going to kind of slide to herself. Yeah, Mark,
I'm gonna pull them Medina here. Okay, Manzi's got a point,
because I think the most famous call in soccer is
hand of God. Yes it is, yeah, which was a
(14:46):
goal that never should have happened and wouldn't happen in
today's game. So I think, you know, to Manti's to
Monti's point about that that is tough to argue. But
I still would side with Alex, and I still would
side with with Chris that I think that yesterday's play
was great. It's just that goal is the most popular
goal ever scored that shouldn't have been a goal, right, right,
(15:08):
So yeah, Chris.
Speaker 3 (15:09):
If I may, if I may positive Devil's advocate here,
if I said, because there's always I used to believe
when I was a lot younger that like I hated
instant replay in the NFL, I hated twenty minutes or
whatever it was when we would go to the monitors.
I think centralizing has made it better. We opened up
Pandora's box trying to adjudicate pass interference. But I always
(15:30):
think about people arguing. I think I was watching an
NFL films about people arguing on the immaculate the immaculate catch,
you know, the famous Pittsburgh Steeler play, and there were
rare I think there were old Raiders players in there
arguing that that should not have been a real catch,
that it was off the ground or something happened. I
just I sit here and I wonder if we had
(15:51):
had video replay back then, and if that had revealed
the immaculate catch, immaculate reception, immaculate reception. Excuse me, if
the immaculate hadn't been a reception, we just wipe out
that piece of our history. I I understand the poll
to get it right, But at the same time, I
saw what happened in the NFL for so long, where
(16:11):
it's been thirty minutes reviewing something. It slows down the game.
It kills some It kills a lot of emotion about
a game. And I wonder, for those one percent of
plays that we argue about all the time, is it
worth it?
Speaker 2 (16:24):
Is it worth it? At the end of the day,
you gotta say this. I actually thought the drama of
the goal was good mm hmm. For for that aspect
of it yesterday of seeing it now, does every single
goal need to be reviewed? I'm not sure. But in
that instance, it was so dramatic and it was so heartbreaking,
and I know what breaks up the rhythm, But there's
(16:44):
also I think a dynamic where it does add some
drama to it, which I think is is a positive.
So I would counter those as saying like it just
breaks up the rhythm of the game. But man, when
it goes to that, when when the ref comes out
and has to push everybody off and he does his
square thing, that judgment day, bring it, let's hear the decision.
Speaker 4 (17:02):
Which is what's crazy, because I feel like a lot
of Americans here find soccer boring, and that's been the
exact opposite of the World Cup.
Speaker 5 (17:08):
The World Cup has been so dramatic that goal.
Speaker 4 (17:11):
We were I was at the Dodgers yesterday because it
was a wild day. We'll get into that, but we
had the game on and every we instantly started arguing
with each other, whether.
Speaker 5 (17:20):
That was off sides or not. And again, we don't care.
Speaker 4 (17:22):
What was No nobody there was rooting for Croatia or Portugal,
you know what I'm saying, And instantly It created a
conversation within us in the office, and we weren't split.
We were arguing about it. And I love that because
I feel like a lot of people, a lot of Americans,
associate soccer is boring, and the World Cup has been
the last thing it's been has been boring.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
Imagine if a wide receiver on every touchdown got like
a five yard head start, right, we'd be like, yeah,
this is dumb. H this is ridiculous, Like that's what
would happen if you like got rid of off sides. Essentially,
it'd be terrible.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
And you know what's fun though, I love about this because,
like you're saying, drama, now, think about this, right, we're
playing the biggest game in US history. I could argue
again Belgium without our best score because of the drama.
I love it because everybody, I guess Yvonte in the
back shouts to him. He said, I'm like the only
person saying that was a red card and it was
the way. Yeah, if you really watch everything now, right,
we wouldn't have seen that with Madrik, we wouldn't have
(18:15):
seen the goal, callback we wouldn't have seen half of
these were a guy's toes off sides for it. I
love it, and think about it. If you pods on
that perfect angle, it looks like Belligan snapping this guy's angle.
Speaker 2 (18:26):
The same thing the other night, and he called a
mumbling thing about it.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
That be the best player in the world ten years,
maybe you'll get better calls. We're just yeah, I'm saying.
You know, if you look at Messi's side by side
with this, it's completely different. This guy attacks from the back,
steps on his ankle and slides down the back of
his whole calf. That's a red card in any aspect.
Just don't make that challenge. And I love it. I
love they got it right now. America is going into
(18:50):
this next game having to prove who they are and
it's beautiful.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
So I brought this up because I think, and I
think this is a little different like the part that
I think the show. The referee in the US Bosnia
Herzegovina match, he was given once it went to the review,
he was only given two options, either nothing or he
gets a red card. There was no middle ground on
the yellow card portion of it. If he was given
(19:14):
a yellow card in that moment, do you think there
would have been.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
A review for a red probably still you still think
so yeah, because the VR now whistles in and tells
him like, hey, dude, you have to look at this again.
So they probably saw something and told him like, it's
a it's a worse step he did than we thought.
Speaker 2 (19:28):
Okay, so fair enough. But then my point is is
if he was already given a yellow at that point,
would that official then say, well, I can't give him
a red. I don't think it would warrant him to
miss another match. I am good with him getting a yellow.
Like So that's so like when we were talking about
changing off sides, it's a or is there a chip
(19:51):
in the ball and should it counters offsides or not?
To me, that's a completely different VRA conversation than the
red card. Because the red card, the official was cornered
into a decision where it was you're in jail or
you're scott free. And if there was any sort of
punishment that was allowed to like if the foul was
called on the field to give him a yellow card,
(20:14):
I think everybody would have been cool with it. And
that wasn't the case. It was two extremes. You either
got away with it or you got penalized for it,
and I think that when we look at it, the
penalty was way too extreme for what we saw.
Speaker 4 (20:28):
Now.
Speaker 2 (20:28):
Alex may feel differently, but I think if you gave
him a yellow card and that the rules allowed you
to just keep the yellow card, I think everybody would
have been cool with it.
Speaker 5 (20:37):
Yeah, I think you're saying, by letter of the law,
that was the right call. But do you think it
was a soft call?
Speaker 4 (20:42):
Because I immediately texted my brother, the soccer player, and
he's like, to me, that was a soft call.
Speaker 5 (20:47):
But he didn't say it was the wrong crime. You
get what I'm saying. He didn't say that.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
Well, it's true without VR you could get away with it.
But again, when you pause at that one spot, that
guy's ankle could have been snapped if he stepped a
little too hard on it right there, that's a bad
don't you think it?
Speaker 4 (21:02):
If you don't stop it there, it doesn't look like
Baaligan knows that that guy's coming from that side.
Speaker 2 (21:08):
Well he's behind it.
Speaker 3 (21:10):
I think it's I think it was incidental there, And
to be honest, I feel like it only looks bad
in slow motion.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
And that's where we keep coming back to.
Speaker 3 (21:17):
This and this is the where video will lie to
you constantly, repeatedly all the time. It only looks bad
in slow motion because we're catching it in this moment.
And now because of that, the US had to play
for ten men for about sixty minutes and now won't
have their best player in the next game. It's a
call that I would never see done to a country
like France or England. It just it's it's ludicrous that
(21:41):
that's the kind of penalty it carries here.
Speaker 2 (21:42):
It is orange card, orange card. You missed the rest
of this stuff, but you can play in the next stop.
How about that? It's the middle of red and yellow. Yes,
orange card. It blends. It's got like a three D
glass and it's like, oh, it's like translucent. You hold
it like a cross a fross each Yeah, yeah, there
you go. We don't have him for the rest of
(22:03):
this match, but you do have him in the next match.
Speaker 1 (22:06):
Ye imagine the voice too, He's like orange yes, freaking holds.
Speaker 2 (22:11):
Both of them up? Could one go down? Could one
go up? Could they cross the Roman thumb in the day? Yes,
this is where soccer needs to go. Quit with the
I don't understand off side so I don't want it conversation.
This is where the conversation needs to go when it
comes to uh to uh the great the greatest game.
Is that what they call soccer beautiful, the beautiful game,
(22:35):
that's so beautiful.
Speaker 5 (22:36):
Yes, that's Lexi.
Speaker 4 (22:38):
In case you didn't know, we get both, you get
Alex Tycher and Lexi.
Speaker 2 (22:42):
So Lexington, thank you. Alex is in a couple of
hours earlier than before. Monty's here on weeknights. Chris can
be as well. Fox Sports Areadio weeknights here a completely
different animal like it is it is. There's names that
I've never heard of from people that I've known for years.
Oh uh, this is Covenent. This is Covino and Rich
(23:03):
here on Fox Sports Radio. Guys were in for Dan
Patrick wrapping up their Dan Patrick Haatrick earlier in the day.
So Moncey and myself are happy to sit along with
you as our Chris Profet, Jason Stewart and Alex Tyscher.
Speaker 7 (23:17):
Fox Sports Radio had the best sports talk lineup in
the nation. Catch all of our shows at Fox Sports
Radio dot com and within the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2 (23:27):
It's Covino and Rich here on Fox Sports Radio. She's
Moncey Bolango, So I'm Dan bayer Is the guys wrapped
up their Dan Patrick hat trick earlier today. I think
I can also say guys are going to need a
little break after doing the work this past week. So
you and I are going to be in for CNR
on Monday and Tuesday.
Speaker 5 (23:42):
Guess right, just right, find an ex.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
At Moncey Bolangho so you can find me at Dan
Byer on Fox.
Speaker 7 (23:49):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (23:49):
And you know, for over forty years, Tyrek has been
helping customers find the right tires for how, what and
where they drive. Ship fast and free back by free
road hazard protection with convenient installation options like mobile tar installation,
tyreq dot Com the way tirebine should be. And now
it's time for our Tyract play of the Day courtesy
of the World Cup on Fox TV, The Great Full.
Speaker 8 (24:09):
Egypt Days to Win It AGYPT sixteen.
Speaker 5 (24:26):
Again chills and I don't even care chills?
Speaker 2 (24:28):
You do you do? Gooselums, She's got chicken skin And
here's my thing, Like, it's the first time we've had
a round of thirty two. It's the first time we've
allowed forty eight countries. So there are a lot of firsts,
so winning this knockout stage isn't as much to me
as if they were to win in the round of sixteen,
and I would be like, oh, okay, now you've won
(24:50):
in the knockout stage. Right now, this is just kind
of phony. I hear what you're because it's a first of.
Speaker 5 (24:56):
Everything, right, but it is very well.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
It was enough to give Manzi goo.
Speaker 5 (25:00):
I really did, I really did.
Speaker 2 (25:01):
If you were wearing a green jacket, we would not
have been able to see those goosebumps.
Speaker 5 (25:06):
I would not take that green jacket off, and.
Speaker 2 (25:09):
Now that did Rory McElroy as earlier this week at Wimbledon,
he was spotted wearing his Master's jacket from winning a
second straight Masters and he wore it the All England Club.
In fact, Novak Djokovic said that he wanted one of
those green jackets. Everybody had a good time with it
except one person. I wonder who, Jason Stewart. Jason Stewart
(25:30):
was not down with the threads that Rory McElroy was wearing.
Earlier this week when taking in Wimbledon action on center court.
You had an issue with him wearing the master's green jacket. Well,
I mean to add some context here. I didn't know
that this was a thing. So the first time I
had ever seen anything like this was reporter Dan Wolken.
(25:52):
He was with USA Today. Don't know what he is.
Speaker 6 (25:54):
He put out a tweet with a screenshot that said
Rory wearing the green jacket to Wimbledon is the biggest
flex ever. So that Dan Wolkin was like drawing attention
to it as if this was some kind of a
unique thing. Further investigation, I guess it is a thing
where the current Master's champ will show up in public
(26:14):
with the green jacket, no matter what the facts are
of the case. Guys, I think it's douchey. I think
that if Rory McElroy had an honest wife, he would
be like, I'm going out to Wimbledon today, how about
this green jacket that I wanted at the Masters? And
she'd be like to douchey, And he'd be like, you know,
(26:35):
you're right. I'm gonna put it back in the trophy
case and aware it to Masters events, but I won't
take it out in public. It would be like if
Michael Phelps went to the USA game on Monday with
ten gold medals around his neck. I would say that's douchey.
It would be like when JJ Watt wins goes to
the Hall of Fame, he's gonna be a guy who
(26:56):
just shows up to like a an Applebee's with the
yellow jacket, and I'll say that's douchey, because JJ Watt
is a douche.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
I don't think that it was a douche move at all,
And I actually appreciate it because I feel like the
Masters and Wimbledon are on that same level, Like it's
the if you wanted to look at it this way,
like Wimbledon is the Masters of tennis, or the Masters
is the Wimbledon of golf, and how they're revered and
(27:25):
what comes with them, the honor of the prestige. So
I feel like it's it's even more even than it
would be, say Rory McElroy's showing up at the US
Open and wearing the green jacket, which I don't think
he would do.
Speaker 5 (27:40):
Rory McElroy can wear this jacket.
Speaker 4 (27:43):
Jason as the only golfer for a year outside of Augusta, right, Dan,
He's the only one. Again, if I had the screen,
if I won the Masters and it was my year.
I would I wouldn't take the jacket off. I would
wear it for your birthday, Alex's birthday, Bronch, Chris' soccer game.
Speaker 5 (28:03):
I don't know I'm wearing the green jacket.
Speaker 4 (28:06):
This is like, this is not him going to a
Spurs playoff game where everyone is wearing the same color
in each location and he's there wearing green.
Speaker 5 (28:17):
That is not what this is.
Speaker 4 (28:19):
And comparing it to the Michael Philips wearing all of
his gold medals. Everybody's got a bunch of gold medals. Literally,
Rory mcclroy is the only one to be able to
wear this jacket outside, and instead of wearing it every
single day as I would.
Speaker 5 (28:32):
He brings it out to Wimbledon, like I loved it.
I loved it.
Speaker 2 (28:37):
If Jack Nicholas went to Wimbledon, he would not be
able to wear the green jacket because he is not
allowed to leave the premises now because he is not
the current champion at the Masters. It is Rory McElroy.
So you have the three hundred and sixty five days,
or if you want to take the seven days out
of Master's week, the three hundred and fifty eight days
to try to live to its absolute fullest for you,
(28:59):
and then April it'll return to Augusta. And if Rory
doesn't win, then the jacket is going to stay in
his locker.
Speaker 6 (29:05):
And this this, this is basically just two opposite opinions. Like,
I think that it's your choice, it's his discretion. If
he could wear it, he doesn't have to wear it,
and he can wear it. I'm not saying he can't
do it, but I'm just saying the decision to do
it is douchey. So you think it's badass. I think
it's a douche move. What is prefet thing?
Speaker 3 (29:25):
So I would say two things. Number one, I'm curious
what your opinion would because I think one of the
stories this is where kind of how I learned about
that the green jacket you hold it for a year
and do whatever you want with it, was when Bubba
Watson talked about wrapping his newborn son in the green jacket. Yes,
so like that was that I thought was very heartfelt.
But according to Jason, that would be kind of kind
(29:45):
of douche.
Speaker 2 (29:45):
Yeah. Wow, I'm a jacket right, I'm that callist.
Speaker 6 (29:48):
I'm very much a callist first too.
Speaker 2 (29:50):
I would say This is extremely like.
Speaker 3 (29:52):
There's only one other thing like the green Jacket as
far as holding it and doing whatever you want with
it for a set period of time. And compare to
what happens to the Stanley Cup, to the teams that
win the Stanley Cup.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
This is tame. This is tame. It is still respectful.
Speaker 3 (30:07):
Whereas the things guys put in put in the Stanley Cup,
where they take the Stanley Cup and what they do
with the Stanley Cup, some of that probably can't even
go on the.
Speaker 2 (30:16):
Air, well they can. They give a jacket away when
you win the RBC Heritage, which is the week after.
It's kind of a plaid tartan pattern. Nobody's wearing it.
Speaker 5 (30:28):
Why even do it? That change the award?
Speaker 2 (30:32):
Nobody's nobody. Matt Fitzpatrick isn't showing up at the All
England Club with that jacket. As great as it is
to win the RBC Heritage, no doubt, great win. I've
played the course, it's magnificent, but there is something about
the Masters of Course and it's different and I'm there.
I appreciate you being so such a stunt supporter of
(30:53):
Rory Mackle.
Speaker 6 (30:54):
Let me ask you a question, Monsie let me ask. Okay,
so say you you go and you win a Marconi okay,
and that the award for a Marconi for Best Women
Broadcaster of the Year is a crown. Would you show
up to work with that crown and do all the
FSR shows?
Speaker 2 (31:11):
It shows up every day in it.
Speaker 5 (31:14):
Maybe on every day. That ends with why there?
Speaker 2 (31:17):
Yeah, there's your answer. Plus she does she has the earbuds,
so it would work for you.
Speaker 4 (31:22):
And I find that a little different. I find that
it's like a crown is a pageant queen. It has
a crown.
Speaker 5 (31:30):
There is something where the green jacket it stands.
Speaker 4 (31:34):
Out like in a way where it seems important and
it is. I see chicks wearing crowns at the bar
and they're on the cuckoo birds.
Speaker 5 (31:43):
So like, I don't love that example. I think you
should have said, but you.
Speaker 4 (31:46):
Win a a blade, I don't know, gold blade, I
don't know.
Speaker 2 (31:50):
And I'm not saying you wouldn't have earned it, But
the masters is earned one like an award would be
given to you. That's a really someone's like like Rory
beat everybody else. He had the best slowest score of anyone,
and he wanted himself. Yeah, and so I think there's
difference than someone maybe awarding you something right, right.
Speaker 5 (32:09):
Right, that's a great that's a great way to put it.
Speaker 4 (32:11):
And I really doubt that his wife was like, if
she's a good wife, which I'm sure she is, should
have been like, yeah, babe, wear that every day.
Speaker 5 (32:18):
What I'm saying, like, that's how it should be. Support
easily won the masters.
Speaker 2 (32:22):
Yes, support the team. Support the team, just like Puddy,
support the team. Chris Purfett giving us the latest of
what's happening today. Would you done that green jacket? Chris Prefett.
Speaker 3 (32:31):
I don't know if I would take it to like
I don't know, a tiki bar, but you know in
any place where I'm not going to get it just
utterly destroyed. Sure, absolutely, why not? Just it's a green jacket.
Some people might get it, some people otherwise it's it's nice,
but we move on.
Speaker 2 (32:47):
They got a lot more fans on their side, I'll
tell you that much. They have all the energy right now.
The day very popular. Also wearing the green jacket popular.
Even Alex Tyscher would wear that thing here, there and
everywhere as some guy was probably like, yeah, I was
out at Joshua Tree this past weekend, I saw some
dude with a green jacket and I swear it was
(33:07):
Master's Champion Alex Tye shirt. I think that's that was me. Yeah,
that's ripping balls. But in Green Bay the guy's like
I thought I was tripping, No, it was.
Speaker 5 (33:18):
He probably was tripping for other reasons. If you're a
Joshua Tree, h.
Speaker 2 (33:21):
Come on, Dan, right, wouldn't you wear it every day?
Speaker 4 (33:23):
If you wore one?
Speaker 2 (33:23):
Yes, I would wear it at a lot of occasions,
so much that ultimately maybe the Jason's point poopa would
be like, is he gonna wear it again?
Speaker 5 (33:30):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (33:31):
Yeah, is Dan gonna show up in his green jacket again?
Speaker 1 (33:34):
And then he trolls him has a jacket on top
of it, just kidding takes it off.
Speaker 2 (33:37):
It's still on.
Speaker 5 (33:37):
It's still on.
Speaker 2 (33:38):
This is my RBC heritage jacket.
Speaker 4 (33:40):
Suckers, please that jacket'd be like, where'd you get that?
Speaker 5 (33:44):
Where'd you can I get one of the.
Speaker 7 (33:45):
Host Fox Sports Radio had the best sports talk lineup
in the nation yet. Catch all of our shows at
Fox sports radio dot com and within the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2 (33:56):
Can you know what rich?
Speaker 7 (33:56):
Here?
Speaker 2 (33:57):
At Fox Sports Radio? If you missed any of today's show.
We should to catch the podcast, just search Cavino and
Rich wherever you get your podcast. Please follow the podcast
three at five stars and provide a review. Again, just
search Covino and Rich wherever you get your podcast, and
you'll find today's full show and a best of version
posted right after the end of the show. The Wedding
of the Year, Wedding of the century, however you want
to put it. Apparently going down to New York City,
(34:19):
Travis Kelsey, Taylor Swift about to say I do, and
Manzie Milanios, I'm dan byer Aper CNR. You're about to
say I don't or I can't.
Speaker 4 (34:30):
Y'all, there's no way that they're getting married.
Speaker 5 (34:33):
They're already married.
Speaker 4 (34:35):
There's no way that this is like this ceremony. If
you are telling me like, oh, they're doing this because
they want to keep it real private.
Speaker 5 (34:42):
I know everything.
Speaker 4 (34:44):
I know every detail because y'all keep telling me there
is no way that they are not already married and
that this isn't just like the party for everybody, because
I can't imagine Taylor Swift wanting to get married at
Madison's We're Garden.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
Isn't that every girl's dream.
Speaker 4 (35:02):
No, and also like maybe, but not not somebody that
has literally all of the resources necessary in order to
get married in a private island somewhere with a castle
like I just and it's just like.
Speaker 5 (35:17):
No, it's just because they want to keep it private. Literally,
you have told me when the food has arrived.
Speaker 4 (35:21):
You told me when the castle that they're building arrived,
You told me when she arrived, You told me everything.
Speaker 5 (35:26):
You told me that they had pizza, You told me this.
Speaker 4 (35:28):
There is no way that this is the actual wedding
ceremony that they're actually saying I do for the first time.
Speaker 2 (35:36):
No way, you think this is just a ten thousand
people party with all their celebrity friends.
Speaker 4 (35:41):
Yes, that's what I think. We're gonna find out that
that's what this says.
Speaker 2 (35:44):
You don't think that Taylor Swift, when she was nine
years old, said I want to get married where og
Nanobi tipped in the game winning shot to lead the
New York Knicks past the San Antonio Spurs.
Speaker 4 (35:56):
I think I don't think so. No, I don't think
she was thinking when she was nine years old. Oh yes, uh,
who was a who would be a New York Naga?
Speaker 5 (36:06):
Phil Jackson? He was a nick, right, Phil Jackson.
Speaker 2 (36:09):
I want to I want to be married in the
house that Ewing built. The Ewing built that he didn't
build it. But you know what we're talking.
Speaker 4 (36:17):
You get it, like I just there's no there's no way,
and I get the privacy aspect of being able to
have this party, but I think, like though, I think
they're already married, though the actual wedding has happened, and
this has to be a reception.
Speaker 2 (36:34):
I'll never forget when Mark Messier lifted that Stanley cup
that that's where I wanted to say, I do, That's
where I want to be in to the love of
my life.
Speaker 1 (36:43):
Right.
Speaker 2 (36:44):
I heard that they wanted to go to a like
a couple's resort in Arizona, but we're afraid of the
privacy that that was the right. You showed the clip
of Mike Vrabel and his wife going to the reception.
He showed me during the break like is that elephant
in the like elephant the room? Right?
Speaker 5 (37:00):
Absolutely, I'm surprised they're going.
Speaker 2 (37:03):
It was very interesting and very odd to see business
as usual. When I saw a clip with Matthew Stafford
being there, I also find it interesting. There's just a
lot of NFL people going. That doesn't seem to me
like that makes it seem like it's more of a
party than the actual special day.
Speaker 5 (37:20):
Right exactly.
Speaker 4 (37:21):
It's there's no I bet she got married on the
thirteenth of like June or something or like my why
thirteen is her favorite number. That's another reason I don't
think they're getting married today.
Speaker 2 (37:31):
Because it's it's number three.
Speaker 4 (37:32):
No, thirteen is her number. It's everywhere. It wouldn't surprise
me if they got married on the thirteenth of of
a month.
Speaker 5 (37:38):
Earlier this year.
Speaker 2 (37:40):
Yeah, I thought there would be some sort of Easter
egg numerology related to it, right, Honestly, when me and
my wife were given options for the wedding venue that
we had, that played a part in it.
Speaker 5 (37:50):
Yeah, of course.
Speaker 2 (37:51):
So we were married on May sixth of twenty seventeen,
so it was five six seventeen, but like like a
week prior, it was April two ninth. And there's nothing
against anybody who may have been born on April twenty ninth,
but there just wasn't any.
Speaker 5 (38:04):
Flowing significance or significance.
Speaker 2 (38:07):
Yeah, So we just liked, we liked five six seventeen,
and so that's when we ended up doing it. Yeah,
but man, to make you turn on T Swift, I'm
not turning T Swift.
Speaker 5 (38:16):
I'm not turning he's light. I'm saying, you're not doing it.
You're bigger than this
Hosts And Creators
Rich Davis
Steve Covino
Popular Podcasts
Betrayal Weekly
Betrayal Weekly is back for a new season. Every Thursday, Betrayal Weekly shares first-hand accounts of broken trust, shocking deceptions, and the trail of destruction they leave behind. Hosted by Andrea Gunning, this weekly ongoing series digs into real-life stories of betrayal and the aftermath. From stories of double lives to dark discoveries, these are cautionary tales and accounts of resilience against all odds. From the producers of the critically acclaimed Betrayal series, Betrayal Weekly drops new episodes every Thursday. If you would like to share your story, you can reach out to the Betrayal Team by emailing them at betrayalpod@gmail.com and follow us on Instagram at @betrayalpod and @glasspodcasts. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations, and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience, and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com