February 27, 2026 • 65 mins
Despite being neither an official government department nor, arguably, all that efficient, Elon Musks's "Department of Government Efficiency" has made a lot of waves over its short life span. In tonight's episode, Ben, Matt and Noel explore the origin of DOGE... and why so many people are convinced there's a conspiracy at play.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
From UFOs to psychic powers and government conspiracies. History is
riddled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or
learn the stuff they don't want you to know. A
production of iHeartRadio.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Hello, welcome back to the show. My name is Matt,
my name is Nol.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
They call be Ben. We're joined as always with our
super producer Dylan the Tennessee pal Fagan. Most importantly, you
are you. You are here. That makes this the stuff
they don't want you to know. Ed, we are pleased
as punch that you are joining us tonight, folks. This
is going to be an exploration of memes, an exploration
(00:52):
of conspiracies, and the just the ridiculous, surreal situation of
something called doge.
Speaker 4 (01:00):
That's the stuff they Doze wants you to know.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
We're gonna play a bit of doge ball as we're
talking off air. Okay, Department of Government Efficiency, we've heard
of it.
Speaker 4 (01:11):
I love it when you like walk backwards into the acronym,
you know.
Speaker 3 (01:15):
A backronym that's weird for it?
Speaker 4 (01:16):
Is that really true? Yeah? Yeah, If it's not, then
you've coined it, and I do I doff my cap
to you, sir, oh man.
Speaker 3 (01:23):
It's a whole thing. Uh, let's get right into it, guys.
Here are the facts. Despite the name, the Department of
Government Efficiency is not an official department.
Speaker 4 (01:41):
But it has department in the name.
Speaker 3 (01:42):
Man, true department in the name. And what do we
always say about innocuous names.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
Yeah, isn't it of another service that did exist.
Speaker 3 (01:53):
Mm hmmm in twenty fourteen. Yeah, this thing technically is
an initial from the second Trump administration. Look at it
on paper. The idea is DOZE will modernize government. It
Doze will reduce harmful spending and financial waste, and it
(02:16):
will at the same time cut all those pesky regulations
and fraud getting waste and fraud keeps. Yeah, maximize productivity. Right,
that doesn't sound too bad. We got to introduce one
of our first players here. Doze is the brainchild of
Ellen Musk. This guy was the largest known individual donor
(02:41):
to the twenty twenty four US election cycle, more than
two hundred and ninety million dollars.
Speaker 4 (02:48):
This guy is fine. That seems fine.
Speaker 3 (02:50):
I mean, we could have we could have done cool stuff.
Speaker 4 (02:53):
It just seems interesting that the guy that you know
spent all that money on the election is the one
that then gets to single handedly gut the government.
Speaker 2 (03:04):
Well, it's going to get to one of the theories
they're going to put forward today.
Speaker 4 (03:07):
About the.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
The real meaning and goals of doge as it was
thought about and then implemented.
Speaker 4 (03:16):
Yeah, Yeah, nailed it, okay.
Speaker 3 (03:19):
Doge is technically the result of an executive order EO
one four one five eight, which is really a rebranding
of another thing. Also, starting an initiative like this via
an executive order means that you're already starting in a
pretty sticky place with Congress, because they're super into laws
(03:43):
and institutions, in theory, in theory on paper. Yes, come
election time, everybody's a good boy. Doge is to our
earlier point there, no. Doge is a purposeful backronym. A
backronym is where you take an exisiting word and then
turn it into an acronym.
Speaker 4 (04:04):
Right an existing word. Also, you can refer to a
cute pupper, a doggo, a little doge. It also refers
to a cryptocurrency that was I believe named after the
shiba enu meme.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
Yeah, kabosu kubasu. I don't know how to say the
actual name of the cute little doge.
Speaker 4 (04:22):
I don't know that I really was in on the
original Doge or what you're talking about. Can you describe it?
Speaker 3 (04:28):
Very? Wow much dog much dog? Oh, heck right, Doge.
It's a it's an adorable sheba eud sometimes doing a
very excited face. Oh, sometimes doing a very like side
eye face.
Speaker 4 (04:47):
Of course I know this guy. Yeah, yeah, it's very
You've seen his word too many situations. So it is
a bit of a side eye sort of a surprised look.
But also depending on the text that you accompany it with,
could be the side eye situation.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
Yeah, like a knowing look.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
The things left unsaid Doge. We also know that the
real name for Doge is, to your earlier point, Matt,
the US Digital Service. This was created by the Obama
administration President Barack Obama on August eleventh, twenty fourteen. So Doge,
as it's being sold to you in the media now,
(05:28):
is not an original thought. It is a rebranding, or,
according to critics, it is a weaponization of an existing thing.
Speaker 2 (05:36):
Yes, and interestingly enough, the department or the digital service
in this thing that was created in twenty fourteen is
a direct result of the botched healthcare dot gov launch.
Speaker 4 (05:52):
Right, that was such a nightmare.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Yes, So back then they went, ooh, we should probably
get better at websites and you know, digital technology and
stuff as a government. So that's what this thing was
supposed to do. It's it was designed in twenty fourteen
to just do a better job on the internet basically.
Speaker 3 (06:12):
And I want to take a moment to that excellent point.
I want to take a moment and just congratulate all
of us for being able to talk so much valid
trash about this government and not get black backed.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
Bye for now, for now.
Speaker 4 (06:30):
Interestingly enough, it's described on the Obama White House dot
archives dot org site as a startup at the White
Holes that pairs the country's top technology talent with the
best public servants to improve the usefulness and reliability of
the country's most important digital services.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
And then everybody clapped.
Speaker 2 (06:50):
Well, hey, I hear what you're saying, Ben, But I
also think that's kind of a great thing. I think
maybe we've all over the course of our years, had
to do some thing for either a local government, state government,
or the federal government online and it was just through
some web portal that was clearly developed twenty years.
Speaker 3 (07:11):
For geo cities style, you know, construction, add in regulatory capture.
Like the entire reason that it is difficult to pay
your taxes is do it's because there is a industry
of middlemen. Right Look, the private public thing, as you
(07:33):
were pointing out there and all the private public thing
is always going to come back to bite you in
the butt as a civilization right now, Alon Musk his
role with Doge is a little murky. We were talking
about this off air. There are numerous clips memes that
went viral of the guy holding a chainsaw or standing
(07:56):
next to the current President of the United States in
the Oval office while they talked about Doge and wearing
multiple hats, messing with his spinners, his kid, I think stemming.
I wonder if the kid picks his nose anyway?
Speaker 2 (08:13):
They all do? We all do? We all did?
Speaker 4 (08:18):
What was the thing that the kid mauthed at Trump
like you're a horrible person or I hate you, or
you don't know anything. It was something very sinister like that.
Speaker 2 (08:28):
We talked about it just looking at that picture though, guys,
I mean, we've often brought back the WWE imagery of
it all, you know, relating to the recent politics in
the US and that image that you're referencing Ben. I'm
looking at it. It's posted on an MPR finger and oh,
it's like an America chainsaw.
Speaker 3 (08:51):
It's we got a little idiocracy, to be honest, it's
really quickly.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
I'm just so excited I had to share. I am
going to my first WWE events on Monday. I'm going
to see what w w E raw show. I'm pretty pumped.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
You should call hop okay.
Speaker 4 (09:11):
Get the special treatment.
Speaker 3 (09:12):
Speaking of special treatment, right, the White House has had
some strangely I don't know, fluid information is not the
right word, contradictory statements about the role of ELM. Musk
in DOGE or Elon Musk, if you want to say
it that way. At various times they have said he
(09:33):
is a senior advisor to the president. At other times
they have denied that he makes any decisions whatsoever. And
then also from the President himself, they have claimed that
Musk is in fact the head of DOGE and does
make all the decisions. This is coming from the same place.
Speaker 4 (09:54):
Except when they're openly beefing on Twitter.
Speaker 3 (09:57):
Except when they're openly beefing on Twitter at least me five.
That's when Musk said he was pivoting from this initiative,
which again is not a real department, just to be
very clear about that.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
Oh yeah, it's really strange to see initial reporting and
statements from Elon Musk himself in the early stages of
this January February twenty twenty five, when he's saying things like, oh,
I'm I think I'll probably spend a day, maybe two
days a week on government work, and then just imagining
(10:30):
being appointed to something that was touted as such an
important part of an administration, thinking that the head guy
would only be there, and he wasn't the only head guy, right,
there was another dude that was going to there were
gonna be co heads or something, Vivik Rebmaswami. Yeah, And
then they just splipped it and said, well, we like
this other we like Elon's way better.
Speaker 3 (10:51):
So per their official website, Doge's official website Doze dot gov,
this initiative had already saved the United States hundreds of
billions of dollars per them. But if you look at
other government agencies gonna they're gonna tell you this has
already cost Uncle Sam almost twenty two billion dollars. And
(11:16):
then other analysts are gonna say doges actions will eventually
cost this country as much as one hundred and thirty
five billion bucks.
Speaker 4 (11:27):
Well, that seems counter to the spirit of the initiative,
doesn't it. Right. It's almost as though there were another
reason to do the whole thing.
Speaker 3 (11:34):
It's like starting a nonprofit called People for Cheese and
our first thing is to eliminate all cheesemongers.
Speaker 4 (11:44):
Let just get rid of the middle. Yeah, yeah, go straight.
Speaker 3 (11:49):
Straight from the utter.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
Guys, I'm looking at the DOGE website.
Speaker 4 (11:56):
Exists. Yes, it is.
Speaker 2 (11:58):
Just a weird little legs out of different tables, I guess,
and you click on a couple of things around here.
Speaker 3 (12:05):
It does Twitter speed.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
Yeah, that's what it feels like. You can't join it,
I guess. But it is weird to me that that exists.
But the USDs dot gov also still exists. Note well,
and now that we're gonna get to it, and I
don't want to spoil too much, but DOGE had a
limited time window that it was going to operate under,
and we're still in that window. But for some reason,
(12:31):
if you go to the USDs dot gov website, it's
still You will find DOSEE references in there, but it's
mostly back to USDs, which is weird.
Speaker 3 (12:43):
Yeah, it might be kind of a grift under the
maybe leadership of Musk Vivek Ramaswami and Amy Gleeson at
various points, Gleason's the one you're going to hear the
most directly attached to policy or action by Doge because
Gleason reports to the Chief of Staff for the White House.
(13:06):
Doge got unprecedented access to sensitive information on individuals, on businesses,
on government affairs, while also cutting tons and tons of funding,
more money than we could ever imagine, cutting tons of
funding to various existing government programs, as well as creating
(13:26):
what they call deferred resignation.
Speaker 4 (13:29):
Remember that one, right, that was the letters that were
sick in the road working the road. And I gotta ask,
where does big Balls fit into this ORG chart?
Speaker 1 (13:39):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (13:39):
Yeah, that was one of the kids, right mm hmm.
I mean I believe he was kind of running the
team that stormed into some government's offices and demanded all
of these documents and access to terminals and sorry, terminals,
what am I doing? In the fifties, very very raid
like behavior. Folks were not giving the heads up. Heads
of departments were not told what was going on, and
(14:01):
it just felt very much like an invasion.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
When many judges stopped specific actions from happening, or at least,
you know, put out we're going to get into it.
But there are several times there are attempted to be stopped.
But then there were also secret actions taking place that
we're going to talk about. Even when there was a stoppage,
a federal judge said no, and they're like, OK, well.
Speaker 4 (14:24):
You also can't stop what has already occurred. You can
try to keep it from happening again, happening further. But
a lot of these things were just such a swoop in,
do the thing, the damage is done. Oh now the
judge weighs in. If you don't really you know, pay
attention or follow the orders of the judges, then it
doesn't really have much effect.
Speaker 3 (14:43):
And to be clear, obviously one of the most important
things here is that we don't body shame. The guy's
street name is big Balls, and it might be a
medical condition.
Speaker 4 (14:55):
It's more of an attitude.
Speaker 3 (14:56):
You know, well, please get yourself checked, folks, is what say?
Walk down the street for that one ballsy.
Speaker 4 (15:05):
M down by your giant balls.
Speaker 3 (15:07):
Oh jeez, tell me about it. I mean, this is
divisive stuff. Right. It might surprise a lot of us
outside of the United States to know that some people,
a not insignificant portion of this country loved the idea
of DOGE because it spoke directly to ongoing concerns. Right,
(15:29):
the idea of big red tape, of massive bureaucracy, inefficient government.
You're taking my money and you're wasting it. Why so
if we could save the government and the taxpayer a
bit of scratch, a bit of cheddar, why not tighten
the belt? So other people absolutely hate this idea, and
they say, look, we're allowing a level of private involvement, influence,
(15:54):
and interference into public institutions. This will bite us in
the ass later. And now, as we record on February twentieth,
twenty twenty six, we are officially at later the Yeah,
officially ass bitten. Would Yeah, the leopards have eaten the face. Uh,
(16:15):
the ass has been didten. It's no surprise that a
lot of these critics and even a few early supporters
of DOGE have concluded it is less a government agency
and more a conspiracy.
Speaker 2 (16:28):
Oh for sure, let's not forget when this thing was initiated,
the public statements were Doge is going to save the
government two trillion dollars in spending, and that that goal
went almost immediately down to one trillion, and then that
got slashed down to one hundred and fifty billion.
Speaker 4 (16:50):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (16:51):
Yeah, always start big, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
But it makes you, it makes you call into question
what is this thing really for?
Speaker 3 (17:00):
Right?
Speaker 2 (17:01):
If it's not to save tremendous amounts of money on
operating costs, and you know, government budgets, what are they
actually doing.
Speaker 4 (17:09):
They're trying to project twenty twenty five of five the
government like.
Speaker 3 (17:15):
Five to five.
Speaker 4 (17:16):
That's nice.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
Yeah, depending upon whom you ask, Doge is not a warm,
fuzzy angel farts and Trumpet's good faith effort to clean
up financial waste. There is one criticism we want to
point out before we get to the crazy part, which
is the following quote. Under the auspices of finding fraud, waste,
(17:37):
and abuse, Doge has hurt the middle class, created chaos,
and attempted to usurp Congress's power of the purse with
illegal impoundments end quote. That quote is not from a
random podcast or person on the internet. That is from
the House Committee on the Budget. The government itself does
(17:59):
not like what the government itself is doing.
Speaker 2 (18:02):
Yeah, or at least the new digital services. This thing is,
let's do it.
Speaker 3 (18:09):
Yeah. Okay, So what exactly is DOSE done? Why are
so many people concerned? Perhaps most importantly, what's it really for?
And what's it going to do in the future. We're
going to pause for a word from our sponsors and
hope our bosses don't catch up with us before we
finish this episode. Here's where it gets crazy. Despite being
(18:34):
around for a very short amount of time, DOGE has
already created a massive amount of controversy tsunamis of controversy,
some of which we talked about in earlier episodes, some
of which we mentioned in Strange News. I'm thinking of usaid, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
That thing is weird, I think specifically for the show,
because we understand the positives that something like the United
States Agency Agency for International Development can do, right, we
also know the pitfalls of that kind of money injection
to other countries, especially when you are quietly involved in
(19:19):
nation building and coups and things like that.
Speaker 4 (19:22):
Well, let's also just point out too, that there is
a lot of opportunity for waste abuse and fraud within
these systems, which makes it such a solid cover story
because who doesn't want to eliminate some of that stuff
in bureaucracy and you know, to safeguard our tax dollars
and make sure they're going to the right things and
not being funneled into, you know, things that are a
(19:45):
little more untoward.
Speaker 3 (19:47):
Yeah, but there's you bring up a great point because
there is an interesting disconnect, a little bit of a
logical leap that the supporters of DOGE failed to clock
when the big cuts happened to fundy. It is not
as though you the individual get some kind of money back,
(20:07):
right USA funding gets cut. It's not as though everybody
in the United States gets a dollar thirty five back,
you know.
Speaker 2 (20:15):
That is what the DOGE website says. Though it's like
this is the amount of money saved per American. So
it makes makes you feel as though, oh, I might
get that money back.
Speaker 4 (20:24):
Wasn't there talk about issuing some kind of that was
the tariffs, issuing a dividend?
Speaker 3 (20:28):
Cheh.
Speaker 4 (20:29):
A lot of talk about you know, getting.
Speaker 3 (20:32):
Anything but Epstein, you know.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
Did you guys see the news from the Supreme Court
this morning on February twentieth, as we record the Supreme
Court is basically shutting down his sweeping tariffs.
Speaker 4 (20:43):
Oh well, I'm cool.
Speaker 3 (20:45):
Yeah, Well, messing with the money and that's always going
to be the third rail outside of the theater of culture,
wars and politics.
Speaker 4 (20:54):
We also mentioned enough of Mike this whole ten billion
dollars to the Bureau of Peace or whatever it's called.
Lit'll put a pin in that and save that for
another time, but very interesting use of our tax dollars.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
Yeah, Dylan. Dylan notes that there was a several thousand
and five thousand dollars DOGE refund that was like discussed several.
Speaker 3 (21:13):
Times, discussed, discussed, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, like, oh yeah, we're gonna do this
for sure.
Speaker 3 (21:19):
I love discussing stuff because it's different. It's just close
enough to doing stuff.
Speaker 2 (21:25):
Yeah, we have an idea of a concept of a.
Speaker 4 (21:27):
Concept of an idea concept.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
It's actually it's funny you say that, guys, because I
was talking to our pal friend of the show, Josh
Clark about a potential collaboration as we're out in the
field and broad uh, and he said that sounds cool.
What are you thinking. I said, I don't know. I
think we should hang out. And he said so you
don't have a plan, and I said, we got the
concept of a plan, so you need Yeah. But the
(21:52):
thing is, we're talking about podcasting and doing fun shows
to entertain and educate. These folks are talking about billions
of dollars and they are putting lives on the line. USAID.
USAID was always targeted by Musk and the Doge folks
(22:12):
at all. For a while, Musk repeatedly stated on his
favorite social media platform that too much of the USAID
budget was either misappropriated through fraud or they weren't putting
the money in the right place. They were misprioritizing stuff.
(22:32):
Up until Doge, USAID had like fourteen thousand full time employees,
and now it's looking more like maybe three hundred, depending
on all the court stuff works out.
Speaker 4 (22:44):
I think the part that really stuck with me too
about this was the food aid that was not distributed right,
that literally just sat in a warehouse to rhyme. So
it just seems like cruelty is at the heart of
a lot of that stuff, and not actual savings. Because
the money's been spent, why wouldn't I just distribute it
to the people who need it as opposed to like
(23:05):
throwing it in the fire.
Speaker 3 (23:06):
I'm so glad you brought that up, because, like we're
saying on Strange News, when we first talked about that
food waste, it's it's just unclean. You're right, it's a
sunk cost. The food was already purchased, the food on
expiration date. The only real cost would have been transportation
(23:26):
and logistics, which already had a paid contract. Right, So
what are we saving. We're not saving people. We're definitely
not helping folks.
Speaker 4 (23:40):
Let's send a message too that we that we don't
want to help folks, that we're trying to have much
more of an isolationist kind of approach.
Speaker 2 (23:48):
It's also tremendously I was just gonna say, upsetting when
you think about this forty billion dollars being targeted as
the thing that's wasteful when everybody in the in that
world knows that it's the Department of Defense and the
military industrial congressional complex that is the thing that loses.
(24:08):
As we've talked about on this show, palettes of billions
of US dollars that loses, you know, who knows how
much to black budgets that just goes away, Money that
goes away that isn't officially appropriated, that doesn't officially exist.
We know this is just a fact, and it's so
much more than forty billion dollars.
Speaker 4 (24:27):
There was a story recently about a lot of military
equipment that was just languishing in a warehouse and never opened,
or something along those lines. It might be crossing some
wires there, but stuff like that happens. Remember the electric
coffee mugs, that whole sugarfuffle, toilet seats, the hammers. How
much will Pentagon pay for one? Yeah, the pork barrel
(24:48):
spending is true. The stereotypes about high level American financial
corruption are true. These are not made up tall tales.
But we have to remember USAID, despite some of their
spooky doopy affiliations at times, this was the world's largest
(25:11):
foreign aid agency. It fed and clothed children, It funded education,
It helped people learn to read, It helped small businesses.
It genuinely made the US look a little bit better
in the global sphere. And the current administration via doge
as well. Even pre Doge, the current administration, for some
(25:35):
unknowable reason, wanted to hamstring USAID, so Doze was an
easy way to directly attack this current administration cut eighty
three percent of the existing USAID contracts, and then they
moved them under the State Department, which is kind of
(25:58):
like this sabitat.
Speaker 3 (26:00):
That's what they did.
Speaker 2 (26:01):
Yeah, they did. I like what you're saying, there been
because in my mind, this is one of the only
real open hand movements or or appendages that the US
government had for a while there the whole like, here's
some here's some goodwill right to anybody else outside of
(26:23):
the US, we will we will send you our help.
Speaker 3 (26:27):
Right like the hospital boats kind of. Yeah, you don't
have to take a pledge of allegiance to the United States.
You don't have to agree with ideology. We just want
to feed your kids.
Speaker 2 (26:40):
And install a couple of spies. That's it. That's one.
Speaker 3 (26:44):
There's like one. I T guy, Okay, yeah, yeah, and
office is you know Steve. Yeah, Steve is a legend.
And congrats on the promotion, Steve. Uh yeah, it's it's
soft powers. It's a weird thing to cut to your
earlier point there, guys. We also know this occurs in
step with the federal firings. You can hold them deferred
(27:09):
resignations if you like, folks, But they were firing people.
They were offering to buy out federal employees. This was
in the headlines. This was blamed on Doge, but it
actually came from the Office of Personnel Management the OPM. Still,
I think Doge was running point there, especially with things
(27:33):
like musks fork in the Road email where he said
what he gave people. We had a lot of you
folks right into us about this. We have a lot
of government employees in the crowd. There was such a
limited time window, remember you guys, where they were like,
justify your job, do the following things. Do it by
(27:55):
you know, Tuesday or whatever. Because we're cleaning up the house,
were dreaming, well.
Speaker 4 (28:01):
It's all such a you know, classic Silicon Valley hatchet
man kind of behavior. You know, like when Musk, you know,
took over Twitter and came into the office holding the
what was it, the sink, right, Yeah, it's that kind
of stuff. These letters with this kind of fork in
the Road language is sort of like ultimatums. It is
very Silicon Valley coded.
Speaker 2 (28:21):
The weird thing about it, I think in the moment
when we were all going through that and reading it,
we were doing some reading of the tea leaves. We're
you know, trying to understand the message behind the message,
and in that moment it did feel like a loyalty
test of some sort, especially because of what else was
happening in the news at the time, like to all
(28:43):
of a sudden, get this, Hey, you can get out
now if you want to, cause we're we're doing new things.
That's while the Department of Defense, the Defense Department is
turning into the Department of War. That's when there's all
kinds of peat exists stuff happening in the news, and
it just looks I would say, the optics of the
administration where that we're changing things around here, and if
(29:04):
you want to get out, here is here's our little
rights offering or.
Speaker 3 (29:10):
Side a loyalty statement just so we know you're down
to clown. This was also coupled with a lot of
cryptic stream of consciousness post and statements by Musk himself.
There was one on uh, want to say, December seventh,
I can't remember exactly which year, but said, we have
(29:33):
to make sure that civilization takes the path most likely
to pass the Fermi Great filters.
Speaker 4 (29:40):
From some sci fi series. Yes, okay, y, yeah, it's
the idea that.
Speaker 3 (29:46):
Civilization the reason humans have yet to meet extra terrestrial
civilizations is because there is a series of predictable nigh
inescapable factors, or filters that prevent those civilizations from expanding
past a certain threshold. Actually, also, Musk said that Doge
(30:09):
had to exist so he could go forward with the
Mars colony. This guy was just like spitballing. He's got
he must have an amazing writer's room. I don't know.
Speaker 4 (30:20):
We also way out to me. Oh by time, he's
also done with Mars. Now he's fine.
Speaker 3 (30:25):
The Moon guy down, the Moon guy, he's a lunatic.
Now that's funny for the etymology mark, Thank you, sir. So.
The current administration said about seventy five thousand employees took
this offer before it closed down, before that time window
collapsed on February twelfth, twenty twenty six. That's roughly four
(30:49):
percent of the federal workforce. Doesn't sound that big, right,
four percent? Maybe not that big in the ratio numbers,
but it's gonna have a serious impact on the day
to day life of people who live in this country.
Speaker 2 (31:07):
Let's talk about the day to day life of federal workers.
Do you remember the thing that came after the Fork
in the Road email. It was the thing about, hey,
every week, we need you to send an email to
the Department of Personnel Management and you need to put
five things you accomplished this week in that email to
justify your job. And they said it was because they
(31:29):
were trying to identify federal workers that didn't exist but
were still on a payroll somewhere.
Speaker 3 (31:34):
So much talk of that.
Speaker 4 (31:35):
Not only that, but in like social Security checks going
to deceased people.
Speaker 3 (31:40):
Which has happened, but just not as often as it's
used to dog whistles. So yeah, the federal employees did
have to write to the Office of Personnel Management OPM
and say like, here, my five good boy things.
Speaker 2 (31:57):
But doesn't it make you think a little bit about
I was just gonna say spies, but people who work
in intelligence that aren't officially listed as let's say, a
member of the FBI or an agent somewhere in the CIA.
But you wanted to have somebody that could function and
travel and go places, you could put them I don't
(32:19):
know in any governmental department, even those if you wanted to,
but just give them a paycheck. They're a part of
that thing. But really they're working for you know somebody.
Speaker 3 (32:28):
I also my immediate question. I'm sure I'm not alone
in this. When you have to list the five things,
could you list responding to the email as one of
those five things that gets you a four.
Speaker 4 (32:39):
We've all had to do employee self evaluations. They're all
they're so silly. You have to just it's such a reach.
Most of the time you even have to couch it
in terms of like things that can be verified or
that can be measured, and it can often seem like
such a such a chore. You know, I am so
on board with you in that one. Uh, maybe I've
(33:01):
been a little bit too fast and loose with some
of that bureaucracy here in.
Speaker 3 (33:06):
Our own corporate empire. Noel Matt Dillon. I started out
a self review not too long ago saying this year
was a wild vibe for a conspiracy show. I think
we are doing good. Yeah, I mean, there's definitely no
shortage of topics.
Speaker 2 (33:28):
Yeah, but it is a weird thing too, especially when
you are kind of tattling on yourself or trying to
be honest about how well you have performed or how
well the thing you're creating performed. That's a weird Oh,
that's a weird thing to do to somebody.
Speaker 3 (33:44):
Let's do it this way. Okay, guys, assuming the world
doesn't burned down by the next time we have to
do those self reviews. Can we in our goals and milestones?
Can we all put complete did this self review as
one of the things.
Speaker 2 (34:02):
I'm not doing it, man, I'm too scared.
Speaker 4 (34:06):
We've even been like, you know, kind of counseled by
our you know, our direct reports on the kind of
ways that you should word these things, you know, in
order to make them quote unquote achievable or measurable. So
all it's such an odd, bureaucratic little device.
Speaker 3 (34:24):
You know, one time I jazzed a little bit too
much and I got a text from our top breast
that just said, come on, man, you.
Speaker 4 (34:32):
Got kicked back.
Speaker 3 (34:34):
Anyway, So we know that labor unions are part of
the federal workforce here, and they fought tooth and nail, hooked,
tentacle and claw to stop these deferred resignation initiatives in
the courts, but in the end all they got was
a brief pause. Basically, they got a time out. They
(34:56):
didn't get the problem solved. And opponents argue that it's
not even guaranteed that the federal employees who did take
deferred resignation are actually going to get their payouts. It's
strangely similar to during the pandemic lockdown, notable US airlines
(35:17):
started offering their employees buyout packages, but they paid immediately
once you signed. That doesn't appear to be the case with.
Speaker 2 (35:26):
DOGE now, at least according to Gosh. There was a
review by NPR that you can find by checking out
All Things Considered, and it was dude, this was completed
in April twenty eighth of last year, twenty twenty five.
Just it's titled what has DOGE done in Trump's First
one hundred Days? So that's just way back then. But
they were immediately in already finding that people were not
(35:48):
actually getting payouts from any of the things that were
happening and the incentives that were being pushed forward. And
then you look at reviews and updates from like November
of twenty twenty five, and it's still seems like some
of that stuff was vaporware.
Speaker 3 (36:03):
Definitely, And I think vaporware is a great word for it,
because you're running out the clock on the headlines, right
on the Zeitgeist on that limited attention span. We don't
have official confirmation yet even in twenty twenty six on
how many workers have been fired or you know, iced,
in total, but the latest figures available are something like
(36:26):
two hundred and twenty thousand federal workers. This is pretty nuts.
I guess you could say there's another there's another win
for Doge, which gets into our conspiracy theory here. If
we're all comfortable eliminating those pesky rats at the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau, what a bunch of buzzkills, what a
(36:50):
bunch of fun police. The CFPB doesn't want you to party,
say the billionaires.
Speaker 2 (36:57):
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau boo. Wait wait wait, I'm a consumer.
I consume things are going to protect my financials.
Speaker 3 (37:07):
As a bureau, I don't know. I think it's a
terrible idea, say the billionaires. This officially comes from a
guy who was in charge of the Office of Management
and Budget, Russell Vaught, back in twenty twenty five. Vough,
(37:28):
in his professional role, instructed ol CFPB employees to stop
performing quote any work task, just a stop doing stuff.
Speaker 2 (37:41):
Everybody, stop stop working, but also get back to the office.
Speaker 3 (37:47):
Right, stop working.
Speaker 4 (37:49):
Get back to the office.
Speaker 3 (37:50):
Make sure you look busy when our bosses dropped by. Yeah,
but otherwise, you know, f you to the fullest.
Speaker 2 (37:57):
We know there aren't enough computers, we know the WiFi
has down for at least two weeks. Just get back
to the office and stop working.
Speaker 3 (38:06):
We have an open door policy, by which we mean
the door is open and you should leave. That is
how they treated the people here. The bureau does have
a weird financial thing. To be fair, It's money comes
from the Federal Reserve, not from a specific congressional decision
(38:28):
or appropriation. But Vought said, also, we're just not going
to fund it. Stop everybody, stop working. We're not going
to fund this thing anymore. And critics immediately, I think
this goes to our larger thesis here. Critics immediately said,
this is not about government efficiency, right. The Consumer Financial
(38:53):
Protection Bureau is an a political good thing for people
who live in the United States. Noted that the CFPV
had a couple of looming investigations into the businesses of
Ela Musk stuff like X, stuff like Tesla, stuff like
a third example.
Speaker 2 (39:13):
Speaking of a third example, I'm trying to figure out,
actually what in the hell they do at the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau. I'm heading over to Consumer Finance dot
gov and it says they aim to make consumer financial
markets work for consumers, responsible providers, and the overall economy.
Speaker 3 (39:34):
Their hound dogs, dude, they they hunt for financial shenanigans.
Oh really, that's their job. Yeah, they're supposed to. They're
supposed to identify institutions or businesses that have defrauded the
average person. So presatory lending practices or RELs fargo maybe.
Speaker 2 (39:58):
Yeah, hidden fees, things like that, but also so private
corporations also as like how what they do to their customers.
I wonder how much they look at contracts and stuff
like that that come down from the government. So, okay,
it feels like a good thing, feels like a really
good thing.
Speaker 3 (40:15):
It is a I think it is a good thing.
They've been persistently Look, this is a relatively new thing,
a relatively new organization I think was twenty eleven maybe,
And ever since the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created,
it has been persecuted by lobbyists in the financial sector, like,
(40:40):
come on, man, why you're stressing me people over get
overdraft fees. That's that's not my bad. Why are you
being weird about it fun police. So it is no
surprise that the CFPB was targeted, probably at the direction
of DOGE. We know that there are some serious issues
(41:03):
of conflict of interest of access. This occurred in step
with the social media platform X formerly Twitter, announcing plans
for a mobile payment service. It's going to be called
an X money account, according to MPR. And I think
we all saw this. If this went through and the
(41:25):
CFPB was still a thing, then it would have had
oversight on how this new digital payment system worked.
Speaker 2 (41:35):
Oh my goodness. Yeah, huh so, okay, we see you.
We see what you're doing here. I'm looking at a
thing on Consumer Finance dot gov from the Council of
Economic Advisors, you guys, and it's doing this thing, Ben,
it's trying to estimate exactly how much the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau is going to cost Americans and how much
(41:57):
it's already cost since twenty eleven. You know. It puts
it up in like the three hundred and fifty billion
dollar range, which you can you can understand why you
could justify that as a target to go after to
reduce spending.
Speaker 3 (42:10):
Right, Yes, of course, if your.
Speaker 2 (42:12):
Goal is to take away some of those safeguards that
the US people have against you know, moves corporations are
going to make, or the government itself.
Speaker 3 (42:21):
All these regulations. Man, it reminds me of years ago.
Some of us in the crowd may be old enough
to remember this. Years ago, there were so many weird
loopholes in the laws of Georgia and regulations. There was,
in fact, an exception for seat belts. You have to
(42:43):
wear a seat belt right if you're in a car
and a vehicle, except for a while in Georgia, you
did not have to wear a seat belt in a
pickup truck because one of the members of our state's
political class had a pickup truck and hated wearing seat belts.
Speaker 4 (43:00):
I thought it was curious that there are no seat
builts on school buses.
Speaker 3 (43:03):
But that I thought about that too. Yeah, that's a
good point. Oh, let's pause for a word from our
sponsor and get to one of the biggest things which
informs our conspiracy. Tonight, we're back the Treasury Department, all right,
(43:26):
The Treasury Department is a conspiracy in itself. Check out
our earlier episodes. Doge gained access to Treasury Department databases
and files. The big question is how individualized that data was,
so like, do they, for instance, have Noel Brown's Social
(43:51):
Security number and all his W two's or what have
you know? All his charitable contributions? Do they know the
spending history of Dylan tennessee pal Fagan. They're very strict
disclosure rules about this kind of stuff. Really, it's like
ken Elon Musk, Now see my tax returns.
Speaker 2 (44:14):
This is tough because we we kind of don't know
right right, and we've gotten mixed signals from news organizations
because a lot of people just weren't talking. There were
some whistleblowers though, that came forward to talk about what
all they were getting access to. And weirdly enough, even
(44:36):
even back in April of last year, the is it
the Oversight Committee? The House Oversight Committee was putting forward
and it is partisan, so it's like the Democratic side
of that committee was putting forward the concept that Doge
had access to way more than we were being told.
I guess we'll get into it. Maybe we'll put the
(44:57):
seed here. This is where that House Oversite Committee is
where you get this concept that there is potentially a
secret list and what would you guys call a data
set of all Americans stuff all of our private information. Yes,
that sounds creepy, but it also sounds like maybe why
(45:19):
this thing was created in the first place.
Speaker 3 (45:21):
Right, Yeah, a bit of a false flag, you know,
it's the the question is is it the wolf of
big data aggregation wearing the sheep's wool of financial conservation convoluted?
But we got there another thing. That another thing that
(45:41):
folks are accusing Doze of. And to your point, Matt,
these accusations are coming from inside the house. These are
other members of the government and the political class, Pauli Malarkey.
So one of the big concerns is that Doge may
have gained access to something that honestly I had never
(46:02):
heard about before. The Integrated Data Retrieval System IDRS. That's
your treasure trove, right, that's your Aladdin's cavern with all
the goodies and the bobbles. So this place I DRS
includes very detailed financial information about every single person who
(46:24):
pays taxes in the United States, every single business, every
single nonprofit again a Laddin's cavern. No one thing should
have all of this information of what's yep.
Speaker 2 (46:37):
And the scariest thing I think about that having access
to that is that we know there were certain employees
within DOGE that were uploading mass quantities of that data
onto services like cloud flare and cloud services that should
not have this sensitive materials on though, no matter how
(46:58):
secure you think they are, the government has very specific,
rigorous security protocols for that kind of sensitive data.
Speaker 4 (47:07):
We would like to think at the very least, I
mean talk about the ultimate data leak, you know, I mean,
this is this would be the big one.
Speaker 3 (47:14):
Also again to that wolf Sheep's wool thing, this had
the petita of updating information technology, of modernizing tech. But
we have to remember, and we've said this before in
previous episodes, there is a series of very valid reasons
(47:39):
that your government has dumb technology for some things.
Speaker 2 (47:44):
It makes so much sense, Ben, can you just tell
us a little more about that, like why, I mean,
I think I understand, but it would be good to
get another understanding.
Speaker 3 (47:53):
Right, Okay, So we are let's say the five of
us you listening along home. Let's say we're all hanging
out and we're in charge of nuclear weapons, and it
takes the five of us to agree whenever we are
going to fire a puppy hug into Iran, Right, or
(48:16):
earlier it's a new missile. We're working on the puppy hug.
So okay, So if technology is modernized, we could agree
on the cloud. Right. The old school stuff means that
you don't touch the Internet in those kind of decisions
you get together in your weird, creepy rooms. You might
(48:36):
have a secure A to B conversation platform of some sort,
but it doesn't touch the Internet, and then all five
of us will say, okay.
Speaker 2 (48:46):
Inserting my key.
Speaker 4 (48:47):
We got to turn key three two one, go crack
the code, read the code to each other, like physically
written down on paper, analog style.
Speaker 3 (48:56):
So I hope that answers the question those That's one
example of why technology is purposely nerved in some parts
of government, and it should be. Unfortunately it has.
Speaker 4 (49:08):
To be same with voting systems. Right.
Speaker 2 (49:11):
It makes so much sense to me when you consider
someone could take an action from any terminal, any you know,
machine that has access to the Internet and then steal
things from a machine that is also like, has access
to the Internet. You can't do it. It could happen.
In this case. When you're describing ben you have to
go to a specific sub basement level four to access
(49:33):
the filing the physical file records where the Social Security
Administration keeps all this stuff, which is not how they
do it. But if it were that way, right, you
could you could put a ton of security on that
building and people aren't getting in and they're definitely not
getting out with mass quantities of you know, physical paper.
Speaker 4 (49:52):
Unless you like uploaded it to cloud flare, right.
Speaker 3 (49:55):
Right exactly, unless you bypass that air gap, you know. Uh,
that's so that's the issue. And Washing Post had some
great reporting on this as well as in PR. They said,
this system allows you to access IRS records, which include
stuff like your Social Security number, stuff like your bank
(50:17):
account information. This was per the administration. This was legally
done and with the appropriate security clearances because we have
to bring efficiency to the FED, and also we want
all of your info. All of your data are belonged
to us. I mean, what me worrying?
Speaker 4 (50:40):
Gosh?
Speaker 3 (50:41):
Man? Yes, sorry, I got back into Mad magazine pretty hard.
Remember that guy.
Speaker 2 (50:49):
The term that NPR used back in April to describe
it as personal dossiers on every American citizen and non
citizen that is within the United State.
Speaker 3 (51:00):
Record, your permanent record. Turns out that old grade school
conspiracy was true, but not in the way we thought.
And but wait, there's more conflicts of interest. Guys, We've
got to talk about this one a little bit. How
do we respond? I don't want to tip the scale, hero,
I want to hear from guys. How do we respond
(51:22):
to the accusations or speculation that Elon Musk could have
been spearheading Doge for ulterior motives?
Speaker 4 (51:32):
No? What, I don't believe it?
Speaker 3 (51:35):
Okay, that says no.
Speaker 2 (51:37):
Look, just because a guy gives two undred ninety million
dollars to some dude to run for president doesn't mean
there's going to be a conflict of interest. Who cares
if he's got government contracts with two count of two
separate private entities that are now all becoming one weird
conglomerate thing called X.
Speaker 3 (51:55):
I think the Fox has some great ideas about henhouse
design and we should listen to them.
Speaker 4 (52:00):
Let's remove the doors, no more chicken wire, open door policy.
Speaker 3 (52:06):
So I mean, yeah, it's got to be a conflict
of interest.
Speaker 4 (52:09):
Right.
Speaker 3 (52:10):
Logically we're not saying this is definitely happening, But logically
it is naive to assume that it is not happening.
Speaker 4 (52:20):
It just seems so utterly clear that it is.
Speaker 3 (52:25):
I mean, you wanta you wanta cut regulations? U. We
see that happening now. It's happening in the automotive industry
quite recently, by the way.
Speaker 4 (52:34):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (52:34):
We see budget cuts, we see targeting of agencies that
have previously investigated elon musk business dealings, rollback.
Speaker 4 (52:44):
Of environmental regulations that directly impact positively, you know, big
energy companies.
Speaker 3 (52:50):
Yeah. You ever walk outside in the forest and you
think this place?
Speaker 2 (52:54):
Yes, I wish I wish about a dozen technogarks would
come out here, that's all. And I don't know tech,
but did I wish they come out here really beautify
this place and make it more efficient?
Speaker 4 (53:05):
Plopped some data centers on these redwoods?
Speaker 3 (53:08):
And thanks for the beet, Dylan. Sorry, I got a
little irritated with this word.
Speaker 4 (53:12):
Yeah, you're you're right.
Speaker 3 (53:14):
Guys like walk into a forest and then say, what
if you had to subscribe to each of these trees?
Speaker 4 (53:23):
That's great? But no, I mean, we let's think about it.
Speaker 2 (53:26):
Let's go quickly just on data centers and weird stuff
going on. I can't remember what episode it was I
mentioned that I'm seeing some weird stuff going on with
detention centers out where I am. Guys, about thirteen miles
from I am, there is another warehouse really close to
where I live that has been vacant for about a
year and looks like it was at least sold or
(53:48):
least to someone. But I went to the assessor's office,
I can't find any information about it. I'm genuinely interested
in this, and I'm trying to do the you know,
the correct avenues to find stuff. Yeah, it's another one
of these million square foot warehouses. I'm serious, million square
foot warehouses that is just empty. But they're changing the
outside of it right now, and it sure looks like
(54:11):
it could be used as either a data center or one.
Speaker 3 (54:14):
Of these detention centers.
Speaker 4 (54:15):
Okay, it's like right down the road for me.
Speaker 2 (54:19):
It's freaking out.
Speaker 3 (54:21):
Let's go, let's go visit. I don't know if they
can't stop us from like being on a public.
Speaker 2 (54:28):
Road, we could just be British. Oh yeah, like a tool.
Speaker 3 (54:34):
Like sure, come on in, just end every sentence, within't it. Yeah,
they've got a big warehouse, isn't it. So there's a
lot of stuff happening. There are a lot of legal
actions being taken against dose. So many what. I don't
know how far we want to get into this, but
there was a class action lawsuit filed in February of
(54:57):
last year, twenty twenty five, almost exactly a year ago today.
The lawsuit said, Hey, these Doge boys, big Balls, Musk
and so on, they improperly accessed personal data, financial data
from federal databases and they didn't have any legal reasoning.
(55:17):
They didn't have a green light. There are more privacy
and data security lawsuits, constitutional challenges, allegations of violating the
Federal Advisory Committee Act FACA. We are drowning in acronyms today. Guys.
I hate how the government does this. Why is there
(55:37):
an initialism for everything?
Speaker 4 (55:41):
Efficiency? Efficiency?
Speaker 2 (55:43):
Yeah, but it's also just to make the whole thing
seem so complicated. We were looking at that initial order
that was put forward by the Trump administration establishing and
implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency, And if you
just look through that pretty simple like two pager on
(56:04):
this new thing called Doge, but you look at the
way there's so many acronyms in there. There's so many
things that are being talked about, and then the way
they're being talked about, it just feels confusing, and it's
such legal speak, you know. I think so often that occurs,
so that it just becomes boring and you tune out.
(56:26):
Ben you've said that before on purpose, like it's meant
to make you tune out.
Speaker 3 (56:30):
Yes, yeah, you are meant to be bored. You are
meant to stop doing difficult reading about numbers and acronyms
and so on, and go over to your dopamine casino right.
Speaker 4 (56:45):
Needle in the haystack. Effect of all of it, like
not to mention the Epstein files, I mean so many
things that you're just have all this data dumped on
you where maybe there's something of interest or of value
hidden in there, but unless you are really, really, really diligent,
they never gonna find it, and you will likely just
get bored and give up.
Speaker 2 (57:02):
Some of the Epstein files. Of course, you add a
little a couple buckets of trauma and you know horrific
details in there, which further makes it you want to
look away even more.
Speaker 3 (57:13):
Mmmm. Yeah, that's a great point. I've got. I've got
a question, uh for us all have you guys been
to Fort Knox yet?
Speaker 4 (57:21):
I have not.
Speaker 2 (57:23):
Oh, it's been on a list before, and I was
near there, but I never got to go in.
Speaker 3 (57:26):
Ben I didn't. Well, it depends on what we mean
by in, but.
Speaker 2 (57:32):
I wanted to get in.
Speaker 3 (57:34):
Oh, I get in Baby, Let me.
Speaker 4 (57:37):
Bond movie A knock.
Speaker 3 (57:41):
Well, there's this longstanding conspiracy theory in the United States
that you'll find in any number of uh folklore branches
right of conspiracy, which is that Fort Knox doesn't actually
have any gold in the vault, and that it is
just a tall tale that Uncle Sam has told other
(58:01):
countries so that it looks more wealthy than it is.
Speaker 2 (58:07):
Yeah, so we can hide all the alien bodies there. Duh.
Speaker 4 (58:10):
Right.
Speaker 3 (58:11):
It's so weird that in step of the birth of Doge,
Musk brought up this conspiracy theory. Who was replying to
a post from a senator named Mike Lee out of Utah,
and Senator Lee said, I was I'm a senator. I
was not able to enter Fort Knox. Why are they
denying access? Musk loved this, and he said, who's confirming
(58:35):
the gold wasn't stolen from Fort Knox? Maybe it's there,
Maybe it's not. That gold is owned by the American public.
We want to know if it's still there. So on
top of all the other things. This guy just added
the Fort Knox conspiracy.
Speaker 2 (58:50):
Dude, isn't funny? I think, yes, we'll go check for you,
mister Musk. The weirdest thing is this all, this thing,
this doge concept is pulling away the facade that presidents
and senators used to always talk about. You know, you
wouldn't say anything bad about Fort Knox and the gold
(59:13):
supply on purpose because we have to pretend. We all
have to pretend or this whole thing falls apart. The
US is extremely wealthy, and yeah, a ton of it's
in Fort Knox and it's great. And also we don't
spend too much money. We make so much money, it's incredible.
But then you look at how some of these things,
these pillars are just being yanked away. It just makes
(59:35):
you wonder why.
Speaker 3 (59:36):
It does make one wonder. Also side note, just to
be objective, folks, you cannot visit the vaults at Fort Knox.
You can go on the base depending on your circumstances.
You can walk around depending on your circumstances, but you
cannot go it. It's kind of like the It's kind
(59:57):
of like that church in Ethiopia that apparently houses the
arc of the Covenant. You can walk around it, you
could talk to people outside all the livelong day, but
you cannot enter. I don't know. It's strange because we
have a billion, perhaps a trillion dollar question here what
(01:00:20):
happens next answer is, we don't know, but we do know.
They're very disturbing signals from the halls of power. There
is clear internal descent which should not be occurring in
the way it's occurring now. It seems like a heist.
It seems like Doge is a heist. It seems like
it's kind of not very well thought out organized crime,
(01:00:45):
right like Hamstring. The coppers who are coming to get
me also give me leverage for future stuff and swindle
the American people think about the consequences later. I don't know.
Speaker 2 (01:01:00):
Zabarra, I agree. There might be something even more insidious
here in a connection to the Department of Homeland Security
coming out of this NPR article, I'm just gonna read
these two sentences. The access Doge had is also being
used to further the administration's immigration policies. The Department of
(01:01:22):
Homeland Security announced last week that Doge helped overhaul an
immigration database to serve as a quote single reliable source
for verifying non citizen status nationwide.
Speaker 3 (01:01:34):
Yeah right, So if.
Speaker 2 (01:01:37):
You get access to all that that information that not
one group is supposed to have access to all of it,
then you can decide who is okay and who is
not okay according to the administration.
Speaker 3 (01:01:51):
Yes.
Speaker 2 (01:01:52):
The other weird thing to me is that DOGE only
had until July fourth this year, twenty twenty six to
a comp all of its goals, but already in November
of last year, twenty twenty five, they've already seemed to
have dissolved, as though dose doesn't actually exist anymore, at
least according to Reuter's.
Speaker 4 (01:02:13):
Well, let's mission accomplished though, Man, Yeah, you know.
Speaker 2 (01:02:16):
But so that mission was save you know, one hundred
and fifty to two hundred billion dollars in operating costs
and then make these lists.
Speaker 4 (01:02:27):
That was, well, we were told the mission was, but
I do not believe that was in fact the actual mission.
Speaker 3 (01:02:32):
I agree with you, Noel. The part of the mission
was to appear to be doing those good faith things right,
but the real mission again seems to be on the
level of not super well thought out organized crime. The
heist doesn't need to continue after you leave the bank,
(01:02:55):
you know what I mean. For instance, if we are
bank robbers and we dress in cool costumes, what's a costume?
Somebody give me at.
Speaker 4 (01:03:05):
A stripey you burglar outfit and that's that bag man
right there.
Speaker 3 (01:03:11):
All right, So we've got we've got our outfits on.
We rob the bank, we get away. We're probably not
going to wear those costumes for the rest of our lives.
The heist is over, you know what I mean. It's
on to the next score unless.
Speaker 4 (01:03:25):
You build a back door to the bank and that
allows you to continue to heist over the time, right,
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (01:03:34):
I mean, Look, there's so much more to explore here, folks.
We cannot wait to hear your thoughts. Thank you so
much for tuning in. Tell us what is the stuff
they don't want you to know about Doge and what
happens next? Please find us on the lines, give us
a call on a phone, or shoot us an email
in the dark.
Speaker 4 (01:03:54):
If you are on the lines, you can find us
at the handle Conspiracy Stuff or Conspiracy Stuff Show, depending
on your social media platform of choice. And there's more, Yes,
there is.
Speaker 2 (01:04:03):
We have a phone number. It is one eight three
three STD WYTK. Turn those letters into numbers, call them
with your phone. You're gonna hear Ben's voice, and then
you've got a voicemail system three minutes. You have give
yourself a cool nickname and let us know if we
can use your name and message on one of our
listener mail episodes that show up in the audio feed,
So you have to go find it, not on Netflix.
(01:04:25):
If you want to send us an email, you can
do that too.
Speaker 3 (01:04:27):
We are the entities that read each piece of correspondence
we receive. Be well aware, yet's unafraid. Sometimes the void
writes back. Hit us up with a random fact, get
one in return. We'll see you out there in the dark.
Conspiracy at iHeartRadio dot com.
Speaker 2 (01:05:01):
Stuff they Don't Want You to Know is a production
of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
From UFOs to psychic powers and government conspiracies. History is
riddled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or
learn the stuff they don't want you to know. A
production of iHeartRadio.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Hello, welcome back to the show. My name is Matt,
my name is Nol.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
They call be Ben. We're joined as always with our
super producer Dylan the Tennessee pal Fagan. Most importantly, you
are you. You are here. That makes this the stuff
they don't want you to know. Ed, we are pleased
as punch that you are joining us tonight, folks. This
is going to be an exploration of memes, an exploration
(00:52):
of conspiracies, and the just the ridiculous, surreal situation of
something called doge.
Speaker 4 (01:00):
That's the stuff they Doze wants you to know.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
We're gonna play a bit of doge ball as we're
talking off air. Okay, Department of Government Efficiency, we've heard
of it.
Speaker 4 (01:11):
I love it when you like walk backwards into the acronym,
you know.
Speaker 3 (01:15):
A backronym that's weird for it?
Speaker 4 (01:16):
Is that really true? Yeah? Yeah, If it's not, then
you've coined it, and I do I doff my cap
to you, sir, oh man.
Speaker 3 (01:23):
It's a whole thing. Uh, let's get right into it, guys.
Here are the facts. Despite the name, the Department of
Government Efficiency is not an official department.
Speaker 4 (01:41):
But it has department in the name.
Speaker 3 (01:42):
Man, true department in the name. And what do we
always say about innocuous names.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
Yeah, isn't it of another service that did exist.
Speaker 3 (01:53):
Mm hmmm in twenty fourteen. Yeah, this thing technically is
an initial from the second Trump administration. Look at it
on paper. The idea is DOZE will modernize government. It
Doze will reduce harmful spending and financial waste, and it
(02:16):
will at the same time cut all those pesky regulations
and fraud getting waste and fraud keeps. Yeah, maximize productivity. Right,
that doesn't sound too bad. We got to introduce one
of our first players here. Doze is the brainchild of
Ellen Musk. This guy was the largest known individual donor
(02:41):
to the twenty twenty four US election cycle, more than
two hundred and ninety million dollars.
Speaker 4 (02:48):
This guy is fine. That seems fine.
Speaker 3 (02:50):
I mean, we could have we could have done cool stuff.
Speaker 4 (02:53):
It just seems interesting that the guy that you know
spent all that money on the election is the one
that then gets to single handedly gut the government.
Speaker 2 (03:04):
Well, it's going to get to one of the theories
they're going to put forward today.
Speaker 4 (03:07):
About the.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
The real meaning and goals of doge as it was
thought about and then implemented.
Speaker 4 (03:16):
Yeah, Yeah, nailed it, okay.
Speaker 3 (03:19):
Doge is technically the result of an executive order EO
one four one five eight, which is really a rebranding
of another thing. Also, starting an initiative like this via
an executive order means that you're already starting in a
pretty sticky place with Congress, because they're super into laws
(03:43):
and institutions, in theory, in theory on paper. Yes, come
election time, everybody's a good boy. Doge is to our
earlier point there, no. Doge is a purposeful backronym. A
backronym is where you take an exisiting word and then
turn it into an acronym.
Speaker 4 (04:04):
Right an existing word. Also, you can refer to a
cute pupper, a doggo, a little doge. It also refers
to a cryptocurrency that was I believe named after the
shiba enu meme.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
Yeah, kabosu kubasu. I don't know how to say the
actual name of the cute little doge.
Speaker 4 (04:22):
I don't know that I really was in on the
original Doge or what you're talking about. Can you describe it?
Speaker 3 (04:28):
Very? Wow much dog much dog? Oh, heck right, Doge.
It's a it's an adorable sheba eud sometimes doing a
very excited face. Oh, sometimes doing a very like side
eye face.
Speaker 4 (04:47):
Of course I know this guy. Yeah, yeah, it's very
You've seen his word too many situations. So it is
a bit of a side eye sort of a surprised look.
But also depending on the text that you accompany it with,
could be the side eye situation.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
Yeah, like a knowing look.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
The things left unsaid Doge. We also know that the
real name for Doge is, to your earlier point, Matt,
the US Digital Service. This was created by the Obama
administration President Barack Obama on August eleventh, twenty fourteen. So Doge,
as it's being sold to you in the media now,
(05:28):
is not an original thought. It is a rebranding, or,
according to critics, it is a weaponization of an existing thing.
Speaker 2 (05:36):
Yes, and interestingly enough, the department or the digital service
in this thing that was created in twenty fourteen is
a direct result of the botched healthcare dot gov launch.
Speaker 4 (05:52):
Right, that was such a nightmare.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Yes, So back then they went, ooh, we should probably
get better at websites and you know, digital technology and
stuff as a government. So that's what this thing was
supposed to do. It's it was designed in twenty fourteen
to just do a better job on the internet basically.
Speaker 3 (06:12):
And I want to take a moment to that excellent point.
I want to take a moment and just congratulate all
of us for being able to talk so much valid
trash about this government and not get black backed.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
Bye for now, for now.
Speaker 4 (06:30):
Interestingly enough, it's described on the Obama White House dot
archives dot org site as a startup at the White
Holes that pairs the country's top technology talent with the
best public servants to improve the usefulness and reliability of
the country's most important digital services.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
And then everybody clapped.
Speaker 2 (06:50):
Well, hey, I hear what you're saying, Ben, But I
also think that's kind of a great thing. I think
maybe we've all over the course of our years, had
to do some thing for either a local government, state government,
or the federal government online and it was just through
some web portal that was clearly developed twenty years.
Speaker 3 (07:11):
For geo cities style, you know, construction, add in regulatory capture.
Like the entire reason that it is difficult to pay
your taxes is do it's because there is a industry
of middlemen. Right Look, the private public thing, as you
(07:33):
were pointing out there and all the private public thing
is always going to come back to bite you in
the butt as a civilization right now, Alon Musk his
role with Doge is a little murky. We were talking
about this off air. There are numerous clips memes that
went viral of the guy holding a chainsaw or standing
(07:56):
next to the current President of the United States in
the Oval office while they talked about Doge and wearing
multiple hats, messing with his spinners, his kid, I think stemming.
I wonder if the kid picks his nose anyway?
Speaker 2 (08:13):
They all do? We all do? We all did?
Speaker 4 (08:18):
What was the thing that the kid mauthed at Trump
like you're a horrible person or I hate you, or
you don't know anything. It was something very sinister like that.
Speaker 2 (08:28):
We talked about it just looking at that picture though, guys,
I mean, we've often brought back the WWE imagery of
it all, you know, relating to the recent politics in
the US and that image that you're referencing Ben. I'm
looking at it. It's posted on an MPR finger and oh,
it's like an America chainsaw.
Speaker 3 (08:51):
It's we got a little idiocracy, to be honest, it's
really quickly.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
I'm just so excited I had to share. I am
going to my first WWE events on Monday. I'm going
to see what w w E raw show. I'm pretty pumped.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
You should call hop okay.
Speaker 4 (09:11):
Get the special treatment.
Speaker 3 (09:12):
Speaking of special treatment, right, the White House has had
some strangely I don't know, fluid information is not the
right word, contradictory statements about the role of ELM. Musk
in DOGE or Elon Musk, if you want to say
it that way. At various times they have said he
(09:33):
is a senior advisor to the president. At other times
they have denied that he makes any decisions whatsoever. And
then also from the President himself, they have claimed that
Musk is in fact the head of DOGE and does
make all the decisions. This is coming from the same place.
Speaker 4 (09:54):
Except when they're openly beefing on Twitter.
Speaker 3 (09:57):
Except when they're openly beefing on Twitter at least me five.
That's when Musk said he was pivoting from this initiative,
which again is not a real department, just to be
very clear about that.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
Oh yeah, it's really strange to see initial reporting and
statements from Elon Musk himself in the early stages of
this January February twenty twenty five, when he's saying things like, oh,
I'm I think I'll probably spend a day, maybe two
days a week on government work, and then just imagining
(10:30):
being appointed to something that was touted as such an
important part of an administration, thinking that the head guy
would only be there, and he wasn't the only head guy, right,
there was another dude that was going to there were
gonna be co heads or something, Vivik Rebmaswami. Yeah, And
then they just splipped it and said, well, we like
this other we like Elon's way better.
Speaker 3 (10:51):
So per their official website, Doge's official website Doze dot gov,
this initiative had already saved the United States hundreds of
billions of dollars per them. But if you look at
other government agencies gonna they're gonna tell you this has
already cost Uncle Sam almost twenty two billion dollars. And
(11:16):
then other analysts are gonna say doges actions will eventually
cost this country as much as one hundred and thirty
five billion bucks.
Speaker 4 (11:27):
Well, that seems counter to the spirit of the initiative,
doesn't it. Right. It's almost as though there were another
reason to do the whole thing.
Speaker 3 (11:34):
It's like starting a nonprofit called People for Cheese and
our first thing is to eliminate all cheesemongers.
Speaker 4 (11:44):
Let just get rid of the middle. Yeah, yeah, go straight.
Speaker 3 (11:49):
Straight from the utter.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
Guys, I'm looking at the DOGE website.
Speaker 4 (11:56):
Exists. Yes, it is.
Speaker 2 (11:58):
Just a weird little legs out of different tables, I guess,
and you click on a couple of things around here.
Speaker 3 (12:05):
It does Twitter speed.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
Yeah, that's what it feels like. You can't join it,
I guess. But it is weird to me that that exists.
But the USDs dot gov also still exists. Note well,
and now that we're gonna get to it, and I
don't want to spoil too much, but DOGE had a
limited time window that it was going to operate under,
and we're still in that window. But for some reason,
(12:31):
if you go to the USDs dot gov website, it's
still You will find DOSEE references in there, but it's
mostly back to USDs, which is weird.
Speaker 3 (12:43):
Yeah, it might be kind of a grift under the
maybe leadership of Musk Vivek Ramaswami and Amy Gleeson at
various points, Gleason's the one you're going to hear the
most directly attached to policy or action by Doge because
Gleason reports to the Chief of Staff for the White House.
(13:06):
Doge got unprecedented access to sensitive information on individuals, on businesses,
on government affairs, while also cutting tons and tons of funding,
more money than we could ever imagine, cutting tons of
funding to various existing government programs, as well as creating
(13:26):
what they call deferred resignation.
Speaker 4 (13:29):
Remember that one, right, that was the letters that were
sick in the road working the road. And I gotta ask,
where does big Balls fit into this ORG chart?
Speaker 1 (13:39):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (13:39):
Yeah, that was one of the kids, right mm hmm.
I mean I believe he was kind of running the
team that stormed into some government's offices and demanded all
of these documents and access to terminals and sorry, terminals,
what am I doing? In the fifties, very very raid
like behavior. Folks were not giving the heads up. Heads
of departments were not told what was going on, and
(14:01):
it just felt very much like an invasion.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
When many judges stopped specific actions from happening, or at least,
you know, put out we're going to get into it.
But there are several times there are attempted to be stopped.
But then there were also secret actions taking place that
we're going to talk about. Even when there was a stoppage,
a federal judge said no, and they're like, OK, well.
Speaker 4 (14:24):
You also can't stop what has already occurred. You can
try to keep it from happening again, happening further. But
a lot of these things were just such a swoop in,
do the thing, the damage is done. Oh now the
judge weighs in. If you don't really you know, pay
attention or follow the orders of the judges, then it
doesn't really have much effect.
Speaker 3 (14:43):
And to be clear, obviously one of the most important
things here is that we don't body shame. The guy's
street name is big Balls, and it might be a
medical condition.
Speaker 4 (14:55):
It's more of an attitude.
Speaker 3 (14:56):
You know, well, please get yourself checked, folks, is what say?
Walk down the street for that one ballsy.
Speaker 4 (15:05):
M down by your giant balls.
Speaker 3 (15:07):
Oh jeez, tell me about it. I mean, this is
divisive stuff. Right. It might surprise a lot of us
outside of the United States to know that some people,
a not insignificant portion of this country loved the idea
of DOGE because it spoke directly to ongoing concerns. Right,
(15:29):
the idea of big red tape, of massive bureaucracy, inefficient government.
You're taking my money and you're wasting it. Why so
if we could save the government and the taxpayer a
bit of scratch, a bit of cheddar, why not tighten
the belt? So other people absolutely hate this idea, and
they say, look, we're allowing a level of private involvement, influence,
(15:54):
and interference into public institutions. This will bite us in
the ass later. And now, as we record on February twentieth,
twenty twenty six, we are officially at later the Yeah,
officially ass bitten. Would Yeah, the leopards have eaten the face. Uh,
(16:15):
the ass has been didten. It's no surprise that a
lot of these critics and even a few early supporters
of DOGE have concluded it is less a government agency
and more a conspiracy.
Speaker 2 (16:28):
Oh for sure, let's not forget when this thing was initiated,
the public statements were Doge is going to save the
government two trillion dollars in spending, and that that goal
went almost immediately down to one trillion, and then that
got slashed down to one hundred and fifty billion.
Speaker 4 (16:50):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (16:51):
Yeah, always start big, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
But it makes you, it makes you call into question
what is this thing really for?
Speaker 3 (17:00):
Right?
Speaker 2 (17:01):
If it's not to save tremendous amounts of money on
operating costs, and you know, government budgets, what are they
actually doing.
Speaker 4 (17:09):
They're trying to project twenty twenty five of five the
government like.
Speaker 3 (17:15):
Five to five.
Speaker 4 (17:16):
That's nice.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
Yeah, depending upon whom you ask, Doge is not a warm,
fuzzy angel farts and Trumpet's good faith effort to clean
up financial waste. There is one criticism we want to
point out before we get to the crazy part, which
is the following quote. Under the auspices of finding fraud, waste,
(17:37):
and abuse, Doge has hurt the middle class, created chaos,
and attempted to usurp Congress's power of the purse with
illegal impoundments end quote. That quote is not from a
random podcast or person on the internet. That is from
the House Committee on the Budget. The government itself does
(17:59):
not like what the government itself is doing.
Speaker 2 (18:02):
Yeah, or at least the new digital services. This thing is,
let's do it.
Speaker 3 (18:09):
Yeah. Okay, So what exactly is DOSE done? Why are
so many people concerned? Perhaps most importantly, what's it really for?
And what's it going to do in the future. We're
going to pause for a word from our sponsors and
hope our bosses don't catch up with us before we
finish this episode. Here's where it gets crazy. Despite being
(18:34):
around for a very short amount of time, DOGE has
already created a massive amount of controversy tsunamis of controversy,
some of which we talked about in earlier episodes, some
of which we mentioned in Strange News. I'm thinking of usaid, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
That thing is weird, I think specifically for the show,
because we understand the positives that something like the United
States Agency Agency for International Development can do, right, we
also know the pitfalls of that kind of money injection
to other countries, especially when you are quietly involved in
(19:19):
nation building and coups and things like that.
Speaker 4 (19:22):
Well, let's also just point out too, that there is
a lot of opportunity for waste abuse and fraud within
these systems, which makes it such a solid cover story
because who doesn't want to eliminate some of that stuff
in bureaucracy and you know, to safeguard our tax dollars
and make sure they're going to the right things and
not being funneled into, you know, things that are a
(19:45):
little more untoward.
Speaker 3 (19:47):
Yeah, but there's you bring up a great point because
there is an interesting disconnect, a little bit of a
logical leap that the supporters of DOGE failed to clock
when the big cuts happened to fundy. It is not
as though you the individual get some kind of money back,
(20:07):
right USA funding gets cut. It's not as though everybody
in the United States gets a dollar thirty five back,
you know.
Speaker 2 (20:15):
That is what the DOGE website says. Though it's like
this is the amount of money saved per American. So
it makes makes you feel as though, oh, I might
get that money back.
Speaker 4 (20:24):
Wasn't there talk about issuing some kind of that was
the tariffs, issuing a dividend?
Speaker 3 (20:28):
Cheh.
Speaker 4 (20:29):
A lot of talk about you know, getting.
Speaker 3 (20:32):
Anything but Epstein, you know.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
Did you guys see the news from the Supreme Court
this morning on February twentieth, as we record the Supreme
Court is basically shutting down his sweeping tariffs.
Speaker 4 (20:43):
Oh well, I'm cool.
Speaker 3 (20:45):
Yeah, Well, messing with the money and that's always going
to be the third rail outside of the theater of culture,
wars and politics.
Speaker 4 (20:54):
We also mentioned enough of Mike this whole ten billion
dollars to the Bureau of Peace or whatever it's called.
Lit'll put a pin in that and save that for
another time, but very interesting use of our tax dollars.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
Yeah, Dylan. Dylan notes that there was a several thousand
and five thousand dollars DOGE refund that was like discussed several.
Speaker 3 (21:13):
Times, discussed, discussed, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, like, oh yeah, we're gonna do this
for sure.
Speaker 3 (21:19):
I love discussing stuff because it's different. It's just close
enough to doing stuff.
Speaker 2 (21:25):
Yeah, we have an idea of a concept of a.
Speaker 4 (21:27):
Concept of an idea concept.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
It's actually it's funny you say that, guys, because I
was talking to our pal friend of the show, Josh
Clark about a potential collaboration as we're out in the
field and broad uh, and he said that sounds cool.
What are you thinking. I said, I don't know. I
think we should hang out. And he said so you
don't have a plan, and I said, we got the
concept of a plan, so you need Yeah. But the
(21:52):
thing is, we're talking about podcasting and doing fun shows
to entertain and educate. These folks are talking about billions
of dollars and they are putting lives on the line. USAID.
USAID was always targeted by Musk and the Doge folks
(22:12):
at all. For a while, Musk repeatedly stated on his
favorite social media platform that too much of the USAID
budget was either misappropriated through fraud or they weren't putting
the money in the right place. They were misprioritizing stuff.
(22:32):
Up until Doge, USAID had like fourteen thousand full time employees,
and now it's looking more like maybe three hundred, depending
on all the court stuff works out.
Speaker 4 (22:44):
I think the part that really stuck with me too
about this was the food aid that was not distributed right,
that literally just sat in a warehouse to rhyme. So
it just seems like cruelty is at the heart of
a lot of that stuff, and not actual savings. Because
the money's been spent, why wouldn't I just distribute it
to the people who need it as opposed to like
(23:05):
throwing it in the fire.
Speaker 3 (23:06):
I'm so glad you brought that up, because, like we're
saying on Strange News, when we first talked about that
food waste, it's it's just unclean. You're right, it's a
sunk cost. The food was already purchased, the food on
expiration date. The only real cost would have been transportation
(23:26):
and logistics, which already had a paid contract. Right, So
what are we saving. We're not saving people. We're definitely
not helping folks.
Speaker 4 (23:40):
Let's send a message too that we that we don't
want to help folks, that we're trying to have much
more of an isolationist kind of approach.
Speaker 2 (23:48):
It's also tremendously I was just gonna say, upsetting when
you think about this forty billion dollars being targeted as
the thing that's wasteful when everybody in the in that
world knows that it's the Department of Defense and the
military industrial congressional complex that is the thing that loses.
(24:08):
As we've talked about on this show, palettes of billions
of US dollars that loses, you know, who knows how
much to black budgets that just goes away, Money that
goes away that isn't officially appropriated, that doesn't officially exist.
We know this is just a fact, and it's so
much more than forty billion dollars.
Speaker 4 (24:27):
There was a story recently about a lot of military
equipment that was just languishing in a warehouse and never opened,
or something along those lines. It might be crossing some
wires there, but stuff like that happens. Remember the electric
coffee mugs, that whole sugarfuffle, toilet seats, the hammers. How
much will Pentagon pay for one? Yeah, the pork barrel
(24:48):
spending is true. The stereotypes about high level American financial
corruption are true. These are not made up tall tales.
But we have to remember USAID, despite some of their
spooky doopy affiliations at times, this was the world's largest
(25:11):
foreign aid agency. It fed and clothed children, It funded education,
It helped people learn to read, It helped small businesses.
It genuinely made the US look a little bit better
in the global sphere. And the current administration via doge
as well. Even pre Doge, the current administration, for some
(25:35):
unknowable reason, wanted to hamstring USAID, so Doze was an
easy way to directly attack this current administration cut eighty
three percent of the existing USAID contracts, and then they
moved them under the State Department, which is kind of
(25:58):
like this sabitat.
Speaker 3 (26:00):
That's what they did.
Speaker 2 (26:01):
Yeah, they did. I like what you're saying, there been
because in my mind, this is one of the only
real open hand movements or or appendages that the US
government had for a while there the whole like, here's
some here's some goodwill right to anybody else outside of
(26:23):
the US, we will we will send you our help.
Speaker 3 (26:27):
Right like the hospital boats kind of. Yeah, you don't
have to take a pledge of allegiance to the United States.
You don't have to agree with ideology. We just want
to feed your kids.
Speaker 2 (26:40):
And install a couple of spies. That's it. That's one.
Speaker 3 (26:44):
There's like one. I T guy, Okay, yeah, yeah, and
office is you know Steve. Yeah, Steve is a legend.
And congrats on the promotion, Steve. Uh yeah, it's it's
soft powers. It's a weird thing to cut to your
earlier point there, guys. We also know this occurs in
step with the federal firings. You can hold them deferred
(27:09):
resignations if you like, folks, But they were firing people.
They were offering to buy out federal employees. This was
in the headlines. This was blamed on Doge, but it
actually came from the Office of Personnel Management the OPM. Still,
I think Doge was running point there, especially with things
(27:33):
like musks fork in the Road email where he said
what he gave people. We had a lot of you
folks right into us about this. We have a lot
of government employees in the crowd. There was such a
limited time window, remember you guys, where they were like,
justify your job, do the following things. Do it by
(27:55):
you know, Tuesday or whatever. Because we're cleaning up the house,
were dreaming, well.
Speaker 4 (28:01):
It's all such a you know, classic Silicon Valley hatchet
man kind of behavior. You know, like when Musk, you know,
took over Twitter and came into the office holding the
what was it, the sink, right, Yeah, it's that kind
of stuff. These letters with this kind of fork in
the Road language is sort of like ultimatums. It is
very Silicon Valley coded.
Speaker 2 (28:21):
The weird thing about it, I think in the moment
when we were all going through that and reading it,
we were doing some reading of the tea leaves. We're
you know, trying to understand the message behind the message,
and in that moment it did feel like a loyalty
test of some sort, especially because of what else was
happening in the news at the time, like to all
(28:43):
of a sudden, get this, Hey, you can get out
now if you want to, cause we're we're doing new things.
That's while the Department of Defense, the Defense Department is
turning into the Department of War. That's when there's all
kinds of peat exists stuff happening in the news, and
it just looks I would say, the optics of the
administration where that we're changing things around here, and if
(29:04):
you want to get out, here is here's our little
rights offering or.
Speaker 3 (29:10):
Side a loyalty statement just so we know you're down
to clown. This was also coupled with a lot of
cryptic stream of consciousness post and statements by Musk himself.
There was one on uh, want to say, December seventh,
I can't remember exactly which year, but said, we have
(29:33):
to make sure that civilization takes the path most likely
to pass the Fermi Great filters.
Speaker 4 (29:40):
From some sci fi series. Yes, okay, y, yeah, it's
the idea that.
Speaker 3 (29:46):
Civilization the reason humans have yet to meet extra terrestrial
civilizations is because there is a series of predictable nigh
inescapable factors, or filters that prevent those civilizations from expanding
past a certain threshold. Actually, also, Musk said that Doge
(30:09):
had to exist so he could go forward with the
Mars colony. This guy was just like spitballing. He's got
he must have an amazing writer's room. I don't know.
Speaker 4 (30:20):
We also way out to me. Oh by time, he's
also done with Mars. Now he's fine.
Speaker 3 (30:25):
The Moon guy down, the Moon guy, he's a lunatic.
Now that's funny for the etymology mark, Thank you, sir. So.
The current administration said about seventy five thousand employees took
this offer before it closed down, before that time window
collapsed on February twelfth, twenty twenty six. That's roughly four
(30:49):
percent of the federal workforce. Doesn't sound that big, right,
four percent? Maybe not that big in the ratio numbers,
but it's gonna have a serious impact on the day
to day life of people who live in this country.
Speaker 2 (31:07):
Let's talk about the day to day life of federal workers.
Do you remember the thing that came after the Fork
in the Road email. It was the thing about, hey,
every week, we need you to send an email to
the Department of Personnel Management and you need to put
five things you accomplished this week in that email to
justify your job. And they said it was because they
(31:29):
were trying to identify federal workers that didn't exist but
were still on a payroll somewhere.
Speaker 3 (31:34):
So much talk of that.
Speaker 4 (31:35):
Not only that, but in like social Security checks going
to deceased people.
Speaker 3 (31:40):
Which has happened, but just not as often as it's
used to dog whistles. So yeah, the federal employees did
have to write to the Office of Personnel Management OPM
and say like, here, my five good boy things.
Speaker 2 (31:57):
But doesn't it make you think a little bit about
I was just gonna say spies, but people who work
in intelligence that aren't officially listed as let's say, a
member of the FBI or an agent somewhere in the CIA.
But you wanted to have somebody that could function and
travel and go places, you could put them I don't
(32:19):
know in any governmental department, even those if you wanted to,
but just give them a paycheck. They're a part of
that thing. But really they're working for you know somebody.
Speaker 3 (32:28):
I also my immediate question. I'm sure I'm not alone
in this. When you have to list the five things,
could you list responding to the email as one of
those five things that gets you a four.
Speaker 4 (32:39):
We've all had to do employee self evaluations. They're all
they're so silly. You have to just it's such a reach.
Most of the time you even have to couch it
in terms of like things that can be verified or
that can be measured, and it can often seem like
such a such a chore. You know, I am so
on board with you in that one. Uh, maybe I've
(33:01):
been a little bit too fast and loose with some
of that bureaucracy here in.
Speaker 3 (33:06):
Our own corporate empire. Noel Matt Dillon. I started out
a self review not too long ago saying this year
was a wild vibe for a conspiracy show. I think
we are doing good. Yeah, I mean, there's definitely no
shortage of topics.
Speaker 2 (33:28):
Yeah, but it is a weird thing too, especially when
you are kind of tattling on yourself or trying to
be honest about how well you have performed or how
well the thing you're creating performed. That's a weird Oh,
that's a weird thing to do to somebody.
Speaker 3 (33:44):
Let's do it this way. Okay, guys, assuming the world
doesn't burned down by the next time we have to
do those self reviews. Can we in our goals and milestones?
Can we all put complete did this self review as
one of the things.
Speaker 2 (34:02):
I'm not doing it, man, I'm too scared.
Speaker 4 (34:06):
We've even been like, you know, kind of counseled by
our you know, our direct reports on the kind of
ways that you should word these things, you know, in
order to make them quote unquote achievable or measurable. So
all it's such an odd, bureaucratic little device.
Speaker 3 (34:24):
You know, one time I jazzed a little bit too
much and I got a text from our top breast
that just said, come on, man, you.
Speaker 4 (34:32):
Got kicked back.
Speaker 3 (34:34):
Anyway, So we know that labor unions are part of
the federal workforce here, and they fought tooth and nail, hooked,
tentacle and claw to stop these deferred resignation initiatives in
the courts, but in the end all they got was
a brief pause. Basically, they got a time out. They
(34:56):
didn't get the problem solved. And opponents argue that it's
not even guaranteed that the federal employees who did take
deferred resignation are actually going to get their payouts. It's
strangely similar to during the pandemic lockdown, notable US airlines
(35:17):
started offering their employees buyout packages, but they paid immediately
once you signed. That doesn't appear to be the case with.
Speaker 2 (35:26):
DOGE now, at least according to Gosh. There was a
review by NPR that you can find by checking out
All Things Considered, and it was dude, this was completed
in April twenty eighth of last year, twenty twenty five.
Just it's titled what has DOGE done in Trump's First
one hundred Days? So that's just way back then. But
they were immediately in already finding that people were not
(35:48):
actually getting payouts from any of the things that were
happening and the incentives that were being pushed forward. And
then you look at reviews and updates from like November
of twenty twenty five, and it's still seems like some
of that stuff was vaporware.
Speaker 3 (36:03):
Definitely, And I think vaporware is a great word for it,
because you're running out the clock on the headlines, right
on the Zeitgeist on that limited attention span. We don't
have official confirmation yet even in twenty twenty six on
how many workers have been fired or you know, iced,
in total, but the latest figures available are something like
(36:26):
two hundred and twenty thousand federal workers. This is pretty nuts.
I guess you could say there's another there's another win
for Doge, which gets into our conspiracy theory here. If
we're all comfortable eliminating those pesky rats at the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau, what a bunch of buzzkills, what a
(36:50):
bunch of fun police. The CFPB doesn't want you to party,
say the billionaires.
Speaker 2 (36:57):
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau boo. Wait wait wait, I'm a consumer.
I consume things are going to protect my financials.
Speaker 3 (37:07):
As a bureau, I don't know. I think it's a
terrible idea, say the billionaires. This officially comes from a
guy who was in charge of the Office of Management
and Budget, Russell Vaught, back in twenty twenty five. Vough,
(37:28):
in his professional role, instructed ol CFPB employees to stop
performing quote any work task, just a stop doing stuff.
Speaker 2 (37:41):
Everybody, stop stop working, but also get back to the office.
Speaker 3 (37:47):
Right, stop working.
Speaker 4 (37:49):
Get back to the office.
Speaker 3 (37:50):
Make sure you look busy when our bosses dropped by. Yeah,
but otherwise, you know, f you to the fullest.
Speaker 2 (37:57):
We know there aren't enough computers, we know the WiFi
has down for at least two weeks. Just get back
to the office and stop working.
Speaker 3 (38:06):
We have an open door policy, by which we mean
the door is open and you should leave. That is
how they treated the people here. The bureau does have
a weird financial thing. To be fair, It's money comes
from the Federal Reserve, not from a specific congressional decision
(38:28):
or appropriation. But Vought said, also, we're just not going
to fund it. Stop everybody, stop working. We're not going
to fund this thing anymore. And critics immediately, I think
this goes to our larger thesis here. Critics immediately said,
this is not about government efficiency, right. The Consumer Financial
(38:53):
Protection Bureau is an a political good thing for people
who live in the United States. Noted that the CFPV
had a couple of looming investigations into the businesses of
Ela Musk stuff like X, stuff like Tesla, stuff like
a third example.
Speaker 2 (39:13):
Speaking of a third example, I'm trying to figure out,
actually what in the hell they do at the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau. I'm heading over to Consumer Finance dot
gov and it says they aim to make consumer financial
markets work for consumers, responsible providers, and the overall economy.
Speaker 3 (39:34):
Their hound dogs, dude, they they hunt for financial shenanigans.
Oh really, that's their job. Yeah, they're supposed to. They're
supposed to identify institutions or businesses that have defrauded the
average person. So presatory lending practices or RELs fargo maybe.
Speaker 2 (39:58):
Yeah, hidden fees, things like that, but also so private
corporations also as like how what they do to their customers.
I wonder how much they look at contracts and stuff
like that that come down from the government. So, okay,
it feels like a good thing, feels like a really
good thing.
Speaker 3 (40:15):
It is a I think it is a good thing.
They've been persistently Look, this is a relatively new thing,
a relatively new organization I think was twenty eleven maybe,
And ever since the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created,
it has been persecuted by lobbyists in the financial sector, like,
(40:40):
come on, man, why you're stressing me people over get
overdraft fees. That's that's not my bad. Why are you
being weird about it fun police. So it is no
surprise that the CFPB was targeted, probably at the direction
of DOGE. We know that there are some serious issues
(41:03):
of conflict of interest of access. This occurred in step
with the social media platform X formerly Twitter, announcing plans
for a mobile payment service. It's going to be called
an X money account, according to MPR. And I think
we all saw this. If this went through and the
(41:25):
CFPB was still a thing, then it would have had
oversight on how this new digital payment system worked.
Speaker 2 (41:35):
Oh my goodness. Yeah, huh so, okay, we see you.
We see what you're doing here. I'm looking at a
thing on Consumer Finance dot gov from the Council of
Economic Advisors, you guys, and it's doing this thing, Ben,
it's trying to estimate exactly how much the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau is going to cost Americans and how much
(41:57):
it's already cost since twenty eleven. You know. It puts
it up in like the three hundred and fifty billion
dollar range, which you can you can understand why you
could justify that as a target to go after to
reduce spending.
Speaker 3 (42:10):
Right, Yes, of course, if your.
Speaker 2 (42:12):
Goal is to take away some of those safeguards that
the US people have against you know, moves corporations are
going to make, or the government itself.
Speaker 3 (42:21):
All these regulations. Man, it reminds me of years ago.
Some of us in the crowd may be old enough
to remember this. Years ago, there were so many weird
loopholes in the laws of Georgia and regulations. There was,
in fact, an exception for seat belts. You have to
(42:43):
wear a seat belt right if you're in a car
and a vehicle, except for a while in Georgia, you
did not have to wear a seat belt in a
pickup truck because one of the members of our state's
political class had a pickup truck and hated wearing seat belts.
Speaker 4 (43:00):
I thought it was curious that there are no seat
builts on school buses.
Speaker 3 (43:03):
But that I thought about that too. Yeah, that's a
good point. Oh, let's pause for a word from our
sponsor and get to one of the biggest things which
informs our conspiracy. Tonight, we're back the Treasury Department, all right,
(43:26):
The Treasury Department is a conspiracy in itself. Check out
our earlier episodes. Doge gained access to Treasury Department databases
and files. The big question is how individualized that data was,
so like, do they, for instance, have Noel Brown's Social
(43:51):
Security number and all his W two's or what have
you know? All his charitable contributions? Do they know the
spending history of Dylan tennessee pal Fagan. They're very strict
disclosure rules about this kind of stuff. Really, it's like
ken Elon Musk, Now see my tax returns.
Speaker 2 (44:14):
This is tough because we we kind of don't know
right right, and we've gotten mixed signals from news organizations
because a lot of people just weren't talking. There were
some whistleblowers though, that came forward to talk about what
all they were getting access to. And weirdly enough, even
(44:36):
even back in April of last year, the is it
the Oversight Committee? The House Oversight Committee was putting forward
and it is partisan, so it's like the Democratic side
of that committee was putting forward the concept that Doge
had access to way more than we were being told.
I guess we'll get into it. Maybe we'll put the
(44:57):
seed here. This is where that House Oversite Committee is
where you get this concept that there is potentially a
secret list and what would you guys call a data
set of all Americans stuff all of our private information. Yes,
that sounds creepy, but it also sounds like maybe why
(45:19):
this thing was created in the first place.
Speaker 3 (45:21):
Right, Yeah, a bit of a false flag, you know,
it's the the question is is it the wolf of
big data aggregation wearing the sheep's wool of financial conservation convoluted?
But we got there another thing. That another thing that
(45:41):
folks are accusing Doze of. And to your point, Matt,
these accusations are coming from inside the house. These are
other members of the government and the political class, Pauli Malarkey.
So one of the big concerns is that Doge may
have gained access to something that honestly I had never
(46:02):
heard about before. The Integrated Data Retrieval System IDRS. That's
your treasure trove, right, that's your Aladdin's cavern with all
the goodies and the bobbles. So this place I DRS
includes very detailed financial information about every single person who
(46:24):
pays taxes in the United States, every single business, every
single nonprofit again a Laddin's cavern. No one thing should
have all of this information of what's yep.
Speaker 2 (46:37):
And the scariest thing I think about that having access
to that is that we know there were certain employees
within DOGE that were uploading mass quantities of that data
onto services like cloud flare and cloud services that should
not have this sensitive materials on though, no matter how
(46:58):
secure you think they are, the government has very specific,
rigorous security protocols for that kind of sensitive data.
Speaker 4 (47:07):
We would like to think at the very least, I
mean talk about the ultimate data leak, you know, I mean,
this is this would be the big one.
Speaker 3 (47:14):
Also again to that wolf Sheep's wool thing, this had
the petita of updating information technology, of modernizing tech. But
we have to remember, and we've said this before in
previous episodes, there is a series of very valid reasons
(47:39):
that your government has dumb technology for some things.
Speaker 2 (47:44):
It makes so much sense, Ben, can you just tell
us a little more about that, like why, I mean,
I think I understand, but it would be good to
get another understanding.
Speaker 3 (47:53):
Right, Okay, So we are let's say the five of
us you listening along home. Let's say we're all hanging
out and we're in charge of nuclear weapons, and it
takes the five of us to agree whenever we are
going to fire a puppy hug into Iran, Right, or
(48:16):
earlier it's a new missile. We're working on the puppy hug.
So okay, So if technology is modernized, we could agree
on the cloud. Right. The old school stuff means that
you don't touch the Internet in those kind of decisions
you get together in your weird, creepy rooms. You might
(48:36):
have a secure A to B conversation platform of some sort,
but it doesn't touch the Internet, and then all five
of us will say, okay.
Speaker 2 (48:46):
Inserting my key.
Speaker 4 (48:47):
We got to turn key three two one, go crack
the code, read the code to each other, like physically
written down on paper, analog style.
Speaker 3 (48:56):
So I hope that answers the question those That's one
example of why technology is purposely nerved in some parts
of government, and it should be. Unfortunately it has.
Speaker 4 (49:08):
To be same with voting systems. Right.
Speaker 2 (49:11):
It makes so much sense to me when you consider
someone could take an action from any terminal, any you know,
machine that has access to the Internet and then steal
things from a machine that is also like, has access
to the Internet. You can't do it. It could happen.
In this case. When you're describing ben you have to
go to a specific sub basement level four to access
(49:33):
the filing the physical file records where the Social Security
Administration keeps all this stuff, which is not how they
do it. But if it were that way, right, you
could you could put a ton of security on that
building and people aren't getting in and they're definitely not
getting out with mass quantities of you know, physical paper.
Speaker 4 (49:52):
Unless you like uploaded it to cloud flare, right.
Speaker 3 (49:55):
Right exactly, unless you bypass that air gap, you know. Uh,
that's so that's the issue. And Washing Post had some
great reporting on this as well as in PR. They said,
this system allows you to access IRS records, which include
stuff like your Social Security number, stuff like your bank
(50:17):
account information. This was per the administration. This was legally
done and with the appropriate security clearances because we have
to bring efficiency to the FED, and also we want
all of your info. All of your data are belonged
to us. I mean, what me worrying?
Speaker 4 (50:40):
Gosh?
Speaker 3 (50:41):
Man? Yes, sorry, I got back into Mad magazine pretty hard.
Remember that guy.
Speaker 2 (50:49):
The term that NPR used back in April to describe
it as personal dossiers on every American citizen and non
citizen that is within the United State.
Speaker 3 (51:00):
Record, your permanent record. Turns out that old grade school
conspiracy was true, but not in the way we thought.
And but wait, there's more conflicts of interest. Guys, We've
got to talk about this one a little bit. How
do we respond? I don't want to tip the scale, hero,
I want to hear from guys. How do we respond
(51:22):
to the accusations or speculation that Elon Musk could have
been spearheading Doge for ulterior motives?
Speaker 4 (51:32):
No? What, I don't believe it?
Speaker 3 (51:35):
Okay, that says no.
Speaker 2 (51:37):
Look, just because a guy gives two undred ninety million
dollars to some dude to run for president doesn't mean
there's going to be a conflict of interest. Who cares
if he's got government contracts with two count of two
separate private entities that are now all becoming one weird
conglomerate thing called X.
Speaker 3 (51:55):
I think the Fox has some great ideas about henhouse
design and we should listen to them.
Speaker 4 (52:00):
Let's remove the doors, no more chicken wire, open door policy.
Speaker 3 (52:06):
So I mean, yeah, it's got to be a conflict
of interest.
Speaker 4 (52:09):
Right.
Speaker 3 (52:10):
Logically we're not saying this is definitely happening, But logically
it is naive to assume that it is not happening.
Speaker 4 (52:20):
It just seems so utterly clear that it is.
Speaker 3 (52:25):
I mean, you wanta you wanta cut regulations? U. We
see that happening now. It's happening in the automotive industry
quite recently, by the way.
Speaker 4 (52:34):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (52:34):
We see budget cuts, we see targeting of agencies that
have previously investigated elon musk business dealings, rollback.
Speaker 4 (52:44):
Of environmental regulations that directly impact positively, you know, big
energy companies.
Speaker 3 (52:50):
Yeah. You ever walk outside in the forest and you
think this place?
Speaker 2 (52:54):
Yes, I wish I wish about a dozen technogarks would
come out here, that's all. And I don't know tech,
but did I wish they come out here really beautify
this place and make it more efficient?
Speaker 4 (53:05):
Plopped some data centers on these redwoods?
Speaker 3 (53:08):
And thanks for the beet, Dylan. Sorry, I got a
little irritated with this word.
Speaker 4 (53:12):
Yeah, you're you're right.
Speaker 3 (53:14):
Guys like walk into a forest and then say, what
if you had to subscribe to each of these trees?
Speaker 4 (53:23):
That's great? But no, I mean, we let's think about it.
Speaker 2 (53:26):
Let's go quickly just on data centers and weird stuff
going on. I can't remember what episode it was I
mentioned that I'm seeing some weird stuff going on with
detention centers out where I am. Guys, about thirteen miles
from I am, there is another warehouse really close to
where I live that has been vacant for about a
year and looks like it was at least sold or
(53:48):
least to someone. But I went to the assessor's office,
I can't find any information about it. I'm genuinely interested
in this, and I'm trying to do the you know,
the correct avenues to find stuff. Yeah, it's another one
of these million square foot warehouses. I'm serious, million square
foot warehouses that is just empty. But they're changing the
outside of it right now, and it sure looks like
(54:11):
it could be used as either a data center or one.
Speaker 3 (54:14):
Of these detention centers.
Speaker 4 (54:15):
Okay, it's like right down the road for me.
Speaker 2 (54:19):
It's freaking out.
Speaker 3 (54:21):
Let's go, let's go visit. I don't know if they
can't stop us from like being on a public.
Speaker 2 (54:28):
Road, we could just be British. Oh yeah, like a tool.
Speaker 3 (54:34):
Like sure, come on in, just end every sentence, within't it. Yeah,
they've got a big warehouse, isn't it. So there's a
lot of stuff happening. There are a lot of legal
actions being taken against dose. So many what. I don't
know how far we want to get into this, but
there was a class action lawsuit filed in February of
(54:57):
last year, twenty twenty five, almost exactly a year ago today.
The lawsuit said, Hey, these Doge boys, big Balls, Musk
and so on, they improperly accessed personal data, financial data
from federal databases and they didn't have any legal reasoning.
(55:17):
They didn't have a green light. There are more privacy
and data security lawsuits, constitutional challenges, allegations of violating the
Federal Advisory Committee Act FACA. We are drowning in acronyms today. Guys.
I hate how the government does this. Why is there
(55:37):
an initialism for everything?
Speaker 4 (55:41):
Efficiency? Efficiency?
Speaker 2 (55:43):
Yeah, but it's also just to make the whole thing
seem so complicated. We were looking at that initial order
that was put forward by the Trump administration establishing and
implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency, And if you
just look through that pretty simple like two pager on
(56:04):
this new thing called Doge, but you look at the
way there's so many acronyms in there. There's so many
things that are being talked about, and then the way
they're being talked about, it just feels confusing, and it's
such legal speak, you know. I think so often that occurs,
so that it just becomes boring and you tune out.
(56:26):
Ben you've said that before on purpose, like it's meant
to make you tune out.
Speaker 3 (56:30):
Yes, yeah, you are meant to be bored. You are
meant to stop doing difficult reading about numbers and acronyms
and so on, and go over to your dopamine casino right.
Speaker 4 (56:45):
Needle in the haystack. Effect of all of it, like
not to mention the Epstein files, I mean so many
things that you're just have all this data dumped on
you where maybe there's something of interest or of value
hidden in there, but unless you are really, really, really diligent,
they never gonna find it, and you will likely just
get bored and give up.
Speaker 2 (57:02):
Some of the Epstein files. Of course, you add a
little a couple buckets of trauma and you know horrific
details in there, which further makes it you want to
look away even more.
Speaker 3 (57:13):
Mmmm. Yeah, that's a great point. I've got. I've got
a question, uh for us all have you guys been
to Fort Knox yet?
Speaker 4 (57:21):
I have not.
Speaker 2 (57:23):
Oh, it's been on a list before, and I was
near there, but I never got to go in.
Speaker 3 (57:26):
Ben I didn't. Well, it depends on what we mean
by in, but.
Speaker 2 (57:32):
I wanted to get in.
Speaker 3 (57:34):
Oh, I get in Baby, Let me.
Speaker 4 (57:37):
Bond movie A knock.
Speaker 3 (57:41):
Well, there's this longstanding conspiracy theory in the United States
that you'll find in any number of uh folklore branches
right of conspiracy, which is that Fort Knox doesn't actually
have any gold in the vault, and that it is
just a tall tale that Uncle Sam has told other
(58:01):
countries so that it looks more wealthy than it is.
Speaker 2 (58:07):
Yeah, so we can hide all the alien bodies there. Duh.
Speaker 4 (58:10):
Right.
Speaker 3 (58:11):
It's so weird that in step of the birth of Doge,
Musk brought up this conspiracy theory. Who was replying to
a post from a senator named Mike Lee out of Utah,
and Senator Lee said, I was I'm a senator. I
was not able to enter Fort Knox. Why are they
denying access? Musk loved this, and he said, who's confirming
(58:35):
the gold wasn't stolen from Fort Knox? Maybe it's there,
Maybe it's not. That gold is owned by the American public.
We want to know if it's still there. So on
top of all the other things. This guy just added
the Fort Knox conspiracy.
Speaker 2 (58:50):
Dude, isn't funny? I think, yes, we'll go check for you,
mister Musk. The weirdest thing is this all, this thing,
this doge concept is pulling away the facade that presidents
and senators used to always talk about. You know, you
wouldn't say anything bad about Fort Knox and the gold
(59:13):
supply on purpose because we have to pretend. We all
have to pretend or this whole thing falls apart. The
US is extremely wealthy, and yeah, a ton of it's
in Fort Knox and it's great. And also we don't
spend too much money. We make so much money, it's incredible.
But then you look at how some of these things,
these pillars are just being yanked away. It just makes
(59:35):
you wonder why.
Speaker 3 (59:36):
It does make one wonder. Also side note, just to
be objective, folks, you cannot visit the vaults at Fort Knox.
You can go on the base depending on your circumstances.
You can walk around depending on your circumstances, but you
cannot go it. It's kind of like the It's kind
(59:57):
of like that church in Ethiopia that apparently houses the
arc of the Covenant. You can walk around it, you
could talk to people outside all the livelong day, but
you cannot enter. I don't know. It's strange because we
have a billion, perhaps a trillion dollar question here what
(01:00:20):
happens next answer is, we don't know, but we do know.
They're very disturbing signals from the halls of power. There
is clear internal descent which should not be occurring in
the way it's occurring now. It seems like a heist.
It seems like Doge is a heist. It seems like
it's kind of not very well thought out organized crime,
(01:00:45):
right like Hamstring. The coppers who are coming to get
me also give me leverage for future stuff and swindle
the American people think about the consequences later. I don't know.
Speaker 2 (01:01:00):
Zabarra, I agree. There might be something even more insidious
here in a connection to the Department of Homeland Security
coming out of this NPR article, I'm just gonna read
these two sentences. The access Doge had is also being
used to further the administration's immigration policies. The Department of
(01:01:22):
Homeland Security announced last week that Doge helped overhaul an
immigration database to serve as a quote single reliable source
for verifying non citizen status nationwide.
Speaker 3 (01:01:34):
Yeah right, So if.
Speaker 2 (01:01:37):
You get access to all that that information that not
one group is supposed to have access to all of it,
then you can decide who is okay and who is
not okay according to the administration.
Speaker 3 (01:01:51):
Yes.
Speaker 2 (01:01:52):
The other weird thing to me is that DOGE only
had until July fourth this year, twenty twenty six to
a comp all of its goals, but already in November
of last year, twenty twenty five, they've already seemed to
have dissolved, as though dose doesn't actually exist anymore, at
least according to Reuter's.
Speaker 4 (01:02:13):
Well, let's mission accomplished though, Man, Yeah, you know.
Speaker 2 (01:02:16):
But so that mission was save you know, one hundred
and fifty to two hundred billion dollars in operating costs
and then make these lists.
Speaker 4 (01:02:27):
That was, well, we were told the mission was, but
I do not believe that was in fact the actual mission.
Speaker 3 (01:02:32):
I agree with you, Noel. The part of the mission
was to appear to be doing those good faith things right,
but the real mission again seems to be on the
level of not super well thought out organized crime. The
heist doesn't need to continue after you leave the bank,
(01:02:55):
you know what I mean. For instance, if we are
bank robbers and we dress in cool costumes, what's a costume?
Somebody give me at.
Speaker 4 (01:03:05):
A stripey you burglar outfit and that's that bag man
right there.
Speaker 3 (01:03:11):
All right, So we've got we've got our outfits on.
We rob the bank, we get away. We're probably not
going to wear those costumes for the rest of our lives.
The heist is over, you know what I mean. It's
on to the next score unless.
Speaker 4 (01:03:25):
You build a back door to the bank and that
allows you to continue to heist over the time, right,
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (01:03:34):
I mean, Look, there's so much more to explore here, folks.
We cannot wait to hear your thoughts. Thank you so
much for tuning in. Tell us what is the stuff
they don't want you to know about Doge and what
happens next? Please find us on the lines, give us
a call on a phone, or shoot us an email
in the dark.
Speaker 4 (01:03:54):
If you are on the lines, you can find us
at the handle Conspiracy Stuff or Conspiracy Stuff Show, depending
on your social media platform of choice. And there's more, Yes,
there is.
Speaker 2 (01:04:03):
We have a phone number. It is one eight three
three STD WYTK. Turn those letters into numbers, call them
with your phone. You're gonna hear Ben's voice, and then
you've got a voicemail system three minutes. You have give
yourself a cool nickname and let us know if we
can use your name and message on one of our
listener mail episodes that show up in the audio feed,
So you have to go find it, not on Netflix.
(01:04:25):
If you want to send us an email, you can
do that too.
Speaker 3 (01:04:27):
We are the entities that read each piece of correspondence
we receive. Be well aware, yet's unafraid. Sometimes the void
writes back. Hit us up with a random fact, get
one in return. We'll see you out there in the dark.
Conspiracy at iHeartRadio dot com.
Speaker 2 (01:05:01):
Stuff they Don't Want You to Know is a production
of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Stuff They Don't Want You To Know News
Hosts And Creators
Matt Frederick
Ben Bowlin
Noel Brown
Show Links
RSSStoreAboutLive ShowsPopular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Betrayal Season 5
Saskia Inwood woke up one morning, knowing her life would never be the same. The night before, she learned the unimaginable – that the husband she knew in the light of day was a different person after dark. This season unpacks Saskia’s discovery of her husband’s secret life and her fight to bring him to justice. Along the way, we expose a crime that is just coming to light. This is also a story about the myth of the “perfect victim:” who gets believed, who gets doubted, and why. We follow Saskia as she works to reclaim her body, her voice, and her life. If you would like to reach out to the Betrayal Team, email us at betrayalpod@gmail.com. Follow us on Instagram @betrayalpod and @glasspodcasts. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations, and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience, and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack.