Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Now here's a highlight from coast to coast AM on
iHeartRadio and.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Welcome back George Dory along with Dan and Wegginten and
your calls this hour. Dan, if we were to stop
climate engineering immediately, just stop it, why do you think
would happen?
Speaker 3 (00:17):
Well, certainly needs to stop so the planet has a
chance to respond to the damage already done. But at
this point, so much of that damage can't be undone.
It would be a bit like George Dummot and Louise
deciding they need to put it instead of brakes in
their car after they've gone through the guard rail and
are sailing to the bottom of the canyon. But that
being set again, it needs to stop. It must stop.
If it's allowed to continue, our odds are far beyond bleak.
(00:42):
And I want to make clear that again, whatever the motive,
whatever the agenda, climate engineering is inseparable from the now
completely unprecedented wildfire infernos, from the cutting off of moisture
from the entire western US. Or do you know that
this was the lowest snow year ever recorded in the
(01:04):
entire Western US?
Speaker 2 (01:05):
Right, I had heard that, and I also hear the
Himalayas are in bad shape.
Speaker 3 (01:11):
You're exact took the words out of my mouth. Brother.
Lowest year in Himalaya is also many Americans don't know that.
Kudos to you. But and again, in whatever the agendas
are being played out where the objectives, climate engineering is
absolutely inseparable from all of this, and we're being lied
to it at so many levels. And as you know
that the Lake Meat and Lake Powell crisis in the
(01:32):
southwestern right, you know, they're both almost at deadpool. You've
probably heard that, right.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
Mm hmm.
Speaker 3 (01:39):
So it's worse than that, and we're not being told
about that. So deadpool for those that don't know, that
means those reservoirs no longer function, nothing can flow over
the top of the dam. And we're told that that's
about twenty five percent. Lake Pale's already twenty three percent.
What we're not being told is those basins are heavily set.
(02:00):
In fact, George behind Hoover Dam and Lake Mead, largest
reservoir in the US largest dam, there's about one hundred
and ten feet of sediment, which means that's not water,
it's dirt. So the actual water content in those reservoirs
is about half or being told, and the major reservoir
in that region has already been pumped so low they've
(02:22):
pumped a volume of water larger than lake meat out
of it. We have forty million people in the Southwest
about to go high and dry, and people aren't addressing
this issue. We warned about this for the record of
June's You watched that Org George about a decade and
a half ago. And George, here's a final little caveat.
Did you know that Las Vegas has a billion and
a half dollar drain plug they built into the bottom
(02:43):
of Lake Mead? Literally did you know that?
Speaker 2 (02:45):
I did not know that.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
No, I want your listeners to look this up. This
is not a secret. It's not speculation. You can find
I found it first on the US Geological Survey data
in their maps. This is not a secret. It was
a billion and a half dollar Somehow somebody knew twenty
five years in advance that this was coming. There is
literally what amounts to a drain hole in the bottom
(03:08):
of Lake Meads, so that even when water can't flow
out of the damn Vegas can pump the last drops
out of that basin. If that doesn't show a lot
of things, including desperation and somebody knowing this was coming.
I don't know what does, but I challenge your listeners
to please research every single thing. I state, it's rock solid.
Speaker 2 (03:26):
What's going on with the Colorado River these days?
Speaker 3 (03:31):
Well again, it's drying up. And even that record low
snowpack that fell, much of that was chemically nucleated. And George,
you know a chemically nucleated material that sublimates completely as
dry ice, right, you know dry ice, as your listeners
know what that is. There's no runoff. It transitions sublimation
(03:51):
and transitions from a solid to a gas. There's no liquid.
When you have a chemically nucleated material like they're doing
over the western US and all the rest of the world.
Much of that moisture, that snowpack, what little there was, sublimate,
so there's even less runoff. So again, there's there's zero question, Georgie,
(04:12):
if we had the US military so successful the controlling
precipitation in the sixties, does any rational person really think
that if they wanted to help, they couldn't. And the
exact opposite is happening. They're doing to US citizens exactly
what they've done to Iran, cutting off precipitation. And I'm
(04:34):
not saying our military brothers and sisters that are participating
and realize what they're doing. They don't. Just like the
pilots in Vietnam, they're spraying agent orange on their comrades,
didn't really realize what they were doing. But they need
to wake the hell up, and they need to do
so soon. But the US citizens in many parts of
the country are being treated exactly the same as what's
been done to Iran for four plus decades. And that's
(04:54):
a matter of record that they've spoken on the four
of you in Iranian presidents that their precipitation was being
cut off to to stabilize their populations. That's happening countries
all over the globe, by the way, So there's so
much historical data. I wouldn't you know. It would take hours.
But Americans should wake up, look up, and start connecting
puzzle pieces because we're late in the game.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
Go to the phones. Let's go to Garyton, Tacoma, Washington.
Welcome to the show. How close are you to the
fires out there?
Speaker 3 (05:21):
Garrett?
Speaker 2 (05:22):
Quite a way.
Speaker 4 (05:23):
It's four hundred miles that there's two big fires, one
in Lane and one in Spokane, and I'm getting reports
from friends that live there. They're calling in the California
Palisades fire people to oversee what they're doing. But we
(05:43):
know the Palisades and the Hawaii fire. You know, there's
a lot of discrepancies and what actually is.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
Going on there.
Speaker 4 (05:53):
But just praying for those folks. The winds have been
high the last couple of days, so you know, it
calms down at night, but you know it's supposed to
get hotter the next few days. But you know, I
got thirty four questions and three comments. I'm joking. But anyway,
(06:15):
So Dane, I've been wanting to call you for a
couple of years. But remember the Hurricane Helena, which was
a stupid name for hurricane. The devastation that did it
was really awkward. But I actually got on monkey Works
and then the weather, one of the weather websites I have,
and I watched the one that was heading towards Florida.
(06:38):
It was down on the north coast of Yucatan and
it took like a hard left, I mean like right
angle left turn and then it went to Florida and
I was blown away. And then shortly after we had
the bombed cyclone up that come up the Pacific on
(06:59):
the west coast, and it had the lowest barometric pressure
ever recorded for a storm. And my thought, we know
that nature of pours a vacuum, and that we know
that water will find the lowest point, same as weather,
same as same as water. The low pressure, you know,
(07:20):
will draw draw in, and then the high pressure comes in,
you know, fills up the low pressure. But I think
that because they manipulated those two hurricanes, it put a
differential in the high pressure on the East coast and
they needed to balance it out, so they created the
(07:42):
cyclone to draw the pressure back to the west coast.
Am I crazy? Or am I not? I don't know.
Speaker 3 (07:51):
We like to stick to data. We can back up
a gelandre and watch it, or so let me stay
on a Hurricane Helene. We recorded it, Garrett, We recorded
the manipulation of that storm. We recorded Hurricane Harvey. George
and Garrett, you both remember that somehow the so called
weather expertsknew seven days in advance where Harvey was going
to go, and that was going to sit there for
(08:12):
days and precipitate fifty inches of rain. How would they
know seven days in advance? Unless they were reading the script,
and that's exactly what they were doing. We know raytheon
un Lockey Martin do all the weather modeling for the
nation's weatherman National Weather Service, and Noah, why in the
world would our national weather personnel need private defense contractors
to do their weather modeling. Because the narrative needs to match.
(08:34):
The foxes are running the hen house, and that's that's
what's passed down. So in the case of Harvey, we
recorded that also. Your listeners, George can go take in
search Junjery and watch that are hurricanes. We recorded Helene
Ian Harvey, and we recorded the frequency transmissions and I'm
very surprised we still have access to these data loops.
But the frequency transmissions that actually steer the storm, the
(08:58):
frequency transmissions have a repelling effect on an air mass
that's saturated with electriclyconductive particles. You can see it in
real time. The interaction of the transmissions with the storms.
The spawning of the storm is a separate subject completely.
The ignition of the wildfires separate subject completely. But what
is manipulating these systems or what is setting the template
(09:19):
for these wildfires? Climate engineering is absolutely inseparable from all
of it agendas and objectives against separate subject. These storms
are being steered period. These are patented processes period. In
the American public simply too many of them still don't
want to know the truth.
Speaker 2 (09:36):
Who is the genius who came up with all this?
Speaker 3 (09:38):
Dame, Oh, there are many, George, there are many. This
is this is not a single process. I mean we
have we have people, for example, blaming Bill Gates for things,
and these processes were going on before he was even born.
We have patents going back over one hundred years. We
have when people claim it's condensation. We have patented biplane
(10:00):
pumps dispersions nineteen twenty three, flying information on film on
the record dispersing this type of aerosol trail. And that's
why it looks so much like what you see in
an airshow, because that's an aerosol trail at an airshow.
When they're painting this guy and doing what they do,
those are aerosols. So again, too many people believe whatever
(10:20):
they heard from so and so and you know and
some other person, and they don't do any research themselves.
We're asking them to actually research. We have a mountain
of data. Jamesor and watch dot org this is an
immediate existential threat. And to put that into context, George
and Garrett, do you guys both feel how intense the
sun feels on your face and surfaces when you get
(10:41):
an understructed shot of it, do you feel that, Oh, sure,
we're getting UVC on the surface. That is a DNA
damaging spectrum of v radiation. We're not guessing. We had
probably the world's foremost expert. He's just passed away, but
he worked for us with metering equipment. We supplied him
into five figures and we're getting far into the short
(11:03):
wavelength radiation. It's UVC. It's burning the bark off of trees,
it's killing plankton, it's killing insects, it's crushing crops. People
have no idea how great this isn't in George and Garrett,
you guys know that was all blamed on hairspray cans, right.
Speaker 2 (11:17):
Remember that it was crazy.
Speaker 3 (11:19):
Hey, that's literally focusing on the ant and not the elephant.
And the elephant is geoengineering, and all available climate science
says if they geoengineer, it will decimate the ozone layer,
and they have and it has.
Speaker 2 (11:33):
And Dane, what about people who are coming down with
all these respiratory ailments.
Speaker 3 (11:38):
Well, how could they not? So when we have all
official air quality testing testing for generally PM ten ten microns,
very occasionally PM two point five. And that's what you're
the most about because it's so harmful. No metering for,
let alone disclosing nanoparticles, which are by far the most
harmful of all of any element. And now we're talking
(11:59):
about to talking about not just toxic elements, but synergistically
toxic elements like aluminum, mercury, manganese, surfactants, polymer fibers, graphene.
So there's no metering for any of that, let alone
disclosing it. And we're talking about, based on hundreds of
lab tests working with the University of Minnesota, forty to
(12:20):
sixty million tons of highly toxic, highly inflammatory nanoparticles dumped
into our sky's annually. That's on top of all other
forms of pollution. And we know garretts and stripped by
the fires and George, you remember the Paradise fire. Right,
We filmed blanket geoengineering aerosol spraying operations being conducted directly
(12:44):
above that smoke canopy. What's that about? They're spraying above
the smoke canopies. Whatever that is it damn sure isn't benevolent.
So again, there's some very nefarious things going on here.
And whatever other problems we face, whatever other concerns we have,
we cannot hide from this one. We have to breathe.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
Let's go to Dan Virginia d take it away.
Speaker 5 (13:07):
Well, Hi, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 4 (13:10):
Sure, I've got two.
Speaker 5 (13:11):
Questions for you. This is a fascinating discussing tonight. I
am learning the truth in math dosis. Thank you very
much for it. I'd like to know two things. There's
a lot of just constant pressure when you go outside
on a sunny day, apply sun's green, apply suns green,
(13:32):
on and on and then for years it's been you know, recycle, recycle, recycle,
a lot of times, there's going to be innocent sounding
reasons that are that are thrown around on a regular
basis of people watch onto because they do sound exactly
that perfectly innocent. But is there something nefarious behind both
(13:55):
of those things?
Speaker 3 (13:59):
Well, again, telling people they can bought UVC with sunscreen
is a ly and that's why we have so much
skin cancer and melanona's now. And on the recycling, we
know that in many cases, something like five percent of
materials brought in are actually recycled. So again, it's a
lot of smoke and mirrors, a lot of feeding of
(14:19):
normalcy bias to keep the population comatased at the wheel
until the moment of impact. So again, when people stop
paying attention to their own senses, that the sun feels
like it's burning your skin down deep in very limited exposure,
that's because it is. And even the uv B spectrum,
(14:39):
we're told ninety five percent of incoming uv radiation's UVA,
five percent UVB, no UVC below UVC. You have X ray.
We all know how dangerous that is. So we're getting
in some cases ten times more UVB than we're being told.
And we're now into UVC again, which is DNA damaging spectrum.
And George and do you you guys, we both know
(15:00):
how important plankton is, right, Plankton is the single greatest
oxygen producer on the planet. This intense UVC is also
killing plankton. We have recent period of study from the
Atlantic five hundred locations plankton has crashed ninety percent decline.
No plankton, no people, Because there's a lot of causes.
I'm not blaming everything on Climbateager. I want to make
(15:21):
that clear. We've trashed this planet from a million directions.
But what's not being disclosed with the air quality is
the nanoparticles, which is a mountain of the most toxic
particles not being disclosed. The UV spectrum radiation is not
being disclosed, and it is not just killing forests and crops,
it's killing plankton, the primary pillars of the planet's life
support systems.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
Dane, do they know what they're doing? Are they bubbling
their way through all this?
Speaker 3 (15:46):
Well, that's exactly what they're doing, George. They're we're talking
about a planet that's run by mad men, literally madmen.
There's been psychoanalysis of those in power. They have common
forms of mental scenarios, and they're right from the psychoanalysis
manuals this that there's a near total lack of comprehension
(16:11):
as to the consequences of their actions, even to themselves. George,
does an addict care that the next fix might kill them? Power?
Addiction is the greatest of all That's what we have. So, George,
you've probably heard people say, well, they wouldn't do this
to themselves, so it can't be true. Right, have you
heard that?
Speaker 1 (16:29):
Listen to more Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at
one am Eastern, and go to Coast to coastam dot
com for more