April 12, 2026 • 19 mins
The Manhattan DA’s office has opened a criminal investigation into the allegations made by Congressman Eric Swalwell’s former staff member who claims Swalwell raped her in a New York City hotel room in 2024. The young woman made several allegations against the leading Democratic candidate for California Governor that spanned several years along with 3 other women who made allegations of sexual harassment against Swalwell. Meantime, Swalwell’s senior staffers put out a joint statement distancing themselves from their boss, saying they stand with his accusers.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Hey, that folks. It is Sunday, April twelfth, and a
huge political story is now becoming possibly a criminal one.
Congressman Eric Swalwell, one of the leading candidates for governor
of California, facing allegations of rape, and now a district
attorney is asking possibly for more victims to come forward.
(00:25):
And with that, welcome to this episode of Amy and TJ.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
Robes.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
There is now a criminal investigation into an allegation we
are just hearing about of the sexual assault and rape
of a former staff member Robes not just looking into
that matter, but looking into other matters.
Speaker 2 (00:41):
Yes, this has become it was, at least in the beginning,
a political nightmare for Eric Swalwell, but this could now become, yes,
a question of whether or not he becomes criminally charged
in this matter, and as you point out, potentially other
possible incidents, and so, yes.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Is that there's something they put out? I was surprised
to see. Do they know something we don't know? Is
this just standard?
Speaker 2 (01:06):
Fair? And I don't know if this is standard, but
it definitely stood out to a lot of folks. So
we can actually read for you exactly what the Manhattan
District Attorney's office put out They put this out on Saturday,
and they urged survivors and anyone with knowledge of these
allegations to contact our Special Victim's Division, gave the number there.
Our specially trained prosecutors, investigators and counselors are well equipped
(01:30):
to help you in a trauma informed, survivor's centered manner.
Speaker 3 (01:35):
Wow, that I have not looked this.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
You point out might be standard operating procedure, but this seems.
Speaker 3 (01:43):
Like they know something that there it.
Speaker 1 (01:45):
Is that was a suggestion there that maybe they I
don't know, maybe that's just the standard language they use.
But again, we're talking about a congressman from the Bay
Area who was running for governor of California. So reminder, Robes,
why the hell is Manhattan looking into the guy, because
this is where this incident allegedly took place.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
Yes, the former staffer who basically set this story in
motion by speaking first to the San Francisco Chronicle and
then to CNN, she has said that she was raped
by Eric Swallwell in a Manhattan hotel room in twenty
twenty four, and that is why charges are being considered
(02:22):
against the congressman in New York.
Speaker 1 (02:25):
And he's been quiet so far this weekend. He told
us what on Friday, when the video and all this
came out, he was going to spend time with friends
and family over the weekend. So we're standing by and waiting.
I guess, I guess what everybody's waiting for is for
him to say he's getting out of the race.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Yes, But when reporters pressed his attorney on this, this
attorney said, he's busy running a gubernatorial campaign.
Speaker 3 (02:44):
That was their response, at.
Speaker 2 (02:46):
Least as official as it gets, because that is what.
Speaker 3 (02:48):
His attorney said, Did you have a rally this weekend?
It probably wasn't the right tone given everything that's going on.
Speaker 1 (02:54):
It's not that's too dismissive the seriousness of what we're
talking about now.
Speaker 3 (02:57):
Busy running a campaign.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
He didn't brush up against somebody at a bar. He's
being accused of a violent assault. That's not and he's
too busy with just fromround me of you know, I
shouldn't use that comparison, but that, come on, man, that
tone is not right.
Speaker 3 (03:10):
It's not right. It certainly isn't.
Speaker 2 (03:12):
And look, these stories are mounting, and and look, perhaps
the Manhattan DA knows something. There are videos circulating, there
are audio tapes being circulated. None of them have been authenticated,
but certainly there's bubbling, right. There are people who have things,
who've seen things, who've recorded things, and they're now starting
(03:33):
to be put out on social media unverified, But certainly
there's enough other.
Speaker 3 (03:40):
Just noise that's percolating.
Speaker 2 (03:42):
Now.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
Some of that noise. We need to be clear here.
Some of this other noise we're talking about is not
criminal noise. This is stuff about bad behavior and a
boy behaving badly, if you will, and it's unfortunately we
use that sometimes boys behaving badly. But some of the
stuff that's out there is just trying to show him
as being.
Speaker 3 (03:56):
A alomanizer who cheese on his wife.
Speaker 1 (03:59):
And what's the way use a smirmy smarty Oh well
he's smarmy.
Speaker 2 (04:03):
Smarmy, that's marmie. Yes, that that's just sleazy smarmy stuff.
Is what's being circulated.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
That's what they're trying to highlight there, at least bud Robe.
There is a separator and all the stuff we have
been talking about with him, and that is this young
woman who worked on his staff back in twenty starting
in twenty nineteen, Robes. Her allegations are something else. This
isn't just a little a playboy.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
He likes to.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
Drink and likes to cheat on his wife and run
around and find young No, no, no, no, no, we are
she is describing. And we discussed this robes in writing
and putting in headlines, and we worked in the industry
a long time, and sometimes they like to put sexual
assault in the headline. Sometimes. The even we've been in
television news and big networks, big shows don't like the
(04:47):
word rape, like to use sexual assault. Robes there is
It's significant to make the damn distinction because rape is
a very specific suggestion and alex gation that goes beyond
you can grab somebody's butt and call that a sexual assault.
This is an allegation of rape, and that distinction needs
(05:08):
to continually be made here.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
Yes, because this former staffer describes nothing short of rape.
Speaker 3 (05:15):
When she talks about that night.
Speaker 2 (05:16):
Now, she says she doesn't remember most of the night
and the way she put it to CNN. She says
she remembers flashes where Swalwell was on top of her
and wouldn't get off. She says she remembers trying to
push him off. She remembers telling him no and he continued,
So that is a rape, she describes.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
It, But she isn't she describing She doesn't remember everything,
but she says she remembers enough and the stuff she's recalling, right,
isn't she specifically saying I remember saying no, I remember
trying to.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
Bite this guy off me and the other points around
this specific incident that this former staffer describes. And CNN
corroborated this, as did the San Francisco Chronicle, but they
said two family members and a friend, so free people
said that that this woman told them about the alleged
assault within the days surrounding it. And they also said
(06:07):
that they have a text message where she sent to
two friends, I was sexually assaulted on Thursday by Eric.
So at the time the alleged incident occurred, she told people,
and she specifically named her accuser. She also gave these
news outlets medical records detailing her getting an STD test,
(06:28):
a pregnancy test, and she claimed she had bruises and
she was bleeding.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
So she describes a fairly violent assault.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
Yeah, and then there was twenty four statute of limitations
is not an issue right now, right, so they could
go So, yes, we're talking about a guy who was
what a month away for finding out possibly if he
is going to be Yeah, they're going to start voting
in about a month out in California, the leg right, Yeah,
and then the election is June's second, and then he
(06:58):
possibly was on his way to becoming the next governor
of California. We talked about eight he might get charged,
criminally charged with something. Now, this is a stunning.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
Look.
Speaker 1 (07:09):
We talk about downfalls and all this stuff and politics
and ropes from that to that. In a matter of
seventy two hours. This all happened on Friday.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
It's remarkable.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
Also stunning in all of this was the joint statement
that members of his own staff, the senior staff members,
came together from his congressional office and from his gubernatorial
campaign and they released a statement that, frankly is telling
(07:42):
and I don't know how else to put it.
Speaker 3 (07:44):
We can read it for you in its entirety. Just
take a listen. As leaders of teams working for Eric.
Speaker 2 (07:49):
Swalwell, we're horrified by the recent reporting in the San
Francisco Chronicle and by CNN. We stand with our former
colleague and the other women who have come forward. We
believe you should stand with them too. The behavior detailed
in these reports is abhorrent, beneath the dignity of those
serving in public office, and betrays the trust of all Californians.
(08:11):
We also understand that we lead teams who need guidance
and stability. Now more than ever, we are focused on
supporting our colleagues during this challenging time. Any decision of
staff members to remain in their roles in the interim
should not be viewed as support for Eric Swolwell. We
recognize that not everyone, in particular our junior staff, can
(08:31):
immediately forfeit their income and benefits without significant personal risk
or consequence. Our responsibility now is to them. We, more
than he, understand that we have obligations to the people
we lead and to the constituents of California's fourteenth Congressional District.
Those of us that remain on staff do so for
(08:51):
the sole purpose of ensuring that as many of those
obligations are fulfilled as possible.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
Ouch now WO I applaud and I would like to
hire whoever wrote that statement. It was perfectly said. They
are actually and I'm sure they're not necessarily working with
him that much. He's out in California. Maybe they're back
in DC. Who knows how this is going down, But
they're saying to their constituents, you're our constituents, even though
the guy you voted for might have let you down,
(09:19):
we're actually in this office working for you. I think
that was the perfect way to say it. I think
I'm not even upset with them for in the midst
of all this madness, and what's most important was a
possible criminal charge that yeah, there's a reality here and
we have jobs.
Speaker 3 (09:35):
Yeah, and I.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Hadn't thought about all the people who spent tireless hours
working for him, and this is their livelihood, this is
their income. Now all of that not only is at
risk in jeopardy, but also their reputations of just being
associated with him, And so they're basically making a very
clear separation from him and saying just because we work
in his office doesn't mean we support them.
Speaker 1 (09:57):
It's well done. I thought it was really well done.
And then you know what, it's maybe reassuring to the
people in that district as well. He's not currently work.
You could even argue he hasn't been focused on the
district because he's trying to become governor. Of California. Okay,
I loved how they put all of this. We are
actually working for the district, we have a responsibility.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
We got you.
Speaker 3 (10:19):
That makes a lot of sense.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
And look, they have seen where everything is you said
in seventy two hours. That really is stunning thinking about
this was just two days ago. But pretty much damn well,
every single person in politics has not only distanced themselves
from him, but calling for him to obviously end his
gubernatorial campaign, which he doesn't show any signs of doing,
(10:42):
by the way. And look we didn't even reference, of course,
on Friday, we should point out very specifically, he did
a video to camera and completely rejected and denied all
of these allegations, saying, these allegations of sexual assault are
flat false.
Speaker 3 (10:57):
They're absolutely false.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
They did not happen, and they have never happened, and
I will fight them with everything that I have.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
And we ain't heard from him since though, because a
lot more has come out, a lot more detail has
come out, and Robes, there.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
Is not a.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
You say that you said he's losing support. I haven't
even heard a measured response or statement from somebody just
saying give it a beat, let's investigate it's all get
out now. We want nothing to do with you. I
haven't even heard just a hey, let's give it some time, we.
Speaker 3 (11:30):
Need to look into this. And Nope, not you know
what that's so telling.
Speaker 2 (11:35):
Usually there's someone who says, let's wait for police to
do their job, for the investigation to go forward before
we make any rushes to judgment. No one is even
asking folks for a time or caution or just a
little perspective.
Speaker 3 (11:49):
Nothing. It's all bye bye, bye bye.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
And it's not just about his race for governor. No, no, no,
when we come back, we will tell you about what
may happen to his congressional position. And welcome back everyone
(12:12):
to this episode of Amy and TJ. Yes, we have
been talking about four days now, the political fallout for
California Congressman Eric Swollwell, who is the leading Democratic candidate
for governor of California. That election begins, or at least
voting begins in less than a month now. Of course,
(12:35):
growing calls for him to drop out of the gubernatorial race.
But there is a criminal investigation now, the Manhattan District
Attorney's Office launching that investigation into that claim of rape.
Young woman says a former staffer of his says it
happened in a New York City hotel room in twenty
twenty four, and so as we're hearing for folks to
say drop out of the race, he is also a
(12:58):
US congressman, and Congress has been on spring break Easter
break for the last two weeks. They reconvene on Monday, correct,
and we already have at least one congress woman.
Speaker 3 (13:10):
Her name is Anna Paulina Luna. She's from Florida.
Speaker 2 (13:13):
She is a Republican, and she put out on X
over the weekend. As soon as she gets back, the
first thing she's going to do is file a motion
to expel Swallowell from Congress.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
I mean, okay, we'll see how far this goes at
some butt. Right now, it's fresh on everybody's mind. It's horrific.
In the headlines, people are talking about it, so frankly,
other politicians want to make sure with those headlines they
get separated from this guy. Understood. They are really hesitant
to kick out one of their own in Congress.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
I know, we initially heard some folks are going to
bring censure. There are different ways to punish lawmakers, but yes,
to actually expel a lawmaker from Congress.
Speaker 3 (13:55):
That is as serious as it gets.
Speaker 1 (13:57):
And I know in the hit I can't remember the
last one, and then the history, it's got to be
a single digits. It's got to be on one hand
the number of times this just happened in Robes. I
kind of I really do understand that, because you don't
want to overturn the will of the voters. They put
this guy in. This is their guy. If they got
a problem with him, let them vote them out. We
shouldn't do it on their behalf.
Speaker 3 (14:16):
All right.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
Well, according to the Internet six members only six members
of the US House of Representatives and one Senator have
ever been expelled in US history. The most recent was
I forgot about this, George Santos from New York in
twenty twenty three for fraud and campaign finances. This recent, yes,
and then James traffickan from Ohio Democrat in two thousand
(14:41):
and two for corruption. Michael Myers, well that's a name.
A Democrat in Pennsylvania in nineteen eighty for bribery.
Speaker 1 (14:48):
Okay, Well, these after post convictions that I'm not sure
traffic can't for whatever reason I think, was.
Speaker 3 (14:55):
Corruption, fraud and campaign.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
Finally, it's rare because what happens then Robes, It's like, oops,
they are they going to come after me for any
little thing I do? You don't want to do that?
Speaker 3 (15:04):
And Robes.
Speaker 1 (15:05):
How many members of Congress do we know of right
now are facing something pretty serious or.
Speaker 3 (15:10):
Have done something similar. Let's just be honest, but.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
We got a handful. We talk about the numbers in Congress. Okay,
let's play this. What did they do last time? Redistricting
Texas wants to do it now? California do it now?
In another state? Trying to balance it out? Okay, you
want to kick out one of our Democrats. You know what,
there's a poorly behaving Republican over here. So now you're
going to start messing with the numbers to kick each
other out to balance your numbers. Robes, that's going to
(15:36):
be a tough hill to climb. But it's also going
to be difficult right now to be in Congress in
a mid term election year and said, yeah, a guy
accused a rape and I voted to keep him in Congress.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
Yeah, you can't sit on the sidelines, and you don't
want to be on the wrong side of things. That
is certainly true record, Dave, I had not even thought of.
Of course, the balance of the House is more important
than any one congressman and any one young former staff
who claimed she was raped by him. That's just the
truth of the matter, as sad as it is.
Speaker 1 (16:04):
What was the President talking about not long ago one
guy was Member Cony's was really really ill and that
he was only given this horrible diagnosis and they thought
he might die, and the President stepped in, we don't
need him to die because I need his vote.
Speaker 3 (16:15):
You remember that, say that was recent, This was in
the last few weeks.
Speaker 1 (16:18):
Yes, so that's what I'm saying, Ropes, It's not so
sure they gonna kick one of the people.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
Out, by the way, when we were talking about just
well and to your point about how important the balance
of Congress is and why for that reason alone, probably
we don't see expulsions of congressmen and women.
Speaker 3 (16:33):
Do you know for the I said there were six,
you had to go back.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
To eighteen sixty one for the other three members because
they were expelled for supporting the Confederacy. That's how I
just for perspective, that rises to the level that is
where we are, and that's how high of a bar.
Sometimes things have to be said. And how far we
had to go back to see a single digit number
of congressmen and women face expulsion.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
But we wait to hear from him when we're going
to hear it. He is not just running a campaign
at all right now. He's finding a defense attorney right now.
He is managing his family, the immediate one in the house,
but he is managing in laws, He's managing grandparents, He's
managing aunts and uncles and everybody else. He's managing his kids,
school teachers, all of these people are impacted now by
(17:23):
what's going on. He is not running for California governor
right now.
Speaker 3 (17:27):
You know, you don't think about it.
Speaker 2 (17:30):
It's so interesting you put that because you think about
him being political and him thinking about his business, and
imagine him as a husband, a father, a son in law.
All of those things are happening, and those I'm sure
have become suddenly way more important than any.
Speaker 3 (17:49):
Political career he thought he had.
Speaker 2 (17:51):
That is, there's a human element to this that you
know is going on behind the scenes. But obviously this
story is far far from over. Congress back in tomorrow
that will be a telling time. Will he even be
in DC at that point, will he even come back?
You're looking at me like, hell, now, how is.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
You going to show his face right now in the
halls of Congress. You can't do that. He's going to
be sitting at a table alone in the lunch room.
I mean, what is he supposed to do it he
comes back, He's got other things to handle right now.
And Robes in the midst of all this, and this
conversation we're having is always robes that he said, she said,
these about the balance of power, about men behaving badly,
(18:30):
and about alcohol. Rose, there's a different conversation. And we know,
as you're listening here, there's a conversation you're probably having
at home or maybe with your friends, with your girlfriends
in particular, and maybe some people are having with their daughters. Robes.
That's a very difficult conversation that you and I were
very much interested in getting into.
Speaker 2 (18:48):
Yes, and so please, as we wrap up this episode,
look for our next one, because we are going to
be talking about this issue of he said, she said,
and and how we feel about it, how the law
may be changing around it, and yes, what we're telling
our daughters. So look for that. But In the meantime,
(19:09):
thank you for listening to us. We always appreciate you.
I'm made roboch alongside TJ.
Speaker 3 (19:13):
Holmes. We will talk to you very soon.
Hey, that folks. It is Sunday, April twelfth, and a
huge political story is now becoming possibly a criminal one.
Congressman Eric Swalwell, one of the leading candidates for governor
of California, facing allegations of rape, and now a district
attorney is asking possibly for more victims to come forward.
(00:25):
And with that, welcome to this episode of Amy and TJ.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
Robes.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
There is now a criminal investigation into an allegation we
are just hearing about of the sexual assault and rape
of a former staff member Robes not just looking into
that matter, but looking into other matters.
Speaker 2 (00:41):
Yes, this has become it was, at least in the beginning,
a political nightmare for Eric Swalwell, but this could now become, yes,
a question of whether or not he becomes criminally charged
in this matter, and as you point out, potentially other
possible incidents, and so, yes.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Is that there's something they put out? I was surprised
to see. Do they know something we don't know? Is
this just standard?
Speaker 2 (01:06):
Fair? And I don't know if this is standard, but
it definitely stood out to a lot of folks. So
we can actually read for you exactly what the Manhattan
District Attorney's office put out They put this out on Saturday,
and they urged survivors and anyone with knowledge of these
allegations to contact our Special Victim's Division, gave the number there.
Our specially trained prosecutors, investigators and counselors are well equipped
(01:30):
to help you in a trauma informed, survivor's centered manner.
Speaker 3 (01:35):
Wow, that I have not looked this.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
You point out might be standard operating procedure, but this seems.
Speaker 3 (01:43):
Like they know something that there it.
Speaker 1 (01:45):
Is that was a suggestion there that maybe they I
don't know, maybe that's just the standard language they use.
But again, we're talking about a congressman from the Bay
Area who was running for governor of California. So reminder, Robes,
why the hell is Manhattan looking into the guy, because
this is where this incident allegedly took place.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
Yes, the former staffer who basically set this story in
motion by speaking first to the San Francisco Chronicle and
then to CNN, she has said that she was raped
by Eric Swallwell in a Manhattan hotel room in twenty
twenty four, and that is why charges are being considered
(02:22):
against the congressman in New York.
Speaker 1 (02:25):
And he's been quiet so far this weekend. He told
us what on Friday, when the video and all this
came out, he was going to spend time with friends
and family over the weekend. So we're standing by and waiting.
I guess, I guess what everybody's waiting for is for
him to say he's getting out of the race.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Yes, But when reporters pressed his attorney on this, this
attorney said, he's busy running a gubernatorial campaign.
Speaker 3 (02:44):
That was their response, at.
Speaker 2 (02:46):
Least as official as it gets, because that is what.
Speaker 3 (02:48):
His attorney said, Did you have a rally this weekend?
It probably wasn't the right tone given everything that's going on.
Speaker 1 (02:54):
It's not that's too dismissive the seriousness of what we're
talking about now.
Speaker 3 (02:57):
Busy running a campaign.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
He didn't brush up against somebody at a bar. He's
being accused of a violent assault. That's not and he's
too busy with just fromround me of you know, I
shouldn't use that comparison, but that, come on, man, that
tone is not right.
Speaker 3 (03:10):
It's not right. It certainly isn't.
Speaker 2 (03:12):
And look, these stories are mounting, and and look, perhaps
the Manhattan DA knows something. There are videos circulating, there
are audio tapes being circulated. None of them have been authenticated,
but certainly there's bubbling, right. There are people who have things,
who've seen things, who've recorded things, and they're now starting
(03:33):
to be put out on social media unverified, But certainly
there's enough other.
Speaker 3 (03:40):
Just noise that's percolating.
Speaker 2 (03:42):
Now.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
Some of that noise. We need to be clear here.
Some of this other noise we're talking about is not
criminal noise. This is stuff about bad behavior and a
boy behaving badly, if you will, and it's unfortunately we
use that sometimes boys behaving badly. But some of the
stuff that's out there is just trying to show him
as being.
Speaker 3 (03:56):
A alomanizer who cheese on his wife.
Speaker 1 (03:59):
And what's the way use a smirmy smarty Oh well
he's smarmy.
Speaker 2 (04:03):
Smarmy, that's marmie. Yes, that that's just sleazy smarmy stuff.
Is what's being circulated.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
That's what they're trying to highlight there, at least bud Robe.
There is a separator and all the stuff we have
been talking about with him, and that is this young
woman who worked on his staff back in twenty starting
in twenty nineteen, Robes. Her allegations are something else. This
isn't just a little a playboy.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
He likes to.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
Drink and likes to cheat on his wife and run
around and find young No, no, no, no, no, we are
she is describing. And we discussed this robes in writing
and putting in headlines, and we worked in the industry
a long time, and sometimes they like to put sexual
assault in the headline. Sometimes. The even we've been in
television news and big networks, big shows don't like the
(04:47):
word rape, like to use sexual assault. Robes there is
It's significant to make the damn distinction because rape is
a very specific suggestion and alex gation that goes beyond
you can grab somebody's butt and call that a sexual assault.
This is an allegation of rape, and that distinction needs
(05:08):
to continually be made here.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
Yes, because this former staffer describes nothing short of rape.
Speaker 3 (05:15):
When she talks about that night.
Speaker 2 (05:16):
Now, she says she doesn't remember most of the night
and the way she put it to CNN. She says
she remembers flashes where Swalwell was on top of her
and wouldn't get off. She says she remembers trying to
push him off. She remembers telling him no and he continued,
So that is a rape, she describes.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
It, But she isn't she describing She doesn't remember everything,
but she says she remembers enough and the stuff she's recalling, right,
isn't she specifically saying I remember saying no, I remember
trying to.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
Bite this guy off me and the other points around
this specific incident that this former staffer describes. And CNN
corroborated this, as did the San Francisco Chronicle, but they
said two family members and a friend, so free people
said that that this woman told them about the alleged
assault within the days surrounding it. And they also said
(06:07):
that they have a text message where she sent to
two friends, I was sexually assaulted on Thursday by Eric.
So at the time the alleged incident occurred, she told people,
and she specifically named her accuser. She also gave these
news outlets medical records detailing her getting an STD test,
(06:28):
a pregnancy test, and she claimed she had bruises and
she was bleeding.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
So she describes a fairly violent assault.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
Yeah, and then there was twenty four statute of limitations
is not an issue right now, right, so they could
go So, yes, we're talking about a guy who was
what a month away for finding out possibly if he
is going to be Yeah, they're going to start voting
in about a month out in California, the leg right, Yeah,
and then the election is June's second, and then he
(06:58):
possibly was on his way to becoming the next governor
of California. We talked about eight he might get charged,
criminally charged with something. Now, this is a stunning.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
Look.
Speaker 1 (07:09):
We talk about downfalls and all this stuff and politics
and ropes from that to that. In a matter of
seventy two hours. This all happened on Friday.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
It's remarkable.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
Also stunning in all of this was the joint statement
that members of his own staff, the senior staff members,
came together from his congressional office and from his gubernatorial
campaign and they released a statement that, frankly is telling
(07:42):
and I don't know how else to put it.
Speaker 3 (07:44):
We can read it for you in its entirety. Just
take a listen. As leaders of teams working for Eric.
Speaker 2 (07:49):
Swalwell, we're horrified by the recent reporting in the San
Francisco Chronicle and by CNN. We stand with our former
colleague and the other women who have come forward. We
believe you should stand with them too. The behavior detailed
in these reports is abhorrent, beneath the dignity of those
serving in public office, and betrays the trust of all Californians.
(08:11):
We also understand that we lead teams who need guidance
and stability. Now more than ever, we are focused on
supporting our colleagues during this challenging time. Any decision of
staff members to remain in their roles in the interim
should not be viewed as support for Eric Swolwell. We
recognize that not everyone, in particular our junior staff, can
(08:31):
immediately forfeit their income and benefits without significant personal risk
or consequence. Our responsibility now is to them. We, more
than he, understand that we have obligations to the people
we lead and to the constituents of California's fourteenth Congressional District.
Those of us that remain on staff do so for
(08:51):
the sole purpose of ensuring that as many of those
obligations are fulfilled as possible.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
Ouch now WO I applaud and I would like to
hire whoever wrote that statement. It was perfectly said. They
are actually and I'm sure they're not necessarily working with
him that much. He's out in California. Maybe they're back
in DC. Who knows how this is going down, But
they're saying to their constituents, you're our constituents, even though
the guy you voted for might have let you down,
(09:19):
we're actually in this office working for you. I think
that was the perfect way to say it. I think
I'm not even upset with them for in the midst
of all this madness, and what's most important was a
possible criminal charge that yeah, there's a reality here and
we have jobs.
Speaker 3 (09:35):
Yeah, and I.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Hadn't thought about all the people who spent tireless hours
working for him, and this is their livelihood, this is
their income. Now all of that not only is at
risk in jeopardy, but also their reputations of just being
associated with him, And so they're basically making a very
clear separation from him and saying just because we work
in his office doesn't mean we support them.
Speaker 1 (09:57):
It's well done. I thought it was really well done.
And then you know what, it's maybe reassuring to the
people in that district as well. He's not currently work.
You could even argue he hasn't been focused on the
district because he's trying to become governor. Of California. Okay,
I loved how they put all of this. We are
actually working for the district, we have a responsibility.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
We got you.
Speaker 3 (10:19):
That makes a lot of sense.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
And look, they have seen where everything is you said
in seventy two hours. That really is stunning thinking about
this was just two days ago. But pretty much damn well,
every single person in politics has not only distanced themselves
from him, but calling for him to obviously end his
gubernatorial campaign, which he doesn't show any signs of doing,
(10:42):
by the way. And look we didn't even reference, of course,
on Friday, we should point out very specifically, he did
a video to camera and completely rejected and denied all
of these allegations, saying, these allegations of sexual assault are
flat false.
Speaker 3 (10:57):
They're absolutely false.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
They did not happen, and they have never happened, and
I will fight them with everything that I have.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
And we ain't heard from him since though, because a
lot more has come out, a lot more detail has
come out, and Robes, there.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
Is not a.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
You say that you said he's losing support. I haven't
even heard a measured response or statement from somebody just
saying give it a beat, let's investigate it's all get
out now. We want nothing to do with you. I
haven't even heard just a hey, let's give it some time, we.
Speaker 3 (11:30):
Need to look into this. And Nope, not you know
what that's so telling.
Speaker 2 (11:35):
Usually there's someone who says, let's wait for police to
do their job, for the investigation to go forward before
we make any rushes to judgment. No one is even
asking folks for a time or caution or just a
little perspective.
Speaker 3 (11:49):
Nothing. It's all bye bye, bye bye.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
And it's not just about his race for governor. No, no, no,
when we come back, we will tell you about what
may happen to his congressional position. And welcome back everyone
(12:12):
to this episode of Amy and TJ. Yes, we have
been talking about four days now, the political fallout for
California Congressman Eric Swollwell, who is the leading Democratic candidate
for governor of California. That election begins, or at least
voting begins in less than a month now. Of course,
(12:35):
growing calls for him to drop out of the gubernatorial race.
But there is a criminal investigation now, the Manhattan District
Attorney's Office launching that investigation into that claim of rape.
Young woman says a former staffer of his says it
happened in a New York City hotel room in twenty
twenty four, and so as we're hearing for folks to
say drop out of the race, he is also a
(12:58):
US congressman, and Congress has been on spring break Easter
break for the last two weeks. They reconvene on Monday, correct,
and we already have at least one congress woman.
Speaker 3 (13:10):
Her name is Anna Paulina Luna. She's from Florida.
Speaker 2 (13:13):
She is a Republican, and she put out on X
over the weekend. As soon as she gets back, the
first thing she's going to do is file a motion
to expel Swallowell from Congress.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
I mean, okay, we'll see how far this goes at
some butt. Right now, it's fresh on everybody's mind. It's horrific.
In the headlines, people are talking about it, so frankly,
other politicians want to make sure with those headlines they
get separated from this guy. Understood. They are really hesitant
to kick out one of their own in Congress.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
I know, we initially heard some folks are going to
bring censure. There are different ways to punish lawmakers, but yes,
to actually expel a lawmaker from Congress.
Speaker 3 (13:55):
That is as serious as it gets.
Speaker 1 (13:57):
And I know in the hit I can't remember the
last one, and then the history, it's got to be
a single digits. It's got to be on one hand
the number of times this just happened in Robes. I
kind of I really do understand that, because you don't
want to overturn the will of the voters. They put
this guy in. This is their guy. If they got
a problem with him, let them vote them out. We
shouldn't do it on their behalf.
Speaker 3 (14:16):
All right.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
Well, according to the Internet six members only six members
of the US House of Representatives and one Senator have
ever been expelled in US history. The most recent was
I forgot about this, George Santos from New York in
twenty twenty three for fraud and campaign finances. This recent, yes,
and then James traffickan from Ohio Democrat in two thousand
(14:41):
and two for corruption. Michael Myers, well that's a name.
A Democrat in Pennsylvania in nineteen eighty for bribery.
Speaker 1 (14:48):
Okay, Well, these after post convictions that I'm not sure
traffic can't for whatever reason I think, was.
Speaker 3 (14:55):
Corruption, fraud and campaign.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
Finally, it's rare because what happens then Robes, It's like, oops,
they are they going to come after me for any
little thing I do? You don't want to do that?
Speaker 3 (15:04):
And Robes.
Speaker 1 (15:05):
How many members of Congress do we know of right
now are facing something pretty serious or.
Speaker 3 (15:10):
Have done something similar. Let's just be honest, but.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
We got a handful. We talk about the numbers in Congress. Okay,
let's play this. What did they do last time? Redistricting
Texas wants to do it now? California do it now?
In another state? Trying to balance it out? Okay, you
want to kick out one of our Democrats. You know what,
there's a poorly behaving Republican over here. So now you're
going to start messing with the numbers to kick each
other out to balance your numbers. Robes, that's going to
(15:36):
be a tough hill to climb. But it's also going
to be difficult right now to be in Congress in
a mid term election year and said, yeah, a guy
accused a rape and I voted to keep him in Congress.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
Yeah, you can't sit on the sidelines, and you don't
want to be on the wrong side of things. That
is certainly true record, Dave, I had not even thought of.
Of course, the balance of the House is more important
than any one congressman and any one young former staff
who claimed she was raped by him. That's just the
truth of the matter, as sad as it is.
Speaker 1 (16:04):
What was the President talking about not long ago one
guy was Member Cony's was really really ill and that
he was only given this horrible diagnosis and they thought
he might die, and the President stepped in, we don't
need him to die because I need his vote.
Speaker 3 (16:15):
You remember that, say that was recent, This was in
the last few weeks.
Speaker 1 (16:18):
Yes, so that's what I'm saying, Ropes, It's not so
sure they gonna kick one of the people.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
Out, by the way, when we were talking about just
well and to your point about how important the balance
of Congress is and why for that reason alone, probably
we don't see expulsions of congressmen and women.
Speaker 3 (16:33):
Do you know for the I said there were six,
you had to go back.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
To eighteen sixty one for the other three members because
they were expelled for supporting the Confederacy. That's how I
just for perspective, that rises to the level that is
where we are, and that's how high of a bar.
Sometimes things have to be said. And how far we
had to go back to see a single digit number
of congressmen and women face expulsion.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
But we wait to hear from him when we're going
to hear it. He is not just running a campaign
at all right now. He's finding a defense attorney right now.
He is managing his family, the immediate one in the house,
but he is managing in laws, He's managing grandparents, He's
managing aunts and uncles and everybody else. He's managing his kids,
school teachers, all of these people are impacted now by
(17:23):
what's going on. He is not running for California governor
right now.
Speaker 3 (17:27):
You know, you don't think about it.
Speaker 2 (17:30):
It's so interesting you put that because you think about
him being political and him thinking about his business, and
imagine him as a husband, a father, a son in law.
All of those things are happening, and those I'm sure
have become suddenly way more important than any.
Speaker 3 (17:49):
Political career he thought he had.
Speaker 2 (17:51):
That is, there's a human element to this that you
know is going on behind the scenes. But obviously this
story is far far from over. Congress back in tomorrow
that will be a telling time. Will he even be
in DC at that point, will he even come back?
You're looking at me like, hell, now, how is.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
You going to show his face right now in the
halls of Congress. You can't do that. He's going to
be sitting at a table alone in the lunch room.
I mean, what is he supposed to do it he
comes back, He's got other things to handle right now.
And Robes in the midst of all this, and this
conversation we're having is always robes that he said, she said,
these about the balance of power, about men behaving badly,
(18:30):
and about alcohol. Rose, there's a different conversation. And we know,
as you're listening here, there's a conversation you're probably having
at home or maybe with your friends, with your girlfriends
in particular, and maybe some people are having with their daughters. Robes.
That's a very difficult conversation that you and I were
very much interested in getting into.
Speaker 2 (18:48):
Yes, and so please, as we wrap up this episode,
look for our next one, because we are going to
be talking about this issue of he said, she said,
and and how we feel about it, how the law
may be changing around it, and yes, what we're telling
our daughters. So look for that. But In the meantime,
(19:09):
thank you for listening to us. We always appreciate you.
I'm made roboch alongside TJ.
Speaker 3 (19:13):
Holmes. We will talk to you very soon.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by Audiochuck Media Company.