January 21, 2026 • 32 mins
What's the skinny on why we lose our hair? Is it genetic or avoidable? Or do we need to comb over society's stigma about it? Jorge gets to the hairy truth.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Hey, welcome to Sign Stuff, a production of iHeartRadio Horhea
Cham and today we are tackling the science of baldness.
Going bald is something that happens to a lot of people.
But why do we go bald? Who goes bald? And
why does it affect us so much? I'm going to
be reviewing the most current theories about the origins of baldness,
(00:22):
and I'm going to talk to a couple of experts
on two related questions. Why is there a negative stigma
about baldness and is baldness really hereditary? In both cases,
I think the answer will surprise you, so comb over
with us as we uncover the hairy truth about the
science of baldness. Enjoy. Hey, everyone, here are some interesting
(00:50):
facts about baldness. According to a recent paper in the
prestigious journal Nature Reviews, about fifty percent of men and
twenty five percent of women experience some form of balding
or hair loss by the time they're fifty years old.
This translates to roughly fifty million men and about thirty
million women in the US alone. It also varies a
(01:14):
lot with ancestry or race. If you're of South Asian descent,
like from India or Pakistan, your chances of losing hair
by the time you're fifty jumps to fifty eight percent,
whereas if you're of East Asian descent, like from China
or Korea, the number drops to twenty five percent. It
also depends a lot on your age. For example, if
(01:37):
you're of East Asian descent, your chances of losing hair
in your twenties is small, only about two point three percent.
In your thirty s it's four percent. In your forties
it's eleven percent, although way up to forty seven percent
by the time you reach seventy. There are several types
of baldness for men and women. If names like M
(01:58):
one or C two, or YOU three or type three,
depending on the pattern of hair loss that you get,
whether it starts in your forehead or the corners or
the top of your scalp. Now, when I started this episode,
I wanted to answer the question why do we go bald?
But I quickly found out the answer is, we don't know.
(02:21):
From an evolutionary perspective, we don't know why this is
involved in humans. It's sort of related to your age.
So evolutionary biologists have proposed theories with that in mind.
For example, one theory says that it may be assigned
to the rest of your tribe that you're older and
therefore more mature and wiser, and therefore you should have
(02:43):
a position of dominance or leadership. But there are also
theories that say that it's as signed to others that
you're old and therefore not very good material. Both theories
but explain why baldness helps your species survive. We also
don't quite know why baldness happens at the level of
(03:04):
hair follicles. We know that when people experience androgenetic alopecia,
which is the scientific name for male and female pattern
hair loss, the hair follicles in your scalp shrink and
become the kind of follicles that cover the non hairy
parts of your body, But we don't really know why
this happens. Our current best theory is that it's kind
(03:24):
of the opposite of when young men start to grow
a beard during puberty. At some point, your hair follicles
are just preprogrammed to be more sensitive to your hormones
and change from one kind of hair to another. So
when you're a teenager, the hairs on your armpits pubic
areas and your chin and upper lip for men, turn
into the kind of thick and hairy kind of hair,
(03:47):
and at some point, when you get older the hair
is on your head do the opposite and turn into
the thin, wispy kind. There are hormones that scientists think
are involved, like testosterone or diehydrotest ptosterone or DHT, and
enzymes that contribute to this, like five alpha reductase type
one and two. We can see that these molecules are
(04:09):
more active involving hair follicles, but what sets this process
in motion for what is actually happening at the cellular
and molecular level is not quite clear. Now, there are
some cool things we do know about the genetics of baldness.
I'll get to that later in the program with a
scientist who's done one of the largest ever genetic population
(04:32):
studies on baldness. But first, there was one section in
this Nature Journal paper that caught my attention, and that
is a section about how baldness impacts your quality of life.
The scientists right, quote androgenetic alopecia can trigger profound negative
psychological effects in affected individuals, owing to social pressure to
(04:55):
maintain quote good hair end quote. In other words, the
only negative effective bondness are psychological. So to get to
the bottom of this, I reached out to a psychologist
who's made it his mission to debunk this negative stigma
that bondness has in our society and to teach people
(05:16):
that bondness, no pun intended, is all in our heads. Well,
thank you, doctor Jenkowski for joining us pleasure. Can you
please tell us who you are and what do you do?
Speaker 2 (05:28):
Yes, I'm doctor Glennankovski. I am a associate professor University
College Dublin, and I'm a researcher in psychology who specializes
in the social and cultural interpretation of alopecia.
Speaker 1 (05:42):
And is that the term we should be using for
bondness or are ukay we say bondness or.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Yeah, I'm much more for a further term, boldness as well.
I tend to use alopecia in the Ireland because my
accent and a lot of Irish people think I'm saying
bravery rather than boldness.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
Is that true?
Speaker 2 (06:00):
Yeah? I say boldness like being bold. Oh, I see,
and it's happened so many times now an island that
I really I've switched a bit.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
Well, there might be another interesting topic for you to
research boldness. Yeah, and whether it's related to baldness.
Speaker 3 (06:15):
Yes, but you've done a lot.
Speaker 1 (06:16):
Of research on this stigma against baldness. Can you tell
us what that stigma is?
Speaker 2 (06:21):
So there is a tendency for people to have attitudes
that are stigmatizing towards men and their boldness in particular.
Typically there's experimental studies that show that people hold more
negative attitudes towards men with boldness than they do men
with full heads of hair.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
Okay, can you describe these studies a little bit.
Speaker 2 (06:41):
It is actually a large evidence space. So the majority
of studies actually tend to be experiments where a group
of people are divided randomly into two conditions and presented
images of the same man airbrushed, typically with a full
head of hair, and then with some boldness. And so
it's that say, mimbiture of the man, same facial features, etc.
(07:03):
And they are asked to rate the image of the
man on certain characteristics like how masculine, how successful, etcetera.
Speaker 1 (07:10):
And there's a bias towards certain attributes there.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
Is, Yeah, and those tend to be that those men
are less attractive, older, that they may be less dominant
and some other negative characteristics.
Speaker 1 (07:25):
So there is a negative bias that people have about
bald men. But here's the thing about those studies. According
to doctor Jenkowski, A, people also have a positive bias
towards bald men in some categories, and b these negative
and positive biases are not that big.
Speaker 2 (07:45):
The re such does show that, and I don't mean
to minimize it. However, I do question how totalizing that
stigma is because there are also some positive attributes that
people make about bold men, like that they're more inclined
to be leaders, or that they're more affablen approachable than
haired men. And then sometimes these differences are also quite small.
(08:05):
People can exaggerate how bigly are, especially journalists or businesses,
but actually if you look at their data, they're quite small.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
New characterized how small they are.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
Yeah. So one study found that out of a scale
of one hundred of attractiveness, bold men were seven percent
less attractive than their head counterpouts and rated on average
about two years older than the head counterpart images. So
two years older, seven cent less out of one hundred.
(08:35):
It's not a huge amount.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
No, it's not. I would have thought it was higher,
but that seems are most negligible.
Speaker 2 (08:42):
I would have thought that too if I wasn't a
researcher studying this. Most people think this too, because most
of us are influenced by advertising and marketing of anti
bold products.
Speaker 1 (08:54):
And this brings up the question where does this negative
stigma against bog people, or at least the impression that
is a big negative stigma against boldners come from. And
here doctor Tinkowski has a s pricing theory.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
It really does come from anti boldness businesses. They are
the ones who profit from this stigma. And we've had
a long history of it, and it's ramped up since
the nineteen eighties when anti bold products for the first
time in history, got more official approval.
Speaker 1 (09:26):
Wow, so you're looking it to the business of selling
anti partners treatments. It's sort of a timing issue.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
Well, we've always had boldness since men have been around.
But what we can see in the historical record is
that there were many neutral interpretations of boldness. There were
some negative and there were also some very positive interpretations.
When we see the rise of snake oil products in
the eighteen hundreds and the nineteen hundreds, some of them
were for hairy growth. Of course, they weren't effective, but
(09:57):
their marketing was designed to show that old men needed
these products, needed these treatments for this devastagencies, and if
they didn't take it, they might not get a job,
they might not get a date, they might not be happy.
When they became approved in the eighties and onwards, that
gave them scientific legitimacy these products so that doctors and
(10:18):
professionals could start to say, these are treatments I see.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Whereas before you might tell your doctor, oh, I think
I'm losing my hair, and the doctor might be like, yeah,
it's normal, no big deal, nothing's going to happen to you.
Now they might be like, oh, there's a treatment for that.
Speaker 2 (10:31):
Exactly. Those pharmaceutical companies have done training videos, they've done
training programs, They've targeted medical professionals and doctors to convince
them that bolding men and bolding people in general need
these treatments.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
Now, it's hard to say how much of a role
the pharmaceutical and Bontner's treatment industries have had in creating
this negative stigma against baldness. As I mentioned, there are
theories that tie it to our evolutionary history, but it's
also hard to discount. For example, remember the Nature Journal
paper I've been citing. That paper was written by nine scientists,
(11:07):
all of whom have positions at major universities, but at
the end of the paper, the journal requires them to
disclose any conflicts of interest. So here's the list of
those conflicts of interest for that paper. Authors one two
are inventors on patent applications related to hair loss treatment
filed by the University of California, Irvine. Author two is
(11:28):
co founder and chief scientific officer at a corporation and
has received consultation fees from Audit Labs and lorel Author
three has received consultation fees from DS Laboratories, Almirale, thirty Madison,
Eli Lilly and Company, Peiser, Iovan Sciences, Bristol Meyers, quibb
Ortho Dermatologics, and Sun Pharmaceutical. Author four has received consultation
(11:50):
fees from Eli Lilly and Company, peiser Olaplex, and Maovn Sciences,
and they direct the Ethnic Skin program at John Hoppins University,
funded by an educational brand from Jansen. Author five has
received salary payments from Life and Brain GNBH. Author six
has received clinical trial funds from Eli Lilly, and company.
Author seven has received consultation frees from Eli Lillyan Company
(12:13):
and has received clinical study funds from Eli Lillien Company, Pfizer,
and ATB. Authors eight and nine declare no competing interests. Yeah,
that's a lot of conflicts of interest.
Speaker 3 (12:27):
All right.
Speaker 1 (12:27):
When we come back, we're gonna talk about whether the
treatments all these companies are pushing actually work. Do they
stop baldness or is it all snake oil. Stay with us,
we'll be right back. Welcome back. We're talking about the
(12:58):
size of baldness, and so we've talked about what we
know and don't know about what causes baldness. Now we're
going to talk about the treatments that are out there
for hair loss. In terms of medicines, there's one called monoxidyl,
which was originally made to treat hypertension, but then women
patients started reporting extra hair growth and so it became
(13:19):
a baldanis medicine that you put on the scalp. Scientists
have some ideas about what this medicine actually does, but
not really. Another class of treatments are five alpha reductase inhibitors,
which includes the popular drug called finasteride. Scientists know these
treatments block the enzyme that splits the stosterone called five
(13:40):
alpha reductas, but they don't know much beyond that. Now,
do these treatments actually work a sort of, according to
doctor Jenkowski.
Speaker 2 (13:53):
So there are metro analyzes. These are series of studies
that look at large pools of data of menking these
products versus men who don't take these products, and they're
more objective. So these matronalyses have looked many anti baldness
products and what they've found is that most produced between
eight to twelve hair follow calls in a centimeter squared
(14:15):
area of scalp that's monitored, and that's some hairy growth.
It's not nothing, but on average most people have one
hundred and twenty hair follow calls and that's centimeter squared
area of regrowth.
Speaker 1 (14:28):
What doctor Jenkowski seeing is that these treatments do help
you grow back on average about eight to ten percent
of the hair you lose, which is not nothing, but
it's also not a lot.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
So most people do not find that to be a
cosmetically meaningful amount of hair regrowth. I see these products
might be better at preventing further boldness. It's a bit hard
to determine that, but in terms of actual hair regrowth
is quite minimal.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
And of course you have to weigh that against the
potential side effects of these treatments.
Speaker 2 (15:02):
And obviously the bigger issues which the Metro analyses to
show as well, is that some of these products do
risk quite severe side of x. You know, if you're
taking finasteride, for example, this is a common antibodleness product.
Typically it's taken orally and it disrupts your hormonal system,
that's how it's working. But there's evidence so it's affecting
(15:23):
all sorts of other things that are really important to
your bodily functions, like your mood. Men who've taken a
finanasteroid of reported vision problems, reported mood issues, sexual dysfunction issues,
these hosts of side effects.
Speaker 1 (15:37):
For finasteride fills. The US Food and Drug Administration or FDA,
has issued a warning that there is a risk of
depression in suicide ideation when using this drug, and according
to the Nature paper, there's also a risk of impotence
after you start taking the drug.
Speaker 2 (15:57):
And what's really difficult for men taking finasteride is you
don't which kind of man you're going to be. The
one that's going to be negatively somewhat permanently affected by
these side effects, or the ones that might have safe
experience of it.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
Wow, in which case, maybe it's not worth it for
those extra eight twelve pollicles exactly. There's also the possibility
of hair transplants, which is where they take follicles from
one part of your scalp and implant them in the
areas where you're losing hair. This treatment is expensive and
(16:29):
it's not for everyone. It sort of only works for
thinning hair, not full hair loss. So now my question
was is this all worth it? What's really the impact
that baldness has in people's lives? Is there any data
as to how baldness affects you in life, or in
(16:49):
your profession or in your social life?
Speaker 2 (16:52):
There is, yeah, Bolting men are surveyed about discrimination romantically
and employment socially. What's difficult is that most of these
studies are commercially funded and biased, and some of the
studies are very very poor, So it might just be
a market research a series of questions that are really leading,
that are kind of pishing men to suggest they're discriminated
(17:12):
against when they're not. Those surveys do show that some
men report some discrimination and many men do not report any.
A really important study by Goslin and colleagues in their
eighties asked bolding men and haired men what they expected
boldness discrimination to be, and then what the actual reality
of old discrimination was, and in all cases the reality
(17:35):
was much easier than bold men and haired men predict it.
So I think those are really useful to put it
into perspective for bolding men. We get told that there's
huge amounts of discrimination, but actually the reality is that
really it's quite rare.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
What effect do you think this negative stigma and this commercialization,
what does it have on men and people who might
be dealing with boldness.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
You know, there's a word called medicalization, and it's this
term for how normal aspects of our bodies are often
changed into diseases, sometimes for commercial profit, and it really
changes how we respond to those aspects of our bodies
and how we view them. Bold men increasingly see their
boldness as a devastating, disadvantageous disease. It's real shame because
(18:24):
if you look properly at history and you see so
many bolding men of the norm, and that many many
accept it, and that also find positives from it. Shakespeare,
for example, said boldness gives you wits. You don't have
to listen to the political opinions of barbers. Shakespeare said,
there are all these lovely little advantages from it as well.
(18:44):
So it's a little bit about having a healthier perspective
about it. The loveliest thing for me is that many
bold men report a healthier perspective from it, including feeling
less superficial about their own appearance. You know, they accept
their bodies and that's great because all of us age
and all of our bodies change in different ways and
that shouldn't be feared. But also they don't look at
(19:06):
other people so superficially. They can also see past appearance,
and that's a beautiful thing in a vain world.
Speaker 1 (19:12):
Yeah, oh that's interesting. It can change how you see others. Yeah,
it is beautiful. It can also help you see.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
Beauty, real beauty, which is inner beauty, which is making
someone laugh or you know, acts of kindness. It's that
kind of beauty that you know, sustains a long term
relationship as well. If we're judging people on their head
hair follow calls, I don't think that makes a good marriage.
I think a good marriage is you know most people
realize is beyond the surface.
Speaker 1 (19:42):
All right, we talked about the word when and why
of boldness. Now we're going to talk about the who
who ends up losing their hair is a genetic and
if it is, is it something we can predict When
we come back, We're going to talk to each geneticis,
especially in appearance traits, and who was involved in creating
(20:03):
one of the largest and most comprehensive genetic population models,
that is the world's or most expert in predicting who
will go bald. We'll see what it says about me.
So stay with us and we'll be right back. Hey,
(20:31):
welcome back. We're now going to talk to Professor Manfred Kaiser,
a molecular biologist at Erasmus University in the Netherlands who
specializes in the genetics of appearances. Now this is pretty cool.
Imagine that you're at a crime scene and you find
some DNA of the person you think might have committed
(20:51):
to crime. What if you could take that DNA and
from that genetic code you could tell if the person
was tall, or had dark hair or blue eyes, or
had a small nose, or was bald or what if
you found the DNA of a famous historical person like
Genghis Khan or Cleopatra, or the DNA of a distant
(21:14):
human ancestor, could you tell from their DNA what they
looked like. That is the dream of doctor Kaiser and
his colleagues, and to test his idea, they decided to
start with baldness. In twenty twenty two, they published the
results of one of the largest genetic population studies ever
done on baldness, where they looked at the DNA and
(21:37):
the hairline of one hundred and eighty six thousand men
of European descent, and then they looked at whether the
resulting data could predict who was going to go bald
or not. To tell us about what they found, here
is Professor Manfred Kaiser. Well, thank you doctor Kaiser for
(21:57):
joining us.
Speaker 3 (21:58):
Well, you're welcome.
Speaker 1 (21:59):
You recently posted the paper on the genetic markers of baldness.
Speaker 2 (22:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (22:03):
So, baldness, of course is a very remarkable visible trade,
especially in men. So we were interested in looking into
the predictability. So people do what they call genome white
association studies, so they basically scan the genome of one
thousands and tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands of
which they know, for instance, may it pad on baldness.
(22:25):
So you need these two types of information, and then
they ask is there one site in the human genome
that is more frequent in people with baldness.
Speaker 1 (22:35):
In other words, doctor Kaiser and his team had access
to the DNA of one hundred and eighty six thousand
men in Europe, for which they knew if they had
baldness or not. Then they asked that there was one
gene that could predict whether a man was going to
be bald or not. And they found two things that
are surprising. The first is that there isn't a gene
(22:57):
that is going to make you bald. There's hundreds of them.
Speaker 3 (23:02):
For male pattern baldness. It seems to be hundreds of genes.
All these different genes work together and make what we
actually see in the end as made pattern baldness.
Speaker 1 (23:13):
Yes, it's not just one gene that makes you go bald,
it's hundreds of genes. Wow, so many genes. Why are
there so many genes involved in something like hair loss.
Speaker 3 (23:24):
Yeah, that's a good question. That's a good question. You
have to ask evolution why they made it so complicated. Apparently.
You think, oh, so the hair falls out, that is simple,
But the reason why a hair may fall out is
not simple at all. And of course these genes, they
all play different roles in molacular pathways that exist, and
(23:48):
that makes the complexity.
Speaker 1 (23:50):
I see. It's not a simple process, even though the
end result is relatively simple. Indeed, yeah, baldness is complicated.
You might have heard that male pattern baldness was due
to one gene that is passed down from your mother's
side of the family, but this is not quite true.
When you look at the genome of hundreds of thousands
(24:11):
of men, you see that there are hundreds of genes
that influence the end result of losing your hair. There
is one gene in particular that does come from your
X chromosome, which is passed down from your mother, that
has a higher influence than others, but it's not higher
by a lot, according to doctor Kaiser, and there are
still hundreds of other genes involved. And doctor Kaiser says
(24:35):
this is not unusual. In the human body. Any single
thing about the way you look is determined by many
many genes. Your height, your skin color, the shape of
your face or nose, whether you have curly or straight hair,
studies have found that those are also determined by many
many genes. According to doctor Kaiser, there's only one appearance
(24:57):
trade that scientists have found is the by a single gene.
Speaker 3 (25:03):
So red hair is the only human appearance trait which
is actually monogenic, one gene, one trade, but all other
appearance traits are influenced by a large number of genes.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
That's right, there's a single gene for red hair. If
you have it, your hair is red. If you don't
have it, your hair is not red. But that's the
only gene related to how you look. That's like that.
Speaker 3 (25:28):
Well, people thought in the past. Eye color is simple.
I mean, there is the notion that brown eye is dominant,
and in many cases, if you have one brown eye parent,
the child is brown. But not in all cases. And
this is not because the father is not the father.
This is actually because eye color does have many more
than one or two genes. We actually found more than
(25:50):
fifty genes for eye color, but there is indeed one
or two that have a larger effect. And therefore, in
many situations, if you have one brown eyed parents, you
have a brown eyed child, but not in all cases.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
All right. The second surprising thing that doctor Kaiser and
his colleagues learned about the genetics of bondness was when
they tried to use the one hundred genes they found
to predict who is going to go bald and who
is not. And when you do that, you find that
you can't.
Speaker 3 (26:21):
And we have done this prediction and tens of thousands
of people. Yeah, so it's large data set. So in
a prediction studies, people use a term that includes sensitivity
and specificity, and you don't have to understand what that
term is. You only have to know that this term
runs between point five and one. So what we see
with these different categories of maypattern baldness is that they
(26:42):
run between say point seven and maybe point seventy five.
So it's somewhere in the middle between random prediction and
accurate prediction.
Speaker 1 (26:52):
What doctor Kaiser is saying is that even if you
take these one hundred genes into accounts that we know
are associated with baldness, you still can't accurately predict who's
going to go bald. Your prediction falls somewhere between a
random guess and always being right. So what does that
tell you? So it tells you that they predict something,
(27:15):
but this is far away from accurate prediction, which also
tells you that these hundreds are not enough, and that
tells that people have to find more genes. Doctor Kaiser
thinks there may be more than a thousand genes that
determine whether you will go bald or not, and to
find out what they are we need more data because
(27:35):
that difference in accuracy might be hidden in genes that
have a low effect on hair loss, which means they
are hard to find. Okay, you might be wondering, for hey,
what if hair loss is not one hundred percent genetic,
wouldn't that explain why it's so hard to predict? And
that is true. There may be some environmental components to baldness,
(27:56):
but doctor Kusler says scientists are pretty sure baldness is
mostly genetic, and we know this from twin studies. Scientists
attract identical twins separated at birth and compare them to
twins that grew up together. For the most part, if
you're twin who has the same DNA you do is bald,
there is a pretty good chance you are bald too. Okay,
(28:19):
so what does this all mean and specifically, what does
this all mean for my hair. Okay, so I'm training
fifty this.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
Year, but you know that's quite good in terms of bolts,
I cannot see.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Thank you. So far, so good. So my father still
has all his hair. And on my mother's side my grandfather,
her father was bald. Oh, and some of my mother's
brothers are bald, but some are not. So what does
that mean for me? Do you think?
Speaker 3 (28:49):
Well? Not so easy indeed. But obviously this one gene
that comes from your mother's side, that's only one of
one hundreds of thousands, so that per se doesn't tell
you much. So if they're fifty percent from your father,
give you all the non bold then of course the
sum of all the others is larger than the effect
(29:09):
of this one gene on the X chromolome. So maybe
you will not develop it.
Speaker 1 (29:13):
At least that's the hope.
Speaker 3 (29:15):
If you would do the genetic tests, you would come
up with a fairly low probability.
Speaker 1 (29:19):
Okay, I guess my hair loss is TBD to be
determined or is it to bald determined. We'll have to
check in in a few years to see how good
this prediction was. But doctor Casher thinks there's maybe a
more important question to ask here.
Speaker 3 (29:36):
So the question is why are you doing this? Why
do you want to know?
Speaker 1 (29:40):
In other words, if someone could predict whether you were
going to go bald or not, what are you going
to do with that information? We now know it's not
going to be possible to perfectly predict baldness. I mean
not even red hair can be predicted with one hundred
percent accuracy, because our ability to read genes and identify
mutations and sequences is never are going to be perfect.
(30:01):
So what if a doctor told you you have a
fifty percent chance of going bald or an eighty percent chance.
Would that make you start treatments which have serious risks
of side effects, or would you wait and see, knowing
that starting treatments then might be too late, Or, as
doctor Kyser argues, maybe it's better not to know, or
(30:22):
maybe we should just accept that there's nothing wrong with
being bald.
Speaker 3 (30:25):
No indeed, And actually I can tell you that this country,
in the Netherlands, I'm not Dutch and Germans. I came
here for work, so it's quite fashionable here to shave
completely boiled. So I've never seen so many completely shaved persons.
It's just fashionable.
Speaker 1 (30:41):
Wow. Maybe the real solution Niston moves to the Netherlands. Indeed,
all right, there you have it. Maybe the real cure
for baldness is for everyone to go Dutch to see
it as normal or even beautiful. Thanks for joining us.
See you next time you've been listening to Science Stuff.
(31:05):
The production of iHeartRadio written and produced by me Or
hitch Ham, credited by Rose Seguda, executive producer Jerry Rowland,
and audio engineer and mixer Kasey peckram Hey. Thanks to
our experts today. If you're interested, Doctor glenchen Kowski has
written a book called Branding Baldness, published by Cambridge University
(31:25):
Press that he has pushed to make open access, which
means it's free for anyone to download. I also want
to thank Professor Luis Garza of John Hopkins University for
filling me in on a lot of the details of
what we know about baldness. And you can follow me
on social media. Just search for PhD Comics and the
name of your favorite platform. Be sure to subscribe to
(31:45):
Sign Stuff on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever
you get your podcasts, and please tell your friends we'll
be back next Wednesday with another episode
Hey, welcome to Sign Stuff, a production of iHeartRadio Horhea
Cham and today we are tackling the science of baldness.
Going bald is something that happens to a lot of people.
But why do we go bald? Who goes bald? And
why does it affect us so much? I'm going to
be reviewing the most current theories about the origins of baldness,
(00:22):
and I'm going to talk to a couple of experts
on two related questions. Why is there a negative stigma
about baldness and is baldness really hereditary? In both cases,
I think the answer will surprise you, so comb over
with us as we uncover the hairy truth about the
science of baldness. Enjoy. Hey, everyone, here are some interesting
(00:50):
facts about baldness. According to a recent paper in the
prestigious journal Nature Reviews, about fifty percent of men and
twenty five percent of women experience some form of balding
or hair loss by the time they're fifty years old.
This translates to roughly fifty million men and about thirty
million women in the US alone. It also varies a
(01:14):
lot with ancestry or race. If you're of South Asian descent,
like from India or Pakistan, your chances of losing hair
by the time you're fifty jumps to fifty eight percent,
whereas if you're of East Asian descent, like from China
or Korea, the number drops to twenty five percent. It
also depends a lot on your age. For example, if
(01:37):
you're of East Asian descent, your chances of losing hair
in your twenties is small, only about two point three percent.
In your thirty s it's four percent. In your forties
it's eleven percent, although way up to forty seven percent
by the time you reach seventy. There are several types
of baldness for men and women. If names like M
(01:58):
one or C two, or YOU three or type three,
depending on the pattern of hair loss that you get,
whether it starts in your forehead or the corners or
the top of your scalp. Now, when I started this episode,
I wanted to answer the question why do we go bald?
But I quickly found out the answer is, we don't know.
(02:21):
From an evolutionary perspective, we don't know why this is
involved in humans. It's sort of related to your age.
So evolutionary biologists have proposed theories with that in mind.
For example, one theory says that it may be assigned
to the rest of your tribe that you're older and
therefore more mature and wiser, and therefore you should have
(02:43):
a position of dominance or leadership. But there are also
theories that say that it's as signed to others that
you're old and therefore not very good material. Both theories
but explain why baldness helps your species survive. We also
don't quite know why baldness happens at the level of
(03:04):
hair follicles. We know that when people experience androgenetic alopecia,
which is the scientific name for male and female pattern
hair loss, the hair follicles in your scalp shrink and
become the kind of follicles that cover the non hairy
parts of your body, But we don't really know why
this happens. Our current best theory is that it's kind
(03:24):
of the opposite of when young men start to grow
a beard during puberty. At some point, your hair follicles
are just preprogrammed to be more sensitive to your hormones
and change from one kind of hair to another. So
when you're a teenager, the hairs on your armpits pubic
areas and your chin and upper lip for men, turn
into the kind of thick and hairy kind of hair,
(03:47):
and at some point, when you get older the hair
is on your head do the opposite and turn into
the thin, wispy kind. There are hormones that scientists think
are involved, like testosterone or diehydrotest ptosterone or DHT, and
enzymes that contribute to this, like five alpha reductase type
one and two. We can see that these molecules are
(04:09):
more active involving hair follicles, but what sets this process
in motion for what is actually happening at the cellular
and molecular level is not quite clear. Now, there are
some cool things we do know about the genetics of baldness.
I'll get to that later in the program with a
scientist who's done one of the largest ever genetic population
(04:32):
studies on baldness. But first, there was one section in
this Nature Journal paper that caught my attention, and that
is a section about how baldness impacts your quality of life.
The scientists right, quote androgenetic alopecia can trigger profound negative
psychological effects in affected individuals, owing to social pressure to
(04:55):
maintain quote good hair end quote. In other words, the
only negative effective bondness are psychological. So to get to
the bottom of this, I reached out to a psychologist
who's made it his mission to debunk this negative stigma
that bondness has in our society and to teach people
(05:16):
that bondness, no pun intended, is all in our heads. Well,
thank you, doctor Jenkowski for joining us pleasure. Can you
please tell us who you are and what do you do?
Speaker 2 (05:28):
Yes, I'm doctor Glennankovski. I am a associate professor University
College Dublin, and I'm a researcher in psychology who specializes
in the social and cultural interpretation of alopecia.
Speaker 1 (05:42):
And is that the term we should be using for
bondness or are ukay we say bondness or.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Yeah, I'm much more for a further term, boldness as well.
I tend to use alopecia in the Ireland because my
accent and a lot of Irish people think I'm saying
bravery rather than boldness.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
Is that true?
Speaker 2 (06:00):
Yeah? I say boldness like being bold. Oh, I see,
and it's happened so many times now an island that
I really I've switched a bit.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
Well, there might be another interesting topic for you to
research boldness. Yeah, and whether it's related to baldness.
Speaker 3 (06:15):
Yes, but you've done a lot.
Speaker 1 (06:16):
Of research on this stigma against baldness. Can you tell
us what that stigma is?
Speaker 2 (06:21):
So there is a tendency for people to have attitudes
that are stigmatizing towards men and their boldness in particular.
Typically there's experimental studies that show that people hold more
negative attitudes towards men with boldness than they do men
with full heads of hair.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
Okay, can you describe these studies a little bit.
Speaker 2 (06:41):
It is actually a large evidence space. So the majority
of studies actually tend to be experiments where a group
of people are divided randomly into two conditions and presented
images of the same man airbrushed, typically with a full
head of hair, and then with some boldness. And so
it's that say, mimbiture of the man, same facial features, etc.
(07:03):
And they are asked to rate the image of the
man on certain characteristics like how masculine, how successful, etcetera.
Speaker 1 (07:10):
And there's a bias towards certain attributes there.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
Is, Yeah, and those tend to be that those men
are less attractive, older, that they may be less dominant
and some other negative characteristics.
Speaker 1 (07:25):
So there is a negative bias that people have about
bald men. But here's the thing about those studies. According
to doctor Jenkowski, A, people also have a positive bias
towards bald men in some categories, and b these negative
and positive biases are not that big.
Speaker 2 (07:45):
The re such does show that, and I don't mean
to minimize it. However, I do question how totalizing that
stigma is because there are also some positive attributes that
people make about bold men, like that they're more inclined
to be leaders, or that they're more affablen approachable than
haired men. And then sometimes these differences are also quite small.
(08:05):
People can exaggerate how bigly are, especially journalists or businesses,
but actually if you look at their data, they're quite small.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
New characterized how small they are.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
Yeah. So one study found that out of a scale
of one hundred of attractiveness, bold men were seven percent
less attractive than their head counterpouts and rated on average
about two years older than the head counterpart images. So
two years older, seven cent less out of one hundred.
(08:35):
It's not a huge amount.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
No, it's not. I would have thought it was higher,
but that seems are most negligible.
Speaker 2 (08:42):
I would have thought that too if I wasn't a
researcher studying this. Most people think this too, because most
of us are influenced by advertising and marketing of anti
bold products.
Speaker 1 (08:54):
And this brings up the question where does this negative
stigma against bog people, or at least the impression that
is a big negative stigma against boldners come from. And
here doctor Tinkowski has a s pricing theory.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
It really does come from anti boldness businesses. They are
the ones who profit from this stigma. And we've had
a long history of it, and it's ramped up since
the nineteen eighties when anti bold products for the first
time in history, got more official approval.
Speaker 1 (09:26):
Wow, so you're looking it to the business of selling
anti partners treatments. It's sort of a timing issue.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
Well, we've always had boldness since men have been around.
But what we can see in the historical record is
that there were many neutral interpretations of boldness. There were
some negative and there were also some very positive interpretations.
When we see the rise of snake oil products in
the eighteen hundreds and the nineteen hundreds, some of them
were for hairy growth. Of course, they weren't effective, but
(09:57):
their marketing was designed to show that old men needed
these products, needed these treatments for this devastagencies, and if
they didn't take it, they might not get a job,
they might not get a date, they might not be happy.
When they became approved in the eighties and onwards, that
gave them scientific legitimacy these products so that doctors and
(10:18):
professionals could start to say, these are treatments I see.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Whereas before you might tell your doctor, oh, I think
I'm losing my hair, and the doctor might be like, yeah,
it's normal, no big deal, nothing's going to happen to you.
Now they might be like, oh, there's a treatment for that.
Speaker 2 (10:31):
Exactly. Those pharmaceutical companies have done training videos, they've done
training programs, They've targeted medical professionals and doctors to convince
them that bolding men and bolding people in general need
these treatments.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
Now, it's hard to say how much of a role
the pharmaceutical and Bontner's treatment industries have had in creating
this negative stigma against baldness. As I mentioned, there are
theories that tie it to our evolutionary history, but it's
also hard to discount. For example, remember the Nature Journal
paper I've been citing. That paper was written by nine scientists,
(11:07):
all of whom have positions at major universities, but at
the end of the paper, the journal requires them to
disclose any conflicts of interest. So here's the list of
those conflicts of interest for that paper. Authors one two
are inventors on patent applications related to hair loss treatment
filed by the University of California, Irvine. Author two is
(11:28):
co founder and chief scientific officer at a corporation and
has received consultation fees from Audit Labs and lorel Author
three has received consultation fees from DS Laboratories, Almirale, thirty Madison,
Eli Lilly and Company, Peiser, Iovan Sciences, Bristol Meyers, quibb
Ortho Dermatologics, and Sun Pharmaceutical. Author four has received consultation
(11:50):
fees from Eli Lilly and Company, peiser Olaplex, and Maovn Sciences,
and they direct the Ethnic Skin program at John Hoppins University,
funded by an educational brand from Jansen. Author five has
received salary payments from Life and Brain GNBH. Author six
has received clinical trial funds from Eli Lilly, and company.
Author seven has received consultation frees from Eli Lillyan Company
(12:13):
and has received clinical study funds from Eli Lillien Company, Pfizer,
and ATB. Authors eight and nine declare no competing interests. Yeah,
that's a lot of conflicts of interest.
Speaker 3 (12:27):
All right.
Speaker 1 (12:27):
When we come back, we're gonna talk about whether the
treatments all these companies are pushing actually work. Do they
stop baldness or is it all snake oil. Stay with us,
we'll be right back. Welcome back. We're talking about the
(12:58):
size of baldness, and so we've talked about what we
know and don't know about what causes baldness. Now we're
going to talk about the treatments that are out there
for hair loss. In terms of medicines, there's one called monoxidyl,
which was originally made to treat hypertension, but then women
patients started reporting extra hair growth and so it became
(13:19):
a baldanis medicine that you put on the scalp. Scientists
have some ideas about what this medicine actually does, but
not really. Another class of treatments are five alpha reductase inhibitors,
which includes the popular drug called finasteride. Scientists know these
treatments block the enzyme that splits the stosterone called five
(13:40):
alpha reductas, but they don't know much beyond that. Now,
do these treatments actually work a sort of, according to
doctor Jenkowski.
Speaker 2 (13:53):
So there are metro analyzes. These are series of studies
that look at large pools of data of menking these
products versus men who don't take these products, and they're
more objective. So these matronalyses have looked many anti baldness
products and what they've found is that most produced between
eight to twelve hair follow calls in a centimeter squared
(14:15):
area of scalp that's monitored, and that's some hairy growth.
It's not nothing, but on average most people have one
hundred and twenty hair follow calls and that's centimeter squared
area of regrowth.
Speaker 1 (14:28):
What doctor Jenkowski seeing is that these treatments do help
you grow back on average about eight to ten percent
of the hair you lose, which is not nothing, but
it's also not a lot.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
So most people do not find that to be a
cosmetically meaningful amount of hair regrowth. I see these products
might be better at preventing further boldness. It's a bit hard
to determine that, but in terms of actual hair regrowth
is quite minimal.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
And of course you have to weigh that against the
potential side effects of these treatments.
Speaker 2 (15:02):
And obviously the bigger issues which the Metro analyses to
show as well, is that some of these products do
risk quite severe side of x. You know, if you're
taking finasteride, for example, this is a common antibodleness product.
Typically it's taken orally and it disrupts your hormonal system,
that's how it's working. But there's evidence so it's affecting
(15:23):
all sorts of other things that are really important to
your bodily functions, like your mood. Men who've taken a
finanasteroid of reported vision problems, reported mood issues, sexual dysfunction issues,
these hosts of side effects.
Speaker 1 (15:37):
For finasteride fills. The US Food and Drug Administration or FDA,
has issued a warning that there is a risk of
depression in suicide ideation when using this drug, and according
to the Nature paper, there's also a risk of impotence
after you start taking the drug.
Speaker 2 (15:57):
And what's really difficult for men taking finasteride is you
don't which kind of man you're going to be. The
one that's going to be negatively somewhat permanently affected by
these side effects, or the ones that might have safe
experience of it.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
Wow, in which case, maybe it's not worth it for
those extra eight twelve pollicles exactly. There's also the possibility
of hair transplants, which is where they take follicles from
one part of your scalp and implant them in the
areas where you're losing hair. This treatment is expensive and
(16:29):
it's not for everyone. It sort of only works for
thinning hair, not full hair loss. So now my question
was is this all worth it? What's really the impact
that baldness has in people's lives? Is there any data
as to how baldness affects you in life, or in
(16:49):
your profession or in your social life?
Speaker 2 (16:52):
There is, yeah, Bolting men are surveyed about discrimination romantically
and employment socially. What's difficult is that most of these
studies are commercially funded and biased, and some of the
studies are very very poor, So it might just be
a market research a series of questions that are really leading,
that are kind of pishing men to suggest they're discriminated
(17:12):
against when they're not. Those surveys do show that some
men report some discrimination and many men do not report any.
A really important study by Goslin and colleagues in their
eighties asked bolding men and haired men what they expected
boldness discrimination to be, and then what the actual reality
of old discrimination was, and in all cases the reality
(17:35):
was much easier than bold men and haired men predict it.
So I think those are really useful to put it
into perspective for bolding men. We get told that there's
huge amounts of discrimination, but actually the reality is that
really it's quite rare.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
What effect do you think this negative stigma and this commercialization,
what does it have on men and people who might
be dealing with boldness.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
You know, there's a word called medicalization, and it's this
term for how normal aspects of our bodies are often
changed into diseases, sometimes for commercial profit, and it really
changes how we respond to those aspects of our bodies
and how we view them. Bold men increasingly see their
boldness as a devastating, disadvantageous disease. It's real shame because
(18:24):
if you look properly at history and you see so
many bolding men of the norm, and that many many
accept it, and that also find positives from it. Shakespeare,
for example, said boldness gives you wits. You don't have
to listen to the political opinions of barbers. Shakespeare said,
there are all these lovely little advantages from it as well.
(18:44):
So it's a little bit about having a healthier perspective
about it. The loveliest thing for me is that many
bold men report a healthier perspective from it, including feeling
less superficial about their own appearance. You know, they accept
their bodies and that's great because all of us age
and all of our bodies change in different ways and
that shouldn't be feared. But also they don't look at
(19:06):
other people so superficially. They can also see past appearance,
and that's a beautiful thing in a vain world.
Speaker 1 (19:12):
Yeah, oh that's interesting. It can change how you see others. Yeah,
it is beautiful. It can also help you see.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
Beauty, real beauty, which is inner beauty, which is making
someone laugh or you know, acts of kindness. It's that
kind of beauty that you know, sustains a long term
relationship as well. If we're judging people on their head
hair follow calls, I don't think that makes a good marriage.
I think a good marriage is you know most people
realize is beyond the surface.
Speaker 1 (19:42):
All right, we talked about the word when and why
of boldness. Now we're going to talk about the who
who ends up losing their hair is a genetic and
if it is, is it something we can predict When
we come back, We're going to talk to each geneticis,
especially in appearance traits, and who was involved in creating
(20:03):
one of the largest and most comprehensive genetic population models,
that is the world's or most expert in predicting who
will go bald. We'll see what it says about me.
So stay with us and we'll be right back. Hey,
(20:31):
welcome back. We're now going to talk to Professor Manfred Kaiser,
a molecular biologist at Erasmus University in the Netherlands who
specializes in the genetics of appearances. Now this is pretty cool.
Imagine that you're at a crime scene and you find
some DNA of the person you think might have committed
(20:51):
to crime. What if you could take that DNA and
from that genetic code you could tell if the person
was tall, or had dark hair or blue eyes, or
had a small nose, or was bald or what if
you found the DNA of a famous historical person like
Genghis Khan or Cleopatra, or the DNA of a distant
(21:14):
human ancestor, could you tell from their DNA what they
looked like. That is the dream of doctor Kaiser and
his colleagues, and to test his idea, they decided to
start with baldness. In twenty twenty two, they published the
results of one of the largest genetic population studies ever
done on baldness, where they looked at the DNA and
(21:37):
the hairline of one hundred and eighty six thousand men
of European descent, and then they looked at whether the
resulting data could predict who was going to go bald
or not. To tell us about what they found, here
is Professor Manfred Kaiser. Well, thank you doctor Kaiser for
(21:57):
joining us.
Speaker 3 (21:58):
Well, you're welcome.
Speaker 1 (21:59):
You recently posted the paper on the genetic markers of baldness.
Speaker 2 (22:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (22:03):
So, baldness, of course is a very remarkable visible trade,
especially in men. So we were interested in looking into
the predictability. So people do what they call genome white
association studies, so they basically scan the genome of one
thousands and tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands of
which they know, for instance, may it pad on baldness.
(22:25):
So you need these two types of information, and then
they ask is there one site in the human genome
that is more frequent in people with baldness.
Speaker 1 (22:35):
In other words, doctor Kaiser and his team had access
to the DNA of one hundred and eighty six thousand
men in Europe, for which they knew if they had
baldness or not. Then they asked that there was one
gene that could predict whether a man was going to
be bald or not. And they found two things that
are surprising. The first is that there isn't a gene
(22:57):
that is going to make you bald. There's hundreds of them.
Speaker 3 (23:02):
For male pattern baldness. It seems to be hundreds of genes.
All these different genes work together and make what we
actually see in the end as made pattern baldness.
Speaker 1 (23:13):
Yes, it's not just one gene that makes you go bald,
it's hundreds of genes. Wow, so many genes. Why are
there so many genes involved in something like hair loss.
Speaker 3 (23:24):
Yeah, that's a good question. That's a good question. You
have to ask evolution why they made it so complicated. Apparently.
You think, oh, so the hair falls out, that is simple,
But the reason why a hair may fall out is
not simple at all. And of course these genes, they
all play different roles in molacular pathways that exist, and
(23:48):
that makes the complexity.
Speaker 1 (23:50):
I see. It's not a simple process, even though the
end result is relatively simple. Indeed, yeah, baldness is complicated.
You might have heard that male pattern baldness was due
to one gene that is passed down from your mother's
side of the family, but this is not quite true.
When you look at the genome of hundreds of thousands
(24:11):
of men, you see that there are hundreds of genes
that influence the end result of losing your hair. There
is one gene in particular that does come from your
X chromosome, which is passed down from your mother, that
has a higher influence than others, but it's not higher
by a lot, according to doctor Kaiser, and there are
still hundreds of other genes involved. And doctor Kaiser says
(24:35):
this is not unusual. In the human body. Any single
thing about the way you look is determined by many
many genes. Your height, your skin color, the shape of
your face or nose, whether you have curly or straight hair,
studies have found that those are also determined by many
many genes. According to doctor Kaiser, there's only one appearance
(24:57):
trade that scientists have found is the by a single gene.
Speaker 3 (25:03):
So red hair is the only human appearance trait which
is actually monogenic, one gene, one trade, but all other
appearance traits are influenced by a large number of genes.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
That's right, there's a single gene for red hair. If
you have it, your hair is red. If you don't
have it, your hair is not red. But that's the
only gene related to how you look. That's like that.
Speaker 3 (25:28):
Well, people thought in the past. Eye color is simple.
I mean, there is the notion that brown eye is dominant,
and in many cases, if you have one brown eye parent,
the child is brown. But not in all cases. And
this is not because the father is not the father.
This is actually because eye color does have many more
than one or two genes. We actually found more than
(25:50):
fifty genes for eye color, but there is indeed one
or two that have a larger effect. And therefore, in
many situations, if you have one brown eyed parents, you
have a brown eyed child, but not in all cases.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
All right. The second surprising thing that doctor Kaiser and
his colleagues learned about the genetics of bondness was when
they tried to use the one hundred genes they found
to predict who is going to go bald and who
is not. And when you do that, you find that
you can't.
Speaker 3 (26:21):
And we have done this prediction and tens of thousands
of people. Yeah, so it's large data set. So in
a prediction studies, people use a term that includes sensitivity
and specificity, and you don't have to understand what that
term is. You only have to know that this term
runs between point five and one. So what we see
with these different categories of maypattern baldness is that they
(26:42):
run between say point seven and maybe point seventy five.
So it's somewhere in the middle between random prediction and
accurate prediction.
Speaker 1 (26:52):
What doctor Kaiser is saying is that even if you
take these one hundred genes into accounts that we know
are associated with baldness, you still can't accurately predict who's
going to go bald. Your prediction falls somewhere between a
random guess and always being right. So what does that
tell you? So it tells you that they predict something,
(27:15):
but this is far away from accurate prediction, which also
tells you that these hundreds are not enough, and that
tells that people have to find more genes. Doctor Kaiser
thinks there may be more than a thousand genes that
determine whether you will go bald or not, and to
find out what they are we need more data because
(27:35):
that difference in accuracy might be hidden in genes that
have a low effect on hair loss, which means they
are hard to find. Okay, you might be wondering, for hey,
what if hair loss is not one hundred percent genetic,
wouldn't that explain why it's so hard to predict? And
that is true. There may be some environmental components to baldness,
(27:56):
but doctor Kusler says scientists are pretty sure baldness is
mostly genetic, and we know this from twin studies. Scientists
attract identical twins separated at birth and compare them to
twins that grew up together. For the most part, if
you're twin who has the same DNA you do is bald,
there is a pretty good chance you are bald too. Okay,
(28:19):
so what does this all mean and specifically, what does
this all mean for my hair. Okay, so I'm training
fifty this.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
Year, but you know that's quite good in terms of bolts,
I cannot see.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Thank you. So far, so good. So my father still
has all his hair. And on my mother's side my grandfather,
her father was bald. Oh, and some of my mother's
brothers are bald, but some are not. So what does
that mean for me? Do you think?
Speaker 3 (28:49):
Well? Not so easy indeed. But obviously this one gene
that comes from your mother's side, that's only one of
one hundreds of thousands, so that per se doesn't tell
you much. So if they're fifty percent from your father,
give you all the non bold then of course the
sum of all the others is larger than the effect
(29:09):
of this one gene on the X chromolome. So maybe
you will not develop it.
Speaker 1 (29:13):
At least that's the hope.
Speaker 3 (29:15):
If you would do the genetic tests, you would come
up with a fairly low probability.
Speaker 1 (29:19):
Okay, I guess my hair loss is TBD to be
determined or is it to bald determined. We'll have to
check in in a few years to see how good
this prediction was. But doctor Casher thinks there's maybe a
more important question to ask here.
Speaker 3 (29:36):
So the question is why are you doing this? Why
do you want to know?
Speaker 1 (29:40):
In other words, if someone could predict whether you were
going to go bald or not, what are you going
to do with that information? We now know it's not
going to be possible to perfectly predict baldness. I mean
not even red hair can be predicted with one hundred
percent accuracy, because our ability to read genes and identify
mutations and sequences is never are going to be perfect.
(30:01):
So what if a doctor told you you have a
fifty percent chance of going bald or an eighty percent chance.
Would that make you start treatments which have serious risks
of side effects, or would you wait and see, knowing
that starting treatments then might be too late, Or, as
doctor Kyser argues, maybe it's better not to know, or
(30:22):
maybe we should just accept that there's nothing wrong with
being bald.
Speaker 3 (30:25):
No indeed, And actually I can tell you that this country,
in the Netherlands, I'm not Dutch and Germans. I came
here for work, so it's quite fashionable here to shave
completely boiled. So I've never seen so many completely shaved persons.
It's just fashionable.
Speaker 1 (30:41):
Wow. Maybe the real solution Niston moves to the Netherlands. Indeed,
all right, there you have it. Maybe the real cure
for baldness is for everyone to go Dutch to see
it as normal or even beautiful. Thanks for joining us.
See you next time you've been listening to Science Stuff.
(31:05):
The production of iHeartRadio written and produced by me Or
hitch Ham, credited by Rose Seguda, executive producer Jerry Rowland,
and audio engineer and mixer Kasey peckram Hey. Thanks to
our experts today. If you're interested, Doctor glenchen Kowski has
written a book called Branding Baldness, published by Cambridge University
(31:25):
Press that he has pushed to make open access, which
means it's free for anyone to download. I also want
to thank Professor Luis Garza of John Hopkins University for
filling me in on a lot of the details of
what we know about baldness. And you can follow me
on social media. Just search for PhD Comics and the
name of your favorite platform. Be sure to subscribe to
(31:45):
Sign Stuff on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever
you get your podcasts, and please tell your friends we'll
be back next Wednesday with another episode
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by Audiochuck Media Company.
Betrayal Season 5
Saskia Inwood woke up one morning, knowing her life would never be the same. The night before, she learned the unimaginable – that the husband she knew in the light of day was a different person after dark. This season unpacks Saskia’s discovery of her husband’s secret life and her fight to bring him to justice. Along the way, we expose a crime that is just coming to light. This is also a story about the myth of the “perfect victim:” who gets believed, who gets doubted, and why. We follow Saskia as she works to reclaim her body, her voice, and her life. If you would like to reach out to the Betrayal Team, email us at betrayalpod@gmail.com. Follow us on Instagram @betrayalpod and @glasspodcasts. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations, and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience, and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack.