March 20, 2026 • 52 mins
Permaculture is a growing trend in the world of farming and home landscaping. It's basically a design principle that emphasizes sustainability and the would-be, natural ecosystem of an area. Simple concepts like planting downhill from a pond and using gravity to feed plants to planting native plants and vegetation that work well together are hallmarks of permaculture. Learn all about this eco-friendly trend today.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Hey, everybody, Think Spring is here with our Think Spring playlist,
and it's Chuck here to introduce today's episode. What's permaculture
all about? Permaculture is a pretty great thing, and it's
you know, if you don't know anything about it, this
can teach you all about it and it may just
change the way you live your life. There at yourius,
so give it a try.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
Welcome to Stuff you should Know from HowStuffWorks dot com.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, and
there's Charles w. Chipper, Chuck Bryant and there's Jerry Rowland,
and we're all in great moods everybody, because it's stuff
you should know. Time. Everything else just falls to the
wayside when we record stuff you should know. It's just
it's the reason we love doing it. Still, after a
(01:02):
thousand episodes.
Speaker 1 (01:04):
You realize every single listener right now is thinking, why
are they in a bad mood? And why is Josh
being so weird?
Speaker 3 (01:10):
I don't think I'm being weird? Am I being? Am
I over selling it? I think so oh oh sorry.
Speaker 1 (01:15):
It makes it sound like we all three were in
a big fist fight and then Jerry.
Speaker 3 (01:19):
Had recorded right, She's like just jammed a Kleenex up
her nose to staunch the bleeding.
Speaker 1 (01:25):
I am recovering a bit because we just got back
from New York City.
Speaker 3 (01:29):
Dude, it has been a week, I know. So we
did show a show Sunday, a show Monday, and a
show Tuesday, all sold out at the Bellhouse, traveled home Wednesday,
and are recording today Thursday.
Speaker 1 (01:42):
Yes, and I just want to say, there's no way
that people will ever hear Tuesday's episode because it was
the filthiest thing we've ever done on stage.
Speaker 3 (01:52):
It was seriously, man, I don't know what got into us.
Speaker 1 (01:56):
I think it was night three of three, So that
is for the three hundred and fifty people in that room. Yeah,
I hope they enjoyed it.
Speaker 3 (02:05):
It was fun. It was fun, and come on out.
Whenever we do a live show, you never know if
we're just gonna be like, this one's not getting released,
let's just go crazy, you know. Especially it was a
twenty one and up show, which is.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Really well, well that's why we for sure why we
did it.
Speaker 3 (02:18):
Yeah, that's what took the feedback off, you know, And
that is saying I think.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
So put the feedbag on. Take it off.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
Yeah, I guess so, I guess so it's not really,
but we'll just press forward. How about that. Let's do so, Chuck,
I know that you know this, but not everybody knows this.
I had a personal conversation with one Charles C. Mann,
who wrote my favorite book of all time fourteen ninety one,
that is correct, And I was talking to mister man
(02:50):
and he has a I was talking to him and
got a show coming out on Existential Risks eventually, but
and he's going to be in it. It's just like
interviewed for it. But he has a book coming out
this January and it's called The Wizard and the Prophet.
Have you heard of it?
Speaker 1 (03:05):
No? But did you just say that he's going to
be part of Existential Risks?
Speaker 3 (03:09):
Yeah, he's an Interviewee.
Speaker 1 (03:11):
That's fantastic.
Speaker 3 (03:12):
Yeah, it's going to be pretty I was really psyched
to just be able to talk to him, and even
better than that, like you know, we were kind of
rapping for a few minutes beforehand, and it was just
as calm and casual as I had always like envisioned
talking to him.
Speaker 1 (03:26):
That's amazing would be.
Speaker 3 (03:27):
Yeah, it was a really really neat conversation but he
was telling me about the book he has coming out,
The Wizard and the Prophet, and it's basically about him
trying to find out how we can possibly, or even
if it is possible, sustain ten billion people on planet Earth. Yeah,
and not just sustained, meaning like you know, keeping him alive,
(03:48):
but how could we do it sustain a blee. And
he goes back and starts digging in and finds that
there's this long standing headbutt between the techno optimists, the
people who are like, well, we humans are smart enough
to invent our way out of any problem, yeah, and
the people who are like, no, we need to really
like mitigate a lot of things that we're doing right
(04:10):
now to make sure that we actually can keep doing
this for the foreseeable future. And part of it is
on Norman Borlog.
Speaker 1 (04:19):
And see the Wizard.
Speaker 3 (04:20):
He is the Wizard, that's actually absolutely right. The Prophet
is a guy named William vote Vogt. I believe his name,
and he I don't know nearly as much about him
as Norman Borlog, which is to say, I know basically
zero about him, but he's the Prophet, so I will
know all about him when the book comes out in January.
I'm psyched about it. But as I was researching this
(04:42):
permaculture article, I was like, you can really see that
same headbutt, that same push and pull between people who
are saying we need sustainability and other people are like,
we need to feed, you know, billions and billions of people,
and that really comes together in the debate over permaculture
and whether it works or whether it is just just
(05:05):
a pie in the sky kind of idea.
Speaker 1 (05:08):
Well, I have a little something to say. Okay, I
am a bit of an IRB. Well not a bit.
I'm an urban permaculturist.
Speaker 3 (05:16):
That's awesome.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
We had not me as like I don't know much
while I do know about this stuff now after researching it,
but we are redoing our front and backyards and we
hired a permaculture company to do so.
Speaker 3 (05:31):
Really, the Permaculture Pros.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
That's not their name, but maybe it should be. Uh yeah,
So we're we are like right in the middle of
making our small little piece of Atlanta a permaculture urban pum.
Speaker 3 (05:48):
I know it's hard to say now that I'm saying
it out loud.
Speaker 1 (05:50):
An urban perm habitat if you will, urb perm that's right.
So I'll be peppering, you know, little things here and there.
Speaker 3 (05:59):
I think that would help a lot. Yeah, because permaculture,
as it turns out, and I didn't know really anything
about it until we started researching this. It is a
wooly idea. It's tough to pin down, which is really
weird because it's actually a set of design principles meant
to grow food for people in a way that's sustainable
(06:23):
and not harmful. And it basically stands in contradiction of
what you would consider like big modern agriculture, which is
we grow one kind of food and we squeeze as
much as we possibly can out of it from the
ground we have, using as much artificial resources as we
possibly need to increase our yield.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
Yeah, And that's like people throw around the word sustainable
or unsustainable, and maybe people sometimes folks don't even stop
to think about what that means. Sustainable or I guess
we'll start with unsustainable. That means that you are you're
depleting resources around you and you are depending very much
on bringing in different resources to make that thing work, right,
(07:08):
Like you're not just using what's available, Like that's what
sustainable would be. You're using what's available. It all works
together to ideally sustain itself without saying, well, now I
need to bring in this thing from way over here
to make these three hundred acres of corn grow.
Speaker 3 (07:26):
Yeah, I've got to go burn a bunch of fossil
fuels to create nitrogen based fertilizer, and it's not going
to attach to the soil very well, so a lot
of it will run off and be wasted, and even worse,
it'll end up in a pond, which will create an
algae bloom which sucks up all of the dissolved oxygen,
which creates a fish kill. That's unsustainable. And it's weird
(07:48):
because I hadn't really thought about that either, Chuck. But
as growing up, as like kids who are sensioned in
the nineties, you hear unsustainable and it's just basically in
your mind with evil, like almost intentionally malicious acts against
the earth, and that's just not necessarily the case. And
that's another thing about like Norman Borlog the Wizard. He
(08:12):
had the greatest of intentions, but you can also lay
at his feet a lot of the ecological problems we're
facing right now because of agriculture and the agricultural practices
he helped pioneer in order to feed a bunch of people.
So there's this tension between unsustainability and sustainability, but it's
also a tension between what's realistic and what's not.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
You know, Yeah, it's definitely a little sticky.
Speaker 3 (08:35):
It is a little sticky.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
But perma culture basically is trying to create like a harmonious,
holistic approach to farming and whether it be a large
farm or like in my case, like an urban small
urban plot. And like I said, we'll kind of go
over both of those through my lens and then through
the larger ideas of the farm. And it's it's not
(09:00):
like Robert Lamb wrote this article from Stuff to blow
your mind. He did a good job with it, always
does he does. But he does point out that you shouldn't.
It doesn't necessarily mean that you have to go back
to caveman days and like you have to live like
tiktook and scavenge the earth. He said, to think of
it in terms of a river, like you were a
(09:20):
boat floating down a river and you were sustained by
that river, but you are also navigating it as well
with your rudder.
Speaker 3 (09:29):
And if you have to pee right now. It just
increased tenfold, that's right. So yeah, it's not like just
passively taking from the land what it has to offer.
There's still management of it, right, Oh yeah, But the
idea behind that management of it is managing the land
in a way that the land.
Speaker 1 (09:50):
Is happy with. Yeah, kind of working with what you got.
Speaker 3 (09:53):
Like you can walk past a dog that's just sitting
there looking at you and maybe you know, give it
like a wink or something like that, and keep walking.
That's passive. But if you stop and scratch it behind
the ear, you're managing that dog in a way or
something like that. You're at least interacting with it more
and the dog likes it. You could also walk past
the dog and like poking in the ribs. Yeah, that's
(10:14):
interacting with it in a way that the dog wouldn't like.
Perma culture is the middle one, right, sure. So you're saying, hey,
I want to get something out of you, like a
good feeling, so I'm going to scratch it behind the
ear earth. And again, like you said, you're doing that
by trying to create a system, whether it's your little
plot of land or a full scale, industrial sized farm
(10:35):
in a way that it has. It's sustainable, meaning it
requires as few external inputs as possible. That's right, But sorry,
I just need to point it again. It's still being managed.
It's still being managed by you, just in a harmonious way.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
Yeah. I think there is a word for the other
thing where you just just let everything do its thing. Right. Yeah,
that's nature, maybe like wild or something or rewilding. Have
we talked about that.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
No, we never did. I'm probably wrong anyway, although we
also thought we didn't do a cat episode, So who
knows if we've talked about it before or not.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
All right, so this all goes back to Australia and
see you in September of next year. Australia. Yep, right, yep,
get excited.
Speaker 3 (11:23):
Oh man, you just sold us a million tickets with
that accent, buddy and New Zealand, so you gotta take
it better than that.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
Well no, I'm super excited about going to New Zealand. Okay,
I didn't want to not mention.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
That, you say in New Zealand.
Speaker 1 (11:39):
In New Zealand. So in Australia in the nineteen seventies,
there were a couple of dudes named Bill Mullison and
David holmegrin and imagine they were sitting around smoking a
joint one night in the version that I have in
my head. Oh yeah, when they dreamed up the word
permaculture in nineteen seventy eight, which is basically what we've
(12:01):
been talking about. This is just put a word on it.
Speaker 3 (12:04):
Actually two words, permanent and agriculture.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
Right, good point. They said let's join those up and
he said right, and that was it. That's how it
went down. And it's a self sustaining alternative to like
what you were talking about, which is mass production of
a single crop. And there are three basic ethics to
the permaculture movement. Yeah, care for the earth, care for
(12:28):
the people, and then setting limits on population and consumption.
Speaker 3 (12:32):
Right. And so Mollison I believe, was a professor at
the time and Holmgren was his student, and they split
within a few years. They had creative differences, I guess
you could kind of call it. They both like pursued permaculture,
but through different ways. So Mollison is frequently accused or
(12:53):
was I think he may have passed accused of being
kind of a dogmatic, charismatic egomaniac maybe where it was
like it's more I waey or the haw way. And
then that extended to even principles of permaculture, right, like
if he said it, it was just that was just true,
(13:15):
whereas Hommegren apparently took a little more of a pragmatic
approach to studying it, finding out the best practices, discarding
the ones that didn't work, even if they were like
precious to everybody, including the entire permaculture movement, and movement
is actually the right word, because there is like this
definite well like Malison put the cult in permaculture, you
(13:41):
know what I'm saying, Like, there's definitely an adherency to
it that's kind of fervent. You know that the whole
movement gets criticized for rightfully or wrongly. Yeah, but they're
both kind of I think the fact that they did
split probably added to this field even more because there's
two different courses of study or of thinking about it
(14:02):
at least that were able to develop in tandem.
Speaker 1 (14:06):
Yeah, and this stuff is nothing new. They didn't invent
this idea because Tuk took in the Gang way back
in the ancient days did things like this. They worked
with what they had. They didn't have four hundred acres
of corn. They did forest farming, they had crop rotation,
they composted, they had multiple crops, and they were not
(14:27):
just out to be leading pioneers and environmentalism. That was
just the way you work the earth back then. And
that's a lot of what permaculture is all about is
returning to this idea of just sort of doing it
the smart right way. And again, this is probably not
going to be the thing that feeds the world, but
(14:48):
that's not to say you can't have a permaculture movement
in farms, in urban permaculture going on.
Speaker 3 (14:54):
Well, that's one of the things that it gets criticized
about is that people who our big time adherents of
permaculture do tend to say, like, uh, yeah, this is
this is what we need to feed the world, and
if we don't do this, then there's not going to
be people around to feed because we're going to wreck
the earth and die from climate change.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
Yeah. I get that, but I think I come from
the like reality camp, and you're not going to undo
conventional modern farming. You're not gonna just completely supplant that anymore.
It's kind of too late.
Speaker 3 (15:28):
I agree with you. I am of the same mindset.
I do think though, that you these practices or most
of them, should be incorporated as best as possible.
Speaker 1 (15:39):
Sure, that'd be great.
Speaker 3 (15:40):
So I think there's a happy medium between you know, big,
big time monoculture agriculture and pure permaculture, just because they're
both probably unsustainable for what we need, which is to
feed a bunch of people in a way that doesn't
wreck the earth.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
Agreed.
Speaker 3 (15:58):
Yeah, I'm with you, man.
Speaker 1 (15:59):
Should we take a sure, all right, We're gonna take
a little, uh, a little pause for the cause and
then come back. That was so corny and sounds like
our radio DJ. It was great, and then come back
and talk about design principles of permaculture right after this.
Speaker 3 (16:33):
Okay, you back, We're back. Are we back?
Speaker 1 (16:36):
I'm back?
Speaker 3 (16:37):
Okay, I'm back to Jerry. You're back.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
She's back, She's back.
Speaker 3 (16:42):
So, like I said early on, Chuck, the permaculture is
a little it's a wooly it's a wooly idea. There's
so many different definitions of it, and as a results,
its image kind of suffers in the mind of rational skeptics. Right, Yes,
but I did find one one definition of it that
I thought really got the whole point across hit me.
(17:05):
The conscious design and maintenance of agriculturally productive systems which
have the diversity, stability, and resilience of natural ecosystems. That's
a big one. There's a second half even it is
the harmonious integration of the landscape with people providing their food, energy, shelter,
and other material and non material needs in a sustainable way.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
That is a great definition.
Speaker 3 (17:28):
I agree wholeheartedly. And I'm not sure who the actual
person who said or wrote it was because it was
misattributed to at least three different people. But regardless, it's
a great definition.
Speaker 1 (17:39):
We should just throw your name in there too.
Speaker 3 (17:40):
Sure, we'll say I said it. So you said you
brought up the three basic ethics, right, the care for earth,
care for people, and setting limits on population.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Correct.
Speaker 3 (17:49):
Feel like we should kind of go over those a
little in depth, don't you think.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
Yeah, care for earth is it's not just like a
lot of this is about plants, of course, but it's
also animals and insects and how the air moves through
the area, and minerals in the earth, and it's basically
respecting all of the things within the ecosystem. Right, How's that.
Speaker 3 (18:14):
I think that's great care for people, right. So basically
that's saying like that there's an importance to community. It's
every person isn't just an island, right, and that this
is a big one too, that access to resources is
a human right and it's easy to take that for granted.
(18:35):
You know where in places where you have easy access
to land or water or something like that, but in
places as diverse as Flint, Michigan, or Central America, they're
the access to good stuff like water is highly restricted
(18:56):
or the water is just not good. So the idea
that everybody's should have easy, cheap, if not free, access
to something like clean water is that's a that's a
big one. That's it's kind of radical in a weird
way these days.
Speaker 1 (19:10):
Yeah. And as far as limits on population and consumption,
Robert puts it as recognizing how you have to reinvest
money in surplus labor and energy into caring for the planet.
Like it's it's it takes.
Speaker 3 (19:24):
Work, right, So those are like the three ethics. That's
not how you go permaculture. That's just kind of the
basis for the designs to permaculture, right, correct. And I
think you said that this is this is not new, right,
this is something that's been around for a very long time.
Or these some of these ideas or the sustainable practices
(19:47):
are adopted from like generations and generations of proven techniques, right, yes,
which is pretty interesting if you ask me. That's another
thing too, if you if you have not read have
you read fourteen ninety one yet?
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Nope?
Speaker 3 (20:00):
Oh man, you have to read it. It talks about
this kind of stuff where like they from just looking
into it, they've they've found that there's all these sophisticated
land management techniques that were just totally lost to time
until archaeologists started discovering them. And at first they didn't
even realize what they were looking at, and they'd be like, well,
(20:23):
there's a lot of kind of weird hills in this area.
It's otherwise pretty flat. And then they realized, oh wait,
this is entire system of berms that used to be planted,
and in between the berms were aquaculture ponds where they
raised fish, and they were just doing all this sophisticated
stuff that no one had any idea. That book is
just all about chasing that stuff down and figuring it out.
(20:45):
So good Chuck. One day you'll read it right, of course. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (20:49):
So before the break, I promised some design principles and
there are believe like ten of these in our article.
And it breaks down like this, and this is this
is talking about a farm, but we have incorporated in
this company that's come in as incorporating these most of
these same principles within like a place as small as
(21:10):
our backyard, for instance, zones. We have divided our yard
up into zones now. And basically in the case of
a farm, it's a little bit different. They divide areas
into zones based on based on the in all this stuff,
it's just sort of makes sense and it's all seems
like it would be intuitive and how Tiktook would have
(21:30):
done it. So it divides into zones based on how
much attention certain things need on the farm and what
does it require out of people in the different areas.
And so if you think of it as a circle,
you got your farm in the center. So obviously the
stuff that needed the most attention would be closest to
the center where the people are. And then as you
(21:52):
go out and out, the activity decreases like the human activity,
and things are allowed like trees to grow a little
more wildly.
Speaker 3 (22:02):
Right, Yeah, So like the zone is kind of like
ripples in a pond or something, right there, concentric circles, yeah,
radiating from the center. And I guess the center is
the actual farmer in this case, your house. Uh yeah, okay,
so that's understandable enough. And then you look into something
called sectors, and that's kind of similar, it seems like,
(22:26):
but it's actually not. With sectors. Again, the center of
the whole, the whole permaculture land or whatever, is the
farm where the people live or whatever. And then the
the zone the sectors radiate outwards, so the whole thing
is one big circle around the center, but this time
(22:47):
it's sliced into like like pizza slices.
Speaker 1 (22:49):
Basically, all right, I'm hungry enough.
Speaker 3 (22:53):
Okay, So but with that, so that doesn't mean like
you do sectors or zones. These are two different ways
of looking at the land that will overlay one another. Right,
And I've seen a couple of places that recommend if
you're setting up a permaculture farm, you want to spend
basically an entire year doing nothing but observing. Don't plant anything,
(23:16):
don't cut anything down, don't dig upond, don't do anything
like that, just observe, figure out where the sun is
at different parts of the year, where does the wind
come from, where does the water go. Are there pollutants
that come onto the property that you need to to,
you know, manage where do the animals, Like if there's
(23:36):
deer that come in and eat the garden, like, where
would they be coming from? And so that's what you
base the sectors on, and then that creates kind of
like this underlying map beneath the zones. Does that make sense?
Speaker 1 (23:52):
Yes?
Speaker 3 (23:52):
Okay? And I got that one right, Yeah, I think so? Okay.
Speaker 1 (23:56):
I mean I'm sure a permaculture expert would say, oh boys, right.
Relative locations another important part of permaculture. That is basically
designing things and again in a way that makes sense
relative to one another. So the great example that Robert
gives is is planning a crop downhill from a pond.
(24:18):
That way it's downhill, you don't need to install a
pump system. The whole idea of sustainability and so if
you can have the stuff you need to water downhill
from your water, then you have just created a sustainable environment.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
Right, And that one is there's it's an actual design principle,
like David Holmgren came up with twelve of them. One
of them was called integrate rather than segregate, and that
one's definitely part of that.
Speaker 1 (24:44):
That's right.
Speaker 3 (24:45):
There's also having single elements with multiple functions, right, Yes,
So going back to that, like a pond example, a
pond also not only serves as a source for irrigation,
but it's also a water source for your live stock,
and depending on where you put it, it also acts
as a barrier between your live stock and the edge
(25:06):
of your property.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Yeah, so you don't even need a fence because cows
aren't going to swim across the pond.
Speaker 3 (25:12):
No, you try to find one doing it, they won't
do it.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
Or a hedge, a hedge lovely hedge connect as a
wind block, things like.
Speaker 3 (25:20):
That, right, And it can also produce seeds that your
chicken seed.
Speaker 1 (25:25):
Right right, or shade if you need shade.
Speaker 3 (25:27):
Right, and so all that I mean that just makes
total sense. Of course you want to do that. But
when you stop and think about the fact that they
don't do this on big modern farms, like this stuff
is not that's just wasted area where you could be
planting more corn. You know, what I mean.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
Yeah, and they don't do Most people don't think about
this when they're designing their home backyards either. They want
they just say this looks pretty. That looks pretty, and
it may be laid out in such a way that
it's completely unharmonious and working against each other at times. Right,
why is that thing dying? It's so pretty? It's like, well,
(26:05):
it's not, it's not where it should be.
Speaker 3 (26:08):
Another permaculture principle that stands in stark opposition to monoculture
is having a single thing have just one function, or
have okay, a bunch of different things serving as failsafes
to one another. You see what I'm saying. Right, So,
like that pond can also provide water, right, so it's
(26:31):
a it's a water reservoir. But you may also have
rain barrels on site as well. So you have all
these different things serving multiple functions but also serving backups
to the functions that they share with one another. And again,
this is the idea that you're doing this if you
take the time to diversify, Like this is where the
(26:53):
idea that you you shouldn't put all of your eggs
in one basket. It came from the farm. Yeah, and
this is this, like some of these principles are just
getting back to that very simple maxim which is you
have to diversify, and the more you diversify, the better
off you're gonna be. If something befalls, like if an
avian flu wipes out your chicken flock, well, if all
(27:13):
you do is raise chickens, you're ruined. Your family's going
to starve, you're gonna lose all of your money, and
the farm's gonna be taken from you. If chickens are
just one part of a larger holistic farm you have
going on, then you lose your chickens, and that's awful,
but you still have You know, you can cut off
a cow's foot and chew on that for the winter.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
You know where the chicken and the eggs in the
basket comes from, right way that little Bobby Joe going
out to get the chicken eggs one morning, taking one basket.
He says, Paw, I got them, don't fret. And then
he trips on the way back and breaks all his
eggs and Pa says, put all the chicken eggs in
one basket. Now I ain't got no eggs. Yeah, And
(27:58):
then Bobby Joe says, well, then paw have more kids
or get more baskets.
Speaker 3 (28:02):
That's right, and that happened in December of eighteen forty
two in Georgia.
Speaker 1 (28:08):
That's right. Those were my relatives.
Speaker 3 (28:10):
That was a great way. They chalked tall.
Speaker 1 (28:12):
No, no, no, this is from the other side of
the family.
Speaker 3 (28:14):
The other side. Okay, yes, that's canna say, the redneck side.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
Energy efficiency is a big deal using energy efficient designs,
whether or not you're straight up using like wind power
or solar, or you can just simply, like I said,
build things in a way where you have natural wind
breaks built in or places to allow the wind to
come through and spread seed and stuff like that.
Speaker 3 (28:38):
Right, My favorite dude of all is the biological resources.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
Let's hear it.
Speaker 3 (28:44):
So it's just basically using nature to help solve the
problems that you have. Right. So mollusin one of the
creators of it. What is his first name begain Bill
Bill Mullison. He had a saying, you don't have a
snail problem, you have a duct of fish, which is
to say.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
That that shirt too.
Speaker 3 (29:04):
It was for a little while it was almost outsold
gas grass or you know, yeah, right, but The premise
of it is that if you are over rum with stils,
get more ducks, because the ducks are going to eat
the snails. And it's fine. It's good to have ducks
because they do other stuff too, like they walk around
and poop all over your property, fertilizing it as they're
(29:28):
doing it. Right, So the just to kind of take
a take a step back and look at it like, okay,
what how just say like what would nature do? That's
a great way to solve your problems through permaculture. Another
one is using pigs or chickens to till the ground
and to actually rotate where you plant crops every year,
(29:50):
and so this year's pig pen is next year's crop
land because you can move the pigs onto another area
and they'll turn it all muddy and turn it up
and get it ready for planting, just like they did
for this year's cropland that you're using now.
Speaker 1 (30:05):
Pretty great insects too, Yeah, very big thing to bring
in the right kinds of plants, to attract the right
kinds of insects, to take care of the wrong kinds
of insects. Right, but great, I love it.
Speaker 3 (30:18):
This raises an issue though, too one of the criticisms
of permacultures. It's like, well, where are you going to
bring in those insects from? Right? So, if, for example,
if you order ladybugs online, it can actually be really
bad for the ladybugs that live in your area because
if they are lab raised or farm raised ladybugs, they
very frequently carry a parasite that you're bringing now into
(30:42):
your neighborhood, and you can wipe out the existing native
ladybug population. So what do you do?
Speaker 1 (30:48):
Well?
Speaker 3 (30:48):
The permaculture way would be to say, I need to
attract more native ladybugs because I got aphids on my
lemon trees. So how do I do that? Well, you
just plant more high pollinating plants like sunflowers, and voila,
native ladybugs parasite free love it.
Speaker 1 (31:08):
I didn't know people bought ladybugs online. Yeah, that's a thing.
Speaker 3 (31:12):
I know that because I've had aphids before I looked
into it.
Speaker 1 (31:15):
You said, duck, I got aphids at my lemon tree.
It's a come here shot. Plant succession is another design principle.
If you think about how land was before people were
messing around with it. In a natural scene, things would
just sort of grow and develop as they as nature intended,
(31:38):
and fields might be barren and then grow into weeds,
and that that might eventually grow into plants that may
eventually grow into trees, and then what do you know,
you have a forest.
Speaker 3 (31:52):
Right, So Robert makes the case like that's apparently the
natural progression of a temperate area. Yeah, if you leave
it alone for long enough, it's going to into a force.
I didn't realize that. I guess it makes sense. So
this is basically saying, well, how can we how can
we do that if that's the way the plant, if
that's the way the area wants to be, how can
we accommodate that while also getting you know, food staples
(32:16):
from that too.
Speaker 1 (32:18):
Right.
Speaker 3 (32:19):
There's also nutrient recycling, which is basically composting. And I
was thinking the other day I don't answer enough when
asked what my favorite episode is. Composting is definitely up there.
Oh yeah, that was a great one. All right, if
you're digging this episode at all, go listen to composting
if you haven't already, it's a good one.
Speaker 1 (32:38):
Yeah. And finally, diversity raising multiple crops, having different kinds
of animals. Like we said, we've kind of been beaten
up on corn. But that's the idea is to not
have you know, a thousand acres of a thing and
have many different things. So, like you said, the benefits there.
If something comes along that is an illness to a crop,
(33:01):
you're not wiped out completely, right, you know.
Speaker 3 (33:05):
So speaking of wiping out, let's take a break for
a second. Okay, well you wiped out. I'm a little
wiped I need to regenerate here. Okay, Okay, we'll be
right back. Okay, we're back. I'm feeling restored.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
Chuck, good, Well, you took a nap on my shoulder
and that always helps.
Speaker 3 (33:38):
I got a little jewel on your sleeve.
Speaker 1 (33:41):
I'm sorry, no big deal.
Speaker 3 (33:43):
Okay. So when when you're talking about this, like design
principles are great and good and they are really interesting
to me. I think ecology is incredibly fascinating. But there
are to actually feed people, you have to take them
into action and like do something. And people have been
(34:04):
trying this right to varying degrees of success, and more importantly,
to varying degrees of scientific study. I ran across a
professor in I believe, the UK at a place called
Schumacher College. Her name is Bethin Stagg, and she I
get the impression Schumacher College is a little crunchy. I
(34:25):
think they're the fighting granola, little hippiepy just a tad.
But one of the things they teach is permaculture, and
so beth and Stag, one of the professors there, I
basically studied this permaculture next to traditional like gardening plots
that are the same size, they're they're like, everything's the same,
(34:48):
the amount of wind and rain and sun they're getting.
The difference is one is one is cultivated in a
through permaculture methods. The other one's more just like traditional gardening,
like go buy fertilizer and stuff like that. Who won
it depends on your definition of one.
Speaker 1 (35:03):
Well, which one was lying dead in a field afterward
the regular gardener.
Speaker 3 (35:09):
They both got a couple of good licks in on
one another. Ultimately, I think most people would say that
the traditional gardening or the normal modern gardening method one.
The reason why it won was because for one hundred
for every hundred square meters of land, it yielded thirteen
kilograms of edible food. The permaculture one yielded two point
(35:34):
three kilograms per one hundred meters, so far, far far
less food was grown. But there's a couple of things
you got to point out here. There was also far,
far far less time put into the permaculture plot, because
that's one of the tenets of permaculture. It's just like
plant this stuff and then just forget about it. You're
not ever supposed to mess with it again except to
(35:56):
harvest stuff. There's an emphasis on perennials rather than annuals.
There's far less inputs that are meant to be made
into it. It's just supposed to be like a little
engine you build and then start and it just keeps
going forever. Yeah, so far less time and far less
effort on the permaculture side, so it kind of wins
in that respect, right. But then also there was over
(36:17):
this three year study there were also at least one
year where the weather was really bad, and so the
normal modern gardening suffered as a result, whereas the permaculture one,
which was more diversified, had about the same yield as
the other years. So they both won. They're all winners.
(36:38):
It's like a soccer game.
Speaker 1 (36:39):
Yeah, And I think the idea too, is it's not
like like that's the kind of tests that should be
carried out over one hundred years.
Speaker 3 (36:46):
Almost yes.
Speaker 1 (36:48):
And the whole point is though still that permaculture is
not like they're not saying we will shall create more
yield than any other farm. That's not the whole point.
Speaker 3 (36:57):
Again, though it depends on who you talk to. There
are but definitely permaculture adherents out there who think that
anyone who doesn't use permaculture is an idiot who's ruining
the planet and this is the way.
Speaker 1 (37:08):
No, I'm not saying that. But are they saying that
they can they can provide more yield the conventional farming.
Speaker 3 (37:13):
I think if you backed them into a corner, they
would probably hedge that. But I think that when they're
amongst themselves they may yes.
Speaker 1 (37:21):
Okay, like you guys totally know we can't okay, we
just won't talk about it.
Speaker 3 (37:27):
Shut up, Simon.
Speaker 1 (37:30):
So there are people doing this to varying degrees all
over the world. Whether or not is if you have
a full scale permaculture farm, then you are almost one
likely to be a pulm permaculture activist or an educator.
It's not something you're doing lightly. You may also be
(37:51):
someone who's like, well, you know, I'm part of my
part of my farm here I'm doing in such a
manner part of it. I'm not. But there are things
that you can do even at your own home, like
a forest garden.
Speaker 3 (38:05):
Well that that's like what permaculture seems to really be
best at is backyard gardening. Yeah, so tell them about
the forest garden, because I found this fascinating. Man.
Speaker 1 (38:17):
Yeah, I mean, if you've got a if you have
a back lawn that is just a big grass lawn.
And you know, during our grass episode, we we didn't
get preachy, but a lot of people will say, like,
that's the worst thing you can do is just to
have a huge flat thing of grass, right as far
as what's good for the earth, And that's a total
(38:38):
I mean once in that I think I remember we
talked about that literally being just like an American creation
in the fifties or something.
Speaker 3 (38:45):
No, it was even that than that. Yeah, but yeah,
I'm pretty sure it was pretty American. Yeah, maybe English.
Speaker 1 (38:51):
So a forest garden is a food garden that you
build or plant. You build it out of wood and
iron in your backyard that imitates a natural forest. So
you're trying to sort of replicate what you might find
in that natural setting in your yard. And this is gonna,
like you said, make things a little easier on you
(39:13):
because you're not gonna have to rotate crops or till
like you normally would, and everything's just sort of working together.
And Robert has sort of a four part example for layers,
if you will, starting with trees, which are gonna obviously
the biggest thing in that forest garden. They're gonna eat
(39:34):
most of that sunlight. But they're also gonna let dapple
light through, which can be great growing conditions for certain things.
Speaker 3 (39:42):
Right, So there's you're gonna grow things like blackberries or
leaf lettuce or strawberries, any vines that are shade loving
that that produce food. But the point of this is
like the tree isn't just like, well, here's a tree,
isn't that great. It's like the tree also provides stability
(40:03):
for the vine to climb up right right, like you said,
it provides shade for these shade loving plants. And I
guess the point And I didn't really see anywhere explained
why people do this. I know it's like an ancient
technique from South America, I believe, like in the Brazilian rainforest.
It's used to great impact.
Speaker 1 (40:24):
What the trees.
Speaker 3 (40:25):
Yeah, agro forestry basically is what it's called. But I
didn't really see what the benefits of it are, especially
if it limits you to shade loving food plants, right,
because there's plenty of food plants out there that don't
love shade. Isn't that correct?
Speaker 1 (40:42):
Yeah? It will, I guess. Let me talk about what
we're doing. Okay, So this lady came in and she's
a company owner, and she takes a look at our
yard and she's basically instead of saying, hey, let's plant
a tree that will take twenty years to grow to
provide whatever shade and then go, she's like, let's look
(41:03):
at what you got now, because Atlanta is an urban
forest on its own, as you know, and there are
trees everywhere. So we had existing trees and stuff, and
she basically just sort of looks at everything, draws up
a design, and then comes back to us and said,
here's what we're gonna do. And that she's working mainly
with Emily because this was sort of her initiative and
(41:23):
she knew more about it than I did, and Emily
is more of the gardener in the family.
Speaker 3 (41:27):
Way to go, Emily.
Speaker 1 (41:28):
Yeah, but I was on board, you know, and I
was sitting in on these meetings, going this sounds great,
this sounds great. So she would say, all right, you
have shade over here, so why don't we think about
this here like blueberry bushes, This is where you might
want to think about putting your herbs and downwind from
there because of how the way the wind blows through
your yard. You might want to think about this there,
(41:49):
and we can move. Like we had certain things that
we wanted to keep, like some azaleas and some roses
and things, and she was like, we got to move
those because they're not in the right place. So we'll
put that over here, move this over there, and then
before you know it, she's drawn a schematic for a
sustainable backyard that all works together. And you know, the
(42:09):
insects from the one plant are close to the where
they need to be to help kill insects that affect
the other plant. And you know, I wish, I, well,
it's probably great to get two wonky over my yard,
but it just all works together in harmony, and we're
doing it in stages. The main thing, the big, big
change that we've done aside from rearranging and planting new things.
(42:32):
Is we got a cistern finally, so we have a big,
huge geez. I don't even know how many gallons. I
want to say, like five hundred gallon. No, it's large.
Speaker 3 (42:44):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (42:45):
I mean it's as big as.
Speaker 3 (42:47):
That's above ground swimming pool. I think you're describing.
Speaker 1 (42:51):
Is that too many gallons?
Speaker 3 (42:52):
Five hundred that's a lot, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (42:55):
Let's say this. It is as big as a it's
like half as big as a Volk wagon beetle.
Speaker 3 (43:01):
Wow, it's large.
Speaker 1 (43:03):
So this is under our deck, so it's not an
iore or anything. All the gutters in the house, all
the water that falls onto our roof is fed into
the cistern. And then that cistern has pipes that they
trenched and they go all underground throughout the whole yard
and just sort of leech water where it needs to be.
(43:24):
And then there's also a couple of pumps. We didn't
have spigots in our backyard. We still don't. It's been awful,
you know, we haven't had We've had to run like
hundreds of feet of hose every time we wanted to
water anything, and it just feels wasteful anyway, And so
we didn't have backyards pigots. And now we have these
two posts with the little pumps and it's sort of
(43:46):
gravity fed in a way, like if the cistern is
full and you turn that pump on, it'll water will
flow some. But then we have an actual pump installed
on the cistern to where we can actually use a
sprinkler if we want to.
Speaker 3 (43:59):
But but the the pump is squirrel run by a
hamster whale, right which and it's it's located in the
chestnut tree, so it's going to attract the squirrels anyway.
Speaker 1 (44:11):
No, it's sadly it does run an electricity. I wish
it was hooked up to solar, but we're not that
far along yet.
Speaker 3 (44:17):
That's pretty cool though. Man, that's a that's a neat
prope plane you got there.
Speaker 1 (44:21):
It's pretty awesome. And guess what we have a swale?
Speaker 3 (44:25):
Oh? I was hoping we were going to be able
to talk about swales. Yeahales.
Speaker 1 (44:28):
Yeah, Robert did include this in his article, but I
sent you a thing on swales. And we have a swale,
which is to say, in the back right corner of
our yard. Now we have a tiny pond. It's only
about five feet across by five feet across, and it
is round and it has a like a round berm
around it, so you know, it's like a little hill
(44:51):
and a swale. The definition of a swale it is
a is a level ditch that has dug across whatever
site you're in with the purpose of stopping the flow
of water in order to make the water slowly filter
into the land instead of rushing over it. And the
idea there is is that most people design their yards
(45:12):
so water won't accumulate and it will run It's graded
in such a way that rain water will just run
off of it as quickly as possible, right, And that's
you know, that's very wasteful, and that's not how the ground.
The ground is supposed to accept the water. I know
that sounds so hippy, but in an ideal situation, the
ground accepts the water into it and it's not dry
(45:33):
a day later. It is actually feeding the ground. And
so this swale now has a runoff from the cistern.
So when the cistern gets too full, the water will
then run out into the swale and just sort of
slowly leach into the ground around it, or if we
get just tons of tons of rain, obviously the swale
(45:54):
will collect it and the water will leach into the
ground around it.
Speaker 3 (45:57):
That is very cool. That is swale.
Speaker 1 (45:59):
It hit a super swale, but it was an important part.
Like when this lady came over, she's like, well, you
got to have a swale.
Speaker 3 (46:06):
Yeah, it's like swales are my biggest seller.
Speaker 1 (46:09):
And right now it's not the most attractive thing in
the world. But over time we're planning. Instead of grass
in between everything, or even mault, we're doing groundcover. I
can't remember the specific variety, but groundcover or malta the
two most sustainable ways to treat your yard period.
Speaker 3 (46:28):
Yeah, that makes sense because the multual breakdown right, degrade
and become nutrients.
Speaker 1 (46:34):
Yeah. So's it's pretty neat, Like we got a good scene.
It's going to be years in the making.
Speaker 3 (46:39):
Well that's another thing too. I mean like you got
to be very patient with this kind of stuff.
Speaker 1 (46:43):
Yeah, that's great man.
Speaker 3 (46:47):
Anywhere there are and I'm wondering you seem to have
a pretty realistic approach to permaculture though, like you're not
going to save the world with your backyard. It sounds
like but it's certainly not hurting some of the issues
that the world is facing right now.
Speaker 1 (47:02):
We're just trying to create our own little sustainable habitat.
Speaker 3 (47:05):
So there are we should mention some criticisms of permaculture.
A lot of criticisms of permaculture, we should say, but
they you know, we've kind of hit on a couple
of them. But the big one probably is that it's
not rigorously tested scientifically enough that it's just kind of
taken like, oh, yeah, that would work intuitively, and then
(47:26):
that it's just left at that in a lot of ways.
So there are people like Beth and Stagg who I mentioned,
and other people around the world who are starting to
apply science to these things to say this one works,
let's keep at it, this one works better if you
do it this way, or this one doesn't work at all,
don't waste your time. And as long as they're doing that,
(47:48):
permaculture deserves any respect it can get because it really
is again, intuitively, it makes a lot of sense, but
that doesn't necessarily mean it's true in fact, which is
why you got to study that kind of thing.
Speaker 1 (48:02):
Yeah, and the other thing that I saw in the
Roberts article that did make sense to me. Was one
of the criticisms was to Mollison himself because he apparently
had a stress on bringing in exotic plants, and that
goes counter to everything that our lady for her company
talked about. She is all about native plants, like only
(48:23):
native plants.
Speaker 3 (48:24):
And Mollison's response was, well, we've already screwed up the
earth so bad that we're not trying to preserve ecosystems
as they are, specifically where we're trying to make them
better through management. And it's like, actually, just contradicted everything
you said back in nineteen seventy eight. And I think
that's a pretty good example of from what I understand
(48:45):
of that guy. He's like, well, this is what I'm
saying now, so this is true, gotcha, you know what
I mean? That's just and I've never met him, never
heard him speak anything like that, just from reading about him.
That's the impression that I have, gotcha. So to the
Mulson family, sorry, if that's all right, You anything else?
Speaker 1 (49:03):
Got nothing else? You'll have to come over in two years.
Speaker 3 (49:07):
I I'll take you upon.
Speaker 1 (49:09):
I want you to see it now.
Speaker 3 (49:10):
I've been waiting for this invitation for ten years.
Speaker 1 (49:13):
Well, it's going to be twelve total.
Speaker 3 (49:15):
Twelve total. All right, If you want to know more
about permaculture, you can type that word into the search
bar how stuff works. And since I said search bar,
it's time for listener mail.
Speaker 1 (49:27):
I'm going to call this harrowing story from a fashion
design intern. Yeah, it's a good one, and I got
her permission. Hey, guys, listen to internships. I wanted to
say thanks for addressing this issue. When I was in college,
I went to work or I wanted to work in
the fashion industry, and the internship process was very difficult
and exploitive. I managed to somehow get an internship without
(49:48):
any connections, which felt nearly impossible, and worked my first
gig for a top designer, and she did not name
the designer. In a follow up email, she did, but
then said, maybe don't read it.
Speaker 3 (50:00):
Okay, but it's a top designer okay.
Speaker 1 (50:03):
Not only was the internship unpaid in one of the
most expensive cities in the world, but I was also
expected to wear an all black, fashionable wardrobe at all times,
so I had to find housing in New York by
all new clothes. Luckily, my parents were able to help
me out there, but I hated how prohibitive the whole
thing was. While I was with that designer, the condin
(50:25):
Nass lawsuits were going on, and I remember people saying
the lawsuit was just another example of stereotypical millennial entitlement.
That's obviously not the case, because, as you mentioned, it's
a social issue. Because of my internship, I was able
to get more experiences in the fashion industry and eventually
a full time job in New York after I graduated.
Everyone I work with now had unpaid fashion internships, and
(50:48):
almost everyone I work with as white, upper class and
from a good school. Unpaid internships have led to bigger
problems and diversity that I think really have hurt the
fashion industry. You always hear about how retail and department
stores are dying. Well, all the companies are run by old, white,
straight dudes, and we lack a variety of perspectives which
prevents innovation. I'm glad I had internships and I learned
(51:12):
a lot, but I think the internship market really needs
to change, So thanks again for addressing this. A lot
of people listen to your podcast and reevaluate how they
do things at their own companies and that is from Gail.
Speaker 3 (51:24):
Thanks a lot, Gail. Nice one.
Speaker 1 (51:25):
Yeah, well there be good one.
Speaker 3 (51:26):
Actually, if you want to get in touch with us,
like Gail did, you can tweat to us. I'm at
sysk podcast, or at Josh M. Clark, Chuck's at Charles W.
Chuck Bryant on Facebook and at Stuff you Should Know
on Facebook. I'm on there too somewhere, although I'm not
sure where. You can send us all an email, including
Jerry J. E. Ri I to Stuff podcast at HowStuffWorks
(51:49):
dot com and in the meantime, hanging out with us
at our home on the web, Stuff youshould Know dot com.
Speaker 2 (51:58):
For more on this and thousands of US or topics,
visit HowStuffWorks dot com.
Speaker 3 (52:08):
M HM
Hey, everybody, Think Spring is here with our Think Spring playlist,
and it's Chuck here to introduce today's episode. What's permaculture
all about? Permaculture is a pretty great thing, and it's
you know, if you don't know anything about it, this
can teach you all about it and it may just
change the way you live your life. There at yourius,
so give it a try.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
Welcome to Stuff you should Know from HowStuffWorks dot com.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, and
there's Charles w. Chipper, Chuck Bryant and there's Jerry Rowland,
and we're all in great moods everybody, because it's stuff
you should know. Time. Everything else just falls to the
wayside when we record stuff you should know. It's just
it's the reason we love doing it. Still, after a
(01:02):
thousand episodes.
Speaker 1 (01:04):
You realize every single listener right now is thinking, why
are they in a bad mood? And why is Josh
being so weird?
Speaker 3 (01:10):
I don't think I'm being weird? Am I being? Am
I over selling it? I think so oh oh sorry.
Speaker 1 (01:15):
It makes it sound like we all three were in
a big fist fight and then Jerry.
Speaker 3 (01:19):
Had recorded right, She's like just jammed a Kleenex up
her nose to staunch the bleeding.
Speaker 1 (01:25):
I am recovering a bit because we just got back
from New York City.
Speaker 3 (01:29):
Dude, it has been a week, I know. So we
did show a show Sunday, a show Monday, and a
show Tuesday, all sold out at the Bellhouse, traveled home Wednesday,
and are recording today Thursday.
Speaker 1 (01:42):
Yes, and I just want to say, there's no way
that people will ever hear Tuesday's episode because it was
the filthiest thing we've ever done on stage.
Speaker 3 (01:52):
It was seriously, man, I don't know what got into us.
Speaker 1 (01:56):
I think it was night three of three, So that
is for the three hundred and fifty people in that room. Yeah,
I hope they enjoyed it.
Speaker 3 (02:05):
It was fun. It was fun, and come on out.
Whenever we do a live show, you never know if
we're just gonna be like, this one's not getting released,
let's just go crazy, you know. Especially it was a
twenty one and up show, which is.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Really well, well that's why we for sure why we
did it.
Speaker 3 (02:18):
Yeah, that's what took the feedback off, you know, And
that is saying I think.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
So put the feedbag on. Take it off.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
Yeah, I guess so, I guess so it's not really,
but we'll just press forward. How about that. Let's do so, Chuck,
I know that you know this, but not everybody knows this.
I had a personal conversation with one Charles C. Mann,
who wrote my favorite book of all time fourteen ninety one,
that is correct, And I was talking to mister man
(02:50):
and he has a I was talking to him and
got a show coming out on Existential Risks eventually, but
and he's going to be in it. It's just like
interviewed for it. But he has a book coming out
this January and it's called The Wizard and the Prophet.
Have you heard of it?
Speaker 1 (03:05):
No? But did you just say that he's going to
be part of Existential Risks?
Speaker 3 (03:09):
Yeah, he's an Interviewee.
Speaker 1 (03:11):
That's fantastic.
Speaker 3 (03:12):
Yeah, it's going to be pretty I was really psyched
to just be able to talk to him, and even
better than that, like you know, we were kind of
rapping for a few minutes beforehand, and it was just
as calm and casual as I had always like envisioned
talking to him.
Speaker 1 (03:26):
That's amazing would be.
Speaker 3 (03:27):
Yeah, it was a really really neat conversation but he
was telling me about the book he has coming out,
The Wizard and the Prophet, and it's basically about him
trying to find out how we can possibly, or even
if it is possible, sustain ten billion people on planet Earth. Yeah,
and not just sustained, meaning like you know, keeping him alive,
(03:48):
but how could we do it sustain a blee. And
he goes back and starts digging in and finds that
there's this long standing headbutt between the techno optimists, the
people who are like, well, we humans are smart enough
to invent our way out of any problem, yeah, and
the people who are like, no, we need to really
like mitigate a lot of things that we're doing right
(04:10):
now to make sure that we actually can keep doing
this for the foreseeable future. And part of it is
on Norman Borlog.
Speaker 1 (04:19):
And see the Wizard.
Speaker 3 (04:20):
He is the Wizard, that's actually absolutely right. The Prophet
is a guy named William vote Vogt. I believe his name,
and he I don't know nearly as much about him
as Norman Borlog, which is to say, I know basically
zero about him, but he's the Prophet, so I will
know all about him when the book comes out in January.
I'm psyched about it. But as I was researching this
(04:42):
permaculture article, I was like, you can really see that
same headbutt, that same push and pull between people who
are saying we need sustainability and other people are like,
we need to feed, you know, billions and billions of people,
and that really comes together in the debate over permaculture
and whether it works or whether it is just just
(05:05):
a pie in the sky kind of idea.
Speaker 1 (05:08):
Well, I have a little something to say. Okay, I
am a bit of an IRB. Well not a bit.
I'm an urban permaculturist.
Speaker 3 (05:16):
That's awesome.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
We had not me as like I don't know much
while I do know about this stuff now after researching it,
but we are redoing our front and backyards and we
hired a permaculture company to do so.
Speaker 3 (05:31):
Really, the Permaculture Pros.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
That's not their name, but maybe it should be. Uh yeah,
So we're we are like right in the middle of
making our small little piece of Atlanta a permaculture urban pum.
Speaker 3 (05:48):
I know it's hard to say now that I'm saying
it out loud.
Speaker 1 (05:50):
An urban perm habitat if you will, urb perm that's right.
So I'll be peppering, you know, little things here and there.
Speaker 3 (05:59):
I think that would help a lot. Yeah, because permaculture,
as it turns out, and I didn't know really anything
about it until we started researching this. It is a
wooly idea. It's tough to pin down, which is really
weird because it's actually a set of design principles meant
to grow food for people in a way that's sustainable
(06:23):
and not harmful. And it basically stands in contradiction of
what you would consider like big modern agriculture, which is
we grow one kind of food and we squeeze as
much as we possibly can out of it from the
ground we have, using as much artificial resources as we
possibly need to increase our yield.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
Yeah, And that's like people throw around the word sustainable
or unsustainable, and maybe people sometimes folks don't even stop
to think about what that means. Sustainable or I guess
we'll start with unsustainable. That means that you are you're
depleting resources around you and you are depending very much
on bringing in different resources to make that thing work, right,
(07:08):
Like you're not just using what's available, Like that's what
sustainable would be. You're using what's available. It all works
together to ideally sustain itself without saying, well, now I
need to bring in this thing from way over here
to make these three hundred acres of corn grow.
Speaker 3 (07:26):
Yeah, I've got to go burn a bunch of fossil
fuels to create nitrogen based fertilizer, and it's not going
to attach to the soil very well, so a lot
of it will run off and be wasted, and even worse,
it'll end up in a pond, which will create an
algae bloom which sucks up all of the dissolved oxygen,
which creates a fish kill. That's unsustainable. And it's weird
(07:48):
because I hadn't really thought about that either, Chuck. But
as growing up, as like kids who are sensioned in
the nineties, you hear unsustainable and it's just basically in
your mind with evil, like almost intentionally malicious acts against
the earth, and that's just not necessarily the case. And
that's another thing about like Norman Borlog the Wizard. He
(08:12):
had the greatest of intentions, but you can also lay
at his feet a lot of the ecological problems we're
facing right now because of agriculture and the agricultural practices
he helped pioneer in order to feed a bunch of people.
So there's this tension between unsustainability and sustainability, but it's
also a tension between what's realistic and what's not.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
You know, Yeah, it's definitely a little sticky.
Speaker 3 (08:35):
It is a little sticky.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
But perma culture basically is trying to create like a harmonious,
holistic approach to farming and whether it be a large
farm or like in my case, like an urban small
urban plot. And like I said, we'll kind of go
over both of those through my lens and then through
the larger ideas of the farm. And it's it's not
(09:00):
like Robert Lamb wrote this article from Stuff to blow
your mind. He did a good job with it, always
does he does. But he does point out that you shouldn't.
It doesn't necessarily mean that you have to go back
to caveman days and like you have to live like
tiktook and scavenge the earth. He said, to think of
it in terms of a river, like you were a
(09:20):
boat floating down a river and you were sustained by
that river, but you are also navigating it as well
with your rudder.
Speaker 3 (09:29):
And if you have to pee right now. It just
increased tenfold, that's right. So yeah, it's not like just
passively taking from the land what it has to offer.
There's still management of it, right, Oh yeah, But the
idea behind that management of it is managing the land
in a way that the land.
Speaker 1 (09:50):
Is happy with. Yeah, kind of working with what you got.
Speaker 3 (09:53):
Like you can walk past a dog that's just sitting
there looking at you and maybe you know, give it
like a wink or something like that, and keep walking.
That's passive. But if you stop and scratch it behind
the ear, you're managing that dog in a way or
something like that. You're at least interacting with it more
and the dog likes it. You could also walk past
the dog and like poking in the ribs. Yeah, that's
(10:14):
interacting with it in a way that the dog wouldn't like.
Perma culture is the middle one, right, sure. So you're saying, hey,
I want to get something out of you, like a
good feeling, so I'm going to scratch it behind the
ear earth. And again, like you said, you're doing that
by trying to create a system, whether it's your little
plot of land or a full scale, industrial sized farm
(10:35):
in a way that it has. It's sustainable, meaning it
requires as few external inputs as possible. That's right, But sorry,
I just need to point it again. It's still being managed.
It's still being managed by you, just in a harmonious way.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
Yeah. I think there is a word for the other
thing where you just just let everything do its thing. Right. Yeah,
that's nature, maybe like wild or something or rewilding. Have
we talked about that.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
No, we never did. I'm probably wrong anyway, although we
also thought we didn't do a cat episode, So who
knows if we've talked about it before or not.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
All right, so this all goes back to Australia and
see you in September of next year. Australia. Yep, right, yep,
get excited.
Speaker 3 (11:23):
Oh man, you just sold us a million tickets with
that accent, buddy and New Zealand, so you gotta take
it better than that.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
Well no, I'm super excited about going to New Zealand. Okay,
I didn't want to not mention.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
That, you say in New Zealand.
Speaker 1 (11:39):
In New Zealand. So in Australia in the nineteen seventies,
there were a couple of dudes named Bill Mullison and
David holmegrin and imagine they were sitting around smoking a
joint one night in the version that I have in
my head. Oh yeah, when they dreamed up the word
permaculture in nineteen seventy eight, which is basically what we've
(12:01):
been talking about. This is just put a word on it.
Speaker 3 (12:04):
Actually two words, permanent and agriculture.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
Right, good point. They said let's join those up and
he said right, and that was it. That's how it
went down. And it's a self sustaining alternative to like
what you were talking about, which is mass production of
a single crop. And there are three basic ethics to
the permaculture movement. Yeah, care for the earth, care for
(12:28):
the people, and then setting limits on population and consumption.
Speaker 3 (12:32):
Right. And so Mollison I believe, was a professor at
the time and Holmgren was his student, and they split
within a few years. They had creative differences, I guess
you could kind of call it. They both like pursued permaculture,
but through different ways. So Mollison is frequently accused or
(12:53):
was I think he may have passed accused of being
kind of a dogmatic, charismatic egomaniac maybe where it was
like it's more I waey or the haw way. And
then that extended to even principles of permaculture, right, like
if he said it, it was just that was just true,
(13:15):
whereas Hommegren apparently took a little more of a pragmatic
approach to studying it, finding out the best practices, discarding
the ones that didn't work, even if they were like
precious to everybody, including the entire permaculture movement, and movement
is actually the right word, because there is like this
definite well like Malison put the cult in permaculture, you
(13:41):
know what I'm saying, Like, there's definitely an adherency to
it that's kind of fervent. You know that the whole
movement gets criticized for rightfully or wrongly. Yeah, but they're
both kind of I think the fact that they did
split probably added to this field even more because there's
two different courses of study or of thinking about it
(14:02):
at least that were able to develop in tandem.
Speaker 1 (14:06):
Yeah, and this stuff is nothing new. They didn't invent
this idea because Tuk took in the Gang way back
in the ancient days did things like this. They worked
with what they had. They didn't have four hundred acres
of corn. They did forest farming, they had crop rotation,
they composted, they had multiple crops, and they were not
(14:27):
just out to be leading pioneers and environmentalism. That was
just the way you work the earth back then. And
that's a lot of what permaculture is all about is
returning to this idea of just sort of doing it
the smart right way. And again, this is probably not
going to be the thing that feeds the world, but
(14:48):
that's not to say you can't have a permaculture movement
in farms, in urban permaculture going on.
Speaker 3 (14:54):
Well, that's one of the things that it gets criticized
about is that people who our big time adherents of
permaculture do tend to say, like, uh, yeah, this is
this is what we need to feed the world, and
if we don't do this, then there's not going to
be people around to feed because we're going to wreck
the earth and die from climate change.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
Yeah. I get that, but I think I come from
the like reality camp, and you're not going to undo
conventional modern farming. You're not gonna just completely supplant that anymore.
It's kind of too late.
Speaker 3 (15:28):
I agree with you. I am of the same mindset.
I do think though, that you these practices or most
of them, should be incorporated as best as possible.
Speaker 1 (15:39):
Sure, that'd be great.
Speaker 3 (15:40):
So I think there's a happy medium between you know, big,
big time monoculture agriculture and pure permaculture, just because they're
both probably unsustainable for what we need, which is to
feed a bunch of people in a way that doesn't
wreck the earth.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
Agreed.
Speaker 3 (15:58):
Yeah, I'm with you, man.
Speaker 1 (15:59):
Should we take a sure, all right, We're gonna take
a little, uh, a little pause for the cause and
then come back. That was so corny and sounds like
our radio DJ. It was great, and then come back
and talk about design principles of permaculture right after this.
Speaker 3 (16:33):
Okay, you back, We're back. Are we back?
Speaker 1 (16:36):
I'm back?
Speaker 3 (16:37):
Okay, I'm back to Jerry. You're back.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
She's back, She's back.
Speaker 3 (16:42):
So, like I said early on, Chuck, the permaculture is
a little it's a wooly it's a wooly idea. There's
so many different definitions of it, and as a results,
its image kind of suffers in the mind of rational skeptics. Right, Yes,
but I did find one one definition of it that
I thought really got the whole point across hit me.
(17:05):
The conscious design and maintenance of agriculturally productive systems which
have the diversity, stability, and resilience of natural ecosystems. That's
a big one. There's a second half even it is
the harmonious integration of the landscape with people providing their food, energy, shelter,
and other material and non material needs in a sustainable way.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
That is a great definition.
Speaker 3 (17:28):
I agree wholeheartedly. And I'm not sure who the actual
person who said or wrote it was because it was
misattributed to at least three different people. But regardless, it's
a great definition.
Speaker 1 (17:39):
We should just throw your name in there too.
Speaker 3 (17:40):
Sure, we'll say I said it. So you said you
brought up the three basic ethics, right, the care for earth,
care for people, and setting limits on population.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Correct.
Speaker 3 (17:49):
Feel like we should kind of go over those a
little in depth, don't you think.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
Yeah, care for earth is it's not just like a
lot of this is about plants, of course, but it's
also animals and insects and how the air moves through
the area, and minerals in the earth, and it's basically
respecting all of the things within the ecosystem. Right, How's that.
Speaker 3 (18:14):
I think that's great care for people, right. So basically
that's saying like that there's an importance to community. It's
every person isn't just an island, right, and that this
is a big one too, that access to resources is
a human right and it's easy to take that for granted.
(18:35):
You know where in places where you have easy access
to land or water or something like that, but in
places as diverse as Flint, Michigan, or Central America, they're
the access to good stuff like water is highly restricted
(18:56):
or the water is just not good. So the idea
that everybody's should have easy, cheap, if not free, access
to something like clean water is that's a that's a
big one. That's it's kind of radical in a weird
way these days.
Speaker 1 (19:10):
Yeah. And as far as limits on population and consumption,
Robert puts it as recognizing how you have to reinvest
money in surplus labor and energy into caring for the planet.
Like it's it's it takes.
Speaker 3 (19:24):
Work, right, So those are like the three ethics. That's
not how you go permaculture. That's just kind of the
basis for the designs to permaculture, right, correct. And I
think you said that this is this is not new, right,
this is something that's been around for a very long time.
Or these some of these ideas or the sustainable practices
(19:47):
are adopted from like generations and generations of proven techniques, right, yes,
which is pretty interesting if you ask me. That's another
thing too, if you if you have not read have
you read fourteen ninety one yet?
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Nope?
Speaker 3 (20:00):
Oh man, you have to read it. It talks about
this kind of stuff where like they from just looking
into it, they've they've found that there's all these sophisticated
land management techniques that were just totally lost to time
until archaeologists started discovering them. And at first they didn't
even realize what they were looking at, and they'd be like, well,
(20:23):
there's a lot of kind of weird hills in this area.
It's otherwise pretty flat. And then they realized, oh wait,
this is entire system of berms that used to be planted,
and in between the berms were aquaculture ponds where they
raised fish, and they were just doing all this sophisticated
stuff that no one had any idea. That book is
just all about chasing that stuff down and figuring it out.
(20:45):
So good Chuck. One day you'll read it right, of course. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (20:49):
So before the break, I promised some design principles and
there are believe like ten of these in our article.
And it breaks down like this, and this is this
is talking about a farm, but we have incorporated in
this company that's come in as incorporating these most of
these same principles within like a place as small as
(21:10):
our backyard, for instance, zones. We have divided our yard
up into zones now. And basically in the case of
a farm, it's a little bit different. They divide areas
into zones based on based on the in all this stuff,
it's just sort of makes sense and it's all seems
like it would be intuitive and how Tiktook would have
(21:30):
done it. So it divides into zones based on how
much attention certain things need on the farm and what
does it require out of people in the different areas.
And so if you think of it as a circle,
you got your farm in the center. So obviously the
stuff that needed the most attention would be closest to
the center where the people are. And then as you
(21:52):
go out and out, the activity decreases like the human activity,
and things are allowed like trees to grow a little
more wildly.
Speaker 3 (22:02):
Right, Yeah, So like the zone is kind of like
ripples in a pond or something, right there, concentric circles, yeah,
radiating from the center. And I guess the center is
the actual farmer in this case, your house. Uh yeah, okay,
so that's understandable enough. And then you look into something
called sectors, and that's kind of similar, it seems like,
(22:26):
but it's actually not. With sectors. Again, the center of
the whole, the whole permaculture land or whatever, is the
farm where the people live or whatever. And then the
the zone the sectors radiate outwards, so the whole thing
is one big circle around the center, but this time
(22:47):
it's sliced into like like pizza slices.
Speaker 1 (22:49):
Basically, all right, I'm hungry enough.
Speaker 3 (22:53):
Okay, So but with that, so that doesn't mean like
you do sectors or zones. These are two different ways
of looking at the land that will overlay one another. Right,
And I've seen a couple of places that recommend if
you're setting up a permaculture farm, you want to spend
basically an entire year doing nothing but observing. Don't plant anything,
(23:16):
don't cut anything down, don't dig upond, don't do anything
like that, just observe, figure out where the sun is
at different parts of the year, where does the wind
come from, where does the water go. Are there pollutants
that come onto the property that you need to to,
you know, manage where do the animals, Like if there's
(23:36):
deer that come in and eat the garden, like, where
would they be coming from? And so that's what you
base the sectors on, and then that creates kind of
like this underlying map beneath the zones. Does that make sense?
Speaker 1 (23:52):
Yes?
Speaker 3 (23:52):
Okay? And I got that one right, Yeah, I think so? Okay.
Speaker 1 (23:56):
I mean I'm sure a permaculture expert would say, oh boys, right.
Relative locations another important part of permaculture. That is basically
designing things and again in a way that makes sense
relative to one another. So the great example that Robert
gives is is planning a crop downhill from a pond.
(24:18):
That way it's downhill, you don't need to install a
pump system. The whole idea of sustainability and so if
you can have the stuff you need to water downhill
from your water, then you have just created a sustainable environment.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
Right, And that one is there's it's an actual design principle,
like David Holmgren came up with twelve of them. One
of them was called integrate rather than segregate, and that
one's definitely part of that.
Speaker 1 (24:44):
That's right.
Speaker 3 (24:45):
There's also having single elements with multiple functions, right, Yes,
So going back to that, like a pond example, a
pond also not only serves as a source for irrigation,
but it's also a water source for your live stock,
and depending on where you put it, it also acts
as a barrier between your live stock and the edge
(25:06):
of your property.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Yeah, so you don't even need a fence because cows
aren't going to swim across the pond.
Speaker 3 (25:12):
No, you try to find one doing it, they won't
do it.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
Or a hedge, a hedge lovely hedge connect as a
wind block, things like.
Speaker 3 (25:20):
That, right, And it can also produce seeds that your
chicken seed.
Speaker 1 (25:25):
Right right, or shade if you need shade.
Speaker 3 (25:27):
Right, and so all that I mean that just makes
total sense. Of course you want to do that. But
when you stop and think about the fact that they
don't do this on big modern farms, like this stuff
is not that's just wasted area where you could be
planting more corn. You know, what I mean.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
Yeah, and they don't do Most people don't think about
this when they're designing their home backyards either. They want
they just say this looks pretty. That looks pretty, and
it may be laid out in such a way that
it's completely unharmonious and working against each other at times. Right,
why is that thing dying? It's so pretty? It's like, well,
(26:05):
it's not, it's not where it should be.
Speaker 3 (26:08):
Another permaculture principle that stands in stark opposition to monoculture
is having a single thing have just one function, or
have okay, a bunch of different things serving as failsafes
to one another. You see what I'm saying. Right, So,
like that pond can also provide water, right, so it's
(26:31):
a it's a water reservoir. But you may also have
rain barrels on site as well. So you have all
these different things serving multiple functions but also serving backups
to the functions that they share with one another. And again,
this is the idea that you're doing this if you
take the time to diversify, Like this is where the
(26:53):
idea that you you shouldn't put all of your eggs
in one basket. It came from the farm. Yeah, and
this is this, like some of these principles are just
getting back to that very simple maxim which is you
have to diversify, and the more you diversify, the better
off you're gonna be. If something befalls, like if an
avian flu wipes out your chicken flock, well, if all
(27:13):
you do is raise chickens, you're ruined. Your family's going
to starve, you're gonna lose all of your money, and
the farm's gonna be taken from you. If chickens are
just one part of a larger holistic farm you have
going on, then you lose your chickens, and that's awful,
but you still have You know, you can cut off
a cow's foot and chew on that for the winter.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
You know where the chicken and the eggs in the
basket comes from, right way that little Bobby Joe going
out to get the chicken eggs one morning, taking one basket.
He says, Paw, I got them, don't fret. And then
he trips on the way back and breaks all his
eggs and Pa says, put all the chicken eggs in
one basket. Now I ain't got no eggs. Yeah, And
(27:58):
then Bobby Joe says, well, then paw have more kids
or get more baskets.
Speaker 3 (28:02):
That's right, and that happened in December of eighteen forty
two in Georgia.
Speaker 1 (28:08):
That's right. Those were my relatives.
Speaker 3 (28:10):
That was a great way. They chalked tall.
Speaker 1 (28:12):
No, no, no, this is from the other side of
the family.
Speaker 3 (28:14):
The other side. Okay, yes, that's canna say, the redneck side.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
Energy efficiency is a big deal using energy efficient designs,
whether or not you're straight up using like wind power
or solar, or you can just simply, like I said,
build things in a way where you have natural wind
breaks built in or places to allow the wind to
come through and spread seed and stuff like that.
Speaker 3 (28:38):
Right, My favorite dude of all is the biological resources.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
Let's hear it.
Speaker 3 (28:44):
So it's just basically using nature to help solve the
problems that you have. Right. So mollusin one of the
creators of it. What is his first name begain Bill
Bill Mullison. He had a saying, you don't have a
snail problem, you have a duct of fish, which is
to say.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
That that shirt too.
Speaker 3 (29:04):
It was for a little while it was almost outsold
gas grass or you know, yeah, right, but The premise
of it is that if you are over rum with stils,
get more ducks, because the ducks are going to eat
the snails. And it's fine. It's good to have ducks
because they do other stuff too, like they walk around
and poop all over your property, fertilizing it as they're
(29:28):
doing it. Right, So the just to kind of take
a take a step back and look at it like, okay,
what how just say like what would nature do? That's
a great way to solve your problems through permaculture. Another
one is using pigs or chickens to till the ground
and to actually rotate where you plant crops every year,
(29:50):
and so this year's pig pen is next year's crop
land because you can move the pigs onto another area
and they'll turn it all muddy and turn it up
and get it ready for planting, just like they did
for this year's cropland that you're using now.
Speaker 1 (30:05):
Pretty great insects too, Yeah, very big thing to bring
in the right kinds of plants, to attract the right
kinds of insects, to take care of the wrong kinds
of insects. Right, but great, I love it.
Speaker 3 (30:18):
This raises an issue though, too one of the criticisms
of permacultures. It's like, well, where are you going to
bring in those insects from? Right? So, if, for example,
if you order ladybugs online, it can actually be really
bad for the ladybugs that live in your area because
if they are lab raised or farm raised ladybugs, they
very frequently carry a parasite that you're bringing now into
(30:42):
your neighborhood, and you can wipe out the existing native
ladybug population. So what do you do?
Speaker 1 (30:48):
Well?
Speaker 3 (30:48):
The permaculture way would be to say, I need to
attract more native ladybugs because I got aphids on my
lemon trees. So how do I do that? Well, you
just plant more high pollinating plants like sunflowers, and voila,
native ladybugs parasite free love it.
Speaker 1 (31:08):
I didn't know people bought ladybugs online. Yeah, that's a thing.
Speaker 3 (31:12):
I know that because I've had aphids before I looked
into it.
Speaker 1 (31:15):
You said, duck, I got aphids at my lemon tree.
It's a come here shot. Plant succession is another design principle.
If you think about how land was before people were
messing around with it. In a natural scene, things would
just sort of grow and develop as they as nature intended,
(31:38):
and fields might be barren and then grow into weeds,
and that that might eventually grow into plants that may
eventually grow into trees, and then what do you know,
you have a forest.
Speaker 3 (31:52):
Right, So Robert makes the case like that's apparently the
natural progression of a temperate area. Yeah, if you leave
it alone for long enough, it's going to into a force.
I didn't realize that. I guess it makes sense. So
this is basically saying, well, how can we how can
we do that if that's the way the plant, if
that's the way the area wants to be, how can
we accommodate that while also getting you know, food staples
(32:16):
from that too.
Speaker 1 (32:18):
Right.
Speaker 3 (32:19):
There's also nutrient recycling, which is basically composting. And I
was thinking the other day I don't answer enough when
asked what my favorite episode is. Composting is definitely up there.
Oh yeah, that was a great one. All right, if
you're digging this episode at all, go listen to composting
if you haven't already, it's a good one.
Speaker 1 (32:38):
Yeah. And finally, diversity raising multiple crops, having different kinds
of animals. Like we said, we've kind of been beaten
up on corn. But that's the idea is to not
have you know, a thousand acres of a thing and
have many different things. So, like you said, the benefits there.
If something comes along that is an illness to a crop,
(33:01):
you're not wiped out completely, right, you know.
Speaker 3 (33:05):
So speaking of wiping out, let's take a break for
a second. Okay, well you wiped out. I'm a little
wiped I need to regenerate here. Okay, Okay, we'll be
right back. Okay, we're back. I'm feeling restored.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
Chuck, good, Well, you took a nap on my shoulder
and that always helps.
Speaker 3 (33:38):
I got a little jewel on your sleeve.
Speaker 1 (33:41):
I'm sorry, no big deal.
Speaker 3 (33:43):
Okay. So when when you're talking about this, like design
principles are great and good and they are really interesting
to me. I think ecology is incredibly fascinating. But there
are to actually feed people, you have to take them
into action and like do something. And people have been
(34:04):
trying this right to varying degrees of success, and more importantly,
to varying degrees of scientific study. I ran across a
professor in I believe, the UK at a place called
Schumacher College. Her name is Bethin Stagg, and she I
get the impression Schumacher College is a little crunchy. I
(34:25):
think they're the fighting granola, little hippiepy just a tad.
But one of the things they teach is permaculture, and
so beth and Stag, one of the professors there, I
basically studied this permaculture next to traditional like gardening plots
that are the same size, they're they're like, everything's the same,
(34:48):
the amount of wind and rain and sun they're getting.
The difference is one is one is cultivated in a
through permaculture methods. The other one's more just like traditional gardening,
like go buy fertilizer and stuff like that. Who won
it depends on your definition of one.
Speaker 1 (35:03):
Well, which one was lying dead in a field afterward
the regular gardener.
Speaker 3 (35:09):
They both got a couple of good licks in on
one another. Ultimately, I think most people would say that
the traditional gardening or the normal modern gardening method one.
The reason why it won was because for one hundred
for every hundred square meters of land, it yielded thirteen
kilograms of edible food. The permaculture one yielded two point
(35:34):
three kilograms per one hundred meters, so far, far far
less food was grown. But there's a couple of things
you got to point out here. There was also far,
far far less time put into the permaculture plot, because
that's one of the tenets of permaculture. It's just like
plant this stuff and then just forget about it. You're
not ever supposed to mess with it again except to
(35:56):
harvest stuff. There's an emphasis on perennials rather than annuals.
There's far less inputs that are meant to be made
into it. It's just supposed to be like a little
engine you build and then start and it just keeps
going forever. Yeah, so far less time and far less
effort on the permaculture side, so it kind of wins
in that respect, right. But then also there was over
(36:17):
this three year study there were also at least one
year where the weather was really bad, and so the
normal modern gardening suffered as a result, whereas the permaculture one,
which was more diversified, had about the same yield as
the other years. So they both won. They're all winners.
(36:38):
It's like a soccer game.
Speaker 1 (36:39):
Yeah, And I think the idea too, is it's not
like like that's the kind of tests that should be
carried out over one hundred years.
Speaker 3 (36:46):
Almost yes.
Speaker 1 (36:48):
And the whole point is though still that permaculture is
not like they're not saying we will shall create more
yield than any other farm. That's not the whole point.
Speaker 3 (36:57):
Again, though it depends on who you talk to. There
are but definitely permaculture adherents out there who think that
anyone who doesn't use permaculture is an idiot who's ruining
the planet and this is the way.
Speaker 1 (37:08):
No, I'm not saying that. But are they saying that
they can they can provide more yield the conventional farming.
Speaker 3 (37:13):
I think if you backed them into a corner, they
would probably hedge that. But I think that when they're
amongst themselves they may yes.
Speaker 1 (37:21):
Okay, like you guys totally know we can't okay, we
just won't talk about it.
Speaker 3 (37:27):
Shut up, Simon.
Speaker 1 (37:30):
So there are people doing this to varying degrees all
over the world. Whether or not is if you have
a full scale permaculture farm, then you are almost one
likely to be a pulm permaculture activist or an educator.
It's not something you're doing lightly. You may also be
(37:51):
someone who's like, well, you know, I'm part of my
part of my farm here I'm doing in such a
manner part of it. I'm not. But there are things
that you can do even at your own home, like
a forest garden.
Speaker 3 (38:05):
Well that that's like what permaculture seems to really be
best at is backyard gardening. Yeah, so tell them about
the forest garden, because I found this fascinating. Man.
Speaker 1 (38:17):
Yeah, I mean, if you've got a if you have
a back lawn that is just a big grass lawn.
And you know, during our grass episode, we we didn't
get preachy, but a lot of people will say, like,
that's the worst thing you can do is just to
have a huge flat thing of grass, right as far
as what's good for the earth, And that's a total
(38:38):
I mean once in that I think I remember we
talked about that literally being just like an American creation
in the fifties or something.
Speaker 3 (38:45):
No, it was even that than that. Yeah, but yeah,
I'm pretty sure it was pretty American. Yeah, maybe English.
Speaker 1 (38:51):
So a forest garden is a food garden that you
build or plant. You build it out of wood and
iron in your backyard that imitates a natural forest. So
you're trying to sort of replicate what you might find
in that natural setting in your yard. And this is gonna,
like you said, make things a little easier on you
(39:13):
because you're not gonna have to rotate crops or till
like you normally would, and everything's just sort of working together.
And Robert has sort of a four part example for layers,
if you will, starting with trees, which are gonna obviously
the biggest thing in that forest garden. They're gonna eat
(39:34):
most of that sunlight. But they're also gonna let dapple
light through, which can be great growing conditions for certain things.
Speaker 3 (39:42):
Right, So there's you're gonna grow things like blackberries or
leaf lettuce or strawberries, any vines that are shade loving
that that produce food. But the point of this is
like the tree isn't just like, well, here's a tree,
isn't that great. It's like the tree also provides stability
(40:03):
for the vine to climb up right right, like you said,
it provides shade for these shade loving plants. And I
guess the point And I didn't really see anywhere explained
why people do this. I know it's like an ancient
technique from South America, I believe, like in the Brazilian rainforest.
It's used to great impact.
Speaker 1 (40:24):
What the trees.
Speaker 3 (40:25):
Yeah, agro forestry basically is what it's called. But I
didn't really see what the benefits of it are, especially
if it limits you to shade loving food plants, right,
because there's plenty of food plants out there that don't
love shade. Isn't that correct?
Speaker 1 (40:42):
Yeah? It will, I guess. Let me talk about what
we're doing. Okay, So this lady came in and she's
a company owner, and she takes a look at our
yard and she's basically instead of saying, hey, let's plant
a tree that will take twenty years to grow to
provide whatever shade and then go, she's like, let's look
(41:03):
at what you got now, because Atlanta is an urban
forest on its own, as you know, and there are
trees everywhere. So we had existing trees and stuff, and
she basically just sort of looks at everything, draws up
a design, and then comes back to us and said,
here's what we're gonna do. And that she's working mainly
with Emily because this was sort of her initiative and
(41:23):
she knew more about it than I did, and Emily
is more of the gardener in the family.
Speaker 3 (41:27):
Way to go, Emily.
Speaker 1 (41:28):
Yeah, but I was on board, you know, and I
was sitting in on these meetings, going this sounds great,
this sounds great. So she would say, all right, you
have shade over here, so why don't we think about
this here like blueberry bushes, This is where you might
want to think about putting your herbs and downwind from
there because of how the way the wind blows through
your yard. You might want to think about this there,
(41:49):
and we can move. Like we had certain things that
we wanted to keep, like some azaleas and some roses
and things, and she was like, we got to move
those because they're not in the right place. So we'll
put that over here, move this over there, and then
before you know it, she's drawn a schematic for a
sustainable backyard that all works together. And you know, the
(42:09):
insects from the one plant are close to the where
they need to be to help kill insects that affect
the other plant. And you know, I wish, I, well,
it's probably great to get two wonky over my yard,
but it just all works together in harmony, and we're
doing it in stages. The main thing, the big, big
change that we've done aside from rearranging and planting new things.
(42:32):
Is we got a cistern finally, so we have a big,
huge geez. I don't even know how many gallons. I
want to say, like five hundred gallon. No, it's large.
Speaker 3 (42:44):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (42:45):
I mean it's as big as.
Speaker 3 (42:47):
That's above ground swimming pool. I think you're describing.
Speaker 1 (42:51):
Is that too many gallons?
Speaker 3 (42:52):
Five hundred that's a lot, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (42:55):
Let's say this. It is as big as a it's
like half as big as a Volk wagon beetle.
Speaker 3 (43:01):
Wow, it's large.
Speaker 1 (43:03):
So this is under our deck, so it's not an
iore or anything. All the gutters in the house, all
the water that falls onto our roof is fed into
the cistern. And then that cistern has pipes that they
trenched and they go all underground throughout the whole yard
and just sort of leech water where it needs to be.
(43:24):
And then there's also a couple of pumps. We didn't
have spigots in our backyard. We still don't. It's been awful,
you know, we haven't had We've had to run like
hundreds of feet of hose every time we wanted to
water anything, and it just feels wasteful anyway, And so
we didn't have backyards pigots. And now we have these
two posts with the little pumps and it's sort of
(43:46):
gravity fed in a way, like if the cistern is
full and you turn that pump on, it'll water will
flow some. But then we have an actual pump installed
on the cistern to where we can actually use a
sprinkler if we want to.
Speaker 3 (43:59):
But but the the pump is squirrel run by a
hamster whale, right which and it's it's located in the
chestnut tree, so it's going to attract the squirrels anyway.
Speaker 1 (44:11):
No, it's sadly it does run an electricity. I wish
it was hooked up to solar, but we're not that
far along yet.
Speaker 3 (44:17):
That's pretty cool though. Man, that's a that's a neat
prope plane you got there.
Speaker 1 (44:21):
It's pretty awesome. And guess what we have a swale?
Speaker 3 (44:25):
Oh? I was hoping we were going to be able
to talk about swales. Yeahales.
Speaker 1 (44:28):
Yeah, Robert did include this in his article, but I
sent you a thing on swales. And we have a swale,
which is to say, in the back right corner of
our yard. Now we have a tiny pond. It's only
about five feet across by five feet across, and it
is round and it has a like a round berm
around it, so you know, it's like a little hill
(44:51):
and a swale. The definition of a swale it is
a is a level ditch that has dug across whatever
site you're in with the purpose of stopping the flow
of water in order to make the water slowly filter
into the land instead of rushing over it. And the
idea there is is that most people design their yards
(45:12):
so water won't accumulate and it will run It's graded
in such a way that rain water will just run
off of it as quickly as possible, right, And that's
you know, that's very wasteful, and that's not how the ground.
The ground is supposed to accept the water. I know
that sounds so hippy, but in an ideal situation, the
ground accepts the water into it and it's not dry
(45:33):
a day later. It is actually feeding the ground. And
so this swale now has a runoff from the cistern.
So when the cistern gets too full, the water will
then run out into the swale and just sort of
slowly leach into the ground around it, or if we
get just tons of tons of rain, obviously the swale
(45:54):
will collect it and the water will leach into the
ground around it.
Speaker 3 (45:57):
That is very cool. That is swale.
Speaker 1 (45:59):
It hit a super swale, but it was an important part.
Like when this lady came over, she's like, well, you
got to have a swale.
Speaker 3 (46:06):
Yeah, it's like swales are my biggest seller.
Speaker 1 (46:09):
And right now it's not the most attractive thing in
the world. But over time we're planning. Instead of grass
in between everything, or even mault, we're doing groundcover. I
can't remember the specific variety, but groundcover or malta the
two most sustainable ways to treat your yard period.
Speaker 3 (46:28):
Yeah, that makes sense because the multual breakdown right, degrade
and become nutrients.
Speaker 1 (46:34):
Yeah. So's it's pretty neat, Like we got a good scene.
It's going to be years in the making.
Speaker 3 (46:39):
Well that's another thing too. I mean like you got
to be very patient with this kind of stuff.
Speaker 1 (46:43):
Yeah, that's great man.
Speaker 3 (46:47):
Anywhere there are and I'm wondering you seem to have
a pretty realistic approach to permaculture though, like you're not
going to save the world with your backyard. It sounds
like but it's certainly not hurting some of the issues
that the world is facing right now.
Speaker 1 (47:02):
We're just trying to create our own little sustainable habitat.
Speaker 3 (47:05):
So there are we should mention some criticisms of permaculture.
A lot of criticisms of permaculture, we should say, but
they you know, we've kind of hit on a couple
of them. But the big one probably is that it's
not rigorously tested scientifically enough that it's just kind of
taken like, oh, yeah, that would work intuitively, and then
(47:26):
that it's just left at that in a lot of ways.
So there are people like Beth and Stagg who I mentioned,
and other people around the world who are starting to
apply science to these things to say this one works,
let's keep at it, this one works better if you
do it this way, or this one doesn't work at all,
don't waste your time. And as long as they're doing that,
(47:48):
permaculture deserves any respect it can get because it really
is again, intuitively, it makes a lot of sense, but
that doesn't necessarily mean it's true in fact, which is
why you got to study that kind of thing.
Speaker 1 (48:02):
Yeah, and the other thing that I saw in the
Roberts article that did make sense to me. Was one
of the criticisms was to Mollison himself because he apparently
had a stress on bringing in exotic plants, and that
goes counter to everything that our lady for her company
talked about. She is all about native plants, like only
(48:23):
native plants.
Speaker 3 (48:24):
And Mollison's response was, well, we've already screwed up the
earth so bad that we're not trying to preserve ecosystems
as they are, specifically where we're trying to make them
better through management. And it's like, actually, just contradicted everything
you said back in nineteen seventy eight. And I think
that's a pretty good example of from what I understand
(48:45):
of that guy. He's like, well, this is what I'm
saying now, so this is true, gotcha, you know what
I mean? That's just and I've never met him, never
heard him speak anything like that, just from reading about him.
That's the impression that I have, gotcha. So to the
Mulson family, sorry, if that's all right, You anything else?
Speaker 1 (49:03):
Got nothing else? You'll have to come over in two years.
Speaker 3 (49:07):
I I'll take you upon.
Speaker 1 (49:09):
I want you to see it now.
Speaker 3 (49:10):
I've been waiting for this invitation for ten years.
Speaker 1 (49:13):
Well, it's going to be twelve total.
Speaker 3 (49:15):
Twelve total. All right, If you want to know more
about permaculture, you can type that word into the search
bar how stuff works. And since I said search bar,
it's time for listener mail.
Speaker 1 (49:27):
I'm going to call this harrowing story from a fashion
design intern. Yeah, it's a good one, and I got
her permission. Hey, guys, listen to internships. I wanted to
say thanks for addressing this issue. When I was in college,
I went to work or I wanted to work in
the fashion industry, and the internship process was very difficult
and exploitive. I managed to somehow get an internship without
(49:48):
any connections, which felt nearly impossible, and worked my first
gig for a top designer, and she did not name
the designer. In a follow up email, she did, but
then said, maybe don't read it.
Speaker 3 (50:00):
Okay, but it's a top designer okay.
Speaker 1 (50:03):
Not only was the internship unpaid in one of the
most expensive cities in the world, but I was also
expected to wear an all black, fashionable wardrobe at all times,
so I had to find housing in New York by
all new clothes. Luckily, my parents were able to help
me out there, but I hated how prohibitive the whole
thing was. While I was with that designer, the condin
(50:25):
Nass lawsuits were going on, and I remember people saying
the lawsuit was just another example of stereotypical millennial entitlement.
That's obviously not the case, because, as you mentioned, it's
a social issue. Because of my internship, I was able
to get more experiences in the fashion industry and eventually
a full time job in New York after I graduated.
Everyone I work with now had unpaid fashion internships, and
(50:48):
almost everyone I work with as white, upper class and
from a good school. Unpaid internships have led to bigger
problems and diversity that I think really have hurt the
fashion industry. You always hear about how retail and department
stores are dying. Well, all the companies are run by old, white,
straight dudes, and we lack a variety of perspectives which
prevents innovation. I'm glad I had internships and I learned
(51:12):
a lot, but I think the internship market really needs
to change, So thanks again for addressing this. A lot
of people listen to your podcast and reevaluate how they
do things at their own companies and that is from Gail.
Speaker 3 (51:24):
Thanks a lot, Gail. Nice one.
Speaker 1 (51:25):
Yeah, well there be good one.
Speaker 3 (51:26):
Actually, if you want to get in touch with us,
like Gail did, you can tweat to us. I'm at
sysk podcast, or at Josh M. Clark, Chuck's at Charles W.
Chuck Bryant on Facebook and at Stuff you Should Know
on Facebook. I'm on there too somewhere, although I'm not
sure where. You can send us all an email, including
Jerry J. E. Ri I to Stuff podcast at HowStuffWorks
(51:49):
dot com and in the meantime, hanging out with us
at our home on the web, Stuff youshould Know dot com.
Speaker 2 (51:58):
For more on this and thousands of US or topics,
visit HowStuffWorks dot com.
Speaker 3 (52:08):
M HM
Stuff You Should Know News
Hosts And Creators
Chuck Bryant
Josh Clark
Show Links
AboutOrder Our BookStoreSYSK ArmyRSSPopular Podcasts
Betrayal Season 5
Saskia Inwood woke up one morning, knowing her life would never be the same. The night before, she learned the unimaginable – that the husband she knew in the light of day was a different person after dark. This season unpacks Saskia’s discovery of her husband’s secret life and her fight to bring him to justice. Along the way, we expose a crime that is just coming to light. This is also a story about the myth of the “perfect victim:” who gets believed, who gets doubted, and why. We follow Saskia as she works to reclaim her body, her voice, and her life. If you would like to reach out to the Betrayal Team, email us at betrayalpod@gmail.com. Follow us on Instagram @betrayalpod and @glasspodcasts. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations, and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience, and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com