September 18, 2026 • 45 mins
In 1960 physicist Freeman Dyson suggested that in the hunt for alien life, we should search for evidence of massive engineering projects that encapsulate stars with solar arrays to harness their energy. Could we humans ever make one ourselves?
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Okay, I'm back with a neat and rollicking look at
some sci-fi theories, in the truest sense of the word sci-fi,
about what lines of progress any intelligent civilization should follow.
And this concept leads, pretty much inevitably, to things like
building space probes and harnessing the energy of stars, all
of which should leave some telltale trace of a civilization
(00:24):
already far more advanced than ours. What happens after that
is another story. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know from HowStuffWorks.com. Hey,
and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, and there's
(00:45):
Charles W. Chuck Bryant. Jerry's over there with their foot
on the button, and that means this is Stuff You
Should Know, the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
The foot on the button.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
Just waiting to cut us off.
Speaker 2 (00:59):
Yeah, that's what no one knows, but Jerry has a
kill switch at her foot for all of our profane tirades.
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Yeah, it would kill us if she ever pressed it.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
That's right.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
That's why they call it that.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
But she's not very good at it, I've noticed.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
I've noticed, too. Some stuff slips by.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
Yeah, I told her she's like Keith Richards of podcast
producers because he can't use guitar pedals.
Speaker 1 (01:23):
So he's known for that? Is that a thing?
Speaker 2 (01:25):
Well, I mean, I don't know. how known he is
maybe among guitar players, but he, uh, he just plugs
right into the amp. That's pretty great.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
Oh, I see.
Speaker 2 (01:34):
And his, he was on, uh, uh, Mark Marin's podcast.
It was a great interview. And Marin, he, you know,
it's pure Keith Richards. And he was just basically like,
you know, I have a hard time standing upright. Like
I can't mess with trying to press foot pedals.
Speaker 1 (01:49):
That's Keith, man.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
Yep. Very pure. Yeah. And by pure, I mean, Pure heroin. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
Pure China.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
No, he's clean now, but.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
Is he really? That's astounding.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
Well, I mean, no, I mean, he doesn't do like
hard drugs anymore.
Speaker 1 (02:08):
I gotcha.
Speaker 2 (02:08):
I think he drinks and smokes weed.
Speaker 1 (02:10):
I gotcha. But it's clean-ish.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
Come on. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
He still smokes too. That's like pristine.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
Actually, Marin smoked his first cigarette in a decade in
that show with him.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
Oh, that was smart. That was a good decision.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
He was like, I have to. How can I not?
Speaker 1 (02:25):
Yeah, he easily could not have done that. I'm disappointed.
Did he really? Yeah.
Speaker 2 (02:31):
Keith Richards offered him a smoke, and he's like, sure.
Speaker 1 (02:33):
Yeah. I mean, I see that, but at the same time,
I also see not smoking.
Speaker 2 (02:38):
Listen to you.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
I know. I'm being judgy.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Wagging your finger.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
So, Chuck.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (02:45):
Have you ever used energy? Yes.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
Well, you know, when you're using energy, most likely you're
using something like a fossil fuel, right?
Speaker 2 (02:57):
Yeah, right.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
Like gasoline or natural gas or something like that. Stuff
that comes from decomposing dinosaurs.
Speaker 2 (03:04):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (03:04):
Okay. The problem with using decomposing dinosaurs, as most people know,
is that it's essentially a non-renewable resource. There's no more
dinosaurs to decompose any longer. And even if there were,
it would take... Tens of millions of years for them
to decompose into fossil fuels for us, right?
Speaker 2 (03:22):
Right. Even if we had dino DNA and we could
make new dinosaurs just to kill them and watch them decompose.
Speaker 1 (03:31):
Which is something we would do if we had the capability,
I guarantee it.
Speaker 2 (03:35):
Oh, sure.
Speaker 1 (03:35):
Right? But we don't have that capability. And as far
as I know, no one's working on that track right now.
I don't think.
Speaker 2 (03:43):
Just Steven Spielberg.
Speaker 1 (03:45):
Right. Maybe someone at Rutgers. So we have to come
up with energy sources that we won't eventually run out of.
And obviously there's like wind and solar. And as far
as solar power goes, from what I understand, we're actually
doing pretty well right now. Like right now we use
something like 0.01% of the sunlight that reaches Earth to
(04:10):
power our world. So there's a lot of room for
growth potential.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
Sure.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
The thing is, is I also saw that if we
keep growing and our energy consumption keeps growing at something
like 1% a year, within a thousand years, we'll be
using more than the entire amount of sunlight that hits
the earth can provide. So we really need to come
up with something else.
Speaker 2 (04:35):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (04:36):
The problem is, is even if we harnessed all of
the energy here on earth, we would very quickly outgrow
whatever energy it provided. So some people have said, well,
why don't we just go straight to the source? If
the sun is such a great source of energy, but
it's shooting that energy out in directions other than the earth,
(04:56):
the stuff that is starting toward the earth doesn't make
it very frequently. Let's just go to the sun and
basically strangle the life out of it to get energy
from it.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
Right. Great idea.
Speaker 1 (05:08):
And one of the first examples, proposals of it i
don't want to say a serious proposal because although it's
been taken seriously over the years and almost been interpreted
like scripture um it was a thought experiment to begin
with it's something called a dyson sphere.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
Yes um well i guess we should introduce the man
not that we have him.
Speaker 3 (05:32):
Here that'd be awesome he's he's still around yeah i
know he's an old dude But we're talking about Freeman Dyson,
not the maker of the vacuum cleaner or the bladeless fan.
Speaker 1 (05:48):
Or the bladeless hair dryer.
Speaker 2 (05:50):
Is that really a thing?
Speaker 3 (05:51):
Mm-hmm.
Speaker 2 (05:52):
They have a Dyson hair dryer? Yeah. You know, I
was so disappointed when I found out what the bladeless
fan was.
Speaker 1 (06:01):
Why?
Speaker 2 (06:01):
Have you seen those?
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Yeah, you can stick your hand through it. It's amazing.
Speaker 2 (06:04):
Well, I know, and I was like, is it magic? Like,
how in the world is it doing this? But it's
got a stupid blade. It's just housed in a casing.
Speaker 1 (06:14):
Yeah, so there's a terrible name for it.
Speaker 2 (06:15):
And then it just channels it up and, you know,
squirts it out the front.
Speaker 1 (06:20):
The Dyson invention that always got me was the Airblade
hand dryer. I think we've talked about this before, where
you stick your hand down in there.
Speaker 2 (06:29):
I love those.
Speaker 1 (06:29):
Yeah, but they're so... Filled with germs that actually I
was in a bathroom the other day and they have
an air blade now that just blows downward onto your hands.
And it's actually I'm like, OK, now I'm satisfied with
this invention.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
Well, you know, you're not supposed to rub your hand
on the air blade itself.
Speaker 1 (06:47):
No, but it's so close. It's like you're playing operation.
Like I'm trying to remove a funny bone or something
like that. It's almost impossible not to hit the sides
of the thing.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
You know, your big meat hooks are just rubbing all
over everything. That's gross.
Speaker 1 (06:59):
Yeah, it is gross. Believe me. Cause I walk out
just crying with my hands held in the air every
time I go to the bathroom.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
Well, you and I have a very big thing about
airport bathrooms. Um, and I think I had the worst
one of my life at, uh, Boston Logan on our
last tour. Oh yeah.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
What happened?
Speaker 2 (07:16):
It was just not up to snuff. Like the, first
of all, the door, and this might've been just this
one bathroom, but the doors to the stalls, none of
them secured.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
They've been ripped clean off.
Speaker 2 (07:30):
Well, they were there, but you couldn't, you know, the
locks didn't work. It was just, I basically had to
push my hand against it, which grossed me out.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
Yeah, no, that's not okay.
Speaker 2 (07:37):
And then the gap when the door was shut was like,
two or three inches big. Like, you could fully just
look in and say, how you doing? How's your poop? Yeah.
Speaker 1 (07:47):
That's the Mr. Peeper's model stall.
Speaker 2 (07:49):
Well, it's just not acceptable, you know, in this day
and age to not have complete privacy in there.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
I mean, I agree with you. Again, I'm going to reiterate,
I think there should be one stall for an entire
bathroom so that no one could possibly sit down next
to you. But barring that.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
One stall to rule them all?
Speaker 1 (08:06):
Exactly. But barring that, though, like, The place, like, what
we have in our office is acceptable. It's a good
second place.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
Oh, it's great.
Speaker 1 (08:15):
There's, like, a complete wall in between you. There's a
complete wall in front of you and a door that's
securely shut.
Speaker 2 (08:21):
Yeah, it's a water closet.
Speaker 1 (08:23):
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. I guess it is.
Speaker 2 (08:25):
Like, you're fully enclosed.
Speaker 1 (08:26):
There's a lot of water flowing there.
Speaker 2 (08:28):
Oh, man. I knew we were going to get distracted
by poop.
Speaker 1 (08:32):
Yeah, this isn't even the port-a-potty episode.
Speaker 2 (08:34):
I know. All right. So, sorry. Back to Freeman Dyson.
Not the vacuum maker. He was born in England. He
worked most of his career. He's retired now, but worked
most of his career as a physics professor at the
Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton University. Not Rutgers. He
(08:57):
was a civilian scientist with the RAF in World War II. Cool.
Went to Cambridge, then Cornell for grad school.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
This guy's got some bona fides.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
And then he's been in the news recently by being
a big, I mean, brilliant, brilliant man. But he's been
in the news recently by being one of the more
prominent scientists as a climate change skeptic.
Speaker 1 (09:21):
Oh, is that right?
Speaker 2 (09:22):
Yeah, and not like a complete skeptic. Like he does
believe that it's, I believe what his stance is that
he does believe that it's man-made. But he doesn't think
we have enough detail about all the variables for these
computer-generated models to be accurate.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
I see.
Speaker 2 (09:40):
So he's basically saying, like, this is not the end
of the world. And, in fact, he thinks that increasing
levels of CO2 can be a good thing for humanity ultimately.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
How so?
Speaker 2 (09:50):
I don't know. I didn't get that far.
Speaker 1 (09:53):
He's like, it gives you a pretty good buzz.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
Maybe. I don't know. It's pretty interesting, though. He's like,
I think, starting about... you know, six to 10 years ago,
really started making the news with his somewhat controversial. Cause
he's a brilliant man. And all these other scientists are like, wow,
he's such a smart guy, but he's so wrong on this.
Speaker 1 (10:11):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (10:12):
But then other people are like, no, he's totally right.
Speaker 1 (10:15):
That's pretty interesting.
Speaker 2 (10:16):
Anyway. Um, so that's who he is. And he, in 1937, well,
not in 1937, he, in the 1960s was reading a
book from 1937 called star maker from, uh, science fiction author,
Olaf Stapledon. And, uh, he saw this thing called a
light trap from this book. Uh, and this book also
(10:37):
had predicted things like virtual reality. And it's kind of a,
pretty much a landmark sci-fi science book. And, um, He said, hey,
this light trap sounds like a good idea. I'm going
to rip it off.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Yeah, he did. And he actually, it was, I think,
a paper that was published in Science in the journal
Science in 1960. And it's really short. Did you read it?
Speaker 2 (10:59):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (11:00):
Yeah, it's like, I think it took up two pages
in Science out of like a thousand or something like
that in that volume. But he basically said, this would
be a great thing, as you say, to rip off.
for a thought experiment I'm working on, right? Because just
very recently, something called Project Ozma had been created. And
(11:20):
that was, they started to search the sky for extraterrestrial intelligence.
It was the first SETI. And they were looking for
radio signals. Still are. But Dyson was saying, well, hold
on a second. If you're going to start looking for
extraterrestrial beings, like signs of intelligent civilizations, you should maybe
start looking for these. And they came to be called
Dyson Spheres, because... He was the first one to popularize it,
(11:44):
even though he got the idea from Olaf.
Speaker 2 (11:46):
Yeah, he actually said he thought a stapled sphere was
a better name, but I guess not good enough to
actually use it.
Speaker 1 (11:54):
Right, right.
Speaker 3 (11:55):
Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1 (11:55):
He said it once.
Speaker 2 (11:57):
Right, very quietly.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
Yeah. But so this Dyson sphere, it was originally created as, again,
a thought experiment. He didn't talk about how to construct
it necessarily or anything like that, although there were some follow-up.
correspondence um after the letter first came out but almost
immediately people started thinking about how you would create one
(12:22):
of these things this this dyson sphere and the whole
point we should say basically at its at its basis
a dyson sphere is um an engineering project a megastructure
that initially was thought to be basically a hollow sphere
that you built around a star For example, we would
(12:43):
build it around our sun.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
Right.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
And the whole point of this thing is on the
inside of the sphere are solar arrays so that all
of that sunlight, like we were talking about earlier, that
gets wasted as far as we're concerned, is captured and
converted into usable energy for us. And Freeman Dyson's point
(13:05):
was if you build one of these things, you're going
to capture light. Light won't get out. But infrared radiation, heat,
thermal heat will escape. And so if you're looking around
the skies for aliens, look for something that has a
tremendous amount of like the infrared radiation of a star,
but isn't putting any light out. And maybe you just
(13:26):
found an alien civilization. That's how it began. But people
started trying to figure out how to make one of
these things almost as soon as he published that letter.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
So the one thing I don't get was he saying
that look for this because other civilizations out there are
using the Dyson sphere.
Speaker 1 (13:42):
He said that it would be likely that this would
be an invention they came up with.
Speaker 2 (13:47):
Okay, gotcha. Yeah. All right, well, let's go. Should we
go to this Nikolai Kardashev real quick?
Speaker 1 (13:56):
I think we should. I think we can't put it
off any longer.
Speaker 2 (13:58):
It's pretty interesting. In the 1960s, there was an astrophysicist
named Nikolai Kardashev, and he was a Bond villain. Actually,
he wasn't, but he should have been. He had this
idea that there were three classifications of civilization. Type one,
which is basically we have learned how to harness all
(14:21):
the energy on the home planet. Like everything you can
possibly harness here on Earth. And you would think, well,
that's probably us. We're not quite there yet. Really smart
dude named Michio Kaku, not a Bond villain either. He
said in the next hundred years or so, maybe 200 years,
(14:41):
we might actually be a type one civilization. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
And like you said, that's where every bit of geothermal energy,
every drop of sunlight, every, um, um, every bit of
hydroelectric power, all of that stuff, every potential bit of
energy is being harnessed by us.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
That's right.
Speaker 1 (15:01):
Yeah. We're nowhere near that right now. I think Kaku's
assessment's a little rosy. Oh, well, And I can say
that because he was on our TV show.
Speaker 2 (15:11):
Sort of. Well, he was.
Speaker 1 (15:14):
Yes, he appeared on.
Speaker 2 (15:15):
But we didn't.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
He didn't interact with us in any real way. Exactly.
He has no idea who we are.
Speaker 2 (15:19):
No, none. So type two is the next, of course.
And that kind of civilization would understand how to harness
all of the energy, not only on your own home planet,
but the energy of a star in its own solar system.
Speaker 1 (15:35):
Right. That's where the Dyson sphere comes in. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
You know, that's what we aspire to do one day. Right.
Speaker 1 (15:42):
Maybe a million or so years from now. And then
type three is just kind of like following this logical progression.
Speaker 2 (15:51):
Right. And that's harnessing all the energy of all the
galaxies or of entire galaxies, not necessarily all of them.
Speaker 1 (15:59):
Yeah. I think that the second, the second stage, the
type two civilization would be, um, the, either the hardest
to get to or take the longest to get to. Right.
And that's because when you build that first Dyson sphere,
your technology and your energy efficiency and your productivity is
(16:21):
going to just shoot forward exponentially from that point on.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
Oh, yes.
Speaker 1 (16:26):
So once you build that first one, you can start
building more and more and more, much more quickly. So
you jump from a type two to a type three
civilization pretty, pretty fast. compared to how long it took
you to go from a Type I to a Type
II civilization.
Speaker 2 (16:42):
Yeah, I think it's like any product, even. That first
one is tough, and then you can scale it. But, well,
we'll get to the robots here soon.
Speaker 1 (16:51):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
In fact, let's take a break.
Speaker 1 (16:53):
I'm getting a little psyched, Chuck.
Speaker 2 (16:55):
And we'll talk a little bit more about the sun
right after this. Da-da-da-da-da, da-da-da-da-da. All right. So I went
(17:26):
when I said the word son.
Speaker 1 (17:29):
Yeah, I thought that was odd.
Speaker 2 (17:30):
No, it's not.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
You know, I honestly had no idea where you're going
with this.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
Well, you do. You're being coy. Uh, Most people out there,
most longtime listeners know that our Sun podcast was one
of our biggest struggles and would have been our biggest
achievements had we done it right.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
It's the biggest pity applause we get for the Sun. No, no.
It was fine. That's what we get.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
You tried.
Speaker 1 (17:59):
Yeah. Good for you for trying.
Speaker 2 (18:02):
But let's talk a little bit about the Sun. This
stuff I can deal with at least.
Speaker 1 (18:06):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
As far as its immense power and energy. And I
love that our own article has some of these comparisons.
The sun can generate 5 times 1023 horsepower.
Speaker 1 (18:21):
I think that that is a typo. I think that
it's supposed to be 5 times 10 to the 23rd power.
Speaker 2 (18:27):
Oh, you think?
Speaker 1 (18:28):
That's the only explanation I have for that.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Yeah, that doesn't make sense.
Speaker 1 (18:31):
That's a really small number, actually.
Speaker 2 (18:33):
Yeah, I agree. It'd be like.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
About 5,100, 5,200 horsepower.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
Yeah, that's five times 10 to the 23.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
It's got to be.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
Someone just got lazy there.
Speaker 1 (18:46):
Seriously.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
They're like, I don't know how to do the little
23 thing. Right.
Speaker 1 (18:49):
I don't know how to use superscript. What am I,
like a great editor?
Speaker 2 (18:53):
Superscript. That's what it is, right?
Speaker 1 (18:55):
Superscript and subscript. Right.
Speaker 2 (18:58):
So let's put it this way. And this one is
the one that cracks me up. The sun has enough
energy to melt an ice bridge. Two miles wide and
a mile thick from Earth to the sun in a
single second.
Speaker 1 (19:11):
In a single second.
Speaker 2 (19:12):
That's pretty good.
Speaker 1 (19:14):
This is the only article I think I've ever seen
an ellipse in. Like the author was like, wait for it. Yeah.
In a single second.
Speaker 2 (19:22):
Yeah. I don't even think they did the ellipse right.
Isn't the ellipse supposed to be right after the letter
or is there a space?
Speaker 1 (19:27):
I think there's supposed to be a space on either side.
Speaker 3 (19:29):
Oh, really?
Speaker 1 (19:29):
Technically, yeah.
Speaker 2 (19:30):
I've been doing these wrong then.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
Well, don't feel bad. This thing says five times 1,023 horsepower,
so it's all good.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
All right, what else? One trillion, one megaton bombs going
off every second.
Speaker 1 (19:45):
If you're warlike.
Speaker 2 (19:46):
And then finally, one single second. of sun action, whatever
that is, is enough to power our Earth for a
half a million years. That drives it home.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
It does. But it also gives you an idea of
just how primitive we are energy consumption wise. Yeah. Like,
it's crazy because, you know, we're really worried about running
out of our non-renewable resources. But we use such a
minute amount of energy that the sun could power the
(20:22):
energy use we use currently for half a million years
in one second.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
Yeah, that's nuts. Right.
Speaker 1 (20:28):
So that also kind of takes your mind, though, too.
And this is, I think, one of the things, one
of the buttons that Freeman Dyson pushed recently. It makes
you realize, like, holy cow, we could do some really
amazing stuff if we could capture a significant amount of
that power that the sun puts out.
Speaker 2 (20:49):
Even an insignificant amount.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
Yeah, really.
Speaker 2 (20:51):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
You'd keep Iggy Pop going for, like, another hundred years.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
So, like you said, the idea behind the Dyson sphere
is this structure. He originally proposed a hollow sphere in space.
kind of referred to it as a shell. But I
think now, or I think he went on to make
it a solid sphere.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
So he actually said he was really, what's the opposite
of clear?
Speaker 2 (21:24):
Convoluted?
Speaker 1 (21:25):
Yeah, I guess a little convoluted. He didn't really go
to the trouble of spelling it out because, again, remember,
this is a thought experiment that had to do with
finding aliens, not an engineering schematic. So he used some very–
it was vague. That was the word I was looking for.
He was using some vague words. People were like, wait,
what are you talking about? What is this sphere? Is
it cohesive? Is it like a solid body? Is it
(21:48):
hollow in the middle? What's going on? And he came
back and said in a letter, a follow-up, he said, no, no, no.
Like there's no way you could build something that would
go around our sun that would be a solid body.
That was hollow in the middle, like it couldn't be
a cohesive whole because the rotational forces, the sheer forces
(22:09):
and the gravitational forces acting on it would just obliterate
it immediately.
Speaker 2 (22:13):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
Like it'd just be mechanically impossible to make it like that.
So he said, so maybe you would make something like
a bubble or a swarm or something like that.
Speaker 2 (22:24):
Yeah. And he said in the letter, I've enclosed some
blotter acid. Put it on your tongue.
Speaker 1 (22:29):
You're going to love this. It's dynamite.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
And call me in an hour. Might make a little
more sense. Yeah, our own article points out that one
of the first downsides, obviously, if you surround the sun completely,
is that sunlight has, I mean, I know we'd be
harnessing that energy, but sunlight provides a lot more than
just energy. Oh, yeah.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
Like it makes us happy. Yeah. People write entire songs
about how sunshine makes you happy, like John Denver did.
You know?
Speaker 2 (23:00):
Uh-huh. And that was just on his shoulders.
Speaker 1 (23:02):
It would be a global bummer if somebody enclosed the sun.
That's like supervillain kind of stuff, right?
Speaker 2 (23:08):
Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 1 (23:09):
So that's a problem. Another problem, though, is that if
you're going to build something like this, and Dyson even
suggested the size of it, he was saying it would
need to have a radius. So a radius, not even
a diameter, half of the diameter. A radius... That was
two times the distance of the Earth to the sun.
Speaker 2 (23:28):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (23:28):
So this thing would be massive, which means that it
would also enclose the Earth too, right? Yeah. Like he
wasn't proposing you just go up and create this tight
ball around the sun. Like it would be much further
spread out and it would actually encompass the Earth's orbit
within it.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
Oh, so it would be like this is mine. It
belongs to the Earth and no one else can get
any sun.
Speaker 1 (23:53):
Yeah, it would block off the stuff outside of two
times the distance of the Earth's orbit. So there's a
couple planets out there that would get the old screw job.
But the ones inside twice the distance of Earth's orbit
would really benefit from it.
Speaker 2 (24:11):
That's very selfish. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (24:13):
But the other problem is, too, Chuck, is I imagine
things would get pretty hot pretty quickly inside this thing.
So the Earth would be destroyed.
Speaker 2 (24:24):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (24:25):
And to get around this, and a lot of people
I don't think got it immediately, he said, well, you
just live inside the Dyson sphere, like in the outer
shell of it.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
Oh, sure. Make it habitable?
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (24:39):
Right. Well, that makes sense.
Speaker 1 (24:40):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (24:41):
But what you were saying about just the sheer size
of it, there literally aren't enough raw materials on our
entire planet to make something this big. In fact, in
our entire solar system. There probably aren't enough raw materials
to make a structure like this.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
No. And not still try to inhabit it. There's just
no way.
Speaker 2 (25:01):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
Some people say, though, and Freeman himself, I keep wanting
to call him Freeman, like that's his last name. But
I just end up sounding like I know him on
a first name.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
Basis.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
He was saying you might be able to build something
like this by disassembling Jupiter. Well, that was his suggestion.
Speaker 3 (25:22):
Oh, really?
Speaker 1 (25:23):
Yeah, he said disassemble Jupiter and put it back together,
and you could build a Dyson sphere that had a
radius twice the distance from the Earth to the sun
and make a solar array of it.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
Must have been some good acid.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (25:42):
Good for him.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (25:44):
All right, so I think we're both in agreement, and
most people are in agreement, that this sphere idea is
not at all tangible.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
Not as like a cohesive whole.
Speaker 2 (25:56):
No, like it just remains in the realm of thought experiment.
So why bother?
Speaker 1 (26:00):
Oh, well, that's the interesting thing to me. It basically
is kind of like he meant it as a thought experiment.
It's been brought out of the realm of thought experiments.
And yeah, we're in no way, shape or form capable
of doing this, but a lot of people have tried
to figure out how to do it. And I think it's,
(26:20):
it's one of those things that's like, yeah, it's theoretically possible. Um,
But we're nowhere near that level of capability right now.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
Well, I think his other ideas that he came up with, though,
are decent.
Speaker 1 (26:37):
Oh, like the swarm and stuff?
Speaker 2 (26:38):
Well, yeah. I mean, let's get to that. He himself
even said the sphere is probably not very realistic at all.
So why don't we do this? Why don't we think
of different machines maybe that are independent of one another
that actually circle the sun? collect this energy, and then
beam it back to Earth.
Speaker 1 (26:56):
Right. So to him, his initial idea was that sphere,
and then what it came to be was that the
sphere was like this umbrella term for these different, slightly
more realistic ideas, like the swarm or the bubble.
Speaker 2 (27:10):
Right.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
So, like, what's the swarm?
Speaker 2 (27:14):
Well, the swarm, maybe they are in different orbits, and they,
like the swarm, he likens it to B's. Like, instead
of gathering pollen, they're just around the sun, moving around,
gathering energy and power. Right. And some of those might
be habitable, too.
Speaker 1 (27:31):
Right. And they're like, they're solar arrays that are satellites
that are moving around on independent orbits of one another.
Speaker 2 (27:37):
That's right.
Speaker 1 (27:38):
And the way that they would make a Dyson sphere is, yeah,
there's a lot of space in between them. But if
you step back a few orders of magnitude further back
into the other parts of the galaxy or the universe,
it would appear as basically a whole sphere around the sun.
Speaker 2 (27:55):
Yeah, sure.
Speaker 1 (27:55):
So it still falls under that category, right?
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Yeah, he had to keep that sphere thing because of branding.
He didn't want to lose that.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
He's like, the genie's out of the bottle.
Speaker 2 (28:04):
They're like, you really don't need it to be a sphere.
He's like, oh, it's got to be a sphere. So
those satellites are actually, they would be called statites.
Speaker 1 (28:15):
Well, no, if they were the bubble, they would be statites.
This guy's got it wrong.
Speaker 2 (28:19):
Oh, really?
Speaker 1 (28:19):
Mm-hmm.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
I thought the solar sails could be the statites. No?
Speaker 1 (28:26):
So what I saw, the difference between the swarm and
the bubble was that the swarm has the satellites in
orbit around the star, and they're in their own orbits,
not interacting with each other.
Speaker 2 (28:38):
Oh, I got you.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
A bubble is where... the satellites are in a fixed
position relative to the star.
Speaker 2 (28:45):
So those are the statites. Right.
Speaker 1 (28:47):
So they're just kind of hovering outside of the star,
not in orbit.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Just kind of hovering instead.
Speaker 2 (28:56):
And then those are the two, and then the third
are the solar sails, correct?
Speaker 1 (29:00):
Well, you can make a solar sail, or you can
make any of them with solar sails, and I don't
know where that guy got that.
Speaker 2 (29:05):
Yeah, did we do a whole episode on solar sails?
Speaker 1 (29:08):
Mm-hmm.
Speaker 2 (29:09):
Yeah, so, I mean, it makes sense. If you get
a bunch of these solar sails orbiting the sun, you
might think that you could harness the power and send
it back to Earth some way.
Speaker 1 (29:19):
Right, exactly. And, like, you could use that with any
of these, whether it's a bubble, whether it's a swarm,
whatever you're doing. And if you, like you said a
second ago, made them habitable, then all of a sudden
you have a recipe for survival for the human race
if Earth ever existed. becomes untenable, right? Right. Or we
(29:42):
can't terraform Mars. We can go live on these things.
And when we think about living out in space, my
brain immediately goes to like the cramped, tiny tin can
conditions of the ISS. These things don't need to be
like that. I mean, if we're creating Dyson spheres, we're
going to be advanced enough that we could build some
really lux satellites and statites as solar arrays to go
(30:05):
hover or orbit around the sun, right? So they could
be huge. So big, in fact, that Dyson was saying,
this doesn't have to be an engineering project that's carried
out by a central global government that's directing the whole thing.
That as our energy consumption and energy needs continue, nations
(30:27):
could take it upon themselves to, individually to create these
solar sails that are habitable, put them into orbit independently,
and just through the desire to preserve one's own life
would make sure that their orbit wasn't going to intersect
with somebody else's orbit who was already up there, and
just organically a Dyson sphere in the form of a
(30:47):
swarm or a bubble could form on its own just
by self-interested nations developing this technology basically independent of one another. Wow.
I don't know. He had some far-thinking thoughts.
Speaker 2 (31:04):
Far-thinking?
Speaker 1 (31:06):
I don't have those.
Speaker 2 (31:08):
Should we take another break?
Speaker 1 (31:10):
I think so.
Speaker 2 (31:10):
All right. We'll do that, and we'll wrap it up
a little bit with how to get this energy back
to the home planet. Da-da-da-da-da Da-da-da-da.
Speaker 1 (31:24):
Stuff you should know.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
All right. So earlier you talked about dismantling Jupiter with
a socket set, a couple of screwdrivers.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (31:51):
Uh, Mercury is another planet that people have talked about
as potentially harvesting. Um, the good thing about Mercury, a
couple of things. One is that it is, uh, near
the sun. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (32:03):
So who needs it already?
Speaker 2 (32:04):
Yeah. So it would make it, um, proximity wise, it
makes a little bit of sense and, uh, I think
this Oxford University physicist, Stuart Armstrong, is who proposed this.
And one of the other great things about mercury is
it has a lot of great raw materials, namely iron,
that we could use. Right.
Speaker 1 (32:24):
And he actually suggested that we could disassemble mercury fully
in basically what amounted to a 40-year stretch.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
I thought you were going to say 20. 30 days,
I could do it.
Speaker 1 (32:35):
Right, exactly. If a contractor tells you he can take
Mercury apart in 30 days, don't trust him.
Speaker 2 (32:41):
Agreed.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
No, this was in basically four 10-year stretches. Combined equals
40 years, obviously. But I think his point, Armstrong's point,
was that you don't have to disassemble Mercury as a
whole and wait until it's fully disassembled to put it
together into Dyson to start creating a Dyson sphere. you
(33:03):
can disassemble and then start reassembling as you go.
Speaker 2 (33:06):
Right.
Speaker 1 (33:06):
And once you start getting one bit of it online,
it's going to help power and create better efficiency to
harvest and reassemble the rest of Mercury, you know, like
we were talking about earlier. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
And not only that, but you could use that energy.
All of a sudden, there would be supercomputing like you've
never seen. Space travel would get faster. Like all these
technologies that we can't even like think about yet would
be growing at exponential rates. Right.
Speaker 1 (33:36):
And I mean, that's the point. Like when you're like, well,
what would we do with with, you know, all of
this energy every second coming off of the sun? Who knows?
We cannot conceive of the stuff we could do with
that amount of energy yet.
Speaker 2 (33:51):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (33:52):
But I guarantee it's not going to be, you know.
using fuel, like charging our smartphones. It should be for
some pretty neat stuff, I guess.
Speaker 2 (34:02):
So the other cool idea is that, holy cow, how
many people would have to take part in this kind
of a project? Just literally the labor force you would need.
And I think Armstrong is the one who said, well,
you could use robots, actually. And with the same idea
(34:22):
that once you get some of these robots going, if
they could self-replicate and build themselves, then you can just
kind of sit back and watch the paint dry on Earth,
and all these robots are up there just building themselves
and working and working and doing everything for you.
Speaker 1 (34:40):
Exactly. And that's why that was his– I don't know
if it was his point, someone's point along the way,
is that when you start that– when you build that
first Dyson sphere– All of a sudden, it's just going
to keep going and going and going faster. It's going
to spread at an exponential rate. So you would go
from a type two civilization to a type three civilization
pretty quickly. And as a matter of fact, you would
(35:03):
also if this project was carried out by a centralized government,
it would spread so quickly and so far in such
a relatively short amount of time. Something like going from
that first Dyson sphere to colonizing an entire galaxy in
something like a million years. that even if it was
a centralized government involved at the beginning, they would very
(35:25):
quickly lose control of the colonies because they'd be so
spread out and there'd be so many of them that
they would just basically become self-sufficient and spread over the galaxy.
So the reason this is noteworthy is that if you
found one Dyson sphere, you would probably find millions or
billions or trillions of them in, in just a, in
(35:47):
a one section of the universe, right? You're not, you,
you probably are not going to find just one Dyson sphere.
You're going to find a Dyson galaxy.
Speaker 2 (35:57):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
A type three civilization. And that's what they're looking for
by sifting through some of these old sky surveys. And
they found a couple of, of candidates actually in the
last year or so, I think. Oh yeah.
Speaker 2 (36:11):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (36:11):
There's a, there's a couple of, surveys that have found stars,
and they have typical star names. One is KIC 8462852,
which is a sexy name.
Speaker 2 (36:25):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (36:26):
And then the other is EPIC, which I'm pretty sure
they call EPIC, 204278916, right? Wow. And EPIC was discovered
by the Kepler spacecraft in 2014, and the reason these
things are noteworthy is because there is some sort of
weird transit pattern where the light dims, I guess randomly,
(36:54):
or not necessarily on some sort of set schedule, around
these stars. And you would say, well, that's probably just
a planet or something coming in between it. Well, yes,
they thought about that already. And normally a star will
dim by about 1%. when a planet-sized object comes in
between you, the observer, and that planet. These things are dipping,
(37:19):
in the case of the KIC star, 22%. And in
the case of the EPIC star, 65%, right? Okay. They
have no idea what could be massive enough to dim
those two stars that much. They haven't encountered it before.
There's a couple of theories. One of them said a
(37:41):
swarm of comets. Somebody else said, well, you could very
easily go from a swarm of comets to a swarm
of solar arrays. So maybe these are evidence of Dyson spheres.
Speaker 2 (37:52):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (37:53):
I mean, it's possible.
Speaker 2 (37:55):
Well, you know, it's kind of fun to talk about
robots building themselves and them doing all this work up there.
One of the big problems is we're not nearly, I mean,
we have robot technology now, but Nothing close to that
at the present. And as this article points out, that
(38:16):
you would need like it would have to be so advanced.
These robots would have to be operating without fail up
there because they would be by themselves or be able
to fix themselves and fix problems. Like the intelligence would
need to be so far advanced. Like we can't even
imagine what that would be like.
Speaker 1 (38:35):
No, but I mean, even if Michio Kaku is off
by 100 or 200 or 500 years, that's not that
far off.
Speaker 2 (38:44):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (38:44):
Like if we can harness all the energy on Earth,
we should very quickly improve as far as our technology
is concerned. So who knows? Maybe those robots aren't that
far off, you know?
Speaker 2 (38:56):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (38:58):
One other thing that I saw from this, though, was
when Freeman Dyson was talking about disassembling jupiter chuck he
said that it should take i don't know roughly 800
years worth of the sun's energy output to disassemble and
reassemble jupiter yeah well that's not bad but do you
remember how much comes out of the sun in a
second we're like whoa you know that's so much we
(39:21):
would need 800 years worth of that to disassemble and
reassemble jupiter so we like not only do we not
have the capability of building a Dyson sphere, we don't
even have the capability of disassembling Jupiter. We just don't
have any way to harness that energy, which creates this
kind of chicken or egg dilemma. Like we almost need
(39:45):
a Dyson sphere to create a Dyson sphere at this point. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (39:49):
Somewhere Freeman Dyson is laughing.
Speaker 1 (39:52):
On acid.
Speaker 2 (39:52):
Somewhere in New Jersey. One of the other big issues is, okay,
let's say that you could even do something like this
and harness this energy. To get it to Earth is
another big problem if we want to make it actually usable.
Some people said we could laser it over. But the
problems with laser beams is after about a mile, you're
(40:15):
going to lose a lot of efficiency with it. So
good luck with that. Microwaves have been floated out there,
but microwaves, even though they're more effective farther out than lasers,
you're still limited to about 100 miles, which will do
us no good. Right. So what's the answer?
Speaker 1 (40:35):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (40:36):
Yeah, I don't have one either.
Speaker 1 (40:37):
I mean, I guess one of the easy ones is, well,
just inhabit the solar arrays. Go inhabit the Dyson Sphere.
Stop being so precious about living on Earth.
Speaker 2 (40:46):
Yeah, that's true.
Speaker 1 (40:48):
Which makes sense, but I like living on Earth.
Speaker 2 (40:51):
Yeah, but would Earth 800 years from now be worth
living on?
Speaker 1 (40:58):
It depends, Chuck. Will it be skipping to school and
skinning knees and spelling bees and all that still? Because
if so, then yes.
Speaker 2 (41:08):
Yeah. I don't know what you're talking about.
Speaker 1 (41:11):
It's another Simpsons reference. Oh, okay. It's the one where
Principal Skinner came back, the real Principal Skinner. Oh, yeah.
Speaker 2 (41:19):
Great one.
Speaker 1 (41:19):
He's like, he goes, if you think skin and knees
and spelling bees are corny, well, then Mr. Corn Me Up.
Speaker 2 (41:28):
That's right. That's when they introduced, we'd like to introduce
our Principal Skinner, Principal Skimor Skinner.
Speaker 1 (41:36):
Armand Tanzarian.
Speaker 2 (41:37):
Yep. That's a great one.
Speaker 1 (41:39):
There's one other thing. You got anything else?
Speaker 2 (41:41):
I got nothing else.
Speaker 1 (41:42):
I got one more thing. So there's. That whole idea
that Dyson came up with to search the skies for
this imprint where there's a lot of infrared radiation but
no visible light. Yeah. There's a problem with that because
this guy came along. His name was Robert Bradbury. He's
a futurist. I think maybe a science fiction writer.
Speaker 2 (42:01):
Ray?
Speaker 1 (42:02):
No, Robert, his little brother.
Speaker 2 (42:05):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (42:06):
Robert Bradbury said, well, you know what? If you really
wanted to make these Dyson spheres efficient– you'd make them
in the same manner that those Russian nesting dolls are made,
like a matryoshka, right?
Speaker 2 (42:18):
Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1 (42:19):
So you'd have the internal sphere and then outer spheres
going around it, catching all that lost heat energy and
turning it into usable power, which is awesome because you'd
have basically 100% efficiency as far as the Dyson sphere
was concerned. But if you're looking at the stars... you
would see nothing. Because not only would there not be
(42:40):
visible light, there also wouldn't be any infrared radiation. And
Freeman Dyson just hung his head, went into his room,
shut the door, and laid down on his bed for
a while.
Speaker 2 (42:51):
The end.
Speaker 1 (42:52):
Yep. Well, if you want to know more about Dyson Spheres,
you can start with this article on HowStuffWorks.com by typing
Dyson Spheres into the search bar at HowStuffWorks, as I said.
And since I said how stuff works twice, that means
it's time for listener mail.
Speaker 2 (43:11):
I'm going to call this We Helped a Lady Out. Hey, guys.
Hope this email finds you well. I've been listening for
only a short time, but I've become so addicted, I've
already binged about half of your episodes offered on Spotify.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
I think she meant binged.
Speaker 2 (43:29):
I know.
Speaker 1 (43:29):
Binged.
Speaker 2 (43:30):
We're on Spotify, by the way, and you can bing
us all you want.
Speaker 1 (43:33):
Oh.
Speaker 2 (43:34):
From that platform. Like many others, I absolutely adore your show.
I came across the podcast after a very upsetting event
in my life. To save you the sob story, I'd
just say I was going through intense grief. There was
something about your kind voices, strong intellect, and raunchy humor
that gave me a thirst for learning and a new
purpose in life.
Speaker 1 (43:55):
Wait a minute, wait a minute. Do we have raunchy humor?
Speaker 3 (43:59):
Sure.
Speaker 1 (44:00):
I didn't realize that.
Speaker 2 (44:01):
Oh, I think she picks up on that.
Speaker 1 (44:03):
That's like Cheech and Chong.
Speaker 2 (44:04):
The sideways comments.
Speaker 1 (44:06):
We're like the new Cheech and Chong.
Speaker 2 (44:09):
I thank you a billion times over for just being
who you are. The podcast was a large factor in
saving my life. Don't ever underestimate or doubt what you
do and know that there are people like me out
there soaking up every word. Sincerely, Cheery B.
Speaker 1 (44:25):
Thanks a lot, Cheery. That's nice. I like hearing that
we help people.
Speaker 2 (44:28):
It makes me feel good in my belly.
Speaker 1 (44:31):
Yeah, we appreciate the compliment. It's very nice of you
to take the time to write in to let us know.
And you can let us know that you think we're
the tops by tweeting to us. I'm at joshumclark, and
there's also an official SYSK podcast one. You can hang
out with Chuck at facebook.com slash charleswchuckbryant or facebook.com slash stuffyoushouldknow.
(44:56):
You can send us an email to stuffpodcasts at howstuffworks.com.
And as always, join us at our home on the
web at StuffYouShouldKnow.com. For more on this and thousands of
other topics, visit HowStuffWorks.com.
Okay, I'm back with a neat and rollicking look at
some sci-fi theories, in the truest sense of the word sci-fi,
about what lines of progress any intelligent civilization should follow.
And this concept leads, pretty much inevitably, to things like
building space probes and harnessing the energy of stars, all
of which should leave some telltale trace of a civilization
(00:24):
already far more advanced than ours. What happens after that
is another story. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know from HowStuffWorks.com. Hey,
and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, and there's
(00:45):
Charles W. Chuck Bryant. Jerry's over there with their foot
on the button, and that means this is Stuff You
Should Know, the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
The foot on the button.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
Just waiting to cut us off.
Speaker 2 (00:59):
Yeah, that's what no one knows, but Jerry has a
kill switch at her foot for all of our profane tirades.
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Yeah, it would kill us if she ever pressed it.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
That's right.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
That's why they call it that.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
But she's not very good at it, I've noticed.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
I've noticed, too. Some stuff slips by.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
Yeah, I told her she's like Keith Richards of podcast
producers because he can't use guitar pedals.
Speaker 1 (01:23):
So he's known for that? Is that a thing?
Speaker 2 (01:25):
Well, I mean, I don't know. how known he is
maybe among guitar players, but he, uh, he just plugs
right into the amp. That's pretty great.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
Oh, I see.
Speaker 2 (01:34):
And his, he was on, uh, uh, Mark Marin's podcast.
It was a great interview. And Marin, he, you know,
it's pure Keith Richards. And he was just basically like,
you know, I have a hard time standing upright. Like
I can't mess with trying to press foot pedals.
Speaker 1 (01:49):
That's Keith, man.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
Yep. Very pure. Yeah. And by pure, I mean, Pure heroin. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
Pure China.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
No, he's clean now, but.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
Is he really? That's astounding.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
Well, I mean, no, I mean, he doesn't do like
hard drugs anymore.
Speaker 1 (02:08):
I gotcha.
Speaker 2 (02:08):
I think he drinks and smokes weed.
Speaker 1 (02:10):
I gotcha. But it's clean-ish.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
Come on. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
He still smokes too. That's like pristine.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
Actually, Marin smoked his first cigarette in a decade in
that show with him.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
Oh, that was smart. That was a good decision.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
He was like, I have to. How can I not?
Speaker 1 (02:25):
Yeah, he easily could not have done that. I'm disappointed.
Did he really? Yeah.
Speaker 2 (02:31):
Keith Richards offered him a smoke, and he's like, sure.
Speaker 1 (02:33):
Yeah. I mean, I see that, but at the same time,
I also see not smoking.
Speaker 2 (02:38):
Listen to you.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
I know. I'm being judgy.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Wagging your finger.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
So, Chuck.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (02:45):
Have you ever used energy? Yes.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
Well, you know, when you're using energy, most likely you're
using something like a fossil fuel, right?
Speaker 2 (02:57):
Yeah, right.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
Like gasoline or natural gas or something like that. Stuff
that comes from decomposing dinosaurs.
Speaker 2 (03:04):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (03:04):
Okay. The problem with using decomposing dinosaurs, as most people know,
is that it's essentially a non-renewable resource. There's no more
dinosaurs to decompose any longer. And even if there were,
it would take... Tens of millions of years for them
to decompose into fossil fuels for us, right?
Speaker 2 (03:22):
Right. Even if we had dino DNA and we could
make new dinosaurs just to kill them and watch them decompose.
Speaker 1 (03:31):
Which is something we would do if we had the capability,
I guarantee it.
Speaker 2 (03:35):
Oh, sure.
Speaker 1 (03:35):
Right? But we don't have that capability. And as far
as I know, no one's working on that track right now.
I don't think.
Speaker 2 (03:43):
Just Steven Spielberg.
Speaker 1 (03:45):
Right. Maybe someone at Rutgers. So we have to come
up with energy sources that we won't eventually run out of.
And obviously there's like wind and solar. And as far
as solar power goes, from what I understand, we're actually
doing pretty well right now. Like right now we use
something like 0.01% of the sunlight that reaches Earth to
(04:10):
power our world. So there's a lot of room for
growth potential.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
Sure.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
The thing is, is I also saw that if we
keep growing and our energy consumption keeps growing at something
like 1% a year, within a thousand years, we'll be
using more than the entire amount of sunlight that hits
the earth can provide. So we really need to come
up with something else.
Speaker 2 (04:35):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (04:36):
The problem is, is even if we harnessed all of
the energy here on earth, we would very quickly outgrow
whatever energy it provided. So some people have said, well,
why don't we just go straight to the source? If
the sun is such a great source of energy, but
it's shooting that energy out in directions other than the earth,
(04:56):
the stuff that is starting toward the earth doesn't make
it very frequently. Let's just go to the sun and
basically strangle the life out of it to get energy
from it.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
Right. Great idea.
Speaker 1 (05:08):
And one of the first examples, proposals of it i
don't want to say a serious proposal because although it's
been taken seriously over the years and almost been interpreted
like scripture um it was a thought experiment to begin
with it's something called a dyson sphere.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
Yes um well i guess we should introduce the man
not that we have him.
Speaker 3 (05:32):
Here that'd be awesome he's he's still around yeah i
know he's an old dude But we're talking about Freeman Dyson,
not the maker of the vacuum cleaner or the bladeless fan.
Speaker 1 (05:48):
Or the bladeless hair dryer.
Speaker 2 (05:50):
Is that really a thing?
Speaker 3 (05:51):
Mm-hmm.
Speaker 2 (05:52):
They have a Dyson hair dryer? Yeah. You know, I
was so disappointed when I found out what the bladeless
fan was.
Speaker 1 (06:01):
Why?
Speaker 2 (06:01):
Have you seen those?
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Yeah, you can stick your hand through it. It's amazing.
Speaker 2 (06:04):
Well, I know, and I was like, is it magic? Like,
how in the world is it doing this? But it's
got a stupid blade. It's just housed in a casing.
Speaker 1 (06:14):
Yeah, so there's a terrible name for it.
Speaker 2 (06:15):
And then it just channels it up and, you know,
squirts it out the front.
Speaker 1 (06:20):
The Dyson invention that always got me was the Airblade
hand dryer. I think we've talked about this before, where
you stick your hand down in there.
Speaker 2 (06:29):
I love those.
Speaker 1 (06:29):
Yeah, but they're so... Filled with germs that actually I
was in a bathroom the other day and they have
an air blade now that just blows downward onto your hands.
And it's actually I'm like, OK, now I'm satisfied with
this invention.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
Well, you know, you're not supposed to rub your hand
on the air blade itself.
Speaker 1 (06:47):
No, but it's so close. It's like you're playing operation.
Like I'm trying to remove a funny bone or something
like that. It's almost impossible not to hit the sides
of the thing.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
You know, your big meat hooks are just rubbing all
over everything. That's gross.
Speaker 1 (06:59):
Yeah, it is gross. Believe me. Cause I walk out
just crying with my hands held in the air every
time I go to the bathroom.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
Well, you and I have a very big thing about
airport bathrooms. Um, and I think I had the worst
one of my life at, uh, Boston Logan on our
last tour. Oh yeah.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
What happened?
Speaker 2 (07:16):
It was just not up to snuff. Like the, first
of all, the door, and this might've been just this
one bathroom, but the doors to the stalls, none of
them secured.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
They've been ripped clean off.
Speaker 2 (07:30):
Well, they were there, but you couldn't, you know, the
locks didn't work. It was just, I basically had to
push my hand against it, which grossed me out.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
Yeah, no, that's not okay.
Speaker 2 (07:37):
And then the gap when the door was shut was like,
two or three inches big. Like, you could fully just
look in and say, how you doing? How's your poop? Yeah.
Speaker 1 (07:47):
That's the Mr. Peeper's model stall.
Speaker 2 (07:49):
Well, it's just not acceptable, you know, in this day
and age to not have complete privacy in there.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
I mean, I agree with you. Again, I'm going to reiterate,
I think there should be one stall for an entire
bathroom so that no one could possibly sit down next
to you. But barring that.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
One stall to rule them all?
Speaker 1 (08:06):
Exactly. But barring that, though, like, The place, like, what
we have in our office is acceptable. It's a good
second place.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
Oh, it's great.
Speaker 1 (08:15):
There's, like, a complete wall in between you. There's a
complete wall in front of you and a door that's
securely shut.
Speaker 2 (08:21):
Yeah, it's a water closet.
Speaker 1 (08:23):
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. I guess it is.
Speaker 2 (08:25):
Like, you're fully enclosed.
Speaker 1 (08:26):
There's a lot of water flowing there.
Speaker 2 (08:28):
Oh, man. I knew we were going to get distracted
by poop.
Speaker 1 (08:32):
Yeah, this isn't even the port-a-potty episode.
Speaker 2 (08:34):
I know. All right. So, sorry. Back to Freeman Dyson.
Not the vacuum maker. He was born in England. He
worked most of his career. He's retired now, but worked
most of his career as a physics professor at the
Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton University. Not Rutgers. He
(08:57):
was a civilian scientist with the RAF in World War II. Cool.
Went to Cambridge, then Cornell for grad school.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
This guy's got some bona fides.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
And then he's been in the news recently by being
a big, I mean, brilliant, brilliant man. But he's been
in the news recently by being one of the more
prominent scientists as a climate change skeptic.
Speaker 1 (09:21):
Oh, is that right?
Speaker 2 (09:22):
Yeah, and not like a complete skeptic. Like he does
believe that it's, I believe what his stance is that
he does believe that it's man-made. But he doesn't think
we have enough detail about all the variables for these
computer-generated models to be accurate.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
I see.
Speaker 2 (09:40):
So he's basically saying, like, this is not the end
of the world. And, in fact, he thinks that increasing
levels of CO2 can be a good thing for humanity ultimately.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
How so?
Speaker 2 (09:50):
I don't know. I didn't get that far.
Speaker 1 (09:53):
He's like, it gives you a pretty good buzz.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
Maybe. I don't know. It's pretty interesting, though. He's like,
I think, starting about... you know, six to 10 years ago,
really started making the news with his somewhat controversial. Cause
he's a brilliant man. And all these other scientists are like, wow,
he's such a smart guy, but he's so wrong on this.
Speaker 1 (10:11):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (10:12):
But then other people are like, no, he's totally right.
Speaker 1 (10:15):
That's pretty interesting.
Speaker 2 (10:16):
Anyway. Um, so that's who he is. And he, in 1937, well,
not in 1937, he, in the 1960s was reading a
book from 1937 called star maker from, uh, science fiction author,
Olaf Stapledon. And, uh, he saw this thing called a
light trap from this book. Uh, and this book also
(10:37):
had predicted things like virtual reality. And it's kind of a,
pretty much a landmark sci-fi science book. And, um, He said, hey,
this light trap sounds like a good idea. I'm going
to rip it off.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Yeah, he did. And he actually, it was, I think,
a paper that was published in Science in the journal
Science in 1960. And it's really short. Did you read it?
Speaker 2 (10:59):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (11:00):
Yeah, it's like, I think it took up two pages
in Science out of like a thousand or something like
that in that volume. But he basically said, this would
be a great thing, as you say, to rip off.
for a thought experiment I'm working on, right? Because just
very recently, something called Project Ozma had been created. And
(11:20):
that was, they started to search the sky for extraterrestrial intelligence.
It was the first SETI. And they were looking for
radio signals. Still are. But Dyson was saying, well, hold
on a second. If you're going to start looking for
extraterrestrial beings, like signs of intelligent civilizations, you should maybe
start looking for these. And they came to be called
Dyson Spheres, because... He was the first one to popularize it,
(11:44):
even though he got the idea from Olaf.
Speaker 2 (11:46):
Yeah, he actually said he thought a stapled sphere was
a better name, but I guess not good enough to
actually use it.
Speaker 1 (11:54):
Right, right.
Speaker 3 (11:55):
Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1 (11:55):
He said it once.
Speaker 2 (11:57):
Right, very quietly.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
Yeah. But so this Dyson sphere, it was originally created as, again,
a thought experiment. He didn't talk about how to construct
it necessarily or anything like that, although there were some follow-up.
correspondence um after the letter first came out but almost
immediately people started thinking about how you would create one
(12:22):
of these things this this dyson sphere and the whole
point we should say basically at its at its basis
a dyson sphere is um an engineering project a megastructure
that initially was thought to be basically a hollow sphere
that you built around a star For example, we would
(12:43):
build it around our sun.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
Right.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
And the whole point of this thing is on the
inside of the sphere are solar arrays so that all
of that sunlight, like we were talking about earlier, that
gets wasted as far as we're concerned, is captured and
converted into usable energy for us. And Freeman Dyson's point
(13:05):
was if you build one of these things, you're going
to capture light. Light won't get out. But infrared radiation, heat,
thermal heat will escape. And so if you're looking around
the skies for aliens, look for something that has a
tremendous amount of like the infrared radiation of a star,
but isn't putting any light out. And maybe you just
(13:26):
found an alien civilization. That's how it began. But people
started trying to figure out how to make one of
these things almost as soon as he published that letter.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
So the one thing I don't get was he saying
that look for this because other civilizations out there are
using the Dyson sphere.
Speaker 1 (13:42):
He said that it would be likely that this would
be an invention they came up with.
Speaker 2 (13:47):
Okay, gotcha. Yeah. All right, well, let's go. Should we
go to this Nikolai Kardashev real quick?
Speaker 1 (13:56):
I think we should. I think we can't put it
off any longer.
Speaker 2 (13:58):
It's pretty interesting. In the 1960s, there was an astrophysicist
named Nikolai Kardashev, and he was a Bond villain. Actually,
he wasn't, but he should have been. He had this
idea that there were three classifications of civilization. Type one,
which is basically we have learned how to harness all
(14:21):
the energy on the home planet. Like everything you can
possibly harness here on Earth. And you would think, well,
that's probably us. We're not quite there yet. Really smart
dude named Michio Kaku, not a Bond villain either. He
said in the next hundred years or so, maybe 200 years,
(14:41):
we might actually be a type one civilization. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
And like you said, that's where every bit of geothermal energy,
every drop of sunlight, every, um, um, every bit of
hydroelectric power, all of that stuff, every potential bit of
energy is being harnessed by us.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
That's right.
Speaker 1 (15:01):
Yeah. We're nowhere near that right now. I think Kaku's
assessment's a little rosy. Oh, well, And I can say
that because he was on our TV show.
Speaker 2 (15:11):
Sort of. Well, he was.
Speaker 1 (15:14):
Yes, he appeared on.
Speaker 2 (15:15):
But we didn't.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
He didn't interact with us in any real way. Exactly.
He has no idea who we are.
Speaker 2 (15:19):
No, none. So type two is the next, of course.
And that kind of civilization would understand how to harness
all of the energy, not only on your own home planet,
but the energy of a star in its own solar system.
Speaker 1 (15:35):
Right. That's where the Dyson sphere comes in. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
You know, that's what we aspire to do one day. Right.
Speaker 1 (15:42):
Maybe a million or so years from now. And then
type three is just kind of like following this logical progression.
Speaker 2 (15:51):
Right. And that's harnessing all the energy of all the
galaxies or of entire galaxies, not necessarily all of them.
Speaker 1 (15:59):
Yeah. I think that the second, the second stage, the
type two civilization would be, um, the, either the hardest
to get to or take the longest to get to. Right.
And that's because when you build that first Dyson sphere,
your technology and your energy efficiency and your productivity is
(16:21):
going to just shoot forward exponentially from that point on.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
Oh, yes.
Speaker 1 (16:26):
So once you build that first one, you can start
building more and more and more, much more quickly. So
you jump from a type two to a type three
civilization pretty, pretty fast. compared to how long it took
you to go from a Type I to a Type
II civilization.
Speaker 2 (16:42):
Yeah, I think it's like any product, even. That first
one is tough, and then you can scale it. But, well,
we'll get to the robots here soon.
Speaker 1 (16:51):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
In fact, let's take a break.
Speaker 1 (16:53):
I'm getting a little psyched, Chuck.
Speaker 2 (16:55):
And we'll talk a little bit more about the sun
right after this. Da-da-da-da-da, da-da-da-da-da. All right. So I went
(17:26):
when I said the word son.
Speaker 1 (17:29):
Yeah, I thought that was odd.
Speaker 2 (17:30):
No, it's not.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
You know, I honestly had no idea where you're going
with this.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
Well, you do. You're being coy. Uh, Most people out there,
most longtime listeners know that our Sun podcast was one
of our biggest struggles and would have been our biggest
achievements had we done it right.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
It's the biggest pity applause we get for the Sun. No, no.
It was fine. That's what we get.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
You tried.
Speaker 1 (17:59):
Yeah. Good for you for trying.
Speaker 2 (18:02):
But let's talk a little bit about the Sun. This
stuff I can deal with at least.
Speaker 1 (18:06):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
As far as its immense power and energy. And I
love that our own article has some of these comparisons.
The sun can generate 5 times 1023 horsepower.
Speaker 1 (18:21):
I think that that is a typo. I think that
it's supposed to be 5 times 10 to the 23rd power.
Speaker 2 (18:27):
Oh, you think?
Speaker 1 (18:28):
That's the only explanation I have for that.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Yeah, that doesn't make sense.
Speaker 1 (18:31):
That's a really small number, actually.
Speaker 2 (18:33):
Yeah, I agree. It'd be like.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
About 5,100, 5,200 horsepower.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
Yeah, that's five times 10 to the 23.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
It's got to be.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
Someone just got lazy there.
Speaker 1 (18:46):
Seriously.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
They're like, I don't know how to do the little
23 thing. Right.
Speaker 1 (18:49):
I don't know how to use superscript. What am I,
like a great editor?
Speaker 2 (18:53):
Superscript. That's what it is, right?
Speaker 1 (18:55):
Superscript and subscript. Right.
Speaker 2 (18:58):
So let's put it this way. And this one is
the one that cracks me up. The sun has enough
energy to melt an ice bridge. Two miles wide and
a mile thick from Earth to the sun in a
single second.
Speaker 1 (19:11):
In a single second.
Speaker 2 (19:12):
That's pretty good.
Speaker 1 (19:14):
This is the only article I think I've ever seen
an ellipse in. Like the author was like, wait for it. Yeah.
In a single second.
Speaker 2 (19:22):
Yeah. I don't even think they did the ellipse right.
Isn't the ellipse supposed to be right after the letter
or is there a space?
Speaker 1 (19:27):
I think there's supposed to be a space on either side.
Speaker 3 (19:29):
Oh, really?
Speaker 1 (19:29):
Technically, yeah.
Speaker 2 (19:30):
I've been doing these wrong then.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
Well, don't feel bad. This thing says five times 1,023 horsepower,
so it's all good.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
All right, what else? One trillion, one megaton bombs going
off every second.
Speaker 1 (19:45):
If you're warlike.
Speaker 2 (19:46):
And then finally, one single second. of sun action, whatever
that is, is enough to power our Earth for a
half a million years. That drives it home.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
It does. But it also gives you an idea of
just how primitive we are energy consumption wise. Yeah. Like,
it's crazy because, you know, we're really worried about running
out of our non-renewable resources. But we use such a
minute amount of energy that the sun could power the
(20:22):
energy use we use currently for half a million years
in one second.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
Yeah, that's nuts. Right.
Speaker 1 (20:28):
So that also kind of takes your mind, though, too.
And this is, I think, one of the things, one
of the buttons that Freeman Dyson pushed recently. It makes
you realize, like, holy cow, we could do some really
amazing stuff if we could capture a significant amount of
that power that the sun puts out.
Speaker 2 (20:49):
Even an insignificant amount.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
Yeah, really.
Speaker 2 (20:51):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
You'd keep Iggy Pop going for, like, another hundred years.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
So, like you said, the idea behind the Dyson sphere
is this structure. He originally proposed a hollow sphere in space.
kind of referred to it as a shell. But I
think now, or I think he went on to make
it a solid sphere.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
So he actually said he was really, what's the opposite
of clear?
Speaker 2 (21:24):
Convoluted?
Speaker 1 (21:25):
Yeah, I guess a little convoluted. He didn't really go
to the trouble of spelling it out because, again, remember,
this is a thought experiment that had to do with
finding aliens, not an engineering schematic. So he used some very–
it was vague. That was the word I was looking for.
He was using some vague words. People were like, wait,
what are you talking about? What is this sphere? Is
it cohesive? Is it like a solid body? Is it
(21:48):
hollow in the middle? What's going on? And he came
back and said in a letter, a follow-up, he said, no, no, no.
Like there's no way you could build something that would
go around our sun that would be a solid body.
That was hollow in the middle, like it couldn't be
a cohesive whole because the rotational forces, the sheer forces
(22:09):
and the gravitational forces acting on it would just obliterate
it immediately.
Speaker 2 (22:13):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
Like it'd just be mechanically impossible to make it like that.
So he said, so maybe you would make something like
a bubble or a swarm or something like that.
Speaker 2 (22:24):
Yeah. And he said in the letter, I've enclosed some
blotter acid. Put it on your tongue.
Speaker 1 (22:29):
You're going to love this. It's dynamite.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
And call me in an hour. Might make a little
more sense. Yeah, our own article points out that one
of the first downsides, obviously, if you surround the sun completely,
is that sunlight has, I mean, I know we'd be
harnessing that energy, but sunlight provides a lot more than
just energy. Oh, yeah.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
Like it makes us happy. Yeah. People write entire songs
about how sunshine makes you happy, like John Denver did.
You know?
Speaker 2 (23:00):
Uh-huh. And that was just on his shoulders.
Speaker 1 (23:02):
It would be a global bummer if somebody enclosed the sun.
That's like supervillain kind of stuff, right?
Speaker 2 (23:08):
Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 1 (23:09):
So that's a problem. Another problem, though, is that if
you're going to build something like this, and Dyson even
suggested the size of it, he was saying it would
need to have a radius. So a radius, not even
a diameter, half of the diameter. A radius... That was
two times the distance of the Earth to the sun.
Speaker 2 (23:28):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (23:28):
So this thing would be massive, which means that it
would also enclose the Earth too, right? Yeah. Like he
wasn't proposing you just go up and create this tight
ball around the sun. Like it would be much further
spread out and it would actually encompass the Earth's orbit
within it.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
Oh, so it would be like this is mine. It
belongs to the Earth and no one else can get
any sun.
Speaker 1 (23:53):
Yeah, it would block off the stuff outside of two
times the distance of the Earth's orbit. So there's a
couple planets out there that would get the old screw job.
But the ones inside twice the distance of Earth's orbit
would really benefit from it.
Speaker 2 (24:11):
That's very selfish. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (24:13):
But the other problem is, too, Chuck, is I imagine
things would get pretty hot pretty quickly inside this thing.
So the Earth would be destroyed.
Speaker 2 (24:24):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (24:25):
And to get around this, and a lot of people
I don't think got it immediately, he said, well, you
just live inside the Dyson sphere, like in the outer
shell of it.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
Oh, sure. Make it habitable?
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (24:39):
Right. Well, that makes sense.
Speaker 1 (24:40):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (24:41):
But what you were saying about just the sheer size
of it, there literally aren't enough raw materials on our
entire planet to make something this big. In fact, in
our entire solar system. There probably aren't enough raw materials
to make a structure like this.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
No. And not still try to inhabit it. There's just
no way.
Speaker 2 (25:01):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
Some people say, though, and Freeman himself, I keep wanting
to call him Freeman, like that's his last name. But
I just end up sounding like I know him on
a first name.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
Basis.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
He was saying you might be able to build something
like this by disassembling Jupiter. Well, that was his suggestion.
Speaker 3 (25:22):
Oh, really?
Speaker 1 (25:23):
Yeah, he said disassemble Jupiter and put it back together,
and you could build a Dyson sphere that had a
radius twice the distance from the Earth to the sun
and make a solar array of it.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
Must have been some good acid.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (25:42):
Good for him.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (25:44):
All right, so I think we're both in agreement, and
most people are in agreement, that this sphere idea is
not at all tangible.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
Not as like a cohesive whole.
Speaker 2 (25:56):
No, like it just remains in the realm of thought experiment.
So why bother?
Speaker 1 (26:00):
Oh, well, that's the interesting thing to me. It basically
is kind of like he meant it as a thought experiment.
It's been brought out of the realm of thought experiments.
And yeah, we're in no way, shape or form capable
of doing this, but a lot of people have tried
to figure out how to do it. And I think it's,
(26:20):
it's one of those things that's like, yeah, it's theoretically possible. Um,
But we're nowhere near that level of capability right now.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
Well, I think his other ideas that he came up with, though,
are decent.
Speaker 1 (26:37):
Oh, like the swarm and stuff?
Speaker 2 (26:38):
Well, yeah. I mean, let's get to that. He himself
even said the sphere is probably not very realistic at all.
So why don't we do this? Why don't we think
of different machines maybe that are independent of one another
that actually circle the sun? collect this energy, and then
beam it back to Earth.
Speaker 1 (26:56):
Right. So to him, his initial idea was that sphere,
and then what it came to be was that the
sphere was like this umbrella term for these different, slightly
more realistic ideas, like the swarm or the bubble.
Speaker 2 (27:10):
Right.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
So, like, what's the swarm?
Speaker 2 (27:14):
Well, the swarm, maybe they are in different orbits, and they,
like the swarm, he likens it to B's. Like, instead
of gathering pollen, they're just around the sun, moving around,
gathering energy and power. Right. And some of those might
be habitable, too.
Speaker 1 (27:31):
Right. And they're like, they're solar arrays that are satellites
that are moving around on independent orbits of one another.
Speaker 2 (27:37):
That's right.
Speaker 1 (27:38):
And the way that they would make a Dyson sphere is, yeah,
there's a lot of space in between them. But if
you step back a few orders of magnitude further back
into the other parts of the galaxy or the universe,
it would appear as basically a whole sphere around the sun.
Speaker 2 (27:55):
Yeah, sure.
Speaker 1 (27:55):
So it still falls under that category, right?
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Yeah, he had to keep that sphere thing because of branding.
He didn't want to lose that.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
He's like, the genie's out of the bottle.
Speaker 2 (28:04):
They're like, you really don't need it to be a sphere.
He's like, oh, it's got to be a sphere. So
those satellites are actually, they would be called statites.
Speaker 1 (28:15):
Well, no, if they were the bubble, they would be statites.
This guy's got it wrong.
Speaker 2 (28:19):
Oh, really?
Speaker 1 (28:19):
Mm-hmm.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
I thought the solar sails could be the statites. No?
Speaker 1 (28:26):
So what I saw, the difference between the swarm and
the bubble was that the swarm has the satellites in
orbit around the star, and they're in their own orbits,
not interacting with each other.
Speaker 2 (28:38):
Oh, I got you.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
A bubble is where... the satellites are in a fixed
position relative to the star.
Speaker 2 (28:45):
So those are the statites. Right.
Speaker 1 (28:47):
So they're just kind of hovering outside of the star,
not in orbit.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Just kind of hovering instead.
Speaker 2 (28:56):
And then those are the two, and then the third
are the solar sails, correct?
Speaker 1 (29:00):
Well, you can make a solar sail, or you can
make any of them with solar sails, and I don't
know where that guy got that.
Speaker 2 (29:05):
Yeah, did we do a whole episode on solar sails?
Speaker 1 (29:08):
Mm-hmm.
Speaker 2 (29:09):
Yeah, so, I mean, it makes sense. If you get
a bunch of these solar sails orbiting the sun, you
might think that you could harness the power and send
it back to Earth some way.
Speaker 1 (29:19):
Right, exactly. And, like, you could use that with any
of these, whether it's a bubble, whether it's a swarm,
whatever you're doing. And if you, like you said a
second ago, made them habitable, then all of a sudden
you have a recipe for survival for the human race
if Earth ever existed. becomes untenable, right? Right. Or we
(29:42):
can't terraform Mars. We can go live on these things.
And when we think about living out in space, my
brain immediately goes to like the cramped, tiny tin can
conditions of the ISS. These things don't need to be
like that. I mean, if we're creating Dyson spheres, we're
going to be advanced enough that we could build some
really lux satellites and statites as solar arrays to go
(30:05):
hover or orbit around the sun, right? So they could
be huge. So big, in fact, that Dyson was saying,
this doesn't have to be an engineering project that's carried
out by a central global government that's directing the whole thing.
That as our energy consumption and energy needs continue, nations
(30:27):
could take it upon themselves to, individually to create these
solar sails that are habitable, put them into orbit independently,
and just through the desire to preserve one's own life
would make sure that their orbit wasn't going to intersect
with somebody else's orbit who was already up there, and
just organically a Dyson sphere in the form of a
(30:47):
swarm or a bubble could form on its own just
by self-interested nations developing this technology basically independent of one another. Wow.
I don't know. He had some far-thinking thoughts.
Speaker 2 (31:04):
Far-thinking?
Speaker 1 (31:06):
I don't have those.
Speaker 2 (31:08):
Should we take another break?
Speaker 1 (31:10):
I think so.
Speaker 2 (31:10):
All right. We'll do that, and we'll wrap it up
a little bit with how to get this energy back
to the home planet. Da-da-da-da-da Da-da-da-da.
Speaker 1 (31:24):
Stuff you should know.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
All right. So earlier you talked about dismantling Jupiter with
a socket set, a couple of screwdrivers.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (31:51):
Uh, Mercury is another planet that people have talked about
as potentially harvesting. Um, the good thing about Mercury, a
couple of things. One is that it is, uh, near
the sun. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (32:03):
So who needs it already?
Speaker 2 (32:04):
Yeah. So it would make it, um, proximity wise, it
makes a little bit of sense and, uh, I think
this Oxford University physicist, Stuart Armstrong, is who proposed this.
And one of the other great things about mercury is
it has a lot of great raw materials, namely iron,
that we could use. Right.
Speaker 1 (32:24):
And he actually suggested that we could disassemble mercury fully
in basically what amounted to a 40-year stretch.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
I thought you were going to say 20. 30 days,
I could do it.
Speaker 1 (32:35):
Right, exactly. If a contractor tells you he can take
Mercury apart in 30 days, don't trust him.
Speaker 2 (32:41):
Agreed.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
No, this was in basically four 10-year stretches. Combined equals
40 years, obviously. But I think his point, Armstrong's point,
was that you don't have to disassemble Mercury as a
whole and wait until it's fully disassembled to put it
together into Dyson to start creating a Dyson sphere. you
(33:03):
can disassemble and then start reassembling as you go.
Speaker 2 (33:06):
Right.
Speaker 1 (33:06):
And once you start getting one bit of it online,
it's going to help power and create better efficiency to
harvest and reassemble the rest of Mercury, you know, like
we were talking about earlier. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
And not only that, but you could use that energy.
All of a sudden, there would be supercomputing like you've
never seen. Space travel would get faster. Like all these
technologies that we can't even like think about yet would
be growing at exponential rates. Right.
Speaker 1 (33:36):
And I mean, that's the point. Like when you're like, well,
what would we do with with, you know, all of
this energy every second coming off of the sun? Who knows?
We cannot conceive of the stuff we could do with
that amount of energy yet.
Speaker 2 (33:51):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (33:52):
But I guarantee it's not going to be, you know.
using fuel, like charging our smartphones. It should be for
some pretty neat stuff, I guess.
Speaker 2 (34:02):
So the other cool idea is that, holy cow, how
many people would have to take part in this kind
of a project? Just literally the labor force you would need.
And I think Armstrong is the one who said, well,
you could use robots, actually. And with the same idea
(34:22):
that once you get some of these robots going, if
they could self-replicate and build themselves, then you can just
kind of sit back and watch the paint dry on Earth,
and all these robots are up there just building themselves
and working and working and doing everything for you.
Speaker 1 (34:40):
Exactly. And that's why that was his– I don't know
if it was his point, someone's point along the way,
is that when you start that– when you build that
first Dyson sphere– All of a sudden, it's just going
to keep going and going and going faster. It's going
to spread at an exponential rate. So you would go
from a type two civilization to a type three civilization
pretty quickly. And as a matter of fact, you would
(35:03):
also if this project was carried out by a centralized government,
it would spread so quickly and so far in such
a relatively short amount of time. Something like going from
that first Dyson sphere to colonizing an entire galaxy in
something like a million years. that even if it was
a centralized government involved at the beginning, they would very
(35:25):
quickly lose control of the colonies because they'd be so
spread out and there'd be so many of them that
they would just basically become self-sufficient and spread over the galaxy.
So the reason this is noteworthy is that if you
found one Dyson sphere, you would probably find millions or
billions or trillions of them in, in just a, in
(35:47):
a one section of the universe, right? You're not, you,
you probably are not going to find just one Dyson sphere.
You're going to find a Dyson galaxy.
Speaker 2 (35:57):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
A type three civilization. And that's what they're looking for
by sifting through some of these old sky surveys. And
they found a couple of, of candidates actually in the
last year or so, I think. Oh yeah.
Speaker 2 (36:11):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (36:11):
There's a, there's a couple of, surveys that have found stars,
and they have typical star names. One is KIC 8462852,
which is a sexy name.
Speaker 2 (36:25):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (36:26):
And then the other is EPIC, which I'm pretty sure
they call EPIC, 204278916, right? Wow. And EPIC was discovered
by the Kepler spacecraft in 2014, and the reason these
things are noteworthy is because there is some sort of
weird transit pattern where the light dims, I guess randomly,
(36:54):
or not necessarily on some sort of set schedule, around
these stars. And you would say, well, that's probably just
a planet or something coming in between it. Well, yes,
they thought about that already. And normally a star will
dim by about 1%. when a planet-sized object comes in
between you, the observer, and that planet. These things are dipping,
(37:19):
in the case of the KIC star, 22%. And in
the case of the EPIC star, 65%, right? Okay. They
have no idea what could be massive enough to dim
those two stars that much. They haven't encountered it before.
There's a couple of theories. One of them said a
(37:41):
swarm of comets. Somebody else said, well, you could very
easily go from a swarm of comets to a swarm
of solar arrays. So maybe these are evidence of Dyson spheres.
Speaker 2 (37:52):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (37:53):
I mean, it's possible.
Speaker 2 (37:55):
Well, you know, it's kind of fun to talk about
robots building themselves and them doing all this work up there.
One of the big problems is we're not nearly, I mean,
we have robot technology now, but Nothing close to that
at the present. And as this article points out, that
(38:16):
you would need like it would have to be so advanced.
These robots would have to be operating without fail up
there because they would be by themselves or be able
to fix themselves and fix problems. Like the intelligence would
need to be so far advanced. Like we can't even
imagine what that would be like.
Speaker 1 (38:35):
No, but I mean, even if Michio Kaku is off
by 100 or 200 or 500 years, that's not that
far off.
Speaker 2 (38:44):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (38:44):
Like if we can harness all the energy on Earth,
we should very quickly improve as far as our technology
is concerned. So who knows? Maybe those robots aren't that
far off, you know?
Speaker 2 (38:56):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (38:58):
One other thing that I saw from this, though, was
when Freeman Dyson was talking about disassembling jupiter chuck he
said that it should take i don't know roughly 800
years worth of the sun's energy output to disassemble and
reassemble jupiter yeah well that's not bad but do you
remember how much comes out of the sun in a
second we're like whoa you know that's so much we
(39:21):
would need 800 years worth of that to disassemble and
reassemble jupiter so we like not only do we not
have the capability of building a Dyson sphere, we don't
even have the capability of disassembling Jupiter. We just don't
have any way to harness that energy, which creates this
kind of chicken or egg dilemma. Like we almost need
(39:45):
a Dyson sphere to create a Dyson sphere at this point. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (39:49):
Somewhere Freeman Dyson is laughing.
Speaker 1 (39:52):
On acid.
Speaker 2 (39:52):
Somewhere in New Jersey. One of the other big issues is, okay,
let's say that you could even do something like this
and harness this energy. To get it to Earth is
another big problem if we want to make it actually usable.
Some people said we could laser it over. But the
problems with laser beams is after about a mile, you're
(40:15):
going to lose a lot of efficiency with it. So
good luck with that. Microwaves have been floated out there,
but microwaves, even though they're more effective farther out than lasers,
you're still limited to about 100 miles, which will do
us no good. Right. So what's the answer?
Speaker 1 (40:35):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (40:36):
Yeah, I don't have one either.
Speaker 1 (40:37):
I mean, I guess one of the easy ones is, well,
just inhabit the solar arrays. Go inhabit the Dyson Sphere.
Stop being so precious about living on Earth.
Speaker 2 (40:46):
Yeah, that's true.
Speaker 1 (40:48):
Which makes sense, but I like living on Earth.
Speaker 2 (40:51):
Yeah, but would Earth 800 years from now be worth
living on?
Speaker 1 (40:58):
It depends, Chuck. Will it be skipping to school and
skinning knees and spelling bees and all that still? Because
if so, then yes.
Speaker 2 (41:08):
Yeah. I don't know what you're talking about.
Speaker 1 (41:11):
It's another Simpsons reference. Oh, okay. It's the one where
Principal Skinner came back, the real Principal Skinner. Oh, yeah.
Speaker 2 (41:19):
Great one.
Speaker 1 (41:19):
He's like, he goes, if you think skin and knees
and spelling bees are corny, well, then Mr. Corn Me Up.
Speaker 2 (41:28):
That's right. That's when they introduced, we'd like to introduce
our Principal Skinner, Principal Skimor Skinner.
Speaker 1 (41:36):
Armand Tanzarian.
Speaker 2 (41:37):
Yep. That's a great one.
Speaker 1 (41:39):
There's one other thing. You got anything else?
Speaker 2 (41:41):
I got nothing else.
Speaker 1 (41:42):
I got one more thing. So there's. That whole idea
that Dyson came up with to search the skies for
this imprint where there's a lot of infrared radiation but
no visible light. Yeah. There's a problem with that because
this guy came along. His name was Robert Bradbury. He's
a futurist. I think maybe a science fiction writer.
Speaker 2 (42:01):
Ray?
Speaker 1 (42:02):
No, Robert, his little brother.
Speaker 2 (42:05):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (42:06):
Robert Bradbury said, well, you know what? If you really
wanted to make these Dyson spheres efficient– you'd make them
in the same manner that those Russian nesting dolls are made,
like a matryoshka, right?
Speaker 2 (42:18):
Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1 (42:19):
So you'd have the internal sphere and then outer spheres
going around it, catching all that lost heat energy and
turning it into usable power, which is awesome because you'd
have basically 100% efficiency as far as the Dyson sphere
was concerned. But if you're looking at the stars... you
would see nothing. Because not only would there not be
(42:40):
visible light, there also wouldn't be any infrared radiation. And
Freeman Dyson just hung his head, went into his room,
shut the door, and laid down on his bed for
a while.
Speaker 2 (42:51):
The end.
Speaker 1 (42:52):
Yep. Well, if you want to know more about Dyson Spheres,
you can start with this article on HowStuffWorks.com by typing
Dyson Spheres into the search bar at HowStuffWorks, as I said.
And since I said how stuff works twice, that means
it's time for listener mail.
Speaker 2 (43:11):
I'm going to call this We Helped a Lady Out. Hey, guys.
Hope this email finds you well. I've been listening for
only a short time, but I've become so addicted, I've
already binged about half of your episodes offered on Spotify.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
I think she meant binged.
Speaker 2 (43:29):
I know.
Speaker 1 (43:29):
Binged.
Speaker 2 (43:30):
We're on Spotify, by the way, and you can bing
us all you want.
Speaker 1 (43:33):
Oh.
Speaker 2 (43:34):
From that platform. Like many others, I absolutely adore your show.
I came across the podcast after a very upsetting event
in my life. To save you the sob story, I'd
just say I was going through intense grief. There was
something about your kind voices, strong intellect, and raunchy humor
that gave me a thirst for learning and a new
purpose in life.
Speaker 1 (43:55):
Wait a minute, wait a minute. Do we have raunchy humor?
Speaker 3 (43:59):
Sure.
Speaker 1 (44:00):
I didn't realize that.
Speaker 2 (44:01):
Oh, I think she picks up on that.
Speaker 1 (44:03):
That's like Cheech and Chong.
Speaker 2 (44:04):
The sideways comments.
Speaker 1 (44:06):
We're like the new Cheech and Chong.
Speaker 2 (44:09):
I thank you a billion times over for just being
who you are. The podcast was a large factor in
saving my life. Don't ever underestimate or doubt what you
do and know that there are people like me out
there soaking up every word. Sincerely, Cheery B.
Speaker 1 (44:25):
Thanks a lot, Cheery. That's nice. I like hearing that
we help people.
Speaker 2 (44:28):
It makes me feel good in my belly.
Speaker 1 (44:31):
Yeah, we appreciate the compliment. It's very nice of you
to take the time to write in to let us know.
And you can let us know that you think we're
the tops by tweeting to us. I'm at joshumclark, and
there's also an official SYSK podcast one. You can hang
out with Chuck at facebook.com slash charleswchuckbryant or facebook.com slash stuffyoushouldknow.
(44:56):
You can send us an email to stuffpodcasts at howstuffworks.com.
And as always, join us at our home on the
web at StuffYouShouldKnow.com. For more on this and thousands of
other topics, visit HowStuffWorks.com.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Bobby Bones Show
Listen to 'The Bobby Bones Show' by downloading the daily full replay.