Biden Admin was Subsidizing Liberal Corporate Media Outlets

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
So we've been talking about exposing government ways fraud and abuse.
That's what Elon Musk and Doe is doing. But just
how corrupt is our government? Well, they've been giving millions
of dollars to media organizations outside of NPR that clearly
have been writing stories to attack conservatives, the MAGA movement,
Donald Trump. Yesterday, there was an email that went out

(00:25):
to Politico's employees, sent sent it to them yesterday, and
Politico's management blamed the people at Politico not getting paid
yesterday on a glitch, not their government gravy train stopping
the flow of the cash coming in. Now, I want
to read for you what the email apparently says. It says,

(00:47):
dear Team Gully, and I want to address this morning's
payroll issues directly, due to what we believe was a
technical error, employees did not receive their paychecks as scheduled.
We understand the urgency of this matter and sincerely apologize
for the convenience. Yeah, not getting paid, Yeah, it's an inconvenience,
that's for sure. Our team is working diligently with our systems, vendors,

(01:09):
and the bank to identify the cause and implement a solution.
As quickly as possible. We will keep you updated as
we learn more and work to resolve the problem as
quick as possible. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
If you have any immediate concerns, please please feel free
to reach out directly.

Speaker 2 (01:25):
Now, that's what they said.

Speaker 1 (01:28):
Whether this is because the gravy train has been turned
off or not, I don't know.

Speaker 2 (01:34):
But here's what I do know.

Speaker 1 (01:36):
Politico, which is a like quote legitimate news company quote unquote,
a news company. They're not a nonprofit, they're not INNGO,
they're not a government agency which has spent the last
decade destroying Donald Trump, the MAGA movement, anybody associated with them,
just trying to, you know, help lock up people and
saying that the insurrections around you know, January sixth, are

(01:57):
the worst people in the world, right like all those
types of stiff worries. We now have found out that
they have been massively subsidized funded by USAID. Donald Trump
and Elon Musk said, we're stopping that funding. The question
now is will Politico go out of business because of

(02:19):
the amount of money we've been giving them. Now the
total award amount that we're talking about here, and you
look at twenty twenty four, if I'm reading this correctly,
on the US spending dot Gov, there has been a
total of at least eight point two million dollars of
your tax dollars going to Politico in the form of

(02:42):
two hundred and thirty seven transactions.

Speaker 2 (02:45):
Now below that, there's another category.

Speaker 1 (02:47):
If you go to US spending dot gov face value
of loans zero dollars from zero transactions. So these are
not loans. This is just straight up money that is
going to subsidize Politico. Eight point two million dollars of
your tax dours that went to them. I think we

(03:10):
can all agree that your tax dollurs should not be
going to Politico. Now, let's go back to one of
the core headlines in Politico that you need to know
about to put it in perspective what you've been paying for,
like the journalism you've been subsidizing. The federal money started
pouring into Politico, and it actually increased exponentially after they

(03:36):
successfully laundered the deep state CIA election rigging propaganda against
Donald Trump. The headline that I want to bring up
to prove this is their national security headline that Politico ran.
This is what they said okay, and again, the amount
of the federal funds that began pouring into Politico inc.

(04:00):
Prees exponentially after this story. You ready for it, Hunter
Biden's story is Russian disinfo. Dozens of former intel officials
say this is under national security. Politico then their byline
below that reads this way, more than fifty former intelligence

(04:22):
officials signed a letter casting doubt on this New York
Post story on the former vice president's son, paraphrasing, So
you got Politico that writes a article that is a lie,
and it's a lie that they were willing to sell

(04:42):
on behalf of the Democratic Party and the fifty former
intelligence officials who, by the way, I've lost their security
clearance and we know they lied to us, and they
were willing to tell you the Hunter Biden story was
Russian disinfo and it wasn't real. And then after they
write that article, the federal government through usaid he is like, oh, hey, political,
we'd love to send you a bunch of money, like

(05:02):
millions of dollars. You guys are doing great work. We
want to keep the money flowing in. This is maybe
the biggest scandal about the corrupt media that I've ever seen.
The only thing worst in political interference is government taxpayer
funded election interference. That is what was paid for to Politico.

(05:25):
It was government taxpayer funded election interference. There was a
real story, the KNW was real story. Politico wrote a
storytelling you it's not real. It's Russian dis info. Fifty
intelligence officers. They didn't do They just they just went
with it. You know, government's saying this is what we
need you to write. They're like, we got it, we'll
do it. And then the government said here's your payoff
eight point two million dollars. Politico then spent years after

(05:48):
that attacking conservatives the MAGA movement, and the money kept
going up. So the more they attacked conservatives and the
MAGA movement, the more money they were given from the government.

Speaker 2 (06:06):
There's also something else that was interesting.

Speaker 1 (06:08):
Politico apparently received and a lot of this is coming
from the website, so I'm just giving it to you.
They received eight hundred and sixty two thousand dollars in
change from the National Park Service in a no compete
subscription contract over four years. You want to know why
Democrats are so anxious overdoge because they were buying the

(06:31):
press to attack US President Trump back to what he
was saying about government waste and abuse and fraud. He's
got something to say now about what they're doing with
a big project that hasn't happened, the high speed rail
project in California. The President saying this and the Oval Office.

Speaker 3 (06:53):
One of the things I want to investigate rapidly because
I've never seen anything to this extent. The train that's
being built between Los Angeles and San Francisco is the
worst managed project I think I've ever seen, and I've
seen some of the worst. Billions and billions, hundreds of
billions of dollars over budget. In fact, I read where

(07:15):
you could take every single person that was going to
go on the train and get the finest limousine service
in the world and take them back and forth with limousines,
and you'd have hundreds of billions of dollars left over.
It is the worst thing, and we're going to start
an investigation of that because it's not possible. I built
for a living, and I built on time on budget.

(07:36):
It's impossible that something could cost that much. And now
it's not even going to San Francisco and it's not
going to Los Angeles. They made it much shorter. So
now it's at little places way away from San Francisco
and way away from Los Angeles. No, We're going to
start a big investigation on that because I've never seen

(07:58):
anything like it. Nobody I've ever seen anything like it.
The worst overruns that there have ever been in the
history of our country.

Speaker 1 (08:07):
The worst overruns we've ever seen in our country. Now,
he's right, like this is insane. I built for a living,
he said, I built on time, on budget. It's impossible
that something could cost us much. So how much corruption
is there? And the headlines in California are very clear.
Despite some progress, the state's high speed rail is one

(08:27):
hundred billion short and many years from reality. Okay, so
if that is the case, what happened to the money?

Speaker 2 (08:39):
Where did it go?

Speaker 1 (08:40):
Donald Trump making it clear that this is a problem
because our tax dollars continue to go to waste, fraud,
and abuse. You'll look at all of the money that
we're finding out where it's going, and I think what
we're going to find out is even more corruption. We

(09:03):
also have been told that there may even be movie
stars that were paid by US aid to go around
the world. Movie stars like big money that is some
of that's coming out right now, like this is some
of the corruption. And you go back to Politico for example,
and the corruption with media and the AP getting money

(09:24):
from USAID subsidizing their attacks on conservatives. White House Press
Secretary was asked about that today.

Speaker 4 (09:32):
So upon coming out here to the briefing room, I
was made aware of the funding from USAID to media outlets,
including Politico, who I know has a seat in this room.
And I can confirm that the more than eight million
taxpayer dollars that have gone to essentially subsidizing subscriptions to Politico,
the American taxpayer's dying will no longer be happening. The

(09:54):
dog's team is working on canceling those payments.

Speaker 1 (09:57):
Now.

Speaker 4 (09:57):
Again, this is a whole of government effort to ensure
or that we are going line by line when it
comes to the federal of government's books, and this president
and his team are are making decisions across the board
on do these receipts serve the interests of the American people.
Is this a good use of the American taxpayers money.

(10:18):
If it is not, that funding will no longer be
sent abroad and American taxpayers will see significant savings because
of that effort.

Speaker 1 (10:26):
One of the things in a word that she just
used there, but one of the things you noticed here
she said eight million dollars on subscriptions to Politico online logins.
That is subsidizing the media. Like, there's no way that
this isn't just pure corruption. And if you're if eight
million dollars is what you're on the take from the

(10:47):
federal government to then trash the opponent of the people
that are in charge they're giving this money, that is
pay to pay propaganda. This is state sponsored propaganda. It's
what I've been telling you has been happening with the
media for a long time. This is state sponsored propaganda.

(11:07):
We're also being told that the New York Times is
being government funded as well. The US government gave the
New York Times tens of millions of dollars just over
the past five years, despite paying relatively little money to
the New York Times in the past years preceding twenty
twenty one. What happened they started going after Donald Trump

(11:29):
and anyone around them that they said take them out, Like, again,
this is state sponsored.

Speaker 2 (11:37):
Is it?

Speaker 1 (11:38):
I'm not even sure it's state sponsored media. It's a
hit list. We're gonna pay you to take down and
tear down the other side, like that's a hit list.
It's like assassinations on a conservative party. We want you
to get rid of these people from the norm. We
want you to turn them into racist, bigots and homophobes.

Speaker 2 (11:58):
Right.

Speaker 1 (11:58):
Well, that's what the government's been doing, that's what they've
been paying for. So let's talk about The New York Times.
Apparently tens of millions of dollars over the past five years.
In August twenty twenty four, the US government awarded another
four point one million dollars to The New York Times.
The bulk of the funds came from the US Department
of Health and Human Services at twenty six point nine million,

(12:22):
followed by the National Science Foundation.

Speaker 2 (12:24):
At nineteen point one million dollars.

Speaker 1 (12:29):
These payments that we're finding out that went to The
New York Times are just paid to play. Let me
give you another example. National Aeronautics and Space Administration has
paid three point eight two million. I wonder how many
negative articles The New York Times has written or positive
articles they've written about any space program that liberals wanted

(12:51):
the Department of Commerce. I think they've got any bad
articles written about them from The New York Times. No,
because they paid them two and a half million dollars
of your money in twenty I mean, this is twenty
twenty four. DoD paid two point three four million to
the New York Times, Department of Treasury half a million,
the sec for Goodness sakes three hundred and forty four thousand,

(13:13):
the DOJ more than a quarter million, State Department more
than two hundred thousand, and the Department of Veterans Affairs
one hundred and seventy seven thousand. I wonder how many
stories got killed that would have made the Department of
Veterans Affairs look bad. This is the government saying, we're
gonna prop you up as long as you write the
stories we need you to write. We need you to

(13:34):
write pro Ukraine stories, We need you to write anti
Trump stories, we need you to write anti Elon Musk propaganda.
Now it all makes a lot of sense, right, because
we have an unlimited amount of money to throw around.
That's what the government was saying to The New York Times, Politico,
the Associated Press, and the timeline clearly also lines up
when the war in Ukraine began. So the US government said, hey,

(13:59):
we want you to sell the propaganda that this war
with Ukraine is good for America, for us to stand
with them and send them on limited funds. And all
of these organizations started writing the pro Ukraine stories right
and propping up Zolenski, not talking about corruption, not talking

(14:19):
about the fraud and abuse of your dollars that are
going there. And so we paid, or the government your
dollars paid the New York Times to write articles talking
about how great Zelensky is and why your money should
go there and why you should stand with them. Let
me give you another example of how bad the money is.
Zelensky is now claiming that Ukraine received less than half

(14:43):
of the US aid that we have sent to the country.
So where to go, Well, it went to corrupt oligarchs
and people around Zelensky. I have no doubt about that.
He's claiming he doesn't know where all the money went.
The Ukrainian president has said that his country has only
received seventy eight billion in aid from the United States,

(15:04):
despite America authorizing one hundred and seventy five billion to
support the war torn country. So to be clear, Zelensky's saying,
you guys, send us one hundred billion dollars and we
don't know where it went. In this interview with the
Associated Press, which is sponsored by our government state sponsored propaganda,
we've been paying the Associated Press millions of dollars. They

(15:29):
published this interview over the weekend. Zelensky says he doesn't
know where most of the money the United States allocated
under the Biden administration to Ukraine has gone. When I
hear both in the past and even now from the
US that America has provided Ukraine with hundreds of billions
as the president of a nation at war, Zelensky said,
I can tell you we actually received only about seventy

(15:50):
five billion. He said, we're talking about tangible things because
this aid didn't come as cash, but rather as weapons,
which amount to about seventy billions.

Speaker 2 (15:59):
So we're missing a hundred billion.

Speaker 1 (16:00):
But when it's said that Ukraine received two hundred billions,
Lelensky says to support the army during the war, that's
not true. I don't know where all that money went,
Zelensky admitted. Perhaps it's true on paper, with hundreds of
different programs. Lelensky said, I won't argue, so he's admitting
one hundred billion just disappeared, and we're immensely grateful for everything,

(16:24):
but in reality, we just received seventy eight excuse me,
seventy six billion, not two hundred billion and eight. The
Ukrainian leader suggested that perhaps the additional funds went to quote,
humanitarian programs. That's the easiest way to funnel money to
his rich oligarch friends, many of them that are in
Warsaw hanging out in five star hotels. Many of the

(16:46):
richest in Ukraine and the government and the oligarchs in
Ukraine don't live in Ukraine right now. Their families are
in Warsaw, in five star hotels and villas. How are
they paying for it? Follow the humanitarian programs is what
I would say. He says he was informed about except
for knowing of their existence, but he doesn't know how
much money went into those programs, And then Zelensky said this,

(17:09):
Perhaps the US president's administration will audit these programs and
find additional billions, But I don't know where those funds went.
I have one question. I wonder how much that money
may have gone back to the Biden crime family.

Speaker 2 (17:24):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (17:25):
I'm just asking for a bunch of taxpayers in this country.
You remember that company named Meta, You know, the company
that owns Facebook. You know the company that had no
problem suspending the account of the sitting president of United
States of America back in twenty twenty one, guy by
the name of Donald Trump after the insurrection at the Capitol.

(17:46):
Of course, remember when that happened, Well, there was a
lawsuit around it. We now know who is right and
who was wrong. Meta is now agreeing to pay millions
to settle that Trump lawsuit over his suspended accounts. So
NBC News breaking the big news earlier tonight that Meta
has now agreed to pay Donald Trump.

Speaker 2 (18:06):
Take a listen.

Speaker 5 (18:07):
President Trump, we've learned has signed an agreement with Meta
to settle a lawsuit that he filed against the company
for suspending his account after the attack on the Capitol
on January sixth, four years ago. The settlement, we understand
it to be twenty five million dollars, most of which
is going towards his future presidential library.

Speaker 2 (18:26):
This story first was reported.

Speaker 5 (18:28):
By The Wall Street Journal. Meta says it has no
comment on that, but says they can confirm that twenty
two million dollar number to the Trump Library. Garrett Hayk
is at the White House, Garrett, this is so interesting
for a lot of reasons here, and I know you've
just confirmed this with some with some with some of
your sources here, it's our understanding. I think that President
Trump like signed this settlement that has to do with
META and the attack on the Capitol sitting in the

(18:49):
Oval office today.

Speaker 6 (18:51):
Well, it looks like a lot of this was discussed, apparently,
according to the Wall Street Journal sources, a detail that
I've yet to confirm but hope to nail down shortly
during the time that he was being sentenced during the
transition on the New York City hush money case. So yeah, look,
the top line number here is extraordinary, twenty five million dollars.
Most of that money going to this fund that, as

(19:12):
best I can tell, doesn't actually exist yet for a
future Trump presidential library. You'll remember that that's what happened
with the defamation settlement that the President won against ABC
and ABC News sort of the start of funding this
library tends to be coming from these lawsuits at the president.

Speaker 1 (19:28):
By the way, can we just pause and just celebrate
the fact that the Trump Presidential Library is an essence
going to be built by the media that lied to him,
lied about him, slandered him, and through these lawsuits where
he's like, all right, we'll see in court. I mean,
you could say that this library is going to have

(19:48):
eight what is it, a ABC wing, a Meta Facebook wing,
and there's others out there, by the way, But this
is a lot of money. Twenty two million going to
fund the Trump Presidential Library, and the balance dedicated legal
fees and other plaintiffs in the case. Now, Meta didn't
have to admit wrongdoing. I don't care if they admit

(20:13):
wrongdoing or not. We know why Meta is paying this
money because they absolutely did something that was wrong. And
the CEO is now saying, all right, well, you're in charge,
so I'm gonna hang out with you and come to
the inauguration and sit in the prime seat for the
swearing in, and then I'm gonna give you twenty five
million or twenty two million for your library. That's what

(20:37):
That's what we're doing here. This is, by the way,
how you beat them. Donald Trump is going all in
to hold them accountable. He's not holding back. He's doing
the same thing with the government right now. He's doing
the same thing to make sure that people are held
accountable for the corruption in our government when you're sending

(20:59):
money by the tens of millions to the media, so
they write stories about the left wing of the Democratic
Party and they attack their political opponents. This is what
happens in Russia and Cuba and China. It should never
happen in America. Donald Trump getting rid of government waste, fraud,
and abuse through USA and other programs.

Speaker 2 (21:21):
We're now also hearing more.

Speaker 1 (21:22):
About the White House's plan for the US involvement in
the rebuilding efforts in Gaza. By the way, there's a
lot of people asking about, well, should we be doing it?
How much is it going to cost? Is that where
we want our money to be spent? The White House
sang the US involvement in rebuilding efforts does not mean

(21:46):
commitment of troops or taxpayer dollars in Gaza. They clarified
that earlier. The White House made it clear that the
US involvement in rebuilding Gaza does not mean a commitment
to send any troops or using any of your tax
dollars for the effort. The White House pressing or Terry
Caroline Levitt filled it a question from NBC News's senior

(22:08):
White House correspondent early in the briefing, after Donald Trump
said Tuesday that the United States would take over the
Gaza Strip. Trump also said his vision included moving Gozins
to nearby Arab nations, which Levitt said Wednesday would be
quote unquote temporary. They also said that Trump's vision could
intail boots on the ground in nation building. That is

(22:28):
how NBC News frame the question. What did Caroline sand
response quote, I would reject the premise of your question
that this forces the United States to be entangled in
conflicts abroad. The President has not committed to putting boots
on the ground in Gaza. He has also said that
the United States is not going to pay for rebuilding

(22:49):
of Gaza. She had that the administration would work with
him Middle least allies to reconstruct this region. Levitt also
emphasized that while it may be an out of the
box idea, the American people elected Trump because he thinks
outside the box. Quote and let me just take a
step back here, because this is an out of the
box idea. That's who President Trump is, That's why the

(23:11):
American people elected him, and his goal is lasting peace
in the Middle East for all people in the region.
She added that the American involvement means the President will
use his deal making prowess to strike a deal with
our partners in the region. Responding to a follow up question,
she also knows the President has spoken to leaders in
the region about his expectations that particularly Egypt and Jordan

(23:34):
will accept Palastinian refugees temporarily so they can rebuild their homes.
Trump has been mulling over the plan for a while.
She went on to say, including sin seeing images of
the well pure rubble that is Gaza right now from
Special Envoy to the Middle East and the visit to
the region last month, according to the White House Press Secretary,

(23:55):
so the media.

Speaker 2 (23:56):
Wanted you to think this was going to be nation.

Speaker 1 (23:58):
Building, that we were going to like own this, We're
going to be seeing troops that we're going to be
paying your tax dollars to actually do all this. The
clear report now is that is not the case, and
the media is in fact lying to you. Now, there's
also something else that came out of this fun came

(24:18):
out Center thun On meeting with Netanyahu's saying the Democrats
anti Israel behavior will not deter the US from supporting Israel.
That was the message coming from the Senate majority leader,
and he will meet with the Israeli Prime Minister tomorrow
at the US Capitol. He said, this meeting, which you hope,
is about America and conveying the importance of this US

(24:41):
Israel ties and also to deepen the peace talks.

Speaker 2 (24:45):
In the region.

Speaker 1 (24:46):
Fun in an interview said ahead of the meeting that
he will convey that to Netanyahu that despite Democrats in Congress,
including particularly in the US Senate, repeatedly finding themselves on
the opposite side of Israel and that the United States
is not with them, the United States stands firmly with Israel,
and that's why Donald Trump was elected. Democrats, of course,

(25:07):
recently voted in the US Senate to take a plan
to sanction the International Criminal Court known as the ICC.
Israel is the US's greatest ally in the Middle East,
and the Democrats this last year have been very divided
in supporting Israel throughout the conflict.

Speaker 2 (25:24):
Is what Thune said to Breitbart News. They seem to.

Speaker 1 (25:27):
Find more things like common cause with Hamas and some
of these folks in the region that are responsible for
the October seventh attack. If you recall this last summer,
the last time Prime Minster Netya, who was in the Capitol,
there were a lot of Democrats, including the Vice Vice
President Harry, who boycotted his appearance.

Speaker 2 (25:48):
This time.

Speaker 1 (25:50):
The Prime Minister's visit follows the Democrats vote last week
to prop an illegitimate court, the ICC up because Democrats
didn't want to defend Israel's sovereignty or American troops have
been targeted by the ICC in the past. So if
and when they decide that they want to take real
action to protect our allies and prevent future targeting of

(26:12):
American citizens, we're here for that.

Speaker 2 (26:14):
Then went on to say, but.

Speaker 1 (26:15):
Until then, we're going to continue to do everything we
can without Democrats to defend our allies and also our nation.
I think tomorrow that will be revisited in the meeting
with the Prime Minister. Now, President Trump back in the
White House has made it clear that there are a
lot of Middle Eastern leaders from across the region that

(26:36):
are hopeful there is a pathway to peace. Donald Trump
has said he wants there to be peace. Donald Trump,
as we saw it in his first term through things
like the Abraham Accords, this is an individual that doesn't
like war. This is the guy who says, I'm also
fighting very hard to end the war between Ukraine and Russia.

(26:56):
And so when you look at what the president is
actually trying to do, I think it's pretty darn clear.
There's also something else that was said in this interview,
and Thune put it this way. He said, quote, of course,
Abraham Accords, negotiated by President Trump in his first term,
were historic in terms of some of the relationships they
built out in the region of the world. I think

(27:17):
my focus in this visit is in being a reliable,
unwavering partner too, and a friend of Israel, something that
they did not have clearly in the last administration. He
went on to say, we want to talk about getting
all the hostages home and how we support Israel as
it works to end once and for all the threats

(27:38):
from hamas Hesblah and the hoodies. He went on to
say that Iran and its shadow of terror government in
the region is another problem, and we've got to make
sure they can't expand we've got to make sure we
expand on the historic success of the Abraham Accords to
try to create a safer and more prosperous future in
that region. So he said this is what they're going

(27:59):
to be talking about now. To be clear, there's a
lot of senators on Thursday that are going to be
meeting with net Yahoo. Many of them are also going
to have we not many, a few that I know
personally are going to be even having one on one
meetings with net Yahoo. And this is I think a
very big turning point in America's foreign policy. What we're

(28:23):
going to see here and what we're witnessing is when
you let Israel hang out to dry the way that
the last administration did for four years, and then you
see what happened on October the seventh, and then you
see the Democratic Party still not backing Israel, our most
important ally in the region. There is going to have
to be something that changes moving forward. There is going

(28:45):
to be something that has to change for them to
know that, look, A, we trust America again. B. We
know you stand with us and not against us, which
is what the last administration was doing. And so this
is I think a clear message of the world from
and this Trump administration. Do not screw with our ally
because we have their back. We are not gonna let
them be out there by themselves. The last administration did

(29:08):
that we're not. So you mess with Israel, you're messing
with America. I think that's part of the messaging we're
seeing here, and it's an important one. The second one
is we absolutely want there to be piece in the
Middle least, and we're gonna work for that. We know
there's gonna need to be rebuilding and we're gonna help
brok those deals. Is Amir gonna pay the whole bill
or part of the bill or a large part of
the bill. Probably not, But we're willing to sit down

(29:31):
and say for others in the region, like you need
to step up. This is your next door neighbor, this
is your uh, this is an area that you need
to be rebuilt. And unfortunately, the terrorists did this to themselves,
and many of the people that support the terrorists did
this to themselves. They lost their homes because they stood
with the terrorists. And that is also a reality of
the situation. But these meetings and standing there with Netanyahu

(29:55):
and the way that the President talked with them in
the joint press conference and talking about a hope in
the future where there's peace, that's something everybody should be
excited about, Like everyone should be fired up for that
they should be excited. I also think Netnahoo coming here
so quickly and being the first foreign leader to sit
down in this way with Donald Trump was no accident.

(30:20):
Donald Trump and netnaw who knew this needed to be
the first one. It needed to be a clear change
in America's foreign policy, a new warning to the rest
of the world. And also I think it's a very
clear message to the anti Semitic individuals in Congress that

(30:41):
your time being in the majority is over. Now shut
up and sit down at the back of the room.

Speaker 6 (30:45):
Now.

Speaker 1 (30:45):
I don't think they're going to do that, Okay. I
think they're going to still be anti Semiticas they've always been.
I think the Squad's going to be anti Semitica as
they've always been. They'll probably get louder, and I think
you're going to have a lot of protesters on college
campuses that are going to stand with the terrorists and
stand against America against Israel. That's gonna happen, but there
may be real consequences for those actions.

Speaker 2 (31:05):
Now.

Speaker 1 (31:06):
There wasn't before, but there's probably gonna be real consequences
moving forward. We're going to cover it all every day
for you. Make sure you hit that subscribe auto download button,
and I will see you back here tomorrow on the
program