Democrats EXPOSED-Paying the Media to Dump On Trump & Conservatives

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
So we've been talking about exposing government ways fraud and abuse.
That's what Elon Musk and Dooje is doing. But just
how corrupt is our government? Well, they've been giving millions
of dollars to media organizations outside of MPR. They clearly
have been writing stories to attack conservatives, the MAGA movement,
Donald Trump. Yesterday, there was an email that went out

(00:25):
to Politico's employees, sent sent it to them yesterday, and
Politico's management blamed the people at Politico not getting paid
yesterday on a glitch. Not there government gravy train stopping
the flow of the cash coming in. Now, I want
to read for you what the email apparently says. It says,

(00:47):
Dear team Gully and I want to address this morning's
payroll issues Directly, due to what we believe was a
technical error, employees did not receive their paychecks as scheduled.
We understand the urgency of this matter and sincerely apologize
for the inconvenience. Yeah, not getting paid, Yeah, it's an inconvenience,
that's for sure. Our team is working diligently with our

(01:07):
systems of vendors and the bank to identify the cause
and implement a solution as quickly as possible. We will
keep you updated as we learn more and work to
resolve the problem as quick as possible. Thank you for
your patience and understanding. If you have any immediate concerns,
please please feel free to reach out directly. Now, that's

(01:27):
what they said. Whether this is because the gravy train
has been turned off or not, I don't know. But
here's what I do know. Politico, which is a quote
legitimate news company quote unquote, a news company. They're not
a nonprofit, They're no INNGO, they're not a government agency
which has spent the last decade destroying Donald Trump, the

(01:50):
MAGA movement, anybody associated with him, just trying to, you know,
help lock up people and saying that the insurrections around
you know, January sixth, are the worst people in the world, right,
Like all those types of stories. We now have found
out that they have been massively subsidized funded by USAID.

(02:11):
Donald Trump and Elon Musk said, we're stopping that funding.
The question now is will Politico go out of business
because of the amount of money we've been giving them.
Now the total award amount that we're talking about here,
and you look at twenty twenty four. If I'm reading

(02:31):
this correctly, on the US spending dot Gov, there has
been a total of at least eight point two million
dollars of your tax dollars going to Politico in the
form of two hundred and thirty seven transactions. Now below that,
there's another category. If you go to US spending dot gov,
face value of loans zero dollars from zero transactions. So

(02:54):
these are not loans. This is just straight up money
that is going to subsidize Politico. Eight point two million
dollars of your tax dours that went to them. I
think we can all agree that your tax dours should

(03:14):
not be going to Politico. Now, let's go back to
one of the core headlines in Politico that you need
to know about to put it in perspective what you've
been paying for, like the journalism you've been subsidizing. The
federal money started pouring into Politico, and it actually increased
exponentially after they successfully laundered the deep state CIA election

(03:41):
rigging propaganda against Donald Trump. The headline that I want
to bring up to prove this is their national security
headline that Politico ran. This is what they said. Okay,
and again the amount of the federal funds that began
pouring into Politico in increase exponentially after this story. You

(04:04):
ready for it, Hunter Biden's story is Russian disinfo. Dozens
of former intel officials say this is under national security.
Politico then their byline below that reads this way, more
than fifty former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt

(04:25):
on this New York Post story on the former vice
president's son, paraphrasing, So you got Politico that writes a
article that is a lie, and it's a lie that
they were willing to sell on behalf of the Democratic
Party and the fifty former intelligence visuals who, by the way,

(04:47):
I've lost their security clearance and we know they lied
to us, and they were willing to tell you the
Hunter Biden story was Russian disinfo and it wasn't real.
And then after they write that article, the federal government
through USAI is like, oh, hey, political we'd love to
send you a bunch of money, like millions of dollars.
You guys are doing great work. We want to keep
the money flowing in. This is maybe the biggest scandal

(05:11):
about the corrupt media that I've ever seen. The only
thing worse in political interference is government taxpayer funded election interference.
That is what was paid for. To Politico, it was
government taxpayer funded election interference. There was a real story,
the new was real story. Politico wrote a storytelling you

(05:32):
it's not real. It's Russian dis info. Fifty intelligence officers.
They didn't do They just they just went with it.
You know, governments saying this is what we need you
to write. They're like, we got it, We'll do it.
And then the government said, here's your payoff eight point
two million dollars. Politico then spent years after that attacking
conservatives the MAGA movement, and the money kept going up.

(05:55):
So the more they attacked conservatives and the mag movement,
the more money they were given from the government. There's
also something else that was interesting. Politico apparently received and
a lot of this is coming for the website, so
I'm just giving it to you. They received eight hundred

(06:16):
and sixty two thousand dollars in change from the National
Park Service in a no compete subscription contract over four years.
You want to know why Democrats are so anxious overdoge
because they were buying the press to attack US President
Trump back to what he was saying about government waste

(06:39):
and abuse and fraud. He's got something to say now
about what they're doing with a big project that hasn't happened,
the high speed rail project in California. Now, I want
to play it for you in just a second, but
first we want to tell you about our friends over
at Patriot Mobile. While we may have won the election,
the fight to restore a great nation is only beginning,

(07:00):
and now is the time for you to take a
stand with your dollars. And Patriot Mobile is leading the
charge with conservative companies that are fighting back. They are
America's only Christian conservative wireless provider. I use them, I
know hundreds of others that use them personally, family friends,
business owners that I know have switched to Patriot Mobile

(07:20):
because they offer a way to vote with your wallet
without compromising on quality or convenience. You may not know,
but Big Mobile gives big donations to democratic causes, candidates
and organizations, radical organizations, including those that advocate, support and
pay for abortions. That is why I made the switch
to Patriot Mobile. Because Patriot Mobile isn't just about providing

(07:44):
exceptional cell phone service. It's a call to action to
defend our rights and freedoms. With Patriot Mobile, every time
you pay your bill, you are giving back to causes
that sent up for our First and our Second Amendment rights,
the sanctity of life, as well as standing with our veterans,
our wounded warriors, and our first responders. Now, switching is easy.
Keep your same number, keep your same phone you have,

(08:06):
or upgrade to a new one. They have a one
hundred percent US based customer service team that will help
you find the perfect plan. So right now, go to
Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson or call them nine to
seven to two Patriot You're going to get a free
month of service with the promo code ferguson. So switch
to Patriot Mobile and make a difference with every call

(08:28):
you make Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson or nine
seven to two Patriot. President Trump back to what he
was saying about government waste and abuse and fraud. The
President saying this and the Oval Office.

Speaker 2 (08:41):
One of the things I want to investigate rapidly because
I've never seen anything to this extent. The trend that's
being built between Los Angeles and San Francisco is the
worst managed project I think I've ever seen, and I've
seen some of the worst. Billions and billion. It's hundreds
of billions of dollars over budget. In fact, I read

(09:04):
where you could take every single person that was going
to go on the train and get the finest limousine
service in the world and take them back and forth
with limousines, and you'd have hundreds of millions of dollars
left over. It is the worst thing, And we're going
to start an investigation of that, because it's not possible.
I built for a living, and I built on time,
on budget. It's impossible that something could cost that much.

(09:28):
And now it's not even going to San Francisco, and
it's not going to Los Angeles. It's they made it
much shorter, so now it's at little places way away
from San Francisco and way away from Los Angeles. No,
we're going to start a big investigation on that because
it's I've never seen anything like it. Nobody has ever

(09:48):
seen anything like it. The worst overruns that there have
ever been in the history of our country.

Speaker 1 (09:55):
The worst overruns we've ever seen in our country. Now,
he's right, this, this is insane. I built for a living,
he said, I built on time on budget, It's impossible
that something could cost us much. So how much corruption
is there? And the headlines in California are very clear.
Despite some progress, the state's high speed rail is one

(10:15):
hundred billion short and many years from reality. Okay, So
if that is the case, what happened to the money?
Where did it go? Donald Trump making it clear that
this is a problem because our tax dollars continue to

(10:36):
go to waste, fraud, and abuse. You'll look at all
of the money that we're finding out where it's going,
and I think what we're going to find out is
even more corruption. We also have been told that there
may even be movie stars that were paid by us
AID to go around the world, movie stars like big money.

(11:03):
That is some of it's coming out right now, Like
this is some of the corruption. And you go back
to Politico for example, and the corruption with media and
the AP getting money from USAID's subsidizing their attacks on conservatives.
White House Press Secretary was asked about that today.

Speaker 3 (11:20):
So upon coming out here to the briefing room, I
was made aware of the funding from USAID to media outlets,
including Politico, who I know has a seat in this room,
and I can confirm that the more than eight million
taxpayer dollars that have gone to essentially subsidizing subscriptions to Politico,
the American taxpayer's dying will no longer be happening. The

(11:43):
Doge team is working on canceling those payments. Now again,
this is a whole of government effort to ensure that
we are going line by line when it comes to
the federal of government's books, and this president and his
team are are making decisions across the board on do
these receipts serve the interests of the American people. Is

(12:04):
this a good use of the American taxpayer's money. If
it is not, that funding will no longer be sent
abroad and American taxpayers will see significant savings because of
that effort.

Speaker 1 (12:14):
One of the things in a word that she just
used there, but one of the things you noticed here
she said eight million dollars on subscriptions to Politico online logins,
that is subsidizing the media. Like there's no way that
this isn't just pure corruption. And if you're if eight
million dollars is what you're on the take from the

(12:36):
federal government to then trash the opponent of the people
that are in charge. They're giving this money. That is
pay to pay propaganda. This is state sponsored propaganda. It's
what I've been telling you has been happening with the
media for a long time. This is state sponsored propaganda.

(12:56):
We're also being told that The New York Times is
being government funded as well. The US government gave the
New York Times tens of millions of dollars just over
the past five years, despite paying relatively little money to
The New York Times in the past years preceding twenty
twenty one. What happened. They started going after Donald Trump

(13:18):
and anyone around them that they said take them out.
Like again, this is state sponsored is it? I'm not
even sure it's state sponsored media. It's a hit list.
We're gonna pay you to take down and tear down
the other side. Like that's a hit list. It's like
assassinations on a conservative party. We want you to get

(13:40):
rid of these people from the norm We want you
to turn them into racist, bigots and homophobes. Right, Well,
that's what the government's been doing, that's what they've been
paying for. So let's talk about New York Times. Apparently
tens of millions of dollars over the past five years.
In August twenty twenty four, the US government awarded another
There are four point one million dollars to The New

(14:02):
York Times. The bulk of the funds came from the
US Department of Health and Human Services at twenty six
point nine million, followed by the National Science Foundation at
nineteen point one million dollars. These payments that we're finding
out that went to The New York Times are just
paid a play. Let me give you another example. National

(14:26):
Aeronautics and Space Administration is paid three point eight two million.
I wonder how many negative articles The New York Times
has written or positive articles they've written about any space
program that liberals wanted. The Department of Commerce, I think
they've got any bad articles written about them for The
New York Times. No, because they paid them two and
a half million dollars of your money in twenty I

(14:49):
mean this is twenty twenty four. DoD paid two point
three four million to The New York Times, the Department
of Treasury half a million, the SEC for three hundred
and forty four thousand, the DOJ more than a quarter million,
State Department more than two hundred thousand, and the Department
of Veterans Affairs one hundred and seventy seven thousand. I

(15:10):
wonder how many stories got killed that would have made
the Department of Veterans Affairs look bad. This is the
government saying, we're gonna prop you up as long as
you write the stories we need you to write. We
need you to write pro Ukraine stories. We need you
to write anti Trump stories, we need you to write
anti elon Musk propaganda. Now it all makes a lot

(15:31):
of sense, right, because we have an unlimited amount of
money to throw around. That's what the government was saying
to the New York Times, Politico, the Associated Press, and
the timeline clearly also lines up when the war in
Ukraine began. So the US government said, hey, we want
you to sell the propaganda that this war with Ukraine

(15:52):
is good for America, for us to stand with them
and send them onlimited funds. And all of these organizations
started writing the pro Ukraine stories right, and propping up Zolenski,
not talking about corruption, not talking about the fraud and
abuse of your dollars that are going there. And so
we paid, or the government your dollars paid the New

(16:15):
York Times to write articles talking about how great Zelensky is,
and why your money should go there and why you
should stand with them. Let me give you another example
of how bad the money is. Zelensky is now claiming
that Ukraine received less than half of the US aid
that we have sent to the country. So where to go, Well,

(16:36):
it went to corrupt oligarchs and people around Zelensky, I
have no doubt about that. He's claiming he doesn't know
where all the money went. The Ukrainian president has said
that his country has only received seventy eight billion in
aid from the United States, despite America authorizing one hundred
and seventy five billion to support the war torn countries.

(17:00):
To be clear, Zolensky saying, you guys send US one
hundred billion dollars and we don't know where it went.
In this interview with the Associated Press, which is sponsored
by our government state sponsored propaganda, we've been paying the
Associated Press millions of dollars. They published this interview over
the weekend, Zelensky says he doesn't know where most of

(17:21):
the money the United States allocated under the Biden administration
to Ukraine has gone. When I hear both in the
past and even now from the US that America has
provided Ukraine with hundreds of billions as the president of
a nation at war, Zelensky said, I can tell you
we actually received only about seventy five billion. He said.
We're talking about tangible things because this a didn't come

(17:43):
as cash, but rather as weapons, which amount to about
seventy billions. So we're missing one hundred billion. But when
it's said that Ukraine received two hundred billions, Zelensky says
to support the army during the war, that's not true.
I don't know where all that money went. Zelensky admitted.
Perhaps it's true on paper, with hundreds of different programs.

(18:04):
Lelensky said, I won't argue. So he's admitting one hundred
billion just disappeared, and we're immensely grateful for everything. But
in reality, we just received seventy eight excuse me, seventy
six billion, not two hundred billion and eight. The Ukrainian
leader suggested that perhaps the additional funds went to quote

(18:25):
humanitarian programs. That's the easiest way to funnel money to
his rich oligarch friends, many of them that are in
warsaw hanging out in five star hotels. Many of the
richest in Ukraine and the government and the oligarchs in
Ukraine don't live in Ukraine right now. Their families are
in Warsaw, in five star hotels and villas. How are
they paying for it? Follow the humanitarian programs is what

(18:47):
I would say. He says he was informed about except
for knowing of their existence, but he doesn't know how
much money went into those programs. And then Zelensky said this,
Perhaps the US presidents administration will audit these programs and
find additional billions. But I don't know where those funds went.

(19:07):
I have one question. I wonder how much of that
money may have gone back to the Biden crime family.
I don't know. I'm just asking for a bunch of
taxpayers in this country. You remember that company named Meta,
You know the company that owns Facebook. You know the
company that had no problem suspending the account of the
sitting president of United States of America back in twenty

(19:29):
twenty one, guy by the name of Donald Trump after
the insurrection at the Capitol. Of course, remember when that happened. Well,
there was a lawsuit around it. We now know who
is right and who was wrong. Metta is now agreeing
to pay millions to settle that Trump lawsuit over his
suspended accounts. So NBC News breaking the big news earlier

(19:51):
tonight that Meta has now agreed to pay Donald Trump
take a listen in.

Speaker 4 (19:56):
Trump, We've learned has signed an agreement with Meta to
settle a lawsuit that he filed against the company for
suspending his account after the attack on the Capitol on
January sixth, four years ago. The settlement we understand to
be twenty five million dollars, most of which is going
towards his future presidential library.

Speaker 1 (20:15):
This story first was reported.

Speaker 4 (20:16):
By the Wall Street Journal. Meta says it has no
comment on that, but says they can confirm that twenty
two million dollar number to the Trump Library. Garrett Hayk
is at the White House. Garrett, this is so interesting
for a lot of reasons here, and I know you've
just confirmed this with some with some of your sources here.

Speaker 1 (20:31):
It's our understanding.

Speaker 4 (20:32):
I think that President Trump like signed this settlement that
has to do with Meta and the attack on the
Capitol sitting in the Oval office today.

Speaker 5 (20:40):
Well, it looks like a lot of this was discussed, apparently,
according to Wall Street Journal sources, a detail that I've
yet to confirm. But hope to nail down shortly during
the time that he was being sentenced during the transition
on the New York City hush money case. So yeah, look,
the top line number here is extraordinary, twenty five million dollars.
Most of that money going to this that, as best

(21:00):
I can tell, doesn't actually exist yet for a future
Trump presidential library. You'll remember that that's what happened with
the defamation settlement that the President won against ABC and
ABC News. Sort of the start of funding this library
tends to be coming from these lawsuits at the president.

Speaker 1 (21:17):
By the way, can we just pause and just celebrate
the fact that the Trump Presidential Library is in essence
going to be built by the media that lied to him,
lied about him, slandered him, and threw these lawsuits where
he's like, all right, we'll see in court. I mean,
you could say that this library is going to have
a what is it, a ABC wing, a Meta Facebook wing,

(21:42):
and there's others out there, by the way, but this
is a lot of money. Twenty two million going to
fund the Trump Presidential Library, and the balance dedicated legal
fees and other plaintiffs in the case. Now, Meta didn't
have to admit wrongdoing. I don't care if they admit
wrongdoing or not. We know why META is paying this

(22:05):
money because they absolutely did something that was wrong. And
the CEO is now saying, all right, well, you're in charge,
so I'm gonna hang out with you and come to
the inauguration and sit in the prime seat for the
swearing in, and then I'm gonna give you twenty five
million or twenty two million for your library. That's what

(22:26):
we're doing here. This is, by the way, how you
beat them. Donald Trump is going all in to hold
them accountable. He's not holding back. He's doing the same
thing with the government right now. He's doing the same
thing to make sure that people are held accountable for
the corruption in our government. When you're sending money by

(22:48):
the tens of millions to the media, so they write
stories about the left wing of the Democratic Party and
they attack their political opponents. This is what happens in Russia,
in Cuba and China. It should never happen in America.
Donald Trump getting rid of government waste, fraud, and abuse
through USA and other programs. We're now also hearing more

(23:11):
about the White House's plan for the US involvement in
the rebuilding efforts in Gaza. By the way, there's a
lot of people asking about, well, should we be doing it?
How much is it going to cost? Is that where
we want our money to be spent? The White House
saying the US involvement in rebuilding efforts does not mean

(23:35):
commitment of troops or taxpayer dollars in Gaza. They clarified
that earlier. The White House made it clear that the
US involvement in rebuilding Gaza does not mean a commitment
to send any troops there or using any of your
tax dollars for the effort. The White House pressing or
Terry Carolina Levitt filled it a question from NBC News's

(23:56):
senior White House correspondent early in the briefing, after Donald
Trump said Tuesday that the United States would take over
the Gaza Strip. Trump also said his vision included moving
gazins to nearby Arab nations, which Levitt said Wednesday would
be quote unquote temporary. They also said that Trump's vision
could intail boots on the ground in nation building. That

(24:17):
is how NBC News frame the question. What did Caroline
san response quote, I would reject the premise of your
question that this forces the United States to be entangled
in conflicts abroad. The President has not committed to putting
boots on the ground in Gaza. He has also said
that the United States is not going to pay for

(24:37):
rebuilding of Gaza. She had that the administration would work
with the Middle East allies to reconstruct this region. Levitt
also emphasized that while it may be an out of
the box idea, the American people like to Trump because
he thinks outside the box. Quote and let me just
take a step back here, because this is an out
of the box idea. That's who President Trump is. The

(25:00):
American people elected him, and his goal is lasting peace
in the Middle East for all people in the region.
She added that the American involvement means the President will
use his deal making prowess to strike a deal with
our partners in the region. Responding to a follow up question,
she also knows that the President has spoken to leaders
in the region about his expectations that particularly Egypt and

(25:22):
Jordan will accept Palestinian refugees temporarily so they can rebuild
their homes. Trump has been mulling over the plan for
a while. She went on to say, including sin seeing
images of the well pure rubble that is Gaza right now,
from Special Envoy to the Middle East and the visit
to the region last month. According to White House Press Secretary,

(25:43):
so the media wanted you to think this was going
to be nation building, that we were going to like
own this, that we are going to be seeing troops,
that we're going to be paying your tax dollars to
actually do all this. The clear report now is that
is not the case, and the media is in fact
lying to you. Now. There's also something else that came

(26:04):
out of this. Fun came out centern on meeting with
Netnahu's saying the Democrats' anti israel behavior will not deter
the US from supporting Israel. That was the message coming
from the Senate majority leader. And he will meet with
the Israeli Prime Minister tomorrow at the US Capitol. He said,

(26:24):
this meeting, which you hope, is about America and conveying
the importance of this US Israel ties and also to
deepen the peace talks in the region. Fun in an
interview said ahead of the meeting that he will convey
that to Netanyahu that despite Democrats in Congress, including particularly
in the US Senate, repeatedly finding themselves on the opposite

(26:45):
side of Israel, and that the United States is not
with them. The United States stands firmly with Israel, and
that's why Donald Trump was elected. Democrats, of course, recently
voted in the US Senate to take a plan to
sanction the Internet National Criminal Court known as the ICC.
Israel is the US's greatest ally in the Middle East,

(27:06):
and the Democrats this last year have been very divided
in supporting Israel throughout the conflict. Is what Thune said
to Breitbart News. They seem to find more things like
common cause with Hamas and some of these folks in
the region that are responsible for the October seventh attack.
If you recall this last summer, the last time Prime

(27:28):
Minster Netya, who was in the Capitol, there were a
lot of Democrats, including the Vice Vice President Harry, who
boycotted his appearance. This time, the Prime Minister's visit follows
the Democrats vote last week to prop an illegitimate court,
the ICC up because Democrats didn't want to defend Israel's

(27:49):
sovereignty or American troops who have been targeted by the
ICC in the past. So if and when they decide
that they want to take real action to protect our
allies and prevent future targeting of American citizens. We're here
for that, then went on to say, but until then,
we're going to continue to do everything we can without
Democrats to defend our allies and also our nation. I

(28:13):
think tomorrow that will be revisited in the meeting with
the Prime Minister. Now, President Trump back in the White
House has made it clear that there are a lot
of Middle Eastern leaders from across the region that are
hopeful there is a pathway to peace. Donald Trump has
said he wants there to be peace. Donald Trump, as

(28:33):
we saw it in his first term through things like
the Abraham Accords. This is an individual that doesn't like war.
This is the guy who says, I'm also fighting very
hard to end the war between Ukraine and Russia. And
so when you look at what the President is actually
trying to do, I think it's pretty darn clear. There's
also something else that was said in this interview and

(28:54):
then put it this way, so quote of course, Abraham Accords,
negotiated by President Trump in his first term, we're historic
in terms of some of the relationships they built out
in the region of the world. I think my focus
in this visit is in being a reliable, unwavering partner too,
and a friend of Israel, something that they did not

(29:16):
have clearly in the last administration. He went on to say,
we want to talk about getting all the hostages home
and how we support Israel as it works to end
once and for all the threats from Hamas Hesblah and
the hoodies. He went on to say that Iran and
its shadow of terror government in the region is another problem,

(29:37):
and we've got to make sure they can't expand we've
got to make sure we expand on the historic success
of the Abraham Accords to try to create a safer
and more prosperous future in that region. So he said,
this is what they're going to be talking about now.
To be clear, there's a lot of senators on Thursday
that are going to be meeting with Netnahu. Many of

(29:57):
them are also going to have on that many a
few that I know personally are going to be even
having one on one meetings with Netanyahu. And this is
I think a very big turning point in America's foreign policy.
What we're going to see here and what we're witnessing
is when you let Israel hang out to dry the

(30:17):
way that the last administration did for four years. And
then you see what happened on October the seventh, and
then you see the Democratic Party still not backing Israel,
our most important ally in the region. There is going
to have to be something that changes moving forward. There
is going to be something that has to change for
them to know that, Look a, we trust America again,

(30:39):
be we know you stand with us and not against us,
which is what the last administration was doing. And so
this is I think a clear message of the world
from this Trump administration. Do not screw with our ally
because we have their back. We are not going to
let them be out there by themselves. The last administration
did that, We're not. So you mess with Israel, you're

(31:00):
messing with America. I think that's part of the messaging
we're seeing here, and it's an important one. The second
one is we absolutely want there to be peace in the
Middle least and we're gonna work for that. We know
there's gonna need to be rebuilding and we're gonna help
brok those deals. Is Amir gonna pay the whole bill
or part of the bill or a large part of
the Bill, probably not, but we're willing to sit down
and say for others in the region, like you need

(31:21):
to step up. This is your next door neighbor, this
is your uh, this is an area that you need
to be rebuilt. And unfortunately, the terrorists did this to themselves,
and many of the people that support the terrorists did
this to themselves. They lost their homes because they stood
with the terrorists. And that is also a reality of
the situation. But these meetings and standing there with net

(31:43):
Yahou and the way that the President talked with them
in the joint press conference and talking about a hope
in the future where there's peace, that's something everybody should
be excited about, Like everyone should be fired up for that.
They should be excited. I also think Yahu coming here
so quickly and being the first foreign leader to sit

(32:03):
down in this way with Donald Trump was no accident.
Donald Trump and Netanya who knew this needed to be
the first one. It needed to be a clear change
in America's foreign policy, a new warning to the rest
of the world. And also I think it's a very

(32:25):
clear message to the anti Semitic individuals in Congress that
your time being in the majority is over. Now, shut
up and sit down at the back of the room. Now.
I don't think they're going to do that, okay. I
think they're going to still be anti Semitic as they've
always been. I think the Squad's going to be anti
Semiticans they've always been. They'll probably get louder, and I
think you're going to have a lot of protesters on
college campuses that are going to stand with the terrorists

(32:47):
and stand against Americans and against Israel. That's going to happen,
but there may be real consequences for those actions. Now.
There wasn't before, but there's probably going to be real
consequences moving forward. We're gonna cover it all every day
for you. Make sure you hit that subscribe auto download button,
and I will see you back here tomorrow on the program.