January 5, 2025 • 29 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
I want to get to two different stories real quick
that are really important heading in to next year. And
number one, it deals with House Speaker Johnson. There have
been a lot of people that are out there that
have been trying to start a war between Speaker Johnson
with a cr and with Donald Trump and wanting him
(00:22):
to lose a speakership. Now there's been chaos because the
margin of victory for the Republicans in the House has
been so small that people, for example, like matc Gaates
have been able to cost people their jobs in leadership positions.
He was clearly able to do that with Kevin McCarthy,
cost him the job he won his entire life Speaker
of the House, and now Ken McCarthy's no longer even
(00:44):
in Congress. This has gotten a little bit out of
control because there have been a few people that realize
how much power they have if they go against their
own party. We need to learn a little bit from
the Democratic Party here. We need to act like adults
and not have people going just for their own personal
gain or for attention, or for fame, or for tweets
(01:05):
and likes and retweets. And we need to have some
order in the House Speaker Johnson. I want to be clear,
I think is by far the best conservative that we
could get. If you get rid of Speaker Johnson and
then you have to rely on Democrats to get a
deal done with a new speaker, you're gonna get a
much more liberal speaker. I don't believe you're gonna get
(01:27):
a more conservative speaker than Speaker Johnson. Do I think
Speaker Johnson is like the most hardcore conservative out there?
Is he my perfect speaker? No, but I think he's
the best speaker we can get, the most conservative speaker
we can get with this thin margin that we have
right now.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
Now, there have been a.
Speaker 1 (01:46):
Lot of people pushing for their own fame on social media,
trying to start a war between Speaker Johnson. These are
a lot of these are quote hardcore conservatives who want
there to be a litnis to and they want to
seem extremely powerful in their tweets, who are trying to
start this war with Mike Johnson, trying to cost them
(02:07):
a jobs they can flex their muscles, and these people
I hate the most.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
Now.
Speaker 1 (02:10):
One of the reasons why I hate some of these
hardcore quote conservative influencers on social media and podcasters is
because you can buy their support. A lot of people
don't know this, but some of the biggest tweeters in
the conservative movement, you can buy their tweets. You can
call them, you can offer them five, ten, fifteen, twenty, twenty, five,
(02:33):
thirty thousand dollars or more for them to do campaigns
to either promote a candidate or to trash an opponent.
This is happening more often. Now, how do I know
this happening because I know some of the people that
have paid some of these hardcore conservative influencers significant cash
(02:55):
for them to say certain things. Now, let's let me
explain how unauthentic some of these tweets are. Many of
the people that are buying tweets will send the exact
tweet they want the conservative social media influence that has
million plus followers on Facebook or Twitter or on Instagram,
(03:16):
and they'll do a deal and they'll say, Hey, we're
going to pay your company twenty grand or thirty grand
or fifteen thousand, depending on their number of followers, for
you to echo this person that we want to either
save or get elected. This has become normal practice for them,
and they're making I want to be clear, millions of
dollars off of doing this. There are many that are
(03:38):
out there that are saying things against Peaker Johnson right
now that I actually don't believe, believe what they're saying.
They're getting paid by groups and organizations and others to
say this, and it's a problem. Like it's a really
big problem. And I want you to understand that if
you see what I would refer to as a coordinated
(04:00):
effort out of nowhere to attack a congressman. A great
example of this is chip Roy chip Roy a week ago.
There was a lot of people that went after chip
Roory out of out Roy, out of nowhere, and it
was a coordinate attack. I believe that it was a
paid for, coordinated attack. And this is just one example
to try to shut him up and get him back
(04:21):
in line. And they were mad at him, and it
was a power play, and this is what is being
done by special interest groups in the conservative movement. Now
chip Roy survived it, He's going to be okay. But
there are a lot of people that are like, if
you don't do this, then you should be primaried, for example,
by Donald Trump. A lot of those types of tweets
that you saw, and you can go back and find
(04:43):
them were paid for. That campaign was a orchestrated financial campaign,
and many of the biggest names that were tweeting some
things like that, like if you don't agree with this
with MAGA, then you should be primaried. Those tweets were
not authentic, they were not real. They were paid to
play tweets. Again, how do I know this because I
(05:04):
know some of the people that were paying, and I
know some of the people that are being paid. In fact,
I know some of the people that are being paid.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
Well.
Speaker 1 (05:10):
Now, to be clear, I have never accepted money for
a tweet that I didn't write, that I didn't believe in. Now,
I could sell tweets, I could sell Facebook posts, and
I could make for my family well into the six figures.
I could sell access, for example, to my show. There
(05:35):
are people on social media, by the way, with large
followings on YouTube and large followings and podcasts. You can
actually buy topics in their show, episodes in their show
as part of your marketing campaign. So let me explain
how that works. Let's say there's somebody out there that's
(05:57):
like running for office or someone that in trouble and
they need good press. There are certain podcasts that you
can call and say, hey, I want you to come
on your show, and I want you to do a
full throated support of this embattled congressman or governor or
attorney general, whoever it may be, and if you'll do it,
(06:21):
then we'll pay you X to do that show.
Speaker 2 (06:24):
I've never in my life done that.
Speaker 1 (06:26):
I want to be clear, and I will never do
that because that is exactly the opposite of what I
believe in. That is paid propaganda. If someone calls me
and says, I'll give you another example of this. Someone
called me and offered me money to do a show
advocating or supporting for an individual I believe in the individual,
(06:49):
and I told him, I said, Number one, I can't
be bought. Number two, I actually like your guy, and
I am more than happy to give him supporting words
because I believe in him and what he's doing. I'm
not going to take money to do it. And the
reason why I'm not gonna take money is because then
I am a pay to play individual. I my audience
(07:10):
wouldn't know what I believe in or what is me
pushing them propaganda Things that I don't actually care about,
things that don't actually believe in things I would have
never said, and they're listening to shows that I would
have never done on my own, but I took a
buck to do it. By the way, this is also
an interesting part of this is one of the reasons
why you know, there's some people that get frustrated because
(07:30):
they hear advertising in radio and in podcasts. That's how
we make our money. I could actually make a lot
more money if I didn't do those ads and I
just took pay to play.
Speaker 2 (07:42):
Hey, I'll support this guy.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
Pay me twenty five grand and I'll do a show,
or fifteen grand or ten grand, and I'll do a
segment that you guys can then echo that sounds genuine
and authentic of me saying this politician and what he's
doing right now is the greatest thing since slice bread.
Speaker 2 (07:58):
I could do that, and I can make a lot
more money.
Speaker 1 (08:01):
In fact, I know different podcasters that are making millions
of dollars doing pay to play fake segments about things
they actually don't care about, are people they don't really
care about, just to get that money, just to get
that cash. And so I say that to give you
a warning over when you see things like the Mike
(08:23):
Johnson anger, and you see they're like, oh, well, he
deserves to not be the speaker anymore. Be careful not
to be taken advantage of now. The other reason why
I bring this up is because here's the story in
the headline. Donald Trump has come out and endorses Mike
Johnson amid the fight for his gavel. And I think
(08:43):
this is the right decision for Donald Trump because he
understands exactly what I told you a second ago, which
is Mike Johnson is a good man. Mike Johnson is
a sincere Christian man, and Mike Johnson is the most
conservative speaker. I think we could get elected right now,
and we don't need to go through another fun and
look like we are in total chaos and anarchy the
(09:03):
day we take over. Mike Johnson's gonna work not just average,
but he's gonna work very well with Donald Trump. And
that is exactly why President elect Trump endorsed Speaker Johnson
Monday morning, after leaving Johnson twisting and the wind, as
some describe the media, for eleven days, Trump posted a
two hundred and thirty two word soliloquy on True Social
(09:28):
touting his electoral romp and attacking Democrats for weaponized the
government against him. At the very end, he endorsed Johnson
for Speaker using this language, Let's not all caps, Let's
not blown this great opportunity which we have been given
the American people. All caps need immediate relief from all
(09:51):
the destructive policies of the last administration. Speaker Johnson is
a good, hard working religious man. He will do the
right thing and we will continue to all caps win.
He has my complete and total endorsement. And then he
said all caps maga with three exclamation points. All right,
(10:12):
there is some big news that is taking place right
now as we speak, and a lot of it deals
with a big issue that is truly shocking, and it
is one that deals with what's happening. And we call
this taking out the trash. They are hoping and I'm
referring to the media and the Democrats that you are
not paying attention right now because you're too busy celebrating
(10:34):
New Year's and you've kind of unplugged and tune out.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
And there's a couple of big stories.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
One that deals with the mastermind of nine to eleven,
Cleete Chek Mohammad, and another one that is getting absolutely
zero press. So I hope you'll take this, take the show,
take the podcast, share it on social media, because this
is a very important story I'm going to start with,
and it deals with Mexico. For years, Mexico has said
that there is that they're not a part of advocating
(10:59):
or supporting or helping people come to the United States.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
Of America from Mexico.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
For years, I've been telling you that is obviously a lie,
and I give you stats and figures to prove the point.
One of them is the number one Stimulu Mexico's economy
outpacing oil is a legal immigrant sending money back to Mexico.
That is incredible when you look at the oil production
of Mexico and you realize, oh my gosh, they make
money as a country by getting rid of citizens and
(11:25):
then the people that they send to America sending massive
amounts of cash via Western Union back to Mexico.
Speaker 2 (11:33):
It is huge.
Speaker 1 (11:34):
The amount of money we're talking about here is billions
and billions and billions and billions and billions of dollars
a year, outpacing their oil projection. Just to put it
in perspective, Mexico wants to continue the floodgates being open.
Not only do they make money because the entire government
down there is basically nothing but a cartel government. It
(11:57):
is one of the worst governments, and I'm talking about
with the issue of corruption that we've ever seen in
twenty twenty five. And it is anyone that has significance
or power at the local state or at the let
me say, local province or the national level in Mexico,
no one of significance is not bought and paid for
(12:18):
by the cartels. They are owned, they are bribed, they
are threatened. However, they have to get what they get
on a person, they will do it. Some of them
are paid for, some of them have been financed at
the highest levels. We know this in the past with
the presidency, even financed by the cartels. And if you
are a quote good guy, then they will threaten you
(12:39):
and your family and they will off people and behead people.
That's just how they work. So knowing that the government
and one of the things you just have to accept
is that the government is the right hand of the
cartel now and that is how deep the corruption goes.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
They're not on our team. They're never going to be
on our team. They're not on our side. They're not honest.
Speaker 1 (12:58):
It is not surprising that the government is now doing
what I'm about to tell you, and this is what
I want you to share with people, share the podcasts.
We now have confirmation that Mexico is sending hundreds of
lawyers to aid illegal immigrants in the United States of America.
Why would they do that because they want them money
(13:18):
to stay in They want the workers stay in America.
They want the money to come back to Mexico. The
Mexican government is sending hundreds of lawyers north into the
US to provide legal aid to shield four million illegal
migrants they claim are currently in the US from the
(13:38):
Trump administration. The government wants to protect Mexican migrants from
deportation in part because they send billions of their US
earnings back to Mexico. How much are we talking. Let's
go back to twenty twenty three. In twenty twenty three,
they sent more than sixty three billion of their dollars
right their remittance of their relatives outside of the of
(14:02):
Mexico in the US back to Mexico. So it's a
sixty three billion dollar industry of direct influx of cash
coming to Mexico. Now, sixty three billion may not see
Michael out in the US. That is an insane amount
of money in an impoverished country, a corrupt country, which
is Mexico. Now, authorities in Mexico announce the pending release
(14:23):
of a new quote app backed by hundreds of Mexican lawyers,
that will help Mexican citizens living illegally in the US
to respond to being targeted or deported by US immigration
authorities when Trump is sworn into office. Now, let me
break down the money just for a second, so you
understand the fact that sixty three billion dollars is being
(14:47):
sent back to Mexico from the US from their citizens
is only half of the financial equation that you need
to understand. Let me explain to you part two of this.
Part two, and it's a much bigger number than sixty
three billion, is the number of illegal immigrants in this
country that are helping the cartels spread their tentacles into
(15:09):
every city in America that is important to them. On
the drug trafficking, human trafficking, sex trafficking, child sex trafficking
that the cartels are making money off of. That's part
of what you need to understand. It is the fentanyl network,
it's the pot network, it's the hair whin, it's the crack,
it's the cocaine. The list goes on and on. That
is worth way more than the sixty three billion, because
(15:31):
when you get this many illegal immigrants into the US,
what it means is you have an incredible network of
humans that are then set up for the smuggling, whether
it's drugs or human beings, and then setting up the
illegal businesses within the United States of America that they
set up, whether it's prostitution, sex trafficking, child sex trafficking,
(15:52):
or drugs that then go back to Mexico. So it's
not just the sixty three billion that is directly sent
back and people that are working in the US, it
is the hundreds of billions that it makes the cartels
by having these human networks inside of the United States America.
Now you understand why the government and the authorities in
Mexico announcing the pending release of this new app to
(16:14):
do exactly what I just described to you.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
Now.
Speaker 1 (16:16):
The app is called the Alert Button. Quote. It will
reportly allow Mexican cistens living illegally in the US and
who are being detained by immigration and Customs Enforcement known
as ICE to warn relatives in Mexico of their status.
It will also alert the closest Mexican consulate about the detention,
(16:37):
upon which the Mexican lawyers will then quote unquote leap
into action after announcing this app. And again, if you're
hearing about this for the very first time, here, there's
a reason they decided this would come out, and it
would happen during a moment when we call taking out
the trash. No one's paying attention. It's New Year's Eve,
(16:58):
it's New Year's Day. People off work, They're not reading
the news. And this is why they announced it when
they did. And this is why I'm saying, please share this.
The announcement, okay, is one that they say is important
for quote the illegal immigrants, and the Mexican Foreign Secretary
urged Mexicans living illegally in the US to register to
(17:19):
use the app immediately, saying quote not everyone has done
this yet, We strongly encourage everyone to register with our consulates,
as this enables us to provide legal protection when needed
to the illegal immigrants that are in the US.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
I have personally attended several open meetings where the key
message is to tell our fellows citizens that are that
they are not alone and will not be alone. That's
what the secretary said, adding that this app will go
live sometime in January. Why because that is when everything
will change with Donald Trump being inaugurated January the twentieth.
(17:56):
This app is the latest from Mexico's president, who is
controlled by the CAR tells to shore up her pledge
to defend quote the rights of Mexican citizens in the
face of the incoming Trump administration's plans to launch the
largest deportation effort in American history. The app is part
of Mexico's Know Your Rights program, aimed at informing Mexican
(18:18):
citizens in the US about what they can and cannot do.
The program is reportedly manned by three and twenty nine
legal advisors stationed across all fifty three consulates in the US. Quote,
we want to tell our fellow countrymen that they are
not alone and they will not be alone, adding that
(18:40):
Mexican authorities will be very vigilant in ensuring that due
process has followed in the United States of America. The
President elect has insisted that he has already had a
quote wonderful conversation with Mexico's president about stopping the flow
of illegals from Central and South America moving through Mexico.
What did Donald try Trump say? He said, untrue, social
(19:02):
I had a wonderful conversation with a new president of Mexico.
She has agreed to stop migration through Mexico and into
the United States, effectively closing our southern border. That's what
he said in his November the twenty seventh post. Here's
the caveat. This woman did not agree to bring all
(19:22):
the illegal immigrants that are in America back to Mexico.
You notice that was left out. She's saying I may
stop the flow from other countries. By the way, she's
not saying she's stopping the flow of illegal immigrants in
Mexico coming into America, just from other countries outside of Mexico.
That is read between the read the fine print right
the part that is not being said. CBS News reporter
(19:45):
is now saying Biden's obvious cognitive decline is the most
underreported twenty twenty four story. President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive
cline was the most underreported story of twenty twenty four.
Who said it, CBS News reporter Jan Crawford claiming on Sunday, Yes,
(20:05):
this happened. Yes the media didn't cover it. Yes the
media didn't try to cover it. Yes the media straight
up lied to you about just how bad things were.
Take a listen to what Jan Crawford had to say
in her own words. Do in the Year end Correspondence
round Table is dig into what was undercovered or underreported?
Speaker 3 (20:25):
Jan undercovered, underreported? That would be to me, Joe Biden's
obvious cognizant decline that became undeniable in the.
Speaker 1 (20:35):
Televised debate at the presidential debate with.
Speaker 3 (20:37):
Unquestioned and you know, it's starting to emerge now that
his advisors kind of managed his limitations. It's been reported
in the Wall Street Journal for four years, and yet
he insisted that he could still run for president. We
should have much more forcefully questioned whether he was fit
for office for another four years, which could have led
(20:57):
to a primary for the Democrats. It could have changed
the scope of the entire election. Yet still, incredibly, we
read the Washington Post that his advisors are saying that
he regrets that he dropped out of the race. You
know that he thinks he could have beaten Trump, and
I think that is either delusional.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
Well, let's just go back to that quote real quick,
Major Gerrett said at the presidents of debate with Donald Trump,
right trying to put context into when this real decline
was seen by the American people, And she said unquestioned.
Then she says, and it's starting to emerge now that
his advisors kind of managed his limitations, which was which
has been reporting the Wall Street Journal for four years.
(21:38):
So they're all admitting what we all knew the entire time,
that they covered up Joe Biden, covered up the White House,
covered up the cabinet members, cut it up, the Vice
President Kamala Harris, covered up that it was very clear
that there was a diminished Joe Biden the entire time
he was president, and it was getting worse the entire time,
and they were hiding it from the American people. Quote
and yet he insisted that he could still run for president.
(22:01):
We should have much more forcely questioned. She's referring to
the media now whether he was fit for office for
another four years, which could have led to a primary
for the Democrats. So what is she saying is that, look,
we all knew that we were being lied to. I'm
not kidding when I say this, Like I think that's
what they're What they're in essence saying here is we
(22:24):
all knew that we were lying to the American people.
That was a bad mistake. We shouldn't have done that.
And the reason why we shouldn't have done that is
because we really screwed ourselves by not having a primary,
since we all knew it was declining and we should
have been honest with the American people. Now they're not
saying they made a mistake because it was like, I
(22:44):
don't know, like lying to the American people about the
cognitive decline of a president. They're only now saying it
was a mistake because they feel like if they would
have done the right thing, it would have been allowed
for an open primary and then Donald Trump wouldn't have
got elected. Like I need you to understand, they're not
saying that they made a mistake and they won't do
it again because they were lying to the American people
with the state sponsored media saying what CBS News is staying,
(23:06):
what Jan Crawford is saying, is we, as democratic operatives
of the state, made a mistake that cost us the
White House. We're fine with lying to you if it
serves us. We're fine with lying the American people if
it protects our interests. We're fine with misleading the American people,
lying to them if it keeps us in power. What
(23:30):
jan Crawford is admitting here is that they made a
bad decision to not basically tell the truth about Joe Biden,
so that there then would have been an earlier come
to Jesus moment in a primary, So then we would
have beaten Donald Trump. That is all she's admitting to here.
(23:51):
It also tells you about the corruption of the media. Now,
there's another part of this story that I think is
also extremely am important right now, and it goes back
to what is happening right now with major decisions that
are being made. Perfect example of the question we all
(24:14):
need to be asking, which is all right, who's really
running the country right now on major issues? Is this
one we have now found out? And again this is
another moment of taking out the trash, hoping you're not
paying attention so they can get away with This is
Joe Biden's plea deal with the nine to eleven mastermind,
a guy by the name of Klee Shake Mohammad. Now
we exposed this several months ago that they were trying
(24:35):
to spare his life. The guy that mastermind nine to eleven,
Kalee Chick Muhammad, and was involved in many other terrorist
attacks that killed women and children and the elderly and
pushed people to the point where they had to decide
between burning to death or jumping out of the twin towers,
just to put it in perspective, hijacking the planes.
Speaker 2 (24:51):
He was the mastermind.
Speaker 1 (24:52):
That was not Osama bin Lauden's idea, that was kale
Shake Mohammad's idea. And he's the guy that followed through.
Kalee check Mhammad followed through on that and it was
very important. Without him, I don't think nine to eleven
would have happened the way that it was.
Speaker 2 (25:06):
He was the godfather of that terrorist attack.
Speaker 1 (25:10):
He is in Gittmo, And we found out a few
months ago that Joe Biden was going to spare his life,
do a deal and then come out and say see,
I'm the guy that closed GETMO, because that's something he's
obsessed with, the same way he was obsessed with pulling
out of Afghanistan on an arbitrary date that cost so
many American soldiers their lives in that pullout. That was
a total and utter disaster. Well after it was exposed
(25:32):
and before election day, people finally like, all right, this
is too unpopular. We can't spare the life of the
mastermind nine to eleven. This is becoming a political issue.
So let's let's pull that off the table. Let's not
do that deal. Well, guess what in theory, Joe Biden
and I would argue someone else who's clearly run the
country right now, or a group of people have now
(25:53):
decided that the plea deals with the nine to eleven
masterminds are back in effect. The Pentagon, which stepped in
to stop them the last time, has lost its appeal.
He's burning everything down or the people around him on
the way out. This coming in the report, A military
appeals court has ruled against the Defense Secretary lord to
(26:13):
Austin's effort to throw out the plea deals reached for
Kleetchik Muhammad and two other defendants of the nine to
eleven attacks. A US official has confirmed decision puts back
on track the agreements that would have three men plead
guilty to one of the deadliest attacks ever on the
United States in exchange for being spared the possibility of
(26:34):
the death penalty the attacks by al Qaeda that killed
nearly three thousand people on September eleventh of VTE one
and helped spur US invasions of Afghanistan Iraq in what
George W. Bush administration called the War on Terror. So
we now have this story, and this is I'm having
to go just to understand to get the details on
this because it's not actually in the US. I'm having
(26:57):
to go to uh Ctvnews dot C to then find
the Associated Press story that read for you what I
just read that is coming from the Associated Press. Now,
let me also say this quote. The Military Appeals Court
released its ruling Monday night. According to the US officials
(27:18):
who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and
spoke on condition of emineity, Military prosecutors and defense attorneys
for Mohammed, the accused mastermind of nine to eleven, and
two co defendants, reached the plea agreements after two years
of government approved negotiations. The deal was announced late last summer.
Supporters of the plea agreement see them as a way
(27:39):
to resolving the legally troubled case against the men at
the US Military Commission at Gitmo. Pre trial hearings for
Mohammed and the other two have been underway for more
than ten years.
Speaker 2 (27:51):
More than a decade.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
Much of the focus of pre trial arguments has been
on how torture of the men while MCA cusse in
the the first years after their detention, may obtained the
overall evidence in the case. Within days of news of
the plea deals with this summer, Austin issued a brief
order saying he was nullifying these plea deals. Why because
(28:14):
they understood this was going to be politically hard for Democrats,
so they said, all right, never mind, we're not going
to do what we want to do anyway. And guess what,
now they're going back and doing exactly what they wanted
to do. He cited, quote the gravity of the nine
to eleven attacks and saying that as Defense Secretary, he
should decide on any plea agreements that would spare the
defendants the possibility of execution. Well, guess what, Democrats lost
(28:36):
the election, and now they're like, all right, we're going
to do exactly what we really want to do. And
what we really want to do is we want to
spare the lives of the masterminds of nine to eleven.
That is how sick these people are. Why are they
doing it now because they're hoping that you're not paying attention.
Why is it so important to share this information because
we need to expose exactly what they're hoping you're too
(28:57):
busy to notice. Make sure you share this podcast with
your family and friends. Shared on social media wherever you
are
I want to get to two different stories real quick
that are really important heading in to next year. And
number one, it deals with House Speaker Johnson. There have
been a lot of people that are out there that
have been trying to start a war between Speaker Johnson
with a cr and with Donald Trump and wanting him
(00:22):
to lose a speakership. Now there's been chaos because the
margin of victory for the Republicans in the House has
been so small that people, for example, like matc Gaates
have been able to cost people their jobs in leadership positions.
He was clearly able to do that with Kevin McCarthy,
cost him the job he won his entire life Speaker
of the House, and now Ken McCarthy's no longer even
(00:44):
in Congress. This has gotten a little bit out of
control because there have been a few people that realize
how much power they have if they go against their
own party. We need to learn a little bit from
the Democratic Party here. We need to act like adults
and not have people going just for their own personal
gain or for attention, or for fame, or for tweets
(01:05):
and likes and retweets. And we need to have some
order in the House Speaker Johnson. I want to be clear,
I think is by far the best conservative that we
could get. If you get rid of Speaker Johnson and
then you have to rely on Democrats to get a
deal done with a new speaker, you're gonna get a
much more liberal speaker. I don't believe you're gonna get
(01:27):
a more conservative speaker than Speaker Johnson. Do I think
Speaker Johnson is like the most hardcore conservative out there?
Is he my perfect speaker? No, but I think he's
the best speaker we can get, the most conservative speaker
we can get with this thin margin that we have
right now.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
Now, there have been a.
Speaker 1 (01:46):
Lot of people pushing for their own fame on social media,
trying to start a war between Speaker Johnson. These are
a lot of these are quote hardcore conservatives who want
there to be a litnis to and they want to
seem extremely powerful in their tweets, who are trying to
start this war with Mike Johnson, trying to cost them
(02:07):
a jobs they can flex their muscles, and these people
I hate the most.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
Now.
Speaker 1 (02:10):
One of the reasons why I hate some of these
hardcore quote conservative influencers on social media and podcasters is
because you can buy their support. A lot of people
don't know this, but some of the biggest tweeters in
the conservative movement, you can buy their tweets. You can
call them, you can offer them five, ten, fifteen, twenty, twenty, five,
(02:33):
thirty thousand dollars or more for them to do campaigns
to either promote a candidate or to trash an opponent.
This is happening more often. Now, how do I know
this happening because I know some of the people that
have paid some of these hardcore conservative influencers significant cash
(02:55):
for them to say certain things. Now, let's let me
explain how unauthentic some of these tweets are. Many of
the people that are buying tweets will send the exact
tweet they want the conservative social media influence that has
million plus followers on Facebook or Twitter or on Instagram,
(03:16):
and they'll do a deal and they'll say, Hey, we're
going to pay your company twenty grand or thirty grand
or fifteen thousand, depending on their number of followers, for
you to echo this person that we want to either
save or get elected. This has become normal practice for them,
and they're making I want to be clear, millions of
dollars off of doing this. There are many that are
(03:38):
out there that are saying things against Peaker Johnson right
now that I actually don't believe, believe what they're saying.
They're getting paid by groups and organizations and others to
say this, and it's a problem. Like it's a really
big problem. And I want you to understand that if
you see what I would refer to as a coordinated
(04:00):
effort out of nowhere to attack a congressman. A great
example of this is chip Roy chip Roy a week ago.
There was a lot of people that went after chip
Roory out of out Roy, out of nowhere, and it
was a coordinate attack. I believe that it was a
paid for, coordinated attack. And this is just one example
to try to shut him up and get him back
(04:21):
in line. And they were mad at him, and it
was a power play, and this is what is being
done by special interest groups in the conservative movement. Now
chip Roy survived it, He's going to be okay. But
there are a lot of people that are like, if
you don't do this, then you should be primaried, for example,
by Donald Trump. A lot of those types of tweets
that you saw, and you can go back and find
(04:43):
them were paid for. That campaign was a orchestrated financial campaign,
and many of the biggest names that were tweeting some
things like that, like if you don't agree with this
with MAGA, then you should be primaried. Those tweets were
not authentic, they were not real. They were paid to
play tweets. Again, how do I know this because I
(05:04):
know some of the people that were paying, and I
know some of the people that are being paid. In fact,
I know some of the people that are being paid.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
Well.
Speaker 1 (05:10):
Now, to be clear, I have never accepted money for
a tweet that I didn't write, that I didn't believe in. Now,
I could sell tweets, I could sell Facebook posts, and
I could make for my family well into the six figures.
I could sell access, for example, to my show. There
(05:35):
are people on social media, by the way, with large
followings on YouTube and large followings and podcasts. You can
actually buy topics in their show, episodes in their show
as part of your marketing campaign. So let me explain
how that works. Let's say there's somebody out there that's
(05:57):
like running for office or someone that in trouble and
they need good press. There are certain podcasts that you
can call and say, hey, I want you to come
on your show, and I want you to do a
full throated support of this embattled congressman or governor or
attorney general, whoever it may be, and if you'll do it,
(06:21):
then we'll pay you X to do that show.
Speaker 2 (06:24):
I've never in my life done that.
Speaker 1 (06:26):
I want to be clear, and I will never do
that because that is exactly the opposite of what I
believe in. That is paid propaganda. If someone calls me
and says, I'll give you another example of this. Someone
called me and offered me money to do a show
advocating or supporting for an individual I believe in the individual,
(06:49):
and I told him, I said, Number one, I can't
be bought. Number two, I actually like your guy, and
I am more than happy to give him supporting words
because I believe in him and what he's doing. I'm
not going to take money to do it. And the
reason why I'm not gonna take money is because then
I am a pay to play individual. I my audience
(07:10):
wouldn't know what I believe in or what is me
pushing them propaganda Things that I don't actually care about,
things that don't actually believe in things I would have
never said, and they're listening to shows that I would
have never done on my own, but I took a
buck to do it. By the way, this is also
an interesting part of this is one of the reasons
why you know, there's some people that get frustrated because
(07:30):
they hear advertising in radio and in podcasts. That's how
we make our money. I could actually make a lot
more money if I didn't do those ads and I
just took pay to play.
Speaker 2 (07:42):
Hey, I'll support this guy.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
Pay me twenty five grand and I'll do a show,
or fifteen grand or ten grand, and I'll do a
segment that you guys can then echo that sounds genuine
and authentic of me saying this politician and what he's
doing right now is the greatest thing since slice bread.
Speaker 2 (07:58):
I could do that, and I can make a lot
more money.
Speaker 1 (08:01):
In fact, I know different podcasters that are making millions
of dollars doing pay to play fake segments about things
they actually don't care about, are people they don't really
care about, just to get that money, just to get
that cash. And so I say that to give you
a warning over when you see things like the Mike
(08:23):
Johnson anger, and you see they're like, oh, well, he
deserves to not be the speaker anymore. Be careful not
to be taken advantage of now. The other reason why
I bring this up is because here's the story in
the headline. Donald Trump has come out and endorses Mike
Johnson amid the fight for his gavel. And I think
(08:43):
this is the right decision for Donald Trump because he
understands exactly what I told you a second ago, which
is Mike Johnson is a good man. Mike Johnson is
a sincere Christian man, and Mike Johnson is the most
conservative speaker. I think we could get elected right now,
and we don't need to go through another fun and
look like we are in total chaos and anarchy the
(09:03):
day we take over. Mike Johnson's gonna work not just average,
but he's gonna work very well with Donald Trump. And
that is exactly why President elect Trump endorsed Speaker Johnson
Monday morning, after leaving Johnson twisting and the wind, as
some describe the media, for eleven days, Trump posted a
two hundred and thirty two word soliloquy on True Social
(09:28):
touting his electoral romp and attacking Democrats for weaponized the
government against him. At the very end, he endorsed Johnson
for Speaker using this language, Let's not all caps, Let's
not blown this great opportunity which we have been given
the American people. All caps need immediate relief from all
(09:51):
the destructive policies of the last administration. Speaker Johnson is
a good, hard working religious man. He will do the
right thing and we will continue to all caps win.
He has my complete and total endorsement. And then he
said all caps maga with three exclamation points. All right,
(10:12):
there is some big news that is taking place right
now as we speak, and a lot of it deals
with a big issue that is truly shocking, and it
is one that deals with what's happening. And we call
this taking out the trash. They are hoping and I'm
referring to the media and the Democrats that you are
not paying attention right now because you're too busy celebrating
(10:34):
New Year's and you've kind of unplugged and tune out.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
And there's a couple of big stories.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
One that deals with the mastermind of nine to eleven,
Cleete Chek Mohammad, and another one that is getting absolutely
zero press. So I hope you'll take this, take the show,
take the podcast, share it on social media, because this
is a very important story I'm going to start with,
and it deals with Mexico. For years, Mexico has said
that there is that they're not a part of advocating
(10:59):
or supporting or helping people come to the United States.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
Of America from Mexico.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
For years, I've been telling you that is obviously a lie,
and I give you stats and figures to prove the point.
One of them is the number one Stimulu Mexico's economy
outpacing oil is a legal immigrant sending money back to Mexico.
That is incredible when you look at the oil production
of Mexico and you realize, oh my gosh, they make
money as a country by getting rid of citizens and
(11:25):
then the people that they send to America sending massive
amounts of cash via Western Union back to Mexico.
Speaker 2 (11:33):
It is huge.
Speaker 1 (11:34):
The amount of money we're talking about here is billions
and billions and billions and billions and billions of dollars
a year, outpacing their oil projection. Just to put it
in perspective, Mexico wants to continue the floodgates being open.
Not only do they make money because the entire government
down there is basically nothing but a cartel government. It
(11:57):
is one of the worst governments, and I'm talking about
with the issue of corruption that we've ever seen in
twenty twenty five. And it is anyone that has significance
or power at the local state or at the let
me say, local province or the national level in Mexico,
no one of significance is not bought and paid for
(12:18):
by the cartels. They are owned, they are bribed, they
are threatened. However, they have to get what they get
on a person, they will do it. Some of them
are paid for, some of them have been financed at
the highest levels. We know this in the past with
the presidency, even financed by the cartels. And if you
are a quote good guy, then they will threaten you
(12:39):
and your family and they will off people and behead people.
That's just how they work. So knowing that the government
and one of the things you just have to accept
is that the government is the right hand of the
cartel now and that is how deep the corruption goes.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
They're not on our team. They're never going to be
on our team. They're not on our side. They're not honest.
Speaker 1 (12:58):
It is not surprising that the government is now doing
what I'm about to tell you, and this is what
I want you to share with people, share the podcasts.
We now have confirmation that Mexico is sending hundreds of
lawyers to aid illegal immigrants in the United States of America.
Why would they do that because they want them money
(13:18):
to stay in They want the workers stay in America.
They want the money to come back to Mexico. The
Mexican government is sending hundreds of lawyers north into the
US to provide legal aid to shield four million illegal
migrants they claim are currently in the US from the
(13:38):
Trump administration. The government wants to protect Mexican migrants from
deportation in part because they send billions of their US
earnings back to Mexico. How much are we talking. Let's
go back to twenty twenty three. In twenty twenty three,
they sent more than sixty three billion of their dollars
right their remittance of their relatives outside of the of
(14:02):
Mexico in the US back to Mexico. So it's a
sixty three billion dollar industry of direct influx of cash
coming to Mexico. Now, sixty three billion may not see
Michael out in the US. That is an insane amount
of money in an impoverished country, a corrupt country, which
is Mexico. Now, authorities in Mexico announce the pending release
(14:23):
of a new quote app backed by hundreds of Mexican lawyers,
that will help Mexican citizens living illegally in the US
to respond to being targeted or deported by US immigration
authorities when Trump is sworn into office. Now, let me
break down the money just for a second, so you
understand the fact that sixty three billion dollars is being
(14:47):
sent back to Mexico from the US from their citizens
is only half of the financial equation that you need
to understand. Let me explain to you part two of this.
Part two, and it's a much bigger number than sixty
three billion, is the number of illegal immigrants in this
country that are helping the cartels spread their tentacles into
(15:09):
every city in America that is important to them. On
the drug trafficking, human trafficking, sex trafficking, child sex trafficking
that the cartels are making money off of. That's part
of what you need to understand. It is the fentanyl network,
it's the pot network, it's the hair whin, it's the crack,
it's the cocaine. The list goes on and on. That
is worth way more than the sixty three billion, because
(15:31):
when you get this many illegal immigrants into the US,
what it means is you have an incredible network of
humans that are then set up for the smuggling, whether
it's drugs or human beings, and then setting up the
illegal businesses within the United States of America that they
set up, whether it's prostitution, sex trafficking, child sex trafficking,
(15:52):
or drugs that then go back to Mexico. So it's
not just the sixty three billion that is directly sent
back and people that are working in the US, it
is the hundreds of billions that it makes the cartels
by having these human networks inside of the United States America.
Now you understand why the government and the authorities in
Mexico announcing the pending release of this new app to
(16:14):
do exactly what I just described to you.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
Now.
Speaker 1 (16:16):
The app is called the Alert Button. Quote. It will
reportly allow Mexican cistens living illegally in the US and
who are being detained by immigration and Customs Enforcement known
as ICE to warn relatives in Mexico of their status.
It will also alert the closest Mexican consulate about the detention,
(16:37):
upon which the Mexican lawyers will then quote unquote leap
into action after announcing this app. And again, if you're
hearing about this for the very first time, here, there's
a reason they decided this would come out, and it
would happen during a moment when we call taking out
the trash. No one's paying attention. It's New Year's Eve,
(16:58):
it's New Year's Day. People off work, They're not reading
the news. And this is why they announced it when
they did. And this is why I'm saying, please share this.
The announcement, okay, is one that they say is important
for quote the illegal immigrants, and the Mexican Foreign Secretary
urged Mexicans living illegally in the US to register to
(17:19):
use the app immediately, saying quote not everyone has done
this yet, We strongly encourage everyone to register with our consulates,
as this enables us to provide legal protection when needed
to the illegal immigrants that are in the US.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
I have personally attended several open meetings where the key
message is to tell our fellows citizens that are that
they are not alone and will not be alone. That's
what the secretary said, adding that this app will go
live sometime in January. Why because that is when everything
will change with Donald Trump being inaugurated January the twentieth.
(17:56):
This app is the latest from Mexico's president, who is
controlled by the CAR tells to shore up her pledge
to defend quote the rights of Mexican citizens in the
face of the incoming Trump administration's plans to launch the
largest deportation effort in American history. The app is part
of Mexico's Know Your Rights program, aimed at informing Mexican
(18:18):
citizens in the US about what they can and cannot do.
The program is reportedly manned by three and twenty nine
legal advisors stationed across all fifty three consulates in the US. Quote,
we want to tell our fellow countrymen that they are
not alone and they will not be alone, adding that
(18:40):
Mexican authorities will be very vigilant in ensuring that due
process has followed in the United States of America. The
President elect has insisted that he has already had a
quote wonderful conversation with Mexico's president about stopping the flow
of illegals from Central and South America moving through Mexico.
What did Donald try Trump say? He said, untrue, social
(19:02):
I had a wonderful conversation with a new president of Mexico.
She has agreed to stop migration through Mexico and into
the United States, effectively closing our southern border. That's what
he said in his November the twenty seventh post. Here's
the caveat. This woman did not agree to bring all
(19:22):
the illegal immigrants that are in America back to Mexico.
You notice that was left out. She's saying I may
stop the flow from other countries. By the way, she's
not saying she's stopping the flow of illegal immigrants in
Mexico coming into America, just from other countries outside of Mexico.
That is read between the read the fine print right
the part that is not being said. CBS News reporter
(19:45):
is now saying Biden's obvious cognitive decline is the most
underreported twenty twenty four story. President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive
cline was the most underreported story of twenty twenty four.
Who said it, CBS News reporter Jan Crawford claiming on Sunday, Yes,
(20:05):
this happened. Yes the media didn't cover it. Yes the
media didn't try to cover it. Yes the media straight
up lied to you about just how bad things were.
Take a listen to what Jan Crawford had to say
in her own words. Do in the Year end Correspondence
round Table is dig into what was undercovered or underreported?
Speaker 3 (20:25):
Jan undercovered, underreported? That would be to me, Joe Biden's
obvious cognizant decline that became undeniable in the.
Speaker 1 (20:35):
Televised debate at the presidential debate with.
Speaker 3 (20:37):
Unquestioned and you know, it's starting to emerge now that
his advisors kind of managed his limitations. It's been reported
in the Wall Street Journal for four years, and yet
he insisted that he could still run for president. We
should have much more forcefully questioned whether he was fit
for office for another four years, which could have led
(20:57):
to a primary for the Democrats. It could have changed
the scope of the entire election. Yet still, incredibly, we
read the Washington Post that his advisors are saying that
he regrets that he dropped out of the race. You
know that he thinks he could have beaten Trump, and
I think that is either delusional.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
Well, let's just go back to that quote real quick,
Major Gerrett said at the presidents of debate with Donald Trump,
right trying to put context into when this real decline
was seen by the American people, And she said unquestioned.
Then she says, and it's starting to emerge now that
his advisors kind of managed his limitations, which was which
has been reporting the Wall Street Journal for four years.
(21:38):
So they're all admitting what we all knew the entire time,
that they covered up Joe Biden, covered up the White House,
covered up the cabinet members, cut it up, the Vice
President Kamala Harris, covered up that it was very clear
that there was a diminished Joe Biden the entire time
he was president, and it was getting worse the entire time,
and they were hiding it from the American people. Quote
and yet he insisted that he could still run for president.
(22:01):
We should have much more forcely questioned. She's referring to
the media now whether he was fit for office for
another four years, which could have led to a primary
for the Democrats. So what is she saying is that, look,
we all knew that we were being lied to. I'm
not kidding when I say this, Like I think that's
what they're What they're in essence saying here is we
(22:24):
all knew that we were lying to the American people.
That was a bad mistake. We shouldn't have done that.
And the reason why we shouldn't have done that is
because we really screwed ourselves by not having a primary,
since we all knew it was declining and we should
have been honest with the American people. Now they're not
saying they made a mistake because it was like, I
(22:44):
don't know, like lying to the American people about the
cognitive decline of a president. They're only now saying it
was a mistake because they feel like if they would
have done the right thing, it would have been allowed
for an open primary and then Donald Trump wouldn't have
got elected. Like I need you to understand, they're not
saying that they made a mistake and they won't do
it again because they were lying to the American people
with the state sponsored media saying what CBS News is staying,
(23:06):
what Jan Crawford is saying, is we, as democratic operatives
of the state, made a mistake that cost us the
White House. We're fine with lying to you if it
serves us. We're fine with lying the American people if
it protects our interests. We're fine with misleading the American people,
lying to them if it keeps us in power. What
(23:30):
jan Crawford is admitting here is that they made a
bad decision to not basically tell the truth about Joe Biden,
so that there then would have been an earlier come
to Jesus moment in a primary, So then we would
have beaten Donald Trump. That is all she's admitting to here.
(23:51):
It also tells you about the corruption of the media. Now,
there's another part of this story that I think is
also extremely am important right now, and it goes back
to what is happening right now with major decisions that
are being made. Perfect example of the question we all
(24:14):
need to be asking, which is all right, who's really
running the country right now on major issues? Is this
one we have now found out? And again this is
another moment of taking out the trash, hoping you're not
paying attention so they can get away with This is
Joe Biden's plea deal with the nine to eleven mastermind,
a guy by the name of Klee Shake Mohammad. Now
we exposed this several months ago that they were trying
(24:35):
to spare his life. The guy that mastermind nine to eleven,
Kalee Chick Muhammad, and was involved in many other terrorist
attacks that killed women and children and the elderly and
pushed people to the point where they had to decide
between burning to death or jumping out of the twin towers,
just to put it in perspective, hijacking the planes.
Speaker 2 (24:51):
He was the mastermind.
Speaker 1 (24:52):
That was not Osama bin Lauden's idea, that was kale
Shake Mohammad's idea. And he's the guy that followed through.
Kalee check Mhammad followed through on that and it was
very important. Without him, I don't think nine to eleven
would have happened the way that it was.
Speaker 2 (25:06):
He was the godfather of that terrorist attack.
Speaker 1 (25:10):
He is in Gittmo, And we found out a few
months ago that Joe Biden was going to spare his life,
do a deal and then come out and say see,
I'm the guy that closed GETMO, because that's something he's
obsessed with, the same way he was obsessed with pulling
out of Afghanistan on an arbitrary date that cost so
many American soldiers their lives in that pullout. That was
a total and utter disaster. Well after it was exposed
(25:32):
and before election day, people finally like, all right, this
is too unpopular. We can't spare the life of the
mastermind nine to eleven. This is becoming a political issue.
So let's let's pull that off the table. Let's not
do that deal. Well, guess what in theory, Joe Biden
and I would argue someone else who's clearly run the
country right now, or a group of people have now
(25:53):
decided that the plea deals with the nine to eleven
masterminds are back in effect. The Pentagon, which stepped in
to stop them the last time, has lost its appeal.
He's burning everything down or the people around him on
the way out. This coming in the report, A military
appeals court has ruled against the Defense Secretary lord to
(26:13):
Austin's effort to throw out the plea deals reached for
Kleetchik Muhammad and two other defendants of the nine to
eleven attacks. A US official has confirmed decision puts back
on track the agreements that would have three men plead
guilty to one of the deadliest attacks ever on the
United States in exchange for being spared the possibility of
(26:34):
the death penalty the attacks by al Qaeda that killed
nearly three thousand people on September eleventh of VTE one
and helped spur US invasions of Afghanistan Iraq in what
George W. Bush administration called the War on Terror. So
we now have this story, and this is I'm having
to go just to understand to get the details on
this because it's not actually in the US. I'm having
(26:57):
to go to uh Ctvnews dot C to then find
the Associated Press story that read for you what I
just read that is coming from the Associated Press. Now,
let me also say this quote. The Military Appeals Court
released its ruling Monday night. According to the US officials
(27:18):
who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and
spoke on condition of emineity, Military prosecutors and defense attorneys
for Mohammed, the accused mastermind of nine to eleven, and
two co defendants, reached the plea agreements after two years
of government approved negotiations. The deal was announced late last summer.
Supporters of the plea agreement see them as a way
(27:39):
to resolving the legally troubled case against the men at
the US Military Commission at Gitmo. Pre trial hearings for
Mohammed and the other two have been underway for more
than ten years.
Speaker 2 (27:51):
More than a decade.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
Much of the focus of pre trial arguments has been
on how torture of the men while MCA cusse in
the the first years after their detention, may obtained the
overall evidence in the case. Within days of news of
the plea deals with this summer, Austin issued a brief
order saying he was nullifying these plea deals. Why because
(28:14):
they understood this was going to be politically hard for Democrats,
so they said, all right, never mind, we're not going
to do what we want to do anyway. And guess what,
now they're going back and doing exactly what they wanted
to do. He cited, quote the gravity of the nine
to eleven attacks and saying that as Defense Secretary, he
should decide on any plea agreements that would spare the
defendants the possibility of execution. Well, guess what, Democrats lost
(28:36):
the election, and now they're like, all right, we're going
to do exactly what we really want to do. And
what we really want to do is we want to
spare the lives of the masterminds of nine to eleven.
That is how sick these people are. Why are they
doing it now because they're hoping that you're not paying attention.
Why is it so important to share this information because
we need to expose exactly what they're hoping you're too
(28:57):
busy to notice. Make sure you share this podcast with
your family and friends. Shared on social media wherever you
are
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.