Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Vice President jd Vance.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
He seems to be loving his new job is the
fraud Tzar. In fact, he is uncovering fraud all over
the country. Just two days ago, the news broke that
jd Vance was freezing serious cash. It was supposed to
be going to California, as it was on Jesse Waters
Show on Fox News.
Speaker 1 (00:21):
Here's how I was explained.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
And today the frauds are jd Vance froze over a
billion bucks headed to California. If Gavin wants the money,
he needs to open up the books.
Speaker 4 (00:32):
And we believe that at least half of the hospices
in the entire area around Los Angeles are fraudulent, and
today we announced eight hundred of those hospices have been suspended.
Mister Vice president, if your core business was shut down
by the federal government, would you call Yes, you would
call crickets. We have less than twenty who have complained.
(00:52):
We're not even sure there's are legitimate eight hundred hospices
shut down, and we're not hearing much.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
It's crickets out there.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
Vance as dirty doctors are running wild.
Speaker 5 (01:02):
You have people who've been prescribed medications that they don't
even need. Sometimes they've had drugs put into their bodies
that they don't need because fraudsters have actually encouraged false
prescriptions and false administration to medications.
Speaker 6 (01:17):
So think about this.
Speaker 5 (01:17):
You're just a person trying to go see a doctor.
You assume that your doctor is doing the right thing.
But these fraudulent healthcare providers are getting rich by giving
people medications they don't even need.
Speaker 3 (01:28):
Fraudsters are whacking taxpayers like a pinata.
Speaker 4 (01:32):
Half of the fraud we believe in the federal government
could be coming out.
Speaker 7 (01:35):
Of healthcare services.
Speaker 4 (01:37):
We're a large rhino that can be stabbed effortlessly by
foreign governments.
Speaker 3 (01:43):
Everywhere we look, more fraud pops up. One of Big
Gretch's big donors. She just got busted. Fay Badoon was
hit with sixteen charges. She's accused of stealing twenty mili
of taxpayer cash from government grants that Whitmer signed off on.
So she donated to Whitmer and Whitmer sends her taxpayer money.
Funny how that always happens.
Speaker 2 (02:05):
Now you think that's just the tip of the iceberg, right, Well,
guess what it absolutely is. And now we are being
told from Jadie Vance that the fraud that has been discovered,
for example, in Maine may be more shocking than anywhere
else we've seen so far. This the Vice President and
Bangerman talking about protecting your taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 5 (02:27):
But because I love this state, I can say I
am heartbroken by what has happened to the fraud that's
being perpetrated on the taxpayers of this state. Because outside
of Minnesota and California, which are probably number one and
number two, if they're the gold medalist and the silver medalist,
I heard somebody shout out in New York, maybe new
York is the bronze medalist. But let me be honest,
(02:49):
maybe Maine is the bronze medalist.
Speaker 6 (02:52):
Because if you.
Speaker 5 (02:53):
Look at the fraud that has happened in this state,
if you look at the illegal immigrant communities who have
taken benefit that ought by rights go to the people
in this room, what you have in Maine is a
festering problem where people have been taken advantage of and
they've been stolen from, and your government hasn't done anything
about it.
Speaker 6 (03:13):
You ask yourself, why did.
Speaker 5 (03:14):
Maine go from a state that did not have a
serious fraud problem to one where I can honestly say
it's one of the worst.
Speaker 6 (03:20):
States in the Union.
Speaker 5 (03:21):
And I'll give you two answers and two politicians. Number
one is Janet Mills and number two is Joe Biden.
And thankfully, thankfully, one of them has already been kicked
to the curb, and one is on our way out
the door, exactly as I should be.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
What's interesting about what Jeddi Vans just said there is
why did Maine and how did Maine go from a
state that did not have a serious fraud problem to
one where I can honestly say it's one of the
worst states in the Union. He said, The answer is clear,
Janet Mills and Joe Biden. One's already gone on the
others on our way out. Thankfully. Every day Americans make
(04:04):
choices that shape our country's future, right down to which
cell phone provider we support. Here's what most people don't
actually realize. Patriot Mobile isn't just a wireless provider. They're
an activist organization funded by selling top tier cell service.
They've been on the front lines defending our freedoms long
before it was cool, standing up and the gap when
(04:27):
others wouldn't. The best part is they deliver prioritized, premium
service on all three major US networks giving you the
same or even better coverage backed by one hundred percent
US based customer support. You get unlimited data, mobile hotspots,
international roaming, and so much more.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
But when you switch to Patriot Mobile, that's what I
love the most. You'll help grow a movement that fuels
the Christian Conservative cause. Every bill you pay helps advance
the values of faith, family, and freedom. And switching is
easier than ever.
Speaker 2 (05:03):
You can literally activate in minutes, keep your number, keep
your phone, or upgrade.
Speaker 1 (05:08):
So take a stand today.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
Go to Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriotmobile
dot com slash ferguson, or call them nine to seven
to two Patriot. That's nine seven to two Patriot, and
use the promo code ferguson for a free month of
service Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson or nine seven to
(05:31):
two Patriot to make the switch today. The Vice President
making it clear this is the Democratic Party and they
are heavily involved in the fraud. As the Vice President
went on to say.
Speaker 5 (05:44):
This question of certain amounts of fraud being so low
level that people weren't even looking at it is it's
impossible to get to the high level fraudsters unless you're
sometimes willing to look at the low level frausters too.
I mean, how many of us have watched good mob movie?
And how do those prosecutions always start that You never
start with the boss. You start with the low level
(06:06):
guys who then give you some sense of the criminal enterprise,
and then you can go after the high level fraud
and the high level crime.
Speaker 6 (06:13):
The fact that we were turned.
Speaker 5 (06:14):
A blind eye to fraud under a million dollars meant
that we weren't even looking at the people who were
sitting on top of.
Speaker 6 (06:21):
Some of these fraud rings.
Speaker 5 (06:22):
And we do see already signs in Minnesota, for example,
of some very sophisticated stuff. I mean, sometimes I see
these fraud rings and I think to myself, you know, sir,
if you just started like a real business.
Speaker 6 (06:34):
Now.
Speaker 1 (06:34):
The Vice President wasn't done there.
Speaker 2 (06:36):
He also had this to say about illegal immigrants and
the fraud they're committing against so many American taxpayers as well.
Speaker 5 (06:43):
Alien goes and steals their identity and applies for snap benefits.
Now all of a sudden, they're tagged in the banking system.
Their credit score is ruined. Not because they did a
single thing wrong, but because somebody stole their identity. Fraud
is exact exactly what happens when you've got a government
that is not fighting for the American people, but is
(07:05):
fighting for fraudsters and illegal aliens.
Speaker 6 (07:08):
And it had to stop.
Speaker 5 (07:09):
And under the Trump administration, we are fighting.
Speaker 6 (07:12):
It every single day.
Speaker 5 (07:22):
And again it is every single day I learn of
something new. I learn about people who say that they're
claiming for hospice services but in fact they're not providing
any services, and they're making hundreds of millions or billions.
Speaker 6 (07:36):
Of dollars in the process.
Speaker 5 (07:38):
Talk about something that we've seen in Minneapolis, but also
in Maine. We have seen people go out there and
say that they're providing services to autistic children, when in
reality they maybe don't have any children at all, or
they certainly don't have autistic children. So they get paid
millions and millions of year dollars to provide services that
(08:00):
they're not actually providing. And oh, by the way, what
happened to the autistic children and their families who actually
need those services and need a competent government to ensure
that they're doing the right thing. My friends, this has
gone on for far too long. You have been fleeced
by your own government for far too long, and we
are stopping it every single day.
Speaker 6 (08:22):
Now.
Speaker 2 (08:23):
There was one final point that the Vice President wanted
to make, and it's one that many Americans, I'm one
of them, you're one of them, I'm sure, is asking
the question, when is there going to be accountability for
all of this. I want you to listen to what JD.
Van t had to say about the lack of accountability
and what may be coming.
Speaker 5 (08:42):
Well, there's got to be accountability because here one of
the things I learned, and I was shocked by this,
is that when we have what is defined as low
level fraud, let's say a person defrauds all of you
for a million bucks, too many of our Department of
Justice leaders under the Biden administration they said that was
too low level to actually go after.
Speaker 6 (09:01):
So, I mean, how many of you would like the
federal government to handy a million dollars?
Speaker 5 (09:07):
Yeah, Well, there were fraudsters out there who were getting
a million dollars of your money and the government wasn't
even paying attention to it.
Speaker 2 (09:15):
What we know now is the government is paying attention
to it. This is one of those moments when the
Vice President says it is time for America to be
ready for US to act exposing massive fraud rings involving
hospice care and services for autistic children. Billions are being
stolen from vulnerable Americans, and he said, we have seen
(09:37):
people go out there and say they're providing services for
autistic children, when in reality they maybe don't have any
children at all, or they certainly don't have autistic children.
What happened to the autistic children and their families who
actually needed these services and need a competent government to
ensure that they're doing the right thing. Well, the Vice
(09:58):
president's making it clear now he's on top of it
and going after the fraudsters and getting ready to put
many of them in jail.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
Quick break, All right, let's do a quick.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
Recap of what has been happening in China as President
Donald Trump has visited Beijing, and it's already being described
by not only the White House but also Chinese state
media as one of the most significant US China summits
in years, and politically, economically, and strategically, the visit is
shaping up as a major moment for this administration. Now
(10:32):
the headline so far has been pretty simple. After years
of tariff wars, economic uncertainty, and rising tensions between Washington
and Beijing, Trump walked into China looking to prove that
he can negotiate from a position of strength instead of weakness,
and walk away with a deal that directly benefits the
American workers, American manufacturing, and American exports as well, and
(10:58):
so far, the White House believes that's exactly what has happened.
Speaker 1 (11:01):
Now.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
One of the biggest developments has come out this summit
is the expectation of massive new Chinese purchases of American goods,
including Boeing aircraft, American agriculture, and US energy exports. The
Treasury Secretary of Scott Bessen said officials expect major announcements
involving Boeing orders during the trip, which has happened along
(11:23):
with expanded access for American companies into Chinese markets. Now
that matters enormously for the American economy, the American worker,
and the American farmer.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
A large Boeing deal alone.
Speaker 2 (11:37):
Could support thousands of high paying manufacturing jobs and states
across the US, add in soybean exports, agricultural contracts, energy sales,
and technology investment, and the White House is now framing
this trip as proof that Donald Trump's aggressive trade posture
against China force Beijing back to the negotiating table. And remember,
(12:00):
just over a year ago the two countries were locked
into a brutal trade war. Now, if you think the
present's blowing smoke, you weren't paying attention to just how
nice the Chinese were to the present in greeting him.
It was something he talked about with Sean Hannity on
Fox News Interview.
Speaker 7 (12:17):
We appreciate it. Wow, they rolled out the red carpet.
Speaker 8 (12:22):
I have a video of when Barack Hussein Obama came
to China. There wasn't as much pageantry from your perspective,
that welcome.
Speaker 7 (12:33):
What did that? How did you interpret that?
Speaker 9 (12:35):
Well, we have a relationship he and I and we've
been working together a long time. We've gotten along well.
When I first came here, China has really taking advantage
of the United States. He understands it, and now we
do great with China, and we have a very good relationship.
Speaker 7 (12:51):
We have a friendship. Really.
Speaker 9 (12:53):
He's a tremendous leader. He's been here a long time,
very powerful, very strong. There's no doubt about it, and
we just have a good relationship. I did actually see
other people arrive here that not treated so well that
we were treated very well.
Speaker 7 (13:07):
So that was meaningful for you.
Speaker 9 (13:10):
Well, I mean if I got out of a plane
and nobody was there agreed me, I would say that
wouldn't be so cool, because it's really respect for our country.
Our country is respected. Look with the hottest country right
now anywhere in the world. But he and I know
each other well I think beyond maybe that. But we
certainly got a very nice greeting, and today was beautiful.
Speaker 2 (13:29):
The President talking about just how beautiful it was to
be respected as a country. And all of this happened
because of the tough work the president did. Remember the
tariff skyrocketed, supply chains were disrupted, rare with minerals, became
a major leverage point for the White House. China retaliated
against the US with their tariffs and tensions over Taiwan.
(13:50):
You also have fights over artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and military influence.
The Pacific pushed the relationship, you could argue to the edge.
But now the Trump administration is showing that Trump's hardline
approach created real leverage and instead of backing down. Trump
kept the pressure up on Beijing, kept it up through
(14:13):
the tariffs, through the trade restrictions, and efforts to rebuild
American manufacturing, and now, according to the administration officials, China
is signaling it wants what they describe as stability and
access to the US economy more than they want confrontation.
(14:34):
That's one reason this summit is being viewed as such
a major diplomatic moment. Another huge story from the visitors
the presence of major American business leaders traveling alongside the president.
We're talking about CEOs and tech leaders participating in meetings,
including executives connected to Boeing, Apple, Tesla, and other major companies.
(14:57):
Trump even told Fox News the Chinese officials discussed potentially
investing hundreds of billions of dollars into US link technology
and business partnerships. Now, politically, that gives Trump something to
love to campaign on investment, job creation, and manufacturing, not
overseas but back in the United States. The White House
(15:20):
has already portraying this trip as evidence that Trump's economic
nationalism has worked, That the tariffs worked, that pressure forced
China into real negotiations for the first time in decades,
and previous administrations, they never even got close to what
is happening right now. And then there's a geopolitical side
of all this trip as well. The summit hasn't just
(15:43):
focused on economics. The two leaders have also spent extensive
time discussing Iran, Taiwan, artificial intelligence, critical minerals, military tensions,
as well as global stability. One of the biggest concerns
for theministration right now is China's relationship with Iran.
Speaker 1 (16:03):
They are drunk on Iranian oil.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
China remains one of the largest buyers of Iranian oil,
and the White House wants Beijing to pressure Tehran towards
de escalation as well as negotiations. Reuters is reporting that
Trump's team has been urging China to help stabilize the
region and avoid further disruptions tied to the Strait of
Hormuz crisis. And that's critical because the global economy is
(16:30):
watching every market very carefully right now. If China cooperates
even partially with the United States on Iran, the administration
could claim a major international win, especially given the economic
consequences of instability in the Middle East. And there are
still major fault lines between the two countries. Everyone knows
(16:51):
that Taiwan remains one of the most dangerous flashpoints in
the world. Chinese President reportedly warrened Trump that mishandling Taiwan
can lead to a quote major conflict. At the same time,
the US is continuing to back Taiwan militarily as well
as strategically, which Beijing is furious about.
Speaker 1 (17:12):
They don't like it and they describe it.
Speaker 2 (17:13):
As interference in its internal affairs. And then there's the
race on Ai and technology competition. Both the US and
China are trying to get a leg up on one another,
and they're trying to understand that whoever dominates Ai the
semiconductor manufacturing and critical minerals could shape the next generation
(17:35):
of real global power. Analysts say this summit may create
communication channels to well prevent real escalation, but nobody believes
that the competition itself is going to go away anytime soon.
I want to take a quick moment and talk to
you about an incredible organization and it is called Compassion
International and how you can get involved. I want to
(17:58):
be honest with you for a seton about how an
act of compassion really feels. A couple of years ago,
I made the choice to partner with an amazing organization
called Compassion International. Why because I wanted to sponsor a
child in need. It was a nice idea, sure, but
I had no idea just how much that simple act
(18:19):
would change my life as well. I sponsored Nadia and
got to watch your life change right in front of
my eyes, going from starving literally alone on the streets,
to getting the healthcare and education she needs to reach
her God given full potential. I got to be a
part of that change, and the light of that compassion
(18:41):
not only illuminates in her, it illuminates now in me.
That is the power of compassion. The light of Christ
shines on all of us. Feel it for yourself and
change literally a child's life, change the world, and you
also change yourself. You can sponsor child today. Visit Compassion
(19:02):
dot com. That's Compassion dot com. One thing, though, that
is interesting, is the tone of the summit has been
a surprise to many observers. Comparing to Trump's first China
trip back in twenty seventeen, analysts say this visit has
been notably warmer and more personal. The ceremonies were elaborate,
(19:22):
the conversations reportedly lasted longer than expected. She and Trump
appeared relaxed publicly toward historical sites together and projected an
image of stability between the world's two largest economies. That
is extremely important because the markets, well, they hate uncertainty
all over the world. And politically, Trump wants Americans to
(19:44):
see him as the one leader who can simultaneously confront China,
negotiate with China, and also bring peace at the same
time resolution and that's really the broader message coming out
of this trip, especially from the White House. This administration
is making it clear the Trump's approach is not weakness
(20:04):
but controlled leverage pressure first, negotiation second, and results third. Critics,
of course, argue China still holds enormous economic power, and
they do, and they do it especially through their rare
earth minerals and manufacturing dominance. Some are saying that America
just has to figure out a way to do it
without China. You can decide what you want to happen there,
(20:28):
but one thing is for sure. The President wanted this
summit to be proof that if you put pressure on China, well,
then they may actually come to the negotiating table and
seriously offer up concessions and that's exactly what the president wants.
In fact, when President Trump was asked about the meeting
and exactly how he felt it was going, here's what
(20:50):
he said to Sean Hannity in your own words, how
did this meeting go?
Speaker 7 (20:55):
Because I knew you were there a long time.
Speaker 9 (20:58):
It was a lone meeting. It started off interestingly because
they're very organized people. And as you know, we have
about thirty of the biggest business leaders in the world,
the biggest everything, you know, I mean, you name it,
from chips to planes to everything.
Speaker 7 (21:15):
And they're all here. I didn't invite them. They all
wanted to.
Speaker 9 (21:17):
Come, and they're all here, and I suggested that I've
always gough at the meeting, I'd like to introduce them
to you. And they were surprised because it wasn't you know,
it wasn't scheduled. And they looked around. They said, well,
and then, uh, you know, we had everybody. Don't want
to go into names because I'll leave some out, but
there were a lot of guys.
Speaker 7 (21:38):
Let them cook, a lot of peoples, you know, we
had to. We had everybody had the videos. We had just.
Speaker 9 (21:46):
Everybody and men and women, all all great business are
the best and they said okay, and they spoke a
little bit and introduced themselves and interesting thin because they
do business and Shad must of them do business here,
but probably like to do more, and I'd like to
see them do more that would be good for trade
(22:07):
and trade balance. And they were fantastic. I'll tell you,
they really had a good time. Once they once the
Chinese leadership, because it was it was presidency and many
other leaders. Once they got used to the fact that
we're a little off schedule here and we're talking about
a subject that wasn't even thought about. But they were outside,
I said, I think we can get them in five
(22:29):
minutes because they were literally, you know, a few minutes
away from.
Speaker 7 (22:32):
The room where we were in the Great Hall.
Speaker 9 (22:33):
We were in the Great Hall, and they came in
and they did fantastically well. It was really good. I
think it was. He actually said that was very good.
That was a good idea, but it was very different
from what the schedule had And then we went on
and we talked about a lot of different subjects and
I think it was all good.
Speaker 2 (22:50):
So after years of tension with Beijing, the White House,
once Americans understand one thing above all else, Donald Trump
went to China not to apologize, not to back down,
but to negotiate deals that they argue put the American
worker first. And that's exactly what seems to be coming
out of all of this. When Donald Trump ran for president,
(23:14):
he made it very clear he was going to put
Americans first. That was the top of his agenda. And
he was going to make sure that people that had
broken in this country, that were here illegally, would no
longer be put ahead of Americans, they wouldn't be able
to get as many government benefits as they've been getting
so far, and that he was going to move to
deport them. Well, we have a new firestorm of an
(23:38):
example of exactly what President Trump was talking about. It's
now erupting in Fairfax County, Virginia, and it's rapidly becoming
a national symbol and the debate over immigration as well
as the census, as well as political representation and the
future balance of power in Washington, d C. Fairfax County
(23:59):
is the largest county in Virginia, sitting just outside of Washington, DC,
and according to figures now being discussed by immigration analysts
and lawmakers, roughly one in five residents I want to
say that again, roughly one in five residents in Fairfax
County could potentially be subject to deportation or removal proceedings
(24:24):
under stricter immigration enforcement standards. We're talking about twenty percent
of the population in Virginia's largest county, right outside of Washington,
d C are individuals that shouldn't be in this country
in the first place. Now that staggering number has ignited
(24:45):
outrage among critics and current immigration policies. It's also triggered
new congressional scrutiny of sanctuary style policies in the region.
There was part of this that became very clear in
the hearing on Washington DA. We see where a Cato
Institute individual said this before Congress.
Speaker 1 (25:06):
It's the first.
Speaker 10 (25:08):
Step would be to give up on the mass deportation fantasy.
About one in five Fairfax residents is someone who could
be deported or who lives with them. It would destroy neighborhoods,
rip Americans away from their spouses, parents, friends, families, customers, employees, employers, nurses, nannies,
and teachers.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
This guy is mister Bayer. He's a random guy that
tells you that one in five Fairfax residents is someone
who could be deported or lives with them.
Speaker 1 (25:40):
It is not normal.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
The twenty percent of the largest county of Virginia could
be deported. What's even more shocking is how not normal
it is for the new argument of the left to be, well,
there's just too many illegal immigrants, so you cannot deport them.
The logic here is now in instead of lying to
you about how many illegal immigrants are in America, the
(26:04):
Democratic Party in the left are now saying, we'll tell
you exactly how many there are to prove a point
that there are so many illegal immigrants that are in
the United States of America that you need to get
rid of the fantasy that we are going to actually
deport all of them, and it would destroy communities if
you did it, so therefore you cannot do it. I
(26:27):
want to play this clip one more time, and now
that you understand the messaging here and what their motivation is,
listen to how the new argument of the left has
completely changed.
Speaker 6 (26:40):
It's them.
Speaker 10 (26:41):
The first step would be to give up on the
mass deportation fantasy. About one in five fairfact residents is
someone who could be deported or who.
Speaker 6 (26:50):
Lives with them.
Speaker 10 (26:51):
It would destroy neighborhoods, rip Americans away from their spouse's parents, friends, families, customers, employees, employeys, nurses, nannies,
and teachers.
Speaker 2 (27:03):
Let me be clear, Let me be clear, really all right,
Republicans on Capitol Hill, now is your opportunity to use
the Fairfax County as a case study in what they
describe as the consequences of failed immigration enforcement and sanctuary
government policies. Hearings have focused on accusations now that the
(27:26):
local officials have no or limited cooperation with federal immigration authorities,
including ICE, while legal immigrant numbers have surged nationwide, as
Democrats seem to be now saying, we want to count
all the illegal immigrants, not underplay the number, but actually
tell you an honest number. So the problem looks so
(27:48):
big that it's inhumane to try to stop it. Now,
behind the controversy is a much larger and an even
more explosive national issue. It is how immigration, both legal
and illegal, is reshaping political representation in the United States
of America. Now, that is the whole plan of the
Democratic Party, and right now, under the current Census Bureau policy,
(28:13):
every person living in the United States of America is
counting the census. That means that all citizens, all legal immigrants,
all green card holders, all refugees, all visa holders, all
asylum seekers, and this is the most important category for Democrats,
all illegal immigrants are counted. The census explicitly states that
(28:37):
congressional appointment is based on counting all persons residing in
the country, regardless of citizenship status. That matters because the
census determines far more than just population statistics. Every ten years,
census totals determine something that's extremely important, how many seats
(28:59):
each date receives in the House of Representatives. Those same
numbers also determine the Electoral College votes in the presidential elections,
and they influence a distribution of hundreds of billions of
federal dollars.
Speaker 1 (29:12):
Now, just hit pause for a second and think about this.
Speaker 2 (29:16):
Is it fair to say that in Virginia there's a
very good chance that there are too many representatives in
Washington representing people of Virginia based on the number of
illegal immigrants. I think the answer is based on the
evidence it's overwhelming. Moved to a place like California. California
has a massive number of individuals representing the state in Congress.
(29:40):
They have an incredible amount of power as a state.
They also have an incredible amount of power in picking
the president of the United States of America. California helps
Democrats get much closer to the finish line on election
night every single time we have a presidential election. And
the reason why there is so much power is based
(30:01):
on the fact that we're counting illegal immigrants. Now, more
people county means more political power, and that's exactly why
you're now hearing people like mister Bayer who are telling
you the truth on the illegal immigrant numbers because they
want that power. Organizations like the Center for Immigration Studies
have argued that immigration levels legal and illegal combined have
(30:25):
shifted congressional seats and electoral college votes towards high immigration
states for decades. Their analysis claim states with large non
citizen populations receive additional representation because non citizens are included
in the census counts even though they cannot vote in
federal elections. California, as I mentioned earlier, is the perfect
(30:49):
example for this debate. California gained enormous political influence because
of population growth that was fueled heavily by illegal immigrants.
The state is also now experiencing a major population exodus
as residents leave over the high taxes, the housing costs,
crime concerns, costs of living pressures. California actually lost a
(31:11):
congressional seat after the twenty twenty census for the first
time in state history. Yet analysts note that California may
have lost even more political representation if non citizens had
not been included in the census count and it brings
up an even bigger question. Is it time for the
(31:33):
American people, for the Republican Party, for the president United
States America to bring this debate front and center. When
you have one in five Fairfax residents is someone that
should be deported, you know you've got a massive problem.
Twenty percent of the largest county in Virginia not a
border state is a massive red flag for other states.
(31:58):
And the question now is not only how many illegals
are actually in this country, but how much are they
costing you as a taxpayer and how much are they
skewing the election towards Democratic.
Speaker 1 (32:09):
Candidates because of the census.
Speaker 2 (32:12):
Make sure you share this podcast with your family and friends,
put it up on social media wherever you are, and
we appreciate you listening every day we'll see you back
here tomorrow.