May 11, 2026 • 34 mins
1. U.S.–Iran Tensions & Negotiations
- Former President Donald Trump rejected Iran’s response to a proposed agreement, calling it “totally unacceptable.
- The U.S. position: Iran must not obtain nuclear weapons and must roll back nuclear capabilities
- Iran’s demands reportedly include:
- Sanctions relief
- Control over uranium stockpiles
- Retaining enrichment capabilities
- Rising regional tensions include drone incidents and threats around the Strait of Hormuz
2. Minnesota Nonprofit Fraud Case
- A nonprofit leader is accused of misusing over $6.5 million in public funds
- Funds allegedly used for:
- Luxury purchases
- Personal debts
- Private businesses
3. Immigration Policy Debate
- A proposed bill could:
- Provide legal status to millions of undocumented immigrants
- Expand work permits and potential citizenship pathways
- Critics label it “mass amnesty,” while others say it has conditions (fines, background checks).
4. California “Diaper Program” Controversy
- California allocated $20 million for a diaper distribution initiative
- Critics allege:
- Overpricing (much higher than retail bulk costs)
- Conflicts of interest linked to political connections
5. Criticism of Democrats & Political Messaging
- Democratic leaders are guilty of:
- Corruption
- Expanding government dependency
- Pushing immigration policies for political gain
6. AOC & Historical/Wealth Debate
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is:
- Claiming the American Revolution was against wealthy elites
- Arguing extreme wealth (billionaires) is largely unearned
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Donald Trump to Benjamin Netanyahu on the Iran deal, saying
this Israel is a great ally, but the deal is
my business, not anyone else's. The president telling the Israeli
Prime minister that the negotiations between the United States and
Iran to end the ongoing conflict are well America's business
(00:22):
to settle. In a post on x a global affairs
correspondent for Axios shared that he had a phone conversation
with Trump and which Trump said he did not like
the response from the Iranians regarding a draft agreement to
in the war. Trump also reportedly shared with the reporter
that he had a nice conversation with Netan Yahoo as well.
(00:45):
President Trump told me that when he spoke with Prime
Minister net Yahoo this evening, they discussed the Iranian response
with him.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
He continued.
Speaker 1 (00:54):
However, he emphasized it was a brief part of their conversation.
It was a very nice conversation. We have a good relationship.
But this is my business, not anyone else's, he said,
in reference to the negotiations with Iran. Now to post
on True Social Trump also shared that the response from
Ran so called representatives was totally unacceptable and they will
(01:19):
be laughing no longer, the president on Sunday Mother's Day,
rejecting Iran's latest response to the American offered in the
conflict and warning Tehran be laughing no longer after reports
indicate the regime refused key important US nuclear demands while
(01:41):
pushing for sanctioned relief, frozen assets to be unfrozen, and
an end to the naval blockade, as well as control
over the Strait of Hormuz. Now Iran, We're being told,
submitted its respond Sunday through Pakistani mediators, following nearly ten
days of deliberations over the latest American proposal, which reportedly
(02:05):
centered on ending hostilities, restoring maritime traffic through the Street
of Hormus, and opening a roughly thirty day negotiation window.
Over Tehran's nuclear program, their uranium enrichment activities, and stockpile
of highly enriched uranium, issues Trump has repeatedly said must
(02:26):
end with a RAN permanently barred from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
I have just read the response from RAN so called representatives,
Trump wrote on Sunday afternoon on True Social saying then
I don't like it, totally unacceptable.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Now.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
In an earlier social post on Sunday, Trump also escalated
his rhetoric towards Tehran, accusing the regime of spending decades
manipulating the United States, exploiting past American concessions to expand
its regional power, bankrolling terror proxy networks like Hamas and hesblah,
(03:03):
and threaten US allies throughout the Middle East.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (03:07):
Iran has been playing games in the United States of
America and the rest of the world for forty seven years.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
Delay, delay, Delay.
Speaker 1 (03:15):
Trump went on to blast former President Barack Obama and
Joe Biden over policies he argued financially as well as
strategically empowered Tehran, accusing Obama of jettison Israel and all
other allies while giving Iran a major and very powerful
new lease on life. Trump further pointed to the Obama
(03:39):
administration's transfer and this is a shocking amount of money
of one point seven billion in cash to Tehran, alongside
broader sanctions reliefs that brought in billions and billions and
billions more of revenue for the country. Trump wrote this,
I finally found the greatest sucker of them all, in
(03:59):
the form of a weak and stupid American president, referencing
Barack Obama. He then reiterated, for forty seven years, the
Iranians have been tapping us along, keeping us waiting, killing
our people with their roadside bombs, destroying protests, and recently
wiping out forty two thousand innocent, unarmed protesters.
Speaker 2 (04:23):
Iranians, they will be laughing no longer now. Speaking.
Speaker 1 (04:28):
In that brief phone interview with Axios following Tehrand response,
Trumps signaled clear dissatisfaction with the proposal and suggested the
administration viewed Iran's latest position as quote insufficient, while Iranian
state media also portrayed Tehran's response as positive and realistic.
Speaker 2 (04:48):
Multiple reports now.
Speaker 1 (04:50):
Indicated the regime refused demands, all of them basically tied
to rolling back its nuclear infrastructure its nuclear program. The
Wall Street Journal is also reporting that Iran rejected dismantling
its nuclear facilities altogether. They also refuse to relinquish long
term control of its enriched capabilities and instead propose a
(05:14):
shorter enrichment more thorium than the roughly twenty year suspension
that has been reportedly sought by Washington d C.
Speaker 2 (05:22):
Now.
Speaker 1 (05:22):
This report further indicates that Tehran Is proposed well basically
a stalling plan here. They want to demand highly enriched
uranium stockpiles stay there, not transferred to a third country,
under conditions that would require quote the material to be
returned if negotiations collapsed or if the United States later
(05:45):
withdrew from the agreement. They then say they want their
enriched uranium back now. Iran's regime linked media outlet also
aggressively pushed back on portions of the Western reporting, while
simultaneous confirming that Tehran's proposal focused heavily on ending hostilities.
(06:05):
They said, lifting sanctions, ending the American naval blockade, and
releasing frozen assets they desperately need, while also preserving Iranians
control over the straight offore moves. Many of these are
obviously non starters to the Trump administration. We also know
that HESBA affiliated outlets in the media reported that Tehran
(06:27):
instead insisted any agreement including immediate ceasefire in Lebanon and
a complex halt to what the Iranian officials described as
the siege that has been imposed on Iran now. The
US Ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, reiterated Sunday
(06:47):
evening that the White House had established a firm red
line in negotiations, saying President Trump has been clear they
will never have a nuclear weapon and cannot hold the
world economy's hostage. He said that during Fox News Sunday,
where he made it clear the White House is not blinking.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
But President Trump has been very clear, not just now,
but frankly for decades, even before he was in office,
that the world cannot and should not have a genocidal,
aggressive regime with its hand on a nuclear button. And Martha,
it's important to point out.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
You listen to what he said there again, this is
the US Ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz. The world
cannot have a genocidal, aggressive regime with its hand on
a nuclear button. Now, the increasingly aggressive posture that you're
witnessing from Tehran has also come as tensions against all
of the Gulf region have skyrocketed. There's this fragile ceasefire
(07:53):
that's been larly held since April. The UAE said its
air defenses intercepted not one, but two drones were launched
from Iran. Kuwait also now reporting several hostile drones entering
its airspace. A cargo vessel near Qatar was also struck
by a drone, sparking a fire on board the ship. Again,
(08:14):
according to maritime reports, Iranian military officials issued fresh threats
tied to the Straight of Hormus, with a Revolutionary Guard
warning that any US attacks on Iranian oil tankers or
commercial vessels would trigger harsh retaliation. It's amazing how crazy
the Iranians are right now. Every day, Americans make choices
(08:36):
that shape our country's future, right down to which cell
phone provider we support. Here's what most people don't actually realize.
Patriot Mobile isn't just a wireless provider. They're an activist
organization funded by selling top tier cell service. They've been
on the front lines defending our freedoms long before it
was cool, standing up and the gap when others wouldn't.
(09:00):
The best part is they deliver prioritized premium service on
all three major US networks, giving you the same or
even better coverage backed by one hundred percent US based
customer support. You get unlimited data, mobile hotspots, international roaming,
and so much more. But when you switch to Patriot Mobile,
(09:21):
that's what I love the most. You'll help grow a
movement that fuels the Christian conservative cause. Every bill you
pay helps advance the values of faith, family and freedom,
and switching is easier than ever. You can literally activate
in minutes, keep your number, keep your phone, or upgrade.
Speaker 2 (09:40):
So take a stand today.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Go to Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriotmobile
dot com slash ferguson, or call them nine to seven
to two Patriot that's nine seven to two Patriot and
use the promo code ferguson for a free month of
service Patriotmi dot slash ferguson or nine to seven to
(10:02):
two Patriot to make the switch today, I want to
bring you to another story, and it gets even worse
about what's coming out of Minnesota. We know about the
fraud and abuse and how much we've witnessed has been
stolen from the American taxpayers, many of them going to
the Somali community. But we have new breaking news that
shows just how far this is extending, as a Minnesota
(10:26):
nonprofit has now been accused of siphoning more than six
and a half million dollars to fund vegas trips, luxury cars,
and even a private liquor store. The head of a
Minnesota nonprofit siphoned off he's being accused of now more
than six and a half million taxpayer funds to treat
(10:49):
himself to an incredibly lavish lifestyle and amazing trips, including
the luxury rides, even a shopping spree at Harley Davison.
The man by the last name of Pallard founded and
is a now former director of the nonprofit We Push
for Peace.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Let me say the name again. We Push for Peace Now.
Speaker 1 (11:10):
It's supposed to be leading the organization providing conflict de
escalation work after the George Floyd murders, an effort fueled
by millions of dollars in government contracts. According to the
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, in a new lawsuit against
the group, this is not a joke. Instead of de
(11:33):
escalating things, Pollard decided, I'm just gonna divert more than
six million of the DOE to fund all well exciting
lifestyle for himself, not to mention to payoff child support,
settle a tax bill with the IRS, and subsidizes private businesses,
including that liquor store as well as a used car dealership.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
Authorities are now.
Speaker 1 (11:56):
Saying Pollard's fellow former director was also nailed in the
alleged scheme. We've now learned now the charity treasurer, we've
been told, paid ourself one thousand a week for the
nonprofits funds into her personal account, while stealing thousands of
dollars more in government grant funds as an administrative expense.
(12:20):
According to prosecutors, again, this is coming from the New
York Post. Instead of helping the community, they helped themselves
to millions of dollars that should have gone into the community.
Ellison now says in a statement, as he's acting like
he's trying to clean things up in Minnesota now after
Floyd's murder at the hands of cops in twenty twenty,
(12:40):
We Push for Peace received millions of dollars in government contracts,
all of it to try to de escalate regional conflicts
and interrupt violence when police weren't present. This is part
of the defund the police movement. When the Attorney General,
Keith Ellison started investigating how the group spent its public cash,
(13:03):
the two men in charge try to cover up their misconduct.
According to the lawsuit, after We Pushed for Peace eventually
elected a new board and blocked Pollard from receiving more money,
so he just started competing for profit business called Change
Makers to drain its remaining revenue, leaving the group no
(13:24):
longer operational. Also, according to the court documents, Poward, they
say allegedly submitted false statements under penalty of perjury, claiming
a child support payment was nonprofit overhead, and describing a
thirty five thousand dollars payout to his personal friends as
(13:44):
quote Chicago payroll. In all, Pollard is accused of misusing
more than six million in assets, all for his personal
enjoyment and gain, while the other guy involved allegedly took
over half a million, although the lawsuits said the exact
amounts are quote uncertain. Now, this just goes back to
(14:07):
the corruption issue in general. What we are witnessing in
Minnesota is massive corruption from anyone that can get their
hands on government aid. This goes back to what President
Donald Trump has been talking about now for quite some time.
He wants to make sure that this type of corruption
(14:30):
doesn't continue.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
Now, there's also something else about this. You need to understand. Democrats,
while all this is happening, are pushing for mass amnesty bills.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
Why are they doing this because they want to replace
you as a voter. We also are now learning that
the Democratic Party is moving towards, as they describing it,
giving benefits to a pool of millions of illegal aliens,
well as left leaning fact checkers at PolitiFact, which they
(15:04):
are now acknowledging trying to change your mind about what's
happening in the world now. The fact check report from
PolitiFact examines remarks by representating Brandon Gill, a Republican from Texas,
in which he called the Dignity the Dad an active
mass amnesty, as the bill gives green cards and thus
(15:25):
offers neutralized citizenship to more than two point five million
so called dreamers, illegal aliens, that's what they are. It
also would provide roughly, they say, ten point five million
illegal aliens with work permits to take away your jobs,
and they can indefinitely renew to stay in the United
(15:47):
States America. So once those ten point five million jobs
are filled by illegal immigrants, you guessed it.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
You guessed it.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Those jobs could be gone forever. I want you to
listen to what Brandon Gill had to say about this,
as he's exposing the Democrats' plans for the midterms.
Speaker 4 (16:06):
There's no way that you can credibly say this isn't
mass amnesty. What this bill does is it gives legal
status to about twelve million illegal aliens who have been
in the United States, came into the United States at
least five years ago. But on top of that, what
it also does is it allows the Department of Homeland
Security to bring in or remember this could happen under
(16:27):
Democrat administration, bring in illegal aliens who have already been
deported back into the United States.
Speaker 1 (16:34):
Back into the United States America. Now, this is where
Democrats will go after anyone that shares the truth, right,
so they fact check conservatives and PolitiFact argues there is
no agreed upon definition to the term amnesty. Fact checkers
admitted that the bill will allow millions to stay in
(16:56):
the US without the threat of deportation, saying this, there's
a pool of millions of people who potentially could benefit
from the Dignity Act, which would allow them to earn
legal status that they met certain criteria, including paying seven
thousand dollars in fines and passing a criminal background check.
(17:16):
The report then attacks Gill's statements as saying they're only
quote partially accurate, rating it is a half truth only
because the congressman did not include details about the bill
in his post. Admitting that yeah, everything he said was
actually correct. Now, the Center for Immigration Studies told Politi
(17:38):
Fact that the act is without question an amnesty for
illegal alien saying, the bill is unambiguous on amnesty for
some people, and it's a generous one.
Speaker 2 (17:49):
Now.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
In addition to its amnesty provisions, this new Act would
more than double employment based legal immigration to the US.
On such employee green cards can apply for naturalized citizenship
after they've lived in the US for just five years,
indicating that the bill would hugely increase annual naturalizations as well.
(18:14):
So you've got two things happening here. One, you have
Democrats attacking the reality of the situation. They're trying to
replace American workers and the voters that they are losing
on election day by giving that to illegal immigrants. They're also,
at the same time allowing illegal immigrants to steal from
(18:36):
all of US as much money as they can possibly
get their hands on. And even when people steal, they
will downplay it and cover it up because they don't
want to have an honest conversation about just how much
damage is actually being done in the United States of
America by Democrats as well as the illegal immigrants. This
(19:01):
is another perfect example of the Democratic Party making sure
that Americans come last, and illegal immigrants, fraudsters, and those
that are corrupt always get the better end of the
bargain because they're betting on the future, a future where
you're out of work, your vote is canceled out by
(19:22):
one of their new voters, an illegal immigrant. So if
you ever wonder just how corrupt the Democratic Party could be,
how corrupt could it be to take your tax dollars
and use it for different projects to hook up your friends?
Is there anything that Democrats won't do to make a buck?
(19:46):
I asked this question because Gavin Newsom, the guy who's
the front runner for the Democratic Party for the presidency.
Speaker 2 (19:52):
Well, there's a new report out the.
Speaker 1 (19:54):
Gavin Newsom figured out a way to have twenty million
dollars diaper deal work with a sweetheart relationship, all using
taxpayers dollars. Now, they're just diapers, right, But even Democrats
have figured out a way to corrupt diapers. They have
now landed the California governor into a no pun intended
(20:17):
messy accusations of corruption for dumping twenty million and taxpayer
money into a nonprofit led by an executive who sits
on the board of his wife's own organization.
Speaker 2 (20:33):
Some would refer to this as a massive kickback.
Speaker 1 (20:37):
Now, the initiative was called the Golden State Start, which
would provide they claim free diapers. By the way, there's
no such thing as free diapers. Somebody's got to pay
for him, and well that just is the taxpayers at
this point, right to newborns and hospitals throughout the state.
It also was a big debut ahead of Sunday's Mother's Day.
(21:00):
It's been promoted as a partnership between the state and
the Los Angeles Base Baby to Baby nonprofit organization. However,
the deal has resulted in massive well scrutiny, as it should,
over how the organization was chosen and specifically it's proximity
(21:21):
to Newsom's political and personal network. The California Post revealed
on Saturday, if you take the number of diapers they're
planning to send out and the amount of money that
he's spending on it, it's about fifty cents for each one,
which is like one hundred times more expensive if you
(21:42):
just bought them literally at costco. I'm going to say
that again, you could take the money that he is
spending the twenty million, you could go and purchase at
Costco retail just to have your Costco card. I've got one.
Many of you listening have one, and you could buy
them one hundred times less expensive than the diapers that
(22:04):
the governor's plan is going to buy. Republican Govntorial candidate
Steve Hilton told the Post, this is what literally corruption
looks like. Where's the money coming from? Is the other
question people should be asking. The answer is us. Now,
this is where it gets really interesting. Newsom's wife co
(22:25):
founded the California partners Project, which helped facilitate this quote partnership,
it's a ripoff. It aims to increase women in leadership,
is what their state of goal is online. The co
CEO sits on Newsom's board of directors. Yes, so this
is just extreme corruption right in front front of your face.
(22:48):
And so therefore it's like, yeah, we just do this
all the time.
Speaker 2 (22:51):
Now.
Speaker 1 (22:51):
The diaper deal, as it was reported in LA is
glaring evidence of what sweetheart relationships between state programs and
then like basically the equivalent of INNGO right non governmental
agency organization or affiliated nonprofit networks instead of taking our money,
(23:12):
putting into some let me rephrase that quote, instead of
taking our money putting into some scheme that benefits their
friends and cronies, Hilton said, why don't they let us
just keep more of our money in the first place,
so we can decide how to spend our money. Now,
the cozy relationships are not limited to just diapers. We're
(23:32):
also learning the woman's family has ties that have also
drawn attention from other critics, including her marriage to a
film producer whose father is a longtime Democratic donor who
has deep ties to the Clinton Air political network. According
to the Post, some seven point four million has already
(23:52):
been approved for the diaper's program. There's twelve point five
million that has been proposed for the program for twenty
twenty six and twenty twenty seven state budget. Now, other
critics also argue that the comparable bulk retail prices are
significantly lower than what the state will be paying. The
Post reach out to Newsom's office and Baby's Baby to
(24:16):
Baby for comment, but guess what. Neither of them have
said a word in response. Newsom, who many observers predict
will run for president in twenty twenty eight, appears undeterred.
He's promising the Golden State start as a unique child
welfare initiative, calling it a first in the nation program
(24:36):
to provide free diapers to all newborns born in California. Now,
I go back to the dollar amount here, and this
is the part that should really make people angry. They
are deliberately funneling money to their family and their friends.
That's the only way that you could describe this logically. Otherwise,
why would you spend on average fifty cents for each
(24:59):
newborn diapers? Right, It's a hundred times more expensive than
if you bought them at costco. In fact, the state
is spending more per diaper than any store. Basically you
could go to in California to buy diapers. So you
could go into any grocery store, you could go into CBS,
you go to Walgreens, whatever Target, and you could get
a better deal on diapers than what the state is
(25:21):
paying while buying in massive bulk. And everyone knows that
when you buy in bulk, what happens you get a
better price.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
That's not hard math to figure out.
Speaker 1 (25:32):
Now, while all of this is happening, there's also another
very interesting story that goes back to this issue of
massive corruption. Democrats don't want you to know about just
how corrupt they are, so instead, what do they do
every time they attack the rich in this country? AOC
doing exactly that, showing how historically illiterate she is as
(25:57):
a communist. In her latest interview that she set down
to talk about the twenty twenty eight mindset right where
the Democratic Party is going now, you should not underestimate
what they're trying to accomplish.
Speaker 2 (26:09):
Here.
Speaker 1 (26:10):
The New York Post has an article out right now
talking about this. The headline says, AOC claims the American
Revolution was fought against billionaires.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
I'm gonna say that again.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
AOC believes that the American Revolution was to fight against billionaires. Now,
she's a squad member. She's obviously under fire because if
any of you know history, you know that that is insane.
She's under fire for radically rewriting history by claiming that
the American Revolution was all about fighting against billionaires, similar
(26:45):
the fights she and other fellow socialists are waging now
on capitalism. Quote, the American Revolution was against the billionaires
of their time. In fact, let me just let you
hear from AOC in her own words. This is AOC
describe the American Revolution. And the scary part is this
was actually done at the Institute of Politics at the
(27:05):
University of Chicago. Another reason why you should be careful
you send your kids to college.
Speaker 5 (27:09):
Listen, the American Revolution was against the billionaires of their time,
and we were declaring independence from such an extreme marriage
of wealth and power in the state.
Speaker 1 (27:25):
By the way, just to be clear, the quote billionaires
of our time when the American Revolution was happening, was
actually people like George Washington who are hisking everything, Thomas Jefferson,
Abraham Lincoln. They were very wealthy, and they were spending
their money at incredible rates to try to have an
independent nation, the complete opposite of what AOC just said.
(27:51):
But she wants you to believe this country was founded
to destroy capitalism when it was actually about freedom and capitalism.
The American Revolution, exact quote, was against the billionaires of
their time. That is not true, and we are declarring
independence from such an extreme marriage of wealth and the state.
She went on to say again, also lie. Now she
(28:12):
went to Boston University. Another reason why if you went there,
maybe you should ask for a refund for noting the
American Revolution was actually, in fact a rebellion against the
British government. And what were we rebelling against? Over unfair
taxation without representation and control by a monarchy, not a
fight over wealth. In fact, it was the opposite of that.
(28:35):
You also, I go back to George Washington and some
of our other founding fathers were among the wealthiest in
the colonies. Washington himself was worth the equivalent of nearly
six hundred million in today's money. So to answer the question,
as Senter Mike Lee put it this week, No, AOC,
the American Revolution was not against the billionaires of their time. Quote,
(28:57):
it was against a large dis It's an overly intrusive
government that recognize no limits over its own authority to tax, regulate,
and eat out the substance of the citizens that claim
to serve. Now, again that's coming from Senator Mike Lee.
He's absolutely right.
Speaker 2 (29:16):
So take a.
Speaker 1 (29:17):
Listen to AOC talking and demonizing billionaires in this country,
saying it's impossible for anyone to make a billion dollars.
Speaker 6 (29:27):
Legitimately, there's a certain level of wealth and accumulation that
is unearned. Right, you can't earn a billion dollars, That's right,
you just can't earn that.
Speaker 4 (29:43):
That's exactly correct.
Speaker 6 (29:45):
You can, you can get market power, you can break rules,
you can do all sorts of things, you can abuse
labor laws, you can pay people less than what they're worth.
But you can't earn that right, and so you have
to create a myth that. Since you didn't earn that,
(30:06):
you have to create a myth of earning it, a.
Speaker 2 (30:10):
Myth of earning it.
Speaker 1 (30:11):
So to be clear, if you're someone that started the
personal computer, that you didn't earn that. If you decide
to come up with like an amazing car that didn't
actually use petrol called a Tesla, you didn't earn that.
If you created a company that decided to start flying
people from point A to point B and it exploded,
(30:32):
you didn't earn that. If you came up with some
unbelievable technology like AI and it explodes, you actually didn't
earn that. This is AOC and the Democratic Party making
it clear ahead of the midterm elections what they're going
to do. They're going to make this about us against them.
If you're successful, you're the devil. They're also going to
(30:54):
talk about race as much as they possibly can as well.
AOC saying this after attacking anyone that's been successful in
this country.
Speaker 6 (31:02):
There are very few like real archetypes of in my opinion,
truly what America is all about. I think about the
civil rights and voting rights movement and how Black Americans
really created democracy in this country. That's exactly right, how
(31:24):
they literally made something from nothing, It is just beyond me.
I think about how like Native people have survived and
preserved and treasured their culture. I think about, and I
(31:48):
think many of us think about immigrants, which if you
aren't from one of those first two populations, you are
certainly from largely the third.
Speaker 1 (31:57):
You listen to AOC, and this goes back to the
core of the Democratic Party. They want you to hate
this country at its core. They want you to hate
anybody that works hard. They want you to hate anybody
that doesn't depend on the government aka them, for your
success or your livelihood, or just your survival. And then
they want to divide also on the issue of race,
(32:19):
because this is what AOC believes, This is what the
Democratic Party believes. I will say it again. They are
telling you what they think about this country. When they
do it, believe them when they tell you they hate
this country. Believe them when they tell you that they
want to destroy this country. Believe them when they tell
you that America is evil and that's what they're saying.
(32:42):
Believe that that is what they believe in. So the
midterms are coming, and if you want to know what
the midterms are about, this is what the midterms are about.
This is the whole ballgame. This is what they want
to happen to America. You destroy it from within, and
(33:03):
you recreated it as a socialist, communist, Marxist society. I
want to get your phone calls one A hundred four
seven four nine seven three two one eight hundred four
seven four nine to seven three to two patriotmonble dot
com phone lines are open. We'll get your thoughts, your
reaction to all this, see what you think about it.
(33:25):
And again AOC coming out saying this, it truly is incredible.
It's also not surprising that this is what she believes,
and this is why she's sang it the way she's
saying it. She wants this country to burn to the ground,
and then she wants the AOC's the world that would
be her and any others to be the ones that
(33:49):
are in charge of it. That's the goal and if
you are a successful person, be ready. Okay, I just
be ready because they also want to bring you down.
They literally want.
Speaker 2 (34:03):
To take you down. Don't forget.
Speaker 1 (34:07):
Share this podcast wherever you can with your family and
your friends, and I'll see you back here tomorrow
Donald Trump to Benjamin Netanyahu on the Iran deal, saying
this Israel is a great ally, but the deal is
my business, not anyone else's. The president telling the Israeli
Prime minister that the negotiations between the United States and
Iran to end the ongoing conflict are well America's business
(00:22):
to settle. In a post on x a global affairs
correspondent for Axios shared that he had a phone conversation
with Trump and which Trump said he did not like
the response from the Iranians regarding a draft agreement to
in the war. Trump also reportedly shared with the reporter
that he had a nice conversation with Netan Yahoo as well.
(00:45):
President Trump told me that when he spoke with Prime
Minister net Yahoo this evening, they discussed the Iranian response
with him.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
He continued.
Speaker 1 (00:54):
However, he emphasized it was a brief part of their conversation.
It was a very nice conversation. We have a good relationship.
But this is my business, not anyone else's, he said,
in reference to the negotiations with Iran. Now to post
on True Social Trump also shared that the response from
Ran so called representatives was totally unacceptable and they will
(01:19):
be laughing no longer, the president on Sunday Mother's Day,
rejecting Iran's latest response to the American offered in the
conflict and warning Tehran be laughing no longer after reports
indicate the regime refused key important US nuclear demands while
(01:41):
pushing for sanctioned relief, frozen assets to be unfrozen, and
an end to the naval blockade, as well as control
over the Strait of Hormuz. Now Iran, We're being told,
submitted its respond Sunday through Pakistani mediators, following nearly ten
days of deliberations over the latest American proposal, which reportedly
(02:05):
centered on ending hostilities, restoring maritime traffic through the Street
of Hormus, and opening a roughly thirty day negotiation window.
Over Tehran's nuclear program, their uranium enrichment activities, and stockpile
of highly enriched uranium, issues Trump has repeatedly said must
(02:26):
end with a RAN permanently barred from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
I have just read the response from RAN so called representatives,
Trump wrote on Sunday afternoon on True Social saying then
I don't like it, totally unacceptable.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Now.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
In an earlier social post on Sunday, Trump also escalated
his rhetoric towards Tehran, accusing the regime of spending decades
manipulating the United States, exploiting past American concessions to expand
its regional power, bankrolling terror proxy networks like Hamas and hesblah,
(03:03):
and threaten US allies throughout the Middle East.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (03:07):
Iran has been playing games in the United States of
America and the rest of the world for forty seven years.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
Delay, delay, Delay.
Speaker 1 (03:15):
Trump went on to blast former President Barack Obama and
Joe Biden over policies he argued financially as well as
strategically empowered Tehran, accusing Obama of jettison Israel and all
other allies while giving Iran a major and very powerful
new lease on life. Trump further pointed to the Obama
(03:39):
administration's transfer and this is a shocking amount of money
of one point seven billion in cash to Tehran, alongside
broader sanctions reliefs that brought in billions and billions and
billions more of revenue for the country. Trump wrote this,
I finally found the greatest sucker of them all, in
(03:59):
the form of a weak and stupid American president, referencing
Barack Obama. He then reiterated, for forty seven years, the
Iranians have been tapping us along, keeping us waiting, killing
our people with their roadside bombs, destroying protests, and recently
wiping out forty two thousand innocent, unarmed protesters.
Speaker 2 (04:23):
Iranians, they will be laughing no longer now. Speaking.
Speaker 1 (04:28):
In that brief phone interview with Axios following Tehrand response,
Trumps signaled clear dissatisfaction with the proposal and suggested the
administration viewed Iran's latest position as quote insufficient, while Iranian
state media also portrayed Tehran's response as positive and realistic.
Speaker 2 (04:48):
Multiple reports now.
Speaker 1 (04:50):
Indicated the regime refused demands, all of them basically tied
to rolling back its nuclear infrastructure its nuclear program. The
Wall Street Journal is also reporting that Iran rejected dismantling
its nuclear facilities altogether. They also refuse to relinquish long
term control of its enriched capabilities and instead propose a
(05:14):
shorter enrichment more thorium than the roughly twenty year suspension
that has been reportedly sought by Washington d C.
Speaker 2 (05:22):
Now.
Speaker 1 (05:22):
This report further indicates that Tehran Is proposed well basically
a stalling plan here. They want to demand highly enriched
uranium stockpiles stay there, not transferred to a third country,
under conditions that would require quote the material to be
returned if negotiations collapsed or if the United States later
(05:45):
withdrew from the agreement. They then say they want their
enriched uranium back now. Iran's regime linked media outlet also
aggressively pushed back on portions of the Western reporting, while
simultaneous confirming that Tehran's proposal focused heavily on ending hostilities.
(06:05):
They said, lifting sanctions, ending the American naval blockade, and
releasing frozen assets they desperately need, while also preserving Iranians
control over the straight offore moves. Many of these are
obviously non starters to the Trump administration. We also know
that HESBA affiliated outlets in the media reported that Tehran
(06:27):
instead insisted any agreement including immediate ceasefire in Lebanon and
a complex halt to what the Iranian officials described as
the siege that has been imposed on Iran now. The
US Ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, reiterated Sunday
(06:47):
evening that the White House had established a firm red
line in negotiations, saying President Trump has been clear they
will never have a nuclear weapon and cannot hold the
world economy's hostage. He said that during Fox News Sunday,
where he made it clear the White House is not blinking.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
But President Trump has been very clear, not just now,
but frankly for decades, even before he was in office,
that the world cannot and should not have a genocidal,
aggressive regime with its hand on a nuclear button. And Martha,
it's important to point out.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
You listen to what he said there again, this is
the US Ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz. The world
cannot have a genocidal, aggressive regime with its hand on
a nuclear button. Now, the increasingly aggressive posture that you're
witnessing from Tehran has also come as tensions against all
of the Gulf region have skyrocketed. There's this fragile ceasefire
(07:53):
that's been larly held since April. The UAE said its
air defenses intercepted not one, but two drones were launched
from Iran. Kuwait also now reporting several hostile drones entering
its airspace. A cargo vessel near Qatar was also struck
by a drone, sparking a fire on board the ship. Again,
(08:14):
according to maritime reports, Iranian military officials issued fresh threats
tied to the Straight of Hormus, with a Revolutionary Guard
warning that any US attacks on Iranian oil tankers or
commercial vessels would trigger harsh retaliation. It's amazing how crazy
the Iranians are right now. Every day, Americans make choices
(08:36):
that shape our country's future, right down to which cell
phone provider we support. Here's what most people don't actually realize.
Patriot Mobile isn't just a wireless provider. They're an activist
organization funded by selling top tier cell service. They've been
on the front lines defending our freedoms long before it
was cool, standing up and the gap when others wouldn't.
(09:00):
The best part is they deliver prioritized premium service on
all three major US networks, giving you the same or
even better coverage backed by one hundred percent US based
customer support. You get unlimited data, mobile hotspots, international roaming,
and so much more. But when you switch to Patriot Mobile,
(09:21):
that's what I love the most. You'll help grow a
movement that fuels the Christian conservative cause. Every bill you
pay helps advance the values of faith, family and freedom,
and switching is easier than ever. You can literally activate
in minutes, keep your number, keep your phone, or upgrade.
Speaker 2 (09:40):
So take a stand today.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Go to Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriotmobile
dot com slash ferguson, or call them nine to seven
to two Patriot that's nine seven to two Patriot and
use the promo code ferguson for a free month of
service Patriotmi dot slash ferguson or nine to seven to
(10:02):
two Patriot to make the switch today, I want to
bring you to another story, and it gets even worse
about what's coming out of Minnesota. We know about the
fraud and abuse and how much we've witnessed has been
stolen from the American taxpayers, many of them going to
the Somali community. But we have new breaking news that
shows just how far this is extending, as a Minnesota
(10:26):
nonprofit has now been accused of siphoning more than six
and a half million dollars to fund vegas trips, luxury cars,
and even a private liquor store. The head of a
Minnesota nonprofit siphoned off he's being accused of now more
than six and a half million taxpayer funds to treat
(10:49):
himself to an incredibly lavish lifestyle and amazing trips, including
the luxury rides, even a shopping spree at Harley Davison.
The man by the last name of Pallard founded and
is a now former director of the nonprofit We Push
for Peace.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Let me say the name again. We Push for Peace Now.
Speaker 1 (11:10):
It's supposed to be leading the organization providing conflict de
escalation work after the George Floyd murders, an effort fueled
by millions of dollars in government contracts. According to the
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, in a new lawsuit against
the group, this is not a joke. Instead of de
(11:33):
escalating things, Pollard decided, I'm just gonna divert more than
six million of the DOE to fund all well exciting
lifestyle for himself, not to mention to payoff child support,
settle a tax bill with the IRS, and subsidizes private businesses,
including that liquor store as well as a used car dealership.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
Authorities are now.
Speaker 1 (11:56):
Saying Pollard's fellow former director was also nailed in the
alleged scheme. We've now learned now the charity treasurer, we've
been told, paid ourself one thousand a week for the
nonprofits funds into her personal account, while stealing thousands of
dollars more in government grant funds as an administrative expense.
(12:20):
According to prosecutors, again, this is coming from the New
York Post. Instead of helping the community, they helped themselves
to millions of dollars that should have gone into the community.
Ellison now says in a statement, as he's acting like
he's trying to clean things up in Minnesota now after
Floyd's murder at the hands of cops in twenty twenty,
(12:40):
We Push for Peace received millions of dollars in government contracts,
all of it to try to de escalate regional conflicts
and interrupt violence when police weren't present. This is part
of the defund the police movement. When the Attorney General,
Keith Ellison started investigating how the group spent its public cash,
(13:03):
the two men in charge try to cover up their misconduct.
According to the lawsuit, after We Pushed for Peace eventually
elected a new board and blocked Pollard from receiving more money,
so he just started competing for profit business called Change
Makers to drain its remaining revenue, leaving the group no
(13:24):
longer operational. Also, according to the court documents, Poward, they
say allegedly submitted false statements under penalty of perjury, claiming
a child support payment was nonprofit overhead, and describing a
thirty five thousand dollars payout to his personal friends as
(13:44):
quote Chicago payroll. In all, Pollard is accused of misusing
more than six million in assets, all for his personal
enjoyment and gain, while the other guy involved allegedly took
over half a million, although the lawsuits said the exact
amounts are quote uncertain. Now, this just goes back to
(14:07):
the corruption issue in general. What we are witnessing in
Minnesota is massive corruption from anyone that can get their
hands on government aid. This goes back to what President
Donald Trump has been talking about now for quite some time.
He wants to make sure that this type of corruption
(14:30):
doesn't continue.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
Now, there's also something else about this. You need to understand. Democrats,
while all this is happening, are pushing for mass amnesty bills.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
Why are they doing this because they want to replace
you as a voter. We also are now learning that
the Democratic Party is moving towards, as they describing it,
giving benefits to a pool of millions of illegal aliens,
well as left leaning fact checkers at PolitiFact, which they
(15:04):
are now acknowledging trying to change your mind about what's
happening in the world now. The fact check report from
PolitiFact examines remarks by representating Brandon Gill, a Republican from Texas,
in which he called the Dignity the Dad an active
mass amnesty, as the bill gives green cards and thus
(15:25):
offers neutralized citizenship to more than two point five million
so called dreamers, illegal aliens, that's what they are. It
also would provide roughly, they say, ten point five million
illegal aliens with work permits to take away your jobs,
and they can indefinitely renew to stay in the United
(15:47):
States America. So once those ten point five million jobs
are filled by illegal immigrants, you guessed it.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
You guessed it.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Those jobs could be gone forever. I want you to
listen to what Brandon Gill had to say about this,
as he's exposing the Democrats' plans for the midterms.
Speaker 4 (16:06):
There's no way that you can credibly say this isn't
mass amnesty. What this bill does is it gives legal
status to about twelve million illegal aliens who have been
in the United States, came into the United States at
least five years ago. But on top of that, what
it also does is it allows the Department of Homeland
Security to bring in or remember this could happen under
(16:27):
Democrat administration, bring in illegal aliens who have already been
deported back into the United States.
Speaker 1 (16:34):
Back into the United States America. Now, this is where
Democrats will go after anyone that shares the truth, right,
so they fact check conservatives and PolitiFact argues there is
no agreed upon definition to the term amnesty. Fact checkers
admitted that the bill will allow millions to stay in
(16:56):
the US without the threat of deportation, saying this, there's
a pool of millions of people who potentially could benefit
from the Dignity Act, which would allow them to earn
legal status that they met certain criteria, including paying seven
thousand dollars in fines and passing a criminal background check.
(17:16):
The report then attacks Gill's statements as saying they're only
quote partially accurate, rating it is a half truth only
because the congressman did not include details about the bill
in his post. Admitting that yeah, everything he said was
actually correct. Now, the Center for Immigration Studies told Politi
(17:38):
Fact that the act is without question an amnesty for
illegal alien saying, the bill is unambiguous on amnesty for
some people, and it's a generous one.
Speaker 2 (17:49):
Now.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
In addition to its amnesty provisions, this new Act would
more than double employment based legal immigration to the US.
On such employee green cards can apply for naturalized citizenship
after they've lived in the US for just five years,
indicating that the bill would hugely increase annual naturalizations as well.
(18:14):
So you've got two things happening here. One, you have
Democrats attacking the reality of the situation. They're trying to
replace American workers and the voters that they are losing
on election day by giving that to illegal immigrants. They're also,
at the same time allowing illegal immigrants to steal from
(18:36):
all of US as much money as they can possibly
get their hands on. And even when people steal, they
will downplay it and cover it up because they don't
want to have an honest conversation about just how much
damage is actually being done in the United States of
America by Democrats as well as the illegal immigrants. This
(19:01):
is another perfect example of the Democratic Party making sure
that Americans come last, and illegal immigrants, fraudsters, and those
that are corrupt always get the better end of the
bargain because they're betting on the future, a future where
you're out of work, your vote is canceled out by
(19:22):
one of their new voters, an illegal immigrant. So if
you ever wonder just how corrupt the Democratic Party could be,
how corrupt could it be to take your tax dollars
and use it for different projects to hook up your friends?
Is there anything that Democrats won't do to make a buck?
(19:46):
I asked this question because Gavin Newsom, the guy who's
the front runner for the Democratic Party for the presidency.
Speaker 2 (19:52):
Well, there's a new report out the.
Speaker 1 (19:54):
Gavin Newsom figured out a way to have twenty million
dollars diaper deal work with a sweetheart relationship, all using
taxpayers dollars. Now, they're just diapers, right, But even Democrats
have figured out a way to corrupt diapers. They have
now landed the California governor into a no pun intended
(20:17):
messy accusations of corruption for dumping twenty million and taxpayer
money into a nonprofit led by an executive who sits
on the board of his wife's own organization.
Speaker 2 (20:33):
Some would refer to this as a massive kickback.
Speaker 1 (20:37):
Now, the initiative was called the Golden State Start, which
would provide they claim free diapers. By the way, there's
no such thing as free diapers. Somebody's got to pay
for him, and well that just is the taxpayers at
this point, right to newborns and hospitals throughout the state.
It also was a big debut ahead of Sunday's Mother's Day.
(21:00):
It's been promoted as a partnership between the state and
the Los Angeles Base Baby to Baby nonprofit organization. However,
the deal has resulted in massive well scrutiny, as it should,
over how the organization was chosen and specifically it's proximity
(21:21):
to Newsom's political and personal network. The California Post revealed
on Saturday, if you take the number of diapers they're
planning to send out and the amount of money that
he's spending on it, it's about fifty cents for each one,
which is like one hundred times more expensive if you
(21:42):
just bought them literally at costco. I'm going to say
that again, you could take the money that he is
spending the twenty million, you could go and purchase at
Costco retail just to have your Costco card. I've got one.
Many of you listening have one, and you could buy
them one hundred times less expensive than the diapers that
(22:04):
the governor's plan is going to buy. Republican Govntorial candidate
Steve Hilton told the Post, this is what literally corruption
looks like. Where's the money coming from? Is the other
question people should be asking. The answer is us. Now,
this is where it gets really interesting. Newsom's wife co
(22:25):
founded the California partners Project, which helped facilitate this quote partnership,
it's a ripoff. It aims to increase women in leadership,
is what their state of goal is online. The co
CEO sits on Newsom's board of directors. Yes, so this
is just extreme corruption right in front front of your face.
(22:48):
And so therefore it's like, yeah, we just do this
all the time.
Speaker 2 (22:51):
Now.
Speaker 1 (22:51):
The diaper deal, as it was reported in LA is
glaring evidence of what sweetheart relationships between state programs and
then like basically the equivalent of INNGO right non governmental
agency organization or affiliated nonprofit networks instead of taking our money,
(23:12):
putting into some let me rephrase that quote, instead of
taking our money putting into some scheme that benefits their
friends and cronies, Hilton said, why don't they let us
just keep more of our money in the first place,
so we can decide how to spend our money. Now,
the cozy relationships are not limited to just diapers. We're
(23:32):
also learning the woman's family has ties that have also
drawn attention from other critics, including her marriage to a
film producer whose father is a longtime Democratic donor who
has deep ties to the Clinton Air political network. According
to the Post, some seven point four million has already
(23:52):
been approved for the diaper's program. There's twelve point five
million that has been proposed for the program for twenty
twenty six and twenty twenty seven state budget. Now, other
critics also argue that the comparable bulk retail prices are
significantly lower than what the state will be paying. The
Post reach out to Newsom's office and Baby's Baby to
(24:16):
Baby for comment, but guess what. Neither of them have
said a word in response. Newsom, who many observers predict
will run for president in twenty twenty eight, appears undeterred.
He's promising the Golden State start as a unique child
welfare initiative, calling it a first in the nation program
(24:36):
to provide free diapers to all newborns born in California. Now,
I go back to the dollar amount here, and this
is the part that should really make people angry. They
are deliberately funneling money to their family and their friends.
That's the only way that you could describe this logically. Otherwise,
why would you spend on average fifty cents for each
(24:59):
newborn diapers? Right, It's a hundred times more expensive than
if you bought them at costco. In fact, the state
is spending more per diaper than any store. Basically you
could go to in California to buy diapers. So you
could go into any grocery store, you could go into CBS,
you go to Walgreens, whatever Target, and you could get
a better deal on diapers than what the state is
(25:21):
paying while buying in massive bulk. And everyone knows that
when you buy in bulk, what happens you get a
better price.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
That's not hard math to figure out.
Speaker 1 (25:32):
Now, while all of this is happening, there's also another
very interesting story that goes back to this issue of
massive corruption. Democrats don't want you to know about just
how corrupt they are, so instead, what do they do
every time they attack the rich in this country? AOC
doing exactly that, showing how historically illiterate she is as
(25:57):
a communist. In her latest interview that she set down
to talk about the twenty twenty eight mindset right where
the Democratic Party is going now, you should not underestimate
what they're trying to accomplish.
Speaker 2 (26:09):
Here.
Speaker 1 (26:10):
The New York Post has an article out right now
talking about this. The headline says, AOC claims the American
Revolution was fought against billionaires.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
I'm gonna say that again.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
AOC believes that the American Revolution was to fight against billionaires. Now,
she's a squad member. She's obviously under fire because if
any of you know history, you know that that is insane.
She's under fire for radically rewriting history by claiming that
the American Revolution was all about fighting against billionaires, similar
(26:45):
the fights she and other fellow socialists are waging now
on capitalism. Quote, the American Revolution was against the billionaires
of their time. In fact, let me just let you
hear from AOC in her own words. This is AOC
describe the American Revolution. And the scary part is this
was actually done at the Institute of Politics at the
(27:05):
University of Chicago. Another reason why you should be careful
you send your kids to college.
Speaker 5 (27:09):
Listen, the American Revolution was against the billionaires of their time,
and we were declaring independence from such an extreme marriage
of wealth and power in the state.
Speaker 1 (27:25):
By the way, just to be clear, the quote billionaires
of our time when the American Revolution was happening, was
actually people like George Washington who are hisking everything, Thomas Jefferson,
Abraham Lincoln. They were very wealthy, and they were spending
their money at incredible rates to try to have an
independent nation, the complete opposite of what AOC just said.
(27:51):
But she wants you to believe this country was founded
to destroy capitalism when it was actually about freedom and capitalism.
The American Revolution, exact quote, was against the billionaires of
their time. That is not true, and we are declarring
independence from such an extreme marriage of wealth and the state.
She went on to say again, also lie. Now she
(28:12):
went to Boston University. Another reason why if you went there,
maybe you should ask for a refund for noting the
American Revolution was actually, in fact a rebellion against the
British government. And what were we rebelling against? Over unfair
taxation without representation and control by a monarchy, not a
fight over wealth. In fact, it was the opposite of that.
(28:35):
You also, I go back to George Washington and some
of our other founding fathers were among the wealthiest in
the colonies. Washington himself was worth the equivalent of nearly
six hundred million in today's money. So to answer the question,
as Senter Mike Lee put it this week, No, AOC,
the American Revolution was not against the billionaires of their time. Quote,
(28:57):
it was against a large dis It's an overly intrusive
government that recognize no limits over its own authority to tax, regulate,
and eat out the substance of the citizens that claim
to serve. Now, again that's coming from Senator Mike Lee.
He's absolutely right.
Speaker 2 (29:16):
So take a.
Speaker 1 (29:17):
Listen to AOC talking and demonizing billionaires in this country,
saying it's impossible for anyone to make a billion dollars.
Speaker 6 (29:27):
Legitimately, there's a certain level of wealth and accumulation that
is unearned. Right, you can't earn a billion dollars, That's right,
you just can't earn that.
Speaker 4 (29:43):
That's exactly correct.
Speaker 6 (29:45):
You can, you can get market power, you can break rules,
you can do all sorts of things, you can abuse
labor laws, you can pay people less than what they're worth.
But you can't earn that right, and so you have
to create a myth that. Since you didn't earn that,
(30:06):
you have to create a myth of earning it, a.
Speaker 2 (30:10):
Myth of earning it.
Speaker 1 (30:11):
So to be clear, if you're someone that started the
personal computer, that you didn't earn that. If you decide
to come up with like an amazing car that didn't
actually use petrol called a Tesla, you didn't earn that.
If you created a company that decided to start flying
people from point A to point B and it exploded,
(30:32):
you didn't earn that. If you came up with some
unbelievable technology like AI and it explodes, you actually didn't
earn that. This is AOC and the Democratic Party making
it clear ahead of the midterm elections what they're going
to do. They're going to make this about us against them.
If you're successful, you're the devil. They're also going to
(30:54):
talk about race as much as they possibly can as well.
AOC saying this after attacking anyone that's been successful in
this country.
Speaker 6 (31:02):
There are very few like real archetypes of in my opinion,
truly what America is all about. I think about the
civil rights and voting rights movement and how Black Americans
really created democracy in this country. That's exactly right, how
(31:24):
they literally made something from nothing, It is just beyond me.
I think about how like Native people have survived and
preserved and treasured their culture. I think about, and I
(31:48):
think many of us think about immigrants, which if you
aren't from one of those first two populations, you are
certainly from largely the third.
Speaker 1 (31:57):
You listen to AOC, and this goes back to the
core of the Democratic Party. They want you to hate
this country at its core. They want you to hate
anybody that works hard. They want you to hate anybody
that doesn't depend on the government aka them, for your
success or your livelihood, or just your survival. And then
they want to divide also on the issue of race,
(32:19):
because this is what AOC believes, This is what the
Democratic Party believes. I will say it again. They are
telling you what they think about this country. When they
do it, believe them when they tell you they hate
this country. Believe them when they tell you that they
want to destroy this country. Believe them when they tell
you that America is evil and that's what they're saying.
(32:42):
Believe that that is what they believe in. So the
midterms are coming, and if you want to know what
the midterms are about, this is what the midterms are about.
This is the whole ballgame. This is what they want
to happen to America. You destroy it from within, and
(33:03):
you recreated it as a socialist, communist, Marxist society. I
want to get your phone calls one A hundred four
seven four nine seven three two one eight hundred four
seven four nine to seven three to two patriotmonble dot
com phone lines are open. We'll get your thoughts, your
reaction to all this, see what you think about it.
(33:25):
And again AOC coming out saying this, it truly is incredible.
It's also not surprising that this is what she believes,
and this is why she's sang it the way she's
saying it. She wants this country to burn to the ground,
and then she wants the AOC's the world that would
be her and any others to be the ones that
(33:49):
are in charge of it. That's the goal and if
you are a successful person, be ready. Okay, I just
be ready because they also want to bring you down.
They literally want.
Speaker 2 (34:03):
To take you down. Don't forget.
Speaker 1 (34:07):
Share this podcast wherever you can with your family and
your friends, and I'll see you back here tomorrow
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Bleep! with Ana Navarro
Fear thrives in silence and confusion. Ana Navarro rejects both. Her voice is an antidote to today’s chaos. Her new podcast, Bleep! with Ana Navarro, takes on today’s most pressing issues with the voices most connected to it: decision-makers, political leaders, cultural shapers, and people on the frontlines of the story. The conversations acknowledge the emotions we all feel—despair, sadness, fear— but emerge with knowledge, perspective, and hope. The belief is simple: fearless dialogue can transform fear into courage, and courage into change. When fear dominates the headlines, this show digs deeper. Because information, debate, and conversation don’t just ease fear, they give us power to shape the future.
Hey Jonas!
Hey Jonas! The official Jonas Brothers podcast. Hosted by Kevin, Joe, and Nick Jonas. It’s the Jonas Brothers you know... musicians, actors, and well, yes, brothers. Now, they’re sharing another side of themselves in the playful, intimate, and irreverent way only they can. Spend time with the Jonas Brothers here and stay a little bit longer for deep conversations like never before.