June 10, 2026 • 48 mins
Spencer Pratt was winning the LA mayor's race on election night — then the mail-in ballots came in, and the count flipped to two socialists.
David Rutherford — former Navy SEAL and CIA-trained intelligence officer — breaks down the LA mayor's race vote-by-vote: how Pratt's election-night lead collapsed as 80%+ mail-in ballots rolled in over the following week, handing the November runoff to incumbent Karen Bass and city councilmember Nathalia Raman. You'll learn how California's consolidated primary works, why no-ID mail-in balloting makes these races nearly impossible to lose, and how the stalled SAVE Act fits the bigger picture. David connects it to Thomas Massie's Kentucky primary, the filibuster math killing voter-ID reform, and his core argument: corrupted elections — not an EMP or economic collapse — are the real threat to the Republic.
This is a domestic-stakes briefing for anyone who's stopped trusting the count.
Sponsors:
☕ Black Rifle Coffee: https://www.blackriflecoffee.com/
🏫 Get coaching by David Rutherford: https://www.froglogicinstitute.com/
00:00 — Our election systems are broken
04:30 — The LA race, vote by vote: how Pratt's lead vanished
12:10 — Karen Bass, the budget, and the Palisades fires
16:40 — Who is Nathalia Raman?
22:30 — Massie's Kentucky primary: was it fraud?
30:00 — The SAVE Act and the filibuster wall
40:00 — What you do now: watch your local numbers
Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Welcome back to the show, everybody.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
I'm your host, David Rutt Rutherford, and I'll tell you what,
hands down, our election systems are completely broken. In the
latest debacle that we've seen is the LA mayors race
and only comes a few weeks after the debacle of
the Thomas Massey primary. And what I conclusively believe is
(00:25):
that our election systems are completely destroyed. You know, there's
a smidgeon of understanding that there might be something.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
Legal or normal about.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
These things, so there aren't a complete revolt yet, but
as soon as you scratch the surface on any one
of these, it's completely obvious that we are in a
massive problem right now dealing with corrupt election systems. Now,
in this one, you had the infamous reality TV star
(01:00):
Spencer Pratt, who, by the way, I loved his campaign.
I loved his grassroots I love the way his advertising work,
I love the whole aspect about him, you know, and
he's up against the incumbent former communists probably still communists,
Karen Bass and Nathiah Rahman, who is a spoken Democratic
(01:26):
socialist and city council member. And what we saw over
one week period was nothing short of just in our
faces guess what.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
We don't care.
Speaker 2 (01:39):
You're not going to stop us, You're not gonna impede
us from this corruption continuing. We're just gonna actually wait
until we get enough votes or we pull in enough
mail in bow votes and tell the person that we
want goes into the runoff. And in California is unique
in that way where they don't separate Democratic primary Republican primary.
Speaker 1 (02:01):
They both.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
They have a one consolidated primary that generates a runoff
between the top two, kind of like a true democratic
system over like over in Europe. What they have and
what we saw as of the latest counts with ninety
three percent tabulated, Karen Bass has thirty four percent of
(02:23):
the vote with two hundred and seventy five thousand, nine
hundred and ninety two votes. Nathiah Raymond Ramin surge pass
Spencer Pratt yesterday with twenty eight point five percent that's
two hundred and twenty nine thousand, five hundred and seventy
six votes, and Spencer Pratt coming in at twenty five
point eight percent with two hundred and seven thousand, seven
hundred and fifty seven votes. Now, all you have to
(02:48):
do is go back to the day of voting and
realize when these votes came in that day it was
Karen Bass in the lead, Spencer Pratt with a considerable
lead in the high twenty percentage area, and then Nathia
in the low teens when she initially well, guess what
(03:08):
happens in the wonderful world of California politics with no
voter ID required, no ID required, mail and open mail
in balloting season, we have seen progressively day after day
both Karen Bass and the Thaia Ramen getting a substantial
(03:29):
portion of those mail in ballots coming in over and
over and over again now again on election nights, when
the polls closed at eight pm, Karen Bass and this
is roughly forty six percent of the votes had come in.
Karen Bass had a strong lead with thirty five to
thirty seven Spencer Pratt, as I said, just under thirty
(03:51):
Nathia Ramen low twenties, teens, And basically it looked like
Spencer Pratt was going to pull off this victory. And
as things went on June thirty more Dump came in
with about twenty percent to Pratt and twenty three percent.
Speaker 1 (04:12):
But on June fifth and six.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
Thursday Friday updates significance of Later mail in ballots came
in and Romin gamed a massive lead or jump in
these with pulling in twenty three thousand, five hundred votes
to Pratt's ten thousand, three hundred and shrinking Pratt's lead
from thirty three to twenty thousand, and Pratt's share dropped
(04:38):
to twenty eight percent, right with Romens rising to twenty
five On June seventh through eighth, this is the weekend
Sunday to Monday updates right. Guess what more for Raman
came in and she growing to Roman overtook Pratt for
second place with a narrow lead a few thousand, growing
(04:58):
to twenty one thousand by final report tallies as of
ninety three, standing stabilized Bass thirty four percent, Robin twenty.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
Eight, and Pret twenty five.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
Now, most of these votes that have obviously come in
were mail in votes, which dominated the total ballots of LA.
Of the LA Mayor's race about eighty plus percent, right,
so in person vote centers tolerated about nineteen percent.
Speaker 1 (05:29):
So what they're.
Speaker 2 (05:30):
Trying to tell you is that nobody goes to the
polls in LA because they can simply mail in their
vote and it's a lot easier, and there's there's no
hurdles to jump. They're just they just get their you know,
their ballot in the mail, they fill it out, they
bringing it to a collection, or they hand it to
somebody knocking on the door collecting ballots, or you know,
(05:50):
even if they're homeless people on the street. James O'Keefe
a great expose exposing the fact that there are certain
NGOs going around giving a person on a homeless person,
telling them what to fill in and collecting their ballots. Right,
and remember, LA is somewhere between sixty to seventy thousand
homeless people. But that's a pretty substantial place to aggregate
(06:15):
votes if you ask me, allegedly. Right anyways, I just
want you to think about this, right and after what
we've seen in terms of LA, in particular the fires
that took place recently which built burned out all of
the Pacific Palisades, which is one of the most high
end neighborhoods, right, It's where a lot of wealthy people live,
(06:38):
kind of west of Hollywood.
Speaker 1 (06:40):
Kind of up in the hills down towards the coastline.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
There. We lost a bunch there, they lost a bunch
of homes in Malibu as well too, from fires that
essentially could have been provoked prevented.
Speaker 1 (06:54):
But the giant reservoir that.
Speaker 2 (06:56):
Was just up over the hill of the Pacific Sages
was empty and that as a result of Karen bass initiatives.
Right meanwhile, while the fires were going on, Karen Bass
was over in Nigeria doing some political event. We don't know,
maybe some other events. We have no idea really what
she was doing, but she wasn't around for things. We
(07:17):
also know that she made substantial cuts and not only
the LAPD but also in the La Fire Department when
she got into office. Right now, if you're not sure
of who she is or who Karen Bass is, you
know she has historic roots and connections to Cuba and
(07:39):
the communist regime of Cuba back in the nineteen seventies
and was a hardcore activist that have worked her way
up and gained access as the mayor of La County.
Mayor of La Now, what's interesting is I went in
and looked at what the budget have been under Bass rule,
(08:00):
and you know, in twenty three, twenty four, they had
a thirteen billion dollar budget with a record one point
three billion for housing in homelessness, including two hundred and
fifty million for Inside Safe, which was a construction of
mobile little home type things. And then they had a
(08:22):
three point two billion for the LAPD focused on emergency responses,
which if you look at crime, crime is shot up
in La County since she's been in office now twenty
five twenty six. Guess what with all the spending, they
immediately went into a one billion dollar budget deficit, involved
in consolidations, positioned limitations, and some hiring slowdowns. Right now,
(08:45):
the projected budget twenty six twenty seven is fourteen point
eight five So from twenty three twenty four at thirteen
now they're twenty six to twenty seven, it went up
to fourteen point eight five billion. That's almost a two
billion dollar dollar increased in spending. Meanwhile, nothing has improved.
Well that's not quite true. They have had some reduction
(09:09):
in homelessness in let's say sustained funding. Let me see
hold the line. Major project here you go in Inside Safe.
This is the Homelessness Response, which is a flagship voluntary
program to clear encampments and move people to interim housing
with services for permanent placement. Over one hundred and twenty
(09:34):
seven operations, thousands were moved indoor, thirty six hundred people
in one period contributed to a seventeen to eighteen percent
drop in unsheltered homelessness.
Speaker 1 (09:47):
Right. The problem is, and they.
Speaker 2 (09:49):
Cleared about seventy five total encampments, which is I guess
a start. Now, obviously you want to come with the
nuance of these things.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
Right.
Speaker 2 (10:03):
The cost of this program was three hundred million dollars
to remove seventy five encampments and get thirty six hundred
peep off the streets. Now, there was a recidivism where
they lost a certain level of these people went back
on the streets right now. The other is a housing
production which streamlines one hundred percent affordable housing approvals.
Speaker 1 (10:26):
And this is a sixty day process.
Speaker 2 (10:29):
Mind you, there has been no approvals to rebuild houses
in the Pacific Palisades from devastating fire. But they have
a sixty day process that expedites being able to get
homeless people in these small little units that they're building
right now, the citywide rezoning to meet and exceed a
(10:50):
state goal of four hundred and fifty six thousand units. Now,
I don't know about you, but I've been to LA
been out there recently. I have no idea where they're
going to pay four hundred and fifty six thousand new
units for these people, but it should be interesting to
see in the projected future how this comes. And this
program will obviously fall on the shoulders or whoever gets
(11:12):
gets this gets the nomination and becomes the next mayor.
There are also other concerns about the upcoming twenty twenty
eight Olympics that are going to be in LA.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
We'll see what happens with that.
Speaker 2 (11:30):
But Karen Bassis to one who's been running the programs
which we haven't seen any really sizeable improvement and a
two billion dollar increase in budget. All right, now, the
other person running for this is Nathiah Raymond Raman.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
Sorry.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
Now, she was born in India, if you don't know,
was naturalized at twenty two and she's got an AB
in social studies, in particular political theory from Harvard University. Now,
if you've heard me ever talk about critical theory, critical
race theory, critical gender theory, political theory. All of this
(12:10):
stems from basically Karl Marx back in the days. It's
postmodernistic belief and thinking that you know the people should
be in control of their own destiny, led by the
chosen few, the real diehard socialists, if you will. And
she has a master's in city planning from MIT. Great
(12:33):
great resume. Really cool. Now she has been her early work,
she was founded the transparent Channaani Research firm focused on
urban sanitation and poverty issues in India. We don't know
much about how she's improved the slum issues in India,
but I'm sure she's done phenomenal. But in Los Angele
(12:56):
moved in twenty thirteen to Los Angeles and she worked
for the city administrative officer. She co chaired the Silver
Lake Neighborhood Council for Homelessness Committee and co founded the
sale Selah the Neighborhood Homeless Coalition, a nonprofit outreach for
unhoused residents residents in Silver Lake, Echo Park and Hollywood.
(13:20):
And she served as the executive director of Times Up Entertainment,
an anti advocacy harassment organization. So when you look at that,
it seems pretty much to me like this woman has
been jockeying to become a politician since her early life. Now,
in her tenure as city council she defeated the incumbanent
(13:42):
David Rye or Ryu Rue in twenty twenty, who was
in council for seventeen years.
Speaker 1 (13:50):
They described it as.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
A political earthquake, right, and she was re elected decisively
in twenty twenty four. And she's the first South Asian
and first Asian American woman on the LA City Council.
Now key role so far she has been the chair
of Housing and Homeless Committee. Go figure, right, the most
(14:12):
corrupt aspect of budgeting within the LA County budget, and
both her and Karen Bass are intimately connected to these programs. Right.
Speaker 1 (14:24):
She was also.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
The vice chair of the Rules, Elections and Inner Governmental
Relations Committees and land Use Committees, which I find it
fascinating there too, also served as the assistant president pro
tempora for the environmental committees as well. Now, when you
(14:48):
go through her services and budgetary, what she's done, it's
not very bright, But that's the person that it seems
that La County residents would want to get in there, right,
especially with this late dumps of mail in voting. All
the people once they realize, oh, I need to get
my vote in after the day to support who either
(15:13):
a communist or a democratic socialist mayor.
Speaker 1 (15:16):
Why do you think that is?
Speaker 2 (15:18):
Now, don't even get me started about Gavin Newsom. In fact,
he just passed a state bill recently that basically makes
it illegal to question elections, to analyze elections, to dig
in elections, and all that.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
Meanwhile, now we're.
Speaker 2 (15:36):
Facing some very strong questions about potential election fraud with
mail in balloting. I just I don't even I don't
even know what to think to myself right now. It's
one of those things that you get what you ask for,
and the people of LA are getting what they ask for.
(15:58):
But what I believe is they're not. I don't believe
this is a reality. I believe that there is something
nefarious going on. I believe they have perfected the program
of seeing what the initial vote tech counts were and
then driving an entire ecosystem of front excuse me, a
fraudulent mail in ballot collection to overturn elections in the days, weeks,
(16:23):
months that come after elections in California. Now, I just
if you live in LA and you pay taxes and
you're law abiding citizen, I have no idea how you
could in any right mind vote for the socialist people
that are literally destroying the city and in my opinion,
(16:46):
the county as well too, But that's another another deal
all right Now, I just want to really talk about
my incredible partnership with one of my best friends, and
that's Evan Hafer and the boys over at Black Rifle Coffee.
I'm so honored to be a part of their organization
(17:09):
and just really can't thank them enough for allowing me
to participate.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
What I want you to do is go to.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
Black Riflecoffee dot com and I want to check out
their new energy drinks. They have these incredible energy drinks
that you can buy at all different kinds of stores Walmart,
Bath Sports and others. Or you can go online in
order and if you want to put in your little
promo code Frog Logic two zero there you get a
(17:38):
little discount on stuff there. I highly recommend that. For me,
it's my morning coffee. I am addicted to. Black Rifle
Coffee is just black. I think the Tiger Stripe Canmo
definitely reels me in. The Other one I love is
the ak Espresso. This one right here is phenomenal. Love
(17:58):
these but they have so many different and things that
you could get at Black Rifle Coffee.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
You will love it again.
Speaker 2 (18:05):
When you go over Black Riflecoffee dot Com and you're
checking out, type in frog Logic to zero, get your
little discount quote and tell them.
Speaker 1 (18:13):
Already R sent you.
Speaker 2 (18:15):
So to all those folks out there who love coffee
like I do, please do yourself a favor and go
over and check out my.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
Brothers at b R C C what this has to do.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
Obviously, if you've paid attention to the show, you realize
that I've been covering a ton of stuff on election
fraud all last year and especially you know, some last year,
and definitely into the first part of this year and
the lead up to the primaries and the midterm elections,
because I believe we're going to see fraud at not
only a national scale like we did in the twenty
(18:51):
twenty elections, but we're gonna see fraud in primaries. We're
going to see it in state elections, in municipality elections.
We're going to see it at every single level of
the electoral system. And in my mind, this is the
this is the thing that ends up leading us to
whatever crazy outcomes you want to grand predict, whether it's secession,
(19:16):
whether it's it's counties or cities taking things into their
own hands, whether it's a federal thing, because there's talk
that that Trump wants to send out Civil Rights Division
out to LA to start seeing if their rights have
been He signed multiple executive orders something in his first
(19:37):
term that gives you know, them the right to go
and investigate any place they believe that civil rights have
been abused by unfair and corrupt elections. Obviously, we saw
the DJ a couple months ago go down into Georgia
and seize all of the ballots that were from the
Georgia twenty twenty election fraud that took place in Fulton
(19:59):
County in other counties, so we know they're active in support.
Speaker 1 (20:03):
We know.
Speaker 2 (20:06):
Tulci Gabbert who recently left the cabinet because her husband
is sick. There's a lot of conspiracy theories or theories
that she walked away because none of the investigations she
we're doing, we're being blocked at everyone in. One of
the major investigations I believe she was a part of
was the investigation on whether or not electronic voting systems
(20:27):
are illegitimate, and that's mainly smartmatic dominion eesn s who
plenty of people have made allegations that these are not
legitimate election systems, and you combine that with the mail
in voting and basically there's nothing left of legit. Now,
I always have people go, well, rut, that's just the Democrats, man,
(20:52):
they're the cheaters.
Speaker 1 (20:53):
Right, slow your role. Let me prove my point all right.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
Now, Obviously, even if you don't believe that Thomas Massey
and Ed Gerene or whatever his name is, election wasn't fraudulent,
we certainly know that a tremendous amount of outside super
pack and pack money influenced that campaign at a high degree. Now,
(21:23):
I went in and I looked at mail in voting
for this system, right, and so I found this interesting
in the Kentucky district for primary between Massey and Ed Gallerin.
Speaker 1 (21:42):
Right, I'm gonna give you those numbers in sec.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
I just want to go back now the twenty twenty
four Republican primary, Massy primary there was Massey won easily
against two challengers with thirty nine thousand votes out of
fifty two thousand votes. So he got thirty nine thousand votes.
Right now, there was no predominant breakdown of absent to
(22:08):
or mail in ballots for that one turnout was mandate,
and so I don't have any of that. And then
in twenty twenty two first primary he won fifty thousand,
three hundred and one votes seventy five percent out of
sixty six thousand, and then in twenty twenty he won
sixty eight thousand, five hundred and out of eighty four
(22:31):
so the max vote in the primary. The last three
prior to this one was all Massy eighty four thousand
votes in twenty total, sixty six total thousand votes in
twenty two, and only fifty two thousand total in twenty four,
so it went from eighty down to fifty, with Massy
(22:54):
traditionally giving in the seventies in terms of turnout. Now
here's the results the overall rate Galleran won the overall
race UH fifty seven thousand UM to forty seven thousand,
so total votes is one hundred and five thousand, three
(23:15):
hundred and sixty one, so it went up by twenty
five thirty thousand votes total, right, Galleran won fifty six. Now,
as in terms of absentee or mail in ballots, Galleran
of a total nineteen thousand, Galleran ed won ten eight
(23:37):
hundred and fifty four and Massy won eighty four eight thousand,
four hundred and twenty one, so the overall race was
fifty five to forty five. The mail in margin was
a significant factor in his victory. The mail in portion
he won by two thousand, four hundred and thirty three votes.
All right, So was that corrupt? I don't know. The
(24:02):
last three primaries there were no significant absentee ballots or
mail in ballots that they've I was able to find.
You know what you have with the primaries, but we
do know we had a total of nineteen thousand come
in for this one. So again they're like, rut, that
(24:26):
is not enough evidence to say it's crup All right,
check give you that. But what I will say is
when you go back and you talk to people like David.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
Clement Clements or or.
Speaker 2 (24:42):
Sean Shaw, Colonel Shaw, and or you go listen to
James o'keef recent stuff, or you listen to Nick Shirley's stuff,
or you listen to some of these other people.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
Even you have Elon Musk.
Speaker 2 (24:59):
Jumping into mix every day, going hard right now for
these elections.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
So let me let me, let me tell you what.
Speaker 2 (25:08):
When you put all this together through my own deductive reasoning,
as well as, you know, reading seminal works such as
Stolen Elections by Ralph Pazzulu, which was led by an
investigation from Gary Bernstein and Martin Rudel. Gary Bernston's a
former case officer, you know, very respected case officer for
(25:31):
twenty plus years at the agency. Martin Rudel was a
human source intelligence expert for DEA working against the cartels.
They did a deep investigation into electronic voting machines. You know,
I think it's pretty, pretty, pretty invaluable that you said
there's a lot more going on here. Now there's another
guy I'm following online that I think you should go
(25:53):
check out on x His name is Mark Cook, and
it's patriot Mark Cook, and he is an election in
cybersecurity SME and his postings are absolutely flawless in terms
of his comprehensive assessment of how all this corruption is
(26:14):
being used and waged against you and me, the American people,
Because at the end of the day, guess what if
we don't have our elections, we got nothing whatsoever. The
whole pretense of the Constitution, the Bill Wrights, and everything
else is the fact that every person has one vote,
(26:35):
and that vote is counted correctly in terms of who
we want to be represented by.
Speaker 1 (26:40):
That's the whole crux of the whole thing.
Speaker 2 (26:43):
And then if we don't believe we have the ability
to speak out openly against it and get things changed
by peacefully protesting, and then if it doesn't go well,
then we deserve the right to throw off the shackles
of that tyranny, if you know.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
What I mean, wink nod, Not all right, So.
Speaker 2 (27:05):
What is the major problem, Well, the major problem is
I believe that on the internal structure of the uniparty politics,
why the hell would they want to give up these
opportunities either side because both sides can play at this
game right. Both sides can go out harvest ballots, Both
(27:29):
sides can have super part packs pay thirty million dollars
for a primary. Both parties can go out and potentially
convince their state lawmakers to use dominion voting machines or
smartmatic or esn s or whoever is out there that
has these CD backgrounds. And you know, date, you know,
(27:52):
have some very substantial questions that have never really genuinely
been asked in terms of source code, where it.
Speaker 1 (28:00):
Comes from how it's used.
Speaker 2 (28:02):
You know, access to these machines, Internet, access to machine
all this stuff has been proven to exist. And it's
not solely by the MyPillow guy, which is everybody. What
do you get your information from, Mike Linnell to might
know from very smart cybersecurity experts that served in the
military and for the US government at very high levels.
(28:24):
That's my sources, and those are the people I'm trusting
that have informed me as to the magnitude of this corruption.
And this is not just in city, state and federal elections.
This is internationally. All you got to do is take
a look at what's going on in South Korea right now.
There's there's mass protests in the streets about the corrupt
(28:49):
elections that are taking place. Just go and take a
little peruse down that that what's going on there. We've
seen it where in all different other their countries overseas.
In Europe, we've seen it with the a f D
in Germany, We've seen it with what Romania. We've seen
(29:10):
it down in Brazil. Right in Brazil, they're imprisoning their
the Pete Bolsonaro, and they want to prison his son.
You know, their elections mysteriously flipped in the last minute.
Now there is an interesting thing that's going on. And
I saw someone post, well, look at this, we got
rid of us A i D, which is a notorious
(29:33):
supporter of NGLs, that NGOs that help with election integrity overseas.
Just listen, dig into any of Mike Ben's in the
work he does online, is his seminal work to expose
the National Endowment for Democracy and all these you know
USA I D supported who are in election integrity experts
(29:55):
overseas and flipping elections.
Speaker 1 (29:58):
And we got rid of them.
Speaker 2 (29:59):
And there's been a staunch wave of right leaning conservative
people that are winning elections all over the world now
that USAID is is gone. Now again allegedly, I always
have to say that correlation. But again, just go listen
to any number of Mike Bends's stream where he gets
into how this stuff all works and how it happens
(30:22):
all right, now, think about all this. So you've got
all this, So what if your President Trump, who basically.
Speaker 1 (30:31):
Ran and.
Speaker 2 (30:35):
Ran on some pretty hardcore statements suggesting that the twenty
twenty election was fraudulent. Now I fundamentally believe that it
was fraudulent, in particular in Nevada, in Arizona, in Georgia,
in Pennsylvania, in Wisconsin, and in Michigan at one hundred
(30:56):
percent believe that there is fraudulent activity taking place there
on a scale level, not just there was thirty five
people on the voter rules that you know we're dead
and voted right, ask yourself, you know, do a little
quick rock search or chap et GPT. How many states
has has rejected the requests from the US federal government
(31:20):
Trump's government right now to gain access to their voter
roles and to purge them. Right there are literal legal
battles taking place right now against the Trump administration fighting
back not to release their voter rules, the state voter rolls,
which are unless the only reason that you want to
do that is so you can cheat with mail invalliding
(31:42):
in my opinion. Now, now, how do you get this guy,
President Trump, this guy who's going to bring elections back.
He's going to fix elections, right, that was one of
his promises that he made to us all. How come
the Save Act has not passed?
Speaker 1 (31:59):
Right? And I know what you say, they're like, rot.
That's not Trump's fault.
Speaker 2 (32:03):
He can't get the Senate in Thune and the four
Republican Senators to vote for this.
Speaker 1 (32:10):
And I'm like, Okay, I guess not. I guess that's true.
Speaker 2 (32:15):
It certainly has passed in the House three times, which
seems to be some type of momentum for sure. And
to give you a little bit of timeline about this, right,
and this is the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, a
later expanded to Save America Act, And it is a
(32:35):
Republican land bill requiring documentary proof of US citizens, such
as a birth certificate of passport, to register to vote
in federal elections. Later versions have also added photo ID
requirements for voting. It has passed the House multiple times,
but never all right, so the precursor version and the
one hundred and eighteenth Congress in May of twenty twenty four,
(32:58):
introduced by chip Roy, right passed the House two hundred
and twenty one to one hundred and ninety eight, pretty
good sizable margin there. Right went to the Senate, stalled
and died. Twenty twenty five version the Save Act this
is the January third to twenty five reintroduced by the
(33:18):
House by chip Roy and referred to the House Administration
Committee January sixteenth. The companion bill S one twenty eight
was introduced by this to the Senator by Mike Lee.
In April twenty ten, the twenty twenty five HR twenty
two passed the House two hundred and twenty to two
hundred and eight right, two hundred and sixteen Republicans in
(33:41):
four Democrats April twenty five. Again, it stalled out in
the Senate, received in the Senate, installed in April tenth.
All right, here's the twenty twenty sixth version we saw
January twenty ninth to thirtieth, the twenty twenty six Save
America Act, again introduced by Chip Roy. Senate companion introduction
(34:02):
by Mike Lee with Senator John Corn who, by the way,
just lost his primary to Ken Baxon, and that was
a big piece of this whole Save Act thing, and
he got on late on that to try and push
himself over the edge. But Trump ended up supporting Packs
and I think Pason was gonna win no matter what.
I don't think people in Texas like Korn, but whatever.
(34:25):
February this version added photo ID requirements for voting in
federal elections. February eleventh, twenty twenty six passed the House
twenty eighteen to twenty thirteen. Mara, margin's getting more narrow, right.
That's what happens when you can whip votes against or
four in these things linger in the voting process, you
(34:49):
have a tendency to close the gap more over time.
Speaker 1 (34:52):
Right on.
Speaker 2 (34:55):
On March seventeenth, the Senate began a debate and deliberations
on the BI bill. In April, it failed an attempt
to attach the bill to or keep provisions to other
legislation via a procedural vote.
Speaker 1 (35:07):
So a procedural.
Speaker 2 (35:08):
Vote impeded Thoon being able to put it in for
a vote on the floor in the Senate. June twenty six,
another attempt to add it as an amendment to the
seventy billion dollars funding DHS funding bill, and that failed
in the Senate forty eight to fifty, and another procedural vote.
(35:30):
Now the Republicans who voted against it were Senator Susan
Collins from Maine, Mitch McConnell from Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski from Alaska,
and Tom Tillis right from North Carolina. As of June ninth,
the bill remained stalled in the Senate and has not
received a full floor vote on passage, and is considered
(35:51):
unlikely to advance without the sixty.
Speaker 1 (35:54):
Votes to overcome the filibuster. All right, so what does
this tell me?
Speaker 2 (36:00):
Right? Not? What's the one thing that that inevitably stops
corruption at all times?
Speaker 1 (36:07):
Right? I think it's three things.
Speaker 2 (36:09):
Right. One, it's it's same day voting unless you have
some extenuating circumses you're in an old age home, you're
not mobile, you can't get there, you have a job,
you have kids, something like that. But again, there's nobody
checking these applications. You know, you put it in, Nobody's like, oh,
I'll give you a call and follow up.
Speaker 1 (36:30):
Again.
Speaker 2 (36:30):
Remember, in all of the corruption you're seeing, the number
one reason is there's.
Speaker 1 (36:35):
There's no follow up.
Speaker 2 (36:36):
Like the h one visas visa fiasco that we're seeing
just unravel this this week, Like one hundred thousand of
these applications went in, not a single follow up on
any single one to see if the information was correct.
Go back to the Somalia stuff in New in Minnesota, California,
and Maine, no follow up, nothing, nobody checking to see
(36:58):
if the corruption is it. So you think that is
going to be checking to see if there's the mail
in balloting is correct, and the people say who they
are and where they are.
Speaker 1 (37:07):
Now, that's not going to happen. So you got to
get right.
Speaker 2 (37:12):
Same day again, same day, everybody shows up, they go
to the polls, they show up right then while they're there,
they show in ID in proof of citizenship. Now, the
way people are responding to that, well, not everybody has
a passport right, which for I think for some is true,
and not everybody has can bring their Social Security card
(37:34):
or their Social Security papers or whatever, which is a
basically you go to a website, you can enter your stuff,
download it and send it to you.
Speaker 1 (37:43):
It's pretty easy electronically. Now.
Speaker 2 (37:45):
So what you gotta do is you got to make
on your license is what your nationality is.
Speaker 1 (37:51):
That's what happens.
Speaker 2 (37:53):
Federal Department of Motor Vehicles requires national law that on
your alliance shows your citizenship on your license.
Speaker 1 (38:00):
That's just what has to happen. And there you have.
You knock out everything in one place.
Speaker 2 (38:05):
Right, So that's the way you fix it, and the
Save Act is the most beautiful start. Now, got understand
most polling shows that about eighty percent of American population
believes this is not a big deal.
Speaker 1 (38:18):
It should be standard. Those who say, well, what about it?
Speaker 2 (38:23):
It hurts minorities because they don't have access to all
this stuff. And I love the on the street interviews.
People go into you know, Harlem, or into some place
in Atlanta or LA and they're like, you know, do
you have an ID to get a bank?
Speaker 1 (38:38):
Yeah, of course, I got it. Do you have an
ID to drive?
Speaker 2 (38:40):
Yeah, of course I got Do you have an idea
to show that you can buy alcohol? Of course is
what do you think? I'm dumb. I don't know how
to get an ID. So all that is just ridiculous.
The latest argument they're making, in particular with the birth
certificate or the passports, is that women who got divorced
it's harder on them to get these documents and all that.
And again I've gone through through this. My wife changed
(39:01):
her name to me. I just adopted her. Two children,
we changed their names. We are dealing with a little
bit of a passport challenge with those documents. So I
will tell you that part is true. It is a
little bit challenging because it is a bureaucratic system of
people who work for minimum wage for the US government
sitting around looking at documents and working as fast or
(39:24):
as slow as their day takes them.
Speaker 1 (39:26):
Now that is a reality. I'm gonna give you that.
So that's why the end day.
Speaker 2 (39:29):
So anyways, the Save Act apparent basically eradicates all of
this problem, gets rid of it. But there are people
in the Senate who don't want to get rid of it,
who don't want to ruin this right. One is a
geriatric and we've watched have four strokes on camera with
Mitch McConnell.
Speaker 1 (39:49):
I can't even believe this.
Speaker 2 (39:52):
We know Susan Collins is pretty much a liberal the
way she runs main we know Mcal's is similar interviews
in Tom Tillis I believe as a hidden democrat as
well too. So you have all this, it's not going
to go anywhere. The bill's dead because you got the filibuster.
(40:13):
So what does everybody say, get rid of the philibuster,
which it seems like.
Speaker 1 (40:18):
We need to do that now.
Speaker 2 (40:19):
Granted we get rid of the philibuster, now they start
ramming through their stuff when.
Speaker 1 (40:24):
They're in office, and we got to deal with that.
So is the filibuster?
Speaker 2 (40:29):
Are we ever going to have a super majority again
with sixty Senate votes. I mean maybe if it keeps
devolving in these places, but if you live in a
democratic state or city with mail in valid, no vote
or ID, they're never going to lose these races. And
that's my point, right, So unless you enact some federal
(40:51):
emergency to investigate these elections, because I believe what it is,
it's a constitutional violation. Even if it's a city election,
it's a constitutional violation if there's corruption in city, state
or federal, especially federal elections. So I think you should
go into all these places where we've seen corruption, do
(41:12):
a full comprehensive investigation and see.
Speaker 1 (41:14):
What comes out.
Speaker 2 (41:16):
But it's not going to happen because the powers that be,
the people that are running the UTI Party or whatever,
the people that are are benefiting from the magnitude of
hundreds of billions of dollars in corruption. I haven't even
begun to cover the corruption in Social Security, which I'm
(41:36):
now is being predicted by twenty thirty or twenty thirty
two is insolvent. So all of your tax dollars you're
paying into Social Security, you're not even going to get
to see much less. The zoomers who are looking at
all this going like What the fuck is all this for?
Speaker 1 (41:51):
What am I even doing? Like? What is this for?
Elections are crooked? Politicians are crooked. There's corruption.
Speaker 2 (41:57):
For foreigners, they get free shit, they get free they
get free businesses. They send all their money overseas. I
can't get access to a loane. I'm in debt, college debt,
my credit card debt. You see what I'm saying. And
now that this final thing, and this is why I've
covered elections so substantially. Elections are the thing that are
(42:18):
going to bring the country down. There's no doubt it's
not going to be an emp it's not gonna be
an economic collapse, because as soon as those happen, you
go into emergency war powers, they lock everything down. And
unless they go back to the draconian shit of the
COVID days, because nobody's falling for that shit again, nobody's
being locked down.
Speaker 1 (42:36):
And if you do that, you're gonna have some problems.
But if you go into one of these places where you.
Speaker 2 (42:41):
Get you know, martial law put in because of these
other grander things, then everybody's just gonna roll over and
they'll accept that because they've been conditioned. But the elections,
the elections is the thing that can can garner a
true change. However, you can't garner the change and unless
you go in and you fully identify the corruption, which
(43:03):
most likely they won't do because they don't want to
expose any one particular side because if they do, then
they can't use the corruption system themselves. Now, once again,
I know what you're saying, Hey, rut Man, that's pretty
bleak stuff. But guess what you know, History's history, and
all you got to do is look back throughout history.
When the politicians or the people in control the imperial
(43:27):
regimes or whoever, the dictators whatever, once they cross the
line where there's no checks and balances in them, what
ends ups happening the eventual devolvement into totalitarian rule. Right,
digital currencies, social credit systems, election by phone, which they'll
(43:49):
never be a fair election again in the history if
you're voting on your phones.
Speaker 1 (43:53):
Right, all of that is on the precipice.
Speaker 2 (43:58):
So if we don't figure out how to do something
or change it, and guess what, it's on us because
we've allowed it to happen. Now, all you got to
do just do me a favor. Here's what I'm going
to ask you, all right, simple question, all right. I
want you to pay attention to your local races. I
want you to pay attention to your state races, and
(44:19):
I want you to pay attention and I want you
to pay attention to the numbers, all right. I want
you to pay attention to mail in ballot numbers. Do
they rise or fall from last elections? Pay attention to
the number of people showing up to vote? Is it
rising and falling? By how much? Pay attention to how
much money is spent in every election and by who
(44:40):
and by where? Right, Because we haven't even we haven't
even dug in the Justice Department hasn't even discovered the
magnitude of the Act Blue complete corruption system. Where you
know again James O'Keefe going in interviewing little old lady. Hey,
it says here by our docum that you've donated one
(45:01):
hundred and fifty seven times to Act Blue in the
last three years, totally one hundred and twenty five thousand dollars.
Oh no, no, no, I'm on a fixed budget. I
gave five dollars two months ago. That's all I've done.
No investigation, then again, probably is there anything in the
similar thing on the Republican National Committee, there could be.
I don't know has anybody done a deep dive on
(45:22):
the left side on this. When the system knows it
can get away with corruption, there is no such thing
as left or right, or conservative or liberal or whatever
you have been conditioned to break this down in it's
all the same. It's people in power not willing to
(45:45):
give up power in order to maintain their corruption schemes,
which is at our current thirty eight. Pretty soon thirty nine.
Are we at thirty No, we might even be at
thirty nine trillion dollar budget with a printing machine just
going and guess what. There's no incentive for these people
to stop. The only incentive comes from mass protests. So
(46:10):
whatever that looks like, I'll tell you what I think.
The best thing I've heard so far is ever you know,
you get fifty million people not paying their tax bill
for four months, that's what That would certainly wake them up.
You get ten million people on the mall protesting this
election fraud on both sides, that's gonna wake some people up, right,
(46:32):
But other than that, guess what, the fraud is just
gonna continue happening, all right. I'm excited to continue paying
attention to this debacle. I can't wait to see what
happens in the runoff with Bass and Ramen in June
or November or something like. That's what's crazy. The runoff
(46:53):
is of November. The one interesting aspect is Steve Hilton,
who's the Republican candidate for They let him pass through,
but guaranteed he doesn't win. Guaranteed, you know, Bass probably
takes over or or Nathiah might take over. They're both socialists,
So the free shit, we'll just keep going. Also, I
(47:15):
want you to think about the numbers involved in the
races that look suspect. I want you to think about
government subsidy programs right state, local, and federal. How much
money in those areas is at state in the budget breakdowns.
That's the other part of the numbers. All right, everybody,
(47:36):
I hope you enjoyed the show. I haven't done one
of these in a while. I hope you've been enjoying
a bunch of the others. Please don't forget to like,
subscribe and share content or make content on there. You
can find the show on all major podcast platforms. We
need your subscription, we need your commentary. Leave a note
on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or iHeart.
Speaker 1 (47:56):
We're really excited about that.
Speaker 2 (47:59):
Just you know, if you want to follow us or
on all social media apps at David Rutherford Show or
on X at d Rutherford Show, you can follow me.
I'm on Instagram and X at Team frog Logic my
original account. And yeah, if you want to know more
about what it is we do with our motivational speaking,
(48:20):
motivational coaching and training, or motivational curriculum, just visit David
Rutherford dot com and it's all there for you. All right,
hu Yah, God bless you, love you
Welcome back to the show, everybody.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
I'm your host, David Rutt Rutherford, and I'll tell you what,
hands down, our election systems are completely broken. In the
latest debacle that we've seen is the LA mayors race
and only comes a few weeks after the debacle of
the Thomas Massey primary. And what I conclusively believe is
(00:25):
that our election systems are completely destroyed. You know, there's
a smidgeon of understanding that there might be something.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
Legal or normal about.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
These things, so there aren't a complete revolt yet, but
as soon as you scratch the surface on any one
of these, it's completely obvious that we are in a
massive problem right now dealing with corrupt election systems. Now,
in this one, you had the infamous reality TV star
(01:00):
Spencer Pratt, who, by the way, I loved his campaign.
I loved his grassroots I love the way his advertising work,
I love the whole aspect about him, you know, and
he's up against the incumbent former communists probably still communists,
Karen Bass and Nathiah Rahman, who is a spoken Democratic
(01:26):
socialist and city council member. And what we saw over
one week period was nothing short of just in our
faces guess what.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
We don't care.
Speaker 2 (01:39):
You're not going to stop us, You're not gonna impede
us from this corruption continuing. We're just gonna actually wait
until we get enough votes or we pull in enough
mail in bow votes and tell the person that we
want goes into the runoff. And in California is unique
in that way where they don't separate Democratic primary Republican primary.
Speaker 1 (02:01):
They both.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
They have a one consolidated primary that generates a runoff
between the top two, kind of like a true democratic
system over like over in Europe. What they have and
what we saw as of the latest counts with ninety
three percent tabulated, Karen Bass has thirty four percent of
(02:23):
the vote with two hundred and seventy five thousand, nine
hundred and ninety two votes. Nathiah Raymond Ramin surge pass
Spencer Pratt yesterday with twenty eight point five percent that's
two hundred and twenty nine thousand, five hundred and seventy
six votes, and Spencer Pratt coming in at twenty five
point eight percent with two hundred and seven thousand, seven
hundred and fifty seven votes. Now, all you have to
(02:48):
do is go back to the day of voting and
realize when these votes came in that day it was
Karen Bass in the lead, Spencer Pratt with a considerable
lead in the high twenty percentage area, and then Nathia
in the low teens when she initially well, guess what
(03:08):
happens in the wonderful world of California politics with no
voter ID required, no ID required, mail and open mail
in balloting season, we have seen progressively day after day
both Karen Bass and the Thaia Ramen getting a substantial
(03:29):
portion of those mail in ballots coming in over and
over and over again now again on election nights, when
the polls closed at eight pm, Karen Bass and this
is roughly forty six percent of the votes had come in.
Karen Bass had a strong lead with thirty five to
thirty seven Spencer Pratt, as I said, just under thirty
(03:51):
Nathia Ramen low twenties, teens, And basically it looked like
Spencer Pratt was going to pull off this victory. And
as things went on June thirty more Dump came in
with about twenty percent to Pratt and twenty three percent.
Speaker 1 (04:12):
But on June fifth and six.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
Thursday Friday updates significance of Later mail in ballots came
in and Romin gamed a massive lead or jump in
these with pulling in twenty three thousand, five hundred votes
to Pratt's ten thousand, three hundred and shrinking Pratt's lead
from thirty three to twenty thousand, and Pratt's share dropped
(04:38):
to twenty eight percent, right with Romens rising to twenty
five On June seventh through eighth, this is the weekend
Sunday to Monday updates right. Guess what more for Raman
came in and she growing to Roman overtook Pratt for
second place with a narrow lead a few thousand, growing
(04:58):
to twenty one thousand by final report tallies as of
ninety three, standing stabilized Bass thirty four percent, Robin twenty.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
Eight, and Pret twenty five.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
Now, most of these votes that have obviously come in
were mail in votes, which dominated the total ballots of LA.
Of the LA Mayor's race about eighty plus percent, right,
so in person vote centers tolerated about nineteen percent.
Speaker 1 (05:29):
So what they're.
Speaker 2 (05:30):
Trying to tell you is that nobody goes to the
polls in LA because they can simply mail in their
vote and it's a lot easier, and there's there's no
hurdles to jump. They're just they just get their you know,
their ballot in the mail, they fill it out, they
bringing it to a collection, or they hand it to
somebody knocking on the door collecting ballots, or you know,
(05:50):
even if they're homeless people on the street. James O'Keefe
a great expose exposing the fact that there are certain
NGOs going around giving a person on a homeless person,
telling them what to fill in and collecting their ballots. Right,
and remember, LA is somewhere between sixty to seventy thousand
homeless people. But that's a pretty substantial place to aggregate
(06:15):
votes if you ask me, allegedly. Right anyways, I just
want you to think about this, right and after what
we've seen in terms of LA, in particular the fires
that took place recently which built burned out all of
the Pacific Palisades, which is one of the most high
end neighborhoods, right, It's where a lot of wealthy people live,
(06:38):
kind of west of Hollywood.
Speaker 1 (06:40):
Kind of up in the hills down towards the coastline.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
There. We lost a bunch there, they lost a bunch
of homes in Malibu as well too, from fires that
essentially could have been provoked prevented.
Speaker 1 (06:54):
But the giant reservoir that.
Speaker 2 (06:56):
Was just up over the hill of the Pacific Sages
was empty and that as a result of Karen bass initiatives.
Right meanwhile, while the fires were going on, Karen Bass
was over in Nigeria doing some political event. We don't know,
maybe some other events. We have no idea really what
she was doing, but she wasn't around for things. We
(07:17):
also know that she made substantial cuts and not only
the LAPD but also in the La Fire Department when
she got into office. Right now, if you're not sure
of who she is or who Karen Bass is, you
know she has historic roots and connections to Cuba and
(07:39):
the communist regime of Cuba back in the nineteen seventies
and was a hardcore activist that have worked her way
up and gained access as the mayor of La County.
Mayor of La Now, what's interesting is I went in
and looked at what the budget have been under Bass rule,
(08:00):
and you know, in twenty three, twenty four, they had
a thirteen billion dollar budget with a record one point
three billion for housing in homelessness, including two hundred and
fifty million for Inside Safe, which was a construction of
mobile little home type things. And then they had a
(08:22):
three point two billion for the LAPD focused on emergency responses,
which if you look at crime, crime is shot up
in La County since she's been in office now twenty
five twenty six. Guess what with all the spending, they
immediately went into a one billion dollar budget deficit, involved
in consolidations, positioned limitations, and some hiring slowdowns. Right now,
(08:45):
the projected budget twenty six twenty seven is fourteen point
eight five So from twenty three twenty four at thirteen
now they're twenty six to twenty seven, it went up
to fourteen point eight five billion. That's almost a two
billion dollar dollar increased in spending. Meanwhile, nothing has improved.
Well that's not quite true. They have had some reduction
(09:09):
in homelessness in let's say sustained funding. Let me see
hold the line. Major project here you go in Inside Safe.
This is the Homelessness Response, which is a flagship voluntary
program to clear encampments and move people to interim housing
with services for permanent placement. Over one hundred and twenty
(09:34):
seven operations, thousands were moved indoor, thirty six hundred people
in one period contributed to a seventeen to eighteen percent
drop in unsheltered homelessness.
Speaker 1 (09:47):
Right. The problem is, and they.
Speaker 2 (09:49):
Cleared about seventy five total encampments, which is I guess
a start. Now, obviously you want to come with the
nuance of these things.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
Right.
Speaker 2 (10:03):
The cost of this program was three hundred million dollars
to remove seventy five encampments and get thirty six hundred
peep off the streets. Now, there was a recidivism where
they lost a certain level of these people went back
on the streets right now. The other is a housing
production which streamlines one hundred percent affordable housing approvals.
Speaker 1 (10:26):
And this is a sixty day process.
Speaker 2 (10:29):
Mind you, there has been no approvals to rebuild houses
in the Pacific Palisades from devastating fire. But they have
a sixty day process that expedites being able to get
homeless people in these small little units that they're building
right now, the citywide rezoning to meet and exceed a
(10:50):
state goal of four hundred and fifty six thousand units. Now,
I don't know about you, but I've been to LA
been out there recently. I have no idea where they're
going to pay four hundred and fifty six thousand new
units for these people, but it should be interesting to
see in the projected future how this comes. And this
program will obviously fall on the shoulders or whoever gets
(11:12):
gets this gets the nomination and becomes the next mayor.
There are also other concerns about the upcoming twenty twenty
eight Olympics that are going to be in LA.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
We'll see what happens with that.
Speaker 2 (11:30):
But Karen Bassis to one who's been running the programs
which we haven't seen any really sizeable improvement and a
two billion dollar increase in budget. All right, now, the
other person running for this is Nathiah Raymond Raman.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
Sorry.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
Now, she was born in India, if you don't know,
was naturalized at twenty two and she's got an AB
in social studies, in particular political theory from Harvard University. Now,
if you've heard me ever talk about critical theory, critical
race theory, critical gender theory, political theory. All of this
(12:10):
stems from basically Karl Marx back in the days. It's
postmodernistic belief and thinking that you know the people should
be in control of their own destiny, led by the
chosen few, the real diehard socialists, if you will. And
she has a master's in city planning from MIT. Great
(12:33):
great resume. Really cool. Now she has been her early work,
she was founded the transparent Channaani Research firm focused on
urban sanitation and poverty issues in India. We don't know
much about how she's improved the slum issues in India,
but I'm sure she's done phenomenal. But in Los Angele
(12:56):
moved in twenty thirteen to Los Angeles and she worked
for the city administrative officer. She co chaired the Silver
Lake Neighborhood Council for Homelessness Committee and co founded the
sale Selah the Neighborhood Homeless Coalition, a nonprofit outreach for
unhoused residents residents in Silver Lake, Echo Park and Hollywood.
(13:20):
And she served as the executive director of Times Up Entertainment,
an anti advocacy harassment organization. So when you look at that,
it seems pretty much to me like this woman has
been jockeying to become a politician since her early life. Now,
in her tenure as city council she defeated the incumbanent
(13:42):
David Rye or Ryu Rue in twenty twenty, who was
in council for seventeen years.
Speaker 1 (13:50):
They described it as.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
A political earthquake, right, and she was re elected decisively
in twenty twenty four. And she's the first South Asian
and first Asian American woman on the LA City Council.
Now key role so far she has been the chair
of Housing and Homeless Committee. Go figure, right, the most
(14:12):
corrupt aspect of budgeting within the LA County budget, and
both her and Karen Bass are intimately connected to these programs. Right.
Speaker 1 (14:24):
She was also.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
The vice chair of the Rules, Elections and Inner Governmental
Relations Committees and land Use Committees, which I find it
fascinating there too, also served as the assistant president pro
tempora for the environmental committees as well. Now, when you
(14:48):
go through her services and budgetary, what she's done, it's
not very bright, But that's the person that it seems
that La County residents would want to get in there, right,
especially with this late dumps of mail in voting. All
the people once they realize, oh, I need to get
my vote in after the day to support who either
(15:13):
a communist or a democratic socialist mayor.
Speaker 1 (15:16):
Why do you think that is?
Speaker 2 (15:18):
Now, don't even get me started about Gavin Newsom. In fact,
he just passed a state bill recently that basically makes
it illegal to question elections, to analyze elections, to dig
in elections, and all that.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
Meanwhile, now we're.
Speaker 2 (15:36):
Facing some very strong questions about potential election fraud with
mail in balloting. I just I don't even I don't
even know what to think to myself right now. It's
one of those things that you get what you ask for,
and the people of LA are getting what they ask for.
(15:58):
But what I believe is they're not. I don't believe
this is a reality. I believe that there is something
nefarious going on. I believe they have perfected the program
of seeing what the initial vote tech counts were and
then driving an entire ecosystem of front excuse me, a
fraudulent mail in ballot collection to overturn elections in the days, weeks,
(16:23):
months that come after elections in California. Now, I just
if you live in LA and you pay taxes and
you're law abiding citizen, I have no idea how you
could in any right mind vote for the socialist people
that are literally destroying the city and in my opinion,
(16:46):
the county as well too, But that's another another deal
all right Now, I just want to really talk about
my incredible partnership with one of my best friends, and
that's Evan Hafer and the boys over at Black Rifle Coffee.
I'm so honored to be a part of their organization
(17:09):
and just really can't thank them enough for allowing me
to participate.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
What I want you to do is go to.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
Black Riflecoffee dot com and I want to check out
their new energy drinks. They have these incredible energy drinks
that you can buy at all different kinds of stores Walmart,
Bath Sports and others. Or you can go online in
order and if you want to put in your little
promo code Frog Logic two zero there you get a
(17:38):
little discount on stuff there. I highly recommend that. For me,
it's my morning coffee. I am addicted to. Black Rifle
Coffee is just black. I think the Tiger Stripe Canmo
definitely reels me in. The Other one I love is
the ak Espresso. This one right here is phenomenal. Love
(17:58):
these but they have so many different and things that
you could get at Black Rifle Coffee.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
You will love it again.
Speaker 2 (18:05):
When you go over Black Riflecoffee dot Com and you're
checking out, type in frog Logic to zero, get your
little discount quote and tell them.
Speaker 1 (18:13):
Already R sent you.
Speaker 2 (18:15):
So to all those folks out there who love coffee
like I do, please do yourself a favor and go
over and check out my.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
Brothers at b R C C what this has to do.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
Obviously, if you've paid attention to the show, you realize
that I've been covering a ton of stuff on election
fraud all last year and especially you know, some last year,
and definitely into the first part of this year and
the lead up to the primaries and the midterm elections,
because I believe we're going to see fraud at not
only a national scale like we did in the twenty
(18:51):
twenty elections, but we're gonna see fraud in primaries. We're
going to see it in state elections, in municipality elections.
We're going to see it at every single level of
the electoral system. And in my mind, this is the
this is the thing that ends up leading us to
whatever crazy outcomes you want to grand predict, whether it's secession,
(19:16):
whether it's it's counties or cities taking things into their
own hands, whether it's a federal thing, because there's talk
that that Trump wants to send out Civil Rights Division
out to LA to start seeing if their rights have
been He signed multiple executive orders something in his first
(19:37):
term that gives you know, them the right to go
and investigate any place they believe that civil rights have
been abused by unfair and corrupt elections. Obviously, we saw
the DJ a couple months ago go down into Georgia
and seize all of the ballots that were from the
Georgia twenty twenty election fraud that took place in Fulton
(19:59):
County in other counties, so we know they're active in support.
Speaker 1 (20:03):
We know.
Speaker 2 (20:06):
Tulci Gabbert who recently left the cabinet because her husband
is sick. There's a lot of conspiracy theories or theories
that she walked away because none of the investigations she
we're doing, we're being blocked at everyone in. One of
the major investigations I believe she was a part of
was the investigation on whether or not electronic voting systems
(20:27):
are illegitimate, and that's mainly smartmatic dominion eesn s who
plenty of people have made allegations that these are not
legitimate election systems, and you combine that with the mail
in voting and basically there's nothing left of legit. Now,
I always have people go, well, rut, that's just the Democrats, man,
(20:52):
they're the cheaters.
Speaker 1 (20:53):
Right, slow your role. Let me prove my point all right.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
Now, Obviously, even if you don't believe that Thomas Massey
and Ed Gerene or whatever his name is, election wasn't fraudulent,
we certainly know that a tremendous amount of outside super
pack and pack money influenced that campaign at a high degree. Now,
(21:23):
I went in and I looked at mail in voting
for this system, right, and so I found this interesting
in the Kentucky district for primary between Massey and Ed Gallerin.
Speaker 1 (21:42):
Right, I'm gonna give you those numbers in sec.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
I just want to go back now the twenty twenty
four Republican primary, Massy primary there was Massey won easily
against two challengers with thirty nine thousand votes out of
fifty two thousand votes. So he got thirty nine thousand votes.
Right now, there was no predominant breakdown of absent to
(22:08):
or mail in ballots for that one turnout was mandate,
and so I don't have any of that. And then
in twenty twenty two first primary he won fifty thousand,
three hundred and one votes seventy five percent out of
sixty six thousand, and then in twenty twenty he won
sixty eight thousand, five hundred and out of eighty four
(22:31):
so the max vote in the primary. The last three
prior to this one was all Massy eighty four thousand
votes in twenty total, sixty six total thousand votes in
twenty two, and only fifty two thousand total in twenty four,
so it went from eighty down to fifty, with Massy
(22:54):
traditionally giving in the seventies in terms of turnout. Now
here's the results the overall rate Galleran won the overall
race UH fifty seven thousand UM to forty seven thousand,
so total votes is one hundred and five thousand, three
(23:15):
hundred and sixty one, so it went up by twenty
five thirty thousand votes total, right, Galleran won fifty six. Now,
as in terms of absentee or mail in ballots, Galleran
of a total nineteen thousand, Galleran ed won ten eight
(23:37):
hundred and fifty four and Massy won eighty four eight thousand,
four hundred and twenty one, so the overall race was
fifty five to forty five. The mail in margin was
a significant factor in his victory. The mail in portion
he won by two thousand, four hundred and thirty three votes.
All right, So was that corrupt? I don't know. The
(24:02):
last three primaries there were no significant absentee ballots or
mail in ballots that they've I was able to find.
You know what you have with the primaries, but we
do know we had a total of nineteen thousand come
in for this one. So again they're like, rut, that
(24:26):
is not enough evidence to say it's crup All right,
check give you that. But what I will say is
when you go back and you talk to people like David.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
Clement Clements or or.
Speaker 2 (24:42):
Sean Shaw, Colonel Shaw, and or you go listen to
James o'keef recent stuff, or you listen to Nick Shirley's stuff,
or you listen to some of these other people.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
Even you have Elon Musk.
Speaker 2 (24:59):
Jumping into mix every day, going hard right now for
these elections.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
So let me let me, let me tell you what.
Speaker 2 (25:08):
When you put all this together through my own deductive reasoning,
as well as, you know, reading seminal works such as
Stolen Elections by Ralph Pazzulu, which was led by an
investigation from Gary Bernstein and Martin Rudel. Gary Bernston's a
former case officer, you know, very respected case officer for
(25:31):
twenty plus years at the agency. Martin Rudel was a
human source intelligence expert for DEA working against the cartels.
They did a deep investigation into electronic voting machines. You know,
I think it's pretty, pretty, pretty invaluable that you said
there's a lot more going on here. Now there's another
guy I'm following online that I think you should go
(25:53):
check out on x His name is Mark Cook, and
it's patriot Mark Cook, and he is an election in
cybersecurity SME and his postings are absolutely flawless in terms
of his comprehensive assessment of how all this corruption is
(26:14):
being used and waged against you and me, the American people,
Because at the end of the day, guess what if
we don't have our elections, we got nothing whatsoever. The
whole pretense of the Constitution, the Bill Wrights, and everything
else is the fact that every person has one vote,
(26:35):
and that vote is counted correctly in terms of who
we want to be represented by.
Speaker 1 (26:40):
That's the whole crux of the whole thing.
Speaker 2 (26:43):
And then if we don't believe we have the ability
to speak out openly against it and get things changed
by peacefully protesting, and then if it doesn't go well,
then we deserve the right to throw off the shackles
of that tyranny, if you know.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
What I mean, wink nod, Not all right, So.
Speaker 2 (27:05):
What is the major problem, Well, the major problem is
I believe that on the internal structure of the uniparty politics,
why the hell would they want to give up these
opportunities either side because both sides can play at this
game right. Both sides can go out harvest ballots, Both
(27:29):
sides can have super part packs pay thirty million dollars
for a primary. Both parties can go out and potentially
convince their state lawmakers to use dominion voting machines or
smartmatic or esn s or whoever is out there that
has these CD backgrounds. And you know, date, you know,
(27:52):
have some very substantial questions that have never really genuinely
been asked in terms of source code, where it.
Speaker 1 (28:00):
Comes from how it's used.
Speaker 2 (28:02):
You know, access to these machines, Internet, access to machine
all this stuff has been proven to exist. And it's
not solely by the MyPillow guy, which is everybody. What
do you get your information from, Mike Linnell to might
know from very smart cybersecurity experts that served in the
military and for the US government at very high levels.
(28:24):
That's my sources, and those are the people I'm trusting
that have informed me as to the magnitude of this corruption.
And this is not just in city, state and federal elections.
This is internationally. All you got to do is take
a look at what's going on in South Korea right now.
There's there's mass protests in the streets about the corrupt
(28:49):
elections that are taking place. Just go and take a
little peruse down that that what's going on there. We've
seen it where in all different other their countries overseas.
In Europe, we've seen it with the a f D
in Germany, We've seen it with what Romania. We've seen
(29:10):
it down in Brazil. Right in Brazil, they're imprisoning their
the Pete Bolsonaro, and they want to prison his son.
You know, their elections mysteriously flipped in the last minute.
Now there is an interesting thing that's going on. And
I saw someone post, well, look at this, we got
rid of us A i D, which is a notorious
(29:33):
supporter of NGLs, that NGOs that help with election integrity overseas.
Just listen, dig into any of Mike Ben's in the
work he does online, is his seminal work to expose
the National Endowment for Democracy and all these you know
USA I D supported who are in election integrity experts
(29:55):
overseas and flipping elections.
Speaker 1 (29:58):
And we got rid of them.
Speaker 2 (29:59):
And there's been a staunch wave of right leaning conservative
people that are winning elections all over the world now
that USAID is is gone. Now again allegedly, I always
have to say that correlation. But again, just go listen
to any number of Mike Bends's stream where he gets
into how this stuff all works and how it happens
(30:22):
all right, now, think about all this. So you've got
all this, So what if your President Trump, who basically.
Speaker 1 (30:31):
Ran and.
Speaker 2 (30:35):
Ran on some pretty hardcore statements suggesting that the twenty
twenty election was fraudulent. Now I fundamentally believe that it
was fraudulent, in particular in Nevada, in Arizona, in Georgia,
in Pennsylvania, in Wisconsin, and in Michigan at one hundred
(30:56):
percent believe that there is fraudulent activity taking place there
on a scale level, not just there was thirty five
people on the voter rules that you know we're dead
and voted right, ask yourself, you know, do a little
quick rock search or chap et GPT. How many states
has has rejected the requests from the US federal government
(31:20):
Trump's government right now to gain access to their voter
roles and to purge them. Right there are literal legal
battles taking place right now against the Trump administration fighting
back not to release their voter rules, the state voter rolls,
which are unless the only reason that you want to
do that is so you can cheat with mail invalliding
(31:42):
in my opinion. Now, now, how do you get this guy,
President Trump, this guy who's going to bring elections back.
He's going to fix elections, right, that was one of
his promises that he made to us all. How come
the Save Act has not passed?
Speaker 1 (31:59):
Right? And I know what you say, they're like, rot.
That's not Trump's fault.
Speaker 2 (32:03):
He can't get the Senate in Thune and the four
Republican Senators to vote for this.
Speaker 1 (32:10):
And I'm like, Okay, I guess not. I guess that's true.
Speaker 2 (32:15):
It certainly has passed in the House three times, which
seems to be some type of momentum for sure. And
to give you a little bit of timeline about this, right,
and this is the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, a
later expanded to Save America Act, And it is a
(32:35):
Republican land bill requiring documentary proof of US citizens, such
as a birth certificate of passport, to register to vote
in federal elections. Later versions have also added photo ID
requirements for voting. It has passed the House multiple times,
but never all right, so the precursor version and the
one hundred and eighteenth Congress in May of twenty twenty four,
(32:58):
introduced by chip Roy, right passed the House two hundred
and twenty one to one hundred and ninety eight, pretty
good sizable margin there. Right went to the Senate, stalled
and died. Twenty twenty five version the Save Act this
is the January third to twenty five reintroduced by the
(33:18):
House by chip Roy and referred to the House Administration
Committee January sixteenth. The companion bill S one twenty eight
was introduced by this to the Senator by Mike Lee.
In April twenty ten, the twenty twenty five HR twenty
two passed the House two hundred and twenty to two
hundred and eight right, two hundred and sixteen Republicans in
(33:41):
four Democrats April twenty five. Again, it stalled out in
the Senate, received in the Senate, installed in April tenth.
All right, here's the twenty twenty sixth version we saw
January twenty ninth to thirtieth, the twenty twenty six Save
America Act, again introduced by Chip Roy. Senate companion introduction
(34:02):
by Mike Lee with Senator John Corn who, by the way,
just lost his primary to Ken Baxon, and that was
a big piece of this whole Save Act thing, and
he got on late on that to try and push
himself over the edge. But Trump ended up supporting Packs
and I think Pason was gonna win no matter what.
I don't think people in Texas like Korn, but whatever.
(34:25):
February this version added photo ID requirements for voting in
federal elections. February eleventh, twenty twenty six passed the House
twenty eighteen to twenty thirteen. Mara, margin's getting more narrow, right.
That's what happens when you can whip votes against or
four in these things linger in the voting process, you
(34:49):
have a tendency to close the gap more over time.
Speaker 1 (34:52):
Right on.
Speaker 2 (34:55):
On March seventeenth, the Senate began a debate and deliberations
on the BI bill. In April, it failed an attempt
to attach the bill to or keep provisions to other
legislation via a procedural vote.
Speaker 1 (35:07):
So a procedural.
Speaker 2 (35:08):
Vote impeded Thoon being able to put it in for
a vote on the floor in the Senate. June twenty six,
another attempt to add it as an amendment to the
seventy billion dollars funding DHS funding bill, and that failed
in the Senate forty eight to fifty, and another procedural vote.
(35:30):
Now the Republicans who voted against it were Senator Susan
Collins from Maine, Mitch McConnell from Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski from Alaska,
and Tom Tillis right from North Carolina. As of June ninth,
the bill remained stalled in the Senate and has not
received a full floor vote on passage, and is considered
(35:51):
unlikely to advance without the sixty.
Speaker 1 (35:54):
Votes to overcome the filibuster. All right, so what does
this tell me?
Speaker 2 (36:00):
Right? Not? What's the one thing that that inevitably stops
corruption at all times?
Speaker 1 (36:07):
Right? I think it's three things.
Speaker 2 (36:09):
Right. One, it's it's same day voting unless you have
some extenuating circumses you're in an old age home, you're
not mobile, you can't get there, you have a job,
you have kids, something like that. But again, there's nobody
checking these applications. You know, you put it in, Nobody's like, oh,
I'll give you a call and follow up.
Speaker 1 (36:30):
Again.
Speaker 2 (36:30):
Remember, in all of the corruption you're seeing, the number
one reason is there's.
Speaker 1 (36:35):
There's no follow up.
Speaker 2 (36:36):
Like the h one visas visa fiasco that we're seeing
just unravel this this week, Like one hundred thousand of
these applications went in, not a single follow up on
any single one to see if the information was correct.
Go back to the Somalia stuff in New in Minnesota, California,
and Maine, no follow up, nothing, nobody checking to see
(36:58):
if the corruption is it. So you think that is
going to be checking to see if there's the mail
in balloting is correct, and the people say who they
are and where they are.
Speaker 1 (37:07):
Now, that's not going to happen. So you got to
get right.
Speaker 2 (37:12):
Same day again, same day, everybody shows up, they go
to the polls, they show up right then while they're there,
they show in ID in proof of citizenship. Now, the
way people are responding to that, well, not everybody has
a passport right, which for I think for some is true,
and not everybody has can bring their Social Security card
(37:34):
or their Social Security papers or whatever, which is a
basically you go to a website, you can enter your stuff,
download it and send it to you.
Speaker 1 (37:43):
It's pretty easy electronically. Now.
Speaker 2 (37:45):
So what you gotta do is you got to make
on your license is what your nationality is.
Speaker 1 (37:51):
That's what happens.
Speaker 2 (37:53):
Federal Department of Motor Vehicles requires national law that on
your alliance shows your citizenship on your license.
Speaker 1 (38:00):
That's just what has to happen. And there you have.
You knock out everything in one place.
Speaker 2 (38:05):
Right, So that's the way you fix it, and the
Save Act is the most beautiful start. Now, got understand
most polling shows that about eighty percent of American population
believes this is not a big deal.
Speaker 1 (38:18):
It should be standard. Those who say, well, what about it?
Speaker 2 (38:23):
It hurts minorities because they don't have access to all
this stuff. And I love the on the street interviews.
People go into you know, Harlem, or into some place
in Atlanta or LA and they're like, you know, do
you have an ID to get a bank?
Speaker 1 (38:38):
Yeah, of course, I got it. Do you have an
ID to drive?
Speaker 2 (38:40):
Yeah, of course I got Do you have an idea
to show that you can buy alcohol? Of course is
what do you think? I'm dumb. I don't know how
to get an ID. So all that is just ridiculous.
The latest argument they're making, in particular with the birth
certificate or the passports, is that women who got divorced
it's harder on them to get these documents and all that.
And again I've gone through through this. My wife changed
(39:01):
her name to me. I just adopted her. Two children,
we changed their names. We are dealing with a little
bit of a passport challenge with those documents. So I
will tell you that part is true. It is a
little bit challenging because it is a bureaucratic system of
people who work for minimum wage for the US government
sitting around looking at documents and working as fast or
(39:24):
as slow as their day takes them.
Speaker 1 (39:26):
Now that is a reality. I'm gonna give you that.
So that's why the end day.
Speaker 2 (39:29):
So anyways, the Save Act apparent basically eradicates all of
this problem, gets rid of it. But there are people
in the Senate who don't want to get rid of it,
who don't want to ruin this right. One is a
geriatric and we've watched have four strokes on camera with
Mitch McConnell.
Speaker 1 (39:49):
I can't even believe this.
Speaker 2 (39:52):
We know Susan Collins is pretty much a liberal the
way she runs main we know Mcal's is similar interviews
in Tom Tillis I believe as a hidden democrat as
well too. So you have all this, it's not going
to go anywhere. The bill's dead because you got the filibuster.
(40:13):
So what does everybody say, get rid of the philibuster,
which it seems like.
Speaker 1 (40:18):
We need to do that now.
Speaker 2 (40:19):
Granted we get rid of the philibuster, now they start
ramming through their stuff when.
Speaker 1 (40:24):
They're in office, and we got to deal with that.
So is the filibuster?
Speaker 2 (40:29):
Are we ever going to have a super majority again
with sixty Senate votes. I mean maybe if it keeps
devolving in these places, but if you live in a
democratic state or city with mail in valid, no vote
or ID, they're never going to lose these races. And
that's my point, right, So unless you enact some federal
(40:51):
emergency to investigate these elections, because I believe what it is,
it's a constitutional violation. Even if it's a city election,
it's a constitutional violation if there's corruption in city, state
or federal, especially federal elections. So I think you should
go into all these places where we've seen corruption, do
(41:12):
a full comprehensive investigation and see.
Speaker 1 (41:14):
What comes out.
Speaker 2 (41:16):
But it's not going to happen because the powers that be,
the people that are running the UTI Party or whatever,
the people that are are benefiting from the magnitude of
hundreds of billions of dollars in corruption. I haven't even
begun to cover the corruption in Social Security, which I'm
(41:36):
now is being predicted by twenty thirty or twenty thirty
two is insolvent. So all of your tax dollars you're
paying into Social Security, you're not even going to get
to see much less. The zoomers who are looking at
all this going like What the fuck is all this for?
Speaker 1 (41:51):
What am I even doing? Like? What is this for?
Elections are crooked? Politicians are crooked. There's corruption.
Speaker 2 (41:57):
For foreigners, they get free shit, they get free they
get free businesses. They send all their money overseas. I
can't get access to a loane. I'm in debt, college debt,
my credit card debt. You see what I'm saying. And
now that this final thing, and this is why I've
covered elections so substantially. Elections are the thing that are
(42:18):
going to bring the country down. There's no doubt it's
not going to be an emp it's not gonna be
an economic collapse, because as soon as those happen, you
go into emergency war powers, they lock everything down. And
unless they go back to the draconian shit of the
COVID days, because nobody's falling for that shit again, nobody's
being locked down.
Speaker 1 (42:36):
And if you do that, you're gonna have some problems.
But if you go into one of these places where you.
Speaker 2 (42:41):
Get you know, martial law put in because of these
other grander things, then everybody's just gonna roll over and
they'll accept that because they've been conditioned. But the elections,
the elections is the thing that can can garner a
true change. However, you can't garner the change and unless
you go in and you fully identify the corruption, which
(43:03):
most likely they won't do because they don't want to
expose any one particular side because if they do, then
they can't use the corruption system themselves. Now, once again,
I know what you're saying, Hey, rut Man, that's pretty
bleak stuff. But guess what you know, History's history, and
all you got to do is look back throughout history.
When the politicians or the people in control the imperial
(43:27):
regimes or whoever, the dictators whatever, once they cross the
line where there's no checks and balances in them, what
ends ups happening the eventual devolvement into totalitarian rule. Right,
digital currencies, social credit systems, election by phone, which they'll
(43:49):
never be a fair election again in the history if
you're voting on your phones.
Speaker 1 (43:53):
Right, all of that is on the precipice.
Speaker 2 (43:58):
So if we don't figure out how to do something
or change it, and guess what, it's on us because
we've allowed it to happen. Now, all you got to
do just do me a favor. Here's what I'm going
to ask you, all right, simple question, all right. I
want you to pay attention to your local races. I
want you to pay attention to your state races, and
(44:19):
I want you to pay attention and I want you
to pay attention to the numbers, all right. I want
you to pay attention to mail in ballot numbers. Do
they rise or fall from last elections? Pay attention to
the number of people showing up to vote? Is it
rising and falling? By how much? Pay attention to how
much money is spent in every election and by who
(44:40):
and by where? Right, Because we haven't even we haven't
even dug in the Justice Department hasn't even discovered the
magnitude of the Act Blue complete corruption system. Where you
know again James O'Keefe going in interviewing little old lady. Hey,
it says here by our docum that you've donated one
(45:01):
hundred and fifty seven times to Act Blue in the
last three years, totally one hundred and twenty five thousand dollars.
Oh no, no, no, I'm on a fixed budget. I
gave five dollars two months ago. That's all I've done.
No investigation, then again, probably is there anything in the
similar thing on the Republican National Committee, there could be.
I don't know has anybody done a deep dive on
(45:22):
the left side on this. When the system knows it
can get away with corruption, there is no such thing
as left or right, or conservative or liberal or whatever
you have been conditioned to break this down in it's
all the same. It's people in power not willing to
(45:45):
give up power in order to maintain their corruption schemes,
which is at our current thirty eight. Pretty soon thirty nine.
Are we at thirty No, we might even be at
thirty nine trillion dollar budget with a printing machine just
going and guess what. There's no incentive for these people
to stop. The only incentive comes from mass protests. So
(46:10):
whatever that looks like, I'll tell you what I think.
The best thing I've heard so far is ever you know,
you get fifty million people not paying their tax bill
for four months, that's what That would certainly wake them up.
You get ten million people on the mall protesting this
election fraud on both sides, that's gonna wake some people up, right,
(46:32):
But other than that, guess what, the fraud is just
gonna continue happening, all right. I'm excited to continue paying
attention to this debacle. I can't wait to see what
happens in the runoff with Bass and Ramen in June
or November or something like. That's what's crazy. The runoff
(46:53):
is of November. The one interesting aspect is Steve Hilton,
who's the Republican candidate for They let him pass through,
but guaranteed he doesn't win. Guaranteed, you know, Bass probably
takes over or or Nathiah might take over. They're both socialists,
So the free shit, we'll just keep going. Also, I
(47:15):
want you to think about the numbers involved in the
races that look suspect. I want you to think about
government subsidy programs right state, local, and federal. How much
money in those areas is at state in the budget breakdowns.
That's the other part of the numbers. All right, everybody,
(47:36):
I hope you enjoyed the show. I haven't done one
of these in a while. I hope you've been enjoying
a bunch of the others. Please don't forget to like,
subscribe and share content or make content on there. You
can find the show on all major podcast platforms. We
need your subscription, we need your commentary. Leave a note
on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or iHeart.
Speaker 1 (47:56):
We're really excited about that.
Speaker 2 (47:59):
Just you know, if you want to follow us or
on all social media apps at David Rutherford Show or
on X at d Rutherford Show, you can follow me.
I'm on Instagram and X at Team frog Logic my
original account. And yeah, if you want to know more
about what it is we do with our motivational speaking,
(48:20):
motivational coaching and training, or motivational curriculum, just visit David
Rutherford dot com and it's all there for you. All right,
hu Yah, God bless you, love you
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News
Hosts And Creators
Clay Travis
Buck Sexton
Show Links
WebsiteNewsletterPopular Podcasts
Hey Jonas!
Hey Jonas! The official Jonas Brothers podcast. Hosted by Kevin, Joe, and Nick Jonas. It’s the Jonas Brothers you know... musicians, actors, and well, yes, brothers. Now, they’re sharing another side of themselves in the playful, intimate, and irreverent way only they can. Spend time with the Jonas Brothers here and stay a little bit longer for deep conversations like never before.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com