March 19, 2025 • 32 mins
The John Kobylt Show Hour 3 (03/19) - Royal Oakes comes on the show to talk about Pres. Trump's legal battles regarding the deportation of illegal immigrant gang members. Two Illinois assemblymen got into it over transgender kids in locker rooms. Newsom's podcast isn't as popular as he thought it might be.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
I am six forty. You're listening to the John Cobelt
Podcast on the iHeartRadio app. We're on every day from
one until four o'clock. After four o'clock John Cobelt Show
on demand and you can listen to whatever you missed.
It's the podcast version of the radio show. Moistline is
back at eight seven seven moist eighty six for Friday.
What is today Wednesday? Eight seven seven moist eighty six
(00:23):
or the talkback feature on the iHeart app. So it's
been a extremely busy week between Trump and a number
of judges, district judges, federal district judges that is the
lowest federal level. Then you have a federal appeals court,
and then you have the Supreme Court. And what happens
is some activist group like the HSLU will go judge shopping.
(00:48):
They'll file a lawsuit in a district hoping to get
a favorable judge, and they often do what they consider
a left wing judge, who who's going to side with
them against Trump. Now, I think most normal people are
really happy that we have two hundred and sixty fewer
(01:09):
Venezuela and El salvadoran illegal alien, criminal, violent gang members
in our country and they've been shipped to El Salvadoran
put in a prison, and they should stay there forever.
But there's one man, the US District Judge James Boseburg,
who while the planes maybe were in the air, he
was telling the Trump people turn him around, land them
(01:30):
in America. They're all due a hearing, and the Trump
people pretended they couldn't hear Boseburg. And now all those
prisoners are actually in the El Salvadoran prison and Boseburg's angry,
and there's more hearings, and Royal Oaks ABC News legal
analyst is going to give us his view on all
this stuff. Royal, how are you.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
I'm doing great? Yeah, big question is this a constitutional crisis?
And of course it isn't, but a lot of people
say it is because they think that Donald Trump is
actually defying a federal court judge's order. Be you summarized
it beautifully. The inside baseball angle is when the judge said, Hey,
I don't want these guys to go back to El Salvador.
Let's talk about it in a week or two. The
(02:15):
judge said this orally from the bench in open court.
But then it took him a while to finalize it
and post it on the website of the court. And
so in between the oral and the posting, the Trump
administration said, well, it isn't final yet, so bub off
you go fly the friendly skies to a prison in
Al Salvador. And so now they're arguing over that. Now,
(02:36):
that's not a constitutional crisis. If Donald Trump heard a
US Supreme Court ruling and said I'm going to ignore it.
You know, you don't have a standing. Are we to
enforce it, that would be a crisis. But we're not
there yet.
Speaker 2 (02:47):
Yeah, how does an oral command work? What weight does
it have legally as compared to an official written order
from a judge.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
It's a great question. I mean, I've been and hundreds
of hearings and judges have issued orders. In most cases,
sometimes they say I got to think about it. I'll
get back to you. Mostly they tell you right there
and then they finalize it later. Sometimes it's a little
different later, and sometimes that you don't really know what
the enforceability of the statement by the judge at the
(03:20):
time is. So the bottom line is it's murky. We
don't really have good clear answers to your question. But
the very fact that we don't have clear answers tells
us it's not a freaking constitutional crisis, which is what
the opponents of Trump are trying to make it into.
Speaker 2 (03:37):
I hear a lot of criticism from the Trump people.
They go on television and they claim, well, you have
a single judge in a district that's creating an order
that governs the entire United States or overrides Trump's executive powers.
And the way it's phrased, it does make you go, well, yeah,
(04:00):
how come a single judge in a far off state
can decide can issue an injunction that affects everybody in
the nation.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
But it's a great question.
Speaker 2 (04:10):
I mean, is that the standard is there's no other
I don't know, I just it does sound kind of ridiculous,
especially in a polarized age where we have a lot
of biased judges.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
Yep. The answer is yeah, we do have what they
call national injunctions. So usually most cases are you know,
John versus Mary, and they're the only ones involved in
the judge issues in order and it binds John and Mary.
But what if one of the defendants is a federal
agency with responsibilities around the solar system throughout the United States.
The argument is, well, yeah, a national injunction should be
(04:47):
permitted by a judge who says to a Department of
Energy or whatever, do this or don't do that, and
of course the loser, the Department of Energy, is free
to go up to the Court of Appeals and immediately
object to it. But you're right, your instinct is they're
trying to change it, actually, and several members of the
Supreme Court think because the idea is really bad, and
so we may not have national injunctions much longer, but
(05:08):
as of now they are still with us.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
Yes, I had read that years ago ago. I got
to the nineteen seventies. You'd end up with a three panel,
three man judge panel, and it would be two district
judges from different parts of the country and then one
Appeals court judge, and they would be empowered to issue
national injunctions, but it would be three not one, and
would be more representative of the nation, which would make
(05:33):
it harder to judge shop And for some reason that
was discontinued in the nineteen seventies. I don't know why,
but that seems more reasonable to me.
Speaker 1 (05:43):
Yeah, it seems like a better system. But you're right,
it's history now and this moment, we've just got the
one single national judge angle. But you know the bottom
line is people who say there's a constitutional crisis, yeah,
Donald Trump likes to walk up to the line and
stomp on it and borrow Leonardo DiCaprio's flamethrower from Once
upon a Time in Hollywood and incinerate you know, the
(06:06):
Manson Girl and obliterate the line. But the good news
is everybody knows where the line was. Supreme Court knows,
and regardless of whether Trump seems to be defying at
least in part some lower court decisions, I've got to
tell you, John, if the United States Supreme Court rules
against Donald Trump, he is not going to pull it
and Andrew Jackson and say, oh, you don't have a
standing army, you go and force it. I think that
(06:27):
would just completely destroy his base. The bottom line is
he knows that he's got some friends on the US
Supreme Court. But here's an inside baseball fact. Judge Boseberg
that the Republicans are attacking right now was the roommate
of Justice Brett Kavanaugh in college. So I don't think
that Kavanaugh is going to be too interested in trashing
(06:49):
and calling for the impeachment of his buddy, who was
probably a wingman for those you know, prat Tiger parties,
because we know Tavanaugh loved the beer and plus Amy
Cony barrett Is was ruling against Trump all the time,
and you saw you've been reporting. Chief Justice John Roberts
blasted Trump last day or two saying, hey, this isn't
an impeachment situation. This just didn't do anything impeachment worthy.
(07:12):
If you don't like the decision, fine fight it up
the appellate ladder. So yeah, it's it's a very knowledge.
Speaker 2 (07:19):
No, the impeachment, impeach. The impeachment thing is ridiculous. It's
just you know, from my understanding is that presidents has
have just almost total authority when it comes to border issues, right,
I mean that's what That's why Biden was able to
let in millions of people. He had the authority.
Speaker 1 (07:40):
This absolutely executive discretion is huge. You're right on immigration matters,
and judges respect that.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
Usually. From what I understand is they were flying people
directly from Venezuela among other places, and landing at small
airports around the country, but they would be pre approved.
They would get on planes, we'd pay for them to
land here. That was okay, no judge stopped that. But
(08:06):
to deport people who are demonstrably among the worst, most
violent men on the planet, that gets stopped by a judge.
How come nobody stopped In fact, in fact, the guy
who killed lacoln Riley, we paid for a plane flight
so he could fly from New York City to Georgia.
We paid for that flight, and that was okay.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
You're right. It's hard to explain it. I mean, the
Alien Enemies Act sense that if you've got you know,
a time of war, a government may send packing any
subjects of the hostile national government. They are considered alien enemies.
And these these monster gang guys, clearly you you're right,
we're better off with them not being here. And so
that's why so many people are really angry with this
(08:50):
Judge Bozburg's decision.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
I just don't understand of all the people to go
to the mat for it, it's it's trendy and marisalv.
Latusia gang members. That's the hill they want to die on.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
That's amazing, It's truly remarkable. If you want to see
a deeper dive in this, if I could plug. I've
got a new substack column called two Lawyers Walk into
a Bar, and I posted this morning the whole story
about how this is not a constitutional crisis. And it's
thanks to you that I picked that name, because it's
two months ago I told you the name of our
new podcast, Lawyers with Balls, and I could tell you
(09:26):
didn't really like it, so I said no, and it
doesn't like it. No, So we're now going with two
Lawyers walk into a Bar.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
I think you just startled me.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
I've got I've got some radar when it comes to
you know what, people don't like my podcast, Well.
Speaker 2 (09:45):
I like two lawyers walking to a bar. Okay, that's
on substance. Thank you, all right, very good, stick with it,
all right, got Royal Oaks, ABC News Legal analyst, Thank
you for coming on.
Speaker 1 (09:57):
You bet all right?
Speaker 2 (09:58):
When when we come back, I'm going to play you
an exchange between two Illinois State assemblymen. One of them
tells a story to the Assembly about middle school girls
who said they were forced to change in front of
a biological mail a transgender before pe class. All right,
(10:23):
middle school girls, they had to change in front of
a biological mail. And he tells his story to the
assembly another assemble. Themen gets up and says, this guy's
lying and the middle school girls are lying. We'll play
you both clips when we come back.
Speaker 3 (10:42):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
John Cobelt Show, I Am six forty Live everywhere on
the iHeartRadio app. Follow us in John Cobelt Radio on
social media. John Cobelt Radio trying to get to you.
Twenty five thousand followers, less than a thousand ago. All right,
that's exciting coming up after Dever's three thirty news In fact,
this is a story she's gonna cover, and then we
(11:11):
are going to talk about ABN Newsom after that. Well,
today's the fifth anniversary of Newsom shutting down the state
and ruining people's lives. It turns out his podcast is
not impressing the public at all. They actually did some
polling and found out that it has not improved most
(11:32):
people's perception of Newsom. In fact, it's more likely to
make Newsom's well, it's more likely that people don't like
Newsom after listening to his podcast. We'll play we'll talk
about that coming up after three point thirty. All right,
I'm gonna give you the backstory. I'm going to play
(11:53):
a couple of clips here. The In Illinois, there is
a woman named Nicole Jeorgis, and Nicole made a complaint
with the Justice Department Federal Justice Department, claiming that school
(12:13):
administrators in her town in Illinois had tried to force
her thirteen year old daughter to change in front of
a transgender student. This would be a biological male transitioning
to female. This was at a Deerfield Public school. Claimed
the incident happened last month. Her daughter refused to change
(12:36):
into her uniform in front of this biological male student.
This is right before fized. The girls want their locker
rooms and bathrooms back, she said during a speech at
a board meeting last week. They want their privacy back.
My thirteen year old daughter's well being, mental health, and
privacy are at stake. She said. Her daughter had been
(12:57):
frightened and extremely upset. She was using the girls back
bathroom and noticed that a biological male was also there,
and she was told by the administration that the student
can use the bathroom as well as a female locker
room because they're now identifying as female. Later days later,
her daughter and other classmates refused to change into their
(13:18):
uniforms during preparation for a phys ed class because again
the transgender student was present. And then the school administrators
and the teachers pulled the girls aside every day, multiple
teachers every day insisting they change into uniform Well, she's
filed the complaint civil rights complaint with the Justice Department,
(13:39):
and this caused Illinois State assembly people to take to
the floor. We're going to play first Assemblyman Adam Kniemerg,
who tells the story of what happened, and then another
assemblyman who claims, well, the girls are lying, so let's play.
Adam Kniemerg, a Republican Illinois State assembly person.
Speaker 4 (14:00):
A story of a thirteen year old girl thirteen who
came home from Shepherd Middle School in Deerfield, Illinois, on
February fifth, and was frightened because a biological male was
in her locker room. The Deerfield School District one to
nine administrators told the girl's family that because the boy
was transgender, he was allowed to be there. A few
(14:23):
days later, the male student was again in the girls
locker room, and the girls refused to change into their
pe clothes due to the violation of their space. What
happened next is something that as a parent, I simply
cannot comprehend. The Deerfield School District one to nine administrators
supervised the locker rooms to ensure everyone changed into their
(14:47):
pe cloths and allegedly tried to force the girls to
change in front of the male student. The parents of
the girl have an audio recording of a school official
threatening to punish the girls if they they refused to
change in the locker room. Folks, these are middle school girls.
These educators at Shepherd Middle School are charged with protecting kids.
(15:11):
They failed miserably. They appear to have intentionally forced these
girls to change in front of a biological male against
their will. The seriousness of this incident cannot be understated.
What happened at SHEPPERD Middle School is tantamount to sexual assault,
and instead of stopping the insanity, the people.
Speaker 2 (15:31):
In charge were enabling it.
Speaker 4 (15:33):
Eighty percent, eighty percent of this country does not want
males invading female spaces. This country completely rejected this ideology
because they understood that males invading female spaces is wrong.
And I find it unbelievably hypocritical of the majority party
here in Springfield to continually say, Okaypresentative, I'll brand to close,
(15:58):
I'll brand to close that we represent women. And yet
you're letting this type of garbage happen in the state
of Illinois.
Speaker 2 (16:05):
Paul Country hates this, but they keep pushing. Listen to
this Democratic Assemblyman from Illinois, Bob Morgan calling everybody liars.
Speaker 5 (16:13):
My colleague on the other side of the aisle always
seems to be so angry, so angry. And you know,
I really was trying to wonder, why is my colleague
so angry all the time about other people's kids, What's
happening in other people's lives. Listen, and I realized it's
because my colleague isn't working to represent his district. He's
(16:34):
not working to benefit his economy of his community, it's
not working to protect his community. He's embarrassed what he's embarrassed,
And I understand I would be too if I came
to this chamber every day and I talked about issues
didn't impact me, didn't impact my community, didn't impact my area,
(16:55):
didn't impact my businesses. Instead talked about other people and
didn't help my own community, didn't help my town, didn't
help my schools, didn't help the families needed the help.
I would be embarrassed if I were still collecting a
per diem, still collecting my salary, not working for my
own district. I represent Deerfield, I live in Deerfield. So
(17:19):
I'm really proud of my community who stood up for
those who need to be defended and protected, making sure
we have great schools, which we do, by the way,
have incredible, incredible schools, incredible families, incredible community come together
to deal with this situation because it's a lie. So
(17:41):
the next time a representative wants to talk about other
districts again, I understand he may be ashamed, and frankly.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Probably should be.
Speaker 5 (17:51):
But instead of standing on this floor and taking our
time here today talking about children, maybe maybe try and.
Speaker 2 (17:59):
Help your own strank you, representative, What an irritating little
wiener he's lying. No, I don't think a mother goes
all the way to the justice department on a made
up story. Of course, the girls are freaked out. Girls
don't want to see a guy's genitals, especially a guy
(18:20):
claiming to be a woman but he still has the
male genitals. The other middle school girls don't want to
see it. And yeah, people ought to be angry. That
was the strangest response, and he sounds like, why does
he talk like that? We come back, Gavin Newsom. His
popularity is actually falling since he started his podcast. This
(18:43):
is terrible. I don't want a fellow, a fellow iHeart
radio podcaster to lose popularity of you. No, I don't.
I mean we're teammates. I've tried my part.
Speaker 3 (18:58):
You're listening to John Kobe on demand from KFI A
six forty.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
We are on from one until four and then after
four o'clock John Colebelt Show on demand the podcast Conway's
going to be here in about twenty minutes now. Debora
had in her news a little that's a flashback. It's
nostalgic PTSD man five years ago today, do some announced
the Great Lockdown? You want to play that clip again? Sure?
Speaker 4 (19:24):
You ready?
Speaker 1 (19:24):
Yeah?
Speaker 5 (19:25):
And there's a recognition of our interdependence that requires of
this moment that we direct a statewide order for people
to stay at home. Not really sure what the whole
interdependence part means.
Speaker 2 (19:41):
I mean, that was five years ago, and you know
I'm listening to it. I don't know what I thought
five years ago, but you know, we found out yesterday
and I checked this out. It's true. His SAT scores
were below average. Yeah, only nine to sixty. The average
SAT scores ten twenty eight. You know, to get into
(20:05):
Harvard you need like a fifteen hundred, So he had
about sixty percent of the SAT score you need to
get into an Ivy League school. And sometimes when people
know they're stupid. Now, he grew up among wealthy people
and accomplished people, so I'm guessing I think a lot
of his weird personality quirks come come from insecurity, trying
(20:26):
to prove himself, trying to prove himself. And one thing
that some people do when they feel intellectually insecure is
they try to use big words, and because they're not
very bright, they tend to use them inappropriately. They use
them in the middle of sentences that make you go,
what the hell is he talking. He does this with jargon.
(20:47):
He throws in a lot of tech jargon, and it's
to cover up that he's not that smart. But he
learned how to manipulate because people will if you use
a lot of big words, people will think you're smart.
And he thinkured he was smart enough to figure that out.
So I'll learn a lot of jargon. I'll learn a
lot of long words, and I'll throw them in even
if they don't make sense. I'll give that to him.
(21:11):
Now obviously, well, we all know the damage he did.
Schools were closed for a year and a half, as
a whole generation of kids have been permanently brain damaged
by that. He killed about twenty thousand businesses, and on
and on and on. One part that's been overlooked was
highlighted by our guest yesterday, Susan Crabtree. She and her
(21:33):
co writer co author Jed McPhatter wrote this book called
Fool's Gold, The Radicals, con artists and traders who killed
the California Dream and now threaten us all. We had
her on for a half hour yesterday. There's an excerpt
online one of the chapters, and I wanted to take
I wanted to read you the excerpt or part of it.
(21:54):
And it's about the lockdown and he let out thousands
of prisoners, claiming falsely that it would be safer for
the prisoners to be outside the prison. If they were inside,
they were more likely to catch COVID and die, which
(22:15):
wasn't true. But in those years immediately after he let
out the prisoners. Violent crime in California. According to Susan
Krabtree and Jed macfatter, violent crime skyrocketed. Homicides jumped by
almost thirty four percent, aggravated assaults by twenty five percent
(22:38):
in twenty twenty two. Gun related homicides went up thirty
seven percent, aggravated assaults with a gun sixty one percent,
and as they write, the actual rates are likely much
higher because crime data only captures the incidents reported to
the police, and a lot of crimes go unreported. And
(22:59):
they directly correspond with what they describe as Newsom's progressive
experiment with criminal justice reform. He released tens of thousands
of prisoners during COVID, and the crime rates went up,
Like I said, homicides thirty four percent, aggravated assaults twenty
(23:20):
five percent, gun related homicides, and aggravated assaults thirty seven percent,
sixty one percent. That's because you had ten thousand, tens
of thousands of criminals released. When you release criminals from
state prison, they are the worst criminals. You have to
do something really, really bad to end up in state prison.
So the state prison population has dropped under Jerry Brown
(23:43):
and Gavin Newsom from one hundred and sixty thousand people
in twenty eleven to ninety one thousand by twenty twenty four,
and Newsom wants to cut another five thousand prisoners in
the next three years. He has closed or is closing
(24:05):
four state prisons. He's reimagining San Quentin. The death row
was shut down, although that violated three referendums passed by
the voters. And then you ended up with what a
couple of years ago, massive smash and grab theft gangs.
(24:28):
Where do you think those guys came from? That wasn't
a graduating class from an accounting school. Those were the
prisoners that knew some let out you had, as they write,
flash mobs of masked robbers stormed through Nordstrom and all
(24:50):
the high end retailers in San Francisco killed the downtown
of San Francisco. All the businesses emptied out. They got
out Nordstrom, Macy's, Whole Foods, Anthropology, Old Navy Office Depot
seven to eleven, Denny's all closed stores in downtown San
(25:10):
Francisco or nearby Oakland. Starbucks and Target also closed locations.
This was all from Newsom letting out tens of thousands
of prisoners by claiming they were at high risk for COVID.
But if you look at the statistics, COVID is actually
less of a problem inside prisons than outside. Newsom, of course,
(25:37):
claimed the business closures in San Francisco were macroeconomic shifts.
There he is using a big word again, macroeconomic. That's
to distract you from the stupidity of his policy. San Francisco,
by twenty twenty three, the downtown was such a hotbed
(25:58):
of crime, homelessness, and drug that the Department of Health
and Human Services, the federal agency, told employees to work
remotely for the foreseeable future, not because of COVID, but
because of all the crime that really they were warning
you stay home and work, otherwise you'll die. Showing up
(26:20):
for work there had become too dangerous. Same thing in
southern California, they write, Santa Monica and Los Angeles.
Speaker 1 (26:29):
We know that.
Speaker 2 (26:31):
Wilshire Boulevard, so many stores and I see this all
the time. In Santa Monica. You go down boulevard, dozens
of boarded up or empty storefronts because of criminals and crazy,
mentally ill, drug addicted vagrants. And this is a complete
(26:52):
failure of progressive politics and the high priest of progressive
politics in California now, Gavin Newsom, governor for six years,
lieutenant governor for eight years before that, and then mayor
San Francisco before that. He's been inflicted on us for
over twenty years. And if you could go on a
(27:13):
time machine and experience San Francisco or downtown LA or
Santa Monica or even Oakland twenty years ago and experience
it today, it's a vicious nightmare. Now it all goes
back to progressive crime policies, all goes back to Newsom
and Jerry Brown. They ruin the place, and now he
(27:33):
thinks he's going to do a podcast and change the perception. Well,
we come back. I'll tell you. They've done a little
study on his popularity since the podcast came out. Wait
till you find out how few there's so few people
listening to do this poll, they actually had to play
snippets of the podcast because most people don't listen to it.
(27:54):
But I mean more than most people, nearly everyone doesn't
listen to it. I'll tell you we come back.
Speaker 3 (28:00):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI Am
six forty.
Speaker 2 (28:06):
So they Capital Weekly did a poll to see if
Gavin Newsen's podcast had any effect on the public's view
of him, and they found out this is this is funny.
Fifty four percent of California and said they had heard
about the podcast right it was all over the news,
but forty six percent did not know about it. But
(28:28):
out of all the respondents, how many people said they
listened to it one half of one percent. Ninety nine
and a half percent of those polled has not listened
to a Gavin Newsom podcast. Boy, you wouldn't know it
by the news coverage, huh. And so they to do
(28:48):
the study, they had to play clips of the podcast
to see what they thought of it. And they played
a clip of about the trans athlete controversy, where Newsom
says it's deeply unfair to biological males competing with women.
Second clip was over the usage of the term LATINX,
(29:10):
which nobody uses, including ninety seven percent of latinos. And
then a clip where Newsom introduced this right wing activist
Charlie Kirk and joke that Newsom's thirteen year old son
wanted to stay home from school to meet Kirk, and
Kirk said, you canceled school for like two years, what's
(29:32):
one more day? So these people polled got to hear
the three clips, and only thirteen percent have an improved
perception of Newsom after listening to the three clips. So
only one half of one percent listen to the podcast,
and among the people giving clips, only thirteen percent improved
(29:53):
their perception. I don't think it's going to do for
him what he thought it was going to do for him.
We now go to.
Speaker 6 (30:03):
Tim Cotton, Dang dong with you, John Colebell, look at you.
We got Michael Monks coming on. I guess the city
of Los Angeles is in some financial trouble. We talk
about that bad vibes and Spirit Airlines has a dress
code now.
Speaker 2 (30:18):
They've had it.
Speaker 6 (30:19):
You have to dress, you have to you gotta wear shoes,
you can't wear flip flops. You can't have a body
odor unless it qualifies under a certain like disability I
don't know, or.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
A cultural waiver maybe, but whatever it is. If you stink,
you got to get off that plane. Have you ever
got on Spirit once to Detroit? It was pretty good.
Yeah it was Yeah.
Speaker 6 (30:42):
I got one of those they call him big ass
seats up in front if you pay another of thirty
bucks or so, and if they still have them or not.
Speaker 2 (30:49):
Just nearly one hundred percent of the fights on airlines
that I see happen on Spirit. Yeah.
Speaker 6 (30:55):
But but John, you know that's sort of you know,
like like when you go on a carnival ride at
a church.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
One of the one of the.
Speaker 6 (31:02):
You know, the the sort of thrilling aspects of it
is this is this ride gonna stay together while I'm
on it? You know, when you go in Spirit airlines,
you want to see where the battle's gonna go.
Speaker 1 (31:12):
Right.
Speaker 6 (31:12):
It does make flying to Vegas more interests, it does, yeah,
you know, like, oh, look it back here, what's going on?
Back here?
Speaker 2 (31:18):
A Spirit flight to Vegas? It will paid nineteen dollars
for right in the middle of the summer. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
although you know now they take off. They used to
taxi from Burbank all the way to Vegas for nineteen dollars,
but I think they take off now, Sonny.
Speaker 6 (31:34):
We've got a lot of big news.
Speaker 2 (31:34):
Also.
Speaker 6 (31:35):
The Dodgers are their magic numbers one sixty now, is
that right?
Speaker 2 (31:39):
You know?
Speaker 6 (31:40):
The over under on the Dodgers this year is one
hundred and four and a half games.
Speaker 2 (31:42):
I think they're going to go north and four and
a half week. Yeah, one hundred and four and a
half way, so they already have two. They only need
one hundred and two and a half more. So far,
so good.
Speaker 6 (31:50):
That's right, that's all right. Yeah, but the Mets, Mets
haven't opened yet. No, no, so they're they're they're one
in sixty two, that's straight said, God's sixty to go.
Speaker 2 (32:01):
Big dog with you, uh Conway here big Dog. Michael
Kerzer is the News Live and the KFI twenty four
hour Newsroom. Hey, you've been listening to the John Cobalt
Show podcast. You can always hear the show live on
KFI Am six forty from one to four pm every
Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime on demand on
the iHeartRadio app.
Can't.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
I am six forty. You're listening to the John Cobelt
Podcast on the iHeartRadio app. We're on every day from
one until four o'clock. After four o'clock John Cobelt Show
on demand and you can listen to whatever you missed.
It's the podcast version of the radio show. Moistline is
back at eight seven seven moist eighty six for Friday.
What is today Wednesday? Eight seven seven moist eighty six
(00:23):
or the talkback feature on the iHeart app. So it's
been a extremely busy week between Trump and a number
of judges, district judges, federal district judges that is the
lowest federal level. Then you have a federal appeals court,
and then you have the Supreme Court. And what happens
is some activist group like the HSLU will go judge shopping.
(00:48):
They'll file a lawsuit in a district hoping to get
a favorable judge, and they often do what they consider
a left wing judge, who who's going to side with
them against Trump. Now, I think most normal people are
really happy that we have two hundred and sixty fewer
(01:09):
Venezuela and El salvadoran illegal alien, criminal, violent gang members
in our country and they've been shipped to El Salvadoran
put in a prison, and they should stay there forever.
But there's one man, the US District Judge James Boseburg,
who while the planes maybe were in the air, he
was telling the Trump people turn him around, land them
(01:30):
in America. They're all due a hearing, and the Trump
people pretended they couldn't hear Boseburg. And now all those
prisoners are actually in the El Salvadoran prison and Boseburg's angry,
and there's more hearings, and Royal Oaks ABC News legal
analyst is going to give us his view on all
this stuff. Royal, how are you.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
I'm doing great? Yeah, big question is this a constitutional crisis?
And of course it isn't, but a lot of people
say it is because they think that Donald Trump is
actually defying a federal court judge's order. Be you summarized
it beautifully. The inside baseball angle is when the judge said, Hey,
I don't want these guys to go back to El Salvador.
Let's talk about it in a week or two. The
(02:15):
judge said this orally from the bench in open court.
But then it took him a while to finalize it
and post it on the website of the court. And
so in between the oral and the posting, the Trump
administration said, well, it isn't final yet, so bub off
you go fly the friendly skies to a prison in
Al Salvador. And so now they're arguing over that. Now,
(02:36):
that's not a constitutional crisis. If Donald Trump heard a
US Supreme Court ruling and said I'm going to ignore it.
You know, you don't have a standing. Are we to
enforce it, that would be a crisis. But we're not
there yet.
Speaker 2 (02:47):
Yeah, how does an oral command work? What weight does
it have legally as compared to an official written order
from a judge.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
It's a great question. I mean, I've been and hundreds
of hearings and judges have issued orders. In most cases,
sometimes they say I got to think about it. I'll
get back to you. Mostly they tell you right there
and then they finalize it later. Sometimes it's a little
different later, and sometimes that you don't really know what
the enforceability of the statement by the judge at the
(03:20):
time is. So the bottom line is it's murky. We
don't really have good clear answers to your question. But
the very fact that we don't have clear answers tells
us it's not a freaking constitutional crisis, which is what
the opponents of Trump are trying to make it into.
Speaker 2 (03:37):
I hear a lot of criticism from the Trump people.
They go on television and they claim, well, you have
a single judge in a district that's creating an order
that governs the entire United States or overrides Trump's executive powers.
And the way it's phrased, it does make you go, well, yeah,
(04:00):
how come a single judge in a far off state
can decide can issue an injunction that affects everybody in
the nation.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
But it's a great question.
Speaker 2 (04:10):
I mean, is that the standard is there's no other
I don't know, I just it does sound kind of ridiculous,
especially in a polarized age where we have a lot
of biased judges.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
Yep. The answer is yeah, we do have what they
call national injunctions. So usually most cases are you know,
John versus Mary, and they're the only ones involved in
the judge issues in order and it binds John and Mary.
But what if one of the defendants is a federal
agency with responsibilities around the solar system throughout the United States.
The argument is, well, yeah, a national injunction should be
(04:47):
permitted by a judge who says to a Department of
Energy or whatever, do this or don't do that, and
of course the loser, the Department of Energy, is free
to go up to the Court of Appeals and immediately
object to it. But you're right, your instinct is they're
trying to change it, actually, and several members of the
Supreme Court think because the idea is really bad, and
so we may not have national injunctions much longer, but
(05:08):
as of now they are still with us.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
Yes, I had read that years ago ago. I got
to the nineteen seventies. You'd end up with a three panel,
three man judge panel, and it would be two district
judges from different parts of the country and then one
Appeals court judge, and they would be empowered to issue
national injunctions, but it would be three not one, and
would be more representative of the nation, which would make
(05:33):
it harder to judge shop And for some reason that
was discontinued in the nineteen seventies. I don't know why,
but that seems more reasonable to me.
Speaker 1 (05:43):
Yeah, it seems like a better system. But you're right,
it's history now and this moment, we've just got the
one single national judge angle. But you know the bottom
line is people who say there's a constitutional crisis, yeah,
Donald Trump likes to walk up to the line and
stomp on it and borrow Leonardo DiCaprio's flamethrower from Once
upon a Time in Hollywood and incinerate you know, the
(06:06):
Manson Girl and obliterate the line. But the good news
is everybody knows where the line was. Supreme Court knows,
and regardless of whether Trump seems to be defying at
least in part some lower court decisions, I've got to
tell you, John, if the United States Supreme Court rules
against Donald Trump, he is not going to pull it
and Andrew Jackson and say, oh, you don't have a
standing army, you go and force it. I think that
(06:27):
would just completely destroy his base. The bottom line is
he knows that he's got some friends on the US
Supreme Court. But here's an inside baseball fact. Judge Boseberg
that the Republicans are attacking right now was the roommate
of Justice Brett Kavanaugh in college. So I don't think
that Kavanaugh is going to be too interested in trashing
(06:49):
and calling for the impeachment of his buddy, who was
probably a wingman for those you know, prat Tiger parties,
because we know Tavanaugh loved the beer and plus Amy
Cony barrett Is was ruling against Trump all the time,
and you saw you've been reporting. Chief Justice John Roberts
blasted Trump last day or two saying, hey, this isn't
an impeachment situation. This just didn't do anything impeachment worthy.
(07:12):
If you don't like the decision, fine fight it up
the appellate ladder. So yeah, it's it's a very knowledge.
Speaker 2 (07:19):
No, the impeachment, impeach. The impeachment thing is ridiculous. It's
just you know, from my understanding is that presidents has
have just almost total authority when it comes to border issues, right,
I mean that's what That's why Biden was able to
let in millions of people. He had the authority.
Speaker 1 (07:40):
This absolutely executive discretion is huge. You're right on immigration matters,
and judges respect that.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
Usually. From what I understand is they were flying people
directly from Venezuela among other places, and landing at small
airports around the country, but they would be pre approved.
They would get on planes, we'd pay for them to
land here. That was okay, no judge stopped that. But
(08:06):
to deport people who are demonstrably among the worst, most
violent men on the planet, that gets stopped by a judge.
How come nobody stopped In fact, in fact, the guy
who killed lacoln Riley, we paid for a plane flight
so he could fly from New York City to Georgia.
We paid for that flight, and that was okay.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
You're right. It's hard to explain it. I mean, the
Alien Enemies Act sense that if you've got you know,
a time of war, a government may send packing any
subjects of the hostile national government. They are considered alien enemies.
And these these monster gang guys, clearly you you're right,
we're better off with them not being here. And so
that's why so many people are really angry with this
(08:50):
Judge Bozburg's decision.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
I just don't understand of all the people to go
to the mat for it, it's it's trendy and marisalv.
Latusia gang members. That's the hill they want to die on.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
That's amazing, It's truly remarkable. If you want to see
a deeper dive in this, if I could plug. I've
got a new substack column called two Lawyers Walk into
a Bar, and I posted this morning the whole story
about how this is not a constitutional crisis. And it's
thanks to you that I picked that name, because it's
two months ago I told you the name of our
new podcast, Lawyers with Balls, and I could tell you
(09:26):
didn't really like it, so I said no, and it
doesn't like it. No, So we're now going with two
Lawyers walk into a Bar.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
I think you just startled me.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
I've got I've got some radar when it comes to
you know what, people don't like my podcast, Well.
Speaker 2 (09:45):
I like two lawyers walking to a bar. Okay, that's
on substance. Thank you, all right, very good, stick with it,
all right, got Royal Oaks, ABC News Legal analyst, Thank
you for coming on.
Speaker 1 (09:57):
You bet all right?
Speaker 2 (09:58):
When when we come back, I'm going to play you
an exchange between two Illinois State assemblymen. One of them
tells a story to the Assembly about middle school girls
who said they were forced to change in front of
a biological mail a transgender before pe class. All right,
(10:23):
middle school girls, they had to change in front of
a biological mail. And he tells his story to the
assembly another assemble. Themen gets up and says, this guy's
lying and the middle school girls are lying. We'll play
you both clips when we come back.
Speaker 3 (10:42):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
John Cobelt Show, I Am six forty Live everywhere on
the iHeartRadio app. Follow us in John Cobelt Radio on
social media. John Cobelt Radio trying to get to you.
Twenty five thousand followers, less than a thousand ago. All right,
that's exciting coming up after Dever's three thirty news In fact,
this is a story she's gonna cover, and then we
(11:11):
are going to talk about ABN Newsom after that. Well,
today's the fifth anniversary of Newsom shutting down the state
and ruining people's lives. It turns out his podcast is
not impressing the public at all. They actually did some
polling and found out that it has not improved most
(11:32):
people's perception of Newsom. In fact, it's more likely to
make Newsom's well, it's more likely that people don't like
Newsom after listening to his podcast. We'll play we'll talk
about that coming up after three point thirty. All right,
I'm gonna give you the backstory. I'm going to play
(11:53):
a couple of clips here. The In Illinois, there is
a woman named Nicole Jeorgis, and Nicole made a complaint
with the Justice Department Federal Justice Department, claiming that school
(12:13):
administrators in her town in Illinois had tried to force
her thirteen year old daughter to change in front of
a transgender student. This would be a biological male transitioning
to female. This was at a Deerfield Public school. Claimed
the incident happened last month. Her daughter refused to change
(12:36):
into her uniform in front of this biological male student.
This is right before fized. The girls want their locker
rooms and bathrooms back, she said during a speech at
a board meeting last week. They want their privacy back.
My thirteen year old daughter's well being, mental health, and
privacy are at stake. She said. Her daughter had been
(12:57):
frightened and extremely upset. She was using the girls back
bathroom and noticed that a biological male was also there,
and she was told by the administration that the student
can use the bathroom as well as a female locker
room because they're now identifying as female. Later days later,
her daughter and other classmates refused to change into their
(13:18):
uniforms during preparation for a phys ed class because again
the transgender student was present. And then the school administrators
and the teachers pulled the girls aside every day, multiple
teachers every day insisting they change into uniform Well, she's
filed the complaint civil rights complaint with the Justice Department,
(13:39):
and this caused Illinois State assembly people to take to
the floor. We're going to play first Assemblyman Adam Kniemerg,
who tells the story of what happened, and then another
assemblyman who claims, well, the girls are lying, so let's play.
Adam Kniemerg, a Republican Illinois State assembly person.
Speaker 4 (14:00):
A story of a thirteen year old girl thirteen who
came home from Shepherd Middle School in Deerfield, Illinois, on
February fifth, and was frightened because a biological male was
in her locker room. The Deerfield School District one to
nine administrators told the girl's family that because the boy
was transgender, he was allowed to be there. A few
(14:23):
days later, the male student was again in the girls
locker room, and the girls refused to change into their
pe clothes due to the violation of their space. What
happened next is something that as a parent, I simply
cannot comprehend. The Deerfield School District one to nine administrators
supervised the locker rooms to ensure everyone changed into their
(14:47):
pe cloths and allegedly tried to force the girls to
change in front of the male student. The parents of
the girl have an audio recording of a school official
threatening to punish the girls if they they refused to
change in the locker room. Folks, these are middle school girls.
These educators at Shepherd Middle School are charged with protecting kids.
(15:11):
They failed miserably. They appear to have intentionally forced these
girls to change in front of a biological male against
their will. The seriousness of this incident cannot be understated.
What happened at SHEPPERD Middle School is tantamount to sexual assault,
and instead of stopping the insanity, the people.
Speaker 2 (15:31):
In charge were enabling it.
Speaker 4 (15:33):
Eighty percent, eighty percent of this country does not want
males invading female spaces. This country completely rejected this ideology
because they understood that males invading female spaces is wrong.
And I find it unbelievably hypocritical of the majority party
here in Springfield to continually say, Okaypresentative, I'll brand to close,
(15:58):
I'll brand to close that we represent women. And yet
you're letting this type of garbage happen in the state
of Illinois.
Speaker 2 (16:05):
Paul Country hates this, but they keep pushing. Listen to
this Democratic Assemblyman from Illinois, Bob Morgan calling everybody liars.
Speaker 5 (16:13):
My colleague on the other side of the aisle always
seems to be so angry, so angry. And you know,
I really was trying to wonder, why is my colleague
so angry all the time about other people's kids, What's
happening in other people's lives. Listen, and I realized it's
because my colleague isn't working to represent his district. He's
(16:34):
not working to benefit his economy of his community, it's
not working to protect his community. He's embarrassed what he's embarrassed,
And I understand I would be too if I came
to this chamber every day and I talked about issues
didn't impact me, didn't impact my community, didn't impact my area,
(16:55):
didn't impact my businesses. Instead talked about other people and
didn't help my own community, didn't help my town, didn't
help my schools, didn't help the families needed the help.
I would be embarrassed if I were still collecting a
per diem, still collecting my salary, not working for my
own district. I represent Deerfield, I live in Deerfield. So
(17:19):
I'm really proud of my community who stood up for
those who need to be defended and protected, making sure
we have great schools, which we do, by the way,
have incredible, incredible schools, incredible families, incredible community come together
to deal with this situation because it's a lie. So
(17:41):
the next time a representative wants to talk about other
districts again, I understand he may be ashamed, and frankly.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Probably should be.
Speaker 5 (17:51):
But instead of standing on this floor and taking our
time here today talking about children, maybe maybe try and.
Speaker 2 (17:59):
Help your own strank you, representative, What an irritating little
wiener he's lying. No, I don't think a mother goes
all the way to the justice department on a made
up story. Of course, the girls are freaked out. Girls
don't want to see a guy's genitals, especially a guy
(18:20):
claiming to be a woman but he still has the
male genitals. The other middle school girls don't want to
see it. And yeah, people ought to be angry. That
was the strangest response, and he sounds like, why does
he talk like that? We come back, Gavin Newsom. His
popularity is actually falling since he started his podcast. This
(18:43):
is terrible. I don't want a fellow, a fellow iHeart
radio podcaster to lose popularity of you. No, I don't.
I mean we're teammates. I've tried my part.
Speaker 3 (18:58):
You're listening to John Kobe on demand from KFI A
six forty.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
We are on from one until four and then after
four o'clock John Colebelt Show on demand the podcast Conway's
going to be here in about twenty minutes now. Debora
had in her news a little that's a flashback. It's
nostalgic PTSD man five years ago today, do some announced
the Great Lockdown? You want to play that clip again? Sure?
Speaker 4 (19:24):
You ready?
Speaker 1 (19:24):
Yeah?
Speaker 5 (19:25):
And there's a recognition of our interdependence that requires of
this moment that we direct a statewide order for people
to stay at home. Not really sure what the whole
interdependence part means.
Speaker 2 (19:41):
I mean, that was five years ago, and you know
I'm listening to it. I don't know what I thought
five years ago, but you know, we found out yesterday
and I checked this out. It's true. His SAT scores
were below average. Yeah, only nine to sixty. The average
SAT scores ten twenty eight. You know, to get into
(20:05):
Harvard you need like a fifteen hundred, So he had
about sixty percent of the SAT score you need to
get into an Ivy League school. And sometimes when people
know they're stupid. Now, he grew up among wealthy people
and accomplished people, so I'm guessing I think a lot
of his weird personality quirks come come from insecurity, trying
(20:26):
to prove himself, trying to prove himself. And one thing
that some people do when they feel intellectually insecure is
they try to use big words, and because they're not
very bright, they tend to use them inappropriately. They use
them in the middle of sentences that make you go,
what the hell is he talking. He does this with jargon.
(20:47):
He throws in a lot of tech jargon, and it's
to cover up that he's not that smart. But he
learned how to manipulate because people will if you use
a lot of big words, people will think you're smart.
And he thinkured he was smart enough to figure that out.
So I'll learn a lot of jargon. I'll learn a
lot of long words, and I'll throw them in even
if they don't make sense. I'll give that to him.
(21:11):
Now obviously, well, we all know the damage he did.
Schools were closed for a year and a half, as
a whole generation of kids have been permanently brain damaged
by that. He killed about twenty thousand businesses, and on
and on and on. One part that's been overlooked was
highlighted by our guest yesterday, Susan Crabtree. She and her
(21:33):
co writer co author Jed McPhatter wrote this book called
Fool's Gold, The Radicals, con artists and traders who killed
the California Dream and now threaten us all. We had
her on for a half hour yesterday. There's an excerpt
online one of the chapters, and I wanted to take
I wanted to read you the excerpt or part of it.
(21:54):
And it's about the lockdown and he let out thousands
of prisoners, claiming falsely that it would be safer for
the prisoners to be outside the prison. If they were inside,
they were more likely to catch COVID and die, which
(22:15):
wasn't true. But in those years immediately after he let
out the prisoners. Violent crime in California. According to Susan
Krabtree and Jed macfatter, violent crime skyrocketed. Homicides jumped by
almost thirty four percent, aggravated assaults by twenty five percent
(22:38):
in twenty twenty two. Gun related homicides went up thirty
seven percent, aggravated assaults with a gun sixty one percent,
and as they write, the actual rates are likely much
higher because crime data only captures the incidents reported to
the police, and a lot of crimes go unreported. And
(22:59):
they directly correspond with what they describe as Newsom's progressive
experiment with criminal justice reform. He released tens of thousands
of prisoners during COVID, and the crime rates went up,
Like I said, homicides thirty four percent, aggravated assaults twenty
(23:20):
five percent, gun related homicides, and aggravated assaults thirty seven percent,
sixty one percent. That's because you had ten thousand, tens
of thousands of criminals released. When you release criminals from
state prison, they are the worst criminals. You have to
do something really, really bad to end up in state prison.
So the state prison population has dropped under Jerry Brown
(23:43):
and Gavin Newsom from one hundred and sixty thousand people
in twenty eleven to ninety one thousand by twenty twenty four,
and Newsom wants to cut another five thousand prisoners in
the next three years. He has closed or is closing
(24:05):
four state prisons. He's reimagining San Quentin. The death row
was shut down, although that violated three referendums passed by
the voters. And then you ended up with what a
couple of years ago, massive smash and grab theft gangs.
(24:28):
Where do you think those guys came from? That wasn't
a graduating class from an accounting school. Those were the
prisoners that knew some let out you had, as they write,
flash mobs of masked robbers stormed through Nordstrom and all
(24:50):
the high end retailers in San Francisco killed the downtown
of San Francisco. All the businesses emptied out. They got
out Nordstrom, Macy's, Whole Foods, Anthropology, Old Navy Office Depot
seven to eleven, Denny's all closed stores in downtown San
(25:10):
Francisco or nearby Oakland. Starbucks and Target also closed locations.
This was all from Newsom letting out tens of thousands
of prisoners by claiming they were at high risk for COVID.
But if you look at the statistics, COVID is actually
less of a problem inside prisons than outside. Newsom, of course,
(25:37):
claimed the business closures in San Francisco were macroeconomic shifts.
There he is using a big word again, macroeconomic. That's
to distract you from the stupidity of his policy. San Francisco,
by twenty twenty three, the downtown was such a hotbed
(25:58):
of crime, homelessness, and drug that the Department of Health
and Human Services, the federal agency, told employees to work
remotely for the foreseeable future, not because of COVID, but
because of all the crime that really they were warning
you stay home and work, otherwise you'll die. Showing up
(26:20):
for work there had become too dangerous. Same thing in
southern California, they write, Santa Monica and Los Angeles.
Speaker 1 (26:29):
We know that.
Speaker 2 (26:31):
Wilshire Boulevard, so many stores and I see this all
the time. In Santa Monica. You go down boulevard, dozens
of boarded up or empty storefronts because of criminals and crazy,
mentally ill, drug addicted vagrants. And this is a complete
(26:52):
failure of progressive politics and the high priest of progressive
politics in California now, Gavin Newsom, governor for six years,
lieutenant governor for eight years before that, and then mayor
San Francisco before that. He's been inflicted on us for
over twenty years. And if you could go on a
(27:13):
time machine and experience San Francisco or downtown LA or
Santa Monica or even Oakland twenty years ago and experience
it today, it's a vicious nightmare. Now it all goes
back to progressive crime policies, all goes back to Newsom
and Jerry Brown. They ruin the place, and now he
(27:33):
thinks he's going to do a podcast and change the perception. Well,
we come back. I'll tell you. They've done a little
study on his popularity since the podcast came out. Wait
till you find out how few there's so few people
listening to do this poll, they actually had to play
snippets of the podcast because most people don't listen to it.
(27:54):
But I mean more than most people, nearly everyone doesn't
listen to it. I'll tell you we come back.
Speaker 3 (28:00):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI Am
six forty.
Speaker 2 (28:06):
So they Capital Weekly did a poll to see if
Gavin Newsen's podcast had any effect on the public's view
of him, and they found out this is this is funny.
Fifty four percent of California and said they had heard
about the podcast right it was all over the news,
but forty six percent did not know about it. But
(28:28):
out of all the respondents, how many people said they
listened to it one half of one percent. Ninety nine
and a half percent of those polled has not listened
to a Gavin Newsom podcast. Boy, you wouldn't know it
by the news coverage, huh. And so they to do
(28:48):
the study, they had to play clips of the podcast
to see what they thought of it. And they played
a clip of about the trans athlete controversy, where Newsom
says it's deeply unfair to biological males competing with women.
Second clip was over the usage of the term LATINX,
(29:10):
which nobody uses, including ninety seven percent of latinos. And
then a clip where Newsom introduced this right wing activist
Charlie Kirk and joke that Newsom's thirteen year old son
wanted to stay home from school to meet Kirk, and
Kirk said, you canceled school for like two years, what's
(29:32):
one more day? So these people polled got to hear
the three clips, and only thirteen percent have an improved
perception of Newsom after listening to the three clips. So
only one half of one percent listen to the podcast,
and among the people giving clips, only thirteen percent improved
(29:53):
their perception. I don't think it's going to do for
him what he thought it was going to do for him.
We now go to.
Speaker 6 (30:03):
Tim Cotton, Dang dong with you, John Colebell, look at you.
We got Michael Monks coming on. I guess the city
of Los Angeles is in some financial trouble. We talk
about that bad vibes and Spirit Airlines has a dress
code now.
Speaker 2 (30:18):
They've had it.
Speaker 6 (30:19):
You have to dress, you have to you gotta wear shoes,
you can't wear flip flops. You can't have a body
odor unless it qualifies under a certain like disability I
don't know, or.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
A cultural waiver maybe, but whatever it is. If you stink,
you got to get off that plane. Have you ever
got on Spirit once to Detroit? It was pretty good.
Yeah it was Yeah.
Speaker 6 (30:42):
I got one of those they call him big ass
seats up in front if you pay another of thirty
bucks or so, and if they still have them or not.
Speaker 2 (30:49):
Just nearly one hundred percent of the fights on airlines
that I see happen on Spirit. Yeah.
Speaker 6 (30:55):
But but John, you know that's sort of you know,
like like when you go on a carnival ride at
a church.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
One of the one of the.
Speaker 6 (31:02):
You know, the the sort of thrilling aspects of it
is this is this ride gonna stay together while I'm
on it? You know, when you go in Spirit airlines,
you want to see where the battle's gonna go.
Speaker 1 (31:12):
Right.
Speaker 6 (31:12):
It does make flying to Vegas more interests, it does, yeah,
you know, like, oh, look it back here, what's going on?
Back here?
Speaker 2 (31:18):
A Spirit flight to Vegas? It will paid nineteen dollars
for right in the middle of the summer. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
although you know now they take off. They used to
taxi from Burbank all the way to Vegas for nineteen dollars,
but I think they take off now, Sonny.
Speaker 6 (31:34):
We've got a lot of big news.
Speaker 2 (31:34):
Also.
Speaker 6 (31:35):
The Dodgers are their magic numbers one sixty now, is
that right?
Speaker 2 (31:39):
You know?
Speaker 6 (31:40):
The over under on the Dodgers this year is one
hundred and four and a half games.
Speaker 2 (31:42):
I think they're going to go north and four and
a half week. Yeah, one hundred and four and a
half way, so they already have two. They only need
one hundred and two and a half more. So far,
so good.
Speaker 6 (31:50):
That's right, that's all right. Yeah, but the Mets, Mets
haven't opened yet. No, no, so they're they're they're one
in sixty two, that's straight said, God's sixty to go.
Speaker 2 (32:01):
Big dog with you, uh Conway here big Dog. Michael
Kerzer is the News Live and the KFI twenty four
hour Newsroom. Hey, you've been listening to the John Cobalt
Show podcast. You can always hear the show live on
KFI Am six forty from one to four pm every
Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime on demand on
the iHeartRadio app.
The John Kobylt Show News
Host
John Kobylt
Popular Podcasts
40s and Free Agents: NFL Draft Season
Daniel Jeremiah of Move the Sticks and Gregg Rosenthal of NFL Daily join forces to break down every team's needs this offseason.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.