February 6, 2026 • 32 mins
The John Kobylt Show Hour 3 (02/06) - Richie Greenberg comes on the show to talk about how San Francisco has cleaned up with the Super Bowl in the Bay Area this weekend. More on the fraud going on in California and a yoga studio clients berating a staff member over ICE in Minneapolis. Moist Line Rounds 1 & 2.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't I am six forty. You're listening to the John
Cobel podcast on the iHeartRadio app run from one until
four o'clock, and the podcast is now released every hour,
So at the end of the one o'clock hour, right
at two, you can hear the podcast for that first hour,
and then the two o'clock hour podcast is released a
(00:21):
little after three o'clock, and the three o'clock hour podcast
released a little after four o'clock. And that's how it's
gonna work. For now, we are got two rides of
the Moistline at three twenty and three fifty, and we're
going to talk with Richie Greenberg. San Francisco, the mayor
for some reason signed a bill reparations for black residents.
(00:45):
It's a city run fund that accepts private donations, also
may use public money, and you can get a payout
up to five million dollars. If you qualify, you could
get debt forgiveness. You get two hundred and fifty years
of tax abatements and income subsidies. This is even though
(01:12):
there are no slaves currently alive in the state of
California and there are no slave owners alive in the Cada.
State of California, and slavery was never legal here. Richie Greenberg,
the activist, writer and commentator, and another resident, Arthur Ritchie,
are suing the city over the plan, and we're going
(01:33):
to talk to Richie Greenberg right now. Richie, how are you.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
I'm doing great. It's a fantastic time to be up
here in San Francisco for a multitude of reasons, but
not for this one with the reparations. And that's why
we went ahead and just said that's it. We've had enough,
but we've got to just put a stop to this permanently.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
Why did the meyrit sign this? Daniel Lurie, he seems
relatively normal by you know, San Francisco political standards. Why
did he signed this thing?
Speaker 2 (02:01):
Well, you know what's really interesting, John's because he did
not actually specify why he signed it and trying to
deflect just when he is. When he was approached by
media asked why did he go through with this, he
just simply said he is right now focusing on helping
the city by making the streets safer and cleaner. That's
(02:25):
what he's focusing on. That's what he said. He avoided answering.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
I've seen conflicting stories. Is there public money in this
fund or not?
Speaker 2 (02:35):
Well, that's what's another really interesting thing about this, and
this is what actually triggered this. This is a triggering milestone,
as I'm calling it, to file suit at this point
that you know, a fund, it's like a bank account.
It's like they opened a bank account the the city
with the mayor's signature on that ordinance, which was done
(02:59):
right at the end of December, allows either publicly appropriated money,
which is you know, us taxpayers money to be deposited
into this account to then be distributed as reparations or
private individuals foundations which which folks friends of Lorries, of
(03:20):
Mayor Lewries, which he has many very wealthy friends, can
put money into this to then have distributed. And that
is part of the problem. That is part of the
the action plan, the complaint for the lawsuit that was
just filed yesterday saying that this particular fund that was
(03:41):
set up is being administered by the city, So there
are city resources being used in an unlawful manner. So
even if it doesn't even if the funds do not
come from at this time taxpayers, there are still employees.
There's an office that has been set up. There's a
(04:02):
human rights commission, you see, right.
Speaker 1 (04:04):
Right, Okay, so at the moment there's not public funding
deposited in the account, but you need to use public
tax money in order to run the department.
Speaker 2 (04:16):
Yes, exactly. And the particular it's actually a commission called
the San Francisco Human Rights Commission, which is different from
the well known human Rights Commission in San Francisco. Here
they do their own thing. They have a thirty million
dollar budget. There was thirty million dollars that is there
within its commit its commission, within its department, and who
(04:39):
knows if tomorrow there could be just that's a whim.
Some money from that gets put into this fund and
it starts slug like it's a slush fund.
Speaker 3 (04:48):
That's okay, what it is?
Speaker 1 (04:50):
Well, you know how that goes. So this goes to
eligible black residents. What what would make you eligible? Like
I said, there's nobody alive from the sligh the era,
and slavery wasn't allowed in California ever, so who possibly
could be eligible?
Speaker 2 (05:08):
Exactly? And that's that's the thing. So they probably these
a different committee. This is a fifteen person reparations committee
that existed for about two years came up with a
plan and said, well, we know that there are either
no individuals that are in this city resident here that
(05:30):
were slaves or direct one generation descendants of slaves. So
let's see what else we could come up with. And
they came up with several more eligibility criteria, which includes
someone who was jailed in a specific time frame during
the period of the failed War on drugs.
Speaker 1 (05:53):
What does that have to do with slavery? If there
were laws, if there's laws against drugs and you were
caught with drugs, then that's what you went to jail for.
It had nothing to do with slavery one hundred and
fifty years ago.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
That's right. And so they expanded it to be beyond
just slavery descendants. There was the the the if you're incarcerated,
that was one criteria, if you will if.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
You're incarcerated, Wait, you committed a felony crime and got
caught and got found guilty, and then you get prize
money when you get out.
Speaker 2 (06:28):
That's one of the reasons why we had to put
a stop to this lunacy and file suit. Of course,
of course, yeah, this is.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
So ridiculous, is what is this two hundred and fifty
years of tax abatements. That means you don't have to
pay taxes until the year here to like twenty two
seventy five.
Speaker 2 (06:49):
No, no, actually, I think you might have read that wrong.
What that was talking about is beyond getting a if
you're if if you are a one who is eligible
for reparations, you would get a a five million dollars
one time lump sum payout five million. Then then if
(07:10):
currently in your job, in your income you do not
make within a certain percentage of the median income of
the city here, which we know is fairly high, then
they will supplement it until you get up to almost
one hundred thousand dollars of annual income for two hundred
(07:31):
and fifty years. Well, that's what that is. So that
would then mean that it could be transferred down generation
of a generation right here.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
Wait a second, So all your descendants for the next
two hundred and fifty years would get this income subsidy.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
Yes, that's the right way to account.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
For slavery that didn't happen one hundred and fifty years ago.
Speaker 2 (07:55):
Or remember if you're jailed in the in the the
failed war, yeah, or if you were denied alone. If
you were a black African American you went in for
a loan, you were denied, that is another potential emil.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
If that's because you had no assets to pay it back.
Speaker 2 (08:16):
Well, even better than that they want to come up
with as part of this whole plan is a separate
kind of black credit score, and so that way you
would see so if you were denied alone because your credits,
your credit was was shot. So now we're going to
come up with a different way, and we have a
black credit score. Doesn't everybody black run banks?
Speaker 1 (08:35):
Doesn't everybody think this is nuts? Even in San Francisco,
black people, white people, everybody.
Speaker 2 (08:41):
I mean no, no, no, no, no. They were activists
here and it's not just a Black African American community
activist in city hall. They voted unanimously to accept this plan.
All eleven of the borders of Advisors, that's our city council,
all eleven voted.
Speaker 1 (08:59):
Where do these people will come from?
Speaker 2 (09:02):
Well, some are locals, some are foreigners that have come
in and and gotten their h you know, their their
their green cars, are citizenship and they're living here now
and they're the ones who are coming up with these plans.
Socialists and centrist Democrats as I love to call themselves.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
Wow, it just it never stops hey before you go. So, uh,
you got the super Bowl, which is actually down in
Santa Clara, but there's a lot of crowds and partying
and events in San Francisco. Did the city clean up
any of the neighborhoods just for show for this week?
Speaker 4 (09:39):
Well?
Speaker 2 (09:40):
Yes, of course. I actually was privy to have a
to go into the media center. I have a press
pass and I was able to go in, and it
is squeaky clean. That area right there around our convention
center is called Moscone Center, right, it's squeaky clean, multiple layers,
checkpoints of security, highly screw nice to be able to
(10:00):
even get a press pass. So it makes me feel
that I'm I'm really up there to get a press pass.
But it's guarded like a fortress. They've got TSA and
they've got Homeland Security, sheriff's apartment with dogs everything all
around inside. It is really it's amazing what they've got
with all their broadcast setups and twenty remote different national
(10:22):
and regional broadcasters are all from there. I saw I
saw Stephen A. Smith's, I saw Martha Stewart was in there, Brandy.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
Carlisle commentator Martha Stewart. Okay, that's right, so it was.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
It was really good there, but the rest of the
city hasn't been touched. The rest of the city has
its good and bad area, but that area and they
have promised no ice. There has been promised that will
no there will be no ice actions within the area
of the city.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Does that piss anybody off? That that they're cleaning all
the streets around the Super Bowl press facility but nowhere
none of the other neighborhoods. You still have to endure
the neatles and the feces, of course, and there.
Speaker 2 (11:04):
Are multiple people including myself, other activists and averag because
we see within a half a block, a few blocks
of the convention area, you've got people that are bent
over in the fentinyl fold and they're they're sleeping out
on the streets there.
Speaker 1 (11:19):
I never heard that there fentinal fold. Oh all right,
Richie Greenberg, thank you very much.
Speaker 2 (11:25):
Okay, my pleasure.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
Have a great week on John our favorite reporter up
in the San Francisco. When we come back, it's going
to be round one of the moist wine.
Speaker 5 (11:36):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (11:42):
A quickie here. I don't know if you heard. The
Washington Post got rid of thirty percent of its news
operations because it loses enormous amounts of money. And all
the journalists are having a hissy fit, and they think
Jeff Bezous ought to keep pouring his money into money
losing operation. They apparently are incapable of attracting a readership
(12:04):
large enough to justify the Post as a business. Now
they're going all over social media to complain that they
were laid off. I'm not making this up. This woman
named Margot Cleveland wrote, I was hired by the Washington
Post in twenty twenty one to transcribe all our interview
(12:25):
questions and give them to Joe Biden days in advance
on picture postcards. Today I was laid off Round one
of the moistline. Let's go man, John. Thanks for calling
the moistline.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
I'm so excited to hear from you.
Speaker 3 (12:46):
Compton. Three cheers for the arrest of Don Lemon and
the so called protesters in the Minnesota church. They say
they were only exercising their First Amendment right. Nay Nay.
It was lawless invasion, trespassing of proper property, disrupting a
religious service, harassment, intimidating families with hate speech. Would this
behavior to be tolerated by any judge in the courtroom?
Was the first Amendment right? No judge, politician or rock
(13:07):
star would tolerated and demand a rest. We need more risk.
Speaker 6 (13:10):
I hear people say, well, we've got the potholes and
we have the homelessness.
Speaker 3 (13:14):
We have all the problems, but it's worth.
Speaker 6 (13:16):
It for this climate. Why does it have to be
an either or Why can't we have both? Why can't
we have a clean, well mannaged state and also have
a nice climate.
Speaker 7 (13:25):
I don't know what all the lessons about illegal immigrants
are taking advantages of Americans. They're the ones that are
causing their kids to suffer. Be angry at them and
save them for baths and Newsom for stealing our tax
dollars and trashing our beautiful cities.
Speaker 8 (13:41):
Hey, if it's Tammy from Denver, thank you for bringing
up the gas prices, because that's why I had to
move because Gavin Newsoon ruined it, ran our poor California
into the ground.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
People are so stupid in this state.
Speaker 9 (13:56):
I drive about four hundred miles a week to and
from work, back and forth, So yeah, I'd love to
pay more. I want to pay more taxes.
Speaker 3 (14:07):
Wasn't it so.
Speaker 10 (14:07):
Important that we needed to drive evse to save the planet.
Speaker 3 (14:12):
Wasn't it more important than taxes?
Speaker 1 (14:14):
In that I thought it was?
Speaker 7 (14:16):
Wasn't it?
Speaker 3 (14:18):
I paid two.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
Sixty nine in Prescott, Arizona.
Speaker 3 (14:22):
This is a simple solution. Tax the electric.
Speaker 11 (14:25):
Vehicles, leave us gas engines alone. We're already paying almost
two dollars.
Speaker 3 (14:30):
A gallon in taxes at the pump. Why isn't Karen.
Speaker 7 (14:34):
Bath and all these other people getting arrested?
Speaker 11 (14:37):
I just heard the mayoral candidate for the city of
Long Beach. One could only hope that the ICE agents
as well as the local Long Beach PD in La
County Sheriff's deputies have you waiting around the corner for
all these idiots to gather and they can slap some
handcuffs on them. Job done.
Speaker 3 (14:57):
Why is it that we can't have the federal metal
in here in audit La and the state of California.
Speaker 6 (15:04):
Too much corrupt stuff going off.
Speaker 12 (15:06):
Please remind everybody about this piecies named Jerry Brown who started.
Speaker 5 (15:11):
This whole mess.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
The trained in nowhere.
Speaker 3 (15:15):
Sounds like a bunch of hogwats to me. Almost every
street I go to has wheelchair acts.
Speaker 4 (15:20):
That's going down, So I don't know.
Speaker 13 (15:23):
That sounds like an excuse to me not to pave
the roads.
Speaker 4 (15:27):
No, it sounds like Gavin Newsom is Frankenstein.
Speaker 14 (15:30):
He doesn't know who he is, where he is, what
he's supposed to do.
Speaker 3 (15:34):
He's Frankenstein.
Speaker 10 (15:35):
He's a dummy.
Speaker 3 (15:36):
That Newsome bit just sounds like an AI generated telenovela.
Come on, man, that's as funny as he is.
Speaker 10 (15:43):
So I just looked up, did any of these gang
members show up today to meet the mayoral candidate Rouhielo
from Long Beach? And that one he showed up because
apparently it was not really a real meeting.
Speaker 14 (15:57):
He just wanted to.
Speaker 10 (15:58):
Sound like a real meeting for attention.
Speaker 3 (15:59):
But this is ridiculous.
Speaker 10 (16:01):
Nobody showed up to meet them.
Speaker 11 (16:03):
None of the gang members, Karen Bath and Hei Anymore,
are pieces of They're like the dog on the bottom
of my shoe.
Speaker 3 (16:11):
We just need to get rid of these people. Change
your vote, everybody start voting different.
Speaker 4 (16:16):
California looks like third world because it's.
Speaker 13 (16:19):
Run by the third World.
Speaker 3 (16:21):
That lady the vote that article invoke magazine about names,
and I think has physically got sick after hearing what
she wrote.
Speaker 4 (16:32):
Karen Bass is not losing any sleep over this.
Speaker 15 (16:37):
Kudos to that person who was out there yelling Karen
Bass more people need to do that, tell me where
we're going to meet. If she came out from behind
her bodyguard, she wouldn't last a minute.
Speaker 13 (16:48):
I really hope the day comes soon that the Senators
investigating the Palasas.
Speaker 3 (16:52):
Fire with Scott and.
Speaker 2 (16:53):
Ron Johnson called Karen Bath that have to testify. She'll
have to say under oath.
Speaker 3 (16:59):
Did she all her text messages? And she'll either get
Cotton to lie.
Speaker 7 (17:03):
Or finally tell us the treat thank you for leaving
your message, Please hang up, Goodbye.
Speaker 1 (17:10):
New York rather than The California Post is reporting that
Karen Pass canceled a scheduled public appearance at the last minute.
She was supposed to attend a ribbon cutting ceremony for
a permanent housing project for the homeless in the San
Fernando Valley this morning, but late Thursday night, media members
(17:32):
were told that she's not going to be able to
attend the event. Nobody knows why gee, maybe it could
be the embarrassment of that La Time story that she's
behind the rewriting of the after action report for the
LA Fire Department. This story has really caused a firestorm,
(17:55):
and she should be chased and questioned on this. It
should constantly be brought up anytime anyone runs into her,
whether you're a regular citizen, member of the media. This
is this is this is a cover up of a
cover up. It is because the after action report was
covering up all her crimes and everybody else's, and then
(18:17):
her rewriting the after action report was covering up I mean,
because none of the versions of the report do we
go back to the first week in January and how
many times she was told about the wind warnings and
fire warnings and got on the plane to Ghana. Anyway,
that's the original sin.
Speaker 5 (18:37):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
We're on every day one until four o'clock. We got
another round of the Moistline coming up in moments, and
if you want to be on next week's Mooints line,
it's eight seven seven Moist eighty six, eight seven seven
Moist eighty six or USU the talkback feature on the
iHeart radio app bit Kelly Loffler on the other Kelly
Loffler is the head of the Small Business Administration under
(19:05):
Trump and former Senator from Georgia, and she released a
video today that the Small Business Administration has uncovered about
eight and a half billion dollars in suspicious business loans
from the COVID era. This is just another layer of
(19:29):
multi billion dollar corruption and theft, and Loffler says that
her agency has suspended more than one hundred and eleven
thousand California bars suspected of committing fraud one hundred and
eleven thousand. They found one address in San Diego where
(19:52):
fourteen businesses were registered going back to twenty twenty that
go over two million dollars in COVID loans the Paycheck
Protection Act. This is separate from the thirty two billion
(20:12):
that was stolen under Newsom's nose from the Unemployment Agency
here in California. This staggering number is the most significant
crackdown on those who defrauded the pandemic program and eliminates
the scale of corruption. And as we did in Minnesota,
we're actively working to identify the criminals who defrauded the
(20:35):
American taxpayers. In Minnesota, the agency suspended about seven thousand
borrowers about eight thousand fraudulent COVID loans worth about four
hundred million. But whatever they're finding in Minnesota is dwarfed
in California one hundred and eleven thousand borrowers suspected of
(20:58):
committing fraud one hundred and eleven thousand, eight and a
half billion dollars in Minneapolis. Meantime, it seems that much
of the public there, a good percentage of the citizens
are insane. Now we've talked a lot about wine moms
(21:19):
and how woke and cantankerous these wine moms have gotten.
There was a pall out which said, oh, I don't know.
Somewhere twenty twenty five percent of people say that violence
in a political situation is okay. But it was sixty
(21:39):
one percent among women ages eighteen to forty four, which
is really frightening. It may be that none of you
husbands or boyfriends ought to go home. I think that's
the lesson out of that statistic was it was a
real poem. It's true, But where did they get that from?
Sixty one percent? Well'll listen to this, A bunch of yo,
(22:00):
a bunch of what did you hear that?
Speaker 11 (22:04):
Oh?
Speaker 1 (22:05):
I see you started playing that that clip? All right,
just wait. These these a group of yoga women, yoga
students at Core Power Yoga, started berating the instructors. They
were demanding that the the yoga shop, the yoga clinic
(22:28):
condemn ice and put an anti ice sign in the window.
This is very popular among the woke businesses in Minneapolies.
Remember those annoying signs. You saw a lot of these
in Santa Monica. People who put these signs on their
front lawn. In this house, we believe, and it gave
like twelve tenets of the woke creed, you know, racial justice,
(22:51):
gender justice, all that. Right, Well, they want an anti
ice sign. These are the customers, These are these are
the young women, and they start barrating the yoga instructors
who don't own the business. Play clip number one.
Speaker 5 (23:08):
You're gonna put the ice up signed back on the
front door.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
You go, we don't want to chat, we want action.
Speaker 9 (23:15):
Do we chat?
Speaker 2 (23:16):
Can day long?
Speaker 1 (23:16):
In this state?
Speaker 5 (23:17):
Are you gonna plant them put the ice outside on
the back on the front.
Speaker 16 (23:19):
Door, not to ask, Yeah, if we want you, if
we want you as if it's up here, please let
me know between If you guys are feeling differently, do
the ask Years at four four is a major corporation.
They're all over this country. The fact to the back,
the fact that they're saying silent about what is happening
in Minneapolis. They're only saying silent but trying to silence
us and speaking out and trying the people who are
working for power. Your guys are teachers, you guys, people
(23:40):
who are presenting you. The fact that is being silence,
the fact that you guys have stayed silent, that is complicit,
That is not okay. People are being murdered and abducted.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
It attacked. Here can get chop faster, nurse.
Speaker 16 (23:51):
It kills me to see people getting word our community,
just our community.
Speaker 17 (23:56):
What it is?
Speaker 1 (23:57):
Silence final before it's you guys always were elsewhere and
I can talk to goodness. So it's gonna hit it
in the wall is not the only way you guys
see it. Guy, is a yoga class.
Speaker 16 (24:29):
The factors, you guys are here to resemble and like
to be the face of for us to a listening here.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
This is the here, Oh, my goodness, this is like
some kind of mental disease. What's wrong with people? You're
screaming at yoga instructors that an anti ice sign was
taken out of the front window.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
What do you?
Speaker 1 (24:49):
What are they? What are they doing? Why don't they
just do their yoga and go home?
Speaker 2 (24:53):
What are they?
Speaker 1 (24:54):
And I mean, is she on drugs? You gotta be
on meth to talk that fast? Nobody can talk that.
I can talk that fast. You can talk that fast
at that high pitch?
Speaker 5 (25:02):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (25:02):
I can.
Speaker 2 (25:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (25:06):
Do you do that when you get mad? Yeah, you
start talking faster and faster, higher, higher pitch.
Speaker 8 (25:10):
I can.
Speaker 1 (25:11):
Well, then you ought to be wrapped up too and
take it so well, well already that's really nuts. There's
a few of us that are wow. I mean, I
just imagine eventually she just started spinning around like a top. No,
I don't do that and shot through the window. If
(25:31):
she frothing at the mouth, I don't froth, you don't
froy I see all right, we've got I want to
play that on the howse thing. Let's say how much
time we have next.
Speaker 5 (25:44):
You're listening to John Cobbels on demand from KFI A six.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
Tepper's already left. But we were talking earlier about a
possible motive for Nancy Guthries kidnapping the mother of Savannah Guthrie,
if it wasn't for ransom, because if you're gonna charge ransom,
you got to show the person you kidnapped is alive,
(26:09):
that you have her, and she's alive, and so far
they have done that, So what would the other reason be?
And never thought maybe something about Savannah Guthrie. They took
her mother, and now there's a FBI special agent. A
former FBI special agent, former CIA member Tracy Walder says
(26:29):
he doesn't believe that they're necessarily after money or only money.
I'm not convinced it's fully about money. There's a lot
of people make more money than she does. But I
feel like, my gut, this is someone who had some
kind of obsession with Savannah, or this was a way
to get to her, or they've got some kind of
(26:51):
beef with her because of whatever story she covered or
whoever she interviewed. And we'll see Deborah is gone, but
the Crosier is going to have the news in a
few minutes. Conway's going to come up. But first round
two of the moistline. Hey, it's Sean.
Speaker 3 (27:08):
Thanks for calling the moistline. I'm so excited to hear
from you to bath time. Well, so, of course we
want to look forward. That is the point is to
look forward.
Speaker 13 (27:16):
But you need to look forward towards something. By the
way to do that is to analyze what you did
wrong in the past. If the same people are still
in charge, and if nobody's learning the lesson of what
they did wrong in the past, and the most forward
event is going to come out the same result, and
we don't want that.
Speaker 4 (27:34):
Well, Karen Bath must have really picked somebody in her
office off to get two of her closest people to
turn it on her. She must have really ticked off
the wrong person. It couldn't happen to a nicer person.
Speaker 12 (27:51):
Now, with this coming out about Karen Bass, that guy,
that head captain, he should start singing like a bird
because she's going to throw him under.
Speaker 3 (27:58):
The bus by much.
Speaker 5 (28:00):
I'm so happy right now that this water down report
has surfaced, because this marked the end of.
Speaker 1 (28:07):
The career of that incompetent parent Bath.
Speaker 12 (28:11):
That's it, Newson is a complete waste of space his
entire cabinet. He could be fixing the roads with that money,
not some silly train line. He could be building desalination plans.
We could have all the fresh water we could possibly
need if they would put the money where it belongs.
How about reservoirs, how about collection ponds. He's a complete
(28:31):
waste of space, It's.
Speaker 3 (28:32):
Said, listening to your show talking about Maxine Waters.
Speaker 6 (28:36):
She's absolutely delusional and thinks that she is untouchable.
Speaker 3 (28:40):
She needs to retire.
Speaker 9 (28:41):
She's crazy.
Speaker 4 (28:42):
I think we should get rid of them, and may
just get rid of that entire.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
Staff so we won't have any bur requests. We do
not need a mayor, no mayor.
Speaker 14 (28:51):
I hope the La Times is taking what Mayor Bash
said about them, the muck breaking comments as a compliment, because.
Speaker 3 (29:01):
It should be a compliment.
Speaker 14 (29:03):
And I can't understand the ignorance of any politician that
goes up there and then makes it a derogatory statement.
Isn't that self incriminating? Doesn't it make them look guilty
at something?
Speaker 15 (29:16):
Newsom, who's goallenging?
Speaker 12 (29:18):
Who seriously two dollars and seven cents for regular in
East Texas?
Speaker 17 (29:24):
Do you think that you know with these environmental limits
on the refineries that we should have had the EPA
check into Gavin Newsom's hair to see exactly how bad
it's affecting the environment, and if so, charge him millions
of dollars to get it fixed.
Speaker 1 (29:42):
So there's no hope for California.
Speaker 6 (29:44):
You keep talking about everybody thinks that Newsom.
Speaker 7 (29:47):
Is so handsome.
Speaker 6 (29:48):
I don't know if these people need glasses or what.
Speaker 10 (29:51):
Because something that makes somebody attractive is their intelligence, their character.
Speaker 11 (29:59):
He one of those.
Speaker 4 (30:01):
I don't find them attractive at.
Speaker 10 (30:02):
All, So don't love me in that group that you
just said, middle aged to older women.
Speaker 3 (30:09):
I am so so angry over the fraud that goes on.
Speaker 7 (30:12):
I have to pay more in taxes this year than
I ever have.
Speaker 10 (30:16):
I expect a refund of my money once it's figured
out how much it's been stolen.
Speaker 3 (30:22):
All of the help the Trump administration is sending the
buyer victims, it's news invest will just take credit for
because they know the majority.
Speaker 11 (30:28):
Of California's hate trell so they'll believe them instead.
Speaker 3 (30:31):
Of believing chaung.
Speaker 7 (30:32):
Thank you for leaving your message, Please hang up goodbye.
Speaker 1 (30:38):
That is round two of the Moist Line. Next week
eight seven seven Moist eighty six eight seven seven Moist
eighty six. And you know, if you have time this weekend,
you really should read the Vogue article on Gavin Newsom,
where in the first line, by the way, the writer's
name is maya Singer, and she will live in infamy
as the most absurddiculous candidate profile I've ever read in
(31:02):
my life, embarrassingly handsome Avenuwsom and it got worse from there.
And also this might be a word to Karen Bass's staff,
especially the spokeshole department. Nobody and I mean nobody is
believing her. She has zero credibility, so she might as
(31:23):
well come clean and admit that she ordered the rewrite
of the report or in the one in a million chants,
it wasn't her that she ought to turn over the
name of the person who did the rewrite. But she knows,
and Ronnie Villanueva knows, and the current fire chief, i
mean Moore knows because it's her, And that's what everybody believes,
(31:45):
because she is a compulsive liar and she has no credibility.
And you, why don't you sit with that thought all
weekend and then Monday morning come up with a new plan,
like telling the truth all right, we'll be back on Monday.
We've got Conway coming up in minutes. Michael Krozer has
(32:06):
the news live in the KFI twenty four hour Newsroom. Hey,
you've been listening to The John Covelt Show podcast. You
can always hear the show live on KFI Am six
forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
and of course, anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app
Can't I am six forty. You're listening to the John
Cobel podcast on the iHeartRadio app run from one until
four o'clock, and the podcast is now released every hour,
So at the end of the one o'clock hour, right
at two, you can hear the podcast for that first hour,
and then the two o'clock hour podcast is released a
(00:21):
little after three o'clock, and the three o'clock hour podcast
released a little after four o'clock. And that's how it's
gonna work. For now, we are got two rides of
the Moistline at three twenty and three fifty, and we're
going to talk with Richie Greenberg. San Francisco, the mayor
for some reason signed a bill reparations for black residents.
(00:45):
It's a city run fund that accepts private donations, also
may use public money, and you can get a payout
up to five million dollars. If you qualify, you could
get debt forgiveness. You get two hundred and fifty years
of tax abatements and income subsidies. This is even though
(01:12):
there are no slaves currently alive in the state of
California and there are no slave owners alive in the Cada.
State of California, and slavery was never legal here. Richie Greenberg,
the activist, writer and commentator, and another resident, Arthur Ritchie,
are suing the city over the plan, and we're going
(01:33):
to talk to Richie Greenberg right now. Richie, how are you.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
I'm doing great. It's a fantastic time to be up
here in San Francisco for a multitude of reasons, but
not for this one with the reparations. And that's why
we went ahead and just said that's it. We've had enough,
but we've got to just put a stop to this permanently.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
Why did the meyrit sign this? Daniel Lurie, he seems
relatively normal by you know, San Francisco political standards. Why
did he signed this thing?
Speaker 2 (02:01):
Well, you know what's really interesting, John's because he did
not actually specify why he signed it and trying to
deflect just when he is. When he was approached by
media asked why did he go through with this, he
just simply said he is right now focusing on helping
the city by making the streets safer and cleaner. That's
(02:25):
what he's focusing on. That's what he said. He avoided answering.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
I've seen conflicting stories. Is there public money in this
fund or not?
Speaker 2 (02:35):
Well, that's what's another really interesting thing about this, and
this is what actually triggered this. This is a triggering milestone,
as I'm calling it, to file suit at this point
that you know, a fund, it's like a bank account.
It's like they opened a bank account the the city
with the mayor's signature on that ordinance, which was done
(02:59):
right at the end of December, allows either publicly appropriated money,
which is you know, us taxpayers money to be deposited
into this account to then be distributed as reparations or
private individuals foundations which which folks friends of Lorries, of
(03:20):
Mayor Lewries, which he has many very wealthy friends, can
put money into this to then have distributed. And that
is part of the problem. That is part of the
the action plan, the complaint for the lawsuit that was
just filed yesterday saying that this particular fund that was
(03:41):
set up is being administered by the city, So there
are city resources being used in an unlawful manner. So
even if it doesn't even if the funds do not
come from at this time taxpayers, there are still employees.
There's an office that has been set up. There's a
(04:02):
human rights commission, you see, right.
Speaker 1 (04:04):
Right, Okay, so at the moment there's not public funding
deposited in the account, but you need to use public
tax money in order to run the department.
Speaker 2 (04:16):
Yes, exactly. And the particular it's actually a commission called
the San Francisco Human Rights Commission, which is different from
the well known human Rights Commission in San Francisco. Here
they do their own thing. They have a thirty million
dollar budget. There was thirty million dollars that is there
within its commit its commission, within its department, and who
(04:39):
knows if tomorrow there could be just that's a whim.
Some money from that gets put into this fund and
it starts slug like it's a slush fund.
Speaker 3 (04:48):
That's okay, what it is?
Speaker 1 (04:50):
Well, you know how that goes. So this goes to
eligible black residents. What what would make you eligible? Like
I said, there's nobody alive from the sligh the era,
and slavery wasn't allowed in California ever, so who possibly
could be eligible?
Speaker 2 (05:08):
Exactly? And that's that's the thing. So they probably these
a different committee. This is a fifteen person reparations committee
that existed for about two years came up with a
plan and said, well, we know that there are either
no individuals that are in this city resident here that
(05:30):
were slaves or direct one generation descendants of slaves. So
let's see what else we could come up with. And
they came up with several more eligibility criteria, which includes
someone who was jailed in a specific time frame during
the period of the failed War on drugs.
Speaker 1 (05:53):
What does that have to do with slavery? If there
were laws, if there's laws against drugs and you were
caught with drugs, then that's what you went to jail for.
It had nothing to do with slavery one hundred and
fifty years ago.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
That's right. And so they expanded it to be beyond
just slavery descendants. There was the the the if you're incarcerated,
that was one criteria, if you will if.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
You're incarcerated, Wait, you committed a felony crime and got
caught and got found guilty, and then you get prize
money when you get out.
Speaker 2 (06:28):
That's one of the reasons why we had to put
a stop to this lunacy and file suit. Of course,
of course, yeah, this is.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
So ridiculous, is what is this two hundred and fifty
years of tax abatements. That means you don't have to
pay taxes until the year here to like twenty two
seventy five.
Speaker 2 (06:49):
No, no, actually, I think you might have read that wrong.
What that was talking about is beyond getting a if
you're if if you are a one who is eligible
for reparations, you would get a a five million dollars
one time lump sum payout five million. Then then if
(07:10):
currently in your job, in your income you do not
make within a certain percentage of the median income of
the city here, which we know is fairly high, then
they will supplement it until you get up to almost
one hundred thousand dollars of annual income for two hundred
(07:31):
and fifty years. Well, that's what that is. So that
would then mean that it could be transferred down generation
of a generation right here.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
Wait a second, So all your descendants for the next
two hundred and fifty years would get this income subsidy.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
Yes, that's the right way to account.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
For slavery that didn't happen one hundred and fifty years ago.
Speaker 2 (07:55):
Or remember if you're jailed in the in the the
failed war, yeah, or if you were denied alone. If
you were a black African American you went in for
a loan, you were denied, that is another potential emil.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
If that's because you had no assets to pay it back.
Speaker 2 (08:16):
Well, even better than that they want to come up
with as part of this whole plan is a separate
kind of black credit score, and so that way you
would see so if you were denied alone because your credits,
your credit was was shot. So now we're going to
come up with a different way, and we have a
black credit score. Doesn't everybody black run banks?
Speaker 1 (08:35):
Doesn't everybody think this is nuts? Even in San Francisco,
black people, white people, everybody.
Speaker 2 (08:41):
I mean no, no, no, no, no. They were activists
here and it's not just a Black African American community
activist in city hall. They voted unanimously to accept this plan.
All eleven of the borders of Advisors, that's our city council,
all eleven voted.
Speaker 1 (08:59):
Where do these people will come from?
Speaker 2 (09:02):
Well, some are locals, some are foreigners that have come
in and and gotten their h you know, their their
their green cars, are citizenship and they're living here now
and they're the ones who are coming up with these plans.
Socialists and centrist Democrats as I love to call themselves.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
Wow, it just it never stops hey before you go. So, uh,
you got the super Bowl, which is actually down in
Santa Clara, but there's a lot of crowds and partying
and events in San Francisco. Did the city clean up
any of the neighborhoods just for show for this week?
Speaker 4 (09:39):
Well?
Speaker 2 (09:40):
Yes, of course. I actually was privy to have a
to go into the media center. I have a press
pass and I was able to go in, and it
is squeaky clean. That area right there around our convention
center is called Moscone Center, right, it's squeaky clean, multiple layers,
checkpoints of security, highly screw nice to be able to
(10:00):
even get a press pass. So it makes me feel
that I'm I'm really up there to get a press pass.
But it's guarded like a fortress. They've got TSA and
they've got Homeland Security, sheriff's apartment with dogs everything all
around inside. It is really it's amazing what they've got
with all their broadcast setups and twenty remote different national
(10:22):
and regional broadcasters are all from there. I saw I
saw Stephen A. Smith's, I saw Martha Stewart was in there, Brandy.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
Carlisle commentator Martha Stewart. Okay, that's right, so it was.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
It was really good there, but the rest of the
city hasn't been touched. The rest of the city has
its good and bad area, but that area and they
have promised no ice. There has been promised that will
no there will be no ice actions within the area
of the city.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Does that piss anybody off? That that they're cleaning all
the streets around the Super Bowl press facility but nowhere
none of the other neighborhoods. You still have to endure
the neatles and the feces, of course, and there.
Speaker 2 (11:04):
Are multiple people including myself, other activists and averag because
we see within a half a block, a few blocks
of the convention area, you've got people that are bent
over in the fentinyl fold and they're they're sleeping out
on the streets there.
Speaker 1 (11:19):
I never heard that there fentinal fold. Oh all right,
Richie Greenberg, thank you very much.
Speaker 2 (11:25):
Okay, my pleasure.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
Have a great week on John our favorite reporter up
in the San Francisco. When we come back, it's going
to be round one of the moist wine.
Speaker 5 (11:36):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (11:42):
A quickie here. I don't know if you heard. The
Washington Post got rid of thirty percent of its news
operations because it loses enormous amounts of money. And all
the journalists are having a hissy fit, and they think
Jeff Bezous ought to keep pouring his money into money
losing operation. They apparently are incapable of attracting a readership
(12:04):
large enough to justify the Post as a business. Now
they're going all over social media to complain that they
were laid off. I'm not making this up. This woman
named Margot Cleveland wrote, I was hired by the Washington
Post in twenty twenty one to transcribe all our interview
(12:25):
questions and give them to Joe Biden days in advance
on picture postcards. Today I was laid off Round one
of the moistline. Let's go man, John. Thanks for calling
the moistline.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
I'm so excited to hear from you.
Speaker 3 (12:46):
Compton. Three cheers for the arrest of Don Lemon and
the so called protesters in the Minnesota church. They say
they were only exercising their First Amendment right. Nay Nay.
It was lawless invasion, trespassing of proper property, disrupting a
religious service, harassment, intimidating families with hate speech. Would this
behavior to be tolerated by any judge in the courtroom?
Was the first Amendment right? No judge, politician or rock
(13:07):
star would tolerated and demand a rest. We need more risk.
Speaker 6 (13:10):
I hear people say, well, we've got the potholes and
we have the homelessness.
Speaker 3 (13:14):
We have all the problems, but it's worth.
Speaker 6 (13:16):
It for this climate. Why does it have to be
an either or Why can't we have both? Why can't
we have a clean, well mannaged state and also have
a nice climate.
Speaker 7 (13:25):
I don't know what all the lessons about illegal immigrants
are taking advantages of Americans. They're the ones that are
causing their kids to suffer. Be angry at them and
save them for baths and Newsom for stealing our tax
dollars and trashing our beautiful cities.
Speaker 8 (13:41):
Hey, if it's Tammy from Denver, thank you for bringing
up the gas prices, because that's why I had to
move because Gavin Newsoon ruined it, ran our poor California
into the ground.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
People are so stupid in this state.
Speaker 9 (13:56):
I drive about four hundred miles a week to and
from work, back and forth, So yeah, I'd love to
pay more. I want to pay more taxes.
Speaker 3 (14:07):
Wasn't it so.
Speaker 10 (14:07):
Important that we needed to drive evse to save the planet.
Speaker 3 (14:12):
Wasn't it more important than taxes?
Speaker 1 (14:14):
In that I thought it was?
Speaker 7 (14:16):
Wasn't it?
Speaker 3 (14:18):
I paid two.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
Sixty nine in Prescott, Arizona.
Speaker 3 (14:22):
This is a simple solution. Tax the electric.
Speaker 11 (14:25):
Vehicles, leave us gas engines alone. We're already paying almost
two dollars.
Speaker 3 (14:30):
A gallon in taxes at the pump. Why isn't Karen.
Speaker 7 (14:34):
Bath and all these other people getting arrested?
Speaker 11 (14:37):
I just heard the mayoral candidate for the city of
Long Beach. One could only hope that the ICE agents
as well as the local Long Beach PD in La
County Sheriff's deputies have you waiting around the corner for
all these idiots to gather and they can slap some
handcuffs on them. Job done.
Speaker 3 (14:57):
Why is it that we can't have the federal metal
in here in audit La and the state of California.
Speaker 6 (15:04):
Too much corrupt stuff going off.
Speaker 12 (15:06):
Please remind everybody about this piecies named Jerry Brown who started.
Speaker 5 (15:11):
This whole mess.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
The trained in nowhere.
Speaker 3 (15:15):
Sounds like a bunch of hogwats to me. Almost every
street I go to has wheelchair acts.
Speaker 4 (15:20):
That's going down, So I don't know.
Speaker 13 (15:23):
That sounds like an excuse to me not to pave
the roads.
Speaker 4 (15:27):
No, it sounds like Gavin Newsom is Frankenstein.
Speaker 14 (15:30):
He doesn't know who he is, where he is, what
he's supposed to do.
Speaker 3 (15:34):
He's Frankenstein.
Speaker 10 (15:35):
He's a dummy.
Speaker 3 (15:36):
That Newsome bit just sounds like an AI generated telenovela.
Come on, man, that's as funny as he is.
Speaker 10 (15:43):
So I just looked up, did any of these gang
members show up today to meet the mayoral candidate Rouhielo
from Long Beach? And that one he showed up because
apparently it was not really a real meeting.
Speaker 14 (15:57):
He just wanted to.
Speaker 10 (15:58):
Sound like a real meeting for attention.
Speaker 3 (15:59):
But this is ridiculous.
Speaker 10 (16:01):
Nobody showed up to meet them.
Speaker 11 (16:03):
None of the gang members, Karen Bath and Hei Anymore,
are pieces of They're like the dog on the bottom
of my shoe.
Speaker 3 (16:11):
We just need to get rid of these people. Change
your vote, everybody start voting different.
Speaker 4 (16:16):
California looks like third world because it's.
Speaker 13 (16:19):
Run by the third World.
Speaker 3 (16:21):
That lady the vote that article invoke magazine about names,
and I think has physically got sick after hearing what
she wrote.
Speaker 4 (16:32):
Karen Bass is not losing any sleep over this.
Speaker 15 (16:37):
Kudos to that person who was out there yelling Karen
Bass more people need to do that, tell me where
we're going to meet. If she came out from behind
her bodyguard, she wouldn't last a minute.
Speaker 13 (16:48):
I really hope the day comes soon that the Senators
investigating the Palasas.
Speaker 3 (16:52):
Fire with Scott and.
Speaker 2 (16:53):
Ron Johnson called Karen Bath that have to testify. She'll
have to say under oath.
Speaker 3 (16:59):
Did she all her text messages? And she'll either get
Cotton to lie.
Speaker 7 (17:03):
Or finally tell us the treat thank you for leaving
your message, Please hang up, Goodbye.
Speaker 1 (17:10):
New York rather than The California Post is reporting that
Karen Pass canceled a scheduled public appearance at the last minute.
She was supposed to attend a ribbon cutting ceremony for
a permanent housing project for the homeless in the San
Fernando Valley this morning, but late Thursday night, media members
(17:32):
were told that she's not going to be able to
attend the event. Nobody knows why gee, maybe it could
be the embarrassment of that La Time story that she's
behind the rewriting of the after action report for the
LA Fire Department. This story has really caused a firestorm,
(17:55):
and she should be chased and questioned on this. It
should constantly be brought up anytime anyone runs into her,
whether you're a regular citizen, member of the media. This
is this is this is a cover up of a
cover up. It is because the after action report was
covering up all her crimes and everybody else's, and then
(18:17):
her rewriting the after action report was covering up I mean,
because none of the versions of the report do we
go back to the first week in January and how
many times she was told about the wind warnings and
fire warnings and got on the plane to Ghana. Anyway,
that's the original sin.
Speaker 5 (18:37):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
We're on every day one until four o'clock. We got
another round of the Moistline coming up in moments, and
if you want to be on next week's Mooints line,
it's eight seven seven Moist eighty six, eight seven seven
Moist eighty six or USU the talkback feature on the
iHeart radio app bit Kelly Loffler on the other Kelly
Loffler is the head of the Small Business Administration under
(19:05):
Trump and former Senator from Georgia, and she released a
video today that the Small Business Administration has uncovered about
eight and a half billion dollars in suspicious business loans
from the COVID era. This is just another layer of
(19:29):
multi billion dollar corruption and theft, and Loffler says that
her agency has suspended more than one hundred and eleven
thousand California bars suspected of committing fraud one hundred and
eleven thousand. They found one address in San Diego where
(19:52):
fourteen businesses were registered going back to twenty twenty that
go over two million dollars in COVID loans the Paycheck
Protection Act. This is separate from the thirty two billion
(20:12):
that was stolen under Newsom's nose from the Unemployment Agency
here in California. This staggering number is the most significant
crackdown on those who defrauded the pandemic program and eliminates
the scale of corruption. And as we did in Minnesota,
we're actively working to identify the criminals who defrauded the
(20:35):
American taxpayers. In Minnesota, the agency suspended about seven thousand
borrowers about eight thousand fraudulent COVID loans worth about four
hundred million. But whatever they're finding in Minnesota is dwarfed
in California one hundred and eleven thousand borrowers suspected of
(20:58):
committing fraud one hundred and eleven thousand, eight and a
half billion dollars in Minneapolis. Meantime, it seems that much
of the public there, a good percentage of the citizens
are insane. Now we've talked a lot about wine moms
(21:19):
and how woke and cantankerous these wine moms have gotten.
There was a pall out which said, oh, I don't know.
Somewhere twenty twenty five percent of people say that violence
in a political situation is okay. But it was sixty
(21:39):
one percent among women ages eighteen to forty four, which
is really frightening. It may be that none of you
husbands or boyfriends ought to go home. I think that's
the lesson out of that statistic was it was a
real poem. It's true, But where did they get that from?
Sixty one percent? Well'll listen to this, A bunch of yo,
(22:00):
a bunch of what did you hear that?
Speaker 11 (22:04):
Oh?
Speaker 1 (22:05):
I see you started playing that that clip? All right,
just wait. These these a group of yoga women, yoga
students at Core Power Yoga, started berating the instructors. They
were demanding that the the yoga shop, the yoga clinic
(22:28):
condemn ice and put an anti ice sign in the window.
This is very popular among the woke businesses in Minneapolies.
Remember those annoying signs. You saw a lot of these
in Santa Monica. People who put these signs on their
front lawn. In this house, we believe, and it gave
like twelve tenets of the woke creed, you know, racial justice,
(22:51):
gender justice, all that. Right, Well, they want an anti
ice sign. These are the customers, These are these are
the young women, and they start barrating the yoga instructors
who don't own the business. Play clip number one.
Speaker 5 (23:08):
You're gonna put the ice up signed back on the
front door.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
You go, we don't want to chat, we want action.
Speaker 9 (23:15):
Do we chat?
Speaker 2 (23:16):
Can day long?
Speaker 1 (23:16):
In this state?
Speaker 5 (23:17):
Are you gonna plant them put the ice outside on
the back on the front.
Speaker 16 (23:19):
Door, not to ask, Yeah, if we want you, if
we want you as if it's up here, please let
me know between If you guys are feeling differently, do
the ask Years at four four is a major corporation.
They're all over this country. The fact to the back,
the fact that they're saying silent about what is happening
in Minneapolis. They're only saying silent but trying to silence
us and speaking out and trying the people who are
working for power. Your guys are teachers, you guys, people
(23:40):
who are presenting you. The fact that is being silence,
the fact that you guys have stayed silent, that is complicit,
That is not okay. People are being murdered and abducted.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
It attacked. Here can get chop faster, nurse.
Speaker 16 (23:51):
It kills me to see people getting word our community,
just our community.
Speaker 17 (23:56):
What it is?
Speaker 1 (23:57):
Silence final before it's you guys always were elsewhere and
I can talk to goodness. So it's gonna hit it
in the wall is not the only way you guys
see it. Guy, is a yoga class.
Speaker 16 (24:29):
The factors, you guys are here to resemble and like
to be the face of for us to a listening here.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
This is the here, Oh, my goodness, this is like
some kind of mental disease. What's wrong with people? You're
screaming at yoga instructors that an anti ice sign was
taken out of the front window.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
What do you?
Speaker 1 (24:49):
What are they? What are they doing? Why don't they
just do their yoga and go home?
Speaker 2 (24:53):
What are they?
Speaker 1 (24:54):
And I mean, is she on drugs? You gotta be
on meth to talk that fast? Nobody can talk that.
I can talk that fast. You can talk that fast
at that high pitch?
Speaker 5 (25:02):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (25:02):
I can.
Speaker 2 (25:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (25:06):
Do you do that when you get mad? Yeah, you
start talking faster and faster, higher, higher pitch.
Speaker 8 (25:10):
I can.
Speaker 1 (25:11):
Well, then you ought to be wrapped up too and
take it so well, well already that's really nuts. There's
a few of us that are wow. I mean, I
just imagine eventually she just started spinning around like a top. No,
I don't do that and shot through the window. If
(25:31):
she frothing at the mouth, I don't froth, you don't
froy I see all right, we've got I want to
play that on the howse thing. Let's say how much
time we have next.
Speaker 5 (25:44):
You're listening to John Cobbels on demand from KFI A six.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
Tepper's already left. But we were talking earlier about a
possible motive for Nancy Guthries kidnapping the mother of Savannah Guthrie,
if it wasn't for ransom, because if you're gonna charge ransom,
you got to show the person you kidnapped is alive,
(26:09):
that you have her, and she's alive, and so far
they have done that, So what would the other reason be?
And never thought maybe something about Savannah Guthrie. They took
her mother, and now there's a FBI special agent. A
former FBI special agent, former CIA member Tracy Walder says
(26:29):
he doesn't believe that they're necessarily after money or only money.
I'm not convinced it's fully about money. There's a lot
of people make more money than she does. But I
feel like, my gut, this is someone who had some
kind of obsession with Savannah, or this was a way
to get to her, or they've got some kind of
(26:51):
beef with her because of whatever story she covered or
whoever she interviewed. And we'll see Deborah is gone, but
the Crosier is going to have the news in a
few minutes. Conway's going to come up. But first round
two of the moistline. Hey, it's Sean.
Speaker 3 (27:08):
Thanks for calling the moistline. I'm so excited to hear
from you to bath time. Well, so, of course we
want to look forward. That is the point is to
look forward.
Speaker 13 (27:16):
But you need to look forward towards something. By the
way to do that is to analyze what you did
wrong in the past. If the same people are still
in charge, and if nobody's learning the lesson of what
they did wrong in the past, and the most forward
event is going to come out the same result, and
we don't want that.
Speaker 4 (27:34):
Well, Karen Bath must have really picked somebody in her
office off to get two of her closest people to
turn it on her. She must have really ticked off
the wrong person. It couldn't happen to a nicer person.
Speaker 12 (27:51):
Now, with this coming out about Karen Bass, that guy,
that head captain, he should start singing like a bird
because she's going to throw him under.
Speaker 3 (27:58):
The bus by much.
Speaker 5 (28:00):
I'm so happy right now that this water down report
has surfaced, because this marked the end of.
Speaker 1 (28:07):
The career of that incompetent parent Bath.
Speaker 12 (28:11):
That's it, Newson is a complete waste of space his
entire cabinet. He could be fixing the roads with that money,
not some silly train line. He could be building desalination plans.
We could have all the fresh water we could possibly
need if they would put the money where it belongs.
How about reservoirs, how about collection ponds. He's a complete
(28:31):
waste of space, It's.
Speaker 3 (28:32):
Said, listening to your show talking about Maxine Waters.
Speaker 6 (28:36):
She's absolutely delusional and thinks that she is untouchable.
Speaker 3 (28:40):
She needs to retire.
Speaker 9 (28:41):
She's crazy.
Speaker 4 (28:42):
I think we should get rid of them, and may
just get rid of that entire.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
Staff so we won't have any bur requests. We do
not need a mayor, no mayor.
Speaker 14 (28:51):
I hope the La Times is taking what Mayor Bash
said about them, the muck breaking comments as a compliment, because.
Speaker 3 (29:01):
It should be a compliment.
Speaker 14 (29:03):
And I can't understand the ignorance of any politician that
goes up there and then makes it a derogatory statement.
Isn't that self incriminating? Doesn't it make them look guilty
at something?
Speaker 15 (29:16):
Newsom, who's goallenging?
Speaker 12 (29:18):
Who seriously two dollars and seven cents for regular in
East Texas?
Speaker 17 (29:24):
Do you think that you know with these environmental limits
on the refineries that we should have had the EPA
check into Gavin Newsom's hair to see exactly how bad
it's affecting the environment, and if so, charge him millions
of dollars to get it fixed.
Speaker 1 (29:42):
So there's no hope for California.
Speaker 6 (29:44):
You keep talking about everybody thinks that Newsom.
Speaker 7 (29:47):
Is so handsome.
Speaker 6 (29:48):
I don't know if these people need glasses or what.
Speaker 10 (29:51):
Because something that makes somebody attractive is their intelligence, their character.
Speaker 11 (29:59):
He one of those.
Speaker 4 (30:01):
I don't find them attractive at.
Speaker 10 (30:02):
All, So don't love me in that group that you
just said, middle aged to older women.
Speaker 3 (30:09):
I am so so angry over the fraud that goes on.
Speaker 7 (30:12):
I have to pay more in taxes this year than
I ever have.
Speaker 10 (30:16):
I expect a refund of my money once it's figured
out how much it's been stolen.
Speaker 3 (30:22):
All of the help the Trump administration is sending the
buyer victims, it's news invest will just take credit for
because they know the majority.
Speaker 11 (30:28):
Of California's hate trell so they'll believe them instead.
Speaker 3 (30:31):
Of believing chaung.
Speaker 7 (30:32):
Thank you for leaving your message, Please hang up goodbye.
Speaker 1 (30:38):
That is round two of the Moist Line. Next week
eight seven seven Moist eighty six eight seven seven Moist
eighty six. And you know, if you have time this weekend,
you really should read the Vogue article on Gavin Newsom,
where in the first line, by the way, the writer's
name is maya Singer, and she will live in infamy
as the most absurddiculous candidate profile I've ever read in
(31:02):
my life, embarrassingly handsome Avenuwsom and it got worse from there.
And also this might be a word to Karen Bass's staff,
especially the spokeshole department. Nobody and I mean nobody is
believing her. She has zero credibility, so she might as
(31:23):
well come clean and admit that she ordered the rewrite
of the report or in the one in a million chants,
it wasn't her that she ought to turn over the
name of the person who did the rewrite. But she knows,
and Ronnie Villanueva knows, and the current fire chief, i
mean Moore knows because it's her, And that's what everybody believes,
(31:45):
because she is a compulsive liar and she has no credibility.
And you, why don't you sit with that thought all
weekend and then Monday morning come up with a new plan,
like telling the truth all right, we'll be back on Monday.
We've got Conway coming up in minutes. Michael Krozer has
(32:06):
the news live in the KFI twenty four hour Newsroom. Hey,
you've been listening to The John Covelt Show podcast. You
can always hear the show live on KFI Am six
forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
and of course, anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app
The John Kobylt Show News
Host
John Kobylt
Popular Podcasts
Betrayal Season 5
Saskia Inwood woke up one morning, knowing her life would never be the same. The night before, she learned the unimaginable – that the husband she knew in the light of day was a different person after dark. This season unpacks Saskia’s discovery of her husband’s secret life and her fight to bring him to justice. Along the way, we expose a crime that is just coming to light. This is also a story about the myth of the “perfect victim:” who gets believed, who gets doubted, and why. We follow Saskia as she works to reclaim her body, her voice, and her life. If you would like to reach out to the Betrayal Team, email us at betrayalpod@gmail.com. Follow us on Instagram @betrayalpod and @glasspodcasts. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations, and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience, and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by Audiochuck Media Company.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.