May 14, 2026 • 35 mins
Trump in China, JD at home and Dems nowhere at COVID hearing.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Hi, I'm Michael. I'd love to have you listen to
your morning show live. Every day We're heard on great
stations like News Talk five point fifty k FYI and
Phoenix News Radio, eleven ninety k EX in Portland and
ten ninety The Patriot in Seattle. Make us a part
of your morning routine. We'd love to have you listen live.
But in the meantime, enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:19):
Two three starting your morning off right. A new way
of talk, a new way of understanding because we're in
this together.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
This is your Morning Show with Michael O'Dell Chornan.
Speaker 1 (00:35):
Just looking over the beautiful state dinner that is happening
live in China as we speak, and beautiful table settings.
Speaker 4 (00:44):
I'm just looking at.
Speaker 1 (00:45):
The poor Chinese guy through the short straw and guy
Stephen Miller sitting next to him. That's gonna be a
priveting conversation.
Speaker 4 (00:53):
If I were to eat it this time, I would
have indigestion. How are these people doing this well, they're kind.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
Of like you know, boy girl boy year Chinese American
Chinese American. President Trump signaling a desire to do business
with China following a meeting with the president of China.
She at the Great Hall of the People. The Senate
meanwhile have confirmed Kevin warsh here at home nothing to
do with your hands. He will be the next chair
(01:20):
of the fed Bfex Sports to China can restart for
major US producers. Protests in Havana are breaking out as
Cuba is running out of fuel and the people are panicking.
And Cleveland, the Cavaliers moved one went away, they return home.
They can take the Eastern Conference Final with a win
over the Pistons tomorrow night.
Speaker 4 (01:40):
They won last night.
Speaker 1 (01:41):
The Abs made pretty short work of the wild in
five games. They were down three to nothing yesterday and
they came back, tied the game one and over time
four to three. The Abs advance to take the Knights
or the Duck sound for the Western Conference Final. Good
morning and welcome to Thursday May, the fourteenth year of
Our Lord twenty SI twenty six on the air, streaming
(02:02):
live on your iHeart app.
Speaker 4 (02:03):
This is the show that belongs to you.
Speaker 1 (02:04):
This is your morning show and it is I'm Michael
del Journal honored to serve you. You can always be
a part of your morning show by taking your place
at the kitchen table. If you're listening on the iHeart app.
There's a microphone. If you press it counts you down
very professionally. Three two one gives you thirty seconds to
make a common ask a question. And of course you
can always email Michael d at iHeartMedia dot com. Jeffrey's
(02:25):
got the sound red keeping an eye on the content. Well,
don't do it like this.
Speaker 4 (02:31):
I'm here.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
You'll have to just talk in a complete sentence and
we'll play in its entirety. Lady, that was actually a
real caller, by the way, I want play that again
from that was in our first few months on the air.
Speaker 4 (02:43):
Who I think he expected us to answer? I can
hear you.
Speaker 1 (02:52):
And that's why we go to such great lens to
explain how the talkback works. All right, couple of things,
big picture there, and it's difficult with translators. It's not
quite as riveting. I'll never forget when this is when email.
This is before text messaging, which it still happens today
with text messaging. But going back to the beginning of email,
(03:15):
and people would read emails in the mood they were in,
not the mood the person who sent it was in,
and so often relationships would sour or fights would break
out over emails.
Speaker 4 (03:34):
Then you'd have to later explain.
Speaker 1 (03:36):
Well, I was joking or I wasn't meaning that mean,
you know, because we're used to three dimensional communication, which
is you can see my face when I'm talking the
words that I'm choosing to use, and then the inflection.
Think of the words I love you. It sounds different
(04:01):
and the look on my face is different every time
I say it. One thing, I like thembout the Greek language.
It's a little more perfect than ours. And that's why
in the Bible they have different words for each kind
of love fialao which is brotherly love, eros which is
love you have with your intimate lover, and then agape,
(04:22):
which is a godly love I extend to you. We
don't differentiate those, so you have to just understand them
by the look on my face. If I'm looking like
Peppy Lapew and I go I love you, you better duck.
But because you know, and then there's inflection, right I
and go I love oh, I love you.
Speaker 4 (04:43):
You know, it's all how you say it.
Speaker 1 (04:46):
And I just bring all this up not to belabor
the point, but when you're having long conversations with the
President of China, that is going through a translator. It's
kind of reminded me of texting and and early emails
in business, you lose something. And President She, unlike President Trump,
(05:09):
who was nodding and you could read everything on his
face as he's nodding, is far more stoic.
Speaker 4 (05:15):
So it's going to be easy to read a lot
into this.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
I mean, what do we do We all wait for
the text on all of this to read every single
word that each leader said and exchanged. People can, just
like every day in bias, pick the angles they choose
to cover, the angles they don't, the quotes they choose
to use, the quotes they don't. So the question becomes
(05:42):
based on who greeted the president on the tarmac with
red carpet and children waving flags. How excited is China
to have the president back? If you go through She's
Marx remarks, it's pretty clear that the way the president glowing,
he talks about President she President she talks about the president.
(06:07):
But you're going to get a feeling today a cut
to the chase that it didn't take very long for
China bring up Taiwan, and I do think that would
be out of balance. No, they're not going to suddenly
give up on Taiwan. That's just not going to happen.
And no, he's not going to fall over himself fawning
(06:29):
over President Trump. He's going to represent his people. He's
got an art of the deal of his own to cut.
So how do we think it's going?
Speaker 4 (06:42):
Well?
Speaker 1 (06:42):
So far, two people realize how important their country is
to the world and the example they can set to
the world in a very troubled time. And it sounds
over simplistic, but for me, right now, that's enough. The
(07:05):
fact that they seem to be on the same page
and see the same opportunity. Now they're going to represent
their country and their interests. I don't think you're going
to see Donald Trump abandoned Taiwan, and I don't think
you're going to see China give up on wanting Taiwan.
But what can they find in common ground in action?
(07:27):
And can that include securing the Strait of Horne moves.
We'll break that down for you. Yesterday hit home, we
had a different breakthrough. So Marco and others are with
the President in China. At home, the Vice President jd
Vance is dealing with fraud as the frauds are and
(07:51):
in doing so, a few cockadoodle doos happened. What does
that mean? I've been talking for well over a year
about how obvious, well, I've been talking for well over
two and a half years that I believe Marco Rubio
is the President's guy. That's who Donald Trump wanted to
(08:11):
be vice president, That's who Donald Trump wants to be
the next president. I am thoroughly convinced of that, and
I would take it to my grave. I think his
kids and strategists came to him with JD.
Speaker 4 (08:24):
Vance.
Speaker 1 (08:26):
Donald Trump wouldn't be likely to forgive a former never Trumper,
and I think he's been playing the apprentice. And I've
been saying that exact word ever since, giving them assignments,
very public assignments so that you can grade them. In
some cases the same assignments. Go to the press court today, Marco,
(08:52):
go to the press cort like JD did, and let
you decide who did it better. Marco, I'm going to
give you a ron JD. I'm going to give you fraud.
Let the American people judge. And so I was having
these conversations, nobody else was. I never doubted that I
was crazy. And then the President drops the bomb and
(09:14):
out in the rose garden does a straw poll on
both of them. Well, that came up yesterday.
Speaker 4 (09:25):
And JD.
Speaker 1 (09:27):
Vance is in the middle of an apprentice assignment, and
the question comes up, is the President playing apprentice with
you guys?
Speaker 5 (09:40):
Well, I just don't think it sounds like the President
of the United States to have a televised competition for
who would succeed him as his apprentice. I just think
that's not at all what you would expect the president
to do. But no, Look, I think the president he's
always been fascinated by politics. If you talk to him,
he was fascinated by politics thirty years before we ever
(10:00):
ran for office.
Speaker 4 (10:01):
So I think it's.
Speaker 5 (10:01):
Natural for him to joke around with us a little bit,
to play around with the idea. But I can tell
you the President is as focused as any of us
on making sure we do as good of a job
now for the American people. What are you going to
be anna see?
Speaker 1 (10:19):
I mean I know that you can win for losing
responding to it. I think JD responded to it as
well as he could. No, that's exactly what the President
is doing. He's playing apprentice, And I think both Marco
and JD know it, which is why later he felt
the need to once again explain his feelings about Marco.
Speaker 4 (10:41):
What's your reaction to the alleged home health fraud?
Speaker 1 (10:44):
Oh wait, wait wait, that's the I know I know
which one is it. We have so many of JD
I don't know which is which. I thought I put
them together. Hold on, Oh gosh, I just went buy
something really funny. Have you seen the I'm gonna stop
(11:04):
and do it. I'm that add So you remember the
attack ad on Pratt in Los Angeles for Mayor and
we were playing it and I was saying to you, all,
this is supposed to be an attack ad on an opponent,
and it's selling the opponent. By we've seen the numbers
move dramatically. Mayor is flat and Pratt is rising. Well,
(11:31):
then we believe it's the Pratt camp that did this, right, Yeah,
I mean we're pretty positive it is. And with AI,
it's amazing what you can do now, right, don't you
don't need and you're in Hollywood you could get the
best pert you don't need them. So Pratt comes out
with this viral commercial. Now this is not on television.
(11:53):
I don't believe. I think it's just viral online. And
of course Los Angeles is burning to then and listen.
Speaker 6 (12:01):
Los Angeles on fire mayor nowhere to be found.
Speaker 4 (12:05):
We were so prepared for wildfires.
Speaker 7 (12:08):
I didn't even have to be in the country when
the town burned.
Speaker 4 (12:12):
I've addressed the homeless problem.
Speaker 7 (12:14):
Now most of them won't stab you as long as
you don't make eye contact.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
She's walking down the street among all the homeless. By
the way, she's out of town and she's she's drinking
with Kamala.
Speaker 4 (12:27):
Our climate change policy is so strong.
Speaker 7 (12:31):
We've brought down energy use in the Palisades by ninety nine.
Speaker 1 (12:35):
As she's walking through the burned rumscent now she's worn
by the drugs and scared children. None of the needles
in children's playgrounds have aids on them.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
If you like the last four years, you're going to
love the next four.
Speaker 4 (12:49):
Boat bass I was just brilliant.
Speaker 1 (12:53):
I'm not ruling out he can win, and I mean,
this is this is how you run for office new Age.
Speaker 8 (13:00):
It really saw him in the hills. I mean he
was sharp tongued. Nobody wanted to mess with him. He
would just completely destroy anybody and any argument. So when
they first said that he was going to run for mayor,
I was like, give me some popcorn.
Speaker 1 (13:17):
Because this is going it is going to be already
is fun. It's fun. I mean her attack ad, what
a disaster. And now his viral ad and it is
it's a visual I mean I did the best I
could playing in the audio, but you know how you
know how good AI.
Speaker 4 (13:32):
Is and suddenly, Michael, She's not going to show up
for the debate. Debate.
Speaker 1 (13:39):
Uh, it's this viral ad is a game changer. It's
one of my favorites all time in politics. It was
it's hysterical. Everyone forgets something now and then a name,
a word. Why you walk into a room, look at
that's all normal. When it starts happening all too often
or more and more, well, then it may be time
(14:02):
to support your brain health with in a more targeted way.
And that's where Sarahfolan brain wellness can come in. Recommended
not by talk show hosts, but by neurologists. This particular
talk show host just studied it. Sarahfolin brain wellness delivers
targeted nutrition designed to support brain health, help slow cognitive decline.
And I know we're all paranoid about that. It's formulated
(14:25):
with very specific nutrients your brain needs as part of
a medical approach for mild cognitive impairment with hyperhomless systeinemia,
and getting started is simple the way I did. Learning more,
exploring the science for yourself and see if Sarah Folan
Brain Wellness is right for you. Go to Sarahfolan dot com.
C E R E, F O, L I N Sarahfolan
(14:47):
dot com. You can also find it on Amazon. Sara
Follen Brain Wellness is a medical food for your brain
with specific nutrients for mild cognitive impairment with hyperhomo systeinemia. Obviously,
consult and use under the medical supervision with your primary physician,
but supporting your brain today can make a real difference
(15:07):
in your tomorrow. Learn more at Sarah Folan dot com.
That's Sarah Folan dot com.
Speaker 3 (15:14):
This is your morning show with Michael del Chuna.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
Obviously, all eyes are on China. The President met with
the Chinese leader, Shijingping at Beijing's Great Hall of the
People last night. Speaking before the meeting, Trump had nothing
but praise for the Chinese president. It's an honor to
be with you.
Speaker 8 (15:35):
It's an honor to be your friend, and the relationship
between China and the USA is going to be better
than ever before.
Speaker 4 (15:42):
President went out to tell the importance of the meeting,
So I.
Speaker 8 (15:45):
Really look very much forward to our discussion.
Speaker 4 (15:47):
It's a big discussion.
Speaker 8 (15:48):
There were those that say this is maybe the biggest
summit ever, They can never remember anything like it.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
The Chinese President seemed to feel the same way through
a translator and his call for the magnitude of these
meetings and what cooperation can produce.
Speaker 2 (16:04):
We should be partners, not rivals, so should help each
other succeed and prosper together and find the right way
for major countries to get along well with each other
in the new era.
Speaker 1 (16:16):
Meanwhile, at home, the Senate has confirmed Kevin Walsh as
the next Chair of the Federal Reserve.
Speaker 9 (16:21):
Mark Mayfield reports Wednesday's vote was fifty four to forty five,
with every Republican voting in favor. Senator John Fetterman of
Pennsylvania was the only Democrat to vote for Walsh. In
terms of Senate history, it was the most partisan vote
for a FED Chair nominee. Current FED Chair Jerome Powell's
term expirers Friday. Powell's term was marked with constant battles
with President Trump overcutting interest rates, and included a DOJA
(16:44):
criminal investigation into Powell's renovations at the Reserve building that
was later dropped. Worsh has expressed caution about cutting interest
rates this year, despite pressure from Trump to lower borrowing costs.
Speaker 4 (16:56):
I'm Mark Nefield.
Speaker 1 (16:57):
Protests of breaking out all over Havana after Cuba runs
out of fuel. Perhaps now they may be more interested
in sensible conversation.
Speaker 4 (17:07):
I'm executive Chef George Harvelle.
Speaker 8 (17:09):
My morning show is your Morning Show with Michael Dojorna.
Speaker 4 (17:17):
Hi, I'm Michael.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
We'd love to have you listen every weekday morning to
your Morning Show live, even take us along with you
on the drive to work. We can be heard on
great radio stations like one oh four ninth The Patriot
in Saint Louis, or Talk Radio ninety eight point three
and fifteen ten WLAC in Nashville and News Talk by
fifty k f YI and Phoenix Arizona. Love to be
a part of your morning routine, but we're always grateful
(17:38):
you're here.
Speaker 4 (17:38):
Now. Enjoy the podcast Rise.
Speaker 1 (17:40):
In Shine, Early Bird Gets the Warm, Sleepy Squirrel, Missus
a Nut Welcome to Thursday. Made the fourteenth year of
Our Lord twenty twenty six. Next week Brett Bear another
visit with Brett Baer.
Speaker 4 (17:49):
How'd you get that? Do you think we can keep
a straight face if he says.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
Soda straw moment, Well, I'll just Last time we interviewed Brett,
he did the soda straw moment quote four times.
Speaker 8 (18:02):
I'll just turn away from the camera. When when I
started to laugh, I don't twitch you were.
Speaker 4 (18:06):
In I fell in love with the expression.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
You know, if you went through life looking through a
soda straw, you're not getting the whole picture right. It's
a soda straw moment, Brett bar Next week he's out
with a new book, The Case for America. Tomorrow john
Ford Coley of England, Dan and john Ford Coley. It's
the fiftieth anniversary of I really want to see it tonight.
(18:29):
And I remember dancing to that at a sacop. I
think it was Holmes Junior High. It might have been
South Junior High. It's a long time ago.
Speaker 4 (18:39):
That ear warmed me.
Speaker 8 (18:40):
The other day I was walking around singing, I'm not talking,
I'm moving in and a dumb on it.
Speaker 1 (18:47):
But yeah, that's crazy, I was, so we will visit
with John tomorrow about that. Later in the show. David
Monson will be joining us. You know, this week we
had the jobs report. Payroll increased by one hundred and
I think it was one hundred going by me, one
hundred and fifty five thousand. The projection was fifty thousand. Now,
when you keep exceeding projections by two and a half
(19:08):
times every time one of these roles around, we might
want to get a new projectionist. Right, you fire somebody
or somebody's playing the narrative game. Why do they keep
getting it so wrong? We'll visit with David Bonson about
that a little bit later on. All right, two things,
There's a difference between urgent and important. These are great
(19:30):
life lessons to learn. This one I think I don't
think I've passed on to my kids yet.
Speaker 4 (19:35):
I need to. I'm thinking about writing a book.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
Just to my kids of all these things, because I
don't know which ones I covered and which ones they
did right. But most people waste their life dealing with
urgent Have you ever worked for a company with a
style of crisis management?
Speaker 4 (19:54):
You go nowhere.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
And it's chaos, not TeamWorks, and you're constantly this is
what no one will look you in the eye and
tell you you're constantly living in the realm of urgent and
never getting to the realm of important. And so something
I try to do every morning for you all is
(20:17):
filter between the urgent and the important. Let me give
you an example, because today is one of those that
was just a perfect example. You might think that these
meetings in China are very very important. I would suggest
had the President had to cancel again as he did
(20:39):
months ago, their relationship would be the same, our challenges
would be the same, and our opportunities would be the same. Therefore,
this can only be urgent. That probably goes against everything
you're thinking. But even the Strait of Hormuz and it's China,
And again I'd thought Stephen Boucci hit grand slams all week.
(21:04):
I really don't know whether or not to make one
of the Fairly Brothers the Spotlight Interview of the Week
tomorrow or that interview with Bouci. That's how incredible that
interview was. Not to imagine he tells you exactly what's coming.
Everything we're going to bomb in the coming days and
everywhere boots are going. He lays it all out for you.
(21:25):
But the truth of the matter is even the Strait
of Hormuz is an urgency more than important. And really,
even though Iran is a proxy of China, so you
might as well talk to China directly, they're not as
(21:47):
cooperative as like North Korea. Like North Korea is a
proxy of China as well, kind of like a crazy
cousin now. But they're always about regime preservation, whereas Iran
is not. They're about fulfilling the calling Mohammed. They're about jihad,
and so they're either going to destroy Israel in America,
(22:09):
kill every Jew, every Christian, dominate the world, or they're
going to die trying.
Speaker 4 (22:12):
And there's no other way to eternity.
Speaker 1 (22:13):
But that that doesn't mean that she and China shouldn't
try to get them to stop. But it might not work,
as Bucci laid out, but really technically it's urgent. You know,
you could make a case that the most important two
things that happened yesterday was the fun discussion I was
starting with with Adie Vans and the President playing apprentice
(22:41):
with him and Marco or a dream ticket, whatever you
want to refer to it as. Because that's the future
of trump Ism, and that's the future of the Republican Party.
I mean, you've got both major parties that could be
gone by the end of the decade. And I would
(23:01):
suggest that's more important and better for the future of
America than anything Donald Trump and she can sit down
and achieve. Therefore, you could make the case that fun
conversation with JD. Vance is more important than China. But
this was my main point. Nothing yesterday was more important
(23:29):
than the testimony of James Erdman IID in a Senate
Homeland Security Governmental Affairs Committee chaired by Senator Rand Paul
that not listened very closely to this. Not a single
Democrat showed up for not a single Democrat was interested
(23:55):
in knowing the truth about COVID. Not a single day
Democrat was interested to know if the point person that
we all crowned infallible Fauci had lied. That's breathtaking. Well
that's the matrix. And what did he say once he
(24:20):
began to testify?
Speaker 6 (24:22):
Listen, Intentional or not, the ICs actions resulted in cover up,
wasted resources, and a failure to properly inform policymakers. Public
health policy would have been very different had the American
public been made aware that a virus from a lab
(24:43):
in China was going to serve as the foundation for
an Emergency Use Authorization mRNA products being mandated by the
former administration.
Speaker 4 (24:53):
Now, several things happened.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
Number One, we treated this virus like we didn't know
how it happened or what it was. He's not even
addressing that yet. How much panic would would not have existed. Oh,
that's from gain and function research. We know exactly what
(25:20):
that is. We've been doing that with China.
Speaker 7 (25:25):
No.
Speaker 1 (25:25):
In the mystery was the void that could be filled with, Oh,
this is gonna be worse than anything. One out of
two of you you get this. The expectation of the
American people was if you get COVID, you die, and
then they reinforced it with the ticker tapes on your television,
and of course that was all a scam. The same
(25:47):
guy that was dyna copd or emphysema eventually died, and
because he tested positive for COVID, they made the cause
of death COVID for reimbursement reasons, and so it started
building this notion that many are dying.
Speaker 4 (26:09):
Doesn't mean there weren't people who did die of COVID.
It just means they exaggerated the number. They certainly knew
what it was from the very beginning, and they knew
how it leaked from the very beginning. I would also
give you a different angle. They went on to destroy
Trump's presidency, destroy the economy he was building, the agenda
(26:30):
he was achieving, and then right before the end of
us all.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
Being staying home, staying safe, you know, the new normal,
watching sports with cardboard cutout audiences.
Speaker 4 (26:43):
While we were.
Speaker 1 (26:43):
All bowing and complying, they were busy changing election laws
and state legislatures, especially in swing states, in order to
harvest ballots and steal the election. Go Retime Magazine, February
fourteenth edition, twenty twenty one. They'll come right out and
tell you how they stole the election. It's called the
(27:05):
Shadow Campaign to save the Democracy, and they say, hey, look,
we're not proud of this, but.
Speaker 4 (27:10):
We had to do it.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
Democracy was at stake, and had Trump won, they had
an insurrection planned. In fact, they tell you in the
article how they scrambled to get the insurrection stopped. And boy,
had they been conditioning you right with Antifa and Black
Lives Matter all while I'm watching this CIA whistleblower, all
I can think of is all the other atrocities, But
(27:35):
he's just focusing on mainly a clip from the conference
that I had played. I think we played on this show.
I know I played it on my local show over
and over again. And this is all the scientists talking
(27:55):
about the vaccine technology and how it will take a
decade of testing and millions and millions of dollars. And
then one of the scientists, this one wasn't fouled, she
though filed.
Speaker 4 (28:09):
She talked a.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Lot in Helsinki during these One of them goes, well,
what if we had a leak from a lab. Yeah,
a leak from a lab that created a worldwide pandemic
and a crisis that had to be solved with the
(28:38):
M and R technology. Oh, well, that could work. And
then two months later it happened. So the whole time
you're listening to whistleblower James Erdman, he's basically pointing to
their rushed technology that they knew had problems. So just
as I'll look at you and say, there are some
people that died of COVID depending on the comorbidities that
(29:01):
existed in their body at the time, they got it.
Speaker 4 (29:05):
For most they did not.
Speaker 1 (29:07):
Obviously, there are some that died to the vaccine too,
and they won't even show up for these hearings, let
alone admit it. So he's starting with the vaccine technology
and how they lied to us in order to enact it.
Speaker 6 (29:29):
Doctor Fauci's role in the cover up was intentional. Doctor
Fauci influenced the analytical process and findings by leveraging his
position to ensure the IC consulted with a conflicted list
of curated subject matter experts, public health officials, and scientists.
(29:50):
This included some of the authors of the paper The
Proximal Origin of Sarskov two, and other public health experts
who have been in his orbit for the last twenty
plus years. Some of the scientists were part of the
Biological Sciences Experts Group or the b SEG, an Office
of a Director national intelligence advisory body whose members often
(30:13):
received considerable funding from ANIAID and public health agencies.
Speaker 1 (30:19):
I don't have to tell you the role that Donald
Trump was on and the expense to China to have
this conveniently leak and destroy his presidency. It may have
been the first assassination attempt. Frankly and we're not even
(30:45):
discussing how this particular character. Fauci walked in before Easter
to the Oval office and said, mister President, if you
don't shut down the economy and lock everybody up in
their home, two million will be dead by Easter.
Speaker 4 (31:01):
And he knew he was lying when he said it.
Speaker 1 (31:08):
See, that's what this really all builds up to, the
inconsistent conclusions and the retaliation against anyone who would point
to a lab leak, a lab the US was involved with,
and the very advisor to the President was the head
(31:29):
of Listen.
Speaker 6 (31:29):
The CIA and D and I analytic managers responsible for
examining the origin of COVID made decisions inconsistent with the
conclusions of subject matter experts and analytical tradecraft, consistently favoring
the theory of zoonosis or natural origin. Following the CIA's
(31:50):
COVID relook that culminated in twenty twenty three, the CIA
retaliated against analysts supporting the lab leak hypothesis. CI analysts
were not bribed. The analysts that supported the twenty twenty
three lably conclusion took every administrative measure available to them
(32:15):
to address their deep concerns regarding the analytic integrity of
their finished intelligence. CIA managers retaliated against them for their
refusal to agree with managements. Middle of the night, anonymous
rewrite of the analysis which changed the assessment to a
non call judgment.
Speaker 1 (32:37):
This goes on and on and on. By the way,
if you're going to put jd. Vance in charge of fraud,
he may want it to have attended this meeting, or
may want to take the findings of Rand Paul's committee
and begin to investigate that. You can't be serious about
fraud and not addressed the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on
(32:58):
the American people or any country by its own country
and the history of mankind, like COVID, And why is
it important?
Speaker 4 (33:08):
One? There should be justice.
Speaker 1 (33:13):
That may include Fauci going to jail or many others,
but the ultimate justice is the truth. I saw somebody
on Facebook already change their profile with the circle saying
there is no vaccination for the virus yet, so really
(33:34):
stupid if you fall for it. But with this day home,
stay safe, Moniker. Why is it important understand what they
did with COVID because they're going to try to do
it again.
Speaker 3 (33:47):
It's your Morning Show with Michael del Churno.
Speaker 4 (33:51):
There is something about Mary, you know.
Speaker 7 (33:54):
Good morning, Michael. So the Chinese president has already brought
up the subject of Taiwan the leading producer in the
world of semiconductors, and I think it was a little
flex on our president's part to take along with him
and his technology delegation the CEO of Micron Technologies, who
are currently building a fifteen billion dollar semiconductor plant right
(34:16):
here in Boise, Idaho in America.
Speaker 4 (34:18):
Baby, have a great day. He's got a lot of
people with him.
Speaker 1 (34:23):
That was not an accident. Who's with the president? But again,
these are negotiations. I like that the two are on
the same page, that these countries can send an example
for a troubled world. The world will be a better
place if they work together instead of keep fighting. Now
the question is will they do it? Kathy wrote me this, Michael.
(34:45):
This is a great booklet. I read it a while ago.
It's very good. Basically, what it boils down to is
what is important isn't necessarily urgent, and what is urgent
isn't necessarily important. Great one, Kathy. I'll read that booklet.
I just use it as an analogy. There's a lot
going on right now. Two of the most important things
happened at home, not in China yesterday. We'll talk more
(35:06):
about it. Ory's coming up next day with us.
Speaker 3 (35:08):
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael Ndheld, journo
Hi, I'm Michael. I'd love to have you listen to
your morning show live. Every day We're heard on great
stations like News Talk five point fifty k FYI and
Phoenix News Radio, eleven ninety k EX in Portland and
ten ninety The Patriot in Seattle. Make us a part
of your morning routine. We'd love to have you listen live.
But in the meantime, enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:19):
Two three starting your morning off right. A new way
of talk, a new way of understanding because we're in
this together.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
This is your Morning Show with Michael O'Dell Chornan.
Speaker 1 (00:35):
Just looking over the beautiful state dinner that is happening
live in China as we speak, and beautiful table settings.
Speaker 4 (00:44):
I'm just looking at.
Speaker 1 (00:45):
The poor Chinese guy through the short straw and guy
Stephen Miller sitting next to him. That's gonna be a
priveting conversation.
Speaker 4 (00:53):
If I were to eat it this time, I would
have indigestion. How are these people doing this well, they're kind.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
Of like you know, boy girl boy year Chinese American
Chinese American. President Trump signaling a desire to do business
with China following a meeting with the president of China.
She at the Great Hall of the People. The Senate
meanwhile have confirmed Kevin warsh here at home nothing to
do with your hands. He will be the next chair
(01:20):
of the fed Bfex Sports to China can restart for
major US producers. Protests in Havana are breaking out as
Cuba is running out of fuel and the people are panicking.
And Cleveland, the Cavaliers moved one went away, they return home.
They can take the Eastern Conference Final with a win
over the Pistons tomorrow night.
Speaker 4 (01:40):
They won last night.
Speaker 1 (01:41):
The Abs made pretty short work of the wild in
five games. They were down three to nothing yesterday and
they came back, tied the game one and over time
four to three. The Abs advance to take the Knights
or the Duck sound for the Western Conference Final. Good
morning and welcome to Thursday May, the fourteenth year of
Our Lord twenty SI twenty six on the air, streaming
(02:02):
live on your iHeart app.
Speaker 4 (02:03):
This is the show that belongs to you.
Speaker 1 (02:04):
This is your morning show and it is I'm Michael
del Journal honored to serve you. You can always be
a part of your morning show by taking your place
at the kitchen table. If you're listening on the iHeart app.
There's a microphone. If you press it counts you down
very professionally. Three two one gives you thirty seconds to
make a common ask a question. And of course you
can always email Michael d at iHeartMedia dot com. Jeffrey's
(02:25):
got the sound red keeping an eye on the content. Well,
don't do it like this.
Speaker 4 (02:31):
I'm here.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
You'll have to just talk in a complete sentence and
we'll play in its entirety. Lady, that was actually a
real caller, by the way, I want play that again
from that was in our first few months on the air.
Speaker 4 (02:43):
Who I think he expected us to answer? I can
hear you.
Speaker 1 (02:52):
And that's why we go to such great lens to
explain how the talkback works. All right, couple of things,
big picture there, and it's difficult with translators. It's not
quite as riveting. I'll never forget when this is when email.
This is before text messaging, which it still happens today
with text messaging. But going back to the beginning of email,
(03:15):
and people would read emails in the mood they were in,
not the mood the person who sent it was in,
and so often relationships would sour or fights would break
out over emails.
Speaker 4 (03:34):
Then you'd have to later explain.
Speaker 1 (03:36):
Well, I was joking or I wasn't meaning that mean,
you know, because we're used to three dimensional communication, which
is you can see my face when I'm talking the
words that I'm choosing to use, and then the inflection.
Think of the words I love you. It sounds different
(04:01):
and the look on my face is different every time
I say it. One thing, I like thembout the Greek language.
It's a little more perfect than ours. And that's why
in the Bible they have different words for each kind
of love fialao which is brotherly love, eros which is
love you have with your intimate lover, and then agape,
(04:22):
which is a godly love I extend to you. We
don't differentiate those, so you have to just understand them
by the look on my face. If I'm looking like
Peppy Lapew and I go I love you, you better duck.
But because you know, and then there's inflection, right I
and go I love oh, I love you.
Speaker 4 (04:43):
You know, it's all how you say it.
Speaker 1 (04:46):
And I just bring all this up not to belabor
the point, but when you're having long conversations with the
President of China, that is going through a translator. It's
kind of reminded me of texting and and early emails
in business, you lose something. And President She, unlike President Trump,
(05:09):
who was nodding and you could read everything on his
face as he's nodding, is far more stoic.
Speaker 4 (05:15):
So it's going to be easy to read a lot
into this.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
I mean, what do we do We all wait for
the text on all of this to read every single
word that each leader said and exchanged. People can, just
like every day in bias, pick the angles they choose
to cover, the angles they don't, the quotes they choose
to use, the quotes they don't. So the question becomes
(05:42):
based on who greeted the president on the tarmac with
red carpet and children waving flags. How excited is China
to have the president back? If you go through She's
Marx remarks, it's pretty clear that the way the president glowing,
he talks about President she President she talks about the president.
(06:07):
But you're going to get a feeling today a cut
to the chase that it didn't take very long for
China bring up Taiwan, and I do think that would
be out of balance. No, they're not going to suddenly
give up on Taiwan. That's just not going to happen.
And no, he's not going to fall over himself fawning
(06:29):
over President Trump. He's going to represent his people. He's
got an art of the deal of his own to cut.
So how do we think it's going?
Speaker 4 (06:42):
Well?
Speaker 1 (06:42):
So far, two people realize how important their country is
to the world and the example they can set to
the world in a very troubled time. And it sounds
over simplistic, but for me, right now, that's enough. The
(07:05):
fact that they seem to be on the same page
and see the same opportunity. Now they're going to represent
their country and their interests. I don't think you're going
to see Donald Trump abandoned Taiwan, and I don't think
you're going to see China give up on wanting Taiwan.
But what can they find in common ground in action?
(07:27):
And can that include securing the Strait of Horne moves.
We'll break that down for you. Yesterday hit home, we
had a different breakthrough. So Marco and others are with
the President in China. At home, the Vice President jd
Vance is dealing with fraud as the frauds are and
(07:51):
in doing so, a few cockadoodle doos happened. What does
that mean? I've been talking for well over a year
about how obvious, well, I've been talking for well over
two and a half years that I believe Marco Rubio
is the President's guy. That's who Donald Trump wanted to
(08:11):
be vice president, That's who Donald Trump wants to be
the next president. I am thoroughly convinced of that, and
I would take it to my grave. I think his
kids and strategists came to him with JD.
Speaker 4 (08:24):
Vance.
Speaker 1 (08:26):
Donald Trump wouldn't be likely to forgive a former never Trumper,
and I think he's been playing the apprentice. And I've
been saying that exact word ever since, giving them assignments,
very public assignments so that you can grade them. In
some cases the same assignments. Go to the press court today, Marco,
(08:52):
go to the press cort like JD did, and let
you decide who did it better. Marco, I'm going to
give you a ron JD. I'm going to give you fraud.
Let the American people judge. And so I was having
these conversations, nobody else was. I never doubted that I
was crazy. And then the President drops the bomb and
(09:14):
out in the rose garden does a straw poll on
both of them. Well, that came up yesterday.
Speaker 4 (09:25):
And JD.
Speaker 1 (09:27):
Vance is in the middle of an apprentice assignment, and
the question comes up, is the President playing apprentice with
you guys?
Speaker 5 (09:40):
Well, I just don't think it sounds like the President
of the United States to have a televised competition for
who would succeed him as his apprentice. I just think
that's not at all what you would expect the president
to do. But no, Look, I think the president he's
always been fascinated by politics. If you talk to him,
he was fascinated by politics thirty years before we ever
(10:00):
ran for office.
Speaker 4 (10:01):
So I think it's.
Speaker 5 (10:01):
Natural for him to joke around with us a little bit,
to play around with the idea. But I can tell
you the President is as focused as any of us
on making sure we do as good of a job
now for the American people. What are you going to
be anna see?
Speaker 1 (10:19):
I mean I know that you can win for losing
responding to it. I think JD responded to it as
well as he could. No, that's exactly what the President
is doing. He's playing apprentice, And I think both Marco
and JD know it, which is why later he felt
the need to once again explain his feelings about Marco.
Speaker 4 (10:41):
What's your reaction to the alleged home health fraud?
Speaker 1 (10:44):
Oh wait, wait wait, that's the I know I know
which one is it. We have so many of JD
I don't know which is which. I thought I put
them together. Hold on, Oh gosh, I just went buy
something really funny. Have you seen the I'm gonna stop
(11:04):
and do it. I'm that add So you remember the
attack ad on Pratt in Los Angeles for Mayor and
we were playing it and I was saying to you, all,
this is supposed to be an attack ad on an opponent,
and it's selling the opponent. By we've seen the numbers
move dramatically. Mayor is flat and Pratt is rising. Well,
(11:31):
then we believe it's the Pratt camp that did this, right, Yeah,
I mean we're pretty positive it is. And with AI,
it's amazing what you can do now, right, don't you
don't need and you're in Hollywood you could get the
best pert you don't need them. So Pratt comes out
with this viral commercial. Now this is not on television.
(11:53):
I don't believe. I think it's just viral online. And
of course Los Angeles is burning to then and listen.
Speaker 6 (12:01):
Los Angeles on fire mayor nowhere to be found.
Speaker 4 (12:05):
We were so prepared for wildfires.
Speaker 7 (12:08):
I didn't even have to be in the country when
the town burned.
Speaker 4 (12:12):
I've addressed the homeless problem.
Speaker 7 (12:14):
Now most of them won't stab you as long as
you don't make eye contact.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
She's walking down the street among all the homeless. By
the way, she's out of town and she's she's drinking
with Kamala.
Speaker 4 (12:27):
Our climate change policy is so strong.
Speaker 7 (12:31):
We've brought down energy use in the Palisades by ninety nine.
Speaker 1 (12:35):
As she's walking through the burned rumscent now she's worn
by the drugs and scared children. None of the needles
in children's playgrounds have aids on them.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
If you like the last four years, you're going to
love the next four.
Speaker 4 (12:49):
Boat bass I was just brilliant.
Speaker 1 (12:53):
I'm not ruling out he can win, and I mean,
this is this is how you run for office new Age.
Speaker 8 (13:00):
It really saw him in the hills. I mean he
was sharp tongued. Nobody wanted to mess with him. He
would just completely destroy anybody and any argument. So when
they first said that he was going to run for mayor,
I was like, give me some popcorn.
Speaker 1 (13:17):
Because this is going it is going to be already
is fun. It's fun. I mean her attack ad, what
a disaster. And now his viral ad and it is
it's a visual I mean I did the best I
could playing in the audio, but you know how you
know how good AI.
Speaker 4 (13:32):
Is and suddenly, Michael, She's not going to show up
for the debate. Debate.
Speaker 1 (13:39):
Uh, it's this viral ad is a game changer. It's
one of my favorites all time in politics. It was
it's hysterical. Everyone forgets something now and then a name,
a word. Why you walk into a room, look at
that's all normal. When it starts happening all too often
or more and more, well, then it may be time
(14:02):
to support your brain health with in a more targeted way.
And that's where Sarahfolan brain wellness can come in. Recommended
not by talk show hosts, but by neurologists. This particular
talk show host just studied it. Sarahfolin brain wellness delivers
targeted nutrition designed to support brain health, help slow cognitive decline.
And I know we're all paranoid about that. It's formulated
(14:25):
with very specific nutrients your brain needs as part of
a medical approach for mild cognitive impairment with hyperhomless systeinemia,
and getting started is simple the way I did. Learning more,
exploring the science for yourself and see if Sarah Folan
Brain Wellness is right for you. Go to Sarahfolan dot com.
C E R E, F O, L I N Sarahfolan
(14:47):
dot com. You can also find it on Amazon. Sara
Follen Brain Wellness is a medical food for your brain
with specific nutrients for mild cognitive impairment with hyperhomo systeinemia. Obviously,
consult and use under the medical supervision with your primary physician,
but supporting your brain today can make a real difference
(15:07):
in your tomorrow. Learn more at Sarah Folan dot com.
That's Sarah Folan dot com.
Speaker 3 (15:14):
This is your morning show with Michael del Chuna.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
Obviously, all eyes are on China. The President met with
the Chinese leader, Shijingping at Beijing's Great Hall of the
People last night. Speaking before the meeting, Trump had nothing
but praise for the Chinese president. It's an honor to
be with you.
Speaker 8 (15:35):
It's an honor to be your friend, and the relationship
between China and the USA is going to be better
than ever before.
Speaker 4 (15:42):
President went out to tell the importance of the meeting,
So I.
Speaker 8 (15:45):
Really look very much forward to our discussion.
Speaker 4 (15:47):
It's a big discussion.
Speaker 8 (15:48):
There were those that say this is maybe the biggest
summit ever, They can never remember anything like it.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
The Chinese President seemed to feel the same way through
a translator and his call for the magnitude of these
meetings and what cooperation can produce.
Speaker 2 (16:04):
We should be partners, not rivals, so should help each
other succeed and prosper together and find the right way
for major countries to get along well with each other
in the new era.
Speaker 1 (16:16):
Meanwhile, at home, the Senate has confirmed Kevin Walsh as
the next Chair of the Federal Reserve.
Speaker 9 (16:21):
Mark Mayfield reports Wednesday's vote was fifty four to forty five,
with every Republican voting in favor. Senator John Fetterman of
Pennsylvania was the only Democrat to vote for Walsh. In
terms of Senate history, it was the most partisan vote
for a FED Chair nominee. Current FED Chair Jerome Powell's
term expirers Friday. Powell's term was marked with constant battles
with President Trump overcutting interest rates, and included a DOJA
(16:44):
criminal investigation into Powell's renovations at the Reserve building that
was later dropped. Worsh has expressed caution about cutting interest
rates this year, despite pressure from Trump to lower borrowing costs.
Speaker 4 (16:56):
I'm Mark Nefield.
Speaker 1 (16:57):
Protests of breaking out all over Havana after Cuba runs
out of fuel. Perhaps now they may be more interested
in sensible conversation.
Speaker 4 (17:07):
I'm executive Chef George Harvelle.
Speaker 8 (17:09):
My morning show is your Morning Show with Michael Dojorna.
Speaker 4 (17:17):
Hi, I'm Michael.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
We'd love to have you listen every weekday morning to
your Morning Show live, even take us along with you
on the drive to work. We can be heard on
great radio stations like one oh four ninth The Patriot
in Saint Louis, or Talk Radio ninety eight point three
and fifteen ten WLAC in Nashville and News Talk by
fifty k f YI and Phoenix Arizona. Love to be
a part of your morning routine, but we're always grateful
(17:38):
you're here.
Speaker 4 (17:38):
Now. Enjoy the podcast Rise.
Speaker 1 (17:40):
In Shine, Early Bird Gets the Warm, Sleepy Squirrel, Missus
a Nut Welcome to Thursday. Made the fourteenth year of
Our Lord twenty twenty six. Next week Brett Bear another
visit with Brett Baer.
Speaker 4 (17:49):
How'd you get that? Do you think we can keep
a straight face if he says.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
Soda straw moment, Well, I'll just Last time we interviewed Brett,
he did the soda straw moment quote four times.
Speaker 8 (18:02):
I'll just turn away from the camera. When when I
started to laugh, I don't twitch you were.
Speaker 4 (18:06):
In I fell in love with the expression.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
You know, if you went through life looking through a
soda straw, you're not getting the whole picture right. It's
a soda straw moment, Brett bar Next week he's out
with a new book, The Case for America. Tomorrow john
Ford Coley of England, Dan and john Ford Coley. It's
the fiftieth anniversary of I really want to see it tonight.
(18:29):
And I remember dancing to that at a sacop. I
think it was Holmes Junior High. It might have been
South Junior High. It's a long time ago.
Speaker 4 (18:39):
That ear warmed me.
Speaker 8 (18:40):
The other day I was walking around singing, I'm not talking,
I'm moving in and a dumb on it.
Speaker 1 (18:47):
But yeah, that's crazy, I was, so we will visit
with John tomorrow about that. Later in the show. David
Monson will be joining us. You know, this week we
had the jobs report. Payroll increased by one hundred and
I think it was one hundred going by me, one
hundred and fifty five thousand. The projection was fifty thousand. Now,
when you keep exceeding projections by two and a half
(19:08):
times every time one of these roles around, we might
want to get a new projectionist. Right, you fire somebody
or somebody's playing the narrative game. Why do they keep
getting it so wrong? We'll visit with David Bonson about
that a little bit later on. All right, two things,
There's a difference between urgent and important. These are great
(19:30):
life lessons to learn. This one I think I don't
think I've passed on to my kids yet.
Speaker 4 (19:35):
I need to. I'm thinking about writing a book.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
Just to my kids of all these things, because I
don't know which ones I covered and which ones they
did right. But most people waste their life dealing with
urgent Have you ever worked for a company with a
style of crisis management?
Speaker 4 (19:54):
You go nowhere.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
And it's chaos, not TeamWorks, and you're constantly this is
what no one will look you in the eye and
tell you you're constantly living in the realm of urgent and
never getting to the realm of important. And so something
I try to do every morning for you all is
(20:17):
filter between the urgent and the important. Let me give
you an example, because today is one of those that
was just a perfect example. You might think that these
meetings in China are very very important. I would suggest
had the President had to cancel again as he did
(20:39):
months ago, their relationship would be the same, our challenges
would be the same, and our opportunities would be the same. Therefore,
this can only be urgent. That probably goes against everything
you're thinking. But even the Strait of Hormuz and it's China,
And again I'd thought Stephen Boucci hit grand slams all week.
(21:04):
I really don't know whether or not to make one
of the Fairly Brothers the Spotlight Interview of the Week
tomorrow or that interview with Bouci. That's how incredible that
interview was. Not to imagine he tells you exactly what's coming.
Everything we're going to bomb in the coming days and
everywhere boots are going. He lays it all out for you.
(21:25):
But the truth of the matter is even the Strait
of Hormuz is an urgency more than important. And really,
even though Iran is a proxy of China, so you
might as well talk to China directly, they're not as
(21:47):
cooperative as like North Korea. Like North Korea is a
proxy of China as well, kind of like a crazy
cousin now. But they're always about regime preservation, whereas Iran
is not. They're about fulfilling the calling Mohammed. They're about jihad,
and so they're either going to destroy Israel in America,
(22:09):
kill every Jew, every Christian, dominate the world, or they're
going to die trying.
Speaker 4 (22:12):
And there's no other way to eternity.
Speaker 1 (22:13):
But that that doesn't mean that she and China shouldn't
try to get them to stop. But it might not work,
as Bucci laid out, but really technically it's urgent. You know,
you could make a case that the most important two
things that happened yesterday was the fun discussion I was
starting with with Adie Vans and the President playing apprentice
(22:41):
with him and Marco or a dream ticket, whatever you
want to refer to it as. Because that's the future
of trump Ism, and that's the future of the Republican Party.
I mean, you've got both major parties that could be
gone by the end of the decade. And I would
(23:01):
suggest that's more important and better for the future of
America than anything Donald Trump and she can sit down
and achieve. Therefore, you could make the case that fun
conversation with JD. Vance is more important than China. But
this was my main point. Nothing yesterday was more important
(23:29):
than the testimony of James Erdman IID in a Senate
Homeland Security Governmental Affairs Committee chaired by Senator Rand Paul
that not listened very closely to this. Not a single
Democrat showed up for not a single Democrat was interested
(23:55):
in knowing the truth about COVID. Not a single day
Democrat was interested to know if the point person that
we all crowned infallible Fauci had lied. That's breathtaking. Well
that's the matrix. And what did he say once he
(24:20):
began to testify?
Speaker 6 (24:22):
Listen, Intentional or not, the ICs actions resulted in cover up,
wasted resources, and a failure to properly inform policymakers. Public
health policy would have been very different had the American
public been made aware that a virus from a lab
(24:43):
in China was going to serve as the foundation for
an Emergency Use Authorization mRNA products being mandated by the
former administration.
Speaker 4 (24:53):
Now, several things happened.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
Number One, we treated this virus like we didn't know
how it happened or what it was. He's not even
addressing that yet. How much panic would would not have existed. Oh,
that's from gain and function research. We know exactly what
(25:20):
that is. We've been doing that with China.
Speaker 7 (25:25):
No.
Speaker 1 (25:25):
In the mystery was the void that could be filled with, Oh,
this is gonna be worse than anything. One out of
two of you you get this. The expectation of the
American people was if you get COVID, you die, and
then they reinforced it with the ticker tapes on your television,
and of course that was all a scam. The same
(25:47):
guy that was dyna copd or emphysema eventually died, and
because he tested positive for COVID, they made the cause
of death COVID for reimbursement reasons, and so it started
building this notion that many are dying.
Speaker 4 (26:09):
Doesn't mean there weren't people who did die of COVID.
It just means they exaggerated the number. They certainly knew
what it was from the very beginning, and they knew
how it leaked from the very beginning. I would also
give you a different angle. They went on to destroy
Trump's presidency, destroy the economy he was building, the agenda
(26:30):
he was achieving, and then right before the end of
us all.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
Being staying home, staying safe, you know, the new normal,
watching sports with cardboard cutout audiences.
Speaker 4 (26:43):
While we were.
Speaker 1 (26:43):
All bowing and complying, they were busy changing election laws
and state legislatures, especially in swing states, in order to
harvest ballots and steal the election. Go Retime Magazine, February
fourteenth edition, twenty twenty one. They'll come right out and
tell you how they stole the election. It's called the
(27:05):
Shadow Campaign to save the Democracy, and they say, hey, look,
we're not proud of this, but.
Speaker 4 (27:10):
We had to do it.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
Democracy was at stake, and had Trump won, they had
an insurrection planned. In fact, they tell you in the
article how they scrambled to get the insurrection stopped. And boy,
had they been conditioning you right with Antifa and Black
Lives Matter all while I'm watching this CIA whistleblower, all
I can think of is all the other atrocities, But
(27:35):
he's just focusing on mainly a clip from the conference
that I had played. I think we played on this show.
I know I played it on my local show over
and over again. And this is all the scientists talking
(27:55):
about the vaccine technology and how it will take a
decade of testing and millions and millions of dollars. And
then one of the scientists, this one wasn't fouled, she
though filed.
Speaker 4 (28:09):
She talked a.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Lot in Helsinki during these One of them goes, well,
what if we had a leak from a lab. Yeah,
a leak from a lab that created a worldwide pandemic
and a crisis that had to be solved with the
(28:38):
M and R technology. Oh, well, that could work. And
then two months later it happened. So the whole time
you're listening to whistleblower James Erdman, he's basically pointing to
their rushed technology that they knew had problems. So just
as I'll look at you and say, there are some
people that died of COVID depending on the comorbidities that
(29:01):
existed in their body at the time, they got it.
Speaker 4 (29:05):
For most they did not.
Speaker 1 (29:07):
Obviously, there are some that died to the vaccine too,
and they won't even show up for these hearings, let
alone admit it. So he's starting with the vaccine technology
and how they lied to us in order to enact it.
Speaker 6 (29:29):
Doctor Fauci's role in the cover up was intentional. Doctor
Fauci influenced the analytical process and findings by leveraging his
position to ensure the IC consulted with a conflicted list
of curated subject matter experts, public health officials, and scientists.
(29:50):
This included some of the authors of the paper The
Proximal Origin of Sarskov two, and other public health experts
who have been in his orbit for the last twenty
plus years. Some of the scientists were part of the
Biological Sciences Experts Group or the b SEG, an Office
of a Director national intelligence advisory body whose members often
(30:13):
received considerable funding from ANIAID and public health agencies.
Speaker 1 (30:19):
I don't have to tell you the role that Donald
Trump was on and the expense to China to have
this conveniently leak and destroy his presidency. It may have
been the first assassination attempt. Frankly and we're not even
(30:45):
discussing how this particular character. Fauci walked in before Easter
to the Oval office and said, mister President, if you
don't shut down the economy and lock everybody up in
their home, two million will be dead by Easter.
Speaker 4 (31:01):
And he knew he was lying when he said it.
Speaker 1 (31:08):
See, that's what this really all builds up to, the
inconsistent conclusions and the retaliation against anyone who would point
to a lab leak, a lab the US was involved with,
and the very advisor to the President was the head
(31:29):
of Listen.
Speaker 6 (31:29):
The CIA and D and I analytic managers responsible for
examining the origin of COVID made decisions inconsistent with the
conclusions of subject matter experts and analytical tradecraft, consistently favoring
the theory of zoonosis or natural origin. Following the CIA's
(31:50):
COVID relook that culminated in twenty twenty three, the CIA
retaliated against analysts supporting the lab leak hypothesis. CI analysts
were not bribed. The analysts that supported the twenty twenty
three lably conclusion took every administrative measure available to them
(32:15):
to address their deep concerns regarding the analytic integrity of
their finished intelligence. CIA managers retaliated against them for their
refusal to agree with managements. Middle of the night, anonymous
rewrite of the analysis which changed the assessment to a
non call judgment.
Speaker 1 (32:37):
This goes on and on and on. By the way,
if you're going to put jd. Vance in charge of fraud,
he may want it to have attended this meeting, or
may want to take the findings of Rand Paul's committee
and begin to investigate that. You can't be serious about
fraud and not addressed the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on
(32:58):
the American people or any country by its own country
and the history of mankind, like COVID, And why is
it important?
Speaker 4 (33:08):
One? There should be justice.
Speaker 1 (33:13):
That may include Fauci going to jail or many others,
but the ultimate justice is the truth. I saw somebody
on Facebook already change their profile with the circle saying
there is no vaccination for the virus yet, so really
(33:34):
stupid if you fall for it. But with this day home,
stay safe, Moniker. Why is it important understand what they
did with COVID because they're going to try to do
it again.
Speaker 3 (33:47):
It's your Morning Show with Michael del Churno.
Speaker 4 (33:51):
There is something about Mary, you know.
Speaker 7 (33:54):
Good morning, Michael. So the Chinese president has already brought
up the subject of Taiwan the leading producer in the
world of semiconductors, and I think it was a little
flex on our president's part to take along with him
and his technology delegation the CEO of Micron Technologies, who
are currently building a fifteen billion dollar semiconductor plant right
(34:16):
here in Boise, Idaho in America.
Speaker 4 (34:18):
Baby, have a great day. He's got a lot of
people with him.
Speaker 1 (34:23):
That was not an accident. Who's with the president? But again,
these are negotiations. I like that the two are on
the same page, that these countries can send an example
for a troubled world. The world will be a better
place if they work together instead of keep fighting. Now
the question is will they do it? Kathy wrote me this, Michael.
(34:45):
This is a great booklet. I read it a while ago.
It's very good. Basically, what it boils down to is
what is important isn't necessarily urgent, and what is urgent
isn't necessarily important. Great one, Kathy. I'll read that booklet.
I just use it as an analogy. There's a lot
going on right now. Two of the most important things
happened at home, not in China yesterday. We'll talk more
(35:06):
about it. Ory's coming up next day with us.
Speaker 3 (35:08):
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael Ndheld, journo
Popular Podcasts
Joy 101 with Hoda Kotb
Joy is essential. And it's also elusive. You can't order it, borrow it, or simply hope it into life. But now, there's a new and exciting way to start your journey toward a more joyful existence: The Joy 101 Podcast with Hoda! Best known for her Emmy-winning work and co-anchoring Today, Hoda Kotb infuses her authenticity, curiosity, and warmth into conversations with the world’s most fascinating people. Entertainment legends, sport icons, wellness experts, and everyday folks will share how they find, allow, and experience joy. Hoda will offer her own tips and takes on seeking a more balanced, harmonious life. If you're craving inspiration, support, and useful tools to maximize your joy, tune in to these candid, uplifting, and moving on-air chats. Joy after a breakup, joy as an empty-nester, joy after loss, joy as a caretaker — Hoda's new podcast will speak to you. Joy 101 with Hoda Kotb, an iHeartPodcast.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com