Plagiarist Kamala

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good morning, Cooner country. Oh oh boy, oh boy, the
hits just keep on coming. And if you're following the
Cooner man on X and I urge all of you
to do so. My handle at the Kooner Report all

(00:20):
one word kuh and is in national Er at the
Cooner Report. You know exactly what I'm talking about because
I was all over this baby last night. So here
is now the absolute latest. The Kamala Harris campaign is
in serious and I mean serious damage control mode in

(00:44):
the wake of stunning There's no other way to put it.
Bombshell revelations. Doctor Stephan Weber who you you may ask Jeff, Jeff, Jeff,
who the hell is doctor Stephan Weber.

Speaker 2 (01:03):
Well, Doctor Weber is.

Speaker 1 (01:08):
One of the world's most renowned international quote unquote plagiarism hunters.
He is an individual who has destroyed the careers of
countless German speaking politicians in Germany in Austria because he
will locate and find politicians who've written books or memoirs

(01:32):
and expose the plagiarism that is contained in those books. Well,
according now to Christopher Ruffo of the Manhattan Institute, and
the goods are there. It's the evidence is there. It's
it's irrefutable. Stephan Weber now has found that Kamala Harris

(01:54):
in her two thousand and nine book on crime. The
book is called Small on Crime. This was the book
that propelled her to victory in her campaign to be
California Attorney General.

Speaker 2 (02:12):
If you remember, at the.

Speaker 1 (02:13):
Time she was the district attorney for San Francisco. She
wanted to now make her move in terms of her career.
She had gotten everything she could possibly get out of
Willie Brown and everything she did for Willie Well, now
she was making her move into California statewide politics. And

(02:34):
so she wrote a book co authored with another individual,
but it was her name at the top. And guess what,
by the way, that book proved instrumental in Kamala Harris
defeating her opponent, the Republican by a single point, a
single point, in that election for Attorney General in twenty ten. Anyway,

(02:58):
that book that helped launch Kamala Harris is a fraud
just like she is. As has now been completely documented,
and you can see the passages for yourself. It is everywhere,
it is undeniable, it is irrefutable over a dozen sections

(03:20):
of her book, over a dozen as I said on
X last night, and I'm going to repeat it. It
is text book plagiarism. There's no getting around it. Entire passages,
in fact, entire pages, page after page after page, is

(03:41):
lifted and copied and pasted from an entire article on Wikipedia,
press releases from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

Speaker 2 (03:57):
I could go on and on and on.

Speaker 1 (04:00):
She lifted entire passages, entire pages, entire articles, without ever
providing any attribution whatsoever. In other words, she passed something
off as her own when it was clearly the work
of someone else. There's no getting around it. And in

(04:25):
many cases now they found that she literally manufactured the
source reference. In other words, she claims that, you know,
whatever I got this information from, I'm just gonna make
something up. This law review, okay, the Harvard Criminal Law Review.
She made up nonexistent pages. She claimed that she got

(04:47):
information from pages that didn't exist. The whole thing is
a massive work of fraud, complete and utter fraud. And
as many people have pointed out, plagiarism. I remember the
good old days where plagiarism would destroy a candidate's campaign.

(05:12):
Why because it shows many things. It shows that they're
a liar. It shows that they're a thief, that they
literally steal other people's ideas and work without giving them
proper a reference or proper attribution and notice and recognition.
And also because it is completely unethical and immoral, it

(05:35):
is cheating. It is absolute cheating. In academia, it leads
to you being fired journalists, you're fired politicians. Look at
Joe Biden here, look at Joe Ee when he plagiarized
speeches from then Britain's labor leader Neil Kennick practically word

(05:57):
for word. It ended his campaign on the spot in
nineteen eighty eight. He was done, he was cooked, finished, finito.
Now the media is desperately trying to cover up for
Kamala Harris. The New York Times, in one of the

(06:17):
most pitiful pathetic attempts, is now claiming, yes, they admit
she plagiarized.

Speaker 2 (06:24):
There's no question she plagiarized. So what's their excuse?

Speaker 1 (06:29):
But the pages and the passages and the sections that
she plagiarized, they're not that important, they're not that serious.
In other words, this is no big deal. Well, as
I said on X and I'm gonna repeat it right now.
Can you imagine if Donald Trump plagiarized.

Speaker 2 (06:54):
Page after page.

Speaker 1 (06:56):
Paragraph after paragraph, passage after passage, section after section of
let's say, The Art of the Deal, one of his
most famous books. Can you imagine if he lifted entire
articles word for word just he was so lazy and
so reckless, he didn't even add a word here or

(07:20):
a ward. There was just copy paste entire articles, entire articles,
just blindly take press releases, throw it into his book
and just copy and paste. It would be the media
scandal of the century. It would be saturation coverage twenty

(07:43):
four seven. There would be massive, overwhelming pressures saying you
need to resign, you are not fit for the presidency.
And this is now the problem that Kamala faces. And
this is why her campaign now has no answers.

Speaker 2 (08:02):
None.

Speaker 1 (08:05):
She plagiarized. It's undeniable that she plagiarized. The evidence is there. Everybody,
the whole world can see it. And so listen now
to the crisis that Kamala is now in. Her policies
are non existent. She has run in essence a policy campaign,

(08:26):
a policy free campaign. Every policy she has she plagiarized
from Joe Biden. In fact, on her website, all of
the policy section was copied and pasted from Joe Biden.
Everything about her now is a plagiarized candidacy, a fake candidacy.

(08:50):
But the one thing that she said that she had
over Trump, and this was the heart of her candidacy,
the heart of her campaign.

Speaker 2 (08:58):
She has character.

Speaker 1 (09:01):
She's the prosecutor, she knows his kind. As she said
at her acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention, he's
a fraud, he's a con, he's a cheater, and she's
gonna prosecute this cheater. Well, guess what, who's the con? Now,

(09:23):
who's the fraud and the cheater. Now this is a
woman whose entire biography for this election is that she's
the one who's the prosecutor, who's going to uphold the law,
uphold the rules, uphold what's right. And now she's caught

(09:45):
stealing other people's work, fraudulently passing it off as her own,
engaging in openly deceptive and mendacious behavior, lying literally lying,
and committing one of the most unacceptable sins in writing

(10:09):
and journalism and political writing, which is to steal other
people's words, their ideas, their work and pass it off
as your own. If she was in academia she'd be gone.
If I did this in a book, I would lose

(10:32):
my job. I'd be ashamed, I would be forced out,
My reputation would be finished. As I said, in the
old days, and I'm not talking that old you know
that long ago, it would be a career ender. In
most democracies around the world, politicians have been forced to resign.

(10:53):
You know, the question now is really is there anything
real about this woman or her campaign. I mean that's
the question now posed by Victor Davis Hanson in his
latest column, and he's like, you look at everything about
her now. Her biography completely fake, completely fake. She's not

(11:14):
middle class. She ever came from a middle class background.
She was privileged in upper middle class, in fact, upper class.
She was raised, as I said, in Westmount in Montreal,
which is one of the wealthiest, most privileged areas in
the entire country, and in Palo Alto, which is also
one of the most privileged, upper income areas in all

(11:37):
of California. So everything about her biography has been a lie.
Her ethnic background has been a lie, her heritage has
been a lie. Her policies, her record has been an
absolute lie. And she's flip flopped on so many issues.
Nobody knows what she stands for anymore. And now the

(12:01):
last piece of her campaign, which is supposedly her character.
She's the prosecutor, she's the former attorney general, the former
district attorney.

Speaker 2 (12:14):
She's the one that's going to.

Speaker 1 (12:15):
Uphold the rules and uphold the law and go after
cheaters and cons and frauds, you know, allah like Donald Trump,
according to her. And now it turns out she's a
swindler and a liar and a plagiarist. And her campaign
has no response. They don't know how. What they're now

(12:38):
doing is they're hoping that the media will just ignore
this story, pretended that it's not there, pretend the plagiarism
did not take place, and not ask her any questions
and hope just you know, bury it and keep moving on.
And they have The New York Times rushing to her defense,
and really the New York Times, whatever little credibility they

(13:03):
have left, they just flushed it right down to toilet.
This is by anybody's standards, it's unbelievable. The headline in
the New York Times is a conservative activist seizes on
plagiarism in Kamala Harris's book that's seizes, not Kamala Harris plagiarized. No, no, no, no,

(13:28):
And they're talking about Chris Ruffo, who's one of the
leading conservative intellectuals and policy thinkers in the country. He
works at a very good think tank, the Manhattan Institute.
He was the one who worked along with this international
plagiarism hunter that I talked about in my opening monologue,
doctor Stefan Weber. He's believe Austrian or German anyway. Normally

(13:53):
he brings down big German speaking politicians. This time just
on his own, he started to go through Kamala's book
and he couldn't believe it. He goes to plagiarism was
so blatant it was, and so lazy. And as this
is now a Stefan Weber saying this, who the hell

(14:15):
plagiarizes from Wikipedia? She took an entire article off of Wikipedia, which,
if you know anything about Wikipedia, it's supposed to be
an online encyclopedia.

Speaker 2 (14:28):
It is. It is completely unreliable.

Speaker 1 (14:32):
Almost everything written about me on Wikipedia is a lie.

Speaker 2 (14:36):
As it is for most people.

Speaker 1 (14:38):
It's used by the far left to go after and
smear and defame and target their political opponents. So that
you would even take something off of Wikipedia and copy
and paste and put it into a book shows you
how honestly how unintelligent, un serious, lazy, and irresponsible.

Speaker 2 (15:04):
This woman is. She's a joke.

Speaker 1 (15:07):
It's not even like she's cribbing stuff off of a
you know, some criminal justice review or journal. I mean,
it's Wikipedia, for God's sake. And then she went to
links on Wikipedia. You know, as Chris Ruffo pointed out,
he goes, well, then I just started to independently corroborate
it myself. And what she did was she playediarized straight

(15:30):
off of Wikipedia.

Speaker 2 (15:31):
Word for word for word.

Speaker 1 (15:34):
She didn't even try to add a couple of her
own words here or there. No, it was a straight
copy and paste job. But then she would go to
the links on Wikipedia, and he goes, you just follow
the links. She goes to this link, copy and paste
that link, copy and paste. She was even copy and
pasting lifting press releases. Who the hell copies and paste

(15:55):
a press release? The book almost all of it is
completely and utterly plagiarized. The New York Times is response,
I kid you not that Chris Rufo would bother to
fact check and investigate Kamala's book was an act of

(16:15):
racism to expose her plagiarism. You could read the article
in New York Times. Don't take my word for it.
It's quote racist. It's racist now to detect, notice and
unmask her plagiarism, which by the way, is almost exactly

(16:38):
like the plagiarism that caused so much scandal at Havard
and at Harvard University. Now, I can just tell you
this as a former professor who taught at McGill University,
the Harvard of the North. The worst offense a student
can commit, the worst offense a professor or any writer,

(17:03):
or any teacher or any administrator can't commit, is that
of plagiarism.

Speaker 2 (17:11):
Why, because you're literally it's theft.

Speaker 1 (17:14):
You're literally stealing someone else's work and passing it off
as your own. Six one seven two six x sixty
eight sixty eight. Okay, boy, oh boy. Every day is
bad news for Kamala. It's just every day. So now
it's a huge scandal. There's no other way to put it.

(17:34):
It is now rocking her campaign. They are in serious,
serious damage control mode. The media now writing to their
rescue or they're trying to write to her rescue. I
don't know if it's gonna work. Jd Vance is already
openly mocking her on X saying, you know, I wrote
a book called Hillbilly Elegy, and no I didn't plagiarize that. No,

(17:57):
my work was actually my work. I wrote it. I
were my ideas. I know, I did all the research.

Speaker 2 (18:06):
It was all me. It was all me.

Speaker 1 (18:08):
So already now Trump's campaign is seizing on this, as
they should. They have now been given a massive political gift. Now,
let me just make one quick point, and I want
to go to the phone lines six one seven two
six six sixty eight sixty eight is the number. This
is from Larry on Messenger, and it's a pretty good one.

Speaker 2 (18:31):
Jeff.

Speaker 1 (18:32):
Kamala is writing a new autobiography. It'll be titled Fake
Your Way to the Top. But then, you know, Larry
also makes another very good point, Jeff, you know what
she really is. Kamala is the female version of the

(18:54):
f UP. And that, of course was the nickname Obama
gave to Joe Biden. I can't say the whole thing, obviously,
I'm gonna get fine, but that's what he nicknamed them,
you know, the f UP. He goes, you want something
fed up, you call in Joe. And this is what
all of this is now starting to expose. And I
think this is why you want to understand why her

(19:15):
campaign is collapsing, why her numbers now are starting to
crumble while Trump is surging and getting stronger. She's fundamentally
no different than Joe Biden outside of her skin color,
I mean to put it, very crudely, outside of her
skin color and her plumbing. Hey, her sex, her biological sex,

(19:37):
outside of the fact that she's a woman and half Indian,
half black. Outside of that, how is she different than
Joe Biden? Just objectively, just stand back for a second.
And that's what the American public is now realizing. She's
no agent of change. She's no different than Biden on

(19:58):
anything that's fundamental. She's copying all of his policies. When
asked on the View, when asked on Stephen Colbert, when
asked an interview after interview, if you could do something
different in the last four and a half years from Biden,

(20:19):
would you have done anything different? And her answer is no.
On all the major issues, she says, I helped make him,
helped him make the decision, and I wouldn't have done
anything different on the border, same inflation, same spending, same Afghanistan,
same crime, same everything the same. So you're getting Biden

(20:46):
two point zero. She's no different on every single fundamental issue,
in fact, even in her campaign. And this is not
an original insight on my part, far from it. Many people,
even on the left, have been saying, how come she
didn't take even one issue.

Speaker 2 (21:07):
I don't care.

Speaker 1 (21:08):
Make it abortion, make it climate change, make it crime,
make it whatever. Pick an issue, a childcare, a daycare, healthcare, anything,
and distinguish herself, really separate herself from Joe Biden. She
hasn't done it, and the reason why is because she

(21:32):
knows that if she goes to the middle in any
significant way, she will alienate her radical left wing base,
and she's petrified to do it. So she has embraced
Biden's entire record, She has embraced his entire policy agenda.

Speaker 2 (21:52):
She is just as.

Speaker 1 (21:53):
Divisive and polarizing as Biden. The joy and vibes are
now gone in her campaign. I want to play you cuts,
not now, I want to take calls, but later in
the show.

Speaker 2 (22:06):
Now it's Trump is a dictator.

Speaker 1 (22:09):
Now it's pure fear fear mongering with three weeks left
to go, because they're in full panic.

Speaker 2 (22:15):
He's dangerous, he's unstable, he's unhinged. He's a dictator. He's
going to kill us all. So now the joy is gone.
It's back even now to the doom and gloom, dark
rhetoric of Joey dark Brandon, as his advisors called him.

Speaker 1 (22:35):
And now even on character, he was a plagiarist. It's
what cost him his first presidential run. He was caught
red handed, like her, copying word for word from a
speech by Neil Kennick.

Speaker 2 (22:51):
Well, forget a speech, this is a book. He's a cheat.
She's a cheat. He's a fraud. She's a fraud.

Speaker 1 (23:02):
He's corrupt. She's corrupt. He's a grifter. She's a grifter.
He's a liar. She's a liar. He's a phony and
a fake. She's a phony and a fake. Honestly, what's
the difference, if anything? If anything? And honestly, I want to,

(23:26):
you know, to ask the audience in all seriousness, Okay,
if someone was holding you and your family hostage, and
they were holding a gun to your head and they said, look,
you've only got two choices. Yeah, you don't have a
third choice. There is no third choice. Someone of these

(23:47):
two must be President of the United States. Click give
us an answer, or you're dead. Joe Biden or Kamala Harris?

Speaker 2 (23:57):
Who would you say? In all honesty, who would you say?
Or else?

Speaker 1 (24:02):
You know, we offer you your children, your wife or
your husband and your children.

Speaker 2 (24:06):
What I'm saying is I would say Joe Biden.

Speaker 1 (24:10):
You know, I can't stand the guy, but I'm telling
you he may be demented, he may be a corrupt crook,
he may be a trader, But I'm telling you the
guy is slightly slightly more competent than she is.

Speaker 2 (24:26):
Am I wrong?

Speaker 1 (24:28):
If you were in that position, wouldn't you say, well, jeez,
if you're gonna hold a gun to my head, Yeah, yeah,
I guess I'll go with Joey. So here's what you're
getting with Kamala. You're gonna get Bidenism. Biden the last
four years, it's gonna be this. In the next four

(24:51):
years will be the same as the last four years.
That's why she's going down. That's what the American people
are realizing. They're like, there's no change.

Speaker 2 (25:05):
What change? It's more of the same.

Speaker 1 (25:07):
If anything, even more of the same, but more incompetent
of the same, if that's humanly possible with that annoying
cackling and laugh.

Speaker 2 (25:20):
And so I want to ask all of you.

Speaker 1 (25:22):
It is the Kooner country Pole Question of the Day
sponsored by Marios Marios Quality Roofing, Siding and Windows. Now
that she has been exposed as having plagiarized her book
on crime in twenty nineteen, and I'm talking massive sections

(25:46):
of her book, she's a plagiarist, is there any difference,
any real difference between Kamala Harris and Shoe Biden. I'd
love to hear from you, Kooner Country A yes, b no.
You know my position. I'm an a yes all the way, baby,

(26:11):
but that's me. You can vote on our web page
wrko dot com slash cooner w r ko dot com
slash cooner. K u h n is in national Er.
You can also vote via x my handle there at
the Kooner Report. All one word kuh na is in

(26:31):
national Er. Angelo in Rockland, You're gonna kick us off. Angelo,
thanks for holding and welcome.

Speaker 3 (26:39):
Hey, good morning, Jeff. Don't forget now we all know
the real story here is when they put Joe Biden,
and he was the number one puppet. The deep Steak
can do what they want, and that's why they removed
him to put puppet number two in. And it's working
out well, isn't it really really well? But the reason

(26:59):
really why I called today, Jeff was in Columbus Day yesterday,
beautiful day, celebrating everything. She brought that up in her speech.
Wasn't that remarkable? How he brought disease and he did
this and he did that. But she forgets she's got
a little lambnees during election time. Remember how her family

(27:20):
was the number one slave trader in the Dominicans. Why
don't you bring that up? How she destroyed all those
lives and scared them forever. It's remarkable. What's going on?

Speaker 4 (27:32):
You know?

Speaker 3 (27:33):
Rules for me, none for these. It's unbelievable. And that's
her family. What a disgrace. And no one's mentioned it.

Speaker 1 (27:40):
Why well, because Angelo would destroy her entire appeal to
the black community. Look as I speak to you now,
she's getting ready to do a big audio town hall
with Charlemagne the God. And the reason why she's going
on with Charlemagne the God, it's going to be a
big thing on iHeart later today is because she trying
to desperately win back blacks. Black voters and especially black

(28:04):
men who are fleeing her and voting for Trump. Well,
they don't want to hear that her family were the
biggest slave owners and slave traders in Jamaica. Six one
seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight is the
number Dave in the Great State of Pennsylvania. Thanks for holding,
Dave and welcome.

Speaker 5 (28:26):
Hey what's her buddy?

Speaker 6 (28:27):
Hey, Jeff, I guess that Kamala Harris smiths the junior
year of high school with the when you did your
turn paper about footnoting things? Oh, Jeff Waite, footnote is
the move that she used to do to get where
she's at if you know what I mean?

Speaker 5 (28:41):
You know quobetter.

Speaker 6 (28:42):
Hey, Jeff, a quick note for I got a joke
for you from the Butler rally. Where did Kamala Harris
attend college?

Speaker 2 (28:49):
I don't know where?

Speaker 5 (28:50):
University of Monica, Lewinsky.

Speaker 1 (28:52):
Oh, Dave, what do you make of this plagiarism scandal
that's now in golf campaign?

Speaker 2 (29:01):
In golf the candidacy.

Speaker 1 (29:04):
The New York Times is trying to carry water for her,
telling us it's not that serious. And if you dare
mention it, you're a racist. Do you think this is
gonna work with the American people or do they just
not care?

Speaker 6 (29:17):
Maybe with the lid TODs, Jeff, But I'll tell you this,
you better be careful how you use the term in golfing, buddy.

Speaker 5 (29:22):
I'm just kidding.

Speaker 6 (29:23):
But Jeff, get this, okay, Junior, you're in high school.

Speaker 5 (29:28):
I wrote my term paper.

Speaker 6 (29:29):
I don't know what you did in Canada because you're
a Canuck, but that's okay. Kamala came from the same
area as you, and that's not putting you down, buddy.
But Jeff, I did in my turn paper on the
US attack on Libya, which of course wasn't mentioned in
the Reagan movie. Jeff, I had the footnote in footnote
my comments an italicized writing of the nuns came after me, buddy, literally,
but no, Jeff, seriously, it's called the footnote. Kamala not

(29:52):
a sex move to get where you're at. Just to
clarify that, and Jeff. She also has something in common
with Clyudine Day, the other plagiarist about anti Semites.

Speaker 1 (30:02):
Dave Tomorrow, and this apparently is a big thing for
Fox News. She's gonna be on with Brett Boring. Okay,
Brett Bear snagged an interview with Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris
is now right away. She's telling everybody, what do you mean,
I'm only doing softball interviews.

Speaker 2 (30:21):
No, I'm going on Fox. Look at me.

Speaker 1 (30:24):
I'm not afraid to take on the tough questions. Well,
you know, I know this audience knows Brett Bear. I
e Brett Boring is a Trump hating rhino. He hates Trump.
He's made that very obvious, very clear. If I was
to do an interview on Fox, if I was Kamal
as people, of course I would pick Brett Boring as well.

(30:48):
Do you think he's even gonna ask her this question
about how the fact that she plagiarized her book and
used it as the launching pad for her career as
attorney general in cal Or? Do you think he's just
gonna throw her softball after softball after softball?

Speaker 2 (31:06):
What do you say, Dave Jeff punintended.

Speaker 6 (31:10):
Remember when you were playing softball, sometimes they threw a
white grapefruit at you.

Speaker 5 (31:13):
And then you hit it and it was a joke.

Speaker 6 (31:15):
I think that's what's going to happen, Jeff, even though
he's a rhinosterroistic rino like Mitt Romney and Charlie Faker there.
But here's my point, Jeff, I think that it's not
going to be a softball I think he is going
to have to get tough or why don't you know what, Jeff,
why didn't she go to news match at Rob Schmidt?
She would run away from the quote you made yesterday
like Garla to Drakula and the grucafeis why don't she

(31:38):
go on a news match that's like, you know.

Speaker 5 (31:40):
The silver bullet to the white wolf.

Speaker 6 (31:42):
Jeff, Since it's Harlloween and I'm from Salem originally, buddy,
But now, Jeff, I think it's gonna be a softball interview.

Speaker 5 (31:48):
I agree with you.

Speaker 6 (31:48):
One hundred percent. Why didn't she get interviewed with Hannity
or even Laura Ingram?

Speaker 5 (31:52):
I agree?

Speaker 2 (31:53):
Dave?

Speaker 1 (31:53):
I agree, I completely agree. Okay, fine, you're gonna do Fox.
You know, Trump made this point on True Social and
he was completely right. He said, well, if you're going
to do Fox, at least do somebody it's a little
more hard hitting, you know, Laura Ingram or Jesse Waters
or even Sean Hannity. There's many others that would have been,
you know, Harris Faulkner, even not that I'm a huge

(32:14):
fan of hers, but even she's better. But ayya yai,
you pick that cream puff really that guy, that empty
suit Bread Boring. So he's going to be an interview
about nothing. That's all it's going to be. And this
is my fear, And thank you for that call, Dave.

Speaker 2 (32:33):
This is my fear. She's desperate.

Speaker 1 (32:37):
I think the Rhinos at Fox News are going to
try to throw her a lifeline. They're going to try
to rejuvenate her campaign, re energize her campaign, make it
seem now that look at her, she's appealing to independence,
she's appealing to moderate Republicans.

Speaker 2 (32:55):
She's going on Fox, and look.

Speaker 1 (32:57):
How she handled bred Boring, shaken handle the tough questions.
Paul rhino'riyan runs effectively Fox News. He's at the he's
on the board. The Murdochs, the Sons who have said
openly they want Kamala Harris to win. These are the
people now calling the shots at Fox. And my fear

(33:21):
is that the reason why Fox asked her and the
reason why she agreed is they're going to try to
use this as a way to rehabilitate Kamala get her
campaign back on track, because as things stand right now,
the whole thing is coming apart, the wheels are coming off.

(33:43):
So we'll see if Brett Boring asks a question about
this massive plagiarism scandal and if he actually has the
guts to follow through with some real serious, tough questions.
Don't hold your breath, Tom in the Philippines, Thanks for holding,
and welcome to Can you hold on? We can barely

(34:10):
hear you. We have no connection whatsoever. We're going to
try to reconnect with you. Let's go to Mark in Medford.
Thanks for holding, Mark, and welcome.

Speaker 5 (34:21):
Good morning Jeff.

Speaker 2 (34:23):
Mark.

Speaker 5 (34:23):
I I just want to say I usually call on Mondays.

Speaker 7 (34:26):
I'll send you a message to it, but it was
Columbus Day yesterday, so I actually had the day off,
so I slept so happy belated Columbus.

Speaker 2 (34:34):
Agy, Happy Columbus Day, Mark.

Speaker 5 (34:38):
And I'll get to that in a minute.

Speaker 8 (34:40):
But to the subject at hand, Jeff, don't you know
by now, ever since Trump came down.

Speaker 5 (34:46):
That escalator, all the rules that apply.

Speaker 8 (34:49):
To plagiarism and committing actual crimes and perjury and being
corrupt have gone out the window. They don't exist anymore.

Speaker 7 (35:00):
But if it happened eight years ago, oh my god, Jeff,
we'd all be in prison, Trump would be in prison,
or you wouldn't be allowed on the radio, or people
wouldn't be allowed to run for office, that they'd be
automatically disqualified.

Speaker 5 (35:13):
Am I right? Jet for am I wrong?

Speaker 2 (35:14):
You're completely right, You're absolutely right.

Speaker 1 (35:17):
Look Mark, just to piggyback and reinforce what you're saying here,
forget when I was at McGill, Okay, that's a career render.
I'm gone here at iHeart right now. On WRKO. If
I came out with a book and it was totally plagiarized,
and not just plagiarized, but it was so blatant and

(35:38):
sloppy and lazy, oh frankly insulting. How obvious it was plagiarized,
management would haul me in, they take me to the
woodshed and they'd say, let me get this straight. You're
peddling a book that not only you didn't right, that
you stole from others, off of Wikipedia and press releases

(36:03):
from you know, from these colleges, Like what kind of
a joke are you man, there's the door. Your show
is over effective immediately. I'm done. I'm telling you, I'm done.
Most people are done.

Speaker 5 (36:23):
Look.

Speaker 1 (36:23):
I had a student once who literally plagiarized the book review.
Okay again, I caught him. I'd read all the reviews
of the book and I warned the class. I said,
don't do it. Well, this guy did it. So I
hauled him into my office.

Speaker 2 (36:36):
Mark. He was on the floor crying, begging me.

Speaker 1 (36:40):
He played football, he was a field goal kicker for
McGill University at the time, and he said, you don't understand.
He claims he had a concussion in one of the
games and his head was hurting and he just couldn't
write the review. And but I mean, he practically begged
me in the office, saying, please don't report me.

Speaker 2 (36:57):
They're going to expel me from universe. I'm done.

Speaker 1 (37:01):
I'm losing my football scholarship. I'm out of McGill. I'm expelled.
Like this is one of the most serious things you
can do. And she did it. She didn't just even
a little here. Mark, this name probably won't mean anything
to you, and it shouldn't. I remember this was maybe
what fifteen twenty years ago. Steven Ambrose, very famous American historian,

(37:27):
writes about American history, usually twentieth century. Eisenhower d Day
three volume biography on Nixon. Marvelous writer, a marvelous writer.
He was under contract. They kept saying, you know, a
book a year, A book a year, a book a year.
So the guy and he writes these thick books, six
seven hundred pages.

Speaker 2 (37:46):
So he was under so much pressure to.

Speaker 1 (37:49):
Just keep, you know, pumping out these books that they
began to notice in some of his later books, Hey,
I think this paragraph is plagiarized from another work. Hey
I think these those two lines are word for word
from another book. It was a massive scandal. It pretty
much ended his career. Now we're talking about a paragraph.

(38:11):
We're talking about a couple sentences. Mark, Holy Shimoli, forget,
we're talking page after page after page, section after section
after section. I maybe she wrote her own name.

Speaker 2 (38:28):
That's it.

Speaker 1 (38:29):
I think that's the only thing that was hers in
the whole book. How is she still standing? That's my question?

Speaker 2 (38:36):
Mark? Am I wrong? What say you, Jeff?

Speaker 5 (38:39):
As you and I'd say, are one thousand percent right?

Speaker 7 (38:42):
If it was you, Jeff, you'd be able to hack
a fraud and you'd be on the unemployment line trying
to support your family.

Speaker 5 (38:49):
Okay, reading the dad and that's a fact.

Speaker 7 (38:51):
But Jeff, I just want to go off the subject
for real quick. As you mentioned Columbus State.

Speaker 9 (38:55):
Yes, so this month is Italian Heritage Month also, Okay, Now,
I've seen commercials on TV to celebrate Indigenous People's Day.
I've seen commercials on TV to celebrate Hispanic Latino heritage.
No offense to my Hispanic and Latino brothers and sisters
out there, but jesf, do they hate Italian people this

(39:17):
much that we can't even get a freaking acknowledgment.

Speaker 1 (39:21):
Well, I remember, Look, Columbus Day was an Italian American
and it was like what the Italian American version of
Saint Patrick's Day. It was a source of tremendous pride
and celebration, honestly, not just in the Italian American community,
but across the entire country. And the Italians were so proud,
and they were right to be proud, you know, Americans

(39:43):
of Italian descent, for all the incredible contributions they made
to the United States. Look, honestly, Mark, I'm not going
to stroke your ego and I'm not saying it's because
my own wife is Italian.

Speaker 5 (39:54):
Ah.

Speaker 1 (39:55):
I can't think of a more successful immigrant group. I'm
not saying others weren't very successful, you know, the Jews, Irish,
I could go on, you know, many successful immigrant groups,
but I can't think of a more successful one than
Italian Americans. They've made America. They've helped make America what
it is. And you know, to think about this without

(40:17):
Columbus day, Okay, without Christopher Columbus, there's no America.

Speaker 2 (40:23):
I mean, that's just a fact.

Speaker 1 (40:25):
By the way, you mentioned your Latino brothers and sisters,
there's no Latin America. That's the find that part I
also find amazing. What do you think Latinos are. They're
a mixture of yes, the indigenous peoples, but of Spanish,
the European Spaniards. They're a unique mix in combination. So

(40:47):
no Christopher Columbus, there's no Latin America, no Central America,
no South America, and there certainly is no the United
States of America. So to me, one of the greatest
heroes in world history and should be a statue in
almost every city, every town in the United States. Is
Christopher Columbus and the Italians should be immensely proud that

(41:13):
he was Italian. Now he did it on behalf of
the Spanish gang. We all know the story. But still
he was an Italian. An Italian discovered the Americas, and
now they turn it into something called Indigenous People's Day.
So think about this. We're going to destroy one of

(41:33):
the greatest achievements in the history of the world, one
of the greatest men, one of the greatest pioneers, adventurers
in the history.

Speaker 2 (41:44):
Of the world. Explorers.

Speaker 1 (41:46):
He was a great explorer for an unspecified indigenous group
of people who by the way, and I want to
play this cut Mark, and I want to get your
reaction to it, because this, to me sums up everything
that is wrong with Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren. Oh,
by the way, the chief spreading bull, Elizabeth Warren, I

(42:10):
forgot this yesterday. Happy Indigenous People's Day, Chief Jeef. I
know yesterday was your day. Your people were being celebrated yesterday,
Elizabeth Warren, So happy Indigenous People's Day. Listen now to
this is Kamala Harris about Columbus Day, and I want

(42:31):
to get your reaction. Mark roll cut six.

Speaker 10 (42:34):
Mike, it is an honor, of course, to be with
you this week as we celebrate Indigenous People's Day, as
we speak truth about our nation's history. Since nineteen thirty four,
every October, the United States has recognized the voyage of

(42:57):
the European explorers who first landed on the shores of
the Americas. But that is not the whole story. That
has never been the whole story. Those explorers ushered in
a wave of devastation for tribal nations, perpetrating violence, stealing land,

(43:20):
and spreading disease. We must not shy away from this
shameful past, and we must shed light on it and
do everything we can to address the impact of the
past on Native communities.

Speaker 1 (43:37):
Now, Mark, I want you, I want to get your
say on this. But just before I go to you,
she's basically saying America should never have been discovered. That's
what she's saying. That we should be ashamed that America
became a country and a civilization. And you know, and
she stands there with this arrogance and smirk like she

(44:01):
knows it all. And I've never seen someone so historically ignorant.
I'm sorry, the only other word stupid in my entire life.

Speaker 2 (44:11):
Does she not know anything.

Speaker 1 (44:13):
About Native Americans anything? What you think they weren't destroying
each other? You don't think they were waging wars of
aggression against each other. They practiced slavery, they practiced ethnic cleansing.
They committed unspeakable rapes and an atrocities against each other.

(44:38):
This idea that only the Europeans brought depredation and violence
and rape and stealing land. What do you think the
Native American tribes were doing to each other? They kept
stealing each other's land. It was NonStop warfare. In fact,
many tribes you can look it up, whether it be
the Mayas, whether it be the Aztecs. They engaged in

(45:01):
human sacrifice and cannibalism.

Speaker 2 (45:05):
What is this woman talking about?

Speaker 1 (45:08):
But fundamentally, Mark, and by the way, if you want
a great movie on this, see the movie Apocalypto with
Mel Gibson directed it.

Speaker 2 (45:16):
It's a brilliant movie.

Speaker 1 (45:18):
It accurately shows what life was like prior to the
coming of the Europeans. It'll change your view permanently forever.

Speaker 2 (45:27):
Okay, but let that go. Let that go.

Speaker 1 (45:30):
And the last scene, Oh, it's the most politically incorrect
scene you'll ever see in a Hollywood movie. But it's
all true. Okay, but let that go. So what she's
saying is this, she's fundamentally anti American. She hates this country.
Our founding was based on genocide. Our founding was based
upon hatred and theft. It's what the left says about Israel,

(45:56):
that they're a settler, colonial nation, a genocide. That's what
they say about the United States, as if the Indians
weren't committing genocide against each other, as if they weren't
engaging in wars of colonialism and imperialism against each other,
as if they didn't have slavery. In fact, most Indian
tribes had slavery. Okay, but let all that go. This

(46:22):
is a woman that wants to be our president. If
you hate our country and our founding so much that
we should be ashamed that it was discovered and created,
then you have no business governing US.

Speaker 2 (46:39):
I mean, Mark, am I wrong?

Speaker 11 (46:42):
Last word again again, Jeff, You're a thousand percent right
and my rebuttal to Kamala Harris's come. What Kamala Harris
has said is this, she should thank the Good Lord
that the teleprompter didn't malfunction because she would have.

Speaker 6 (46:58):
Never said any of those figure wars.

Speaker 7 (47:00):
Because she has no clue about the history of this
country and how it was discovered.

Speaker 5 (47:06):
And I'm gonna leave you with this, Jeff, Christopher Columbus.

Speaker 7 (47:09):
The only migrant that liberals and Democrats hate.

Speaker 2 (47:15):
Oh, Mark dropped the mic.

Speaker 1 (47:18):
Dropped the mic, Mark to say, my friend, that one
is for the vault. That's a that's a hall of fame.
Call Mark, thank you very much.

Speaker 2 (47:29):
That's true.

Speaker 1 (47:29):
This is the only migrant the liberals eight is Christopher
Columbus six one, seven to six. Say he's right by
the way, and by the way, I would just say
this to Kamala. Hey, Kamala, you know your family in Jamaica.
You know the ones that hundreds of years ago were
the biggest slave owners and the biggest slave traders. Yeah,
they wouldn't have been so freaking rich if Columbus hadn't

(47:54):
discovered America. Hey, what are you talking about? If I
were you, I'd be praising him. Palm in the Philippines.
Have we reconnected with Palm Palm? Thanks for holding and welcome.

Speaker 4 (48:11):
Hey Jeff number one, I wanted to call about Kamala's
plagiarism and it's oh, it's crying time again. You're gonna
leave me. And just for the record, I plagiarized about
the Rolling Stones. In the spring of nineteen seventy five.
I blatantly plagiarized something from an author by the name

(48:35):
of Nick Collin and got busted for it and flugged
English that year in Foxboro High I was not a
good student. I digress.

Speaker 5 (48:45):
So here's the point.

Speaker 2 (48:46):
Let that go right here, all.

Speaker 4 (48:48):
Right, yeah, well, hey, I'm honest, Okay, all right, Now,
as far as Indigenous People's Day goes, now, my ancestry
and the fuller side of the family goes back to
the sixteen thirties. Sixteen seventy five, King Philip murdered three
of my ancestors and what is now the town of Rehoboth.

(49:10):
Do I have any animosity No. Mom's side of the
family in West Virginia Hitt In West Virginia, seventeen seventy five,
Elizabeth Graham was kidnapped by the Shawnee Indians. Her brother
Thomas was scalped alive along with the slave named Sharp.
Do I have any animosity towards Shawnee's Of course not.

Speaker 5 (49:32):
It happened.

Speaker 4 (49:33):
Now here's the other point that I talked to when
I talk with white liberals on my Facebook page, that
always lay this guilt trip about how we the white
man stole the land from the Native Americans, which yeah,
pretty much is I'll agree to that. So here's the question,
now that we know the real truth about America, who

(49:55):
in Facebook land that suffers from liberal white is going
to do the morally righteous thing. And that piece of
property you owner in Foxboro, Massachusetts, or Brockton, Massachusetts or Marlinton,
West Virginia, are you going to give that back to

(50:15):
the rightful owners that are sent Well

Speaker 2 (50:18):
There you go, Tom, and the answer is no.