June 25, 2025 • 54 mins
Get the stories from today's show in THE STACK: https://justinbarclay.com
Kirk Elliott PHD - FREE consultation on wealth conservation - http://GoldWithJustin.com
Join Justin in the MAHA revolution - http://HealthWithJustin.com
Try Cue Streaming for just $2 / day and help support the good guys https://justinbarclay.com/cue
Up to 80% OFF! Use promo code JUSTIN http://MyPillow.com/Justin
Patriots are making the Switch! What if we could start voting with our dollars too? http://SwitchWithJustin.com
Kirk Elliott PHD - FREE consultation on wealth conservation - http://GoldWithJustin.com
Join Justin in the MAHA revolution - http://HealthWithJustin.com
Try Cue Streaming for just $2 / day and help support the good guys https://justinbarclay.com/cue
Up to 80% OFF! Use promo code JUSTIN http://MyPillow.com/Justin
Patriots are making the Switch! What if we could start voting with our dollars too? http://SwitchWithJustin.com
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The Crown of Independence Day weekend for years has been
the Living in Freedom event at Nuchapel. Hey it's justin Barklay.
This year, July sixth, they're hosting Pastor Willie George with
thrilling carnival rides, games inflatables, free food trucks, the car
show and giveaways including FamilyFun packs at a premium shotgun
and so much more. The best part, it's all free
(00:21):
fun for the whole family. Nuchapel a quarter mile west
of I'm fine in four mile Living in Freedom July sixth.
Get all the details at Newchapel dot com, slash Freedom,
get the Good newsletter, all the news they don't want
you to hear, and more. Let's get around big tech
with the Good Newsletter. Stay in touch. Go to Justin
Barclay dot com, slash Goodnews. That's justin Barklay dot com
(00:42):
slash good News. Get the good News Today, a Strapannie,
It's going to be a heck of a riote. It's
like drinking from a fire hose. Never a dull moment,
but yes, you'll hear the stories you won't hear anywhere else,
and we appreciate you being here with us.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
Form today.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
I'm justin Barclay. All right, welcome into the after show,
the show, After the show. We got Trump. They're setting
him up. Looks like he's going to speak here at NATO.
I got a little bit of the lay here, but believe,
(01:19):
I believe we have Now that's Jerome Powell. Hang on,
let me make sure I get the right agreement here.
Speaker 3 (01:25):
He is late Monday, and we call it the twelve
day war.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Twelve day war.
Speaker 3 (01:30):
Spoke to a few people. I guess that just sounded
like the right the right name.
Speaker 2 (01:34):
It was a twelve day war, and we think it's over.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
I don't think they're going to be going back at
each other. I don't think so. Trump's note decisively with
the critical threat of Iran's nuclear program, which was what
I wanted. I said, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
I've said that for fifteen years, long before I decided
to do the political thing. But we've also reasserted the
(01:59):
credit ability of American deterrence, which is like no other.
The people at NATO said, there's never been anything.
Speaker 5 (02:07):
You know.
Speaker 3 (02:07):
I rebuilt the entire military during my first term, and
we have a great military.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
We have great generals.
Speaker 3 (02:15):
Got to know the good ones and the bad ones.
We kept the good ones. Over the past two days,
I was on it to participate in the NATO leaders
meeting and also had extremely good individual discussions with the
King and the Queen, Secretary General Ruta and the Prime Minister.
Great discussions, very knowledgeable people. Major focus of our conversations
(02:38):
at the summit was the need for other NATO members
to take up the burden of the defense of Europe,
and that included the financial burden. As you know, it
was two percent, and we got it up to five percent,
and they said a couple of them came up to me,
one in particular said, sir, we've been trying to get
it up to three percent for twenty years a week.
(03:00):
I haven't been able, and you got it up to
five percent. So they're going to be most of them,
I guess almost all of them are going to be
contributing now five percent, a number that.
Speaker 2 (03:10):
People are surprised that, but you need it.
Speaker 3 (03:12):
Today. The United States accounts for two thirds of all
NATO defense spending, and since I began pushing for additional
commitments in twenty seventeen, believe it or not, our allies
have increased spending by seven hundred billion dollars. I said
to people, you don't have any money, and a lot
of them weren't paying, and so I started the process
(03:32):
and I picked it up as soon as I got back,
which is six months ago, and following my election last November,
almost all have accelerated plans to reach the two percent,
three percent, four percent, and then ultimately, very quickly five percent.
And all of this is going to be done very quickly,
almost immediately. You probably know this as well as I do.
(03:56):
I'm sure they've been talking about it. It's really been
a big focus. In a very historic milestone. This week,
the NATO Allies committed to dramatically increase their defense spending
to that five percent of GDP, something that no one
really thought possible. And they said, you did it, sir,
you did it. Well, I don't know if I did it,
but I think I did.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
This will be.
Speaker 3 (04:18):
Known as the Hague Defense Commitment, which is pretty good,
pretty appropriate. When the Allies reached this number, it will
add more than one trillion dollars a year. Think of that,
one trillion per year to our common defense. And this
is a monument really to victory. But it's a monumental
(04:40):
win for the United States because we were carrying much
more than our fair share. It was quite unfair, actually,
but this is a big win for Europe and for
actually Western civilization. For years, past administrations failed to get
most allies to contribute even the two percent. I remember
when I came, we had four countries that were up
(05:01):
to two percent, and I remember Poland was there. A
couple of them were there, but most of them were.
We had twenty eight at the time. As you know,
it's increased a little bit, and they've agreed now to
more than double.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
Their budgets in all cases.
Speaker 3 (05:18):
And Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for its
security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation
with Russia and Ukraine, and hopefully we're going to get
that solved. Last week there were seven thousand soldiers, mostly soldiers,
but they're also getting hit in Kiev. They're getting hit
in some of the towns also, and that means life
(05:44):
is disappearing also in the cities and towns. Should have
never happened, would have never happened. If I was president,
said it a thousand times, and it never did happen.
It's never even thought about. But it's vital that this
additional money be spent on very serious military hardware, not bureaucracy.
And hopefully that hardware is going to be made in
(06:06):
America because.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
We have the best hardware in the world.
Speaker 3 (06:08):
You saw that we're fourteen missiles was shot at us
the other day and they were very nice. They gave
us warning. They said, we're going to shoot him. It
is one o'clock. Okay, they said, it's fine, and everybody
was emptied off the base so they couldn't get hurt
except for the gunners. Wow, they call them the gunners.
(06:29):
And at of fourteen high end missiles that were shot
at the base in guitar, all fourteen, as you know,
we're shot down by.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Our Yeah, but but ayah, and then's just you know,
they didn't really get the nuclear sides that they were
just minimal damage.
Speaker 3 (06:44):
There amazing stuff. Amazing that they can do. It's like
shooting a bullet with a bullet. It's the same thing
if you think about it. Fourteen out of fourteen and
they were they weren't even that surprise. I said, do
you do that? Well, often say, we pretty much do, sir.
The Ukraine crisis has also highlighted the urgency of rebuilding
(07:06):
our defense industrial base, both in the United States and
among the Allied nations. We cannot afford to be dependent
on foreign adversaries for critical minerals.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
And as you know, we made a deal with Ukraine.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
To take a vast amount of the land they have
for minerals.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
We need it.
Speaker 3 (07:25):
And once again I want to thank all of the
people in the Netherlands, incredible people, it's a great place,
and all of the NATO allies for the tremendous summit
that we just had. A letter just came in and
a statement came in from the Atomic Energy Commission of Israel,
(07:45):
and I just wondered this is an official letter and
the very serious people. As you know, the devastating US
strike on Fordo destroyed the site's critical infrastructure and rendered
the enrichment facility totally inoperable.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
It was devastated.
Speaker 3 (08:02):
We assessed that the American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities
has set back Aren's ability to develop nuclear.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
Weapons for many years to come.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
This achievement can continue indefinitely if Iran does not get
access to nuclear material, which it won't. It's so said
that that whole thing had to go. But I just
I just want to thank our pilots. You know, they
were maligned and treated very bad, demeaned by fake New CNN,
which is back there, believed in wasting time, wasting it.
(08:35):
Nobody's watching them, so they just wasted a lot of time.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
Wasting my time.
Speaker 3 (08:40):
And the New York Times they put out a story
that well, maybe they were hit, but it wasn't bad. Well,
it was so bad that they ended the war. It
ended the war, somebody said, in a certain way. It
was so devastating. Actually, if you look at Hiroshimo, if
you look at Nagasaki, you know that end did a war.
(09:00):
To this ended a war in a different way, but
it was so devastating. Also, they have out of Dubai.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Just came that.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
Irans this Ransi mess because it's near its nuclear installations
were very badly damaged by the American strike. So what
bothered me about these reports with fake reports put out
by the New York Times failing? I caught the failing
(09:30):
New York Times because it's stilling terribly.
Speaker 2 (09:32):
Without me, it would be doing no business at all.
Speaker 3 (09:35):
But end by fake new CNN and MSDNC, all of
these terrible people. You know, they have no credibility. You know,
when I started, there were at ninety four percent credibility
the media.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
Now it's at sixteen percent.
Speaker 3 (09:50):
And I'm very proud of it because I've exposed it
for what it is. But when I when I saw
them starting to question the caliber of the attack.
Speaker 2 (10:01):
Was it bad?
Speaker 3 (10:02):
What was really bad? It was devastted. They obliterated, like,
you can't get into the tunnels they just put that
over that just came out. They can't, there's nothing, there's
no way you can even get down. The whole thing
is collapsed at a disaster, and I think all of
the nuclear stuff is down there because it's very hard
to remove, and we did it very quickly. When they
heard we were coming, it was you know, you can't
(10:24):
move it very hard, very dangerous actually to move too.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
And they also knew we were coming.
Speaker 3 (10:29):
So I don't think too many people want to be
down there knowing we're coming with the bunker busters as
we call them.
Speaker 2 (10:34):
We're the only ones that have them.
Speaker 3 (10:35):
We have the best equipment, best nuclear equipment, and we
have the best equipment in the world. And by the way,
we can't forget our submarine, which was out there. Submarines actually,
but submarine was out there. We shut thirty rockets into
an area, every single one of them. I think it
was almost four hundred miles away, I think four hundred
(11:00):
and long. It was in the ocean, long ways away,
and we shot. We shot a total of thirty. Every
single one of hit within nine inches from where it
was supposed to be. It took it a lot because
we didn't do just sporido.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
We did two others.
Speaker 3 (11:19):
In addition, which hadn't been completely destroyed, so we hit
them with a submarine from hundreds of miles away. Amazing,
just amazing equipment. Greatest submarines in the world. Nobody's even closer,
twenty years behind us when it comes to submarine technology.
So that's one and the other was from the Atomic
(11:43):
Energy Commission, and they have about three or four of
them now coming in from Atomic Energy commissions from various places.
But the one that we have that just came out
we released it a little while ago, was from the
Israeli Atomic Energy Commission. But numerous of them are getting
to see the site and the site has been demolished,
(12:04):
and again we had these brave patriots, these incredible flyers,
these people that can fly a plane better than anybody
can fly a plane going into very hostile territory, flying
into the territory that it's got more missiles and things
pointed at it, but it was very stealth. They didn't
(12:25):
get to see it. It was dark. That's the amazing
thing about the shots. They hit the shots perfectly, and
yet it was dead dark. There was no moon, there
was no light. It was virtually moonless. It was very dark,
and they hit the shots, were hit perfectly. But when
they get demeaned, and they were very upset about it
because they knew how strong it would be back in Missouri.
(12:47):
The pilots flew about thirty six hours two ways far
distance and in those incredible B two's, and we then
had the F twenty twos and we had the F
thirty five, so we had other planes, and we had
I think a total of fifty two tankers. That means
the big the big tankers because the refueling was a
lot for all of the different planes that we sent.
(13:07):
Incredible operation and I have to say General Raisin Gain
was incredible. That's why he beat Isis and we beat
Isis in a matter of weeks. I was told it
would take four to five years. We did it in
a few weeks and he was great. That's why he's
ahead of the Joint chiefs of Staff right now because
I had a very good experience with him. He knocked
(13:28):
out Isis in a period of literally a few weeks.
Speaker 2 (13:31):
Amazing.
Speaker 3 (13:33):
I was supposed to take a few years, five years
to be exact. So we had a great victory there
and we then came here and I think we had
a great victory here. But this is an ongoing project.
This is the safety of Europe, the safety of the world,
and they've raised it from two percent to five percent,
something which nobody and you're talking about over a trillion
(13:56):
dollars a year, so we're talking about a lot of
money from coming in from countries that were not paying
nearly enough to be effective.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
So I have, as you know, Marco Rubio with me
and Pete.
Speaker 3 (14:07):
Heggsas Secretary of State and Secretary of war. Should we
say secretary You know it used to be called secretary
of war. Maybe for a couple of weeks we'll call
it that because we feel like warriors used to be
called secretary of war.
Speaker 2 (14:20):
Effective.
Speaker 3 (14:21):
Look at the old building next to the White House.
You can see where it used to be Secretary of War.
Then we became politically correct and they called it Secretary
of Defense, and maybe we have to start thinking about
changing it.
Speaker 2 (14:33):
But we feel that way. Do we have any questions? Please?
Speaker 3 (14:38):
Wow, that's a lot of questions. Uh, who's a nice
Oh you're not a nice person.
Speaker 2 (14:46):
But I'll let you ask one.
Speaker 3 (14:47):
Here we go.
Speaker 4 (14:48):
You're gonna ask conference nice President Trump.
Speaker 3 (14:52):
I know him well. Thank you, mister President. Thank you
for taking the time before flying home.
Speaker 6 (14:58):
You just said you believe the conflict between Israel and
Iran is over.
Speaker 3 (15:03):
What makes you so confident it is? And what do
you do if it isn't? Because I dealt with both
and they're both tired, exhausted. They fought very very hard
and very viciously, very violently, and they were both satisfied
to go home and get out. And can it start again?
I guess someday it can. It could maybe start soon.
(15:26):
I think A big telltale sign was when, as you know,
Iran somewhat by not much violated the ceasefire and Israel
had the planes going out that morning, and there were
a lot of them, fifty two of them, and I said,
you got to get them back, and they brought them back.
They didn't do anything, they brought them back. It was
(15:46):
very good. I thought it was amazing. Actually, they have
fought a hell of a war. They fought very hard.
I think the war ended actually when we hit the
various nuclear sites with the planes. And I just hope
you people can give these pilotsies are the best pilots
in the world. They're the best shots in the world.
They call them shots. That's what they are. True And
(16:08):
wait a minute, and I just hope you can give
them the respect they deserve because they came home to
fake news and like, oh geez, there was hardly any damage.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
The things are decimated.
Speaker 3 (16:18):
So but I think now I think they're very much finished.
I think Israel's going to get back to doing what
they do, and I think that Iran's going to get back.
You know, Iran is a huge advantage. They have great
oil and they can do things. I don't see them
getting back involved in the nuclear business anymore.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
I think they've had it.
Speaker 3 (16:37):
They've been at it for twenty years and I don't
see that happening either. Now. If it does, we're always there.
It won't be me, it'll be somebody else. But we're there.
We'll have to do something about it. Yes, please go ahead, goad.
Oh fake news in it? Oh yeah, yeah, here we go.
(16:58):
Where do you hear this question? I think you should
really say how great soldiers warriors are.
Speaker 7 (17:05):
I think everyone appreciates our soldiers and our warriors.
Speaker 8 (17:07):
I do have two.
Speaker 9 (17:07):
Questions for you, mister president.
Speaker 7 (17:09):
You just cited Israeli intelligence on these attacks. Earlier, you
said US intelligence was inconclusive. Are you relying on Israeli
intelligence for your assessment of the impact of the strikes?
Speaker 3 (17:21):
This is also a rand made the statement. And it's
also if you read the document that was given that
Pete can talk about if you'd like. The document said
it could be very severe damage, but they didn't take that.
They said it could be limited or it could be
very severe. They really didn't know other than to say
it could be limited or it could be very very severe.
(17:42):
And you didn't choose to put that because it was
very early after Since then, we've collected additional intelligence. We've
also spoken to people have seen the site, and the
site is obliterated and we think everything nuclear is down there.
They didn't take it out. Okay, question please go ahead.
Speaker 4 (18:01):
This right ahead from Jason. This is right on the mark,
mister President.
Speaker 10 (18:06):
Yesterday you said China can now continue to purchase oil
from Iran. Are you giving up on your maximum pressure
campaign because they're sanctions right now.
Speaker 3 (18:17):
With on Iran. Look, they just had a war. The
war was fought. They fought it bravely. I'm not giving up.
They're in the oil business. I mean I could stop
it if I wanted, would sell China the oil myself.
I don't want to do that. They're going to need
money to put that country back into shape. We want
to see that happen. Would know if they're going to
(18:39):
sell oil, they're gonna sell oil. We're not taking over
the oil. We could have you know, I used to
say with the Raq, keep the oil. I could say
it here.
Speaker 2 (18:45):
Too, We could have kept the oil.
Speaker 3 (18:48):
Now China is gonna want to buy oil. They can
buy it from us, they can buy it from other people.
But you're gonna have to put that country back into shape.
Heeds desperately needs money. Yeah, it'sident Yeah, Please.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
Here we go. I'm picking the beauties today. Go ahead,
mister President.
Speaker 11 (19:10):
Secretary General Ruta has described President Putin as an adversary,
a threat, an enemy. Do you view him the same way?
And in addition to that, you mentioned General Kane, your
chief of staff, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Kane. Yes,
he has said that mister Putin has territorial ambitions beyond Ukraine.
Speaker 3 (19:35):
Do you view that in the same way? Possible? As possible.
I know one thing he'd like to settle. He'd like
to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him.
He called the other day, he said, can I help
you with Iran? I said, no, you can help me
with Russia. Because you know, in the last few weeks
we took care of India and Pakistan, Kosovo, Serbia.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
I think on Friday were you have coming in?
Speaker 3 (20:00):
The Congo is coming in and Rwanda is coming in.
There was a vicious war that went on, a MATCHETI
war heads chopped off all over Africa. They're coming in.
We did two others. In addition to that, nobody's ever
done anything like this. No, I consider him a person
(20:20):
that's I think been misguided. I'm very surprised, actually, I
thought we would have had that settled. I've settled four
of them in the meantime, But he did call up
and he said, you know, he's close to Iran.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
He'd like to help us get a settlement.
Speaker 3 (20:35):
I said, no, No, you helped me get a settlement
with you with Russia, and I think we're going to
be doing that too.
Speaker 2 (20:41):
Yeah, please go ahead, Please, thank.
Speaker 12 (20:45):
You, mister President. You've made clear your position on what
impact the strikes had. I wanted to ask you what
is next with Iran? For instance, is there any indication
from US intelligence that Iran was able to move any material?
Speaker 2 (20:59):
No, well, you just opposite.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
We think we hit them so hard and so fast
they didn't get to move. And if you knew about that, Matuire,
it's very hard and very dangerous to move. It's called
it's called in many people, they call it dust. But
it's very very heavy, it's very very hard to move.
And they were way down. You know, there are thirty
stories down literally, thirty thirty five stories down underground.
Speaker 2 (21:23):
Oh yeah, we think we got well, we.
Speaker 3 (21:24):
Think it's it's covered with granite, concrete and steel.
Speaker 12 (21:30):
I'm going to ask you, are you interested in restarting
negotiations with Iran? And if so, have they received so.
Speaker 3 (21:36):
Our people Marco could answer it, but our people are not.
I'm not the way I look at it. They fought.
The war's done, and you know, I could get a
statement that they're not going to go nuclear. We're probably
going to ask for that, but they're not going to
be doing it.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
But they're not going to be doing it anyway. They've
had it.
Speaker 3 (21:57):
They've had it now. Maybe someday in the future will
want that. But I've asked Marca, do you want to
draw I just asked him the question as we were
walking on the stage. You want to draw up a
little agreement for them to sign because I think we
can get them to sign it. I don't think it's necessary. Marko,
do you want to talk about that place, mister president?
I think you.
Speaker 13 (22:17):
President Trump has shown a willingness to meet and talk
to anybody in the world who is interested in peace.
I don't know of any president that's been as willing
as he has to meet with anyone and talk about peace.
Speaker 3 (22:26):
We'd love to have peaceful relations.
Speaker 13 (22:28):
With any country in the world, and so obviously that
will depend on Iran's willingness not just to engage in peace,
but to negotiate directly with the United States, not through
some third country or fourth country process. But I know
of no president probably in our modern history that's sought
peace more than President Trump has.
Speaker 12 (22:48):
But you're in no rush, is that right?
Speaker 2 (22:51):
I'll tell you what.
Speaker 3 (22:52):
Look, we're going to talk to them next week with
the run. We may sign an agreement. I don't know
to be I don't think it's necessary. I mean, they
had a war, they fought. Now they're going back to
their world. I don't care if I have an agreement
or not. We the only thing we'ld be asking for
is what we were asking for before about we want
no nuclear, but we we destroyed the nuclear. In other words,
(23:15):
that's destroyed.
Speaker 2 (23:16):
I said, Iran.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
Will not have nuclear.
Speaker 2 (23:19):
What we blew it up is.
Speaker 3 (23:21):
Blown up the kingdom come and so I don't feel
very strongly about it. If we got a document, wouldn't
be bad. We're gonna meet with him. Actually we're gonna
meet with him.
Speaker 8 (23:33):
Yeah, go ahead, please, Yes, it's the President Netherland CV.
Thank you for visiting our country. That I of course,
I like to know how you slept last night at
the hoard beautifully, But probably more serious question, I think
you just had a meeting with President Zelenski. Did you
discuss any cease fire in this Russo Ukrainian?
Speaker 3 (23:53):
No, No, I just I wanted to know how he's doing.
It was very nice, actually, you know, we had a
little rough times sometimes he was couldn't have been nicer.
I think he'd like to see an end to this.
Speaker 2 (24:04):
I do.
Speaker 3 (24:05):
I think what I took from the meeting couldn't have
been nicer. Actually, But I took from the meeting that
he'd like to see it end. I think it's a
great time to end it. I'm going to speak to
Vladimir Putin.
Speaker 2 (24:16):
See if we can get it ended.
Speaker 3 (24:18):
But look, these are brave people. They're fighting these wars
all over the place. You know, last week they had
I guess close, I told you seven close to seven
thousand young soldiers, Russian and Ukrainian soldiers were killed. Seven
thousand in one week. It's crazy. It's crazy. So I'll
(24:38):
be speaking to Putin now. I had a good meeting
with Zelenski, and I had a lot of good meetings
with a lot of good meetings with a lot of people,
a lot of great leaders. But he's fighting a brave battle.
It's a tough battle. Yeah, go ahead, white dress, Oh.
Speaker 14 (24:58):
Thank you, eat Halakan and from Finland ill the centiment.
You have played golf with President Alexandri Stube. How do
you see Pheland as a NATO ally and partner and
how would you describe your relationship with our president.
Speaker 3 (25:12):
Well, he's a very good golfer, okay. In fact, he
was in his college golf team. He went to a
good college in the South, as you know, a very
good college, and he was a good golfer. We had
a good time.
Speaker 2 (25:24):
I think my relationships great. I want to buy.
Speaker 3 (25:28):
Icebreakers. You know, you're very good at icebreakers. And I
actually made them an offer. I didn't go to Congress.
They'll try and impeach me for this. But there's an
old it's not old, it's fairly new, but it's used icebreaker.
And I offered him about one third of what he
asked for, but would negotiate. We need icebreakers in the US,
(25:50):
and if we can get some inexpensively, I'd like to
do that. Actually, they'll fix it up, make it good. Also,
we may buy some icebreakers. You know that you make
the you're the king of icebreakers that particular country. They
make them good, They make them really good, and they
know what they're doing, and so we're negotiating with them
for about fifteen different icebreakers, but one of them is
(26:10):
available now. It's old and it's you know old, it's
like five six years old, and we're trying to buy it.
I'm trying to make a good deal.
Speaker 2 (26:19):
It's all I do.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
My whole life, my whole life, that's all I do
is big deals.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
Yeah, please go ahead, sir, go ahead.
Speaker 15 (26:29):
Yeah, a question for a news hour Dutch TV. First
of all, on Article five on your way here, you
spoke about the commitment of the US to Article five,
saying I'll give you my definition once we're here, what
is your definition? And made the US commitment to Article
five change in case some of the NATAL members do
not reach the threshold that was discussed today.
Speaker 4 (26:51):
My second question is.
Speaker 15 (26:52):
Following up on a colleague on Iran. What Intel reports
do say that everything over there was obliterated.
Speaker 3 (27:01):
Yeah, well, there are numerous of those reports and they're
coming out fast and furious, but the most respected ones
we've already seen, and I will say that on a
very confidential basis. They're looking at the reports, like numerous
reports and including people going to the site and checking
the site and they're going to be having I guess
(27:22):
you're going to be having over the next.
Speaker 2 (27:23):
Couple of days of full we're going to encapsulate it.
Speaker 3 (27:26):
But no, the site was obliterated, just like I said
it was, and just like the pilots should be given
credit for as far as Article five. Look, when I
came here, I came here because it was something I'm
supposed to be doing. But I left here a little
bit different differently I said. I watched the heads of
(27:49):
these countries get up, and the love and the passion
that they showed for their country was unbelievable. I've never
seen quite anything like it. They want to tech their country,
and they need the United States, and without the United States,
it's not going to be the same. And you can
ask Mark, or you can ask any of the people
that were there. It was really moving to see it.
(28:12):
They loved their country. They were so respectful of me
because I'm the head of the United States, and I made,
you know, the king of Saudi Arabia. When I was
in I was in the Middle East. So I was
in guitar for a different reason, not a reason to
get shot at. We're in there for economic development reasons.
Qutar Uae and Saudi Arabia, all three leaders of those countries,
(28:36):
and we took back five point one trillion dollars into
the United States. All three leaders said, you know, you're
presiding over the hottest country in the world. The United
States right now.
Speaker 2 (28:45):
Is the hottest.
Speaker 3 (28:45):
Everybody wants to be there, everybody, everybody wants a piece
of it. You said, a year ago your country was dead,
you had a deadhead running it. You had a country
that was dead and it was dead, had people.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
Pouring through the border, had inflation.
Speaker 3 (29:01):
Yet everything he said, You've made it in five months
at that time, You've made it the hottest country. This
is the hottest country in the world. The United States
right now is the hottest country in the world. And
when I was around that table, it was a nice
group of people, many of whom I knew from previous
When I saw the passion they had for the country,
(29:23):
almost everyone, and you probably have the tapes. It was
very public, but almost every one of them said, thank
God for the United States. Without the United States, they
couldn't really have NATO. It wouldn't work. It wouldn't work.
It will in the future because now they're paying much
more money, but it wouldn't work.
Speaker 2 (29:42):
It was great, and I left here differently.
Speaker 3 (29:44):
I left here saying that these people really love their countries.
It's not a ripoff, and we're here to help them
protect their country. Okay, we'll do one or two more.
Speaker 9 (29:57):
Thank you, mister President of question on a Spain.
Speaker 4 (30:00):
Are you satisfyed with today?
Speaker 3 (30:02):
Oh? I think Spain's terrible what they've done.
Speaker 2 (30:05):
No, I do.
Speaker 3 (30:05):
They're the only country that won't pay the full up.
They want to stay at two percent. I think it's terrible.
And you know, they're doing very well. The economy is
very well, and that economy could be blown right out
of the water with something bad happening. You know, Spain
is the only country that are you from Spain? Good congratulations.
You're the only country that is not paying. I don't
(30:25):
know what the problem is. It's I think it's too bad.
So we'll make it up. You know what we're going
to do. We're negotiating with Spain on a trade deal.
We're going to make them pay twice as much. And
I'm actually serious about that. We're going to make Spain.
Speaker 2 (30:37):
I like Spain.
Speaker 3 (30:38):
I have so many people from Spain that it's a
great place and they're great people. But Spain is the
only country out of all other countries that refuses to
pay and you know, so they want a little bit
of a free ride, but they'll have to pay it
back to us on trade because I'm not going to
(30:59):
let that happen. Unfair, it's unfair to it. All right, sir,
please go ahead right in the back. Yeah, you tall one,
the tall man.
Speaker 16 (31:10):
Mister President Johannes Petro from Austrian National Television how he
once said that you would end the Ukraine War in
twenty four hours. You later said you said that sarcastically.
Speaker 2 (31:20):
Of course it was sarcastic.
Speaker 16 (31:22):
But you've now been in office for five months and
five days. Why have you not been able to end?
Speaker 4 (31:28):
Do you listen to this guy?
Speaker 3 (31:29):
Because it's more difficult than people would have any idea.
Vladimir Putin has been more difficult. Frankly, I had some
problems with Zelinsky. You may have read about him. And
it's been more difficult than other wars. I mean, look,
we just ended a war in twelve days that was
simmering for thirty years. Frankly, we ended Rwanda and the Congo.
(31:52):
It's coming to sign the documents. We've already signed basic documents,
but they're coming, I think to the White House. On Friday,
we ended Serbia was going to go at it, but
maybe the most important of all India and Pakistan, and
that wasn't whether or not they may someday have nukes
like we're talking about in the Middle East, like we're
(32:15):
talking about with Israel and Iran.
Speaker 2 (32:19):
This is the half nuclear weapons.
Speaker 3 (32:21):
I ended that with a series of phone calls on trade.
I said, look, if you're going to go fighting each other,
it was getting very bad.
Speaker 2 (32:29):
You know how bad that last attack was.
Speaker 3 (32:31):
It was really bad. If you're going to go fighting
each other, we're not doing any trade deal. No, no, no,
you have to do a trade deal. I said, we're
not doing any trade deal. And in fact I had
the general. It really was very impressive. The General from
Pakistan was in my office last week. You know, Prime
(32:51):
Minister Moot. He's a great friend of mine, he's a
great gentleman, he's a great man. And I got them
to reason and I said, we're not doing a trade
deal if you're going to fight, and if you fight
each other, we're not doing a trade till and you know,
what he said. No, I want to do the trade deal.
We stopped in nuclear work. Go ahead, go ahead, Jeff.
Speaker 2 (33:09):
Here's another beauty, Jeff, He's a beauty, all.
Speaker 3 (33:14):
Right, mister President.
Speaker 6 (33:17):
Follow up on Ukraine? Will the United States contribute any
more money to Ukraine's defense this year to the five
billion that.
Speaker 4 (33:23):
Allies are giving?
Speaker 3 (33:24):
And one question.
Speaker 6 (33:25):
You had another meeting with the Dutch opposition leader, mister Wilders.
Can you tell us about that meeting and are you
upset about his anti Muslim stance.
Speaker 2 (33:34):
I'm not upset about it.
Speaker 3 (33:35):
It's just his view. He's unhappy with the way things
are going in this country. In various countries, he was
an opposition leader, and I was asked to meet with
the opposition leader by the people that are running. I
think they have some deal where if you have a meeting,
you're supposed to meet with an opposition leader.
Speaker 2 (33:50):
I said, that's strange. We don't do that. But I
met with he.
Speaker 3 (33:55):
I didn't know him. He seemed like a very nice guy,
but he's an opposition of the current people, and that
were set up by the current people. So I assume
when I met with the Prime minister, you're supposed to
meet with the opposition.
Speaker 2 (34:07):
We'll have to try that sometime in our country.
Speaker 3 (34:10):
Let's not do it. But he was I thought he
was very good as far as money going. We'll see
what happens. There's a lot of spirit. Look, Vladimir Putin
really has to end that war. People are dying at
levels that people haven't seen before for a long time.
Speaker 2 (34:28):
Go ahead, go ahead, quite shirt. Oh she's all excited.
Speaker 17 (34:35):
So she is Ukrainian.
Speaker 3 (34:40):
Where are you from? I'm from Ukraine.
Speaker 17 (34:42):
So my question to you is whether or not the
US is ready to sell anti air missile systems Patriot
to Ukraine. We know that Russia has been pound in
Ukraine really heavily.
Speaker 3 (34:56):
Right now, are you living yourself now? And you my
husband is there, wow, and I can see you very
you know, it's amazing, and.
Speaker 17 (35:04):
Me with the kids, I mean, you are so actually
because he wanted me to.
Speaker 3 (35:08):
Is your husband the soldier now he's there now? Yeah?
Well that's rough stuff, right, that's tough. And you're living
here and you're a reporter. I am good. So let
me just tell you. They do want to have the
anti missile missiles, okay, as they call them the Patriots,
(35:29):
And we're going to see if we can make some available.
You know, they're very hard to get. We need them to.
We were supplying them to Israel and they're very effective,
one hundred percent effective. Hard to believe how effective. And
they do want that more than any other thing. As
you probably know.
Speaker 2 (35:44):
That's a very good question, and I wish you a
lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very
upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband. Okay,
thank you, go ahead, thank you.
Speaker 17 (36:01):
Thank you.
Speaker 16 (36:01):
Mister President, you were criticizing where are you.
Speaker 1 (36:04):
From Bloomberg News?
Speaker 3 (36:05):
Oh, Bloomberg you were.
Speaker 17 (36:08):
You were criticizing the Federal Reserve chair before coming to
this summit.
Speaker 2 (36:12):
I think he's terrible.
Speaker 16 (36:13):
I was wondering if.
Speaker 17 (36:14):
You've begun interviewing different candidates.
Speaker 3 (36:17):
For the Fed pick. Yeah, I know, within three or
four people who are going to pick. I mean, he
goes out pretty so unfortunately, because I think he's terrible.
We have no inflation, we have a tremendous economy. Hundreds
of billions of dollars of tariff money is pouring in.
Factories are being built because they don't want to pay
the tariff, so they're building them all over the country.
(36:38):
I think what close to fifteen trillion dollars. I told
you five point one trillion from the Middle East alone,
but of investment money coming and there's never been anything
like that in the history of our country. But we
have no inflation, and we have borring because Biden stupidly
they did short term dead So we have borring coming up.
And you know, we'll go ten years, maybe longer, maybe short,
(37:01):
but we'll go a long period of time when we
do the debt. And because of him, because of this guy,
we will have to pay four years. We'll be paying
for him.
Speaker 2 (37:11):
And I said to him, listen, there's no inflation.
Speaker 3 (37:14):
He says, but maybe they'll be strong. That's true. I said,
if there is some what you do is raise the rate.
I'm okay with that. You raise the rate in two
years from now or a year from now. But because
the rates high, we have to pay more for debt.
It's pretty equal. In other words, if it's four percent,
it's four percent. If you drop it a point, you'll
pay three percent. So it's fairly equal, not necessarily, but
fairly equal.
Speaker 2 (37:36):
So we're going to end up paying.
Speaker 3 (37:37):
Maybe two points or three points more. Three points would
be about nine hundred billion dollars a year because of
this very average mentally person. He's an average mentally person.
I'd say low in terms of what he does. Low
low IQ for what he does. Okay, quite so, unsaid
(38:00):
instead of paying nine hundred billion dollars, we don't want
to pay nine hundred just because he doesn't want to
lower the rate. I said, if there's inflation in two
years or three years or one year from now, you
raise the RAID and you take care of the inflation
among other things. But he's probably a very political guy.
(38:22):
I guess. I don't know.
Speaker 2 (38:23):
I think he's a very stupid person. Actually, all right,
one more, let's go.
Speaker 3 (38:26):
How about you? Go ahead? She looks so happy and everything.
Thank you from Spain too. I'm on a book from
La Vanguardia. I wanted to know if you're where from Spain.
I wanted to know if you want to know, it's the.
Speaker 2 (38:39):
Spain corner right there.
Speaker 3 (38:41):
I shouldn't have said that's okay.
Speaker 2 (38:43):
I do like Spain, by the way, I think it's
unfair that they're not paying.
Speaker 3 (38:46):
But go ahead. Are you going to negotiate directly with
Spain about I'm going to negotiate directly with Spain I'm
going to do it myself.
Speaker 2 (38:53):
They're going to pay.
Speaker 4 (38:53):
They'll pay more money this way.
Speaker 3 (38:56):
You should tell them to go back and pay.
Speaker 2 (38:58):
You're a reporter, tell.
Speaker 3 (39:00):
Them to go back. They ort to join all of
those countries that are paying five percent.
Speaker 2 (39:04):
I love this.
Speaker 3 (39:05):
Stine's going to be just about the only one that's known.
They were the most hostile toward toward doing it. It
just doesn't make sense to me. Okay, us one more,
here we go, there's another one. We got them all today.
Speaker 9 (39:23):
Okay, So, mister President, you talked about expecting some on
the ground assessments at four doh and other sites. Is
that it's really and us.
Speaker 3 (39:34):
It's been obliterated, Kelly, it's been What is your.
Speaker 9 (39:37):
Message answer to the intelligence community when they present reports.
You're not disputing the de I are.
Speaker 3 (39:42):
Just they presented a report that wasn't finished. We're talking
about something that took place context context.
Speaker 2 (39:49):
The report was done days.
Speaker 3 (39:51):
Wait a minute, yes, they didn't see it. All they
can do is take a guess. Now, if you take
a look at the pictures, if you take a look
how it's all blackened. You know the fire and brimstone
is all underground because it's granted, and it's all underground,
you don't show it. But even there, with all of
that being said, the whole area for seventy five yards
around the hole where it hit is black with fire.
(40:16):
The group that's run by this gentleman, in fact, you
may want to talk about it for a second, because
we're going to issue a report, and I think it's
not even a very exciting report at this point. It's
been obliterated, totally obliterated. And they did a report but
it was like if you look at the dates, it's
just a few days after so they didn't see it.
Speaker 2 (40:38):
They said they may be very severe.
Speaker 3 (40:41):
Understood.
Speaker 9 (40:41):
Do you have a message for the intelligence community though,
in terms of unmarnish information getting to you that it's.
Speaker 3 (40:47):
Not I don't really have a message. I would say,
issue the report when you know what happened. I wouldn't
say that it could be severe or maybe not.
Speaker 2 (40:55):
They use the word severe. It could be severe or
maybe it's not. But like you picked up and said, bingo,
it's not.
Speaker 3 (41:03):
Severe is all? The report was not a complete report. Yeah,
the message was probably wait till you know the answer
before you interact.
Speaker 9 (41:10):
Do you not have a public opponent to your Zelenski
meeting for a tactical reason with President put Hello, mister secretary.
Speaker 18 (41:18):
Yeah, uh, there's a reason the President calls out fake
news for what it is. Thank you these pilots, these refuelers,
on these fighters, these air defenders, The skill and the
courage it took to go into enemy territory flying thirty
six hours on behalf of the American people in the
world to take out a nuclear program is beyond what
(41:39):
anyone in this audience can fathom.
Speaker 5 (41:42):
And then the instinct, the instinct of CNN, the instinct
of the New York Times, is to try to find
a way to spin it for their own political reasons,
to try to hurt President.
Speaker 3 (41:54):
Trump or our country.
Speaker 19 (41:55):
They don't care what the troops think, they don't care
what the world thinks. They want to spin it to
try to make him look bad based on a leak.
Of course, we've all seen plenty of leakers, and what
a leakers do? They have agendas and what do they do?
Do they share the whole information or just the part
that they want to introduce, And when they introduce that
preliminary a preliminary report that's deemed to be a low assessment,
(42:20):
you know what a low assessment means, low confidence in
the data in that report. And why is there low
confidence Because all of the evidence of what was just
bombed by twelve thirty thousand pound bombs is buried under
a mountain, devastated and obliterated. So if you want to
make an assessment of what happened at four to doh,
you better get a big shovel and go really deep,
(42:42):
because Iron's nuclear program is obliterated, and somebody somewhere is
trying to leak something to say, oh, with low confidence,
we think maybe.
Speaker 3 (42:53):
It's moderate.
Speaker 5 (42:54):
Those that drop the bombs precisely in.
Speaker 18 (42:57):
The right place know exactly what happened and when that exploded,
and you know who else knows, Iran.
Speaker 4 (43:03):
That's why they came to the table.
Speaker 18 (43:04):
Right away, because their capabilities have been set back beyond
what they thought were possible.
Speaker 5 (43:10):
Yes, because of the courage of a commander.
Speaker 3 (43:13):
In chief who let our troops.
Speaker 5 (43:14):
Despite what the fake news wants to.
Speaker 1 (43:15):
Say, this is exactly what I said today when I
ran down the five reasons why this whole thing's a hux.
Nobody else, anybody else talking about this this morning. No,
the news is running with this and it's it's an
insult to our intelligence. He's absolutely right, He's right on
the money. Secretary of Defense, Pete, hegseeth fantastic decision.
Speaker 9 (43:36):
But you're not disputing the report said what it said.
Speaker 4 (43:39):
Even though it was this woman.
Speaker 2 (43:41):
Listen to her.
Speaker 3 (43:42):
The report said what it said, and it was fine.
It was severe, they think, but they had no idea.
They shouldn't have issued a report until they did. But
we've gotten the information. I think Pete said it better
than you can say it. And you know, you should
be proud, you especially, you should be proud of those pilots,
and you shouldn't be trying to demean them. Those pilots
(44:04):
flew at great risk, a big chance that they've never
come back home and see their husbands or their wives.
Speaker 2 (44:10):
Let me just tell you.
Speaker 3 (44:11):
You and NBC Fake News, which is one of the worst,
and CNN New York Times, they're all bad.
Speaker 2 (44:18):
They're sick. There's something wrong with them.
Speaker 3 (44:20):
Do you know what?
Speaker 2 (44:20):
You should be praising those people instead.
Speaker 3 (44:22):
Of trying to find something by getting me, by trying
to go and get me, you're hurting those people. They
were devastated. You know, I got a call from Missouri,
great state and I won three times by a lot,
and I got a call that the pilots and the
people on the plane were devastated because they were trying
to minimize the attack. And they all said it was hit. Oh,
(44:44):
but we don't think it was really maybe hit that badly,
and they were devastated. They put their lives on the line.
And then they have and I'm not referring to you,
but real scum, real scum coming into reports that are
as negative as they could possibly be. It should be
the opposite. You should make them heroes and heroines. You
(45:05):
should make them really people that they were so devastated
when they heard this news.
Speaker 2 (45:11):
And you know what they said.
Speaker 3 (45:12):
One of them, I spoke to one of them, said, sir,
we hid the side. It was perfect. It was dead on.
Because they don't understand fake news because they have a
normal life except they have to fly very big, very
fast planes. But it's a shame. You should be making
them heroes. All right in the back absolutely, right, go ahead,
(45:32):
back white Yeah, one more white jacket.
Speaker 4 (45:36):
Yeah that he'd done, but now I think he's just
got a new taste.
Speaker 20 (45:42):
Debrah Haynes from Skyneese. Mark Ritter, the NATO chief. Who
is your friend? He called you daddy earlier. Do you
forgot your NATO allies as kind of children?
Speaker 9 (45:56):
No?
Speaker 3 (45:56):
He likes me.
Speaker 2 (45:57):
I think he likes me.
Speaker 3 (45:58):
If he doesn't, i'll let you know. Oh I'll come
back and I'll hit him hard. Okay, he did, He
did it very affectionate. Daddy here, my daddy.
Speaker 20 (46:05):
Do you regard your NATO allies though, as kind of
like children? And they're obviously listening to you, and they're
spending more, and you're you're obviously appreciative of that. But
do you hurt they're going to be able to defend themselves,
defend Europe on their own with it.
Speaker 3 (46:22):
I think they need help a little bit at the beginning,
and I think they'll be able to do. And I
think they're going to remember this day.
Speaker 2 (46:27):
And this was a big day for NEO. You know,
this was a very big day.
Speaker 3 (46:30):
They took it. One of the gentlemen said, you know what,
we've been trying to raise money for raise the rate
for thirty years, he said, twenty years, from almost the beginning.
And he's been there for a long time, he said,
until you came along, it never happened. What you did
is amazing. It's been sort of an amazing day for
a lot of reasons, but also for that. Yeah, go ahead,
you think they can do it without you?
Speaker 2 (46:51):
Though in the future, can they do it with that? Well,
they're smart SPEs. I mean you have to ask smart.
Speaker 3 (46:55):
Okay, So we're heading back. We're heading back. I want
to thank these two gentlemen behind me. They are incredible people,
both of them. They're really they've done a fantastic job.
And Susie's in the front and she's done great. And Monica,
thank you very much. That was quite an exciting time.
And we're going to be heading back. We'll be back sooner.
(47:16):
We'll see you in Washington, DC.
Speaker 2 (47:20):
Remember this.
Speaker 3 (47:21):
We have the hottest country anywhere in the world. Thank
you very much, everybody, thank you.
Speaker 1 (47:26):
I have it's President Trump speaking of NETA. I'll tell
you I'm measured and uh, I just I love the
tone that he had yesterday or today rather, that was fantastic.
That was fantastic. And then hag Seth got up and
really set the record straight. Look, I said it earlier.
(47:48):
I gave the five different reasons why I knew this
was a hoax, and it was busted like those bunkers,
and it was obvious to me, but ceasefire wouldn't happen.
That's number one, biggest probably of all. If those sites
weren't really hit and completely obliterated, smells more like damage
control than real damage.
Speaker 4 (48:06):
Is number two.
Speaker 1 (48:07):
The fact that they're talking about relocated or uranium and
they don't know where the nine hundred pounds went. That's
another reason I think just shows that this is all
spin and damage control, because they got real damage. CNN
again citing anonymous sources. Always a red flag, always a leak,
(48:27):
and it's always, as Hegsat said, secondary defense very I think,
very rightly. So it's always just a piece of it.
It's not the real and full complete picture in the context,
and you are the president. Try and make that point
with that reporter who was asking the questions. Fourth, Israel
wouldn't pause to see how hard and heavy they were going.
They wouldn't have paused unless I ran, and they would
(48:49):
have known that their program was devastated. They just would
not have done it. And in the Iran regime trying
to save face here another piece. But the bottom line
and the big point, as you just already you don't
call time out if you're winning both around in Israel,
agreeing to a cease fire at the same time tells
you everything you need to know. The strikes worked, and
(49:12):
they don't want to give him that's that's it. They
just don't want to give him credit. The media spend
trying to walk it back so they can hurt Trump.
And as he pointed out rightly, so you paint a
lot to be thankful. You ought to be grateful. You
got to be grateful that these these pilots were able
to do what they did. You got to be grateful
that they were able to go into it the way
(49:34):
that they did. And you know, they go out there,
as you said, they don't know whether they come home
to their families or not. They have no idea. And
that's the problem. Each and every day they go out
and they face danger, much like police. But it's a
very similar thing. It's always an issue with authority. You
notice that, Well, I'll tell you why. There's a reason
(49:54):
for it. Because we wrestle, not against flesh and blood.
These people always have an issue with authority. They always
have a problem with authority. That's that's where it comes from.
I don't want you thinking why is that well, as
I mentioned, massive spiritual implications because of it. So anyway,
(50:20):
I thought a fantastic press conference, this whole idea. By
the way, this daddy comment, did you hear that? I'm
gonna play that for you before we get out of here,
greatest analogy and hang on.
Speaker 3 (50:29):
Let me.
Speaker 1 (50:31):
Let me find that here it is. This just happened
before we saw him speak. They know, Chief just called
Trump daddy following his f momb dropped the other day.
They said, forty seven run in the show. So here
you go, here's the here's here's the clip.
Speaker 2 (50:48):
I mean, we may do papers, aren't Marco. Maybe we're
there to do papers. I don't even know if you
need them. They're not going to be fighting each other.
Speaker 3 (50:55):
They've had it. They've had a big fight, like two
kids in a school yard.
Speaker 5 (50:59):
You know.
Speaker 2 (50:59):
They fight like you can't stop them. Let him fight
for about two three minutes. Then it's easy to stop them.
And then daddy has sometimes language everyone a certain word.
I think.
Speaker 1 (51:13):
I think that was affectionate too. I don't think there
was anything rude or weird meant by that, but it
is funny. They're going to say that Trump's daddy and
of course that's hilarious anyway in itself, because he really is.
The adults are back in the room, folks. That's just
a fact. That's that's a way that it's it's going
to lay out, all right, Winters today, thank you for
the remind they're joined to appreciate the help with that.
(51:35):
Today books on the line, I copy of my book
Good News, Hope and Encouragement for trying time.
Speaker 4 (51:40):
So yesterday's winter.
Speaker 1 (51:42):
Over on Rummel. We see your name all the time,
Tennisaal and I hope I'm saying that right, Tennessil. Please
email me Justin at Justin Barclay dot com today, Justin
and just can you hear them out there working again?
They're drilling. Looks like it's raining out there. I can't
imagine that any of that is effective. And what they're
doing was this is actually going to work.
Speaker 4 (52:07):
Either rain, But I guess that's what they're.
Speaker 1 (52:11):
Meant to do right now. And then today's Winter another book.
Laura Gardner Sweeney. Laura Gardner Sweeney, congratulations, Laura. I appreciate
you sharing today the program. You help us break the algorithm.
Whether you're on Rumble or you're on X or you're
on Facebook, even YouTube. If you help us share, you
(52:35):
help us get the word out about what's going on
and the truth. As you see, today was a moment,
a moment where truth was desperately needed and we were
able to lay that down. I hope people got to
hear it because of that, So thank you so much.
Send me your information. I want to get a book
off to you. I'll sign it and send it to
you in the mail back tomorrow morning. No fireside chat tonight.
(52:58):
Wishing you the best. If you're oncleus you're a VIP,
hang on for just a few minutes and I will
rap with you. I'm trying not to talk too much
today because I got this junk going on in the
allergies or whatever it is. But thank you so much
for being here as always, wishing you the best, God bless.
I got good news and bad news. The good news
is it's a deal and a steal for you. The
(53:19):
bad news is I missed out.
Speaker 4 (53:20):
Well. I just bought a bunch of betting.
Speaker 1 (53:22):
I just bought a bunch of new pillows and sheets
and things from Mike Lindell at my Pillow and I
didn't get this good of a deal for a little
bit of time. Mike is selling his pillows, the classic
fourteen eighty eight. That's it, the my pillow, the thing
that started at all just fourteen eighty eight. He had
one of these big box stores that canceled on them.
You know how they do well. This is actually your win.
(53:46):
It's a win for everyone. Win for Mike because he
can unload the pillows at the great price. It's a
win for you because you get a good deal and
you can help support this program at the same time.
Get your pillows for fourteen eighty eight. When you go
to my pillow dot com slash justin, use code justin
at check out. That's my pillow dot com slash justin.
And while you're there, shop for all kinds of great things.
I love the towels, the best towels I've ever used
(54:08):
in my entire life.
Speaker 4 (54:09):
Mike Scott.
Speaker 1 (54:09):
All kinds of great goodies at my pillow dot com
slash justin.
Speaker 2 (54:13):
Do it today.
The Crown of Independence Day weekend for years has been
the Living in Freedom event at Nuchapel. Hey it's justin Barklay.
This year, July sixth, they're hosting Pastor Willie George with
thrilling carnival rides, games inflatables, free food trucks, the car
show and giveaways including FamilyFun packs at a premium shotgun
and so much more. The best part, it's all free
(00:21):
fun for the whole family. Nuchapel a quarter mile west
of I'm fine in four mile Living in Freedom July sixth.
Get all the details at Newchapel dot com, slash Freedom,
get the Good newsletter, all the news they don't want
you to hear, and more. Let's get around big tech
with the Good Newsletter. Stay in touch. Go to Justin
Barclay dot com, slash Goodnews. That's justin Barklay dot com
(00:42):
slash good News. Get the good News Today, a Strapannie,
It's going to be a heck of a riote. It's
like drinking from a fire hose. Never a dull moment,
but yes, you'll hear the stories you won't hear anywhere else,
and we appreciate you being here with us.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
Form today.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
I'm justin Barclay. All right, welcome into the after show,
the show, After the show. We got Trump. They're setting
him up. Looks like he's going to speak here at NATO.
I got a little bit of the lay here, but believe,
(01:19):
I believe we have Now that's Jerome Powell. Hang on,
let me make sure I get the right agreement here.
Speaker 3 (01:25):
He is late Monday, and we call it the twelve
day war.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Twelve day war.
Speaker 3 (01:30):
Spoke to a few people. I guess that just sounded
like the right the right name.
Speaker 2 (01:34):
It was a twelve day war, and we think it's over.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
I don't think they're going to be going back at
each other. I don't think so. Trump's note decisively with
the critical threat of Iran's nuclear program, which was what
I wanted. I said, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
I've said that for fifteen years, long before I decided
to do the political thing. But we've also reasserted the
(01:59):
credit ability of American deterrence, which is like no other.
The people at NATO said, there's never been anything.
Speaker 5 (02:07):
You know.
Speaker 3 (02:07):
I rebuilt the entire military during my first term, and
we have a great military.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
We have great generals.
Speaker 3 (02:15):
Got to know the good ones and the bad ones.
We kept the good ones. Over the past two days,
I was on it to participate in the NATO leaders
meeting and also had extremely good individual discussions with the
King and the Queen, Secretary General Ruta and the Prime Minister.
Great discussions, very knowledgeable people. Major focus of our conversations
(02:38):
at the summit was the need for other NATO members
to take up the burden of the defense of Europe,
and that included the financial burden. As you know, it
was two percent, and we got it up to five percent,
and they said a couple of them came up to me,
one in particular said, sir, we've been trying to get
it up to three percent for twenty years a week.
(03:00):
I haven't been able, and you got it up to
five percent. So they're going to be most of them,
I guess almost all of them are going to be
contributing now five percent, a number that.
Speaker 2 (03:10):
People are surprised that, but you need it.
Speaker 3 (03:12):
Today. The United States accounts for two thirds of all
NATO defense spending, and since I began pushing for additional
commitments in twenty seventeen, believe it or not, our allies
have increased spending by seven hundred billion dollars. I said
to people, you don't have any money, and a lot
of them weren't paying, and so I started the process
(03:32):
and I picked it up as soon as I got back,
which is six months ago, and following my election last November,
almost all have accelerated plans to reach the two percent,
three percent, four percent, and then ultimately, very quickly five percent.
And all of this is going to be done very quickly,
almost immediately. You probably know this as well as I do.
(03:56):
I'm sure they've been talking about it. It's really been
a big focus. In a very historic milestone. This week,
the NATO Allies committed to dramatically increase their defense spending
to that five percent of GDP, something that no one
really thought possible. And they said, you did it, sir,
you did it. Well, I don't know if I did it,
but I think I did.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
This will be.
Speaker 3 (04:18):
Known as the Hague Defense Commitment, which is pretty good,
pretty appropriate. When the Allies reached this number, it will
add more than one trillion dollars a year. Think of that,
one trillion per year to our common defense. And this
is a monument really to victory. But it's a monumental
(04:40):
win for the United States because we were carrying much
more than our fair share. It was quite unfair, actually,
but this is a big win for Europe and for
actually Western civilization. For years, past administrations failed to get
most allies to contribute even the two percent. I remember
when I came, we had four countries that were up
(05:01):
to two percent, and I remember Poland was there. A
couple of them were there, but most of them were.
We had twenty eight at the time. As you know,
it's increased a little bit, and they've agreed now to
more than double.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
Their budgets in all cases.
Speaker 3 (05:18):
And Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for its
security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation
with Russia and Ukraine, and hopefully we're going to get
that solved. Last week there were seven thousand soldiers, mostly soldiers,
but they're also getting hit in Kiev. They're getting hit
in some of the towns also, and that means life
(05:44):
is disappearing also in the cities and towns. Should have
never happened, would have never happened. If I was president,
said it a thousand times, and it never did happen.
It's never even thought about. But it's vital that this
additional money be spent on very serious military hardware, not bureaucracy.
And hopefully that hardware is going to be made in
(06:06):
America because.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
We have the best hardware in the world.
Speaker 3 (06:08):
You saw that we're fourteen missiles was shot at us
the other day and they were very nice. They gave
us warning. They said, we're going to shoot him. It
is one o'clock. Okay, they said, it's fine, and everybody
was emptied off the base so they couldn't get hurt
except for the gunners. Wow, they call them the gunners.
(06:29):
And at of fourteen high end missiles that were shot
at the base in guitar, all fourteen, as you know,
we're shot down by.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Our Yeah, but but ayah, and then's just you know,
they didn't really get the nuclear sides that they were
just minimal damage.
Speaker 3 (06:44):
There amazing stuff. Amazing that they can do. It's like
shooting a bullet with a bullet. It's the same thing
if you think about it. Fourteen out of fourteen and
they were they weren't even that surprise. I said, do
you do that? Well, often say, we pretty much do, sir.
The Ukraine crisis has also highlighted the urgency of rebuilding
(07:06):
our defense industrial base, both in the United States and
among the Allied nations. We cannot afford to be dependent
on foreign adversaries for critical minerals.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
And as you know, we made a deal with Ukraine.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
To take a vast amount of the land they have
for minerals.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
We need it.
Speaker 3 (07:25):
And once again I want to thank all of the
people in the Netherlands, incredible people, it's a great place,
and all of the NATO allies for the tremendous summit
that we just had. A letter just came in and
a statement came in from the Atomic Energy Commission of Israel,
(07:45):
and I just wondered this is an official letter and
the very serious people. As you know, the devastating US
strike on Fordo destroyed the site's critical infrastructure and rendered
the enrichment facility totally inoperable.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
It was devastated.
Speaker 3 (08:02):
We assessed that the American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities
has set back Aren's ability to develop nuclear.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
Weapons for many years to come.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
This achievement can continue indefinitely if Iran does not get
access to nuclear material, which it won't. It's so said
that that whole thing had to go. But I just
I just want to thank our pilots. You know, they
were maligned and treated very bad, demeaned by fake New CNN,
which is back there, believed in wasting time, wasting it.
(08:35):
Nobody's watching them, so they just wasted a lot of time.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
Wasting my time.
Speaker 3 (08:40):
And the New York Times they put out a story
that well, maybe they were hit, but it wasn't bad. Well,
it was so bad that they ended the war. It
ended the war, somebody said, in a certain way. It
was so devastating. Actually, if you look at Hiroshimo, if
you look at Nagasaki, you know that end did a war.
(09:00):
To this ended a war in a different way, but
it was so devastating. Also, they have out of Dubai.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Just came that.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
Irans this Ransi mess because it's near its nuclear installations
were very badly damaged by the American strike. So what
bothered me about these reports with fake reports put out
by the New York Times failing? I caught the failing
(09:30):
New York Times because it's stilling terribly.
Speaker 2 (09:32):
Without me, it would be doing no business at all.
Speaker 3 (09:35):
But end by fake new CNN and MSDNC, all of
these terrible people. You know, they have no credibility. You know,
when I started, there were at ninety four percent credibility
the media.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
Now it's at sixteen percent.
Speaker 3 (09:50):
And I'm very proud of it because I've exposed it
for what it is. But when I when I saw
them starting to question the caliber of the attack.
Speaker 2 (10:01):
Was it bad?
Speaker 3 (10:02):
What was really bad? It was devastted. They obliterated, like,
you can't get into the tunnels they just put that
over that just came out. They can't, there's nothing, there's
no way you can even get down. The whole thing
is collapsed at a disaster, and I think all of
the nuclear stuff is down there because it's very hard
to remove, and we did it very quickly. When they
heard we were coming, it was you know, you can't
(10:24):
move it very hard, very dangerous actually to move too.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
And they also knew we were coming.
Speaker 3 (10:29):
So I don't think too many people want to be
down there knowing we're coming with the bunker busters as
we call them.
Speaker 2 (10:34):
We're the only ones that have them.
Speaker 3 (10:35):
We have the best equipment, best nuclear equipment, and we
have the best equipment in the world. And by the way,
we can't forget our submarine, which was out there. Submarines actually,
but submarine was out there. We shut thirty rockets into
an area, every single one of them. I think it
was almost four hundred miles away, I think four hundred
(11:00):
and long. It was in the ocean, long ways away,
and we shot. We shot a total of thirty. Every
single one of hit within nine inches from where it
was supposed to be. It took it a lot because
we didn't do just sporido.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
We did two others.
Speaker 3 (11:19):
In addition, which hadn't been completely destroyed, so we hit
them with a submarine from hundreds of miles away. Amazing,
just amazing equipment. Greatest submarines in the world. Nobody's even closer,
twenty years behind us when it comes to submarine technology.
So that's one and the other was from the Atomic
(11:43):
Energy Commission, and they have about three or four of
them now coming in from Atomic Energy commissions from various places.
But the one that we have that just came out
we released it a little while ago, was from the
Israeli Atomic Energy Commission. But numerous of them are getting
to see the site and the site has been demolished,
(12:04):
and again we had these brave patriots, these incredible flyers,
these people that can fly a plane better than anybody
can fly a plane going into very hostile territory, flying
into the territory that it's got more missiles and things
pointed at it, but it was very stealth. They didn't
(12:25):
get to see it. It was dark. That's the amazing
thing about the shots. They hit the shots perfectly, and
yet it was dead dark. There was no moon, there
was no light. It was virtually moonless. It was very dark,
and they hit the shots, were hit perfectly. But when
they get demeaned, and they were very upset about it
because they knew how strong it would be back in Missouri.
(12:47):
The pilots flew about thirty six hours two ways far
distance and in those incredible B two's, and we then
had the F twenty twos and we had the F
thirty five, so we had other planes, and we had
I think a total of fifty two tankers. That means
the big the big tankers because the refueling was a
lot for all of the different planes that we sent.
(13:07):
Incredible operation and I have to say General Raisin Gain
was incredible. That's why he beat Isis and we beat
Isis in a matter of weeks. I was told it
would take four to five years. We did it in
a few weeks and he was great. That's why he's
ahead of the Joint chiefs of Staff right now because
I had a very good experience with him. He knocked
(13:28):
out Isis in a period of literally a few weeks.
Speaker 2 (13:31):
Amazing.
Speaker 3 (13:33):
I was supposed to take a few years, five years
to be exact. So we had a great victory there
and we then came here and I think we had
a great victory here. But this is an ongoing project.
This is the safety of Europe, the safety of the world,
and they've raised it from two percent to five percent,
something which nobody and you're talking about over a trillion
(13:56):
dollars a year, so we're talking about a lot of
money from coming in from countries that were not paying
nearly enough to be effective.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
So I have, as you know, Marco Rubio with me
and Pete.
Speaker 3 (14:07):
Heggsas Secretary of State and Secretary of war. Should we
say secretary You know it used to be called secretary
of war. Maybe for a couple of weeks we'll call
it that because we feel like warriors used to be
called secretary of war.
Speaker 2 (14:20):
Effective.
Speaker 3 (14:21):
Look at the old building next to the White House.
You can see where it used to be Secretary of War.
Then we became politically correct and they called it Secretary
of Defense, and maybe we have to start thinking about
changing it.
Speaker 2 (14:33):
But we feel that way. Do we have any questions? Please?
Speaker 3 (14:38):
Wow, that's a lot of questions. Uh, who's a nice
Oh you're not a nice person.
Speaker 2 (14:46):
But I'll let you ask one.
Speaker 3 (14:47):
Here we go.
Speaker 4 (14:48):
You're gonna ask conference nice President Trump.
Speaker 3 (14:52):
I know him well. Thank you, mister President. Thank you
for taking the time before flying home.
Speaker 6 (14:58):
You just said you believe the conflict between Israel and
Iran is over.
Speaker 3 (15:03):
What makes you so confident it is? And what do
you do if it isn't? Because I dealt with both
and they're both tired, exhausted. They fought very very hard
and very viciously, very violently, and they were both satisfied
to go home and get out. And can it start again?
I guess someday it can. It could maybe start soon.
(15:26):
I think A big telltale sign was when, as you know,
Iran somewhat by not much violated the ceasefire and Israel
had the planes going out that morning, and there were
a lot of them, fifty two of them, and I said,
you got to get them back, and they brought them back.
They didn't do anything, they brought them back. It was
(15:46):
very good. I thought it was amazing. Actually, they have
fought a hell of a war. They fought very hard.
I think the war ended actually when we hit the
various nuclear sites with the planes. And I just hope
you people can give these pilotsies are the best pilots
in the world. They're the best shots in the world.
They call them shots. That's what they are. True And
(16:08):
wait a minute, and I just hope you can give
them the respect they deserve because they came home to
fake news and like, oh geez, there was hardly any damage.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
The things are decimated.
Speaker 3 (16:18):
So but I think now I think they're very much finished.
I think Israel's going to get back to doing what
they do, and I think that Iran's going to get back.
You know, Iran is a huge advantage. They have great
oil and they can do things. I don't see them
getting back involved in the nuclear business anymore.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
I think they've had it.
Speaker 3 (16:37):
They've been at it for twenty years and I don't
see that happening either. Now. If it does, we're always there.
It won't be me, it'll be somebody else. But we're there.
We'll have to do something about it. Yes, please go ahead, goad.
Oh fake news in it? Oh yeah, yeah, here we go.
(16:58):
Where do you hear this question? I think you should
really say how great soldiers warriors are.
Speaker 7 (17:05):
I think everyone appreciates our soldiers and our warriors.
Speaker 8 (17:07):
I do have two.
Speaker 9 (17:07):
Questions for you, mister president.
Speaker 7 (17:09):
You just cited Israeli intelligence on these attacks. Earlier, you
said US intelligence was inconclusive. Are you relying on Israeli
intelligence for your assessment of the impact of the strikes?
Speaker 3 (17:21):
This is also a rand made the statement. And it's
also if you read the document that was given that
Pete can talk about if you'd like. The document said
it could be very severe damage, but they didn't take that.
They said it could be limited or it could be
very severe. They really didn't know other than to say
it could be limited or it could be very very severe.
(17:42):
And you didn't choose to put that because it was
very early after Since then, we've collected additional intelligence. We've
also spoken to people have seen the site, and the
site is obliterated and we think everything nuclear is down there.
They didn't take it out. Okay, question please go ahead.
Speaker 4 (18:01):
This right ahead from Jason. This is right on the mark,
mister President.
Speaker 10 (18:06):
Yesterday you said China can now continue to purchase oil
from Iran. Are you giving up on your maximum pressure
campaign because they're sanctions right now.
Speaker 3 (18:17):
With on Iran. Look, they just had a war. The
war was fought. They fought it bravely. I'm not giving up.
They're in the oil business. I mean I could stop
it if I wanted, would sell China the oil myself.
I don't want to do that. They're going to need
money to put that country back into shape. We want
to see that happen. Would know if they're going to
(18:39):
sell oil, they're gonna sell oil. We're not taking over
the oil. We could have you know, I used to
say with the Raq, keep the oil. I could say
it here.
Speaker 2 (18:45):
Too, We could have kept the oil.
Speaker 3 (18:48):
Now China is gonna want to buy oil. They can
buy it from us, they can buy it from other people.
But you're gonna have to put that country back into shape.
Heeds desperately needs money. Yeah, it'sident Yeah, Please.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
Here we go. I'm picking the beauties today. Go ahead,
mister President.
Speaker 11 (19:10):
Secretary General Ruta has described President Putin as an adversary,
a threat, an enemy. Do you view him the same way?
And in addition to that, you mentioned General Kane, your
chief of staff, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Kane. Yes,
he has said that mister Putin has territorial ambitions beyond Ukraine.
Speaker 3 (19:35):
Do you view that in the same way? Possible? As possible.
I know one thing he'd like to settle. He'd like
to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him.
He called the other day, he said, can I help
you with Iran? I said, no, you can help me
with Russia. Because you know, in the last few weeks
we took care of India and Pakistan, Kosovo, Serbia.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
I think on Friday were you have coming in?
Speaker 3 (20:00):
The Congo is coming in and Rwanda is coming in.
There was a vicious war that went on, a MATCHETI
war heads chopped off all over Africa. They're coming in.
We did two others. In addition to that, nobody's ever
done anything like this. No, I consider him a person
(20:20):
that's I think been misguided. I'm very surprised, actually, I
thought we would have had that settled. I've settled four
of them in the meantime, But he did call up
and he said, you know, he's close to Iran.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
He'd like to help us get a settlement.
Speaker 3 (20:35):
I said, no, No, you helped me get a settlement
with you with Russia, and I think we're going to
be doing that too.
Speaker 2 (20:41):
Yeah, please go ahead, Please, thank.
Speaker 12 (20:45):
You, mister President. You've made clear your position on what
impact the strikes had. I wanted to ask you what
is next with Iran? For instance, is there any indication
from US intelligence that Iran was able to move any material?
Speaker 2 (20:59):
No, well, you just opposite.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
We think we hit them so hard and so fast
they didn't get to move. And if you knew about that, Matuire,
it's very hard and very dangerous to move. It's called
it's called in many people, they call it dust. But
it's very very heavy, it's very very hard to move.
And they were way down. You know, there are thirty
stories down literally, thirty thirty five stories down underground.
Speaker 2 (21:23):
Oh yeah, we think we got well, we.
Speaker 3 (21:24):
Think it's it's covered with granite, concrete and steel.
Speaker 12 (21:30):
I'm going to ask you, are you interested in restarting
negotiations with Iran? And if so, have they received so.
Speaker 3 (21:36):
Our people Marco could answer it, but our people are not.
I'm not the way I look at it. They fought.
The war's done, and you know, I could get a
statement that they're not going to go nuclear. We're probably
going to ask for that, but they're not going to
be doing it.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
But they're not going to be doing it anyway. They've
had it.
Speaker 3 (21:57):
They've had it now. Maybe someday in the future will
want that. But I've asked Marca, do you want to
draw I just asked him the question as we were
walking on the stage. You want to draw up a
little agreement for them to sign because I think we
can get them to sign it. I don't think it's necessary. Marko,
do you want to talk about that place, mister president?
I think you.
Speaker 13 (22:17):
President Trump has shown a willingness to meet and talk
to anybody in the world who is interested in peace.
I don't know of any president that's been as willing
as he has to meet with anyone and talk about peace.
Speaker 3 (22:26):
We'd love to have peaceful relations.
Speaker 13 (22:28):
With any country in the world, and so obviously that
will depend on Iran's willingness not just to engage in peace,
but to negotiate directly with the United States, not through
some third country or fourth country process. But I know
of no president probably in our modern history that's sought
peace more than President Trump has.
Speaker 12 (22:48):
But you're in no rush, is that right?
Speaker 2 (22:51):
I'll tell you what.
Speaker 3 (22:52):
Look, we're going to talk to them next week with
the run. We may sign an agreement. I don't know
to be I don't think it's necessary. I mean, they
had a war, they fought. Now they're going back to
their world. I don't care if I have an agreement
or not. We the only thing we'ld be asking for
is what we were asking for before about we want
no nuclear, but we we destroyed the nuclear. In other words,
(23:15):
that's destroyed.
Speaker 2 (23:16):
I said, Iran.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
Will not have nuclear.
Speaker 2 (23:19):
What we blew it up is.
Speaker 3 (23:21):
Blown up the kingdom come and so I don't feel
very strongly about it. If we got a document, wouldn't
be bad. We're gonna meet with him. Actually we're gonna
meet with him.
Speaker 8 (23:33):
Yeah, go ahead, please, Yes, it's the President Netherland CV.
Thank you for visiting our country. That I of course,
I like to know how you slept last night at
the hoard beautifully, But probably more serious question, I think
you just had a meeting with President Zelenski. Did you
discuss any cease fire in this Russo Ukrainian?
Speaker 3 (23:53):
No, No, I just I wanted to know how he's doing.
It was very nice, actually, you know, we had a
little rough times sometimes he was couldn't have been nicer.
I think he'd like to see an end to this.
Speaker 2 (24:04):
I do.
Speaker 3 (24:05):
I think what I took from the meeting couldn't have
been nicer. Actually, But I took from the meeting that
he'd like to see it end. I think it's a
great time to end it. I'm going to speak to
Vladimir Putin.
Speaker 2 (24:16):
See if we can get it ended.
Speaker 3 (24:18):
But look, these are brave people. They're fighting these wars
all over the place. You know, last week they had
I guess close, I told you seven close to seven
thousand young soldiers, Russian and Ukrainian soldiers were killed. Seven
thousand in one week. It's crazy. It's crazy. So I'll
(24:38):
be speaking to Putin now. I had a good meeting
with Zelenski, and I had a lot of good meetings
with a lot of good meetings with a lot of people,
a lot of great leaders. But he's fighting a brave battle.
It's a tough battle. Yeah, go ahead, white dress, Oh.
Speaker 14 (24:58):
Thank you, eat Halakan and from Finland ill the centiment.
You have played golf with President Alexandri Stube. How do
you see Pheland as a NATO ally and partner and
how would you describe your relationship with our president.
Speaker 3 (25:12):
Well, he's a very good golfer, okay. In fact, he
was in his college golf team. He went to a
good college in the South, as you know, a very
good college, and he was a good golfer. We had
a good time.
Speaker 2 (25:24):
I think my relationships great. I want to buy.
Speaker 3 (25:28):
Icebreakers. You know, you're very good at icebreakers. And I
actually made them an offer. I didn't go to Congress.
They'll try and impeach me for this. But there's an
old it's not old, it's fairly new, but it's used icebreaker.
And I offered him about one third of what he
asked for, but would negotiate. We need icebreakers in the US,
(25:50):
and if we can get some inexpensively, I'd like to
do that. Actually, they'll fix it up, make it good. Also,
we may buy some icebreakers. You know that you make
the you're the king of icebreakers that particular country. They
make them good, They make them really good, and they
know what they're doing, and so we're negotiating with them
for about fifteen different icebreakers, but one of them is
(26:10):
available now. It's old and it's you know old, it's
like five six years old, and we're trying to buy it.
I'm trying to make a good deal.
Speaker 2 (26:19):
It's all I do.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
My whole life, my whole life, that's all I do
is big deals.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
Yeah, please go ahead, sir, go ahead.
Speaker 15 (26:29):
Yeah, a question for a news hour Dutch TV. First
of all, on Article five on your way here, you
spoke about the commitment of the US to Article five,
saying I'll give you my definition once we're here, what
is your definition? And made the US commitment to Article
five change in case some of the NATAL members do
not reach the threshold that was discussed today.
Speaker 4 (26:51):
My second question is.
Speaker 15 (26:52):
Following up on a colleague on Iran. What Intel reports
do say that everything over there was obliterated.
Speaker 3 (27:01):
Yeah, well, there are numerous of those reports and they're
coming out fast and furious, but the most respected ones
we've already seen, and I will say that on a
very confidential basis. They're looking at the reports, like numerous
reports and including people going to the site and checking
the site and they're going to be having I guess
(27:22):
you're going to be having over the next.
Speaker 2 (27:23):
Couple of days of full we're going to encapsulate it.
Speaker 3 (27:26):
But no, the site was obliterated, just like I said
it was, and just like the pilots should be given
credit for as far as Article five. Look, when I
came here, I came here because it was something I'm
supposed to be doing. But I left here a little
bit different differently I said. I watched the heads of
(27:49):
these countries get up, and the love and the passion
that they showed for their country was unbelievable. I've never
seen quite anything like it. They want to tech their country,
and they need the United States, and without the United States,
it's not going to be the same. And you can
ask Mark, or you can ask any of the people
that were there. It was really moving to see it.
(28:12):
They loved their country. They were so respectful of me
because I'm the head of the United States, and I made,
you know, the king of Saudi Arabia. When I was
in I was in the Middle East. So I was
in guitar for a different reason, not a reason to
get shot at. We're in there for economic development reasons.
Qutar Uae and Saudi Arabia, all three leaders of those countries,
(28:36):
and we took back five point one trillion dollars into
the United States. All three leaders said, you know, you're
presiding over the hottest country in the world. The United
States right now.
Speaker 2 (28:45):
Is the hottest.
Speaker 3 (28:45):
Everybody wants to be there, everybody, everybody wants a piece
of it. You said, a year ago your country was dead,
you had a deadhead running it. You had a country
that was dead and it was dead, had people.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
Pouring through the border, had inflation.
Speaker 3 (29:01):
Yet everything he said, You've made it in five months
at that time, You've made it the hottest country. This
is the hottest country in the world. The United States
right now is the hottest country in the world. And
when I was around that table, it was a nice
group of people, many of whom I knew from previous
When I saw the passion they had for the country,
(29:23):
almost everyone, and you probably have the tapes. It was
very public, but almost every one of them said, thank
God for the United States. Without the United States, they
couldn't really have NATO. It wouldn't work. It wouldn't work.
It will in the future because now they're paying much
more money, but it wouldn't work.
Speaker 2 (29:42):
It was great, and I left here differently.
Speaker 3 (29:44):
I left here saying that these people really love their countries.
It's not a ripoff, and we're here to help them
protect their country. Okay, we'll do one or two more.
Speaker 9 (29:57):
Thank you, mister President of question on a Spain.
Speaker 4 (30:00):
Are you satisfyed with today?
Speaker 3 (30:02):
Oh? I think Spain's terrible what they've done.
Speaker 2 (30:05):
No, I do.
Speaker 3 (30:05):
They're the only country that won't pay the full up.
They want to stay at two percent. I think it's terrible.
And you know, they're doing very well. The economy is
very well, and that economy could be blown right out
of the water with something bad happening. You know, Spain
is the only country that are you from Spain? Good congratulations.
You're the only country that is not paying. I don't
(30:25):
know what the problem is. It's I think it's too bad.
So we'll make it up. You know what we're going
to do. We're negotiating with Spain on a trade deal.
We're going to make them pay twice as much. And
I'm actually serious about that. We're going to make Spain.
Speaker 2 (30:37):
I like Spain.
Speaker 3 (30:38):
I have so many people from Spain that it's a
great place and they're great people. But Spain is the
only country out of all other countries that refuses to
pay and you know, so they want a little bit
of a free ride, but they'll have to pay it
back to us on trade because I'm not going to
(30:59):
let that happen. Unfair, it's unfair to it. All right, sir,
please go ahead right in the back. Yeah, you tall one,
the tall man.
Speaker 16 (31:10):
Mister President Johannes Petro from Austrian National Television how he
once said that you would end the Ukraine War in
twenty four hours. You later said you said that sarcastically.
Speaker 2 (31:20):
Of course it was sarcastic.
Speaker 16 (31:22):
But you've now been in office for five months and
five days. Why have you not been able to end?
Speaker 4 (31:28):
Do you listen to this guy?
Speaker 3 (31:29):
Because it's more difficult than people would have any idea.
Vladimir Putin has been more difficult. Frankly, I had some
problems with Zelinsky. You may have read about him. And
it's been more difficult than other wars. I mean, look,
we just ended a war in twelve days that was
simmering for thirty years. Frankly, we ended Rwanda and the Congo.
(31:52):
It's coming to sign the documents. We've already signed basic documents,
but they're coming, I think to the White House. On Friday,
we ended Serbia was going to go at it, but
maybe the most important of all India and Pakistan, and
that wasn't whether or not they may someday have nukes
like we're talking about in the Middle East, like we're
(32:15):
talking about with Israel and Iran.
Speaker 2 (32:19):
This is the half nuclear weapons.
Speaker 3 (32:21):
I ended that with a series of phone calls on trade.
I said, look, if you're going to go fighting each other,
it was getting very bad.
Speaker 2 (32:29):
You know how bad that last attack was.
Speaker 3 (32:31):
It was really bad. If you're going to go fighting
each other, we're not doing any trade deal. No, no, no,
you have to do a trade deal. I said, we're
not doing any trade deal. And in fact I had
the general. It really was very impressive. The General from
Pakistan was in my office last week. You know, Prime
(32:51):
Minister Moot. He's a great friend of mine, he's a
great gentleman, he's a great man. And I got them
to reason and I said, we're not doing a trade
deal if you're going to fight, and if you fight
each other, we're not doing a trade till and you know,
what he said. No, I want to do the trade deal.
We stopped in nuclear work. Go ahead, go ahead, Jeff.
Speaker 2 (33:09):
Here's another beauty, Jeff, He's a beauty, all.
Speaker 3 (33:14):
Right, mister President.
Speaker 6 (33:17):
Follow up on Ukraine? Will the United States contribute any
more money to Ukraine's defense this year to the five
billion that.
Speaker 4 (33:23):
Allies are giving?
Speaker 3 (33:24):
And one question.
Speaker 6 (33:25):
You had another meeting with the Dutch opposition leader, mister Wilders.
Can you tell us about that meeting and are you
upset about his anti Muslim stance.
Speaker 2 (33:34):
I'm not upset about it.
Speaker 3 (33:35):
It's just his view. He's unhappy with the way things
are going in this country. In various countries, he was
an opposition leader, and I was asked to meet with
the opposition leader by the people that are running. I
think they have some deal where if you have a meeting,
you're supposed to meet with an opposition leader.
Speaker 2 (33:50):
I said, that's strange. We don't do that. But I
met with he.
Speaker 3 (33:55):
I didn't know him. He seemed like a very nice guy,
but he's an opposition of the current people, and that
were set up by the current people. So I assume
when I met with the Prime minister, you're supposed to
meet with the opposition.
Speaker 2 (34:07):
We'll have to try that sometime in our country.
Speaker 3 (34:10):
Let's not do it. But he was I thought he
was very good as far as money going. We'll see
what happens. There's a lot of spirit. Look, Vladimir Putin
really has to end that war. People are dying at
levels that people haven't seen before for a long time.
Speaker 2 (34:28):
Go ahead, go ahead, quite shirt. Oh she's all excited.
Speaker 17 (34:35):
So she is Ukrainian.
Speaker 3 (34:40):
Where are you from? I'm from Ukraine.
Speaker 17 (34:42):
So my question to you is whether or not the
US is ready to sell anti air missile systems Patriot
to Ukraine. We know that Russia has been pound in
Ukraine really heavily.
Speaker 3 (34:56):
Right now, are you living yourself now? And you my
husband is there, wow, and I can see you very
you know, it's amazing, and.
Speaker 17 (35:04):
Me with the kids, I mean, you are so actually
because he wanted me to.
Speaker 3 (35:08):
Is your husband the soldier now he's there now? Yeah?
Well that's rough stuff, right, that's tough. And you're living
here and you're a reporter. I am good. So let
me just tell you. They do want to have the
anti missile missiles, okay, as they call them the Patriots,
(35:29):
And we're going to see if we can make some available.
You know, they're very hard to get. We need them to.
We were supplying them to Israel and they're very effective,
one hundred percent effective. Hard to believe how effective. And
they do want that more than any other thing. As
you probably know.
Speaker 2 (35:44):
That's a very good question, and I wish you a
lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very
upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband. Okay,
thank you, go ahead, thank you.
Speaker 17 (36:01):
Thank you.
Speaker 16 (36:01):
Mister President, you were criticizing where are you.
Speaker 1 (36:04):
From Bloomberg News?
Speaker 3 (36:05):
Oh, Bloomberg you were.
Speaker 17 (36:08):
You were criticizing the Federal Reserve chair before coming to
this summit.
Speaker 2 (36:12):
I think he's terrible.
Speaker 16 (36:13):
I was wondering if.
Speaker 17 (36:14):
You've begun interviewing different candidates.
Speaker 3 (36:17):
For the Fed pick. Yeah, I know, within three or
four people who are going to pick. I mean, he
goes out pretty so unfortunately, because I think he's terrible.
We have no inflation, we have a tremendous economy. Hundreds
of billions of dollars of tariff money is pouring in.
Factories are being built because they don't want to pay
the tariff, so they're building them all over the country.
(36:38):
I think what close to fifteen trillion dollars. I told
you five point one trillion from the Middle East alone,
but of investment money coming and there's never been anything
like that in the history of our country. But we
have no inflation, and we have borring because Biden stupidly
they did short term dead So we have borring coming up.
And you know, we'll go ten years, maybe longer, maybe short,
(37:01):
but we'll go a long period of time when we
do the debt. And because of him, because of this guy,
we will have to pay four years. We'll be paying
for him.
Speaker 2 (37:11):
And I said to him, listen, there's no inflation.
Speaker 3 (37:14):
He says, but maybe they'll be strong. That's true. I said,
if there is some what you do is raise the rate.
I'm okay with that. You raise the rate in two
years from now or a year from now. But because
the rates high, we have to pay more for debt.
It's pretty equal. In other words, if it's four percent,
it's four percent. If you drop it a point, you'll
pay three percent. So it's fairly equal, not necessarily, but
fairly equal.
Speaker 2 (37:36):
So we're going to end up paying.
Speaker 3 (37:37):
Maybe two points or three points more. Three points would
be about nine hundred billion dollars a year because of
this very average mentally person. He's an average mentally person.
I'd say low in terms of what he does. Low
low IQ for what he does. Okay, quite so, unsaid
(38:00):
instead of paying nine hundred billion dollars, we don't want
to pay nine hundred just because he doesn't want to
lower the rate. I said, if there's inflation in two
years or three years or one year from now, you
raise the RAID and you take care of the inflation
among other things. But he's probably a very political guy.
(38:22):
I guess. I don't know.
Speaker 2 (38:23):
I think he's a very stupid person. Actually, all right,
one more, let's go.
Speaker 3 (38:26):
How about you? Go ahead? She looks so happy and everything.
Thank you from Spain too. I'm on a book from
La Vanguardia. I wanted to know if you're where from Spain.
I wanted to know if you want to know, it's the.
Speaker 2 (38:39):
Spain corner right there.
Speaker 3 (38:41):
I shouldn't have said that's okay.
Speaker 2 (38:43):
I do like Spain, by the way, I think it's
unfair that they're not paying.
Speaker 3 (38:46):
But go ahead. Are you going to negotiate directly with
Spain about I'm going to negotiate directly with Spain I'm
going to do it myself.
Speaker 2 (38:53):
They're going to pay.
Speaker 4 (38:53):
They'll pay more money this way.
Speaker 3 (38:56):
You should tell them to go back and pay.
Speaker 2 (38:58):
You're a reporter, tell.
Speaker 3 (39:00):
Them to go back. They ort to join all of
those countries that are paying five percent.
Speaker 2 (39:04):
I love this.
Speaker 3 (39:05):
Stine's going to be just about the only one that's known.
They were the most hostile toward toward doing it. It
just doesn't make sense to me. Okay, us one more,
here we go, there's another one. We got them all today.
Speaker 9 (39:23):
Okay, So, mister President, you talked about expecting some on
the ground assessments at four doh and other sites. Is
that it's really and us.
Speaker 3 (39:34):
It's been obliterated, Kelly, it's been What is your.
Speaker 9 (39:37):
Message answer to the intelligence community when they present reports.
You're not disputing the de I are.
Speaker 3 (39:42):
Just they presented a report that wasn't finished. We're talking
about something that took place context context.
Speaker 2 (39:49):
The report was done days.
Speaker 3 (39:51):
Wait a minute, yes, they didn't see it. All they
can do is take a guess. Now, if you take
a look at the pictures, if you take a look
how it's all blackened. You know the fire and brimstone
is all underground because it's granted, and it's all underground,
you don't show it. But even there, with all of
that being said, the whole area for seventy five yards
around the hole where it hit is black with fire.
(40:16):
The group that's run by this gentleman, in fact, you
may want to talk about it for a second, because
we're going to issue a report, and I think it's
not even a very exciting report at this point. It's
been obliterated, totally obliterated. And they did a report but
it was like if you look at the dates, it's
just a few days after so they didn't see it.
Speaker 2 (40:38):
They said they may be very severe.
Speaker 3 (40:41):
Understood.
Speaker 9 (40:41):
Do you have a message for the intelligence community though,
in terms of unmarnish information getting to you that it's.
Speaker 3 (40:47):
Not I don't really have a message. I would say,
issue the report when you know what happened. I wouldn't
say that it could be severe or maybe not.
Speaker 2 (40:55):
They use the word severe. It could be severe or
maybe it's not. But like you picked up and said, bingo,
it's not.
Speaker 3 (41:03):
Severe is all? The report was not a complete report. Yeah,
the message was probably wait till you know the answer
before you interact.
Speaker 9 (41:10):
Do you not have a public opponent to your Zelenski
meeting for a tactical reason with President put Hello, mister secretary.
Speaker 18 (41:18):
Yeah, uh, there's a reason the President calls out fake
news for what it is. Thank you these pilots, these refuelers,
on these fighters, these air defenders, The skill and the
courage it took to go into enemy territory flying thirty
six hours on behalf of the American people in the
world to take out a nuclear program is beyond what
(41:39):
anyone in this audience can fathom.
Speaker 5 (41:42):
And then the instinct, the instinct of CNN, the instinct
of the New York Times, is to try to find
a way to spin it for their own political reasons,
to try to hurt President.
Speaker 3 (41:54):
Trump or our country.
Speaker 19 (41:55):
They don't care what the troops think, they don't care
what the world thinks. They want to spin it to
try to make him look bad based on a leak.
Of course, we've all seen plenty of leakers, and what
a leakers do? They have agendas and what do they do?
Do they share the whole information or just the part
that they want to introduce, And when they introduce that
preliminary a preliminary report that's deemed to be a low assessment,
(42:20):
you know what a low assessment means, low confidence in
the data in that report. And why is there low
confidence Because all of the evidence of what was just
bombed by twelve thirty thousand pound bombs is buried under
a mountain, devastated and obliterated. So if you want to
make an assessment of what happened at four to doh,
you better get a big shovel and go really deep,
(42:42):
because Iron's nuclear program is obliterated, and somebody somewhere is
trying to leak something to say, oh, with low confidence,
we think maybe.
Speaker 3 (42:53):
It's moderate.
Speaker 5 (42:54):
Those that drop the bombs precisely in.
Speaker 18 (42:57):
The right place know exactly what happened and when that exploded,
and you know who else knows, Iran.
Speaker 4 (43:03):
That's why they came to the table.
Speaker 18 (43:04):
Right away, because their capabilities have been set back beyond
what they thought were possible.
Speaker 5 (43:10):
Yes, because of the courage of a commander.
Speaker 3 (43:13):
In chief who let our troops.
Speaker 5 (43:14):
Despite what the fake news wants to.
Speaker 1 (43:15):
Say, this is exactly what I said today when I
ran down the five reasons why this whole thing's a hux.
Nobody else, anybody else talking about this this morning. No,
the news is running with this and it's it's an
insult to our intelligence. He's absolutely right, He's right on
the money. Secretary of Defense, Pete, hegseeth fantastic decision.
Speaker 9 (43:36):
But you're not disputing the report said what it said.
Speaker 4 (43:39):
Even though it was this woman.
Speaker 2 (43:41):
Listen to her.
Speaker 3 (43:42):
The report said what it said, and it was fine.
It was severe, they think, but they had no idea.
They shouldn't have issued a report until they did. But
we've gotten the information. I think Pete said it better
than you can say it. And you know, you should
be proud, you especially, you should be proud of those pilots,
and you shouldn't be trying to demean them. Those pilots
(44:04):
flew at great risk, a big chance that they've never
come back home and see their husbands or their wives.
Speaker 2 (44:10):
Let me just tell you.
Speaker 3 (44:11):
You and NBC Fake News, which is one of the worst,
and CNN New York Times, they're all bad.
Speaker 2 (44:18):
They're sick. There's something wrong with them.
Speaker 3 (44:20):
Do you know what?
Speaker 2 (44:20):
You should be praising those people instead.
Speaker 3 (44:22):
Of trying to find something by getting me, by trying
to go and get me, you're hurting those people. They
were devastated. You know, I got a call from Missouri,
great state and I won three times by a lot,
and I got a call that the pilots and the
people on the plane were devastated because they were trying
to minimize the attack. And they all said it was hit. Oh,
(44:44):
but we don't think it was really maybe hit that badly,
and they were devastated. They put their lives on the line.
And then they have and I'm not referring to you,
but real scum, real scum coming into reports that are
as negative as they could possibly be. It should be
the opposite. You should make them heroes and heroines. You
(45:05):
should make them really people that they were so devastated
when they heard this news.
Speaker 2 (45:11):
And you know what they said.
Speaker 3 (45:12):
One of them, I spoke to one of them, said, sir,
we hid the side. It was perfect. It was dead on.
Because they don't understand fake news because they have a
normal life except they have to fly very big, very
fast planes. But it's a shame. You should be making
them heroes. All right in the back absolutely, right, go ahead,
(45:32):
back white Yeah, one more white jacket.
Speaker 4 (45:36):
Yeah that he'd done, but now I think he's just
got a new taste.
Speaker 20 (45:42):
Debrah Haynes from Skyneese. Mark Ritter, the NATO chief. Who
is your friend? He called you daddy earlier. Do you
forgot your NATO allies as kind of children?
Speaker 9 (45:56):
No?
Speaker 3 (45:56):
He likes me.
Speaker 2 (45:57):
I think he likes me.
Speaker 3 (45:58):
If he doesn't, i'll let you know. Oh I'll come
back and I'll hit him hard. Okay, he did, He
did it very affectionate. Daddy here, my daddy.
Speaker 20 (46:05):
Do you regard your NATO allies though, as kind of
like children? And they're obviously listening to you, and they're
spending more, and you're you're obviously appreciative of that. But
do you hurt they're going to be able to defend themselves,
defend Europe on their own with it.
Speaker 3 (46:22):
I think they need help a little bit at the beginning,
and I think they'll be able to do. And I
think they're going to remember this day.
Speaker 2 (46:27):
And this was a big day for NEO. You know,
this was a very big day.
Speaker 3 (46:30):
They took it. One of the gentlemen said, you know what,
we've been trying to raise money for raise the rate
for thirty years, he said, twenty years, from almost the beginning.
And he's been there for a long time, he said,
until you came along, it never happened. What you did
is amazing. It's been sort of an amazing day for
a lot of reasons, but also for that. Yeah, go ahead,
you think they can do it without you?
Speaker 2 (46:51):
Though in the future, can they do it with that? Well,
they're smart SPEs. I mean you have to ask smart.
Speaker 3 (46:55):
Okay, So we're heading back. We're heading back. I want
to thank these two gentlemen behind me. They are incredible people,
both of them. They're really they've done a fantastic job.
And Susie's in the front and she's done great. And Monica,
thank you very much. That was quite an exciting time.
And we're going to be heading back. We'll be back sooner.
(47:16):
We'll see you in Washington, DC.
Speaker 2 (47:20):
Remember this.
Speaker 3 (47:21):
We have the hottest country anywhere in the world. Thank
you very much, everybody, thank you.
Speaker 1 (47:26):
I have it's President Trump speaking of NETA. I'll tell
you I'm measured and uh, I just I love the
tone that he had yesterday or today rather, that was fantastic.
That was fantastic. And then hag Seth got up and
really set the record straight. Look, I said it earlier.
(47:48):
I gave the five different reasons why I knew this
was a hoax, and it was busted like those bunkers,
and it was obvious to me, but ceasefire wouldn't happen.
That's number one, biggest probably of all. If those sites
weren't really hit and completely obliterated, smells more like damage
control than real damage.
Speaker 4 (48:06):
Is number two.
Speaker 1 (48:07):
The fact that they're talking about relocated or uranium and
they don't know where the nine hundred pounds went. That's
another reason I think just shows that this is all
spin and damage control, because they got real damage. CNN
again citing anonymous sources. Always a red flag, always a leak,
(48:27):
and it's always, as Hegsat said, secondary defense very I think,
very rightly. So it's always just a piece of it.
It's not the real and full complete picture in the context,
and you are the president. Try and make that point
with that reporter who was asking the questions. Fourth, Israel
wouldn't pause to see how hard and heavy they were going.
They wouldn't have paused unless I ran, and they would
(48:49):
have known that their program was devastated. They just would
not have done it. And in the Iran regime trying
to save face here another piece. But the bottom line
and the big point, as you just already you don't
call time out if you're winning both around in Israel,
agreeing to a cease fire at the same time tells
you everything you need to know. The strikes worked, and
(49:12):
they don't want to give him that's that's it. They
just don't want to give him credit. The media spend
trying to walk it back so they can hurt Trump.
And as he pointed out rightly, so you paint a
lot to be thankful. You ought to be grateful. You
got to be grateful that these these pilots were able
to do what they did. You got to be grateful
that they were able to go into it the way
(49:34):
that they did. And you know, they go out there,
as you said, they don't know whether they come home
to their families or not. They have no idea. And
that's the problem. Each and every day they go out
and they face danger, much like police. But it's a
very similar thing. It's always an issue with authority. You
notice that, Well, I'll tell you why. There's a reason
(49:54):
for it. Because we wrestle, not against flesh and blood.
These people always have an issue with authority. They always
have a problem with authority. That's that's where it comes from.
I don't want you thinking why is that well, as
I mentioned, massive spiritual implications because of it. So anyway,
(50:20):
I thought a fantastic press conference, this whole idea. By
the way, this daddy comment, did you hear that? I'm
gonna play that for you before we get out of here,
greatest analogy and hang on.
Speaker 3 (50:29):
Let me.
Speaker 1 (50:31):
Let me find that here it is. This just happened
before we saw him speak. They know, Chief just called
Trump daddy following his f momb dropped the other day.
They said, forty seven run in the show. So here
you go, here's the here's here's the clip.
Speaker 2 (50:48):
I mean, we may do papers, aren't Marco. Maybe we're
there to do papers. I don't even know if you
need them. They're not going to be fighting each other.
Speaker 3 (50:55):
They've had it. They've had a big fight, like two
kids in a school yard.
Speaker 5 (50:59):
You know.
Speaker 2 (50:59):
They fight like you can't stop them. Let him fight
for about two three minutes. Then it's easy to stop them.
And then daddy has sometimes language everyone a certain word.
I think.
Speaker 1 (51:13):
I think that was affectionate too. I don't think there
was anything rude or weird meant by that, but it
is funny. They're going to say that Trump's daddy and
of course that's hilarious anyway in itself, because he really is.
The adults are back in the room, folks. That's just
a fact. That's that's a way that it's it's going
to lay out, all right, Winters today, thank you for
the remind they're joined to appreciate the help with that.
(51:35):
Today books on the line, I copy of my book
Good News, Hope and Encouragement for trying time.
Speaker 4 (51:40):
So yesterday's winter.
Speaker 1 (51:42):
Over on Rummel. We see your name all the time,
Tennisaal and I hope I'm saying that right, Tennessil. Please
email me Justin at Justin Barclay dot com today, Justin
and just can you hear them out there working again?
They're drilling. Looks like it's raining out there. I can't
imagine that any of that is effective. And what they're
doing was this is actually going to work.
Speaker 4 (52:07):
Either rain, But I guess that's what they're.
Speaker 1 (52:11):
Meant to do right now. And then today's Winter another book.
Laura Gardner Sweeney. Laura Gardner Sweeney, congratulations, Laura. I appreciate
you sharing today the program. You help us break the algorithm.
Whether you're on Rumble or you're on X or you're
on Facebook, even YouTube. If you help us share, you
(52:35):
help us get the word out about what's going on
and the truth. As you see, today was a moment,
a moment where truth was desperately needed and we were
able to lay that down. I hope people got to
hear it because of that, So thank you so much.
Send me your information. I want to get a book
off to you. I'll sign it and send it to
you in the mail back tomorrow morning. No fireside chat tonight.
(52:58):
Wishing you the best. If you're oncleus you're a VIP,
hang on for just a few minutes and I will
rap with you. I'm trying not to talk too much
today because I got this junk going on in the
allergies or whatever it is. But thank you so much
for being here as always, wishing you the best, God bless.
I got good news and bad news. The good news
is it's a deal and a steal for you. The
(53:19):
bad news is I missed out.
Speaker 4 (53:20):
Well. I just bought a bunch of betting.
Speaker 1 (53:22):
I just bought a bunch of new pillows and sheets
and things from Mike Lindell at my Pillow and I
didn't get this good of a deal for a little
bit of time. Mike is selling his pillows, the classic
fourteen eighty eight. That's it, the my pillow, the thing
that started at all just fourteen eighty eight. He had
one of these big box stores that canceled on them.
You know how they do well. This is actually your win.
(53:46):
It's a win for everyone. Win for Mike because he
can unload the pillows at the great price. It's a
win for you because you get a good deal and
you can help support this program at the same time.
Get your pillows for fourteen eighty eight. When you go
to my pillow dot com slash justin, use code justin
at check out. That's my pillow dot com slash justin.
And while you're there, shop for all kinds of great things.
I love the towels, the best towels I've ever used
(54:08):
in my entire life.
Speaker 4 (54:09):
Mike Scott.
Speaker 1 (54:09):
All kinds of great goodies at my pillow dot com
slash justin.
Speaker 2 (54:13):
Do it today.
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.