Ryan spells out how President Trump has earned our trust, and benefit of the doubt, on when and how and whether to use the American military in missions worldwide - including a potential strike in Iran.
President Biden's supposed 81 million votes garnered in the 2020 election has never made logical sense, and Ryan spells out the specific reasons why it's even more unbelievable than you may think.
President Trump delivers a hilarious moment at the ceremony 'lifting' a new flagpole on the White House front lawn.
Also, our Friday Fool of the Week is revealed...
President Biden's supposed 81 million votes garnered in the 2020 election has never made logical sense, and Ryan spells out the specific reasons why it's even more unbelievable than you may think.
President Trump delivers a hilarious moment at the ceremony 'lifting' a new flagpole on the White House front lawn.
Also, our Friday Fool of the Week is revealed...
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Does a ron have two weeks or if a two
strike before that, are you essentially giving them a two
week timeline, giving them a period of time.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
We're going to see what that period of time is,
but I'm giving them a period of time, and I
would say two weeks would be the maximum.
Speaker 1 (00:13):
That's President Trump earlier today on the tarmac in Morristown,
New Jersey, outside of Air Force One, taking time with
reporters as he did yesterday. And we'll have one of
those funnier exchanges from yesterday as part of our hot
takes here in the final hour of Ryan Schuling Live
on this Friday, your text at five seven seven thirty
nine as well. Donald Trump also had this to say
(00:34):
during the brief gaggle with the media. You've been making
progress stores of peace steel. But I don't know if
you know this, but Lindsay Brahm and Mike Pumpaign where
they are on the ground in Ukraine seemingly doing the opposite,
trying to promote the Ukrainians to keep fighting, what do
you think of that? Well, We're going to.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
See, and people have to be very careful with what
they say. They got to be very careful with their mouths.
Because their mouth could get them into a lot of trouble.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Aptly said, and could not agree more. What Donald Trump
is trying to do on multiple fronts in the world
as it stands right now, is to broker a peace.
He is a deal maker art of the deal. He
doesn't like war. He doesn't want war. He tries to
avoid war at all costs. When he does use the
military is for very precise strikes in out achieved the ejective.
(01:23):
I am totally on board with the Trump foreign policy
when it comes to using the military. He has tremendous
discretion with this. He has tremendous restraint with this. He
has shown that restraint as it pertains to Iran, and
I'm glad that he's showing that restraint. He is giving
them every single conceivable off ramp to avoid utter destruction.
(01:46):
Now they're nuclear facilities, those are going to go. That
time went bye bye. He offered a sixty day parameter
in period during which the Ayatola, the Mallas, the leadership
in Iran could have negotiated to keep maybe some semblance
of a nuclear program without enriching uranium to a degree
where it could be weaponized as part of a centrifuge
(02:07):
of a nuclear warhead to be used against the rest
of the world. That was never gonna happen. That was
a non starter for President Trump. He made that clear
to Iran. They did not take him seriously. It appears
they did not believe. They thought maybe he was bluffing.
And on day sixty one, that's when Israel went in.
And you have to believe that President Trump greenlighted that.
(02:29):
And what it all comes down to for me personally,
is I trust President Trump when it comes to matters
like this. This is why we voted for him. This
is why he was elected, because we wanted him in
that situation room when the stakes were highest, Not Joe Biden,
not Kamala Harris, but Donald Trump. Am I going to
(02:50):
agree with every single decision that he makes. I don't know,
and I don't have the evidence and the intel and
the information at my disposal that he does always have
to allow for that. Do I extend benefit of the
doubt status to President Trump? One hundred percent, absolutely, And
I know most of you do too. He has done
(03:10):
a lot to earn that trust, to earn that capital
politically and otherwise, and for us to kind of wait
and see to go with him on this. And if
President Trump decides that it is in our best interests,
our national security interests to help spearhead and attack using
our aerial forces to go into Iran to eliminate the
(03:32):
rest of their nuclear reserves. And again here's the key,
get out, not get engaged in a long slog, boots
on the ground, any of that. And there's no indication
that that would ever be on the table as an option.
But President Trump has coyly and cleverly kept his cards
close to his vest on this one. And he's even
extended this two week kind of period, like I'm going
(03:55):
to give him two more weeks maybe at most. That's
what you got. He's sending signals to Iran every single
time that he does this. And with regard to those
comments that he just made that you just heard about Ukraine,
I think that is apped as well. You've got Senator
Lindsay Graham, Mike Pompeo. You know, they are on the
hawkish side of the Republican Party urging Ukraine to dig
(04:16):
in and fight more. That's not what President Trump wants,
That's not what he envisions for that war and bringing
it to an end. He understands that he can't further
agitate Russia. It's not that he supports Putin, but he
has to give the appearance that he's an honest broker
in any kind of peace talks or deals that might
materialize in order to invite and welcome Russia to the table.
(04:38):
That doesn't mean you like Russia, but if you're sincerely
searching for a lasting peace, then there's going to have
to be some level of compromise, and it's not going
to be clean, and it's not going to be great.
But it's not because of President Trump that this whole
conflict started in the first place. It was the weakness
of Joe Biden that invited it. And this very interesting
kind of detail and wrinkle from Vladimir Putin earlier today
(05:02):
via Defiant Els. You can follow them on x at
that very handle at defiant ls LS. Putin said, quote,
Israel today is almost a Russian speaking country. Two million
people from the Soviet Union in Russia live there. We
take that into account. That's a telling quote to me.
For the following reason, there's a lot of speculation that
(05:24):
Russia might be engaged in some form of an alliance
with Iran. This nexus, this axis of evil Iran, Russia, China,
North Korea, but noticeably absent from a full throated voice
of support for the Iranians in their current predicament are
the Chinese. We're kind of sitting this one out all.
(05:45):
Jijenping has said, yeah, this is not the best way
to go about things, a very kind of milk toast
neutral statement other than he doesn't want war, he doesn't
want an escalating he doesn't think it's a good thing. Okay,
well that's fine, but it's not like, oh, Iran the Great,
we want their oil. We're gonna have a no. And
even putin with these comments about Israel, I found them
(06:05):
fascinating that he's not going to just automatic lockstep, knee
jerk react and go to the support of Iran and
the other regimes in the Middle East. I talked to
Jacobe about this, so a former resident himself of the
United Arab Emirates earlier this week, and he knows the region,
and he knows the history of that region, the culture
of that region. That even countries that might be adversarial
(06:29):
in nature, like Qatar, for instance, that provided safe harbor
to members of Hamas and may do the same for
the Iranian regime. We don't know. They've been very lukewarm
in their statements. I think Saudi Arabia came out initially
saying they condemned the Israeli attacks, but that was kind
of boilerplate. They felt like maybe they had to make
that statement, but they've not said anything since. And the
(06:51):
feeling is that off the record, a country like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey,
maybe even Qatar, United Arab Emirates, all of those countries
in the region that if Iran's regime were to topple
and fall, well maybe that wouldn't be the worst thing.
They're not going to cheerlead Israel to do it, but
(07:13):
if it happens, I think the most likely reaction is
going to be, well, okay, that happen. Now we have
this to deal with and we move forward, and how
can we best assimilate and adapt? And that's where we
stand right now. Is Donald Trump just making those comments
five seven, seven thirty nine. Your vot's coming in for
Friday fool of the Week as well. Let's get to
some of those here. I vote Tucker Carlson for Friday
(07:36):
Fool the Week says this text here he may be
competing with Candace Owens for most offensive and arrogant. I
would use a slightly different word on the second one.
There there's some ignorance there, and it's either intentional or
it's just happenstance. And I've never been a big fan
of Candace Owans. I have been a big fan of
Tucker Carlson. Candace used to go on Tucker's show, and
(07:59):
I'm like, why she on this show? What does she
bring to the table, what are her credentials, what's her background,
and what's her level of expertise? Why should I care?
Why should I care what this person is saying? And
I never was that convinced or impressed that Candace Owens
was one of those moral authority figures that we should
all be listening to. She was also hired by Daily
Wire and Ben Shapiro, and I think he would acknowledge,
(08:20):
if he were being honest and forthright now, that is
perhaps the biggest mistake he's ever made in his professional career. Ben,
they had a very severe and public falling out and
it was just a bad hire. I just I'm not
a big fan of hers. I never have been, and
even less so now. But with Tucker it's more confusing
to me because I know he's an intelligent person, but
(08:43):
what is his modus operandi here? What is his objective?
Why is he doing what he did? And why was
he a nominee for fool a week because of that
exchange that we played for you with Senator Ted Cruz.
And it's like I view things on a spectrum. Everything's
a shade of gray for the most part. There are
certain things that are black and absolute, and I acknowledge that.
But in this instance, I'm not a warhawk by any
(09:06):
stretch of the imagination. But I'm not a total dove either.
I don't neatly fit into a category. I think the
American military needs to be strong peace through strength. There
are instances where using our military makes sense to achieve
an objective and that it sends the right message. Dan
said this yesterday and I could not agree more. Peace
through strength means, yeah, you want the peace, but sometimes
(09:26):
you got to show the strength in order to ensure
the piece. It's a carrot in the stick approach. On occasion,
it's to show that you're willing to use the stick,
and you send the message to the rest of the world,
and Donald Trump has done that with the takeouts of
Kasim Solimani, the Iranian general, and that, as Dan put
it put a target on Trump's back. And we've seen
(09:47):
now intel showing that Iran maybe wanted to get some
form of retribution for that attack and that killing of
the general by assassinating Donald Trump. And then further to
that point we joked about a little bit early with
Shane Gillis, Abu Bakar Albegnadi took him out too. But
I think what President Trump has demonstrated is a real
(10:09):
pragmatic approach to the use of the military. He wants
minimal risk for casualties for any of our American service members,
maximum chance for success, a well defined mission, achieving that mission,
and then getting out. And I think it's a very
streamlined approach and it sets up for success rather than
(10:31):
these forever wars, long drawn out and listen, nature indeterminate Iraq, Afghanistan.
Both neither can be considered a success long term in
my view. And again I'm going to support President Trump
and his judgment throughout this. Continue with your tax five
seven to seven thirty nine, Steven Littleton, can you just
declare it a tie for Fool of the Week. They
(10:52):
all qualify to win. They're all winners or losers or
however you look at that. But we need your votes.
And Whoopie Goldberg is one of them. Tucker Carlson sadly,
I take no joy in it, but he's another. And
then Governor Kathy Hochel New York saying she's going to
provide free legal services. And as we know, no such
thing as a free lunch. Nothing's ever free, especially when
it comes to politics. Even if Mayor Mike Johnston promises
(11:14):
here in Denver, somebody's paying for it. And the people
that are paying for it are you, American taxpayer in Denver,
it's you, the Denver taxpayer for housing illegals and the
homeless in all e that in Colorado taxpayers indirectly also
paying for that in various ways. New York City taxpayers
and New York State taxpayers are going to foot the
(11:34):
bill for illegal aliens that need legal counsel. Kathy Hochel
came right out and said that, and that makes her
a nominee for Fool of the Week. Now, this wasn't nice.
Aoc is hairrier than a sasquatch. You now, come on,
how would you know that one and two? I don't
even I don't think that's true. I dispute the veracity
of this, and I don't know one way or the other.
(11:55):
I do know that there's a running joke about her
boyfriend fiance. Is she married man. I don't know that
he's just an overgrown gnome or he's lost from the
shire like Lord of the Rings. He's a hobbit, he's
got like these large feet. I hate making fun of
somebody for their physical appearance, but it's the way that
he dresses. I think there's a choice that he makes
(12:15):
that lends itself to this perception. And he's kind of
a hairy dude. Ryan. I thought AI was going to
take all the jobs. AI cannot milk a cow, question mark,
pit crops three question marks. Well, not but AI, but
certainly mechanization of various assembly lines and how we harvest crops.
(12:37):
A lot of that has been modernized to the point
where we don't need human beings to pick certain crops
or cultivate them, or shake almonds off of trees. There's
various other ways in which automation has taken over, and
cow milking is one of them. Had Anna Navarro ever
been to a dairy farm. This has been a largely
automated process. There are still humans that are necessary to
(12:59):
make sure everything's going according a plan about the ability
to generate large amounts of milk, large quantities on a
daily basis, distribute those in large part has been an
optimization of the supply chain and the modernization of how
that milk is acquired. Continue with your tax, Ryan, how
can illegals complain about a family being broken up when
(13:20):
they broke up their families in their country to come here.
Can't use that as an excuse to take to not
take your kids and money they made here back to
your country and not in handcuffs. To me, you lose
all credibility or any kind of stance a platform to
stand on when you come to this country illegally. That's it.
(13:42):
That's then all bets are off. Came what did you do? Oh?
You came to this country illegally? You have you know
you have no right to be here. Arnold Schwarzenegger clearly
articulated that, and I think accurately him being an immigrant,
and he bifurcated, he differentiated between joy Behar's characterization of
illegals immigrants. Immigrants, there are the illegal or they legal.
(14:05):
There's no difference between the two. There's a big difference
between the two, and legal immigrants are the ones that
are going to tell you about it. And that's why
Arnold Schwarzenegger articulated what he did, and he did such
a good job of it. I'm glad that he did
it with that audience on the view. Eric Manning got
to be careful with his tax five seven seven three
nighte Ryan, you great Americton. As a black man, I
can say this, Whoope Goldberg is a here comes the
(14:30):
odd of day? Eric, You say she's a racist? Okay,
she married a white man ted dance and I remember that.
I also remember the sketch which has now since been buried.
But Howard Stern, I don't know if he's kind of
genuflected of the woke mob and earned their forgiveness because
of it. But there was no more politically incorrect figure
in the media during the nineteen nineties as kind of
(14:52):
his heyday, but even before that and certainly after that,
than Howard Stern politically incorrect. This is a quotes Gary
the retard that was a figure that was a character
on his show. I'm not making that. Jackie the joke man.
He would make racist jokes to Robin Quivers, who was
a black woman herself, but she was in on the gag,
(15:13):
and they all were just kind of going down this path.
And then he did a video sketch of himself as
Ted Danson in blackface. You might remember that controversy. That
was from early nineties. I want to say, at some events,
some dinner and Howard Stern portrayed Ted Danson in blackface.
And then Sherman Helmsley, who played George Jefferson on Jeffersons
(15:34):
and All in the Family before that, he portrayed Whoopy
Goldberg and it was a whole sketch and whatever. But yeah,
Eric says put that you're making fun of Whoopy's hair.
Her dreads and yeah, yeah, but her comments enough are
enough to mock. Comparing the plight of women in Iran
posts nineteen seventy nine to the plight currently of black
(15:57):
Americans in twenty twenty five, and how I present this
analysis for all of you is the following, how many
women post nineteen seventy nine. That's a key date in
history because that's when the Iranian fascistic autocratic theocratic regime
of the Ayatola in the Malas took over and overthrew
(16:17):
the Shah of Iran and the monarchy that preceded it,
Women then were subjugated in a very dramatic way. Women
do not have equal rights in Iran, not even close.
How many women are in positions of leadership or have
been since nineteen seventy nine in Iran. Then compare that
to how many elected members of Congress or throughout state legislatures,
(16:38):
or governors in the United States, or President of the
United States Sparack Obama have been elected in this country.
It's apples and oranges. It it's not even that, it's
beyond that. It's a that would be an insult to
apples and oranges. They're much more similar than this argument
that would Bee Goldberg's making the hey same thing. In America.
(16:59):
We've dragged eight people from trucks, and black people have
been lynched from trees. It's an ugly part of our history.
There's no denying that. I'm not denying that. Is that
happening now? Has that been happening over the last thirty
forty fifty years? This country's come a long way, and
(17:19):
I think to acknowledge the pains, the scars of our
past is one thing, but you also have to acknowledge
the progress that we have made in the wake of that.
That we elected a black president of the United States,
no matter how you feel about his politics, is a
historically momentous thing. The election of Barack Obama meant something.
It should mean something, not just to the left but
(17:39):
to America in general, that we've come that far where
a president was elected and it had very little to
do with his race, and I just think that we
have to bear that in mind. Well, We've got a
very hysterical and hilarious episode of Trump's hot takes when
we come back. This is from the White House lawn
where they were having the White House flag pole installed,
(18:01):
and it has to do with that, and you may
have seen this clip, but we'll have that for you
when we come back. More of your text as well
at five seven, seven, three nine. Thanks for tuning in,
Thanks for joining in your votes for Fool of Theweek.
Also at that text line, you were always on my mind,
yes Willie Nelson saying it. But if you've got movie
(18:24):
on your mind, may I direct you to Keyfrontrangehomes dot
com and my friend Ashley Key. Moving during the summer,
this seems to make the most sense. But even if
you're not moving until the fall, you want to check
in right now at keyfrontrangehomes dot com and when you
get there, you can reach out to Ashley directly today
through the iheartlink on our website. It's right there. You
(18:45):
can see it. I'm looking right at it Keyfrontrange homes
dot com. And just start the conversation just by saying
maybe that's it. That's all it will take, and she
will hook you up with a one thousand dollars closing
credit just for reaching out. That's all you have to do.
That's all the effort you have to make. Don't be shy.
This is a sign that you should reach out today.
(19:05):
Just check out what she has to offer. Check out
the staging photos of how your home can be presented.
Top of the line Lives Southeby's International affiliated Ashley Key.
She specializes homes on the front range, that's why it's
in the website, and wherever you're moving throughout Colorado, she
could provide her expertise, her background, her knowledge of the market,
to help you move your home and move into your
(19:29):
dream home again online Ashley Key. You can reach her
at Keyfront Range Homes dot com and she gives one
hundred percent of her effort, one hundred percent of the
time to one hundred percent of her clients. And you
want to become one right now. That's Keyfrontrange Homes dot
com for Ashley Kee, a prow sponsor of Ryan Shuling Live.
It's time once again for another edition of Trump's hot takes,
(19:52):
charting the forty seven president's epic interactions with the fake
news media.
Speaker 2 (19:56):
Let's have a good till it lifting to use another word,
but I'm not going to use that word.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
You know that it is the word. It starts with
an E. You know what the word is.
Speaker 2 (20:07):
If I ever used it, I'd be run out of
town by you people. All right, So enjoy it, Doug,
You're gonna get some good He's gonna win another Nobel Prize,
I think for this picture. So maybe the flag will
be even more exciting. But this is pretty exciting.
Speaker 1 (20:20):
That's some equipment. I'll tell you a lot end at
that time.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
That's some beautiful equipment. There's nothing like America.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
Have a good time, That's of my favorite lines that
he uses from time to time. Have a good time, everybody,
what I'm having a good time with it? What am
I doing? I want to know about this President Trump?
They're saying, I'm not going to say the E word.
You know what it is. It's when you lift a
flag bowl. You know what happens. You don't need viagra
for it if it lasts four hours. Contacted doctor, my
(20:51):
goodness five seven seven three nine. That is the line
to text us at for your vote. Full of the Week,
Tucker Carlson finding his way into the finalist realm with
that interaction with Ted Cruz getting a couple of votes
for him coming in. Also Governor Kathy Hochel New York
providing legal services at the taxpayer expense for illegal aliens,
(21:12):
and then whoopee Goldberg, go big or go home. I
suppose she saying that the plight of black Americans in
twenty twenty five USA is the equivalent of Iran and
women in Iran. That is something to behold. Now, this
thing that's come up in the news, and as many
of you know, I have a sports background, but the
(21:33):
Los Angeles Dodgers have really stepped in it here, and
I'm not sure why. The typical I think Major League
Baseball crowd is pretty diverse, pretty evenly split, I would
say politically maybe like our country is, but certainly no
shortage of conservative folks and those in the middle who
believe that illegal aliens should be deported and they support
(21:53):
Donald Trump's policies on this poll after polls shows now
in Los Angeles, is that breakdown difference in terms of
fans that attend the games? Not sure, but it would appear,
at least by ICE's account that a characterization of an
encounter that happened to Dodgers' stadium last night was fake
news was not accurate, and the Dodgers claimed that there
(22:14):
were ICE agents showing up at Chabez Ravine in Los
Angeles prior to a Dodgers game at the parking lot,
trying to maybe remove some illegal aliens, and the Dodgers
told them, no, no, you can't do that. ICE is
like this never happened. I don't know what you're talking about.
Who do you believe that's up to you. I think
I have my preference there. But my bigger question again
(22:34):
is why are the Dodgers doing this? Why are they
entering the fray. Why are they tiptoeing through the tulips
and inserting themselves into this debate and again on the
short end of this debate, just to woke virtue signal
of people and how many fans will that turn off?
By and large, staying away from matters like this as
a professional sports franchise is the best move. You want
(22:58):
an inclusive environment. But when you hear that, you think, oh,
that's woke. No no, no, no. What an inclusive environment
meaning is sterile? It is free from these political hang ups.
It is not going to impose any kind of viewpoint
on you. And you can go to a ballgame with
your family and enjoy it and have a good time
like we do at Corsfield here with the Rockies. But
(23:20):
Dodgers apparently they want to matter more and it makes
is not surprising that this would happen in California. But
here's here's the real confusing part about this for me.
We've talked about on the program. In the two thousand
and eight primary on the Democrat side, you had three
prominent members who would all become nominees of the party.
At one point Barack Obama would win that primary in
(23:43):
two thousand and eight, he would be the nominee again
running for reelection as president in twenty twelve. Hillary Clinton
ran in that primary in two thousand and eight, and
she would be the nominee in twenty sixteen and get
upset by Donald Trump. Joe Biden was a candidate in
that primary and would be the nominee in twenty twenty
and win under very controversial circumstances eighty one million votes. Again,
(24:08):
I would always pose this question to your liberal friends
out there, if they still exist. How in the world,
how on God's green Earth did old man senile Joe Biden,
mediocre Joe Biden for all these years? How did he
get eighty one million votes? But three count, not one,
not two? Three quote unquote historical candidates all receive far less.
(24:31):
And Barack Obama, being a historical candidate that won twice,
did not receive eighty one million votes? How How how
did Barack Obama not get to that number? But Joe
Biden did explain that to me. Then you had the
first female nominee for president in Hillary Clinton. Not I
(24:52):
can't stand her, and I know many of you can't either,
but she was historic. She would have been the first
female president she can get. Ay were me that number
of votes eighty one million that Joe Biden allegedly got,
and then Kamala Harris this last time around, all the
same kind of pull of the Democratic machine, the advertising,
the pomp and circumstance, and she was historic on both fronts,
(25:16):
from a racial front like Barack Obama and from a
gender front like Hillary Clinton. She would have been the
first woman of color ever elected president. And yet she
not only didn't get eighty one million votes, but unlike
Barack Obama twice, unlike Hillary Clinton, she didn't even win
the popular vote head to head against Donald Trump. And
yet you would have us believe that while Barack Obama
(25:41):
twice in winning, Hillary Clinton in winning the popular vote,
and Kamala Harris, all three historic candidates, in one way
or another, didn't get not even close to the eighty
one million votes we are told old Joe Biden got. Also,
(26:02):
if Joe Biden got eighty one million in twenty twenty,
where did all those votes go for Kamala Harris? How
did that all fall off? Was Joe Biden that great,
that transformational, that iconic, that unifying, that he would have
garnered more votes than Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris.
(26:25):
Make it make sense, because it doesn't make sense if
you were if you would have told me. Let's say
you go back to two thousand and six, and I
knew who Barack Obama was. He was his hot shot senator.
He gave this great speech to the two thousand and
four convention. I was watching his political assent, so were
many of you. So go back about twenty years or so,
and you asked me, I didn't know who Kamala Harris
(26:48):
was at the time, But you just tell me that
the Democratic Party, this is the key. The Democratic Party
nominee was going to be a black man, a white woman,
or a black woman or a white mant those four
quadrants all covered which one of the four would receive
the most votes. And I could tell you, knowing Joe Biden,
(27:10):
I wouldn't even need to know who Kamala Harris was.
I knew who Hillary Clinton was, even though I wasn't
crazy about Hillary. Joe, I did like Barack Obama. One time.
I had some hope and changing all that stuff, and
then it quickly faded away. But all that to say,
Joe Biden would have finished fourth out of four every
single time. I think for anybody that was of a
(27:31):
sound mind at that time being asked that question, who
would receive the dewest votes? Now, if you were to
ask who would receive the most votes, who in their
right mind would have said, well, I think Joe Biden,
quite frankly, would receive the most votes. That's why this
has never made sense to me. It's never made sense
to me. But this made sense to me. This was
(27:52):
Barack Obama in two thousand and eight. The positions by
the Democratic Party for the working class. We're talking about
illegal immigration, welfare to work programs that Bill Clinton championed
in the nineties. But here's Barack Obama on the issue
of illegal immigration two thousand and eight.
Speaker 3 (28:08):
This administration, the Bush administration, has done nothing to control
the problem.
Speaker 4 (28:13):
That we have.
Speaker 3 (28:14):
We've had five million undocumented workers come over the borders
since George Bush took office. It has become an extraordinary problem.
And the reason the American people are concerned is because
they are seeing their own economic positions slip away, and
oftentimes employers are exploiting these undocumented workers. They're not paying
(28:36):
the minimum wage, they're not observing worker safety laws. As president,
I will make sure that we finally have the kind
of border security that we need. That's step number one.
Step number two is to take on employers. Right now,
an employer has more of a chance of getting hit
by lightning than be prosecuted for.
Speaker 1 (28:56):
Hiring an undocumented worker. Oh, that has to change.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
They have to be held accountable, start shedding some light
on the problem, and we can once again be a
nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. So that's
what I intend to do as President of the United States.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
Literally agree with everything Barack Obama just said there. Remember
when they called him the deporter in chief? I do
what happened? What changed? Where do this all go sideways?
It's a question worth asking. We'll take this time out
and the question we're going to answer is who is
our Friday fool of the Week? Your vote still coming
in five seven to seventy three nine, Your choices are
(29:30):
WHOOPI Goldberg? The comments on the view women in Iran
they don't have it as bad or they have it
equally as bad as black Americans in the United States
twenty twenty five, Really, Governor Kathy Hulkel saying that Hey,
New York taxpayers, you're going to foot the bill for
every illegal alien that needs legal representation because they don't
have it and they need it, and you're going to
pay for it. And then also in addition to those two,
(29:53):
we look also at Tucker Carlson, who, in an exchange
with Ted Cruz, got a got you question, a red herring,
a straw man, whatever you're gonna make of it, Like,
what's the population? Ran? I don't know why you don't
have any business advocating for the elimination of the mallus?
What nice that for?
Speaker 3 (30:09):
You?
Speaker 1 (30:10):
Would come back? Also a sad day in the history
of cheese. That'll be our final story that we cover
here on Ryan Schuling Live on a Friday after this. Oh,
such a fun song on this Friday, but unfortunately not
a fun story to go along with it. Colorado billionaire
(30:32):
James Loprino, once called the Willy Wonka of cheese, has died.
Lived a long, full life and made an impact right
here in our community. One of Colorado's most influential businessman
has died, according to Fox thirty one, here James Jim Loprino,
the chairman of Loprino formerly Loaprino Foods died Thursday. According
(30:53):
to the company, he was born in nineteen thirty seven
right here in Denver, which would make him eighty eight
years old, and he spent his childhood with a tightly
knit family rooted in Denver's Italian community. Laprino was called
a devoted family man in a notification of his death
shared by the company. He shared, so rest in peace
to James Loprino, the Willy Wonka of cheese finishing now
(31:16):
and this is an upset the Friday fool of the
Week I anticipated this is going to be a laydown
loner in the parlance of Uker for those of you
from the Upper Midwest. But from the top rope, may
I introduce to you a first time er. I believe
in our fool of the Week process. WHOOPI Goldberg one
hundred thousand times over. I think has been the winner
(31:36):
in at least a nominee Tucker Carlson for this. How
many people living around?
Speaker 4 (31:40):
By the way, I don't know the population at all. No,
I don't know the population. You don't know the population
of the country you seek to topple. And how many
people living around nine eight two million? Okay, Yeah, how
could you not know that? I don't sit around memorizing
population tables.
Speaker 1 (31:59):
Well, it's irrelevant because you're calling for the overthrow of
the government.
Speaker 4 (32:03):
Why is it relevant whether it's well because ninety million
or eighty million or one hundred million. Why is this
if you don't know anything about the country.
Speaker 1 (32:08):
He didn't say, I don't know anything about Okay, what's
the there's a scene. I think it's Tommy boy or
Chris Farley turns to David Spain as you didn't know that?
And that's kind of a vibe I got there from
Tucker Carlson. Was Senator Ted Cruz in a quizzical exchange
and Tucker Carlson, Wow, our Friday fool of the Week again.
I take no joy in that. Here's some more texts five, seven,
(32:30):
seven to three nine. Ryan, can I throw in a
last minute fool the week? How about Greg that stepped
in for Mandy today? He started off a segment saying
manly instead of Mandy and then finished the segment with
her last name being Connolly. Now, my question would be
is that intentional? Was it done for the sake of comedy?
Because if he committed to the bit and he was
doing it to be funny, that's one thing. But the
(32:52):
way you're presenting it is that he wasn't, which, in
a way, I guess is even funnier. But of course,
you know, like when Saraj Hashmi comes on this program,
I used to fill in for all these other shows,
and when I was on Ross, he would call me Ross.
When I was on Leland, he would call me Leland.
When I was on Mandy, you'd call me Mandy. Still
does that, so you know, it's a bit right. You
commit to the bet and it's funny, But I didn't
hear what you're talking about there, so I'd be interested
(33:15):
to hear the highlights. Gina in Springfield says, whoope's the worst.
The torture that women in that part of the world
go through is despicable. Talking about Iran how darees, she yeah,
thanks for that. Deporter in Chief, Obama didn't do interior
deportations like Clinton. Obama counted caught at the border and
sent back as deportation. Even so, either way, however you
(33:38):
define it, he took pride in it. Right. This is
a point of pride for the Obama administration and telling
the American people that, you know, illegal aliens were not
going to take over our workforce. It was not going
to be tolerated. You were going to be deported. We're
going to protect the wages of hard working Americans. This
was the credo for the Democratic Party as recently as
President Obama. What changed? Why did it change? Why are
(34:00):
they at war against the working class? Is this how
they figure they're gonna win elections? I don't know. I
wish them luck, No, I don't. Christy Burton Brown is
in for Dan Kaplas. I'll talk to you again on Monday.
Thanks for tuning in today. I'm Ryan Schuling Live
Does a ron have two weeks or if a two
strike before that, are you essentially giving them a two
week timeline, giving them a period of time.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
We're going to see what that period of time is,
but I'm giving them a period of time, and I
would say two weeks would be the maximum.
Speaker 1 (00:13):
That's President Trump earlier today on the tarmac in Morristown,
New Jersey, outside of Air Force One, taking time with
reporters as he did yesterday. And we'll have one of
those funnier exchanges from yesterday as part of our hot
takes here in the final hour of Ryan Schuling Live
on this Friday, your text at five seven seven thirty
nine as well. Donald Trump also had this to say
(00:34):
during the brief gaggle with the media. You've been making
progress stores of peace steel. But I don't know if
you know this, but Lindsay Brahm and Mike Pumpaign where
they are on the ground in Ukraine seemingly doing the opposite,
trying to promote the Ukrainians to keep fighting, what do
you think of that? Well, We're going to.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
See, and people have to be very careful with what
they say. They got to be very careful with their mouths.
Because their mouth could get them into a lot of trouble.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Aptly said, and could not agree more. What Donald Trump
is trying to do on multiple fronts in the world
as it stands right now, is to broker a peace.
He is a deal maker art of the deal. He
doesn't like war. He doesn't want war. He tries to
avoid war at all costs. When he does use the
military is for very precise strikes in out achieved the ejective.
(01:23):
I am totally on board with the Trump foreign policy
when it comes to using the military. He has tremendous
discretion with this. He has tremendous restraint with this. He
has shown that restraint as it pertains to Iran, and
I'm glad that he's showing that restraint. He is giving
them every single conceivable off ramp to avoid utter destruction.
(01:46):
Now they're nuclear facilities, those are going to go. That
time went bye bye. He offered a sixty day parameter
in period during which the Ayatola, the Mallas, the leadership
in Iran could have negotiated to keep maybe some semblance
of a nuclear program without enriching uranium to a degree
where it could be weaponized as part of a centrifuge
(02:07):
of a nuclear warhead to be used against the rest
of the world. That was never gonna happen. That was
a non starter for President Trump. He made that clear
to Iran. They did not take him seriously. It appears
they did not believe. They thought maybe he was bluffing.
And on day sixty one, that's when Israel went in.
And you have to believe that President Trump greenlighted that.
(02:29):
And what it all comes down to for me personally,
is I trust President Trump when it comes to matters
like this. This is why we voted for him. This
is why he was elected, because we wanted him in
that situation room when the stakes were highest, Not Joe Biden,
not Kamala Harris, but Donald Trump. Am I going to
(02:50):
agree with every single decision that he makes. I don't know,
and I don't have the evidence and the intel and
the information at my disposal that he does always have
to allow for that. Do I extend benefit of the
doubt status to President Trump? One hundred percent, absolutely, And
I know most of you do too. He has done
(03:10):
a lot to earn that trust, to earn that capital
politically and otherwise, and for us to kind of wait
and see to go with him on this. And if
President Trump decides that it is in our best interests,
our national security interests to help spearhead and attack using
our aerial forces to go into Iran to eliminate the
(03:32):
rest of their nuclear reserves. And again here's the key,
get out, not get engaged in a long slog, boots
on the ground, any of that. And there's no indication
that that would ever be on the table as an option.
But President Trump has coyly and cleverly kept his cards
close to his vest on this one. And he's even
extended this two week kind of period, like I'm going
(03:55):
to give him two more weeks maybe at most. That's
what you got. He's sending signals to Iran every single
time that he does this. And with regard to those
comments that he just made that you just heard about Ukraine,
I think that is apped as well. You've got Senator
Lindsay Graham, Mike Pompeo. You know, they are on the
hawkish side of the Republican Party urging Ukraine to dig
(04:16):
in and fight more. That's not what President Trump wants,
That's not what he envisions for that war and bringing
it to an end. He understands that he can't further
agitate Russia. It's not that he supports Putin, but he
has to give the appearance that he's an honest broker
in any kind of peace talks or deals that might
materialize in order to invite and welcome Russia to the table.
(04:38):
That doesn't mean you like Russia, but if you're sincerely
searching for a lasting peace, then there's going to have
to be some level of compromise, and it's not going
to be clean, and it's not going to be great.
But it's not because of President Trump that this whole
conflict started in the first place. It was the weakness
of Joe Biden that invited it. And this very interesting
kind of detail and wrinkle from Vladimir Putin earlier today
(05:02):
via Defiant Els. You can follow them on x at
that very handle at defiant ls LS. Putin said, quote,
Israel today is almost a Russian speaking country. Two million
people from the Soviet Union in Russia live there. We
take that into account. That's a telling quote to me.
For the following reason, there's a lot of speculation that
(05:24):
Russia might be engaged in some form of an alliance
with Iran. This nexus, this axis of evil Iran, Russia, China,
North Korea, but noticeably absent from a full throated voice
of support for the Iranians in their current predicament are
the Chinese. We're kind of sitting this one out all.
(05:45):
Jijenping has said, yeah, this is not the best way
to go about things, a very kind of milk toast
neutral statement other than he doesn't want war, he doesn't
want an escalating he doesn't think it's a good thing. Okay,
well that's fine, but it's not like, oh, Iran the Great,
we want their oil. We're gonna have a no. And
even putin with these comments about Israel, I found them
(06:05):
fascinating that he's not going to just automatic lockstep, knee
jerk react and go to the support of Iran and
the other regimes in the Middle East. I talked to
Jacobe about this, so a former resident himself of the
United Arab Emirates earlier this week, and he knows the region,
and he knows the history of that region, the culture
of that region. That even countries that might be adversarial
(06:29):
in nature, like Qatar, for instance, that provided safe harbor
to members of Hamas and may do the same for
the Iranian regime. We don't know. They've been very lukewarm
in their statements. I think Saudi Arabia came out initially
saying they condemned the Israeli attacks, but that was kind
of boilerplate. They felt like maybe they had to make
that statement, but they've not said anything since. And the
(06:51):
feeling is that off the record, a country like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey,
maybe even Qatar, United Arab Emirates, all of those countries
in the region that if Iran's regime were to topple
and fall, well maybe that wouldn't be the worst thing.
They're not going to cheerlead Israel to do it, but
(07:13):
if it happens, I think the most likely reaction is
going to be, well, okay, that happen. Now we have
this to deal with and we move forward, and how
can we best assimilate and adapt? And that's where we
stand right now. Is Donald Trump just making those comments
five seven, seven thirty nine. Your vot's coming in for
Friday fool of the Week as well. Let's get to
some of those here. I vote Tucker Carlson for Friday
(07:36):
Fool the Week says this text here he may be
competing with Candace Owens for most offensive and arrogant. I
would use a slightly different word on the second one.
There there's some ignorance there, and it's either intentional or
it's just happenstance. And I've never been a big fan
of Candace Owans. I have been a big fan of
Tucker Carlson. Candace used to go on Tucker's show, and
(07:59):
I'm like, why she on this show? What does she
bring to the table, what are her credentials, what's her background,
and what's her level of expertise? Why should I care?
Why should I care what this person is saying? And
I never was that convinced or impressed that Candace Owens
was one of those moral authority figures that we should
all be listening to. She was also hired by Daily
Wire and Ben Shapiro, and I think he would acknowledge,
(08:20):
if he were being honest and forthright now, that is
perhaps the biggest mistake he's ever made in his professional career. Ben,
they had a very severe and public falling out and
it was just a bad hire. I just I'm not
a big fan of hers. I never have been, and
even less so now. But with Tucker it's more confusing
to me because I know he's an intelligent person, but
(08:43):
what is his modus operandi here? What is his objective?
Why is he doing what he did? And why was
he a nominee for fool a week because of that
exchange that we played for you with Senator Ted Cruz.
And it's like I view things on a spectrum. Everything's
a shade of gray for the most part. There are
certain things that are black and absolute, and I acknowledge that.
But in this instance, I'm not a warhawk by any
(09:06):
stretch of the imagination. But I'm not a total dove either.
I don't neatly fit into a category. I think the
American military needs to be strong peace through strength. There
are instances where using our military makes sense to achieve
an objective and that it sends the right message. Dan
said this yesterday and I could not agree more. Peace
through strength means, yeah, you want the peace, but sometimes
(09:26):
you got to show the strength in order to ensure
the piece. It's a carrot in the stick approach. On occasion,
it's to show that you're willing to use the stick,
and you send the message to the rest of the world,
and Donald Trump has done that with the takeouts of
Kasim Solimani, the Iranian general, and that, as Dan put
it put a target on Trump's back. And we've seen
(09:47):
now intel showing that Iran maybe wanted to get some
form of retribution for that attack and that killing of
the general by assassinating Donald Trump. And then further to
that point we joked about a little bit early with
Shane Gillis, Abu Bakar Albegnadi took him out too. But
I think what President Trump has demonstrated is a real
(10:09):
pragmatic approach to the use of the military. He wants
minimal risk for casualties for any of our American service members,
maximum chance for success, a well defined mission, achieving that mission,
and then getting out. And I think it's a very
streamlined approach and it sets up for success rather than
(10:31):
these forever wars, long drawn out and listen, nature indeterminate Iraq, Afghanistan.
Both neither can be considered a success long term in
my view. And again I'm going to support President Trump
and his judgment throughout this. Continue with your tax five
seven to seven thirty nine, Steven Littleton, can you just
declare it a tie for Fool of the Week. They
(10:52):
all qualify to win. They're all winners or losers or
however you look at that. But we need your votes.
And Whoopie Goldberg is one of them. Tucker Carlson sadly,
I take no joy in it, but he's another. And
then Governor Kathy Hochel New York saying she's going to
provide free legal services. And as we know, no such
thing as a free lunch. Nothing's ever free, especially when
it comes to politics. Even if Mayor Mike Johnston promises
(11:14):
here in Denver, somebody's paying for it. And the people
that are paying for it are you, American taxpayer in Denver,
it's you, the Denver taxpayer for housing illegals and the
homeless in all e that in Colorado taxpayers indirectly also
paying for that in various ways. New York City taxpayers
and New York State taxpayers are going to foot the
(11:34):
bill for illegal aliens that need legal counsel. Kathy Hochel
came right out and said that, and that makes her
a nominee for Fool of the Week. Now, this wasn't nice.
Aoc is hairrier than a sasquatch. You now, come on,
how would you know that one and two? I don't
even I don't think that's true. I dispute the veracity
of this, and I don't know one way or the other.
(11:55):
I do know that there's a running joke about her
boyfriend fiance. Is she married man. I don't know that
he's just an overgrown gnome or he's lost from the
shire like Lord of the Rings. He's a hobbit, he's
got like these large feet. I hate making fun of
somebody for their physical appearance, but it's the way that
he dresses. I think there's a choice that he makes
(12:15):
that lends itself to this perception. And he's kind of
a hairy dude. Ryan. I thought AI was going to
take all the jobs. AI cannot milk a cow, question mark,
pit crops three question marks. Well, not but AI, but
certainly mechanization of various assembly lines and how we harvest crops.
(12:37):
A lot of that has been modernized to the point
where we don't need human beings to pick certain crops
or cultivate them, or shake almonds off of trees. There's
various other ways in which automation has taken over, and
cow milking is one of them. Had Anna Navarro ever
been to a dairy farm. This has been a largely
automated process. There are still humans that are necessary to
(12:59):
make sure everything's going according a plan about the ability
to generate large amounts of milk, large quantities on a
daily basis, distribute those in large part has been an
optimization of the supply chain and the modernization of how
that milk is acquired. Continue with your tax, Ryan, how
can illegals complain about a family being broken up when
(13:20):
they broke up their families in their country to come here.
Can't use that as an excuse to take to not
take your kids and money they made here back to
your country and not in handcuffs. To me, you lose
all credibility or any kind of stance a platform to
stand on when you come to this country illegally. That's it.
(13:42):
That's then all bets are off. Came what did you do? Oh?
You came to this country illegally? You have you know
you have no right to be here. Arnold Schwarzenegger clearly
articulated that, and I think accurately him being an immigrant,
and he bifurcated, he differentiated between joy Behar's characterization of
illegals immigrants. Immigrants, there are the illegal or they legal.
(14:05):
There's no difference between the two. There's a big difference
between the two, and legal immigrants are the ones that
are going to tell you about it. And that's why
Arnold Schwarzenegger articulated what he did, and he did such
a good job of it. I'm glad that he did
it with that audience on the view. Eric Manning got
to be careful with his tax five seven seven three
nighte Ryan, you great Americton. As a black man, I
can say this, Whoope Goldberg is a here comes the
(14:30):
odd of day? Eric, You say she's a racist? Okay,
she married a white man ted dance and I remember that.
I also remember the sketch which has now since been buried.
But Howard Stern, I don't know if he's kind of
genuflected of the woke mob and earned their forgiveness because
of it. But there was no more politically incorrect figure
in the media during the nineteen nineties as kind of
(14:52):
his heyday, but even before that and certainly after that,
than Howard Stern politically incorrect. This is a quotes Gary
the retard that was a figure that was a character
on his show. I'm not making that. Jackie the joke man.
He would make racist jokes to Robin Quivers, who was
a black woman herself, but she was in on the gag,
(15:13):
and they all were just kind of going down this path.
And then he did a video sketch of himself as
Ted Danson in blackface. You might remember that controversy. That
was from early nineties. I want to say, at some events,
some dinner and Howard Stern portrayed Ted Danson in blackface.
And then Sherman Helmsley, who played George Jefferson on Jeffersons
(15:34):
and All in the Family before that, he portrayed Whoopy
Goldberg and it was a whole sketch and whatever. But yeah,
Eric says put that you're making fun of Whoopy's hair.
Her dreads and yeah, yeah, but her comments enough are
enough to mock. Comparing the plight of women in Iran
posts nineteen seventy nine to the plight currently of black
(15:57):
Americans in twenty twenty five, and how I present this
analysis for all of you is the following, how many
women post nineteen seventy nine. That's a key date in
history because that's when the Iranian fascistic autocratic theocratic regime
of the Ayatola in the Malas took over and overthrew
(16:17):
the Shah of Iran and the monarchy that preceded it,
Women then were subjugated in a very dramatic way. Women
do not have equal rights in Iran, not even close.
How many women are in positions of leadership or have
been since nineteen seventy nine in Iran. Then compare that
to how many elected members of Congress or throughout state legislatures,
(16:38):
or governors in the United States, or President of the
United States Sparack Obama have been elected in this country.
It's apples and oranges. It it's not even that, it's
beyond that. It's a that would be an insult to
apples and oranges. They're much more similar than this argument
that would Bee Goldberg's making the hey same thing. In America.
(16:59):
We've dragged eight people from trucks, and black people have
been lynched from trees. It's an ugly part of our history.
There's no denying that. I'm not denying that. Is that
happening now? Has that been happening over the last thirty
forty fifty years? This country's come a long way, and
(17:19):
I think to acknowledge the pains, the scars of our
past is one thing, but you also have to acknowledge
the progress that we have made in the wake of that.
That we elected a black president of the United States,
no matter how you feel about his politics, is a
historically momentous thing. The election of Barack Obama meant something.
It should mean something, not just to the left but
(17:39):
to America in general, that we've come that far where
a president was elected and it had very little to
do with his race, and I just think that we
have to bear that in mind. Well, We've got a
very hysterical and hilarious episode of Trump's hot takes when
we come back. This is from the White House lawn
where they were having the White House flag pole installed,
(18:01):
and it has to do with that, and you may
have seen this clip, but we'll have that for you
when we come back. More of your text as well
at five seven, seven, three nine. Thanks for tuning in,
Thanks for joining in your votes for Fool of Theweek.
Also at that text line, you were always on my mind,
yes Willie Nelson saying it. But if you've got movie
(18:24):
on your mind, may I direct you to Keyfrontrangehomes dot
com and my friend Ashley Key. Moving during the summer,
this seems to make the most sense. But even if
you're not moving until the fall, you want to check
in right now at keyfrontrangehomes dot com and when you
get there, you can reach out to Ashley directly today
through the iheartlink on our website. It's right there. You
(18:45):
can see it. I'm looking right at it Keyfrontrange homes
dot com. And just start the conversation just by saying
maybe that's it. That's all it will take, and she
will hook you up with a one thousand dollars closing
credit just for reaching out. That's all you have to do.
That's all the effort you have to make. Don't be shy.
This is a sign that you should reach out today.
(19:05):
Just check out what she has to offer. Check out
the staging photos of how your home can be presented.
Top of the line Lives Southeby's International affiliated Ashley Key.
She specializes homes on the front range, that's why it's
in the website, and wherever you're moving throughout Colorado, she
could provide her expertise, her background, her knowledge of the market,
to help you move your home and move into your
(19:29):
dream home again online Ashley Key. You can reach her
at Keyfront Range Homes dot com and she gives one
hundred percent of her effort, one hundred percent of the
time to one hundred percent of her clients. And you
want to become one right now. That's Keyfrontrange Homes dot
com for Ashley Kee, a prow sponsor of Ryan Shuling Live.
It's time once again for another edition of Trump's hot takes,
(19:52):
charting the forty seven president's epic interactions with the fake
news media.
Speaker 2 (19:56):
Let's have a good till it lifting to use another word,
but I'm not going to use that word.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
You know that it is the word. It starts with
an E. You know what the word is.
Speaker 2 (20:07):
If I ever used it, I'd be run out of
town by you people. All right, So enjoy it, Doug,
You're gonna get some good He's gonna win another Nobel Prize,
I think for this picture. So maybe the flag will
be even more exciting. But this is pretty exciting.
Speaker 1 (20:20):
That's some equipment. I'll tell you a lot end at
that time.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
That's some beautiful equipment. There's nothing like America.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
Have a good time, That's of my favorite lines that
he uses from time to time. Have a good time, everybody,
what I'm having a good time with it? What am
I doing? I want to know about this President Trump?
They're saying, I'm not going to say the E word.
You know what it is. It's when you lift a
flag bowl. You know what happens. You don't need viagra
for it if it lasts four hours. Contacted doctor, my
(20:51):
goodness five seven seven three nine. That is the line
to text us at for your vote. Full of the Week,
Tucker Carlson finding his way into the finalist realm with
that interaction with Ted Cruz getting a couple of votes
for him coming in. Also Governor Kathy Hochel New York
providing legal services at the taxpayer expense for illegal aliens,
(21:12):
and then whoopee Goldberg, go big or go home. I
suppose she saying that the plight of black Americans in
twenty twenty five USA is the equivalent of Iran and
women in Iran. That is something to behold. Now, this
thing that's come up in the news, and as many
of you know, I have a sports background, but the
(21:33):
Los Angeles Dodgers have really stepped in it here, and
I'm not sure why. The typical I think Major League
Baseball crowd is pretty diverse, pretty evenly split, I would
say politically maybe like our country is, but certainly no
shortage of conservative folks and those in the middle who
believe that illegal aliens should be deported and they support
(21:53):
Donald Trump's policies on this poll after polls shows now
in Los Angeles, is that breakdown difference in terms of
fans that attend the games? Not sure, but it would appear,
at least by ICE's account that a characterization of an
encounter that happened to Dodgers' stadium last night was fake
news was not accurate, and the Dodgers claimed that there
(22:14):
were ICE agents showing up at Chabez Ravine in Los
Angeles prior to a Dodgers game at the parking lot,
trying to maybe remove some illegal aliens, and the Dodgers
told them, no, no, you can't do that. ICE is
like this never happened. I don't know what you're talking about.
Who do you believe that's up to you. I think
I have my preference there. But my bigger question again
(22:34):
is why are the Dodgers doing this? Why are they
entering the fray. Why are they tiptoeing through the tulips
and inserting themselves into this debate and again on the
short end of this debate, just to woke virtue signal
of people and how many fans will that turn off?
By and large, staying away from matters like this as
a professional sports franchise is the best move. You want
(22:58):
an inclusive environment. But when you hear that, you think, oh,
that's woke. No no, no, no. What an inclusive environment
meaning is sterile? It is free from these political hang ups.
It is not going to impose any kind of viewpoint
on you. And you can go to a ballgame with
your family and enjoy it and have a good time
like we do at Corsfield here with the Rockies. But
(23:20):
Dodgers apparently they want to matter more and it makes
is not surprising that this would happen in California. But
here's here's the real confusing part about this for me.
We've talked about on the program. In the two thousand
and eight primary on the Democrat side, you had three
prominent members who would all become nominees of the party.
At one point Barack Obama would win that primary in
(23:43):
two thousand and eight, he would be the nominee again
running for reelection as president in twenty twelve. Hillary Clinton
ran in that primary in two thousand and eight, and
she would be the nominee in twenty sixteen and get
upset by Donald Trump. Joe Biden was a candidate in
that primary and would be the nominee in twenty twenty
and win under very controversial circumstances eighty one million votes. Again,
(24:08):
I would always pose this question to your liberal friends
out there, if they still exist. How in the world,
how on God's green Earth did old man senile Joe Biden,
mediocre Joe Biden for all these years? How did he
get eighty one million votes? But three count, not one,
not two? Three quote unquote historical candidates all receive far less.
(24:31):
And Barack Obama, being a historical candidate that won twice,
did not receive eighty one million votes? How How how
did Barack Obama not get to that number? But Joe
Biden did explain that to me. Then you had the
first female nominee for president in Hillary Clinton. Not I
(24:52):
can't stand her, and I know many of you can't either,
but she was historic. She would have been the first
female president she can get. Ay were me that number
of votes eighty one million that Joe Biden allegedly got,
and then Kamala Harris this last time around, all the
same kind of pull of the Democratic machine, the advertising,
the pomp and circumstance, and she was historic on both fronts,
(25:16):
from a racial front like Barack Obama and from a
gender front like Hillary Clinton. She would have been the
first woman of color ever elected president. And yet she
not only didn't get eighty one million votes, but unlike
Barack Obama twice, unlike Hillary Clinton, she didn't even win
the popular vote head to head against Donald Trump. And
yet you would have us believe that while Barack Obama
(25:41):
twice in winning, Hillary Clinton in winning the popular vote,
and Kamala Harris, all three historic candidates, in one way
or another, didn't get not even close to the eighty
one million votes we are told old Joe Biden got. Also,
(26:02):
if Joe Biden got eighty one million in twenty twenty,
where did all those votes go for Kamala Harris? How
did that all fall off? Was Joe Biden that great,
that transformational, that iconic, that unifying, that he would have
garnered more votes than Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris.
(26:25):
Make it make sense, because it doesn't make sense if
you were if you would have told me. Let's say
you go back to two thousand and six, and I
knew who Barack Obama was. He was his hot shot senator.
He gave this great speech to the two thousand and
four convention. I was watching his political assent, so were
many of you. So go back about twenty years or so,
and you asked me, I didn't know who Kamala Harris
(26:48):
was at the time, But you just tell me that
the Democratic Party, this is the key. The Democratic Party
nominee was going to be a black man, a white woman,
or a black woman or a white mant those four
quadrants all covered which one of the four would receive
the most votes. And I could tell you, knowing Joe Biden,
(27:10):
I wouldn't even need to know who Kamala Harris was.
I knew who Hillary Clinton was, even though I wasn't
crazy about Hillary. Joe, I did like Barack Obama. One time.
I had some hope and changing all that stuff, and
then it quickly faded away. But all that to say,
Joe Biden would have finished fourth out of four every
single time. I think for anybody that was of a
(27:31):
sound mind at that time being asked that question, who
would receive the dewest votes? Now, if you were to
ask who would receive the most votes, who in their
right mind would have said, well, I think Joe Biden,
quite frankly, would receive the most votes. That's why this
has never made sense to me. It's never made sense
to me. But this made sense to me. This was
(27:52):
Barack Obama in two thousand and eight. The positions by
the Democratic Party for the working class. We're talking about
illegal immigration, welfare to work programs that Bill Clinton championed
in the nineties. But here's Barack Obama on the issue
of illegal immigration two thousand and eight.
Speaker 3 (28:08):
This administration, the Bush administration, has done nothing to control
the problem.
Speaker 4 (28:13):
That we have.
Speaker 3 (28:14):
We've had five million undocumented workers come over the borders
since George Bush took office. It has become an extraordinary problem.
And the reason the American people are concerned is because
they are seeing their own economic positions slip away, and
oftentimes employers are exploiting these undocumented workers. They're not paying
(28:36):
the minimum wage, they're not observing worker safety laws. As president,
I will make sure that we finally have the kind
of border security that we need. That's step number one.
Step number two is to take on employers. Right now,
an employer has more of a chance of getting hit
by lightning than be prosecuted for.
Speaker 1 (28:56):
Hiring an undocumented worker. Oh, that has to change.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
They have to be held accountable, start shedding some light
on the problem, and we can once again be a
nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. So that's
what I intend to do as President of the United States.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
Literally agree with everything Barack Obama just said there. Remember
when they called him the deporter in chief? I do
what happened? What changed? Where do this all go sideways?
It's a question worth asking. We'll take this time out
and the question we're going to answer is who is
our Friday fool of the Week? Your vote still coming
in five seven to seventy three nine, Your choices are
(29:30):
WHOOPI Goldberg? The comments on the view women in Iran
they don't have it as bad or they have it
equally as bad as black Americans in the United States
twenty twenty five, Really, Governor Kathy Hulkel saying that Hey,
New York taxpayers, you're going to foot the bill for
every illegal alien that needs legal representation because they don't
have it and they need it, and you're going to
pay for it. And then also in addition to those two,
(29:53):
we look also at Tucker Carlson, who, in an exchange
with Ted Cruz, got a got you question, a red herring,
a straw man, whatever you're gonna make of it, Like,
what's the population? Ran? I don't know why you don't
have any business advocating for the elimination of the mallus?
What nice that for?
Speaker 3 (30:09):
You?
Speaker 1 (30:10):
Would come back? Also a sad day in the history
of cheese. That'll be our final story that we cover
here on Ryan Schuling Live on a Friday after this. Oh,
such a fun song on this Friday, but unfortunately not
a fun story to go along with it. Colorado billionaire
(30:32):
James Loprino, once called the Willy Wonka of cheese, has died.
Lived a long, full life and made an impact right
here in our community. One of Colorado's most influential businessman
has died, according to Fox thirty one, here James Jim Loprino,
the chairman of Loprino formerly Loaprino Foods died Thursday. According
(30:53):
to the company, he was born in nineteen thirty seven
right here in Denver, which would make him eighty eight
years old, and he spent his childhood with a tightly
knit family rooted in Denver's Italian community. Laprino was called
a devoted family man in a notification of his death
shared by the company. He shared, so rest in peace
to James Loprino, the Willy Wonka of cheese finishing now
(31:16):
and this is an upset the Friday fool of the
Week I anticipated this is going to be a laydown
loner in the parlance of Uker for those of you
from the Upper Midwest. But from the top rope, may
I introduce to you a first time er. I believe
in our fool of the Week process. WHOOPI Goldberg one
hundred thousand times over. I think has been the winner
(31:36):
in at least a nominee Tucker Carlson for this. How
many people living around?
Speaker 4 (31:40):
By the way, I don't know the population at all. No,
I don't know the population. You don't know the population
of the country you seek to topple. And how many
people living around nine eight two million? Okay, Yeah, how
could you not know that? I don't sit around memorizing
population tables.
Speaker 1 (31:59):
Well, it's irrelevant because you're calling for the overthrow of
the government.
Speaker 4 (32:03):
Why is it relevant whether it's well because ninety million
or eighty million or one hundred million. Why is this
if you don't know anything about the country.
Speaker 1 (32:08):
He didn't say, I don't know anything about Okay, what's
the there's a scene. I think it's Tommy boy or
Chris Farley turns to David Spain as you didn't know that?
And that's kind of a vibe I got there from
Tucker Carlson. Was Senator Ted Cruz in a quizzical exchange
and Tucker Carlson, Wow, our Friday fool of the Week again.
I take no joy in that. Here's some more texts five, seven,
(32:30):
seven to three nine. Ryan, can I throw in a
last minute fool the week? How about Greg that stepped
in for Mandy today? He started off a segment saying
manly instead of Mandy and then finished the segment with
her last name being Connolly. Now, my question would be
is that intentional? Was it done for the sake of comedy?
Because if he committed to the bit and he was
doing it to be funny, that's one thing. But the
(32:52):
way you're presenting it is that he wasn't, which, in
a way, I guess is even funnier. But of course,
you know, like when Saraj Hashmi comes on this program,
I used to fill in for all these other shows,
and when I was on Ross, he would call me Ross.
When I was on Leland, he would call me Leland.
When I was on Mandy, you'd call me Mandy. Still
does that, so you know, it's a bit right. You
commit to the bet and it's funny, But I didn't
hear what you're talking about there, so I'd be interested
(33:15):
to hear the highlights. Gina in Springfield says, whoope's the worst.
The torture that women in that part of the world
go through is despicable. Talking about Iran how darees, she yeah,
thanks for that. Deporter in Chief, Obama didn't do interior
deportations like Clinton. Obama counted caught at the border and
sent back as deportation. Even so, either way, however you
(33:38):
define it, he took pride in it. Right. This is
a point of pride for the Obama administration and telling
the American people that, you know, illegal aliens were not
going to take over our workforce. It was not going
to be tolerated. You were going to be deported. We're
going to protect the wages of hard working Americans. This
was the credo for the Democratic Party as recently as
President Obama. What changed? Why did it change? Why are
(34:00):
they at war against the working class? Is this how
they figure they're gonna win elections? I don't know. I
wish them luck, No, I don't. Christy Burton Brown is
in for Dan Kaplas. I'll talk to you again on Monday.
Thanks for tuning in today. I'm Ryan Schuling Live
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.