February 11, 2025 • 36 mins
Amused, but not amazed, Ryan has some fun with MSNBC's Joy Reid and CNN's Dana Bash losing their marbles over 'Big Balls' and 'Harry Bolz' trolling their very existence in the DOGE auditing of government spending.
John Fabbricatore checks in again on Tom Homan confirming DHS secretary Kristi Noem's assertion that the mole leaking ICE raid operations was within the FBI.
John Fabbricatore checks in again on Tom Homan confirming DHS secretary Kristi Noem's assertion that the mole leaking ICE raid operations was within the FBI.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Take a deep rector and ponder big Balls.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Now the Disruptor in Chief. Elon Musk, who apparently has
adopted the alias at least he changed his social media
handle to Harry Balls, tweeted this morning, democracy in America
is being destroyed by judicial creup. An activist judge is
not a real judge.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
They are broken and they are beyond repair. I believe automatons.
Joy read MSNBC Dana Bash CNN being trolled by the
likes of a gen z who referred to himself in
an online platform as big Balls. Joy read, that's just
a pounder that and then following suit it would seem
(00:45):
Elon Musk, Danna Bash calls him the disruptor in Chief. Good,
fantastic embrace the label. Folks lean into this. Whatever the left,
and I include, of course the mainstream media. But I
repeat myself, whatever they lob at us, just embrace it.
You know, the Orange Man, that's something we've embraced. They
(01:09):
it's teflon. You can use it right back against them.
They don't know how to come after this barrage, this
absolute corn ucopia of executive orders by President Trump. Doze
going into each one of these wasteful government bureaucracies, agencies
finding spending that is absolutely ridiculous and it should be
(01:31):
embarrassing for the left. But they can help themselves. They
are fighting everything tooth and nail. They're trying to be
like Keanu Reeves and the Matrix and stop everything that's
coming their way rather than picking one important battle and
going with that. No, they're gonna die in every hill.
I got to hear this again.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
Take a deep breath for just a moment, okay, and
ponder Big Balls.
Speaker 4 (01:56):
Now.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
The Disruptor and Chief Elon Musk, who has adopted the
alias at least he changed his social media handle to
Harry Balls, tweeted this morning democracy in America is being
destroyed by judicial coup. An activist judge is not a
real judge.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
Well, she's trying to discount the argument with the preface
that you heard right there, Disruptor in Chief that Elon
is calling himself with good self deprecating humor, Harry bulls Bolz.
They don't know how to respond to this. They are
beside themselves with Trump arrangement syndrome. They're outside the Treasury
(02:39):
building then they're trying to go over probably next to
the Department of Education, and then after that it'll be
the second of the Defense Department.
Speaker 1 (02:47):
But how do they square that.
Speaker 3 (02:49):
Circle when the left ostensibly is against defense spending until
recent years, when it's all become part of the same
military industrial complex, the pro war pigs and the so
called hawks. They're left their right, they're part of the establishment.
They're Republicans, some they're Democrats, all because they are beholden
(03:11):
to these interests, this unholy alliance of these three letter agencies.
The funding that has circumvented Congress, that has been appropriated
by the executive branch, and therefore the President of the
United States has every right to limit that type of funding.
Now when the House and Representative Speaker Mike Johnson and
(03:31):
Steve Scalise, when they go back to the drawing board,
and this time is coming up pretty quick for a
new budget. This has all been exposed to the light
of day, sunlight being the best disinfectant. Guatemalan sex change operations,
LGBTQ operas for Third world countries, DEI initiatives in Serbia,
(03:54):
which I still find hilarious as I half served myself.
Nobody wants to spend money on this. The American taxpayers.
First of all, plurality of voters more than voted for
Kamala Harris voted for Donald Trump and support these initiatives.
Even Harry Enton on CNN a truthteller because he turns
(04:17):
a lot of stomachs when he reports simple facts, and
he starts things off this way with a very disengaged
and demoralized CNN anchor asking him questions, and holy smokes.
Speaker 4 (04:30):
I mean, look at what the difference is between now
versus eight years ago during the first Trump term. Right,
this is Trump's net approval rating on February tenth.
Speaker 3 (04:37):
You go back to.
Speaker 4 (04:37):
Twenty seventeen, Trump was already under water at minus five.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
Points from the net approval rating. That's approval minus.
Speaker 4 (04:42):
Systo, what a difference eight years makes. He's on the
positive side of the ledger at plus four points. And again,
it's not just the CBS News poll. We're talking about
the Gallup poll, We're talking about the IPSOS poll, we
are talking about the Pewpole. All of these respective pollsters
have Trump in a better position now than they did
a years ago. The bottom line is Americans are far
more likely to say they like what they're seeing now
(05:05):
versus what they felt during Trump's first term.
Speaker 3 (05:07):
You ask yourself, why is that? Harry gets into the
why right here.
Speaker 2 (05:12):
Is there something that Americans say about why it is
that they like.
Speaker 5 (05:17):
Him now more than they did back in the first term.
Speaker 4 (05:20):
You know, I think one of the things that's so
important for politicians is for folks to believe what they're
saying and that they're keeping their campaign promises. So I
think this gives you a pretty gosh darn good idea
of what may be going on. Trump's doing what he
promised to do. You go back to April of twenty seventeen,
it was just forty six percent of all Americans who
said that Trump was doing what he promised to do.
(05:42):
Compare that now to February of twenty twenty five. You know,
there was a good show that was on during the
nineteen nineties called a Different World.
Speaker 1 (05:50):
That is what's going on right now. We're living in
a different world.
Speaker 3 (05:54):
There was a number baked into the cake coming out
of the shoot in twenty seventeen, a resistance that started
day one of those who had Trump Arrangement syndrome that
were shell shocked that how Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton.
They couldn't believe it, didn't want to believe it, and
we're dug in entrenched in whatever Trump did, we're going
(06:16):
to be against it. And only forty six percent of
Americans said in twenty seventeen that Trump was doing what
he promised to do. Now, I would beg to differ
that number should be much higher. But even the ones
who dislike him now are acknowledging, Look, I didn't vote
for the guy. I don't like him at all, and
I don't even like his policies, but he's doing what
he said he was going to do.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Listen to where that number is now.
Speaker 3 (06:39):
Remember forty six percent in twenty seventeen, Flash forward eight years,
and where is it.
Speaker 4 (06:47):
Seventy percent of Americans say, well, Trump is doing what
he promised to do.
Speaker 1 (06:51):
Again. Compare that to April.
Speaker 4 (06:53):
Of twenty seventeen, when it's just forty six percent. When
Americans are twenty four points more likely to say that
you're doing what you promise to do, it's no wonder
that your net approval rating is much more likely to
be on the positive side of the ledger than on
the negative side. And so far, what we're seeing again
is Americans twenty one days so far versus just eleven
days during his entire first term. That Trump has a
(07:14):
positive net approval rating. Quite a different world. So they
can't stop him. They can't even hope to contain him.
Speaker 3 (07:21):
To paraphrase Dan Patrick and his old ninety Sports Center phrases. There,
they do not have control of the Supreme Court, meaning
the left. The right has that majority by at least
a five to four margin, but six ' three if
John Roberts stays in line and can never predict him.
They don't have control of the Senate. They lost several
swing state seats there, it's fifty three forty seven favor
(07:42):
of the Republicans. They didn't gain enough in the House
to flip the majority position there, so Speaker of the House,
Mike Johnson, they're not going to bring up articles of
impeachment on Trump, at least not while the Republicans are
in charge.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
So the only thing they.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
Have to kind of hang their hats on is these
are these localized judges Obama and Biden appointees, and they
can go judge shopping anywhere in the country and find
a judge that doesn't like what Donald Trump is doing.
As the duly elected President of the United States and
(08:17):
try to put a hold or some kind of restraining order.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
On not spending money.
Speaker 3 (08:25):
Keep in mind the following Democrats, the left, the media,
they were carrying the water for Joe Biden, or the
ghost of Joe Biden, or the puppet master of Joe Biden.
The multiple times that he attempted to circumvent and override
the expressed written opinion of the Supreme Court of the
United States when it came to the so called student
(08:46):
loan forgiveness. He kept trying to usurp that directly, and
that was to take our taxpayer money and spend it
on that endeavor. Donald Trump is trying to prevent the
spending and wasteful spending of taxpayer money bought. A judge
steps in from Rhode Island and says, nope, got to
keep spending money. I a judge, a federal judge in
(09:09):
Rhode Island, can override the duly elected president of the
United States. Kendalanian, who is no friend of the right,
shows up exactly to express this part of it, as
the NBC Justice correspondent.
Speaker 6 (09:25):
Taking us out of the realm of a theoretical discussion
into the practical and the real here you have this
federal judge in Rhode Island saying very explicitly that we
believe you are I believe you're violating my order that
you stop this spending freeze and resume funding to places
like the National Institutes of Health, because I think that's unconstitutional.
(09:46):
And he began his ruling with a quote from a
Supreme Court decision that essentially says those who defy federal
court orders risk criminal contempt.
Speaker 3 (09:56):
In a Supreme Court decision, but where is it written
that a judge in Rhode Island, federal or otherwise, can
step in and put a wall up so the president
of the United States cannot carry out his agenda that
the American people voted on. Delanian details that inconvenient truth
in detail.
Speaker 6 (10:13):
Now, he didn't explicitly threaten the Trump administration with criminal
contempt and the rest of the ruling, but that was
certainly the implication of opening that way, and it raises
a whole host of questions, which is, how does a
judge hold an administration in criminal contempt?
Speaker 1 (10:27):
I mean who he.
Speaker 6 (10:28):
Can't jail the president obviously. In fact, if we remember,
you know, Donald Trump was held in criminal contempt by
the New York judge in his criminal case. But that
doesn't was very reluctant to meet out that ultimate sanction
of jail time. It didn't happen when he was the
ex president. It's not going to happen when he's the president.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
No, it's not. So what do they do? What can
the left do? They're desperate?
Speaker 6 (10:49):
So what are the remedies? I mean, we're gaming this
out yesterday? Can they Are they going to throw some
hapless Justice Department lawyer who happens to be in the
qurtum throw.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
That person in jail? Do they levy finds?
Speaker 6 (10:59):
What would be the point of finding the federal government,
which has unlimited resources.
Speaker 1 (11:03):
So we're really at that point where.
Speaker 6 (11:05):
It's starting to become a practical question not just a
theoretical question.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
Uh.
Speaker 6 (11:10):
And their issue is it's really difficult for the judge
to get the facts when you have a government agency
and you know the planiffs aren't aren't allowed inside, and
you have Elon Musk and as people and they're saying, well,
we are spending the money, and folks are saying, well,
we're not getting the money. So it's a really difficult situation.
Speaker 3 (11:28):
Yes, the plantiffs have no case. They are the members
of Congress that want the wasteful spending to continue, and
President Trump has put a halt on it. Now there
is something that will happen from here. But just one
more This is Scott Jennings CNN clapping back at Gretchen Carlson,
formerly a Fox.
Speaker 2 (11:43):
News You want individual federal judges who hate Donald Trump.
Speaker 7 (11:47):
I don't do tying him up.
Speaker 1 (11:48):
For four years.
Speaker 8 (11:48):
I know.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
If you want a.
Speaker 7 (11:49):
Big policy questions decided, let the Supreme Court do it.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
But in the interim, the executive has to be allowed
to go.
Speaker 1 (11:55):
How do we get to the Supreme Court?
Speaker 7 (11:58):
But you can time.
Speaker 1 (11:59):
Let me get the Supreme Court time. Let me get
to the Supreme Court. By the judge's ruling, things going
to appeal.
Speaker 7 (12:06):
And then it goes in the meantime.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
What happens intermediate In.
Speaker 9 (12:09):
The meantime, you're supposed to comply with the court's rulings.
Speaker 1 (12:12):
Am I wrong about that? You're exactly wrong about that.
Speaker 3 (12:16):
This is the whole point of the politicization of the
justice system is to delay and deny Donald Trump from
his legitimate duties in the executive branches president of the
United States.
Speaker 1 (12:26):
What needs to happen here.
Speaker 3 (12:28):
President Trump obviously is going to appeal this, and while
that's being appealed, No, you don't adhere to the order,
you defy it. And then it gets to the Supreme Court,
and if they lose there, if the Trump administration loses there,
then it is settled. The matter is settled. But you
can't let a lower court commandeer the executive branch just
because they have a politically different opinion. That's all this
(12:52):
is because they are reduced to these kinds of desperation tactics.
They have those, and they have moles and plants from
within their own government bureaucracies, notably the FBI. And hopefully
this will be cleaned up as soon as Cash Fetel
has voted in later this week. But Tom Holman dropped
this bombshell last night on Hannity. Where are these leaks
(13:14):
coming from?
Speaker 8 (13:14):
Well, look where think it's coming from? Inside? And we
know the first week with Aurora is under current investigation.
We think we identify that person under investigation right now.
The California League Secretary Nome, She's correct, some of the
information we're receiving tensive lead toward the FBI. But I
(13:36):
talked to Deputy Turner General all this weekend. They've opened
up the criminal investigation and they have promised that not
only this person will lose their job and lose their pension,
they will go to jail. They won't criminally prosecute. So
we're all over it. We got the DHS IG investigating
the first one. Have a pretty good idea what happened.
Can't share a lot because's under investigation. But the IG's
(13:58):
opened up a criminal investigation. We're on a strong message.
It's just not you know, given the bad guys. It
heads up to the escape apprehension right ar wrestling and
you know given you know uh Venezuela gang heads up,
so we can't arrest them. You're putting officers lives at risk.
It's only a matter of time. We walk into a
place where there's gonna be a bad guy doesn't care.
He's going to be sitting and wait for the officers
(14:19):
show up and ambush them. This is not a game.
So THHS and DOJ are connected to the hip the
oldest people responsible in a criminal fashion.
Speaker 3 (14:27):
We've talked about this point that Tom Homan makes with
John Fabricatory, and he's got some breaking news of his
own to share with us today. But my process of elimination, John,
what I'm gathering here is DHS, headed up by Christy Nome,
is pulling in the same direction as ICE. Certainly DOJ
with Attorney General Pam Bondi heading that up, is pulling
in the same direction as ICE. That leaves the FBI,
(14:49):
and I want you to take us from there and
your experience as an ICE field office director what the
cooperation and coordination is between ICE and the FBI. Let's
just say generically going in on one of these raids.
Speaker 7 (15:03):
Yeah, generically, first off, thanks for having me back on
the show. Awesome every single time. But generically, what normally
happens is it's a good relationship. There's good information back
and forth between the FBI. But the information that I'm
hearing is that there are some FBI agents who do
not want to be doing immigration work. We're against going
(15:23):
out on the street to make immigration arrests. They're pissed
off about it, and those are the ones that are
leaking and it has to stop. The President has given
this order that this is what he wants identified, and
this is what he wants worked on, and apparently some
people don't like that and something has to be done
about it.
Speaker 3 (15:43):
And it seems like this is a root and branch
type thing, unfortunately, John, because I want to believe in
the FBI Again, at one time I did. I viewed
them with great regard as the pre eminent federal enforcement
agency of law in the United States and a tremendous
asset in that regard.
Speaker 1 (15:59):
Is it going to take cash Ptel.
Speaker 3 (16:00):
Being sworn in to head up the FBI and just
go through one by one, every agent at every level
and determining whether or not they are serving up subterfuge
for the current president of the United States.
Speaker 7 (16:14):
Yeah, it's actually gonna take that. And you know, I'm
not ready to totally trash out the FBI yet. I
worked with some great agents over my career who did
some outstanding work protecting the United States. But I believe
a lot of those guys were old school like me,
and you know a lot of the newer agents that
have come on under Obama and under Joe Biden just
(16:36):
we're bred a different way and taught a different way.
And unfortunately that's some of the agents that we're dealing
with again, not all, but it's pervasive enough that it's
a problem. And unfortunately, the problem just isn't in the FBI,
it's throughout the federal government right now. We're seeing it
(16:57):
with a lot of federal employees who are high hired
under certain administrations, who just believe that they deserve a
paycheck no matter what they do, whether it's sitting at home,
you know, and also working for uber at the same
time when they're supposed to be doing their government job
and getting paid and getting these benefits. It's that the
federal government has just become rife with fraud, waste, and abuse.
Speaker 3 (17:19):
John Fabricatory joining us. You can follow him on exit.
John E underscore fab with two bees and some breaking news.
Speaker 1 (17:27):
You can read about it in Westward.
Speaker 3 (17:29):
Former ICE director and MMM fighter MMA fighter leading new
immigration enforcement group. John, what can you tell us about
this new group that you'll be.
Speaker 7 (17:37):
Heading up Well, Safe Colorado. You know what we're trying
to do is we're trying to make Colorado a better
place again. We have to start fighting for Colorado. We
need to make it safer for our children, safer for
our communities. We started up by myself and Steve Monahan
who also ran for CD six before I did, and
basically we're just gonna work with local politicians on trying
(17:58):
to generate and and you know, get laws created that
that actually protect United States citizens, not criminal illegal alliens.
So what we're trying to do is we're trying to
get rid of sanctuary status. We're looking at some bills
right now looking you know, possibly to getting something you know,
voted on in about two years from now. So there
are some different things that we're working on, and you know,
(18:22):
it just needs to be done. We need to look,
Conservatives need to stand up and fight for this state
if we truly want to get it back.
Speaker 3 (18:29):
And what is the name of that organization again, it's
Safe Colorado, Safe Colorado.
Speaker 7 (18:35):
You can go to Safecolorado dot org.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
There it is Safecolorado dot org.
Speaker 3 (18:39):
Two former candidates against Jason Crow in the sixth congressional district.
Monahan's a great guy too, Steve and joining with John
Fabrigatory in this effort, and you can find out more
there at Safecolorado dot org. Follow him on exit John
E Underscore fab with two vs. John Fabrigatory. Always good
catching up with you. We'll definitely keep in touch about
this new operation that you'll be heading up and we'll
(19:01):
see what happens with the ice deportation efforts going forward.
Speaker 7 (19:06):
Thanks lot Rn, I appreciate having you.
Speaker 3 (19:07):
Thanks John Fabricatory right there, your thoughts and reaction to
anything you just heard five seven seven three nine, Please
send those texts along when we come back.
Speaker 1 (19:16):
We have one of President Trump's hot takes.
Speaker 3 (19:18):
We got two really good ones today, and we'll be
back with that and more after this. As Ryan Schuley
Live rolls on, it's time once again for another edition
(19:52):
of Trump's hot takes, churning the forty seventh president's epic
interactions with the fake news media.
Speaker 10 (19:57):
We're going back to plastic sus. These things don't work.
I've had them many times, and on occasion they break,
they explode if something's hot. They don't last very long,
like a matter of minutes, sometimes a matter of seconds.
It's a ridiculous situation. So we're going back to plastic straws.
I think it's okay, And I don't think that plastics
(20:21):
going to affect a shark very much as they're eating,
as they're munching their way through the ocean.
Speaker 3 (20:27):
Okay, He's tackling every issue, even ones that might not
be on the radar.
Speaker 1 (20:35):
Were you thinking about plastic straws paper straws.
Speaker 3 (20:37):
I only think about paper straws when I encounter them,
and they're fraudulent, they're fugaisy, they're phony, they're fake news.
Speaker 1 (20:48):
They don't work, they don't sustain.
Speaker 3 (20:51):
The integrity of the body of the straw is compromised.
And Trump just didn't mention it in this executive order
that he signed, so obviously put the full force of
that behind it. He talked about it with Brett Baer
in an expanded version of the interview that was conducted
prior to the Super Bowl.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
He went to the further detail right here, last thing.
Speaker 6 (21:15):
I mean, you have a lot of things on your
plate that you're going to do, but right now.
Speaker 11 (21:18):
Well, you know one thing I did last night that's right. Well,
really the straw. They gave us a paper straw. It melts,
it's horrible. He started, they should make it in flavors,
because by the time you finish it is so horrible.
I ended, the paper straw. We're going to go back
to plas. That might be a ninety ten issue. It's
about a ninety nine. No one loves these, well, no,
(21:41):
but I thought this was a Biden issue, big Biden issue.
I'm sure Biden really knew. You don't think put things
in front of him and sign whatever they did. I
think you're right at least a ninety percent issue.
Speaker 3 (21:51):
And this is what President Trump had started with, maybe
a ninety ten issue. There, an eighty twenty issue over here,
at least a seventy thirty issue. He has not taken
on a single purely partisan, hard right issue. I don't
believe in these first twenty two days that he's been
in office, he has basically executed what he ran on,
(22:16):
and a lot of that was veering toward the middle
lane that the Democrats abandoned, talking about keeping biological males
out of female sports and spaces. And currently right now
Donald Trump is in the Oval Office along with Elon Musk,
explaining the wasteful spending that DOGE is investigating, and this
(22:38):
argument from the left, let's try it out on all
of our listeners here, maybe even try it on to
your little bit of front.
Speaker 1 (22:44):
So what you're saying, left is that you.
Speaker 3 (22:47):
Want to preserve the wasteful government spending in all of
these agencies for pork barrel projects, for obvious conflicts of
interest where there is a money laundering scheme going on,
either in theory or in direct practice that you support
these left wing agendas hither and yon, and you get
(23:10):
kickbacks in the form of donations and payments to your campaign.
This is why the Department of Education, and my view,
should be disbanded. And Linda McMahon, who is going to
head that up, her job, Donald Trump has said, is
to make it so that her job is no longer
necessary or required.
Speaker 1 (23:29):
To return education to the States.
Speaker 3 (23:31):
Federal funding of education, quite simply, quite plainly, quite directly,
has not worked. Go back to nineteen seventy nine, that
was my kindergarten year, and that is when President Carter
created the Department of Education. Has our performance as American
students gotten better or worse since that time? How many
(23:55):
dollars have been invested poured into public schools across the
nation and where are the results for that? And how
do we hold such a failing government agency accountable for that?
The left is all about creating these government bureaucracies that
are unaccountable directly to voters. And that's exactly what happened
(24:17):
when Elizabeth Warren decided to create this so called consumer
protection Bureau and it goes by another name. But Maxine
Water has really lost her mind over this one, and
it was very hilarious to behold. And my whole stance
is if someone like Maxine Waters is for it, brother,
(24:39):
I'm against it. She calls out Elon Musk yesterday, right here.
Speaker 9 (24:43):
Elon Musk, where are you bring your ass of a
hair so you can say who's here and what we're doing.
We're not afraid of you. We know that you are
the co president now of the Union is st of America.
But ladies and gentlemen, I want you to follow very
(25:05):
closely what he's doing and how he has done it.
Speaker 3 (25:09):
He has done it with the full consent and support
of the President of the United States, who has appointed
him in this role from outside the Beltway, to come
in and give a fresh set of eyes to everything
that's being spent in Washington, every agenda, every pet project,
and to identify objectively what needs to be cut, what
(25:32):
departments need to be cut, what jobs need to be cut,
what wasteful spending needs to be cut, the fraud and
abuse that's taking place, And that's what Elon is explaining
in the Oval Office. So far, let's hear though, mad
maxine out and get her description as to what this
CFPB is and what it does and why it's important.
Speaker 9 (25:52):
First of all, we're here at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau?
Speaker 1 (25:57):
What is it? This is so important? Prior to this.
Speaker 9 (26:03):
Being organized in the did Frank reforms, consumers didn't have
any place to really foul complaints. They didn't have anywhere
to go when the biggest banks in America was ripping
them off, the student loans were being undermined. They didn't
have any place to go. But guess what, the Consumer
(26:25):
Financial Protection Bureau was organized in a way to deal
with people who were the victims of fraud by the
biggest corporations in America.
Speaker 3 (26:38):
Why wasn't that done through an Act of Congress then
creating direct funding voted upon by the House that holds
the purse strings in Washington? Why create this separate shell
company agency, government bureaucracy to handle the protection of consumers?
Speaker 1 (26:57):
Again, Elizabeth Warren, this was her brain show. She came
up with.
Speaker 3 (27:01):
This, the Dodd Frank reforms. That's Christopher Dodd and Barney Frank.
Those are two Democrats.
Speaker 1 (27:08):
And why is it if.
Speaker 3 (27:09):
These are such important departments, agencies programs that everybody should
agree that, you know, we should stay with them and
support them and fund them, and that taxpayers should fervently
offer up their tax.
Speaker 1 (27:24):
Dollars in their aim.
Speaker 3 (27:28):
Why is it only Democrats are yelling and screaming about
this right now? Why isn't there a single Republican going.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
You no, no, no, no.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
That's an important agency. We need to keep the CFPB.
Why is it purely partisan? Because it benefits the partisans
who supported the Democrats who support it. It's their way
of how they make money in Congress through peddling influence.
Why are so many and there's some Republicans in this
category two and they're part of the swamp and they're
part of the establishment. I get that, But the overwhelming
(27:57):
majority of Democrats, be it AOC or Maximum Waters or
Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer or Joe Biden before he
was president. How do they go in there in a
government salary and come out as millionaires? How do we
quantify their wealth and how they got there? How did
that happen? Waters continues with this, and so what.
Speaker 2 (28:20):
Do they do?
Speaker 9 (28:21):
They're holding megabanks accountil both are violating the law. They're
protecting service members from illegal fees, high interest loans and
false advertising, stops discrimination in housing and the US economy
protects students from scams. Why does Elon Musk want to
(28:44):
get rid of all of this? Because he's a thief,
He's a gangster? What he brings his billionaire friends along
with him because they think that they can take over
this country? And what Trump has said, you give me
enough money, you can have it.
Speaker 1 (29:02):
And that's what he has done.
Speaker 9 (29:04):
He has turned over our country to Elon Musk. We
didn't elect him, we didn't select him, we didn't ask
for him, and we don't want him.
Speaker 3 (29:17):
Is Water suggesting that Elon Musk is simply pocketing that
money that it's his to take the government that President
Trump has told him, Hey, you find what you want,
you can take it. Elon Musk is not making a
dime on this endeavor either. Is President Trump? Follow the money?
Who are the people getting rich off these scams and schemes?
(29:38):
Elon Musk is not being paid a dime for what
he's doing that one dime. President Trump is donating his
salary as president to various causes, as he did in
his first term.
Speaker 1 (29:49):
He will do it every month in this term.
Speaker 3 (29:52):
So if Elon Musk is not making any money and
Donald Trump is not making any money, but the Democrats
are up in arms because their spigots being turned off
so they won't make money, who's to blame here?
Speaker 1 (30:03):
Who's at fall? Whose money is it? Anyway?
Speaker 3 (30:07):
Maxine Waters would have you believe that the taxpayers have
entrusted her with it, and it's the Democrats money, it's
Congress is money.
Speaker 1 (30:15):
No, no, no, no, it's our money.
Speaker 3 (30:18):
And who do you personally trust more with your taxpayer
money money that you've earned.
Speaker 1 (30:27):
Taxation is theft in my book anyway.
Speaker 3 (30:28):
But let's just accept the premise that the federal income
tax is legit. I still don't but it's there and
it's a fact of life. So we have to pay taxes.
Who do you trust with the oversight of that money more?
A Congress that has spent us into the ground, that
has racked up a tab that we cannot pay, that
does not balance a budget in its own checkbook, that
(30:52):
has run up deficits both in terms of trade and
spending that cannot be accounted for that tax and spend.
Speaker 1 (30:59):
Liberals can continue to.
Speaker 3 (31:00):
Drive up the price and the cost of doing business
in Washington, wanting to supplement that with higher taxes on everyone,
not just the very wealthy, not just those who don't
pay their fair share of Corney to the left, our
national debt is a disgrace.
Speaker 1 (31:16):
It's skyrockets by the month.
Speaker 3 (31:17):
So are we going to trust the likes of Maxine
Waters in the House and the Senate and Congress with
the spending.
Speaker 1 (31:24):
Of our taxpayer money?
Speaker 3 (31:26):
Or are we going to try it a different way
and have Elon Musk come in and offer his opinion
as a very successful entrepreneur who is made money and
is looking out for this country and its taxpayers to
save us money so that we can spend less money
our money.
Speaker 1 (31:46):
Whose side do you come down on.
Speaker 3 (31:49):
We'll take this break and get to some of those
texts five seven, seven, three nine, rounding out our number
one of Ryan Schuling Live after these.
Speaker 12 (32:00):
Contry bows sticks and big bowles, hes got strings, He's
got big balls.
Speaker 2 (32:13):
Bone, take a deep breath for just a moment and
ponder big balls now. The disruptor in chief Elon Musk,
who apparently has adopted the alias at least he changed
his social media handle to Harry Balls, tweeted this morning
Democracy in America is being destroyed by judicial coup. An
(32:35):
activist judge is not a real judge.
Speaker 3 (32:38):
It's all fun and games till somebody's budget gets cut.
And that's what we're looking to do, and that's what
we elected Donald Trump to do, and that's what we
support Elon Musk doing. Every poll they take, it doesn't
matter the outlet, whether it's CBS News or you have
some of the other ones out there that have been
around for a very long time that are charting this
(33:02):
opinion poll. And the American people support the efforts of Doge.
Speaker 1 (33:08):
They just do. And the Democrats might not like it
in the mainstream media might not like it.
Speaker 5 (33:13):
We like it.
Speaker 3 (33:15):
And right now Elon Musk joining Donald Trump at an
executive order signing event. There is bigger news too on
the horizon. American school teacher Mark Fogel has been released
by RUSH after more than three years in custody following
an arrest for medical marijuana possession. Umber Britney Griner, the
women's basketball player who had I think a vight pen
(33:36):
or something with marijuana in it and she was being detained.
It would have been held for like ten years, and
Joe Biden made a train of the Merchant of Death.
I believe he was known as traded him to Russia
for Britney Griner. Worst trade ever. But welcome home, Brittany,
and I'm glad that she's home. But this one a
part of an agreement between Washington and Moscow, the US
(33:59):
saying it came about as a result of negotiations to
end the war in Ukraine. So this could be a
very positive sign. The White House saying this afternoon that
Fogel was leaving Russian airspace with President Trump's Special Envoy
to the Middle East, Steve Whitcoff, and we'd be back
on American soil by the end of the day. In
a statement announcing Fogel's release, the White House said the
(34:20):
exchange quote serves as a show of good faith from
the Russians and a sign we are moving in the
right direction to end the brutal and terrible war in Ukraine.
This is a good gesture of faith by the Russians,
and I believe that the Trump administration continues to actively
work behind the scenes on a cessation plan.
Speaker 1 (34:39):
For the war itself.
Speaker 3 (34:41):
Donald Trump talked about this with Brett bhar in the
interview before the Super Bowl, And this is why we
elected him too. We're tired of getting ripped off, taken
advantage of, taken for granted, we poured about three hundred
billion dollars into Ukraine, so what does Trump want in return?
Speaker 1 (34:58):
He wants something, and he's going to get some thing Ukraine.
Speaker 6 (35:01):
Though you think you can get a deal, do you
keep sending American weapons until you do.
Speaker 11 (35:05):
What I'm saying is the following. They have tremendously valuable
land in terms of rare earth, in terms of oil
and gas, in terms of other things.
Speaker 7 (35:15):
I want to have our.
Speaker 11 (35:15):
Money secured because we're spending.
Speaker 5 (35:18):
Hundreds of billions of dollars and you know, they may
make a deal, they may not make a deal. They
may be Russian someday, or they may not be Russian someday.
But we're going to have all this money in there,
and I say I want it back. And I told
them that I want the equivalent like five.
Speaker 11 (35:35):
Hundred billion dollars worth of rare earth, and they've essentially
agreed to do that. So at least we don't feel stupid.
Otherwise we're stupid. I said to them, we have to
get something. We can't continue to pay this money.
Speaker 1 (35:50):
I like how you set that up to They may
be Russian. Someday they may not be.
Speaker 3 (35:54):
It might be up to them and whether or not
they're willing to give us these rare earth minerals. Absolutely
and holds Zelenski over a barrel on this. He's been
living high on the hog ever since Biden was sworn in,
and those days are done, and he has to know
that Putin gives up this teacher. We're very excited to
report Mark Fogel is coming home and Donald Trump said
(36:14):
he'd be in the White House tonight. We'll get to
your texts reacting to all this five seven seven three
nine when we come back. We're also going to get
local with Representative Lauren Bobert, part of a hearing that
yielded some very unnerving details, shall we say, to put
it mildly. She'll be joining Dan Caples a little bit
later on, and also George Brockler covering two separate shootings
(36:38):
at the same venue over the weekend. He'll appear with
Dan Caples. We'll have that story for him when we
come back after this
Take a deep rector and ponder big Balls.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Now the Disruptor in Chief. Elon Musk, who apparently has
adopted the alias at least he changed his social media
handle to Harry Balls, tweeted this morning, democracy in America
is being destroyed by judicial creup. An activist judge is
not a real judge.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
They are broken and they are beyond repair. I believe automatons.
Joy read MSNBC Dana Bash CNN being trolled by the
likes of a gen z who referred to himself in
an online platform as big Balls. Joy read, that's just
a pounder that and then following suit it would seem
(00:45):
Elon Musk, Danna Bash calls him the disruptor in Chief. Good,
fantastic embrace the label. Folks lean into this. Whatever the left,
and I include, of course the mainstream media. But I
repeat myself, whatever they lob at us, just embrace it.
You know, the Orange Man, that's something we've embraced. They
(01:09):
it's teflon. You can use it right back against them.
They don't know how to come after this barrage, this
absolute corn ucopia of executive orders by President Trump. Doze
going into each one of these wasteful government bureaucracies, agencies
finding spending that is absolutely ridiculous and it should be
(01:31):
embarrassing for the left. But they can help themselves. They
are fighting everything tooth and nail. They're trying to be
like Keanu Reeves and the Matrix and stop everything that's
coming their way rather than picking one important battle and
going with that. No, they're gonna die in every hill.
I got to hear this again.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
Take a deep breath for just a moment, okay, and
ponder Big Balls.
Speaker 4 (01:56):
Now.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
The Disruptor and Chief Elon Musk, who has adopted the
alias at least he changed his social media handle to
Harry Balls, tweeted this morning democracy in America is being
destroyed by judicial coup. An activist judge is not a
real judge.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
Well, she's trying to discount the argument with the preface
that you heard right there, Disruptor in Chief that Elon
is calling himself with good self deprecating humor, Harry bulls Bolz.
They don't know how to respond to this. They are
beside themselves with Trump arrangement syndrome. They're outside the Treasury
(02:39):
building then they're trying to go over probably next to
the Department of Education, and then after that it'll be
the second of the Defense Department.
Speaker 1 (02:47):
But how do they square that.
Speaker 3 (02:49):
Circle when the left ostensibly is against defense spending until
recent years, when it's all become part of the same
military industrial complex, the pro war pigs and the so
called hawks. They're left their right, they're part of the establishment.
They're Republicans, some they're Democrats, all because they are beholden
(03:11):
to these interests, this unholy alliance of these three letter agencies.
The funding that has circumvented Congress, that has been appropriated
by the executive branch, and therefore the President of the
United States has every right to limit that type of funding.
Now when the House and Representative Speaker Mike Johnson and
(03:31):
Steve Scalise, when they go back to the drawing board,
and this time is coming up pretty quick for a
new budget. This has all been exposed to the light
of day, sunlight being the best disinfectant. Guatemalan sex change operations,
LGBTQ operas for Third world countries, DEI initiatives in Serbia,
(03:54):
which I still find hilarious as I half served myself.
Nobody wants to spend money on this. The American taxpayers.
First of all, plurality of voters more than voted for
Kamala Harris voted for Donald Trump and support these initiatives.
Even Harry Enton on CNN a truthteller because he turns
(04:17):
a lot of stomachs when he reports simple facts, and
he starts things off this way with a very disengaged
and demoralized CNN anchor asking him questions, and holy smokes.
Speaker 4 (04:30):
I mean, look at what the difference is between now
versus eight years ago during the first Trump term. Right,
this is Trump's net approval rating on February tenth.
Speaker 3 (04:37):
You go back to.
Speaker 4 (04:37):
Twenty seventeen, Trump was already under water at minus five.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
Points from the net approval rating. That's approval minus.
Speaker 4 (04:42):
Systo, what a difference eight years makes. He's on the
positive side of the ledger at plus four points. And again,
it's not just the CBS News poll. We're talking about
the Gallup poll, We're talking about the IPSOS poll, we
are talking about the Pewpole. All of these respective pollsters
have Trump in a better position now than they did
a years ago. The bottom line is Americans are far
more likely to say they like what they're seeing now
(05:05):
versus what they felt during Trump's first term.
Speaker 3 (05:07):
You ask yourself, why is that? Harry gets into the
why right here.
Speaker 2 (05:12):
Is there something that Americans say about why it is
that they like.
Speaker 5 (05:17):
Him now more than they did back in the first term.
Speaker 4 (05:20):
You know, I think one of the things that's so
important for politicians is for folks to believe what they're
saying and that they're keeping their campaign promises. So I
think this gives you a pretty gosh darn good idea
of what may be going on. Trump's doing what he
promised to do. You go back to April of twenty seventeen,
it was just forty six percent of all Americans who
said that Trump was doing what he promised to do.
(05:42):
Compare that now to February of twenty twenty five. You know,
there was a good show that was on during the
nineteen nineties called a Different World.
Speaker 1 (05:50):
That is what's going on right now. We're living in
a different world.
Speaker 3 (05:54):
There was a number baked into the cake coming out
of the shoot in twenty seventeen, a resistance that started
day one of those who had Trump Arrangement syndrome that
were shell shocked that how Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton.
They couldn't believe it, didn't want to believe it, and
we're dug in entrenched in whatever Trump did, we're going
(06:16):
to be against it. And only forty six percent of
Americans said in twenty seventeen that Trump was doing what
he promised to do. Now, I would beg to differ
that number should be much higher. But even the ones
who dislike him now are acknowledging, Look, I didn't vote
for the guy. I don't like him at all, and
I don't even like his policies, but he's doing what
he said he was going to do.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Listen to where that number is now.
Speaker 3 (06:39):
Remember forty six percent in twenty seventeen, Flash forward eight years,
and where is it.
Speaker 4 (06:47):
Seventy percent of Americans say, well, Trump is doing what
he promised to do.
Speaker 1 (06:51):
Again. Compare that to April.
Speaker 4 (06:53):
Of twenty seventeen, when it's just forty six percent. When
Americans are twenty four points more likely to say that
you're doing what you promise to do, it's no wonder
that your net approval rating is much more likely to
be on the positive side of the ledger than on
the negative side. And so far, what we're seeing again
is Americans twenty one days so far versus just eleven
days during his entire first term. That Trump has a
(07:14):
positive net approval rating. Quite a different world. So they
can't stop him. They can't even hope to contain him.
Speaker 3 (07:21):
To paraphrase Dan Patrick and his old ninety Sports Center phrases. There,
they do not have control of the Supreme Court, meaning
the left. The right has that majority by at least
a five to four margin, but six ' three if
John Roberts stays in line and can never predict him.
They don't have control of the Senate. They lost several
swing state seats there, it's fifty three forty seven favor
(07:42):
of the Republicans. They didn't gain enough in the House
to flip the majority position there, so Speaker of the House,
Mike Johnson, they're not going to bring up articles of
impeachment on Trump, at least not while the Republicans are
in charge.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
So the only thing they.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
Have to kind of hang their hats on is these
are these localized judges Obama and Biden appointees, and they
can go judge shopping anywhere in the country and find
a judge that doesn't like what Donald Trump is doing.
As the duly elected President of the United States and
(08:17):
try to put a hold or some kind of restraining order.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
On not spending money.
Speaker 3 (08:25):
Keep in mind the following Democrats, the left, the media,
they were carrying the water for Joe Biden, or the
ghost of Joe Biden, or the puppet master of Joe Biden.
The multiple times that he attempted to circumvent and override
the expressed written opinion of the Supreme Court of the
United States when it came to the so called student
(08:46):
loan forgiveness. He kept trying to usurp that directly, and
that was to take our taxpayer money and spend it
on that endeavor. Donald Trump is trying to prevent the
spending and wasteful spending of taxpayer money bought. A judge
steps in from Rhode Island and says, nope, got to
keep spending money. I a judge, a federal judge in
(09:09):
Rhode Island, can override the duly elected president of the
United States. Kendalanian, who is no friend of the right,
shows up exactly to express this part of it, as
the NBC Justice correspondent.
Speaker 6 (09:25):
Taking us out of the realm of a theoretical discussion
into the practical and the real here you have this
federal judge in Rhode Island saying very explicitly that we
believe you are I believe you're violating my order that
you stop this spending freeze and resume funding to places
like the National Institutes of Health, because I think that's unconstitutional.
(09:46):
And he began his ruling with a quote from a
Supreme Court decision that essentially says those who defy federal
court orders risk criminal contempt.
Speaker 3 (09:56):
In a Supreme Court decision, but where is it written
that a judge in Rhode Island, federal or otherwise, can
step in and put a wall up so the president
of the United States cannot carry out his agenda that
the American people voted on. Delanian details that inconvenient truth
in detail.
Speaker 6 (10:13):
Now, he didn't explicitly threaten the Trump administration with criminal
contempt and the rest of the ruling, but that was
certainly the implication of opening that way, and it raises
a whole host of questions, which is, how does a
judge hold an administration in criminal contempt?
Speaker 1 (10:27):
I mean who he.
Speaker 6 (10:28):
Can't jail the president obviously. In fact, if we remember,
you know, Donald Trump was held in criminal contempt by
the New York judge in his criminal case. But that
doesn't was very reluctant to meet out that ultimate sanction
of jail time. It didn't happen when he was the
ex president. It's not going to happen when he's the president.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
No, it's not. So what do they do? What can
the left do? They're desperate?
Speaker 6 (10:49):
So what are the remedies? I mean, we're gaming this
out yesterday? Can they Are they going to throw some
hapless Justice Department lawyer who happens to be in the
qurtum throw.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
That person in jail? Do they levy finds?
Speaker 6 (10:59):
What would be the point of finding the federal government,
which has unlimited resources.
Speaker 1 (11:03):
So we're really at that point where.
Speaker 6 (11:05):
It's starting to become a practical question not just a
theoretical question.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
Uh.
Speaker 6 (11:10):
And their issue is it's really difficult for the judge
to get the facts when you have a government agency
and you know the planiffs aren't aren't allowed inside, and
you have Elon Musk and as people and they're saying, well,
we are spending the money, and folks are saying, well,
we're not getting the money. So it's a really difficult situation.
Speaker 3 (11:28):
Yes, the plantiffs have no case. They are the members
of Congress that want the wasteful spending to continue, and
President Trump has put a halt on it. Now there
is something that will happen from here. But just one
more This is Scott Jennings CNN clapping back at Gretchen Carlson,
formerly a Fox.
Speaker 2 (11:43):
News You want individual federal judges who hate Donald Trump.
Speaker 7 (11:47):
I don't do tying him up.
Speaker 1 (11:48):
For four years.
Speaker 8 (11:48):
I know.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
If you want a.
Speaker 7 (11:49):
Big policy questions decided, let the Supreme Court do it.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
But in the interim, the executive has to be allowed
to go.
Speaker 1 (11:55):
How do we get to the Supreme Court?
Speaker 7 (11:58):
But you can time.
Speaker 1 (11:59):
Let me get the Supreme Court time. Let me get
to the Supreme Court. By the judge's ruling, things going
to appeal.
Speaker 7 (12:06):
And then it goes in the meantime.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
What happens intermediate In.
Speaker 9 (12:09):
The meantime, you're supposed to comply with the court's rulings.
Speaker 1 (12:12):
Am I wrong about that? You're exactly wrong about that.
Speaker 3 (12:16):
This is the whole point of the politicization of the
justice system is to delay and deny Donald Trump from
his legitimate duties in the executive branches president of the
United States.
Speaker 1 (12:26):
What needs to happen here.
Speaker 3 (12:28):
President Trump obviously is going to appeal this, and while
that's being appealed, No, you don't adhere to the order,
you defy it. And then it gets to the Supreme Court,
and if they lose there, if the Trump administration loses there,
then it is settled. The matter is settled. But you
can't let a lower court commandeer the executive branch just
because they have a politically different opinion. That's all this
(12:52):
is because they are reduced to these kinds of desperation tactics.
They have those, and they have moles and plants from
within their own government bureaucracies, notably the FBI. And hopefully
this will be cleaned up as soon as Cash Fetel
has voted in later this week. But Tom Holman dropped
this bombshell last night on Hannity. Where are these leaks
(13:14):
coming from?
Speaker 8 (13:14):
Well, look where think it's coming from? Inside? And we
know the first week with Aurora is under current investigation.
We think we identify that person under investigation right now.
The California League Secretary Nome, She's correct, some of the
information we're receiving tensive lead toward the FBI. But I
(13:36):
talked to Deputy Turner General all this weekend. They've opened
up the criminal investigation and they have promised that not
only this person will lose their job and lose their pension,
they will go to jail. They won't criminally prosecute. So
we're all over it. We got the DHS IG investigating
the first one. Have a pretty good idea what happened.
Can't share a lot because's under investigation. But the IG's
(13:58):
opened up a criminal investigation. We're on a strong message.
It's just not you know, given the bad guys. It
heads up to the escape apprehension right ar wrestling and
you know given you know uh Venezuela gang heads up,
so we can't arrest them. You're putting officers lives at risk.
It's only a matter of time. We walk into a
place where there's gonna be a bad guy doesn't care.
He's going to be sitting and wait for the officers
(14:19):
show up and ambush them. This is not a game.
So THHS and DOJ are connected to the hip the
oldest people responsible in a criminal fashion.
Speaker 3 (14:27):
We've talked about this point that Tom Homan makes with
John Fabricatory, and he's got some breaking news of his
own to share with us today. But my process of elimination, John,
what I'm gathering here is DHS, headed up by Christy Nome,
is pulling in the same direction as ICE. Certainly DOJ
with Attorney General Pam Bondi heading that up, is pulling
in the same direction as ICE. That leaves the FBI,
(14:49):
and I want you to take us from there and
your experience as an ICE field office director what the
cooperation and coordination is between ICE and the FBI. Let's
just say generically going in on one of these raids.
Speaker 7 (15:03):
Yeah, generically, first off, thanks for having me back on
the show. Awesome every single time. But generically, what normally
happens is it's a good relationship. There's good information back
and forth between the FBI. But the information that I'm
hearing is that there are some FBI agents who do
not want to be doing immigration work. We're against going
(15:23):
out on the street to make immigration arrests. They're pissed
off about it, and those are the ones that are
leaking and it has to stop. The President has given
this order that this is what he wants identified, and
this is what he wants worked on, and apparently some
people don't like that and something has to be done
about it.
Speaker 3 (15:43):
And it seems like this is a root and branch
type thing, unfortunately, John, because I want to believe in
the FBI Again, at one time I did. I viewed
them with great regard as the pre eminent federal enforcement
agency of law in the United States and a tremendous
asset in that regard.
Speaker 1 (15:59):
Is it going to take cash Ptel.
Speaker 3 (16:00):
Being sworn in to head up the FBI and just
go through one by one, every agent at every level
and determining whether or not they are serving up subterfuge
for the current president of the United States.
Speaker 7 (16:14):
Yeah, it's actually gonna take that. And you know, I'm
not ready to totally trash out the FBI yet. I
worked with some great agents over my career who did
some outstanding work protecting the United States. But I believe
a lot of those guys were old school like me,
and you know a lot of the newer agents that
have come on under Obama and under Joe Biden just
(16:36):
we're bred a different way and taught a different way.
And unfortunately that's some of the agents that we're dealing
with again, not all, but it's pervasive enough that it's
a problem. And unfortunately, the problem just isn't in the FBI,
it's throughout the federal government right now. We're seeing it
(16:57):
with a lot of federal employees who are high hired
under certain administrations, who just believe that they deserve a
paycheck no matter what they do, whether it's sitting at home,
you know, and also working for uber at the same
time when they're supposed to be doing their government job
and getting paid and getting these benefits. It's that the
federal government has just become rife with fraud, waste, and abuse.
Speaker 3 (17:19):
John Fabricatory joining us. You can follow him on exit.
John E underscore fab with two bees and some breaking news.
Speaker 1 (17:27):
You can read about it in Westward.
Speaker 3 (17:29):
Former ICE director and MMM fighter MMA fighter leading new
immigration enforcement group. John, what can you tell us about
this new group that you'll be.
Speaker 7 (17:37):
Heading up Well, Safe Colorado. You know what we're trying
to do is we're trying to make Colorado a better
place again. We have to start fighting for Colorado. We
need to make it safer for our children, safer for
our communities. We started up by myself and Steve Monahan
who also ran for CD six before I did, and
basically we're just gonna work with local politicians on trying
(17:58):
to generate and and you know, get laws created that
that actually protect United States citizens, not criminal illegal alliens.
So what we're trying to do is we're trying to
get rid of sanctuary status. We're looking at some bills
right now looking you know, possibly to getting something you know,
voted on in about two years from now. So there
are some different things that we're working on, and you know,
(18:22):
it just needs to be done. We need to look,
Conservatives need to stand up and fight for this state
if we truly want to get it back.
Speaker 3 (18:29):
And what is the name of that organization again, it's
Safe Colorado, Safe Colorado.
Speaker 7 (18:35):
You can go to Safecolorado dot org.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
There it is Safecolorado dot org.
Speaker 3 (18:39):
Two former candidates against Jason Crow in the sixth congressional district.
Monahan's a great guy too, Steve and joining with John
Fabrigatory in this effort, and you can find out more
there at Safecolorado dot org. Follow him on exit John
E Underscore fab with two vs. John Fabrigatory. Always good
catching up with you. We'll definitely keep in touch about
this new operation that you'll be heading up and we'll
(19:01):
see what happens with the ice deportation efforts going forward.
Speaker 7 (19:06):
Thanks lot Rn, I appreciate having you.
Speaker 3 (19:07):
Thanks John Fabricatory right there, your thoughts and reaction to
anything you just heard five seven seven three nine, Please
send those texts along when we come back.
Speaker 1 (19:16):
We have one of President Trump's hot takes.
Speaker 3 (19:18):
We got two really good ones today, and we'll be
back with that and more after this. As Ryan Schuley
Live rolls on, it's time once again for another edition
(19:52):
of Trump's hot takes, churning the forty seventh president's epic
interactions with the fake news media.
Speaker 10 (19:57):
We're going back to plastic sus. These things don't work.
I've had them many times, and on occasion they break,
they explode if something's hot. They don't last very long,
like a matter of minutes, sometimes a matter of seconds.
It's a ridiculous situation. So we're going back to plastic straws.
I think it's okay, And I don't think that plastics
(20:21):
going to affect a shark very much as they're eating,
as they're munching their way through the ocean.
Speaker 3 (20:27):
Okay, He's tackling every issue, even ones that might not
be on the radar.
Speaker 1 (20:35):
Were you thinking about plastic straws paper straws.
Speaker 3 (20:37):
I only think about paper straws when I encounter them,
and they're fraudulent, they're fugaisy, they're phony, they're fake news.
Speaker 1 (20:48):
They don't work, they don't sustain.
Speaker 3 (20:51):
The integrity of the body of the straw is compromised.
And Trump just didn't mention it in this executive order
that he signed, so obviously put the full force of
that behind it. He talked about it with Brett Baer
in an expanded version of the interview that was conducted
prior to the Super Bowl.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
He went to the further detail right here, last thing.
Speaker 6 (21:15):
I mean, you have a lot of things on your
plate that you're going to do, but right now.
Speaker 11 (21:18):
Well, you know one thing I did last night that's right. Well,
really the straw. They gave us a paper straw. It melts,
it's horrible. He started, they should make it in flavors,
because by the time you finish it is so horrible.
I ended, the paper straw. We're going to go back
to plas. That might be a ninety ten issue. It's
about a ninety nine. No one loves these, well, no,
(21:41):
but I thought this was a Biden issue, big Biden issue.
I'm sure Biden really knew. You don't think put things
in front of him and sign whatever they did. I
think you're right at least a ninety percent issue.
Speaker 3 (21:51):
And this is what President Trump had started with, maybe
a ninety ten issue. There, an eighty twenty issue over here,
at least a seventy thirty issue. He has not taken
on a single purely partisan, hard right issue. I don't
believe in these first twenty two days that he's been
in office, he has basically executed what he ran on,
(22:16):
and a lot of that was veering toward the middle
lane that the Democrats abandoned, talking about keeping biological males
out of female sports and spaces. And currently right now
Donald Trump is in the Oval Office along with Elon Musk,
explaining the wasteful spending that DOGE is investigating, and this
(22:38):
argument from the left, let's try it out on all
of our listeners here, maybe even try it on to
your little bit of front.
Speaker 1 (22:44):
So what you're saying, left is that you.
Speaker 3 (22:47):
Want to preserve the wasteful government spending in all of
these agencies for pork barrel projects, for obvious conflicts of
interest where there is a money laundering scheme going on,
either in theory or in direct practice that you support
these left wing agendas hither and yon, and you get
(23:10):
kickbacks in the form of donations and payments to your campaign.
This is why the Department of Education, and my view,
should be disbanded. And Linda McMahon, who is going to
head that up, her job, Donald Trump has said, is
to make it so that her job is no longer
necessary or required.
Speaker 1 (23:29):
To return education to the States.
Speaker 3 (23:31):
Federal funding of education, quite simply, quite plainly, quite directly,
has not worked. Go back to nineteen seventy nine, that
was my kindergarten year, and that is when President Carter
created the Department of Education. Has our performance as American
students gotten better or worse since that time? How many
(23:55):
dollars have been invested poured into public schools across the
nation and where are the results for that? And how
do we hold such a failing government agency accountable for that?
The left is all about creating these government bureaucracies that
are unaccountable directly to voters. And that's exactly what happened
(24:17):
when Elizabeth Warren decided to create this so called consumer
protection Bureau and it goes by another name. But Maxine
Water has really lost her mind over this one, and
it was very hilarious to behold. And my whole stance
is if someone like Maxine Waters is for it, brother,
(24:39):
I'm against it. She calls out Elon Musk yesterday, right here.
Speaker 9 (24:43):
Elon Musk, where are you bring your ass of a
hair so you can say who's here and what we're doing.
We're not afraid of you. We know that you are
the co president now of the Union is st of America.
But ladies and gentlemen, I want you to follow very
(25:05):
closely what he's doing and how he has done it.
Speaker 3 (25:09):
He has done it with the full consent and support
of the President of the United States, who has appointed
him in this role from outside the Beltway, to come
in and give a fresh set of eyes to everything
that's being spent in Washington, every agenda, every pet project,
and to identify objectively what needs to be cut, what
(25:32):
departments need to be cut, what jobs need to be cut,
what wasteful spending needs to be cut, the fraud and
abuse that's taking place, And that's what Elon is explaining
in the Oval Office. So far, let's hear though, mad
maxine out and get her description as to what this
CFPB is and what it does and why it's important.
Speaker 9 (25:52):
First of all, we're here at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau?
Speaker 1 (25:57):
What is it? This is so important? Prior to this.
Speaker 9 (26:03):
Being organized in the did Frank reforms, consumers didn't have
any place to really foul complaints. They didn't have anywhere
to go when the biggest banks in America was ripping
them off, the student loans were being undermined. They didn't
have any place to go. But guess what, the Consumer
(26:25):
Financial Protection Bureau was organized in a way to deal
with people who were the victims of fraud by the
biggest corporations in America.
Speaker 3 (26:38):
Why wasn't that done through an Act of Congress then
creating direct funding voted upon by the House that holds
the purse strings in Washington? Why create this separate shell
company agency, government bureaucracy to handle the protection of consumers?
Speaker 1 (26:57):
Again, Elizabeth Warren, this was her brain show. She came
up with.
Speaker 3 (27:01):
This, the Dodd Frank reforms. That's Christopher Dodd and Barney Frank.
Those are two Democrats.
Speaker 1 (27:08):
And why is it if.
Speaker 3 (27:09):
These are such important departments, agencies programs that everybody should
agree that, you know, we should stay with them and
support them and fund them, and that taxpayers should fervently
offer up their tax.
Speaker 1 (27:24):
Dollars in their aim.
Speaker 3 (27:28):
Why is it only Democrats are yelling and screaming about
this right now? Why isn't there a single Republican going.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
You no, no, no, no.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
That's an important agency. We need to keep the CFPB.
Why is it purely partisan? Because it benefits the partisans
who supported the Democrats who support it. It's their way
of how they make money in Congress through peddling influence.
Why are so many and there's some Republicans in this
category two and they're part of the swamp and they're
part of the establishment. I get that, But the overwhelming
(27:57):
majority of Democrats, be it AOC or Maximum Waters or
Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer or Joe Biden before he
was president. How do they go in there in a
government salary and come out as millionaires? How do we
quantify their wealth and how they got there? How did
that happen? Waters continues with this, and so what.
Speaker 2 (28:20):
Do they do?
Speaker 9 (28:21):
They're holding megabanks accountil both are violating the law. They're
protecting service members from illegal fees, high interest loans and
false advertising, stops discrimination in housing and the US economy
protects students from scams. Why does Elon Musk want to
(28:44):
get rid of all of this? Because he's a thief,
He's a gangster? What he brings his billionaire friends along
with him because they think that they can take over
this country? And what Trump has said, you give me
enough money, you can have it.
Speaker 1 (29:02):
And that's what he has done.
Speaker 9 (29:04):
He has turned over our country to Elon Musk. We
didn't elect him, we didn't select him, we didn't ask
for him, and we don't want him.
Speaker 3 (29:17):
Is Water suggesting that Elon Musk is simply pocketing that
money that it's his to take the government that President
Trump has told him, Hey, you find what you want,
you can take it. Elon Musk is not making a
dime on this endeavor either. Is President Trump? Follow the money?
Who are the people getting rich off these scams and schemes?
(29:38):
Elon Musk is not being paid a dime for what
he's doing that one dime. President Trump is donating his
salary as president to various causes, as he did in
his first term.
Speaker 1 (29:49):
He will do it every month in this term.
Speaker 3 (29:52):
So if Elon Musk is not making any money and
Donald Trump is not making any money, but the Democrats
are up in arms because their spigots being turned off
so they won't make money, who's to blame here?
Speaker 1 (30:03):
Who's at fall? Whose money is it? Anyway?
Speaker 3 (30:07):
Maxine Waters would have you believe that the taxpayers have
entrusted her with it, and it's the Democrats money, it's
Congress is money.
Speaker 1 (30:15):
No, no, no, no, it's our money.
Speaker 3 (30:18):
And who do you personally trust more with your taxpayer
money money that you've earned.
Speaker 1 (30:27):
Taxation is theft in my book anyway.
Speaker 3 (30:28):
But let's just accept the premise that the federal income
tax is legit. I still don't but it's there and
it's a fact of life. So we have to pay taxes.
Who do you trust with the oversight of that money more?
A Congress that has spent us into the ground, that
has racked up a tab that we cannot pay, that
does not balance a budget in its own checkbook, that
(30:52):
has run up deficits both in terms of trade and
spending that cannot be accounted for that tax and spend.
Speaker 1 (30:59):
Liberals can continue to.
Speaker 3 (31:00):
Drive up the price and the cost of doing business
in Washington, wanting to supplement that with higher taxes on everyone,
not just the very wealthy, not just those who don't
pay their fair share of Corney to the left, our
national debt is a disgrace.
Speaker 1 (31:16):
It's skyrockets by the month.
Speaker 3 (31:17):
So are we going to trust the likes of Maxine
Waters in the House and the Senate and Congress with
the spending.
Speaker 1 (31:24):
Of our taxpayer money?
Speaker 3 (31:26):
Or are we going to try it a different way
and have Elon Musk come in and offer his opinion
as a very successful entrepreneur who is made money and
is looking out for this country and its taxpayers to
save us money so that we can spend less money
our money.
Speaker 1 (31:46):
Whose side do you come down on.
Speaker 3 (31:49):
We'll take this break and get to some of those
texts five seven, seven, three nine, rounding out our number
one of Ryan Schuling Live after these.
Speaker 12 (32:00):
Contry bows sticks and big bowles, hes got strings, He's
got big balls.
Speaker 2 (32:13):
Bone, take a deep breath for just a moment and
ponder big balls now. The disruptor in chief Elon Musk,
who apparently has adopted the alias at least he changed
his social media handle to Harry Balls, tweeted this morning
Democracy in America is being destroyed by judicial coup. An
(32:35):
activist judge is not a real judge.
Speaker 3 (32:38):
It's all fun and games till somebody's budget gets cut.
And that's what we're looking to do, and that's what
we elected Donald Trump to do, and that's what we
support Elon Musk doing. Every poll they take, it doesn't
matter the outlet, whether it's CBS News or you have
some of the other ones out there that have been
around for a very long time that are charting this
(33:02):
opinion poll. And the American people support the efforts of Doge.
Speaker 1 (33:08):
They just do. And the Democrats might not like it
in the mainstream media might not like it.
Speaker 5 (33:13):
We like it.
Speaker 3 (33:15):
And right now Elon Musk joining Donald Trump at an
executive order signing event. There is bigger news too on
the horizon. American school teacher Mark Fogel has been released
by RUSH after more than three years in custody following
an arrest for medical marijuana possession. Umber Britney Griner, the
women's basketball player who had I think a vight pen
(33:36):
or something with marijuana in it and she was being detained.
It would have been held for like ten years, and
Joe Biden made a train of the Merchant of Death.
I believe he was known as traded him to Russia
for Britney Griner. Worst trade ever. But welcome home, Brittany,
and I'm glad that she's home. But this one a
part of an agreement between Washington and Moscow, the US
(33:59):
saying it came about as a result of negotiations to
end the war in Ukraine. So this could be a
very positive sign. The White House saying this afternoon that
Fogel was leaving Russian airspace with President Trump's Special Envoy
to the Middle East, Steve Whitcoff, and we'd be back
on American soil by the end of the day. In
a statement announcing Fogel's release, the White House said the
(34:20):
exchange quote serves as a show of good faith from
the Russians and a sign we are moving in the
right direction to end the brutal and terrible war in Ukraine.
This is a good gesture of faith by the Russians,
and I believe that the Trump administration continues to actively
work behind the scenes on a cessation plan.
Speaker 1 (34:39):
For the war itself.
Speaker 3 (34:41):
Donald Trump talked about this with Brett bhar in the
interview before the Super Bowl, And this is why we
elected him too. We're tired of getting ripped off, taken
advantage of, taken for granted, we poured about three hundred
billion dollars into Ukraine, so what does Trump want in return?
Speaker 1 (34:58):
He wants something, and he's going to get some thing Ukraine.
Speaker 6 (35:01):
Though you think you can get a deal, do you
keep sending American weapons until you do.
Speaker 11 (35:05):
What I'm saying is the following. They have tremendously valuable
land in terms of rare earth, in terms of oil
and gas, in terms of other things.
Speaker 7 (35:15):
I want to have our.
Speaker 11 (35:15):
Money secured because we're spending.
Speaker 5 (35:18):
Hundreds of billions of dollars and you know, they may
make a deal, they may not make a deal. They
may be Russian someday, or they may not be Russian someday.
But we're going to have all this money in there,
and I say I want it back. And I told
them that I want the equivalent like five.
Speaker 11 (35:35):
Hundred billion dollars worth of rare earth, and they've essentially
agreed to do that. So at least we don't feel stupid.
Otherwise we're stupid. I said to them, we have to
get something. We can't continue to pay this money.
Speaker 1 (35:50):
I like how you set that up to They may
be Russian. Someday they may not be.
Speaker 3 (35:54):
It might be up to them and whether or not
they're willing to give us these rare earth minerals. Absolutely
and holds Zelenski over a barrel on this. He's been
living high on the hog ever since Biden was sworn in,
and those days are done, and he has to know
that Putin gives up this teacher. We're very excited to
report Mark Fogel is coming home and Donald Trump said
(36:14):
he'd be in the White House tonight. We'll get to
your texts reacting to all this five seven seven three
nine when we come back. We're also going to get
local with Representative Lauren Bobert, part of a hearing that
yielded some very unnerving details, shall we say, to put
it mildly. She'll be joining Dan Caples a little bit
later on, and also George Brockler covering two separate shootings
(36:38):
at the same venue over the weekend. He'll appear with
Dan Caples. We'll have that story for him when we
come back after this
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.