All Episodes

October 3, 2024 • 33 mins

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Donald Trump in the polls has actually gone up a
little bit.

Speaker 2 (00:05):
What does that mean.

Speaker 1 (00:06):
It means if the election was today, there's a better
chance that he wins than Kamala Harris. But we all
know the election isn't today. It's a little more than
a month from now, and so Democrats are trying to
figure out what do we do to get rid of
this possible victory for Donald Trump and insert lawfair. Yet again,

(00:29):
a desperate Department of Justice, clinging to power, has come
out with another attack on Donald Trump. The judge has
released Jack Smith's latest filing in the Trump election interference case.
This is simple lawfair and is a lawfair revival that

(00:50):
has come on the hills of vance trouncing Walton.

Speaker 2 (00:54):
The VP debate.

Speaker 1 (00:55):
Now, you may ask yourself, and we've talked about it here,
did the VP debate actually matter? Does it have a
chance to influence people? Well, here's what we know about
the number of people that watched more than forty three
million people watched Tuesday's vice presidential debate. That concerns Democrats

(01:17):
because you saw a very likable and a guy that
seemed to connect with a lot of Americans in the
name of JD Vance.

Speaker 2 (01:25):
They are not happy about this.

Speaker 1 (01:27):
This is the forty three point one five million viewers
across the fifteen networks that were running this debate. Let
me also say this, the debate was the fourth least
watched of the twelve vice presidential debates throughout the presidential cycle,
to put it in perspective. But with that being said,

(01:47):
it is a large number in general, especially knowing how
many clips then are watched online and go viral afterwards. Now,
the four big broadcast networks and then throw in DNN,
Fox News, and MSNBC accounted for about thirty eight million
of the total viewers. What does that mean. It means

(02:09):
that the president of the United States of America right now,
Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are very concerned about where
this election is trending, which brings us back to the
lawfare that is now coming out of right nowhere, right
and just oh, all of a sudden, this is just
going to happen, and the timing of this is perfect.
What's even funnier about the report is it's clearly not

(02:33):
a report that is being done, or a case that's
being done, or the redactions in the court filings that
are being done to stop people from connecting political dots.
On CNN, as they announced this, CNN's Jake Tapper really
just started cracking up at the redactions in this new

(02:56):
DOJ filing. Now, redactions are done so that you don't
know certain information, right, It's to protect witnesses and to
protect others. But this isn't a traditional and or a
normal indictment.

Speaker 2 (03:12):
This is lawfair. It's warfare.

Speaker 1 (03:14):
It's to take out Donald Trump and anyone else around
him who the Left doesn't like. And they put these
reactions in there. But these reactions are just a joke.
They want you to know who they believe is involved
in a grand conspiracy with Donald Trump, so you can
slander all the people that are around him. I want

(03:36):
you to listen carefully to exactly what Jake Tapper had
to say about these reactions, because it is hilarious and
even he's laughing at it, going this isn't normal. This
is clearly being done on purpose so that you can
connect dots and figure out everybody that they want you
to hate Donald Trump and all of his associates. Before

(03:57):
I play that for you, though, I want to tell
you about Amos Square. If you are like me and
you love being able to shoot, and you want to
make sure you never are without AMO, then you've got
to know about Amo Squared. They ensure that you have
AMMO when you need it. It is an automated approach
to purchasing AMMO on any budget. It's simple how it works,

(04:18):
and this is why I use Ammo Squared. You pick
your calibers, you set your budget, you select a shipping trigger,
and that's it. Your AMMO grows over time, and it's
also stored for free as it builds up, and then
you ship it with a click of a button or
automatically on your schedule. Now, unlike a traditional subscription service,

(04:40):
Ammo Squared is a place where you are not forced
into a set budget or a monthly shipment. You decide
your budget, you schedule when you went your ammo. Amo
Squared offers nearly seventy different caliber options, and each shipment
contains a carefully curated mix of factory new ammunition. It's
budget friendly and you can change it at any time.

(05:03):
You can literally buy as little as a few dollars
a month and use dollar costs averaging to your advantage.
Maybe you store up a bunch of AMMO in a
caliber and then that firearm you're board with or you
trade it in or you want a different gun, not
a problem. You can switch one caliber to another with
the click of a button. And what happens if you
invest in AMO like a four oh one K and

(05:25):
then the price of AMO goes through the roof like
it did during COVID, you can sell that AMMO back
and make big bucks. So why don't get yourself some
free Ammo? Yeah, sign up an ammosquared dot com slash
bed to day to get.

Speaker 2 (05:38):
Free AMMO in your account.

Speaker 1 (05:40):
Ammosquared dot com slash ben and get free AMMO in
your account today. There's no minimum to buy, no memberships,
no extra fees. You'll love ammosquared dot com slush bend
and get free AMO in your account today. All right,
listen to Jake Tapper cracking up is he's describing what

(06:02):
is nothing more than a hit piece on Donald Trump
and his associates when they try to redact information so
you won't know who they're talking about, when they clearly
want you to know exactly who they are talking about
in the Trump world.

Speaker 3 (06:17):
So, Paul, let me just ask you about some of
these reactions because again I'm a lay person, I'm not
a lawyer like yourself and the wise people involved in
this case, but they don't really make a whole lot
of sense to me. For example, P one is quite
obviously Steve Bannon just to read, and this is page seven,
so I haven't really gotten very.

Speaker 4 (06:37):
Far in it.

Speaker 3 (06:38):
But by October twenty twenty, P One, a private political
advisor who had worked for the defendant's twenty sixteen presidential campaign,
began to assist with the defendants reelection later effort. Three
days before election day, p One described the defendant's plan
to a private gathering of supporters. Quote and what Trump's
going to do is just declare victory. Right, He's going
to declare victory. That doesn't mean he's the winner. He's
just going to say he's the winner.

Speaker 5 (07:00):
Quote.

Speaker 3 (07:00):
Now that quote exists on video, we know it's Steve Bannon.
Why even redact it?

Speaker 6 (07:07):
So here you do see redactions, mostly of specific names
of witnesses. Again, this is highly unusual to release the
kind of evidence that you have uncovered any criminal investigation,
any filing like this that is made public.

Speaker 1 (07:19):
So, by the way, it is unusual unless you're trying
to just come after someone politically, and you've weaponized the
Department of Justice to take out your political opponent. The
reason why Jake Tapper laughed there is they're not trying
to hide who the people are they're wanting to destroy.
They're literally leaving you the crumbs in this indictment, so

(07:41):
you know exactly through googling these exact quotes who it
is that they're talking about.

Speaker 2 (07:48):
Here.

Speaker 1 (07:49):
They're trying to indict Donald Trump and every one of
his friends that they hate right before the election day
by putting together a basically a fake filing which is
nothing more than a witch hun and a hip piece
on these individuals. And that's why Jake Tapper was laughing.
That's why this lawyer is laughing. Keep listening.

Speaker 6 (08:11):
These are the types of redactions. Though, any one who
has covered this case, this investigation, and who's followed this
story we're given a little bit of time, is going
to figure out who most of these people are, because,
as you said, this has been something that's been out
in the open. There's of course the January sixth Committee,
They've been other cases related to this, so it's going
to be pretty easy to figure out who said what.
But the court here making some attempt to protect the

(08:33):
identities of officials in this.

Speaker 1 (08:35):
Case, by the way, I will by they say they're
making some attempt to try to protect the identities of
these people, know they're not. They deliberately gave quotes that
you could google and the quote would go directly back
to the person that they're trying that they claim they're
trying to protect in the court filing, which is absurd.
Keep listening is a laugh about this because they're laughing

(08:55):
at it. But they also understand why the DOJ did this,
which makes even funnier. It's warfare, it's law fair, and
they hate Trump and everybody around them.

Speaker 2 (09:04):
So let's just screw.

Speaker 6 (09:05):
Them all witnesses, right, because these were people who either
testified before the grand jury or spoke to investigators. I
just I want to underscore this is an extraordinary thing
to get a filing like this, and this is part
of the court's efforts to try to protect those witnesses.
But like you said, you only got to paid seven
and you already knew who one of the witnesses was.

Speaker 3 (09:23):
Well, for anybody at home who's doing this, that kind
of like a bingo game page eighteen, it refers to
Georgia Governor P seventeen. I believe that's probably Brian Kamp.
I'm no master strategist here, but I mean it would
that be your reading as well.

Speaker 6 (09:38):
Yes, I think this is an easy mad libs if
you look at it that way. And again, what we're
looking for specifically is any new evidence things that we
haven't actually heard before, specifically new evidence from former Vice
President Mike Pence.

Speaker 1 (09:52):
I mean they're telling you every name because when they
made the filing this was not to keep at private.
They're like, oh, we'd redacted it, but you guys figured
it out.

Speaker 2 (10:03):
Good job.

Speaker 1 (10:03):
No, they're handing you the quote to then Google to
then make sure you know exactly who they're talking about.
This is how corrupt the Department of Justice, Jack Smith,
Kamala Harris, Joe Biden are to try to take out
Donald Trump because apparently the last two assassins didn't do it,
so now they're going back to lawfair here and it's

(10:24):
pure communism, that is what this is. So if you
look at this game plan, it's like, all right, we're
thirty plus days out from election day.

Speaker 2 (10:38):
We need to hit Donald Trump hard.

Speaker 1 (10:40):
He is stabilized in the polls and Kamala Harris has
come down a little bit. We need to go back
to lawfair because that always seems to work. We tell
everybody he's this evil guy, and Jack Smith's like, hey,
I got this. We got to protect our corruption at
the Department of Justice. So the wash DCUs District Judge

(11:02):
unsealed the Special Council Jacksmith's latest motion and is in
his salvage case against Trump for interference in the twenty
twenty election. I can't believe we're having this conversation, but
here we are. And they released of this quote redacted
motion filed last week follows Trump's surge and swing state
polls and comes the day after Vance just shined in

(11:26):
the VP to debate. That is why they decided to
do this now now. Under a local criminal rule forty
seven e okay of the US District Court for the
District of Columbia, motions of this type are limited okay
to forty five pages. That, by the way, doesn't even apply, apparently,

(11:47):
because the judge allowed Smith to file a mammoth one
hundred and sixty five page motion, which is far outside
of the forty five pages, which is normally allowed. Again,
this is how you know this is corruption. You might

(12:08):
as well just call this motion the Steele dossier. We're
going to just bring up a bunch of random crap
right before the election, and we're going to try to
use it to our advantage to say, see, Donald Trump's
the worst person in the world, and we need to
remind you of that before election day. And so here
you go. Now we're going to remind you right now,
that's what this is. This is this Steele dossier two

(12:29):
point zero, but it's on the letterhead of an official
judge and a court in the District of Columbia, so
it's a lot more official, right than the Steele dossier
that worked last time. So well, so here's one hundred
and sixty five pages that we are going to release
to you.

Speaker 2 (12:47):
And in these one hundred and.

Speaker 1 (12:49):
Sixty five pages, we're going to throw out a bunch
of conspiracy theories and attack Donald Trump so that he'll
have a really, really hard time in the last thirty
thirty five days. And the media can pick up on this,
and that is exactly what happened.

Speaker 2 (13:07):
It's almost like there's a.

Speaker 1 (13:09):
Grand conspiracy between the state sponsored media and Biden and
Harris and this White House and the Department of Justice
and the FBI to conspire together to try to hurt
their political opponent, who so far they haven't been able
to murder him. And so now they're like, all right, well,
we got to go back to law fair because that's
what we did before, and you know, the bullets had

(13:30):
hit him, and so we'll just go back to the
law fair.

Speaker 2 (13:33):
Now.

Speaker 1 (13:34):
Smith's motion included some egregious, one sided allegations that turned,
by the way, on Trump's quote state of mind, repeating
that Trump's claims regarding the election were knowingly false and deceitful,
without allowing the possibility that actually Donald Trump at the

(13:56):
time believed what he was saying, had reason to believe
what he was saying because of those around him and
lawyers and others that were talking about corruption. Now, you
can debate that all you want in a court of law,
but in this filing they're basically saying Donald Trump is
a criminal because Donald Trump believes something that we have

(14:20):
decided is not true. Now, let's also put in perspective
for you, and let me remind you, the same people
that are telling you this are the same people that
told you that the Stele dossier was real and authentic,
even though they'd already classified as user generated, right, they
knew that it was provided and paid for by the

(14:41):
Democratic National Committee in Hillary Clinton's campaign. And these are
the same people that also lied to you and told
you that the Hunter Biden laptop was not real and
that that was somehow Russian disinformation. So they want me
to now believe, in a one hundred and sixty five

(15:03):
page report that's supposed to be no more than forty
five pages, that Donald Trump is the worst person in
the world, and that Donald Trump deserves to not be
the president but go to jail and be a felon
and have his right to even vote taken away from him. Now,

(15:24):
Donald Trump has emphatically denied these charges coming from Smith,
and obviously I understand why, and many commentators profess that
Trump since he believed that he would have won if
all the relevant laws were faithfully enforced. And by the way,
there's nothing conspiratorial about believing that with it, especially at

(15:45):
the time, like there's nothing wrong with that. So what
do the Democrats do? The Democrats come out with one
hundred and sixty five page document. It is unusual. It
is outside the norm. It is far outside the number
of pages you're supposed to file. And then you time
it at the exact moment when Kamala Harris is dropping

(16:08):
the polls and JD Vance had a very big VP
debate by the way, that Kamala Harris released knowingly thousands
and thousands of rapists and murderers into America that they
knew were rapists and murderers that were convicted rapists and
murderers when they crossed our southern border when we caught them. Now,

(16:33):
this judge, by the way, and if you want to
know how corrupt the judge is here, this is the
entire government standing up to Donald Trump going against him, saying, yeah,
we don't want you back here, and we are afraid
that you're gonna, you know, blow everything up in the
corruption of this communist government that we've set up and
the power that we have set up at the CIA

(16:55):
and the FBI and the DOJ.

Speaker 2 (16:57):
And so this judge right could have kept the.

Speaker 1 (17:02):
Motion under seal until after the election, all one hundred
and sixty plus pages.

Speaker 2 (17:09):
Guess what the judge.

Speaker 1 (17:10):
Said, No, No, because I need influence the election. I
want to make sure, Donald Trump has never sworn in again.
So instead, this activist district judge in Washington, DC released
a quote highly redacted motion that appears to have redacted

(17:31):
little other than names and the names, which goes back
to what I played for you on CNN and Jake
Tapper earlier that they redacted. It's a joke, you know,
and you can figure out who every single person is.
In fact, as I was reading this document when it
came out, one of the texts I sent, I'm going
to read it to you verbatim. And I sent this

(17:53):
to a lawyer friend of mine and I said, is
redaction supposed to be to protect people? And he responded
with yes, unless your name is Donald Trump or you
worked with or around Donald Trump, that's the truth. Like
he's not lying. And I texted another friend that's a lawyer.

(18:13):
I said, Okay, explain this to me. What is the
point of a reaction if what the name that you're
redacting is connected directly verbatim to the as I described it,
to the actual blanking. I was mad, I didn't about
the whole word. I should get a little credit for that, right,
ideas I says, directly connect to the blanking quote that

(18:38):
you can find in the New York Times. The response,
I've never seen anything like this in my twenty four
years as a lawyer. This is all about election interference,
something the Democrats say that they can't stand. They're trying
to interfere with the upcoming election by influencing you, you

(19:00):
and influencing others by saying, here's a bunch of redacted
things that you can figure out. Trump's team, by the way,
argued more redactions were necessary if the judge chose to
release the motion publicly. They also objected the timing, noting
that early voting had already begun, so clearly this is
being done to influence election outcomes, and what did Smith's

(19:22):
team do. They rejected any accusations of political motivation behind
the filing or its timing, saying that despite the timing
that being so close to the election day quote, they
have no role or interest in partisan politics. If you
believe that, you're an idiot, you can look at the quotes.

(19:44):
You can look at who they've voted for. You can
look at the party where they gained their power. You
can look at Jack Smith and all of his filings.
If there's anything I'm sure of it's that he's that
he hates Donald Trump and he wants to put him
in jail, and he also wants to make sure that
Donald Trump never becomes president, and he wants to make

(20:04):
sure that Donald Trump is persecuted for his beliefs because
this is what communists and socialists do each and every
single day.

Speaker 4 (20:18):
All right.

Speaker 1 (20:18):
I want to move to another issue that is really
important right now, and is the fallout from something that jd.
Vance said that the left is really upset about. And
he said, and they were trying to turn into like, oh,
you're a racist because he said, well, you let twenty
million American or legal immigrants come into America. What the
hell do you think was going to happen? We're going
to have higher home prices. And they immediately were like,

(20:42):
that's not true, that's not true. Right, it is true.
We know it's true.

Speaker 2 (20:47):
Now.

Speaker 1 (20:47):
Tim Waltz is out there saying in these one on
one interviews, Oh, we're going to make housing more affordable
again without a plan. But he keeps saying it over
and over again. Apparently everybody believes him.

Speaker 4 (20:56):
We're here in Ashville. This is one area of the
state where we've seen housing.

Speaker 6 (21:00):
Prices skyrocket here, there's very little affordable housing.

Speaker 4 (21:04):
It's the story you see time and again. How do
you think your plan can help?

Speaker 7 (21:08):
Well, first of all, the Vice President's plan starts by
that this this shortage of housing units in general is
three million new units. And she understands this is making
sure that we're not seeing banks by these things up
keep money inventory, and then that down payment assistance for me.

Speaker 4 (21:22):
I use the GI bill.

Speaker 7 (21:23):
I think she's starting about making sure you tax credits,
that we're able to make sure people have the money
to go forward.

Speaker 2 (21:29):
I love this.

Speaker 1 (21:30):
So they say, well, we just seed a bunch more
houses and we're going to give you money to do it, right,
And so then they came out with its plan. They're like,
all right, we're just gonna give you like twenty five
thousand dollars Kamoa Herrison a big, big one on one
exclusive within MSNBC with this type of propaganda, and she said, well,
we're going to housing more affordable, right, and we're gonna

(21:51):
make sure they enough price gouging you. And they blame everybody.
They blame the boogeyman, the evil big banks, the private investors, right,
And so then.

Speaker 2 (22:01):
They come out.

Speaker 1 (22:01):
They're like, God, we're gonna give you money for houses, right, Like,
we're gonna, we're gonna give you a bunch of cash.
We're gonna give you twenty five thousand highest bidder if
that's what you want, We're gonna, we're gonna, we're gonna
give you, you know, twenty five thousand and and and
that's gonna, you know, fix your problem. Well, every economist
came out like, if you give a twenty five thousand

(22:21):
our check first time home buyers, that's gonna happen. The
price of every home in America is just gonna go up.
Like everybody knows this, it's basic economics. And and you
have this idea now that oh, well, we're just gonna,
you know, randomly build a bunch of houses that the
government's gonna subsidize. And that's somehow going to fix the problem.

(22:44):
Harris is gonna kill housing, is what the experts have said.
They're gonna kill housing.

Speaker 2 (22:50):
Now.

Speaker 1 (22:51):
Not only are they gonna kill it with they're planned,
but they're killing the American dream of owning a house
because of all the illegal immigrants they've led into this country.
And during the debate, the well that's not true, and
J D Vance wrote back pretty quickly, right to the
biased people he's talking to me, like, hold on a second, Well,
we'll put it up online. We'll stick the facts out there.

(23:12):
If you think that illegal immigrants aren't rising the prices
of home and rent, you're insane. And guess what the
fact show you guessed it. That's exactly what's happening. Let
me tell you real quick about my friends over at
bond Arms. I am a huge advocate for the Second Amendment.
If you know me, you know that without having a

(23:33):
firearm to protect myself, I wouldn't be here right now.
I had to use my firearm to save my life.
And I'm an advocate for our God given Second Amendment rights.
And I'm also an advocate for people caring to protect
and defend themselves. And that's why I want you to
tell you about bond Arms. Bond Arms a thirty year
old Texas based company, and Bond Arms makes the smallest,

(23:56):
most powerful, best built personal protection that you can and carry.
These unique handguns are simple, easy to use, and have
unparalleled power like their forty five seventy or the fifty Asycops,
which makes them a great personal protection option. I want
you to check out their amazing handguns at get bondarms

(24:20):
dot com. That's get bondarms dot Com. Which are built
like a tank and they've been seen on a lot
of hit TV shows and movies. Plus, go to get
bondarms dot com and also check out their newly padded
AR platform lever Gun. It actually won Recoil Magazine's Best
Firearm at Shot Show twenty twenty three.

Speaker 2 (24:42):
It's pretty awesome.

Speaker 1 (24:43):
You're not gonna be disappointed with adding some of the
coolest and unique firearms on the market to your personal collection.
Tell them I sent you, and again the website get
bondarms dot com. That's get bondarms dot com. So before
I get back to the busted fact check on the

(25:04):
lie that was told during the debate that illegal immigrants
are not causing the prices of housing and rent to
go up, let's just also hammer down on this twenty
five thousand dollars that she just randomly says is like
magic money that she's going to give out to everybody
that wants to buy a house. It's never going to happen,
number one, and number two, it is not going to

(25:26):
lower the price of housing or make housing more affordable,
which is what she's claiming. It's just going to make
the price of every house cup twenty five grand because
everybody knows, well, you got the twenty five grand. The
government just gave it to you, which means the taxpayers
we are subsidizing everybody else's house.

Speaker 5 (25:39):
Listen, I want to talk about Harris's got Kamala House's
economic plan. You've got a tweet out there saying that
Harris is either financially illiterate, incompetent, or she believes her
voters are.

Speaker 2 (25:52):
You really don't like her plan?

Speaker 4 (25:53):
Do your grant?

Speaker 8 (25:56):
No, because I know it won't work. Okay, she's going
to kill housing. Okay, I don't know why she's I
guess I understand why she's not giving people like you
a moment to ask her a question. Why would you
want to build or three million homes when you know
your four point two million home short. Why would you
want to give a twenty five thousand dollars first time
tax credit or buyer's credit when you know that's going

(26:18):
to inflate housing? Okay. Margage applications had a spike this week,
and we're still lower than two thousand, two thousand and
eight twenty ten literally the lowest levels in twenty four
years of martgage applications. The housing market is getting slaughtered,
and nobody's talking about it. And if she thinks twenty
five thousand dollars is going to somehow, you know, relieve

(26:40):
the system, she's crazy.

Speaker 4 (26:42):
So she's either lying to.

Speaker 8 (26:43):
The public or worse, she doesn't know what she's talking
about or her her team does. Now now I know Mark
Cuban's a huge fan of hers. Right now, he's at a
pimpinger like every minute of every day. But and Mark
knows a lot about a lot of things. But housing
is not going to get fixed. Because she promises to
build three million homes, she doesn't even know what it

(27:05):
would cost, how long it would take, who would build them,
who would get the homes. And by the way, it's
six percent interest. You can't afford a loon anyway, because
the interests alone is two thousand dollars a month.

Speaker 1 (27:18):
Grant caught on the interest alone is two thousand dollars
a month. So this idea that I'm just going to
hand out twenty five k and it's going to fix
the problem. And you're gonna and you're gonna build three
million homes. Now, in my lifetime, we've never had a
conversation about building three million homes, Like, that's never been
a conversation. And I think the real reason why we've

(27:42):
never had that conversation is because we've never had to
deal with the possibility of being three million homes too short, right, Like,
we've never had to have that conversation. Why are we
even having the conversation. It goes back to what Jdvan said,
and it's the fact that we have a housing crisis

(28:04):
in this country because we have an immigration crisis that
is skyrocket the cost of rent and homes. So called
policy experts quote unquote at the libertarian Kiddo Institute, known
for its defense of open borders, are admitting now that
center JD. Vance is correct when he says immigration increases

(28:26):
increases housing prices for Americans. We don't want to want
to blame immigrants for higher housing prices, but we do
want to blame Kamala Harris for letting in millions of
illegal aliens in this country, which does drive up costs.
Vance said it Tuesday Evening's vice president of Debate, twenty
five million illegal aliens are competing with Americans for houses

(28:48):
for homes, and it's one of the most significant drivers
of home prices in the country. It's why we have
massive increases in home prices and have happened right alongside
massive increases in illegal alien populations under Kamala Harris's leadership. Also,
you want to know where home prices of skyrocket the
most and heavily populated areas where illegal immigrants are living. Yes,

(29:14):
that is the truth. So when JD. Vance said what
he said, he wasn't lying. He was speaking truth to power,
which is exactly why they hated what he said.

Speaker 4 (29:24):
Tim just said something that I agree with.

Speaker 9 (29:25):
We don't want to blame immigrants for higher housing prices,
but we do want to blame Kamala Harris for letting
in millions of illegal aliens into this country.

Speaker 4 (29:33):
Which does drive up cost him.

Speaker 9 (29:36):
Twenty five million Illegal aliens competing with Americans for scarce
homes is one of the most significant drivers of home
prices in the country.

Speaker 4 (29:44):
It's why we have massive increases in.

Speaker 9 (29:47):
Home prices that have happened right alongside massive increases in
illegal alien populations under Kamala Harris's leadership. Now, Tim just
mentioned a bunch of ideas. Now, some of those ideas
I actually think are and some of them I disagree with.
But the most important thing here is Kamala Harris is
not running as a newcomer to politics.

Speaker 4 (30:07):
She is the sitting vice president.

Speaker 9 (30:09):
If she wants to enact all of these policies to
make housing more affordable, I invite her to use the
office that the American people already gave her, not sit
around in campaign and do nothing while Americans find the
American dream of home ownership completely unaffordable.

Speaker 1 (30:25):
One of the reasons why I think this moment was
so effective for him is because if you were listening
and you're looking at buying a house, or you're looking
to rent, or you decided not to buy a house,
is because you understood what he was saying there.

Speaker 2 (30:40):
Jade Vance is correct.

Speaker 1 (30:42):
Immigration increases housing prices, and that's just the truth. It's
okay to admit that, but the media doesn't want to
talk about that. The intersection of supplying demand determines housing prices,
like all prices.

Speaker 2 (30:55):
Quote.

Speaker 1 (30:55):
When housing supply curves are upward sloping, increased demand from
immigrants will increase housing prices. Immigrants are people who want
to roof over their heads after all. So when you're
going to the market to rind er buy, does the
market care if you're an illegal or not? The answer
is no, it doesn't matter. Bringing the discussion back to

(31:17):
Springfield and Ohio, where Vans started, housing prices have increased
there as more Haitian migrants have moved in. According to redfin,
the medium sale price of a single family hold sold
there has increased from seventy eight thousand, five hundred dollars
in August of twenty nineteen to one hundred and fifty

(31:40):
eight thousand in August of twenty twenty four. That is
a one hundred and one percent increase in nominal terms.
By the way, the nationwide increase was forty six percent
in nominal terms during the same period. And what happened
during that period a massive influx and ellegal immigrants by

(32:01):
the millions coming across the southern border that has made
renters and first time home buyers worse off than Springfield
and homeowners who are mostly native born quote better off.
At a recent House Oversight Committee hearing, the Center for
Immigration Studies director set his analysis has found that a

(32:21):
five percent point increase in the recent immigrant share of
a metro area's population is associated with a twelve percent
increase in the average US born household rent relative to
their income. What do they note The high levels of
immigration particularly increase rents. Adding this, very large numbers of

(32:46):
people added to the country are significantly impacting housing prices
by driving up demand for rental properties. The Census Bureau
reports of the increase in rents in twenty twenty three
was by far the large just in the past decade.
And what happened during that period of time. We had
the largest increase of the immigrants, illegal immigrants coming across

(33:08):
the southern border. And the fact that the media even
tried to argue with him over this is insane. Make
sure you share this podcast with your family and your friends,
and I'll see you back here tomorrow
Advertise With Us

Host

Ben Ferguson

Ben Ferguson

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2024 iHeartMedia, Inc.