The Benjamin Yount Show-4-2-26 Matt Kittle fills in

The Benjamin Yount Show-4-2-26 Matt Kittle fills in

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
Good morning, Good Thursday morning, getting close to a weekend.
That feels good, doesn't it, even with this schizophrenic weather
we're experiencing. I think Mother Nature is in need of
some psychotropic medications. But that's what you can expect in
early April in Milwaukee Land, across the state of Wisconsin.

(00:25):
Matt Kittle in with you for Benjamin Yon to the
Benjaminyon Show. Oh, We've got much to get to this morning.
It was a busy night, of course, with the President speaking,
addressing the nation, talking about where we are and where
we go next in Iran. The war there looks like,

(00:46):
at least according to the President, a couple few weeks
and we go. We'll get into that coming up in
just a bit. The aforementioned weather, of course, we could
have starting this is how crazy it is. Starting this.
We've got a wintry mix. We're at thirty three now,
and then we warm up apparently, well I guess I'll

(01:10):
believe it when I feel it. We'll warm up into
the low sixties by the afternoon. But that's when the
chance of severe weather and some pretty problematic weather is possible.
We'll keep you up to date on all of that
throughout the morning. Jason Gotch has your news this morning,

(01:31):
and of course Greg John, our excellent producer, is making
sure that this thing stays on the road, which is
of course, as always when I'm in the.

Speaker 2 (01:40):
Lord's work, I'm kind of confused him. Are we in
our fifth or sixth? What do we call it? A
false spring? It just he's teasing us every every year.

Speaker 1 (01:54):
It is. It's a tease, that's what it is. This
weather is a tease. You know, if we had shown
up at the bar, you would buy it a drink
and it would be all coquettish and it would be
winking at you, and you would think, Okay, my chances
are good. And then now sorry, I'm going home with
Billy Nice. Analogy what we're experiencing. That's what we're experiencing

(02:18):
with the weather and the fall spring starts. But here
we are.

Speaker 2 (02:22):
Oh.

Speaker 1 (02:23):
I want to wish everybody a very happy Holy Week
for those who celebrate I do. Today is Monday Thursday.
Is it called aka the Mandate Christ's greatest Commandment to
all of us who are of the faith. Happy Passover

(02:43):
today for our Jewish friends listening in, and of course
good Friday coming up. Tomorrow for Christians, and obviously the
day Sunday where we say he has risen, he has risen. Indeed. Yeah,
busy night last night. Trump's speech very interesting. We're going

(03:04):
to get into that coming up just after the six
thirty Information block. We're gonna chat about Artemis too. I'll
tell you what that was. Something else, And I can
tell you this just briefly. I have a child who
got to see that live and man, was he excited

(03:25):
about all of that. Just after the seven o'clock news
this morning, Senator Ron Johnson will join us to talk
about President Trump's plan in Iran birthright citizenship that was
a big deal yesterday. What a Supreme Court oral argument
or oral arguments we saw yesterday, and the future of

(03:46):
the Save America Act. What the hell is happening there?
I can tell you this, It is not moving forward
right now. It is mothballed and Senators don't want to
do I'm not talking about Senator Johnson here. I know
he would show up for work at the drop of
a dime, he would definitely be there and certainly if

(04:07):
there was any hope or promise that the Save America Act.
But we basically as we take a look at a
country in crisis and an election system imperiled by all
kinds of issues, as we have come to know all
too well over the last several years. In this country.

(04:30):
The Senate is on spring break. Look for Pages Gone
Wild on your Netflix sometime soon. They won't be returning,
of course, for several days. And that's usually a good
thing when Congress is not working. Quite frankly, most times

(04:51):
it's better off if they're not doing something as opposed
to doing something it's less dangerous than usually really could
use this Election Integrity bill pass, and you know, it's
pretty popular. Eighty percent of Americans to eighty five in

(05:11):
some polls, ninety percent support the elements of the Save
America Act. And it's really simple at its core. What
it's asking for is that you be a US citizen
to vote in US elections. I don't think that's a hardship.
And all of this Jim Crow two point zero crappola
from the usual suspects, the Hikeem Jeffreys and the Chuck

(05:35):
U Schumers of the world, it's just absolute nonsense. We
have thirty two states in this country that already is
it thirty two? Is it thirty six. I believe it's
thirty six states, including the state of Wisconsin, where you've
got to show a photo ID to vote in an

(05:56):
election that was going to be Remember this now because
I think this is important as Wisconsin voter. I remember
post two thousand and eleven when photo ID was presented
and when the Scott Walker controlled government pushed this along

(06:21):
with the help of the Republican controlled legislature. Obviously it
passed it, and then it was oh my god. During
this whole thing, who there are people out there that
won't be able to get an identification to vote? What
are they going to do? Oh no, oh no? And
there were lawsuits and lies and all kinds of garbage.

(06:44):
We have some Supreme Court justices and Supreme Court candidates
who represented individuals as attorneys and legislators selling this lie
to Wisconsin. The sky did not fall. We have had many,
many successful elections. And for those who say that voter
ID photo ID to vote suppresses the vote, suppresses turnout,

(07:12):
are absolutely fools. They're lying to you. What we saw
after some significant election integrity changes after the twenty twenty
election in Georgia, we saw a huge increase in turnout
in twenty twenty two, including especially the minority vote that

(07:36):
the Democrats believe. And this is what is aggravating and
for you Democrats listening in right now, you liberals, you lefties,
this is what your party is saying to you, saying
to minorities, saying to black voters, Hispanic voters, women, you
are too stupid to get an ID to vote or

(08:01):
the proper documentation to register to vote. That is their argument.
Remember that as we talk about the Save Act, which
we will of course with Senator Ron Johnson. Oh and
before we close the show, the question, the big question,
where have all the fat people gone? I know, being

(08:25):
one of them? In fact I am. I like to
consider myself the ambassador of fat people. But apparently this
is a real deal. With all of the weight loss
drugs going on, it is impacting agriculture.

Speaker 2 (08:39):
What really foof?

Speaker 1 (08:41):
Yeah, I'm not kidding you. We'll get into this. But
all those weight loss drugs, people aren't a eating as
much and they're not eating the crap that they used
to eat. And so watch out. Freedom lay is the
underlying store. We'll delve into that in just a bit. Also,

(09:04):
I know that Ben probably talked about this I know
our other excellent host of more than likely talked about this,
but it does bear repeating that I did not have
on my bingo card. This week, Christy Nomes's husband enjoyed
wearing huge prosthetic boobs. And if we have a chance,

(09:30):
we'll get to the latest on the huge prosthetic boob crisis.
But right now I want to get into a guy that,
at one time in my rock and roll history, my
love of rock and roll, I greatly respected. His name
is Bruce Springsteen. They call him the Boss. He really

(09:52):
has gone full Robert de Niro. Don't you think, I
mean just bat guana crazy? And he's doing it to
people who have paid one thousand dollars to see this nonsense.
Bruce Springsteen used a concert stage in Minneapolis to deliver
a blunt warning about the state of America, leading critics

(10:15):
to label the musician a trader and other words, I
just think he's an idiot. But nonetheless, Springsteen unleashed four
pointed political speeches during the opening night of his Land
of Hope and Dreams American tour on Tuesday this week.

(10:35):
Four four speeches. Let me ask you this, Greg, have
you ever seen Springsteen in concert.

Speaker 2 (10:41):
No, I haven't, but I heard it was great back
in the day, but not anymore.

Speaker 1 (10:45):
Oh yeah, yeah. I have a friend who has seen
Springsteen no less than a dozen times. I never have.
I just I work in radio. I don't have that
kind of scratch and at these tickets cost a lot
of money. But he, you know, he loves Springsteen, my friend,
and he said, you will never see a harder working rocker.

(11:07):
The guy does three hours straight, doesn't take a break.
I mean, it's just you know what, to the walls
with Bruce Springsteen. But now, of course, as he ages
gets into his later seventies, he's going to make political
speeches and he suffers from severe Trump derangement syndrome, just

(11:30):
like De Niro. You know, he really ought to have
his own view show coming up. But this is this
is the sort of garbage that we have heard. We
are living through some very dark times, he told the
crowd mid show. According to Variety, our American values that
have sustained us for two hundred and fifty years are
being challenged as never before. We've got our young men

(11:54):
and women's lives at risk in an unconstitutional and illegal war.
I don't think he understands the Constantine, and I don't
think he understands the framers of the Constitution. If you're
going to span back two hundred and fifty years, I
can guarantee the people who put together this ingenious constitutional

(12:14):
republic never envisioned the sort of nonsense that we have seen.
In fact, they tried desperately to prevent the mob rule
that Bruce Springsteen endorses. Nonetheless, for those who showed up
at the concert and really didn't want four lectures or more,

(12:35):
there are some folks not happy with the boss. This
comment from the Fox News story, what an elite self
righteous pos? What does POS stand for? Perhaps we shouldn't

(12:56):
go there, the FCC monitor, I regret ever buying this
low life's music. He talks about the middle class as
his roots while living, living and acting as the king
go kiss Biden's arse trader.

Speaker 2 (13:19):
Well you know here he is.

Speaker 3 (13:21):
He is.

Speaker 2 (13:21):
He flies in with a private jet, you know, a
big mansion, one of five different mansions around the world,
and to to spew all this and and charge you
one thousand dollars to see him spew all this. Yes,
you know he's Greta Greta Bunberg. He's standing up there
saying how dare you? And then, of course he lives

(13:44):
a completely different life than the people, many of the
people who are spending their hard earned dollars to see
him just what an out of touch idiot and like
the weather, probably probably could use some psychotropic medication. Oh
and speaking of music, Greg, Lindsey Buckingham has a stalker?

(14:10):
Want to set in. Guitarist and vocalist Lindsey Buckingham, former
member of the storied rock band Fleetwood Mack, of course,
was attacked by a woman when he showed up for
an appointment in Santa Monica, multiple law enforcement sources tell
NBC Investigates. When Buckingham entered the building, the woman, described

(14:37):
by authorities as a stalking suspect, through an unknown substance
in the two time Grammy winner's face I guess or
at least at him, and then fled. Police have identified
the suspect, but no arrest were reported. Early Wednesday morning,
I read one account where the woman screamed out.

Speaker 1 (14:58):
I'm your daughter. So two surprising things here, maybe not
altogether surprising on the latter, but the first is Lindsey
Buckingham has a stalker. As you noted, when we were
talking about this story before, Greg, you said, of all
of the members of Fleetwood Mac, Lindsey Buckingham.

Speaker 2 (15:19):
As a star, the guitarist and backup vocalists gets a stalker.

Speaker 1 (15:23):
I don't get it well, you know. And he's also
besides the album rumors that really ripped up the hearts
of the band, and besides the years of drinking and
addiction and those sorts of things, this guy is a
pretty laid back dude by all accounts. Why why would

(15:45):
somebody stalk this guy? And finally, the other point here
is that someone would declare Lindsey Buckingham their father. You know,
he's got some cash, no doubt about it, but I'm
your daughter, Lindsey Buckingham. That I would imagine was quite

(16:06):
a surprise for the Fleetwood Mac guitarist. All right, we
have to catch up on some news. We've got an
information block coming up. We'll give you all the details
on that gnarly weather forecast right ahead and around the corner.
We will, indeed to get into President Trump's speech last night,
where we're at in the war in Iran and how

(16:28):
much longer and a lot of other details that came up.
Stay with us so much more to come on this
Thursday morning edition of The Benjaminon Show with Yours truly
Matt Kittle on news radio News Talk eleven thirty WISN.
It's kind of a creepy song when you think about
it't it.

Speaker 2 (16:47):
I used to call it the pedo song, Bruce's Pedo song,
and I had a little parody of it. Hey, little
girl with your rear sol round, you must have come
from a up town.

Speaker 1 (16:56):
Oh yeah, oh those up girls. Yeah, this is maybe
otherwise known as the Registry song. It's got that kind
of feel to it. Coming up in just a bit,
turning Japanese, I really think so. Katanji Brown Jackson's turning

(17:18):
Japanese theory on birthright citizenship is so dumb it stuns
that coming up in the seven o'clock hour, along with
our conversation with Wisconsin's senior US Senator Ron Johnson. Now,
let's get you caught up on the news headlines of
the day. Jason Gotch has that for you.

Speaker 4 (17:36):
I appreciate it, Matt. The Supreme Court debate will happen
to night here in Wisconsin after it was postponed last
week because left wing candidate Chris Taylor said she had
kidney stones. Taylor's going to debate conservative candidate Marie Lazar
this evening at Channel twelve in Milwaukee. The election will
be held this coming Tuesday, with early voting already under way.
And President Trump addressed the nation last night about the

(17:57):
conflict in Iran. Trump said, if Iran doesn't want to
play ball through diplomacy and fall in line, the US
is going to destroy key Iranian infrastructure and cripple the
country over the next two to three weeks. The President
says Iran needs to give up state sponsored terrorism and
nuclear ambitions. The President opened the door again for diplomacy
to solve the crisis. That'll do it for your bottom

(18:19):
of the hour update.

Speaker 1 (18:22):
Thank you, sir, I appreciate it. We'll check back in
with Jason get the full details on the news coming
up around the top of the seven o'clock hour. Your
forecast from the Fox six Weather experts just a mixed
bag of nonsense today. This morning, you're going to have
some tricky weather driving in, some freezing rain, maybe a

(18:44):
little snow to the north, showers, thunderstorms, and then in
the afternoon we have that slight to enhanced risk of
severe storms late in the day, a high sixty two.
Tonight windy, cloudy, and for your Friday, partly cloudy, evening
storms likely marginal risk of severe storms and the high

(19:08):
of fifty right now thirty three cold degrees. As you
start your April second morning here on the Benjaminonho on
News Talk eleven thirty win Thank you blue eyes. Mm hmmm,

(19:31):
fly me to the Moon. Very fitting for the crew
of Artemis two taking off to the dark side of
the Moon. Perhaps we can play a little pink Floyd
later on the show. I'll see you on the Dark
side of the Moon. That launch was something else. I
got a report last night from my son, my boy.

(19:56):
He is a student in the Era Space program at
a university in Daytona Beach, Florida, and I think he
said they drove about under an hour to get to
around the launch side. Obviously you can't be that close

(20:16):
to it. But he said this to us in our
little chat last night. Just went to the Artemis two
rocket launch. This will be the farthest humans have ever
been and the first time they see the dark side
of the moon. This is right in his geek zone,
my son. He loves this stuff. So he said, we

(20:38):
drove an hour south, so it was about five miles
away in terms of how close they could get. And
he was promised to send me some video and I'm
looking forward to that later. But yeah, this is this
is right to down my son's ali. He loves this stuff.
And how cool is it to be heading back to

(20:59):
the Moon. Something certainly to shoot for space exploration over
the years, and I know a lot of people have
raised a salient point, and that is, we got we
got enough problems down here on planet Earth to take
care of. But so many things through space exploration have
come about, some things I think we're cursing these days

(21:22):
technology quite frankly. But nonetheless, space travel has generated, has
garnered a great deal of technological advancement in all kinds
of different fields. So I'm excited about this. I'm I'm
what you call a space kid man. I'm a little
older than you are, but I remember, you know, landing
the Moon. I saw it the live when I was

(21:43):
probably nine years old at that time, and my mom
getting us a tang.

Speaker 2 (21:47):
We drank tang and we ate the space. Remember the
space food snacks that would come out like they were like,
oh sure, Yeah, there were a paste they like a
little paste that was like a peanut butter chocolate mix
and it was it was horrible, but it was so
with the space guys. That's that's what the astronauts were reading.
So we thought it was cool for sure.

Speaker 5 (22:08):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (22:09):
I used to I used to put that paste on
my my toothbrush and uh, I didn't cut it. I
told I told this to my son last night because
I remember this. I'm I was a space geek when
I was a kid too. I had, in fact, I
had dreamed of there's a place in Huntsville, Alabama, Alabama,
which is you know, incredibly tied into NASA and space

(22:32):
and aeronautics, all of that sort of thing, big tech
city on that front, and they had a place called
space Camp where you could do you know, NASA astronaut
things for a week. But my parents would have had
to take out a second or third mortgage, and I
don't think they wanted to do that. They loved me,
but that much, I know, And I told my son,

(22:58):
what a cool experience. Glad you got the chance to
see it. I went to the Kennedy Space Center when
I was a kid, and I really I remember this.
It was in nineteen seventy nine in Florida, but I
didn't get to see anything like a launch. The moose
out front apologized but said the park was closed, so

(23:18):
that was tough. I'm sorry, it's a vacation reference. Sorry, folks,
the park is closed. The move should have told you
that outfront. Chris Taylor has is back in action, the
far left, wacko candidate from Madison for your Supreme Court
who is campaigning as somebody she's not, which is very

(23:40):
fitting based on where the left is in identity politics today.
Chris Taylor, the leftist candidate for Supreme Court, has identified
as a rational judge, and her record just really speaks otherwise,

(24:05):
both on the bench and of course during her lengthy
recorded career in the state legislature. There is some stuff
going on out there right now, a couple of issues
as the debate comes up tonight, the only debate by
the way of this race. As you may know, Chris
Taylor experienced about of kidney stones before last week's scheduled

(24:30):
debate debate and they had to cancel it. So what's
the over under on a gallbladder issue tonight? I'm not sure,
but we'll keep monitoring that for you. But Greg, you've
been monitoring this story on social media. This is what
we're hearing. A Wisconsin Ethics Commission complaint was filed against

(24:51):
Supreme Court candidate Chris Taylor. The allegations, according to this post,
are stunning dead people donated for deceased individal jewels. Two
dead since twenty thirteen show contributions to her campaign. Seventy
two nursing home and memory care residents allegedly made one
hundred and seventy one donations, totaling twenty seven two hundred

(25:13):
and seventy dollars. Again, this is the complaint. Apparently it
is out there being discussed quite a bit on social
media today. I have not tracked down the complaint at
this point, but this is what is being reported this morning.
And you're getting a lot of a comment on this complaint.

Speaker 2 (25:33):
Yeah, a lot of people are saying, oh see, you know,
why did we have to find out about this now
when early voting started like last week?

Speaker 1 (25:41):
So it is amazing, isn't that always the way? Well,
you know, Dan O'Donnell had the story the other day
and this one was sent to me as well, that
you have this Supreme Court candidate, far left Supreme Court
candidate repeatedly, according to the story, violating a judicial ethics

(26:04):
rule she introduced as a member of the Assembly by
repeatedly ruling on cases involving the Sierra Club. So the
plot definitely thickens on this front. I wonder if these
ethics questions will come up during tonight's debate. We'll have
more on these developing stories and more obviously throughout the day.

(26:30):
What is coming up at tonight's debate? What is expected
in advance of Tuesday's election. The headline I read earlier
this morning was not as many people interested in this race,
not as much national interest going on here. I wonder
why if Chris Taylor wins, the Supreme Court just turns

(26:53):
even more left. The leftist already have obviously a four
to three majority, This would make it five to two,
and so what is the difference ultimately here? I guess
the issue is, you want to just in case one
of these leftists decides to actually follow the rule of law,

(27:18):
you want to be there the conservatives do, and just
in general we just need more rational conservative voices who
appreciate and follow the rule of law. On this court,
and we shall see coming up real quick. I just

(27:38):
wanted to play a little audio from last night's a
speech by the President of the United States, and he
talked about where we stand in Iran. He talked about
why we are here, and he talked about a promise
he made a long time ago. Now, whatever you think
about this current conflict, whatever you think about how it

(28:04):
has been handled, and I think in many ways it's
been handled quite well. And I do think that Iran
was stunned that they are in this situation. Nobody wants
a never ending war, of course, as we have seen
too often in this century, and very few people want
to see boots on the ground in this whole thing.

(28:27):
All of that said, it's hard to make a case
for Iran, poor poor evil regime, poor Iatolas who keep
getting knocked down, Poor Iotolas to keep getting scratched out.
That's basically what the Democrats position is. It's an unjust war,

(28:51):
poor poor Iatolas. It's ridiculous. But Trump Trump said this
a long time ago, and that's what people forget. As
he was campaigning in twenty fifteen.

Speaker 6 (29:04):
On the very first day I announced my campaign for
president in twenty fifteen, I have vowed that I would
never allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. This finacular
regime has been chanting death to America, death to Israel
for forty seven years. Their proxies were behind the murder

(29:27):
of two hundred and forty one Americans and the Marine
barracks bombing in Beirut, the slaughter of hundreds of our
service members with roadside bombs. They were involved in the
attack on the USS call, and they're carried out the
countless other Heinus acts, including the blood just horrible, bloody

(29:48):
atrocities of October seventh in Israel, something that most people
have never seen anything like it. This murderer's regime also
recently killed five thousand of their own people who are
protesting in Iran, forty five thousand dead. For these terrorists
to have nuclear weapons would be an intolerable threat.

Speaker 1 (30:12):
I agree, and I think the region in the Middle
East degrees. I know Israel agrees with that sentiment, and
I know a lot of Americans and a lot of
folks around the world very nervous about Iran getting closer
and closer to a nuclear weapon. Again, we can argue

(30:34):
over the details of the prosecution of this war, but
what the people inside Iran have suffered for nearly fifty years,
particularly the women there. For all of the feminists out
there who want to stand up for women's rights, here's
your opportunity here, because it is an absolute human rights

(30:57):
disaster and has been for a long time and iron
and there's certainly are reasons to do what the United
States and Israel have done. As the President just so
eloquently laid out. We'll take a break straight ahead a
conversation on this front and others with Wisconsin Senior Senator
Ron Johnson as we roll on this Thursday morning edition

(31:21):
of The Benjamin Yonce Show with Matt Kittle on news
Talk eleven thirty. WISN Welcome back thrill Seekers, Matt Kittle
year old emphasis on old radio talk show host Phil
and Daddy doing just that filling in on the Benjamin
yont Show here on news Talk eleven thirty. WISN got
much to accomplish coming up in just a bit after

(31:44):
the seven thirty news update. Turning Japanese, I really think
so Kaitanji Brown Jackson's turning Japanese theory on birthright citizenship
is so dumb it stuns. Now we have much to
talk about what's happening opening in the swamp and how
it's affecting the rest of US. Wisconsin's Senior Senator Ron

(32:06):
Johnson joining us now to talk about President Trump's plan
in Iran, birthright citizenship, and the future of the Save
America Act doesn't have a future. Good morning, sir.

Speaker 5 (32:17):
How are you boy Matt doing well? How about myself?

Speaker 1 (32:22):
I am well as well. Are you in the swamp?
Are you in God's country right now?

Speaker 5 (32:29):
Not in the swamp, but we're actually out of there
for time being. Looks like we'll be able to complete
this recess.

Speaker 1 (32:36):
Okay, fair enough, fair enough. I wanted to get your
first takes on the President's speech last night. I think
a lot of Americans were waiting for this. Do you
think he delivered a message that will satisfy the questions
that Americans have about the prosecution of this war.

Speaker 5 (32:54):
Well, hopefully most Americans understood what a menace Iran is
has been for forty seven years, and how other presidents said,
you can't, we can't allow around to be a nuclear power,
and yet they toddled them, funnled hundreds of billions of
dollars to help Iran build up the military, build up
their proxies, you know, be the world's largest state sponsored terror.

(33:19):
So President Trump, I'm sure it's a tough decision for him.
You know, President Trump wants peace, but he realized he
had to act before he could no longer act or
any president could act. So we had to take up
the nuclear capabilities. They didn't back down after we destroyed
their one facility. So he finally went in with Israel

(33:39):
and you know, it's gonna take care of it. So no,
I think he laid out that case. I think of
the two takeaways I have from the speech last night. First,
I mean, spent a lot of the time and a
lot of what he said was there to cajole our
NATO allies to step up the plate. Again, you need
the oil. We don't Asian analogy, you need the oil,
we don't step up the plate and help us with this,

(34:01):
you know, don't don't make us do all the heavy
lifting here. So that that was a I think a
big part in the major purpose of his speech. And
then secondly, I was, you know, very glad to hear that.
First of all, he goes and visits the families at
Dover for the dignified return, but that apparently everyone and
he made a point of this, and every every one

(34:21):
of the family members told him, please finish the job.
You know, we are family, our loved ones to sacrifice.
Don't let that sacrifice be in vain. Finish the job.
Do not allow a regime to be in power in
our rand that will continue to threaten the world. And

(34:42):
I think, you know, the fact that he pointed that
out and and emphasize that, I think is important, so
uh that that gives me confidence that Trump will will
finish the job.

Speaker 1 (34:53):
He did lay out a timeline two to three weeks.
What are what are you hearing? That is, what can
you share with us now about where we stand in
terms of taking out the nuclear capabilities of Iran and
this evil regime behind it.

Speaker 5 (35:12):
I remember running on this bout with President Trump in
twenty sixteen and he was asked a question about foreign policy.
He said, you know, America were just way too predictable
when it comes to foreign policy. In my mind, I thought, man,
that's the wrong answer. I mean, I think America has
to be very predictable, but to a cercumstance. And I
think you know the way he does it. He was
absolutely correct, and he keeps everybody you know, off balance

(35:35):
and people really do not know what he's going to do.
Now he's also shown strength, so people realize that you know,
you better, you better do a piece deal, or he
will follow through on his threats. But again you never
quite sure. So I think that's a fair amount of
basically his strategy in terms of negotiating. He's just keeping people.

(35:56):
People really do not know what he's going to do.

Speaker 1 (36:00):
So again, no doubt about it, he does.

Speaker 5 (36:03):
He certainly wants to end this wark in two to
three weeks. But I go back to what he told
those families or families told him, finish the job.

Speaker 1 (36:12):
Yeah. Yeah, this is a president that keeps his in
this country's enemies on its toes and that is a
good thing. I think NATO and the rest of the
world are still waiting for Obama to come back and
to apologize for America. Donald Trump is not going to
do that, and he is going to put America first. Now,
sometimes that does you can make an argument that putting

(36:36):
America first means making sure that the people who have
been screaming death to America and have come through on
those chants in so many different bloody occasions that they
don't have the power to hurt you in a very
major way. Let's turn our attention to birthright citizenship. The

(36:58):
Supreme Court oral argue humans were interesting, as I noted
before you and I started a conversation way that Justice
Katanji Brown Jackson is something else, didn't she. But beyond
the craziness of Katanji Brown Jackson and her clear lack
of understanding of the Constitution in law in general, what

(37:20):
did you think about the rest of the questions that
came up? Are you at all hopeful that birthright citizenship
could be a thing of the past, at least as
how it's been practiced now for over one hundred years
in this country.

Speaker 5 (37:36):
I would have liked to have heard far more supportive
statements coming out of more of the justices. You know,
the past titution is not a suicide path when these laws,
when these amendments were passed. I mean, I've been reading
quite a bit about this. I'm not a pastitution scholar myself,
but I mean I'm reading arguments on both sides. Both

(37:57):
sides make good points. Okay, I see what this is.
This is somewhat of a tough decision. But I think
what you have to throw into the into the mix
here in terms of just you know, the original content
of the you know, the language and the law. You
know what the times were. You have to look at
the times are now and how the Constitution in this
amendment will be used for us to you know, really

(38:19):
commit suicide. You take a look at what Peter Schweizer
is out there in his books, you know, talking about,
you know, the the mills, I mean the bird rights
citizenship mills that you know from China. Apparently five hundred
companies that offer these travel travel to America to have
a child here, they go back to China, they're American citizens,

(38:41):
and they come back here when they're eighteen nineteen. They
can vote, they can contribute to elections. And this is
exactly how China wages war. If you've ever read Sun
Suit's Art of War, and I've read it in a
number of times, because it really shows you exactly how
long term thinking and exactly how China and that entire
culture uses people's own laws and you know, and you know,

(39:04):
anything's fair game when they're in war, but they try,
they try and win a war without ever fighting a
battle and here's how you do it. You you infiltrate
the country with citizens that can vote in elections and
vote the way you want them to and be there
at universities and steal your intellectual property. I mean, China's
been doing this for decades. We better wake up. And
I hope the Supreme Court takes that in in account.

(39:27):
If if, if they, you know, and and hopefully decide
to end birth right citizens citizenship. It is insane, uh
what we're doing here, Uh, regardless of what the law
of the constitutions. Again, if they don't rule the right way,
I hope they leave a lane for a for Congress
to act. But then in order for us to do that,
and we'll have to end the filibuster because Democrats sure

(39:48):
don't want to end birth right citizenship. This is these
are people coming in here and you know, flood flooding
our elect election system with people are going to vote
for them.

Speaker 1 (40:01):
Absolutely, and before we get to that, I think it
is rather interesting that the leftist on this court have
long been saying the Constitution is a living, breathing document,
but in this case, interestingly enough, they want to be textualists.
They want to be a originalist at least as they
interpret that one clause in the fourteenth Amendment to the

(40:24):
US Constitution, and I think it is a horribly bad
reading on the legal front. To begin with, the Congress
in eighteen sixty eight did not mean for birthright tourism
as you just talked about. It didn't mean that you

(40:46):
could come into this country illegally, have a child and
an anchor baby, and there you are, you get to stay.
That wasn't the intent, certainly, and anybody who says it
was is either to you or an idiot. But speaking
of the long term game, the leftists are very good
at that, and maybe that comes from Marxist China. I

(41:09):
think the same elements do. They are playing the long
term game as you just mentioned about citizenship and voting
and non citizens ultimately being able to vote in mass
in this country, which brings us to the Save America Act.
Where is that and why isn't there a sense of

(41:30):
urgency from some of your Republican colleagues on this front.

Speaker 5 (41:34):
Well, to quick go back to the key phrase in
the fourteenth Amendment is under the jurisdiction thereof, And that's
what this whole argument is going to be. Turning around
you know who's under the jurisdiction of US constitutions. But
in terms of what the less long term game plan,
and they are relentless. Okay, it's pretty obvious to me.

(41:54):
They open up the borders you're starting with Obama really
put into hyperderate drive under President Biden, allows the country
to be flooded with millions of people completely outvetted. They
open up their states and cities to the sanctuary cities,
so they fled into there. That pump up the census numbers.
Given more members of Congress in those states. They make

(42:17):
it easy to teat to vote when you're a non
US citizen. Automatic registration uh, mail in balloting uh no
controls over there. As the as the Baker Carter Commission,
totally non Parsonan commissions said the greatest threat to election
integrity is is apste bouts and that's left all four.
So again it's just obvious. When Democrats had the chance

(42:41):
to end the filibuster, only two Democrats voted against that.
They've encouraged from the party they want to end the
filbuster under you know, to pass. I think it was
HR one, but it was basically the national takeover of
elections which would have made probably automatic registration mail and
all that legal. So they've they've transmitted you know, their

(43:05):
their game plan here. It couldn't be more obvious what
their game plan is. And so what President Trump is
trying to do is, let's at least try and while
we're in the position to do so, let's add some
integrity back to our elections, because most Americans agree with us.
They want truth and citizenship, they want motor ID. But
if we don't do it now, the minute the Democrats

(43:27):
get power, they will end the filibuster. They will pass
their nationalization of our elections, and it's over, game over.
That's why they're going to matter this. They will die
in this hill because any kind of election integrity measures
is existential to their long term game plan and turning
this nation to one party nation. And the way they'll
do it is they'll turn DC and Puerto Rico to states.

(43:49):
They'll pack the Supreme Court with what it's more Catanzi Browns.
That's what we have to look forward to. We've got
three years. We have three years to President Trump in power.
Who knows what's going to happen in twenty twenty nine.
We better take advantage of this, which is why you
know I reluctantly out there, very publicly saying no, this

(44:10):
is the time we got to step up to plate
and the Philibuster report. The Democrats get a chance and
take this three years, do everything we can to secure elections,
secure our border, make America more prosperous. And that's a
big difference. If we do it, it will be for the
best American public, for our freedom. If the Democrats do it,
it's all about turning this into one party nation.

Speaker 1 (44:30):
Yes, And you just scared the hell out of me
and a lot of people in this audience by talking
about the potential this should get the attention of Congress
on this issue, the potential for more Katanji Brown Jackson's
good lord, kiss the Republic goodbye. A final point on
that and just have a minute left. But you have
been talking about at the very least, test these Democrats.

(44:52):
Let's see where they stand on this, because as you noted,
with the exception of a couple of renegades so to speak,
in their party a while back, they they're all in
on ending the filibuster to work their will.

Speaker 5 (45:10):
Yeah, again, we've got the split party pumpeding conference between
those of us who think no, the Democrats will and
the philbuster and those that are hoping against all hope
they won't. And so right now we don't have the
votes to you know, new philibuster with just a you
know majority. So the minimum we ought to do is
get everybody on record, including the Democrats. Okay, when we're
in power, do you want to end the philbuster? So

(45:32):
take a rule change vote, which is sixty seven vote threshold.
I mean, be incredibly interesting to see whether Democrats would
vote then the philbuster or not. Now, will that constrain
them when they get powered. Probably not. I mean they're
just you know, enormous hypocrits. But you know, that's one technique.
But again I think, you know, we may have to

(45:53):
bypass that the way they have used DHS, not funding
DHS the moment when we're worth ran literally using the
security of our homeland security American citizens as bargaining chips
in the sick game of theirs. Again, I don't know
how much more broken the United States Senate could be

(46:13):
before my colleagues kind of wake up, smell the roses go, Yeah,
we better act before they do.

Speaker 2 (46:20):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (46:21):
I couldn't agree with you more. What more do they
need in terms of convincing on what this party would
do with that much power. We covered a lot of ground.
I always appreciate your time, and I appreciate your perspective, sir,
and I hope to talk soon, and I want to
wish you a very blessed Easter season.

Speaker 5 (46:40):
Stay well you too.

Speaker 1 (46:43):
There is your Wisconsin Senior Senator Ron Johnson. Yeah, like
we said, we talked about a lot of stuff there,
a lot of stuff that is so critical to the
continuation of this constitutional republic. We'll take a quick break
for news coming up up and just a bit and
we'll go over a little bit more about yesterday's oral

(47:04):
arguments in the case involving Trump's executive order that would
end birthright citizenship as we know it. Stick around. We're
just getting warmed up here on the Benjamin Yont Show
with yours truly Matt Kittle on News Talk eleven thirty
wisn mm H seven thirty two. Still cold, still messy,

(47:29):
and we're gonna warm up a little bit later and
then the severe weather comes in. So welcome to schizophrenic
weather Wisconsin in early April. We'll give you all the
deats on the forecast straight ahead in this edition to
the Benjamin Yonce Show with your old radio Amgo Matt Kittle,
and before we do that, let's check in with Jason
Gotch for the headlines.

Speaker 4 (47:50):
I appreciate it, Matt. A Beloit woman has been charged
with killing her fourteen year old daughter back in March
to quote unquote protect her from Elon Musk. One year
old Tayis Oninsky is charged with first degree intentional homicide.
She faces a life sentence if convicted. Oninsky reported to
police she did the killing and unsuccessfully tried to take

(48:10):
her own life. Oninsky did not specify any danger that
Musk pose to her daughter. The birthright citizenship hearing was
held at the US Supreme Court yesterday. The case involves
President Trump's executive order last year that denies automatic American
citizenship to children born to illegal immigrants and also birth
tourism babies born to people just visiting America. A ruling

(48:33):
in that case is expected early this summer. And that
is your bottom of the hour look at news headlines.

Speaker 1 (48:40):
Thank you, sir. Forecast today, like I said before, is
pretty much a mess. It's a grab bag, is what
it is. Your Fox six weather experts say a classic
early April split setup across southern Wisconsin. That means this
morning you're dealing with freezing rain, then showers, understorms, a

(49:01):
slight to enhanced risk of severe storms late day. Keep
it here because there is the potential that these things
could pop up, some tornadoes. We're told, definitely severe weather
coming up with high of sixty two today, coming up tonight, windy, cloudy,
and a low of forty. Friday, partly cloudy, evening storms likely,

(49:25):
marginal risk of severe storms, a high of fifty into
your Easter weekend. Showers likely on Saturday with a high
of fifty six, and on Easter itself a high of
fifty under am clouds and then pm sunshine. Right now,
you start your morning at thirty seven degrees with a

(49:48):
little rain and slushy activity depending on where you are today.
Here at Newstalk eleven thirty, wisn well played? Sir, well played,

(50:17):
Oh you're giving me the vapors. I haven't heard this
song in a long time. How old were you when
you learned what this song is about? Greg?

Speaker 2 (50:28):
It was actually when I first heard it, I thought
I thought it was kind of a derogatory song.

Speaker 6 (50:34):
But.

Speaker 1 (50:36):
That it was explained to me.

Speaker 2 (50:39):
Yeah, and what it was explained to me that a
thirteen or fourteen year old boy would totally understand it.

Speaker 1 (50:47):
Yes, yes, uh. And the big surprise of my childhood,
of course, was finding out what Cyndy Lauper was talking
about with she bop.

Speaker 2 (50:56):
Oh, yeah, if we did, Why didn't we didn't even know?

Speaker 1 (51:02):
No, we did? My goodness, women do that too. Oh
just opened up a whole new world, it really did.
Why are we playing Turning Japanese by the vapors? Well,
it is relevant. Stay with us on this point. Yesterday's
oral arguments on President Trump's executive order that he signed,

(51:27):
what was the first day, second day in office, I mean,
right away, an executive order that would and birthright citizenship,
the idea that just because you are born in this
country that automatically means you are a US citizen. And
of course, what we've seen over many years is that

(51:47):
people are coming to this country just for the privilege
of having their child be a US citizen, and their
hope eventually, after receiving a lot of your tax dollars
over the years, that they will be a US citizen.
A naturalized citizen eventually as well as you can understand.

(52:11):
It's caused a few problems over the years. Well, we
get into oral arguments yesterday, and there she is Miss
America Katanji Brown Jackson. Justice Katanji Brown Jackson on Tuesday,
once again showing us that you don't have to understand

(52:32):
the law to be a Supreme Court justice in the
United States of America. You'll find this full story at
the Federalist the Federalist dot com. I like the writer
of this story. This guy really gets it. He gets
the zeitgeist of our times. The headline, fittingly, Justice Jackson's

(52:55):
turning Japanese argument is so dumb stuns Hey, stupid kids,
be of good cheer. Oh you're not gonna win a
Nobel Prize in physics or solve any puzzles on the
wheel of fortune. But you can still grow up to
be a United States Supreme Court justice, just like Katanji

(53:19):
Brown Jackson did. During Tuesday's oral arguments on a widely
watched birthright citizenship case, Jackson once again showed that a
basic understanding of the law is no longer a prerequisite
to serve on the nation's highest court. Let me tell
you something. No three words uttered together stir more terror

(53:43):
in the hearts of men, As kg B declaring, I
was thinking that always leads to trouble on the court
and certainly during oral arguments. The case before Scotus was
Trump the Barbara testing. The president's executive order meant to

(54:07):
end birthright citizenship, as we mentioned before, the absolutely insane
reading of the Constitution's fourteenth Amendment. But virtually anyone born
in the United States is magically a US citizen done law,
doesn't matter how long you've been here, doesn't matter if
you've really truly established residency here. Yeah, you're a US citizen.

(54:33):
President Trump, who showed up to watch the court way
in on his stalled executive order, and man, oh man,
did the Left and their pals in the accomplice media
go insane over this unprecedented move? Again, are you surprised
that the president would do this? Are you surprised that

(54:57):
an unprecedented president would take unprecedented action? Might he be
very interested in the outcome of this issue since he's
campaigned on that for years? AnyWho he was there? He
later posted on truth Social platform, his Truth Social platform,

(55:18):
that the United States is the only country in the
world stupid in all caps, as the president is want
to do stupid enough to allow birthright citizenship. Not quite.
According to Pew Research, thirty two other countries provide automatic
birthright citizenship similar to the US, although I am not

(55:42):
sure how many people are crossing the border into Venezuela
or the Republic of Chad or Canada, for the love
of God, for unrestricted birthright citizenship. Trump's point is well taken.
The US is as stupid as Canada and the other
third world countries on the list, and it's been stupid

(56:08):
on anchor babies since the late nineteenth century, when the
Supreme Court went all in on the insanity that is
birthright citizenship. Speaking of stupid, Jackson struggled all Tuesday morning
with the intent of the fourteenth Amendment really puzzling her
puzzler on this. It was ratified in eighteen sixty eight,

(56:32):
the Civil Rights Amendment written to grant citizenship to freed
slaves and their children, not the children of millions of
illegal immigrants looking for a past to stay or birth tourists.
A couple of areas of tourism that I really have
struggled with over the last several years, can't believe that

(56:54):
they're a part of the industry. One is abortion tourism,
which is the absolute mark of a depraved society. And
our friends to the South JB. Pritzker and crew in Illinois,
Gavin Newsom over in California and other Blue states have

(57:18):
really marketed since the overturn of Roe v. Wade the
abortion tourism industry. That's right, where you make money off
of the death of unborn children. Again, that is about
the bottom of a society, a society that has lost

(57:42):
its moral compass. The other tourism industry that I've struggled
with is the birth right tourism industry. US Solicitor General
John D. Souer noted that for decades after the amendment
took effect, the Fourteenth Amendment, it was widely understood and

(58:02):
understandably so, that children born to temporary workers in the
United States were not citizens. In what will henceforth be
known as the Turning Japanese, I really think so precedent,
Jackson mused that if she stole a wallet while in Japan,

(58:23):
she would be bound by her allegiance to the country's
criminal laws and the consequences Therein what Yeah, the bizarre
train of logic began with those three dangerous words once again.

(58:45):
This is the audio from yesterday's Oral Arguments Katanji Brown
Jackson and the Turning Japanese Precedent.

Speaker 7 (58:56):
I was thinking about this, and I think they there
are various sources that say this that you can have.
You obviously have permanent allegiance based on being born in
whatever country you're from. That's what everybody recognizes. But you
also have local allegiance when you are on the soil

(59:16):
of this other sovereign. And I was thinking, you know,
I'm ius citizen and visiting Japan, and what it means
is that, you know, if I steal someone's wallet in Japan,
the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me. It's allegiance,

(59:37):
meaning can they control you as a matter of law.
I can also rely on them if my wallet is
stolen to you know, under Japanese law, go and prosecute
the person who has stolen it. So there's this relationship
based on even though I'm a temporary traveler, I'm just
on vacation in Japan, I'm still locally owing allegiance in

(01:00:01):
that set.

Speaker 1 (01:00:04):
Okay, that's quite enough. Even Elena Kagan looked at her
and said, what the hell are you talking about? Just amazing,
Just amazing, she says, So there is this relationship. Even
though I'm just a temporary traveler, I'm just on vacation

(01:00:24):
in Japan, I'm still locally owing allegiance in that sense,
in a very real sense. Though that makes no sense.
Visitors are bound by the laws of the country in
which they travel, kind of like millions of undocumented migrants
are bound or should be bound by US immigration law.

(01:00:47):
The Democrat Party doesn't think so. Those travelers don't owe
an allegiance to the country that should be enforcing said laws.
And therein lies a huge problem, by the way, with
birthright citizenship. As I said, even Jackson's far left fellow
justices on the Court wanted to drop the Billy Madison

(01:01:10):
wine on her, you know, the one where he says
that is the most idiotic thing I have ever heard.
Everyone in this room is dumber for having heard it.
The woman who said she wasn't qualified to define what
a woman is because she is not a biologist has

(01:01:34):
indeed dented the esteemed High Court's reputation with a growing
list of head scratching bench questions and legal arguments. The
day before she unleashed the turning Japanese defense, Jackson stood
as the lone dissenting vote in a First Amendment case.
In the eight one ruling, the court found a Colorado

(01:01:56):
law violated the free speech of counselors by banning them
from practicing talk therapy to help patients overcome gender dysphoria.
Jackson said the mental health professionals have no free speech
rights if said speech runs counter to a state's gender
identity agenda. That's right. Listen to the experts. She has

(01:02:20):
expressed grave concerns about the First Amendment hamstringing government. Yeah,
it's a real drag when the amendments to the Constitution,
When the Constitution itself gets in the way of the government,
Jackson has abandoned her states right stance when progressive national

(01:02:40):
policy is on the line. Of course, as the Federalist
senior legal correspondent Margot Cleveland put it in an expost Tuesday,
the Solicitor General failed to employ what she called the
Trump card. The Solicitor General didn't use his most effective
argument this morning, Cleveland wrote, which would be this, and lastly,

(01:03:05):
I'd ask the justices to remember that you cannot rule
against the government without agreeing with Justice Jackson, and everybody went, oh, yeah,
got it. That's the state of the Supreme Court, the

(01:03:27):
turning Japanese President. Really amazing times these All right, we'll
stop for news and weather and all of that good stuff.
Coming up next, Chris Taylor has some splaining to do
ahead of the big debate tonight. Stick around Matt kittle

(01:03:48):
In and the Benjamin You Show on News Talk eleven
thirty WISNY. Then let's do it final hour the Benjamin

(01:04:11):
Yaut Show for this Thursday, April second, twenty twenty six,
in the Year of our Lord, Matt kittlefilling in this morning,
how are you yeah? At a cold start, sloppy start.
It's gonna continue wet today and then some potential severe
weather as we warm up into the lower sixties. It
is indeed a mixed bag that Mother Nature is offering today.

(01:04:37):
Yesterday April fools, boy, didn't we have some fun with that.
My daughter came home from school yesterday and she said,
I hate this day. He said, why is that? Don't
you like people repeatedly lying to you and then laughing,
and then screaming out a catchphrase, Aha, I get away
with lying today. You know what I just thought about

(01:04:58):
this bill and Hillary Billery as I like to call them,
How they fought for such a long time that subpoena
to appear before Congress involving the Epstein files. They should
have said, yeah, I'll appear on April first. Then they

(01:05:19):
could lie and lie and lie like they love to
do without any repercussions. Alas that has passed. But yes,
I was saying, if you don't, for those who don't
get the concept of April Fool's day, let me give

(01:05:39):
you a little sense of this and I little thought
exercise if you will. And I said, well, try this.
Gavin Newsome is a good and decent man, April fools.
See how that works?

Speaker 2 (01:05:56):
Just like that.

Speaker 1 (01:05:59):
Katanji around Jackson is in a stute observer and practitioner
of the US Constitution. Gotcha again, April fools. That's fun,
isn't it?

Speaker 5 (01:06:14):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (01:06:15):
Greg, by the way, for you, I had mentioned this
when we did our last segment on Katanji Brown Jackson,
the absolutely unqualified jurist now serving as a Supreme Court member.
A Supreme Court justice, Greg pulled out the old song

(01:06:35):
by the Vapors Turning Japanese, because we were talking about
how Katanji Brown Jackson likened allegiance to a country and
birthright citizenship to pickpocketing someone's wallet and then in Japan
and then having the allegiance to that country to be

(01:06:56):
moved through that country's legal system. It was baffling. It
still doesn't make any damn sense, but that pretty much
describes justice Katanji Brown Jackson. I mentioned there was another
version of this song that I really enjoyed in the
early nineteen eighties. It came from one of my favorite

(01:07:16):
shows of all time, one of the few things that
Canada has done right. It's called setv Oh Yeah. And
here's here's the alternate version of that. Greg.

Speaker 3 (01:07:28):
If you would, I've got your picture. I've got your picture.
I like a million of you all round mysell I
want the doctor to take a picture, yes, so I
can look at you from inside as well. You did

(01:07:50):
it turning up and turning down. I'm turning it and
turning around, turning Japanese.

Speaker 1 (01:07:57):
Turning Japanese. I really think so.

Speaker 2 (01:08:01):
Love it.

Speaker 1 (01:08:03):
He's got his white shoved tarlk shoes on and his
crass orange pants with the white belt. Rick moranis that
show was awful. That show was fantastic. I remember there
was a show on ABC that tried to compete with

(01:08:23):
Saturday Night Live at the time, and actually it came
out in the early nineteen eighties before Eddie Murphy on
and SNL just was awful, unwatchable, as it has been
so many times over the course of the years. But
the show is called Fridays, I think, yeah, I remember
that show. Yeah, yeah, you know who was in that?

(01:08:43):
Of course Kramer, Michael Richards from Seinfeld, he was in that,
and Larry David was in that, oddly enough, and that
had some funny moments. But I don't think it ever
competed with SNL. But I think SCTV in its own
way did that and I miss it dearly.

Speaker 3 (01:09:02):
Well.

Speaker 2 (01:09:03):
Remember the Schmangy brothers from Sheboygan.

Speaker 1 (01:09:06):
Oh, I love the Schmengies, the Smenghis and their little
Polka band and how they would eat cabbage rolls, rolls
in coffee.

Speaker 2 (01:09:14):
Coffee, rolls in tag he said, cabbage rolls in coffee.

Speaker 1 (01:09:17):
That's what it was. Cabbage rolls in coffee. That's how
they Yeah, that's how they would do it. Oh, that
had so many great characters, so many great people on
that show. John Candy obviously, God think about that and
just all the things. And of course we just lost
another SCTV alum and Catherine O'Hara, that was that was
sad she made that show. I remember he did a

(01:09:41):
Brooke Shield's talk show where she interviews Tip O'Neil, Speaker
of the House back in the nineteen eighties, this rotund
and very serious Boston or Massachusetts guy, and well it
was fun. It was fun back then. People had a
sense of humor back then that has died over the

(01:10:04):
intervening forty forty five plus years. Here's something deadly serious.
Crazy cat Lady Chris Taylor has some splaining to do
before tonight's big debate. We told you this before. I
don't have this documented. I don't have the complaint in

(01:10:24):
front of me because the Wisconsin Elections Commission would not
turn that over to me or anybody else. Those complaints
are always considered confidential. But we're hearing from multiple sources
that an ethics complaint has been filed against Chris Taylor,
the wacko leftist judge running for Wisconsin Supreme Court. You

(01:10:45):
go to the polls on Tuesday. Don't forget to go
to the polls on Tuesday. This is still a critical election.
If Chris Taylor wins, the Liberals will have a five
two hold on the Court. They already have control of
the court. It just makes it that much more difficult

(01:11:06):
to bring back a conservative majority. And good lord, this
court could need every conservative voice it has. It's losing
one of the best jurists in this country. I believe
in Rebecca Bradley that it was a shame, but I
certainly understand it the shame that she did not run again.

(01:11:29):
I think she has many big things in her future
when it comes to the courts in America. That said,
Maria Lazarre is a fantastic candidate, a real conservative as
it relates to the real, actual law, the reading of

(01:11:53):
the law, not activist judging from the bench, not legislative
activism from the bench. Obviously, last week they were supposed
to hold the debate between the two candidates, and well

(01:12:15):
that didn't happen. Apparently Chris Taylor had about of the
kidney stones. Listen if in need. That is the case.
I know, and I'm knocking on Chuck Schumer's head right now.
I don't ever want to experience that. I have been

(01:12:36):
told by family members and friends that kidney stones the
passing of more painful than childbirth. I am glad to
tell you that, as a biological man, I have experienced
neither in my life, and I hope I don't curse that.

(01:12:56):
I've had enough on the prostate side of things. We'll
just call it even god. Okay, Yeah, So I have
a friend who is I'm not kidding you, has had
kidney stones at least fifteen times, about of them. On

(01:13:17):
numerous occasions he's had to go into the emergency room
and the screams coming out of that hospital must have
been must have been intense. So if indeed that was
the case. But now you get a chance to look
at the two candidates. Tonight the debate will be held

(01:13:40):
on is conducted by WISN correct, Yes, the WISNTV, of course.
Now what time does that start? I don't have that
readily available. It is this evening. I'll get you a
final note on the time of that, but it is
it would be good to tune in and see Chris

(01:14:04):
Taylor try to defend all of the crazy liberal stuff
that she has done in her career in law, on
the bench, and of course several years in the Wisconsin
State legislature, as Dan O'Donnell broke earlier this week, was
it yesterday? This is the same woman as a legislator

(01:14:28):
who tried to put in an ethics law on recusal
that would demand Supreme Court justices recuse themselves if they
received contributions from certain organizations, activist organizations, political, whatever the
case may be. And it appears that Judge Taylor has

(01:14:54):
accepted a fair amount of money from the leftist SIRA
Club and doesn't want to talk about recusing, just like
the rest of the liberal justices who have campaigned for
their seat and done so, of course in a highly
political way, saying things like the maps, the political maps

(01:15:20):
in Wisconsin were rigged. You remember that old classic talking
about how Act ten was horrible, even though of course
it saved taxpayers, cities, local governments around the state billions
of dollars. These are people who defended the abortion industry.

(01:15:46):
Their campaigns, of course accepted money from these players, and
they don't feel the need to recuse themselves. They don't
see that as a conflict of interest. I'm hoping that
an honest media. First of all, I hope they show
up tonight. That would be something with it. They're very
welcome to attend this debate. That would be nice. I

(01:16:08):
hope there are some honest questions about this leftist record
Chris Taylor and what she has done, what she believes,
and what that will mean for the Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
Now here's a scarier thought for you. Think about next
Tuesday's election as a warm up to an absolutely necessary,

(01:16:33):
critical election in November. Because Democrats holding the legislature at
least one house of the legislature, the governor's office, and
the Supreme Court. That is a trifecta for disaster when

(01:16:59):
it comes to civil liberties, when it comes to basic
common sense values, when it comes to the tax dollars.
You are paying into a vast, vast administrative state that
will only explode under leftist leadership. It is critical you
vote on Tuesday. It is critical you vote in November.

(01:17:26):
It really is about saving this state. We'll take a
quick break and coming, Oh, we have so much more
to talk about. Well before you do that.

Speaker 2 (01:17:34):
Debate tonight is at seven o'clock on Channel twelve seven.

Speaker 1 (01:17:37):
Thank you, thank you. I thought it was, but I
didn't want to say something incorrect. Tune in, like I said,
It'll be on Channel twelve seven o'clock, as Greg noted,
and you will get a chance, hopefully to see Maria
Lazarre first and foremost, and she will talk about how
she approaches the law. And then I hope you get

(01:18:00):
a chance to see Chris Taylor try to answer questions
about how she has approached the law over her long
leftist Marxist career. Coming up in just a bit, Where
have all the fat people gone? Yeah, we'll talk more

(01:18:20):
about that and the crisis in some sectors of agriculture
because of the disappearance that coming up here on this
Thursday edition of The Benjaminon Show with Yours truly Matt
Kittle on News Talk eleven thirty WISN Hi, gorgeous. How
you doing? We're getting closer to a weekend inchin along

(01:18:46):
through some lucky mixed bag of weather this morning thirty
nine right now in Milwaukee as you begin your day
at news Talk eleven thirty WISN You were cast for
today the Fox six experts. We're expecting a classic early

(01:19:08):
April split setup. As they say, am freezing rain and
we have seen some of that slick spots around the
area today. Showers and thunderstorms. That's basically it for the
rest of the day, although those thunderstorms do include an
enhanced risk of severe turning severe. Later Today we'll see

(01:19:31):
a high of sixty two with winds out of the
southeast switching over to the southwest ten to twenty miles
per hour. Tonight, a low of forty under cloudy skies.
Should be windy still and to close out your work
week on Friday, partly cloudy, evening storms likely marginal risk
of severe storms and a high of fifty. Again, it's

(01:19:53):
thirty nine under rain and in some areas and freezing
rain out there, so b be careful set up a
plan for your weekend. Of course, as we're getting around
the corner, weather looks well, looks very early spring like.
On Saturday, showers again with a high of fifty six,

(01:20:17):
and then Sunday high of fifty, although the sunshine does
indeed return. In just a moment, we're going to get
into a crisis apparently caused by weight loss drugs. I'll

(01:20:37):
tell you about that in just a moment, but I
want to put in a little at a boy for
an organization near and dear to my heart, the Federalist.
You can find them at the Federalist dot com. This
week it's not been reported all that much, but a

(01:20:58):
significant victory against the censorship industrial complex. The Federalist, like
a number of conservative organizations, particularly conservative news organizations, was
absolutely silenced for years in what I think is appropriately

(01:21:22):
called the censorship industrial complex. And we saw it. We
all know what happens to conservatives on Facebook even to
this day, but it was significantly worse. And that's just
you know, the social media side of things, that the
front facing side of things. There is an entire nefarious

(01:21:46):
movement that was sanctioned by the US government, mostly under
the Biden administration, but there were players in the Trump
administration too, big government trying to tell you what is
good information, what is misinformation, what is disinformation? And my favorite,

(01:22:07):
of course in this series of Big Brotherhood malinformation, that
is information that is true, factual, but the government finds
it very uncomfortable anyway. Margo Cleveland from The Federalist writes
this week, after more than two years of litigation, the

(01:22:29):
Federalist successfully negotiated a deal with the State Department to
end the lingering effects of the Global Engagement Centers unconstitutional
targeting of domestic media outlets, and to ensure a future
administration does not restart the censorship activities that flourished under

(01:22:51):
the Biden administration. The Global Engagement Center. This was no
hall of justice. By the way, there are no super
friends involved in this, only villains. Again this well, I'll
tell you more about. The Federalist and The Daily Wire
filed a lawsuit against the State Department, its Global Engagement Center,

(01:23:14):
and several officers and employees in December of twenty twenty three.
The complaint, filed by the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a
public interest firm committed to fighting the Administrative State, alleged
violations of the plaintiff's First Amendment rights to freedom of
speech and freedom of the press, and also alleged the

(01:23:34):
defendants exceeded their statutory authorities, which was limited to foreign affairs.
They got into domestic affairs quite a bit, as we
have seen the Deep State and the administrative State do
for so long in this country. Early Wednesday, attorneys representing

(01:23:56):
The Federalist and The Daily Wire filed a motion for
entry of consent decree along with a detailed consent decree
with places which places significant locations or limitations on the
State Department's ability to target speech or fund tech companies
which target speech. Now, all of that is to say

(01:24:18):
that the Trump administration is recognizing the wrongs that were
committed against conservative news organizations, in this case the Federalist
and the Daily Wire. There were many more violations of this,
And what happened was you have this secret, nefarious group,
this organization, working with so many others to suppress, to

(01:24:43):
throttle back the release of information that came from sources
the government did not like. Now, think about what happened
during COVID. Think about all of the lies that the experts,
the scientist we were supposed to to follow told us.
A lot of people were screaming, listen, listen, this is wrong.

(01:25:06):
These lockdowns are stupid, they're not working. In fact, they're
much more deleterious to Americans and people around the world
in general than the actual virus is.

Speaker 5 (01:25:21):
But no, you.

Speaker 1 (01:25:25):
Couldn't get that information out, at least into a mass
audience like the corporate accomplice media, which was regurgitating the
line of the experts who were lying to us. Yeah,
if you stand six feet away from someone in the supermarket,
you don't have to worry about this pesky coronavirus. If

(01:25:49):
you put this paper mask on, you should be just fine.
Now take this vaccine and shut up. And by the way,
if you don't, you lose your job, You lose your reputation.
Look at all of these these doctors who were really

(01:26:09):
truly following the science. Look how many of those physicians,
those in the medical field during COVID were blacklisted, shunned,
and shamed. More so, their very important work, research and
information was being silenced, was being shut down by this

(01:26:36):
hideous censorship industrial complex real quick. On this discovery, evidence
obtained by the plaintiffs revealed that the Geck wasn't there
a character Elaine's boyfriend on Seinfeld named Todd Geck. That
is your your your global, your global. Uh Stifler of

(01:27:01):
speech had regularly promoted technologies that targeted domestic speech, such
as NewsGuard and the Global Disinformation Index. How about that
for nineteen eighty four, language and operation the Global Disinformation
Index also known as GDI, including two technology companies and

(01:27:26):
foreign governments. NewsGuard and GDI branded The Federalist and the
Daily Wire as unreliable or risky. That had some really
awful effects on those news organizations. It severely impacted their

(01:27:46):
advertising revenues, negatively impacted their reach, and obviously did a
battering and bruising on their reputation. And I will tell
you something, I know these folks. These are some of
the best journalists you will find out there. They are
committed to real investigative journalism, document based journalism. They are

(01:28:10):
committed to making sure that your government is beholden to you,
not the other way around. But your government saw these
messengers as dangerous, dangerous to their lies and their cover ups.

(01:28:35):
So this is a huge when I know it's not
going to get a lot of reporting in your usual
accomplice Pravda press media sites. But I thought it important
to take a few moments to talk about this battle
because I can tell you this personally, the Federalist is
not just reporting on the news of the day. They

(01:28:58):
are holding the government accountable literally in cases like this
suing for First Amendment basic civil rights in America. We'll
take a quick break, and yes we do have to
get to I like to think of it as perhaps

(01:29:18):
one of the big stories of the day. Maybe you don't.
The question being posed, where have all the fat people gone?
Will delve into that in a few more spare thoughts
as we wrap up this edition of The Benjamin Yonk
Show with Yours truly Matt Kittle on News Talk eleven
thirty wisn Happy Easter Week? Do you on this blessed

(01:29:39):
holiday week? Good Friday tomorrow, Mondy Thursday today for Christians
and obviously the day that it's all about, Easter Sunday,
Happy Passover to our Jewish friends. Today and we were
talking about the author of this song, creator of the song,

(01:30:00):
Lindsey Buckingham, best known for his involvement with the Mac,
the Fleetwood Mac. We found out today that Lindsey Buckingham
has a stalker and the stalker apparently thinks Lindy Lindsay
Buckingham is her father. Now we know the wayward How

(01:30:23):
do I express this? The wayward Seed of rock and
roll has produced many an illegitimate child over he said,
Wayward Seed, Wayward Seed, which I believe, which I believe
was Lindsey Buckingham's album in.

Speaker 2 (01:30:42):
Which, uh, it's really good. That could be that could
be the name of a rock band, Wayward Seed.

Speaker 1 (01:30:49):
Wayward Seed, Yes, then Kansas do that song carry on
my Wayward Seed. There'll be a circumcision when you are done. Anyway,
all of that said, Lindsay Buckingham has a stalker, and
so Greg and I were talking about it, and he goes,
does Lindsey Buckingham actually have a song beyond Fleetwood Mac?

(01:31:11):
And I said, oh, yeah, I remember this tune from Vacation.
This is the second Vacation reference that I think I've made.
And we're really on a roll on that today. But
God bless Lindsay Buckingham. I believe the stalker in question
is in custody. So far there has been no harm
done to Lindsey Buckingham, at least in this particular situation.

(01:31:34):
I've been promoting it all morning long because I think
this is this is quite a story the weight loss
industry with all of the weight loss drugs now, it's
really been an issue for say, your potato chip makers

(01:31:56):
in particular, among other fatty foods. It's just they're putting
them down now. And the headline from Fox News is
weight loss drugs crush food demand as farmers face dumping
mountains of potatoes. That's right. The rapid rise of weight

(01:32:18):
loss injections, and I believe they have a pill for
that now, is reshaping the quantity of food people eat,
leaving farmers in some areas with a growing surplus of
unsold potatoes. Yeah, I think the chips. I think I'll
put those down now. At least I won't have as

(01:32:40):
many of the chips as I had before. The trend
toward healthier eating habits, combined with the widespread use of
drugs like ozempic and others, are cutting demand for traditional
staples and weighing on grocery sales. News agency SWNS reported,
I love the fact that they're grouping potato chips in

(01:33:04):
with funny staples. But I suppose, you know, include mashed
potatoes in there, bakers with a lot of butter and
sour cream, as I did at the Old Roadhouse the
other night. Mmmm delicious. I'm here to tell you that
I am the ambassador of the fat guys out there,

(01:33:27):
so I don't have I don't know if I have
a dog in the fight unless chip prices go up.
Farmers across the United Kingdom, for example, say they are
facing the prospect of discarding thousands of tons of stored
potatoes as their sales continue to fall. Farm owner Andy

(01:33:47):
good Acre, which I think is an awesome name for
a farmer, don't you good Acre, Yeah,