December 3, 2025 • 39 mins
Listen to The Next-Gen Report live! Sundays at 7:00 p.m. on AM950, KPRC.
The left, and their friends in the mainstream media, are still super angry at President Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth for blowing up drug boats. I can't think of a better use for our military.
The Trump administration is finally calling out the massive amounts of fraud and crime that we have seen as a result of mass immigration from Somalia into the United States. Thankfully, he's also taking action.
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
Find clips and highlights on TikTok:
@_ethanbuchanan
Watch this episode of The Next-Gen Report on YouTube!
https://youtu.be/qc_NW2NCcGY
The left, and their friends in the mainstream media, are still super angry at President Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth for blowing up drug boats. I can't think of a better use for our military.
The Trump administration is finally calling out the massive amounts of fraud and crime that we have seen as a result of mass immigration from Somalia into the United States. Thankfully, he's also taking action.
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
Find clips and highlights on TikTok:
@_ethanbuchanan
Watch this episode of The Next-Gen Report on YouTube!
https://youtu.be/qc_NW2NCcGY
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
From the heart of the Space City to the heart
of gen Z. Welcome to Next Gen Conversation, not Dad's
Talk Radio.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Ethan talks to you about the issues and events that
men are to our generation.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
This is the next Gen Report put Ethan U can
in that. Hey, welcome once again. I hope you had
a great Thanksgiving. That's one of my all time favorite holidays.
It really is. It does not get the credit it deserves.
One of the reasons that I'm such a hardliner on
(00:40):
when you can start celebrating Christmas is because I love
Thanksgiving so much and I want Thanksgiving to get it's
sort of it's due respect. I feel like it doesn't
get that a lot of the times. But anyway, we
have got a lot to talk about today. It has
been busy. It's been a busy Thanksgiving. I ended up
doing a show on Sunday when I wasn't planning to.
(01:03):
I was planning on taking that evening off. I didn't
because there was just so much that we had to
talk about. It needed to be discussed, and it was discussed,
and so yeah, here we are. I want to start
this show off with something a little bit lighter because
we had a rough Thanksgiving. You know, it was a
very serious show. If you haven't listened to it, it
(01:25):
is important. You should go listen to it. It's on
the podcast. You can find it right now, the Next
Gen Report. Wherever you get podcasts, go listen to it.
It is important. But let's start off on a little
bit of a kind of lighter note. We're gonna talk
about some local stuff. We don't do that as much
as we should. I should, but we're gonna do it today.
There's plenty of local stuff going on, so we're gonna
(01:45):
talk about it. Starting with Lena Hidalgo, Harris County Judge.
Lena Hidalgo announces quote painful split from husband after one
year of marriage. And there's a picture of them right
after they got engaged, looking all cute with the skyline
in the back, and they it ended. It got blown up.
Which I don't tend to comment on celebrity gossip at
(02:09):
all because I don't care. But this is sort of
celebrity gossip that I think is worth my attention because
this is the county judge. But anyway, let's dig into
her announcement here. So here it is on Instagram. This
is where I first saw it, and I thought this
was crazy. She announced on her one year anniversary that
she had split from her husband, who, for the record,
(02:30):
she had been with for nine years. Before that, she
was with this guy for nine years, married him precisely
one time, and a year after that they've split up.
So here's the announcement. Our wedding day was the best
day of my life so far, perhaps because my life
with David has been incredible. It's been over half of
(02:51):
my adult life, full of joy, new experiences, major changes.
So the whole time I'm reading this, I'm thinking, Okay, yeah,
this is a nice, normal anniversary post, because that's what
it sounds like. Incredible friendships, successes, companionship, growth, support and
deep love. We are a fantastic team. Well, apparently you're
not that good. Our time together has also seen challenges. Okay,
this is you know, still normal, but starting to get
(03:13):
a little fishy of course, but we've worked hard and
availed ourselves of resources to whether those and strengthen our relationship. Okay, nice, Yeah,
happy one year anniversary. This is great. This year life
took a turn that made us see things differently. That
was out of left field. Where'd that come from? So
very much unexpectedly, this day of our anniversary, David and
(03:34):
I are separated. It's not what either of us wanted.
It's what we confidently, though painfully feel is best. I
mean the definition of out of left field, the definition.
But then again, it wasn't. If you follow Lena Hidalgo,
if you know who this person is, you saw this
coming a mile away. I famously predicted amongst friends that
(03:55):
this marriage would last not more than two years. I
thought it would get up to about two years. I
didn't even expect it to make it just one. I
thought for sure they'd clear the two year mark and
call it quits there. I expected this post a year
from now, but I did expect it. So this makes
a lot more sense when you realize the kind of
(04:16):
person Lena Hidogo is. She's mentally ill. Openly, by the way,
that's not just me saying that and being mean. She
admits this. She talks about this, she goes in front
of Commissioner's court and complains about it. So this is
well known, and I'm not shaming her for it. I'm
stating a fact. She is mentally ill. She's also a narcissist.
And here's a good example of this Harris County Judge
(04:38):
Lena Hidalgo accused of disrespect at slain corporal's funeral. This
is from twenty twenty two. It's a little bit older,
but if you follow news and local news, and you
have been for some time, you'll remember this incident. There
are few services more somber and more sacred than those
honoring a fallen law officer. And yet the funeral of
slain Corporal Charles Galloway with Harris County Pricinc. Five com dicibles,
(05:00):
now lies under a shroud of controversy, with Lena Hidalgo
accused of being the instigator. So apparently what she had
done was try to make herself essentially the center of
attention at this funeral. She was welcome to attend, but
she wasn't necessarily, you know, part of the entourage, part
of the you know, honoraries at this funeral. And anyone
(05:22):
who's been to a funeral knows what I'm talking about.
One of the people that's there to you know, I guess,
give a speech, or stand behind the casket during the eulogy,
any of those things like that. She was just invited
to be there, and she had a reserve seat, but no,
she wanted to be part of the procession and stand
with the pallbearers and Lottie Dottie don You can read
(05:43):
all the details in this article. It's narcissism. She wanted
to make this slain officer's funeral about herself, and when
she got checked on it by members of law enforcement,
she fussed them for it. She has a pattern of
doing this, and when when you realize what a deranged,
mentally ill narcissist she is, it's not surprising in the
(06:05):
least bit that she got divorced, because no kidding, I mean,
the only mystery here is how in the world did
she make it nine years with this guy and then
marry him? And that was the breaking point. It's just wild.
It's just wild. Who I really feel bad for is
(06:26):
her husband. And I'll explain to you why. Tony Ortiz
at Current Revolt dug this up in a Vogue article
promoting Hidalgo and her marriage. Hidalgo mentions that she was
able to feel comfortable marrying her now ex after he
used half of his life savings to pay her medical bills. Here,
she is quoted in the Vogue article, what I didn't
(06:47):
always tell everyone is that David had used the bulk
of his savings to pay off a massive bill I'd
received for my mental health treatment. So because she was
so crazy, she racked up all this medical debt trying
to get uncrazy. Spoiler, it didn't work. And then she
married this guy after having taken all his savings, and
now they're getting divorced or they're split. I don't know
(07:09):
if they're officially getting divorced or they're just split or
what have you. But assuming they get divorced, which would
be where my betting money is going, that's even more
money out of this guy's pocket because he's gonna have
to get a lawyer for sure. So I mean, as
a guy, as a proud proponent of the bro code,
(07:30):
I feel terrible for this poor dude that she married,
who John Wimer famously called a nerd in their engagement pictures.
But anyway, we got a lot coming up, very important topics.
Just wanted to share something fun with you before we
really get rolling. We'll be right back after this quick break.
This is the next Gen Report. I'm gonna say something controversial.
(08:22):
I don't think it should be controversial, but in this
day and age. It is controversial, and I'm gonna say
it anyway. American enemies that are threatening the lives and
livelihoods of the general American populace should just be killed
by our military. That's why, in my humble opinion, we
(08:47):
have a military right. That's the whole concept. This is
a threat to the country, we kill it that this.
I feel like what I'm saying is not crazy, but
apparently these days it's crazy. So you've probably seen this.
Over the last we'll say, maybe a week and a half.
(09:08):
This has been the big story is, oh, did Pete
Hegseth order survivors of a kinetic strike on a drug
boat to be executed by another kinetic strike. I'm gonna
get out in front of this and say I don't
think he did, But even if he did, I don't care.
(09:34):
These are narco terrorists. These are not good people. These
are people that would willingly kill American people directly for money.
That's what they were on that boat to do. They're
transporting drugs into the United States, which will kill people.
That's a guaranteed fact. They will distribute those drugs to
(09:54):
people who will overdose on them. They are a threat
to our national security and the well being an individual
livelihood of millions of Americans. They should be killed. That
is a good use of our military finding these people
all over the world and killing them. Just like if
we found someone in wherever, third world country, pick a
(10:18):
sandbox nation, and if we discovered that, oh, these people
in this country are planning an imminent terrorist attack on
the United States that will kill thousands, we would fly
a drone or stealth bomber over that nation and we
would put a crater where people used to be in
order to preserve the lives and livelihoods of the American people.
(10:38):
And that's good. That's why we have a military. That's
what it's for. I support that one hundred percent. That
doesn't mean we need endless wars. We don't have to
go and try to nation build in those countries, but
we do need to make sure every single person on
this planet knows if you're objective, if your purpose in life,
if your business model is killing Americans, we are We're
(11:00):
going to kill you first. We're not gonna be nice
about it. We're not gonna be polite, So don't mess
with us. We will destroy you. This I feel like
is fairly simple, it's fairly commonplace. I think it's reasonable.
We won't go start anything. We're not going to go
out of our way to cause problems, so we have
an excuse to blow people up. But if we have
(11:22):
a good reason to blow people up, we will blow
people up. I think that's biblical. I think that's necessary.
I think reality dictates that that's how you should do business.
And so when I see things like this from ABC News,
it kind of gets on my nerves. Three key questions
about the US boat strikes that killed survivors. Defense Secretary
(11:44):
Pete Hegseth and a top military commander are facing serious
questions about why the US on September second killed survivors
of a military strike against a suspected drug boat when
the laws of war, Oh, the laws of war say
survivors on the battlefield should be rescued. And basically where
(12:05):
this has devolved to, by the way, is a bunch
of leftists on well the Internet and Congress running in
circles losing their mind over international law. Let me make
one thing perfectly clear to everyone listening to the sound
of my voice or looking at my face. International law
only exists if you lose the war, and you can
(12:27):
pick any example of any war, and I'll prove it
to you any example any war. Do you know how
many things the US has done in war that are
against international law? So many? But we win the war,
so it doesn't matter. Here's an example, World War One.
Both sides agree not to use chemical attacks. We both
(12:50):
a mustard gas. We're not going to do it. It's bad,
it's unfair, it's cruel and unusual, it's not honorable warfare.
Both sides say we won't do it anymore, and then
both sides again including the Allies, go right back to
doing it. You know who got in trouble for it? Germany? Why?
Because they lost? You know why we didn't get in
trouble for it, and why you don't even know what
(13:11):
happened because we won. So it doesn't matter. There's international
law for you right then and there. It is made up.
It's not real, it doesn't exist. Insert that Matthew McConaughey clip.
It's very dust. So if your whole argument here is, oh,
Pete Hegseth violated international law dot dot dot in the
(13:32):
defense of American citizens, I don't care violate it harder
I don't care. The White House acknowledges that a second
strike was ordered on the boat already hit by military
in the Caribbean Sea, and ABC News has confirmed that
survivors from the initial strike were killed as a result.
And so this is where things get complicated. Did he
(13:52):
launch the second strike to kill these survivors or did
he launch the second strike to make sure that the
drug boat was and the drugs were destroyed. That raises
a lot of questions right there, because here's the dirty
little secret about an international war. You're allowed to say, Oh,
I didn't achieve my objective, so I'm going to hit
it again. I'm gonna double down on this target. Are
(14:15):
you allowed to go in and intentionally kill survivors? Technically no,
but who cares? It happens all the time in every war.
Nobody ever gets punished for it. Again, it doesn't exist.
It's not real, international laws made up. But again, if
he's just saying, I need to hit this boat again
because it didn't sink and there's still drugs on it
that could be hypothetically recovered by these cartels and then redistributed,
(14:37):
I'm going to hit the boat again. That's allowed. You're
allowed to do that. And hey, if people survived the
first strike on the boat and then didn't survive the
second strike on the boat, boo hoo, don't smuggle drugs
next time. That's my take on this. That appears to
be the White House take on this. Here is Press
Secretary Caroline Levitt basically saying, look, this is what happened.
(14:57):
We hit the boat twice. We're allowed to hit the
boat twice.
Speaker 3 (15:01):
I have a statement to read for you here. President
Trump and Secretary Hegseth have made it clear that presidentially
designated narco terrorist groups are subject to lethal targeting in
accordance with the laws of war. With respect to the
strikes in question. On September two, Secretary Hegseth authorized Admiral
Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes. Admiral Bradley worked well
(15:24):
within his authority and the law directing the engagement to
ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the
United States of America was eliminated. And I would just
add one more point to remind the American public why
these lethal strikes are taking place, Because this administration has
designated these narco terrorists as foreign terrorist organizations. The president
(15:45):
has a right to take them out if they are
threatening the United States of America and if they are
bringing illegal narcotics that are killing our citizens at a
record rate, which is what they are doing. And under
the previous administration, there was enough fetinal trafficked into our
country to kill every every American man, woman, and child,
many times over. And so that's why you've seen a
(16:05):
drastic difference in this administration's policy with respect to the
last and it's one of the many reasons the American
public re elected this president and support this Secretary of
War in conducting these strikes.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
Amen, hit them again, listen it. At some point the
American populace as a whole is going to have to
get it into our heads that we have real dirty
issues and those real dirty issues oftentimes require real dirty solutions.
(16:37):
This is what war is, this is what terrorism is,
this is what drug trading is. It's not clean, it's
not simple and dry cut. Sometimes you're gonna have people
that maybe survive the first strike on a boat that
you have to kill because you've got to make sure
that boat is sank so that those drugs do not
(16:57):
kill more American citizens. And that's where my concern is.
That's where this administration's concern is. I frankly do not
care if these terrorists because that's what they are, they're
narco terrorists. I don't care if they're killed by my
government when my government is working to protect me. As
a matter of fact, I encourage it. These people are evil,
(17:17):
They're doing evil things. This is the just reward for
their evil. We are going to bomb the hell out
of you. If you have a problem with that, I
don't know what to tell you. Move to Venezuela and
join the cartels and you can fight for them. And
until you do that, shut the hell up. Because this
is the reality. We have to kill these people or
(17:38):
they will kill us. It's your life for theirs. Pick one,
all right, we'll be right back. All right, let's stay
(18:17):
on this for a minute. We had what I think
was a very good cabinet meeting yesterday, and we'll talk
a little bit about more or talk a little bit
more about that. Gosh, I can't speak on Sunday because
there's a lot in that that I want to cover,
but I want to focus specifically. Pete hag Seth, the
(18:39):
Secretary of War, addressed this cartel boat bombing, and he
essentially made the point that I made, which is, listen,
this is war. It's a dirty business. It's a nasty business.
Things happen that aren't necessarily nice. Not everybody has their
right to do process or what have you in war,
(19:02):
because it's war. You in war, people die without getting
a trial. They're executed by the government without trial. That's
what war is. It's seeing an enemy combatant and executing
them for the crime of being an enemy combatant. This
is what warfare is. Wake up, this is real life.
This isn't a war movie where everybody looks themselves in
the eye and it has a heart to heart and
(19:23):
soldiers very thoughtfully lower their rifles and come together in
a moment of humanity. No, this is reality. People die,
people kill people. This is what we're dealing with. It's
their people are our people. This is it. And in
those realities things get messy. Maybe after the first strike
there's some survivors and you have to hit them again.
(19:44):
Because the objective wasn't just to knock out the boat
or stop its motor or inconvenience them. The objective was
destroy the boat and the drugs. So if the boat's
still floating and the drugs are still hypothetically in it
hit it again, even if there might possibly be some
survivors on the boat, because the objective is destroy the boat,
(20:07):
and then once these people are done, maybe we can
have a conversation about, you know, pulling them out of
the water. I guess. But that's not even a realistic situation.
So I don't understand what the left wants he or
other than don't drug strike or drone strike the drug boats,
which the only reason you would want that is because
you want more fentanyl. So here we are back at
(20:27):
the beginning. But anyway, I say all that to say,
here is Pete Hegseth saying, look, this is warfare. It's
a dirty business, but it's necessary. Take a listen.
Speaker 4 (20:38):
You didn't see any survivors, to be clear, after that
first lee, I did not personally see survivors, but I
stand because the thing was on fire, that was exploded.
Speaker 5 (20:48):
In fire or smoke, you can't see anything digital. There's
This is called the fog of war. This is what
you and the press don't understand.
Speaker 1 (20:56):
You sit in your air.
Speaker 5 (20:57):
Conditioned offices or up on Capitol Hill and you knit
pick you plant fake stories, in the Washington Post about
kill everybody, phrases on anonymous sources, not based in anything,
not based in any truth at all, and then you
want to throw up really irresponsible terms about American heroes,
about the judgment that they made.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
I wrote a whole book on this.
Speaker 5 (21:17):
Topic because of what politicians and the press does to
war fighters. President Trump has empowered commanders, commanders to do
what is necessary, which is dark and difficult things in
the dead of night on behalf of the American people.
We support them, and we will stop the poisoning of
the American people.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
And there you go, we will stop the poisoning of
the American people. That's necessary, that's good, that's noble. These
are righteous killings. And I said earlier that I thought
it was biblical. I stand by that. If you read
the Book of Romans, it clearly says the government has
the sword. The government does have the sword, not just
(21:56):
to sit there and look at and say, oh, what
a sword. No, it's there to be wielded against our
enemies in defense of us. That's why we pay for
all these extravagant drones and bomber planes and helicopters and
advanced weaponry. And all this garbage that costs the taxpayer
hundreds of hundreds of billions of dollars every year. We
(22:17):
don't pay for that just so we can say we
have it, we pay for it so we can use
it to defend ourselves. I see no problem with this,
but the left does. They're very upset about this. I
saw this tweet. I thought this was kind of funny,
Laura Rigaro, I don't have any idea who this woman is.
Pete Hegseth literally posted that his intent is to kill.
(22:38):
Why isn't anything being done about it? What would you
propose we do? What do you mean, Oh, his intent
is to kill? Yeah, no kidding. He's the secretary of war.
His job is to kill people on behalf of the
United States. So why are we sitting here going, oh
my god? How could he say his intent is to kill?
(23:01):
What the hell do you expect? This was the top comment. Well,
it isn't the secretary of backgammon, Laura, exactly, it's not.
You have to kill these people. That's the reality. These
are terrorists that will kill us if we don't kill
them first, So we should kill them. That's what war
is for. So what you want when you look at
(23:23):
situations like this is say, okay, are the leaders that
we're putting into positions of deciding when we kill? Are
those people trustworthy? Are the people they're deciding to kill
the type of people that we should be killing? And
I think in this case the answer is clearly yes,
(23:44):
unless you would say no, we want the narco terrorists
to win. We want Fentanel pouring into this country killing Americans.
If that's your position, fine, I think you're crazy, but
fair enough. I mean again, nobody has the capacity to
sit and look at what the reality on the ground
is like. We can sit and say what would be
nice and all if we lived in a perfect world
(24:06):
all day long. Here's the hard truth. We don't live
in a perfect world. We don't. We live in a sinful,
fallen world where there is danger all of the time.
And I've said this before and I'll say it again.
You personally should be prepared to kill should it be necessary.
You should pray to God it never becomes necessary for
you personally to take a human life. But in the
(24:28):
event where you or your family or someone in your
immediate vicinity is threatened, and it comes down to a
choice of being your life or some robber, some thug,
some murderer's life. There's not gonna be some Disney moment
where you say, oh, you don't want to do this
and you both lower your guns like that Michael Jackson bit.
(24:51):
There may very well come a point in time where
you are put in a position where you have to say,
am I going to take a life or allow my
life for the life of my friends and family to
be taken. These are the realities of the world we
live in, and that's true on a global geopolitical scale
as well. So that's why we elect hardline politicians who
(25:13):
say I will defend my country and I will kill
you to do it. I have no problem with this anyway.
Let's move on from that. I can stay on this
topic for forever. I have some very very deeply seated
beliefs about what kind of righteous warfare and honorable warfare
(25:35):
and righteous self defense are. All of that is rooted
in very deep religious beliefs, political beliefs, practical beliefs, all
of those things. I could stay on that topic for
literally five years, and we just don't have that kind
of time. So let's jump to Somalia. Here is another
really good moment from this cabinet meeting. Here is Secretary
(25:59):
of State Christynome calling out the just insane amounts of
fraud that are going on right now in Minnesota with
the Somalian population there. And if you're not familiar with
what's going on there, I don't think it can be
overstated how overrun with Somali immigrants Minnesota has become. And
(26:21):
it is I truly mean this. It is starting to
look like it's not even a part of America anymore.
Like if you look at Minneapolis, like it's very difficult
to say, oh, yes, this is a functioning American city.
There's maybe an argument to be made that it's a
functioning Somalian city, but I think even that's probably not
(26:43):
the case. Just to give you an idea before we
play this clip, comer targets Walls in new house investigations,
citing nearly one billion in alleged Minnesota fraud. Federal prosecutors
have so far charged roughly three hundred men in alleged
fraud connected to the non profit Feeding Our Future, and
(27:05):
that's just one of many. Minnesota Governor Tim Walls was
warned about massive fraud in a pandemic food aid program
for children, yet he failed to act, according to Chairman
James Comer, and of course this follows after a bunch
of whistleblowers from Minnesota. Instead, whistleblowers who raised concerns face retaliation.
Comer added, because of Governor Walls's negligence, criminals, including Somali terrorists,
(27:30):
stole nearly one billion from the program while children suffered.
And this is a consistent problem that we're seeing out
of the Somali immigrant population in Minneapolis and Minnesota as
a whole. It's not racist to say that. It's the facts.
There is a huge population of Smali immigrants in Minnesota,
(27:51):
and there is a huge amount of fraud and abuse
and stealing and various other crimes within that population, which
shouldn't be supper because if you look at the nation
of Somalia, were a massive majority of these people were
born and raised before coming here. That's what we see
in Somalia, massive amounts of crime, massive amounts of fraud.
(28:14):
It's not a good place to live. That's why they're
coming over here. But here's the question, why isn't it
a good place to live? It didn't just magically happen
to be that way. It's because the people there, the
people in government and the general population do not seem
to value things like human rights and not doing crime.
I was gonna play this clip. I don't have time
(28:35):
in this segment now because I prefaced it. I think
I'm gonna designate the entire segment to be talking about this.
Coming up right after this ad break, we're going to
play that clip of the press conference, and we're gonna
give you some more details about what's going on in Minnesota,
because again, the issues there simply cannot be overstated. We
(28:56):
will be right back, all right, So let's talk about
(29:20):
what's actually going on in Minneapolis. And again I cannot
preface this enough. This is not racist to say there's
nothing racial here. These are the facts. These people are
from Somalia. They are Somalians. Many of them still have
massive amounts of loyalty to Somalia that they openly demonstrate
(29:43):
for reasons that I can't figure out, and they're at
the same time committing massive amounts of fraud. You're not
allowed to point this out the moment you say, hey,
we got a bunch of people from Somalia that are
doing fraud and stealing money from the taxpayers. Some leftists
will go, oh, what's racist about that? It has nothing
(30:04):
to do with race. They're not doing fraud because they're brown.
They're just doing fraud and they're from Somalia. But again,
you're not allowed to say this. The Trump administration, praise God,
is finally saying this. Here's Christy Gnome calling this out
at this cabinet meeting. Take a listen to this.
Speaker 6 (30:23):
Well, you told me to look into Minnesota and they're
fraud on visas and their programs. Fifty percent of them
are fraudulent, which means that that wacko Governor Walls either
is an idiot or he did it on purpose, and
I think he's bold, sir. He brought people in there
(30:45):
illegally that never should have been in this country, said
they were somebody that they're not. They said they were
married to somebody who was their brother or somebody else.
Fraudulent visa applications, signed up for government programs, took hundreds
of millions of dollars from the taxpayers, and we're going
to remove them and we're going to get our money back.
Speaker 1 (31:04):
Oh you okay, So what is she actually talking about here?
She's talking about instances where you have one Somalion and
this applies, by the way, to anybody from any country.
It's not specifically Somalians, but these are the ones that
are doing it right now. In Minnesota. This is the
issue that has cropped up. You've got one person who,
(31:28):
let's say they file a refugee claim and they get
in their paperwork for whatever reason, gets approved, so they're in.
All right, Now, what's next, Well, I've got my mom,
so I'm gonna use chain migration. I'm going to try
to get family visas, visitors visas, tourist visas so I
can bring some of my close friends and relatives and
(31:51):
family members in. I'm here legally, and so I'm going
to bring them with me. And this sort of cascades
the best example. And of course, once those people get
in and get something along the lines of like a
long term visa permanent residency, they then start pursuing citizenship
and oftentimes over the last fifteen years they've been getting
(32:13):
it all right. This is something that people have been
calling out recently. It's not just the illegal immigration that's
the problem, that's a big part of it, but it's
the fraudulent but technically legal immigration or the mass migration
that's completely legal but still not beneficial to the American people.
(32:33):
Here's a prime example of this, ilhan Omar, who almost definitely,
according to the paperwork that we've seen, married her brother
so he could get into the country. This is a
prime example. Ilhan Omar, for whatever reason, by whatever methodology,
got citizenship, permanent residency, and then citizenship in the United States.
(32:53):
Then in order to get her brother into the country,
she allegedly married him. That's weird, obviously not allowed. But
he's in Somalia, his documentation is in Somalia. They don't
have any documentation or at least that we can keep
up with and find because it's a third world country.
(33:14):
So she just says, oh, yeah, here's this guy, he's
my husband, I'm a citizen. Let him in, and then
they do. Ilhan Omar did marry her brother and says
she would quote do what she had to do to
get him quote papers to keep him in the US,
reveal Somali community leader. This is the Daily Mail reporting this.
Ilan Omar told friends years ago that the man who
(33:35):
went on to become her second husband was in fact
her brother. Dailymail dot Com can not confirm so I mean,
you can go research this on your own. The documentation
is out there if you just google it, you'll see
copies of the documents all over Twitter. It's not hard
to find. So this is what Christinome's calling out here.
This is what you would call a fraudulent claim because
(33:58):
that's not a legitimate marriage, that's not allowed, that's not legal.
But he gets in because of it, because we can't
go fact check this. It's Somalia, this is a third
world country. We can't go ask their government, hey, what's
going on here because they really don't have an effective government.
That's something Trump has been calling out. So what's the
solution here? Do we just let these people lie and
(34:19):
bs us and work their way into our system to
then defraud us and collect taxpayer benefits, et cetera. The
argument from the Trump administration is, right now, no, So
if we can't verify everything you're telling us, and we
can't do a thorough background check on you, make sure
you are who you say you are, make sure you're
here for what you're saying you're here for, and make
sure that while you're here you're a benefit to us,
(34:41):
then we're just not going to let you in, that's reasonable.
We don't want people coming in just to get citizenship
and then draw on our welfare. We don't want people
coming in to just take our benefits, in our handouts,
our charity that we give to refugees. We don't want
people taking advantage of that either. But that's what's been
happening in Somalia, and we're finally calling this out. Trump
(35:05):
is calling this out here. Here, he is again in
this press conference saying, hey, listen, we've got this problem,
and it's a real demonstratable problem. These people want if
you look at ilhann Omar, are not grateful to be here.
They don't want to be here. She openly says, I've
played with the clip before on this show. I'm here
for Somalia. I'm here to represent Somalia in the US Congress.
Her words, she said it in Somalia, and I'm saying
(35:26):
in English, but she said it. Trump is saying, we
don't want those people. We don't want people who come
here just to take advantage of us and then complain
about how racist we are when we call out the
fact that they're taking advantage of us.
Speaker 2 (35:40):
Take it away, Donald, and they contribute nothing. The welfare
is like eighty eight percent. They contribute nothing. I don't
want him in our country. I'll be honest with you.
Ka somebody say, oh, that's not politically correct. I don't care.
I don't want them in our country. Their country is
no good for a reason. Their countryes stay and we
(36:01):
don't want them in our country. I can say that
about other countries too. I can say that about other
countries too. We don't want them to help.
Speaker 1 (36:08):
We got to.
Speaker 2 (36:09):
We have to rebuild our country. You know, our countries
at are tipping point. We could go bad. We're at
a tipping point.
Speaker 1 (36:16):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (36:17):
People mind me saying that, but I'm saying it. We
could go one way or the other, and we're going
to go the wrong way if we keep taking in
garbage into our country. Elan Omar is garbage. She's garbage.
Her friends are garbage. These are people that work. These
are people that say, let's go, come on, let's make
this place great. These are people that do nothing but complain.
(36:40):
They complain, and from where they came from, they got nothing.
Speaker 1 (36:45):
You know, if they came from paradise.
Speaker 2 (36:47):
And they said, this isn't paradise. But when they come
from hell and they complain and do nothing, but bitch,
we don't want them in our country. Let them go
back to where they came from and fix it.
Speaker 1 (37:06):
And then massive applause from the crowd. And he's exactly right.
Nothing that he said should be controversial. If you care
about America and you want what's best for America and
American citizens, what he just said is completely true. These
people are coming en mass, some of them legally, some
of them illegally, and why are they coming here. They're
(37:27):
not coming here because they want to be Americans. They
want to come here because they've so wrecked their own
country and they see a nation that's prosperous and think, oh, well,
I can just take that. I've wrecked my thing, I'm
gonna take their thing. It's like in the Bible when
those two ladies that both have kids and they're living together,
(37:48):
and that one lady sleeps and rolls over onto her
child and kills her child and then steals her other
or her neighbor's child. And that's what we're dealing with
on a national level. We've got these Somalians that killed
their country and now they're coming over here and trying
to take ours take from us. Unfortunately, we don't have
(38:11):
a King Solomon to say, hey, no, we're not doing
this boom. We've got the next best thing, I think,
which is Donald Trump, who's finally calling this stuff out.
And I don't have any problem with him doing that,
and you shouldn't either call this stuff out. It's not
racist to say I don't want people from another country
who wrecked their country coming in and wrecking mind. You're
allowed to say that, all right. I just did it
(38:32):
right here. All right, That's all I've got for you.
We will be back Sunday, seven pm on AM nine
to fifty KPRC. Listen to the live broadcast. If you
miss the live broadcast, watch it on YouTube or listen
to it on the podcast. On Monday morning. You can
get the Next Gen Report wherever you get podcasts, and again,
feel free to reach out to me. I'm on social
media at Underscore Ethan Buchanan. Wherever you do social media,
(38:53):
that's where I'm at. Check me out there. Thank you
very much. We'll be back Sunday. Stater to betray
From the heart of the Space City to the heart
of gen Z. Welcome to Next Gen Conversation, not Dad's
Talk Radio.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Ethan talks to you about the issues and events that
men are to our generation.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
This is the next Gen Report put Ethan U can
in that. Hey, welcome once again. I hope you had
a great Thanksgiving. That's one of my all time favorite holidays.
It really is. It does not get the credit it deserves.
One of the reasons that I'm such a hardliner on
(00:40):
when you can start celebrating Christmas is because I love
Thanksgiving so much and I want Thanksgiving to get it's
sort of it's due respect. I feel like it doesn't
get that a lot of the times. But anyway, we
have got a lot to talk about today. It has
been busy. It's been a busy Thanksgiving. I ended up
doing a show on Sunday when I wasn't planning to.
(01:03):
I was planning on taking that evening off. I didn't
because there was just so much that we had to
talk about. It needed to be discussed, and it was discussed,
and so yeah, here we are. I want to start
this show off with something a little bit lighter because
we had a rough Thanksgiving. You know, it was a
very serious show. If you haven't listened to it, it
(01:25):
is important. You should go listen to it. It's on
the podcast. You can find it right now, the Next
Gen Report. Wherever you get podcasts, go listen to it.
It is important. But let's start off on a little
bit of a kind of lighter note. We're gonna talk
about some local stuff. We don't do that as much
as we should. I should, but we're gonna do it today.
There's plenty of local stuff going on, so we're gonna
(01:45):
talk about it. Starting with Lena Hidalgo, Harris County Judge.
Lena Hidalgo announces quote painful split from husband after one
year of marriage. And there's a picture of them right
after they got engaged, looking all cute with the skyline
in the back, and they it ended. It got blown up.
Which I don't tend to comment on celebrity gossip at
(02:09):
all because I don't care. But this is sort of
celebrity gossip that I think is worth my attention because
this is the county judge. But anyway, let's dig into
her announcement here. So here it is on Instagram. This
is where I first saw it, and I thought this
was crazy. She announced on her one year anniversary that
she had split from her husband, who, for the record,
(02:30):
she had been with for nine years. Before that, she
was with this guy for nine years, married him precisely
one time, and a year after that they've split up.
So here's the announcement. Our wedding day was the best
day of my life so far, perhaps because my life
with David has been incredible. It's been over half of
(02:51):
my adult life, full of joy, new experiences, major changes.
So the whole time I'm reading this, I'm thinking, Okay, yeah,
this is a nice, normal anniversary post, because that's what
it sounds like. Incredible friendships, successes, companionship, growth, support and
deep love. We are a fantastic team. Well, apparently you're
not that good. Our time together has also seen challenges. Okay,
this is you know, still normal, but starting to get
(03:13):
a little fishy of course, but we've worked hard and
availed ourselves of resources to whether those and strengthen our relationship. Okay, nice, Yeah,
happy one year anniversary. This is great. This year life
took a turn that made us see things differently. That
was out of left field. Where'd that come from? So
very much unexpectedly, this day of our anniversary, David and
(03:34):
I are separated. It's not what either of us wanted.
It's what we confidently, though painfully feel is best. I
mean the definition of out of left field, the definition.
But then again, it wasn't. If you follow Lena Hidalgo,
if you know who this person is, you saw this
coming a mile away. I famously predicted amongst friends that
(03:55):
this marriage would last not more than two years. I
thought it would get up to about two years. I
didn't even expect it to make it just one. I
thought for sure they'd clear the two year mark and
call it quits there. I expected this post a year
from now, but I did expect it. So this makes
a lot more sense when you realize the kind of
(04:16):
person Lena Hidogo is. She's mentally ill. Openly, by the way,
that's not just me saying that and being mean. She
admits this. She talks about this, she goes in front
of Commissioner's court and complains about it. So this is
well known, and I'm not shaming her for it. I'm
stating a fact. She is mentally ill. She's also a narcissist.
And here's a good example of this Harris County Judge
(04:38):
Lena Hidalgo accused of disrespect at slain corporal's funeral. This
is from twenty twenty two. It's a little bit older,
but if you follow news and local news, and you
have been for some time, you'll remember this incident. There
are few services more somber and more sacred than those
honoring a fallen law officer. And yet the funeral of
slain Corporal Charles Galloway with Harris County Pricinc. Five com dicibles,
(05:00):
now lies under a shroud of controversy, with Lena Hidalgo
accused of being the instigator. So apparently what she had
done was try to make herself essentially the center of
attention at this funeral. She was welcome to attend, but
she wasn't necessarily, you know, part of the entourage, part
of the you know, honoraries at this funeral. And anyone
(05:22):
who's been to a funeral knows what I'm talking about.
One of the people that's there to you know, I guess,
give a speech, or stand behind the casket during the eulogy,
any of those things like that. She was just invited
to be there, and she had a reserve seat, but no,
she wanted to be part of the procession and stand
with the pallbearers and Lottie Dottie don You can read
(05:43):
all the details in this article. It's narcissism. She wanted
to make this slain officer's funeral about herself, and when
she got checked on it by members of law enforcement,
she fussed them for it. She has a pattern of
doing this, and when when you realize what a deranged,
mentally ill narcissist she is, it's not surprising in the
(06:05):
least bit that she got divorced, because no kidding, I mean,
the only mystery here is how in the world did
she make it nine years with this guy and then
marry him? And that was the breaking point. It's just wild.
It's just wild. Who I really feel bad for is
(06:26):
her husband. And I'll explain to you why. Tony Ortiz
at Current Revolt dug this up in a Vogue article
promoting Hidalgo and her marriage. Hidalgo mentions that she was
able to feel comfortable marrying her now ex after he
used half of his life savings to pay her medical bills. Here,
she is quoted in the Vogue article, what I didn't
(06:47):
always tell everyone is that David had used the bulk
of his savings to pay off a massive bill I'd
received for my mental health treatment. So because she was
so crazy, she racked up all this medical debt trying
to get uncrazy. Spoiler, it didn't work. And then she
married this guy after having taken all his savings, and
now they're getting divorced or they're split. I don't know
(07:09):
if they're officially getting divorced or they're just split or
what have you. But assuming they get divorced, which would
be where my betting money is going, that's even more
money out of this guy's pocket because he's gonna have
to get a lawyer for sure. So I mean, as
a guy, as a proud proponent of the bro code,
(07:30):
I feel terrible for this poor dude that she married,
who John Wimer famously called a nerd in their engagement pictures.
But anyway, we got a lot coming up, very important topics.
Just wanted to share something fun with you before we
really get rolling. We'll be right back after this quick break.
This is the next Gen Report. I'm gonna say something controversial.
(08:22):
I don't think it should be controversial, but in this
day and age. It is controversial, and I'm gonna say
it anyway. American enemies that are threatening the lives and
livelihoods of the general American populace should just be killed
by our military. That's why, in my humble opinion, we
(08:47):
have a military right. That's the whole concept. This is
a threat to the country, we kill it that this.
I feel like what I'm saying is not crazy, but
apparently these days it's crazy. So you've probably seen this.
Over the last we'll say, maybe a week and a half.
(09:08):
This has been the big story is, oh, did Pete
Hegseth order survivors of a kinetic strike on a drug
boat to be executed by another kinetic strike. I'm gonna
get out in front of this and say I don't
think he did, But even if he did, I don't care.
(09:34):
These are narco terrorists. These are not good people. These
are people that would willingly kill American people directly for money.
That's what they were on that boat to do. They're
transporting drugs into the United States, which will kill people.
That's a guaranteed fact. They will distribute those drugs to
(09:54):
people who will overdose on them. They are a threat
to our national security and the well being an individual
livelihood of millions of Americans. They should be killed. That
is a good use of our military finding these people
all over the world and killing them. Just like if
we found someone in wherever, third world country, pick a
(10:18):
sandbox nation, and if we discovered that, oh, these people
in this country are planning an imminent terrorist attack on
the United States that will kill thousands, we would fly
a drone or stealth bomber over that nation and we
would put a crater where people used to be in
order to preserve the lives and livelihoods of the American people.
(10:38):
And that's good. That's why we have a military. That's
what it's for. I support that one hundred percent. That
doesn't mean we need endless wars. We don't have to
go and try to nation build in those countries, but
we do need to make sure every single person on
this planet knows if you're objective, if your purpose in life,
if your business model is killing Americans, we are We're
(11:00):
going to kill you first. We're not gonna be nice
about it. We're not gonna be polite, So don't mess
with us. We will destroy you. This I feel like
is fairly simple, it's fairly commonplace. I think it's reasonable.
We won't go start anything. We're not going to go
out of our way to cause problems, so we have
an excuse to blow people up. But if we have
(11:22):
a good reason to blow people up, we will blow
people up. I think that's biblical. I think that's necessary.
I think reality dictates that that's how you should do business.
And so when I see things like this from ABC News,
it kind of gets on my nerves. Three key questions
about the US boat strikes that killed survivors. Defense Secretary
(11:44):
Pete Hegseth and a top military commander are facing serious
questions about why the US on September second killed survivors
of a military strike against a suspected drug boat when
the laws of war, Oh, the laws of war say
survivors on the battlefield should be rescued. And basically where
(12:05):
this has devolved to, by the way, is a bunch
of leftists on well the Internet and Congress running in
circles losing their mind over international law. Let me make
one thing perfectly clear to everyone listening to the sound
of my voice or looking at my face. International law
only exists if you lose the war, and you can
(12:27):
pick any example of any war, and I'll prove it
to you any example any war. Do you know how
many things the US has done in war that are
against international law? So many? But we win the war,
so it doesn't matter. Here's an example, World War One.
Both sides agree not to use chemical attacks. We both
(12:50):
a mustard gas. We're not going to do it. It's bad,
it's unfair, it's cruel and unusual, it's not honorable warfare.
Both sides say we won't do it anymore, and then
both sides again including the Allies, go right back to
doing it. You know who got in trouble for it? Germany? Why?
Because they lost? You know why we didn't get in
trouble for it, and why you don't even know what
(13:11):
happened because we won. So it doesn't matter. There's international
law for you right then and there. It is made up.
It's not real, it doesn't exist. Insert that Matthew McConaughey clip.
It's very dust. So if your whole argument here is, oh,
Pete Hegseth violated international law dot dot dot in the
(13:32):
defense of American citizens, I don't care violate it harder
I don't care. The White House acknowledges that a second
strike was ordered on the boat already hit by military
in the Caribbean Sea, and ABC News has confirmed that
survivors from the initial strike were killed as a result.
And so this is where things get complicated. Did he
(13:52):
launch the second strike to kill these survivors or did
he launch the second strike to make sure that the
drug boat was and the drugs were destroyed. That raises
a lot of questions right there, because here's the dirty
little secret about an international war. You're allowed to say, Oh,
I didn't achieve my objective, so I'm going to hit
it again. I'm gonna double down on this target. Are
(14:15):
you allowed to go in and intentionally kill survivors? Technically no,
but who cares? It happens all the time in every war.
Nobody ever gets punished for it. Again, it doesn't exist.
It's not real, international laws made up. But again, if
he's just saying, I need to hit this boat again
because it didn't sink and there's still drugs on it
that could be hypothetically recovered by these cartels and then redistributed,
(14:37):
I'm going to hit the boat again. That's allowed. You're
allowed to do that. And hey, if people survived the
first strike on the boat and then didn't survive the
second strike on the boat, boo hoo, don't smuggle drugs
next time. That's my take on this. That appears to
be the White House take on this. Here is Press
Secretary Caroline Levitt basically saying, look, this is what happened.
(14:57):
We hit the boat twice. We're allowed to hit the
boat twice.
Speaker 3 (15:01):
I have a statement to read for you here. President
Trump and Secretary Hegseth have made it clear that presidentially
designated narco terrorist groups are subject to lethal targeting in
accordance with the laws of war. With respect to the
strikes in question. On September two, Secretary Hegseth authorized Admiral
Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes. Admiral Bradley worked well
(15:24):
within his authority and the law directing the engagement to
ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the
United States of America was eliminated. And I would just
add one more point to remind the American public why
these lethal strikes are taking place, Because this administration has
designated these narco terrorists as foreign terrorist organizations. The president
(15:45):
has a right to take them out if they are
threatening the United States of America and if they are
bringing illegal narcotics that are killing our citizens at a
record rate, which is what they are doing. And under
the previous administration, there was enough fetinal trafficked into our
country to kill every every American man, woman, and child,
many times over. And so that's why you've seen a
(16:05):
drastic difference in this administration's policy with respect to the
last and it's one of the many reasons the American
public re elected this president and support this Secretary of
War in conducting these strikes.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
Amen, hit them again, listen it. At some point the
American populace as a whole is going to have to
get it into our heads that we have real dirty
issues and those real dirty issues oftentimes require real dirty solutions.
(16:37):
This is what war is, this is what terrorism is,
this is what drug trading is. It's not clean, it's
not simple and dry cut. Sometimes you're gonna have people
that maybe survive the first strike on a boat that
you have to kill because you've got to make sure
that boat is sank so that those drugs do not
(16:57):
kill more American citizens. And that's where my concern is.
That's where this administration's concern is. I frankly do not
care if these terrorists because that's what they are, they're
narco terrorists. I don't care if they're killed by my
government when my government is working to protect me. As
a matter of fact, I encourage it. These people are evil,
(17:17):
They're doing evil things. This is the just reward for
their evil. We are going to bomb the hell out
of you. If you have a problem with that, I
don't know what to tell you. Move to Venezuela and
join the cartels and you can fight for them. And
until you do that, shut the hell up. Because this
is the reality. We have to kill these people or
(17:38):
they will kill us. It's your life for theirs. Pick one,
all right, we'll be right back. All right, let's stay
(18:17):
on this for a minute. We had what I think
was a very good cabinet meeting yesterday, and we'll talk
a little bit about more or talk a little bit
more about that. Gosh, I can't speak on Sunday because
there's a lot in that that I want to cover,
but I want to focus specifically. Pete hag Seth, the
(18:39):
Secretary of War, addressed this cartel boat bombing, and he
essentially made the point that I made, which is, listen,
this is war. It's a dirty business. It's a nasty business.
Things happen that aren't necessarily nice. Not everybody has their
right to do process or what have you in war,
(19:02):
because it's war. You in war, people die without getting
a trial. They're executed by the government without trial. That's
what war is. It's seeing an enemy combatant and executing
them for the crime of being an enemy combatant. This
is what warfare is. Wake up, this is real life.
This isn't a war movie where everybody looks themselves in
the eye and it has a heart to heart and
(19:23):
soldiers very thoughtfully lower their rifles and come together in
a moment of humanity. No, this is reality. People die,
people kill people. This is what we're dealing with. It's
their people are our people. This is it. And in
those realities things get messy. Maybe after the first strike
there's some survivors and you have to hit them again.
(19:44):
Because the objective wasn't just to knock out the boat
or stop its motor or inconvenience them. The objective was
destroy the boat and the drugs. So if the boat's
still floating and the drugs are still hypothetically in it
hit it again, even if there might possibly be some
survivors on the boat, because the objective is destroy the boat,
(20:07):
and then once these people are done, maybe we can
have a conversation about, you know, pulling them out of
the water. I guess. But that's not even a realistic situation.
So I don't understand what the left wants he or
other than don't drug strike or drone strike the drug boats,
which the only reason you would want that is because
you want more fentanyl. So here we are back at
(20:27):
the beginning. But anyway, I say all that to say,
here is Pete Hegseth saying, look, this is warfare. It's
a dirty business, but it's necessary. Take a listen.
Speaker 4 (20:38):
You didn't see any survivors, to be clear, after that
first lee, I did not personally see survivors, but I
stand because the thing was on fire, that was exploded.
Speaker 5 (20:48):
In fire or smoke, you can't see anything digital. There's
This is called the fog of war. This is what
you and the press don't understand.
Speaker 1 (20:56):
You sit in your air.
Speaker 5 (20:57):
Conditioned offices or up on Capitol Hill and you knit
pick you plant fake stories, in the Washington Post about
kill everybody, phrases on anonymous sources, not based in anything,
not based in any truth at all, and then you
want to throw up really irresponsible terms about American heroes,
about the judgment that they made.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
I wrote a whole book on this.
Speaker 5 (21:17):
Topic because of what politicians and the press does to
war fighters. President Trump has empowered commanders, commanders to do
what is necessary, which is dark and difficult things in
the dead of night on behalf of the American people.
We support them, and we will stop the poisoning of
the American people.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
And there you go, we will stop the poisoning of
the American people. That's necessary, that's good, that's noble. These
are righteous killings. And I said earlier that I thought
it was biblical. I stand by that. If you read
the Book of Romans, it clearly says the government has
the sword. The government does have the sword, not just
(21:56):
to sit there and look at and say, oh, what
a sword. No, it's there to be wielded against our
enemies in defense of us. That's why we pay for
all these extravagant drones and bomber planes and helicopters and
advanced weaponry. And all this garbage that costs the taxpayer
hundreds of hundreds of billions of dollars every year. We
(22:17):
don't pay for that just so we can say we
have it, we pay for it so we can use
it to defend ourselves. I see no problem with this,
but the left does. They're very upset about this. I
saw this tweet. I thought this was kind of funny,
Laura Rigaro, I don't have any idea who this woman is.
Pete Hegseth literally posted that his intent is to kill.
(22:38):
Why isn't anything being done about it? What would you
propose we do? What do you mean, Oh, his intent
is to kill? Yeah, no kidding. He's the secretary of war.
His job is to kill people on behalf of the
United States. So why are we sitting here going, oh
my god? How could he say his intent is to kill?
(23:01):
What the hell do you expect? This was the top comment. Well,
it isn't the secretary of backgammon, Laura, exactly, it's not.
You have to kill these people. That's the reality. These
are terrorists that will kill us if we don't kill
them first, So we should kill them. That's what war
is for. So what you want when you look at
(23:23):
situations like this is say, okay, are the leaders that
we're putting into positions of deciding when we kill? Are
those people trustworthy? Are the people they're deciding to kill
the type of people that we should be killing? And
I think in this case the answer is clearly yes,
(23:44):
unless you would say no, we want the narco terrorists
to win. We want Fentanel pouring into this country killing Americans.
If that's your position, fine, I think you're crazy, but
fair enough. I mean again, nobody has the capacity to
sit and look at what the reality on the ground
is like. We can sit and say what would be
nice and all if we lived in a perfect world
(24:06):
all day long. Here's the hard truth. We don't live
in a perfect world. We don't. We live in a sinful,
fallen world where there is danger all of the time.
And I've said this before and I'll say it again.
You personally should be prepared to kill should it be necessary.
You should pray to God it never becomes necessary for
you personally to take a human life. But in the
(24:28):
event where you or your family or someone in your
immediate vicinity is threatened, and it comes down to a
choice of being your life or some robber, some thug,
some murderer's life. There's not gonna be some Disney moment
where you say, oh, you don't want to do this
and you both lower your guns like that Michael Jackson bit.
(24:51):
There may very well come a point in time where
you are put in a position where you have to say,
am I going to take a life or allow my
life for the life of my friends and family to
be taken. These are the realities of the world we
live in, and that's true on a global geopolitical scale
as well. So that's why we elect hardline politicians who
(25:13):
say I will defend my country and I will kill
you to do it. I have no problem with this anyway.
Let's move on from that. I can stay on this
topic for forever. I have some very very deeply seated
beliefs about what kind of righteous warfare and honorable warfare
(25:35):
and righteous self defense are. All of that is rooted
in very deep religious beliefs, political beliefs, practical beliefs, all
of those things. I could stay on that topic for
literally five years, and we just don't have that kind
of time. So let's jump to Somalia. Here is another
really good moment from this cabinet meeting. Here is Secretary
(25:59):
of State Christynome calling out the just insane amounts of
fraud that are going on right now in Minnesota with
the Somalian population there. And if you're not familiar with
what's going on there, I don't think it can be
overstated how overrun with Somali immigrants Minnesota has become. And
(26:21):
it is I truly mean this. It is starting to
look like it's not even a part of America anymore.
Like if you look at Minneapolis, like it's very difficult
to say, oh, yes, this is a functioning American city.
There's maybe an argument to be made that it's a
functioning Somalian city, but I think even that's probably not
(26:43):
the case. Just to give you an idea before we
play this clip, comer targets Walls in new house investigations,
citing nearly one billion in alleged Minnesota fraud. Federal prosecutors
have so far charged roughly three hundred men in alleged
fraud connected to the non profit Feeding Our Future, and
(27:05):
that's just one of many. Minnesota Governor Tim Walls was
warned about massive fraud in a pandemic food aid program
for children, yet he failed to act, according to Chairman
James Comer, and of course this follows after a bunch
of whistleblowers from Minnesota. Instead, whistleblowers who raised concerns face retaliation.
Comer added, because of Governor Walls's negligence, criminals, including Somali terrorists,
(27:30):
stole nearly one billion from the program while children suffered.
And this is a consistent problem that we're seeing out
of the Somali immigrant population in Minneapolis and Minnesota as
a whole. It's not racist to say that. It's the facts.
There is a huge population of Smali immigrants in Minnesota,
(27:51):
and there is a huge amount of fraud and abuse
and stealing and various other crimes within that population, which
shouldn't be supper because if you look at the nation
of Somalia, were a massive majority of these people were
born and raised before coming here. That's what we see
in Somalia, massive amounts of crime, massive amounts of fraud.
(28:14):
It's not a good place to live. That's why they're
coming over here. But here's the question, why isn't it
a good place to live? It didn't just magically happen
to be that way. It's because the people there, the
people in government and the general population do not seem
to value things like human rights and not doing crime.
I was gonna play this clip. I don't have time
(28:35):
in this segment now because I prefaced it. I think
I'm gonna designate the entire segment to be talking about this.
Coming up right after this ad break, we're going to
play that clip of the press conference, and we're gonna
give you some more details about what's going on in Minnesota,
because again, the issues there simply cannot be overstated. We
(28:56):
will be right back, all right, So let's talk about
(29:20):
what's actually going on in Minneapolis. And again I cannot
preface this enough. This is not racist to say there's
nothing racial here. These are the facts. These people are
from Somalia. They are Somalians. Many of them still have
massive amounts of loyalty to Somalia that they openly demonstrate
(29:43):
for reasons that I can't figure out, and they're at
the same time committing massive amounts of fraud. You're not
allowed to point this out the moment you say, hey,
we got a bunch of people from Somalia that are
doing fraud and stealing money from the taxpayers. Some leftists
will go, oh, what's racist about that? It has nothing
(30:04):
to do with race. They're not doing fraud because they're brown.
They're just doing fraud and they're from Somalia. But again,
you're not allowed to say this. The Trump administration, praise God,
is finally saying this. Here's Christy Gnome calling this out
at this cabinet meeting. Take a listen to this.
Speaker 6 (30:23):
Well, you told me to look into Minnesota and they're
fraud on visas and their programs. Fifty percent of them
are fraudulent, which means that that wacko Governor Walls either
is an idiot or he did it on purpose, and
I think he's bold, sir. He brought people in there
(30:45):
illegally that never should have been in this country, said
they were somebody that they're not. They said they were
married to somebody who was their brother or somebody else.
Fraudulent visa applications, signed up for government programs, took hundreds
of millions of dollars from the taxpayers, and we're going
to remove them and we're going to get our money back.
Speaker 1 (31:04):
Oh you okay, So what is she actually talking about here?
She's talking about instances where you have one Somalion and
this applies, by the way, to anybody from any country.
It's not specifically Somalians, but these are the ones that
are doing it right now. In Minnesota. This is the
issue that has cropped up. You've got one person who,
(31:28):
let's say they file a refugee claim and they get
in their paperwork for whatever reason, gets approved, so they're in.
All right, Now, what's next, Well, I've got my mom,
so I'm gonna use chain migration. I'm going to try
to get family visas, visitors visas, tourist visas so I
can bring some of my close friends and relatives and
(31:51):
family members in. I'm here legally, and so I'm going
to bring them with me. And this sort of cascades
the best example. And of course, once those people get
in and get something along the lines of like a
long term visa permanent residency, they then start pursuing citizenship
and oftentimes over the last fifteen years they've been getting
(32:13):
it all right. This is something that people have been
calling out recently. It's not just the illegal immigration that's
the problem, that's a big part of it, but it's
the fraudulent but technically legal immigration or the mass migration
that's completely legal but still not beneficial to the American people.
(32:33):
Here's a prime example of this, ilhan Omar, who almost definitely,
according to the paperwork that we've seen, married her brother
so he could get into the country. This is a
prime example. Ilhan Omar, for whatever reason, by whatever methodology,
got citizenship, permanent residency, and then citizenship in the United States.
(32:53):
Then in order to get her brother into the country,
she allegedly married him. That's weird, obviously not allowed. But
he's in Somalia, his documentation is in Somalia. They don't
have any documentation or at least that we can keep
up with and find because it's a third world country.
(33:14):
So she just says, oh, yeah, here's this guy, he's
my husband, I'm a citizen. Let him in, and then
they do. Ilhan Omar did marry her brother and says
she would quote do what she had to do to
get him quote papers to keep him in the US,
reveal Somali community leader. This is the Daily Mail reporting this.
Ilan Omar told friends years ago that the man who
(33:35):
went on to become her second husband was in fact
her brother. Dailymail dot Com can not confirm so I mean,
you can go research this on your own. The documentation
is out there if you just google it, you'll see
copies of the documents all over Twitter. It's not hard
to find. So this is what Christinome's calling out here.
This is what you would call a fraudulent claim because
(33:58):
that's not a legitimate marriage, that's not allowed, that's not legal.
But he gets in because of it, because we can't
go fact check this. It's Somalia, this is a third
world country. We can't go ask their government, hey, what's
going on here because they really don't have an effective government.
That's something Trump has been calling out. So what's the
solution here? Do we just let these people lie and
(34:19):
bs us and work their way into our system to
then defraud us and collect taxpayer benefits, et cetera. The
argument from the Trump administration is, right now, no, So
if we can't verify everything you're telling us, and we
can't do a thorough background check on you, make sure
you are who you say you are, make sure you're
here for what you're saying you're here for, and make
sure that while you're here you're a benefit to us,
(34:41):
then we're just not going to let you in, that's reasonable.
We don't want people coming in just to get citizenship
and then draw on our welfare. We don't want people
coming in to just take our benefits, in our handouts,
our charity that we give to refugees. We don't want
people taking advantage of that either. But that's what's been
happening in Somalia, and we're finally calling this out. Trump
(35:05):
is calling this out here. Here, he is again in
this press conference saying, hey, listen, we've got this problem,
and it's a real demonstratable problem. These people want if
you look at ilhann Omar, are not grateful to be here.
They don't want to be here. She openly says, I've
played with the clip before on this show. I'm here
for Somalia. I'm here to represent Somalia in the US Congress.
Her words, she said it in Somalia, and I'm saying
(35:26):
in English, but she said it. Trump is saying, we
don't want those people. We don't want people who come
here just to take advantage of us and then complain
about how racist we are when we call out the
fact that they're taking advantage of us.
Speaker 2 (35:40):
Take it away, Donald, and they contribute nothing. The welfare
is like eighty eight percent. They contribute nothing. I don't
want him in our country. I'll be honest with you.
Ka somebody say, oh, that's not politically correct. I don't care.
I don't want them in our country. Their country is
no good for a reason. Their countryes stay and we
(36:01):
don't want them in our country. I can say that
about other countries too. I can say that about other
countries too. We don't want them to help.
Speaker 1 (36:08):
We got to.
Speaker 2 (36:09):
We have to rebuild our country. You know, our countries
at are tipping point. We could go bad. We're at
a tipping point.
Speaker 1 (36:16):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (36:17):
People mind me saying that, but I'm saying it. We
could go one way or the other, and we're going
to go the wrong way if we keep taking in
garbage into our country. Elan Omar is garbage. She's garbage.
Her friends are garbage. These are people that work. These
are people that say, let's go, come on, let's make
this place great. These are people that do nothing but complain.
(36:40):
They complain, and from where they came from, they got nothing.
Speaker 1 (36:45):
You know, if they came from paradise.
Speaker 2 (36:47):
And they said, this isn't paradise. But when they come
from hell and they complain and do nothing, but bitch,
we don't want them in our country. Let them go
back to where they came from and fix it.
Speaker 1 (37:06):
And then massive applause from the crowd. And he's exactly right.
Nothing that he said should be controversial. If you care
about America and you want what's best for America and
American citizens, what he just said is completely true. These
people are coming en mass, some of them legally, some
of them illegally, and why are they coming here. They're
(37:27):
not coming here because they want to be Americans. They
want to come here because they've so wrecked their own
country and they see a nation that's prosperous and think, oh, well,
I can just take that. I've wrecked my thing, I'm
gonna take their thing. It's like in the Bible when
those two ladies that both have kids and they're living together,
(37:48):
and that one lady sleeps and rolls over onto her
child and kills her child and then steals her other
or her neighbor's child. And that's what we're dealing with
on a national level. We've got these Somalians that killed
their country and now they're coming over here and trying
to take ours take from us. Unfortunately, we don't have
(38:11):
a King Solomon to say, hey, no, we're not doing
this boom. We've got the next best thing, I think,
which is Donald Trump, who's finally calling this stuff out.
And I don't have any problem with him doing that,
and you shouldn't either call this stuff out. It's not
racist to say I don't want people from another country
who wrecked their country coming in and wrecking mind. You're
allowed to say that, all right. I just did it
(38:32):
right here. All right, That's all I've got for you.
We will be back Sunday, seven pm on AM nine
to fifty KPRC. Listen to the live broadcast. If you
miss the live broadcast, watch it on YouTube or listen
to it on the podcast. On Monday morning. You can
get the Next Gen Report wherever you get podcasts, and again,
feel free to reach out to me. I'm on social
media at Underscore Ethan Buchanan. Wherever you do social media,
(38:53):
that's where I'm at. Check me out there. Thank you
very much. We'll be back Sunday. Stater to betray
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.