02-14-25 - HOUR THREE

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Here's the former famous director of SCHEW host Michael Brown.

Speaker 2 (00:02):
Brownie, No, Brownie, you're doing the head of the drug.

Speaker 1 (00:05):
The situation with Michael Brown. You're a plitical express on
six point thirty K how Denver's talk station.

Speaker 3 (00:19):
It's a low Friday, no work till the day, dude,
It's a low lot Friday, no work till days. It's

(00:47):
up there.

Speaker 2 (00:47):
Bring it up.

Speaker 3 (00:48):
My man got gigs.

Speaker 1 (00:49):
He's running than that.

Speaker 2 (00:50):
Bring got some book on the sign.

Speaker 3 (00:54):
I'm almost shine to hide the men then behind the game.

Speaker 4 (00:58):
Don't happy Friday, everybody. So Jamie Vance, the Vice President
of the United States of America, is at the Munich Conference,
the Unique Security Conference, and talk about a guy that
is willing to just speak his mind. Now, of course,

(01:19):
everything he says, to one degree or another is approved
by the White House. He's not going to go out
and make a major policy speech without the approval of
either the Chief of Staff or the White House Comms
Office or you know, the Director of O and B
or whoever it might be. But somebody is doing that.

(01:40):
But nonetheless I think it well. As he says at
one point in one of these in one part of
the speech, there's a new sheriff in town, and there's
a new way of doing business. So I want to
walk through some of the things. I've got some audio
for some of it, and I don't have audio for
other parts of it, but I want to hear. I
want you to hear part of what he has to say.

(02:01):
For example, we've had a lot of discussion on this
program about the censorship that goes on in the United Kingdom,
but that same censorship goes on throughout the entire European Union,
and Vance warns them against that.

Speaker 5 (02:18):
The freedom to surprise, to make mistakes, to invent, to build.
As it turns out, you can't mandate innovation or creativity,
just as you can't force people what to think, what
to feel, or what to believe. And we believe those
things are certainly connected. And unfortunately, when I look at
Europe today, it's sometimes not so clear what happened to

(02:42):
some of the Cold Wars winners.

Speaker 4 (02:45):
Now, I just I want to paint a picture for
you the Munichue Security Conference, which has been going on
for a long time. Munich is famous for Neville Chamberlain
coming back after Hitler takes over Czechoslovakia and says, hey

(03:08):
this is a good guy. This is somebody we can
deal with. And the Security conference has a follow on
to even that post World War two is a BFD
and the assembled crowd probably a thousand people or so.

(03:28):
These are diplomats, these are foreign ministers, these are generals,
these are some are prime ministers. It's the whole gamut
of the European governing elite. This is who he's talking to.

Speaker 1 (03:45):
And he's and we believe those things are certainly connected.

Speaker 4 (03:50):
Free speech lack of censorship are all connected to the
ability of people to think for themselves, to innovate, to
do the kinds of creative things that allows a nation
to live in freedom and prosperity.

Speaker 5 (04:04):
And unfortunately, when I look at Europe today, it's sometimes
not so clear what happened to some of the Cold
Wars winners.

Speaker 4 (04:14):
Out talking about a new sheriff in town. Can you imagine,
as much as I want to forget the Biden administration,
can you imagine Kamala Harris speaking as directly to these
elitists as JD.

Speaker 2 (04:31):
Vance is.

Speaker 4 (04:33):
I mean, first of all, the word salad. There's no
way she could do this, nor would she have the
gravitas to say that because regardless of what words she
would use, they would be looking at her as if
she were and then she is indeed an empty suit.
Can you imagine Joe Biden stumbling through a teleprompter speech

(04:57):
saying these things and then trying to figure out to
get off the stage.

Speaker 5 (05:02):
I look to Brussels, where you commission Commissars Warren citizens
that they intend to shut down social media during times
of civil unrest.

Speaker 4 (05:12):
He just called the members of the EU Parliament commissars. Well,
fellow comrades, all of you commissars in the European Union, Oh,
just find miss glorious.

Speaker 5 (05:29):
I look to Brussels, where you commission Commissars Warren citizens
that they intend to shut down social media during times
of civil unrest the moment they spot what they've judged
to be quote, hateful content. Or to this very country
where police have carried out raids against citizens suspected of
posting anti feminist comments online as part of quote combating

(05:54):
misogyny on the Internet, a day of action.

Speaker 4 (06:00):
Them out by country, And in this very nation where
we sit, you go after and unrest citizens for saying
things that you perceived to be anti feminist.

Speaker 5 (06:13):
I looked to Sweden, for two weeks ago, the government
convicted a Christian activist for participating in Kuran burnings that
resulted in his friend's murder. As the judge in his
case chillingly noted, Sweden's laws to supposedly protect.

Speaker 1 (06:30):
Expression do not in fact grants.

Speaker 5 (06:33):
And I'm quoting a free pass to do or say
anything without risking offending the group that holds that belief.

Speaker 4 (06:44):
Now, how close are we in this country to that
very sane, similar attitude. How many stories do we have
in this country where people are afraid to say things
because it might offend someone?

Speaker 2 (07:02):
Certainly not in these quarters.

Speaker 4 (07:05):
But you know, and you've probably witnessed it in your
own life, work, church, school, wherever it might be. You've
witnessed it happening here. It just has yet to be
really codified in some judges ruling somewhere.

Speaker 5 (07:20):
And perhaps most concerningly, I look to our very dear
friends the United Kingdom, where the backslide away from conscience
rights has placed the basic liberties of religious Britons in
particular in the crosshairs.

Speaker 1 (07:33):
A little over two years ago, the British.

Speaker 5 (07:35):
Government charged Adam Smith Conner, a fifty one year old
physiotherapist and an Army veteran with the heinous crime of
standing fifty meters from an abortion clinic and silently praying
for three minutes, not obstructing anyone, not interacting.

Speaker 1 (07:53):
With anyone, just silently praying on his own.

Speaker 5 (07:57):
After British law enforcement spotted him and demanded to know
what he was praying for, Adam replied simply, it was
on behalf of the unborn son he and his former
girlfriend had aboarded years before. Now, the officers were not moved.
Adam was found guilty of breaking the government's new buffer
zones law, which criminalized as silent prayer and other actions

(08:19):
that could influence a person's decision within two.

Speaker 1 (08:23):
Hundred meters of an abortion facility.

Speaker 5 (08:25):
He was sentenced to pay thousands of pounds in legal
costs to the prosecution. Now, I wish I could say
that this was a fluke, a one off, crazy example
of a badly written law being enacted against a single person.

Speaker 1 (08:38):
But no.

Speaker 5 (08:40):
This last October, just a few months ago, the Scottish
government began distributing letters to citizens whose houses lay within
so called safe access zones, warning them that even private
prayer within their own homes may amount to breaking the law.

Speaker 4 (08:57):
It's true, Scott's are in the toilet too. This is
a shot across the bow to these European leaders that
everything that we fought for in World War two, American
blood and treasure, everything that we fought for to liberate

(09:21):
you from Nazism, from fascism, and now you're acting.

Speaker 2 (09:26):
Just like Hitler.

Speaker 4 (09:28):
The only thing you're not doing yet is trying to
exterminate the Jews. You are exterminating free speech, independent thought,
free thinkers, even prayer.

Speaker 5 (09:42):
Naturally, the government urged readers to report any fellow citizens
suspected guilty of thought crime.

Speaker 4 (09:49):
M that sounds like the old Stasi other people's lives. Yes,
he's calling them out to their faces.

Speaker 5 (09:59):
In Britain and across Europe, free speech, I fear is
in retreat and in the interest of comedy, my friends,
but also in the interest of truth.

Speaker 1 (10:09):
I will admit that.

Speaker 5 (10:10):
Sometimes the loudest voices for censorship have come not from
within Europe, but from within my own country, where the
prior administration threatened and bullied social media companies to censors
so called misinformation. Misinformation like, for example, the idea that
coronavirus had likely leaped leaked from a laboratory in China.

(10:32):
Our own government encouraged private companies to silence people who
dared to utter what turned out to be an obvious truth.

Speaker 1 (10:42):
So I come here today not just with an observation,
but with an offer.

Speaker 5 (10:47):
Just as the Biden administration seemed desperate to silence people
for speaking their minds, so the Trump administration will do
precisely the opposite. And I hope that we can work
together on that. And Washington, there is a new sheriff
in town. And under Donald Trump's leadership, we may disagree
with your views, but we will fight to defend your

(11:08):
right to offer it in the public square.

Speaker 1 (11:10):
Agree or disagree, bam.

Speaker 4 (11:14):
Now you may think to yourself, but Michael, what's happening
in Europe doesn't really have anything to do with us.
That you know, We're not doing anything like that. What
if I told you that, hang on, What if I
told you that in this country that the iPhone that

(11:41):
I hold in my hands is being regulated by a
foreign country. The Wall Street Journal, in an editorial published
a couple of days ago, headlined.

Speaker 2 (11:57):
The United Kingdom kicks Apple's door open for China.

Speaker 4 (12:01):
The subhead is Beijing would quickly exploit the British order
to allow access to encrypted data. Now, one of the
things that one of the reasons other than I like
the design, I like the capabilities. I like just about
everything about Apple products other than the expending nature of them,

(12:24):
I like the privacy safeguards that are built into Apple.
In fact, I'm having a problem right now with my
laptop because i have certain rules about that I've put
in on my mail program, and now the content of
some of those emails are being blocked because I have
rules that send certain emails to certain mailboxes that are

(12:46):
contained on my disc as opposed to being contained in
the cloud. And it's all because of privacy standards. So
they've kind of gone a little overboard, and I'm trying
to figure out a work around to it. But nonetheless,
here's the story from the Wall Street Journal. The United
Kingdom has ordered Apple, an American corporation, to build a

(13:08):
backdoor that would allow the British government to download and
read the private encrypted data of any iPhone user anywhere
in the world. The journal says this would be a
massive downgrade in the security features that protect the privacy
of billions of people, and then made Apple one of

(13:29):
the world's most valuable companies, and they demand that Congress.
The journal does that Congress immediately enact a law prohibiting
American tech companies from providing encryption back doors to any country,
and as ay rightly point out, that would create a

(13:49):
conflict of laws situation, allowing Apple to fight the order
in the United Kingdom courts and protect your safety and
our security. Now think about this, What gives the UK
the right to tell an American corporation. I know they
sell their products in the United Kingdom, but this is

(14:12):
basically as the Wall Street Journal points out. And I
know that there are people that would disagree with me
about this. I don't want the FBI to have an
unlimited backdoor into my iPhone or my MacBook Pro or
any of my products. I want them to have to
work for it. I want them to have to go

(14:36):
to a court of competent jurisdiction, go to a judge
in that court of competent jurisdiction, and get a Fourth
Amendment of warrant as required by the Fourth Amendment to
the United States Constitution before they can access the data.
And then once they get that warrant, because Apple has
encrypted it now. I want them to have to figure

(14:57):
out a way to get into it. But Michael, you
might be a terrorist and you might be communicating about
some terrorist activity going on. Yeah, that's exactly right. So
if you disagree with me, what your in essence saying
is you want to trade you your liberty for a

(15:17):
little bit of freedom. You want to trade your freedom
for a little bit of security. I got it backwards.
You want to give up your privacy in order to
keep you know, some guy from driving down the street
and mowing into a crowd of children at some you know,

(15:38):
uh football game in New Orleans. Well, I got shocking
news for you. They can do that without the use
of an iPhone. They can They can do that in
other ways. They can use that with other Chinese apps. What'sapp?

(15:59):
We check all of those, which, by the way, the
Chinese have access to the UK Government's demand the General
Rights comes at a peak of global cyber conflict. Hackers
from Russia continue to run rough shot over businesses, demanding
millions of dollars in ransom to return access to computers
and data. The Chinese Ministry of State Security successfully hacked

(16:24):
most major US telecom providers and the US Treasury. They
even targeted Donald Trump and Kamala Harris's campaigns. Following these
attacks on our national security, the FBI reversed its hostility
toward end to encryption and recommended that Americans use encrypted
message applications to protect themselves against foreign adversaries.

Speaker 2 (16:49):
Wow.

Speaker 4 (16:50):
When even the snooping, prying eyes of the FBI suggests that, oh,
you might want to encrypt your data to keep it
from Chinese or foreign adversarial access, that tells you you
had a big problem. In the United Kingdom, this law
is known as the supers Charter, the Snoopers Charter. That

(17:15):
law gives the British government unprecedented power to compel tech
companies to weaken the security of the devices that Americans
use every single day.

Speaker 2 (17:26):
Now.

Speaker 4 (17:26):
Other countries have tried to regulate encryption in ways that
would compromise the security of users worldwide, but our own
tech companies have refused to build features for either democratic
or autocratic governments that would make encryption worthless to consumers.

Speaker 2 (17:47):
JD.

Speaker 4 (17:48):
Vance goes right before the Munique Security Conference and says
free speech is more important than what you're trying to do.
Trump and Congress have made protecting us from China where

(18:08):
their top priorities as well they should. I don't think
we have a greater adversary in the world than the
Chinese Communist Party. China's economy sucks right now. China's economy
is on the brink of utter collapse. And yet they

(18:29):
continue to steal our ip they continue to break into
our phones, They continue to send military age men into
this country, although I doubt many of them are getting
in right now. And so Katie Vance does what needed
to be done over the past four years to recognize
that and to say to our European allies, what you're

(18:51):
doing is actually almost as bad as what you fought
against in World War Two. Yep, I would say, without
a doubt, there's a new sheriff in town. And for
that matter, one of the hottest topics in this country
mass illegal immigration. And here's what the Vice President said now,
just again to give you perspective about how drastically the

(19:16):
world has changed.

Speaker 2 (19:20):
As I tell you what he said, I want you
to think.

Speaker 4 (19:24):
Back over the past four years, or for that matter,
think back over the past twenty years in this country.
He said, I believe there is nothing now. I just
want you to know, I'm reading a verbatim, so when
he uses terms that I wouldn't ordinarily use, I'm reading
this verbatim. I believe there is nothing more urgent than

(19:49):
mass migration. Today, Almost one in five people living in
this country Germany moved here from abroad. That of course,
that is of course an all time high. It's a
similar number, by the way, in the United States, which
is also an all time high. The number of immigrants

(20:10):
who entered the EU from non EU countries doubled between
twenty twenty one and twenty twenty two alone. And we
know the situation. It did not materialize in a vacuum.
It's the result of a series of conscious decisions made
by politicians all over the continent and others across the

(20:32):
world over the span of a decade. We saw the
horrors wrought by these decisions yesterday in this very city.
Just footnote when that I think it was Afghan driver
mowed down twenty eight people or whatever the number was.

Speaker 2 (20:54):
Right there.

Speaker 4 (20:58):
He continues, it's a story, but it's one we've heard
way too many times in Europe and unfortunately too many
times in the United States as well. An asylum seeker
often a young man in his mid twenties, already known
to police, rams a car into a crowd and shatters
a community. How many times must we suffer these appalling

(21:19):
setbacks before we change course and take our shared civilization
in a new direction. No voter on this continent, meaning Europe,
no voter on this continent, went to the ballot box
to open the floodgates to millions of unvetted immigrants. But
you know what they did vote for. In England, they

(21:42):
voted for Brexit, and agree or disagree, they voted for it,
and more and more all over Europe they're voting for
political leaders who promised to put an end to out
of control migration. Now I happen to agree with a
lot of these can discerns, but you don't have to
agree with me. I just think that people care about

(22:05):
their homes, their dreams, their safety, their capacity to provide
for themselves and their children.

Speaker 2 (22:12):
And they're smart, he says.

Speaker 4 (22:15):
I think this is one of the most important things
I've learned in my brief time in politics. Contrary to
what you might hear a couple of mountains over in DeVos,
the citizens of all of our nations don't generally think
of themselves as educated animals or as interchangeable cogs of
a global economy, and it's hardly surprising that they don't

(22:37):
want to be shuffled about more relentlessly ignored by their leaders. Bam. Now,
that speech will doubtless cause a lot of consternation among
those European elites that he was speaking to, But for
those in Europe who agree, it will sound like the

(22:58):
call of the trumpet for freedom for all of those
in Europe who are suffering under this yoke of repressing globalists.
He's kind of like Paul Revere riding through the night
for the cause of liberty. Dance rode through Paris and
Munich this week, aggressively waving the American flag and waving
the flag for America's founding values. And it's about tombody,

(23:22):
about time that somebody stood up to Europe and said,
you're going down this path of utter destruction, and we
shed blood and treasure to save you from all, from
all the fascism that was spreading like a wildfire across Europe.
And now I come here and I'm telling you the
wildfire is spreading and you need to stop it now,

(23:46):
can you imagine Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. Now, I'm
not gonna lay the blame for the entire distance that
you're traveled during those four years that they run office,
but those four years in office certainly allowed Europe to

(24:09):
speed up its descendancy into fascism. And we are now
all these decades later. You think about the time period
between World War One, World War two and today, and
you look at that time span and you understand that

(24:32):
history tends to repeat itself. We're pretty close to entering
another World War. And I think it's absolutely appropriate that
he first goes to Munich, particularly Munich, to give this speech.

(24:54):
This is the clarion call, this is the new sheriff
is in town. And you know, even though you may,
I think what many of you do, not all of you,
but many of you. I think I think most Americans
don't pay a lot of attention to foreign policy or

(25:15):
international relations. And I understand why we're more concerned about
the security of our of our jobs, our employment. We're
more concerned about the security of our children when they
when when they're in school. We're more concerned about the
security of our nation as a whole, not just from
In fact, I think more so from illegal immigration than
we are saved from communists China, not so much from

(25:39):
you know, say Russia, which their economy is not that
great right now either, and they're fighting a war and
they're killing millions of their own or the war in
the Middle East for that matter. But what we have
to comprehend is that while we can make fun of,
you know, all of the globalist elitists like John Kerry

(26:02):
or Bill Gates or Warren Buffett or anybody else that
travels to DeVos and gives these high haughty speeches about
climate change and how we need to be you we
need more than the you know what was it Klaus
said that, you know, they won and we lost, and
now we've got to figure out what to do next.
You know, they they do need to figure out what
to do next, and they will try to figure out

(26:23):
what to do next. But these international relationships is based
now on a world that has shrunk to a tiny,
tiny little tennis ball, maybe a tiny little golf ball,
where we're all interconnected and we're all interrelated like it
or not, which means that once again, what this country

(26:47):
needs to do if we want to maintain the old
American world order. If we want to maintain our position
as as the leader of the free world and keep
all the enemies at.

Speaker 2 (26:59):
Bay, then we need more speeches like this. We need
to go to Europe.

Speaker 4 (27:04):
We need to go to whether it's Beijing, or we
go to Taipei, or we go to somewhere in Asia
and we give a similar speech. We need to do
exactly the same thing Chijing Ping. I know that Chi
ching Ping knows that there's a new sheriff in town,
but somebody needs to say it on a stage that
is designed for him specifically, just like Munich is designed

(27:25):
for the Europeans to hear what the new sheriff in
town has to say. We need to find that spot,
whether it's in Tokyo or Soul, wherever it is, but
we need to go there. Maybe it's maybe it's a
Manila where the Chinese are making their moves in the
South China Sea. But somewhere we need to go and
say stop what you're doing. This sheriff doesn't tolerate now

(27:49):
at the same time that we're doing all of that.
Pete Hegsen in the United States Congress needs to eliminate
all of the woke bulkraf app that exists in the Pentagon.
The I forget whether it was the Abraham Lincoln of
the Kniemens, but.

Speaker 2 (28:09):
One of our.

Speaker 4 (28:12):
Main warships collided with some sort of boat over the
Mediterranean or maybe somewhere.

Speaker 2 (28:19):
In the Middle East.

Speaker 4 (28:21):
How does that happen? How does that kind of accident happen.
We're behind on our shipbuilding, We're behind on all sorts
of arms and munitions. We're not And I know Trump
talks about trying to reduce nuclear weapons, and that's fine,
I can go for it. See if you can't get
that done, But we need to rebuild our military into

(28:45):
true warfighters, and we need to truly get our act
together and tell the contractors who we are dependent upon
for the design, you know, design and the manufacturing of
these of these new weapons. Where are where are our
hypersonic missiles? Where is our ability to defend aggression from China,

(29:09):
to defend aggression from the Iranians. All of these international
relations can at some time affect our lifestyle, our economy,
our way of life. And so I would just encourage
you that as as this administration now almost a month

(29:31):
in office, next six days from now, six days from now,
it will be only thirty days one month, And I
want you to think about everything gets occurred and all
the roadblocks that are being thrown up in Trump's way,
all of the lawsuits, all of the restraining orders, the injunctions,

(29:52):
and everything else. So I won't be able to explain
fully what the Solicitor General and the Attorney Journal the
United States have announced about what they're going to do
about all these injunctions. So tune in tomorrow on the
nationally syndicated program right intend to fully explain all of that,

(30:12):
because it is one more amazing example of how the
Department of Justice and in particular Solicitor General has announced
to the world and in particular to the Supreme Court
that this old way of doing business is unconstitutional and
we do have a unitary executive and we're going to

(30:34):
fight for it. And in specifics, which you'll learn about tomorrow,
they're going to seek to overturn a particular Supreme Court
case that many of these judges are relying upon for
these injunctions. So at the same time that the tearing
down and the breaking things up is occurring over here

(30:58):
on the legal side, they're planting the seeds to rebuild
the ability of the chief executive officer of the Article
two branch to actually administer and control the executive branch.
And you're required to accept cash, but you're not required
to exclusively accept cash. So you can exclude cash, and

(31:20):
you can have a POS a point of sales system
that would only accept a credit card. I don't think
there's any law that I mean, I don't think that
there's any law that mandates that you have to take
cash as a private business. I know that if you look,
if you look on it, it says that this Federal
reserve note, which is what it is, it's the currency,

(31:41):
a federal reserve note that is, you know, for all
debts public and private. So but it's done because at
a convenience, which has always amazed me, because a credit
card swipe entails a fee that when you pay for
in the cost of of you know, goods or services

(32:02):
you're buying with a credit card, those fees are built
into that price structure. Plus when you pay for in cash,
that dollar gets spread around much more than a credit
card does, because the credit card dollar travels through you know, travels,
it travels through the POS, it travels to a bank.
Bank collects it its fee, then part of that goes

(32:24):
back and then usually that get gets paid in a paycheck,
and cash is just much more efficient, not not as convenient,
more efficient. But I want to make a couple of
notes about my comments about the Defense Department. The budget
now exceeds eight hundred billion dollars, three million troops and civilians,

(32:48):
and this is going to be the biggest challenge that
DOGE has as it moves in, and Secretary Defense Hexith
has already indicated he welcomes DOGE coming in, but how
do we get to eight hundred billion dollars and three
million troops and civilians. It's been a growing Pentagon budget

(33:09):
since nine to eleven when suddenly we felt in this hurry.
And I do agree there was a sense of urgency
to build better weapons. But what happened was and if
you ever read anything from the Stempson Center, you would
you would find an article from Dan Grazier who says

(33:31):
something to the effect that in the post nine to
eleven permissive environment, we saw a slew of ill conceived
weapons programs, and now we're seeing the result of that
failed program after failed program, the F thirty five I
think it is is expected to cost well over two
trillion dollars. It's it's another scam going on. This is

(33:57):
a great example of where those is going to have
to step in and figure out a way that. Look,
let's let's cut the losses. Let's quit throwing bad money
after a bad program, and instead let's let's scrap if
it I think it's the F thirty five, let's scrap that.
But at the same time, let's develop some actual effective

(34:20):
weapons programs.

Speaker 2 (34:21):
We've entered a whole new era of war fighting.

Speaker 4 (34:26):
The attack on Chernobyl that I read about that occurred
overnight essentially by a drone, not not some fighter jet
shooting a missile at Chernobyl, but a drone. So it's
it's it's all. It's all new asymmetrical warfare that we're fighting.
Does that mean we have to get rid of traditional

(34:47):
war fighting mechanisms. No, but we have to develop new,
improved and technologically advanced weapons systems. And you're going to
hear all kinds of squealing because the military industrial complex,
just like the healthcare industrial complex, is now under attack

(35:09):
and Pete Hegsath has a humongous job at the same
time making the Pentagon more efficient, which may include some
budget cuts while at the same time some budget increases.
So balancing all of that is going to be Yeoman's work.
Pray that that Doge and Hegsith can get it done