Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The big dragon.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Is this climate change going to cause you to wear
pants on Monday?
Speaker 3 (00:09):
I would have to own pants in order to wear them.
Speaker 1 (00:14):
So it will it's gonna be like zero yeah.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
When she'll be like minus one thy and twelve degrees. Yeah,
and you'll still wear what you have right now? Yeah,
I find that. You know me, I come in here
all bundled up immediately.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
I have one pair of pants, but it's part of
the suit that I own, So they're suit pants and
that's that's it.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
No longer pants whatsoever? Correct, not anywhere in the house.
Speaker 3 (00:51):
Correct. Well, like I said, the suit, the suit.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
But you don't own a pair of jeans? Correct, You
don't want a pair of khakis?
Speaker 3 (00:59):
Correct?
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Just just those shorts?
Speaker 3 (01:02):
Yes?
Speaker 1 (01:04):
Who else was it used to wear?
Speaker 2 (01:05):
Here?
Speaker 1 (01:05):
Always wore shorts?
Speaker 3 (01:06):
Shannon did for a while, Shannon.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
But then didn't Kenny or somebody always wears shorts? Kenny, Yeah,
always wore shorts, no matter. He might have a gigantic
park on, but.
Speaker 1 (01:16):
He had shorts.
Speaker 3 (01:17):
And uh, Darryl for a while, loub.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
Yeah, Yeah, not me. I come in here, I crank
up the heat. Sometimes I just leave my pea coat on.
Speaker 3 (01:28):
Here's the thing, I'm not outside. I'm going from a
heated house to a heated car, to a heated office building,
back to a heated car, back to a heated house.
I ain't worried about it.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
And what are you to do when that car breaks down?
You're gonna You're gonna call me and say, hey, my
car's broken down. I've got shorts on. It's it's totally
the well digger's ass outside. Would you come and get me?
Speaker 3 (01:51):
And I'm gonna say, nope, stay in the car.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Stay in the car. So let's talk for a moment
about this ceasefire in Gaza and just is Jaza, Israel,
the Middle East in general. Uh Biden. Biden mentioned that
last night too, my fellow Americans.
Speaker 4 (02:19):
I'm speaking to you tonight from the old Office. Before
I began, let me speak to important news that from
earlier today, after eight months of NonStop negotiation by administration,
by my administration, ceasefire and hostage deal has been reached
by Israel and Hamas, the elements of which I laid
(02:40):
out and great detail in May this year.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
Now I have a question. Now we'll get to the
details of this ceasefire in the moment, because I'm perplexed
by it. I I understand parts, I don't understand other parts,
and when I try to it all together, it makes
my brain hurt. So we're going to walk through it.
But I have a question, and that is, if this is.
Speaker 4 (03:08):
True Israel hamas the elms of which I laid out
in rape detail in May this year.
Speaker 2 (03:15):
Let's see May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December, January.
That would be five fingers plus three is eight fingers.
So eight months ago he laid out the format the
tenets of this cease fire, and you couldn't get it done,
(03:40):
and then all of a sudden, just before you're leaving,
it gets done. What was the difference? What was the difference.
Speaker 3 (03:52):
I can't think of anything that's changed in the past
couple of months as to why that would happen.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
I can't either. Let's see if I can. Let me
see if I can find out if there's any sound
anywhere I should have looked this up early, any sound
somewhere that might tell us some indication about what might
have changed.
Speaker 5 (04:17):
We want to get back those hostages.
Speaker 1 (04:19):
For Israel and for us.
Speaker 5 (04:21):
You know, we do have people that are hostage is
being held.
Speaker 1 (04:24):
And I'll just say it again.
Speaker 5 (04:26):
If this deal is not done with the people representing
our nation by the time I get to office, all
hell is going to break out that hmm.
Speaker 3 (04:36):
Now, I don't know, I don't recognize the voice.
Speaker 2 (04:39):
Well, it's it's some oligarch, some low levels, some low
level oligarch. The things he you know, is like, you know,
he's thinks he's some influential guy that people around the
world listen to.
Speaker 3 (04:51):
He's an influencer.
Speaker 2 (04:52):
He's an influencer, that's right, rag, He's he's an Instagram influencer,
and and and he thought that maybe he would just
post that to Instagram account and or you might be
social and posts the truth about it somewhere. He might
do that too. Uh, maybe that changed. He may be
the same guy that killed Solomone or whatever his name was.
(05:20):
And he's also the guy that just says, you know,
I'm gonna blow the fieces out of you if you
don't stop doing what you're doing. And then he sends,
you know, a bunch of bombers over and blows the
pieces out of stuff. So maybe that's what's changed. But
when I think about this agreement, I don't understand why.
Well I do, but I don't understand why Israel agreed
(05:44):
to it. You have to get in the mindset of
the Israelis to understand why they would do this. Now,
Natan Yahoo is already getting blowback from his party, the LECUD,
plus many many others who are upset that they've had
(06:04):
four hundred soldiers die in this battle that's been going
on for what fifteen months or whatever it is now
since not this past October seventh, the previous October seven,
So we've.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
Had all of that going on then.
Speaker 2 (06:23):
Now. I don't have a solid source for this. Maybe
some of you do, but I have heard from friends
of mine that work inside the Beltway that we have
intel that Hamas has let's just pick a three thousand,
(06:46):
that the Israelis, the IDF has killed three thousand Hamas soldiers.
Some people inside the Beltway tell me that they have that.
The Hamas leadership, which by the way, does not live
in Gaza. They're in Cutter, They're somewhere in the Cutter
(07:07):
or the UAE. They they don't want to live. They
don't live in that craphole country that is the Gaza strip.
So the leadership lives elsewhere, but the leadership has managed
to recruit more than if the number three thousand, they
have recruited more than three thousand replacements to replace the
(07:28):
three thousand, or again, whatever that number is that the
Israelis have killed. So if if the purpose that Netta y'all,
if the objective that Neatnall who set out was to
obliterate Hamas from the face of the earth, then I
would say they have not they have yet succeeded in
doing so, if the Intel is correct about that. So
(07:52):
I'm trying, for the life of me to understand why
they would do this. Well, I found one place they
gave me some indication about why, and I want to
walk through it. It's a house editorial in the Wall
Street Journal that was published.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
Let me get the date on this. It was published yesterday.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
At five point thirty four pm Eastern Times, so sometime
yesterday afternoon I read this and I thought, oh, this
helps me understand it. And they write this when a
president elects to use it, American power is something to behold.
That's one lesson from the Israel from the Israel Hamas
hostage deal that was reached yesterday with only days despair
(08:37):
before Donald Trump's inauguration. It's an echo of the US
hostages freed from Iran in the Reagan presidency's first minutes.
That's true, and I do believe, sincerely believe that what
drove at least Hamas to.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
Say, as a negotiate and cutter, yeah, let's do something.
Speaker 5 (09:03):
We want to get back those hostages for Israel and
for us. You know, we do have people that are
hostage is being held.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
It's a great remind don't forget there are Americans held
hostage also.
Speaker 5 (09:16):
And I'll just say it again, if this deal is
not done with the people representing our nation by the
time I get to office, all hell is going to
break out.
Speaker 2 (09:26):
Thanks and remember Biden himself once to lay claimed that
he was able to get this done.
Speaker 4 (09:35):
I'm speaking to you tonight from the ill of office
before I began, let me speak to important news that
from earlier today, after eight months of NonStop negotiation by administration,
by my administration, cease fire and a hostage deal has
been reached by Israel and Hamas, the almost of which
(09:55):
I anyway, the almost laid out and great detail in May.
Speaker 2 (10:00):
This year, so May, and eight months later, we have
a premature baby not quite nine months. We got a premium,
so we got an eight month old baby. More So,
I think there are parallels between the Iran hostages and
these Godsen hostages. But what I don't understand is if
(10:26):
the intel is true, then why do they do this?
And of course, you know, here's Biden taking credit for it,
claiming that I've been doing this since you know, May
of last year. So for a year his administration, as
the Wall Street General writes, this is great language. For
a year his Biden's administration pushed this rock up the hill,
(10:50):
only to see it roll back down every time. Then
the US election changed the regional calculus. And there's where
they talk about Trump threatening that there's going to be
hell to pay it if you don't let these people out.
The Journal reports this that Israel's Cabinet will meet today
to approve the deal, which is expected to begin Sunday
(11:13):
free thirty three of the ninety four remaining hostages held
by Hamas dead or alive. Here's where I do understand
part of the mindset of the Israelis, having spent I
would consider considerable time compared to most Americans in Israel
(11:34):
speaking in to Israeli security conferences, and having actually been
chastised by an Israeli general one time, that I don't
fully comprehend what it's like to live with those enemies
around you all the time. They also want to preserve
their population and their people so much because there are
(11:59):
so few Jews left in the world that they ever
to them as.
Speaker 1 (12:06):
It should do all of us.
Speaker 2 (12:08):
Every single life counts, So if they can get and
Israeli hostage back, they will do it because they know
that they will live to fight another day, not the hostage.
I'm just saying that Israel itself will live to fight
another day, the journal says to an Israeli society holding
(12:31):
his breath since October seventh, twenty twenty three. This comes
as a relief, but the next breath must take in
the deal's steep cost. First, the release of about a
thousand Palestinian terraces, including more than one hundred that are
serving life sentences. Some of the murderers are sure to
(12:51):
return to the fight and cost innocent lives in the future,
both Palestinian and Israeli. This makes the deal a hard
show voice, but one that is for the Israelis to make,
not us. And the Journal's right, they have to make
this choice. We can we can help facilitate so that
(13:15):
there's a choice for them to make, but we can't
impose it upon them. That's why net and Yahoo's War
Cabinet and the Knesset will meet and they will make
the decision today whether or not they're going to agree
to this ceasefire. But here's the second point that I
don't understand. Israel will withdraw from most of Gaza, including
(13:41):
the Nazeerum corridor that bisects the strip, and retreat and
retreat to the buffer zones that were created during the war.
The Journal says such strategic territorial concessions go far beyond
the usual prisoner releases common to most hostage deals. Israeli
(14:02):
withdrawal has been part of Biden's plan all along, pressed
as well by Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Whitkoff, who
has been a part of the negotiating team since Trump's election.
But of course Biden doesn't want to give me credit
for that. He does kind of on the periphery say that, oh, yeah,
(14:28):
they've been a part of this and we've kept them
fully informed. Well, they've actually been more than a part
of They've been an active participant in it. So then
the journal says, no surprise, then that Prime Minister Netanyahu
is under heavy fire from the Israeli righte for accepting
the deal, including many in his own party. They accuse
(14:48):
him of surrendering the military gains in Gaza, for which
four hundred soldiers have given their lives in abandons, abandoning
the Gaza Strip to Hamas. But the journal says, wait
a minut If you look at the entire deal, Hamas
made concessions too, including the Philadelphia corridor that blocks Hamas's
(15:09):
supply route from Egypt, and they have given concessions on
inspections of Gossans returning to the strip's northern end. Most important,
Hamas gave up its demand that Israel agreed to a
permanent end of the war at the start of the
deal's first phase. So there you've got the framework of
(15:31):
what this deal is. Here's where the Journal helped me
understand why would Israel even think about agreeing to this?
Because the Israelis, as part of the negotiating team, had
to say, Okay, this framework that we've now reached we
agree to, will now take it to our leadership, our
(15:52):
political leadership, and will let them decide. The Journal says,
the alternative to negotiate indefinitely as Biden proposed Wednesday, or
moved to the deal's next phase, which includes a permanent
end of the war that would likely doom Gaza to
(16:12):
remain to remain a Hamas jihadis state. This would be,
the Journal says, a phony piece that prepares the way
for the next Hamas attack against Israel, probably on President
Trump's watch. Why would they agree to this? I think
(16:37):
this is the three D chess that both net and
Yahoo and Trump talked about when they met at mar Lago,
and that gets us to this paragraph. The key variable
will be Donald Trump's willingness to back Israel if Hamas
(16:57):
refuses to return the rest of the hostage, just refuses
to disarm and refuses to agree to a non terrorist
government in Goza six weeks from now, Trump, Well, will
mister Trump give Israel the backing to exit from the
deal and finish a moss he never He pledged Wednesday
(17:20):
to work closely with Israel and our allies to make
sure that Gaza never again becomes a terrorist safety. I
think this is a stop gap measure. I don't think
it's over.
Speaker 6 (17:35):
Good morning from South Dakota. Back in the day, when
my brother and I would be screwing around the back
seat of the car, my mom would give us an ultimatum,
kind of an equivalent to all hell will break loose.
And we listened, because that was back in the days
before seat belts, and she could reach every square into
the back seat of that Osmobile. Everyone have a great day.
Speaker 2 (17:55):
And of course it was an Osmobile. How many of
us had parents that had Osmobiles. I can remember my
dad's first Osmobile, brand new car. The dealer called him
when the eighteen wheeler or the trailer arrived with that car,
(18:19):
so that he could watch it being driven off that truck.
Small town America was great. John Adams one time, one time,
once said, the dignity and stability of government in all
its branches, the morals of the people, and every blessing
of society depends so much upon an upright and skillful
(18:44):
administration of justice. Now, Donald Trump said one time, I
need that button, move over here, dragon.
Speaker 7 (19:00):
Will you pardon anyone who attacked a police officer? Well,
you know, the only one that was killed was a
beautiful young lady named Ashley Babbitt. She was killed, and
there was actually somebody else that was killed, also a
MAGA person, but people don't give it one hundred percent credibility.
I'm going to find out about it. I'm We're going
(19:22):
to find out. But Ashley Babbitt was killed. She was shot.
She had never been shot. She was shot for no
reason whatsoever.
Speaker 8 (19:32):
In fact, they say that she was trying to hold
back the crowd, and the crowd was.
Speaker 1 (19:36):
Made up of a lot of different people.
Speaker 8 (19:38):
So we'll see, but I will tell you this, the
person that was killed was Ashley Babbitt. The other thing
is when they talk, you know, there was sever charges
of insurrection or anything like that.
Speaker 2 (19:50):
The point is one person was killed, Ashley Babbitt. So
go back just before Christmas when most the talking heads
on the cabal we're abloviating about the oh, the possibility
that Donald Trump might issue pardons to nonviolent January sixth protesters.
(20:12):
That's when Joe Biden issued a record number sixty five
pardons and one thousand, six hundred and thirty four clemency
clemencies for some really violent criminals. Biden has now pardoned
or granted clemency to more than eight thousand criminals, far
more than any president in the entire history of this country. Now,
(20:35):
for context, Trump issued a total of two hundred and
thirty seven pardons and clemencies in his first term, and
all of those pardons and clemencies that Biden did came
on the heels of his disgraceful pardon of Hunter Biden,
despite his repeated assurances to us that he would never
(20:59):
do so. Of course, Biden will be remembered. You know,
as some of you have commented on the text line
for why you didn't watch the speech last night, for
his endless list of lies, right, you know what, maybe
we'll go through. Maybe we'll go through some of those
(21:19):
later on. The big pardoning clemency giveaway was much like
his last minute presidential medal extravaganza, giving all those trophies
mostly to his disreputable political benefactors. So I've been thinking
(21:39):
about what's Trump going to do with convictions of nonviolent
January sixth, twenty twenty one protesters. They weren't insurrectionists because,
as he pointed out in that sound bite, nobody's been
charged with the crime of insurrection there so far, there
have been more than fourteen hundred people charged with federal
(22:00):
crimes associated with the protest. Most of those nonviolent offenses
like trespassing nine hundred people. More than nine hundred people
have been convicted, and amid tens of thousands of rally
participants outside the Capitol grounds, there were an estimated somewhere
(22:20):
between fifty maybe seventy five offenders who actually did commit
violence or vandalism by damaging the Capitol building or the
contents in the building or the interior of the building. Now,
for the record, I don't have any sympathy for any
of those violent offenders. If you broke out a window,
(22:43):
if you broke a lock, broke a door, then to me,
you're just like any other thug that you know, breaks
into a home or does anything else. You went beyond
protesting and then you started committing acts of violent you
actually engage in criminal activity. But the Democrats, with the
(23:07):
help of the cabal, they cast a blanket over everybody
present at the Capitol building as violent insurrectionists. They were not.
But I would add that entering that entering the building
(23:28):
the Capitol in that day amid all the protests really
was an act of idiocy. I often think about that grandmother,
whom I actually think is from Colorado that got caught
up in the mob, and just you know is and
again speaking from my personal experience, the very first time
(23:50):
that I saw Washington, d C. As a young man
flying in the river route to land at Reagan and
I saw the Mall, the Washington Monument, and the Capitol
looking trying to, you know, to spot the White House.
I remember it was. It was. It was probably like
this time of year. It's probably January February. It was
(24:12):
kind of overcast and airs not very clear, and it
was hard to see everything. But I just remember thinking wow.
Speaker 3 (24:19):
And then.
Speaker 2 (24:22):
As you drive across Memorial Bridge and you see the
Lincoln Memorial, it's all inspiring the very first I mean
to this state. It's still for me, it's like seeing
the Rockies and seeing the Continental Divide on a morning
like today when you have a gorgeous sunrise and you
can see that out of the mountains. I still have
that same feeling today, and when I go back to
(24:43):
d C. I still have that same feeling. And I
think about that grandmother a lot because she gets charged
for trespassing. Have you ever trespassed? I think I may have.
I think maybe sometimes I have cross boundaries hiking up
in the wilderness that put me off, you know, it
(25:05):
took me off federal lands, and perhaps I trespassed onto
some private land inadvertently, just you know, taking a wrong
turn on a trail or something I've done. At the
undisclosed location, there's a ranch on the mountain behind us
that belongs to the Scouts. It's part of the whole Films.
It's not Cold Filmont, but it's part of the Filmont,
(25:27):
and I have purposely hiked back up in there, so
I've trespassed. But the grandmother probably caught up in the
movement of that mob and seeing the capital, wanders into
the rotunda and is like, oh my gosh, this is
amazing and then walks out. I think about that woman
(25:50):
a lot, and when and when you when you had
the Democrats spending the last four years wringing me Trump
and all of his deplorables across the nation for the
actions of the jackasses that were violent, that woman always
pops into my mind, And of course that's what fueled
(26:11):
the January sixth insurrection inquisition so predictably, responding to the
prospect that Trump might now issue some pardons. Schumer's out
there protesting quote to those who use violence and intimidation
to threaten our government, to hurt our government, and particularly
to those who threaten police officers, pardoning them would set
(26:34):
a terrible example for future in America and for the
world that it was okay, that was forg forgivable to
do this. Oh so, it's okay if someone commits a
violent crime, and it's okay for the president to pardon them.
And don't get me wrong, I recognize the constitution gives
the president the power to do that. But for Chuck
(26:57):
Schumer to equate and say that because you attacked where
I live, you attacked my house, you attacked our government,
and that's a terrible example for the future of America
because Trump might pardon some of them, you know, Chucky,
bite my ass. But of course Trump never said he
(27:17):
was going to pardon those who used violence. He never
said he was going to pardon those who threaten the cops,
unlike the violent offenders who were gifted Biden's latest pardons
and all his clemencies. What Trump did say is that
a vast majority should not be in jail. And I
think he's right now as for winter, if you'll issue
(27:40):
those pardons, he says, most likely, I'll do it very quickly.
Those people have suffered long and hard. So now here
we are and now four days away from the inauguration.
Speaker 1 (27:52):
JD.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
Vance, Vice President Vance addressed that cabal that Trump would
pardon those who used violence, and they made it clear.
He said this. He said, Look, if you protested peacefully
on January the sixth, and you've had Merrick Garland's Department
of Justice treat you like a gang member, you should
be pardoned. If you committed violence on that day, Van says,
(28:16):
obviously you should not be pardoned. Well, before I make
my point, I want to make sure you understand that
I'm not trying to argue the merit of pardons or clemencies. Instead,
I want to do something else. I want to argue
for the prosecution of a particular cop.
Speaker 9 (28:36):
Pam Bondi's response to Adam Shift and the other Dens
yesterday was excellent. I appreciated how she stood her ground
and that she also is able to highlight some of
the things that they did not want to expose. For example,
when Adam Shift asked her if she would destroy the
January sixth evidence. She asked if he was worried that
(29:01):
she would do what the previous January sixth committee did.
Speaker 1 (29:05):
It was great, It was great.
Speaker 2 (29:07):
It was also I heard one quick SoundBite where she
said this is a hypothetical and he's like, no, it's
not a hypothetical. I'm asking you what you think, And
she said, no, what you're trying to do is you're
just trying to trap me into a position that I'm
not willing to take. But step back for a moment.
You realize that, now that Adam Schiff is a US senator,
(29:29):
California just continues to swirl down the crap hole. So
in January sixth, only one person was deliberately killed, and
that was by Lieutenant Michael Bert, a demonstrably incompetent Capitol
Police officer. By the way, just happened to be black.
Speaker 3 (29:48):
Didn't he get promoted like a few months later, got.
Speaker 2 (29:51):
Promoted and he just happens to be a black that
shot of white. So you know, you got if you
know what seems to me, they went to the other
way around. That makes the news all the time, but
not here now. She did attempt to climb through a
broken window within the Speaker's lobby leading to a hallway
where some members of the House I think, even like
(30:12):
Jason Crowe, may have taken refuge. But despite months of
all of the cabal's claims to the contrary, Officer Brian
sick Nick was not killed by the protesters, but Babbitt was,
by any objective account, unjustifiably shot and killed by Michael Byrd.
(30:33):
You don't have to strain your imagination, but you think
about the death of George Floyd, the forty six year
old violent career criminal and perennial drug offender. He died
while being arrested and detained on ground on the ground
by the cops in Minnesota and I and now we're
finding out that Derek Chauvin may have been improperly prosecuted
(30:57):
and improperly convicted. Floyd's autopsy shows a fatal level of
fentnel in this system. I could go on and on
about him, but then then think about how Pelosi and
Schumer in that those African garbs you know, took a kniel,
took a knee for George Floyd, kneel down in the
(31:18):
rotunda for him. The Democrats want to insist that our
justice system is infested with systemic racism.
Speaker 1 (31:27):
Well that's a lie.
Speaker 2 (31:30):
So what does the Floyd Chauvin case have to do
with the Babbitt Bird case. The connection is the hypocritical
proliferation of a two tier justice system over the past
five years, one tier for the tens of thousands of
Democrat rioters and another for the j six protesters. They
were about five hundred Democrats supported riots nationwide and then
(31:52):
in a mirror seven months before the January sixth protest,
resulting in dozens of murders, including two cops, billions in
urban businesses and government building damage, thousands of violent cop
and citizen assaults, but they were bailed out, charges dropped,
including almost all the protesters that were arrested during that
(32:14):
summer of violence in DC. So the Summer of Rage
unleashed a surge of violence nationwide that has yet to subside.
Despite Joe Biden trying to convince us otherwise. He continues
to try to tell us that, oh, violent crime is down,
and that you know, we were able to do that
(32:34):
in our administration.
Speaker 1 (32:37):
What a bunch of bull.
Speaker 4 (32:40):
Lower prescription drug pressures from millions of seniors and finally
doing something to protect our children and our families by
passing the most significant gun safety law in thirty years
and bringing violent crime to a fifty year low meeting shape.
Speaker 5 (32:58):
No, you have not.
Speaker 2 (33:02):
I think one thing that Pam BONDI ought to do
is at least open a criminal investigation or order the
whoever will be the newly appointed US Attorney for the
District of Columbia to at least investigate and see if
there are grounds for the prosecution of Michael Byrd, because
you know, there's no statue limitations on murder even in DC.
(33:26):
So if we're going to let off all of these
Summer of Ray protesters that actually did kill cops and
actually did commit assault, burned down buildings and everything else,
maybe I'll look at a black cop shooting a white
(33:47):
woman
The big dragon.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Is this climate change going to cause you to wear
pants on Monday?
Speaker 3 (00:09):
I would have to own pants in order to wear them.
Speaker 1 (00:14):
So it will it's gonna be like zero yeah.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
When she'll be like minus one thy and twelve degrees. Yeah,
and you'll still wear what you have right now? Yeah,
I find that. You know me, I come in here
all bundled up immediately.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
I have one pair of pants, but it's part of
the suit that I own, So they're suit pants and
that's that's it.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
No longer pants whatsoever? Correct, not anywhere in the house.
Speaker 3 (00:51):
Correct. Well, like I said, the suit, the suit.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
But you don't own a pair of jeans? Correct, You
don't want a pair of khakis?
Speaker 3 (00:59):
Correct?
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Just just those shorts?
Speaker 3 (01:02):
Yes?
Speaker 1 (01:04):
Who else was it used to wear?
Speaker 2 (01:05):
Here?
Speaker 1 (01:05):
Always wore shorts?
Speaker 3 (01:06):
Shannon did for a while, Shannon.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
But then didn't Kenny or somebody always wears shorts? Kenny, Yeah,
always wore shorts, no matter. He might have a gigantic
park on, but.
Speaker 1 (01:16):
He had shorts.
Speaker 3 (01:17):
And uh, Darryl for a while, loub.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
Yeah, Yeah, not me. I come in here, I crank
up the heat. Sometimes I just leave my pea coat on.
Speaker 3 (01:28):
Here's the thing, I'm not outside. I'm going from a
heated house to a heated car, to a heated office building,
back to a heated car, back to a heated house.
I ain't worried about it.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
And what are you to do when that car breaks down?
You're gonna You're gonna call me and say, hey, my
car's broken down. I've got shorts on. It's it's totally
the well digger's ass outside. Would you come and get me?
Speaker 3 (01:51):
And I'm gonna say, nope, stay in the car.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Stay in the car. So let's talk for a moment
about this ceasefire in Gaza and just is Jaza, Israel,
the Middle East in general. Uh Biden. Biden mentioned that
last night too, my fellow Americans.
Speaker 4 (02:19):
I'm speaking to you tonight from the old Office. Before
I began, let me speak to important news that from
earlier today, after eight months of NonStop negotiation by administration,
by my administration, ceasefire and hostage deal has been reached
by Israel and Hamas, the elements of which I laid
(02:40):
out and great detail in May this year.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
Now I have a question. Now we'll get to the
details of this ceasefire in the moment, because I'm perplexed
by it. I I understand parts, I don't understand other parts,
and when I try to it all together, it makes
my brain hurt. So we're going to walk through it.
But I have a question, and that is, if this is.
Speaker 4 (03:08):
True Israel hamas the elms of which I laid out
in rape detail in May this year.
Speaker 2 (03:15):
Let's see May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December, January.
That would be five fingers plus three is eight fingers.
So eight months ago he laid out the format the
tenets of this cease fire, and you couldn't get it done,
(03:40):
and then all of a sudden, just before you're leaving,
it gets done. What was the difference? What was the difference.
Speaker 3 (03:52):
I can't think of anything that's changed in the past
couple of months as to why that would happen.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
I can't either. Let's see if I can. Let me
see if I can find out if there's any sound
anywhere I should have looked this up early, any sound
somewhere that might tell us some indication about what might
have changed.
Speaker 5 (04:17):
We want to get back those hostages.
Speaker 1 (04:19):
For Israel and for us.
Speaker 5 (04:21):
You know, we do have people that are hostage is
being held.
Speaker 1 (04:24):
And I'll just say it again.
Speaker 5 (04:26):
If this deal is not done with the people representing
our nation by the time I get to office, all
hell is going to break out that hmm.
Speaker 3 (04:36):
Now, I don't know, I don't recognize the voice.
Speaker 2 (04:39):
Well, it's it's some oligarch, some low levels, some low
level oligarch. The things he you know, is like, you know,
he's thinks he's some influential guy that people around the
world listen to.
Speaker 3 (04:51):
He's an influencer.
Speaker 2 (04:52):
He's an influencer, that's right, rag, He's he's an Instagram influencer,
and and and he thought that maybe he would just
post that to Instagram account and or you might be
social and posts the truth about it somewhere. He might
do that too. Uh, maybe that changed. He may be
the same guy that killed Solomone or whatever his name was.
(05:20):
And he's also the guy that just says, you know,
I'm gonna blow the fieces out of you if you
don't stop doing what you're doing. And then he sends,
you know, a bunch of bombers over and blows the
pieces out of stuff. So maybe that's what's changed. But
when I think about this agreement, I don't understand why.
Well I do, but I don't understand why Israel agreed
(05:44):
to it. You have to get in the mindset of
the Israelis to understand why they would do this. Now,
Natan Yahoo is already getting blowback from his party, the LECUD,
plus many many others who are upset that they've had
(06:04):
four hundred soldiers die in this battle that's been going
on for what fifteen months or whatever it is now
since not this past October seventh, the previous October seven,
So we've.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
Had all of that going on then.
Speaker 2 (06:23):
Now. I don't have a solid source for this. Maybe
some of you do, but I have heard from friends
of mine that work inside the Beltway that we have
intel that Hamas has let's just pick a three thousand,
(06:46):
that the Israelis, the IDF has killed three thousand Hamas soldiers.
Some people inside the Beltway tell me that they have that.
The Hamas leadership, which by the way, does not live
in Gaza. They're in Cutter, They're somewhere in the Cutter
(07:07):
or the UAE. They they don't want to live. They
don't live in that craphole country that is the Gaza strip.
So the leadership lives elsewhere, but the leadership has managed
to recruit more than if the number three thousand, they
have recruited more than three thousand replacements to replace the
(07:28):
three thousand, or again, whatever that number is that the
Israelis have killed. So if if the purpose that Netta y'all,
if the objective that Neatnall who set out was to
obliterate Hamas from the face of the earth, then I
would say they have not they have yet succeeded in
doing so, if the Intel is correct about that. So
(07:52):
I'm trying, for the life of me to understand why
they would do this. Well, I found one place they
gave me some indication about why, and I want to
walk through it. It's a house editorial in the Wall
Street Journal that was published.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
Let me get the date on this. It was published yesterday.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
At five point thirty four pm Eastern Times, so sometime
yesterday afternoon I read this and I thought, oh, this
helps me understand it. And they write this when a
president elects to use it, American power is something to behold.
That's one lesson from the Israel from the Israel Hamas
hostage deal that was reached yesterday with only days despair
(08:37):
before Donald Trump's inauguration. It's an echo of the US
hostages freed from Iran in the Reagan presidency's first minutes.
That's true, and I do believe, sincerely believe that what
drove at least Hamas to.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
Say, as a negotiate and cutter, yeah, let's do something.
Speaker 5 (09:03):
We want to get back those hostages for Israel and
for us. You know, we do have people that are
hostage is being held.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
It's a great remind don't forget there are Americans held
hostage also.
Speaker 5 (09:16):
And I'll just say it again, if this deal is
not done with the people representing our nation by the
time I get to office, all hell is going to
break out.
Speaker 2 (09:26):
Thanks and remember Biden himself once to lay claimed that
he was able to get this done.
Speaker 4 (09:35):
I'm speaking to you tonight from the ill of office
before I began, let me speak to important news that
from earlier today, after eight months of NonStop negotiation by administration,
by my administration, cease fire and a hostage deal has
been reached by Israel and Hamas, the almost of which
(09:55):
I anyway, the almost laid out and great detail in May.
Speaker 2 (10:00):
This year, so May, and eight months later, we have
a premature baby not quite nine months. We got a premium,
so we got an eight month old baby. More So,
I think there are parallels between the Iran hostages and
these Godsen hostages. But what I don't understand is if
(10:26):
the intel is true, then why do they do this?
And of course, you know, here's Biden taking credit for it,
claiming that I've been doing this since you know, May
of last year. So for a year his administration, as
the Wall Street General writes, this is great language. For
a year his Biden's administration pushed this rock up the hill,
(10:50):
only to see it roll back down every time. Then
the US election changed the regional calculus. And there's where
they talk about Trump threatening that there's going to be
hell to pay it if you don't let these people out.
The Journal reports this that Israel's Cabinet will meet today
to approve the deal, which is expected to begin Sunday
(11:13):
free thirty three of the ninety four remaining hostages held
by Hamas dead or alive. Here's where I do understand
part of the mindset of the Israelis, having spent I
would consider considerable time compared to most Americans in Israel
(11:34):
speaking in to Israeli security conferences, and having actually been
chastised by an Israeli general one time, that I don't
fully comprehend what it's like to live with those enemies
around you all the time. They also want to preserve
their population and their people so much because there are
(11:59):
so few Jews left in the world that they ever
to them as.
Speaker 1 (12:06):
It should do all of us.
Speaker 2 (12:08):
Every single life counts, So if they can get and
Israeli hostage back, they will do it because they know
that they will live to fight another day, not the hostage.
I'm just saying that Israel itself will live to fight
another day, the journal says to an Israeli society holding
(12:31):
his breath since October seventh, twenty twenty three. This comes
as a relief, but the next breath must take in
the deal's steep cost. First, the release of about a
thousand Palestinian terraces, including more than one hundred that are
serving life sentences. Some of the murderers are sure to
(12:51):
return to the fight and cost innocent lives in the future,
both Palestinian and Israeli. This makes the deal a hard
show voice, but one that is for the Israelis to make,
not us. And the Journal's right, they have to make
this choice. We can we can help facilitate so that
(13:15):
there's a choice for them to make, but we can't
impose it upon them. That's why net and Yahoo's War
Cabinet and the Knesset will meet and they will make
the decision today whether or not they're going to agree
to this ceasefire. But here's the second point that I
don't understand. Israel will withdraw from most of Gaza, including
(13:41):
the Nazeerum corridor that bisects the strip, and retreat and
retreat to the buffer zones that were created during the war.
The Journal says such strategic territorial concessions go far beyond
the usual prisoner releases common to most hostage deals. Israeli
(14:02):
withdrawal has been part of Biden's plan all along, pressed
as well by Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Whitkoff, who
has been a part of the negotiating team since Trump's election.
But of course Biden doesn't want to give me credit
for that. He does kind of on the periphery say that, oh, yeah,
(14:28):
they've been a part of this and we've kept them
fully informed. Well, they've actually been more than a part
of They've been an active participant in it. So then
the journal says, no surprise, then that Prime Minister Netanyahu
is under heavy fire from the Israeli righte for accepting
the deal, including many in his own party. They accuse
(14:48):
him of surrendering the military gains in Gaza, for which
four hundred soldiers have given their lives in abandons, abandoning
the Gaza Strip to Hamas. But the journal says, wait
a minut If you look at the entire deal, Hamas
made concessions too, including the Philadelphia corridor that blocks Hamas's
(15:09):
supply route from Egypt, and they have given concessions on
inspections of Gossans returning to the strip's northern end. Most important,
Hamas gave up its demand that Israel agreed to a
permanent end of the war at the start of the
deal's first phase. So there you've got the framework of
(15:31):
what this deal is. Here's where the Journal helped me
understand why would Israel even think about agreeing to this?
Because the Israelis, as part of the negotiating team, had
to say, Okay, this framework that we've now reached we
agree to, will now take it to our leadership, our
(15:52):
political leadership, and will let them decide. The Journal says,
the alternative to negotiate indefinitely as Biden proposed Wednesday, or
moved to the deal's next phase, which includes a permanent
end of the war that would likely doom Gaza to
(16:12):
remain to remain a Hamas jihadis state. This would be,
the Journal says, a phony piece that prepares the way
for the next Hamas attack against Israel, probably on President
Trump's watch. Why would they agree to this? I think
(16:37):
this is the three D chess that both net and
Yahoo and Trump talked about when they met at mar Lago,
and that gets us to this paragraph. The key variable
will be Donald Trump's willingness to back Israel if Hamas
(16:57):
refuses to return the rest of the hostage, just refuses
to disarm and refuses to agree to a non terrorist
government in Goza six weeks from now, Trump, Well, will
mister Trump give Israel the backing to exit from the
deal and finish a moss he never He pledged Wednesday
(17:20):
to work closely with Israel and our allies to make
sure that Gaza never again becomes a terrorist safety. I
think this is a stop gap measure. I don't think
it's over.
Speaker 6 (17:35):
Good morning from South Dakota. Back in the day, when
my brother and I would be screwing around the back
seat of the car, my mom would give us an ultimatum,
kind of an equivalent to all hell will break loose.
And we listened, because that was back in the days
before seat belts, and she could reach every square into
the back seat of that Osmobile. Everyone have a great day.
Speaker 2 (17:55):
And of course it was an Osmobile. How many of
us had parents that had Osmobiles. I can remember my
dad's first Osmobile, brand new car. The dealer called him
when the eighteen wheeler or the trailer arrived with that car,
(18:19):
so that he could watch it being driven off that truck.
Small town America was great. John Adams one time, one time,
once said, the dignity and stability of government in all
its branches, the morals of the people, and every blessing
of society depends so much upon an upright and skillful
(18:44):
administration of justice. Now, Donald Trump said one time, I
need that button, move over here, dragon.
Speaker 7 (19:00):
Will you pardon anyone who attacked a police officer? Well,
you know, the only one that was killed was a
beautiful young lady named Ashley Babbitt. She was killed, and
there was actually somebody else that was killed, also a
MAGA person, but people don't give it one hundred percent credibility.
I'm going to find out about it. I'm We're going
(19:22):
to find out. But Ashley Babbitt was killed. She was shot.
She had never been shot. She was shot for no
reason whatsoever.
Speaker 8 (19:32):
In fact, they say that she was trying to hold
back the crowd, and the crowd was.
Speaker 1 (19:36):
Made up of a lot of different people.
Speaker 8 (19:38):
So we'll see, but I will tell you this, the
person that was killed was Ashley Babbitt. The other thing
is when they talk, you know, there was sever charges
of insurrection or anything like that.
Speaker 2 (19:50):
The point is one person was killed, Ashley Babbitt. So
go back just before Christmas when most the talking heads
on the cabal we're abloviating about the oh, the possibility
that Donald Trump might issue pardons to nonviolent January sixth protesters.
(20:12):
That's when Joe Biden issued a record number sixty five
pardons and one thousand, six hundred and thirty four clemency
clemencies for some really violent criminals. Biden has now pardoned
or granted clemency to more than eight thousand criminals, far
more than any president in the entire history of this country. Now,
(20:35):
for context, Trump issued a total of two hundred and
thirty seven pardons and clemencies in his first term, and
all of those pardons and clemencies that Biden did came
on the heels of his disgraceful pardon of Hunter Biden,
despite his repeated assurances to us that he would never
(20:59):
do so. Of course, Biden will be remembered. You know,
as some of you have commented on the text line
for why you didn't watch the speech last night, for
his endless list of lies, right, you know what, maybe
we'll go through. Maybe we'll go through some of those
(21:19):
later on. The big pardoning clemency giveaway was much like
his last minute presidential medal extravaganza, giving all those trophies
mostly to his disreputable political benefactors. So I've been thinking
(21:39):
about what's Trump going to do with convictions of nonviolent
January sixth, twenty twenty one protesters. They weren't insurrectionists because,
as he pointed out in that sound bite, nobody's been
charged with the crime of insurrection there so far, there
have been more than fourteen hundred people charged with federal
(22:00):
crimes associated with the protest. Most of those nonviolent offenses
like trespassing nine hundred people. More than nine hundred people
have been convicted, and amid tens of thousands of rally
participants outside the Capitol grounds, there were an estimated somewhere
(22:20):
between fifty maybe seventy five offenders who actually did commit
violence or vandalism by damaging the Capitol building or the
contents in the building or the interior of the building. Now,
for the record, I don't have any sympathy for any
of those violent offenders. If you broke out a window,
(22:43):
if you broke a lock, broke a door, then to me,
you're just like any other thug that you know, breaks
into a home or does anything else. You went beyond
protesting and then you started committing acts of violent you
actually engage in criminal activity. But the Democrats, with the
(23:07):
help of the cabal, they cast a blanket over everybody
present at the Capitol building as violent insurrectionists. They were not.
But I would add that entering that entering the building
(23:28):
the Capitol in that day amid all the protests really
was an act of idiocy. I often think about that grandmother,
whom I actually think is from Colorado that got caught
up in the mob, and just you know is and
again speaking from my personal experience, the very first time
(23:50):
that I saw Washington, d C. As a young man
flying in the river route to land at Reagan and
I saw the Mall, the Washington Monument, and the Capitol
looking trying to, you know, to spot the White House.
I remember it was. It was. It was probably like
this time of year. It's probably January February. It was
(24:12):
kind of overcast and airs not very clear, and it
was hard to see everything. But I just remember thinking wow.
Speaker 3 (24:19):
And then.
Speaker 2 (24:22):
As you drive across Memorial Bridge and you see the
Lincoln Memorial, it's all inspiring the very first I mean
to this state. It's still for me, it's like seeing
the Rockies and seeing the Continental Divide on a morning
like today when you have a gorgeous sunrise and you
can see that out of the mountains. I still have
that same feeling today, and when I go back to
(24:43):
d C. I still have that same feeling. And I
think about that grandmother a lot because she gets charged
for trespassing. Have you ever trespassed? I think I may have.
I think maybe sometimes I have cross boundaries hiking up
in the wilderness that put me off, you know, it
(25:05):
took me off federal lands, and perhaps I trespassed onto
some private land inadvertently, just you know, taking a wrong
turn on a trail or something I've done. At the
undisclosed location, there's a ranch on the mountain behind us
that belongs to the Scouts. It's part of the whole Films.
It's not Cold Filmont, but it's part of the Filmont,
(25:27):
and I have purposely hiked back up in there, so
I've trespassed. But the grandmother probably caught up in the
movement of that mob and seeing the capital, wanders into
the rotunda and is like, oh my gosh, this is
amazing and then walks out. I think about that woman
(25:50):
a lot, and when and when you when you had
the Democrats spending the last four years wringing me Trump
and all of his deplorables across the nation for the
actions of the jackasses that were violent, that woman always
pops into my mind, And of course that's what fueled
(26:11):
the January sixth insurrection inquisition so predictably, responding to the
prospect that Trump might now issue some pardons. Schumer's out
there protesting quote to those who use violence and intimidation
to threaten our government, to hurt our government, and particularly
to those who threaten police officers, pardoning them would set
(26:34):
a terrible example for future in America and for the
world that it was okay, that was forg forgivable to
do this. Oh so, it's okay if someone commits a
violent crime, and it's okay for the president to pardon them.
And don't get me wrong, I recognize the constitution gives
the president the power to do that. But for Chuck
(26:57):
Schumer to equate and say that because you attacked where
I live, you attacked my house, you attacked our government,
and that's a terrible example for the future of America
because Trump might pardon some of them, you know, Chucky,
bite my ass. But of course Trump never said he
(27:17):
was going to pardon those who used violence. He never
said he was going to pardon those who threaten the cops,
unlike the violent offenders who were gifted Biden's latest pardons
and all his clemencies. What Trump did say is that
a vast majority should not be in jail. And I
think he's right now as for winter, if you'll issue
(27:40):
those pardons, he says, most likely, I'll do it very quickly.
Those people have suffered long and hard. So now here
we are and now four days away from the inauguration.
Speaker 1 (27:52):
JD.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
Vance, Vice President Vance addressed that cabal that Trump would
pardon those who used violence, and they made it clear.
He said this. He said, Look, if you protested peacefully
on January the sixth, and you've had Merrick Garland's Department
of Justice treat you like a gang member, you should
be pardoned. If you committed violence on that day, Van says,
(28:16):
obviously you should not be pardoned. Well, before I make
my point, I want to make sure you understand that
I'm not trying to argue the merit of pardons or clemencies. Instead,
I want to do something else. I want to argue
for the prosecution of a particular cop.
Speaker 9 (28:36):
Pam Bondi's response to Adam Shift and the other Dens
yesterday was excellent. I appreciated how she stood her ground
and that she also is able to highlight some of
the things that they did not want to expose. For example,
when Adam Shift asked her if she would destroy the
January sixth evidence. She asked if he was worried that
(29:01):
she would do what the previous January sixth committee did.
Speaker 1 (29:05):
It was great, It was great.
Speaker 2 (29:07):
It was also I heard one quick SoundBite where she
said this is a hypothetical and he's like, no, it's
not a hypothetical. I'm asking you what you think, And
she said, no, what you're trying to do is you're
just trying to trap me into a position that I'm
not willing to take. But step back for a moment.
You realize that, now that Adam Schiff is a US senator,
(29:29):
California just continues to swirl down the crap hole. So
in January sixth, only one person was deliberately killed, and
that was by Lieutenant Michael Bert, a demonstrably incompetent Capitol
Police officer. By the way, just happened to be black.
Speaker 3 (29:48):
Didn't he get promoted like a few months later, got.
Speaker 2 (29:51):
Promoted and he just happens to be a black that
shot of white. So you know, you got if you
know what seems to me, they went to the other
way around. That makes the news all the time, but
not here now. She did attempt to climb through a
broken window within the Speaker's lobby leading to a hallway
where some members of the House I think, even like
(30:12):
Jason Crowe, may have taken refuge. But despite months of
all of the cabal's claims to the contrary, Officer Brian
sick Nick was not killed by the protesters, but Babbitt was,
by any objective account, unjustifiably shot and killed by Michael Byrd.
(30:33):
You don't have to strain your imagination, but you think
about the death of George Floyd, the forty six year
old violent career criminal and perennial drug offender. He died
while being arrested and detained on ground on the ground
by the cops in Minnesota and I and now we're
finding out that Derek Chauvin may have been improperly prosecuted
(30:57):
and improperly convicted. Floyd's autopsy shows a fatal level of
fentnel in this system. I could go on and on
about him, but then then think about how Pelosi and
Schumer in that those African garbs you know, took a kniel,
took a knee for George Floyd, kneel down in the
(31:18):
rotunda for him. The Democrats want to insist that our
justice system is infested with systemic racism.
Speaker 1 (31:27):
Well that's a lie.
Speaker 2 (31:30):
So what does the Floyd Chauvin case have to do
with the Babbitt Bird case. The connection is the hypocritical
proliferation of a two tier justice system over the past
five years, one tier for the tens of thousands of
Democrat rioters and another for the j six protesters. They
were about five hundred Democrats supported riots nationwide and then
(31:52):
in a mirror seven months before the January sixth protest,
resulting in dozens of murders, including two cops, billions in
urban businesses and government building damage, thousands of violent cop
and citizen assaults, but they were bailed out, charges dropped,
including almost all the protesters that were arrested during that
(32:14):
summer of violence in DC. So the Summer of Rage
unleashed a surge of violence nationwide that has yet to subside.
Despite Joe Biden trying to convince us otherwise. He continues
to try to tell us that, oh, violent crime is down,
and that you know, we were able to do that
(32:34):
in our administration.
Speaker 1 (32:37):
What a bunch of bull.
Speaker 4 (32:40):
Lower prescription drug pressures from millions of seniors and finally
doing something to protect our children and our families by
passing the most significant gun safety law in thirty years
and bringing violent crime to a fifty year low meeting shape.
Speaker 5 (32:58):
No, you have not.
Speaker 2 (33:02):
I think one thing that Pam BONDI ought to do
is at least open a criminal investigation or order the
whoever will be the newly appointed US Attorney for the
District of Columbia to at least investigate and see if
there are grounds for the prosecution of Michael Byrd, because
you know, there's no statue limitations on murder even in DC.
(33:26):
So if we're going to let off all of these
Summer of Ray protesters that actually did kill cops and
actually did commit assault, burned down buildings and everything else,
maybe I'll look at a black cop shooting a white
(33:47):
woman
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.