Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Branny, you ain't gonna finish carry next.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
We're on to you, Bucco.
Speaker 3 (00:05):
It's going to take you another thirty minutes to get
through this two minute.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
SoundBite challenge accepted. Challenge accepted, Bucco. So here's John Carrey
speaking to the World Economic Forum in which he proves
my point that the globalists around the world want to
(00:32):
destroy the US Constitution. Now, don't forget, I still want
to know on the text line who you think is
going to win and why, And some of you have
tapped into something that well I was planning on talking about,
and you prove my point. So here's John Carey in
(00:57):
all his glory, the former Secretary of State, almost the
president of the United States of America the climates are,
and now having resigned from the Biden White House because
I really think he knew that Biden was not there
(01:18):
and so he wanted to get out before he could
be blamed for having known how bad the president is.
So the World Economic Forum, he proves my point about
globalists trying to viscerate the Constitution.
Speaker 3 (01:36):
The dislike of and anguish over social media is just
growing and growing and growing, and as part of our problem,
particularly in democracies. In terms of building consensus around any issue,
it's really hard to govern today. You can't you know,
you know, there's no the referees we used to have
(01:58):
to determine what's the fact that as in the fact
that kind of been eviscerated to a certain degree.
Speaker 2 (02:06):
Who referees, Who are the referees, who are the gatekeepers,
who's the filter? There should be no filter. There should
be no gatekeepers. There should be no referees. But that's
what he wants, and that's who the globalists think they are.
Speaker 3 (02:26):
And people go and that people self select where they
go for their news or for their information.
Speaker 2 (02:34):
Oh, people make choices. They don't want you to have
a choice.
Speaker 3 (02:39):
You just get into a vicious cycle. So it's really
really hard, much harder to build consensus today than at
any time in the forty five to fifty years I've
been involved in this. And you know, there's a lot
of discussion now about how you curb those entities in
order to guarantee that you're going to have, you know,
(02:59):
some accountability of facts, et cetera.
Speaker 2 (03:03):
So now there's a conversation about how we curb those entities.
Now when he says those entities. I would say that
involves individuals, the media, the cabal, Uh, this program, this entity. iHeartMedia, newspapers, radio, television,
(03:29):
h you know, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, every conversations.
Speaker 3 (03:39):
But look, if people go to only one source and
the source they go to is sick at.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
Sick, I find that a fascinating choice of word sick.
If people go to one source, to one source that's sick.
Speaker 3 (03:56):
Uh, you know, has an agenda and they're putting out disinformation.
Speaker 2 (04:00):
Disinformation, get rid of, dismiss and malinformation. Whatever entity he's
referring to is putting out information. Whether the information is
right or wrong, correct or incorrect. Uh, that's for you
and I to ascertain. That's for you and I to determine.
(04:24):
Not somebody else. I mean somebody else. Can you know
another radio program can take the same topic that I'm
talking about and they may have an entirely different take
on it. Well, that's that's their privilege to do so,
that's their right to do so, and it's my privilege
(04:47):
and my right to counter them.
Speaker 3 (04:51):
Our First Amendment stands as a major block to the
ability to be able to just you know, hammer it
out of existence.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
So the first am is a major block to our
ability to simply just hammer out of existence those sick
sources of information. Globalist, communist right there, they're all over
(05:20):
our government, they're all over our society. And let's call
the spade a spade. He's a globalist, he's a fascist,
he's a Marxist, he's a communist, he's a want to
be dictator. Oh, Democrats seem to do a lot of projecting.
Speaker 3 (05:41):
What you need, what we need is to is to
win the ground, win the right to govern by hopefully
having you winning enough votes that you're free to be
able to implement change.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
Let me rephrase it for you. We need to convince
enough useful idiots out there, i e. Democrat, low information,
ill informed voters so that we can then do exactly
what they're accusing Donald trumple wanting to be, and that's
a dictator, so that we are free, so that we're
(06:19):
free to do whatever we want to do. Communist. This
guy is an absolute communist. In Russia, he'll be an oligarch. Now,
he's not a self made oligarchy. He married in to
his oligarchy. He married in to the Heinz family. John
(06:41):
Heinz Kerry.
Speaker 3 (06:43):
Now, obviously there are some people in our country who
are prepared to implement change in other ways, and that's where.
Speaker 4 (06:49):
We're saying, really, if democracy can survive, I'm writing.
Speaker 3 (06:54):
I think democracies are very challenged right now and have
not proven they could move fast enough or big enough
to deal with the challenges that we are facing. And
to me, that is part of what this race, this
election is all about. Will we break the fever in
the United States?
Speaker 2 (07:16):
Will we break the fever? What fever's he referring to?
And why do they do this? Last? Maybe a week
or so ago, we found out that the government in
Ireland had abandoned its dangerous new hate speech law. Now
(07:38):
that's a huge victory for all of those people who
organized and did what they did to defeat that bill.
That bill would have allowed the cops to invade homes,
read people's cell phones, and look through their computers. Let
(08:00):
me repeat that. That Irish law would have allowed the
cops to invade a home, read the person's cell phones,
seize their computers, read everything on it. Can you imagine that? Now,
go to Brazil. In Brazil they want to get rid
(08:23):
of or have gotten rid of X. It's being challenged,
but they wanted to get rid of Twitter whine because
it's spread so called misinformation. No X spreads information. Some
of them may be wrong, some of them be be right,
some of them be incorrect. But if it is, and
I love it. Have you ever seen community notes now
(08:44):
on x Twitter? Community notes are both good and bad.
But you know, somebody puts up something that is obviously
wrong or is questionable. Some people have the right, including me,
to go in and add a community note, and I
can all so comment on a community note, and I
can rank a community note about whether it is accurate
(09:06):
or inaccurate and put down reasons why. But despite those
wins in that battle in Brazil, the pressure in the
demand for censorship from governments, from politicians, from journalists continues
to grow. Now with respect to Elon Musk and X
(09:29):
in Brazil, it's it's a Hobson's choice. It could remain
blocked for the twenty million and growing number of Brazilians
who use the platform to defend the principle of not
bowing to that nation's supreme Court justice turned to facto
dictator Alexandra de Morris, or must could accede to the
(09:52):
demands and sacrifice some accounts so that millions still have
some access. I don't think an in dependent observer could
deny that there are advantages and disadvantages for the people
of Brazil and both of those scenarios. Now, whatever Musk
and ex decide to do, whatever eventually happens, still that
situation underscores the true peril of our current situation. The
(10:16):
risk is that we are headed toward total Well, that's
that's redundant. I started to say we're headed toward total totalitarianism.
We are headed toward totalitarianism and government censorship and the
control of the flow of information is the key to
(10:36):
achieving it totalitarianism. And that risk comes from people like
Kamala Harris, Tim Walls, the Democrat Party, our intelligence community,
all of the security state apparatus that we live under now,
(10:58):
and quite frankly, the dominant news media owners and their employees.
They are just watch CNN for a while, watch MSNBC
for a while, and then go read about whatever Chuck
Schumer and Nancy Pelosi and the King Jeffries are doing
in in Congress right now. All of that is putting
(11:26):
us on this road to totalitarianism. They are writ large
demanding that government censor social media platforms, including x Google Meta,
and they're trying to censor them of legally and constitutionally
(11:46):
protected speech that they simply don't like or that they
deem to be a threat to their attempt to totalitarianism.
Now it's both good and bad news. The Australian government,
(12:09):
for example, moderated its legislation to protect free speech, and
they did so with exemptions for news, narrowed its definition
of so called harmful content and included government content. Bill
Gates himself said, now I despise Bill Gates, but Bill
(12:31):
Gates talks through. Bill Gates talked with fork tongue. Bill
Gates talks out of both sides of his mouth. On
the one hand, he's often talking about how we need
to control these platforms. On the other hand, with respect
to the Australian attempt, he said that they should have
free speech. But there is less to all of these
(12:57):
qualifications that say the Australian government put in place while
trying trying to claim that they protected free speech. That
that Hobson's choice that exis facing in Brazil still remains
and Gates full remarks in context, he did say we
(13:19):
should have free speech. But that was a throw a light.
That was a throwaway line. A few sentences later, this
is what he said. This is Bill Gates, an American citizen,
just like John Kerry. The United States is a tough
one because we have the notion of the First Amendment. Huh,
(13:46):
the First Amendment is a notion. No. The First Amendment
is both a natural right and the embodiment of that
natural right into an end visual constitutional right guaranteed by
the US Constitution, and a limit on the government in
(14:11):
respect to what it can do regarding free speech. And
the government cannot use a private entity like Google or
Meta or x or anything else to get them to
do what the government itself is constitutionally prohibited from doing.
So it's more than a notion, mister Gates. But it
(14:34):
shows you that these globalists, their first and foremost target
is me. Is you? What you say, what you think,
what you post, what you tweet, what you listen to,
(14:56):
what you might say in private conversations, what you might
say with a bullhorn, whatever your bullhorn might be, a
social media platform, a radio program, I don't know, a
you know, some sort of social club that you belong
to in which you're asked to give remarks anything, maybe
(15:17):
even just conversations in your home with your dog. In truth,
you know, gates demand for censorship, I think is even
more radical and more disturbing than just that statement, because
(15:37):
Gates implied that artificial intelligence should be programmed to immediately
mass sensor disfavored views of vaccines, one of his big
things that he keeps pushing. Now again, the caveat I've
got to put out there is I'm not anti vaccine,
(15:58):
but I'm not going to go take, you know, twenty
five vaccines. All it was, I'm gonna pick and choose
which vaccines I think there's efficacy or for which there's
too high of a risk, and not take those. Bill
Gates said, if you're causing people not to take vaccines,
even that US should have rules. And then if you
(16:19):
have rules, you know what it is, is there some
kind of artificial intelligence that encodes those rules. Because you
have billions of activity, got to get it done.
Speaker 4 (16:29):
Say good morning, gentlemen. Hey the World Economic Forum it's
at wef rum dot org. Yeah, they're own website. And
if you have reading comprehension, critical thinking, can read between
the lines they're telling you right there, what they plan
on doing to this world and to the liberty that
(16:50):
we all enjoy. Everybody, have a great day. Don't fall
for it.
Speaker 2 (16:56):
Absolutely, don't fall for it. Yeah, and it would be
it would be good for you to go read it,
because he's right. They they don't hide what they want.
But I want to focus on what they want is
happening right here in the Democrat Party. This, this is,
(17:22):
this is right here in front of us. This isn't
I mean, it's easy to I probably use the word
globalists more today than I have in my entire life
in this in this short period of time. But the
reason I've chosen to use the word globalist is because
(17:43):
Carrie Kamala Harris, Alexandria Cossia Cortez, Bill Gates, all of
these people are indeed globalist, which is another word for
Marxists or communists, because they are trying to eviscerate the institution.
(18:04):
Speaking of AOC back in twenty twenty one, she said this,
We're going to have to figure out how we rein
in our media environment so that you so that you
can't just spew disinformation and misinformation. It's one thing to
have different opinions. But it's another thing entirely to just
(18:29):
save things that are faulse. So she's been promoting this
idea for the past three or four years about media literacy.
Well what's that. Well, that's Orwellian code words for government propaganda,
and I would say, in her case, most often aimed
at children. Now, all this is happening behind the backdrop
(18:54):
of what I've asked you to do about telling me
who you think is when you win the election close
enough that you're starting to get a feel for that.
So all of this right now, all of this globalist crap,
all of this stuff about information and how we have
to control the media. We've got to control social media.
We have to limit people from what they can hear,
(19:17):
what they can read, what they can see with their
own eyes, and even to what they can discuss among themselves.
And all that's happening behind this backdrop of the possibility
that the useful idiots in this country will elect Kamala
Harrison Tim Wallas as president and vice president of this country.
And those two have repeatedly called for government censorship of
(19:40):
social media platforms, including banning their political rivals, just like
they were trying to do in Brazil. You should recall
that Harris said that social media sites quote are directly
speaking to millions and millions of people without any level
of oversight or regulation, and that has to stop. Wow,
(20:07):
that's the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party, quite honestly, are
useful idiots themselves because they are now controlled by either
willingly unwillingly, or willingly or unwillingly by the globalists, by
(20:31):
people that are part of the World Economic Forum, that
are the Bill Gates, people of the world that believe
sincerely that And I'm going to use the word democracy
here democracy here simply to make a point that these
people believe that a democracy like ours in their vernacular
(20:56):
has to now be limited because democracy go back to
what Kerry said, democracy simply is unable to keep up.
What does that really mean? Democracy is unable to keep up.
It means that this republican constitutional form of government is
(21:18):
allowing people to make their own decisions to counter government
propaganda to not be willing, particularly with the experiment that
they tried with COVID, to realize that there is that
goes back to my feeling about this awakening that's occurring
(21:42):
that if there were to be another pandemic, And I
believe that to a certain degree, the COVID nineteen pandemic,
not the virus itself, that's a whole separate subject, but
the idea of locking down not just American society because
(22:04):
they couldn't get by with that. I really don't believe.
You got to think about it in terms of globalism.
Do you think that when COVID nineteen struck, if Donald
Trump had on his own followed what Fauci recommended and
just shut down the US economy and just told US
(22:24):
citizens to stay in their homes and that we're going
to pick the winners and losers about which businesses can
operate or not operate, or which employees are essential or
non essential employees. Do you think that if he and
the NIH had tried to do that just in this country,
do you think it would have succeeded. No. I don't
think it would have because too many of us would
(22:48):
have been questioning, why are we doing this when the
rest of the world is not doing it? And I
think that that would have caused the globalist attempt to fail.
So the globalists knew that in order to truly shut
down and see if they could shut down and control everybody.
It had to be a worldwide experiment. So the World
(23:11):
Health Organization, in conjunction with people like doctor Fauci and
all the doctor Faucis and all the other countries of
the world all agreed that, oh, the only way to
control the spread of this virus, this flu like virus,
is to shut down the entire world. And they succeeded,
(23:33):
but their success might prove to be their achilles heel heel.
And the reason I say that is because having gone
through it, there are and I haven't done a lot
of it, but maybe I should do more of it.
(23:53):
But there is so much information that is now coming
out about the non advocacy of the STARS CoV two vaccine.
There is now more and more people that are reporting
to the Stars Adverse Reaction Database that is absolutely frightening,
(24:22):
truly frightening. And some people have probably unknown long term effects,
some people have short term known effects. And so now
people are beginning to question why did we provide immunity
to the pharmaceutical companies for something that's never gotten full
(24:49):
FDA approval. Why. People are starting to ask questions why,
And I think that's a part of this great awakening
and so if if they're going to do another controlled experiment,
if they are truly going to try to shut down
the world sometime in the future, they have to control
(25:11):
the flow of information. Now, I think that's just I
think COVID is just one reason that they you know,
when these when all these globalists start thinking about it,
whether collectively or individually, about the experiment of shutting down
the entire world, one of the first things they recognize
(25:33):
is that, oh, controlling the flow of information is absolutely
necessary if we're going to control society. Because post COVID lockdowns,
all of this information is beginning to leak out, is
coming to the surface, and we're all recognizing how we've
(25:54):
been played, totally played. And so there is a group
of people now I have a feeling that it's much
larger than anybody would like to believe, that realize we've
been played and we won't be played again. Which is
why I believe very sincerely that maybe not yet in
(26:18):
my lifetime, because I'm an old fart, but maybe clearly
within my lifetime there may be a second American Revolution,
or a civil war, or some sort of societal breakdown
where society breaks into different camps and those camps are
(26:39):
basically two camps, those that believe in that want liberty
and freedom and those that want security and those that
want government to dictate their lives because they don't want
to have to make choices. Have you ever had let
me give you an example. Have you ever walked into
(27:00):
a grocery store and you're just buying groceries and you
got you've got, I don't know, some item on your
list and you stop in the aisle where that item
is located, and you look and you realize, Now, over time,
people just develop habits, and so over time, you you
pull up to you know, you take your cart, you
(27:20):
get to that point wherever that item is, and you
just naturally grab for the first one that you've always
been buying, and out of habit, you just pick up
that same item that's same, that same can of pork
and beans. I always use porking beans and as an example,
but say you've never bought porking beans before in your
entire lifetime, but suddenly it's on your grocery list, and
you pull up and you realize, holy feecs batman there,
(27:46):
and you stare, I know people have done this, I've
done it. If I've done it, I know you've done it,
and you stare, huh, which which brand do I buy?
Now you look and if you're critically thinking about it,
you realize, okay, the labels are all marketing attempts. There's
(28:08):
always the price point to consider, and there is, you know,
a brand name versus the store brand, basically the generic brand.
And so you stay there. Maybe it's only fifteen seconds,
but stop and count fifteen seconds, maybe count sixty seconds,
since you're standing there trying to decide which pork and
beans to choose. Will now take that habit, that experience,
(28:33):
and there are people who don't want to do that.
They want someone to tell them which can of pork
and beans to choose. We've raised entire generations like that
who are scared to make a choice, who are scared
to make a decision, and they're scared to take a break.
(28:57):
So I'll take a break.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
Good morning, Michael. Under the theme of new speak, I'm
more and more convinced that every time a democrat uses
the word democracy, it's really a euphemism for at least
social democracy or democratic socialism, or just straight up communism.
So you can just translate that every time they say
(29:20):
it into one of those other terms.
Speaker 2 (29:23):
Yes, because a true democracy ultimately leads to communism, mob
rule eventually leads to some form of tyranity. I think
you're absolutely right. This text message is a great way
to sum up this whole topic, Michael. Have you ever
thought that society has become so busy and people are
so overworked and strung so thin that they might just
(29:44):
want the government to dictate an aspect of their life.
As an example, I don't want to have any choices
in my healthcare. I just want to have coverage. Life
is becoming so busy people are thinking it's just easier
to have some decision made for them. Well, I partially
agree that in this regard, I do think life has
(30:04):
become so busy that we do tend to just want,
you know, just tell me, just give me a can
of pork and beans. I don't I don't want to decide,
you know, which is which. I don't want to calculate,
you know, the price per serving. I don't want to,
you know, determine you look at the nutrition label and
determine which one's better or best for me. Just give
(30:26):
me put a canon porking beans. I don't think it's
necessarily busyness. I think that we have such overwhelming choices.
I think that's the issue. Now, I'm all for choice,
and I'm all for a free market providing as many
(30:46):
choices of pork and beans as possible.
Speaker 5 (30:48):
Pretty easy to figure out whether you want chocolate, vanilla
or strawberry. Yeah, but then if you add in you
know pecan and pre lead, and you know cookie dough
and cookies, and it gets a little bit more confident,
it gets opplicated.
Speaker 2 (31:00):
Right, that's right. And people laugh at me when I
if I happen to be somewhere where the ice creams
of choice, you just have strawberry, you just have chocolate.
Just give me one of those two. I don't care
about all the others. Now, I'm not against that multitude
of choices because that represents the free market. And so
those choices will come and go. They will expand or
(31:24):
contract based upon the success in the marketplace. So if
a new cana pork and beans comes out and they've
got shelf space, they will survive based on us making
choices about too or making the choice to choose that
particular can of pork and beans or that brand of
pork and beans, and so they will rise or fall
(31:47):
based upon our choice. So I don't Yeah, we're all busy,
but I think it's just that we have such an
abundance of choice, which remember, that's the price of a
free society. That is the reward of a free society.
I'd rather have too many choices than too little choices.
Branny, you ain't gonna finish carry next.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
We're on to you, Bucco.
Speaker 3 (00:05):
It's going to take you another thirty minutes to get
through this two minute.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
SoundBite challenge accepted. Challenge accepted, Bucco. So here's John Carrey
speaking to the World Economic Forum in which he proves
my point that the globalists around the world want to
(00:32):
destroy the US Constitution. Now, don't forget, I still want
to know on the text line who you think is
going to win and why, And some of you have
tapped into something that well I was planning on talking about,
and you prove my point. So here's John Carey in
(00:57):
all his glory, the former Secretary of State, almost the
president of the United States of America the climates are,
and now having resigned from the Biden White House because
I really think he knew that Biden was not there
(01:18):
and so he wanted to get out before he could
be blamed for having known how bad the president is.
So the World Economic Forum, he proves my point about
globalists trying to viscerate the Constitution.
Speaker 3 (01:36):
The dislike of and anguish over social media is just
growing and growing and growing, and as part of our problem,
particularly in democracies. In terms of building consensus around any issue,
it's really hard to govern today. You can't you know,
you know, there's no the referees we used to have
(01:58):
to determine what's the fact that as in the fact
that kind of been eviscerated to a certain degree.
Speaker 2 (02:06):
Who referees, Who are the referees, who are the gatekeepers,
who's the filter? There should be no filter. There should
be no gatekeepers. There should be no referees. But that's
what he wants, and that's who the globalists think they are.
Speaker 3 (02:26):
And people go and that people self select where they
go for their news or for their information.
Speaker 2 (02:34):
Oh, people make choices. They don't want you to have
a choice.
Speaker 3 (02:39):
You just get into a vicious cycle. So it's really
really hard, much harder to build consensus today than at
any time in the forty five to fifty years I've
been involved in this. And you know, there's a lot
of discussion now about how you curb those entities in
order to guarantee that you're going to have, you know,
(02:59):
some accountability of facts, et cetera.
Speaker 2 (03:03):
So now there's a conversation about how we curb those entities.
Now when he says those entities. I would say that
involves individuals, the media, the cabal, Uh, this program, this entity. iHeartMedia, newspapers, radio, television,
(03:29):
h you know, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, every conversations.
Speaker 3 (03:39):
But look, if people go to only one source and
the source they go to is sick at.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
Sick, I find that a fascinating choice of word sick.
If people go to one source, to one source that's sick.
Speaker 3 (03:56):
Uh, you know, has an agenda and they're putting out disinformation.
Speaker 2 (04:00):
Disinformation, get rid of, dismiss and malinformation. Whatever entity he's
referring to is putting out information. Whether the information is
right or wrong, correct or incorrect. Uh, that's for you
and I to ascertain. That's for you and I to determine.
(04:24):
Not somebody else. I mean somebody else. Can you know
another radio program can take the same topic that I'm
talking about and they may have an entirely different take
on it. Well, that's that's their privilege to do so,
that's their right to do so, and it's my privilege
(04:47):
and my right to counter them.
Speaker 3 (04:51):
Our First Amendment stands as a major block to the
ability to be able to just you know, hammer it
out of existence.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
So the first am is a major block to our
ability to simply just hammer out of existence those sick
sources of information. Globalist, communist right there, they're all over
(05:20):
our government, they're all over our society. And let's call
the spade a spade. He's a globalist, he's a fascist,
he's a Marxist, he's a communist, he's a want to
be dictator. Oh, Democrats seem to do a lot of projecting.
Speaker 3 (05:41):
What you need, what we need is to is to
win the ground, win the right to govern by hopefully
having you winning enough votes that you're free to be
able to implement change.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
Let me rephrase it for you. We need to convince
enough useful idiots out there, i e. Democrat, low information,
ill informed voters so that we can then do exactly
what they're accusing Donald trumple wanting to be, and that's
a dictator, so that we are free, so that we're
(06:19):
free to do whatever we want to do. Communist. This
guy is an absolute communist. In Russia, he'll be an oligarch. Now,
he's not a self made oligarchy. He married in to
his oligarchy. He married in to the Heinz family. John
(06:41):
Heinz Kerry.
Speaker 3 (06:43):
Now, obviously there are some people in our country who
are prepared to implement change in other ways, and that's where.
Speaker 4 (06:49):
We're saying, really, if democracy can survive, I'm writing.
Speaker 3 (06:54):
I think democracies are very challenged right now and have
not proven they could move fast enough or big enough
to deal with the challenges that we are facing. And
to me, that is part of what this race, this
election is all about. Will we break the fever in
the United States?
Speaker 2 (07:16):
Will we break the fever? What fever's he referring to?
And why do they do this? Last? Maybe a week
or so ago, we found out that the government in
Ireland had abandoned its dangerous new hate speech law. Now
(07:38):
that's a huge victory for all of those people who
organized and did what they did to defeat that bill.
That bill would have allowed the cops to invade homes,
read people's cell phones, and look through their computers. Let
(08:00):
me repeat that. That Irish law would have allowed the
cops to invade a home, read the person's cell phones,
seize their computers, read everything on it. Can you imagine that? Now,
go to Brazil. In Brazil they want to get rid
(08:23):
of or have gotten rid of X. It's being challenged,
but they wanted to get rid of Twitter whine because
it's spread so called misinformation. No X spreads information. Some
of them may be wrong, some of them be be right,
some of them be incorrect. But if it is, and
I love it. Have you ever seen community notes now
(08:44):
on x Twitter? Community notes are both good and bad.
But you know, somebody puts up something that is obviously
wrong or is questionable. Some people have the right, including me,
to go in and add a community note, and I
can all so comment on a community note, and I
can rank a community note about whether it is accurate
(09:06):
or inaccurate and put down reasons why. But despite those
wins in that battle in Brazil, the pressure in the
demand for censorship from governments, from politicians, from journalists continues
to grow. Now with respect to Elon Musk and X
(09:29):
in Brazil, it's it's a Hobson's choice. It could remain
blocked for the twenty million and growing number of Brazilians
who use the platform to defend the principle of not
bowing to that nation's supreme Court justice turned to facto
dictator Alexandra de Morris, or must could accede to the
(09:52):
demands and sacrifice some accounts so that millions still have
some access. I don't think an in dependent observer could
deny that there are advantages and disadvantages for the people
of Brazil and both of those scenarios. Now, whatever Musk
and ex decide to do, whatever eventually happens, still that
situation underscores the true peril of our current situation. The
(10:16):
risk is that we are headed toward total Well, that's
that's redundant. I started to say we're headed toward total totalitarianism.
We are headed toward totalitarianism and government censorship and the
control of the flow of information is the key to
(10:36):
achieving it totalitarianism. And that risk comes from people like
Kamala Harris, Tim Walls, the Democrat Party, our intelligence community,
all of the security state apparatus that we live under now,
(10:58):
and quite frankly, the dominant news media owners and their employees.
They are just watch CNN for a while, watch MSNBC
for a while, and then go read about whatever Chuck
Schumer and Nancy Pelosi and the King Jeffries are doing
in in Congress right now. All of that is putting
(11:26):
us on this road to totalitarianism. They are writ large
demanding that government censor social media platforms, including x Google Meta,
and they're trying to censor them of legally and constitutionally
(11:46):
protected speech that they simply don't like or that they
deem to be a threat to their attempt to totalitarianism.
Now it's both good and bad news. The Australian government,
(12:09):
for example, moderated its legislation to protect free speech, and
they did so with exemptions for news, narrowed its definition
of so called harmful content and included government content. Bill
Gates himself said, now I despise Bill Gates, but Bill
(12:31):
Gates talks through. Bill Gates talked with fork tongue. Bill
Gates talks out of both sides of his mouth. On
the one hand, he's often talking about how we need
to control these platforms. On the other hand, with respect
to the Australian attempt, he said that they should have
free speech. But there is less to all of these
(12:57):
qualifications that say the Australian government put in place while
trying trying to claim that they protected free speech. That
that Hobson's choice that exis facing in Brazil still remains
and Gates full remarks in context, he did say we
(13:19):
should have free speech. But that was a throw a light.
That was a throwaway line. A few sentences later, this
is what he said. This is Bill Gates, an American citizen,
just like John Kerry. The United States is a tough
one because we have the notion of the First Amendment. Huh,
(13:46):
the First Amendment is a notion. No. The First Amendment
is both a natural right and the embodiment of that
natural right into an end visual constitutional right guaranteed by
the US Constitution, and a limit on the government in
(14:11):
respect to what it can do regarding free speech. And
the government cannot use a private entity like Google or
Meta or x or anything else to get them to
do what the government itself is constitutionally prohibited from doing.
So it's more than a notion, mister Gates. But it
(14:34):
shows you that these globalists, their first and foremost target
is me. Is you? What you say, what you think,
what you post, what you tweet, what you listen to,
(14:56):
what you might say in private conversations, what you might
say with a bullhorn, whatever your bullhorn might be, a
social media platform, a radio program, I don't know, a
you know, some sort of social club that you belong
to in which you're asked to give remarks anything, maybe
(15:17):
even just conversations in your home with your dog. In truth,
you know, gates demand for censorship, I think is even
more radical and more disturbing than just that statement, because
(15:37):
Gates implied that artificial intelligence should be programmed to immediately
mass sensor disfavored views of vaccines, one of his big
things that he keeps pushing. Now again, the caveat I've
got to put out there is I'm not anti vaccine,
(15:58):
but I'm not going to go take, you know, twenty
five vaccines. All it was, I'm gonna pick and choose
which vaccines I think there's efficacy or for which there's
too high of a risk, and not take those. Bill
Gates said, if you're causing people not to take vaccines,
even that US should have rules. And then if you
(16:19):
have rules, you know what it is, is there some
kind of artificial intelligence that encodes those rules. Because you
have billions of activity, got to get it done.
Speaker 4 (16:29):
Say good morning, gentlemen. Hey the World Economic Forum it's
at wef rum dot org. Yeah, they're own website. And
if you have reading comprehension, critical thinking, can read between
the lines they're telling you right there, what they plan
on doing to this world and to the liberty that
(16:50):
we all enjoy. Everybody, have a great day. Don't fall
for it.
Speaker 2 (16:56):
Absolutely, don't fall for it. Yeah, and it would be
it would be good for you to go read it,
because he's right. They they don't hide what they want.
But I want to focus on what they want is
happening right here in the Democrat Party. This, this is,
(17:22):
this is right here in front of us. This isn't
I mean, it's easy to I probably use the word
globalists more today than I have in my entire life
in this in this short period of time. But the
reason I've chosen to use the word globalist is because
(17:43):
Carrie Kamala Harris, Alexandria Cossia Cortez, Bill Gates, all of
these people are indeed globalist, which is another word for
Marxists or communists, because they are trying to eviscerate the institution.
(18:04):
Speaking of AOC back in twenty twenty one, she said this,
We're going to have to figure out how we rein
in our media environment so that you so that you
can't just spew disinformation and misinformation. It's one thing to
have different opinions. But it's another thing entirely to just
(18:29):
save things that are faulse. So she's been promoting this
idea for the past three or four years about media literacy.
Well what's that. Well, that's Orwellian code words for government propaganda,
and I would say, in her case, most often aimed
at children. Now, all this is happening behind the backdrop
(18:54):
of what I've asked you to do about telling me
who you think is when you win the election close
enough that you're starting to get a feel for that.
So all of this right now, all of this globalist crap,
all of this stuff about information and how we have
to control the media. We've got to control social media.
We have to limit people from what they can hear,
(19:17):
what they can read, what they can see with their
own eyes, and even to what they can discuss among themselves.
And all that's happening behind this backdrop of the possibility
that the useful idiots in this country will elect Kamala
Harrison Tim Wallas as president and vice president of this country.
And those two have repeatedly called for government censorship of
(19:40):
social media platforms, including banning their political rivals, just like
they were trying to do in Brazil. You should recall
that Harris said that social media sites quote are directly
speaking to millions and millions of people without any level
of oversight or regulation, and that has to stop. Wow,
(20:07):
that's the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party, quite honestly, are
useful idiots themselves because they are now controlled by either
willingly unwillingly, or willingly or unwillingly by the globalists, by
(20:31):
people that are part of the World Economic Forum, that
are the Bill Gates, people of the world that believe
sincerely that And I'm going to use the word democracy
here democracy here simply to make a point that these
people believe that a democracy like ours in their vernacular
(20:56):
has to now be limited because democracy go back to
what Kerry said, democracy simply is unable to keep up.
What does that really mean? Democracy is unable to keep up.
It means that this republican constitutional form of government is
(21:18):
allowing people to make their own decisions to counter government
propaganda to not be willing, particularly with the experiment that
they tried with COVID, to realize that there is that
goes back to my feeling about this awakening that's occurring
(21:42):
that if there were to be another pandemic, And I
believe that to a certain degree, the COVID nineteen pandemic,
not the virus itself, that's a whole separate subject, but
the idea of locking down not just American society because
(22:04):
they couldn't get by with that. I really don't believe.
You got to think about it in terms of globalism.
Do you think that when COVID nineteen struck, if Donald
Trump had on his own followed what Fauci recommended and
just shut down the US economy and just told US
(22:24):
citizens to stay in their homes and that we're going
to pick the winners and losers about which businesses can
operate or not operate, or which employees are essential or
non essential employees. Do you think that if he and
the NIH had tried to do that just in this country,
do you think it would have succeeded. No. I don't
think it would have because too many of us would
(22:48):
have been questioning, why are we doing this when the
rest of the world is not doing it? And I
think that that would have caused the globalist attempt to fail.
So the globalists knew that in order to truly shut
down and see if they could shut down and control everybody.
It had to be a worldwide experiment. So the World
(23:11):
Health Organization, in conjunction with people like doctor Fauci and
all the doctor Faucis and all the other countries of
the world all agreed that, oh, the only way to
control the spread of this virus, this flu like virus,
is to shut down the entire world. And they succeeded,
(23:33):
but their success might prove to be their achilles heel heel.
And the reason I say that is because having gone
through it, there are and I haven't done a lot
of it, but maybe I should do more of it.
(23:53):
But there is so much information that is now coming
out about the non advocacy of the STARS CoV two vaccine.
There is now more and more people that are reporting
to the Stars Adverse Reaction Database that is absolutely frightening,
(24:22):
truly frightening. And some people have probably unknown long term effects,
some people have short term known effects. And so now
people are beginning to question why did we provide immunity
to the pharmaceutical companies for something that's never gotten full
(24:49):
FDA approval. Why. People are starting to ask questions why,
And I think that's a part of this great awakening
and so if if they're going to do another controlled experiment,
if they are truly going to try to shut down
the world sometime in the future, they have to control
(25:11):
the flow of information. Now, I think that's just I
think COVID is just one reason that they you know,
when these when all these globalists start thinking about it,
whether collectively or individually, about the experiment of shutting down
the entire world, one of the first things they recognize
(25:33):
is that, oh, controlling the flow of information is absolutely
necessary if we're going to control society. Because post COVID lockdowns,
all of this information is beginning to leak out, is
coming to the surface, and we're all recognizing how we've
(25:54):
been played, totally played. And so there is a group
of people now I have a feeling that it's much
larger than anybody would like to believe, that realize we've
been played and we won't be played again. Which is
why I believe very sincerely that maybe not yet in
(26:18):
my lifetime, because I'm an old fart, but maybe clearly
within my lifetime there may be a second American Revolution,
or a civil war, or some sort of societal breakdown
where society breaks into different camps and those camps are
(26:39):
basically two camps, those that believe in that want liberty
and freedom and those that want security and those that
want government to dictate their lives because they don't want
to have to make choices. Have you ever had let
me give you an example. Have you ever walked into
(27:00):
a grocery store and you're just buying groceries and you
got you've got, I don't know, some item on your
list and you stop in the aisle where that item
is located, and you look and you realize, Now, over time,
people just develop habits, and so over time, you you
pull up to you know, you take your cart, you
(27:20):
get to that point wherever that item is, and you
just naturally grab for the first one that you've always
been buying, and out of habit, you just pick up
that same item that's same, that same can of pork
and beans. I always use porking beans and as an example,
but say you've never bought porking beans before in your
entire lifetime, but suddenly it's on your grocery list, and
you pull up and you realize, holy feecs batman there,
(27:46):
and you stare, I know people have done this, I've
done it. If I've done it, I know you've done it,
and you stare, huh, which which brand do I buy?
Now you look and if you're critically thinking about it,
you realize, okay, the labels are all marketing attempts. There's
(28:08):
always the price point to consider, and there is, you know,
a brand name versus the store brand, basically the generic brand.
And so you stay there. Maybe it's only fifteen seconds,
but stop and count fifteen seconds, maybe count sixty seconds,
since you're standing there trying to decide which pork and
beans to choose. Will now take that habit, that experience,
(28:33):
and there are people who don't want to do that.
They want someone to tell them which can of pork
and beans to choose. We've raised entire generations like that
who are scared to make a choice, who are scared
to make a decision, and they're scared to take a break.
(28:57):
So I'll take a break.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
Good morning, Michael. Under the theme of new speak, I'm
more and more convinced that every time a democrat uses
the word democracy, it's really a euphemism for at least
social democracy or democratic socialism, or just straight up communism.
So you can just translate that every time they say
(29:20):
it into one of those other terms.
Speaker 2 (29:23):
Yes, because a true democracy ultimately leads to communism, mob
rule eventually leads to some form of tyranity. I think
you're absolutely right. This text message is a great way
to sum up this whole topic, Michael. Have you ever
thought that society has become so busy and people are
so overworked and strung so thin that they might just
(29:44):
want the government to dictate an aspect of their life.
As an example, I don't want to have any choices
in my healthcare. I just want to have coverage. Life
is becoming so busy people are thinking it's just easier
to have some decision made for them. Well, I partially
agree that in this regard, I do think life has
(30:04):
become so busy that we do tend to just want,
you know, just tell me, just give me a can
of pork and beans. I don't I don't want to decide,
you know, which is which. I don't want to calculate,
you know, the price per serving. I don't want to,
you know, determine you look at the nutrition label and
determine which one's better or best for me. Just give
(30:26):
me put a canon porking beans. I don't think it's
necessarily busyness. I think that we have such overwhelming choices.
I think that's the issue. Now, I'm all for choice,
and I'm all for a free market providing as many
(30:46):
choices of pork and beans as possible.
Speaker 5 (30:48):
Pretty easy to figure out whether you want chocolate, vanilla
or strawberry. Yeah, but then if you add in you
know pecan and pre lead, and you know cookie dough
and cookies, and it gets a little bit more confident,
it gets opplicated.
Speaker 2 (31:00):
Right, that's right. And people laugh at me when I
if I happen to be somewhere where the ice creams
of choice, you just have strawberry, you just have chocolate.
Just give me one of those two. I don't care
about all the others. Now, I'm not against that multitude
of choices because that represents the free market. And so
those choices will come and go. They will expand or
(31:24):
contract based upon the success in the marketplace. So if
a new cana pork and beans comes out and they've
got shelf space, they will survive based on us making
choices about too or making the choice to choose that
particular can of pork and beans or that brand of
pork and beans, and so they will rise or fall
(31:47):
based upon our choice. So I don't Yeah, we're all busy,
but I think it's just that we have such an
abundance of choice, which remember, that's the price of a
free society. That is the reward of a free society.
I'd rather have too many choices than too little choices.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
The Bobby Bones Show
Listen to 'The Bobby Bones Show' by downloading the daily full replay.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.