Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Dragon, Michael. Anyhow did anyone else see the clip that
they're going to send four hundred more million dollars to Ukraine. Meanwhile,
some of the Helene hurricane victims haven't even been able
to get their seven hundred and fifty dollars because they
haven't been able to apply for it or they don't
(00:21):
qualify for some stupid reason. Oh my god, my hand's exploding.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
Joe Biden, Well, here here's a talk about sin. Get
me off on a squirrel. So I've been I've been
reading about Joe Biden's desire to have a foreign policy legacy,
whether that's Ukraine or the Middle East. When Joe Biden
(00:53):
was first elected as a US senator at the age
of you know, thirty whatever, the CIA saw Biden as
a as an easy mark, someone that they could use
to their benefit because he had already expressed an interest
(01:15):
in foreign policy, and so between the CIA and some
of the senators that kind of glommed on to him
as a freshman senator. I mean, it's kind of like
the new kid shows up at school and everyone's kind of,
you know, let's kind of analyze and let's kind of
(01:38):
see if we can't figure out what this new kid
is like and figure where he might fit in the
different cliques that exist, because clicks exist in DC just
like they do in high school. I've not mentioned this
book in a long time, but if you ever have
the opportunity to read Meg Greenfield's book just called Washington,
(02:02):
you should. It's it's I'm sure you can probably still
get it on Amazon. It's maybe out of print, I
don't know, but you can probably.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
Get an e book.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
But it's Meg Greenfield and it's called Washington and it's
Greenfield was an old columnist for the Washington Post, I
think and others too, but Washington Post mainly. She She
just did this voluminous, uh kind of storytelling about how Washington,
(02:34):
DC works.
Speaker 3 (02:35):
And one of the.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
Things that stuck out with me about the book was
how it really is just like high school. You have
all these cliques, You've You've got all these different little groups.
Everybody's vying for attention. Everybody wants to be the most popular,
everybody wants to belong every Yeah, it's just it's icky
(02:58):
to think that adult that we elect to go to
d C to represent us on some of the most
important matters of our lives. You know, taxes, national security,
homeland security, all you know, immigration, all of these issues,
and and they they they're just like, can I sit
(03:20):
with you at the lunch table?
Speaker 3 (03:22):
It?
Speaker 2 (03:22):
Can I eat with you?
Speaker 3 (03:22):
Guys?
Speaker 2 (03:24):
So Biden shows up and because of his his his style,
he he he was at any is. When I knew Biden,
he was a really gregarious kind of guy. He was,
you know, always slapping people on the back and you know,
(03:45):
giving people hugs and you know how you're doing, and
you know, how's the family. And it was he was
a very gregarious politician. He's not the old shell of
a man that you see today. And that's the Biden
that I knew. And when I think because I didn't
know him when he first went to the Senate, but
when I think about how he was during those almost
(04:06):
six years that I knew him, I can only imagine
that he was even more so as a newly minted
US senator. So they decided that they ought to put
him on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. There is this
(04:27):
really unholy alliance between all of the agencies. And I'm
not talking about just the CIA. I'm talking about even
something like the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Commerce,
Department of who Land Security. They all have their people
on the hill that have a vested interest in that
(04:48):
topic or that department, and so they become sympatico. They
become like a one sell aniba and they worked along
beside and with each other to accomplish their mutual goals.
(05:11):
As far back as Biden's early years, he took an
interest in Ukraine because there's always been this American interest
in Ukraine, not because of any geopolitical reasons. I mean
there may be on the on the margins an interest
in Ukraine because of its geographic location, but more so
(05:33):
because of other things. It's natural resources, it's it's a
gigantic bread basket for the world, and it's always been corrupt,
always corrupt. So the CIA knows that it's a country
that it can manipulate. And so the CIA almost not
(05:58):
even covertly overthrows one president, installs another president. Biden's involved
in that. Biden becomes vice president and now he has
even more influence. And we have him on tape talking
about actually, you know, with holding money from Ukraine in
(06:23):
exchange for and I forget the president, I'm drawing a
brain fart on the then president's name, Porshenko, whoever it was,
of getting him to fire the attorney general or the
equivalent of their attorney general that was investigating Bearisma, that
was paying his son Hunter Biden a million bucks a
(06:44):
year to be on the board of directors in order
to buy influence with the United States government and for
Joe Biden to have influence over Ukraine. I mean, it's
a long standing, ongoing relationship, and now Biden, in his
(07:05):
waning years, is trying to go them onto some sort
of foreign policy legacy. And so four hundred million dollars,
that's nothing that keeps the military industrial complex happy. They
can shove off four hundred million dollars and then they
can go back to their counterparts on the Hill and say, look,
(07:29):
we just took four hundred million dollars out of our
budget for Ukraine. Now we want another four hundred million
dollars so that we can either replace equipment or just
the fact that you know, because all this money's fungible.
You know, all of the money in DLD is fungible.
So whether they actually sent four hundred million dollars or
(07:53):
they sent four hundred million dollars worth of equipment or
they did a combination thereof as in material. It's four
hundred million dollars of value of something, either money or equipment.
And so now they go to their sponsors on the
hill and say, okay, we gave four hundred million dollars,
now we need four hundred million dollars of something back.
(08:16):
So they will, you know, in the in the next
you know, in the next continuing resolution. Because we have
no budget in this country, we'll just you know, add
in additional four hundred million dollars and it'll go on
to the national debt, it'll go on to the budget deficit,
and we'll just continue to pay out the wazoo for it,
and inflation will continue and everybody will just be it
(08:38):
because everybody that runs the cabal will all be happy,
and you and I will continue to suffer for it.
So don't be surprised that there's another four hundred million dollars,
And don't be surprised between now and January twentieth of
next year, regardless who wins the presidency, that there'll be
even more money going. I mean, Trump can win the
(08:58):
presidency in November five, and that will not stop Joe
Biden from continuing to send even more money to Ukraine. Now,
let me make something else clear about money going to Ukraine.
If we actually had an articulated, succinct, achievable goal, objective
(09:21):
or mission in Ukraine, that I might not bitch about
four hundred million dollars. But the mission is what The
mission in Ukraine right now is not to win. The
mission in Ukraine is to just stand with them as
long as it takes well Hell's bells, that could be forever.
(09:44):
They're now fighting this war of attrition that is just
costing millions of lives for what nothing. Zelensky I not
plan to talk about this. I don't have my notes
in front of me. But Zelensky is now threatening, you know,
he wants to get nuclear weapons because if we're not
(10:05):
going to do anything, and Putin's over here threatening to
use tactical nukes, and he wants something, and he wants
to join NATO, which is not going to happen as
long as this war's going on.
Speaker 3 (10:16):
So oh oh, and.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
He recently shut down one of the Orthodox churches again,
so Ukraine's just a corrupt, crap whole country.
Speaker 4 (10:29):
Let's not forget also that they canceled their elections because
they're in a war.
Speaker 3 (10:34):
So this dictator now that.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
Every time you mentioned that, every single time you mentioned.
Speaker 4 (10:41):
That, admittedly is in their constitution that they cannot hold
an election while they're actively at war.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
I know, but every time you mentioned it, do you
go through my brain?
Speaker 3 (10:50):
What goes through your brain?
Speaker 2 (10:51):
Rudy Giuliani and George Pataki, who were the mayor and
the governor of New York during nine to eleven. It
was the mayor election. In fact, it was an election
where Bloomberg eventually won. Giuliani wanted to postpone the election,
and but Takey kind of wanted to do so too,
And we sat down with them, like, no, you're not
(11:14):
going to postpone an election because the city was attacked.
That that's not a reason to postpone an election. It's
it shows how people in power are so reluctant to
give up that power. Now, people accused Donald Trump of,
(11:37):
you know, not wanting to adhere to the results of
an election. Yet he did. But I can guarantee you
that maybe not quite so much like others, because Trump,
being a billionaire, already has his own What is that plan?
A seventh, I think it's a seven fifty seven, but whatever,
I think it's a seven fifty seven that he owns.
(11:59):
But so he he has a large private jet, not
quite like air Force one, because there is no plane
quite like air Force one. But you take somebody like
Joe Biden, who who's really never really had much of
anything in his life except cash from foreign countries. But
he hasn't spent that on like private jets. He's spent
(12:22):
it on mansions and just you know, living the high
life and taking care of his kids and never having
to worry about paying a bill. People like Barack Obama,
Bill Clinton, even George W. Bush give up something like
air Force one and all of the amazing things that
come with the president. It's really hard to give up power.
(12:44):
And so even people like Rudy Giuliani just using nine
to eleven as an excuse to postpone an election, No,
that's not going to happen. In fact, there was a
come to Jesus meeting between US and Pataki and Giuliani
about look, you got to quit the infighting. You got
(13:05):
to quit you know, fighting him amongst each other about
you know, how money's going to be spent, where it's
going to be spent. The fire department, the police department
have've got to start working together. We're not going to
put up with this, and you're certainly gonna you're not
going to postpone an election. But all of that goes
to show that this is this is how, this is
how stuff inside DC works, and it's a clique. It's
(13:27):
just like Meke Greenfield rights his high school all over again,
and they're all jocking for position. They're all jocking for influence,
they're jocking for popularity, they're jocking for power, they're jocking
for all of that. Why do you think that after
that debate with Donald Trump, in which Joe Biden was
(13:47):
literally mentally absent, did all of the Democrat uh power
brokers go into motion to upend his campaign? Do you
think they did? Do you think Nancy Pelosi did it
(14:07):
because she wanted to protect Joe Biden's legacy. She doesn't
give a rats petwit. She just give a rats ass
about Joe Biden's legacy.
Speaker 4 (14:15):
I beg your pardon. She thinks he should be on
Mount Rushmore.
Speaker 2 (14:19):
Okay, Uh, whatever that voice is in my ear is
the ghost of Nancy Pelopsis lying to me. Just like
Nancy Pelosi lies about she thinks he ought to be
on Mount Rushmore. She'll say anything to anybody anywhere to
cover her ass about what she really did to make
sure he will never be on Mount Rushmore and he'll
(14:41):
never be the next president of the United States of America.
Why because they didn't want to lose power. Now they
may be regretting that right now. Now I'm not sure
that Biden could have won a general election anyway, but
nonetheless they may be regretting that decision and may may
be regretting that decision because they didn't let so called
(15:05):
air quote here democracy take place. They didn't let it
run its course. They decided to intervene. And again, like
high school, Oh my gosh, the homecoming king is injured.
We have to have a homecoming queen a king, well
maybe queen too, I don't know. We have to have
(15:26):
a homecoming king. And we cannot let him falter. We cannot.
So we got to replace him. Let's kick that quarterback
off or the fallback of where it happens to be
the homecoming king. Let's kick him out and let's replace
him with somebody else. And we've got somebody in mind,
and we got a way we're gonna do it so
we get so that we can't control who the nominee is,
because I do not believe for a second that either
(15:49):
Chuck Schumer, Barack Obama or Nancy Pelosi wanted Kamala Harris
to be the nominee and Joe Biden knew that, And
so what did he do? I think it was Joe
Biden's first, very first once he got kicked out, that
(16:09):
was his first act of revenge was to say that
he fully supports Kamala Harris to be the nominee in
that stupid post on X And now what has he done.
He's out maneuvered Pelosi, Obama and Schumer, and so now
they're stuck with her, and I think they're going to lose.
(16:31):
And I think deep down inside they know it's their
fault that perhaps they should have, you know, said to
Biden as opposed to just pushing him out. Look, look,
we don't think you ought to run again, but we
think we ought to have at least a shortened primary
to at least let other people run, because there are
(16:54):
other people that are probably can you imagine what this
race would be like if it was Donald Trump versus
Josh Pierrot or Donald Trump even versus Gavin Newsom, Donald
Trump versus Donald Duck. You're being in not saying that
Trump would lose. I'm just saying to be an entirely
different race. So sometimes y'all to be careful what they
(17:16):
wish for. When me get back, one of those little
wannabes is really upset about Donald Trump going to McDonald's,
and it's freaking hilarious how upset.
Speaker 4 (17:29):
She is, Mike or Michael, Hey, do you really believe that.
Speaker 2 (17:39):
Joe Biden's got the mental wherewithal two Outsmart Barack Obama?
Speaker 3 (17:45):
I don't know, man, Dad doesn't compute with me.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
In this case. Let me tell you why it computes.
They failed to coordinate among them. Sol When I say they,
I'm talking about Obama, Pelosi, Schumer, and then whatever big
donors might have been involved, because here's the tactical error
they made, rather than I mean they, So they decide
(18:19):
that Pelosi's going to be the one to convince Biden
to withdraw. So she does that. Now they think that
once he does that, they have time to either then
convince him or they themselves to announce that. Hey, here's
(18:41):
how we're going to select our nominee because they don't
want Kamala Harris. You'll never convince me that Nancy Pelosi,
Chuck Schumer, or Barack Obama, particularly Barack Obama, wanted Kamala Harris.
Why would you want a nominee that withdrew in twenty
nineteen because she could not she couldn't raise any money,
(19:05):
and she could not get one single vote. But the
problem was she's a black female, or she's a black
Indian female, or whatever the hell she is. So this
is where either Biden himself, or doctor Jill Biden or
(19:27):
the family Hunter and Jill and everybody else gathered together
and said, Okay, let's come out and let's immediately throw
our support behind Kamala Harris, because that circumvents the selection
of anybody else. And now that puts Pelosi, Schumer, Obama,
(19:53):
everybody else in the position of saying, oh, no, no, no,
no no, we don't want to do that. We want
to have a sort of a.
Speaker 3 (20:00):
Compact primary season.
Speaker 2 (20:03):
Maybe spend three weeks, four weeks, and let anybody and
everybody throw their hat in the wing, in the ring,
and whoever comes out on top, that's our nominee. Because
that gives them time to throw their support by whoever
it is that they really want to run, who I
do believe may have been Josh Shapiro or Gavin Newsom.
(20:29):
So yes, I think in that one instance, Joe Biden
outsmarted them by not giving them the opportunity to announce
anything else. And now they're boxed in because you can't.
You can't say, oh, oh no, no, that's not who
we're going to support. We're not going to support the
black Indian female. We're going to open it up, because
(20:54):
that would cause women and blacks and everybody else to
be pissed off. Now, I will give you this. Maybe
he didn't outsmart them, Maybe he didn't realize what he
was doing, and maybe he just thought to himself, well,
they pushed me out, it's gotta be Kamala, so I'll
(21:15):
just I'll throw out my support for Kamala right now.
I'll be the first to endorse her. And he may
have thought, he may not even thought about it, or
he may have thought, I'll do that because of the money.
The money and the Biden Harris campaign account, which can
only use for Biden or Harris at least immediately. Now
(21:36):
over time. They could have slowly distributed that out to
other candidates, but that's really hard politically to do in
the middle of a presidential campaign. So either he outsmarted
them by doing deliberately what he did, or he outsmarted
them by accidentally doing what he did. I think both
(22:00):
are reasonable beliefs, because you'll never convince me that Barack
Obama in particular wanted Kamala Harris to be the nominee
because he's too smart of a politician to understand that
a woman who could not get one single delegate and
who had to drop out, and who was known for
(22:24):
being quite an airhead. Yeah, Obama did not want that.
Let's go to mcdonald'shere, I wanted to go.
Speaker 3 (22:33):
I'll take a mcgriddle.
Speaker 2 (22:35):
Really, I've never had one.
Speaker 3 (22:36):
Oh, I love him.
Speaker 4 (22:36):
They got the pancake and with the syrup infused inside
of it. Then you get the the sausage or the
ham or the bacon and the egg.
Speaker 2 (22:45):
Says the guy that has shed one hundred and fifty plus.
Speaker 3 (22:48):
Pounds and two orders of ash ground space.
Speaker 2 (22:51):
And two orders of hash Browns with that, and that's
at your breakfast.
Speaker 3 (22:56):
Yeah, that sounds pretty good.
Speaker 2 (22:57):
And then how long does it take before you recover
from the sugar shock? A couple of days? Okay, all right,
it's just never. It's like I just I don't know.
I've just never tried them.
Speaker 3 (23:09):
I don't like the mcmuffins. They're just not n.
Speaker 2 (23:14):
Have you have you have ever done just the pancakes.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
A long time? Maybe as a kid.
Speaker 2 (23:20):
I can't even imagine what the sugar content of those,
because they're just so you don't even need sugar for them.
They're so sweet or whatever. That that face that you put,
that chemical compound that you pour over that they call
so called maple syrup. Well, McDonald's has waited into the
controversy about whether Vice President Harris has ever actually worked
(23:42):
at its restaurant, saying that hey, neither they nor their
franchisees keep records going back to the eighties. So what
is the evidence so far that Kamala Harrison may have
worked out of McDonald's. The New York Times says the
only thing they can find is a friend of Kamala
(24:04):
Harris's deceased mother, who says that she was told that
Kamala was going to work at McDonald's. There's no corroboration
there's nothing. Now Here's what I find fascinating. Kamala Harris
could confirm that she did work at McDonald's because if
(24:27):
she did work at McDonald's, even if she worked there
for just a week, she got a W two at
the end of that tax year, she got a W
two for whatever minimal wages she earned. I checked this myself.
You can file. I forget what the form number is,
but you can file with the Social Security Administration, who
(24:50):
keeps track of all of this. Because I earned my
very first W two that I received back in the
dark day ages was for like forty eight dollars and
ninety five cents, which maybe at that time, I don't know,
a fairly good amount of money. I don't you know,
back in the dark ages could have been amount of money.
(25:11):
But my Social Security account shows that first W two.
I can request the Social Security Administration to provide me
the information. Now they can't provide me obviously a copy
of it, because they've digitized everything, but they can provide
the information from that W two, So Kamala Harris could.
(25:34):
Now I can't do it for her, nobody can do it.
But she can do it for herself because she's the
only one that has access to that account. She's chosen
not to do that, and I think I know why
because I don't think she ever worked there. Now here's
the other thing they could have done.
Speaker 4 (25:53):
You know, darn well, we're only getting anybody's tax records
that they're leaked.
Speaker 2 (25:58):
Well, and what's interesting, Dragon is these aren't even like
tax records. These are your because if you earn a
W two, you may have even paid let's say, two
cents into the Social Security Administration on your FIGHTA two
cents that gets that gets tracked back. You go in,
(26:19):
go into you have a whether you believe it or not,
you have a Social Security account. You can set it up.
You can log in, and you can go back and
you can find the first W two that your mom
paid for, you paid you, if she if she paid
you legitimately at a subway or whatever job you had
before subway, and you can find that.
Speaker 4 (26:40):
That my comment about the hacking things. They hacked Trump's
financial data and showed that.
Speaker 2 (26:45):
But yeah, but those were income tax records. I'm making
a distincsion between an income tax record here and a
Social Security record.
Speaker 3 (26:51):
Potatoes potatoes, Okay, Well.
Speaker 2 (26:53):
The point is she could prove it if she wanted to. Yeah,
and she's chosen not to. Now here's the other thing
that key about the McDonald's trip. They knew he was
going there for at least a week, so they could
have gotten in front of this story and killed it.
(27:14):
And in fact, now I guess Trump would have gone
to the McDonald's and worked regardless of whether she ever
proved that she had worked at McDonald's, because he had
already made the commitment and he was going to go
do it, and he was going to put on that apron,
and he was going to cook some French fries and
he was going to serve somebody because that is a
great political event. But it could been watered down by
(27:39):
the Harris campaign and they didn't do it. But somebody's
upset about it. And I'll tell you who that is next. Hey,
Goober's Alexandria Cassia Cortez.
Speaker 4 (27:52):
Donald Trump is running around what you mean, the bartender?
Speaker 3 (27:58):
The bartender's upset.
Speaker 4 (28:00):
Somebody is doing a job at McDonald's.
Speaker 3 (28:03):
Yeah, okay, just want to make yes, all right?
Speaker 4 (28:07):
Do you have that former bartender?
Speaker 3 (28:10):
Yes?
Speaker 2 (28:10):
Can you deal with this ball headed ahole? Can you
deal with this.
Speaker 4 (28:13):
I'm just just making sure I got the connections all
laid down properly.
Speaker 2 (28:17):
Okay, here we go.
Speaker 3 (28:18):
Donald Trump is running around.
Speaker 5 (28:20):
He put on his little McDonald's costume. Halloween came early
for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
We know that man's never worked a day in his life.
We know that man's never punched a clock in his life.
Speaker 5 (28:35):
He's never wiped down a table in his life.
Speaker 3 (28:38):
He's never had.
Speaker 5 (28:39):
To fix his own car or never struggle to make
ends meet.
Speaker 3 (28:43):
He does not know.
Speaker 5 (28:44):
What it means to check your paycheck every week and
see what you've got left. We see you on musk
were coming in there. He's doing these little contests before.
He's promising people a million dollars in some kind of
lottery giveaway if they sign up for his list. You
have a billionaire just dangling a million bucks to those
(29:04):
of us and many of us who are struggling to
make ends meet.
Speaker 3 (29:08):
Women.
Speaker 2 (29:09):
To those of us who are struggling to make ends meet,
says the former bartender that's now making at least one
hundred and seventy five one hundred and eighty thousand dollars
a year plus expenses full, I mean the best healthcare
(29:29):
coverage and medical care in the world, little two faces,
not if they dance for him.
Speaker 5 (29:40):
You've got Donald Trump putting on a little McDonald's costume, because.
Speaker 2 (29:48):
Isn't she kind of belittling people that work.
Speaker 3 (29:51):
To McDonald's, says the bartender, says the.
Speaker 2 (29:54):
Bartender, Who's who? Because he puts on that little McDonald's
costume because he thinks that's what people do. Well, that
is what people do at McDonald's. They wear the McDonald's uniform.
Speaker 3 (30:08):
Do you think that's what people do? They're not trying
to emphasize with us.
Speaker 2 (30:14):
They are making fun of us. Donald serious question. Do
you think Donald Trump is making fun of the people
that worked at that McDonald's or the people that worked
at any McDonald's. The guy who himself loves McDonald's, who
feeds entire football team to McDonald's, who has McDonald's serve
(30:38):
to him, you know, he probably he probably has uber
eats or whoever, however he gets it at mar Lago
in his multi million dollar resort. Oh, I'm sorry, did
I just over did I over value it? I'm sorry?
In his one hundred thousand dollars resort. People who work
(30:59):
at McDonald's a joke.
Speaker 5 (31:01):
Elon Musk thinks that dangling money if I'm a working
person is a cute thing to do. They have absolutely
no idea what our.
Speaker 3 (31:10):
Lives are like.
Speaker 2 (31:12):
Wow, AOC is pissed off, and in the course of
doing so, I think she's offended every fast food worker
in the country. Yes, I think. I think serving French
fries really hit a nerve.
Dragon, Michael. Anyhow did anyone else see the clip that
they're going to send four hundred more million dollars to Ukraine. Meanwhile,
some of the Helene hurricane victims haven't even been able
to get their seven hundred and fifty dollars because they
haven't been able to apply for it or they don't
(00:21):
qualify for some stupid reason. Oh my god, my hand's exploding.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
Joe Biden, Well, here here's a talk about sin. Get
me off on a squirrel. So I've been I've been
reading about Joe Biden's desire to have a foreign policy legacy,
whether that's Ukraine or the Middle East. When Joe Biden
(00:53):
was first elected as a US senator at the age
of you know, thirty whatever, the CIA saw Biden as
a as an easy mark, someone that they could use
to their benefit because he had already expressed an interest
(01:15):
in foreign policy, and so between the CIA and some
of the senators that kind of glommed on to him
as a freshman senator. I mean, it's kind of like
the new kid shows up at school and everyone's kind of,
you know, let's kind of analyze and let's kind of
(01:38):
see if we can't figure out what this new kid
is like and figure where he might fit in the
different cliques that exist, because clicks exist in DC just
like they do in high school. I've not mentioned this
book in a long time, but if you ever have
the opportunity to read Meg Greenfield's book just called Washington,
(02:02):
you should. It's it's I'm sure you can probably still
get it on Amazon. It's maybe out of print, I
don't know, but you can probably.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
Get an e book.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
But it's Meg Greenfield and it's called Washington and it's
Greenfield was an old columnist for the Washington Post, I
think and others too, but Washington Post mainly. She She
just did this voluminous, uh kind of storytelling about how Washington,
(02:34):
DC works.
Speaker 3 (02:35):
And one of the.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
Things that stuck out with me about the book was
how it really is just like high school. You have
all these cliques, You've You've got all these different little groups.
Everybody's vying for attention. Everybody wants to be the most popular,
everybody wants to belong every Yeah, it's just it's icky
(02:58):
to think that adult that we elect to go to
d C to represent us on some of the most
important matters of our lives. You know, taxes, national security,
homeland security, all you know, immigration, all of these issues,
and and they they they're just like, can I sit
(03:20):
with you at the lunch table?
Speaker 3 (03:22):
It?
Speaker 2 (03:22):
Can I eat with you?
Speaker 3 (03:22):
Guys?
Speaker 2 (03:24):
So Biden shows up and because of his his his style,
he he he was at any is. When I knew Biden,
he was a really gregarious kind of guy. He was,
you know, always slapping people on the back and you know,
(03:45):
giving people hugs and you know how you're doing, and
you know, how's the family. And it was he was
a very gregarious politician. He's not the old shell of
a man that you see today. And that's the Biden
that I knew. And when I think because I didn't
know him when he first went to the Senate, but
when I think about how he was during those almost
(04:06):
six years that I knew him, I can only imagine
that he was even more so as a newly minted
US senator. So they decided that they ought to put
him on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. There is this
(04:27):
really unholy alliance between all of the agencies. And I'm
not talking about just the CIA. I'm talking about even
something like the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Commerce,
Department of who Land Security. They all have their people
on the hill that have a vested interest in that
(04:48):
topic or that department, and so they become sympatico. They
become like a one sell aniba and they worked along
beside and with each other to accomplish their mutual goals.
(05:11):
As far back as Biden's early years, he took an
interest in Ukraine because there's always been this American interest
in Ukraine, not because of any geopolitical reasons. I mean
there may be on the on the margins an interest
in Ukraine because of its geographic location, but more so
(05:33):
because of other things. It's natural resources, it's it's a
gigantic bread basket for the world, and it's always been corrupt,
always corrupt. So the CIA knows that it's a country
that it can manipulate. And so the CIA almost not
(05:58):
even covertly overthrows one president, installs another president. Biden's involved
in that. Biden becomes vice president and now he has
even more influence. And we have him on tape talking
about actually, you know, with holding money from Ukraine in
(06:23):
exchange for and I forget the president, I'm drawing a
brain fart on the then president's name, Porshenko, whoever it was,
of getting him to fire the attorney general or the
equivalent of their attorney general that was investigating Bearisma, that
was paying his son Hunter Biden a million bucks a
(06:44):
year to be on the board of directors in order
to buy influence with the United States government and for
Joe Biden to have influence over Ukraine. I mean, it's
a long standing, ongoing relationship, and now Biden, in his
(07:05):
waning years, is trying to go them onto some sort
of foreign policy legacy. And so four hundred million dollars,
that's nothing that keeps the military industrial complex happy. They
can shove off four hundred million dollars and then they
can go back to their counterparts on the Hill and say, look,
(07:29):
we just took four hundred million dollars out of our
budget for Ukraine. Now we want another four hundred million
dollars so that we can either replace equipment or just
the fact that you know, because all this money's fungible.
You know, all of the money in DLD is fungible.
So whether they actually sent four hundred million dollars or
(07:53):
they sent four hundred million dollars worth of equipment or
they did a combination thereof as in material. It's four
hundred million dollars of value of something, either money or equipment.
And so now they go to their sponsors on the
hill and say, okay, we gave four hundred million dollars,
now we need four hundred million dollars of something back.
(08:16):
So they will, you know, in the in the next
you know, in the next continuing resolution. Because we have
no budget in this country, we'll just you know, add
in additional four hundred million dollars and it'll go on
to the national debt, it'll go on to the budget deficit,
and we'll just continue to pay out the wazoo for it,
and inflation will continue and everybody will just be it
(08:38):
because everybody that runs the cabal will all be happy,
and you and I will continue to suffer for it.
So don't be surprised that there's another four hundred million dollars,
And don't be surprised between now and January twentieth of
next year, regardless who wins the presidency, that there'll be
even more money going. I mean, Trump can win the
(08:58):
presidency in November five, and that will not stop Joe
Biden from continuing to send even more money to Ukraine. Now,
let me make something else clear about money going to Ukraine.
If we actually had an articulated, succinct, achievable goal, objective
(09:21):
or mission in Ukraine, that I might not bitch about
four hundred million dollars. But the mission is what The
mission in Ukraine right now is not to win. The
mission in Ukraine is to just stand with them as
long as it takes well Hell's bells, that could be forever.
(09:44):
They're now fighting this war of attrition that is just
costing millions of lives for what nothing. Zelensky I not
plan to talk about this. I don't have my notes
in front of me. But Zelensky is now threatening, you know,
he wants to get nuclear weapons because if we're not
(10:05):
going to do anything, and Putin's over here threatening to
use tactical nukes, and he wants something, and he wants
to join NATO, which is not going to happen as
long as this war's going on.
Speaker 3 (10:16):
So oh oh, and.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
He recently shut down one of the Orthodox churches again,
so Ukraine's just a corrupt, crap whole country.
Speaker 4 (10:29):
Let's not forget also that they canceled their elections because
they're in a war.
Speaker 3 (10:34):
So this dictator now that.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
Every time you mentioned that, every single time you mentioned.
Speaker 4 (10:41):
That, admittedly is in their constitution that they cannot hold
an election while they're actively at war.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
I know, but every time you mentioned it, do you
go through my brain?
Speaker 3 (10:50):
What goes through your brain?
Speaker 2 (10:51):
Rudy Giuliani and George Pataki, who were the mayor and
the governor of New York during nine to eleven. It
was the mayor election. In fact, it was an election
where Bloomberg eventually won. Giuliani wanted to postpone the election,
and but Takey kind of wanted to do so too,
And we sat down with them, like, no, you're not
(11:14):
going to postpone an election because the city was attacked.
That that's not a reason to postpone an election. It's
it shows how people in power are so reluctant to
give up that power. Now, people accused Donald Trump of,
(11:37):
you know, not wanting to adhere to the results of
an election. Yet he did. But I can guarantee you
that maybe not quite so much like others, because Trump,
being a billionaire, already has his own What is that plan?
A seventh, I think it's a seven fifty seven, but whatever,
I think it's a seven fifty seven that he owns.
(11:59):
But so he he has a large private jet, not
quite like air Force one, because there is no plane
quite like air Force one. But you take somebody like
Joe Biden, who who's really never really had much of
anything in his life except cash from foreign countries. But
he hasn't spent that on like private jets. He's spent
(12:22):
it on mansions and just you know, living the high
life and taking care of his kids and never having
to worry about paying a bill. People like Barack Obama,
Bill Clinton, even George W. Bush give up something like
air Force one and all of the amazing things that
come with the president. It's really hard to give up power.
(12:44):
And so even people like Rudy Giuliani just using nine
to eleven as an excuse to postpone an election, No,
that's not going to happen. In fact, there was a
come to Jesus meeting between US and Pataki and Giuliani
about look, you got to quit the infighting. You got
(13:05):
to quit you know, fighting him amongst each other about
you know, how money's going to be spent, where it's
going to be spent. The fire department, the police department
have've got to start working together. We're not going to
put up with this, and you're certainly gonna you're not
going to postpone an election. But all of that goes
to show that this is this is how, this is
how stuff inside DC works, and it's a clique. It's
(13:27):
just like Meke Greenfield rights his high school all over again,
and they're all jocking for position. They're all jocking for influence,
they're jocking for popularity, they're jocking for power, they're jocking
for all of that. Why do you think that after
that debate with Donald Trump, in which Joe Biden was
(13:47):
literally mentally absent, did all of the Democrat uh power
brokers go into motion to upend his campaign? Do you
think they did? Do you think Nancy Pelosi did it
(14:07):
because she wanted to protect Joe Biden's legacy. She doesn't
give a rats petwit. She just give a rats ass
about Joe Biden's legacy.
Speaker 4 (14:15):
I beg your pardon. She thinks he should be on
Mount Rushmore.
Speaker 2 (14:19):
Okay, Uh, whatever that voice is in my ear is
the ghost of Nancy Pelopsis lying to me. Just like
Nancy Pelosi lies about she thinks he ought to be
on Mount Rushmore. She'll say anything to anybody anywhere to
cover her ass about what she really did to make
sure he will never be on Mount Rushmore and he'll
(14:41):
never be the next president of the United States of America.
Why because they didn't want to lose power. Now they
may be regretting that right now. Now I'm not sure
that Biden could have won a general election anyway, but
nonetheless they may be regretting that decision and may may
be regretting that decision because they didn't let so called
(15:05):
air quote here democracy take place. They didn't let it
run its course. They decided to intervene. And again, like
high school, Oh my gosh, the homecoming king is injured.
We have to have a homecoming queen a king, well
maybe queen too, I don't know. We have to have
(15:26):
a homecoming king. And we cannot let him falter. We cannot.
So we got to replace him. Let's kick that quarterback
off or the fallback of where it happens to be
the homecoming king. Let's kick him out and let's replace
him with somebody else. And we've got somebody in mind,
and we got a way we're gonna do it so
we get so that we can't control who the nominee is,
because I do not believe for a second that either
(15:49):
Chuck Schumer, Barack Obama or Nancy Pelosi wanted Kamala Harris
to be the nominee and Joe Biden knew that, And
so what did he do? I think it was Joe
Biden's first, very first once he got kicked out, that
(16:09):
was his first act of revenge was to say that
he fully supports Kamala Harris to be the nominee in
that stupid post on X And now what has he done.
He's out maneuvered Pelosi, Obama and Schumer, and so now
they're stuck with her, and I think they're going to lose.
(16:31):
And I think deep down inside they know it's their
fault that perhaps they should have, you know, said to
Biden as opposed to just pushing him out. Look, look,
we don't think you ought to run again, but we
think we ought to have at least a shortened primary
to at least let other people run, because there are
(16:54):
other people that are probably can you imagine what this
race would be like if it was Donald Trump versus
Josh Pierrot or Donald Trump even versus Gavin Newsom, Donald
Trump versus Donald Duck. You're being in not saying that
Trump would lose. I'm just saying to be an entirely
different race. So sometimes y'all to be careful what they
(17:16):
wish for. When me get back, one of those little
wannabes is really upset about Donald Trump going to McDonald's,
and it's freaking hilarious how upset.
Speaker 4 (17:29):
She is, Mike or Michael, Hey, do you really believe that.
Speaker 2 (17:39):
Joe Biden's got the mental wherewithal two Outsmart Barack Obama?
Speaker 3 (17:45):
I don't know, man, Dad doesn't compute with me.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
In this case. Let me tell you why it computes.
They failed to coordinate among them. Sol When I say they,
I'm talking about Obama, Pelosi, Schumer, and then whatever big
donors might have been involved, because here's the tactical error
they made, rather than I mean they, So they decide
(18:19):
that Pelosi's going to be the one to convince Biden
to withdraw. So she does that. Now they think that
once he does that, they have time to either then
convince him or they themselves to announce that. Hey, here's
(18:41):
how we're going to select our nominee because they don't
want Kamala Harris. You'll never convince me that Nancy Pelosi,
Chuck Schumer, or Barack Obama, particularly Barack Obama, wanted Kamala Harris.
Why would you want a nominee that withdrew in twenty
nineteen because she could not she couldn't raise any money,
(19:05):
and she could not get one single vote. But the
problem was she's a black female, or she's a black
Indian female, or whatever the hell she is. So this
is where either Biden himself, or doctor Jill Biden or
(19:27):
the family Hunter and Jill and everybody else gathered together
and said, Okay, let's come out and let's immediately throw
our support behind Kamala Harris, because that circumvents the selection
of anybody else. And now that puts Pelosi, Schumer, Obama,
(19:53):
everybody else in the position of saying, oh, no, no, no,
no no, we don't want to do that. We want
to have a sort of a.
Speaker 3 (20:00):
Compact primary season.
Speaker 2 (20:03):
Maybe spend three weeks, four weeks, and let anybody and
everybody throw their hat in the wing, in the ring,
and whoever comes out on top, that's our nominee. Because
that gives them time to throw their support by whoever
it is that they really want to run, who I
do believe may have been Josh Shapiro or Gavin Newsom.
(20:29):
So yes, I think in that one instance, Joe Biden
outsmarted them by not giving them the opportunity to announce
anything else. And now they're boxed in because you can't.
You can't say, oh, oh no, no, that's not who
we're going to support. We're not going to support the
black Indian female. We're going to open it up, because
(20:54):
that would cause women and blacks and everybody else to
be pissed off. Now, I will give you this. Maybe
he didn't outsmart them, Maybe he didn't realize what he
was doing, and maybe he just thought to himself, well,
they pushed me out, it's gotta be Kamala, so I'll
(21:15):
just I'll throw out my support for Kamala right now.
I'll be the first to endorse her. And he may
have thought, he may not even thought about it, or
he may have thought, I'll do that because of the money.
The money and the Biden Harris campaign account, which can
only use for Biden or Harris at least immediately. Now
(21:36):
over time. They could have slowly distributed that out to
other candidates, but that's really hard politically to do in
the middle of a presidential campaign. So either he outsmarted
them by doing deliberately what he did, or he outsmarted
them by accidentally doing what he did. I think both
(22:00):
are reasonable beliefs, because you'll never convince me that Barack
Obama in particular wanted Kamala Harris to be the nominee
because he's too smart of a politician to understand that
a woman who could not get one single delegate and
who had to drop out, and who was known for
(22:24):
being quite an airhead. Yeah, Obama did not want that.
Let's go to mcdonald'shere, I wanted to go.
Speaker 3 (22:33):
I'll take a mcgriddle.
Speaker 2 (22:35):
Really, I've never had one.
Speaker 3 (22:36):
Oh, I love him.
Speaker 4 (22:36):
They got the pancake and with the syrup infused inside
of it. Then you get the the sausage or the
ham or the bacon and the egg.
Speaker 2 (22:45):
Says the guy that has shed one hundred and fifty plus.
Speaker 3 (22:48):
Pounds and two orders of ash ground space.
Speaker 2 (22:51):
And two orders of hash Browns with that, and that's
at your breakfast.
Speaker 3 (22:56):
Yeah, that sounds pretty good.
Speaker 2 (22:57):
And then how long does it take before you recover
from the sugar shock? A couple of days? Okay, all right,
it's just never. It's like I just I don't know.
I've just never tried them.
Speaker 3 (23:09):
I don't like the mcmuffins. They're just not n.
Speaker 2 (23:14):
Have you have you have ever done just the pancakes.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
A long time? Maybe as a kid.
Speaker 2 (23:20):
I can't even imagine what the sugar content of those,
because they're just so you don't even need sugar for them.
They're so sweet or whatever. That that face that you put,
that chemical compound that you pour over that they call
so called maple syrup. Well, McDonald's has waited into the
controversy about whether Vice President Harris has ever actually worked
(23:42):
at its restaurant, saying that hey, neither they nor their
franchisees keep records going back to the eighties. So what
is the evidence so far that Kamala Harrison may have
worked out of McDonald's. The New York Times says the
only thing they can find is a friend of Kamala
(24:04):
Harris's deceased mother, who says that she was told that
Kamala was going to work at McDonald's. There's no corroboration
there's nothing. Now Here's what I find fascinating. Kamala Harris
could confirm that she did work at McDonald's because if
(24:27):
she did work at McDonald's, even if she worked there
for just a week, she got a W two at
the end of that tax year, she got a W
two for whatever minimal wages she earned. I checked this myself.
You can file. I forget what the form number is,
but you can file with the Social Security Administration, who
(24:50):
keeps track of all of this. Because I earned my
very first W two that I received back in the
dark day ages was for like forty eight dollars and
ninety five cents, which maybe at that time, I don't know,
a fairly good amount of money. I don't you know,
back in the dark ages could have been amount of money.
(25:11):
But my Social Security account shows that first W two.
I can request the Social Security Administration to provide me
the information. Now they can't provide me obviously a copy
of it, because they've digitized everything, but they can provide
the information from that W two, So Kamala Harris could.
(25:34):
Now I can't do it for her, nobody can do it.
But she can do it for herself because she's the
only one that has access to that account. She's chosen
not to do that, and I think I know why
because I don't think she ever worked there. Now here's
the other thing they could have done.
Speaker 4 (25:53):
You know, darn well, we're only getting anybody's tax records
that they're leaked.
Speaker 2 (25:58):
Well, and what's interesting, Dragon is these aren't even like
tax records. These are your because if you earn a
W two, you may have even paid let's say, two
cents into the Social Security Administration on your FIGHTA two
cents that gets that gets tracked back. You go in,
(26:19):
go into you have a whether you believe it or not,
you have a Social Security account. You can set it up.
You can log in, and you can go back and
you can find the first W two that your mom
paid for, you paid you, if she if she paid
you legitimately at a subway or whatever job you had
before subway, and you can find that.
Speaker 4 (26:40):
That my comment about the hacking things. They hacked Trump's
financial data and showed that.
Speaker 2 (26:45):
But yeah, but those were income tax records. I'm making
a distincsion between an income tax record here and a
Social Security record.
Speaker 3 (26:51):
Potatoes potatoes, Okay, Well.
Speaker 2 (26:53):
The point is she could prove it if she wanted to. Yeah,
and she's chosen not to. Now here's the other thing
that key about the McDonald's trip. They knew he was
going there for at least a week, so they could
have gotten in front of this story and killed it.
(27:14):
And in fact, now I guess Trump would have gone
to the McDonald's and worked regardless of whether she ever
proved that she had worked at McDonald's, because he had
already made the commitment and he was going to go
do it, and he was going to put on that apron,
and he was going to cook some French fries and
he was going to serve somebody because that is a
great political event. But it could been watered down by
(27:39):
the Harris campaign and they didn't do it. But somebody's
upset about it. And I'll tell you who that is next. Hey,
Goober's Alexandria Cassia Cortez.
Speaker 4 (27:52):
Donald Trump is running around what you mean, the bartender?
Speaker 3 (27:58):
The bartender's upset.
Speaker 4 (28:00):
Somebody is doing a job at McDonald's.
Speaker 3 (28:03):
Yeah, okay, just want to make yes, all right?
Speaker 4 (28:07):
Do you have that former bartender?
Speaker 3 (28:10):
Yes?
Speaker 2 (28:10):
Can you deal with this ball headed ahole? Can you
deal with this.
Speaker 4 (28:13):
I'm just just making sure I got the connections all
laid down properly.
Speaker 2 (28:17):
Okay, here we go.
Speaker 3 (28:18):
Donald Trump is running around.
Speaker 5 (28:20):
He put on his little McDonald's costume. Halloween came early
for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
We know that man's never worked a day in his life.
We know that man's never punched a clock in his life.
Speaker 5 (28:35):
He's never wiped down a table in his life.
Speaker 3 (28:38):
He's never had.
Speaker 5 (28:39):
To fix his own car or never struggle to make
ends meet.
Speaker 3 (28:43):
He does not know.
Speaker 5 (28:44):
What it means to check your paycheck every week and
see what you've got left. We see you on musk
were coming in there. He's doing these little contests before.
He's promising people a million dollars in some kind of
lottery giveaway if they sign up for his list. You
have a billionaire just dangling a million bucks to those
(29:04):
of us and many of us who are struggling to
make ends meet.
Speaker 3 (29:08):
Women.
Speaker 2 (29:09):
To those of us who are struggling to make ends meet,
says the former bartender that's now making at least one
hundred and seventy five one hundred and eighty thousand dollars
a year plus expenses full, I mean the best healthcare
(29:29):
coverage and medical care in the world, little two faces,
not if they dance for him.
Speaker 5 (29:40):
You've got Donald Trump putting on a little McDonald's costume, because.
Speaker 2 (29:48):
Isn't she kind of belittling people that work.
Speaker 3 (29:51):
To McDonald's, says the bartender, says the.
Speaker 2 (29:54):
Bartender, Who's who? Because he puts on that little McDonald's
costume because he thinks that's what people do. Well, that
is what people do at McDonald's. They wear the McDonald's uniform.
Speaker 3 (30:08):
Do you think that's what people do? They're not trying
to emphasize with us.
Speaker 2 (30:14):
They are making fun of us. Donald serious question. Do
you think Donald Trump is making fun of the people
that worked at that McDonald's or the people that worked
at any McDonald's. The guy who himself loves McDonald's, who
feeds entire football team to McDonald's, who has McDonald's serve
(30:38):
to him, you know, he probably he probably has uber
eats or whoever, however he gets it at mar Lago
in his multi million dollar resort. Oh, I'm sorry, did
I just over did I over value it? I'm sorry?
In his one hundred thousand dollars resort. People who work
(30:59):
at McDonald's a joke.
Speaker 5 (31:01):
Elon Musk thinks that dangling money if I'm a working
person is a cute thing to do. They have absolutely
no idea what our.
Speaker 3 (31:10):
Lives are like.
Speaker 2 (31:12):
Wow, AOC is pissed off, and in the course of
doing so, I think she's offended every fast food worker
in the country. Yes, I think. I think serving French
fries really hit a nerve.
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.