12-8-25 - 11am - Islamization of France

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, Michael, just looking at my iHeart report card and
listening to your radio program and podcast. I have over
twelve hundred hours wondering if you pay for overtime listening
to your program.

Speaker 2 (00:20):
Oh no, we don't pay overtime. But you should have
gotten your base pay for those hours.

Speaker 3 (00:24):
Yeah your salary, bro.

Speaker 2 (00:26):
Yeah, your salary. But I don't understand why you haven't
gotten your check. So it's Dragon at iHeartMedia dot com.
Dragon at iHeart because well.

Speaker 4 (00:37):
It's in the mail. If it's safe for elections, it's
safe for your.

Speaker 2 (00:40):
Check, all right, But if you want to double check,
email Dragon at iHeartMedia dot com. Since he thinks this
is his program, he's in charge of all the administrative stuff.
He says, he controls everything, so they're perfect talkback. Just email.
Let me repeat that again for everybody else who hasn't
gotten their check. Everybody within the sound of my voice,
if you've not gotten your check for listening to this program,

(01:04):
email him as soon as you can, Dragon at iHeartMedia
dot com.

Speaker 5 (01:11):
Just flood that inbox.

Speaker 3 (01:14):
What are you?

Speaker 4 (01:14):
What are you trying to do here? Ain't nothing going
to happen? You happen? You hate email? You despise email.

Speaker 3 (01:27):
I do.

Speaker 5 (01:28):
I'm trying to plug your inbox as.

Speaker 4 (01:30):
Soon as I get a chance to delete anything I do.
I hate having an email, but the words.

Speaker 2 (01:35):
How badly he hates email only because I said, you
really have to read this one. Well, the CEO and
the chairman of the board sent out a company wide
email about fifteen minutes ago, and I read it and
kind of chuckled, and I said, hey, wait till you
read this one, you know, and it and he read it,
and of course he's now he's in a foul move,

(01:57):
which was which was my objective.

Speaker 3 (02:01):
Mission accomplished and it's deleted.

Speaker 5 (02:04):
By the way, did you make the change as requested?
Check down a chance in hell? Did you? Of course not.

Speaker 3 (02:11):
I don't want me to make that kind of change
if I do.

Speaker 2 (02:15):
Yeah, I know, because once you start making one little change,
you'll never stop. You'll do what you talked about and
it'll just yeah, yeah, funny. And I'm just telling you
as a friend, I is that word. But as a friend,
I would just suggest you just lay low and not
do anything.

Speaker 5 (02:35):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:37):
So last week the Trump administration exposed I shouldn't say exposed,
they expressed. How about that they express their fear that
Europe faces civilizational erasure. They put out a thirty three
page national security strategy, and in that if you can

(03:00):
find it online, you really should skim through it. It
outlines Trump's worldview and how America ought to respond economically
and militarily to everything going on in the world. Probably
the one sentence that caused the most reaction on the
other side of the pond was the assertion that if
current trends continue, Europe will be quote unrecognizable in twenty

(03:27):
years or less.

Speaker 5 (03:31):
I disagree wholeheartedly that sentence.

Speaker 2 (03:34):
You know why, because I think many parts of Europe
today are unrecognizable. I don't think you have to wait
twenty years. I think in twenty years it'll be hard
to go to Paris and find a true Parisian. It'll
be hard to go to Denmark and find a native Dane.

(03:54):
It'll be hard to go to Sweden and find a
native Swede, or in Germany a native German. They'll all
be from Sub Sahara, Africa, or the Middle East or
lord knows where, and they'll all be refugees from some
crapold country somewhere. The trends that made them write that

(04:15):
indeed are mass immigration and what conservative French commentators called
the Islamification of Europe, and that if Europe does not
address those trends, the Trump administration is predicting the continence
civilizational erasure. Now, Germans Foreign Minister Johan what a fool,
What a fool issued a really akey response to the

(04:38):
security strategy report, claiming that, Wow, we don't need any
outside advice. Are you really sure about that, Minister, because
last year, the chief of police in Berlin, a woman
by the name of Barbara Slovak, warned Jews and Gaze
to go hide their identity in the city's Arab neighborhoods.

(05:01):
Let me repeat that, a chief of police in Berlin.
You know, Berlin was once divided East Berlin West Berlin.
Just in case you forgot that, Barbara Slovak warned the
Jews and the gays to hide their identities in the
city's Arab neighborhoods. Now, in France, Jews have been just running.

(05:26):
They've been exiting the country in large numbers. Between twenty
and twenty twenty, some sixty thousand Jews, which is more
than ten percent of the French Jewish community, have absconded.
They just left because since twenty twenty three, acts of
anti Semitism have soared by more than three hundred percent,

(05:46):
including oak synagogues getting burned and the beating of rabbis. No,
there's nothing to see here. It's like, oh, on the
same train in Charlotte, North Carolina, we've got dirt bags
trying to kill people, but nothing to see here.

Speaker 5 (06:04):
Maybe we'll include Charlotte in this category.

Speaker 2 (06:07):
The civilizational erasure is I want to point out self inflicted,
largely self inflicted to be more precise. And it's particularly
noticeable when you get to this time of year because
one of the most famous Christmas markets in Paris in
La Defense, which this year is offering a low meet

(06:33):
in its Steve delicacies. Now for the left, they will
claim that that's celebrating diversity. They however, take a different
view about those right run towns which have the check
to display a a Nativity scene in their town hall.

(06:54):
In those cases, such overt signs of Christianity, those are
breach of France's secularism. Yeah, you just can't do that.
It goes against their culture. So their culture is really
changing from oh secular to oh will Gin reflect at

(07:15):
the feet of Islam now. Similarly, the left in France
support the wearing of Islamic garments such as the jab
or the full length a baia as that's supposedly liberating,
and those who object on the grounds of their culture
are labeled Islamophobic. And arguably nothing symbolize Islamification of Europe

(07:39):
more than the job. In Iran, young women are risking
their lives. I want you to just think about this contrast.
In in France, the wearing of the his jab is
symbolizing the Islamification of Europe and it is celebrated, while

(08:01):
in Teyran and other cities throughout Iran, young women are
risking their lives. They are risking death for the right
to not wear a his job, and in Western Europe
it's almost dog it's just almost like a cool thing

(08:21):
to do.

Speaker 6 (08:22):
Kagan, I think it would be great if you can
enlighten the goobers on how the talkback line works in
terms of especially when villains are there, whether they have
access or not. I also was wondering if it's very
difficult for you to deal with having talkbacks under Ross's show,

(08:43):
and then people like me who obviously leave them ahead
of the Michael Brown start show. If you know which
ones belong to which shows.

Speaker 3 (08:50):
Thanks, there's an easy trick to that.

Speaker 4 (08:54):
It's knowing who's belongs to who's you listen to them.

Speaker 2 (09:02):
And do you yes, and you want to give a
lesson to leave a talkback just like that.

Speaker 4 (09:12):
Her question was more or less? Is the guests hosts
to have access to the talkbacks? No, they don't have
access to the screen that I have.

Speaker 5 (09:18):
I think she met. I think she meant the phill
in producers.

Speaker 4 (09:21):
Oh, I have those, assuming the host for some reason,
because that's not important at all. It would depend John. Yes,
I believe all of the typical producers that fill in
would have access to all the talkbacks from this station. Yes,
whether or not they know to try and listen before
or after.

Speaker 2 (09:40):
The right they just they need a They need a
rundown of how the program operates. Like you do this
and this and this, and in every few minutes you
you interrupt Michael and you know, say something negative to him,
and then you you know, go back to doing whatever
you're doing and they come back.

Speaker 4 (09:57):
Michael's very particular. He has to have the rules of engagement.
There has to be the proper rules of engagement. Camps
pork Grant played a few from the other station here
on Koop so well, and has to have the Traveling
Little Berries at the end of the show, and has
to have the letterman. Elvis has left the building at
the end of the show. But Michael's very particularly, you
don't know how much work it is to be Michael's

(10:20):
producer because just the way he.

Speaker 5 (10:22):
Is ocd aintal retenting.

Speaker 3 (10:29):
Yeah, that's kind of why we're a good fit.

Speaker 2 (10:32):
Unfortunately, exactly that's exactly why we're a good fit. And well,
you still have explained how to do the talkback.

Speaker 4 (10:42):
Oh you listen live, Just say to your iHeart free
to U iHeart app you listen live. There should be
a little microphone button in the upper right hand corner.
Ish you press that button, it'll give you thirty seconds
to leave a talkback or a voicemail and you can
say whatever you want. And if it's clever, funny, degrading
towards my, it gets played on the air.

Speaker 5 (11:02):
Funny, clever and degrading towards me. All right, got it?

Speaker 2 (11:07):
And then I would remind everybody and I can tell
you I don't have it up, but dragon informs me
that some of you are still using the incorrect text line.
The text line for this program is three three one
zero three keyword Mike or Michael. So if you've been
telling me something on the other text line, swear to
goodness I don't see it, and you need to send

(11:31):
that to a three three one zero three keyword Mike
or Michael.

Speaker 7 (11:35):
Hey, Michael, since we're talking about some grammatical stuff today
and proper use of words and things. That article that
you read earlier about Joe Biden and the border and stuff,
I think I'm sure they probably wrote it this way,
So I'm just curious what you think it was? The
Democratic present Biden? So that should that have been Democrat

(11:58):
or Democratic health?

Speaker 5 (12:02):
Well, technically, if you follow.

Speaker 2 (12:05):
The correct naming, they are the Democratic Party, but I
refuse to call them that. I haven't called them the
Democratic Party for decades. I call them democrats because I
don't find them to be very democratic. Is their last
nominating process was that very democratic? No, it's just Democrats,

(12:29):
So I refuse to use that one. And then there's
a text message that taught my attention. I want to
share with you because it feeds off when I'm the
point I'm trying to make about this story about the
Islamification of Europe, which is included in Trump's you know,

(12:52):
national defense strategy that they released last week, that I
really would encourage you to go read. You've a number
forty five nineteen, Mike, how about Americans worry?

Speaker 5 (13:03):
Oh just refresh.

Speaker 2 (13:05):
How about Americans worry about our country and fix the
crap hole we are becoming before telling other countries how
to live. We can't even take care of our own
house one? Is there anything I would challenge you to
find anything that I said in that last segment where
I'm trying to tell in particular, I haven't gotten to

(13:26):
the other countries yet, but we talked about France. Was
there anything that I said telling France about how I
think they ought to live?

Speaker 5 (13:33):
No, I'm pointing out.

Speaker 2 (13:34):
The reality of how they are living, and if that's
a danger to us, we don't as much as and
I find this with all due respect, if you go
renumber which number was? Were you forty five nineteen? If
you believe this way, then I apologize for offending you.

(13:55):
But you're being naive because if you think that we
can live in isolation, then you're truly naive about how
the world operates. Just look at I forget what the
headline was this morning in the Wall Street Journal, but
something about China's trade imbalance and it was like, you know,
a trillion dollars or something, which shows just how much

(14:15):
we still rely upon China for cheap craft and we
buy all the time, and we are a consumer economy.
You know, the majority of our gross domestic product is
because of consumerism. We don't really make enough stuff anymore,
which we need to change. To get back to France
and the Islamification of France. The more that continues and

(14:36):
the more France allows their own Islamification, that culture will
spread to all the other countries. If France is allowing it,
do you think Portugal has the wherewithal to stop it.
I told you about the police chief in Berlin who
actually warned Jews, hey, and Jews and gaze. So let's

(15:01):
let's take those two groups and let's warn them, Hey,
hyde your identity.

Speaker 5 (15:06):
Now.

Speaker 2 (15:07):
I understand that Jews might have a star of David
on them. They might have, you know, they might be wearing,
you know, a skull cap or something. I'm not quite
sure how gays identify themselves. Do they wear do they
walk around with a middle name? Tiger says, hey, my
name is Jody and I am day. No, I don't
think so. But when the police chief warns you about

(15:31):
hiding your identity? What about Protestants? What about anybody who's
an apostate in the eyes of Islam? You got a
hydr identity, don't you dare? Wear that cross that bleeds
over into other countries and pretty soon an entire continent
upon which we have a legally morally binding obligation to defend.

Speaker 3 (15:57):
Hmm.

Speaker 2 (15:58):
How's that going to affect our relationship with Europe? And
if you tell me that you will, we just won't
defend Europe. Well, look what's going on in Ukraine right now.

Speaker 5 (16:07):
Now. Whether you agree with what we're doing.

Speaker 2 (16:09):
In Ukraine to help them or not help them, is
an entirely different issue. Set that aside for a moment
and look solely at what Vladimir Putin is doing. Putin
is trying to re establish the old Soviet Union. So
if he can, if he could succeed even partially right
now in taking some of Ukraine, that will give him

(16:31):
time to I mean, losing two hundred thousand soldiers a
month or whatever he's losing is not sustainable. And losing
the jets that he's lost, losing their one, the hugest
vessel in their navy, they lost one almost a year ago.
He needs time to rebuild, so he'll do anything to

(16:52):
appease us, to appease the Ukrainians, he might enter into
a peace agreement, and absent any secure the agreements which
would keep him at bay, he'll just rebuild his own economy.
He'll rebuild everything, and then when the time is right,
he'll take over Kiev. And then what's next Warsaw. Yes,

(17:13):
that's precisely what he wants to do. And as long
as he remains in power, and as long as the
oligarchs in Russia allow him to remain in power, that's
the ultimate goal. So when and maybe I've not used
this example in this program yet over here on KOA,
but I've tried to explain to my other audiences.

Speaker 5 (17:35):
I want you to think of the world.

Speaker 2 (17:36):
Remember the old Sherwin Williams advertisement which showed this globe
and they were pouring a can of paint. You know,
Sherwin Williams covers the globe. Well, imagine that paint represents tyranny. Well,
that's what's happening all around us everywhere you look. I
don't know what's going on right now between Thailand and Cambodia,

(18:00):
but there's apparently some scuffle going on between Thailand and Tambodia.
We still have all the genocide going on in some Sahara, Africa.
We have the Islamification going on in Europe. We've got
what our hell's going on in the Caribbean with Venezuela,
and we've got all the corruption going on in Brazil.

(18:22):
We've got Malay trying to survive down in Argentina. And yes,
the Western hemisphere we need a Trump doctrine, like a
Monroe doctrine for the Western hemisphere. But we can't ignore
the rest of the world. We can't ignore Western civilization
because at some point we will find ourselves so isolated

(18:44):
that all of our allies are no longer representative of
Western civilization and they become Islamified. Do you think that
we can defend sincere sincere question absent enough time to
rebuild our military. Do you think we could truly engage

(19:08):
in a Third World War and win it today? I
don't think so. I don't think we have the naval capability.
I don't know that we have the new technology capability.
I know we're building drones and trying to get new
technology as quickly as we can, and I support the
Trump team in doing that, but I don't know that
we're at the goal post yet. And until we get

(19:31):
to that goal post, if suddenly Russia decides that, oh,
I'm just going to go ahead and start invading Eastern Europe,
that will be a signal to Xijinping that, oh, maybe
I should try to invade Taiwan right now. He invades Taiwan,
that automatically draws in Japan and Korea. That whether whether
automatic draws US in or not depends on how successful

(19:56):
or how bogged down that invasion of Taiwan gets. I
think it will get pretty bogged down. There's only about
three times out of a twelve month calendar year that
it's really conducive to a invasion across the Taiwan Straits.
Outside those time periods, it's going to be urban warfare

(20:18):
like you've never seen Tainan, Taipei. The city's along the
southern tip of the island, and that's going to draw
in Japan. And Korea. Once it draws in Japan and Korea,
that draws US in once we get drawn in. Can
you imagine? So we're fighting once again on the Eastern
Front and on the Western Front. I don't think we're

(20:38):
ready for that. So, yes, these stories matter about the
Islamification of Europe because it is upending Western civilization and
that could be dangerous to us. This civilization erasure, which
is the term I used in the earlier segment, is

(21:00):
to a large extent self inflicted. I know they're allowing
themselves to be overtaken by all of the radical Islamis,
but nothing symbolizes the Lama, the Lamification of Europe, as
I said, more than the hijab, because while they're allowing

(21:20):
that to occur and actually celebrating the job. In France,
Iranian women are risking their lives trying to get the
molas to allow them to not wear one. The hijab
is becoming more and more popular among young French Muslims.
In two thousand and three, figures show that just under

(21:43):
sixteen percent of under twenty five wore the head scarf,
a figure that today is up to forty five percent.
Almost half last week, one police force in England proudly
displayed its new quick release hajah for female officers, and
for the moment, British people can still question the wisdom

(22:06):
of allowing its cops to weary his jobs. But the
Labor government is expected to introduce new Islamophobia laws that
will criminalize criticizing is law. So it's spreading in the
UK too, in Brussels. In the Brussels a bazillion times
because NATO's there, a Muslim city councilor recently declared that

(22:30):
Belgians who object to women wearing the job should go
living somewhere else. Oh so native Belgians are being told
by a city councilor in Brussels, you need to go
live somebody. See where they're Belgian.

Speaker 5 (22:49):
They have the right to live in their own city.

Speaker 2 (22:51):
The same city last week unveiled this traditional Nativity scene
in its historic market square in Brussels. They got this
beautiful square, the little statue of peace, the little guy
ping is just off that square. There's a difference this
year in their Nativity scene. The Holy Family no faces whatsoever.

(23:14):
And it's been suggested, at least in the Belgian newspapers
that this is not to offend the followers of Islam,
because it's not permitted to show the faces of the prophets.
Remember Charlie Hebdoh, I know it seems like ancient history, right, Oh,
publish a cartoon, Go blow them up. Fifty two percent

(23:37):
of Brussels school children are Muslim, fifteen percent more than
in London. The two main drivers of Islamification in Europe
mass immigration and the Muslim brotherhood That islamis organization that
Trump intends to ban, and quite frankly, i'be does ban them.

(23:58):
What if Europ's leading experts on Muslim brotherhood is the
French academic Florence Beckler, who requires police protection as a
result just of her research. Imagine that just researching Islamophobia
is Imagine researching the march of Islam radical Islamist through Europe,

(24:20):
and you do research on it, and you get published,
and now you have to have a deep of security
detail to protect you from the Islamist who want to
kill you because the research. Back in twenty twenty three,
in a book that she published, she explained that quote
their goal is not to adapt Islam to Europe, but
to adapt Europe to Islam, to adapt to Islam. Europe

(24:46):
has to erase its own civilization and that's what's going on,
and that's why it's a danger to the entire world.
Imagine where we're left. Is the only country maybe Ken't
you know? I want put the Canucks in there, because
canon is a matter as weak neat as the Belgians
or the French French are Mexicans, they might stand up

(25:07):
to it. I'm not sure, but I think they might.
South America not quite a problem yet. But do you
want to rely on allies in.

Speaker 5 (25:18):
Japan?

Speaker 2 (25:18):
Doesn't allow it either. In Korea not so much there either.
Do you want to rely on the military in South
America and then the Japanese military which is just now
starting to build up, and the Korean army of course,
which is in good shape as against the rest of
the world. No, I'm not ready for that fight, and
I don't think this country is ready for that fight.

Speaker 5 (25:40):
But even worse, it's a cancer.

Speaker 2 (25:45):
And once that cancer metastasizes, whether it be in Europe,
South America, in the United Kingdom, wherever it might occur,
that cancer begins to spread, you already see it in
this country. Do I have to mention what's going on?
In Minnesota right now? Do I have to mention the
fraud going on in Minnesota? Why do you think where

(26:07):
do you think that money's going? Yes, going back to
al Shabab. And you think that somehow elon Omar is
just ignorant of what's really going on. No, she's actually
probably actively participating in that fraudulent endeavor. She gave some
statement to some newspaper recently, and I've listened to it

(26:27):
or read it, and I thought to myself, you didn't
deny it. You just said, oh, maybe we're not doing
enough to stop it. Huh, yes, we are. The people
who are not doing anything to stop it are your
own attorney general, you as a congresswoman, who care more

(26:47):
about that money going to al Shabab than you do
about that money going to poor kids in your own neighborhood.
I don't think we also be spending money anyway. But
regardless we are spending the money. As long as we're
spending the money, I wanted to go to the people
that it's intended to and not to some terrorist organization
over in Africa.

Speaker 5 (27:04):
How about that? How about that elon Omar? You know
when Trump.

Speaker 2 (27:09):
Called her garbage, she is she absolutely is garbage, and
I think we're being utterly ignorant if we don't realize
how this is even here beginning to affect how we
react to things. Jews ought to be looking at what's
going on around the world and they realize, oh, we've

(27:29):
seen this act before, because the Nazis collaborated with the
Islamist during the Holocaust, during World War Two, and that
kind of cooperation is going on again, and we absolutely
act like we're ignorant of it. It boggles my mind

(27:51):
about it. You know, Mike Bins, if you don't follow
Mike bens over on act, she probably should do it.
He went over the effort that's going on with the
Democrats and the deep state that's trying to create a
color revolution in this country. And I think that again
going back to the idea of isolationism, that if we

(28:12):
focus on isolationism and we don't realize that the color
revolution is trying to take hold on American soil, then
once again we're being naive and we're being ignorant. He
posted a video tour that it's really a tour of
the fource, which runs for more than three hours. I
didn't watch the entire three hours. I skim, admittedly skim
through it, but I highly recommend that you you know,

(28:33):
go invest some time to watch part of it, because
it truly is a public service. It is transparently obvious that,
at least to me anyway, that Democrats and they're fellow travelers,
that they're back in color revolution mode. They're going to
take a second bite at the treason this apple, as

(28:54):
it were, and that reality was made crystal clear with
the release initially of the subeditious sixth video, and now
that group has expanded to the Seditious seven with Virginia
Deep State Senator Mark Warner leaping aboard too. But there's
a catch to their ability to pull all of this off.
To succeed in pulling off a full on color revolution

(29:15):
in this country requires the ability to control the flow
of information across the entire target society, which are those
people who are not discerning consumers of news. The drive
by consumers of the media truth, Truth, which is what
we try to bring on this program, is basically kryptonite

(29:36):
for any color revolution. It is impossible for any insurgency
to control people's minds and their behavior if it cannot
control the flow of information. They're allowed to consume. So
if I deliver information that you find makes me uncomfortable,
or I just told I refuse to accept it, maybe

(30:00):
you ought to check your objectivity because I don't come
here just trial people up. I come to tell you
based on my experience, which is much.

Speaker 5 (30:11):
You know. I'm not trying to brag here.

Speaker 2 (30:12):
But my experience for six years getting briefed by the
CIA and the NSSAY and everybody ask about what's going
on in the world. I think I'm pretty attuned to
what's going on in the world, and I'm telling you
it's a dangerous place. And the seditionists are out there
trashing columns, editions. That's probably over that's over the top.
But those who are trying to really invoke a color

(30:35):
revolution in this country are truly trying to control the
flow of information that you get so that when they
finally throw down the sledgehammer, you'll be caught off guard.
I refuse to let that happen.