Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I'm up here in Poketel, Idaho.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
It's partly cloudy and cold as well.
Speaker 3 (00:04):
Diggers ass the hell Idaho is always cold. Pretty soon
I'll be headed to Jackson Hall, where I'm gonna run
me over some super rus and teesfla trucks.
Speaker 4 (00:16):
Weather update for Wyoming who zip code eight two five
two three. It is now minus six degrees, partly cloudy
skies and an extremely light dusting of snow.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
You know, Dragon and I we joke about how we
despise goobers.
Speaker 2 (00:42):
Yeah, but I'm absolutely loving that.
Speaker 3 (00:43):
We love you guys.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
Give me the weather report where you are right now?
Speaker 5 (00:47):
Beautiful, beautiful and and I don't mean it this way,
but I like how we can just kind of throw
a little worm out there on book and then they
just take it and just take it run with it.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
We don't we don't have to do anything. I think
I think we could probably we should try this as
an experiment someday when we just don't care, which is
any day, why of just nothing but just throw kidbits
out and then just play talkbacks and read text messages
(01:26):
all day. That's all we would do.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
Well, I think we should have a no politics day
coming up right. We've been hammering it pretty hard. Of course,
there's all the news about us to say. If you
can't not talk, we're.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
Gonna have to wait until he takes a breath. Now,
when he takes a breath, maybe we can take a breath.
But if we took a breath right now, let's say,
for example, we got Monday's a holiday for us because
it's president thing for a moment. Is it Juneteenth? No,
this is February, so it's President's Day, So Dragon I
(01:59):
will be I'm I'm actually I'm gonna try once again
to go see my mom this coming weekend. Leaves after
Saturday show, drive down to Oklahoma see here for you know,
for thirty six hours or so, and then drive back.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
That's love right there.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
That is love. And all I'm all I'm thinking is
he won't stop on Monday. He'll keep going. So you know,
between between one pm Mountain time on Saturday when I
finished the syndicated program and we come back at six
am on Tuesday, that's gonna be a lot of crap.
(02:35):
Do try to cover. Holy cow, all's not good on
the Western front. No, it's not. There's a defense contractor
that's involved in uh DLD aviation parks production that's not
getting scrutinized because of alleged ties to its CEO with
(03:00):
the Chinese Communist Party intelligence agencies. You know, didn't we
go through this with the whole I mean, have you
ever read the book Witness by Whittaker Chambers. It's I'm
sure it's still available on Amazon. It's got to be
(03:20):
out of print, but somebody's got to be printing in
paperback somewhere. If you I read this book decades ago,
I would encourage you to find it and read it.
It's I know that everybody has a preconceived notion about
the McCarthy era, and maybe Joe McCarthy in his tactics
(03:44):
may have been a little over the top, but what
he was driving at remains true, and unfortunately, to a
certain degree, remains true today. And Chambers, in the book Witness,
outlines the communist infiltration of the federal government and outlines
(04:08):
pretty much everything that McCarthy was trying to prove. He
just lays it out in a book and it's a
great study.
Speaker 5 (04:16):
Not only in.
Speaker 3 (04:19):
The unholy alliance between communists and Hollywood and the bureaucracy,
the deep state, but it gives you a great perspective
on where we are today, and stories like this where
a company SNL Aerospace Medals LLC. This is a company
(04:39):
that supplies critical components for our fighter aircrafts. It's led
by a CEO by the name of Jerry Wang, who
reportedly has connections with organizations that are linked to the
Chinese Communist Party. And DLD has awarded significant contracts to
(05:00):
SNL sn L not SNL like Sunday Night Live SNL
for parts to go into military aircraft, helicopters, missile launchers.
And despite those contracts, questions have been raised about Wing's associations,
including his presence at numerous Chinese Communist Party events alongside
(05:25):
top party officials. Now he's lawyered up, and I don't
blame my lawyer up to and even if he's innocent.
Even if I were innocent in this situation, I would
lawyer up because I wouldn't say another FN word to
anybody publicly, whether it was true or not. I'd be
having a lawyer do it. But his lawyers denied any
(05:49):
affiliations with any foreign political entities, but did not refute
the evidence of his appearance at those events. Now you
can read what you want to end to that. But
your last name, your name's Lee Wang, all right, now,
I know maybe that's I don't think that's racist. That's
(06:10):
just recognizing. Okay, So there's your nationality and you're showing
up an event in for the Chinese Communist Party event.
It's not like you're showing up at a fundraiser for
you know, Adam Schiff, where you would expect, you know,
some Communist Party members to be. But you're actually showing
(06:31):
up for a Chinese Communist Party event where Adam Schiff
just happens to be. And I'm not saying Adam Schiff
was at this one. I'm just saying that as an example,
when you don't deny the or you don't refute the
evidence of your appearance at these events that leads to
(06:54):
further questions, you should have the lawyer should have at
least said that he went to these events knowing that
it was a CCP party or in the CCP sponsored event,
or if you did know that it was, that you
went because there's a particular business. Explain no transparency. Once again,
(07:16):
shine that batman spotlight on it, and let's find out
why you were there. The United Front Work Department, which
is an intelligence arm of the Chinese Communist Party, has
actually identified Wang as a member of the United Front
Work Department in numerous instances. Well, so what is the
United Front Work Department. It's known for its role in
(07:39):
shaping China's influence strategies abroad. Now, critics will argue that
Wang's role in US defense supply chains that presents substantial
risks with potential implications for national security. No fec Sherlock,
Really you think so? I would argue that it is
(07:59):
all almost prime effacient evidence of substantial national security risks.
But I want you to stop and just think again.
Let's let's do it kind of an out of body experience.
Musk is trying to find inefficiencies, in effectiveness, uh, waste, fraud, abuse,
(08:23):
all of that. That's great. If I'm reading about this,
and if I know about this, where's the House Armed
Services Committee? Where's where where's the where's the Senate? Where's
any member of Congress raising a red flag? Where's any
(08:47):
member of Congress maybe saying to the executive branch or
doing it themselves, Uh, let's terminate these contracts. And I
know that termination of contracts comes with a price. Most
any contract you enter into. I can't speak for you,
but most contracts that I enter into have a price
attached for an early termination. Well, isn't it worth taxpayer money? Now?
(09:15):
I would make an argument that you could terminate this
contract because this guy has reached whatever covenants should be
in that contract to protect our national security interest and
he's clearly not doing that. LJ Eads, who's a former
intelligence analyst with the Air Force. He's emphasizing if there's
(09:36):
a gap in oversight within the defense contracting system, well, duh.
If you're entering into contracts and the procurement system in
DoD can't check or catch that the CEO of a
company that you're going to contract with for parts that
(09:58):
go into military aircraft, helicopters and missile systems is associated
with the Chinese Communist Party. If you can't recognize that,
then there's something truly left up with the DLD contracting system.
Maybe that's the next place that and must can't look.
I don't think realistically that Musk himself can keep doing
(10:19):
all of this. Oh, he can spearhead it, but I
think what Trump's going to have to do is, and
I know it's already been officially made a part of
the Executive Office of the President, but the Executive Office
of the President needs to be hiring hundreds, if not thousands,
of these twenty somethings to start going over every department
(10:42):
and agency. Now he's already instructed as cabinet secretaries. But
again that gets back to the point of where's the
FBI director. Supposedly we might get him out of committee tomorrow,
we might get the d and I Tulsea Cabert, we
might get her Friday. It's gonna be a month next week,
(11:04):
a week from or a you know, a week from
tomorrow will be exactly a month. And we don't have
the complete cabinet finished yet. I think Obama had his
cabinet done within a week or less from his inauguration.
We control the Senate now. I know there are procedural
(11:26):
and parliamentary things that the Democrats can do to slow
things down, but that's when John Thune says, then we're
gonna stay in session, and we're gonna keep working Friday night,
all day Saturday, and all day Sunday. So your thirty
hours of debate time are gonna get eaten up on
the weekends as opposed to you taking off on the weekends.
And we're gonna come back so that or we're gonna
(11:47):
stay in DC. Why why the hell?
Speaker 5 (11:50):
You know?
Speaker 3 (11:50):
We've got President's Day coming up. Anybody want to take
bets and whether or not they take President's Day off.
You know, if I take President's Day off, it doesn't
imply cape national security. They take President's Day off, that
gives Democrats. That pushes a nomination off. If they're invoking
the thirty hour debate rule, that's gonna push a nomination
off for at least another day, so they can keep
(12:14):
stretching it out, and maybe, if we're lucky, by the
end of February, we'll have the president's cabinet in place.
I cannot tell you how much I despise Democrats. For
that matter, I can't tell you how much I despise
even some of the good guys, ostensibly good guys like
John Thune, who tell us, on the one hand, we're
gonna work day and night, we're gonna work all through
the weekends, and then the first thing he does, he
(12:35):
takes a weekend off. All you decodins ought to be
screaming at John Thune. The country ought to be screaming
at John Thun at least one. Congressman John Mullinar, a
Republican from Michigan. He chairs the House Select Committee on
on the Chinese Communist Party. I just wanted to read
(13:00):
you what he says. I'm calling for urgent measures to
address these vulnerabilities. You have a congressman, you have a staff,
you have a committee, the House Select Committee on the
Chinese Communist Party. Why don't you get off your ass
(13:20):
and drafts some legislation? Why don't you draft some resolutions?
Why don't you draft some things like to rescind or
terminate contracts? I mean, you do.
Speaker 5 (13:30):
I have to do.
Speaker 3 (13:30):
I have to explain to everybody what you can do.
I mean, I'm just a dumbass former undersecretary and I'm
sitting here explaining to to all you goobers what these
supposedly you know, high flute and elected officials could be doing.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
So while while.
Speaker 3 (13:46):
We're talking about this, SNL Aerospace Industries maintains its position
on a Department of Homeland Security Council that focuses on
fill in the blank. What do you think critical manufacturing security?
(14:10):
You know, we have we established originally in DHS a
Critical Infrastructure Committee, and the Critical Infrastructure's Committee's purpose was
basically to ensure that all of these vendors and all
these supply chains that we have that feed into the
federal government, that we map out those that are critical,
(14:34):
that are highly important to this country's national security, and
then put in some metrics by which we make certain
that those supply chains are secure and that we don't
have any vulnerabilities in it. Well, obviously, I mean, I
know that's been twenty some years ago, and I'm certain
(14:54):
that's gone by the wayside too. So they not only
are applying. So let's just think about this. So the
CEO of a defense contractor attends parties that are hosted
by the Chinese Communist Party, it is a legend he
has ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Meanwhile, not only
(15:16):
is his company a supplier of parts to fighter jets, helicopters,
and missile systems, but his company is also on the
Critical Manufacturing Security Committee the Department of Ponemaned Security. And
now they're asserting that there is no influence from foreign entities,
but they can't explain his documented associations I've got should
(15:43):
not be shocking news to you. But not only is
our government in ept, not only is it inefficient and ineffective,
I would argue, which again goes back to Whitaker Chambers,
it made, indeed be highly infiltrated by Communists. Now we
(16:04):
and let me differentiate here, because you know, there's no
doubt in my mind that it's infiltrated by Marxists.
Speaker 5 (16:14):
We just call them.
Speaker 3 (16:14):
Democrats, but I'm talking about actual Chinese Communist Party agents
within the federal government in key security positions, and the
Democrats are and associate justice. So to my oar is
(16:35):
talking about how Donald Trump is going to turn into
a monarchy, He's going to turn into a dictator, and
he's going to destroy this republic. There is a rotten,
horrible cancer in this government, and nobody seems to give
orb at tests about it. Nobody. You know, yesterday there
(16:58):
was this news that came out about FEMA supplying fifty
nine million dollars to the Roosevelt Hotel. Because I pointed
out on x I, you know, it's been ten fifteen
years I stayed in the Roosevelt Hotel one time, vowed
never to stay in that hotel again because we're so nasty.
It's now owned by the Pakistani. Well, the fifty nine
(17:20):
million dollars nine million dollars actually went to the hotel
fifty million dollars man security another stuff. It's time to
either completely reconstitute THEMA or get ridden.
Speaker 6 (17:34):
Good morning from the last frontier. It's a balmy minus
fourteen point eight degrees with a blanket of snow covering
the ground. That's not new, it's been here for months.
We are expecting a zero degree day with sunny blue
skies when it's sunny, and we are expecting a rash
of hot air that is going to be blowing up
from the Denver area over the airwaves between about four
(17:58):
and eight am.
Speaker 3 (17:59):
Can can?
Speaker 6 (18:00):
I can feel it now?
Speaker 3 (18:03):
The only thing missing from that otherwise very good report
and very accurate report, I might add, in all aspects,
is the lack of the a man of sunshine because
while it will be sunny blue skies for what thirty seconds.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
Or are they on that time frame where they get
sunshine for twenty three hours of the day.
Speaker 3 (18:25):
No, that's in the summertime. Oh okay, it's in the summertime.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
So it's it's I've been in.
Speaker 3 (18:30):
I've been in anchorage in November. I've never been in.
And I've been an anchorage in July.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
And did he say the lost Frontier.
Speaker 3 (18:40):
The last, the last front last, the last. Although I'm
sure in his mind you feel pretty lost. He is
a lost frontier. He's a totally lost fer uh So,
back to Musk for a moment. So in that Oval
Office meeting, he laid out some pretty detailed plans of
(19:01):
how he wanted to cut the federal deficit in half
by twenty twenty six. Now, remember, he's a tech billionaire.
He's not a dummy. He's not me or Dragon. Well.
I can't speak for Dragon well, I can't speak for dragons.
He's not a dummy like me and Dragon. And Dragon's
obviously done because he's back there working with me. But
(19:23):
he emphasized that any success in tackling the budget deficit
will come down to and I thought this was brilliant
wording competence and caring among the Trump administration officials and
especially those working at DOGE. He said, quote, what are
(19:44):
the two ingredients that are really necessary in order to
cut the budget deficit in half? From two trillion to
one trillion. And it's truly two things, competence and caring.
There's a lot to say about that. Listen to him for.
Speaker 7 (20:04):
What, what are the two ingredients that are really necessary
in order to cut the budget depth sit in half
from two trillion to one trillion?
Speaker 8 (20:11):
And it's really two things, competence and caring. And if
you add competence and caring, if you'll cut the budget
depth sit in half, and and and I fully.
Speaker 7 (20:22):
Expect to be scrutinized and get, you know, a daily
productology exam. Basically my sol's camp out there. So it's
not like I think I can get away with something.
I'll be scrutinized non stop. And but with one of
the president, we can we can cut the budget depth
sit in half from two trillion to one. And then
with deregulation, because there's a lot of sort of regulations
(20:46):
that don't ultimately serve the public good, we need to.
Speaker 8 (20:49):
Free free the builders of America to build.
Speaker 7 (20:52):
And if we do that, that means I think we
can get the economic growth to be maybe three four percent,
maybe five percent.
Speaker 8 (20:59):
And that means if you can get a trillion.
Speaker 7 (21:01):
Dollars economic growth and you can cut the budget deficit
by a trillion between now.
Speaker 8 (21:06):
And next year. There is no inflation.
Speaker 7 (21:09):
There's no inflation in twenty six and if the government
is not borrowing as much, it means.
Speaker 8 (21:14):
That interest costs a client.
Speaker 7 (21:16):
So everyone's the mortgage, the car payment, their credit card bills,
any their their student dead the multipayments drop.
Speaker 8 (21:25):
That's a fantastic scenario for the average American.
Speaker 7 (21:30):
I mean, imagine they're going down the grocery out and
the prices from one a year to the next are
the same and there and they're there, they're mortgage or.
Speaker 8 (21:41):
The dead payments dropped. How great is that for the
average American?
Speaker 3 (21:50):
He couldn't be more spot on in describing exactly how
it adds up. If you add competence and carry, you'll
cut the budget deficit and half. And I fully expect
to be scrutinized and get, you know, a daily proctology
examination basically, but with the support of the President, we
can cut the budget deficis and half from two trillion
to one. So, according to Musk, it's a combination of
(22:15):
cuts in federal government spending in addition to an aggressive
deregulation agenda that creates two fronts to slash the deficit. Now,
the amount of the deficit that is not reduced through
spending could be wiped out by economic growth. Part of
(22:35):
the way that you could always get to a balanced
budget is to cut a dominiums amount of government spending.
Say I don't know a nickel for every dollar that
we spend, a penny for every dollar we spend. At
one time, it's been years ago, Heritage came out that
if you could reduce federal spending by one cent for
(22:58):
every dollar that you spend, that you budget just cut
it by a penny. But of course that would cause
the Democrats to howl. But if you did that and
you spurred economic growth through deregulation, if I recall the
Heritage Foundation study correctly, you could balance the budget within
four or five years. But that takes discipline, that takes
(23:21):
an effort to actually do that. Must continue continue to say,
I think we can get the economic growth to be
maybe three or four percent, maybe even five percent. And
that means if you can get one trillion dollars of
economic growth and you can cut the budget deficit by
a trillion dollars between now next year, there would be
(23:45):
no inflation. Now considering the promo that I just cut
for tomorrow about you're going to hear tonight about how,
oh my god, the consumer price inducts is up by
three percent. That's higher than the expectation. So, oh my gosh,
Wait a minute, that's not higher than expectations. That's what
(24:06):
they'll tell you. But if you've paid any attention at all,
the at least the honest part of whatever news media
you could find, has been telling you that since Christmas,
inflation has been creeping up. And why is inflation continuing
to creep up Because all of the spending that Biden
(24:26):
put in place is continuing unabated. So until Trump gets
a handle on spending by either freezing it, cutting it,
rescinding it, whatever he can do at the same time
he's doing deregulation, you will get to a point. It
may not be next week, you know, one month into
the administration, but by summer. It's only by the end
(24:51):
of the year you'll start to see economic growth turn around,
and you'll start to see inflation actually start to drop.
He notes a fundamental thing that I think most people ignore,
and that is that if the federal gunment is borrowing
less and the economy sees growth than the cost of
(25:12):
goods and services for average Americans will drop, and I
think it would drop significantly. This is probably the first
time ever in my lifetime that I have seen a meticulous, concerted, deliberate,
ongoing effort to actually cut the budget. And I don't
(25:35):
mean cut in terms of what's morally known as a cut.
In Washington, Oh. Next year we were going to spend
one hundred dollars, but now we're going to spend ninety
dollars over what we spent last year. And that's a cut. Now,
that is not a cut. A cut is this year
we spent fifty dollars and next year we're going to
spend forty five dollars. That is a cut. And you
(25:57):
couple that with kind to be more efficient and more effective.
How do you think of private How do you think
any business out here makes money if they have cut
to the bone. Now, I maintain you can always I
mean I look around at this company. They can always
find one more place to cut, one more thing that'll
save them one more penny somewhere. And I think any
(26:19):
business can do that. But if you find ways to
be more efficient, to be more effect even how you
spend your money. Maybe you find a supplier that is
able to get goods that you're going to use in
whatever you produce to you quicker, or maybe they have
(26:40):
a different billing system, maybe you have a better point
of sale system. Anything that makes whatever goods and services
you provide more efficient to the ultimate retail consumer is
going to make it's going to go straight to your
bottom line. And the same is true with the federal government.
We just have to recognize that that's what's going on
and it's not going to happen overnight. So I guess
(27:05):
the point is, don't let the cabal convince you that
what they're doing is not working because of headlines that
you're going to read or you're going to hear on
the evening news tonight, because that's just simply not true.
You'll even hear stupid stuff like this. The Dose sub
(27:27):
Committee is meeting as we speak on the Senate side.
Listen to this.
Speaker 9 (27:36):
You mentioned the newly confirmed O and B director who
also controls of IRA. Kind of the levers of government
right now, both from Senate confirmed officials, appointed officials, and
then kind of the quasi group that Elon Musk is
running The biggest question I have since Democrats from the
minority in the House in the Senate has been is
there any recourse or is it almost entirely based on
(27:58):
the courts to try and stiff Well, you're talking.
Speaker 5 (28:00):
About the CFPV.
Speaker 9 (28:01):
Republicans of long opposed to CFPV of long tried to
figure out a way to suffocate the agency's existence.
Speaker 2 (28:07):
Now they're actually doing it.
Speaker 3 (28:09):
No one is trying to suffocate an agency's existence. Are
we trying to suffocate DLD so they can't fight wars
so we can't be prepared for a war. Are we
really trying to suffocate DHS so they can't secure a border?
Are we No, we're not trying to suffocate anything. But
that's the premise that CNN wants to use. Oh my gosh,
they're going to suffocate social Security so Grandma's not going
(28:31):
to get her social Security check. What bullcrap, what utter
bull crap. Well, that's right, by the way, This is
Sindra van Holland.
Speaker 10 (28:40):
Look, there are three lines of defenses, but the most
immediate line of defense are the courts. When you see
this much illegal activity going on all at once, the
courts have to be the first to react. And I've
been working very closely with the lawyers bringing these cases
in the courts, and we have seen so many temporary
(29:01):
restraining orders issued in just the last few weeks. That's
a reflection of the scope of illegal activity going on
by the Trump administration that thinks that it can use
executive orders to make sweeping changes that really have to
go through Congress.
Speaker 3 (29:17):
Now, you h so, are you for these changes or
are you against these changes? Because it seems to me
that Senator Van Holland is opposed to the changes because
he's going to court to stop the changes. Imagine if
the Democrats stood up and said, you know what we
don't like and this is obviously true, we don't like
(29:40):
what Musk is doing, but we support the idea of
what Musk is doing. So, mister President, can we sit
down with you and can we figure out a way
together to accomplish what Musk is trying to accomplish, but
maybe maybe doing it through Congress. Trump would be stupid
not to take him up on the offer. Now, would
(30:03):
Congress really follow through? Not in a New York minute,
but call their bluff? Why do you think they're not
making that offer? Why? Because They don't want these changes.
They don't want government to be more efficient or affecting.
They don't want to eliminate the waste, fraudened abuse. They
(30:24):
live on it. It's their blood, Mike.
Speaker 1 (30:28):
It's freaking cold outside, and my little chuweenis will knack
outside and put their little pies in the snow unless
they clear off a little spot for them to go
potty on primadonnas.
Speaker 3 (30:46):
Dragging in. There's some rule that dogs kind of reflect
their owners.
Speaker 2 (30:52):
I think that is they look like their owners too.
Speaker 3 (30:54):
They look like their owners. They kind of reflect the
owner's personality everything. So I mean, I wouldn't want to
point out the obvious where but you know, it seems
to me that what she call them hueenies or something,
and they won't put their little paws outside. Hey, let
me tell you. Listen. Listen to you, goober. You go
out there and bare feet and stand out there and think.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
A whizz and it to a chiuaua. You know, a
dusting of snow is like four feet to us.
Speaker 3 (31:26):
Uh, let's just kill this segment.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
Pretty different from any other time we do any other segment.
Speaker 3 (31:32):
No, but you know you you caught my attention with.
Speaker 2 (31:35):
The story finally at nine fifty two. You're gonna look
at the story as I gave you this morning.
Speaker 3 (31:41):
Yeah, I actually looked at them earlier. I decided that
one about fartsh a metropolitan police officer is facing a
misconduct hearing after allegedly farting in a female officer's face.
You know, stuff like that goes on in police stations
and fire stations, radio stations, and everywhere else. This probably
(32:04):
goes on in radio stations too, but I haven't figured
out when I get my day off for it. Knocking
boots instead of clocking in increases employee product productivity, according
to a new data on the benefits of taking sex
days off from the job. Did you see that Super
Bowl commercial?
Speaker 2 (32:23):
Yes that mayonnaise one now, yes.
Speaker 3 (32:25):
Now mayonnaise, which I thought to myself.
Speaker 2 (32:28):
You could have picked a different product, different.
Speaker 3 (32:30):
Product, right, Yeah? Like you know, really, man, let's see
new search research from zip Health found that most employees
who've taken a sex day off from work experience a
boost in their productivity upon returning to the daily grind.
You know, I just during the during the I won't
(32:53):
tell you details about it, but during the break, I
just got my finalized cop track with the changes I'd requested.
Speaker 2 (33:02):
So we're stuck with you.
Speaker 3 (33:03):
You're stuck with me for a long time, a long time.
But now I'm thinking about what if it's too late
to withdraw my approval of the final draft and include
some sex days off?
Speaker 2 (33:16):
Well, that would have to mean that Tamora would want
to have sex with you.
Speaker 3 (33:20):
Well, who was talking about Tamra I mean, you know,
and who's talking about? Who was talking about a human being?
Speaker 5 (33:30):
Oh? Come on.
Speaker 3 (33:36):
Instead of raising chickens, I'm thinking about raising sheep or goats.
With younger generations leading the way in tech, healthcare, and finance,
companies embracing the trend, the future of workplace wellness might
be the more dynamic thing of the year. Sex day
off
I'm up here in Poketel, Idaho.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
It's partly cloudy and cold as well.
Speaker 3 (00:04):
Diggers ass the hell Idaho is always cold. Pretty soon
I'll be headed to Jackson Hall, where I'm gonna run
me over some super rus and teesfla trucks.
Speaker 4 (00:16):
Weather update for Wyoming who zip code eight two five
two three. It is now minus six degrees, partly cloudy
skies and an extremely light dusting of snow.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
You know, Dragon and I we joke about how we
despise goobers.
Speaker 2 (00:42):
Yeah, but I'm absolutely loving that.
Speaker 3 (00:43):
We love you guys.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
Give me the weather report where you are right now?
Speaker 5 (00:47):
Beautiful, beautiful and and I don't mean it this way,
but I like how we can just kind of throw
a little worm out there on book and then they
just take it and just take it run with it.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
We don't we don't have to do anything. I think
I think we could probably we should try this as
an experiment someday when we just don't care, which is
any day, why of just nothing but just throw kidbits
out and then just play talkbacks and read text messages
(01:26):
all day. That's all we would do.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
Well, I think we should have a no politics day
coming up right. We've been hammering it pretty hard. Of course,
there's all the news about us to say. If you
can't not talk, we're.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
Gonna have to wait until he takes a breath. Now,
when he takes a breath, maybe we can take a breath.
But if we took a breath right now, let's say,
for example, we got Monday's a holiday for us because
it's president thing for a moment. Is it Juneteenth? No,
this is February, so it's President's Day, So Dragon I
(01:59):
will be I'm I'm actually I'm gonna try once again
to go see my mom this coming weekend. Leaves after
Saturday show, drive down to Oklahoma see here for you know,
for thirty six hours or so, and then drive back.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
That's love right there.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
That is love. And all I'm all I'm thinking is
he won't stop on Monday. He'll keep going. So you know,
between between one pm Mountain time on Saturday when I
finished the syndicated program and we come back at six
am on Tuesday, that's gonna be a lot of crap.
(02:35):
Do try to cover. Holy cow, all's not good on
the Western front. No, it's not. There's a defense contractor
that's involved in uh DLD aviation parks production that's not
getting scrutinized because of alleged ties to its CEO with
(03:00):
the Chinese Communist Party intelligence agencies. You know, didn't we
go through this with the whole I mean, have you
ever read the book Witness by Whittaker Chambers. It's I'm
sure it's still available on Amazon. It's got to be
(03:20):
out of print, but somebody's got to be printing in
paperback somewhere. If you I read this book decades ago,
I would encourage you to find it and read it.
It's I know that everybody has a preconceived notion about
the McCarthy era, and maybe Joe McCarthy in his tactics
(03:44):
may have been a little over the top, but what
he was driving at remains true, and unfortunately, to a
certain degree, remains true today. And Chambers, in the book Witness,
outlines the communist infiltration of the federal government and outlines
(04:08):
pretty much everything that McCarthy was trying to prove. He
just lays it out in a book and it's a
great study.
Speaker 5 (04:16):
Not only in.
Speaker 3 (04:19):
The unholy alliance between communists and Hollywood and the bureaucracy,
the deep state, but it gives you a great perspective
on where we are today, and stories like this where
a company SNL Aerospace Medals LLC. This is a company
(04:39):
that supplies critical components for our fighter aircrafts. It's led
by a CEO by the name of Jerry Wang, who
reportedly has connections with organizations that are linked to the
Chinese Communist Party. And DLD has awarded significant contracts to
(05:00):
SNL sn L not SNL like Sunday Night Live SNL
for parts to go into military aircraft, helicopters, missile launchers.
And despite those contracts, questions have been raised about Wing's associations,
including his presence at numerous Chinese Communist Party events alongside
(05:25):
top party officials. Now he's lawyered up, and I don't
blame my lawyer up to and even if he's innocent.
Even if I were innocent in this situation, I would
lawyer up because I wouldn't say another FN word to
anybody publicly, whether it was true or not. I'd be
having a lawyer do it. But his lawyers denied any
(05:49):
affiliations with any foreign political entities, but did not refute
the evidence of his appearance at those events. Now you
can read what you want to end to that. But
your last name, your name's Lee Wang, all right, now,
I know maybe that's I don't think that's racist. That's
(06:10):
just recognizing. Okay, So there's your nationality and you're showing
up an event in for the Chinese Communist Party event.
It's not like you're showing up at a fundraiser for
you know, Adam Schiff, where you would expect, you know,
some Communist Party members to be. But you're actually showing
(06:31):
up for a Chinese Communist Party event where Adam Schiff
just happens to be. And I'm not saying Adam Schiff
was at this one. I'm just saying that as an example,
when you don't deny the or you don't refute the
evidence of your appearance at these events that leads to
(06:54):
further questions, you should have the lawyer should have at
least said that he went to these events knowing that
it was a CCP party or in the CCP sponsored event,
or if you did know that it was, that you
went because there's a particular business. Explain no transparency. Once again,
(07:16):
shine that batman spotlight on it, and let's find out
why you were there. The United Front Work Department, which
is an intelligence arm of the Chinese Communist Party, has
actually identified Wang as a member of the United Front
Work Department in numerous instances. Well, so what is the
United Front Work Department. It's known for its role in
(07:39):
shaping China's influence strategies abroad. Now, critics will argue that
Wang's role in US defense supply chains that presents substantial
risks with potential implications for national security. No fec Sherlock,
Really you think so? I would argue that it is
(07:59):
all almost prime effacient evidence of substantial national security risks.
But I want you to stop and just think again.
Let's let's do it kind of an out of body experience.
Musk is trying to find inefficiencies, in effectiveness, uh, waste, fraud, abuse,
(08:23):
all of that. That's great. If I'm reading about this,
and if I know about this, where's the House Armed
Services Committee? Where's where where's the where's the Senate? Where's
any member of Congress raising a red flag? Where's any
(08:47):
member of Congress maybe saying to the executive branch or
doing it themselves, Uh, let's terminate these contracts. And I
know that termination of contracts comes with a price. Most
any contract you enter into. I can't speak for you,
but most contracts that I enter into have a price
attached for an early termination. Well, isn't it worth taxpayer money? Now?
(09:15):
I would make an argument that you could terminate this
contract because this guy has reached whatever covenants should be
in that contract to protect our national security interest and
he's clearly not doing that. LJ Eads, who's a former
intelligence analyst with the Air Force. He's emphasizing if there's
(09:36):
a gap in oversight within the defense contracting system, well, duh.
If you're entering into contracts and the procurement system in
DoD can't check or catch that the CEO of a
company that you're going to contract with for parts that
(09:58):
go into military aircraft, helicopters and missile systems is associated
with the Chinese Communist Party. If you can't recognize that,
then there's something truly left up with the DLD contracting system.
Maybe that's the next place that and must can't look.
I don't think realistically that Musk himself can keep doing
(10:19):
all of this. Oh, he can spearhead it, but I
think what Trump's going to have to do is, and
I know it's already been officially made a part of
the Executive Office of the President, but the Executive Office
of the President needs to be hiring hundreds, if not thousands,
of these twenty somethings to start going over every department
(10:42):
and agency. Now he's already instructed as cabinet secretaries. But
again that gets back to the point of where's the
FBI director. Supposedly we might get him out of committee tomorrow,
we might get the d and I Tulsea Cabert, we
might get her Friday. It's gonna be a month next week,
(11:04):
a week from or a you know, a week from
tomorrow will be exactly a month. And we don't have
the complete cabinet finished yet. I think Obama had his
cabinet done within a week or less from his inauguration.
We control the Senate now. I know there are procedural
(11:26):
and parliamentary things that the Democrats can do to slow
things down, but that's when John Thune says, then we're
gonna stay in session, and we're gonna keep working Friday night,
all day Saturday, and all day Sunday. So your thirty
hours of debate time are gonna get eaten up on
the weekends as opposed to you taking off on the weekends.
And we're gonna come back so that or we're gonna
(11:47):
stay in DC. Why why the hell?
Speaker 5 (11:50):
You know?
Speaker 3 (11:50):
We've got President's Day coming up. Anybody want to take
bets and whether or not they take President's Day off.
You know, if I take President's Day off, it doesn't
imply cape national security. They take President's Day off, that
gives Democrats. That pushes a nomination off. If they're invoking
the thirty hour debate rule, that's gonna push a nomination
off for at least another day, so they can keep
(12:14):
stretching it out, and maybe, if we're lucky, by the
end of February, we'll have the president's cabinet in place.
I cannot tell you how much I despise Democrats. For
that matter, I can't tell you how much I despise
even some of the good guys, ostensibly good guys like
John Thune, who tell us, on the one hand, we're
gonna work day and night, we're gonna work all through
the weekends, and then the first thing he does, he
(12:35):
takes a weekend off. All you decodins ought to be
screaming at John Thune. The country ought to be screaming
at John Thun at least one. Congressman John Mullinar, a
Republican from Michigan. He chairs the House Select Committee on
on the Chinese Communist Party. I just wanted to read
(13:00):
you what he says. I'm calling for urgent measures to
address these vulnerabilities. You have a congressman, you have a staff,
you have a committee, the House Select Committee on the
Chinese Communist Party. Why don't you get off your ass
(13:20):
and drafts some legislation? Why don't you draft some resolutions?
Why don't you draft some things like to rescind or
terminate contracts? I mean, you do.
Speaker 5 (13:30):
I have to do.
Speaker 3 (13:30):
I have to explain to everybody what you can do.
I mean, I'm just a dumbass former undersecretary and I'm
sitting here explaining to to all you goobers what these
supposedly you know, high flute and elected officials could be doing.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
So while while.
Speaker 3 (13:46):
We're talking about this, SNL Aerospace Industries maintains its position
on a Department of Homeland Security Council that focuses on
fill in the blank. What do you think critical manufacturing security?
(14:10):
You know, we have we established originally in DHS a
Critical Infrastructure Committee, and the Critical Infrastructure's Committee's purpose was
basically to ensure that all of these vendors and all
these supply chains that we have that feed into the
federal government, that we map out those that are critical,
(14:34):
that are highly important to this country's national security, and
then put in some metrics by which we make certain
that those supply chains are secure and that we don't
have any vulnerabilities in it. Well, obviously, I mean, I
know that's been twenty some years ago, and I'm certain
(14:54):
that's gone by the wayside too. So they not only
are applying. So let's just think about this. So the
CEO of a defense contractor attends parties that are hosted
by the Chinese Communist Party, it is a legend he
has ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Meanwhile, not only
(15:16):
is his company a supplier of parts to fighter jets, helicopters,
and missile systems, but his company is also on the
Critical Manufacturing Security Committee the Department of Ponemaned Security. And
now they're asserting that there is no influence from foreign entities,
but they can't explain his documented associations I've got should
(15:43):
not be shocking news to you. But not only is
our government in ept, not only is it inefficient and ineffective,
I would argue, which again goes back to Whitaker Chambers,
it made, indeed be highly infiltrated by Communists. Now we
(16:04):
and let me differentiate here, because you know, there's no
doubt in my mind that it's infiltrated by Marxists.
Speaker 5 (16:14):
We just call them.
Speaker 3 (16:14):
Democrats, but I'm talking about actual Chinese Communist Party agents
within the federal government in key security positions, and the
Democrats are and associate justice. So to my oar is
(16:35):
talking about how Donald Trump is going to turn into
a monarchy, He's going to turn into a dictator, and
he's going to destroy this republic. There is a rotten,
horrible cancer in this government, and nobody seems to give
orb at tests about it. Nobody. You know, yesterday there
(16:58):
was this news that came out about FEMA supplying fifty
nine million dollars to the Roosevelt Hotel. Because I pointed
out on x I, you know, it's been ten fifteen
years I stayed in the Roosevelt Hotel one time, vowed
never to stay in that hotel again because we're so nasty.
It's now owned by the Pakistani. Well, the fifty nine
(17:20):
million dollars nine million dollars actually went to the hotel
fifty million dollars man security another stuff. It's time to
either completely reconstitute THEMA or get ridden.
Speaker 6 (17:34):
Good morning from the last frontier. It's a balmy minus
fourteen point eight degrees with a blanket of snow covering
the ground. That's not new, it's been here for months.
We are expecting a zero degree day with sunny blue
skies when it's sunny, and we are expecting a rash
of hot air that is going to be blowing up
from the Denver area over the airwaves between about four
(17:58):
and eight am.
Speaker 3 (17:59):
Can can?
Speaker 6 (18:00):
I can feel it now?
Speaker 3 (18:03):
The only thing missing from that otherwise very good report
and very accurate report, I might add, in all aspects,
is the lack of the a man of sunshine because
while it will be sunny blue skies for what thirty seconds.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
Or are they on that time frame where they get
sunshine for twenty three hours of the day.
Speaker 3 (18:25):
No, that's in the summertime. Oh okay, it's in the summertime.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
So it's it's I've been in.
Speaker 3 (18:30):
I've been in anchorage in November. I've never been in.
And I've been an anchorage in July.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
And did he say the lost Frontier.
Speaker 3 (18:40):
The last, the last front last, the last. Although I'm
sure in his mind you feel pretty lost. He is
a lost frontier. He's a totally lost fer uh So,
back to Musk for a moment. So in that Oval
Office meeting, he laid out some pretty detailed plans of
(19:01):
how he wanted to cut the federal deficit in half
by twenty twenty six. Now, remember, he's a tech billionaire.
He's not a dummy. He's not me or Dragon. Well.
I can't speak for Dragon well, I can't speak for dragons.
He's not a dummy like me and Dragon. And Dragon's
obviously done because he's back there working with me. But
(19:23):
he emphasized that any success in tackling the budget deficit
will come down to and I thought this was brilliant
wording competence and caring among the Trump administration officials and
especially those working at DOGE. He said, quote, what are
(19:44):
the two ingredients that are really necessary in order to
cut the budget deficit in half? From two trillion to
one trillion. And it's truly two things, competence and caring.
There's a lot to say about that. Listen to him for.
Speaker 7 (20:04):
What, what are the two ingredients that are really necessary
in order to cut the budget depth sit in half
from two trillion to one trillion?
Speaker 8 (20:11):
And it's really two things, competence and caring. And if
you add competence and caring, if you'll cut the budget
depth sit in half, and and and I fully.
Speaker 7 (20:22):
Expect to be scrutinized and get, you know, a daily
productology exam. Basically my sol's camp out there. So it's
not like I think I can get away with something.
I'll be scrutinized non stop. And but with one of
the president, we can we can cut the budget depth
sit in half from two trillion to one. And then
with deregulation, because there's a lot of sort of regulations
(20:46):
that don't ultimately serve the public good, we need to.
Speaker 8 (20:49):
Free free the builders of America to build.
Speaker 7 (20:52):
And if we do that, that means I think we
can get the economic growth to be maybe three four percent,
maybe five percent.
Speaker 8 (20:59):
And that means if you can get a trillion.
Speaker 7 (21:01):
Dollars economic growth and you can cut the budget deficit
by a trillion between now.
Speaker 8 (21:06):
And next year. There is no inflation.
Speaker 7 (21:09):
There's no inflation in twenty six and if the government
is not borrowing as much, it means.
Speaker 8 (21:14):
That interest costs a client.
Speaker 7 (21:16):
So everyone's the mortgage, the car payment, their credit card bills,
any their their student dead the multipayments drop.
Speaker 8 (21:25):
That's a fantastic scenario for the average American.
Speaker 7 (21:30):
I mean, imagine they're going down the grocery out and
the prices from one a year to the next are
the same and there and they're there, they're mortgage or.
Speaker 8 (21:41):
The dead payments dropped. How great is that for the
average American?
Speaker 3 (21:50):
He couldn't be more spot on in describing exactly how
it adds up. If you add competence and carry, you'll
cut the budget deficit and half. And I fully expect
to be scrutinized and get, you know, a daily proctology
examination basically, but with the support of the President, we
can cut the budget deficis and half from two trillion
to one. So, according to Musk, it's a combination of
(22:15):
cuts in federal government spending in addition to an aggressive
deregulation agenda that creates two fronts to slash the deficit. Now,
the amount of the deficit that is not reduced through
spending could be wiped out by economic growth. Part of
(22:35):
the way that you could always get to a balanced
budget is to cut a dominiums amount of government spending.
Say I don't know a nickel for every dollar that
we spend, a penny for every dollar we spend. At
one time, it's been years ago, Heritage came out that
if you could reduce federal spending by one cent for
(22:58):
every dollar that you spend, that you budget just cut
it by a penny. But of course that would cause
the Democrats to howl. But if you did that and
you spurred economic growth through deregulation, if I recall the
Heritage Foundation study correctly, you could balance the budget within
four or five years. But that takes discipline, that takes
(23:21):
an effort to actually do that. Must continue continue to say,
I think we can get the economic growth to be
maybe three or four percent, maybe even five percent. And
that means if you can get one trillion dollars of
economic growth and you can cut the budget deficit by
a trillion dollars between now next year, there would be
(23:45):
no inflation. Now considering the promo that I just cut
for tomorrow about you're going to hear tonight about how,
oh my god, the consumer price inducts is up by
three percent. That's higher than the expectation. So, oh my gosh,
Wait a minute, that's not higher than expectations. That's what
(24:06):
they'll tell you. But if you've paid any attention at all,
the at least the honest part of whatever news media
you could find, has been telling you that since Christmas,
inflation has been creeping up. And why is inflation continuing
to creep up Because all of the spending that Biden
(24:26):
put in place is continuing unabated. So until Trump gets
a handle on spending by either freezing it, cutting it,
rescinding it, whatever he can do at the same time
he's doing deregulation, you will get to a point. It
may not be next week, you know, one month into
the administration, but by summer. It's only by the end
(24:51):
of the year you'll start to see economic growth turn around,
and you'll start to see inflation actually start to drop.
He notes a fundamental thing that I think most people ignore,
and that is that if the federal gunment is borrowing
less and the economy sees growth than the cost of
(25:12):
goods and services for average Americans will drop, and I
think it would drop significantly. This is probably the first
time ever in my lifetime that I have seen a meticulous, concerted, deliberate,
ongoing effort to actually cut the budget. And I don't
(25:35):
mean cut in terms of what's morally known as a cut.
In Washington, Oh. Next year we were going to spend
one hundred dollars, but now we're going to spend ninety
dollars over what we spent last year. And that's a cut. Now,
that is not a cut. A cut is this year
we spent fifty dollars and next year we're going to
spend forty five dollars. That is a cut. And you
(25:57):
couple that with kind to be more efficient and more effective.
How do you think of private How do you think
any business out here makes money if they have cut
to the bone. Now, I maintain you can always I
mean I look around at this company. They can always
find one more place to cut, one more thing that'll
save them one more penny somewhere. And I think any
(26:19):
business can do that. But if you find ways to
be more efficient, to be more effect even how you
spend your money. Maybe you find a supplier that is
able to get goods that you're going to use in
whatever you produce to you quicker, or maybe they have
(26:40):
a different billing system, maybe you have a better point
of sale system. Anything that makes whatever goods and services
you provide more efficient to the ultimate retail consumer is
going to make it's going to go straight to your
bottom line. And the same is true with the federal government.
We just have to recognize that that's what's going on
and it's not going to happen overnight. So I guess
(27:05):
the point is, don't let the cabal convince you that
what they're doing is not working because of headlines that
you're going to read or you're going to hear on
the evening news tonight, because that's just simply not true.
You'll even hear stupid stuff like this. The Dose sub
(27:27):
Committee is meeting as we speak on the Senate side.
Listen to this.
Speaker 9 (27:36):
You mentioned the newly confirmed O and B director who
also controls of IRA. Kind of the levers of government
right now, both from Senate confirmed officials, appointed officials, and
then kind of the quasi group that Elon Musk is
running The biggest question I have since Democrats from the
minority in the House in the Senate has been is
there any recourse or is it almost entirely based on
(27:58):
the courts to try and stiff Well, you're talking.
Speaker 5 (28:00):
About the CFPV.
Speaker 9 (28:01):
Republicans of long opposed to CFPV of long tried to
figure out a way to suffocate the agency's existence.
Speaker 2 (28:07):
Now they're actually doing it.
Speaker 3 (28:09):
No one is trying to suffocate an agency's existence. Are
we trying to suffocate DLD so they can't fight wars
so we can't be prepared for a war. Are we
really trying to suffocate DHS so they can't secure a border?
Are we No, we're not trying to suffocate anything. But
that's the premise that CNN wants to use. Oh my gosh,
they're going to suffocate social Security so Grandma's not going
(28:31):
to get her social Security check. What bullcrap, what utter
bull crap. Well, that's right, by the way, This is
Sindra van Holland.
Speaker 10 (28:40):
Look, there are three lines of defenses, but the most
immediate line of defense are the courts. When you see
this much illegal activity going on all at once, the
courts have to be the first to react. And I've
been working very closely with the lawyers bringing these cases
in the courts, and we have seen so many temporary
(29:01):
restraining orders issued in just the last few weeks. That's
a reflection of the scope of illegal activity going on
by the Trump administration that thinks that it can use
executive orders to make sweeping changes that really have to
go through Congress.
Speaker 3 (29:17):
Now, you h so, are you for these changes or
are you against these changes? Because it seems to me
that Senator Van Holland is opposed to the changes because
he's going to court to stop the changes. Imagine if
the Democrats stood up and said, you know what we
don't like and this is obviously true, we don't like
(29:40):
what Musk is doing, but we support the idea of
what Musk is doing. So, mister President, can we sit
down with you and can we figure out a way
together to accomplish what Musk is trying to accomplish, but
maybe maybe doing it through Congress. Trump would be stupid
not to take him up on the offer. Now, would
(30:03):
Congress really follow through? Not in a New York minute,
but call their bluff? Why do you think they're not
making that offer? Why? Because They don't want these changes.
They don't want government to be more efficient or affecting.
They don't want to eliminate the waste, fraudened abuse. They
(30:24):
live on it. It's their blood, Mike.
Speaker 1 (30:28):
It's freaking cold outside, and my little chuweenis will knack
outside and put their little pies in the snow unless
they clear off a little spot for them to go
potty on primadonnas.
Speaker 3 (30:46):
Dragging in. There's some rule that dogs kind of reflect
their owners.
Speaker 2 (30:52):
I think that is they look like their owners too.
Speaker 3 (30:54):
They look like their owners. They kind of reflect the
owner's personality everything. So I mean, I wouldn't want to
point out the obvious where but you know, it seems
to me that what she call them hueenies or something,
and they won't put their little paws outside. Hey, let
me tell you. Listen. Listen to you, goober. You go
out there and bare feet and stand out there and think.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
A whizz and it to a chiuaua. You know, a
dusting of snow is like four feet to us.
Speaker 3 (31:26):
Uh, let's just kill this segment.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
Pretty different from any other time we do any other segment.
Speaker 3 (31:32):
No, but you know you you caught my attention with.
Speaker 2 (31:35):
The story finally at nine fifty two. You're gonna look
at the story as I gave you this morning.
Speaker 3 (31:41):
Yeah, I actually looked at them earlier. I decided that
one about fartsh a metropolitan police officer is facing a
misconduct hearing after allegedly farting in a female officer's face.
You know, stuff like that goes on in police stations
and fire stations, radio stations, and everywhere else. This probably
(32:04):
goes on in radio stations too, but I haven't figured
out when I get my day off for it. Knocking
boots instead of clocking in increases employee product productivity, according
to a new data on the benefits of taking sex
days off from the job. Did you see that Super
Bowl commercial?
Speaker 2 (32:23):
Yes that mayonnaise one now, yes.
Speaker 3 (32:25):
Now mayonnaise, which I thought to myself.
Speaker 2 (32:28):
You could have picked a different product, different.
Speaker 3 (32:30):
Product, right, Yeah? Like you know, really, man, let's see
new search research from zip Health found that most employees
who've taken a sex day off from work experience a
boost in their productivity upon returning to the daily grind.
You know, I just during the during the I won't
(32:53):
tell you details about it, but during the break, I
just got my finalized cop track with the changes I'd requested.
Speaker 2 (33:02):
So we're stuck with you.
Speaker 3 (33:03):
You're stuck with me for a long time, a long time.
But now I'm thinking about what if it's too late
to withdraw my approval of the final draft and include
some sex days off?
Speaker 2 (33:16):
Well, that would have to mean that Tamora would want
to have sex with you.
Speaker 3 (33:20):
Well, who was talking about Tamra I mean, you know,
and who's talking about? Who was talking about a human being?
Speaker 5 (33:30):
Oh? Come on.
Speaker 3 (33:36):
Instead of raising chickens, I'm thinking about raising sheep or goats.
With younger generations leading the way in tech, healthcare, and finance,
companies embracing the trend, the future of workplace wellness might
be the more dynamic thing of the year. Sex day
off
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
24/7 News: The Latest
Today’s Latest News In 4 Minutes. Updated Hourly.