3-17-25 - 7am - Misled About Covid and French Want The Statue of Liberty Back

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Michael.

Speaker 2 (00:00):
This is at Guber seven three nine six of Louisville, Kentucky.

Speaker 3 (00:03):
Back about five six years ago, when I moved from
Boulder County out here to Louisville, Kentucky, my insurance rates doubled,
and then I had to do one of those bundle
and safe things and just stick it all together.

Speaker 1 (00:14):
Like a sandwich.

Speaker 2 (00:19):
I had to.

Speaker 1 (00:19):
Stick them all together like a sandwich.

Speaker 2 (00:22):
Your rates doubled in Kentucky. I still love that. I
think I do. No here it is is Kentucky on here. Uh,
Kentucky's not in the top ten. Kentucky's not in the
bottom ten. Huh. All right, Well, I don't know. I
got a text from the boss.

Speaker 1 (00:42):
No the text or the email.

Speaker 2 (00:44):
No, I got a text from the boss.

Speaker 1 (00:47):
Oh you're in trouble.

Speaker 2 (00:50):
She says. The BASS. I mentioned this childcare thing. Didn't
know what it is. Yeah, somebody called BASS, she says.
BASS is a before and after school care program for
parents who work late or have to go in really early.

Speaker 4 (01:03):
So it's not for somebody like me who had a
you know, a kid at sixteen in high school.

Speaker 1 (01:08):
So it's not like you know, you're what.

Speaker 2 (01:11):
We call so ol.

Speaker 1 (01:12):
Yeah, yeah, you.

Speaker 2 (01:16):
Know, I've pretty much been sol our entire lives.

Speaker 1 (01:19):
It's day one.

Speaker 2 (01:20):
It's day one. The New York Times had a had
an opinion piece that you know, I really despise not
per well, maybe sometimes personally, but I really despise the
liberal mindset because it's and look, I think I have

(01:43):
a fairly good balance of uh intellect and emotions. I
think that I'm a fairly dragon well like IQ versus
EQ intellectual your intelligence quot and your emotional quotient. You

(02:04):
need to be balanced in both of those.

Speaker 1 (02:06):
So they're both pretty damn low.

Speaker 2 (02:08):
Well, I said they're balanced. I didn't say they're high.
I said they're balanced, So they're pretty equal. But no,
I did not say it was high, nor did I
say it was low.

Speaker 1 (02:21):
Get me there, mister lawyer.

Speaker 2 (02:22):
All right, all right, thank you. Anyway, So I just
tend to think that the liberal mindset is so emotion
based that they can't logically think. They put an They
set aside rationality and logic to do everything emotional. Because

(02:43):
that's the thing about liberal policies, socialist policies, It's all
about what makes us feel good, right, Oh, it makes
us happy, makes us feel like we're doing. Mark Kelly,
selling a stupid Tesla to go after Elon Musk is
a solely emotional thing to do, because if you were

(03:06):
if you if you stop and think about all of
the factors that go in to the manufacturing of a
Tesla versus a so called American made car, which they're
not really American made cars. You think about the economic
impact or that stupid decision. You think about the fact
that Elon Musk has already gotten your money from your

(03:28):
original purchase of your Tesla's that when you trade it
in that doesn't affect him at all other than I
said it might affect It might it might lower the
price of used Teslas because now there's many more of
them for sales. So I just don't get that. There's
no logic in it. But yet how many people watch

(03:52):
that TikTok of Mark Kelly and thought to themselves, Oh,
my gosh, he's so brave, he's so good about think
about what he's doing. It's it's absolutely wonderful what he did.

Speaker 5 (04:07):
All right here I am with my new ride s
Tahoe here in Washington.

Speaker 4 (04:14):
Du say got one of those in Tucson as Wow,
this one was moved by Union Raider United Island Workers.
He said he also has one in Tucson, so he
has two guess guzzling Chevy Tahoes.

Speaker 2 (04:32):
Which is a point that I failed to make in
the first use of this SoundBite is think about how
willing they're there to abandon their whole thing about evs
are going to save the planet. And instead he didn't
buy just like a little tiny Kia they get, you know,

(04:53):
I don't know thirty or forty miles in the yelling,
he bought a big ass Chevy Tahoe Afford Focus. It's
a very tiny right, and so now he's going to
pollute the planet. And Mark Kelly's going to kill all
of us because he gave up his.

Speaker 1 (05:07):
ZV bought two Chevy toes.

Speaker 2 (05:10):
Two United Island Workers in Arlington, Texas.

Speaker 1 (05:14):
I was good to buy Union of.

Speaker 2 (05:16):
Cars, incredibly reliable and I'm looking at color to drive
him floor. All right, I'm sorry. He also points out
that how incredibly reliable they are. Yes, uh, most internal
combustion engines are incredibly reliable and looking you can get
you very efficiently from point A to point B. But anyway, they.

Speaker 4 (05:38):
Enough brand new cars tend to last a few years anyway,
So yeah.

Speaker 2 (05:44):
Yeah, anyway, the Chevy Tahoe does not qualify for the
Maiden America label under the American labeling that. But I
just point out that, I just want to make sure
that you understand that the whole point I'm trying to
make here is that it's all emotion based. Well, yesterday

(06:04):
the New York Times had an opinion piece that is headlined,
we were badly misled about the event that changed our lives.
It's written by Zenapechi, you know Dragon Redbeard Michael Brown.
I mean, you don't get much simpler than that, Zinapi.

(06:25):
She's an opinion columnist. She writes, since scientists began playing
around with dangerous pathogens and laboratories, the world has experienced
four or five pandemics. Now is she trying to say
in that sentence that scientists that are playing around with
dangerous pathogens and labs that they're the cause of four

(06:47):
or five pandemics, because she starts at her entire opinion
piece with this bull crap that somehow, Now, look, do
I think that COVID was caused by scientists playing around
orthogens in a lab? Absolutely? I do. But if you
had said that, you know, five years ago, you were

(07:07):
a conspiracy theorists, and you were going to get deplatformed,
maybe even debanked. She talks about the nineteen seventy seven
Russian flu, which was almost certainly sparked by a research mishap.
Some Western scientists, she writes, quickly suspected the odd virus
had resided in a lab freezer for a couple of decades,

(07:28):
but they kept mostly quiet for fear of rustling, ruffling feathers. Yet,
she says, in twenty twenty, when people started speculating that
a lab accident might have been the spark that started
the COVID nineteen pandemic, they were treated like cooks and cranks.
Many public health officials and prominent scientists dismissed the idea
as a conspiracy theory, insisting that the virus had emerged

(07:51):
from animals in a seafood market in Wuhan, China. And then,
when a nonprofit called Eco Health Alliance lost to grant
because it was planning to con risk your research back
into bat viruses with the Wuhon Institute of Virology, Research
that have conducted with lack of safety standards could have
resulted in a dangerous pathogen leaking out into the world.

(08:12):
No fewer than seventy seven Nobel laureates and thirty one
scientific societies lined up to defend the organization. And when
I read that sentence, I thought, oh, so, now we'll
get to her conclusion in a minute. I want you
to They focus on the lead up to her conclusion.

(08:35):
She's saying that seventy seven Nobel laureates thirty one scientific
societies lined up to defend the organization. Didn't we have
the same thing, the same a parallel, an analogy, a
similarity with fifty one members of the Intel community telling

(08:59):
us that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. So
if she reaches a conclusion in a minute, why can't
we have the same conclusion about the laptop, even though
they continue to deny that the laptop.

Speaker 1 (09:19):
Is really his.

Speaker 2 (09:21):
She said, so the Wuhan research was totally safe, and
the pandemic was definitely caused by natural transmission. It certainly
seemed like a consensus. But then she goes on to
say this We have since learned, however, that to promote
the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hit or
understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter orchestrated campaigns

(09:45):
of supposedly independent voices and even compared notes about how
to hide their communications in order to keep the public
from hearing the whole story. And as for that Wuhan
Labs research, the details that have since emerged show that
safety precautions might have been terrifyingly lax. I am so

(10:07):
outraged that The New York Times would, on the anniversary
of the COVID pandemic, come out and say, oh, you
know what, we were badly misled about the event that
changed our lives, when they were the ones that were
the very people participating in misleading us about it. This

(10:32):
is nothing but this blatant attempt by the cabal to
now somehow do a maya culpa in hopes that the
other members of the cabal will join in in this
maya culpa, and you and I will just fall prey
to it and say, well, at least now they recognize
it and so everything's okay. I will never forgive them.

(10:55):
And here's why, because what were they since doing by
denying at the time that oh, well, we got all
these Nobel laureates, we have all these scientists telling us
that we need to believe this, and all of you
people that believe something else, well, you're conspiracy nuts, you're crazy,

(11:17):
you're you're just a bunch of idiots that don't know
what you're talking about. And we at the New York
Times know precisely what we're talking about. They did two
unfathomable and unforgivable things. They destroyed or continued the destruction

(11:37):
of free speech in this country. They completely demolished the
idea that if I've got a different opinion, you don't
deplatform me, you don't call me a conspiracy theorist. You
debate me if you think that what I'm saying about.
I believe that COVID nineteen was produced in war On,

(12:01):
and I believe was probably purposely let go because it
allowed for what could have been, and to some degree
was what they were attempting to accomplish, the great reset.
But we wouldn't let them do it. The other thing

(12:24):
that they destroyed, which to me, is just as important
as free speech, as they destroyed the scientific method. They
completely demolished the idea that wait a minute, these other
scientists over here are telling us that whether it was ivermectin,
it was high doses of vitamin D whatever. The alternative

(12:46):
treatments were No, no, no, you can't do that because we
as the as the Cabal, have decided that you can't
do except the prescribed remedies that we tell you to use.
Well is the New York Times? Do they have a
medical degree? And even if they have a medical degree,

(13:09):
you know, I use several doctors. They don't always agree,
and so they they debate among themselves through me about
what I ought to be doing. Have you ever, for example,
you know, I go back to when I when I
had my second retina surgery on my left eye. I

(13:30):
sincerely believe that the the because it was an emergency
surgery and the doctor on call that weekend was an oncologist.
He was a he was an eye oncologist, a retina oncologist,
so his specialty was treating cancers of the eye. So

(13:51):
obviously you have to be a surgeon. So he generally
knew what he was doing, but that wasn't necessarily his expertise,
and so then when the heat wasn't taking place like
it was supposed to, he called in the guy that
normally would have done the surgery, and he goes, oh, yeah,
you need to do x y Z, and they did
x y Z, but it never recovered the way it

(14:12):
should have if they had done that in the first place. Now,
I personally don't think it was malpractice, but because the
risk was there, and I'm certainly not going to assue
these doctors anyway, but I do think that I to
this day suffer from reduced vision in that eye because
it was an oncologist versus another doctor that would have

(14:34):
done it in a different way. And so they you know,
they debate. They should have debated at the time, but
they didn't do it. But now you kind of get
the idea that during COVID the doctors could not even
debate different approaches, and those who did got vilified. They

(14:57):
in some places, like in Texas, of all places, in
Texas to Texas State Medical Board actually took licenses away
for daring to look at alternative treatments.

Speaker 1 (15:07):
That didn't cruise.

Speaker 4 (15:08):
Have a whole meeting with five or six doctors, and
they posted it up on YouTube somewhere, and then they
got the platform and got that platform.

Speaker 2 (15:15):
Yeah, yeah, but you got to take it away because
we can't allow people to see alternatives. You can't see
an alternative universe, she says, five years after the onset
of the COVID pandemic, it's tempting to think of all
that as agent history. We learned our lessons about lab
safety and about the need to be straight with the public,

(15:38):
and now we can move on to new crises like
measles in the evolving bird flu. Right wrong, she says.
If anyone needs convincing that the next pandemic is only
an accident, away, check out our recent paper and sell
of prestigious scientific journal researchers, many of whom work or
have worked at the Wuhan Institute. Yeah, the same place,

(16:00):
describe taking samples of viruses found in bats bats yep,
same animal, and experimenting to see if they could infect
human sales impose a pandemic risk. Huh doesn't that sound
like exactly what happened more than five years ago that

(16:21):
resulted in the pandemic that we had five years ago?

Speaker 1 (16:24):
You're talking crazy talk, I, you know, am.

Speaker 2 (16:29):
I just misreading everything? She says. You would think by
now we'd have learned it's not a good idea to
test possible gas leaks by lighting a match, And you'd
hope that prestigious scientific journals would have learned not to
reward such risky research. Now you may be thinking at

(16:50):
this stage that, well, Michael, why are you dissing on
this woman? Why because she's kind of admitting that. In fact,
she says in the very next paragraph, why haven't we
learned our lesson? Because this is the same efing newspaper
that crammed down our throat how bad we were for

(17:10):
thinking something differently. And now what are they trying to do.
They're trying to cover up what they were doing five
years ago. Peven going on to talk about ego health.
It is not unbelievable to me. It is disgusting to

(17:31):
me that the cabal can never ever do anything but
admit that. No, we were always right, and we'll be
right next time. Just continue to trust it. Yeah, I'm
not going to do anything. Good morning, Mike Dragon.

Speaker 3 (17:49):
Hey, so this year I have paid just almost six
hundred dollars for my twenty two I on five. But
also thank that guy for buying those because that means
Chevy still had to buy more oxygen offsets, those CO
two offsets.

Speaker 2 (18:04):
Sorry. Yeah, so, hey guys, have a great day.

Speaker 1 (18:09):
Let's keep the market rolling.

Speaker 2 (18:14):
I'm just I just find it freaking hilarious that the
very people that try to lecture us about economics and
about how we don't need to worry about this waste,
fraud and abuse are out going after Elon Musk that
they're proving to it. The bottom line, the Democrats have

(18:35):
proven to you that this whole You know, one time,
this is this is way back in the eighties. I
was giving a political speech and I my father in
law happened to be in the audience, and I don't
remember exactly what the phrase was, but I said, it

(18:58):
is it's something to the effect that my firm belief
that Congress is corrupt. And I used the word corrupt.
And when I finished, and we were all going back
to the hotel or wherever we were going, he had

(19:18):
haltingly and hesitatingly said, I think that was a little
too strong. Now. You gotta remember he was kind of
to the right of Attila the Hunt, and he believed
that Congress indeed was corrupt. But this is back in
the nineteen eighties, and he really thought that that was
maybe for a public speech, maybe that was a little

(19:41):
too much. Oh my god, if you can hear me now.
But then also if he saw what was going on
now because he cursed like a sailor. I mean, he's
a wonderful man. I loved him to death, but I
can never bring him into this studio and turn a
microphone on and asking well, what do you think about

(20:01):
what Musk is doing? What do you think about this money?
What do you think about that money? It would be
g d as word everything you could possibly imagine, b
as about.

Speaker 1 (20:14):
I'd have a heart attack.

Speaker 2 (20:16):
Absolutely. Dragon would be back there because I think the
dub button after like two or three punches is it
too then you got to it's god, you have to
wait for it to reset. So we would be Dragon
would be turning microphones off as fast as he could.
It's it's strange, not strange. It's interesting how we go

(20:37):
from oh, let's be a little careful when I thought
to myself, well, I can imagine what you would say
and think. Think about it today. So speaking of socialists,
Ralph Bluxman, who's a member of France's left wing Place
Publique party, he's now demanding that we return the statue

(20:59):
of Limbert statue limitations that we returned the statue of Liberty.
He gave a speech yesterday, in which he demands that
the United States returned the Statue of Liberty. I feel
like we're entering into an era of at the same
time that I think we're entering into an era where

(21:20):
free speech is back, where we're no longer deplatforming people. Oh,
I guess I've got a sweating story for you in
a minute. But where people are starting to realize that
the Constitution really does mean things. Now. I know there
are those on the left like this goofball from France,
the things that we're destroying our constitution. Well, who are

(21:42):
you to lecture us about our constitution when you live
in a socialist republic? Sit down and shut up now.
The demand stems from his criticism of our approach toward
ending the conflict between Ukraine and Russia. He's a firm
supporter of you. Well, so a lot of people who

(22:02):
still support the ending of the war between Russia and
Ukraine are supporters of Ukraine. He addressed the issue during
a party convention, return the Statue of Liberty and assisted.
This is as reported by Agents Front's press. He contends

(22:22):
that we have strayed from the value symbolized by the statue,
which was gifted to us by France back in eighteen
eighty four. I think celebrating Franco American relations and quite frankly,
let's be honest, the French, the French were absolutely critical
in US winning the revolution. He criticized Trump's domestic and

(22:45):
international policies, which include withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accords,
which Trump achieved through executive orders almost immediately upon assuming office.
He points to Trump's alliance with Elon muh Us and
why is he going after Elon Musk because he's apparently

(23:06):
reducing commitments to health in climate research. He said, in part,
we gave it the statue of liberty to use a gift,
but apparently you despise it. So it will be just
fine here at home. I'm in time to say, okay,

(23:26):
let's you know, if you want it. It's kind of
like our friend in South Dakota. Uh, no charge to come,
and he'll come and pick up your tesla if you
want to give it to him. There's no pick up
charge or anything else. He'll just come and get it. Well,
we ought to say to the French, you know what
you know where it is? Uh, Well, we'll cordon off
an area We'll give you enough room so that ships

(23:49):
can maneuver around and you can you can take it back.
I think it'd be Look, I don't want to see
it happen. But on the other hand, if that's how
you feel, come and get it.

Speaker 4 (24:02):
I might also point out really quickly that France has
a smaller copy of.

Speaker 2 (24:08):
The Oh that's right, I forgot. They do have it.

Speaker 1 (24:10):
They already have one.

Speaker 2 (24:11):
Yeah, yeah, but but this is this is the one.

Speaker 4 (24:15):
Oh sure, ye when you think you don't think about
the one in you know, Vegas, you don't think about that.

Speaker 2 (24:20):
But you know, if I always thought the one in
Vegas kind of personified or kind of exemplifies how this
country really does look at I mean, everything's commercialized, right,
So we're gonna take the Statue of Liberty. Why don't
we take the Washington Monument. But let's have a Washington
Monument on the Vegas stretch.

Speaker 4 (24:39):
Vegas already has the Pyramids, they already have a Lifel Tower.

Speaker 1 (24:42):
Why not let's have.

Speaker 2 (24:44):
The Lincoln Memorial. Hey, what do you do in Vegas?
I stayed in the Lincoln Memorial. Why not have a
fake White house with you know, with a Lincoln bedroom.
Come on, it'd be great. Hey, we had sex in
the Lincoln bedroom. We have a big origin this lincol bedroom.
October twenty eight, eighteen eighty six, was when the statue

(25:04):
was revealed, and it was supposed to symbolize the enduring
friendship between the two nations and our shared values of
freedom and democracy. That's under got a bunch of restorations,
notably from nineteen eighty four to nineteen eighty sixt year
was in all that, in all the scaffolding and everything
to address structural issues and try to preserve its iconic appearance.

Speaker 4 (25:27):
Well, I also think it's a little footbuney that the
French didn't want it returned in the nineteen forties. Yeah,
I wonder why.

Speaker 2 (25:39):
Because maybe it was that we were defending them so
that they could go ahead and abandon all of their
principles of free markets and a republican form of government
instead turned themselves into a social welfare state. And while
they saw that, around the corner, we were like, why

(26:01):
don't we create this alliance called NATO and we'll protect
and defend you so you don't have to spend money
on defense, so you can go engage in your social experiment.

Speaker 4 (26:11):
What kind of person asks for a gift back? Have
you ever asked for a gift to be returned to you?

Speaker 1 (26:19):
Ever?

Speaker 2 (26:20):
I never have my entire life, and I can only
think of one instance in which that might be possible,
and that would be if I accidentally gave you something
that I might think to myself, what was I thinking? Yeah?
I might want that back. Now, I'm being very honest,
I'd be tempted to maybe not just let them come
and get it, but maybe send it back. You know why,

(26:41):
because I think the Statue of Liberty is pretty cool.
But they have so misinterpreted the poem that it's been
used as an excuse for all the mass migration and
the illegal immigration, whatever you want to describe it as
for decades. Now we can build our own new Golden

(27:05):
Age statue to replace her. But if if Lady Liberty
has returned to France, so should every French person in
this country return, And the French should relinquish everything American
on their shores too. No more defense sharing, no more

(27:26):
intelligent sharing, no more American investment, no more American jobs.
You can have your proxy statue, just take it and
move on, and there you go. Theah didn't time this
very well. But let me guess here's where I want
to go next, and this will lead over into the

(27:48):
next hour, I'm sure. But an Obama era appointed judge
in the DC Circuit yesterday or maybe this Saturday, ye
I forget a Saturday evening, Friday evening or Saturday evening,
I forget which it was issued a restraining order. Now,
these judges and their damn restraining orders are getting out

(28:10):
of control. If you've not seen the videos of ICE
and CBP and members of the US military taking members
of trend of Arragua and other domestic terrorists, shaving their heads,

(28:32):
putting them on planes and sending them to Guatemala. Yes,
sending them to a prison in Guatemala. We're deporting people,
were deporting gang members, and an Obama era of pointee
tried to issue a restraining order demanding that Trump not

(28:57):
just let me say this clearly, training order prohibiting Trump
from exercising his authority under several acts from deporting criminal
aliens out of this country. The details next.

Speaker 1 (29:15):
Just curious technical question.

Speaker 5 (29:17):
Does France have an ass because if it does, I
think we should return the statue and shove.

Speaker 2 (29:22):
It up in there good and tight.

Speaker 5 (29:23):
Oh and if it's preloaded with a dozen nukes using
proximity triggers which detect wine and cheese and the lack
of deodorant, well that would be okay, too.

Speaker 4 (29:33):
Over out, Well, somebody's upset.

Speaker 2 (29:40):
If there were ever an opportunity for somebody to give
a speech or just a short comment and start World
War three between US and a former ally, that would
be it right there. I mean that detects wine and
cheese and body odor. And does France have an ass

(30:01):
Do we.

Speaker 1 (30:04):
Get Boulder? Yeah, there's you know, we would probably be Colorado's.

Speaker 4 (30:09):
I mean, there are probably others in the United States
may may suit a better purpose.

Speaker 2 (30:13):
But if you hear of Colorado, yeah yeah, well no,
you know what, I disagree because Boulder, if if you
just look at Boulder superficially, Boulder is actually beautiful. Like
if you get on top of Davidson Hill and you
look out across the fat flat irons in the city
and the mountains and the you know, the Indian peaks

(30:33):
behind it, it's actually quite beautiful. It's only when you
get into Boulder you realize that it's an.

Speaker 1 (30:39):
Able when you meet the people, right.

Speaker 2 (30:41):
Yeah, then you realize now. Denver, on the other hand,
not only is, but it looks like an ass. See,
so I think it's Denver. Yeah, I think it's Denver. Now,
if you were looking for a beautiful ass, you can
go to Aspen because all the beautiful people of course, right,

(31:03):
So it's a beautiful ass. So tell us what you
think in Colorado? Is the ass of Colorado? All right?
Or tell us what the ass is of I can't
believe we're discussing this, but that's you know. I sometimes
I get.

Speaker 1 (31:22):
Work third floor topic, not only as a third.

Speaker 2 (31:24):
Floor topic, but oftentimes I worry like talkbacks like that
kind of reflect the host yep and that kind of
like when I hear it, I'm thinking they actually felt
comfortable leaving that talk about because they knew that I
would probably chase something like that.

Speaker 4 (31:43):
Huh you damn your died laughing over there. Your face
was bright red. It was great.

Speaker 2 (31:48):
I thought it was wonderful. That was wonderful. So anyway,
let me get started on this and we'll continue it
after the break. But this this Obama are appointed judge
for issued a restraining order demanding that trend of the
rod with members that are subject to Trump's deportation plan
actually be returned to this country. Now, it may be

(32:13):
in some ways a small victory for those that are
defending deportees. Deportees now think about that, for example, the
American Civil Civil Liberties Union. These are people that if
they had come to this, if they had gone to
an I don't know if do we have an embassy
in Venezuela still Caracas and I need to check that

(32:35):
or something. Somebody check for that. Let me know if
we still have an active embassy in Venezuela. But if
these people in particular had gone to the embassy in
Venezuela and had sat down with an immigration officer and
asked for a visa to come to this country, they
would have turned them down and said, no, you're not
going to the United States. We don't care what you

(32:56):
what your plans are. So they have no right to
be here anyway. But take it one step further. These
are criminals. These are people that are engaged in sex trafficking,
human trafficking, child trafficking, They're engaged in extortion. You saw
what they did to the tenants over here in the
apartment buildings in Aurora. Oh I'm sorry, that was part

(33:19):
of our imagination. We didn't even know that was going on.
There are people that support, literally support keeping those people
in this country. Consider that this country is at war
for its soul and it's between those who who take Look.

(33:42):
You won't find a stronger stauncher supporter of the US
Constitution than Michael Brown. Somebody said, what was the Somebody
asked on ex over the weekend, what's the greatest thing
America has ever invented other than something material? And somebody
wrote the Constitution. I We posted that that's the greatest
invention to mankind is the US Constitution.