5-22-24 - 9am - Deadly Force and Gaza Aid

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
I'm a little bit confused now thatwe have it confirmed that the coronavirus came
out of a lab in Wuhan,China, where the US government helped to
fund the gain of function research.But now we're hearing that there's bats in
Colorado with rabies. Are we okayto eat bat soup again? Oh?

(00:23):
I'm asking for a friend. Yeah. Yeah. In fact, I was
thinking about going to Chinatown and well, actually it's Vietnamese town, I think
in Colorado over your own Federal Boulevard, Federal and like Alameda somewhere, and
I was gonna have I was gonnahave batwe ton soup today. You want
to join me dragon love to Yeah, yeah, you're buying, huh.

(00:45):
As long as you're buying, Yeah, you would actually go to lunch with
me, as long as I wasbuying. Yeah yeah, and as long
as missus Redbeer was accompany, yes, so that she and I could carry
on a conversation and you and Iwouldn't have to have any any inn action
at all. That sounds pretty good, except when the check arrives, you
just hand the check to me.Yeah, you know, that's what he
did last time. The check arrivesand rather than you know, look at

(01:08):
it and like, you know,like even pretend he was gonna be He
just handed it to me like oneof this is where you like fake reach.
And that's right, the fake reachlike oh here, or you pull
your credit card out and you kindof wave your credit card like here,
and and now the other person feelsall begain. Oh no, no,

(01:30):
no, it's okay. If youhad waved your credit card, I would
have grabbed it and stuck it inthere with mine and made you pay for
half. If missus Redbeard raided herraised wave her credit card, no,
no, there's no way I'm gonnahave you paid for lunch. You owe
the other hand, different story.Uh. There was an exhibit filed yesterday

(01:56):
by Trump in his motion to suppressevidence that was seized during that what was
it February of well, sometimes no, summer twenty twenty two. I think
it was the rate at Marlago.I am. I am absolutely shocked by

(02:21):
this. You may have already heardabout it, but you haven't heard why
I'm shocked about it. The FBI, in their search warrant and in their
order to the agents about what theywere searching for, authorized the use of

(02:44):
deadly force and to even engage theSecret Service if necessary. Holy crap,
Batman. Now see has been runningon a chiron Or story off and on
all morning about how Judge Eileen Cannonis considering dismissing the document's case. Now,

(03:13):
I don't know if this is oneof the reasons why or not,
but let's focus on the deadly useof force. And in August third,
twenty two operations order for the searchwarrant. By the way, the whole
operation was called Plasmic Echo. Thatwas the code word, the code name

(03:36):
for the FBI's investigation into Trump's allegedI got to kept all these qualifiers in
mishandling of national defense information. TheFBI furnished instructions on how to proceed with

(03:57):
this raid. Quote FBI Washington FieldOffice and FBI Miami agents and the Evidence
Response Team will effect a search ofdesignated locations within mar A Lago and mar
A Logo then becomes an acronym mLto locate and seize classified information national defense

(04:20):
in the I information and US governmentrecords as described in the Captain Search warrant.
Now a little perspective. Twenty fiveagents for Washington FBI agents, one
unidentified individual from headquarters, one attorneyfrom the Department of Justice, and the

(04:44):
assistant US Attorney from the Southern Districtof Florida. That's who showed up for
the raid. Now, according tothe operations Order, law enforcement apparently was
not preparing for a routine search forpresidential papers. One section of the plan
described how agents should handle the potentialfor use of deadly force. I'm going

(05:14):
to tell you what it says,but I want to add a caveat to
it first. This may give youa him about where I'm going. The
policy statement of use of deadly forceis dated July nineteenth, twenty twenty,
two weeks before the actual raid occurred. Now it's important to note that it's

(05:41):
weeks before the actual raid occurred.Based on my research and show prep yesterday,
this policy statement seems to be aboiler plate policy statement for use of
deadly force at any time that deadlyforce is authorized in a raid, going

(06:03):
back almost or almost a two decades, a quarter of a century, going
back to at least two thousand bestI can tell. So this is a
standard policy statement. Was this standardpolicy statement that was inserted into the operational

(06:27):
orders? Several weeks before the raidactually occurred. Now let me just tell
you generally what it says deadly force. Let's see law enforcement officers. The
DOJ may use deadly force only whennecessary. That is, when the officer
has a reasonable belief that the subjectof such force this is so funny,

(06:51):
and not when the subject of suchforce poses an imminent danger of death or
serious physical injury to the officer orto another person. Deadly force may not
be used solely to prevent the escapeof a fleeing suspect. Firearms may not

(07:11):
be fired solely to disable moving vehicles, and there's details about that if feasible
and if to do so would notincrease the danger to the officer or others.
A verbal warming to submit to theauthority of the officer shall be given
prior to the use of deadly force. Warning shots are not permitted outside of
the prison context. See how thisis standard prison context e officers will be

(07:40):
trained in alternate methods and tactics.Blah blah blah. Deadly force should not
be used against persons whose actions area threat solely to themselves or to the
property, unless that person poses animminent danger of death, officeris to the
officers of anybody in proximity. Officersshould seek to gain voluntary compliance before you
using deadly force. Three officers mustprevent or stop, as appropriate another officer

(08:07):
from engaging in an unlawful use ofdeadly force that might violate DOJ policy.
And number four officers must request andor render medical aid as appropriate. Now,
the FBI, in addition to thatstandard, but I would what I
consider to be a standard use ofdeadly force policy adding some contingencies. Agents

(08:35):
were prepared to go door to doorto terrorize the guests at mar A Lago
if the staff refused to turn overroom keys. Imagine that you are staying
at mar A Lago. And nowI don't know how the FBI would effectuate

(08:58):
this, but do they think thatclassified documents were hidden in guest rooms so
they were ordered to Well, letme just say this. Here are the
contingencies is outlined by the DOJ.Should media be president mar A Lago,
all personnel will refer to their mediaperson number two. Should the former president

(09:26):
arrive at mar Algo, the FBIand all of their officers, all their
special teams will be prepared to engagewith f Potus, former President of the
United States, and United States SecretService security Team. Sorry, but it's

(09:52):
just this is so surreal and absurd. Number three. Should the Secret Service
provide resistance or interfere with the FBItimeline or accesses, the FBI will engage
with and then it's predacted and willengage with the Secret Services persons or point

(10:13):
of contact per existing liaison relationships.Number four. Should Marlogo guest reception be
unwilling to provide a list of occupiedguest rooms, the FBI search team will
knock on each guest room to determineoccupation status. FBI will request a map,

(10:33):
list of rooms and a skeleton keycard for all rooms from the Marlgos
staff. An FBI locked picking equipmentperson will be unseen, and there's all
sorts of stuff about standard issue weaponsmL blah blah blah blah. Now,

(10:54):
the FBI team included a medic totend to anyone that might be injured during
the raid, and the operations orderidentified a nearby trauma center with directions on
how to get there. Then therewere additional exhibits in the unsealed motion that

(11:16):
indicate the agents ransacked the bedrooms ofMilania Trump and Baron Trump. Let me
tell you why this is so bizarreand why I think the media is missing
so much of this story. Andthat goes back to my point that my

(11:43):
research shows that this is standard operatingprocedure for the execution of a search warrant.
But here's what's not standard. First, this was drafted, cut and

(12:07):
pace put together however you want todescribe it. The execution of the warrant,
the procedures, the policies, theuse of forced policies, all were
put together weeks before the rate actuallyoccurred. I have questions. Yes,

(12:28):
this is all standard operating procedure.However, this may come as a shock
to you, but I don't finda execution of a search warrant on a
former president of the United States ofAmerica's home to be standard by any stretch

(12:48):
of the imagination. I don't carewho the current president is, I don't
care who the current Attorney General is, Democrat or Republican. If you're going
to execute a search warrant on ahome of a former president of the United
States of America, that is anythingbut standard operating procedure. Therefore, knowing

(13:16):
how government works, somebody should havegone to I don't care. The Attorney
General, White House Counsel could havegone to. I don't know, the
deputy US Attorney General could have goneto whoever the person is that's the that

(13:37):
is the career civil servant that dealswith search warrants and say, oh,
here, uh, look here,here, here's the uh, here's the
documentation for a raid that we're goingto do at mar A Lago. And
in case you have to be acomplete effing idiot, mar Alago is the
home of the former President the UnitedStates of America, Donald Trump. And

(13:58):
there are things in this stand underoperating procedure that I think you want to
look at, and I think youwant to consider, and I think you
might want to take out of here, because I don't really think that I
want to execute a search warrant wherethey're going to be armed agents of the
United States Secret Service whose only jobis to protect the life of the President

(14:22):
of the United States of America firstand foremost, and then second his family,
the former first Lady and by theway, their son Baron, who
lives at Marlago. I don't thinkwe want our agents to engage in a
gun battle with them. Which theywill do. If we walk in and
we point a gun at either themor the president or his family, they're

(14:48):
going to open fire on us.Did nobody stop and think about that?
Or even worse, did they stopand think about that? Person said,
yeah, leave it in there.Okay, if we're going to leave it
in there, maybe we ought togo talk to the Attorney general about this.

(15:11):
Now it gets really weird because that'swhat should have happened. If that
happened, I don't care if thecurrent president was a Republican or a Democrat,
meaning I don't care whether the currentAttorney General happened to be a Republican
appointee or a Democrat appointee. Thatshould have been removed from the memo and

(15:37):
the operational guidelines. If it wasn't, that means that the Attorney General allowed
that to happen, or the FBIand the director of the FBI knew full
well that they had authorized the useof deadly force. Again, a person

(16:00):
who happened to be a former presidentprotected by guys with automatic weapons who,
at the moment you make a threateningmove to that person are going to step
in and stop you with deadly forceif necessary. Thus, you end up
with a gun battle at mar ALago, and you know who I think
wins that gun battle, the SecretService. This is utterly, utterly out

(16:29):
of control, and it shows corruptionwithin the FBI and the Department of Justice,
and or it shows incompetence within theFBI and the Department of Justice.
Who and you know what. Havingdealt with the Secret Service, having been

(16:52):
in that bubble, I don't thinkI want to be an FBI agent that
is going to, under any circumstances, pull a weapon anywhere near a president
or a former president. This isnot the first time the Democratic Party planned
the assassination of a US president.Has happened at least once and possibly twice

(17:18):
Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. There's a strategist in DC by the
name of Bruce Melman, and he'sdone some analysis about you know, Dragon
and I laughed about Maybe you didn't, but Dragon and I did, about
the generational difference between his generation thatwatched The Princess Bride and my generation,

(17:45):
which generally speaking probably did not.But these differences I think are worth noting
and thinking about. There's a there'sa striking array of topics for which there
is a striking difference in an opinion, and mostly centers around values. Members

(18:14):
of gen Z are less than halfas likely than baby boomers to say that
patriotism, belief in God, oreven having children are very important. Actually,
patriotism is important to and those areages eighteen to twenty six, as

(18:37):
opposed to baby boomers fifty nine toseventy seven. Patriotism for gen Z thirty
two percent baby boomers, seventy sixpercent, belief in God or religion twenty
six percent for gen Z, andsixty five percent for baby boomers. Having
children. Now, I would saythese numbers might be skeered a little bit

(18:59):
because severe a baby boomer, probablythe last thing you're thinking about is having
another kid. Speaking for myself,but having children was important only to twenty
three percent of gen Z, asopposed to fifty two percent of baby boomers.
And when it comes to believing thatAmerica that the United States of America

(19:21):
has the highest standard of living andis the best place in the world to
live, sixty six percent of babyboomers agree with that, and only a
third of gen Z's Let's go toeconomics, Americans ages eighteen to twenty nine

(19:44):
were more likely to say they havea positive impression of socialism forty four percent,
as opposed to capitalism only forty percent, just twenty eight eight percent of
seniors. Although I would say,really twenty eight percent of seniors viewed socialism

(20:10):
favorably. I guess so because whenI think about my generation is also a
bunch of hippies. Now, thenmay be so. But here is where
it gets very interesting. In termsof retail politics, Millennials and members of
Gen Z are twice as likely toconsider themselves as independent as the oldest generation

(20:32):
of Americans twenty six percent. Melmanwrites over on Substack. And he told
Axios that younger voters are just shunningthe two tiered I'm sorry, the two
tired parties, not the two tieredparties, the two tired parties. Actually,

(20:53):
I might be in that younger groupbecause while I believe in the two
party system and that we need theseparties in order to have the infrastructure to
run, as opposed to delving intojust a free for all democracy. Yeah,
and then he gets to the MiddleEast Americans, and you wonder why

(21:18):
this is going on in college campuses, And you also wonder why, and
maybe you don't wonder why, butI think it's I think it's evidence that
the indoctrination by my generation, byour generation, the indoctrination of younger people
about how bad America is and howPalestinians so called Palestinians are somehow tread upon

(21:41):
Americans under thirty or twice as likelyto sympathize with Palestinians then the US population
as a whole. So when Melmawas talking to Axios, he said this,
I got I got the idea forthis, for this generation gap when
reading a Washington Post story showing thefavorite music genres by generation that I ended

(22:03):
up not even using. But Ithink it's pretty insightful. There's a whole
group of people over our shoulders thatdon't believe at all like we do.
Some of them may be your children, some of them may be your grandchildren,

(22:25):
and it maybe time you actually havea conversation with them about what they
believe or don't believe, or outthey're being taught or not taught speaking to
Palestinians. Our savings, what savings, you might ask, are not worth.

(22:48):
Our savings are just worth, notworth what they used to be.
Because the Democrats have been throwing awaymoney faster than they can confiscate it through
taxation, which is why we borrowsome much money. One example of the
waste that's driving inflation dragging. Doyou how much we spend on that pier?

(23:08):
Did you have those? Don't?Do you know? Oh? You
got it? I got it.Okay, lay it on me. Three
hundred twenty million dollars. Oh isthat too bad? Just a drop in
the bucket. That's more than aquarter of a billion dollars. To use
your phrase, it hurts when yousay it that way. Yeah, when

(23:30):
I say it that way. Andthen it's like, oh, this pier
that was built off the edge ofthe God in the Mediterranean, off the
edge of the Gaza strip, itwas built for a mass In my opinion,
it was built for a moss,as if to reward them for all
the horrors of ten to seven andlike everything else that this administration throws money

(23:56):
at. The project's not going verywell. How could you say that?
Do you do you have any evidenceto back that up? Well? As
a matter of fact, I happento have a little bit of evidence here.
If a large cargo ship has fivethousand tons of food and medical supplies
to be offloaded, and if eachtruck can hold two and a half tons
of cargo, it will take twothousand trucks to take the cargo from one

(24:21):
ship. Two thousand trucks to offloadone ship driving one eight hundred feet on
a causeway that will be dangerously affectedby tides, winds, and waves might
be a recipe for disaster, exceptthat close to three fourths according to my

(24:41):
report, because you got me duringthe break going down a rabbit hole,
close to three forces of the humanitarianaid transported from a new from that three
hundred and twenty whatever it was milliondollars floating pier built by our military off
the coast of Gaza, was stolenon Saturday en route to a UN warehouse.

(25:03):
According to Reiters, Hamas has beenstealing up to sixty percent of the
aid entering the Gaza Strip. AChannel twelve report last week revealed that the
terrorist organization has made at least fivehundred million dollars in profit off humanitarian aid
since the start of the war inOctober seventh. Now you said you saw

(25:26):
a report that none has gotten toThis person said, none of the aid
has gotten to the Palestinian people.So between your story and my story,
I would say I probably believe thatto be true. So we are,
in essence, feeding the moss,feeding all of their soldiers, all the

(25:48):
what is it two battalions for Iforget, you know, two or four
battalions that are still hiding in thetunnels down in the Raffian and we're feeding
them. And not only are wefeeding them, but the excess aid that's
not being consumed by them is beingsold for a profit. And they have

(26:10):
made what was the number, fivehundred million dollars, five hundred million dollars
from the EID. So congratulations tous for once again proving that we don't
know that we don't know what we'redoing. We talked earlier about Bobby Kennedy.
Bobby Kennedy's back in the news speakingof money, because it's not just

(26:33):
the government that wants to spend money, but candidates that want to spend money.
I don't know that. I don'tknow. Look, I know what
the attraction to Bobby Kennedy is BobbyKennedy Junior. I mean, his name
obviously probably one hundred percent name recognitionfor all I know, and he's young,

(26:57):
always not that young, and he'sdifferent. He's there, he's not
those two guys, and so everybodylooks at him as an alternative until you
pull back the curtain. In arecent episode of his podcast featuring John Boyd
Junior, the founder of the NationalBlack Farmers Association, Bobby Kennedy Junior vowed

(27:21):
promised to get black farmers five billiondollars in reparations if he wins the twenty
twenty four presidential election. Huh,where's that going to come from? And
and by the way, black farmers, Uh, what about Asian farmers?
What about Hispanic farmers? What aboutwhite farmers? What about dumb farmers?

(27:45):
What about smart farmers? What aboutjust farmers in general? Let's just yeah,
you know, just in fact,let's just have farmers quit farming and
just pay him not farm Oh wekind of do that, don't we.
Now? According to the Democrat brandof Marxism, other people's property belongs to

(28:07):
those of a preferred pigmentation, youknow, because of racism, nour discrimination.
You might as well vote for PatriceKulurs. Remember hers he's the founder
of Black Lives Matter. But it'snot just Bobby Kennedy Jr. Interestingly,
his proposal are You Ready was actuallypart of Biden's America Rescue plan. It

(28:30):
was part of the COVID nineteen STEMSpackage only because a court struck down as
unconstitutional when white farmers pushed back andsaid, what's this all about. But
then again, as we know earlierin the program, Biden's been proving,
Eh, who cares what the courtsays. They tell us it's unconstitutional to

(28:55):
forces to pay off billions of dollarsof people students loans. Who cares about
that? But Bobby Kennedy Junior,He's got more. He also promises increased
access to investment capital for a robust, self sustaining black business infrastructure, along
with low interest micro loans to investin approved business plans with flexible repayment loans.

(29:18):
Me, you probably will have tobe it back. He also vowed
to push to make student debt dischargeablein bankruptcy and move to cancel student debt.
Promises to expand reintroduction to the communityfor non violent offenders. Oh man,
this just pass out the money andlet's just let the criminals right back
into society. Know, not nobig deal here. I would make some

(29:41):
really awful comment about I'm wonder Iwon't make an awful comments. He ll
us ask you a question for aguy whose namesake was assassinated, his father,
by the way, was assassinated ashe was campaigning for a president,
and by the way, his unclewas assassinated as he was in essence campaign

(30:07):
for re election. Why would JoeBiden deny Secret Service protection? I happened
to see us who oversees the UnitedStates Secret Service, which I think was
a huge mistake DHS was created.Being asked by Neil Kvoodl, why did
you deny Bobby Kennedy Junior Secret Serviceprotection when his family has a history of

(30:30):
political assassinations? Because we did,ah, because we have security protocol,
we have what was it, Wehave security and a security analysis that was
done, and we have certain metricsby which we measure whether someone should get
protection. And the memo that Igot said that he did not deserve it,

(30:52):
so I refused it. Man.Not only is it break time,
it's time for these people to go. Hey, Mike, just have to
let you know that you got mein trouble yesterday and now I got to
go spend money because the wife cameby Walls listen to the program, heard
you talking about Ted's Montana Grill.She looked it up and Oliver herd was

(31:15):
bison. Bison. By now I'mobligated this weekend take my wife to Ted's
Montana Grill because she's looking forward toeither a Beisenberger or some bison stakes.
Thanks again, Cupcake. Later,anything I can do to help you know,
I am the Doctor Ruth of radio, just here to help your relationships.

(31:38):
You know, Rocky Mountain Men's ClinnyTed's Montana Grill. Who knows,
maybe when you get home, maybeyou can have a little romp in the
sack. Speaking of Ted's Montana Grill, I want to clear something up.
Uh. I understand that it's thateverybody thinks that it's owned by Ted Turner.

(32:02):
It is not. Now I maycurrently be wrong about this, but
the last I looked this up,Ted Turner loaned his name to the guy
that was the restaurant tour that startedthe place. So I don't know anything
about the restaurant tour himself. Butyeah, Ted Turner's a whack job.

(32:29):
Colonel Ted Turner, I mean god, he must be one hundred and twelve
years old, and you never hearfrom him anymore, so you'll enjoy Ted's
Montana grill. In a new study, those who went who underwent sex change
surgery transman, trans woman, transwhatever, were twelve times more likely to

(32:52):
commit suicide than those who did not. Data from fifty six different health organizations
in the United States and studied ninetymillion patients, four different groups, different
age categories, specifically those who hadgender affirming surgery between the ages of eighteen

(33:12):
and sixty, and in those cohorts, they were twelve times more likely to
commit suicide than those who did not. Now, I don't think any reasonable
people would be surprised by those results. Having your body this figure, I
mean truly this figure. Well,we ran some numbers, what was it

(33:34):
a few months back that even theprisoners of war and the Holocaust camps had
a smaller percentage than trans people.Yeah, and then you think about just
the number of trans Now, sotwelve percent more likely to commit suicide.
But we're making such this, Wehave capitulated to such a tiny fraction of

(33:59):
the entire population, all out ofpolitical correctness. It's utter insanity. But
you know, regardless of this data, the wicked lie that sexually mutilating children
protects them from suicide. That's whatthe liberal that's what the medical establishment pushes,

(34:23):
and it's absolutely incorrect. But thebig lie and the many big lies, just continues