Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Mike, climate change is just a talking point for stupid
people to sound smart. Hmmm, climate change is just a
talking point to make stupid people seem smart. But they
don't seem smart. They may maybe they think they sound smart,
(00:24):
but I don't think they sound smart at all. So
back to the back to BEAD good greet the bad
program now single the broadband Equity Access and Deployment program
headed up by the current Democrat nominee to be the
next President of the United States of America, Kamala Harris.
(00:50):
Not one person, not one family, not one single barn, house, outhouse, garage, nothing,
not even a dumbass cows had a broadband ethernet cable
hooked up to it, but don't know. A bunch of
(01:13):
major broadband program executives wrote what they called an emergency
letter I like the fact they call it an emergency
letter to the Biden administration just last week, asserting that
the BEADS program rates are quote completely unmoored from the
economic realities of deploying and operating networks in the highest cost,
(01:36):
hardest reach areas that BEAD funding is precisely designed to reach.
Oh they sound a little ticked off. Let's see It
is with both a sense of alarm and urgency that
we write to alert you to the reality that growing
(01:57):
numbers of the hundreds of local and regional rural band
providers that we represent are increasingly concerned about their ability
to participate in the BAD program, which your agency administers.
Without significant and immediate changes of approach toward its implementation,
we are concerned the program will fail to advance our
(02:19):
collective goal of connectivity.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
For all in America.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
We and our members sincerely want this program to work,
but we believe that your agency's administration of the low
cost service option requirement in particular, risks putting the overall
success of BAD in jeopardy. And this is signed by
oh gosh, let's see one, two, three, four, five, six,
seventy nine, ten, twenty or thirty different telecom providers all
(02:46):
around the country. This is pretty important what they write.
Allowing and in fact mandating unrealistically low rates can undermine
our share goal of providing affordable broadband to those who
need it most by making participation economically infeasible for rural
(03:07):
broadband providers. Well, of course, if the government gets in
and the government sets price controls and those prices. You're
it's not feasible for you, even with the government subsidy,
to come in and provide that service to a rural
area simply not going to work. And by the way,
(03:28):
I still go back to you know, I've actually considered accept.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
I can actually.
Speaker 1 (03:35):
Get the fiber optic broadband at the undisclosed location, at
higher speeds and at more reliability than I can starlink.
And I need that because when I'm broadcasting from the
undisclosed location, I need to make sure that the packets
(03:57):
that go back and forth, the data packets that go
back and forth, that those are uninterrupted, so that when
you hear me, if you listen to me on the weekend,
for example, and I'm doing the program for the undisclosed location,
it sounds exactly like I'm in a studio, and I
do need high speed broad band to make that work properly.
Now we have modern equipment. We have these access units
(04:18):
that we can use. In fact, I own one that
is that is able to take even just regular Internet
and do whatever kind of magic the apparatus does to
make sure those packets go back and forth properly. And
I even use that on top of the high speed
(04:39):
gig the fiber optic that I have at the underslosed location.
So I've actually looked into starlink because I thought, well,
maybe I can get it cheaper because starlink you can
turn on and off as you need. Whereas the broad
band that I have the unders undisclosed location, I pay
for it every month, whether I'm there or not. But
(05:01):
I'm willing to do that because of the reliability. So
Vice President Harris for her role as the broad bands
are now nobody named her that, but that's what her
job is. She's continued this campaign for more Internet related
(05:22):
project funding. We wait, what, you haven't hooked up a
damn one and you're already asking for more money. But
now she's doing it from a completely different rhetorical angle.
Last month, she declared that Republics in Congress have quote
refused to help us. Why because they gave you, what
(05:46):
was it, forty some billion dollars and you haven't connected
one person. You give one hundred million dollars to Colorado,
they haven't connected one person yet, so you're doling out
the money. Nobody's being connected. Most of the ISP's and
the broad band providers are saying we cannot do it
at the rates that you want us to charge, and
for the amount of money you're subsidizing, we just can't.
(06:06):
We just simply cannot afford to do it. And yet
you can't do it on your own either. But now
she's going back asking for more money, and now she's
blaming Republicans in Congress for refusing to help us with
their plans to deliver all this internet access. But nowhere
does she mention the forty two billion plus B program
(06:29):
that she taluted as a grant for a digital equity
plan and a state digital equity capacity grant program.
Speaker 2 (06:37):
If they want more money.
Speaker 1 (06:41):
This is exactly how this woman will govern too. Remember
when it comes to liberalism or Marxism, it's not about results.
It's not about actually accomplishing anything. It's about the talking points.
How do you feel, well, we have a digital equity plan.
Speaker 2 (07:07):
You know what?
Speaker 1 (07:08):
I guess when I think about equity and the definition
of equity, I have a simple question. I haven't talked
about this till just now. If this plan works and
they start providing broadband internet access at reduced government subsidized
rates to rural people, if it's supposed to be equitable
(07:32):
then why can't I in my Highlands ranch home? Why
can't I get a high speed broadband internet access at
a subsidized rate that's subsidized by you, the taxpayers? I
want you to subsidize my broadband Internet. Did I pay
(07:53):
out the wall zoo to Comcast that for I don't know.
The reliability for the past few months has been pretty
s word, it's been pretty ethy, if you know what
I mean. So, instead of helping to build out US
broadband capacity and access, Kamala Harris has seemingly has pivoted
(08:15):
her portfolio to actually just allocating dollars to subsidizing already
existing broadband infrastructure and then using a DEI hierarchy to
determine funding mechanisms. Think about that. Now we're coming up.
We're ten days away from August eleven. August eleven will
(08:38):
mark one thousand days since the Biden administration and their
broadbands are Kamala Harris got funding for the bad program
one thousand days and what do they have to show
for it? Well, I go back again to my point
about results don't matter.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
What happened when? What happened when.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
Colorado got their one hundred million dollars Jared Polus went
to the airwaves touting, Oh my gosh, look how great
this infrastructure plan is. Colorado got one hundred million dollars.
So Colorado taxpayers got one hundred million dollars of their
tax dollars and one hundred million dollars whatever the ratio
(09:24):
is of their national debt back to them to provide
people in rural areas. Now, I'm really curious, what's a
rural area. Have you been to Albert County recently? Have
you been to eastern Douglas County?
Speaker 2 (09:43):
Is that still rural? Just asking for a friend or
asking you have a friend who lives in eastern Elbert County?
Is it really still rural?
Speaker 1 (09:54):
And by the way, you know who I'm like. You know,
if you're listening, you know who I'm talking. I'm talking
about you. Are you going to take subsidized broadband internet?
Speaker 2 (10:04):
Are you?
Speaker 1 (10:06):
Mister who could afford it? The broadbands are hasn't done
squat and we shouldn't be surprised at all. No Segway's
best segue. I've had this story in my pos for
quite a while and it goes back to uh, Laura Marshon,
(10:28):
Oh you don't know who Laura Marshon is. She's the
owner of something called Authentic Campaigns. Her daddy is Judge
One Mershon. Oh yeah, he presided over the New York
trial Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
Remember that guy.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
Well, guess what Democrats have paid the company owned by
the politically active daughter of compromise Judge One Mershon at
least twelve and a half million dollars in the first
half of this year federal election reports. You can go
check it out yourself. Show that Authentic Campaigns is the
consulting firm owned by Lauren Marshawn raked in that windfall
(11:10):
between January first and July first of this year. Now,
her father is the judge that provides over District Attorney
Albin Brigge's case against Donald Trump and New York City. Now,
let's think about this sum twelve point seven million dollars.
That is an eighty six percent increase in receipts from
(11:32):
the same time period two years ago. Gi So the
daughter of the judge who has been overruling just about
everything that the Trump camp or the Trump legal team
has tried to accomplish in that criminal trial. He's ruled
(11:53):
against them and has obviously tilted the scales of justice
in favor of the DA that dirt back Alvin Bragg,
and in that in that same time period she has
seen an eighty six percent increase in receipts from the
Democrats over the same time period from two years ago.
(12:19):
Democratic elected officials, candidates, and packs reported six point eight
million dollars in payments to Mershawn between January and July
twenty twenty two, the last general election cycle. Now, according
to her website, they specialize in digital marketing and fundraising.
(12:42):
Isn't it curious that the boom in her business coincided
with Trump's six week trial in her daddy's Manhattan court room,
which began back on April fifteen. Now, prior to start
of the trial, Mershawn repeatedly sided with Bragg, while at
the same time demonstrating open hostility to the former president.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
He's remember, he's the guy.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
That imposed the gag order early on and then proceeded
to deny nearly nearly every single defense motion. Two weeks
into the trial, he actually held Trump in contempt of court.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
For violating the gag order.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
Now, I don't think my personal legal opinion is that
Mershon should never have been near that case, but he
thwarted every single legal attempt to get him removed. Then,
last year, amid details of Loura Mershawn's financial ties to
top Democrats, including Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, and including
(13:39):
the judge himself making small donations to Democrats, Trump asked
formally legally for Mershawn to step aside, quoting your honor,
Your Honor's daughter's close connection to President Trump's political adversaries,
and her work at and financial interest in a firm
which is deeply in grain with democratic politics raises real
(14:02):
and legitimate concerns about this Court's impartiality. The financial wellbeing
of Your Honor's daughter depends, at least in part on
the success of Authentic her firm. An Authentic's business model
is one that requires it to attack President Trump and
to support individuals and causes that are in direct competition
(14:25):
with President Trump. That was the motion to recuse himself,
or the application for his recusal. He denied that request,
accusations his daughter stood to profit off the case, He
said with speculative and hypothetical huh, Well, guess what now,
(14:48):
we got the receipts, and it turns out that Indeed,
the accusations of his daughter's standing to profit off his
case proved to be true. Color me not shocked. Once again,
this Colombian born judge Juan Mershon was wrong, absolutely wrong,
(15:12):
and some of Donald Trump's biggest foes are on her
growing client list. Adam Shifty Shift, his campaign has paid
Mershon's firm about eight million dollars so far this year.
The Trump Russia colosion collusion Hoachster currently is running against
(15:37):
Steve Garvey, the Major League baseball player, both running to
replace Diane Feinstein in the US Senate. Now, that's arguably
Mershon's most lucrative client dating back to the very start
of authentic campaigns back in twenty nineteen. During his role,
remember he was one of the impeachment prosecute against Trump
(16:00):
in twenty nineteen. Shift paymer Shawn's firm four million dollars
during that time period for digital consulting and various services.
A conflict of interest absolutely in my opinion. Yeah, his sentencing.
Trump sentencing was originally scheduled for this month, but he
(16:21):
postponed it until September because of the Supreme Courts. Really
a presidential immunity. Maybe he'll see the light, but I
doubt it, Michael.
Speaker 3 (16:30):
The main question is when you have your broadband and
the undisposed location is house the porn. I'm sure you
didn't do it just so you could do your weekend shows.
Oh my, didn so you can have pawn in your
undisposed location.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
Oh yeah, maybe it's yeah, the porn. The porn at
a full gigabyte of speed is fantastic. You are sick here.
You're one sick individual, you know, and you're jealous. You're
(17:11):
also jealous. Here's the headline over Reuters. The author is
Cathol Kelly. Dateline, Paris, France. The Paris Olympics are the
greenest games ever.
Speaker 2 (17:29):
And none of the athletes like it.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
That's a glorious headline and you really must go look
it up and read it. Among other bits of mindless hilarity,
miss Kelly details all the ways that the same Paris
Olympics and all those officials who brought you the demonic
assault on Christianity on the opening ceremonies have now attempted
(17:55):
to turn these protein hungry athletes into unwilling vegans in
a climate alarm driven mind control experiment. I guess on
par with some sort of mk Ultra program run by
the CIA from back in the nineteen fifties through maybe
even today. Maybe this is a part of an mk
Ultra secret ops going on in Paris right now.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
This is a wonderful gem. Now.
Speaker 1 (18:22):
I know this will come as a shock to a
lot of you, but the athletes are actually in full
revolt over the prospect of I didn't know this, but
they don't have any meat or eggs to eat.
Speaker 2 (18:34):
Now who could have seen? Who could have seen?
Speaker 1 (18:36):
Athletes that consume tens of thousands of galleries trying to
get ready for their events and you can't have any
meat or eggs. Check out this excerpt from the story.
Listen to this part. Paris's quote food vision for competitors
included quote two times more plant based food than previous
(19:02):
Olympic Games.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
Now all the food is.
Speaker 1 (19:05):
Sourced in France, which France, if you've ever been to France,
is a gastronomical wonderland.
Speaker 2 (19:12):
Oh my gosh, it is so good.
Speaker 1 (19:16):
Now, I'm not really a connoisseur of French food, but
when you are in France, you don't have to go
to the fancy schmancy restaurants to get really wonderful food,
but one of it is certified solely from France and
nobody likes it. The story continues, there are not enough
(19:38):
of certain foods, eggs, chickens, certain carbohydrates, according to Britain's
team CEO and the Anson told The London Times. Now
the competitors can complain directly via TikTok. Paris is now
scrambling to solve the problem, promising an additional seven hundred
(19:58):
kilograms of eggs and a ton of meat. Now I
know what seven hundred kilograms is, and I know what
a ton is, but what I don't know is this.
There are ten thousand people in the Olympic village, and
I imagine that their metabolisms run hotter than a jet engine.
(20:21):
According to the story, Now, a ton of meat, what's
that gonna last? Seven hundred kilograms of eggs, what's that
gonna last?
Speaker 2 (20:31):
I have no idea you have.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
This reminds me of remember when Michelle Obama had that
vision of what a healthy school lunch for American kids
looked would look like. And there was that photo if
I remember the photo right, there was it was. It
was a styrofoam tray. You can't have to day, But
I think it was a styrofoam tray, and there was
some sort of soup like liquid. There was a carton, obviously,
(20:56):
the carton of milk you gotta have that, And there
was some sort of vegetable on it, and the other
two things. I have no clue what the other things were.
That was the Michelle lunch. Who could imagine an Olympic
gymnast or a marathon runner who, either of whom might
(21:19):
burn seven to ten thousand calories every single day, rebell
at getting something like a Michelle Obama healthy school lunch.
Speaker 2 (21:28):
I guess what. There's more, the lack of.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Efficient air conditioning for their rooms is also causing probably
a little more than just heartburn among world class athletes.
Remember earlier when we were talking about the things about
fossil fuels that we need to keep in balance and
that fossil fuels are actually great in helping us control
(21:52):
the climate. Well, that's another kind of a fancy schmancy
lawyer way of saying that fossil fuels help.
Speaker 2 (21:59):
Us keep our air conditioning on well.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
As part of their stupid green virtue signaling in the Olympics,
both the Paris Organizing Group and the Ilec. They wanted
the athletes to feel great about relying on Paris's geothermal
cooling system that doesn't produce any greenhouse gas emissions. Now
(22:25):
do you think they really care about that. I'm sure
there are some athletes that, oh, this is wonderful until
they realize, Oh, it's hotter in hell in these rooms,
and it's pretty muggy and humid too.
Speaker 2 (22:38):
You see.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
The problem is that green geothermal cooling system doesn't actually
work as they advertise, which, of course just places it
on part of pretty much every stupid green energy solution
that we get offered by the world's green grifters that
want us to do all this change, not so much
because they want to save the planet, but because they
(22:59):
want to make a bowl the money off. Here's another
excerpt from the story. The other big complaint is the heat.
None of the rooms in the athlete's village are air conditioned.
Some countries, such as Canada, brought their own air conditioning.
Those who did not are now getting advice instead of
(23:20):
relief from organizers. We'll just drink lots of water and
keep the windows open. Keep the windows open, do the
big wigs at Paris twenty This is still from the story.
I can't believe waiters put the story yup, keep the
windows open.
Speaker 2 (23:34):
Do the big wigs at.
Speaker 1 (23:35):
Paris twenty twenty four live with Santa at the North Pole?
Have they only ever read about how heat waves work?
Paris twenty twenty four's explanation for all this is that
they have tried to balance a long term objective to
create a model sustainable neighborhood with the short term objective
(23:57):
of torturing their invited guests. They put it exactly like that.
But that's the untorud version. End of excerpt.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
I love it.
Speaker 1 (24:10):
I mean, I'm yeah, I kind of am laughing at
the athletes. That's to be you, doesn't it. Maybe you
and your country should have demanded something better before you
went over there, But oh nobody. Oh you know, we
want to comply with all the green energy stuff. We
want to be well, you want to be a mission
for you too. Now, this excerpt from the story has
(24:35):
to be probably the most hilarious one. Every time you
open the app that tells you how to take a
game's bus to a venue, it advises you how much
carbon you would save if you walked footnote here, that's
like when I book a flight on the United Airlines,
(24:55):
and it tells me what the carbon emissions are, and
then if I want to pay extra, I can offset
those carbon emissions, which of course I do every single time,
because I look at the airfare and I think, well,
that's pretty ridiculously high. Why can't I pay some more
to offset my carbon emissions? Because I don't give a
(25:15):
rats ask, that's why. And I'm more concerned about how
much money I can keep in my pocket. So when
I get from point A, Denver to whatever point B
might be, I've got some extra money to oh, I
don't know, maybe buy dinner in Paris.
Speaker 2 (25:30):
The story continues.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
The author writes, for instance, if I hoofed it from
the place to La Concorde on Tuesday, when the sun
was twenty feet overhead and the real field was pressing
at forty degrees centigrade, oh my god, that's actually pretty
damn hot, I could have saved the planet three hundred
and seventy two grams of carbon, not tons grams. Additionally,
(25:57):
she writes, because I would have died along the way,
I would have also offered up a nutrient rich man
sized blob to feed mother Gaia am I angry that
they won't just hand me a bottle of water at
any of the venues, but instead insist on pouring it
into a plastic cup that has a two yuro deposit. First, no,
(26:23):
does it make sense that in order to save.
Speaker 2 (26:25):
The earth from the.
Speaker 1 (26:27):
Scourge of plastic you have now used two plastic containers
to distribute one plastic container's worth of liquid? Also, no,
but I must stop. This amount of fuming produces unlevel,
unusual levels of CO two. Truly, I mean, if these
(26:49):
people did not already exist, not nobody in the right
mind could ever dream of trying to make that crap up.
You ought to go read the full piece. It's a
great inglorious way to start to day. Kudos to the
virtual signaling editors at Reuters to allow an actual piece
of truth about the utter absurdity of the global Church
(27:11):
of Climate change, the Church of the climate activists, to
actually put that on their website.
Speaker 2 (27:17):
That's all. I'll be right back, Michael. They've got the
wrong person in charge. You need to replace Kamala Harris
with Pete Budajich. Look what a great job he did
with all the ev charging stations two in a row.
Speaker 1 (27:31):
So what do you do? Who do all of you
think will be her VP choice? Budhajig, Josh Shapiro from Pennsylvania, JB. Pritzker,
Mark Kelly from Arizona.
Speaker 2 (27:47):
Who's it going to be?
Speaker 1 (27:50):
I wanted to be Budhajig, I mean he fits on
think about it, white guy, gay, a little shorter than her,
so he won't above her like Mark Kelly will. She
can't pick Josh Shapiro because then he's Jewish and she's
married to a Jew, and so now all of her
(28:12):
pro Palestinian friends will be really pissed off because we
got too many Jews controlling things.
Speaker 4 (28:17):
I do personally think whomever it is, yes, he will
be shorter than her, because you can't have a man
and a woman standing next to each other and it's
still gonna look bad if a man is taller and
she's the one in charge. I don't think that that
look will sell very well. So he needs to be
shorter than her.
Speaker 1 (28:36):
So I forget what the occasion was, but I get
a call from Tepper who says, hey, Mandy and Ross
are doing something. They'd like to talk to you about.
Whatever the deal was, maybe it was a selection to Jdvans,
I forget, but they asked me who I thought the
potential nominees were for Kamala Harris, and I mentioned Mark
(28:57):
Kelly's name, and I said to Ross and Mandy, I
don't think it'll be Mark Kelly because when you look
at him, he's too big stout. He's like, you know,
six ' three or something, in weighs two uter and
eighty pounds and it's all muscle, and he's got that
big bald head that you know, and it's a.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Giant head like mine and yours.
Speaker 1 (29:16):
And I said, and she's not gonna want that in
side by side photos and what's her name, Randy McDonald
or whatever the woman's name is over there on that
station said I can't believe you're that shallow, Michael Brown,
and I said, I'm just being realistic. I understand how
politics work.
Speaker 4 (29:35):
It just doesn't look right.
Speaker 1 (29:37):
It doesn't look right. And I'm telling you when they
when politicians get together, those things are important.
Speaker 4 (29:45):
It could work if she was a very strong, very
powerful woman, but we haven't seen that from.
Speaker 2 (29:52):
Her, and you're not going to see that from her.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
That's why I think Pete Bodajig is the perfect selection,
white guy shorter kind of a Now don't read anything
into this, but you know many people would say, well,
he's got kind of a cute little face, and he's gay.
I mean, you got you got the whole package right there.
And he's married and has kids married to a guy.
(30:17):
So think about if you want.
Speaker 2 (30:19):
A dei uh team.
Speaker 1 (30:24):
And you want to try to play to every little
identitical politics vertical out there, it's got to be Pete
Budhajig plus the name Harris Budajig, Harris Kelly. And that
sounds good, but it just doesn't work. Hella U Harris Shapiro.
I mean, this sounds like a law firm Harris Shapiro
(30:44):
or Harror Shapiro Industries.
Speaker 2 (30:45):
Now that doesn't work. Harris Kelly, Harris Harris Kelly.
Speaker 1 (30:52):
Just yeah, no, no, no, So yeah, I think it's
h I think it's Pete Budajig. Actually, to be honest,
I hope it's peak in the t
Mike, climate change is just a talking point for stupid
people to sound smart. Hmmm, climate change is just a
talking point to make stupid people seem smart. But they
don't seem smart. They may maybe they think they sound smart,
(00:24):
but I don't think they sound smart at all. So
back to the back to BEAD good greet the bad
program now single the broadband Equity Access and Deployment program
headed up by the current Democrat nominee to be the
next President of the United States of America, Kamala Harris.
(00:50):
Not one person, not one family, not one single barn, house, outhouse, garage, nothing,
not even a dumbass cows had a broadband ethernet cable
hooked up to it, but don't know. A bunch of
(01:13):
major broadband program executives wrote what they called an emergency
letter I like the fact they call it an emergency
letter to the Biden administration just last week, asserting that
the BEADS program rates are quote completely unmoored from the
economic realities of deploying and operating networks in the highest cost,
(01:36):
hardest reach areas that BEAD funding is precisely designed to reach.
Oh they sound a little ticked off. Let's see It
is with both a sense of alarm and urgency that
we write to alert you to the reality that growing
(01:57):
numbers of the hundreds of local and regional rural band
providers that we represent are increasingly concerned about their ability
to participate in the BAD program, which your agency administers.
Without significant and immediate changes of approach toward its implementation,
we are concerned the program will fail to advance our
(02:19):
collective goal of connectivity.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
For all in America.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
We and our members sincerely want this program to work,
but we believe that your agency's administration of the low
cost service option requirement in particular, risks putting the overall
success of BAD in jeopardy. And this is signed by
oh gosh, let's see one, two, three, four, five, six,
seventy nine, ten, twenty or thirty different telecom providers all
(02:46):
around the country. This is pretty important what they write.
Allowing and in fact mandating unrealistically low rates can undermine
our share goal of providing affordable broadband to those who
need it most by making participation economically infeasible for rural
(03:07):
broadband providers. Well, of course, if the government gets in
and the government sets price controls and those prices. You're
it's not feasible for you, even with the government subsidy,
to come in and provide that service to a rural
area simply not going to work. And by the way,
(03:28):
I still go back to you know, I've actually considered accept.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
I can actually.
Speaker 1 (03:35):
Get the fiber optic broadband at the undisclosed location, at
higher speeds and at more reliability than I can starlink.
And I need that because when I'm broadcasting from the
undisclosed location, I need to make sure that the packets
(03:57):
that go back and forth, the data packets that go
back and forth, that those are uninterrupted, so that when
you hear me, if you listen to me on the weekend,
for example, and I'm doing the program for the undisclosed location,
it sounds exactly like I'm in a studio, and I
do need high speed broad band to make that work properly.
Now we have modern equipment. We have these access units
(04:18):
that we can use. In fact, I own one that
is that is able to take even just regular Internet
and do whatever kind of magic the apparatus does to
make sure those packets go back and forth properly. And
I even use that on top of the high speed
(04:39):
gig the fiber optic that I have at the underslosed location.
So I've actually looked into starlink because I thought, well,
maybe I can get it cheaper because starlink you can
turn on and off as you need. Whereas the broad
band that I have the unders undisclosed location, I pay
for it every month, whether I'm there or not. But
(05:01):
I'm willing to do that because of the reliability. So
Vice President Harris for her role as the broad bands
are now nobody named her that, but that's what her
job is. She's continued this campaign for more Internet related
(05:22):
project funding. We wait, what, you haven't hooked up a
damn one and you're already asking for more money. But
now she's doing it from a completely different rhetorical angle.
Last month, she declared that Republics in Congress have quote
refused to help us. Why because they gave you, what
(05:46):
was it, forty some billion dollars and you haven't connected
one person. You give one hundred million dollars to Colorado,
they haven't connected one person yet, so you're doling out
the money. Nobody's being connected. Most of the ISP's and
the broad band providers are saying we cannot do it
at the rates that you want us to charge, and
for the amount of money you're subsidizing, we just can't.
(06:06):
We just simply cannot afford to do it. And yet
you can't do it on your own either. But now
she's going back asking for more money, and now she's
blaming Republicans in Congress for refusing to help us with
their plans to deliver all this internet access. But nowhere
does she mention the forty two billion plus B program
(06:29):
that she taluted as a grant for a digital equity
plan and a state digital equity capacity grant program.
Speaker 2 (06:37):
If they want more money.
Speaker 1 (06:41):
This is exactly how this woman will govern too. Remember
when it comes to liberalism or Marxism, it's not about results.
It's not about actually accomplishing anything. It's about the talking points.
How do you feel, well, we have a digital equity plan.
Speaker 2 (07:07):
You know what?
Speaker 1 (07:08):
I guess when I think about equity and the definition
of equity, I have a simple question. I haven't talked
about this till just now. If this plan works and
they start providing broadband internet access at reduced government subsidized
rates to rural people, if it's supposed to be equitable
(07:32):
then why can't I in my Highlands ranch home? Why
can't I get a high speed broadband internet access at
a subsidized rate that's subsidized by you, the taxpayers? I
want you to subsidize my broadband Internet. Did I pay
(07:53):
out the wall zoo to Comcast that for I don't know.
The reliability for the past few months has been pretty
s word, it's been pretty ethy, if you know what
I mean. So, instead of helping to build out US
broadband capacity and access, Kamala Harris has seemingly has pivoted
(08:15):
her portfolio to actually just allocating dollars to subsidizing already
existing broadband infrastructure and then using a DEI hierarchy to
determine funding mechanisms. Think about that. Now we're coming up.
We're ten days away from August eleven. August eleven will
(08:38):
mark one thousand days since the Biden administration and their
broadbands are Kamala Harris got funding for the bad program
one thousand days and what do they have to show
for it? Well, I go back again to my point
about results don't matter.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
What happened when? What happened when.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
Colorado got their one hundred million dollars Jared Polus went
to the airwaves touting, Oh my gosh, look how great
this infrastructure plan is. Colorado got one hundred million dollars.
So Colorado taxpayers got one hundred million dollars of their
tax dollars and one hundred million dollars whatever the ratio
(09:24):
is of their national debt back to them to provide
people in rural areas. Now, I'm really curious, what's a
rural area. Have you been to Albert County recently? Have
you been to eastern Douglas County?
Speaker 2 (09:43):
Is that still rural? Just asking for a friend or
asking you have a friend who lives in eastern Elbert County?
Is it really still rural?
Speaker 1 (09:54):
And by the way, you know who I'm like. You know,
if you're listening, you know who I'm talking. I'm talking
about you. Are you going to take subsidized broadband internet?
Speaker 2 (10:04):
Are you?
Speaker 1 (10:06):
Mister who could afford it? The broadbands are hasn't done
squat and we shouldn't be surprised at all. No Segway's
best segue. I've had this story in my pos for
quite a while and it goes back to uh, Laura Marshon,
(10:28):
Oh you don't know who Laura Marshon is. She's the
owner of something called Authentic Campaigns. Her daddy is Judge
One Mershon. Oh yeah, he presided over the New York
trial Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
Remember that guy.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
Well, guess what Democrats have paid the company owned by
the politically active daughter of compromise Judge One Mershon at
least twelve and a half million dollars in the first
half of this year federal election reports. You can go
check it out yourself. Show that Authentic Campaigns is the
consulting firm owned by Lauren Marshawn raked in that windfall
(11:10):
between January first and July first of this year. Now,
her father is the judge that provides over District Attorney
Albin Brigge's case against Donald Trump and New York City. Now,
let's think about this sum twelve point seven million dollars.
That is an eighty six percent increase in receipts from
(11:32):
the same time period two years ago. Gi So the
daughter of the judge who has been overruling just about
everything that the Trump camp or the Trump legal team
has tried to accomplish in that criminal trial. He's ruled
(11:53):
against them and has obviously tilted the scales of justice
in favor of the DA that dirt back Alvin Bragg,
and in that in that same time period she has
seen an eighty six percent increase in receipts from the
Democrats over the same time period from two years ago.
(12:19):
Democratic elected officials, candidates, and packs reported six point eight
million dollars in payments to Mershawn between January and July
twenty twenty two, the last general election cycle. Now, according
to her website, they specialize in digital marketing and fundraising.
(12:42):
Isn't it curious that the boom in her business coincided
with Trump's six week trial in her daddy's Manhattan court room,
which began back on April fifteen. Now, prior to start
of the trial, Mershawn repeatedly sided with Bragg, while at
the same time demonstrating open hostility to the former president.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
He's remember, he's the guy.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
That imposed the gag order early on and then proceeded
to deny nearly nearly every single defense motion. Two weeks
into the trial, he actually held Trump in contempt of court.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
For violating the gag order.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
Now, I don't think my personal legal opinion is that
Mershon should never have been near that case, but he
thwarted every single legal attempt to get him removed. Then,
last year, amid details of Loura Mershawn's financial ties to
top Democrats, including Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, and including
(13:39):
the judge himself making small donations to Democrats, Trump asked
formally legally for Mershawn to step aside, quoting your honor,
Your Honor's daughter's close connection to President Trump's political adversaries,
and her work at and financial interest in a firm
which is deeply in grain with democratic politics raises real
(14:02):
and legitimate concerns about this Court's impartiality. The financial wellbeing
of Your Honor's daughter depends, at least in part on
the success of Authentic her firm. An Authentic's business model
is one that requires it to attack President Trump and
to support individuals and causes that are in direct competition
(14:25):
with President Trump. That was the motion to recuse himself,
or the application for his recusal. He denied that request,
accusations his daughter stood to profit off the case, He
said with speculative and hypothetical huh, Well, guess what now,
(14:48):
we got the receipts, and it turns out that Indeed,
the accusations of his daughter's standing to profit off his
case proved to be true. Color me not shocked. Once again,
this Colombian born judge Juan Mershon was wrong, absolutely wrong,
(15:12):
and some of Donald Trump's biggest foes are on her
growing client list. Adam Shifty Shift, his campaign has paid
Mershon's firm about eight million dollars so far this year.
The Trump Russia colosion collusion Hoachster currently is running against
(15:37):
Steve Garvey, the Major League baseball player, both running to
replace Diane Feinstein in the US Senate. Now, that's arguably
Mershon's most lucrative client dating back to the very start
of authentic campaigns back in twenty nineteen. During his role,
remember he was one of the impeachment prosecute against Trump
(16:00):
in twenty nineteen. Shift paymer Shawn's firm four million dollars
during that time period for digital consulting and various services.
A conflict of interest absolutely in my opinion. Yeah, his sentencing.
Trump sentencing was originally scheduled for this month, but he
(16:21):
postponed it until September because of the Supreme Courts. Really
a presidential immunity. Maybe he'll see the light, but I
doubt it, Michael.
Speaker 3 (16:30):
The main question is when you have your broadband and
the undisposed location is house the porn. I'm sure you
didn't do it just so you could do your weekend shows.
Oh my, didn so you can have pawn in your
undisposed location.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
Oh yeah, maybe it's yeah, the porn. The porn at
a full gigabyte of speed is fantastic. You are sick here.
You're one sick individual, you know, and you're jealous. You're
(17:11):
also jealous. Here's the headline over Reuters. The author is
Cathol Kelly. Dateline, Paris, France. The Paris Olympics are the
greenest games ever.
Speaker 2 (17:29):
And none of the athletes like it.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
That's a glorious headline and you really must go look
it up and read it. Among other bits of mindless hilarity,
miss Kelly details all the ways that the same Paris
Olympics and all those officials who brought you the demonic
assault on Christianity on the opening ceremonies have now attempted
(17:55):
to turn these protein hungry athletes into unwilling vegans in
a climate alarm driven mind control experiment. I guess on
par with some sort of mk Ultra program run by
the CIA from back in the nineteen fifties through maybe
even today. Maybe this is a part of an mk
Ultra secret ops going on in Paris right now.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
This is a wonderful gem. Now.
Speaker 1 (18:22):
I know this will come as a shock to a
lot of you, but the athletes are actually in full
revolt over the prospect of I didn't know this, but
they don't have any meat or eggs to eat.
Speaker 2 (18:34):
Now who could have seen? Who could have seen?
Speaker 1 (18:36):
Athletes that consume tens of thousands of galleries trying to
get ready for their events and you can't have any
meat or eggs. Check out this excerpt from the story.
Listen to this part. Paris's quote food vision for competitors
included quote two times more plant based food than previous
(19:02):
Olympic Games.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
Now all the food is.
Speaker 1 (19:05):
Sourced in France, which France, if you've ever been to France,
is a gastronomical wonderland.
Speaker 2 (19:12):
Oh my gosh, it is so good.
Speaker 1 (19:16):
Now, I'm not really a connoisseur of French food, but
when you are in France, you don't have to go
to the fancy schmancy restaurants to get really wonderful food,
but one of it is certified solely from France and
nobody likes it. The story continues, there are not enough
(19:38):
of certain foods, eggs, chickens, certain carbohydrates, according to Britain's
team CEO and the Anson told The London Times. Now
the competitors can complain directly via TikTok. Paris is now
scrambling to solve the problem, promising an additional seven hundred
(19:58):
kilograms of eggs and a ton of meat. Now I
know what seven hundred kilograms is, and I know what
a ton is, but what I don't know is this.
There are ten thousand people in the Olympic village, and
I imagine that their metabolisms run hotter than a jet engine.
(20:21):
According to the story, Now, a ton of meat, what's
that gonna last? Seven hundred kilograms of eggs, what's that
gonna last?
Speaker 2 (20:31):
I have no idea you have.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
This reminds me of remember when Michelle Obama had that
vision of what a healthy school lunch for American kids
looked would look like. And there was that photo if
I remember the photo right, there was it was. It
was a styrofoam tray. You can't have to day, But
I think it was a styrofoam tray, and there was
some sort of soup like liquid. There was a carton, obviously,
(20:56):
the carton of milk you gotta have that, And there
was some sort of vegetable on it, and the other
two things. I have no clue what the other things were.
That was the Michelle lunch. Who could imagine an Olympic
gymnast or a marathon runner who, either of whom might
(21:19):
burn seven to ten thousand calories every single day, rebell
at getting something like a Michelle Obama healthy school lunch.
Speaker 2 (21:28):
I guess what. There's more, the lack of.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Efficient air conditioning for their rooms is also causing probably
a little more than just heartburn among world class athletes.
Remember earlier when we were talking about the things about
fossil fuels that we need to keep in balance and
that fossil fuels are actually great in helping us control
(21:52):
the climate. Well, that's another kind of a fancy schmancy
lawyer way of saying that fossil fuels help.
Speaker 2 (21:59):
Us keep our air conditioning on well.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
As part of their stupid green virtue signaling in the Olympics,
both the Paris Organizing Group and the Ilec. They wanted
the athletes to feel great about relying on Paris's geothermal
cooling system that doesn't produce any greenhouse gas emissions. Now
(22:25):
do you think they really care about that. I'm sure
there are some athletes that, oh, this is wonderful until
they realize, Oh, it's hotter in hell in these rooms,
and it's pretty muggy and humid too.
Speaker 2 (22:38):
You see.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
The problem is that green geothermal cooling system doesn't actually
work as they advertise, which, of course just places it
on part of pretty much every stupid green energy solution
that we get offered by the world's green grifters that
want us to do all this change, not so much
because they want to save the planet, but because they
(22:59):
want to make a bowl the money off. Here's another
excerpt from the story. The other big complaint is the heat.
None of the rooms in the athlete's village are air conditioned.
Some countries, such as Canada, brought their own air conditioning.
Those who did not are now getting advice instead of
(23:20):
relief from organizers. We'll just drink lots of water and
keep the windows open. Keep the windows open, do the
big wigs at Paris twenty This is still from the story.
I can't believe waiters put the story yup, keep the
windows open.
Speaker 2 (23:34):
Do the big wigs at.
Speaker 1 (23:35):
Paris twenty twenty four live with Santa at the North Pole?
Have they only ever read about how heat waves work?
Paris twenty twenty four's explanation for all this is that
they have tried to balance a long term objective to
create a model sustainable neighborhood with the short term objective
(23:57):
of torturing their invited guests. They put it exactly like that.
But that's the untorud version. End of excerpt.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
I love it.
Speaker 1 (24:10):
I mean, I'm yeah, I kind of am laughing at
the athletes. That's to be you, doesn't it. Maybe you
and your country should have demanded something better before you
went over there, But oh nobody. Oh you know, we
want to comply with all the green energy stuff. We
want to be well, you want to be a mission
for you too. Now, this excerpt from the story has
(24:35):
to be probably the most hilarious one. Every time you
open the app that tells you how to take a
game's bus to a venue, it advises you how much
carbon you would save if you walked footnote here, that's
like when I book a flight on the United Airlines,
(24:55):
and it tells me what the carbon emissions are, and
then if I want to pay extra, I can offset
those carbon emissions, which of course I do every single time,
because I look at the airfare and I think, well,
that's pretty ridiculously high. Why can't I pay some more
to offset my carbon emissions? Because I don't give a
(25:15):
rats ask, that's why. And I'm more concerned about how
much money I can keep in my pocket. So when
I get from point A, Denver to whatever point B
might be, I've got some extra money to oh, I
don't know, maybe buy dinner in Paris.
Speaker 2 (25:30):
The story continues.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
The author writes, for instance, if I hoofed it from
the place to La Concorde on Tuesday, when the sun
was twenty feet overhead and the real field was pressing
at forty degrees centigrade, oh my god, that's actually pretty
damn hot, I could have saved the planet three hundred
and seventy two grams of carbon, not tons grams. Additionally,
(25:57):
she writes, because I would have died along the way,
I would have also offered up a nutrient rich man
sized blob to feed mother Gaia am I angry that
they won't just hand me a bottle of water at
any of the venues, but instead insist on pouring it
into a plastic cup that has a two yuro deposit. First, no,
(26:23):
does it make sense that in order to save.
Speaker 2 (26:25):
The earth from the.
Speaker 1 (26:27):
Scourge of plastic you have now used two plastic containers
to distribute one plastic container's worth of liquid? Also, no,
but I must stop. This amount of fuming produces unlevel,
unusual levels of CO two. Truly, I mean, if these
(26:49):
people did not already exist, not nobody in the right
mind could ever dream of trying to make that crap up.
You ought to go read the full piece. It's a
great inglorious way to start to day. Kudos to the
virtual signaling editors at Reuters to allow an actual piece
of truth about the utter absurdity of the global Church
(27:11):
of Climate change, the Church of the climate activists, to
actually put that on their website.
Speaker 2 (27:17):
That's all. I'll be right back, Michael. They've got the
wrong person in charge. You need to replace Kamala Harris
with Pete Budajich. Look what a great job he did
with all the ev charging stations two in a row.
Speaker 1 (27:31):
So what do you do? Who do all of you
think will be her VP choice? Budhajig, Josh Shapiro from Pennsylvania, JB. Pritzker,
Mark Kelly from Arizona.
Speaker 2 (27:47):
Who's it going to be?
Speaker 1 (27:50):
I wanted to be Budhajig, I mean he fits on
think about it, white guy, gay, a little shorter than her,
so he won't above her like Mark Kelly will. She
can't pick Josh Shapiro because then he's Jewish and she's
married to a Jew, and so now all of her
(28:12):
pro Palestinian friends will be really pissed off because we
got too many Jews controlling things.
Speaker 4 (28:17):
I do personally think whomever it is, yes, he will
be shorter than her, because you can't have a man
and a woman standing next to each other and it's
still gonna look bad if a man is taller and
she's the one in charge. I don't think that that
look will sell very well. So he needs to be
shorter than her.
Speaker 1 (28:36):
So I forget what the occasion was, but I get
a call from Tepper who says, hey, Mandy and Ross
are doing something. They'd like to talk to you about.
Whatever the deal was, maybe it was a selection to Jdvans,
I forget, but they asked me who I thought the
potential nominees were for Kamala Harris, and I mentioned Mark
(28:57):
Kelly's name, and I said to Ross and Mandy, I
don't think it'll be Mark Kelly because when you look
at him, he's too big stout. He's like, you know,
six ' three or something, in weighs two uter and
eighty pounds and it's all muscle, and he's got that
big bald head that you know, and it's a.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Giant head like mine and yours.
Speaker 1 (29:16):
And I said, and she's not gonna want that in
side by side photos and what's her name, Randy McDonald
or whatever the woman's name is over there on that
station said I can't believe you're that shallow, Michael Brown,
and I said, I'm just being realistic. I understand how
politics work.
Speaker 4 (29:35):
It just doesn't look right.
Speaker 1 (29:37):
It doesn't look right. And I'm telling you when they
when politicians get together, those things are important.
Speaker 4 (29:45):
It could work if she was a very strong, very
powerful woman, but we haven't seen that from.
Speaker 2 (29:52):
Her, and you're not going to see that from her.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
That's why I think Pete Bodajig is the perfect selection,
white guy shorter kind of a Now don't read anything
into this, but you know many people would say, well,
he's got kind of a cute little face, and he's gay.
I mean, you got you got the whole package right there.
And he's married and has kids married to a guy.
(30:17):
So think about if you want.
Speaker 2 (30:19):
A dei uh team.
Speaker 1 (30:24):
And you want to try to play to every little
identitical politics vertical out there, it's got to be Pete
Budhajig plus the name Harris Budajig, Harris Kelly. And that
sounds good, but it just doesn't work. Hella U Harris Shapiro.
I mean, this sounds like a law firm Harris Shapiro
(30:44):
or Harror Shapiro Industries.
Speaker 2 (30:45):
Now that doesn't work. Harris Kelly, Harris Harris Kelly.
Speaker 1 (30:52):
Just yeah, no, no, no, So yeah, I think it's
h I think it's Pete Budajig. Actually, to be honest,
I hope it's peak in the t
Popular Podcasts
1. Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
2. Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
3. Crime Junkie
If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people.