8-29-24 - 8am - Moving the Colorado Wolves and Marlon Reis & Texts

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Brandy that our radio stream is just pounding us with
climate change commercials this week. If I hear too many
more of those, I might run out by men electric semi.

Speaker 2 (00:13):
I wonder what the horne of electric semi sounds like?
Meet me got like the roadrunner beat beep. The day
that he drives an electric semi is the day that
we all just check it in and go home. That'll
be it. It'll be over with. So remember those little
cute pups we saw frollicking in that video from Grand Kelly,

(00:36):
those little wolf pups, Well I got a two pronged
story about them. First, they're getting evicted. Yeah, they're getting evicted.
So the Colorado Parks and Wildlife citing livestock depredation. Now,
remember depredation is that fancy word for you know, when

(00:56):
when a wolf kills, like, you know, your little pet puppy.
You got a brand new lab that you want to
put in the back of the pickup truck. You know
you want driving with you, actually you want riding with
you in the cab as you go out to check
on the cattle and stuff. Well, wolves like to eat
those puppies, I mean, like the you know they're they're carnivores.
They kind of ate like the cowls, chickens, pigs, you

(01:19):
know whatever, then get their little teeth into That's called depredation.
I love words. I just love the fact that here depredation.
While it is a technically perfect term, it's also a
term that the urban nites that voted for the reintroduction
of wolves into Colorado they want to use that. It's

(01:41):
it's like, you know, well, and I'm not making fun
of this because I've had to do this too many
times in my life, but it's like, you know, when
you well, I had to put Boguart down, had to
put bo Guart. Well, what does that mean? What I
euthanized Bogart? The old saint remark well, what does that mean? Well,

(02:06):
I had him killed. I mean, if you want to
get really just down raw about it, that's what you're doing. Now.
You may be doing it in humane way, you may
be doing it in you know, in a very you know,
painless way, but nonetheless you're taking the life out of
the dog depredation, killing pets and livestock. So what are

(02:28):
they doing? Colorado Parks and wildlife is going too, They're
going to capture now They're not going to send the
wolves back to Oregon wherever it is, They're going to
relocate them. Now here's where I think it's funny. Of course,
taxpayers are paying for the moving expenses for this little
family of wolves. So like, you know, if if I

(02:51):
got hired by, you know, some big gas station in
Los Angeles or something, part of my negotiations would be
getting my movie expect Tos paid for or well, that's
what we're doing for the wolves. We're paying for their
moving expenses to go from oh, I don't know, Grand
County to Cripple Creek. They're gonna send them to Cripple
Creek County, or I don't know, maybe we all send

(03:12):
them to Pitkin County. I think that we ought to
have the wolves living around Aspen so that when you know,
the little fufu poodle comes out, you know, because it's
got to go tinkle in the morning, he gets swallowed
up by a wolf. And then those people can't complain
because they wanted the wolves reintroduced anyway. Or I think

(03:34):
we could do this. Let's put them in Cheeseman Park.
Cheese Men now Cheeseman Park for those of you live
that live outside of Colorado or Denver. Cheeseman Park is
a big park over in the is it capital is
Capitol Hill region, isn't it? Dragon? You're not paying the ant.
He's not even listening to me. Cheeseman Park, I think

(03:55):
is in Capitol Hill. It's off like maybe eighth eight
Avenue or something, but it's it's a nice big park.
Used to be known as a gay hangout. Well, anyway,
what we could do is we could put the wolves there,
because those are all the people that voted for the
reintroduction of the wolves, So why not put them in
the urban area, and then when they do their air

(04:17):
quote depredation, it'll be the little fufu dogs that live
up on Capitol Hill. God, I'm such an ass uh.
Contra up Park, No, I'm not. I'm just telling you
the truth. Contra up Parks and Wildlife officials said that
they will continue to implement the voter approved wolf reintroduction
plan while working to reduce wolf depredation. Now, because I

(04:42):
am a lawyer, let me let them interpret. Let me
interpret that for you. While the wolves will continue to
kill livestock, taxpayers will continue to fund their relocation and
will continue to fund the reintroduction of even more wolves.
So why well, we now know that wolves are killing

(05:04):
the livestock and killing the family pets, We're gonna move them.
And then after we move them, we're gonna move more
wolves into Do you know that this is utter insanity?
Now I'm thinking this because I I you know, I
look for solutions. I want to you know, I want
to make this work. So why don't we get the

(05:28):
wolves their own homeless shelters. Why don't we move them
into those apartment complexes in Aurora, you know where the
Venezuelan gangs are taken over. Then we can have battles
between the wolves and the gangs, or maybe the gangs
would just hunt the wolves. But nonetheless it would be

(05:49):
a good use of those apartment buildings. Uh, you know, Colorado.
This is just proof that Colorado just continues to swerve
down the tolet the crapper. But for every story that
is kind of gloomy, there's always a silver lining. You

(06:12):
got to thank Dragon Redbeard for this story. I was
in the middle of doing something that he brought this
in and he just hands it to me and at
I just look at the headline and I just laugh.
This is from Aaron Adelson over Itt nine News nine

(06:33):
millimeter News. If you want to follow a good Twitter
account nine millimeter News. Colorado Governor Jared Polis's husband, Marlon Reese,
deactivated his first Gentleman branded social media accounts because he
got into an argument about wolves on Facebook Saturday. A

(06:55):
spokesperson for Polus says this, in recent weeks, you don't
think if before I tell you this story, if you're
one of these goobers that listens to me and I
go on one of my rants about how every single

(07:18):
individual has a sphere of influence, and if every single
individual would just cause a little ripple, all those little
ripples eventually turn into a title wave and you actually
can effect change. Now, it's not gonna happen, you know,
if you do it today, it's not gonna happen tomorrow.

(07:39):
It's gonna take some time. It's gonna take a whole
bunch of individuals all starting to kind of get really
pissed off about something, and eventually there will be room. Well,
this is one of those stories. A spokesperson for police
says this. In recent weeks, the volume of negative commentary

(08:00):
on Marlon Reese, the first gentleman, the number of the
volume of negative commentary on his posts increased to such
a degree that he felt his pages were no longer
serving the goal of fostering compassion, appreciation, and respect for animals.

(08:25):
Now I'm not gonne, of course, I guess I can't
see it now, but I haven't tried to look. But
my guess would be that almost, not all, but almost
every single individual who posted a negative comment on Marlon
Reese's Facebook page about wolves probably actually is an animal lover. Yes,

(08:51):
they probably have a pat raccoon, or maybe they're ranchers
and they got cattle, and you know they actually they
never named it cattle because you know the cattle are
eventually going to go to Sluughter. But nonetheless, they really
care for those animals. You ever watched or you ever
gone with a rancher in the dead of winter when

(09:15):
the wind's blowing, you know, like one thousand miles per
hour and the windshill is about one thousand degrees below zero,
But yet you still have to go feed the cattle.
Have you ever done that? I have. It's hard work.
It's hard work. So that when I decided to go
to say Perry steakhouse and have a really nice bone in,

(09:36):
you know, a bone in, Rabbi, Well, guess what that
animal was cared for. That animal lived a really good
life in a rant somewhere. So when they say it.
In recent weeks, the volume of negative commentary on his
post increased to such a degree that he felt his

(09:57):
pages we're no longer serving the goal of fostering passion, appreciation,
and respect for animals. My guess is a lot of
the people posting negative comments probably have pets, or they've
got cattle or pigs or chickens or something, and they
actually care for them. They actually love animals, and they
actually respect animals. The first gentleman, according to nine News,

(10:18):
posted about grants the state was giving for non lethal
wolf conflict deterns. What a load of crap. Listen to
that again, posting about grants meaning taxpayer money that Colorado,
Colorado was giving for non lethal wolf conflict deterrens. What

(10:46):
were they doing? Hiring hiring arbitrators? Were they hiring like consultants,
hiring therapists and oh, I know what it was. They
were hiring people to go out and do an intervention
between the wolves and the cattle. That's what was going on.
Then he got into an exchange with a Walden rancher

(11:07):
by the name of David Gittleson. Here's what they say
at nine News. The issues that Gettleson's have had with
wolves predates Colorado Parks and Wildlife formally reintroducing them in December. However,
the issues have continued. Nine News has covered the impact

(11:29):
that Gettlesons have felt for years. Initially, Rice Marlon Rice
responded to Ree I forget Yeah, I think you're right,
but I don't care. Marlon Reese, the first Gentleman, responded
to one rancher and then began responding directly to Gittleson.

(11:54):
Here are Reese's comments and screenshots obtained by nine News investigates.
Oh this ought to be good. Let's see if I
can read this dragon. You got to remember see these
these are called glasses. I need a bigger font. I

(12:17):
can't read that one read this one. Uh. Here's what
Marlon Reese wrote to the rancher Gittleson. The truth is
I don't care. I don't care what you do or
don't wait wait a minute, negative comments. This sounds pretty
negative to me. This is first gentleman Marlon Reese David Gidtleson.

(12:37):
He tags David Gidtleson in his Facebook post, I don't
The truth is, I don't care. I don't care what
you do or don't eat. I don't care what you
think you know or what you think you're qualified to
comment on. I don't care why your family seems to
love the limelight and never misses an opportunity to try
to talk the front range. If you're proud of being

(13:00):
a rancher, act like it. All this complaining is leading
nowhere fast. Well, this sounds kind of negative to me.
The truth is I don't care. It sounds like me.
I don't give a ratsass. Then he writes this, David Gittleson,
you've abused the media by stoking fear of wolves? An
entire agency? Is your disposal? For reasons? You didn't read this?

(13:24):
Did you drag it?

Speaker 3 (13:26):
Of course not?

Speaker 2 (13:29):
The first gentleman rides to the rancher. You've abused the
media by stoking fear of wolves an entire agency? Is
that your disposal for solving disputes?

Speaker 4 (13:44):
My god, this is Reese towards an unnamed unknown gentleman.

Speaker 2 (13:49):
This is rees toward the rancher.

Speaker 4 (13:51):
David Gidles just just pointing out that that we've only
heard of one of these people, and the one that
we have heard of is saying that the one that
we have not heard of has an entire agency behind him.

Speaker 3 (14:04):
Am I getting that clear?

Speaker 1 (14:05):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (14:06):
You got it? Yeah, you're pretty much yeah, okay, right?
And the entire agency. So an entire agency, which means
a bunch of bureaucrats paid for by you and I
without hard earned tax dollars. Their whole job is to
do nothing but resolve disputes between wolves and ranchers. And
I still like to I want to go to one
of those arbitration meetings. Are they holding them in a

(14:27):
conference room down on seventeenth Street in some white shoe
law firm? Is that is that where they're doing it?
Or are they going out in the field? And you know,
they they pitch a big you know, with those big
giant tints like you'd have at a wedding or something,
and then they put up, you know, some some folding
chairs and folding tables, and then they then everybody has
a legal pad and a pen that says Colorado Parks

(14:49):
and Wildlife, and then on the wolves side, they got
you know, some fried chicken forum or something, and over here,
you know they're eating vegetarians. You know, they don't eat
eat in front of the wolves because might offend the wolves.
So and then they sit down and somebody calls, you know,
everybody introduced. Everybody. Well, I'm wolf number to eighty seven

(15:10):
and I'm rancher David gibbleson the interference you think is
happening is made up. David. I want you to do well,
but you have to use the system that's been set up.
No one gets special treatment. The law applies equally to
all parties. Well, unless you're a wolf. Let's see. Nine

(15:34):
News reached out to the Governor's office about what happened.
Here's the full response for the spokesperson from Polish. The
First Gentleman views social media as a tool for celebrating
animals and sharing the many ways in which the Polish
administration is proactively working to protect them. In recent weeks,
the volume of negative commentary on his post increased to

(15:56):
such a degree that he felt his pages were no
longer serving the goal of fostering compassion, appreciation, and respect
for animals. Rather than allow his social media channels to
become forums for missing information. He decided to deactivate, to
deactivate them for the time being. Media. As soon as

(16:20):
everybody quits talking about it, he'll be right back on
there again. Hey, Marlon Reese, guess what some of us don't.

Speaker 3 (16:27):
Like wolves killing cattle.

Speaker 2 (16:33):
Why is it he has so much influence over public
policy in Colorado?

Speaker 3 (16:37):
Is somebody elect him my first gentleman?

Speaker 2 (16:41):
Is that an official? Like, there's the first gentleman? I
remember voting for the first gentleman. Hey, Michael, the wolves
didn't kill those cattle, they just put them to sleep.
We got some great text messages that rather than go
to the next political thing I wanted to go to,

(17:02):
I want to go to these text messages. So let's
just go through them in order. A Goubman number fifty
six seventy eight writes Michael, you are questioning the influence
of an elected official spouse. Have you never heard of
Jill Biden? Actually I haven't, and I've heard of a

(17:22):
doctor Jill Biden. And but here's here's the thing. Here's
the thing, man. If you want to make that comparison,
let's make that comparison. Let's say that Jill Biden and
Marlon Reeth. Doctor Jill Biden and Marlon Reese are equivalents.

(17:47):
If that's the case, to make the comparison proper, then
that means that Joe Biden and Jared Polis are equivalents
also to brain dead old farts that have no clue
what they're doing. Dragon. Did you see that picture of

(18:07):
Joe Biden on the beach?

Speaker 3 (18:10):
Which one? There's been quite a few, This.

Speaker 2 (18:12):
Was just one from yesterday that a reporter must have. Now,
the Secret Service allows people to walk in front of
the President along the water, but they most people just
ignore him. But a reporter must have walked along or
someone privately, a private citizen did and snapped a photo

(18:37):
of the president asleep with his eggs, legs kind of
spread eagle out in the sand and his arms kind
of just dangling by the side asleep. Now, while that's
going on, well that's going on, there's a war in Ukraine,
there's a war in the Middle East. We have a

(18:59):
southern border open with Venezuelan Gan gang members coming across
into Aurora, Colorado, the Taiwan Straits, and the Philippines. Well,
basically the Indo Pacific is in turmoil right now because
of China, and we got an economy that's in the crapper.
We have a presidential race going on by his partner

(19:22):
Kamala what's her name, and he's asleep at the beach
and they allowed that photograph to get out. Who's in charge?
So yeah, guber number five, six, seven, eight. If you
want to talk about the influence of an elected official,
then let's make the let's make a comparison. Joe Biden
is Marlon Reese, Joe Biden is Jared Polis. All right,

(19:47):
then ninety two forty nine, Mike, I think for the
arbitration they're using trans to do story hours. Well, I
would say that would be a good way to kind of,
you know, kind of break the ice between the wolves
in the ranchers a little story hour by by a
trans person A ninety five O four says Mike, wolves

(20:08):
don't need chairs. The biggot, the goobers today are over well,
how do you know they how do you know the
wolves don't identify as a human and maybe the wolves
have you want to see sometimes the limburger will jump
up on the couch and sit on the couch like

(20:30):
a human being.

Speaker 4 (20:30):
It's a little bit of speciesist if you're going to
force the wolf to sit on the ground rather than
politely give them a chair.

Speaker 2 (20:37):
Thank you dragon. Then twenty one eighty one rides Michael
send Los Lobos parentheses pulls Reese wolves the Boulder home
of the truly stupid wolves already close to Wyoming ranchers
there give the middle Pointdexter to Colorado and will shoot

(20:59):
the wolves on site. And I did, you're you're right,
I did miss one of the best parts of the
story fifty eight forty three rights, and I went back
and look, it actually is in the story that I
had for the other part.

Speaker 4 (21:20):
Real quick, though, I am kind of curious as to
why they would send the wolves to Boulder, because we
all know the governor lives at the Governor's mansion that's
provided for him.

Speaker 3 (21:28):
That's right, So there would be no reason to send the.

Speaker 2 (21:31):
Wolves, that's right. Yes, yeah, yeah, Because you know, I
was at an event at that at that event center
near the Governor's mansion, I don't know, spend several weeks ago,
and it was in the evening and I was just
walking around. I had to take a whiz, so I
just took a whiz on the wall surrounding the government mansion.

(21:56):
Back to fifty eight forty three, Mike, you're missing the
best part of the story. They're not going to tell
the taxpayers where they're moving the wolves for the safety
of the wolves. That was literally in the story. They
were not going to disclose the new location little wolves,
for the safety of the wolves. Wow. Now seventy one

(22:22):
oh five makes a pretty good point here, Michael. If
they're going to pay fair market value. But who said
they're going to pay fair market value. If the government's
going to pay fair market value for livestock that are
killed by wolves, then I would constantly have a head
or two chained up to a post like the goat
in Dresy part for the Torontosaurus wrecks. That way, I

(22:44):
would have constant revenue coming in throughout the year, and
the wolves would leave, and then the wolves would leave
the rest of them alone. How do you choose which
to head a cattle that you tie up to the
fence post lottery or do you just pick out the
weakest in the herd? Yeah? Uh, sixteen oh three says

(23:10):
uh Mike. Wolves in city park. Maybe we could get
politician depredation now that right, there's pretty good politician depredation.
Oh did you hear Michael Brown today he talked about
killing politicians? No, I didn't. I didn't say that at all.

(23:33):
I said that. No, I, in fact, I didn't do it. Uh,
goober number, I can just give out the entire phone number. No,
I would never do that. Goo number sixteen o three says,
So it's not me, Goo number sixteen oh three, Wolves
in City Park. Maybe we can get politician depredation. Dragon.

(24:00):
I love this audience. I don't know why, but I do.
The Biden Harris Department of Justice is at it again.
Jack Smith filed a superseding indictment against Donald Trump on Tuesday.
I mentioned that briefly yesterday, but I had a chance
to kind of dig through it. Now. What they're trying

(24:23):
to do is they're trying to comply with the Supreme
Court's ruling in Trump the United States about presidential immunity. Now,
on the surface, the indictment appears as another, i'd say,
underhanded attempt to try to escalate the Biden Harris government's
lawfare campaign against the president of the former president technically,

(24:47):
but it's also it really does mean that the DC
election interference trial is not going to occur until well
after the election. So here's I was not aware of this.
But Jack Smith, the special prosecutor, the one that in

(25:07):
the Florida in the Document's case where the judge has
ruled that, oh, by the way, we think your appointment
is unconstitutional. So I dismissed the case. Of course that's
going to be appealed. But that's the same Jack Smith
as in the j sixth case. Well, earlier this month,

(25:28):
Jack Smith asked Judge Chutkin to delay proceedings until August
thirty so his office could submit an updated timetable, and
Chutkin granted that request, and Smith indicated that either an
amended or superseding indictment would be filed in response to
the Supreene Court's community case. Well, the new indictment against

(25:52):
Trump Trump from Jack Smith preserves the four core federal charges.
I want in your mind. I want you to think
about January sixth, twenty twenty one. Got that all all
that stuff taking place, Remember all the news coverage. Remember

(26:14):
Jason Crow was in the House of Representatives and he
was trying to save somebody. And then we had that
a hole that shot Ashley Babbitt. Remember that. So here
are the charges in the new indictment. Conspiracy to defraud
the United States. I'm just shrugging my shoulders here, Uh

(26:38):
defraud what how did he defraud the United States? Conspiracy
to obstruct an official proceeding. He wasn't on Capitol Hill.
He wasn't. Uh, he didn't steal it. Remember the Viking guy,

(26:59):
He isn't he the one that stole Nancy Pelosi's lecture?
Somebody did. I don't remember Trump's. I don't remember Trump
even going up to Capitol Hill that day. Obstruction of
an attempt to obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an
official proceeding. Uh, he didn't do anything. He made some

(27:21):
phone calls, he offered the National Guard. He told the
crowd not to you know, not to vandalize stuff. He
told people to go home, obey the law. He said
that they look people that are doing these bad things.
That are that are, you know, vandalizing the capital. That's
not who we are. Obstruction of an attempt to obstruct,

(27:45):
Conspiracy against rights. There's the catch all. That's what they're
charging most of January sixth defendants with. In addition to
trespassing others is conspiracy against rights. But here's what I
found interesting the superseding indictment. The new one has removed much,

(28:07):
if not all, of the ancillary evidence that really formed
the meat of Smith's prior indictment. I'll give you an example,
all references to conspirator number four, at least I couldn't find.
They've all appeared to have been removed. Conspirator number four
had been identified as former acting Attorney General Jeffrey Clark,

(28:30):
who has steadfastly stood right by Trump throughout these entire proceedings.
And the new version of the indictment removes the accusations
that Trump attempted to use the Department of Justice to
overturn the twenty twenty presidential election results. Now, the way

(28:51):
I read those changes, I think that Jack Smith recognized
that those changes were necessary to remove aspect of his
case that violate the Supreme Court's presidential immunity Ruly, that
ruling granted a presumption of immunity for communications between the

(29:12):
President and his subordinates all of the staffers, including people
at the Department of Justice. Addition, okay, all right, I'm
not paying anything. I'm wrapped up in this case. I'll
tell you one more thing about this case coming up next.

Speaker 3 (29:28):
Michael Gouber number eighty thirty here.

Speaker 2 (29:31):
It just occurred to me, all us goobers are to
you or just numbers. Yeah, we really don't care about you.
They're just numbers. If we you know, well, you could
put your name in the text message and we could
refer to you by name. But you know, there might
be more than one Michael. I know it comes as

(29:53):
a shock to you, but there's more than one Michael
Brown in the country, and one of them's dead.

Speaker 3 (29:58):
But you say you're not the dead one.

Speaker 2 (30:00):
I'm not the dead one. People on that day thought
I was holy crap, Ova, I you know, I was like,
what the hell's going on? Then I realized it ever
been so popular?

Speaker 1 (30:12):
Ever?

Speaker 2 (30:12):
Right? Oh gosh. People were admitting they actually loved me.
They were worried, and then just as soon as they
found out it wasn't me, they're like, oh, never mind
by and just hung up And that was it.

Speaker 3 (30:25):
Detecting tamor their condolences and so.

Speaker 2 (30:27):
So exactly, they're starting to go funder fund me for
I think the most significant change in the indictment from
the prior version aside from the removal of clark Uh
and all these references to Trump's communications with the Department
of Justice is a new argument, and the new argument

(30:50):
that the vice president's role in certifying an election is
purely legislative in nature. Now, why does he make that claim?
Because Smith wants to argue that the president of the
United States has no official role in certifying a presidential election.

(31:12):
That leads to his argument that it falls purely to
Congress and the vice president, So that contention would likely
become the primary focus of the judge's review and the
likely target of an immediate appeal by the attorneys for Trump,

(31:32):
because if there's no role whatsoever, Now, think about that,
you're actually one of the parties that's involved in that count.
Who's involved in the count Biden and Trump, and Trump
has a vested interests in it. Smith's grasping its straws here.

(31:57):
Part of his official duties as the President of the
United States of America is to see the laws of
the country are faithfully executed, and if he has a
question that they are or they are or that they
are not, he has a right to call Mike Pence
and say, hey, hold off now, Pence has a right,

(32:19):
I think also to say no, sir, I'm not going
to do that. But it's nothing that's unconstitutional. He has
the right. He has the right to call Mike Pence
and say, hey, go take a dog before you do
the count, you eat a key sandwich before you do
the count, or as dragon and I would prefer just
blowy and white bread. But you know that's a whole

(32:41):
nother story. It's my Friday, so guess what comes up next?
Taxpayer relief shops,