July 24, 2026 • 31 mins
Are hostile military capabilities taking root just 90 miles off the coast of Florida?
In this episode, Joe Pags and Kay Hill break down alarming national security intelligence surrounding hundreds of advanced military drones reportedly stationed in Cuba—and what this sudden military buildup means for American security.
With Russian and Iranian tactical ties deepening in Havana, we examine the real stakes for Guantanamo Bay, American naval shipping lanes, and mainland defense. Is this a posture of self-defense, or is the Western Hemisphere becoming the next foreign proxy arena?
Joe cuts through the noise, examines the official rhetoric coming out of Washington and Havana, and reveals what’s really driving this escalating Caribbean standoff.
LISTEN & SUBSCRIBE:
Don't miss an episode—hit Follow/Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen!
Connect with Joe Pags:
Website: https://joepags.com
X / Twitter: @JoeTalkShow
Facebook: @JoeTalkShow
Youtube: @JoePags
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You probably haven't heard about this. We're gonna fill you
in big time in a second. But there are Iranian
drones right now, ninety miles off the coast of the
United States. The President was asked about it today. They
do have that, and they.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Might very well have that will take care of it.
Marco's just in the other room, and if they do
have that, will take care of it in short order.
We're not gonna have a problem. We're not going to
allow that to happen. So it could be that their
story sept We're looking into it now. It could be so,
and a prabe isn't, so we'll figure it out.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
Iranian drones are they also Russian backed? Is China involved?
How many are there? Let's dive deep right now with Khill, Joe.
Speaker 3 (00:36):
There are at least that we know of, three hundred
Iranian drones. They're actually eree hundred Russian yeah drones. So
these aren't just like those little things that you see
nipping about like your teenagers using to like, I don't know,
fly over the neighborhood or whatever. So these are not
necessarily stealth drones, but they fly predominantly below radar. They
(00:59):
have about a thousand mile range. They fly at about
one hundred and fifteen miles an hour. They so they
go on a pre planned route. This type of drone
I think it's called the Shaheed, I don't want to
mispronounce it, and it's like one three six or whatever
they you know, if it starts. They give this tech
like such lovely memorable names. But these drones they go
(01:20):
on pre planned routes and when they arrive at their target,
they explode on impact and they carry about one hundred
pounds of explosives each. So we're talking about three hundred
drones that could reach from Cuba to New York. So
little bit of a concern, especially when you sort of
(01:40):
look at the escalating Uh, it's not even tensions at
this point, is it. It's just it's just an escalating
war with Iran. When we see that, you know, Russia
is also somewhat semi involved in the actual procurement. Well,
you know, Iran, Cuba, Russia, they have their little love
triangle going on, and they have done forever really at
(02:04):
least the last you know, forty five to fifty years,
and so these drones have been sitting off the coast.
I think Cuba started really accruing a lot of them
in about twenty twenty three. The estimate right now is
about three hundred drones. So three hundred of these things
could in theory blow up targets across the Eastern seaboard.
(02:27):
It is it is kind of scary when you think
about it like that, but when you think about it
in terms of the scale of the ongoing war with Iran,
three hundred drones is actually not that much.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
So well, I want to stop you because the word
drone brings us back to a few years ago when
you had a bunch of drones over the east coast
of the United States. Some people were saying that it
was some Iranian mothership out in the water. Turns out,
according to Trump and the Trump administration, no, no, no, we
knew what those were. That was us. Don't worry, We're good,
(02:59):
but we never really found out what the cause and
the purpose was. So you've got all these drones, and
I believe it was off the coast of New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware,
that area, and now we've got ninety miles away from Florida,
three hundred plus drones from Iran slash Russia that go
one hundred and fifteen miles an hour last I checked,
that would mean it could hit Florida in forty minutes.
So that's a problem for me. Is anybody in the
(03:22):
government and our current government saying anything about this? How
did we find out about this? Because again this sort
of came out of the.
Speaker 3 (03:27):
Blue to me, so great question. I'm not exactly sure
what the exact source is because when I was doing
my research there was multiple sources, and again it's sort
of it's been happening since twenty twenty three. I'm so
glad that you brought up the new Jersey drones because
I actually have a new theory on that in light
of the intelligence herefore it's been released on. Okay, so
(03:51):
those drones, there is a massive gap. I don't want
to scare people, Joe, and I'm smiling because I'm scared,
and that's what I do when I'm a little bit scared.
But there was a massive gap in our defense systems
across the United States. I'm not sure what it's like
at our international basis, but across certainly the continental US
(04:11):
and Hawaii and Alaska, there is a massive gap in
our defense when it comes to drones. So I think
it's less than fifty percent of all of our military
installations have the right setup. Obviously, you and I probably
wouldn't know what that setup is because it's a lot
of you know, it's for national defense, but the setup
(04:33):
to protect themselves from drone strikes. The drones that were
looking at in Cuba in particular, are designed to fly
below radar, So it's one of those where you sort
of know it's there if you're lucky and somehow you
pick up on it or you're aware of it once
it arrives. So I wouldn't be surprised that what was
going on in New Jersey, in that sort of part
(04:55):
of the northern East coast, I wouldn't be surprised if
that was a tre exercise to figure out what our
actual gaps are. And I think it was late. It
was either late last year or the year before. Congress
basically said this is a huge concern. We Joe this this,
this is what blew my mind. I don't know why
(05:16):
it blew my mind. This next fact I'm about to
tell you, but it did. But I've read it so
many times with so many other disasters. But we don't
actually have a point person in charge for if there
is a massive drone strike across you know, here in
the homeland, and so when, if and when something like
that were to happen, local law enforcement basically has no
(05:41):
authority to do anything. The military and the Department of Defense,
the Pentagon, they can't figure out who's in charge in
that kind of situation.
Speaker 2 (05:51):
War.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
Sorry, it's not a Department of Defense. It's war. Yeah,
go ahead, Department of War.
Speaker 3 (05:56):
But I think that that is one of the biggest
issues that facing right now. So we've got the radar issue,
We've got the fact that these things are pretty stealthy,
they can hit the US, they have a huge range,
and they're designed to not be picked up by the
systems we currently have. Wow, we have no one who
would necessarily be in charge, and no way in that
(06:18):
kind of chaos to choose a person who's in charge.
Joe I just got done on a writing project about
the Maui wildfires, and that's exactly what we saw there.
These wildfires broke out and no one in Hawaii has
taken responsibility because no one can figure out who was
actually in charge and who was calling the shop, and
it looks like it was no one. Yeah, so that
(06:41):
is a huge gap that could very easily be filled,
but that also creates a potent, you know, like, oh,
we could go into.
Speaker 1 (06:47):
So from your research, and again it's a supposition, you
don't know, but you're going down the rabbit hole a
little bit that the drone activity off in New Jersey
and whatever else in the East coast that was probably
some sort of training exercise. And if that's true, let
me ask you what might sound like a really dumb question,
because that's what I do for a living, ask the
dumb questions. Why exactly wouldn't they just tell us it's
(07:09):
a training exercise, that's that's what's going on, because now
we're it's UFOs, it's Iran with the mothership, if we're
being attacked by aliens. I mean, I was surprised the
local law enforcement didn't start shooting them out of the sky.
But as you said, they really can't do that. So
there's no point person they're not telling us when there's
a training exercise and there are three hundred militarized drones
(07:29):
waiting in Cuba, good day in America. I mean, that's
that's all pretty scary, it is.
Speaker 3 (07:35):
Yeah, and that doesn't include the potentially tens of thousands
of terrorists that may have walked over all.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
I think it's more than tens of thousands. I think
it's a lot more than tens of thousands. We have
no idea how many terror cells are here, how many
how many Islamic Jihad and Hamas and has Bellah and
MS thirteen and trend to Irago. We don't know. We
have no idea. During the Biden years, we had no clue.
It is k Hill. Go and follow her everywhere case
smith Hill dot com. You can go see here on Newsmax.
She's amazing. So let's transition that to what Lindsey Graham
(08:07):
was working on before his sudden, untimely passing over the weekend.
He was just in Ukraine. I know he was there,
just in Ukraine, got back and then passed away a
few hours later or something. He's a guy that wanted
to take out Putin. He was a warhawk big time.
He was a guy who wanted to end Iran. And
now you know, Iran puts out the targets. He was
one of the targets and now he's gone. President Trump
(08:28):
is another one of the targets. Now Iran has all
these these drones off the coast of the United States.
Is there a connection there between him going to Ukraine
trying to stop the Russia war, wanted to take out Putin,
complaining about Iran, wanted to take out Iran, to the
fact that they're militarizing the island just off our coast.
Is there a Lindsay Graham connection or no.
Speaker 3 (08:48):
So I think there is a Lindsay Graham connection, but
there's two different versions of that kind take me there,
and I want to be really clear on both of them. Okay,
so what do we know everything that you just described.
We know that Lindsey Graham was anti Putin, We know
that he was just in Ukraine, and we know that,
like so much of his recent career was focused on
(09:13):
that intervention. He's very anti Iran. He was, you know,
if there were lists, which you know we've been told
that there's many lists, he was definitely on the list.
And so there is that kind of involvement where we
know that there's a connection there purely because he was
working so hard to manage this situation. What a lot
of people are saying online is the Lindsey Graham was
(09:37):
killed by Russia and you know. I hate to say it, Joe,
but like the first thing I thought when I read
Lindsay Graham was just in Ukraine trying to figure out
how to help them in the war against Russia. Lindsay
Graham's sadly died way too young of a sudden illness. Joe,
(09:59):
I lost count of the number of articles that I
wrote when I was working a Just Daily caller on
how Russia gets rid of people it doesn't like and
how it's all under very weird, mysterious circumstances. Stuff from
you know, we know that they poison people. That's been
an ongoing like that.
Speaker 1 (10:18):
That's not that's not a headline. That's just that's what
they do.
Speaker 3 (10:22):
There's people who get poisoned, go to the hospital, survive,
and then mysteriously fall out of windows. There are people
who get blown up, but particularly the sort of poison
spect that is just such a Russia vibe. And yes,
I've seen those rumors online that he was killed by Russia.
(10:44):
Two things on that one, I don't know if he
actually did. Because I know a lot of people who've
had those sudden coronary and cardiac issues. There's not a
whole lot you can do I think he had the
same like we're being told that he had the same
issue as John Ritter.
Speaker 1 (11:03):
Who you know, just as he's acting Yeah.
Speaker 3 (11:06):
Dropped, yeah, dropped. And so do I think that he
was killed by Russia? No? But even if he was,
the reason that I think you don't tell the public
that that's how he died is because that starts World
War three. That is the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. That
(11:26):
is killing an American statesman and basically saying we don't care,
We're going to keep doing this stuff. We're so I
can't use the words that I want to use because
in Britain they're definitely swearing. In America, I'm pretty sure
they're swearing. But that is a that's the word I
mean to try and think of a non sweat. It's
a gutsy thing to do. Let's put it that way, Okay.
(11:50):
And so if we knew the Russia had killed Lindsey Graham,
that's World War three.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
That for those who don't know the prelimory caused death.
I just want to put this out there, and this
just sounds very suddenly. There's a tear in the ioora,
there's a tear in his aora and he just died.
But he was just in Ukraine and he was just
talking about how you have to you know, help Ukraine
and end that war. Yeah, you're talking about ending Iran
all the time, talking about we're definitely gonna get the
Save America Act done. He was telling President Trump an
(12:19):
hour or two before he died, we're gonna get that
done starting Monday. So the prelinary cause of death, I'm
reading this now for centaer Lindsay gram a ortic dissection
caused by arterial sclerotic cardiovascular disease, hardening of the arteries. Yeah,
could have happened. It might be that, but there's the
timing is really suspect. So let me ask you from
(12:39):
your research into those who we know were assassinated. I'm
not saying that he was, but we know that some
in history, a lot in history have been assassinated. The
reason to not put it out there is what you
just said, because then it causes World War three. But
I mean, if Russia were to do this, I'm not
saying they did, but if they were to do this,
are they not worried about causing World War three?
Speaker 3 (13:01):
I don't know if Russia cares that much because you've
got to remember World War III isn't just Russia on
its own, it's Russia Iran, It's an Iran, is every
single fundamentalist Islamic terucel in the world. Because there's again
a lot of intelligence that suggests that everyone from Harmas
to Hezbula to al Qaeda, just run down the list,
(13:25):
they're pretty much all under one umbrella now with the
goal obviously being destroyed the Infidel. So we've got the
entire fundamentalist Islamic world involved on Russia side. That brings
in China, and then China gets to basically pick and
choose its allies. You know, you could if Africa was
(13:45):
more developed technologically, like Africa would be on the side
of China, for example, because China has such a strong
financial investment across pretty much all of Africa at this point,
and so you've got to look at every where the
o's China money and think, okay, they would be on
China's side. Are they necessarily the same kind of threat
(14:06):
as like, uh yeah, like all the terror cells that
I just mentioned. No, but that's how that war breaks
down if you look at it from you know, we're
playing like a game of risk or whatever. Yeah, so
world War three, And then you've also got to look
at how destabilized Europe is. You and I have talked
about this, like for years on the show. The number
(14:27):
of terra cells in Europe. I mean, i'd guarantee there's
ten x more in Europe than there is here in
the US. You've also got them proximity to Russia. And
I don't know, like, if you want to rewrite the
face of the Earth, you start World War three. And
even though I would always say America is going to
(14:48):
be the strongest because we literally are, I don't know
how long that plays out for. Because you've also got
to look at the ideologies of these groups, like again,
fundamentalist Islam. I think it was actually Osama bin Laden
who was the big proponent of like even if it
takes a hundred even if it takes a thousand years,
we will destroy and conquer the Infidel. So they have
(15:10):
timelines that ideologically never cross the table for us here
in the US. So even if we won in a
battle where there are three hundred drones coming in from
Cuba at the same time, we've got you know, domestic
like these terror cells get mobilized. Again, we don't know
how many, like even Russian terror cells there might be
(15:33):
here that could be a thing.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
Or Chinese peroucells right.
Speaker 3 (15:36):
Oh, definitely, And so that could simply be one small
chapter in a war that lasts one hundred years. Because
we here in the US, when we think of all,
we think, let's get in, let's get out, might take
twenty years like it did in the Middle East. And
I mean, jury's still out on what good we even
did there. In the end.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
It's always a fun time to take the family to
the movies. But if I spend thirty dollars, when you
can save a bunch of money and get better programming
in better entertainment, why not join the Angel Guild For
just fifteen dollars a month. You're gonna get two free
tickets to see Young Washington in theaters this Independence Day,
plus tickets to future Angel theatrical releases, and full access
to Angel streaming Library. It's one of the best entertainment
(16:19):
values I've seen in a very long time. Now, let's
talk about that movie in theaters this Independence Day. Young
Washington tells the story of George Washington before he became
a general before he became president, and before he became
a legend. At just twenty years old, Washington face failure, setbacks,
and near death experiences that would have broken most people. Instead,
those challenges forged the leader who would help secure America's
(16:42):
independence and future. It's a powerful story of resilience, faith
and purpose. Join the Guild today, save a bunch of money,
get great programming, great entertainment. Receive your two free tickets
right now by visiting angel dot com slash PAGs, Angel
dot com slash PAGs do it right now. Not sure,
much like.
Speaker 3 (17:01):
The Western world in general, like yeah, well, I was like,
we didn't get out of that on the right side
of it.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
Well, let me ask you something crazy. Let me ask
you something crazy. Why then? And I don't want them to,
but why then didn't Russia and China jump into the
Iran situation? And it's a serious question. And maybe through
your research you found out why they wouldn't have, because
if they would have taken out Lindsay Graham, and I
don't think they did. We're just throwing out some conspiracy
stuff right now. If they were to have been involved
(17:28):
in taking out Lindsay Graham, they know that that would
trigger something much more abroad. Why not just jump in
and take us on in Iran? And I think they
would have lost, don't get me wrong, But why wait
to take out you know a statesman who, yes, is
anti Iran, anti Russia, probably anti China in many aspects.
Why wait for that? Why not just jump in? Now
(17:48):
you've got it? We're there. Remember in the Middle East
that you just brought this up. Everybody and anybody and
their uncle and their mother were attacking us in Iraq,
were attacking us in Afghanistan because they could because we
were there, you know what I mean.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
So bear with me on this one, Joe, because I
want to use an analogy here. So I live on
a farm and we have a lot of farm cats,
and they roam around the yard and they wreak absolute
havoc on our squirrel, mouse, wrap, vole, bunny. They killed
the baby fox at one point. They weak havoc here, right,
(18:24):
And I've watched them hunt because after a while, that's
you know, there's not really a lot that you can
do to stop. Once once one of those cats sets
its eyes on the thing it wants to kill and eat,
it's going to do it. But it doesn't similarly to
cats out in the savannah, if you will right, they
don't do it in one shot. They like to have fun.
(18:46):
And because some of those smaller creatures are pretty fast,
they're pretty nimble, they can go down into their little
burrows and get away. But the cat's always, you know,
always going to be bigger and always going to try
to win. And the cat is stealthy. And so when
you watch when you watch a cat hunt, it plays
with the thing that it's trying to kill until the
(19:08):
point that it is so exhausted. The catcher sits there
and eats it. And sometimes that thing is alive when
it starts to get eaten.
Speaker 1 (19:15):
So your point is you got some kind of slow
You've got China and Russia that are probably involved, and
they're nibbling away at something, maybe helping with intelligence, maybe
helping with munitions behind the scenes, and they are already
fighting us, but they're just not like announcing we're fighting you.
Speaker 3 (19:33):
Yeah. Basically, it's death by a thousand cuts in many ways.
And so when you look at China, China's stealth invasion
is linked to our entire digital platform. We know that
Chinese spies like to buy land close to military installations.
We know that China is behind the massive amounts of
(19:56):
fentanyl that have caused massive social destabilization, and I also
have concerns about China's influence within the inner workings of politics.
We literally know that some of our politicians have been
wrapped up with Chinese spies. So you know, China's sort
of stealth influence in this war is very centered on
(20:19):
the homeland. We just don't talk about it because again,
if we talk about it and we start throwing out
those kind of accusations, that's when things tend to escalate. Russia.
Russia seems to be really focused on the European angle.
I do think that there is something to the mass
immigration that we're seeing across Europe is literally out of
(20:40):
Stalin's playbook. It's Stalin used to import predominantly Muslim populations
too countries that he wanted to destabilize and swoop in
and install the leadership that he wanted. So that was
Stalin's whole thing.
Speaker 1 (20:55):
And at the same time, they were not they were
not welcomed into Russia, right, they were not welcome to
the Soviet Union.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
Not welcomed into Russia. But it's sort of like the
it's called the Stan approach. So like all the Stan
countries Tasjiki Stan, tak man Isstan, blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
And so because it wasn't that long ago Putin himself
was fighting Muslims in Chechnya. I mean, they don't want
them there, but you're saying they were exporting them or
importing them into other countries that they wanted to dominate somehow.
Speaker 3 (21:22):
Yeah, because they're like they're also war fodder. And so
there's sort of this relationship you could say, between Russia
and like fundamentalist Islam, where Russia can, even though there's
like this disdain for fundamentalist Islam and Islam in general,
they can import all of these crazy terrorists and these
you know, benefit scroungers. You can financially and socially destabilize
(21:43):
the country with these people and then say there is
a war and it starts to escalate where Iran, all
these people will take up arms in the countries they've
been imported to. So you know, we're looking at the UK,
We're looking at pretty much all of what in Europe.
So Russia can then use them to just take on
(22:05):
a lot of the chaos to become that kind of
war fodder, to be the you know, the sewis, like
the suicide bombers, things like that, and then Russia doesn't
have to expend anywhere near as much of its money,
or its munitions or pretty much anything.
Speaker 1 (22:20):
Pats Russia not realize that they always end up turning
their weaponry on us. We backed the muja Hadeen against
the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, and as soon as they
beat the Soviet Union because of us, we gave them
the weaponry. They turned them on us and took down
the Towers of nine to eleven and everything else. One
of the one of the top dogs in muja Hadeen
was Osama bin Laden. Does Russia not realize that these
(22:41):
people do all they can to end up killing you
by the end of it, they're not your friend.
Speaker 3 (22:47):
I think Russia is like like China is kind of ignorant,
ignorant enough to think that they could handle it, which
I don't think Russia can. But I also don't think
that a lot of terocells win domestically in Russia because
Russia is willing to blow up entire apartment buildings full
(23:07):
of its own people to you know, to win, and
so you got to think about that, saying with China,
you know that they have that complete superiority complex where
I mean the lies that China has told the world
to kind of inflate China's actual potential power, like in
our minds is just like insane. China is not as
(23:30):
amazing as everyone like in China, Like there's Joe, there's
even rumors that you know, that whole thing that China
has like over a billion people in its population that
like math doesn't actually math. I can't get into it,
like the ins and outs of it now, but it's
probably more like five hundred million.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
Wait is that so? Why would they say one point
four billion just to scare the world?
Speaker 3 (23:51):
Sounds Yeah, it makes them sound scary. You know. Wow,
isn't that so stupid? Isn't that so stupid? Like years
I went to school and I was like under the
assumption like, oh, yeah, China has like over a billion
people in its population. Then you sit down you actually
look at even like I was Joe, I was in
China when the one child rule was a thing. Yeah,
(24:13):
me too, And it never crossed my mind how much
that must decimate or must have decimated the population.
Speaker 1 (24:18):
Were we in China at the same time? Is that
what you're telling me? When did you go to China
the same kind of time?
Speaker 3 (24:23):
I nearly moved to Hong Kong. I loved Hong Kong,
and then I took over and I was like, that's
not for me, but I liked it. I was there.
You're in the SARS epidemic, so I got a very
different China to what most people can.
Speaker 1 (24:34):
So you think they literally are blown the numbers up
to scare the world?
Speaker 2 (24:37):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (24:38):
I think so.
Speaker 1 (24:39):
Is that k Hill casemyfield dot com. Go follow her
on all the social media, sere on Newsmax all the
time as well. She's great there. Let's talk about the
the assassination threats against President Trump. Iran now is saying,
I mean literally as we gave them a break, which
I don't get, Okay, why are we giving them a
break from war to bury this disgusting leader? This this
(24:59):
I told will come an e guy. So we give
them a couple of day break and at the funeral
they're holding big signs saying we will kill Trump. Did
I miss something? So the assassination attempts or the assassination
proclamations don't stop, and you would think Trump having already
phase four or five assassination attempts, but let it roll
off his back. You know what really jumped out at me,
(25:21):
and I want your thoughts on this, is that he
actually took the time to say, if they get me,
if they killed me, they'll be decimated. There is a
plan in place to wipe them off the map. What's
going on there is that him saying things that he
knows that they'll react to, them saying things they know
that he'll react to. You know, they'd like to really
kill them, So what's going on with that?
Speaker 3 (25:43):
I think they probably always wanted to kill Trump. I
mean you could replace Trump with pretty much anyone in
power and they would want to kill that person. Is
it's like again like it's the death to the Infidel
too or.
Speaker 1 (25:53):
The big Satan?
Speaker 3 (25:54):
Right, Yeah, yeah, It's is just so stupid and I think,
I mean, this is this is what I love about
Trump though, Like I remember when I don't know if
this is like for sure something that happened, but I'm
pretty sure it happened when Putin was like, oh yeah,
we've got like missiles, little hit Alaska and Trump was like,
(26:15):
do it off Latin Moscow, and like, you know, he would.
And so I think, again, there's always gonna be people
across the Middle East who want to kill not just
whoever is the president, but everyone in America and all
white people. And so I think Trump standing up and
being like, yeah, do it, we will flatten you. I
(26:38):
think that's just super un brand for Trump. And that's
why I think people one of the many reasons I
think he's a great president. But I also think it's
so stupid Iran to start doing stuff like that, especially
since most of the Iranian people are like here, like
us here in the US, like we don't want any
of this. The Iranian people, they don't want fundamentalist Islam,
they don't want war. It's just so it seems at
(27:02):
this point, like I understand that, you know, Iran needs
to give up all of its nuclear weaponry. No, but
I do have a whole thing on nuclear weapons for
you if you want to get into that. Yeah. Well,
it turns out the Joe I saw a thing the
other day, you know, the videos of uh new tests. Yes,
(27:24):
like the videos of.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Them, the whole thing.
Speaker 3 (27:27):
Yeah, how come the camera and the film doesn't get destroyed.
Speaker 1 (27:31):
Yeah, it's a great question. I've always wondered that how
did that survive that forty thousand people died when when
it got dropped? Your theory? Okay, don't you'll just say that,
what's the theory?
Speaker 3 (27:41):
I don't know. Maybe they're not as real as we've
been told that they are. I think that's the extreme
version of that theory. You know. Also, why wouldn't you
create footage like that for propaganda if you're a government
like that just makes sense. That's exactly the type of
propaganda that all governments would make if they had a
weapon like that. So you know, it could be as
(28:03):
innocent as like, well, we can't actually take a video
of it, because that is physically impossible. But here's what
one might look like. Let's just tell the population that
it's real. Well, and most people will believe it. Look
at the Democrats, they'll believe anything.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
Well, let me ask you this, because we know that
that atomic bombs exist, because they were really used and
a lot of people died, and we saw Nagasaki and
Hiroshima flattened in World War Two. That really did happen.
That said, you're saying that you know, Kim Jong Uh,
this idiot North Korea might make a video suggesting he's
(28:35):
got something he doesn't have to scare the rest of
the world.
Speaker 3 (28:39):
Oh yeah, I put money on that. I mean, I
think China does the same thing. I think Russia does
the same thing. I think it's all part of that. Again,
I live on a farm. I watch when, especially in spring,
when all of the male all of the males of
the species start fighting each other in the yard. You know,
it's either power, money, or love, right, those only three
(29:00):
things that people truly will go to those extremes for.
And in the concept of nations, it's all three of those.
So you know, why not lie about it? In pretend
let's finish on this out.
Speaker 1 (29:13):
Do you think Iran is lying about the the enriched uranium?
Do you think they really have it?
Speaker 2 (29:19):
No?
Speaker 3 (29:19):
I think they do really have it, because in this
day and age, why wouldn't they.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
Well, I think if they have it, they probably got
it from those, you know, enemies of ours or people
that we have an acrimonious relationship with that you mentioned earlier, Russia, China,
so on and so forth. I mean, I'm assuming that
we must know there's that kind of radiation there, and
they keep talking about how it's it's enrich way pass
what it would be needed for energy, So you think
they probably do have something.
Speaker 3 (29:45):
I think they absolutely do, And I think that's again
part of the kind of threat. Right We've got these drones,
we've got the terra cells here in the US, we
do have this potential threat of you know, if a
new glands Joe somewhere at the top of the Mississippi
or you know, basically anywhere across the say northeast, that
(30:07):
gets into the water supply like immediately, and that takes
out the rest like half of the country. So you've
got to wonder, like, what would the point be in
doing that, Like, especially when you're talking about a beautiful place.
If these countries want to you know, conquer us and
claim these lands for their own, they don't want to
destroy it within you point, But the fact that they
(30:29):
might want to do that, and the fact that they've
said that they would totally do that if they wanted to,
is enough for us to be like, I don't think
we should let you do that.
Speaker 1 (30:38):
You know, it's k Hill Casemyithill dot com. Go and
follow her on all the social media. I've been blocking
people like crazy because of discussing things they've been saying
about Lindsay Graham. So I'm happy to do that. And
I'm guessing you probably haven't an attack like I had been,
because I literally came out and said, say something discussing,
I'm going to block you. But man, this information was
so good and they'll put this out everywhere. So much
(30:58):
there that all sort of tie back to the assassination,
you know, proclamations to President Trump, to the war, to
Lindsey Graham. I mean, there was a lot there that
I think people wanted answers to. I think you not
only gave us answers, but you gave us one hell
of a cat story.
Speaker 3 (31:13):
You're welcome. Yeah, let's not be the mouse in that one.
Let's come in and be the bed that I totally
saw in my backyard one time, even though my husband
still doesn't believe me, but there was one.
Speaker 1 (31:23):
The bear story for next time, go and follow Ka everywhere.
K thanks a million, Thanks, Jof. That's it. Runshaking and
un afraid with Joe Paggs this time. Make sure you
subscribe another one who drop very soon
You probably haven't heard about this. We're gonna fill you
in big time in a second. But there are Iranian
drones right now, ninety miles off the coast of the
United States. The President was asked about it today. They
do have that, and they.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Might very well have that will take care of it.
Marco's just in the other room, and if they do
have that, will take care of it in short order.
We're not gonna have a problem. We're not going to
allow that to happen. So it could be that their
story sept We're looking into it now. It could be so,
and a prabe isn't, so we'll figure it out.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
Iranian drones are they also Russian backed? Is China involved?
How many are there? Let's dive deep right now with Khill, Joe.
Speaker 3 (00:36):
There are at least that we know of, three hundred
Iranian drones. They're actually eree hundred Russian yeah drones. So
these aren't just like those little things that you see
nipping about like your teenagers using to like, I don't know,
fly over the neighborhood or whatever. So these are not
necessarily stealth drones, but they fly predominantly below radar. They
(00:59):
have about a thousand mile range. They fly at about
one hundred and fifteen miles an hour. They so they
go on a pre planned route. This type of drone
I think it's called the Shaheed, I don't want to
mispronounce it, and it's like one three six or whatever
they you know, if it starts. They give this tech
like such lovely memorable names. But these drones they go
(01:20):
on pre planned routes and when they arrive at their target,
they explode on impact and they carry about one hundred
pounds of explosives each. So we're talking about three hundred
drones that could reach from Cuba to New York. So
little bit of a concern, especially when you sort of
(01:40):
look at the escalating Uh, it's not even tensions at
this point, is it. It's just it's just an escalating
war with Iran. When we see that, you know, Russia
is also somewhat semi involved in the actual procurement. Well,
you know, Iran, Cuba, Russia, they have their little love
triangle going on, and they have done forever really at
(02:04):
least the last you know, forty five to fifty years,
and so these drones have been sitting off the coast.
I think Cuba started really accruing a lot of them
in about twenty twenty three. The estimate right now is
about three hundred drones. So three hundred of these things
could in theory blow up targets across the Eastern seaboard.
(02:27):
It is it is kind of scary when you think
about it like that, but when you think about it
in terms of the scale of the ongoing war with Iran,
three hundred drones is actually not that much.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
So well, I want to stop you because the word
drone brings us back to a few years ago when
you had a bunch of drones over the east coast
of the United States. Some people were saying that it
was some Iranian mothership out in the water. Turns out,
according to Trump and the Trump administration, no, no, no, we
knew what those were. That was us. Don't worry, We're good,
(02:59):
but we never really found out what the cause and
the purpose was. So you've got all these drones, and
I believe it was off the coast of New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware,
that area, and now we've got ninety miles away from Florida,
three hundred plus drones from Iran slash Russia that go
one hundred and fifteen miles an hour last I checked,
that would mean it could hit Florida in forty minutes.
So that's a problem for me. Is anybody in the
(03:22):
government and our current government saying anything about this? How
did we find out about this? Because again this sort
of came out of the.
Speaker 3 (03:27):
Blue to me, so great question. I'm not exactly sure
what the exact source is because when I was doing
my research there was multiple sources, and again it's sort
of it's been happening since twenty twenty three. I'm so
glad that you brought up the new Jersey drones because
I actually have a new theory on that in light
of the intelligence herefore it's been released on. Okay, so
(03:51):
those drones, there is a massive gap. I don't want
to scare people, Joe, and I'm smiling because I'm scared,
and that's what I do when I'm a little bit scared.
But there was a massive gap in our defense systems
across the United States. I'm not sure what it's like
at our international basis, but across certainly the continental US
(04:11):
and Hawaii and Alaska, there is a massive gap in
our defense when it comes to drones. So I think
it's less than fifty percent of all of our military
installations have the right setup. Obviously, you and I probably
wouldn't know what that setup is because it's a lot
of you know, it's for national defense, but the setup
(04:33):
to protect themselves from drone strikes. The drones that were
looking at in Cuba in particular, are designed to fly
below radar, So it's one of those where you sort
of know it's there if you're lucky and somehow you
pick up on it or you're aware of it once
it arrives. So I wouldn't be surprised that what was
going on in New Jersey, in that sort of part
(04:55):
of the northern East coast, I wouldn't be surprised if
that was a tre exercise to figure out what our
actual gaps are. And I think it was late. It
was either late last year or the year before. Congress
basically said this is a huge concern. We Joe this this,
this is what blew my mind. I don't know why
(05:16):
it blew my mind. This next fact I'm about to
tell you, but it did. But I've read it so
many times with so many other disasters. But we don't
actually have a point person in charge for if there
is a massive drone strike across you know, here in
the homeland, and so when, if and when something like
that were to happen, local law enforcement basically has no
(05:41):
authority to do anything. The military and the Department of Defense,
the Pentagon, they can't figure out who's in charge in
that kind of situation.
Speaker 2 (05:51):
War.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
Sorry, it's not a Department of Defense. It's war. Yeah,
go ahead, Department of War.
Speaker 3 (05:56):
But I think that that is one of the biggest
issues that facing right now. So we've got the radar issue,
We've got the fact that these things are pretty stealthy,
they can hit the US, they have a huge range,
and they're designed to not be picked up by the
systems we currently have. Wow, we have no one who
would necessarily be in charge, and no way in that
(06:18):
kind of chaos to choose a person who's in charge.
Joe I just got done on a writing project about
the Maui wildfires, and that's exactly what we saw there.
These wildfires broke out and no one in Hawaii has
taken responsibility because no one can figure out who was
actually in charge and who was calling the shop, and
it looks like it was no one. Yeah, so that
(06:41):
is a huge gap that could very easily be filled,
but that also creates a potent, you know, like, oh,
we could go into.
Speaker 1 (06:47):
So from your research, and again it's a supposition, you
don't know, but you're going down the rabbit hole a
little bit that the drone activity off in New Jersey
and whatever else in the East coast that was probably
some sort of training exercise. And if that's true, let
me ask you what might sound like a really dumb question,
because that's what I do for a living, ask the
dumb questions. Why exactly wouldn't they just tell us it's
(07:09):
a training exercise, that's that's what's going on, because now
we're it's UFOs, it's Iran with the mothership, if we're
being attacked by aliens. I mean, I was surprised the
local law enforcement didn't start shooting them out of the sky.
But as you said, they really can't do that. So
there's no point person they're not telling us when there's
a training exercise and there are three hundred militarized drones
(07:29):
waiting in Cuba, good day in America. I mean, that's
that's all pretty scary, it is.
Speaker 3 (07:35):
Yeah, and that doesn't include the potentially tens of thousands
of terrorists that may have walked over all.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
I think it's more than tens of thousands. I think
it's a lot more than tens of thousands. We have
no idea how many terror cells are here, how many
how many Islamic Jihad and Hamas and has Bellah and
MS thirteen and trend to Irago. We don't know. We
have no idea. During the Biden years, we had no clue.
It is k Hill. Go and follow her everywhere case
smith Hill dot com. You can go see here on Newsmax.
She's amazing. So let's transition that to what Lindsey Graham
(08:07):
was working on before his sudden, untimely passing over the weekend.
He was just in Ukraine. I know he was there,
just in Ukraine, got back and then passed away a
few hours later or something. He's a guy that wanted
to take out Putin. He was a warhawk big time.
He was a guy who wanted to end Iran. And
now you know, Iran puts out the targets. He was
one of the targets and now he's gone. President Trump
(08:28):
is another one of the targets. Now Iran has all
these these drones off the coast of the United States.
Is there a connection there between him going to Ukraine
trying to stop the Russia war, wanted to take out Putin,
complaining about Iran, wanted to take out Iran, to the
fact that they're militarizing the island just off our coast.
Is there a Lindsay Graham connection or no.
Speaker 3 (08:48):
So I think there is a Lindsay Graham connection, but
there's two different versions of that kind take me there,
and I want to be really clear on both of them. Okay,
so what do we know everything that you just described.
We know that Lindsey Graham was anti Putin, We know
that he was just in Ukraine, and we know that,
like so much of his recent career was focused on
(09:13):
that intervention. He's very anti Iran. He was, you know,
if there were lists, which you know we've been told
that there's many lists, he was definitely on the list.
And so there is that kind of involvement where we
know that there's a connection there purely because he was
working so hard to manage this situation. What a lot
of people are saying online is the Lindsey Graham was
(09:37):
killed by Russia and you know. I hate to say it, Joe,
but like the first thing I thought when I read
Lindsay Graham was just in Ukraine trying to figure out
how to help them in the war against Russia. Lindsay
Graham's sadly died way too young of a sudden illness. Joe,
(09:59):
I lost count of the number of articles that I
wrote when I was working a Just Daily caller on
how Russia gets rid of people it doesn't like and
how it's all under very weird, mysterious circumstances. Stuff from
you know, we know that they poison people. That's been
an ongoing like that.
Speaker 1 (10:18):
That's not that's not a headline. That's just that's what
they do.
Speaker 3 (10:22):
There's people who get poisoned, go to the hospital, survive,
and then mysteriously fall out of windows. There are people
who get blown up, but particularly the sort of poison
spect that is just such a Russia vibe. And yes,
I've seen those rumors online that he was killed by Russia.
(10:44):
Two things on that one, I don't know if he
actually did. Because I know a lot of people who've
had those sudden coronary and cardiac issues. There's not a
whole lot you can do I think he had the
same like we're being told that he had the same
issue as John Ritter.
Speaker 1 (11:03):
Who you know, just as he's acting Yeah.
Speaker 3 (11:06):
Dropped, yeah, dropped. And so do I think that he
was killed by Russia? No? But even if he was,
the reason that I think you don't tell the public
that that's how he died is because that starts World
War three. That is the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. That
(11:26):
is killing an American statesman and basically saying we don't care,
We're going to keep doing this stuff. We're so I
can't use the words that I want to use because
in Britain they're definitely swearing. In America, I'm pretty sure
they're swearing. But that is a that's the word I
mean to try and think of a non sweat. It's
a gutsy thing to do. Let's put it that way, Okay.
(11:50):
And so if we knew the Russia had killed Lindsey Graham,
that's World War three.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
That for those who don't know the prelimory caused death.
I just want to put this out there, and this
just sounds very suddenly. There's a tear in the ioora,
there's a tear in his aora and he just died.
But he was just in Ukraine and he was just
talking about how you have to you know, help Ukraine
and end that war. Yeah, you're talking about ending Iran
all the time, talking about we're definitely gonna get the
Save America Act done. He was telling President Trump an
(12:19):
hour or two before he died, we're gonna get that
done starting Monday. So the prelinary cause of death, I'm
reading this now for centaer Lindsay gram a ortic dissection
caused by arterial sclerotic cardiovascular disease, hardening of the arteries. Yeah,
could have happened. It might be that, but there's the
timing is really suspect. So let me ask you from
(12:39):
your research into those who we know were assassinated. I'm
not saying that he was, but we know that some
in history, a lot in history have been assassinated. The
reason to not put it out there is what you
just said, because then it causes World War three. But
I mean, if Russia were to do this, I'm not
saying they did, but if they were to do this,
are they not worried about causing World War three?
Speaker 3 (13:01):
I don't know if Russia cares that much because you've
got to remember World War III isn't just Russia on
its own, it's Russia Iran, It's an Iran, is every
single fundamentalist Islamic terucel in the world. Because there's again
a lot of intelligence that suggests that everyone from Harmas
to Hezbula to al Qaeda, just run down the list,
(13:25):
they're pretty much all under one umbrella now with the
goal obviously being destroyed the Infidel. So we've got the
entire fundamentalist Islamic world involved on Russia side. That brings
in China, and then China gets to basically pick and
choose its allies. You know, you could if Africa was
(13:45):
more developed technologically, like Africa would be on the side
of China, for example, because China has such a strong
financial investment across pretty much all of Africa at this point,
and so you've got to look at every where the
o's China money and think, okay, they would be on
China's side. Are they necessarily the same kind of threat
(14:06):
as like, uh yeah, like all the terror cells that
I just mentioned. No, but that's how that war breaks
down if you look at it from you know, we're
playing like a game of risk or whatever. Yeah, so
world War three, And then you've also got to look
at how destabilized Europe is. You and I have talked
about this, like for years on the show. The number
(14:27):
of terra cells in Europe. I mean, i'd guarantee there's
ten x more in Europe than there is here in
the US. You've also got them proximity to Russia. And
I don't know, like, if you want to rewrite the
face of the Earth, you start World War three. And
even though I would always say America is going to
(14:48):
be the strongest because we literally are, I don't know
how long that plays out for. Because you've also got
to look at the ideologies of these groups, like again,
fundamentalist Islam. I think it was actually Osama bin Laden
who was the big proponent of like even if it
takes a hundred even if it takes a thousand years,
we will destroy and conquer the Infidel. So they have
(15:10):
timelines that ideologically never cross the table for us here
in the US. So even if we won in a
battle where there are three hundred drones coming in from
Cuba at the same time, we've got you know, domestic
like these terror cells get mobilized. Again, we don't know
how many, like even Russian terror cells there might be
(15:33):
here that could be a thing.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
Or Chinese peroucells right.
Speaker 3 (15:36):
Oh, definitely, And so that could simply be one small
chapter in a war that lasts one hundred years. Because
we here in the US, when we think of all,
we think, let's get in, let's get out, might take
twenty years like it did in the Middle East. And
I mean, jury's still out on what good we even
did there. In the end.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
It's always a fun time to take the family to
the movies. But if I spend thirty dollars, when you
can save a bunch of money and get better programming
in better entertainment, why not join the Angel Guild For
just fifteen dollars a month. You're gonna get two free
tickets to see Young Washington in theaters this Independence Day,
plus tickets to future Angel theatrical releases, and full access
to Angel streaming Library. It's one of the best entertainment
(16:19):
values I've seen in a very long time. Now, let's
talk about that movie in theaters this Independence Day. Young
Washington tells the story of George Washington before he became
a general before he became president, and before he became
a legend. At just twenty years old, Washington face failure, setbacks,
and near death experiences that would have broken most people. Instead,
those challenges forged the leader who would help secure America's
(16:42):
independence and future. It's a powerful story of resilience, faith
and purpose. Join the Guild today, save a bunch of money,
get great programming, great entertainment. Receive your two free tickets
right now by visiting angel dot com slash PAGs, Angel
dot com slash PAGs do it right now. Not sure,
much like.
Speaker 3 (17:01):
The Western world in general, like yeah, well, I was like,
we didn't get out of that on the right side
of it.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
Well, let me ask you something crazy. Let me ask
you something crazy. Why then? And I don't want them to,
but why then didn't Russia and China jump into the
Iran situation? And it's a serious question. And maybe through
your research you found out why they wouldn't have, because
if they would have taken out Lindsay Graham, and I
don't think they did. We're just throwing out some conspiracy
stuff right now. If they were to have been involved
(17:28):
in taking out Lindsay Graham, they know that that would
trigger something much more abroad. Why not just jump in
and take us on in Iran? And I think they
would have lost, don't get me wrong, But why wait
to take out you know a statesman who, yes, is
anti Iran, anti Russia, probably anti China in many aspects.
Why wait for that? Why not just jump in? Now
(17:48):
you've got it? We're there. Remember in the Middle East
that you just brought this up. Everybody and anybody and
their uncle and their mother were attacking us in Iraq,
were attacking us in Afghanistan because they could because we
were there, you know what I mean.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
So bear with me on this one, Joe, because I
want to use an analogy here. So I live on
a farm and we have a lot of farm cats,
and they roam around the yard and they wreak absolute
havoc on our squirrel, mouse, wrap, vole, bunny. They killed
the baby fox at one point. They weak havoc here, right,
(18:24):
And I've watched them hunt because after a while, that's
you know, there's not really a lot that you can
do to stop. Once once one of those cats sets
its eyes on the thing it wants to kill and eat,
it's going to do it. But it doesn't similarly to
cats out in the savannah, if you will right, they
don't do it in one shot. They like to have fun.
(18:46):
And because some of those smaller creatures are pretty fast,
they're pretty nimble, they can go down into their little
burrows and get away. But the cat's always, you know,
always going to be bigger and always going to try
to win. And the cat is stealthy. And so when
you watch when you watch a cat hunt, it plays
with the thing that it's trying to kill until the
(19:08):
point that it is so exhausted. The catcher sits there
and eats it. And sometimes that thing is alive when
it starts to get eaten.
Speaker 1 (19:15):
So your point is you got some kind of slow
You've got China and Russia that are probably involved, and
they're nibbling away at something, maybe helping with intelligence, maybe
helping with munitions behind the scenes, and they are already
fighting us, but they're just not like announcing we're fighting you.
Speaker 3 (19:33):
Yeah. Basically, it's death by a thousand cuts in many ways.
And so when you look at China, China's stealth invasion
is linked to our entire digital platform. We know that
Chinese spies like to buy land close to military installations.
We know that China is behind the massive amounts of
(19:56):
fentanyl that have caused massive social destabilization, and I also
have concerns about China's influence within the inner workings of politics.
We literally know that some of our politicians have been
wrapped up with Chinese spies. So you know, China's sort
of stealth influence in this war is very centered on
(20:19):
the homeland. We just don't talk about it because again,
if we talk about it and we start throwing out
those kind of accusations, that's when things tend to escalate. Russia.
Russia seems to be really focused on the European angle.
I do think that there is something to the mass
immigration that we're seeing across Europe is literally out of
(20:40):
Stalin's playbook. It's Stalin used to import predominantly Muslim populations
too countries that he wanted to destabilize and swoop in
and install the leadership that he wanted. So that was
Stalin's whole thing.
Speaker 1 (20:55):
And at the same time, they were not they were
not welcomed into Russia, right, they were not welcome to
the Soviet Union.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
Not welcomed into Russia. But it's sort of like the
it's called the Stan approach. So like all the Stan
countries Tasjiki Stan, tak man Isstan, blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
And so because it wasn't that long ago Putin himself
was fighting Muslims in Chechnya. I mean, they don't want
them there, but you're saying they were exporting them or
importing them into other countries that they wanted to dominate somehow.
Speaker 3 (21:22):
Yeah, because they're like they're also war fodder. And so
there's sort of this relationship you could say, between Russia
and like fundamentalist Islam, where Russia can, even though there's
like this disdain for fundamentalist Islam and Islam in general,
they can import all of these crazy terrorists and these
you know, benefit scroungers. You can financially and socially destabilize
(21:43):
the country with these people and then say there is
a war and it starts to escalate where Iran, all
these people will take up arms in the countries they've
been imported to. So you know, we're looking at the UK,
We're looking at pretty much all of what in Europe.
So Russia can then use them to just take on
(22:05):
a lot of the chaos to become that kind of
war fodder, to be the you know, the sewis, like
the suicide bombers, things like that, and then Russia doesn't
have to expend anywhere near as much of its money,
or its munitions or pretty much anything.
Speaker 1 (22:20):
Pats Russia not realize that they always end up turning
their weaponry on us. We backed the muja Hadeen against
the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, and as soon as they
beat the Soviet Union because of us, we gave them
the weaponry. They turned them on us and took down
the Towers of nine to eleven and everything else. One
of the one of the top dogs in muja Hadeen
was Osama bin Laden. Does Russia not realize that these
(22:41):
people do all they can to end up killing you
by the end of it, they're not your friend.
Speaker 3 (22:47):
I think Russia is like like China is kind of ignorant,
ignorant enough to think that they could handle it, which
I don't think Russia can. But I also don't think
that a lot of terocells win domestically in Russia because
Russia is willing to blow up entire apartment buildings full
(23:07):
of its own people to you know, to win, and
so you got to think about that, saying with China,
you know that they have that complete superiority complex where
I mean the lies that China has told the world
to kind of inflate China's actual potential power, like in
our minds is just like insane. China is not as
(23:30):
amazing as everyone like in China, Like there's Joe, there's
even rumors that you know, that whole thing that China
has like over a billion people in its population that
like math doesn't actually math. I can't get into it,
like the ins and outs of it now, but it's
probably more like five hundred million.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
Wait is that so? Why would they say one point
four billion just to scare the world?
Speaker 3 (23:51):
Sounds Yeah, it makes them sound scary. You know. Wow,
isn't that so stupid? Isn't that so stupid? Like years
I went to school and I was like under the
assumption like, oh, yeah, China has like over a billion
people in its population. Then you sit down you actually
look at even like I was Joe, I was in
China when the one child rule was a thing. Yeah,
(24:13):
me too, And it never crossed my mind how much
that must decimate or must have decimated the population.
Speaker 1 (24:18):
Were we in China at the same time? Is that
what you're telling me? When did you go to China
the same kind of time?
Speaker 3 (24:23):
I nearly moved to Hong Kong. I loved Hong Kong,
and then I took over and I was like, that's
not for me, but I liked it. I was there.
You're in the SARS epidemic, so I got a very
different China to what most people can.
Speaker 1 (24:34):
So you think they literally are blown the numbers up
to scare the world?
Speaker 2 (24:37):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (24:38):
I think so.
Speaker 1 (24:39):
Is that k Hill casemyfield dot com. Go follow her
on all the social media, sere on Newsmax all the
time as well. She's great there. Let's talk about the
the assassination threats against President Trump. Iran now is saying,
I mean literally as we gave them a break, which
I don't get, Okay, why are we giving them a
break from war to bury this disgusting leader? This this
(24:59):
I told will come an e guy. So we give
them a couple of day break and at the funeral
they're holding big signs saying we will kill Trump. Did
I miss something? So the assassination attempts or the assassination
proclamations don't stop, and you would think Trump having already
phase four or five assassination attempts, but let it roll
off his back. You know what really jumped out at me,
(25:21):
and I want your thoughts on this, is that he
actually took the time to say, if they get me,
if they killed me, they'll be decimated. There is a
plan in place to wipe them off the map. What's
going on there is that him saying things that he
knows that they'll react to, them saying things they know
that he'll react to. You know, they'd like to really
kill them, So what's going on with that?
Speaker 3 (25:43):
I think they probably always wanted to kill Trump. I
mean you could replace Trump with pretty much anyone in
power and they would want to kill that person. Is
it's like again like it's the death to the Infidel
too or.
Speaker 1 (25:53):
The big Satan?
Speaker 3 (25:54):
Right, Yeah, yeah, It's is just so stupid and I think,
I mean, this is this is what I love about
Trump though, Like I remember when I don't know if
this is like for sure something that happened, but I'm
pretty sure it happened when Putin was like, oh yeah,
we've got like missiles, little hit Alaska and Trump was like,
(26:15):
do it off Latin Moscow, and like, you know, he would.
And so I think, again, there's always gonna be people
across the Middle East who want to kill not just
whoever is the president, but everyone in America and all
white people. And so I think Trump standing up and
being like, yeah, do it, we will flatten you. I
(26:38):
think that's just super un brand for Trump. And that's
why I think people one of the many reasons I
think he's a great president. But I also think it's
so stupid Iran to start doing stuff like that, especially
since most of the Iranian people are like here, like
us here in the US, like we don't want any
of this. The Iranian people, they don't want fundamentalist Islam,
they don't want war. It's just so it seems at
(27:02):
this point, like I understand that, you know, Iran needs
to give up all of its nuclear weaponry. No, but
I do have a whole thing on nuclear weapons for
you if you want to get into that. Yeah. Well,
it turns out the Joe I saw a thing the
other day, you know, the videos of uh new tests. Yes,
(27:24):
like the videos of.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Them, the whole thing.
Speaker 3 (27:27):
Yeah, how come the camera and the film doesn't get destroyed.
Speaker 1 (27:31):
Yeah, it's a great question. I've always wondered that how
did that survive that forty thousand people died when when
it got dropped? Your theory? Okay, don't you'll just say that,
what's the theory?
Speaker 3 (27:41):
I don't know. Maybe they're not as real as we've
been told that they are. I think that's the extreme
version of that theory. You know. Also, why wouldn't you
create footage like that for propaganda if you're a government
like that just makes sense. That's exactly the type of
propaganda that all governments would make if they had a
weapon like that. So you know, it could be as
(28:03):
innocent as like, well, we can't actually take a video
of it, because that is physically impossible. But here's what
one might look like. Let's just tell the population that
it's real. Well, and most people will believe it. Look
at the Democrats, they'll believe anything.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
Well, let me ask you this, because we know that
that atomic bombs exist, because they were really used and
a lot of people died, and we saw Nagasaki and
Hiroshima flattened in World War Two. That really did happen.
That said, you're saying that you know, Kim Jong Uh,
this idiot North Korea might make a video suggesting he's
(28:35):
got something he doesn't have to scare the rest of
the world.
Speaker 3 (28:39):
Oh yeah, I put money on that. I mean, I
think China does the same thing. I think Russia does
the same thing. I think it's all part of that. Again,
I live on a farm. I watch when, especially in spring,
when all of the male all of the males of
the species start fighting each other in the yard. You know,
it's either power, money, or love, right, those only three
(29:00):
things that people truly will go to those extremes for.
And in the concept of nations, it's all three of those.
So you know, why not lie about it? In pretend
let's finish on this out.
Speaker 1 (29:13):
Do you think Iran is lying about the the enriched uranium?
Do you think they really have it?
Speaker 2 (29:19):
No?
Speaker 3 (29:19):
I think they do really have it, because in this
day and age, why wouldn't they.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
Well, I think if they have it, they probably got
it from those, you know, enemies of ours or people
that we have an acrimonious relationship with that you mentioned earlier, Russia, China,
so on and so forth. I mean, I'm assuming that
we must know there's that kind of radiation there, and
they keep talking about how it's it's enrich way pass
what it would be needed for energy, So you think
they probably do have something.
Speaker 3 (29:45):
I think they absolutely do, And I think that's again
part of the kind of threat. Right We've got these drones,
we've got the terra cells here in the US, we
do have this potential threat of you know, if a
new glands Joe somewhere at the top of the Mississippi
or you know, basically anywhere across the say northeast, that
(30:07):
gets into the water supply like immediately, and that takes
out the rest like half of the country. So you've
got to wonder, like, what would the point be in
doing that, Like, especially when you're talking about a beautiful place.
If these countries want to you know, conquer us and
claim these lands for their own, they don't want to
destroy it within you point, But the fact that they
(30:29):
might want to do that, and the fact that they've
said that they would totally do that if they wanted to,
is enough for us to be like, I don't think
we should let you do that.
Speaker 1 (30:38):
You know, it's k Hill Casemyithill dot com. Go and
follow her on all the social media. I've been blocking
people like crazy because of discussing things they've been saying
about Lindsay Graham. So I'm happy to do that. And
I'm guessing you probably haven't an attack like I had been,
because I literally came out and said, say something discussing,
I'm going to block you. But man, this information was
so good and they'll put this out everywhere. So much
(30:58):
there that all sort of tie back to the assassination,
you know, proclamations to President Trump, to the war, to
Lindsey Graham. I mean, there was a lot there that
I think people wanted answers to. I think you not
only gave us answers, but you gave us one hell
of a cat story.
Speaker 3 (31:13):
You're welcome. Yeah, let's not be the mouse in that one.
Let's come in and be the bed that I totally
saw in my backyard one time, even though my husband
still doesn't believe me, but there was one.
Speaker 1 (31:23):
The bear story for next time, go and follow Ka everywhere.
K thanks a million, Thanks, Jof. That's it. Runshaking and
un afraid with Joe Paggs this time. Make sure you
subscribe another one who drop very soon
Popular Podcasts
Betrayal Weekly
Betrayal Weekly is back for a new season. Every Thursday, Betrayal Weekly shares first-hand accounts of broken trust, shocking deceptions, and the trail of destruction they leave behind. Hosted by Andrea Gunning, this weekly ongoing series digs into real-life stories of betrayal and the aftermath. From stories of double lives to dark discoveries, these are cautionary tales and accounts of resilience against all odds. From the producers of the critically acclaimed Betrayal series, Betrayal Weekly drops new episodes every Thursday. If you would like to share your story, you can reach out to the Betrayal Team by emailing them at betrayalpod@gmail.com and follow us on Instagram at @betrayalpod and @glasspodcasts. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations, and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience, and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.