A Triumphant WLS + California's Ballot Fraud Industrial Complex

It was another triumphant women's event for TPUSA in Texas. The show has the highlights, including a clip of Charlie that sent the online haters into a state of apoplexy. Then, Bill Essayli talks about the extremely shady developments in the Los Angeles mayoral race, enabled by California laws that seem intended to minimize legitimacy and maximize potential fraud. Raheem Kassam weighs the prospects for a post-Henry Nowak awakening of Britain. Lara Logan covers a horrifying euthanasia case in Texas and President Trump's comedic clash with an NBC reporter.

Watch every episode ad-free on members.charliekirk.com! 

Get new merch at charliekirkstore.com!

Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/support

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:03):
My name is Charlie kirk I run the largest pro
American student organization in the country, fighting for the future
of our republic. My call is to fight evil and
to proclaim truth. If the most important thing for you
is just feeling good, you're gonna end up miserable. But
if the most important thing is doing good, you'll end
up purposeful. College is a scam, everybody. You got to

(00:26):
stop sending your kids to college. You should get married
as young as possible and have as many kids as possible.
Go start at turning point. You would say college chapter.
Go start at turning point, yould say high school chapter.
Go find out how your church can get involved. Sign
up and become an activist.

Speaker 2 (00:39):
I gave my.

Speaker 1 (00:39):
Life to the Lord in fifth grade, most important decision
I ever made in my life, and I encourage you.

Speaker 3 (00:44):
To do the same.

Speaker 1 (00:45):
Here I am Lord, Use me. Buckle up, everybody, Here
we go. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor
of the Charlie Kirkshaw, a company that specializes in gold
I rays and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how

(01:07):
you could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at
noblegold investments dot Com. That is Noblegoldinvestments dot Com.

Speaker 4 (01:17):
All Right, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show. It's Monday,
June eighth, twenty twenty six. We are here in Phoenix, Arizona,
at the y Refi Studio. Honored to be with you all.
How we doing, Blake, Oh, we're doing amazing. You know.
I'm just bummed that you were not with us at
what w L. Yeah, I so you missed it. Yeah,
it was a great event. Let me just tell you

(01:38):
the Okay. So I'm like, I don't want to crash
the women's and I'm actually glad you didn't come up.
We're trying to get you fitched anyways. Maybe it would
be they could, but you gotta find your own way here.
You can't be uh can't be going to WLS. All right, listen,
here's the thing. I am a fish out of water
at that event too. I mean it's three thousand, so
it's the biggest women's leadership summit that we've had. It

(02:00):
was in San Antonio. It was amazing. Next year it's
going to be actually in Florida in Palm Beach, West
Palm Beach. But it was amazing. It was amazing to
see this many young women out and it's basically the
things they were saying too. By the way, it's like
none of this boss babe stuff, none of this you know,
freezer eggs stuff. I mean, it's all These are women

(02:20):
that are really going to I think, be the future
of the country in so many ways because they want
to have families, They want to have lots of kids,
they want to get milk on the future.

Speaker 5 (02:32):
Unlike the feminist alternative that literally won't be they won't breed.
We're gonna outbreed them. And that's a good thing. Children
are a blessing. By the way, I don't know if
you saw, but jd. Vance had that great excerpt from
his book in the Wall Street Journal where he was
talking about how Erica after Charlie was killed, you know,
lamented they only had two kids, and then that encouraged

(02:53):
and convinced Usha.

Speaker 4 (02:55):
To have their fourth child.

Speaker 2 (02:56):
That's amazing.

Speaker 4 (02:57):
Yeah, So it's a so anyways, the point is children
are a blessed. People that talk about it like we
say this because they just we just want women to
be birthing factories and all stuff. It's garbage. We want
women to be happy, productive, fulfilled. We believe there's a
design for creation, and having kids is a beautiful, beautiful thing.
We should celebrate it and not stigmatize it. Too much
of our culture has stigmatized. Now, does that mean that

(03:19):
women can't do whatever they want? No, of course they
could do whatever they want. It's still America. Do whatever
you want. But it's what the values that we prioritize
and that we encourage and we celebrate. That's all it is.
We celebrate families. We celebrate beautiful, beautiful children. And gosh, man,
there's a lot of them, a lot of young young
moms there. It was about two thirds of it we're students,
two thirds of other students. About a third of it

(03:39):
was like young moms. So it was a great mix.

Speaker 2 (03:41):
God, we got some great clips.

Speaker 4 (03:42):
Play.

Speaker 5 (03:43):
How about we play one of those young moms. Riley
Gaines was up there and she talked about becoming a parent.
Let's let's get twenty four.

Speaker 6 (03:50):
Now that I'm raising a daughter in this world that
sells fragility and weakness and stick thin as the beauty standard,
I want her to know that strong is beautiful.

Speaker 4 (04:05):
Yeah, well right, I don't know if you've ever been
around Riley, that's right. It looks like she can like
bench press you.

Speaker 2 (04:12):
You know, it was very intimidating.

Speaker 5 (04:14):
She said, you know a lot of women, have you
a tough childbirstn was really easy. I want to have
another kid right away. Okay, that's the most common thing.
But God bless HER's Okay, get right away.

Speaker 4 (04:24):
Erica did a phenomenal job. She just did so much,
so many one liners that went viral. I mean I
could literally pick any of this. Let's go ahead and
pick twenty five.

Speaker 7 (04:34):
When you set out to pursue God's vision for your life,
know that he will show up, He will provide, and
he will honor your obedience to his calling. The world
has a tendency to over complicate the most beautiful and
simple things in this world. But to the women in

(04:58):
this room who are a Christian, it's actually quite simple.
The world will say your life belongs to you, it
does not. Your life belongs to Christ.

Speaker 4 (05:15):
Amen. And then she goes in on the gender I
don't know what you want to call it, this gen
z gender wars. I think one of the most important
things Erica is doing and can do when she communicates
and gives speeches is bring together the men in the wind.

Speaker 5 (05:29):
Yeah, we can talk so much about how they've grown apart,
but they have to live together.

Speaker 4 (05:33):
We literally have to. We need each other. It's true.
Let's go ahead and try cut twenty six.

Speaker 7 (05:39):
When both men and women in society faithfully carry their
responsibilities with integrity and honor, that's how societies flourish and
how great civilizations are sustained.

Speaker 4 (05:53):
And she continues on twenty seven.

Speaker 7 (05:55):
We weren't created to be alone. The scripture reminds us
that men and women were designed to depend on one another,
to support one another, to build together. That is God's
design for us.

Speaker 5 (06:14):
I want to go back to that first clip we
played from Erica because it just it really moved me
as we were watching it again to just think one
of Eric has set a tremendous example over the past
ten months.

Speaker 2 (06:26):
But one of the best ways she's done so is
we know a.

Speaker 5 (06:31):
Horrible tragedy has happened to her, one of the worst
things that can possibly happen, and she's always been so
good at saying no. God's presence has always been here
in my life. I can see how God's will is
manifesting through all of this, and I have surrendered myself
to God. In the same way Charlie did, and that's
a model all of us can live by.

Speaker 4 (06:52):
Well, Kaylee mccannanny said something very similar to that cut
twenty eight.

Speaker 8 (06:57):
There is a spiritual battle playing out and Charlie Kirk
consistently pointed to the truth. He pointed to light. And
I believe there are millions who will be in heaven
with us who accepted Jesus Christ as savior because of
the legacy that Charlie left. I believe that.

Speaker 4 (07:17):
I believe that too, actually, and I see proof of
it all the time. I mean, so many of the
young women that were at this event were saying similar
things to me. They were stopping me saying, you know,
Charlie is why I rededicated myself in my faith.

Speaker 5 (07:32):
And we got an email while you guys were there,
we took a bunch of emails because it was turning
points anniversary, and we got another email from someone who said,
my husband and I were inspired by Charlie to start
a family. And if I interpret it right there about
two months in for their.

Speaker 4 (07:47):
First one good man listen, if one of the lasting
legacies of Charlie and my eight years I got to
spend with Charlie and the show as it continues on,
is that there are lots of new babies that exist
on this planet because of Charlie just hitting that over
and over and over.

Speaker 5 (08:07):
Again, five turning point in the last Yeah, there's babies
all over the place.

Speaker 4 (08:11):
You know that our office basically looks like like ny has.
There's kids toys everywhere. What you get outside of the studio,
there's like little basketball hoops and little kids tables and
all the books and anyway. So it's great. We love kids,
and the whole event was a celebration of that. There
was a little bit of leftist craziness, and Savanna Hernandez

(08:34):
gave some a great comment on this twenty.

Speaker 9 (08:37):
Two Well, the fact that we have people outside that
were swarming one of our entrances with clear Antifa emblems,
wearing Antifa shirts and chanting that they're Antifa goes to
show me that there's a lot of work that still
needs to be done. Radical left wing violence needs to
be dismantled. It's one of the last things that Charlie
talked about before he was taken from us, how serious

(09:00):
this issue is. And again, what was happening outside was
not peaceful protest. What was happening outside was not the
First Amendment. The left wing is not allowed to terrorize us.
They are not allowed to silence us. They're not allowed
to censor us, and we have to stand up against
them every single day.

Speaker 4 (09:18):
Amen. You know, it's such a white pel you know,
because you see so much antagonism about men and women
and feminism and all this stuff. The women at this event,
I just couldn't say enough good things about them, And
Savannah said it really well. There was Antifa outside for
briefly and they were super vile, said all the gross

(09:38):
things you can imagine. The cops dealt with them. Good riddance.
So this was the San Antonio police clashing with them
on the streets outside the event.

Speaker 10 (09:48):
Forty eight.

Speaker 4 (10:06):
Just a positive little Saturday melee on the streets of
I mean, this is what boggles my mind. So you
got three thousand women that are doing they're having a
great time. It's peaceful, it's it's tranquil, it's exciting, it's
it's everything that you would expect it to be. And
they're celebrating their country. They're talking about Maha, they're talking

(10:27):
about families, they're talking about health. All this stuff. It's great.
There's literally like nothing that kind of.

Speaker 5 (10:32):
Get I despise left, but I kind of get them
at least showing up to be agro protesters out a
Trump rally, Like, okay, it's a it's the president, he's
the leader of the opposing faction.

Speaker 2 (10:42):
He is actually campaigning.

Speaker 5 (10:44):
But to do this at just a turning point event
where it's just young women hearing speakers talking about faith,
talking about family, there's something really demented.

Speaker 4 (10:53):
It's really demented, and the dementia where the dementedness gets
even worse. And I apologize in advance for showing you
this clip, but there is a reason we're going to
but just to show you how vile and gross these
people are, and these Antifa thugss, just how unhuman they
tend to be, how they've lacked any empathy, any humanity.

(11:16):
This is a grown man. He made a costume to
resemble Charlie out on the street in front of the
Women's conference, and he made it full of himself, and
it's disgusting, but we're gonna show it forty seven.

Speaker 5 (11:40):
So for those of you who couldn't see that he
was basically lying on the ground to reenact Charlie's assassination.
He was wearing the freedom shirt.

Speaker 4 (11:49):
And he had a like a you know, like a
head made it, some sort of paper macheche head that
was supposed to be Charlie. Anyways, I think the point
is that these people are still celebrating Charlie's assassination. They
still think it's great. They are gleeful, they gloat, and

(12:09):
then they throw it right in our faces. That's what
we're up against. That's how evil this ideology, this movement
is that they are proud of what happened to Charlie.
That's disgusting. But we knew that they wanted us dead.
They knew that, we knew that they wanted Charlie dead.
And if in case there's any any doubt, there's a

(12:32):
living proof right there. That's how gross it is. Right
in front of our women's leadership summit, which again is
the most wholesome, like patriotic, wonderful event. There's there's nothing
that controversial about what's going on. But you know, I
bring that up because you know, nobody in this audience
will be shocked to hear this is not breaking news

(12:54):
that there are those bad actors that have wanted to
somehow implicate or cast suspicion around turning Point in the
wake of Charlie's assassination, and a lot of this is
really unfortunate because it's been targeted at Charlie's widow, Erica, obviously,
and so we decided over the weekend we were gonna
troll the trolls. There's this video that has become a

(13:14):
source of controversy.

Speaker 2 (13:16):
Not even CONTROVERSI just obsession.

Speaker 4 (13:17):
Obsession, people, Yeah, just absurd. I don't even talk about
it because I think the whole thing is so lame.

Speaker 5 (13:23):
And if they demind overwhelming proof for the idea that
Charlie loved his wife and would want his wife to
carry on his mission.

Speaker 4 (13:32):
Yeah, well it's something he told all of us. We
all knew. We didn't talk about it because we thought
Charlie's gonna be with us for another fifty plus years.
But like we all knew, the board knew this was
the plan. Whatever. He said it one time in front
of a camera at a private event with donors and Aspen.
So we just we figured we troll the trolls, and
you get a little taste of it here. SOT forty one.

Speaker 7 (13:53):
The most important relationship in your life is the one
that you have with your Lord and his savor in
Jesus Christ. His passion was my passion, and now his
mission is my mission.

Speaker 1 (14:02):
I appoint my wife's run twenty point USA if something
kind of pistory, Erica would do a great job.

Speaker 4 (14:07):
All right, So that's the clip. Thank you, thank you
studio for bailing me out there. But that so we
knew that it was gonna be like, oh, it's AI
or it's fake or whatever this because that's what they do.
They always move the goalpost here, and that's why it's
a sucker's game to even play this. But it was
really fun to be able to troll the trolls, stuff
it in their face and then watch them predictably melt

(14:29):
down when the evidence was shown.

Speaker 5 (14:31):
They instantly claimed, without any basis whatsoever, that's actually that's
actually Charlie at Achtcon in twenty twenty three. Evidence for this,
none proof for this, none like trivially.

Speaker 4 (14:42):
Even the reason we address it, and I actually on
social media did as well in X is because the
community note got gamed. They weaponized it, they bombarded it probably,
and so they had so many votes on it that
you that it was that Yeah that's akon twenty twenty three,
nothing like the clip we showed. Yeah. There you go
back and forth, back and forth. So we had to
address it. So the community note is now gone, I

(15:03):
will tell you thankfully. So now groc is not misleading
people that have legitimate questions. Mission accomplished. We've all been
told to eat fruits and vegetables forever, but nobody really
explained why. What if I told you that plants have
their own nutrition and that it might be better for you
than a lot of process stuff. We've added if nutrition

(15:24):
feels overwhelming, it helps to take a step back and
zoom out. When you eat whole foods, you're getting what's
called phyto nutrients, natural compounds your body uses to adjust, repair,
and to respond every single day. Stresses balance of nature.
Takes real produce and runs it through a tailored vacuum
cold process that stabilizes that phyto nutrition. Their whole health

(15:47):
system combines fruits and vegetables and fibers and spice, giving
you forty seven whole fruit ingredients, and their phyto nutrition
is one simple routine. Their new freeze dried snacks go
through a similar process, so your snacks can be whole based,
whole food based instead of just empty calories. Whole food
phyto nutrition plus Balance of Nature helps you fight the
good fight. Save over thirty percent when you subscribe at

(16:10):
balanced nature dot com. Join hundreds of thousands of customers
in one simple routine that's changing the world. You can
get an additional ten percent off your order just by
using the discount code Charlie when you purchase at Balance
of Nature dot com. That's discount code Charlie for ten
percent off your order. All right, without further ado, we're

(16:32):
welcoming back our good friend Raheem Cassam from the National
Pulse dot com. Good to see you, Raheem. How you
been It's been too long?

Speaker 3 (16:39):
Thank you. Jen's always always on on it to be
all and I hope you're all well.

Speaker 4 (16:42):
We're doing well. We just had a great weekend in
San Antonio. We went through all the clips, all the fun,
all the video fun. But we got to turn our
attention here Rahim to what's going on in Iran, what's
going on with the Israel Hesbela, the strikes going back
and forth. President Trump was on with Welker over at NBC.

(17:03):
It was a very contentious interview. But here's Trump in
his own words thirty eight.

Speaker 11 (17:10):
I don't like these endless wars. This is not an
endless war. We've been doing this for three months. Much
of it has been under the form a pretty good
form of ceasefire. The blockade has been amazing. Our navy
is amazing. Our military is the best in the world.

Speaker 4 (17:25):
So he's saying, I don't like these forever wars, which
is something that we've always sort of baked into the
cake with President Trump. But then you've got Iran striking,
Israel sent and missiles into Israel, Israel striking a look
as like a petro plant in western Iran. There's all
this hesbalist stuff. You know, you are a student of

(17:46):
international geopolitics, Raheem. It's part of the way that you've
just your makeup in politics because you have been back
and forth across the Atlantic. So what do you make
of this? You know, Trump is telling Israel to stand down,
and how do you see this playing out over the
next days and weeks.

Speaker 12 (18:03):
Yeah, I think the answer that everybody you know here
on Capitol Hill where I'm sitting right now, the answer
that everybody gives is very simple, it's a mess, and
it's a mess because I think most people recognize that
an advance of beginning this operation, there wasn't a lot
of forward planning. Not there was some, but not as

(18:25):
much as one might have hoped for or expected. What
happens in any given scenario, and the scenario we find
ourselves in is one of the few that just simply
wasn't war gamed out, especially the failure to bring in
European partners. And I don't think it's a failure necessarily
on the administration side. I think the European partners themselves

(18:45):
have to look in the mirror and ask themselves questions
about where they've been over the course of this, especially
given how many of them were so willing to work
with the Obama administration to lift sanctions, to help the
Iranian to try and bring them in to the international fold,
and then when Trump tries to do something that you
know it's given is different and a little bit more

(19:08):
sporadic and spur of the moment, they all just sort
of washed their hands of international affairs and wash their
hands of the region, even though a lot of them
heavily reliant on what comes through the Strait of umors.
It seems like an abdication in a sense on their part.
I mean, you know, even if you don't want to
do it, you have to. Real politic will slap you
in the face with with you know, both the.

Speaker 3 (19:29):
Front and the back of the hand.

Speaker 12 (19:31):
And it seems like those slaps just haven't woken any
of the long standing European partners up either. So to
mess all over what I expect to happen from here
is just more of the same.

Speaker 3 (19:42):
I'm afraid, you know, the markets won't.

Speaker 12 (19:43):
Like it, and people won't like the impact that it
has and continues to have.

Speaker 3 (19:47):
In their pockets.

Speaker 12 (19:48):
But in an absence of you know, quote unquote finishing
the job, this this will just continue to go on.
And you know, I have a lot of questions over
what Netanyahu's goal here is, what is domestic you know,
goals are for his own sake, And President Trump has
spoken to some of those. He spoke to some of

(20:09):
those this weekend, right especially the interview with the Financial
Times where he was adamant, you know, that he's calling
the shots in the region regardless, Israel have sort of gone, well, actually,
we're going to do what we want anyway, and said, look,
we have a right to defend ourselves, and I think
that's that's perfectly reasonable and rational. But it just goes
to show that there isn't really one key character, one

(20:30):
key leader in all of this. And it may take
and I know it will make some people uncomfortable, but
it may take some further inducements from the White House
to get Israel on board with what the White House
now wants, because you know, the White House did what
Israel wants for the last couple of months. There's no
doubt about it. I'm not saying they were led. I'm

(20:51):
saying that they found neutral common ground and they did
it together. Right now, Israel has to decide whether or
not it wants to play a little bit more compromise back,
and I'm just I'm not sure that they're yet.

Speaker 4 (21:04):
Yeah, I agree. You know, President Trump took the true
social throw up one point thirty six. Please, and you'll
see President Trump's truth here. He's saying both sides Israel
and Iran are looking to do an immediate ceasefire. Final
negotiations on peace are proceeding, so anyways, he's basically willing

(21:26):
this ceasefire, he told Axios. Okay, they you think he
told the same thing to Fox. He said, listen, Okay,
Iron shot off a couple of missiles, Israel, You shot
off a couple of missiles. Okay. Let you know, let's
a little fight tomorrow, will be bros Again. Everybody put
down their arms. It's almost like you can feel President
Trump pushing willing, and you can imagine the private conversations
behind the scenes. The phone calls are a little bit

(21:48):
more spicy than that.

Speaker 5 (21:49):
I think he's gotten very used to that back and
forth song and dance of these Oh they shoot off
a missile to show that they're serious, because he's done
this with around himself several times.

Speaker 4 (21:58):
Yeah. Yeah, And I think this act shows President Trump's
leadership here. I mean that clip that we started the
segment off with Raheem, I think is the guiding north
star that he doesn't want to do a forever war.
This was something I knew, Charlie knew about the president
very very well. Now, Listen, Iran was probably the biggest
lift that we've seen. It was the most risky. It

(22:19):
was the going up against the most populous country of
any of these sort of conflicts. So I understand people's reticence.
I understand people's skepticism. I've certainly been skeptical of this,
of this effort. I thought, you know, you can start
a war, but you can't always end one. And that's
really the question here. You could get some ink on
paper signed, you could even open up the straight but

(22:40):
that's not going to stop some of these rogue elements
within Iran that are hardliners that are still vying for
power and supremacy in that country from shooting off a
couple of missiles from lands and minds in the Strait.
I mean, this could just sort of go on for
a long time here. I don't see the natural way out,
and I think, to your point, it's a mess. But

(23:01):
I think Trump is making his intentions very clear, and
he's sending a signal loud and clear that he's in charge.
Whether or not he can get the deal done or
not is the question.

Speaker 12 (23:09):
Yeah, Look, there there are several things to think about here.
You know, the President of the United States could abdicate
on this now and just say, look, I've tried, we
did what we needed to do.

Speaker 3 (23:18):
You guys sort it out between yourselves.

Speaker 12 (23:20):
But he's not doing that, right, He's still trying to
play the role of peacemaker to bring people together.

Speaker 3 (23:26):
I think that's you know, it's commendable in its spirit
of what he's doing.

Speaker 12 (23:32):
There are certain leavers that he's going to be able
to pull and I think you'll see him pull on
them this week. That may bring those parties back to
the table.

Speaker 3 (23:40):
Again.

Speaker 12 (23:42):
It's not justice Reelan Iran, by the way. I mean,
you look at the same thing with Russia and Ukraine,
busting these people's heads together and saying, look, we know
you don't want to keep killing one another, that we
know it's not good for either of your countries, either
of your peoples, But are you willing to take the
requisite steps to make that happen. The problem is finding
that mutual ground is becoming more and more difficult. And

(24:05):
I think the normalization, like you say, very hard to
end these things. And look, I was against it when
it first started.

Speaker 3 (24:11):
But you also have to be realistic.

Speaker 12 (24:13):
We're here now. We can't wind the clock back.

Speaker 4 (24:15):
We can't.

Speaker 3 (24:16):
We don't build time machines.

Speaker 12 (24:17):
We have to deal with what with the hand that
we're dealt here and the hand that with dealt now
that the president has been dealt is this is this
intransigence on both sides, and again not just as ran around,
happens in conflicts all over the world, in transigence, in transigence,
and that comes from normalization. The leaders of those countries
are normalizing the state of war for their own two peoples.

(24:38):
And that's what you have to break early on in
this conflict. The idea that the Iranian people would come
out on the streets and march on the streets and
welcome this change in their government isn't something that's come
to fruition. And I think it may be time again
to call on the Iranian people and just see if
there are those forces that still remain.

Speaker 4 (24:57):
That was actually my next question for you, Rahiem. You're
in contact. Some of these guys are in England, some
of them, and you know, it's this Iranian diaspora, and
they all seem to, you know, sort of be like
very positive when it comes to assessing the state of
the Iranian resistance and the potential of an uprising. What
are you hearing about that right now? And are they

(25:18):
waiting for a queue from Western allies to say now's
the time to take to the streets or I saw
some videos on social media this weekend, suggesting that this
was already happening organically.

Speaker 12 (25:27):
Yeah, I think it happens sporadically, but then there's a
big crackdown. You know, when you see your friends and
your neighbors die or being hauled off by security services,
it tends to.

Speaker 3 (25:37):
Put the kibosh on it quite quickly.

Speaker 12 (25:39):
The other thing to mention is, and it's a hard truth,
but the people who want this the most living, as
you say, in Europe, in the UK, in the US,
in Beverly Hills, whatever. And then the other part of it,
the people who wanted it badly enough are dead.

Speaker 3 (25:53):
You know.

Speaker 12 (25:53):
They were massacred by the tens of thousands by the regime. So,
you know, perhaps we need an honest assessment out of
the Trump administration right now as to whether or not
they estimate that that are the numbers of those resistance
fighters still in Iran who could do something like that.

Speaker 3 (26:10):
We want to know the answer to that.

Speaker 4 (26:11):
Well, and they're not armed either, raheem. I mean, there
might be some there might be some efforts to arm them,
but you know, this is one of the reasons we
love our Second Amendment. I mean, people talk about the
Second Amendment in terms of hunting, in terms of you know,
sports shooting, No, no, no, The Second Amendment is about
an armed population that can resist tyranny if a government
needs to be handled or pushed back against. So raheem.

(26:35):
There is so much going on in Europe now, this
isn't just staying in the UK, which is I think
is interesting. But we've gone over it in great detail
on the show. Henry Novac was killed in this very
tragic way. I mean, it's sort of everything the left
wanted George Floyd to be but upon further inspection, was not.
But this kid was. Actually he did nothing wrong. He

(26:56):
didn't hurl racist insults at his killer, was able to
hold a basically a sword in public when Henry and
other native born Brits are not allowed to even carry
pepper spray. And he was killed with this religious exemption
murder weapon and he said I can't breathe, and the
cops denied it, and the poor guy bled out on

(27:18):
the streets. And we didn't hear about this for six
months rahim six months, and then of course outrage has ensued.
Tell us what's happening on the streets in the UK.
But then also beyond.

Speaker 12 (27:29):
Well, you know, I can't think of this case and
even see a picture of Henry Novac, let alone, watch
that footage again without feeling, you know, angry and disgusted
and just let down in You know, a lot of
these things that our governments do are very predictable and

(27:53):
very dull, very eye rolling, and you sort of just go, oh,
you know, stupid. This is different. This is this is
the state, the police being informed that they necessarily must
treat people with foreign ethnic backgrounds as more privileged, as

(28:13):
with greater sensitivity and with greater emphasis on their claims
than white people, not just the native British born people.
But this is this is necessarily skin color that they're
talking about. That delineates how a police force treats you,

(28:34):
not just as you're walking down the street, not when
you're being pulled over in a car, but as a
life threatening and as we saw in this case, life
ending altercation is happening in real time, so you can
imagine and I'm sure lots of your audience has seen
the scenes of what's been going on across the United Kingdom.

Speaker 3 (28:54):
As a result of this.

Speaker 12 (28:56):
The anger is pouring out into the streets and I
can't blame people or for that. Do I hope that
there's riots and other people get hurt, of course not.
But the demonstrations, the protests, they're all welcomed.

Speaker 3 (29:10):
They should be welcomed.

Speaker 12 (29:11):
The police have to take a long, hard look at
themselves and more than anything, the guidance that police forces
are given, there's two tier guidance needs to come to
an end. Not that when the next government comes into power.
But today and unfortunately this labor government is showing no signs.

(29:31):
You know, you saw a two tier police response, You're
now seeing a two tier government response.

Speaker 3 (29:37):
When it was George Floyd.

Speaker 12 (29:38):
Even in the United Kingdom, when it was George Floyd, everybody.

Speaker 3 (29:42):
Got on their hands and knees and groveled for months
and years on end.

Speaker 12 (29:45):
The English Premier League, the big soccer League, the players
took the knee at the beginning of matches for two years.
Have we seen any of that for Henry Novak, we
have not.

Speaker 4 (29:55):
And you're talking about a race action plan that these
police followed. That is to your point, it's intentionally racist
against white people, and.

Speaker 2 (30:02):
We've seen other horrifying things.

Speaker 5 (30:04):
It's come out now that the police in the area
even after they had ample reason to believe that this
was a lie, that Novak had done nothing wrong, that
they were planning to put out statements suggesting he had
been the aggressor because they, you know, they have to
tamp down everything in Britain him.

Speaker 2 (30:21):
It feels in Britain like the police have.

Speaker 5 (30:23):
This attitude of we're occupying a country and we have
to do whatever is possible to keep the rest of
population from having some kind of uprising.

Speaker 2 (30:32):
The natives will get restless.

Speaker 3 (30:33):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 12 (30:34):
I mean all of the thought we've heard over multiculturalism
and social cohesion. You know, the likes of three of
us have understood what those were all dog whistles for.

Speaker 3 (30:44):
All these years.

Speaker 12 (30:45):
You know, certainly the man I wrote a book about
years ago. You know, Powell knew what all of those
things were about. Now the British public have woken up
to what all those things are about. They are buzzwords.
They are weak phrases that are really really meant to
suggest actually an anti white supremacy that's going on in Britain.

Speaker 4 (31:06):
R exactly right, well said anti white supremacy. Now I
want to get into reform versus restore. Okay, So if
I look on the internet, I am very much convinced
that Nigel Faras is going to cuck out on immigration
and Rupert Lowe is the is the real hardliner here.
And then I saw this video of you and I

(31:27):
had never seen these clips before thirty one.

Speaker 12 (31:30):
In fact, Rupert Lowe is actually weaker on a lot
of the mass deportation stuff than reform is. The interviews
that he's done with Jacob ree Smog, the interviews he's
done with Spectator and gb News over the last couple
of months.

Speaker 3 (31:42):
Show that to be the case.

Speaker 13 (31:43):
Though I don't think intellectually I'm against immigration ty. I
have never said we should support people who are here legally.

Speaker 3 (31:50):
That's not something I think we should be talking about.

Speaker 13 (31:53):
Legal immigration is more difficult than I've never talked about repatriation.

Speaker 3 (31:56):
Repatriation and the much more difficult subject.

Speaker 13 (31:59):
I don't agree with Nigel Farage in saying that you know,
all these people should be repatriated. You can't once you've
legally accepted people.

Speaker 4 (32:07):
Okay, okay, this is our code for deportion deportations, right,
I mean, it's essentially denaturalization. Okay, makes sense of it. Raheem,
you got the last two minutes. The floor is are yours.

Speaker 12 (32:17):
Look very quickly because I know we've only got two minutes.
Nigel Farage and Rupert Lowe worked together for a long time.
There was a big falling out, you know, into Nissigan
Party politics.

Speaker 3 (32:29):
He said this, she said that whatever.

Speaker 12 (32:31):
Right now they're leading two separate parties on the right.
Nigel Farage has obviously missed Brexit. He's done this for
thirty years now, banging the drum on immigration, banging the
drum on the illegals.

Speaker 3 (32:43):
Coming over the channel. He himself has been there.

Speaker 12 (32:46):
He was talking about raping grooming gangs back in twenty twelve.
U Kip his previous party, ran on it in twenty fourteen,
pilloried by the Establishment of course for it, but was
one of the first out there as a politic to
do it. When Rupert low was kicked out of Reform
last year. It was the first time he ever spoke
about grooming gangs the first time ever in twenty twenty five,

(33:10):
and has made it sort of his little thing now.

Speaker 3 (33:12):
And that's fine, by the way.

Speaker 12 (33:13):
I think more voices on a topic like that better,
But I also think you know, running you know, supposedly
to the right of Nigel parahes but you see from
those clips it's not really true. And the Spectator has
a great article on it as well, and splitting the
right wing vote, Well, what that means and we've got
a special election coming up on June the eighteenth in
the UK that will bear this out. What that actually

(33:35):
means is that the Labor Party are likely to get
another five years in power. And if you think Joe
Biden flooded the US while he was in office, you know,
think about what a far left Labor Party would do
if the right cannot come together and agree. Hey, listen,
there's one party here that has established its role, has

(33:57):
polled top in the last three hundred polls across the country,
is ready for government, has a shadow cabinet, is ready
to go with a manifesto, and listen, I say, I
totally understand the people that want harder talk and harder
lines on the internet. That's fine, there's a place for it.
But when it comes to the voting booth, I'll stick
with a reform.

Speaker 4 (34:15):
Well, we like Nigel. I'm trying to get Nigel on
the show here soon, and I think that's gonna happen
because I think it is terrifying what labor would do
to that country if given five more years, something's got
to be done. Raheem, and we're here to help as
much as we can. God bless you, my friend. We'll
talk to you soon. You More Americans are starting to

(34:36):
ask an important question, why is it so difficult to
get access to medications you may already know you need.
If your health is your responsibility, why are outside systems
deciding what you can have and when you're allowed to
get it. That's one reason I recommend All Family Pharmacy.
They make it super simple to order a wide range
of medications online, from everyday maintenance medications to travel in

(34:59):
emergency prepare this option. The process is straightforward, secure, and
it's designed for people who value convenience and peace of mind.
Whether you're preparing for a trip, dealing with pharmacy shortages,
or simply want to be proactive for your family, All
Family Pharmacy helps put you back in control and right now.
When you visit All Familypharmacy dot com, slash kirk and
use promo code Kirk ten, you'll save ten percent off

(35:21):
your order. Because being prepared isn't political, it's just responsible.
So visit Allfamilypharmacy dot com, slash Kirk and use code
Kirk ten for ten percent off. I'm so excited to
have our next guest, Lara Logan. She's an award winning
journalist in her own right. She does so much good

(35:41):
for the cause, and she's always highlighting issues and stories
that other people miss or they don't understand how incredible
the impact could be if left unaddressed. And there is
a really heartbreaking tragic story out of Texas that I
want Lara's help to unpack for you. So, without further ado,
Lara Logan, Welcome to the charliekirksh It's good to see you.

Speaker 14 (36:01):
Thank you so much for having me.

Speaker 4 (36:02):
Yes, it's so good to see you again. It's been
too long. You flagged this story for me and I
did a huge deep dive into it, and it just
breaks my heart because I have a three year old
daughter and we've moved to Phoenix after what happened to Charlie,
and there's pools everywhere, and Phoenix is like ground zero
for little kids drowning in pools, and so tell us

(36:24):
the story of what happened with Annalise Camp please.

Speaker 14 (36:27):
Well, this was on Memorial Day and her family had
come to visit with family and I believe it was
in the Houston area and an Li's has been swimming
all day and it was at the end of the
day her life jacket had been taken off. And you
know what it's like as a parent, right, there's tons
of family members around, there's lots of activity, and in
one instant, that child disappeared and she was found in

(36:52):
the bottom of the pool. Her I believe it was well,
what we're told is that her twelve year old cousin
was the one who jumped in and got her out
of the pool and she was rushed to the Houston
campus of Texas Children's Hospital. I'm you know, everything that
I'm telling you is based on the team that's working
with a family and also with family member them, you know,

(37:15):
who is directly involved and present in all of this.
And so just for people to understand, you know, where
this is coming from. And then of course the medical
stuff is coming from the doctors, is coming from doctors.
So what happens to Annelie's is that you know, she's
on eventilator and she has swelling in the stem of
her brain right in her brain stem, and so this

(37:39):
is within a few hours. I believe it was about
thirteen hours or something like that. The effort to begin
to declare her brain dead began. There was a doctor
at Texas Children's who said she was brain dead, and
the family came under extraordinary pressure. Now, one of the
things that I want to point out is that Texas
Children's Hospital proudly boasts on their website that they have

(38:02):
been first in the nation for pediatric transplants for six
consecutive years years. And of course, if your child needs
a transplant and has benefited from this at Texas Children's,
then you will think that that's a great thing. The
problem is that it is worth so much money to
the hospital. In fact, there's something called the Milliman Foundation

(38:24):
that studies this data, and they actually put out a
report in twenty twenty five that showed, listen to this
for your heart and testing kidney, liver, lungs, and pancreas.
Those are worth over eight million dollars in billable charges
from a hospital for organ transplant. So I'm just pointing
out that this little girl who within a very short

(38:48):
amount of time is the hospital is pushing to declare
her brain dead. And this happens to be a hospital
that prides itself on being first in the nation for
pediatric transplants.

Speaker 4 (38:58):
Right.

Speaker 14 (39:00):
What happens is Analise's parents they go to a judge,
they try to get a restraining order. They're trying to
they are Christian, they believe in the sanctity of life,
and they believe in their child, and they're not willing
to give up. And if you look at neuroscientists in
general and neuroscience, I mean, there is a plethora of
medical evidence that will support the fact that toddlers have

(39:23):
extraordinary neuroplasticity. What does that mean. It means that they're able,
their brains are able to come back from things that adults,
you know, might not come back from. In fact, one
doctor said it best to me Andrew, I mean this
really tore at my heart. He said, babies are miracle patients.
They literally are their miracle patients. Their ability to restore

(39:46):
brain function and recover goes beyond what we can say scientifically,
and it is. There are many documented cases of toddless
like Annalist she's just two and a half years old,
of Hoddless going through drownings, being brain dead and coming
back from this. And the one thing that the family

(40:06):
is asking for is time. Give her time. This was
Memorial Day. This isn't even six weeks ago, This isn't
five four three, right, this is like around two weeks ago,
and so and Dexa's children started pushing them to declare
her brain dead. And what they want to do is
they went into a court and they got one of
these radical progressive judges who gave them the right to

(40:30):
perform this brain test that you know is according to
the American Neurological Society or association whatever it is that
they're called, Well, when you do this brain test, and
you know what happens. So part of the test involves
it's an apnea test. And so what does that mean.
It means taking analise off the ventilator. My mother was
on eventilator for over one hundred and thirty days. If

(40:52):
they'd taken her off that ventilator to test her brain
function at any time, she would have died. I mean,
I've never heard of it anything like this. And by
taking this child or any patient with neurological issues, right,
which is really an issue of blood and flow and
oxygen blow and all the rest of it to the brain, right. Well,
when you do that, you you run the risk of

(41:16):
causing further damage. I mean they can have heart attacks.
You know, their hearts can fail, it will collapse and
you can kill them.

Speaker 4 (41:24):
So I mean, yes, Laura, you highlighted this. Somebody responded
to your post on social media. I just want to
put it up. It's Musey eighty said it took my
son three weeks if you could throw that image up
to come back from drowning. Six weeks we left hospital.
All the doctors said he would never make it. He
just needed time. All caps time. Trauma takes time, and

(41:47):
that age they can have the best outcome. So praying
for this family so much. She is I don't know
who he's responding to there, but your the point is
that here's somebody same situation as analyse. It took weeks
to come back from this traumatic brain you know, oxygen
starvation of the brain from a pool drowning incident. And
this baby's alive. This baby has a future. I know

(42:10):
that Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas who's running for senator,
has gotten involved in this and has been fighting alongside.
Any other details you can tell us from the legal
fight that's ensuing.

Speaker 14 (42:20):
Well, yes, I mean, you're right, the attorney general. I mean,
everyone who's involved cannot say enough about the attorney general.
In fact, he's probably the reason that Ane Lisa's father
was not arrested by CPS because the hospital actually was
trying to get CPS involved to take action against the
parents for fighting for the right of their child. And

(42:43):
this is something when people hear me say that, I
know there are people all across America who are saying, yes,
they did that to me. They did that to me
because between the hospitals and the CPS, these institutions that
are supposed to help us, that are supposed to fight
for our children, unfortunately our failing children, and in some
cases like this, I mean literally killing them, trying to

(43:04):
get them killed. And so what has happened is that
Texas Children has been very disingenuous. They have put out
two statements to try to cover their tracks, and they
have been holding onto this child. They don't want to
let her go. And they you know, they put in
their original statement that they called I don't know is
is I think they said one hundred hospitals. Anyway, it
was a large number of hospitals and that people didn't

(43:26):
want to take her well, of course not when you
call them and you pressure them and you tell them,
you know, all kinds of things that make them terrified
to take on the liability. Right, and then when there
is a hospital, I don't want to say too much
about it because the family is desperately hoping and praying
that this hospital, which respects the sanctity of life, will
actually take anlease. But they're also being pressured. And of

(43:50):
course Texas children are saying is look at their equipment
versus ours, and their resources versus ours, but they're not
using all of their resources. Also, most importantly, legally, in Texas,
you have right to try laws which actually reinforce the
federal Right to Try statutes, which gives people the right
to fight for their lives, to go to treatments that

(44:11):
are outside of the FDA and outside the normal medical
treatments and do anything they can to fight for their lives.
And that is what Ane Lisa's parents want to do.
If it were not for the Texas Attorney General Ken
Paxton and his office and all the people there who
have been working through the night, night after night after night,
this case would probably already be over And it's just

(44:34):
staggering that these people are defiant of the law. What
is with this hospital? Why do you have to kill
this child? Let her go?

Speaker 4 (44:42):
Two things, Ken Paxton's team, I will just say, across
the nation, across you know, they are amazing and responsive
in their care. They have blown me away time and
time again. They are good people on Ken's team. He's
a good man. And Two, this is what happens when
leftists take over things like CPS. Talk about how compassionate
they are, but they lack basic humanity and it's insane. Laura,

(45:05):
I check your Twitter all the time because, like I said,
you you bring up stories that nobody else is talking
about that you shine a light on them. And then
there's stories that everybody's now talking about, like Kristin Welker
and President Trump. And I really wanted to get into
the LA Mayor's race with you, but we have billi
Sale joining us next segment, so we're gonna we're gonna
save that for then. So I know you would crush

(45:26):
it on both topics. But this Kristen Welker thing is
just obscene. So she basically they talk Trump gives her everything.
He's talking about Iron, he's talking about Israel, he's talking
about the ceasefire. He's not holding back, he's giving everything
she wants. Then she goes on this diet tribe calling
him a liar for like two minutes, and finally he's like,
you know what, darling, We're done here. Uh see you later.

(45:48):
So I'm gonna play the clip and get your reaction
to it. It top forty two.

Speaker 15 (45:52):
Your elections are crooked, and you crooked. And he's depresses crooked,
and so is ABC and CBS and c your one
sided cook a network. So let's call it quits because
I've had enough.

Speaker 14 (46:05):
Thank you, darling, have a good night, sir President.

Speaker 8 (46:06):
Let's please I traveled all the way to Wisconsin.

Speaker 16 (46:09):
I've just traveling, and I've given you enough time you
would to straighten out your press, because you know what,
mister country can never be great travel.

Speaker 9 (46:23):
We traveled all the way to Wisconsin.

Speaker 4 (46:28):
I came all the way to Wisconsin for this. I traveled,
mister president. Look at she's just dumbfounded, all right. She's
claiming that he was going off on conspiracy theory, saying,
you know, you have no evidence of this, no evidence
about Jay six and that you know the FBI was
there no evidence about election fraud in LA. These people
are such robots that you can hear it's almost like
the editors in my head saying, we have to stick

(46:51):
by our editorial standards. There's no evidence. Explain what we
just witnessed there, Laura Logan.

Speaker 14 (46:55):
Wow, what you just witnessed is the American people being
completely and utterly disrespected by the media. You're you're watching
information warfare operation Underwell.

Speaker 4 (47:07):
It's a real picture we ran in through the AI check.

Speaker 14 (47:13):
That's cruel. That's cruel. I mean maybe appropriate, I don't know,
depending on your politics, right, it would be how you
see that. But this is what we're what we're looking
at here is first of all, dereliction of duty for
somebody to have the audacity to sit down with the
President of the United States who obviously hasn't done a

(47:36):
single shred of journalism. That is an indictment on her,
on her producers, on her network. And that's how you
know this isn't really about journalism, right, because no self
respecting journalists can say today that there's no evidence of
vote for it. Have you not looked at Georgia? Have
you not looked at Marico, but County? Have you not

(47:56):
looked at Michigan? I mean, I could go on and
on and on and never mind Los Angeles. And what
these people do is they hide behind like a catchphrase. Right,
we're gonna say, Okay, evidence is compelling that convinces people.
If you have evidence, you can win a case in
a court of law. Okay. So we're going to tell
people this is our counter to the president. There's no evidence.

(48:19):
The problem is for Kirsten Welker and her network, it's
not true. There is so much evidence at this point.
The problem for the Trump administration is they haven't done
anything with that evidence. If they had held people accountable,
if they were putting people in jail for stealing the
twenty twenty election and many other elections since then, then

(48:41):
people wouldn't be free to act with impunity, and this
wouldn't be going on, it wouldn't be funded, and so
on and so on. Right, And this is a big problem.
But coming back to the media, part of this information
warfare is not journalism, and we are looking at information warfare.
This is the battle for your mind. When these people,
in spite of all the evidence of the country they

(49:03):
just ignore what we all know to be true, and
they keep pushing the lie, and they keep pushing the lie.
They have made themselves co conspirators in treason and sedition
because it is actually to knowingly and intentionally deceive the
American people, to use your platform and use the credibility
that has been built up over many, many years, and

(49:25):
to use that to deceive and to destroy this country
is actually criminal. And these people have had more than
enough time to come out and apologize for being wrong
about Russia collusion, for lying about hunder Biden's laptop, for
lying about the twenty twenty election, and by the way,
for lying about January sixth, And let's not forget before

(49:45):
she asked for evidence of the election, she accused him
of there being no evidence of their being weaponization against
the people of this country by their government. What about
all the parents who were targeted as terrorists by the
Biden administry?

Speaker 4 (50:00):
Right?

Speaker 14 (50:01):
What about all the January sixth defendants who were being
charged with felonies and trespassing and for doing absolutely nothing
but exercise their First Amendment rights, all of whom constitutional
rights were completely obliterated in those kangaroo courts in Washington,
d C. With your juries that are all completely Democrats.
And by the way, the same like I don't know,

(50:22):
four or five judges trying all of those cases, hundreds
of cases, grand standing in the court rooms, making political speeches,
and because the judiciary has proven itself to be so
independent and so honest, it is outrageous what these people do.
They are disgusting and they are a disgrace to the profession.

Speaker 4 (50:42):
Well, and Jake Tapper goes, this is some wild, unhitched
stuff from the president. Welker is a good lie Parson,
an honest journalist and didn't deserve that. But more importantly,
we have a president constantly pushes conspiracy theories with zero evidence.
Oh there's the line, with zero evidence, it can't respond.

Speaker 14 (51:01):
Zero, right, yeah, because that's very convincing.

Speaker 4 (51:05):
Yeah. Well, and it's like, sorry, he's talking about the
weaponization fund. You know what. Okay, maybe it's politically a loser,
maybe you know, I get it, Okay, whatever, but his
I believe the president's heart is in the right place.
By the way, you know who agreed with him, Charlie.
Charlie agreed with pardoning the JA sixers because they had
been bamboozled and railroaded by an absolute weaponized DJ that

(51:26):
took special I mean you could be a grandmar You left.

Speaker 2 (51:29):
Their professionals at this sort of thing too. We can
go into a whole segment later on.

Speaker 4 (51:32):
That, Lara Logan, what a treat to have you. That
was great. We're just gonna have you back on and
just let you rip because it was perfect, Lara Logan, fantastic.
Today's culture would have you believe that a baby is
only a baby if you decide it's a baby. Sometimes
it's a choice, sometimes it's a baby. And guess what,

(51:53):
we all know that's garbage. It's not true. And when
it matters most, Preborn is making sure that the truth
is known, one woman at a time, one baby at
a time. Preborn provides free ultrasounds to abortion vulnerable young women,
and ultrasounds tell the truth. When that mom sees her
baby and here's her baby's heartbeats, she's twice as likely

(52:14):
to choose life. One hundred and forty dollars helps give
five mothers a free ultrasound and saves babies. Two hundred
and eighty dollars can save ten babies, and just twenty
eight dollars a month. Can save a baby a month
for less than a dollar a day. And I know
there's some of you out there. You can do this.
A fifteen thousand dollars gift will provide an ultrasound machine
that will save lives for years to come. Whether you

(52:36):
want to save one baby or five or hundreds, that
opportunity is just a phone call or click away call
eight three three eight five zero two two two nine,
or click on the preborn banner at Charliekirk dot com today.
That's eight three three eight five zero two two two nine,
or click on the preborn banner at Charliekirk dot com today.

(53:00):
All right, without further ado, I want to welcome the
Bill a Sale. He's the first assistant US Attorney for
the Central District of California, and he has been all
over this Los Angeles mayor race story and some of
the sketchiness going around. Welcome back to the show, mister
attorneys US attorney. The salutation I'm working on, but tell

(53:24):
us that you put out this tweet yesterday that blew
my mind. I instantly reached out to your team. California
allows first time voters to register using forms of ID
this is your words that most Americans would find surprising,
including gym membership cards, employer ID cards, credit or debit cards,

(53:44):
prescription drug labels, my Goodness insurance card. By the way,
California provides free health coverage to undocumented immigrants. What is
going on in the Golden State, sir.

Speaker 17 (53:56):
That's a great question, and you really have to understand
what Californi is done over the last about decade in
this election space. I was in the legislature before I
was appointed by the President to be in my current position.
So California is basically eroded all of the election integrity measures.
They've codified it out of the system. It starts with

(54:17):
registering people to vote. Anybody can register to vote pretty
much online. You can go online and there's a box
you can check that says if you don't have a
social you don't have a DMV. You just check some
boxes and they'll register you to vote. And the only
thing they require is that the first time you vote,
you have to show a form of ID.

Speaker 18 (54:35):
So California will lie and say, oh, no ID is
required to vote.

Speaker 17 (54:40):
But then I just showed you the list of what
they consider an acceptable form.

Speaker 18 (54:45):
Of ID in order to be registered to vote.

Speaker 17 (54:47):
We're talking about gen membership card, a prescription label.

Speaker 18 (54:51):
These are ridiculous. This is not proof of ID.

Speaker 17 (54:54):
This does not prove you're a US citizen who is
eligible to vote. So just think about who's on the
voter rule. Then you get into voter role maintenance. There's
no maintenance in California, very little. They do not propertly
remove dead people, people who've moved, people who can convicted
of felonies, and people who are not citizens. So the

(55:15):
voter rules are filthy dirty. Now you go to step three,
universal vote by mail. Put as many mails out into
the many ballots out into the mail as possible, So
they're mailing out millions of ballots. Whether you want a
mail ballot or not, everyone who's a registered voter in
the state of California gets a mail ballot, so they

(55:35):
have millions of ballots floating out there. Now comes step four,
ballot harvesting. They made it legal. This is illegal in
most states, but in California it's legal to handle other
people's ballots, So anybody can go collect anybody's ballot and
turn it in for them. No chain of custody, no
record keeping no documentation of who handled the ballot, who

(55:59):
touched it, and so you could just have you know,
Antifa looking type people going around collecting hundreds of ballots
and putting them in a mailbox and you're not allowed
to stop them or question them because it's legal in California.
So put that all together, and we have no voter
ID when you vote, it's a it's a fraudster's paradise.

Speaker 18 (56:19):
So what are we to do? I mean, I'm gonna
do my job.

Speaker 17 (56:22):
Yes, do we have open investigations into election fraud. Yes,
we will be charging individuals with fraud related to the elections.

Speaker 18 (56:32):
Is it going to be at.

Speaker 17 (56:33):
The scale necessary to expose you know, high widespread the
fraud is in California?

Speaker 18 (56:39):
Probably not. But that's what I can do. I mean,
that's why I'm really pushing.

Speaker 17 (56:43):
What we really need in California is to be able
to audit the roles, audit the voter roles, because.

Speaker 18 (56:49):
That's where all of this starts from.

Speaker 17 (56:51):
If you have dirty roles, you're gonna have dirty elections.
And California is blocking us. They're doing everything in their
power that We've gone to court with them, and we're
up at the nine Circuit Court of Appeals.

Speaker 18 (57:01):
So we're litigating.

Speaker 17 (57:02):
We're doing everything we possibly can to work within the
law as written.

Speaker 18 (57:08):
But Congress, Congress has a role.

Speaker 17 (57:10):
They could they could change the law, they could crack
down on this stuff, but they haven't done it yet.

Speaker 4 (57:16):
Yeah, I mean, this is what's really infuriating is these
California courts keep blocking you from being able to audit. Like,
what do you hide it? What is the legal explanation
a rationale that they're giving you for saying, you know,
you're not allowed to look under the hood.

Speaker 18 (57:30):
Here, are you ready for it?

Speaker 17 (57:32):
They said that, They said that they can't give it
to us because it would violate California's privacy laws. That
to give over the personal identifying information of voters would
be a violation of California's privacy laws. That is so
ridiculous on so many grounds. Number One, we issue those documents,
we issue the social Security numbers.

Speaker 18 (57:53):
It's nothing that we don't have access to.

Speaker 17 (57:55):
Second of all, when Congress has said that we are
allowed to have these records, it supersedes any state laws,
so you have the supremacy clause. But you know what,
they have found lower level judges who are Democrat appointed
judges who side with them, and so until we get
this up to the appropriate courts and get it overturned,
we're stuck a little bit.

Speaker 18 (58:15):
But that's the arguments they rely on.

Speaker 2 (58:17):
Geez, it occurs to me.

Speaker 5 (58:19):
The question of actual fraud is absolutely front and center
here and we absolutely need to find it. But the
bigger picture here is California has any government needs legitimacy.
People need to feel like the system makes sense to them,
and what California has done is they're absolutely burning up
any legitimacy the system has. It doesn't matter if there's

(58:41):
no fraud in this case, because they've done everything they
can to make it look as shady as possible. When
you can register with any kind of IDA, when anyone
can harvest these things, when it's universal mail in ballots,
that party operatives can go and hoover up and help
people figure out, when anyone can do any of these
bizarre smiley faced signature is on things, It doesn't matter

(59:01):
if there's no fraud because the thing looks as fraudulent
as possible and they take a month to count these.
No one is going to trust the outcome of these elections.
And that's going to create cynicism, it's going to create
an atmosphere of deceit and fraud. It's deliberately designed to
look us third world as possible.

Speaker 4 (59:20):
And real quick here, I did the math, and in
the first sixty four percent of the votes counted in
the LA mayor's race, Nitya Rahman received approximately twenty three percent,
a little bit less twenty three percent of the vote.
In the next fifteen percent of votes counted, So this
would take us through Friday and Saturday, right when she
then overtook Spencer Pratt, So we're about at seventy eighty

(59:45):
percent of the vote. She received forty one percent of
the late mail ins, right, so she nearly doubled her
share of the percentage of votes she got with late
mail ins. And my reaction is is that possible? Sure,
it's possible, So I was winning the lottery? Is it likely?
Probably not? So Again to Blake's point, Okay, let's assume

(01:00:06):
everything is on the up and up the way that
this has been conducted, and that this has taken weeks
or a week now and is going to take weeks
to get a final tally. Here, and you see such
dramatic shifts right there, you see it, right that huge
jump up and Spencer Pratt, who had all this momentum,
all of this name id, all of this buzz around him,

(01:00:27):
and nobody was really talking about Nythia Rummin. I'm supposed
to believe all the like really die hard progressives just
really love to vote late and mailing. So it's a
left on left fight. It's a tough pill to swallow here.

Speaker 17 (01:00:39):
Look, California is struggling from a credibility crisis, and regardless
of who wins, you would think they would want the
public to have confidence that this is the person legitimately elected.
They don't seem to care. I mean, I've spent years
in the legislature fighting on this. I was on the
Elections committee and they kicked me off for I guess,
causing too much trouble on that camp.

Speaker 4 (01:00:58):
I remember this.

Speaker 18 (01:00:58):
They don't care. It's all about power.

Speaker 17 (01:01:01):
It's all about winning and power, and they've basically done
everything they can to help fraudsters avoid being detected, which
makes my job harder. Like I said, we will be
prosecuting people for fraud. We just did it last month,
where because of the work James O'Keefe did, we prosecuted
one of the people at skid Row that was paying

(01:01:22):
homeless people to vote and putting false addresses on the registration.

Speaker 18 (01:01:26):
So we've got.

Speaker 17 (01:01:27):
More cases coming, but it's not going to be enough
to override the system. I believe there is a initiative
on the ballot in November that would Yeah, so that's something.
You know, either Congress needs to step in or the
people of California have to take measures into their own hands.
But you know, I'll just say, you know, there's a
lot of pressure on the DOJ right now to fix this,

(01:01:48):
and we'll do what we can. But my lane is narrow.
It's to bring criminal charges in a court of law,
and that's a high burden and we will meet that burden.

Speaker 18 (01:01:56):
But you know, I can't fix it as one person
in this.

Speaker 4 (01:02:00):
Yeah, I mean, your point is well made. This is
a structural problem. When you flood the state with mail
in ballots to everybody. I used to live in California,
I have since moved. I got a ballot. When you
flood the states with the state with all these mail ins,
and then you have very lax signature requirements. We showed
that smiley face one as the witness that's going around.

(01:02:23):
You could throw throw up the smiley face ballot again
if you want. This is endemic though, And then you
got ballot harvesting, and then you've got these NGOs that
are that are paying people in places like skid Row
to register to vote, and they their voter edge is
next to a you know, porta potty out house. And
then you're getting you're letting people with gym cards register

(01:02:44):
to vote, or you know, prescription drug labels. The whole
thing is such a clown show. It is such a farce.
And then they get on the Mockingbird media and they
just tell us, well, this is just how California counts ballots.
We just prioritize access to all these people. They are
delegitimizing themselves when you said it perfectly, they have a
crisis of credibility. I don't believe them as far as

(01:03:06):
I could throw them. And that told things a joke,
and everybody's calling them out on it, and then we're
told we're just conspiracy theorists. I'm sorry. Bill A. Sale,
he's the first assistant US Attorney for the Central District
in California. You are doing great work and you are
one of the few fighters over there that we look
to to keep everybody honest. So thank you. Please keep
it up and know you have alis on this show

(01:03:28):
that will cheer you on as you do it. Sir.
Thank you so.

Speaker 18 (01:03:30):
Much, appreciate thanks for having me.

Speaker 17 (01:03:32):
And as I said, it's the first time I've been
on since Charlie, so it's a little bit sad, but
I'm glad to be on and happy to be back anytime.

Speaker 3 (01:03:40):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:03:40):
Absolutely, thank you, sir, and it's an honor to have
you back on. All right, Blake, We've got updates in
the Iranian Israel Yeahga, that are happening live.

Speaker 2 (01:03:51):
Following us with rapt attention. We want this conflict to end.

Speaker 5 (01:03:54):
We're very I've heard enough about Iran for a lifetime,
I will say, but there's promising signs. So just breaking
now I'm looking at the breaking news ticker is that
Netan Yahoo has said Israel is done striking Iran for
the time being, which is what President Trump was saying,
stop hitting them. And Iran says they're also halting their

(01:04:15):
strikes against Israel. They do say they will resume if
there are more strikes in southern Lebanon that's been of
course the source of constant tension there. It's basically the
second front of this war, arguably the main one. I
think more people have died in Lebanon at this point
than have died in Iran.

Speaker 4 (01:04:30):
It's an important distinction. Yeah. And by the way, there
was a report over the weekends, and this is something
I'm looking at, but it was reported the New York
Times that the Trump admin is seeing increasing threat of
espionage from Israel over the Iran deals. So as Trump
is pushing more and more for peace, Israel wants to

(01:04:51):
sort of, I guess, finish the finish the regime off
in Iran. There is increased concern that there might be
se messi going on from Israel side. Now let me
just be clear. We've known this. It happens both ways.
The United States spies on allies as well as foes.
This is a constant thing. But when you see it

(01:05:11):
ramp up when our objectives seem to be divergent more
and more so, that shows just how much space is
gathering between Bebe and President Trump here. It's very clear.

Speaker 2 (01:05:23):
It just it confirms a few things.

Speaker 5 (01:05:24):
First, It just it confirms the lie President Trump is
not Bibe's puppet. He's not this guy who just obeys him.
And I think they have differences and there's friction between them.
This breaking news now. It also it affirms, frankly, what
we've warned about, which is it's easier to get in
conflicts than to get out. We've seen this struggle go
back and forth. But it also shows that President Trump,

(01:05:46):
I think he's very earnest about wanting to achieve a durable,
long term piece. I think he went into this conflict
thinking I want to be the one who finally ends
this cancer that's been going for nearly half a century now.

Speaker 4 (01:05:59):
Yeah, and I meant President Trump went off on bb
net and Yahoo. They had that very stern call where
he said, knock it off, stop the strikes, I want peace.
Let's get this thing over. The finish line. To Blake's
point to all the people that were saying that Trump
is just Bebe's puppet, you're having a tough time right
now with the reporting because President Trump expletive laced call

(01:06:22):
where President Trump told him what to do. You see
the multiple truth posts where President Trump is telling them, hey,
knock it off, we want peace. Stop throwing missiles at
each other. Stop lobb and missiles at Israel, and Israel
stop lobb and missiles at Iran. Okay, you fired off
your missiles. We want peace. I genuinely believe, knowing what
I know about President Trump, watching him, observing him over

(01:06:43):
the years, there's a part of him that is probably
a little bit bored of this conflict. Thinks he accomplished
his mission, wants to be able to go in and
get the nuclear dust. By the way, he spoke with
Christen Welker before he walked off about this, and I
think he made a fair point thirty nine.

Speaker 14 (01:07:00):
That nuclear dust.

Speaker 6 (01:07:02):
Will you and would you be open to sending in
US forces to retrieve the nuclear.

Speaker 15 (01:07:08):
Style So the official name is highly enriched Uranian.

Speaker 16 (01:07:11):
The way you do it is if we make a deal.

Speaker 19 (01:07:13):
If we make it, do that now we're friendly, Well,
we'll go together.

Speaker 3 (01:07:16):
It'll be our equipment.

Speaker 19 (01:07:18):
We'll take it out and destroy it, whether it's on
site or whether we take it off site. If we
don't make a deal, then we're going to take them
out militarily, very harshly. And we'll wait till we do
that before we go.

Speaker 4 (01:07:31):
Okay, So the President Trump, the President is making his
intentions very clear, he's saying, take the deal. It's a
good deal. You guys will get some more money into
your coffers, about five hundred million dollars a day. Will
ease sanctions as you make step by step incremental progress.
And here's Israel saying, listen, we've still got them funding Lebanon.
And by the way, I just want to say, Israel

(01:07:51):
has a valid point. Even Raheem Kassam said this, like,
if you're striking Israel, Israel has a right to defend itself.
And you've got a big Hesbla problem in the south
of Lebanon. And just to be clear, I mean Iran
has denied that it is backing Hezebla. For years, everybody
knew it was not true, but they've denied it. They
should be technically separate entities. But Iran wants to include

(01:08:13):
Hesbela in the potential peace deal here, which that kind
of gives up the goat. It gives up the fact
that Iran is sponsoring tear cells throughout that region. So
Israel has a point. But the bottom line is President
Trump is pushing for peace. He is the piece through
strength President and all the data points that we're seeing

(01:08:33):
right now only affirms the fact that he's not being
led and dog walked into anything. He's leading this charge.
He is setting the terms, and that's important.

Speaker 2 (01:08:42):
The big picture thing.

Speaker 5 (01:08:43):
We talk to young people on the show and we
always ask them how do people feel about Iran?

Speaker 2 (01:08:48):
We know they don't like it. We know it's a
big struggle.

Speaker 5 (01:08:51):
We know this is the most the most difficult thing
that's and it's a challenge. Now, you can react to
this in two ways. You can decide to complain this
is not what you wanted, and you can crash out
and say it's all.

Speaker 2 (01:09:05):
Over, or I'll be frank.

Speaker 5 (01:09:08):
You can do what Charlie would do, and we know
that Charlie would have argued against this intervention. But we
know that we also want America to win, and we
want America to succeed, and we want President Trump to succeed.

Speaker 2 (01:09:20):
In his objective, President Trump.

Speaker 5 (01:09:22):
Wants to end what has been a half century long
canker sore on American foreign policy. He thinks, I'm a
deal maker. I can strike challenging deals. The Abraham Accords
were tough deals. This is a tough deal. I can
be the one who as tough as it is. Finally,
gets this resolve. So there's not a future American president
who's trying to resolve this end. We want him to

(01:09:45):
succeed at that period period.

Speaker 4 (01:09:49):
We got a root for America here, and we just
say it again. Democrats are unacceptable. What they will do
to this country if given power or if they take power,
be catastrophic for now and for the future. We have
to stop it. Hi, folks, Andrew Colvett here, I'd like

(01:10:09):
to tell you about my friends over at why Refi.
You've probably been hearing me talk about y REFI for
some time now. We are all in with these guys.
If you or someone you know is struggling with private
student loan debt, take my advice and give them a call.
Maybe you're behind on your payments, maybe you're even in default.
You don't have to live in this nightmare anymore. Why

(01:10:30):
ref I will provide you a custom payment based on
your ability to pay. They tailor each loan individually. They
can save you thousands of dollars and you can get
your life back. We go to campuses all over America
and we see student after student who's drowning in private
student loan debt. Many of them don't even know how
much they owe. Why ref I can help, Just go

(01:10:51):
to y refi dot com. That's the letter why then
refi dot com And remember why Refi doesn't care what
your credit score is. Just go to why dot com
and tell them your friend andrews heading.

Speaker 16 (01:11:07):
For more on many of these stories and news you
can trust, go to Charliekirk dot com