Iran Deal Details + The Mexico Menace

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
My name is Charlie kirk I run the largest pro
American student organization in the country, fighting for the future
of our republic. My call is to fight evil and
to proclaim truth. If the most important thing for you
is just feeling good, you're gonna end up miserable. But
if the most important thing is doing good, you'll end
up purposeful. College is a scam, everybody. You got to

(00:26):
stop sending your kids to college.

Speaker 2 (00:27):
You should get married as.

Speaker 1 (00:28):
Young as possible and have as many kids as possible.
Go start at turning point. You would say college chapter.
Go start at turning point, yould say high school chapter.
Go find out how your church can get involved. Sign
up and become an activist.

Speaker 3 (00:39):
I gave my.

Speaker 1 (00:39):
Life to the Lord in fifth grade, most important decision
I ever made in my life, and I encourage you.

Speaker 4 (00:44):
To do the same.

Speaker 1 (00:45):
Here I am Lord, Use me. Buckle up, everybody, Here
we go. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor
of the Charlie Kirkshaw, a company that specializes in gold
iras and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you

(01:07):
could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegold
investments dot Com. That is Noblegoldinvestments dot Com.

Speaker 5 (01:17):
All Right, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show. It's May
twenty eighth, twenty twenty six. We're here in Phoenix, Arizona,
at the y REFI Studios.

Speaker 3 (01:24):
How we doing, Blake, We're doing lovely. Yep.

Speaker 5 (01:26):
We got news this morning that broke from Axios and
it's a potentially massive, massive deal and that is the
US and Iran reach deal for a sixty day piece ceasefire,
but need Trump's final approval. Official say, So, the way
this has gone down is that you got to understand,

(01:47):
dealing with Iran is very very difficult.

Speaker 3 (01:49):
Right now.

Speaker 5 (01:50):
They got carrier pigeons going to their supreme leader. It's
tough to get word back and forth. So if you're
if you're you know, quibbling over a dot on an
eye or.

Speaker 3 (01:59):
A how a tee is?

Speaker 5 (02:00):
It takes roughly about three days to get that back
and forth. Okay, so they say that Iran. Iran has
not officially confirmed this, but US officials are saying that
Iranian senior leadership have said that they have approval to
sign this deal. So what's in the deal. The deal
says that the Strait will be opened Okay, the blockade

(02:21):
will be lifted, Iran will not harash the shipping lane,
and the US will end its blockade. So this will
happen in proportion of the restoration of commercial shipping. A
US official said the MoU will include an Iranian commitment
not to pursue a nuclear weapon. The official said it
will also state that the first issue to be negotiated

(02:43):
in this sixty day window will be how to dispose
of Iran's highly enriched uranium and how to address Iranian enrichment. Okay,
so let's just set out the stakes here for you.
So got to get that shipping lane open, right, We've
got midterms, we got high energy prices. There is pressure
politically domestically to get that gas price under three dollars nationally. Okay,

(03:06):
this would put us on the road to do that. Okay, Yeah,
we are net exporting, We have all this energy in
the United States. These are all good things. China's coming
to US, lots of others are coming to US. Venezuela
sending US ten million barrels of oil. All those things
are good developments. But internationally, you have to understand there's
still a pressure on that gas price, on the energy prices,

(03:28):
and that has a political consequence. You better believe it
that the President is keenly aware of this. Yes, he's
willing to endure some pain here, but he's also a pragmatist. Okay,
President Trump wants a few days to think about this,
but that blockade would be lifted. Iran would agree to
allow the Straight to be open. This would help them economically.

(03:49):
There's no question estimates having at about five hundred million
dollars a day that Iranians are losing by not being
able to access the Straight for shipping of energy internationally. Also,
they have a lot of worry about their wells backing up.
Once that happened, some of those oil wheels cannot be reopened.
You do permanent damage to those wells. And the first

(04:09):
item up forbids during this sixty eight piece fire will
be how to deal with and dispose of the dust,
the nuclear dust that's there now.

Speaker 3 (04:19):
That is open for interpretation.

Speaker 5 (04:20):
There's a lot of different parties involved, a lot of
different ideas of how to best do it. Some say China,
some say Russia. President Trump says that's off the table.
I think President Trump wants a few days to think
about this because he wants the US to directly oversee
the disposal of said nuclear waste.

Speaker 6 (04:36):
It's not a perfect deal. It's not fun to say
that the whole war is the whole thing is not perfect.
In truth, a lot of this is it would be
getting us back to the situation before the war, which
is straight open free trade and we're agreeing to negotiate
on the nuclear issue, which we were negotiating when the
strikes starts.

Speaker 5 (04:54):
So just to be clear, though, what is different is
that they have apparently in this is part of the
background that I have been, you know, exposed to on
some of these calls. The difference right now is that
they have finally conceded that they will not have a
nuclear program and that they're willing to dispose of said nuclear.

Speaker 7 (05:14):
Iran has always said they're not planning to build a
nuclear weapson. We don't believe them, of.

Speaker 5 (05:18):
Course, so well, there is some interesting insight on that.
One school of thought, one theory of the case is
that the old Supreme leader was never going to do it.

Speaker 3 (05:27):
He just wanted to posture.

Speaker 5 (05:29):
He just wanted to When we got rid of him,
the new leadership for a while was actually willing to
do it, so actually things got more risky in the
immediate aftermath. Right now it appears that the moderates are ascended.
So let me explain the breakdown.

Speaker 8 (05:43):
Here.

Speaker 5 (05:44):
You get rid of the leadership structure and it creates
a vacuum. You've got moderates, you've got hardliners. There has
been dust ups in the last couple of days. There
were some last night. We shot down some drones. We
shot down a drone because.

Speaker 6 (05:55):
It just stole the case where they have straight it's
decentralized exactly.

Speaker 3 (06:00):
So here's the deal.

Speaker 5 (06:02):
So when you have a power vacuum, and when you
have the Supreme Leader, who is essentially the leader, but
he's new. First of all, he's injured and he's in hiding,
the communication channels are dispersed, and there are factions fighting
within the emergent Iranian leadership structure that want to dominate.
The hardliners want to dominate, and they want to sabotage

(06:22):
this deal. There was a piece that came out, I believe,
in the Financial Times yesterday that explained how the hardliners
are already trying to sabotage this deal. Do you want
to know how we know this is a good deal
for the United States because the hardliners in Iran want
to sabotage it. They understand that this emboldens, empowers, enables
the moderates to take the reigns of power and to

(06:43):
put Iran on a better course economically where they're not
going to get overthrown by their people in about six months.
But maybe that still happens, okay, because there's been a
ton of damage inflicted upon the Iranian people, and if
they want to do that, if they want to seize
their own destiny and their own futures, they should do that.

Speaker 3 (06:59):
They should feel in powered to do that.

Speaker 5 (07:00):
I would be pro the Iruni people overthrowing this tyrannical regime.
They're evil. Should that be the United States job? That's
an open question. I don't believe it should be our job.
We have a country to run right here at home.
But President Trump was very clear, he said no nuclear weapon.
This deal takes that off off the board. Why because

(07:20):
for the first time, the moderates have been empowered to
take control of the regime. They have been empowered in
our advancing this notion that finally they are conceding that
they cannot have a nuclear weapon. This is a good,
good development. This is a slam dunk development.

Speaker 6 (07:39):
You get the sense, You get the sense of again
how complicated it is, because have you ever heard of
any of these people before any of this happened. I've
got the Financial Times piece open. Influential members of the
ultra conservative Paidari faction who occupy seats in Parliament and
prominent positions at the state broadcasters, have insisted around retain
control over the Strait and refused to make concessions over

(07:59):
its nuclear probe, describing these as red lines we've heard
that were before. They have criticized Parliamentary Speaker Muhammed Bager Galibaf,
a longtime political rival who has been leading the negotiations,
claiming he has acted beyond the mandate given by unseen
new Supreme leader Ayatola Motaba Kameni. So you really sense

(08:19):
how incredibly complicated it is where each different factions in
one country that we're in conflict with are claiming they
have the true mandate of a leader no one.

Speaker 7 (08:29):
Can see, no one's heard from.

Speaker 3 (08:31):
And again very dramatic to underscore this point.

Speaker 5 (08:34):
To underscore this point, there have this guy in hiding,
like incredibly hidden within this country to the point that
they will not establish a digital connection in any way,
shape or form around this guy. So when I say
carrier pigeon, I'm joking, but I'm kind of not joking.
That's what it takes to communicate with this guy. And

(08:54):
you know, we have to assume since he hasn't been
taken out, that he's probably hidden successfully.

Speaker 3 (09:01):
Right.

Speaker 5 (09:01):
So there, when you have a situation like that where
you can't get on a broadcast and dictate the terms
or send out messaging in some other way to his lieutenants,
then there is gonna be this vacuum, this void created.
What the US has challenged right now is to say
our red line is nuclear, our red line is the Strait. Okay,
if you concede on those two points, we will let

(09:22):
you open up and give you some financial lease, very health, energy,
and from sanctions.

Speaker 4 (09:26):
It is very.

Speaker 6 (09:26):
Helpful when you have the Iranians themselves saying anything short
of exclusive Iranian control of the Strait is Iran is
a total loser and the US a total winner.

Speaker 3 (09:35):
So here's the deal.

Speaker 5 (09:37):
We've got hardliners on our side as well here at home.
So and Blake, I know you're very cognizant of this
we both were watching. There's certain people. I'm not gonna
name all of them, but some of them are my
friends and some of them are not my friends. But
let's just use Lindsay Graham as a stand in for
all of them. Lady Graham, Lady Graham. So these people

(09:58):
will not be happy until we just all we do
is drop bombs all over foreign countries and you know,
perpetually send American troops.

Speaker 3 (10:09):
They saw they.

Speaker 6 (10:10):
Saw this escalation as their big chance to divert President
Trump into a full regime change war.

Speaker 7 (10:17):
Whatever.

Speaker 6 (10:17):
They told him, Oh, they'll cave, they'll get rid of
their nuclear programming media. They believe this would be their
chance to get their hook in and get President Trump
to just do a full Iraq overthrow the government.

Speaker 7 (10:28):
And they still do this.

Speaker 6 (10:29):
They say, ten thousand troops, it's gonna be super easy,
in and out, in and out, President Trump.

Speaker 5 (10:34):
Let's just be very clear about something. For those of
you and the audience that maybe do feel a bit
that way, where you want to see the regime topple,
I'm the same I want to see the regime topple,
but I'm not willing to send American boots on the
ground to get that done, and that's essentially the only
thing that we'll get this done. You could arm the

(10:55):
citizenry of Iran, but potentially that would be effective, and
maybe they should pursue that. That usually ends terribly as well.
Let's just be honest, we don't have a great track
record there. But unless you are willing to commit one
hundred thousand boots on the ground to go commander and
wrench control of that country from the regime, then this
is not gonna happen. And I will tell you right

(11:15):
now if President Trump did that, it would be politically disastrous.
Every toss up race we would lose every single one
of them come the midterms, he would be impeached. The
entire last two years of his presidency would be completely
and utterly distracted, and every wrench would be thrown into
every gear you can imagine. Okay, So that's just like,

(11:36):
let's just be very clear about the stakes here, and
so in lieu of getting full regime change and getting
everything that you want, getting them to give up their
nuclear getting them to commit to disposing of the dust,
getting them to allow American officials forces oversee the disposal
of said nuclear material, and getting them to open the

(11:58):
straights up and destroying their entire missile arsenal, sinking their
navy to the bottom of the sea. This is this
is the deal that is possible. So let's deal in
the realm of real.

Speaker 6 (12:10):
It's just a simple fact. Would it be good for
a ran to have a different type of government? Yes,
But is that what President Trump ran on in twenty
twenty four?

Speaker 3 (12:18):
No?

Speaker 7 (12:18):
Is it what the people who voted for him want?
It doesn't seem so.

Speaker 3 (12:22):
No.

Speaker 7 (12:23):
And is it overall?

Speaker 6 (12:24):
Is it good for America to a country that has
fewer resources than it did twenty years ago for this
sort of thing? Is this a good way for us
to be investing in America's focus and assets. I don't
believe it is. You don't believe it is. I don't
think most people believe it is. What we want is
we want to revive middle class, We want a revived
industrial base, we want strength abroad.

Speaker 5 (12:46):
Family formation, affordability, home ownership.

Speaker 3 (12:49):
These are the.

Speaker 5 (12:50):
Things that people voted for President Trump. But do you
want to know ultimately why people voted for President Trump?
It was Yes, it was immigration certainly that motivated me,
But really it is that they felt the economy was
better under Trump than it was under Biden.

Speaker 3 (13:03):
That's it.

Speaker 5 (13:04):
I hate to be that guy, the economy stupid, but
it's kind of that, okay, And right now this is
a drag on fulfilling that promise. They'd looked at President
Trump and you could look at a thousand different videos online,
probably half of them are from Charlie, the Peace President,
the no New Wars president.

Speaker 3 (13:22):
That's what they want. They want domestic focus.

Speaker 6 (13:25):
Ultimately, it was just they thought, oh, it seems like
things were better under Trump because Biden took over and
you could just see the decay everywhere because he let
crime go haywire, he let the border go haywire, he
let prices go haywire, and that was a big post
COVID effect. And we're seeing a similar drag here where
the long term effect of that straight of horror moves.
It's not just on gas prices. It's that a bunch
of factories in Vietnam and Thailand and India and China,

(13:48):
those all slow down their operations, so you get those
shortages that we had during COVID, and then that drives
inflation in prices of other things.

Speaker 3 (13:56):
It's a whole slow motion effect effects and you.

Speaker 6 (13:59):
Don't undo that until you restore that Middle East choke
point back to what it was.

Speaker 5 (14:05):
But lest you be concerned that Trump is going to
sign some bad deal, he's not. This is a step
by step process that's being negotiated here. Okay, you make
good on the first promise, then we give a little bit.
You make good on another promise, we give a little bit.
But if you don't, President Trumps still holds the Trump
carved that we're going to keep our military assets deployed

(14:27):
out there until we have exactly what we need and
what we want to twenty seven.

Speaker 4 (14:31):
Well, I think we're doing very well.

Speaker 9 (14:33):
They are starting to give us the things that they
have to give us, and if they do, that's great.
And if they won't, then the man on my left
is going to finish him off.

Speaker 5 (14:41):
And the man on his left is Secretary of warpete
hexat all right. So he's not changing his posture. He's saying, listen,
carrot and a stick. Here's the carrot if you do
what we want, and here's the stick if you don't
do what we want.

Speaker 3 (14:53):
All right. So we still hold the leverage in that sense,
all right.

Speaker 5 (14:57):
So he's also being very clear that the Strait is
going to be open, be accessible to everybody.

Speaker 3 (15:01):
It's not twenty one now, the.

Speaker 9 (15:02):
Strait's going to be open to everybody. It's it's international waters.
Nobody's going to control it. We're gonna watch over it.
We'll watch over it, but nobody's going to control and
that's part of the negotiation that we have. They would
like to control it. Nobody's going to control. It's international waters,
and oman will behave just like everybody else. So will
have to blow them up. They understand that they'll be fine.

Speaker 3 (15:26):
So listen.

Speaker 5 (15:27):
I hope the stakes are very clear for you, because
it's very clear to me that there you are not
going to get the full regime change unless you commit
boots on the ground, and that ain't happening. What you
can get is you can you can exert leverage with
the blockade, which we've been doing, and leverage with our
aerial offensive which we've been doing. And you can get
them to give up the nuclear and you can get

(15:48):
them to open the straight. If you can do those things,
you take that deal.

Speaker 3 (15:51):
Every day of the week you get out, you declare victory.

Speaker 5 (15:54):
You just avoided nuclear fallout in the Middle East and
Europe and elsewhere. Okay, a good deal. Trust the president
in this. He's not going to take a bad deal.
But this is the right deal to take, and we
should get out. Charlie used to talk a lot about
Angel Studios and what they were building, and as you know,
I've been a longtime fan of it for the same reason.

(16:16):
So I want to share some of my favorite films
and shows on Angel, and I put them all into
one easy to use watch list. This is content that's
actually worth your time, not just noise or recycled talking points,
but stories that go a level deeper and ask better questions.
That's what stands out about Angel to me. They're willing
to put out films and documentaries that don't just follow
the usual script, especially when it comes to politics, culture,

(16:39):
and the bigger conversations you and I should be having.
So on my watch list you'll find picks that lean
into those topics, but there are also solid options for
family or just something meaningful to watch at the end
of a stressful day. If you want to check it out,
go to Angel dot com slash Charlie and take a
look at the watch list I put together. All right,

(16:59):
I want to bring in Senator Eric Schmidt, who's one
of the good guys fighting for us in the Senate,
and I got to just kind of start there. We
got to get to Iran, and it's important. But I mean,
the Senate had a big week this week and it
feels like, listen, I know these are your colleagues, so
you got to be diplomatic. You feel free to be diplomatic.

(17:20):
I'm going to read the subtext just kidding. I so,
but we're seeing new fighters emerge and I'm we're totally
behind Ken Paxton. But what do you make of the
big takeaways there in Texas, Sir? That you saw the
base kind of rise up, you saw this endorsement from
President Trump and it ended up being a blowout.

Speaker 10 (17:40):
Yeah, I think that.

Speaker 11 (17:42):
Look, I've known this for a very very long time
when I went through and ran for the Senate in
twenty twenty two.

Speaker 10 (17:48):
You know, people want fighters right now.

Speaker 11 (17:50):
They want to know that people are committed to President
Trump's agenda. And that's that's what I focus on every
single day. I know that's what the people in Missouri
expect me to do, and that's where my heart is.
And I think we've got so many opportunities still in
front of us, even with the time in these you know,
before the midterms, to continue to push an agenda for
there's a lot of things we've done, but there's still
more to do. And I think it's also guys the

(18:13):
voters want to know. And I saw this as Attorney
general in Missouri before I came to the Senate, that
you understand what time it is. You know, like this
is not your grandfather's Democrat Party of Harry Truman or
Ted Kennedy reaching across the aisle to Bob Dole. These
guys are obsessed with power and control. They've been captured
by the radical left. If they had their way, they'll

(18:34):
open up the borders all over again.

Speaker 10 (18:36):
They'll censor us all over again. They'll pack the Supreme.

Speaker 11 (18:39):
Court, they'll add states to the Union, they'll federalize elections,
all of it.

Speaker 10 (18:42):
They will do all of it.

Speaker 11 (18:44):
And so I think you got to understand the stakes,
and you've got to be willing to fight back.

Speaker 10 (18:47):
And and I just.

Speaker 11 (18:48):
Can tell you my experience here in Missouri. I'm home
this week talking to voters around the state. That's what
they want us to do. They love this country. These
are common sense people. They just want us to fight
for them.

Speaker 3 (18:59):
Amen.

Speaker 5 (19:00):
All right, So one of the big developments here is
this Iranian piece deal. We just got news that were
at the finish line. Basically both sides of the negotiating
table have agreed to it. President Trump's going to take
a couple of days to think about it. What do
you hope happens here, Senator Schmidt, Well.

Speaker 11 (19:16):
Look, we've accomplished what President Trump set out to do,
what he said he wanted to do, which was to
knock back their nuclear ambitions, to knock back their military.

Speaker 10 (19:24):
He's done that, and it's created this space now.

Speaker 11 (19:26):
For diplomacy, and I'm hopeful, I'm hopeful that President Trump
can strike a deal. I know he's not going to
strike a bad deal. This is not Barack Obama at
the negotiating table. This is the ultimate deal maker who
understands the stakes. He's been clear that he doesn't want
them to have a nuclear weapon, and so I have
full confidence that President Trump is gonna, you know, do.

Speaker 10 (19:46):
What's right for the American people.

Speaker 11 (19:47):
But I think, as north Star here has always been
to give an opportunity for these negotiations to play out,
to have a resolution and That's what I'm hoping for here.

Speaker 5 (19:58):
I mean, I think this is a like moment for
the president. If you could stop their nuclear program and
get that straight back open, prices come down, gas prices
below three dollars average nationally. I mean California will still
be like six bucks. But you know whatever, that's their
own problem. I think this is a huge legacy moment
and the president's right to pursue peace. He is the
piece through strength President, and I'm praying for peace. I'll

(20:21):
be honest with you. I think it's a huge, huge
impediment to the midterms. We get this done where we
got big mo behind us. You got look Indiana, you
got Paxton, you got a bunch. It gets a VRA
section two being got it something I want to talk
about with you. You have raised an interesting issue with California.

(20:41):
If we want to talk about California, so they redistrict
their maps, they get about five seats for the Democrats.
You have raised that there might be some problems based
on the Supreme Court ruling.

Speaker 3 (20:52):
Centator, what's your perspective there?

Speaker 11 (20:53):
Yeah, I think this is an underreported story just how
significant this case was at the Supreme Court about a
month ago. Effectively, what they said is the Democrats can't
rely on this AstroTurf you know number of seats they
have by way of racist maps. You can't racially jerrymender maps.
And the Democrats have been doing this for a very
very long time. And so I've encouraged the Department of

(21:16):
Justice to go after states like California, Illinois that have
been very explicit as.

Speaker 10 (21:21):
To why their rationale for why they have the maps
that they have.

Speaker 11 (21:25):
California has this commission that they created, which by the way,
was set up under the guise of nonpartisanship to make
it more democratic maps.

Speaker 10 (21:34):
Now that's not.

Speaker 11 (21:35):
Radical enough for them. They want to toss that and
get to another system. But be that as it may.
Their chief map maker has been cleared that they created
districts based on race. And so for me, Dylan, the
Department of Justice, we've issued a letter to them, encouraged
them to sue the state of California and up end
a racist map, and they ought to do it in
Illinois too. Illinois sets up in their statue criteria that's

(21:56):
based explicitly on race. The Supreme Court's been clear you
can't do that, and I think what we're about to
see that if you zoom out here, Andrew, if we
are successful in that effort. The Democrats have relied on
illegal immigrants patting their numbers, were successful with deportations.

Speaker 10 (22:13):
You do that.

Speaker 11 (22:13):
And then also just the natural redistricting that's going to happen.
Twenty twenty was a bogus census. The twenty thirty census
will be more accurate. And also the people leaving California, Illinois,
New York for red states. You're going to see a
fundamental shift I think structurally where we're going to have
advantages in states in a big way in the next
five years. But we ought to be aggressive here. We

(22:34):
ought to do pedal to the medal and up end
these racist maps. That's what Supreme Court ruling is all about.

Speaker 10 (22:39):
And now they should play offense.

Speaker 3 (22:41):
I love this.

Speaker 5 (22:42):
I mean, so have you gotten any word back from
the DOJ that they're actually going to pursue this? And
I want to remind the audience here. You are the
former attorney general of the state of Missouri. You are
the guy that led the fight against Google and censorship.
We have so many scalps thanks to your leadership, and
so you know this well, I mean, you are a
legal bagle in the truest sense. You happen to be

(23:03):
in the Senate now and you're fighting the fight for us.
But like I just want the audience to understand when
you when you bring up these legal issues, you're not
talking into a vacuum. You're not talking unaware about the
legal precedents that have been set. Have you gotten confirmation
that they're looking into it, that this is that that
they agree with your prescription here?

Speaker 11 (23:22):
Well, I posted about it when we when we issue
the letter to the Department Justice. Posted about it on
X and her Mea. Dylan's response was on it. So
I think that's a good Ok.

Speaker 3 (23:30):
Well, yeah, good, I didn't see that. That is a
good So I.

Speaker 10 (23:34):
Think that's a good sign.

Speaker 11 (23:35):
And I think she's done a great job in that
position the Civil Rights Division, which by the way, was
a cessful cesspool for radical leftist for years and so
a lot of those lawyers have left. She's rebuilding the
ranks with people who actually believe in the rule of law.

Speaker 10 (23:51):
And this is a great example.

Speaker 11 (23:52):
I think of of not just accepting.

Speaker 10 (23:54):
The Supreme Court. I mean, the Supreme Court decision was.

Speaker 11 (23:57):
Very positive, but now playing offense with that, and I
think that's what separates us from the Democrats. We have
to play to win here, and we'd be doing it
for all the right reasons. It's been pretty clear by
the Supreme Court you cannot have racist maps. The Democrats
have relied on racist maps for a long time. And
by the way, in the broader sense, in these redistricting fights,

(24:17):
outside of the racist maps in states like Missouri and
Texas where you've seen it, we should continue to play
offense there too, because you can't have political determinations on
how you draw maps.

Speaker 10 (24:26):
The Supreme Court was very explicit about that too.

Speaker 11 (24:28):
Because if you look at a map of New England there,
even though forty percent of that region is Republican, there's
not a single Republican representative Congress.

Speaker 3 (24:37):
We should be taking the fight to them everywhere.

Speaker 11 (24:39):
Senator absolutely, so, take you take those think of the
Southeast Conference, right, a Southeast Conference, think of those states.

Speaker 10 (24:46):
Be aggressive. We can add you know seats there.

Speaker 11 (24:49):
Take on the Voting Rights Act there, continue the deportations there,
have the you know, the census and the you know,
people voting with their feet over the last decade. I
think we're going to come out on top here, but
we have to be smart and aggressive.

Speaker 5 (25:01):
Well in the census. You're right, is really gonna help.
There's no doubt about it. Okay, So two other things
I want to get to and I know you've got
to run here, but Save America Act ending the filibuster
talking filibuster.

Speaker 3 (25:13):
Uh are you seeing any momentum there?

Speaker 5 (25:15):
I mean, I thought Paxton was very smart the way
he threw that to Corn and said, hey, I'll drop
out of the race.

Speaker 3 (25:20):
If you get behind this.

Speaker 5 (25:22):
I mean, I I want to call him the same
thing for Lindsey Graham and South Carolina.

Speaker 3 (25:26):
You know, but again, I can do that. You can.
I understand you've got you've got colleagues in the Senate.

Speaker 10 (25:31):
But I've been I've been very clear about this.

Speaker 11 (25:34):
So uh, you know, in talking to President Trump, if
just to kind of step back, you know, Mike Lee
had the had the Senate version with the uh you
have to prove citizenship and you have to show photo.
I d I worked closely with the President and talking
with him about adding those three other features to Save America,
which is, you know, making sure you get rid of
mail in voting fraud that's been out there uh, and

(25:55):
making sure men can't compete with women in sports, and
getting rid of the you know, the transgender mutilation of
our kids. So that substitute amendment that lays there, that's mine.
So there's nobody more committed to this than me. I
think the answer, Andrew, is that we have to dedicate
the time on the talking filibuster and then that we're
gonna see, let the chips fall where they may. We're

(26:17):
never gonna know unless we try, and that just takes
a commitment of time, honestly, make the Democrats hold the floor. Now, Look,
they're gonna ask for quorum calls and we have to
have fifty one people go out there. But that's a
good way to determine who's really committed to this thing, right,
And so that's where I'm at on it. I wish
we would spend Yeah, I wish we just need to
spend the time on it, and we're running out of

(26:40):
that time, so we need to be dedicated to it
when we get back in June.

Speaker 5 (26:43):
Yeah, I found myself wondering this morning. And again, I
know you can't say as much as I can, so
you can be quiet here if you need to, Senator,
But I spound myself wondering this morning what the world
would look like if Senator Scott was was the.

Speaker 3 (26:57):
Leader of the Senate and not Thune.

Speaker 5 (26:59):
But here we are, all right, So one last minute here, sir,
there was a I just saw this. It was an
AP story that a federal judge has declined to halt
President Trump's executive order creating a federal voter list and
limiting mail voting. So it's still being challenged in other states.
But just as a legal mind, I'm sure you remember

(27:20):
this story. You sign an executive order saying that the
US Postal Service will have a list of actual approved
voters in a federal election.

Speaker 3 (27:26):
Do you think this will stand up to legal muster?
It's being challenged everywhere.

Speaker 10 (27:29):
I think so.

Speaker 11 (27:30):
I mean, there's nothing preventing us having accurate voter information.
I mean, again, that's how crazy this debate has gotten.
That and I guess, actually, I'll pull back a little bit.
Twenty years ago, there was something called the Carter Baker Commission,
which was a bipartisan commission of Jimmy Carter and James Baker,
and they came together and said, what are the ten

(27:52):
things we can do to ensure election integrity in this country.

Speaker 3 (27:55):
Yeah, I remember this, Yes, remember this.

Speaker 11 (27:57):
By limiting mail and voting to prevent fraud and making
sure people really need to if they can't be there
because of medicinally, that's fine, but you got to limit it.
That's a big piece of it. So didn't used to
be controversial. It is now we got to move forward
on this stuff.

Speaker 5 (28:07):
Senator Eric Schmidt, one of the good guys fighting for
you in the US Senate.

Speaker 3 (28:11):
God bless you, sir. We'll talk to you soon.

Speaker 5 (28:13):
All right, guys, all right, Blake another day, and the
hits keep coming from Tofuller tall.

Speaker 3 (28:21):
Rico, He terrible, tall Rico, terror Tlerrico.

Speaker 5 (28:24):
So I love the Internet for this reason. So so okay,
now we have the matchup. It's Paxton VI tall Rico.
And people are starting to dig through the old interviews
that he's done, these clips from south By Southwest of
him saying crazy stuff. Now they're going back through the
Joe Rogan interview. They're finding even more stuff. And it's
just too good because he's just so bad, and it's

(28:47):
so we owe it to you. We have a moral
obligation to expose just how crazy this is. Blake you
made the point. He's like a bad AI.

Speaker 6 (28:53):
Yeah, like an AI generation, Like create a Democrat circa
twenty twenty one, who's going to do all of the
AI beats. So he's gonna you ask him a question,
what do you care about most.

Speaker 3 (29:06):
Trans Yes, trans kids exactly.

Speaker 5 (29:09):
So he's like Pete Boudhage Edge meets Beto O'Rourke, but
just more effeminate. Okay, so here, I gotta play this
cup because it's just so stupid UHT nineteen.

Speaker 12 (29:19):
Part of this Christian nationalist movement isn't it is trying
to pass these things called private school vouchers. So he's
taking dollars out of the classroom and giving it to
unaccountable private schools, usually Christian private schools. Again part of
this effort to blur the lines between church and state.

Speaker 5 (29:38):
Okay, so there's so much here that is worth unpacking. First,
let me just say school choice is undeniably one of
the very best things the state can do for its students,
especially poor families. Okay, it a lot of students are
trapped in underperforming schools, failing schools, public schools that are

(29:58):
indoctrinating their to become like James Tall Rico. You don't
want that, obviously, so it's a no brainer. We do
it here in Arizona and it's amazing.

Speaker 3 (30:08):
All the families love it.

Speaker 5 (30:10):
So basically, you get a seventy five hundred dollars tax
credit a voucher to use at a private school, and
a lot of people do it. So if you're stuck
at a crappy public school, guess what. You got private
options and it's like this boon. It's this whole entrepreneurial
industry has emerged with new schools popping up in their
classical education, classic Christian education. I mean, they're amazing and

(30:32):
usually they cost about the same amount a year to
send your student there, so they're like seventy five hundred bucks,
maybe eighty five hundred bucks. You can pay extra thousand bucks,
but your students are getting an education that suits your
values and it's amazing. People love it here. Okay, guess
who doesn't love it? The teachers unions. So why does
James tal Rico really want to demonize school vouchers as
Christian nationalism? It breaks the stranglehold of the teachers unions.

(30:55):
And guess what. The teachers unions are a super pack
for Democrats. They are get out the vote machine, they're
door knockers, They're sending millions and millions of dollars to
their preferred Democrat candidates.

Speaker 3 (31:06):
They don't like that.

Speaker 6 (31:07):
It's the most sensor to thing. It's the total capture
of every institution in American life to just be funnel
money to a Democrat cartel. And it's actually a reversion
to a very old way of doing things, because what
was life like if you lived in a decrepit feudal
system like France before the revolution. Everyone's you have different nobles,

(31:28):
and they all have their different noble privileges because their
grandpa pa fought at the Battle of something or other
five hundred years ago. They have the right to collect
this this tax fee in their local area.

Speaker 7 (31:39):
It's exactly like this.

Speaker 6 (31:40):
Oh, we're a public school teacher, we have the right
to get all of these tax revenues that go to us.
Do we need to make sure we actually teach kids?

Speaker 4 (31:47):
No?

Speaker 7 (31:48):
Do we even need to have school in person?

Speaker 3 (31:49):
No?

Speaker 7 (31:50):
We get to, you know, demand shutdowns whenever we want.

Speaker 6 (31:52):
Is there any accountability for us not letting your kids
get molested?

Speaker 4 (31:55):
No?

Speaker 7 (31:56):
And are you allowed to leave?

Speaker 3 (31:57):
No? That's why they hate the vouchers.

Speaker 7 (31:59):
And of course his.

Speaker 6 (32:00):
Biggest donors are going to people who send their kids
to private schools. In the Bay Area.

Speaker 5 (32:07):
Public school his donors are all going private school.

Speaker 3 (32:10):
Okay.

Speaker 5 (32:11):
Secondly, he says it's Christian nationalism. Okay, well, what does
he want at a public school. He wants your kids
trapped in an indoctrination center that is transnationally the secular
cult of wokeness. He wants your kids being indoctrinated from
a very young age to be just like him, woke
mind virus, the whole kitten kaboodle, trans LGBTQ, celebrating trans

(32:37):
Day and Flag Day, all that kind of crap. That's
what he wants instead of going to a Christian school
where they learn to worship Jesus. That's coming from a Christian.
Suppose it a heretical Christian. And by the way, this
is the last thing I want to point out of
that clip, unaccountable. Do you see all these schools are unaccountable.

Speaker 3 (32:55):
Well that's not true.

Speaker 5 (32:56):
First of all, they have certain benchmarks they need to meet,
they need to get a credited All that stuff remains true.
But what that is that's code for their uncontrollable because
you got to remember, the secular left believes that your
kids belong to them, your kids belong to the state.
That's why you get laws in California where they can
basically kidnap your kids. If you don't agree with the

(33:16):
trans cult, if you have not bent the knee to
the Trans god, the golden calf of Trans, then they
get to take your kid away from you. They get
to kidnap your kid because they believe that the kid
belongs to them, not to the parents. So unaccountable, that's
code for you can't control it. And that's bad to

(33:36):
a leftist, to a patriot, to an American, to a constitutionalist.
You realize that's in God's design because God set up
the nuclear family. It is the building block of civilization,
and they can't touch it. If they can touch it,
they can destroy civilization. They can destroy the founder's vision
for this country. They can destroy traditional America. If we
can preserve it, then we can preserve the country. And

(33:58):
they hate that. Ta Rico is not just weird, he's
not just dangerous. He's a con man. He's a snake
oil salesman posing in a Christian skin suit. And it
needs to be called out. And by the way, we
got another clip. Here we went a little longer than
I was expecting to. How long is this clip? We
got enough time?

Speaker 3 (34:18):
Here we go.

Speaker 5 (34:18):
This is him telling you that it's not a Christian nation.
Actually top thirty six.

Speaker 12 (34:23):
But I think it's really important to clarify that we
were not founded as a Christian nation. We were founded
as a nation where you were free to be a
Christian or a Jew, or a Muslim, or a Sikh,
or a Buddhist or an atheist. I mean, that is
the that's the promise of America is that we are
this multicultural melting pot where no one is told how

(34:43):
to pray and no religion is elevated over the others.

Speaker 5 (34:47):
Blake, do you think the founders are really worried about
Sikhs and Muslims?

Speaker 6 (34:51):
You know what's funny is I wonder if they even
knew what a Sikh was at that time, and certainly Islam.
I mean, they thought it was an exotic they'd heard
of it, they'd heard it was an exotic religion for
a broad but I don't think I think they would
have all admitted America would have been an incredibly different nation.

Speaker 7 (35:05):
If we were filled with Islamic jahadis.

Speaker 5 (35:09):
I want to talk to you about an issue so
many Americans face, and that's health insurance. There's an organization
I really really appreciate called Christian Healthcare Ministries CHM is
a faith based alternative to health insurance. And this is
real stuff. Folks like you gotta listen in. With CHM,
You're not paying into a company's profit margin. You're investing

(35:32):
in a community with less overhead than the competition. You
get reliable support through the giving and prayer of fellow members.
Members contribute every month to help pay for each other's
medical bills, allowing believers to afford the care they need.
Because they're not insurance, you get access to your preferred
doctor or hospital without network restrictions. You heard that right.

(35:52):
If you want to see massive savings in your healthcare budget,
HM has four low cost programs for every stage of life,
starting at just one hundred and fifteen dollars a month plus.
You can enroll or switch your program at any time.
See why so many believers are taking a leap of faith.
Start today by visiting cchmnistries dot org, slash Charlie and

(36:13):
use promo code Charlie for a fifty percent credit towards
your first month. That'shministries dot org. Slash Charlie and use
promo code Charlie. I'm very excited about our next guest,
and that is Peter Schwarz Schweitzer, who's a longtime friend
and guests of the show, and he's the author of
an incredible book called The Invisible Coup, and he's making

(36:35):
headlines because he's ruffling all the right feathers.

Speaker 3 (36:38):
Peter, welcome back to the show. It's good to have you.

Speaker 4 (36:41):
Good to be back with you. Thanks for having me.

Speaker 5 (36:43):
Well, so you have really gotten under the skin of
some of our of our friends down south, the our
Mexican neighbors. Claude Shinbaum's really upset about you. So you
have you've been basically saying that these Mexican consulates in
the United States, there's.

Speaker 3 (36:59):
Fifty three of them.

Speaker 5 (37:00):
By the way, fifty how do we need fifty three
Mexican consulates in the United States. It's probably because we
have too much illegal immigration.

Speaker 3 (37:08):
But I digress. There's fifty three of.

Speaker 5 (37:10):
Them here, and you have alleged that they've been up
to some no good things, some things that are against
our interests as Americans, which doesn't shock me. Now Mexico
is denying this, of course, they're calling you a big,
fat liar. Peter, tell us what the allegations are that
you've put forth in some of the evidence you have
for that.

Speaker 4 (37:28):
Yeah, I mean, you're quite right.

Speaker 13 (37:29):
There's fifty three Mexican consulates in the United States. Just
to put that into perspective, there are four alone in
the state of Arizona. Great Britain has six in the
United States. China has seven. So this is a massive number.
And what I lay out in the book is really
quoting Mexican officials and describing what they're doing. And those

(37:50):
consulates are meddling in American politics. They are organizing anti
Trump protest rallies, they are organizing anti ice rallies.

Speaker 4 (38:00):
I highlight in May.

Speaker 13 (38:01):
Of twenty twenty four, a presidential election year, of course,
there was a meeting at the Oklahoma City consulate that
Mexico has. There were officials that flew in from Mexico City,
consular officials from Los Angeles to Orlando and the consults
in between all gathered there.

Speaker 4 (38:18):
And what do they do.

Speaker 13 (38:19):
They met with Democratic Party political organizers and the conversation
was about how they could turn states from red to blue,
and they bragged about how they had turned California from
red to blue, Arizona from red to blue, and they
wanted to do more of that. All of this, by
the way, comes from a transcript of that meeting that

(38:40):
we obtained from the Mexican media. So this is not
me alleging this. This is what they are doing. And
the bottom line is, I don't think anybody would defend
the fact that foreign diplomats are meddling in American politics.
You also have a Mexican official that lives in the
United States, and I'm Alejandro Roblaze. He serves in the

(39:00):
Mexican Parliament. He bragged it in twenty twenty five he
was crossing the United States organizing the militancy against Donald Trump.
In his words, So again, why we're allowing foreign government
officials to do this is beyond me.

Speaker 5 (39:18):
Yeah, I mean, listen, I've long been on this. I
have a lot of conversations behind the scenes about how
the Mexican government is incentivized to help illegals get into
the United States, what to do when they get here.
And by the way, Peterson remittances back to Mexico. Mexico
wants that money too, and guess how they get it.

(39:40):
They get it by sending their people to go get
work here and they go into Western Union or money
Gram or one of these remittance companies that sends it
back to their home country. And that's a really big deal,
a really big part of the Mexican economy.

Speaker 3 (39:54):
And they're very aware of that. So what do they do.

Speaker 5 (39:56):
They send out pamphlets. They have a Gia del mcgrante meh.
So they give this to people that are attempting to cross. Obviously,
the border is way more secure now, but it wasn't
just a little while ago, and there was millions of
them coming over, and they're incentivized. So the whole thing
and how, and your point is so well made. Fifty
three there's no excuse for having fifty three Mexican consulates

(40:18):
in the United States. This is a foreign invasion of another,
of another kind. And they're incentivized to turn red states
blue because that will give more immigrants opportunity to cross
that because they know the Democrats are pro open borders,
they're going to bring them in. And you get blue states,
you get less pushback against this, you get more remittances.

Speaker 4 (40:38):
Yeah, no, you're exactly right.

Speaker 13 (40:39):
It's a cycle that Mexico's elite benefits from.

Speaker 4 (40:44):
And it's not just a question of you.

Speaker 13 (40:47):
Know, the money or we're going to meddle in politics,
that Mexico actually has ambitions in the United States.

Speaker 4 (40:54):
There's this concept reconquista.

Speaker 13 (40:56):
I always thought it was like a kind of a
ridiculous conspiracy theory, except for the fact that Mexico's leaders talk.

Speaker 4 (41:02):
About it all the time.

Speaker 13 (41:03):
And what they mean is re exerting sovereignty over parts
of America that they lost in the nineteenth century as
a result of the US Mexican War when they sold
territories to US.

Speaker 4 (41:15):
They actually talk about this openly. And these aren't cooks.

Speaker 13 (41:18):
These are the most powerful senators in Mexico. These are
top aids to President Shinbaum. This is former President Amlow,
And they talk about exerting Mexico's sovereignty into.

Speaker 4 (41:28):
The United States. So how do they do that.

Speaker 13 (41:31):
Well, one of the things they've done is they have
elected Mexican officials, senators and members of parliament who live
full time in the United States and their job is
to represent Mexicans living in the United States before the
Mexican government. That is a massive erosion of our sovereignty.
Imagine if we did that to Canada. Imagine if we

(41:51):
said we're going to have a congressman representing Americans living
in Alberta. The Canadians would never go for that, and
for rightful reason. But that's for decisely what Mexico's doing.
So this is an effort to immigrant, to use immigration
as a weapon, to weaponize immigration, and I think we
need to recognize that, Yes, it creates unsafe streets, mass immigration,

(42:14):
suppresses wages, all the issues that we have talked about
for years, but there's also a weaponization that is designed
to undermine the United States. And they are open about
it in their discussions among themselves, and I quote them
extensively in the book. So when Shine Mom attacks me,
you notice she doesn't deal within any of the evidence.
She doesn't deal with the fact that I quote one

(42:36):
of her top aides in a December twenty twenty four
report saying through mass migration, we are retaking portions of
the United States.

Speaker 4 (42:45):
She doesn't deal with that.

Speaker 13 (42:46):
She simply says this is a conspiracy theory and wants
it to go away.

Speaker 6 (42:50):
It's really infuriating, and it gets the power of media
narratives to guide things because we hear endlessly, we hear
a lot about China, justifiably, we hear endlessly about is
real allegedly controlling the United States or influence in this
in the United States. And then it's just right in
front of us that a country next door to us
that has by far the most immigration into the United
States will openly talk about this, openly glowed about.

Speaker 7 (43:12):
The effect it has.

Speaker 6 (43:13):
The effect is so clearly negative overall on the United States.
It's a country that has a long history bad blood
with US, and at the same time it's it's like
the major media and even frankly a lot of the
right wing media, they just almost conspire to just have
it not be talked about. And it's almost I think
that's a bigger picture thing because you think of does

(43:33):
anyone really know Mexico's history in the US? Very few
people do, despite the fact that it's right next door
to us and people vacation there and so many of
them move here.

Speaker 7 (43:41):
People don't know a lot about Mexico.

Speaker 6 (43:42):
They don't talk a lot about Mexico, they don't think
about the effect Mexico has on the United States.

Speaker 3 (43:47):
You hear more about Canada now.

Speaker 4 (43:49):
I think that's a really important point.

Speaker 13 (43:51):
And it also, frankly, the people that don't take Mexico's
ambition seriously are kind of stereotyping them. I mean, they'll say, like,
come on, it's Mexico.

Speaker 4 (44:00):
They're corrupt, They're kind of hapless.

Speaker 13 (44:03):
No, I mean, I think that does not give the
Mexican political elite and not a lot of credit.

Speaker 4 (44:09):
And I will give credit to the Trump administration.

Speaker 13 (44:12):
When the book came out, I actually met in the
Oval Office with the President, with the Treasury Secretary Besson,
and with Secretary of State Marco Rubio laid out when
Mexico was doing what China was doing. They've taken a
lot of action on the issue of birth tourism that
I raised with them. But they also announced several weeks
ago that they are reviewing the political activities of the

(44:33):
fifty three consulates that Mexico has in the United States. So, again,
in keeping with form, the Trump administration is not concerned
about taking bold action when they think it's necessary, and
I don't think any other modern president would have undertaken
this review with regards to Mexico. So I think it's
very encouraging.

Speaker 2 (44:53):
Peter.

Speaker 5 (44:53):
You came on the show when your book launched, and
I thought it was so important. You exposed a pretty
devastating fact about birth tourism. And we call birth tourism,
but really that's it's not an aggressive enough term actually,
because it's an invasion, it's a takeover tourism.

Speaker 3 (45:13):
And I mean when we.

Speaker 5 (45:15):
Talk about the numbers of Chinese alone, and then we
put that in context of the Supreme Court and that
decision on birthright citizenship, I'm not hearing good reports that
we're going to get this the ruling the way that
we should. I'm holding out hope, but just set the
stakes for the audience. How big of an issue is

(45:36):
this actually? And you know, and maybe Blake look at
some of the states and the margins of victory versus
how many Chinese immigrants there are.

Speaker 13 (45:45):
The floor is yours, Peter, Yeah, I mean it's a
huge problem. You know, when you look at the fourteenth Amendment,
this sort of radical interpretation that basically the left is proposed,
which is anybody who gets their toe across the border
and gives birth, that child is granted citizenship. Even if
the child is raised overseas, when they turn eighteen, they're

(46:07):
going to be able to vote, they're going to be
able to get government jobs, they can sponsor their parents
as permanent residents. It's a huge vulnerability, and what China
has done is exploited this on an industrial scale, as
only China can do.

Speaker 4 (46:20):
So what we found was that there are more than
five hundred China.

Speaker 13 (46:24):
Business sorry birth tourism companies operating in the United States
and in China. They advertise openly.

Speaker 4 (46:32):
In China.

Speaker 13 (46:32):
The Chinese Communist Party newspaper the Pepers Daily has run
stories encouraging members of the Chinese elite to do this.
And what they essentially do is they send their girlfriends, their.

Speaker 4 (46:42):
Wives to the United States.

Speaker 13 (46:44):
They pay this firm, they get them into the country,
they give birth to a baby, they get that all
important birth certificate that says born in the United States.
They fly home, they raise that child in China. And
these are children of the elites. These are military officers,
intelligence officers, CCP officials, people with a propaganda ministry, and

(47:06):
that child will be raised in China.

Speaker 4 (47:08):
And then when you look at the scale of it,
nobody knows in the United States.

Speaker 13 (47:12):
How many are doing this because when you get a
birth certificate issued in our country, we don't know who
the nationality of.

Speaker 4 (47:19):
The birth parents are.

Speaker 13 (47:20):
But the Chinese have looked at this, and the Chinese
government and Chinese research firms say that on average since
twenty thirteen, every single year, roughly one hundred thousand Chinese
babies have been.

Speaker 4 (47:33):
Born in the United States.

Speaker 13 (47:35):
That includes California, that includes Hawaii, that includes territories like Saipan,
which the same rule applies. They get you a citizenship.
So what that means is right now, there are, according
to the Chinese, more than one million US citizens I'll
put that in air quotes being raised in China right now,

(47:56):
and they're going to be able to start voting around
twenty thirty. And again I share this with President Trump
in the Oval Office with Mark Robio and Treasury Secretary Bessants,
the White House Council was there. The President turned to
the White House Council and says, we need to get
this to the Solicitor General. And this was in fact
part of the debate when this was argued before the

(48:18):
Supreme Court.

Speaker 4 (48:19):
I agree with you.

Speaker 13 (48:20):
I don't think it looks good for the Supreme Court
on the issue of birthright citizenship.

Speaker 4 (48:25):
But I do hold out a sliver of hope. I
think the.

Speaker 13 (48:29):
Court may may come back and say that Trump can't
do this to executive order, but that Congress should have
the ability to limit the scope of birthright citizenship. In
other words, say, if you're here illegally, if you're here
on birth tourism, this does not apply.

Speaker 4 (48:48):
And the reason I say that is Brett Kavanaugh.

Speaker 13 (48:50):
Was asking the ACOU attorney who was arguing on the
other side on this issue, and she said, no, you
shouldn't be.

Speaker 4 (48:56):
Able to limit it at all.

Speaker 13 (48:58):
And Kavanaugh, who I think is kind of one of
these guys in the bubble, was kind of incredulous, saying,
you're kidding me, right, You're saying you can't put any
So I'm hoping the Court will at least come back
and say Congress can in fact put constraints on this,
and then it's a question of getting.

Speaker 4 (49:13):
That body in Washington, d C. To actually do something
about it.

Speaker 5 (49:17):
You know, I was speaking with somebody who knows the
Court very well, and they were saying that John Roberts
in particular has this great nation theory. Really it's sort
of unideological but it's his lens through which he filters
his decisions, which is, would a great nation allow XYZ
to happen? And the question really is, would a great

(49:41):
nation allow a foreign power, it's chief adversary on the
international stage, the CCP, to game our immigration system to
potentially deliver a decisive electoral blow to us, because they
can influence states the margin of victory, and some of
these states ten twenty thousand, thirty thousand, we're talking over

(50:03):
a million, million point five Chinese nationals that would be
allowed to vote in our elections to do whatever, to
influence directly via our representative democracy, to change the outcome
of elections. Would a great nation do that? Of course,
the answer is no.

Speaker 6 (50:18):
It's such a fast stile way to view it, because
of course, you know they'll bring this up and then
I'll say, well, what a great nation take away citizenship
from these vulnerable children. That's how that's how he's gonna
end up framing it, and that's why we're not optimistic
about this case. When, as you say, it's extremely obvious.
How about when America was a great nation, what did
it do? And America as a great nation clearly did

(50:39):
not prioritize allowing people to sail entirely around the world
and just take over this country. When America was a
great nation, it didn't have unlimited welfare programs that a
person could walk off a vote and loot at will
because we don't enforce them and have no standards.

Speaker 7 (50:53):
And yet that's also what they're doing.

Speaker 3 (50:55):
Yeah, I mean, ludicrous operations.

Speaker 5 (50:57):
We are a great nation, but we should not be
We should not be allowed to be made suckers of
by foreign nationals that especially want the worst for America,
that make noe butts about it. And Peter, you should
end on this note. What does the CCP really want
for America? They want our good or they want our ill?

Speaker 13 (51:14):
Well, you know, I quote them in the book, and
you can find it online if you go and look
at some of even the Chinese CCP English language sources.
They say that they view this as a civilizational struggle.
This is not just about military conflict and trade and
spheres of influence. It is a civilizational war between in

(51:35):
their words, the Judeo Christian West and the CCP, and
they intend to win it.

Speaker 4 (51:42):
And what I would add to what you said, I
think very well about Justice.

Speaker 13 (51:47):
Roberts's view is it's been said numerous times by justices
that are more liberal and those that are more conservative.

Speaker 4 (51:53):
The US Constitution is not a suicide pact.

Speaker 13 (51:57):
And given how easy it is for these million foreign
nationals who are now US citizens, who have no connection
to our country, to establish citizenship in so many states,
you can literally show up in some states a week
before an election, and this has happened where twenty five
foreign nationals will rent an apartment, claim citizenship, and.

Speaker 4 (52:18):
Vote in that election.

Speaker 13 (52:20):
That is the kind of manipulation you were setting yourself
up for. So hopefully the Court comes to its census
and makes.

Speaker 4 (52:26):
The right choice.

Speaker 13 (52:27):
But we've got to keep fighting on this issue because
it represents the future challenge for a country, this invasion
or what I call this invisible coup.

Speaker 3 (52:36):
Invisible coup.

Speaker 5 (52:37):
Get your copy today, Peter, great work as always. And
you know, just a note, the fourteenth Amendment does not
grant birthright citizenship to illegals. As a matter of fact,
that's not what it was intended for. So let's just
start there, Supreme Court. It's not that hard, so obvious.
Peter Schweitzer, Thank you, my friend. We'll talk to you soon.

Speaker 4 (52:53):
It was great to be with you.

Speaker 5 (52:54):
Thanks, gentlemen. Let's get real for a second. Are you
frustrated with today's woke dating scene? The apps, the games,
the endless swiping. It's a waste of time finding a
woman who shares your values faith, family, patriotism. If it
feels nearly impossible, it doesn't have to. Selective Search, America's

(53:15):
leading matchmaking firm, is changing the game. They connect strong,
successful men like you, Men who love God, love America,
want a family with women who share your values. These
are intelligent, faith driven women who put family first and
still believe in traditional values.

Speaker 3 (53:30):
Imagine that.

Speaker 5 (53:31):
If you're a single conservative man in his late thirties
to early fifties in southern California, listen up. Selective Search
has an exclusive network of women ready for the real thing.
Here's the best part. Their candidate program is one hundred
percent free and confidential. Some of our closest friends the
show have used Selective Search, and let me tell you,
they're meeting great, great women, high quality women. This is

(53:54):
your chance. This isn't an app, it's your answer. The
perfect conservative woman is out there way for you. Visit
selective search dot com, slash California. Today, let the professionals
introduce you to women already looking for someone like you
in southern California. Don't wait for the perfect match. Take
action now, go to Selective search dot com slash California

(54:16):
and start.

Speaker 3 (54:17):
Building the future you deserve.

Speaker 5 (54:21):
Without further ado, we have Alex Dine ninety nine, the man,
the myth, the legend. Haven't had him on the show
and way too long, by the way, Alex. And it
occurred to me that that was the truth. That I
was like, Alex, you gotta come on. So how you doing,
my friend, Howard?

Speaker 2 (54:34):
Things I'm doing good, Things are good. You know, we
have broke this huge story.

Speaker 14 (54:39):
Trevor Williams was being discriminated by the director of community
relations for the Washington Nationals.

Speaker 2 (54:44):
And actually have some breaking news and I'm going to
break on your show right here.

Speaker 3 (54:47):
Fantastic for mine.

Speaker 14 (54:48):
So I am good friends with Derek Holland. He played
in the Majors for thirteen seasons and he played on
the Pirates with Trevor Williams. And so he called Trevor
Williams last night, and Trevor Williams is pissed, and don't
the only reason that he hasn't been more outspoken and
really address This is because Trevor Williams is such a
team player. He doesn't want to rock the boat. He
doesn't want to mess up the season. He's on the
IR But I just have inside information straight from Trevor Williams.

(55:12):
He's really upset. But it is frustrating because we need
Trevor Williams to speak out because sadly, if this was
a Muslim player, a Jewish player, a black player, a
Chinese player, it would be the biggest mainstream story, you know,
of all of sports and just you know, the political world.
But because it's a Christian and traditionally Christians are oftentimes
discriminated against. Christians don't fight back enough, you know, they

(55:34):
are you know, easily bullied. And so that's why we
need Trevor Williams to come out and say something. But
I do actually appreciate that he's putting the team first.

Speaker 3 (55:40):
I love that.

Speaker 5 (55:41):
Well, that's that's great news, and I'm glad to hear
that he's upset.

Speaker 3 (55:44):
He should be.

Speaker 5 (55:45):
So let's give the audience a little primer here and
just in case you're not aware of this, so Alex
Stein is teamed up with James O'Keefe and they did
another sting operation.

Speaker 3 (55:54):
We love James here.

Speaker 5 (55:55):
They did a sting operation on the Washington Nationals director
of community relations, and the guy just was like vicious
to Trevor Williams. Basically, if you've ever been to a
baseball game, and one of the reasons I want to
do the story outs I'm a huge baseball fan, love it.
I don't miss a game at night if I can.
I'm a Dodgers fan, deal with it, and so like

(56:15):
I try and catch all the games. But they do
these little things where they, like in between the the innings,
you know, while they're warming up and the offenses going
to defense and they're switching over, they'll do like fun
things like is a hot dog a sandwich game right?
And then the fans have to ask the question and
they get the players involved and it's goofy.

Speaker 3 (56:33):
It's fun. It's kind of entertainment in between innings. This
guy dogs on him just like he's too Christian. Whatever.
Here you go clip thirty one.

Speaker 8 (56:42):
One of our.

Speaker 2 (56:43):
Pitchers, do Trevor Williams.

Speaker 8 (56:45):
He is very cap The Dodgers had a group out
to the stadium who were drag queens who sometimes dressed
up as knots. He went on, like a social media
like this is wrong.

Speaker 2 (56:59):
SMI religion.

Speaker 8 (57:00):
You all are mocking it because we don't use him
on social like when they're like is a hot dog
as sandwich? And like the players come up, you know
what I mean? Like, we don't ask you if you
ever come to a NAVS game, there is someone on
our team who is responsible for figuring out everything about
you or getting your requifer of your Google history one
of our pictures. Do Trevor Williams.

Speaker 5 (57:21):
Okay, the religious discrimination's bad enough here, Alex, But that
last part that he admitted to that like they're they're
basically tracking everybody that comes into the into the stadium,
Like that's terrifying.

Speaker 2 (57:35):
Well, Andrew, that's what I thought too.

Speaker 14 (57:37):
But if you actually ask people, because we've done some
Man on the Street videos talking about this specific story,
and everybody is kind of just understands when you sign
the terms of service, we don't even have privacy anymore.
So I would have thought more people would be outraged
on the fact that when you go to a baseball game,
they're getting all under Google data. But really and truly,
people don't even care about that, and I was actually
really shocked. I was really really surprised that people were

(57:58):
not more upset about the Google dataly because I was
very upset when he said that.

Speaker 5 (58:03):
Well so, And I want to remind people of this, uh,
this twenty twenty three story with the Dodgers, because again
I'm a Dodger fan, and it pissed me right off,
I'll tell you that much. The Dodgers made the decision
to honor this queer and transactivist performance group that dresses
in satirical nun habits. It's called the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence.

(58:28):
And it was a complete disgrace and it it was dealing.
I mean, you're a Catholic here. I mean, I don't
want to like steal the thunder from you, but like
they dressed as much a queer trann He's dressed up
like Catholic nuns, and it was It's.

Speaker 7 (58:41):
Just a complete mockery. You could not get away with
it with any.

Speaker 6 (58:47):
Like if we the Sisters of Dirka Derka Jihad and
they like fake blow themselves up, do you think Dodgers
would do that display out a game.

Speaker 3 (58:54):
I would go to that game, but I don't think
they would though.

Speaker 5 (58:57):
To answer your question, Yeah, and they got the Commute
Hero Award, they got the Community Hero Award. And now
I was paying very close attention to the story. Guys
like Blake tryin In, guys like Clayton Kershaw at the time,
they I mean Clayton went straight to the Dodgers management
and said, this is offensive. You need to bring back

(59:19):
where the day where we get to share our faith.
So the Dodgers for years had done a share their
Faith day so you could come to the stadium early
and the Dodgers, like Christian Dodgers would actually preach the
gospel and ask people to accept Christ at Dodger Stadium.
They did this for years. I think after COVID they stopped.
During COVID they stopped and they didn't bring it back.
So Clayton Kershaw demanded they bring it back, and now

(59:41):
they have it back every year so they do a
whole gospel presentation because of this. Thanks to Clayton Kershaw.

Speaker 2 (59:47):
Well, two little factorys.

Speaker 14 (59:48):
I want to say that I actually was Little League
teammates with Clayton Kershaw at Allan Port. Okay, I played yes,
and I'm Matthew Stafford as my quarterback. Actually just recently
tweeted a picture.

Speaker 2 (59:58):
Of when we were on our litter.

Speaker 3 (59:59):
They're a great guy.

Speaker 14 (01:00:00):
Clayton Kurse awesome, But Clayton Kershaw got more canceled for
putting a Bible verse on his hat then, you know,
actually having a strip tease outside of the stadium.

Speaker 2 (01:00:08):
What's Let's be.

Speaker 14 (01:00:08):
Real, we're adults. We like sports, but it's really for kids.
I mean, it's bringing your family to the game and
having this cool experience.

Speaker 3 (01:00:14):
My kids are begging me to take them to a
Dodger game right now. I am genuine.

Speaker 2 (01:00:22):
It makes no sense, though, Andrew, they're having a drag
queen strip show outside of a baseball game.

Speaker 14 (01:00:28):
You know, I maybe I understand in West Hollywood at
a Pride parade, which I don't. You know, I don't
like that, I don't want that, But I mean, there
is a time and place for everything, and I don't
think that there is a worse place to try to
indoctrinate kids and do this weird transgender ideology other than
a baseball game.

Speaker 2 (01:00:43):
And so this is a targeted attack on the youth.
And with Trevor Williams, the other thing I wanted to say.

Speaker 14 (01:00:48):
One of the reasons that people haven't talked about is
the reason why he was targeted was not just for
speaking out against the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence and the
transgenders at the baseball game. He actually every single team
that he's been on, he leads a Bible study with
all the players. Derek Holland was part of that Bible study.
So he's not just like a you know, a milk
toast Christian. He's an all in Catholic guy that wants

(01:01:08):
to spread the Gospel to everybody that he can.

Speaker 2 (01:01:11):
So that's why he was targeted in this. Like I said,
this is a big story, but it should be much bigger.

Speaker 5 (01:01:16):
And just to put a finer point on it, they're
basically relegating this guy to obscurity because he's a Catholic.
They won't put him on any of the social media,
they won't put him on any of the fan videos,
they won't put him on anything. They're like, you know,
it to quote a great quote a great woman. Actually,
you know, they're just it's the shut up and dribble.
But it's not because he's backing somebody in China and
the CCP and billions of dollars because he's backing Jesus Christ.

(01:01:39):
That's how obscene this is. You got to call Sean Hudson,
director of community relations for the Washington Nationals, who's.

Speaker 3 (01:01:46):
Now on leave.

Speaker 5 (01:01:47):
Thank goodness, thanks to you guys. You got to call
him and confront him. I thought, this is a fascinating video.
I don't understand how you made this happen, so I
want the backstory after the video.

Speaker 3 (01:01:57):
It's top forty five.

Speaker 15 (01:01:58):
Oh hey, Sean, this is Alex Stein. How are you doing,
my friend? Well, you know, the Nationals are doing okay
this year. But I had a question. Do you know
when Trevor Williams is going to be back on the field?

Speaker 10 (01:02:10):
Great question.

Speaker 2 (01:02:11):
He is rehabbing right now.

Speaker 10 (01:02:14):
It's sorting bullpen sessions, which is really exciting.

Speaker 14 (01:02:16):
Do you think it'd be realistic when he's back and
he's playing. Would you be willing to share him on
the social media in the future, because we know that
there's a team directive right now where you said that
he's not allowed to be shared because he's a Christian.

Speaker 15 (01:02:28):
Is that correct? You said that you can't share him
because he was against a transgender nun group for the
Dodgers or something that doesn't sound like something I would say.

Speaker 2 (01:02:39):
The players, Ea, you're kind of up to their own
discretion on not.

Speaker 4 (01:02:42):
Likely they want to be shared on social.

Speaker 15 (01:02:44):
Oh so the players choose to be shared on social,
you don't choose that. Well, it's kind of like some
guys are more engaging than the other ones.

Speaker 5 (01:02:52):
It's kind of like, yeah, it goes on and in
the edit because we had to kind of fast forward it.
But like the edit, you you go back to the
video we played before where he's doing exactly what you're
calling him out on. So for two questions, what has
happened to him since he is on leave?

Speaker 3 (01:03:07):
But tell that story?

Speaker 5 (01:03:09):
And two, how the heck did you get him on
the phone and get him so like trying to engage you,
like he was talking to somebody that was going to
be friendly to him.

Speaker 14 (01:03:16):
Well, you know, I kind of tried to be a
good cop on the phone. I think that's why he
was engaging with me at first. And he is on
administrative leave, which is good. But this is a big
lesson that everybody needs to learn. If you look like
Uncle Fester and you're three hundred pounds and you're a
short bald guy and you're on a date with a ten,
you probably shouldn't go and spill your guts.

Speaker 2 (01:03:33):
I think that was his first mistake, trying to.

Speaker 14 (01:03:36):
Impress a hot girl, and I know, the undercover journalist,
I'm not gonna exposure, but she is very attractive, way
out of his league.

Speaker 2 (01:03:42):
So that is a lesson that everybody needs to learn.

Speaker 14 (01:03:44):
If you're on a date and she's out of your league,
you do not give her any inside information.

Speaker 2 (01:03:48):
And you know, this is the other thing that is
frustrating about this. Andrew. Of course we got to call
this out, but you know, I don't like life ruination.
You know, I don't like the fact that this guy's
life is ruined, but I don't like that he's targeting.

Speaker 4 (01:03:59):
You know.

Speaker 2 (01:03:59):
Trevor williamsre I'm here.

Speaker 14 (01:04:00):
So it's just like I said, Like, I don't feel
bad at all. I think it's very important that we
expose this. But I just hate that this is the
world that we live in. I hate that you guys
get attacked. I don't like, you know, I want to
be a copacetic. I want to see kumbaya, hold hands
and have fun. Maybe I'm a woodstack hippie. So it
does kind of stink that this guy's.

Speaker 2 (01:04:15):
Career is over.

Speaker 14 (01:04:16):
He's never gonna work in the majors probably ever again.
But that's just the cold, hard reality. When you discriminate
against a player for his Christianity, or his race or
anything for that matter, you shouldn't be working in a
professional sports organization. So it's a very bad day for
Sean Hudson. I don't know how he recovers in one
of the most egregious things that he said. He said
he'd rather work for the Boston Red Sox because they're
more liberal, And in my mind, I thought traditionally Boston

(01:04:38):
is known.

Speaker 3 (01:04:39):
As kind of a you know, working spoken.

Speaker 2 (01:04:42):
Yeah, well, guess what I'm saying. I just I didn't
think that they were that woke. I know the city
of Boston is, but I think his.

Speaker 5 (01:04:46):
Heart racers it is hard. Yeah, he wants to be
a communist in Boston. Alex Stein, you have a show
here on the Real America's Voice Network. Tell us about
it thirty Seconds.

Speaker 14 (01:04:56):
After Hours with Alex Stein, Monday through Friday, eleven PM.
Easter and we got some great guests. Tonight, we have
a crazy guest on I'm sure, you guys saw Her
name is Shelby Campbell and she is the Democrat running
in Michigan against the theory Kadumda.

Speaker 2 (01:05:10):
I don't know how to say his last name.

Speaker 14 (01:05:11):
The guy that beagles, Yeah, yeah, no, not Abdul said,
the guy that his first name's Thchri. My point is
she was well known for towerking, so we're about to
call her out on that. But sadly, I'd rather have
the twerking congresswoman than the freaking dog abuser.

Speaker 5 (01:05:27):
Alex Stein ninety nine, My man, good to see if
my friend, we'll talk to you soon. Getting prescription medications
shouldn't be this complicated, but for a lot of people
it still is. Appointments, waiting rooms, delays, it all adds up.
But there's a better way to do this. With All
Family Pharmacy, you get to take control of your health
care without the hassle. Simple, safe, secure, simple to order

(01:05:51):
from home safe medications from a licensed US pharmacy, and
secure checkout from start to finish. With access to over
four hundred prescription medications, you can connect with a provider
and have what you need delivered right to your door
if appropriate. A licensed doctor provides the prescription as part
of the process. Everything is handled with fast, secure shipping
and a reliable experience you can trust, because at the

(01:06:13):
end of the day, it's not just about medications. It's
about peace of mind, knowing you're covered no matter what
comes your way. Code All Family Pharmacy dot com slash
kirk and use code Kirk ten for ten percent off.
Stay ready, Take control today. All Family Pharmacy dot com
slash kirk, use code Kirk ten for ten percent off.

(01:06:34):
As you guys know, if you've been watching for a
little while, Near and dear to my heart and to
Blake's heart, both of our hearts, is the issue of immigration.

Speaker 3 (01:06:40):
We have to stay on it like white on rice.

Speaker 5 (01:06:42):
It is the total transformation of our country, and it's
happening right under our noses, often as it's happening legally,
which is very upsetting. This is one of the reasons
I've become a supporter of blowing up the filibuster, nuking
it and getting stuff done if we can, if we can,
which is unclear, This is why we need to reform
the US US Senate, little by little, piece by piece.
We need Paxton's, not Cornin's. We need Lynches, not Grams.

(01:07:07):
It's happening slowly, but surely. The US Senate is getting reformed.
So keep the faith, stay the course. We're making progress.
But one of the senators that we lost, it was
a good guy that was a friend of the show,
is Secretary Mark Wayne Mullin from the state of Oklahoma.
He's now the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.
Now there's been a little consternation within the base that

(01:07:28):
he was not going to be tough enough, that he
was gonna fold, that he was gonna be giving goodies
to illegals to try and make deals with Democrats. Okay,
now listen, I do think that there needed to be
some recalibration DHS. Right, we lost the pr war and
we need to come to grips with that. With what
happened in Minnesota, you know, the alex pretty the Renee

(01:07:50):
good stuff they won that they won that fight that
we saw polling just swing wildly against us. Then you
saw home and go in there. He kind of settled things,
settled the ship. And that's good. That's good because what
we want, and I'll repeat this commas not drama. You
want lots of illegals getting out and you want low drama,
you want to stay off the front page. Okay, But

(01:08:12):
now Secretary Mullen is making some news, some headlines, and
I think for beautiful reasons. An Idi floated on this show,
and it looks like it's found some fertile soil at
DHS place out twenty five And we.

Speaker 16 (01:08:28):
Have to decide where we're going to prioritize our federal employees.
So we're not going to halt the flights. What we're
saying is we just won't be able to process them
because we don't have officers there. We're going to pull
out our customer Border patrol officers that process these flights
and put them in these facilities to help protect our
employees coming out to work. That by the way, and
that's not their job. Their job is to do just

(01:08:52):
what they said, customer and border protection. However, since local
law enforcement isn't able to do their job because they said,
quote they don't have the resource, well, we have to
prioritize our resources as well.

Speaker 5 (01:09:04):
So just to make sure you picked up what he's saying,
he's saying that international flights to say, I don't know Newark,
New Jersey, where there's a bunch of ice protests going
on right now. Well, if you are going to be
a sanctuary city and you're not going to enforce immigration law,
well then why should we have to handle your customs
and border protection at the airports for international flights. You

(01:09:24):
know what, as a matter of fact, maybe there's a
red state, maybe Florida, maybe Texas that could take those
flights and do a better job managing deportations and illegal
visa overstates in this and the like. This is a massive,
massive vulnerability for blue states that want the international travel,
that want the tourist money. So all of a sudden,

(01:09:46):
you're gonna make it really hard for tourists to get
to New York City because they're not going to enforce
immigration laws, or Newark, New Jersey. This is a great idea.
It's thinking outside of the box, and I totally support it.
Here's what I'll just say about Secretary Mullen little faith.
I'm hearing things behind the scenes that we're getting commas
not dramas. Okay, that's what we want. We want commas,

(01:10:08):
not dramas. There's a way to work and cooperate and
keep things off the front page that is good for
the country. And we'll get more of these illegals out
of it. Okay, but there's another story going on, Blake
about a hunger strike. Hunger strikes, yes, hunger strikes.

Speaker 6 (01:10:21):
So people are so upset at the prospect of being
sent out of our country, which we're told is irredeemably
sexist and racist and oppressive and genocidal and really the
worst country to ever exist in human history if you're
not white, and they're so upset at the prospect of
being sent away from it that they are refusing to eat.

Speaker 7 (01:10:39):
And they're also mad.

Speaker 6 (01:10:40):
Because they're not getting enough food, which we are told
is the main reason we need immigration is we won't
have nice enough restaurants otherwise.

Speaker 5 (01:10:48):
Everyone here, as Morgan said, you know, he would trade
a bunch of immigrants as long as he get his
chicken curry, his chicken tika masala, whatever it was.

Speaker 6 (01:10:55):
It's almost perfect poetry that people will say that, because
you could just imagine a children story where someone loses
their house because they're offered.

Speaker 5 (01:11:04):
Little story giving up his birthright for a freaking bull
of porridge. But in this case it's chicken tiaka missaut.

Speaker 4 (01:11:10):
D and C. S.

Speaker 7 (01:11:11):
Lewis they feed him Turkish delight to convince whom to
do evil.

Speaker 3 (01:11:15):
It's it's just nasty place. Op. Thirty.

Speaker 16 (01:11:18):
It shows that this radical left Democrats priorities. When they
decide to go out and protest a detention center or
we're housing rapists.

Speaker 2 (01:11:27):
Child predators, murderers, they.

Speaker 16 (01:11:29):
Say that they're that it's because they're on a hunger strike,
when there was only a handful of individuals that was
refusing to eat because they want their ethnic group or
their ethnic right food. Well, they can go back to
the country and get whatever food they want. The fact
is we're giving them the calories say they want.

Speaker 3 (01:11:43):
This isn't holiday inn it's not a holiday in. Here's
my word to you.

Speaker 5 (01:11:48):
If you are going to get detained by ice and
then be defiant and want to protest that with a
hunger strike, be my guest.

Speaker 3 (01:11:56):
Hunger strike away. And if in the worst of secretary.

Speaker 5 (01:11:59):
Of momenters, spot on, if you want your ethnic food,
you can get the hell out, deport go home. You'll
get all the ethnic foods you want. And that's the
way it should be. We are not going to kowtow
to these foreigners who want our culture to reflect theirs.

Speaker 3 (01:12:13):
This is our home.

Speaker 5 (01:12:14):
This is our country, and if you want your ethnic food,
by all means, we will even help you self deport
We'll give you a one way ticket back to whatever
third world country you came from and you can enjoy
your ethnic food there.

Speaker 3 (01:12:28):
That is obscene to me.

Speaker 5 (01:12:29):
And the fact that this kind of crap would have
worked one administration to go shows you how far gone
the Democrats have really become. Because you know, and I
have to say this to all the black pillars and
the accelerationists who say vote Democrat because we're not getting.

Speaker 10 (01:12:43):
What we want.

Speaker 5 (01:12:44):
Goodness gracious, could you imagine the Biden administration response to this.
First of all, they wouldn't be in detention, and second
of all, they'd be giving them debit cards full of
cash and a plane ticket to their favorite US citizen
city with free housing at the expense of veterans that
can't find hope homes. And they would say, I'm so sorry,
we're so racist. Please welcome in and take everything. And

(01:13:06):
here's a vote. By the way, you can also vote.
So when you are tempted to blackpill when you're tempted
to give into despair, into nihilism, just remember how much
better things actually are under this administration. Do you get
everything you want all the time? No, but at least
you have a Secretary of Department of Homeland Security saying
take a hike. This isn't the holiday inn get real

(01:13:27):
and in the meantime, hopefully we can get peace in
Iran and that we can start focusing domestically. There's a
lot of good things, a lot of good things happening,
and it's up to us to stay focused and positive,
stay focused on winning, not giving into despair.

Speaker 3 (01:13:41):
Blake final word to you.

Speaker 6 (01:13:43):
You know, you get a country, and we're very lucky
to have a very good one, and it would be
a very big shame if we threw it all away
in order to keep our ethnic restaurants or to keep
from offending people. And there's example after example throughout history.
We can I actually think of that standardized test story
we did yesterday, where we can have unlimited nice things

(01:14:05):
in America. We can have incredible schools, we can have
the best education system in the world. We just have
the courage to have to have the courage to come
out and say some people are smarter than other people,
and we have ways of finding that out. And it's
the same thing with immigration. We can have an amazing
country that brings in only the absolute best people. We
just to be willing to admit some people are worth
having and some people aren't.

Speaker 3 (01:14:25):
Some culture all you have to do.

Speaker 6 (01:14:27):
You have to admit that, and you can have the
best country in the world for centuries to come. You
just have to go through the awkward thing of saying
some people are better.

Speaker 5 (01:14:39):
For more on many of these stories and news you
can trust, go to Charliekirk dot com.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Hey Jonas!

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Iran Deal Details + The Mexico Menace

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Hey Jonas!

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

Iran Deal Details + The Mexico Menace

Hey Jonas!