Foreign Trucker Epidemic, The Right's Identity Problem & Netflix Agenda Exposed

Gavin Newsom OPENLY takes credit for building Elon Musk's Tesla empire. Truck drivers are sounding the alarm about the shocking number of Non-English speaking truckers. Sunny Hostin apparently thinks all her white neighbors are racists. Dana explains how she is noticing the right using identity politics like race and gender to defend their positions, lately. Elon Musk tells Americans to CANCEL their Netflix after a show features pushing pro-transgender on CHILDREN resurfaces. Banned Algerian Boxer Imane Khelif has become the face of Algerian beauty brand after her gender investigation continues. Dana explains how the largest funder of American universities is Qatar and how they are sewing divisions between young people for soft power. Dana explains how leftist violence has become so normalized even beyond Antifa.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Well, this is a governor Jesse who is saying that
he does not want ICE agents to put mass on
and they're doing that for their safety because there's a
threat to them and their family out there, as we
saw with the shooting today and the threats that come
in daily to them. But this is the same governor
who forced two year olds to wear masks during COVID

(00:21):
and he wielded executive power to muzzle people, and so
I think he thinks that he just has ultimate power
to do this. But what his rhetoric is doing, what
his actions, what other supposedly mainstream politicians and the Democratic
Party have done, is to put a target on the
back of our ICE agents because they're demonizing them, they're

(00:42):
comparing them to things like the Gestapo, and so that
ends up creating an environment where people like this are
going to act. So we've set the marker down in Florida.
Don't even think about it. We are going to obviously
defend our state and local law enforcement, but we are
there right there with our DHS partners, and if you

(01:05):
go after and target them, we're going to bring down
a ton of bricks on you, and you're not going
to want to do that in the state of Florida.

Speaker 2 (01:11):
Yeah, I wouldn't want to.

Speaker 3 (01:12):
I wouldn't want an FAFO in Florida because here's why
that was Governor round de Santas. The government there won't
allow that. The people all have machetes there. I'm pretty
sure they all have pet alligators too, because.

Speaker 2 (01:25):
I see them.

Speaker 3 (01:26):
I saw I watch the video of a feller the
other day. This is not the old fella that was
walking around with a gator and pants going into a
quick market. It was a new video of a woman
with a gator and a push stroller, and Instagram showed
it to me. They all have like gators and clothes.
They dress them, they go and pet them, They take
people out in tours. Why would you go to Florida
and mess with any of these people. These people know

(01:47):
how to get around swamps. They all own machetes. They're
all friendly with the gators. They know how to get
around swamps, and they just you know, when a hurricane comes,
they're like, oh well, they board up their windows. Why
would why why would you mess with anyone there? Welcome
back to the program, Dana Lash with you are at
the top of this third hour that is a great point.

(02:09):
I mean, your kid had to wear a mask in school,
but they won't allow ice to wear masks. If look,
if Democrats are upset with the laws, why didn't they
change them? This is a question I will never forget.
When I was the token conservative at CNN, I brought
up this point how during Barack Obama's first term in
two thousand and eight, for the first three months until

(02:31):
they had special elections, Democrats had a super majority and
he could have done whatever he wanted to do. And
remember going up into two thousand and eight that election,
one of the big talking points that Obama had was immigration,
and that was a big thing. And I remember after
that some of the Democrats they were railing at Republicans
about immigration and you know, you're not doing anything. And

(02:53):
I remember bringing up on a panel that I actually
think that Matthew Dowd was on and.

Speaker 2 (02:59):
The leftist died like that.

Speaker 3 (03:00):
But I brought up the fact that, well, Democrats have
the supermajority right now until these special elections are underway,
and which point they did lose and they just had
a basic majority, but at this point they technically have
a super majority and they can do whatever they want.

Speaker 2 (03:10):
So why are you not doing it? Why are you blaming.

Speaker 3 (03:12):
Republicans when literally you could override and and get over
any kind of you know, even filibuster. Why they didn't
like that because they're not interested in ever doing anything
about immigration. That's why these laws have been on the
books forever for our lives, Kane. Why if you don't
like the law, you're a lawmaker.

Speaker 2 (03:35):
Change it. It's just like that.

Speaker 3 (03:39):
And a lot of the laws that these these ice
agents are enforcing or lass Democrats also voted for and
some of them wrote them. So I'm I fail to
see why they're so upset over this. They have to
cover their faces so the cartel doesn't get them. At
this point, the left is working hand in hand with
the cartel. You are working with the cartels. If you

(04:01):
are trying to sabotage enforcement of border security, or you're
trying to sabotage any process of deportation, you might as
well just go ahead and affiliate pick a cartel and
affiliate yourself with that cartel, because you're you're there stooge,
and they're getting you for free. They're getting you for free.
You're a cheap date. Good heavens, but they have to

(04:23):
because otherwise can I. God love the people who sign
up to be border agents. God love them because they
are just some of the toughest people.

Speaker 2 (04:33):
God love them. And it's just.

Speaker 3 (04:39):
It's sad that these lawmakers are smearing them and impugning
their characters the way they are. But not surprising because
we've seen it all before. It's just frustrating. It's incredibly frustrating.
Newsom has been trying to pick fights with every single
person out there, including what vance Trump?

Speaker 2 (04:59):
Who? Who else? Who else? Is he picking fights with? Musk? Everybody?
So wait a minute.

Speaker 3 (05:05):
You were telling me about this, and I wanted to
get into this because Newsom is the one who's really
positioning himself for twenty eight.

Speaker 2 (05:13):
JB.

Speaker 3 (05:13):
Pritzker is trying to But JB. Pritzker is very tone
off and he comes off as incredibly adversarial, and I
think that that even some on the left ayre like ugh,
he just has an ick factor. Newsom is picking every
single fight out there because he needs to remain relevant

(05:34):
in the public eye. So he's gonna be doing this
for years. But he was trying to take credit. And
this is audio SoundBite eight for Tesla. If you can
believe for tesla success, for Elon Musk's success, his empire.
I again, the guy who inherited everything he has. Just

(05:56):
to remind you before we play the sound bite, it's
cut eight. Newsom inherited everything that he has and he
comes he is the product of intermarriage between the wealthiest
families of California.

Speaker 4 (06:09):
Listen, I signed the first executive or in the United
States to require alternative field vehicles by twenty thirty five.
That was just taken away by Congress, the soup hine
Congress and the President.

Speaker 5 (06:24):
But we created the market. There is no Elon Musk,
There's no Tesla.

Speaker 4 (06:29):
Without California's regulatory framework Peryo, full stop, it won't exist.

Speaker 2 (06:33):
It was successful.

Speaker 6 (06:35):
It was because of the regulations, because of those signals
and the subsidies over three point two billion dollars direct
subsidies that Tesla received just in my state alone.

Speaker 4 (06:51):
That built this market.

Speaker 3 (06:53):
You know. One of the things that he also did
is of his own hand. He reversed the pledge on
ev buyer support because he missed manage the budget so badly.
Remember he promised everyone a seveny five hundred federal He
promised them a seven five hundred dollars tax credit EV
tax credit that California isn't going to replace, and Newson
was like, well, we got budget restraints and we have

(07:14):
to look at infrastructure and things like that. So he
promised everyone this. They've done California, they've done more to
actually hamstring EV manufacturing and production more than almost any
other state. And then they said, yeah, we're going to
We're not going to replace the tax credit. So they
promised everyone, oh, if you buy these cars, we're going
to make sure you have this tax credit, knowing full
well that the budget was not going to be able

(07:35):
to cover that. They knew the time at the time
that he was he was promising this that their budget
I mean, for crying out loud, guys, when they had
a drought, they couldn't even afford to begin exploration for
desalization plants. They couldn't even you know, they live by
a notion take the water, take the salt out of it,
get it out there. They couldn't even afford budgetary wise,

(07:57):
the exploration land licensing to even do that because they
have spent guess what how much they've spent billions of
dollars trying to quote unquote fix their homeless problem. And
you know where that money went. There was a free
Beacon piece I think like a year fifteen months ago
that came out about that the majority of the money
actually went to all of these left wing groups that
were supposed to facilitate it, and they didn't facilitate it.

(08:18):
I'm sure that's a surprise, knowing how much BLM fleeced
everyone to go buy mansions for their founders, right, So
the same way with this, they they funnel all of
this money out through their street team on the left
and then they act like, oh, well, we didn't get
funded enough, we need more money. This happens every single time.
The reason that they don't have the ability to do
that with the tax credits is California is broke as

(08:39):
a joke under Gavin Newsom's horrific mismanagement, to say nothing
of the rail system that they were promising everyone for
thirteen years now that they were going to do and
they spent billions upon billions. It ballooned three times over budget.
The French company that was hired to actually do it,
and they gave a timeline they said, we can get
it done, and like, what was it like three years?

Speaker 2 (09:00):
I can't even remember.

Speaker 3 (09:01):
They gave a timeline of how quickly it was going
to be done, and they were so dismayed by all
of the corruption and the bloat that this was turning
into that they just shut the books and left the
pro left the project and then they went to I
can't remember what country in Africa, and they did it
within two years. They built that pretty much the exact
same rail system in a country in Africa within like

(09:22):
two years. And in the meantime they still can't even
they only got how much did they get was it
eight hundred meters or sixteen hundred was it a half
mile or a mile.

Speaker 2 (09:34):
Of a bridge? Of one?

Speaker 3 (09:35):
And that's it And it's in the middle of nowhere,
and that's all they have. That's all they got done.
It is the it's the craziest thing. So he can't
he can't do anything. He he this is all on
his watch, and so he's trying to say, well, you know,
Elon Musk wouldn't have been able to do. Elon Musk
was was able to do and be successful in spite

(09:57):
of that.

Speaker 2 (09:58):
In fact, you can say that of all of.

Speaker 3 (09:59):
The these businesses, in spite of all of those things,
he was still able to be successful. So I I,
I don't know what this is, but he's trying to
pick fights and he's trying to stay relevant, and it's
very he's he's he's got to do this.

Speaker 2 (10:16):
Stuff if he's going to stay relevant.

Speaker 7 (10:18):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (10:19):
This UH A couple of other things to get into
with this, because we've been talking about ice uh and
of course UH the rhetoric, political rhetoric as well.

Speaker 2 (10:31):
Getting really tired of the rhetoric.

Speaker 3 (10:33):
But this, this is a Minnesota Senator Zaynab zy nab
Zanab Senator Mohammed I'm shocked that he's from Minnesota.

Speaker 2 (10:49):
Shocked.

Speaker 3 (10:50):
Listen to this. This is what they're doing in Minnesota.
Minnesota is going to be worse than California here soon.

Speaker 2 (10:54):
Listen.

Speaker 8 (10:55):
So this community is my community, and I relate to them. Obviously,
I'm immigrant, that is a citizen that is documented. But
there are so many folks like myself who come here
to make their lives a little bit better and easier,
and they don't have simple things like a way to get.

Speaker 9 (11:10):
To work or school.

Speaker 8 (11:11):
And we can do that, We have the power to
do that. I ran for office because I think that
our job is to make people's lives easier.

Speaker 2 (11:18):
That's not your job.

Speaker 3 (11:18):
That's literally a So you don't even understand. I don't
think that if you are a foreigner, I don't believe that.
I'm sorry, I don't believe that you should be running
for elected office if you don't understand how the country works.
The government's job isn't to make your life easier. The
government's job is to stay the hell out of the
way and not get involved in everyday aspect of your life.
That is the complete opposite of what the government is
supposed to be doing. This woman has not demonstrated an

(11:41):
understanding of how this republic works or a simple understanding
of what she's supposed to be doing in her office,
which in any perfect world would would completely invalidate her
claim to elected office. This is what I'm talking about.
It's not a nanny state. Well, it's supposed to make
people's lives easier.

Speaker 2 (11:56):
No, it's not.

Speaker 3 (11:57):
When has government ever made anyone's lives easier?

Speaker 2 (12:01):
Fair question?

Speaker 3 (12:02):
When when has the government ever made your life easier?
Tax season, going and registering your vehicle, No, getting a
new driver's.

Speaker 5 (12:16):
License, No, definitely not that.

Speaker 2 (12:19):
What about healthcare?

Speaker 5 (12:20):
Oh no?

Speaker 3 (12:22):
What about for the older folks. The medicare Oh.

Speaker 5 (12:25):
Yeah, no, it's actually got a lot worse.

Speaker 3 (12:27):
It's gotten a lot worse. And you know, medicare open
enrollment and all that. I learned a lot about that
from one of our partner's chapter. Oh my gosh. Uh yeah,
it hasn't made anything starting a business, Kane. Has it
made it easier to start a business, Well.

Speaker 5 (12:40):
They've actually made that cost prohibitive as well.

Speaker 3 (12:43):
Surely higher education they've made easier. No, no, no, not
that either.

Speaker 2 (12:52):
So really nothing.

Speaker 3 (12:54):
Then yeah, yeah, okay, she doesn't get it.

Speaker 2 (12:58):
She doesn't get it at all.

Speaker 5 (13:00):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's quick five.

Speaker 3 (13:06):
So we've got ninety six percent of people who admit
to driving aggressively, and a recent Triple A survey, none
of these are me. I drive like an angel, as
you would know. I just put blessings on the roadway.
Man's just blessings on the roadway, all four blessings. Putting
all those four blessings on the roadway were ninety six.

(13:30):
It's true, ninety six percent of people admit to driving aggressively.
In a Triple A survey, they said that they've engaged
in aggressive driving, and a survey of fifty three people
from ages nineteen to sixty four from twenty seven states.
I feel like that's a really small sample. Cutting off
other vehicles and honking out of anger while tailgating and others.
I don't tailgate because I'm always like, what if somebody
tries to carjack me? And I need to be able

(13:52):
to get away, So I don't tailgate for that reason.
I don't cut people off, but I will hank if
someone's not paying attention, like if you're not going at
all light or you're not you know, you're sitting at
around about twiddling your thumbs and you don't.

Speaker 2 (14:04):
I will do that.

Speaker 3 (14:05):
But the other stuff, No, But they said that the
most prevalent aggressive driving behavior running a red light. Eighty
two percent said that they did it at least once
in the last year. Is that aggressive driving?

Speaker 2 (14:15):
Though? Have you done it?

Speaker 10 (14:17):
Yeah?

Speaker 3 (14:18):
I see, I'm not going to admit that because I
you know, I drive like I'm a blessing on the roadway,
Like I said, you know, I'm just providing blessings and
you know, sunshine and cheer and really A confused van
driver kept students from getting home for hours, he had
no idea where to go West Shore School District. He
finally did get them home, but like hours after they

(14:40):
were supposed to be their parents were understandably upset.

Speaker 2 (14:43):
Stick with us more in store.

Speaker 3 (14:45):
Gosh, coming in with that track is absolutely it's very
a pro apropos because it's like sixty degrees in Texas today.
It's like freezing. This is fire building weather. What it's freezing? Sorry, Caine,
it's officially cold. What's the what's the what is the

(15:05):
weather here today?

Speaker 2 (15:06):
Hold up? I lost it.

Speaker 3 (15:09):
It's fifty six degrees. I'm lying, it's not even sixty.
That's fire weather. That's fire weather. No, that was the smith.
The Smith's it's a mood right now for sure. So
welcome back the chats at Rumble. You can find the
newsletter over at sub Stack all that good stuff. So

(15:31):
let's talk about drivers and people who are driving giant
trucks who are not in the country illegal, who are
not in the country legally, because that's what we're dealing
with here. So again, why that alien spacecraft doesn't want
to visit us because they're like, do you see they're drivers.
So a number of truck drivers are sounding the alarm
about the insane amount of non English speaking commercial drivers

(15:55):
that are on the road, and they said, it's you know,
when you think of the staggering number, it seems pretty terrifying.
One of them described it as mad Max on the highways.
And we know that. You know, we've had a handful
of accidents so far, some which have been fatal, in
which you have people who are not residents, they're not

(16:16):
citizens of the United States, and yet they're able to
get CDLs, which is completely against what they're supposed to
be able to get for federal law. But you know, California,
Gavin Newsom, they're just handing them out like Halloween candy.
I mean, apparently it's pretty easy to get your CDL
in California. So there we have horrible accidents, we have,

(16:37):
you know, multiple fatalities, innocent people, all because you have
illegal aliens who are driving giant trucks, who have really
no idea how to drive giant trucks and they cannot
understand our road signs. Case in point, this cut twenty
nine is a trucker who not only can he not
speak English, but he also cannot read the traffic signs.

Speaker 2 (16:59):
This is insane. Look at us? Does that sign mean what?

Speaker 10 (17:04):
I mean?

Speaker 7 (17:07):
Same things?

Speaker 2 (17:09):
What does this sign mean?

Speaker 10 (17:14):
Monster?

Speaker 7 (17:15):
Enter moster.

Speaker 10 (17:20):
With ta.

Speaker 2 (17:23):
Okay, So if you see this sign, what do you do?

Speaker 11 (17:28):
Yeah?

Speaker 5 (17:29):
Tavor Green, Yeah, Trevor Green, number thirty five?

Speaker 2 (17:33):
What is this sign?

Speaker 7 (17:35):
Oh?

Speaker 5 (17:35):
The two people? Webe girl?

Speaker 7 (17:38):
Maybe one mate?

Speaker 2 (17:41):
What does it mean? O?

Speaker 9 (17:42):
Then meat?

Speaker 3 (17:43):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (17:44):
What does that sign mean?

Speaker 7 (17:46):
Yeah?

Speaker 5 (17:46):
Two people?

Speaker 11 (17:47):
Two people doing what.

Speaker 2 (17:49):
They're walking?

Speaker 7 (17:50):
Yeah?

Speaker 5 (17:51):
Two people are walking?

Speaker 3 (17:56):
No, Kaye, don't tell him. He's no idea of what
it is. He has no clue what it thought. Could
it be pedestrians or could it be they don't know?
He doesn't know because he doesn't He has no idea
what this means. How in the world are you driving
a giant truck?

Speaker 1 (18:11):
Right?

Speaker 3 (18:12):
I mean, my husband won't even let me get a
Dodge Demon because he says I'll wrap it around the tree.
But these blinkers can go and they can just get
a CDL out in California and drive a big old
truck around and not even read the road signs. Who
do you think is more dangerous out there? Illegal alien
who can't read the road signs or speak English or
Dana and a Dodge Demon shut up cane.

Speaker 5 (18:34):
I was gonna answer the obvious one, clearly.

Speaker 2 (18:37):
The illegal aliens.

Speaker 3 (18:38):
Yes, yeah, exactly correct, that's the right way to answer it.

Speaker 5 (18:43):
I don't know what those vehicles are so heavy. I mean,
you can't even break in time for anything.

Speaker 2 (18:48):
Wouldn't you be terrified? Okay? I just imagine this.

Speaker 3 (18:52):
Imagine you're going over to like Germany the Autobahn and
you got to drive a giant rig Andermany and you
can't speak Germany to I have no idea what the
heck anything means besides ashtong.

Speaker 2 (19:04):
You don't know.

Speaker 3 (19:06):
Do you feel comfortable driving? I mean, where do people
get the audacity to be like, oh yeah, I can
handle this, this is okay, right, gonna do it.

Speaker 5 (19:15):
I think they drive on the right side of the
road or the left side of the road there. I
don't know. I have no idea.

Speaker 2 (19:21):
Yeah, none of that alone country.

Speaker 5 (19:22):
Even if I knew the signs, I'd still be like, yeah,
a little sketch. I have Once some more practice were
get out there.

Speaker 3 (19:27):
I want to be able to read the road signs
before I drive this giant multi ton truck. But this
is what California's doing, So I got an idea of
California could just go and get CDLs. Why can't we
all just go and get give out CHLS saying right

(19:48):
or CCLS. You got to get to CHL anyway, there,
Steve is Steve is my favorite comment of the day.
He says in slect you said he's scared of normal
talented truck drivers. The normal talented ones scare you.

Speaker 4 (20:03):
Well, just have you ever been on when you're in
the right lane and then they're on the left lane
and you get you get in the blind spot and
you're like, I don't know if I sho's speed up,
slow down, freak out.

Speaker 5 (20:10):
I just paned. I feel it. I mean, one of
my worst car accidents ever was because of a careless
gigantic semi.

Speaker 3 (20:19):
And what the scariest accident I've ever been in was
on Interstate fifty five going linear South County and Saint Louis, Missouri,
and we got hit by a semi and we spun
across three lanes a highway. Thankfully we went towards the
median and not off the ravine, but that was pretty
scary and I was in the front seat seatpals in
my life, I would have been launched through the windshield.

Speaker 5 (20:39):
Yeah, and that dude was an American, could speak English
and read signs, the whole nine.

Speaker 2 (20:43):
Yeah, So I don't know.

Speaker 3 (20:45):
I still think, you know, if California is just going
to be handing out licenses to people, then I think
we should just be able to give ccls out to everybody,
give them a concealed handgun license. If that's what California
wants to do then and it affects all of us,
they can give out license. They don't have any reciprocity
with firearm licenses, but they can give out commercial driver's

(21:06):
license like the Halloween candy. So okay, well, let's just
go ahead and give out everybody in California a CCL.
Two can play that game. Screw the laws.

Speaker 2 (21:14):
It's just going to be total chaos. Let's do it.

Speaker 3 (21:16):
I'm all for it. I'm done. I'm at that point.
I mean, for crying out loud, I'm sincerely praying for
a space rock to obliterate us. So this is nothing
to me. Let's just do it. I'm so tired of this.
This is but this is what happens when state. This
is why somebody's governor affects you. This is why a
gubernatorial race in a state that's not yours affects you

(21:37):
because they're giving out licenses to illegal drivers who are
killing people on highways in your state. An illegal alien
driver was driving a giant rig with an illegally bigot
see his commercial cdo that California gave him in a
complete conflict with federal law, and he killed people in

(21:59):
fl You know, if others kill people in Canada, i'man
come on, So if if this is why these races
are important, even though you don't live in that state,
because this type of stuff happens, he doesn't have any
room to lecture anybody on this stuff, not anybody. And
it just it's it's it's so frustrating. So yeah, why

(22:22):
can't we just go and give them what what? What
other stuff can they not do out there that we
can do? I mean, like pretty much anything, really, I
just it just it's infuriating. But there are these stories,
all these truckers are saying that you would be shocked
at the number of these drivers who come across other

(22:44):
drivers and they're like, they're not proficient in English, they
can't read our road signs, they can't you know nothing.
In fact, one of the largest refrigerated trucking companies told
The Washington Times that non English speaking drivers regularly pull
into their warehouses, and they said that they'll pull in,

(23:05):
they'll pick something up. There'll be two three truckers. Two
drivers in a truck. Two or three of them speak
no English, not even a word. Maybe one speaks very
bad broken English. And they still didn't understand. They said,
so obviously you can. You know, it's concerning because they're
sharing roads with people. That's you know. Now lorainoed too.
The DMV was helping to people cheat on their CDL test.

(23:26):
This was a CBS story. This is terrifying. Why can't
they if you're going to do something helpful in terms
of people cheating and skirting the system, do it with taxes.
For krannell ob New York prosecutors apparently arrested seven, well,
they breasted seven people this last time. The earlier sweep
nutted more because of cheating. To acquire these licenses, you

(23:49):
have to pass the written test. But what they were
doing was selling grades at Garden City, GMV and Nassau County.
I mean, you could pay up to three thousand dollars
for a woman to take the written test, and every
time she went to take it, she addresses somebody else.
So she even wore a fake mustache, according to the
DA in Nassau County, a fake mustache. Even so they're

(24:09):
selling it. It's like how they sell DoorDash accounts. You know,
you can go online and there's all kinds of places
online where you can buy, like, for instance, a DoorDash account.
Somebody's selling it. Somebody somebody went and created their account,
applied to work for DoorDash, did all this stuff, and
then they sell the account. Someone takes the account, they

(24:30):
start working for it, and they get the money for it.
I stopped using door dash because one of the driver's
names that I was supposed to have was name Amanda,
and she just looked like, you know, regular white chick
with brown hair. And the person who shood up at
my door was definitely not a chick and definitely not
little with brown hair, very large person who did not

(24:53):
speak in English. That and after that, I was like,
I can't. I don't know who's coming to my house
a DoorDash. That's kind of a problem, and they've been
in a lot of trouble for it. They were getting
blasted last week online for it, but they sell them.
I mean, it's not difficult to find, so they're selling.
They're selling people to take driver's licenses tests too. Now

(25:14):
they do that at a lot of these big factories. They
have people that they hire that go in and they
do an in person interview with you know, a potential employer,
and then they leave. Especially if it's you know, if
you're doing a factory job, then they send in a
person who's here illegally and they perform that work. You
can't do that with CDLs, though, I I this is

(25:34):
because you're driving a giant weapon basically. Now imagine, I mean,
what if Heaven forbid, it's something caustic, you know, what
if it's something that you know, it's it's flammable, it's caustic.
Something you get someone that doesn't speak any English, can't
read road signs or hell, what's worse, what if you
just have a terrorist do it. I mean, if it's

(25:55):
that easy to just get anybody and sell results for
CDLs and just get you're giving everybody licenses. How's the
national security on that front? That becomes a major national
security issue. They're gonna have to have Department of Transportation
get involved in this. I mean, I know that they're
looking at it, but they need to be out front
and center on it because this is apparently a growing problem.

(26:16):
Do you want to be on the road driving your
little family on the highway with one of these people
out there and then what happens?

Speaker 2 (26:22):
They hit you?

Speaker 3 (26:23):
There's not it's just insane and they don't care about gun.

Speaker 5 (26:27):
Like SAMs through the outer glass. So are the days
of the United States stories.

Speaker 12 (26:34):
But I would say to you that on the food
stamp issue, the money is there. Let us not let
them get away.

Speaker 2 (26:44):
With saying that they can't do it.

Speaker 12 (26:47):
They have, their political will is in there to feed
the people rely on the SNAP program, which is the
most effective anti hunger program in the United States of America.
They're playing fast and loose.

Speaker 2 (27:04):
With people eating.

Speaker 12 (27:06):
Can you imagine that? But that's the reality, and you
need to talk about that.

Speaker 3 (27:12):
I mean, I didn't know Perry Ferrell got it into
spoken word. Did I miss that? Is this like a
new Yeah? Like what kind of Jane's addiction track is this?
You know, when she when she wants something and she
don't want to pay for it, she walks right through
the door. Anyway, it's Rosa Delaro, who I've never seen
her in the same room as Perry Ferrell. I'm just saying,

(27:33):
and there's a reason why that is. And the most
obvious explanation is that they're the same person. There's no
other explanation. That's the same person.

Speaker 2 (27:42):
That's it.

Speaker 3 (27:43):
So realize again that the only reason none of this
stuff has happened is because Democrats are hell bent on
extending Obamacare to illegal aliens. That's what all of this
is about. All of it's about. They don't care if
you go hungry. They don't care about your family. They
wouldn't know, they wouldn't know you if they fell over
you in their living room. They don't know, and they
don't care. They have a problem with object permanence. You

(28:05):
know how babies have this issue up until Oh, I
don't know, they have the same problem. They just never
get over it. They never ever get over it. And
that's how she is. She just has not She just
thinks that, oh, the money is there. It's actually not there.
I mean, you're talking about billions of dollars a month,

(28:26):
and she says it's the most effective what did she say,
the most effective anti hunger?

Speaker 2 (28:31):
Like what is even that?

Speaker 3 (28:32):
First off, I mean, I guess if I want to
judge it off of all of the videos of the
morbidly obese people who are raging on TikTok about you know,
it's like that skit with Chris Farrell and he's saying,
or Chris Farley and he's saying, you know, I'm hungry
when he was at the mall with Adam Sandler.

Speaker 2 (28:51):
I mean, that's the only I don't know.

Speaker 3 (28:53):
When you say it's the most effective anti hunger campaign,
I'm thinking, well, I mean, I guess if I'm judging
by the morbid Leo Beast videos on TikTok, then I
guess you could say that. But it's also ballooned. And
you have forty two million people in the United States
that are getting food stamps, which is insane. These are
not forty two million people that are disabled and can't work.

Speaker 2 (29:16):
That's not forty two that They're not all forty.

Speaker 3 (29:17):
Two million people who can't go and get jobs because
of some sort of physical or mental disability. A lot
of it are people who are in this country illegally.
That's number one, and then number two people who just
don't want to work and then a small portion, I
believe are people who, for whatever reason, they are physically
or mentally legitimately unable to. But the problem is that

(29:41):
our tax structure and our economic are punitive. Economic system
makes it to where it's difficult for private citizens to
fill that gap and stand in and the government exploits
that inability as an excuse or justification for further expansion.
And then guess who doesn't get helped again, the people
that they claim that they are expanding government to help

(30:04):
never happens. They just want to make people easy in
being dependent on the government instead of empowering them to
be independent from the government. And that's what we're dealing
with here. Forty two million people on food stamps is
one of the craziest things I've ever heard of my life.
That's eleven percent of the population. Eleven percent of the
population on food stamps. That is eleven percent. Now, how

(30:27):
many of them are people who are here illegally exactly,
I'm very curious about that. But how many of them
are just people who don't want to work. I see
all these people like, oh, I want to go to war.
I want to go to war for my food stamps.
If you can't even go and get a job. You're
not going to be able to go and prosecute a war.
Sit down, tons of fun. It ain't happening for you.

(30:49):
Good night now. Some of the other stuff coming up.
The argument over Christian Zionism, yay, I know that's one
thing that we all want to argue about on a
happy Wednesday, isn't it. It's not my problem that people
keep bringing this stupid stuff up, and we got to
sit here and address it. We got to do some
house cleaning on the right. Got Lee. Just want to

(31:11):
live my life and hope that the alien space turret
and outer space hits the planet.

Speaker 2 (31:15):
That's all I'm wanting. You know, I don't ask for
a lot in life. Stick with us, We've got more
to come.

Speaker 13 (31:20):
As a mother of black children, I know that black
boys are not given the presumption of innocence and the
presumption of youth. She's calling the police and saying they're
trying to steal her car, and they're eleven years old,
they don't know how to drive. And so for me
what was interesting was I have had to be in
the position where I have gone to my local police
department because I know my son is going to be
training for the Junior Olympics, running around the neighborhood in

(31:42):
an all white neighborhood, and I have brought him to
the police and said, he belongs to me.

Speaker 2 (31:47):
This is my son.

Speaker 13 (31:48):
Do not harass him, do not stop him.

Speaker 2 (31:50):
I feel like this is ridiculous. First off.

Speaker 3 (31:53):
And by the way, if you want to know, I mean,
because she lives in Manhattan, who have been who is
the party that's been in control this entire time that's
to these policies. Oh, that would be Democrats. It'd be
the exact people that she votes for. That's Sunny Houston
on the view, who was descended from slave owners? By
the way, Oh you didn't know that? Yeah, take that
as an intersectional box to check.

Speaker 11 (32:16):
It?

Speaker 10 (32:16):
Well?

Speaker 2 (32:17):
Was she literally?

Speaker 3 (32:17):
Can't mean she did the whole what show was that
where they looked? Yeah, she literally came from slave She
her family owned slaves. Yeah, so she's more like the
Klan than you or I came.

Speaker 2 (32:30):
Look at that. Welcome back to the program, Dana.

Speaker 3 (32:33):
Lash with you. We're at the We're at the top
of the second hour. Our friends set Dylan from the
Babylon B'll be joining us at the bottom of this hour,
and we got a lot of stuff to discuss, but
that's the identity politics stuff that she's getting into. I
gotta tell you, I can't stand identity politics. We've been
talking about this for a little bit, the identity politics

(32:54):
being a Marxist creation and really started it was introduced
to being introduced back in like the really it began
in the sixties to college campuses all across the United States.
If you listened to the show last week, we were
talking a little bit about the history of critical race theory,
which came from that same you know, Frankfurt school of
Marxism came from the same spot. You have the competing

(33:17):
variables of economic status as well as race, and that's
where intersectionality, that is where DEI.

Speaker 2 (33:26):
All of that came out.

Speaker 3 (33:27):
Of critical race theory, which was really promoted heavily by
Marxist academics in the United States at American universities. And
one of the leaders of that was Derek Bell. I
was first talking about this. In fact, I had to
talk about the video of him hugging Barack Obama before
Andrew Breitbart right when he had passed away on CNN
and point out to everyone that this is what's coming

(33:50):
is very bad. This is critical race theory. It's being mainstreamed,
et cetera. And this is what you see with the
left when they talk about intersectionality. For instance, if you
have two candidates, two candidates who are going for the
same position, say that they're both black female candidates. You
have a black female candidate who's married and his kids,
and she's going for this, you know, very high pain position.

(34:13):
And you have another black female candidate who's going for
the high pain position, but she's also maybe she's trans
or alphabet something and xyz. She has one more intersectional
box than the just plano other candidates. So that means
that in DEI world, she's advanced to that position not
because of merit, but because of these you know, self

(34:35):
created intersectional checklist variables. That's what all of that is,
and it all comes from critical race theory. And that's
where you get the substitute of equity for equality. And
as you know, equity, in order for things to be equitable,
you actually have to incorporate discrimination for equitable outcomes. Whereas

(34:57):
equality is about equal access to opportunity, equity is the
guarantee of equal result. That means you have to enforce
discrimination at the opportunity level. So that's all from CRT
critical race theory, and the left has been using this
to browbeat the right for forever. I mean, we've seen

(35:18):
this when I first got heavily involved in politics. I
think it was in college and all my family, I
told everybody I never met. I didn't read a republic
until the day I went to college. I'm not kidding.
I literally grew up in a bubble of Democrats. And
when I went to college and got educated and started

(35:39):
learning more about the world and wasn't as narrow minded
and didn't live in a leftist bubble, then I started actually, like,
we know what, I never believed in this. I was
never against guns, and I was never pro abortion, and
I was never all of this stuff. So why the
hell am identifying as this? This is like some sort
of heritage political ideology that's foisted upon me. And so
started learning about more things, and I noticed that the

(36:01):
DEI stuff came into play when it seemed like Democrats
were losing the plot, and then all of a sudden,
they introduced all of these other things that their leftist
street team could get behind, and that's when you started seeing, well,
someone's more special than you because of these race based things,
which actually is racism being used, but the left is

(36:22):
too doomed to realize it. So long story short, we've
been seeing it in politics.

Speaker 2 (36:26):
We saw it. You know, this is how crazy it gets.

Speaker 3 (36:29):
Back in twenty sixteen, if you remember, when Hillary Clinton
was running against Donald Trump, people were literally saying that
Trump voters were racist because they didn't vote for the
old white woman. I mean, you guys remember this. That's
how crazy the CRT stuff got. It's wild. And now
here we are, you know, twenty twenty five, and the

(36:50):
left is still clinging to it. They're still clinging to it,
especially when you talk about redistricting for voting, redistricting for
voting Texas for instance. This is redistricting to something that happens,
you know, every I mean, they look at this stuff
every three years anyway, and they base things off the census,
and we're simply going by the numbers and by like

(37:11):
the actual counties and et cetera, et cetera, And they're
trying to say that all of that is racist.

Speaker 2 (37:15):
It's de CRT, that's all. This is.

Speaker 3 (37:19):
My fear is that the right is going to start.
I don't want the right to start incorporating this stuff.
And I've had I'm going to put it like this.
I'm not old school. I'm just not over emotional. I
don't like this idea on the right that you've got
to become like the left in order to beat the left.
That's very anti sun Zoo. That means that you're surrendering

(37:44):
you who you are and you become the thing that
you want to beat. That is the ultimate win. That's
why when I am engaging with people, unless they're super nasty,
you know, what is the point of engaging with them
if it's not to persuade them to join you in
your side of reason and logic. That's one lest person
you have to fight, and it's also one person that

(38:05):
you have another person to fight against the things that
you're standing against.

Speaker 2 (38:10):
And so this idea that.

Speaker 3 (38:13):
You have to become like the left to beat the left,
that's something a leftist would say. That's like Satan going, well,
you got to become Satanic to beat me? Well, I
expect that from the devil. I mean, Jesus even said
you can't be lukewarm, did he not. I mean, if
we're going to adhere to the Gospels and say christis
King and all this stuff.

Speaker 2 (38:33):
You know, just FYI.

Speaker 3 (38:35):
So I say this because you know, I've had disagreements
with some folks before over this sort of thing, and
disagreements are good. I reject this theory that you cannot
have civilized debate on the right or the left. Well,
the left, they're incapable. I don't want to be like
the left and not be able to have civilized debate
and even disagree with some people that I might vote

(38:57):
with on ninety or ninety nine percent of the things
right or even agree with on most things. A healthy, intelligent,
emotionally stable, mature movement should be able to tolerate and
handle civilized descent. That is a hallmark of this republic.

(39:19):
Our founders did it. I mean, sure, you can get
heated and all of that other stuff. But what I
can't stand is when I see disagreement maliciously misrepresented as
an attack for loss of being able to properly and

(39:40):
unemotionally refute it. I can't stand that. I just feel
like people are too damned sensitive and too emotionally triggered
for civilized debate. If they think every descent is an attack.
An attack is having a terrorist throw a rocket at
you while you're trying to eat an MRI in the desert. Right,

(40:02):
an attack is what happened at Hamid Karzai International Airport
in Kabble. An attack is Fallujah. An attack is nine
to eleven. An attack is what we saw at Pearl Harbor.
That is an attack. Someone civilly disagreeing with you is
not an attack. And if you think otherwise, you are

(40:25):
a female copulatory organ. You're too sensitive, too hyper emotional
for reasoned debate. And you know who else shares that
hallmark the left. The left does that. The left can't
tolerate dissent. The left purports that every single disagreement is
an attack. The left thinks that if you disagree with

(40:49):
the woman, it's because you're sexist. The left says that
if you disagree with the black person, it's because you're racist.
And I see elements of the right trying to incorporate
that as well, when they're way smarter and way better
than to devolve to that level.

Speaker 2 (41:07):
I had a bit of.

Speaker 3 (41:08):
A disagreement on social media this morning. It's not enough
to make anything out. I don't live my life online
and arguing with Rando's all damn day. You know, I'd
rather hang out with you guys and then, you know,
do what I got to do. I'm getting ready for
this debate coming up in November. I got a lot
of stuff that's going on, you know, family, all that,
So I don't see everybody are I just think if

(41:29):
you're spending all your day online arguing with everybody, then stop.
But people on our side, especially some people who are
trying to be thought leaders and shepherds, need to get
a grip, calm down. I appreciate the dudes and the
ladies who don't do that. I feel like it's becoming

(41:50):
rarer and rarer when I come across them. Almost think
we should have medals minted to hand them at this
point because it's becoming so rare. But I don't think
again that you adopt the attitude and behavior of the
left in order to beat the left. And I just
think that if the conservative movement is so weak that

(42:11):
it can't handle dissent, we deserve to be destroyed as
the sensitive, easy, manipulated losers that we are. I just
feel like that's the way it is, because that's what
that behavior makes us it's crazy, and I think some

(42:32):
of this came from I don't know, like, what do
you think some of this came from cane?

Speaker 2 (42:35):
Like the Nazi stuff? What did it come from?

Speaker 5 (42:38):
What do you mean the division tactics?

Speaker 3 (42:41):
I think I feel like the right is some people
on the right are being baited into this psyop ye
division completely and they don't see it.

Speaker 5 (42:49):
You pointed to it earlier in all of our past
discussions about how crazy we believe the left is. It's
because their emotions are not in check and because of that,
they're easily manipulated. And it doesn't matter if they're manipulated
by lies or the truth, does not matter it's been lies,
but they will react in the same way. So all

(43:10):
it does is create division. It's easy to fool someone.
The hard thing is to convince them they've been fooled.

Speaker 3 (43:17):
I had someone that someone that I know of but
I don't know them personally, and they were saying that
on social media that you know, they feel like they
got to adopt some of the left tactics, and that's
what it is. Just be honest about it. Because after
Charlie Kirk was shot and they had to deal with threats,
and I'll tell you we you know, Charlie was also
a friend, and we all watched him nationwide. I mean

(43:39):
a lot of people felt also like he was a
friend and they saw him get shot in the throat.

Speaker 2 (43:43):
I have had to move.

Speaker 3 (43:45):
I've had to move because I had somebody I had
a left to said hey to me, fly halfway across
the country and try to bust in the windows of
my living room. I had people driving around my house
taking photos and posting it online and threatening me. My gosh,
we had people that tried to hack all my social accounts,
my EMA. We had to have twenty four to seven security.
I had to have security at my kids' school. I
watched leftist shoot cops in front of a building downtown

(44:08):
at a BLM rally the night I was supposed to
go down there for a Fox hit. I watched parts
of my hometown burn. The point is this, everybody has
seen some stuff. Never allow your opposition to manipulate you
into becoming like them. I'm not changed who I am
or what I believe in the hard stuff, I mean

(44:31):
things like oh, well is this policy? Is this energy policy?
Do you change your mind on that? I mean, those
are variables and things can shift, and that's you know whatever,
But you can't give up. You can't allow your soul
to be molded by the people you're fighting against. And
you should be able to gently correct someone on your

(44:52):
side with that fact without them devolving into a hyperbolic,
emotional mess. And if that is unavoidable for their character,
then maybe they're not the right kind of warrior for
this job. And I don't give a rat's ass if
that hurts anybody's feelings, because at this point, I like

(45:13):
you all, but I don't care about making friends, and
I don't care about being invited to the parties, and
I don't care about being on the stage and making
the speech. I don't care. I got a lot of
other stuff.

Speaker 2 (45:23):
We got going on.

Speaker 3 (45:25):
But I do care about the health of the movement,
and I care about the soul of the nation, and
I do care about a lot of the people that
are trying to do really good things in this So
when someone says do not allow yourself to be manipulated,
the correct and strong response isn't to devolve into the
behavior of an overemotional leftist woman. It's to maybe say, Okay,

(45:48):
this person isn't coming from an origin of malice. Maybe
there's something to this. And again, if you can't, then
maybe this debate isn't for you.

Speaker 5 (46:00):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's quick.

Speaker 2 (46:04):
Five Guess what.

Speaker 3 (46:07):
An European media study says that AI is not a
reliable source of news today, and du this is I
do not use AI, and I am not inclined to.
You still have to double and triple check everything. I've
seen other people who do. And I always can tell

(46:29):
when someone sends me something that's like AI because there's
always something off about it. It doesn't it doesn't measure
on fact. It crawls for what pops up in terms
of search results. And by the way, who still controls
all of that?

Speaker 2 (46:41):
The left? There you go. Let's see smartbeds.

Speaker 3 (46:44):
Flipped out during the Amazon outage, the Web services outage.
I didn't know that, like the smartbeds freaked out. Even dude,
we are all way too connected. If your beds freak out,
welcome back to the program, Dana lash with you. Bottom
of this second hour. So Elon Musk has called for
a Netflix boycott. Well, he said he was boycotting. Actually

(47:06):
he's like he goes cancel Netflix for the healthier kids,
and he cites this show called dead End Paranormal Park.
It's a show on Netflix that has I mean, it's
a pretty well I mean they're they're promoting trans stuff
to kids.

Speaker 2 (47:23):
Now.

Speaker 3 (47:24):
The show is advertised for young kids, right it's but
it's rated PG, but it's still advertised for young kids.

Speaker 2 (47:32):
And this.

Speaker 3 (47:36):
Guy, I think people found it. I don't know, because
it's not even in production anymore. It's an older show.
And one of the so Lorraine made the point that
she thinks people found it because the creator of the show,
that who wrote the comic on which the show is based,
was mocking Charlie Kirk's murder. And I think that that

(48:00):
that's kind of and I tend to agree that I
think that's maybe how people found it. And so now
everyone saw the show and this is like an example
of the content for this program. And because we don't
want to get pulled from YouTube, we can play the
audio and show you the screencap, but that's pretty much it.

(48:20):
But this is like the scene, for example, this is
a cut twenty seven Park.

Speaker 11 (48:25):
It's it's me, I'm trans norma and everyone at the
noose and everyone at home those and being here it's
like a whole new place. I can just be Barney,
and I can choose if and when I tell people,
I've never been happier, and that's saying something. When I
spent today Chase by terrifying zombie mascots.

Speaker 2 (48:46):
Puxy reminded me how important.

Speaker 11 (48:47):
It is to live your life without apology. So I
think I got to give living here a shot, don't you.

Speaker 2 (48:54):
You don't need my permission. I just wouldn't want Courtney
as a roommate.

Speaker 3 (48:58):
So the guy who plays Barney is also apparently trans Yeah,
and so Musk saw it was like, oh, yeah, you gotta,
you know, cancel it for to protect your kids. The
guy who Hamish Steel, who created the UH comic on
which the show is based, was the guy who was

(49:22):
you know, apparently he was making fun of Charlie Kirk
being assassinated. And the show got canceled in twenty twenty three,
but it's still on Netflix, like it's archived on Netflix
and it's supposed to be PG.

Speaker 2 (49:35):
I don't know.

Speaker 3 (49:36):
I mean, it seems when you they're like, oh, it's
not really for kids, it's for PG. But then you
see the content. It's being marketed towards kids. I'm not
even going to take that from these people who are like, oh,
guns are marketed towards kids.

Speaker 2 (49:46):
No they're not.

Speaker 3 (49:47):
But this clearly is. This absolutely is. And it hasn't
been a production for like over two years, but it's,
like I said, it's still up on Netflix. So Steel,
the guy who created the comic that the show's based on,
he made fun of Charlie Kirk being murdered and said
some really nasty stuff online, like tons of stuff. And
then so now Musk it has Musk's attention and he's

(50:09):
gone after it as well. And then he kind of
flirted around with the idea of creating a Netflix like
entity and competing with Netflix.

Speaker 2 (50:17):
Right, But I mean, the guy.

Speaker 3 (50:20):
Literally celebrated the murder of Charlie Kirk. He absolutely did.
He celebrated his murder and made fun of it and
all this other stuff. So I don't know, I've never
seen it. The it got it was canceled after the
second season was released in October twenty twenty two, and

(50:42):
the again, the Kirk stuff, his comments and then plus
the Barney trans character just catapulted it now into the news.
I just don't even know why anybody would watch this.
People got to pay your parents also need to pay
attention to this stuff. There's almost no I would not
set my kids in front of any new animation unless

(51:06):
it was like anime. I would not put them in
front of any non I'm not kidding you. If it's
not made in Japan, if it's not made even in
South Korea, if it's not anime, or if it's not
Old Warner Brothers, I would not allow my kid to
watch it at all, no joke. I don't even know.

(51:26):
And my kids, when my kids were younger, we really
really watched what they watched, and they could watch they
I mean, you know, obviously get your chores down, blah
blah blah, but they could watch, you know, the stuff
that we approved for them to watch. And they have
watched Old Warner Brothers, they watched Veggietails, things like that.

Speaker 2 (51:43):
But this new stuff, because it's so subversive.

Speaker 3 (51:48):
You might watch a couple of episodes of something and
then like in the third episode, boom, here's a character
that's talking about trans or talking about very very adult
subjects in what is clearly children's programming, and there's no
indication in any of the descriptions for parents ahead of times.

(52:10):
So you've got to be very very careful as to
what you allow your kids to watch.

Speaker 2 (52:15):
I'm not kidding like I would. I wouldn't. There's there.

Speaker 3 (52:19):
I would not allow my kids to watch anything unless
it was a pre approved, pre you know.

Speaker 2 (52:24):
Really sussed out selection that you know, we had picked
for them.

Speaker 3 (52:32):
Probably even more it would be more controlled than I
was with my kids when they were little. You would
have to because there's so much stuff out there and
there are so many people with political agendas. Used to
when people would create content like children's programming, it would
be programming that the kids would find entertaining. Now it
is the adults that want to massage their egos by

(52:56):
presenting what they think kids should believe two kids, it's
not about the servicing the kids anymore. It's about servicing
the ego of the creator these you know, and they're
usually left leaning. So have you ever seen the Showcane
the Dead and Paranormal Thing? ParaNorman almost went too far
from me towards the end. That was a good movie, ParaNorman,

(53:18):
And at the very end, boom they hit you in
the face with right, you know alphabet stuff that's way
above a kid's pay grade.

Speaker 5 (53:25):
Yeah, I mean you have to think about how these
things get created. There's a lot of intention behind their
creation because you got to be able to generate the
funding in order to make it even happen, So you
got to sell your idea. Now did they sell them
on this idea in the beginning or did they bait
and switch them. That's something that I'd like to find out.
But this was all done with intention. Oh, completely, They

(53:48):
all are done.

Speaker 3 (53:48):
That way, so kind of in this do you guys
remember Imain Keif Khalif, the boxer who wanted to compete
as a woman and got kicked out. Remember this guy
a Main Khalif from Algeria rose to global prominence and
they call him a her But man, it is such

(54:11):
a dude looking dude. So this image of this guy.
So now he got kicked out of the boxing thing,
so he's not in the boxing stuff anymore. And by
the way, Wan says that he canceled his Netflix account
over a year ago. Good for Wand He's like, there's
no point in watching this garbage.

Speaker 2 (54:31):
Man.

Speaker 3 (54:31):
Wan's gonna beat somebody with a flip flop. I'm not messing, man.
So this is the main khalif. Let me set this
up and then I'm gonna tell you where it's going
to go. So this dude who was a boxer, he
got bounced out of boxing because he's a dude who
wanted to compete as a female. And now he is
the face of a beauty brand that is from Algeria.

(54:55):
Now Wan is showing you right now the middle screen
is the ad okay, a beauty brand, A beauty brand.

Speaker 5 (55:06):
Hold on if I'm the photographer. And by the way,
I'm not oh my, this is.

Speaker 2 (55:10):
I swear to you guy's hands. This guy, this is
real people.

Speaker 5 (55:13):
Watching on the screen right now at home. That's a
guy who doesn't look happy.

Speaker 2 (55:18):
That's a man. I uh.

Speaker 5 (55:22):
What is it for?

Speaker 2 (55:23):
Is it like for? Uh?

Speaker 5 (55:26):
How do they use that one of all the pictures
they took?

Speaker 3 (55:29):
Is this the best photo that they had?

Speaker 2 (55:33):
I got?

Speaker 3 (55:34):
I got a lot of questions about this.

Speaker 2 (55:36):
Is this the best?

Speaker 3 (55:39):
I don't know. I'm very torn on this. So the
it's called Bell n c O. I don't even know
how I say it's from Uh, it's a it's an
Algerian beauty brand. And in the campaign. They they they said,
well he embodies strength. Will they call her? They call
him a she and they go she. But it's a

(56:00):
body strength, resilience, and grace. It's a perfect reflection of
what skin with attitude really means. So I guess it's
like a foundation. This is a dude. He is the
most dudast dude I think I have ever Well, she's
a guy, so I've ever seen. But I just need

(56:20):
to see the ad again. I'm sorry, wan, I just
want to see that ad one more time. So maybe
he's born with it, maybe testicle, maybe it's a penis.

Speaker 13 (56:32):
It's just excuse me.

Speaker 3 (56:36):
I'm just saying, is that the best photo is that
his smolder?

Speaker 5 (56:41):
Smolder?

Speaker 3 (56:43):
Ladies, are you buying a beauty brand from that? Are
you gonna see? I want to look like that man?
No said, no, lady ever?

Speaker 5 (56:52):
All right, so we all know that marketing is that.

Speaker 2 (56:54):
Is a man's jawkine. He can crack nuts with it.

Speaker 5 (56:57):
A lot of marketing has to do with the visuals, right,
so this guy doesn't look anything like a woman. And
then if he's holding up the product and the product
looks like it's some black label RX you get from
Randall drugs. Like, no one's gonna be buying that. The
packaging doesn't want to put that up on the screen again.
It's like, what is that?

Speaker 2 (57:18):
I don't even know.

Speaker 5 (57:20):
Woman?

Speaker 3 (57:21):
Come by my foundation, right, I'm just he could sell
razors for your face, but I'm not. Here's another reason
why this ticks me off so bad. Dudes do not
have the same skin as women. Dudes grow hair on

(57:41):
their face. Women do not have the same skin texture.
We don't have the same issues, we don't have the
same hormones, we don't have the same concerns. A man
cannot wear a makeup that will be suitable for a
woman to wear.

Speaker 2 (57:56):
It is not possible that it's us. Not possible.

Speaker 3 (58:02):
You're ignoring the needs of females to cater to a
guy who's playing dress up, and then you you want
to smear everybody as biggots who object to it, who
object to being erased. He already tried to erase women
in women's sports, and now he wants you to listen

(58:23):
to him about ladies makeup. If any photo you've this
is actually, believe it or not, the most feminine photo
that he has ever taken, Cain, if you don't believe me.

Speaker 2 (58:34):
Google his name and look at the images.

Speaker 5 (58:36):
I did, and you are right, And it looks like
there was a lot of effort to make him look
like a female, and.

Speaker 2 (58:42):
It just, I mean, he looks like he hates the product.

Speaker 5 (58:44):
It just ain't working.

Speaker 2 (58:46):
Can't believe I'm selling this? What is he going to
sell next? Tampons?

Speaker 7 (58:51):
Like?

Speaker 3 (58:51):
Are you gonna hot some tam PACs in main Khalif's
tamp PACs?

Speaker 2 (58:58):
Where does it end? You know what I'm saying? Does
it end?

Speaker 3 (59:01):
I mean, it's a legit question ago, but that is
actually I can't That's like the most feminine photo I've
ever seen.

Speaker 2 (59:08):
Of the dude. He's a dude.

Speaker 3 (59:10):
He's a dude with dude stuff. He's got dude chromosomes,
Dude chromosomes, dude, DNA, dude bits, Dude, it's all dudeage. Okay,
there's this no objection. No jury would convict you. If
you saw this gentleman and thought, why is he wearing lipstick?

Speaker 2 (59:27):
Nobody would convict you.

Speaker 3 (59:29):
The problem is that normally, if he was just doing
his thing and just like, I'm a dude that likes
wearing makeup and I'm not going to try to bump
women out of women's spaces, Nobody would have. Honestly, we're
all too busy. I don't care, Like, just don't bother me,
interrupt me, and you know, be a burden on my life.
But when you try shoving women out of men's spaces

(59:49):
and then you fail at that, and then you double
down on the offence, you're absolutely gonna get mocked, and
deservingly so, because ridicule. Ridicules a magnificent weapon.

Speaker 2 (59:59):
I'm oh.

Speaker 3 (59:59):
And by the way, for the lady who thought that
me talking about the mean lady in the gym the
other day was about her, because she thinks everything is
about her. This isn't about you either.

Speaker 5 (01:00:10):
It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time
for Florida.

Speaker 2 (01:00:17):
Man, all right.

Speaker 3 (01:00:20):
I just saw Kane tell a dude that he needs
might all on social media. Just saw that one. It's nice,
nice comeback.

Speaker 2 (01:00:27):
All right.

Speaker 3 (01:00:28):
So a Florida, A Florida attorney was convicted of bringing
cocaine into a Florida jail. It's almost like he should
have known that was illegal, if only he had the
education to know that that was illegal. Sixty year old
David Castles was convicted of one compossession of cocaine, count
of felony introduction of contraband into a county detention facility.

(01:00:48):
Why are his glasses crooked on his mugshot? It's bothering
me really badly. It's very asymmetric in the verdict. The
judge who had sentenced him to a year in jail
three years or three hundred hours of community service. He
has to go through substance abuse things stuff like that.
But that's just one of the dumbest self owns. So

(01:01:08):
much of this is like self owning people's self owning.
This one guy got seventeen and a half years because
he led a cocaine trafficking network from Puerto Rico to
New York. That's also a big bad no no, so
I'm surprised the New York did anything about it.

Speaker 2 (01:01:22):
Right, But it.

Speaker 3 (01:01:25):
Was a cocaine distribution network that spanned from Puerto Rico
to upstate New York. US Attorney's office. They handed this dude,
a forty nine year old dude from Lady Lake, Florida,
seventeen and a half years in prison. He was also
involved in money laundering, distribution, all kinds of bad stuff.
That's not something that you know. There's a lot of

(01:01:47):
the cocaine distribution happening here. This Gulf Coast News to Florida.
Man was accused of street racing at one hundred and
twenty four miles per hour and when and the police
got him, his excuse was that quote, I have to
use the bathroom. That's why he went one hundred and

(01:02:08):
twenty four miles per hour at three am on a Sunday.
You see in Lee County, Florida. It was a late
night street race and they're still searching for the motorcyclist.
He was racing a motorcycle. This is how people get killed.
The Toyota camera this guy was racing. If you were
wondering if it was a camera, you are correct. A
Toyota camera and motorcycle stops side by side of a

(01:02:29):
traffic like they were able to get it on some
CCT stuff from other you know, like businesses and that.
But yeah, they clocked him at go one hundred and
twenty four. The motorcycle hit more than one hundred and forty.
When they stopped him, he said, I had to use
the bathroom really badly. I had to use the bathroom
bad is what he said. The camera driver did not
have a license, and the police were like, well, that's
a red flag. Number one and number two that it

(01:02:51):
was happening at three in the morning, that's also another
red flag.

Speaker 2 (01:02:55):
And then Sheriff JD.

Speaker 3 (01:02:56):
Grudd he, uh, well, no, Sheriff Grady Judge said of
Florida man who's a retired deputy, insulted workers at McDonald's
drive through with a child in the front seat. So
he drove through, he was competitive towards McDonald's workers, and
he had like an unstrained kid, eighteen month old in
the front seat.

Speaker 2 (01:03:13):
We'll have more on that tomorrow. Third Hour on the Way.
Stick with us.

Speaker 9 (01:03:18):
I'm sharring is that there are so many people willing
to excuse the most reprehensible things that he said, that
they agree with, that, that they're willing to have monuments
for him, that they want to create a day to
honor him, and that they want to produce resolutions in
the House of Congress honoring his life and legacy. It

(01:03:41):
is one thing to care about his life because obviously
so many people loved him, including his children and wife.
But I am not going to sit here and be
judged for not wanting to honor any legacy this man
has left behind. That should be in the pen of
history and we should hopefully move on.

Speaker 3 (01:04:04):
As should your citizenship here in the United States. It
should also be in the dustbin of history. That's Elan
o'mar who whenever she has the opportunity to be a
decent human and not a yelping.

Speaker 2 (01:04:15):
Dog, she chooses the dog.

Speaker 3 (01:04:17):
It's fascinating. That's an insulted dogs. I'm sorry, dogs, welcome
back to the program. Being a last top of this
third hour. Do you know it's when you think about
like her, just demonic views. She's a nasty person. She's
just a nasty piece of work. She never has anything
nice to say about anybody. I mean, you know, the
fact that she had a marri or brother to even

(01:04:38):
cheat to get citizenship or to even get in the
United States, isn't insane? And the fact that she used
her campaign money to help facilitate the divorce and all
of this other stuff, oh she did. That's why she
had to pay a fine for all of that. I
don't know if people are actually familiar with that. There
are receipts there. That's why this is said so often
because it's true. It's not a joke.

Speaker 2 (01:04:57):
It's actually true.

Speaker 3 (01:04:59):
And the I think the sentiment that she states and
what I have heard, you know, a lot of these
college campuses the Tpusay went to, she just seems like
she was just very She never liked the group, and
she Charlie, never said anything controversial, except if you consider

(01:05:20):
scripture controversial. He was again the nice one. But I
was thinking about all of this in context with the
pressure that foreign money plays into all of these colleges
and universities across the country. Did you know that the
biggest funder two American universities is Cutter. Billions and billions

(01:05:47):
and billions and billions of dollars they have given. And
it's interesting because if you look at where all the
money which I'm looking at now, if you look at
where all they give their money, are interesting that that's
we're all like. For instance, you know the protests where
they were going after all the Jewish students, It's kind
of interesting that those were the universities where they got

(01:06:08):
the most money from Cutter. I'm just saying it just
could be kan I'm sure a total coincidence. It's and
there are a lot of things that have been written
about this, And it's not just Cutter, China is as well,
but Cutter is the biggest donor of two American universities.
And so allow that to kind of sit in your
head for a little bit when you are wondering, why

(01:06:31):
is it that all of this stuff, like with the
anti Semitic protests, where they actually were targeting people for
being Jewish, They weren't like, well, we disagree with the
Israeli government. They can't even tell you how it's structured.
They just were mad because of to Jews.

Speaker 2 (01:06:44):
That's it.

Speaker 3 (01:06:45):
But think about how that really got kicked off and
why it seems like it was expedited to this point.
And then look at all the money that these these
companies or these countries have been pouring in China and
Cutter they've poorn just over the past few years, it's
been like twenty nine billion, twenty nine billion dollars. Foreign

(01:07:06):
donors have given as much to American universities just like
in the last handful of years as they did in
the last like in the last four years, they've given
as much as they did in the last four decades.

Speaker 2 (01:07:23):
So take four.

Speaker 3 (01:07:24):
Decades and condense it down into four years, there is
an absolute, I mean an explosion of foreign money on campuses.
Cutter is the largest source and all of these donations
to these campuses, all of this started to get reported

(01:07:44):
like a nine in the eighties. They have given over
six billion, China's two point three billion. The Saudi's are
like way below. But I mean, Cutter is the largest
source of all of this foreign money to these campuses.
Now the second largest source of foreign funding is China.

(01:08:09):
So I told you that Cutter six point three billion
in counting, China is five point six billion in counting.
And just like you saw with Cutter, the donations from
China have exploded over the past several years. And again

(01:08:31):
the universities where you saw all of the upheaval where
you can even have TPUSA go on campus, hardly the Harvard's,
the Columbia's, Oh guess who those are the ones that
get the most money from China and Cutter. In fact,
every single one of these universities where you that you
have seen in the headlines where the students are like
rioting or they're protesting to the extent where it's not

(01:08:54):
safe for conservative speakers to even leave the campus, and
they have to hide in janitorial closets. Those are all
the campuses that have received tons. Those are all the
universities that have tons of Qatari and Chinese money. Oh,
it's a fact. The receipts are out. Carnegie, Mellon, Cornell, Stanford, Columbia, Harvard,

(01:09:16):
lots of them. Why because it's soft power. It's a
it's a it's to build selt power. This they're expanding
their influence. If you don't think it's a that sec issue,
I'll remind you every single revolution started in academia. You

(01:09:37):
could even argue French Revolution start in academia. The Color
Revolution in China started in academia. Russia, academia Germany in
the thirties. Academia started on college campuses every single time,

(01:09:57):
because you have minds that are easy, easily influenced, and
there is a huge effort to continue that trend here
in the United States. That's why you've been seeing an
increase in all of this stuff on college campuses, because
there are absolutely outside sources that are funding it. They

(01:10:19):
like the division, they like the hostility spreading on college campuses,
and just like in every other nation where this has happened,
it goes from there, so now it becomes a national
security issue. I have someone say, well, it really isn't.
Tell that to China because their communist revolutions started in

(01:10:42):
their campuses and took over their entire country an outlook.
Tell that to nineteen thirties Germany. Tell it to Russia
with the Bolsheviks. I mean, dare I go on. It's
without exception.

Speaker 2 (01:10:59):
So these this influence.

Speaker 3 (01:11:05):
Is I mean, and the qataris they they're all ramping
up their donations. We're gonna talk a little bit about
this to Steve and Yates as well. But it's interesting
to note the Free Press at a piece where Harvard
didn't comply with seven Section one hundred and seventeen of
the Higher Education Act. They were trying to not disclose
all of this foreign financial funding that seems sketch to

(01:11:28):
the point where it wasn't just like an an over
It wasn't just like a you know, someone just forgot accidentally.
It wasn't just mirror oversight. It was purposeful and that
this is one of the things that the administration is doing.
They are looking at these connections between foreign money and

(01:11:49):
the increasing violence and et cetera. That's happening on college campuses.
It's not just the so, it's these foreign companies, these
foreign countries that would like to sew division. It's very
sun Zoo. If you can sew division within your opponent,

(01:12:09):
you don't even need to do anything because your opponent
will divide and have and fight itself. That's exactly the design.
It's a soft power move, and that's why it's a
national security issue. I don't even know why. I mean,
and this is just me just speculating, but why are
these universities allowed to accept money from foreign governments? Why

(01:12:33):
it's not like Harvard needs it. Their endowment is like
is billions of dollars. Why are they accepting or allowed
to accept money from foreign governments. I'm not even talking about, Oh,
here's a charitable group in United Arab Emirates, We're going
to donate. No, no, no, it's like literally the Katari government.

(01:12:54):
Why are universities allowed to accept money from foreign governments
and you know that they come with strings attached? This
is a giant question. And then Berkeley, for instance, remember
Berkeley where you had all of those riots and protests

(01:13:16):
and all this stuff breakout. Cain, if you had to
guess how much money they had that they got recently
with a partnership with the communist Chinese government, literally from
China's China's government.

Speaker 2 (01:13:28):
How much would you make Guess.

Speaker 5 (01:13:30):
I would say one hundred million or more.

Speaker 2 (01:13:32):
Double it, seriously double it, and then go up a
little bit.

Speaker 3 (01:13:35):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:13:36):
Lord, yeah, Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:13:39):
Here's the funny thing. Berkeley refused to report it the
Daily Beast. Actually, I can't even believe I'm citing the
Daily Beast. This is what the world's come to. They
had their headline. This was from May of twenty three,
Berkeley's two hundred and twenty million dollar mistake exposed in
a massive deal with China. So they were trying to

(01:14:00):
get ahead of it and frame it as a mistake.
But the people that were investigating the failure to disclose,
they didn't really think it was a mistake because they
found other purposeful, questionably purposeful omissions.

Speaker 2 (01:14:17):
Interesting.

Speaker 3 (01:14:17):
Yes, so there's a lot of questions to be asked here,
and all of this comes together. I was thinking about
all of this over this weekend, especially now that people
are talking about approaching campus debates and campus events differently
in light of security that I think that right there

(01:14:42):
is the front line. Those college campuses are the front line,
and I'm just you know, I'm curious. I'd be curious
to look at money going into that Utah Utah Valley College.
Go and look and see all of these universities where
the students have gotten more and more agitated and progressive,

(01:15:05):
and it completely corresponds with the massive amount of donations
that they get from foreign governments. I'm just saying there
is enough there to not only beg the question, but
pose a legitimate one, not even assuming the premise is true.
Now you can actually question whether or not it is.
It's not even begging the question anymore. It's a legit question.

(01:15:28):
This administration is going to have to get around this
one other quick thing. We're talking about some of the
medium malpractice. If we have time to do this. I
was shocked at the way I had posted this. I
think I had tweeted about it online, but I was
looking at the situation with the media. So first up,

(01:15:49):
you had this nbcpiece, and this had to do with this.

Speaker 2 (01:15:54):
Gosh our. If I can get our WiFi to work,
it'd be great.

Speaker 3 (01:15:57):
This had to do. I'm just waiting for it to love. Sorry,
just do it a live radio show We're Gonna Wait
for the Wi Fi to Love. This was had to
do with this Skymeadow country club shooting. Witnesses were saying
that the killer was screaming free Palestine before he fired
upon country club event attendees, and the witnesses were telling

(01:16:20):
the local news and there's a video of it that
the guy was saying free Palestine. He was saying, he
was screaming it. That sounded like a pretty targeted attack,
I think correct. I mean, that's what it sounds like.
Here's what NBC did. NBC had a whole piece and
he pulled this up, a whole entire piece where they

(01:16:41):
refused to admit or refuse to report on the fact
that the killer had screamed free Palestine, or that witnesses
were telling local media that the killer was screaming it.
In their piece, NBC didn't touch on it at all.
They reported it like, oh, some guy did some thing, cover.

Speaker 5 (01:17:01):
Up and now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 3 (01:17:09):
So Amaican woman admits to using her employer's money to
play business's slot machines. It's the average worker, today's work
force on board already by this story.

Speaker 2 (01:17:18):
Let's see.

Speaker 3 (01:17:20):
Oh, here's this, let's do this. This is an Iowa town.
So in Iowa that Jesse Police Department issued a statement
regarding harassment from toilet papering people's houses in that now
their police department says teping has banned anyone caught doing
it will face legal charges, et cetera, and that they

(01:17:42):
said that it's effective immediately there's zero poll I just
think it's perfectly good wayte to toilet paper. It is
kind of a pain to clean up. I've never had,
you know, I've only I've never actually done it to
anyone or had it done. I did help spork someone's art, though.

Speaker 5 (01:17:58):
I never realized how well off we were the day.
We're just throwing toilet paper and.

Speaker 3 (01:18:01):
As everywhere right, did we joke about this during COVID?
Oh my gosh, I just don't let your kids do that.
It's a waste of resources and it's annoying. Okay, I
just don't. A traveler was caught with human remains at
the Tampa airport and when they asked him what he
was going to do with it, he said, it's for rituals,

(01:18:22):
I mean US customs and Border Protection at Tampa. It
was a skull. And what's gross is it was all
wrapped in foil. Ooh, can't it's so gross.

Speaker 2 (01:18:37):
It was all wrapped in foil.

Speaker 3 (01:18:39):
And he told officers that the items were for rituals
and due to it being gross and nasty, they I mean, yes,
health risks and all that, but just totally grody. They
seize them and destroy them.

Speaker 2 (01:18:51):
Wow.

Speaker 3 (01:18:52):
Who thinks they're going to walk through tsa. Oh, here's
my skulls and bones and going what is the matter
to you?

Speaker 10 (01:18:59):
It must take control strongly and immediately of the unmitigated
immigration disaster and the fake energy catastrophe before it's too late.
The carbon footprint is a hoax made up by people
with evil intentions, and they're heading down a path of
total destruction. You know, the carbon footprint was a big,

(01:19:21):
big thing a few years ago. I remember hearing about
the carbon footprint, and then President Obama would get into
Air Force one, a massive Boeing seven forty seven and
not a new one, an old one with old engines
and spew everything into the atmosphere. He talk about the

(01:19:42):
carbon footprint, we must do so then he'd get in
and he'd flies from Washington to Hawaii to play a
round of golf, and then he'd get back onto that
big beautiful plane and it'd fly back and he'd talk
about again global warming and the carbon footprint. It's a
Khan job.

Speaker 2 (01:20:02):
He's right.

Speaker 3 (01:20:05):
As Potus speaking at at the UN and he's like, yeah,
this is all a con Welcome back to the program.
At bottom of this third hour, Danna lash with you.
He's one thousand percent correct. And also one thousand percent correct.
They're classifying Antifa as a terrorist entity. And this is

(01:20:28):
incredibly interesting. I saw this some survey. Let me pull
this up. I actually just saw this, and I was
looking at this on break. Nine and ten Republicans are
apparently concerned with left wing violence. I think they have
reason to be as sad as that is. It's a
recent economist. You go have survey nine and ten Republicans

(01:20:49):
are concerned about left wing extremism. It was taken after
Charlie Kirk was assassinated, and they looked at over fifteen
hundred US adults. Sixty one percent they were very or
somewhat concerned. Fifty six percent of independence expressed concern. Even
thirty eight percent of self identified Democrats expressed concern. That's

(01:21:14):
pretty telling, very telling.

Speaker 2 (01:21:20):
And this is this is after you know, I look
at this. Let me pull this up.

Speaker 3 (01:21:31):
You had a man who was charged with shooting up
an ABC station after the Jimmy Kimmel decision. The FBI
flew in, swooped in. He was let go on bail.
By the way, you guys know that they let the
guy walk. It's another case, a confirmed case of left

(01:21:55):
wing political violence. And they let the guy walk. And
this was after again Kimmel had been suspended. Prosecutors said
that he was quote politically motivated. That is per the
Sacramento County District Attorney. They looked at his vehicle. He

(01:22:19):
had a note in it that criticized members of the
Trump administration and referenced the Charlie Kirk assassination sixty four
year old Annibal Hernandez Santana. They searched his house. They
found other evidence. They found a calendar attached to his refrigerator.
On the calendar for the date of September nineteenth, he

(01:22:40):
had written the message quote do the next scary thing.
Authorities discovered in his vehicle nanti Trump book. They had
a handwritten note quote for hiding Epstein, do not support Bondi, Patel,
all of them. He goes there next he had a
handwritten note signed with his initials or no, signed with

(01:23:00):
the initial c K, and that the DA was saying
that they believed that scenes for Charlie Kirk and he
was arrested after he shot into the lobby of the station.
There were employees inside when he opened fire. They let
him walk, he posted bail and he walked, and then

(01:23:22):
the FBI swooped in because he's facing federal charges now.
And this was after ABC suspended him. So if the
left can say that Brendan Carr, by simply speaking, was
able to convince Sinclair a Next Star, which it's very
evident that it was the viewers who were melting the

(01:23:46):
phones at Sinclair and Next Star that were leading this.
If the left can accuse Carr of doing that and
being responsible for the all of these stations making the
decision to let Kimmel Bess to suspend Kimmel, then surely
they can say that ABC backing Kimmel is the direct
result of a leftist walking into one of the ABC

(01:24:07):
affiliates and shooting up their lobby.

Speaker 2 (01:24:11):
Don't you agree so ABC.

Speaker 3 (01:24:15):
I mean it begs the question that ABC is threatened
by leftist murderous terrorism and they decided to reinstate against
next tur and Sendclair Jimmy Kimmel because they're worried about
getting shot up by leftists. It's a pretty I think
that's you know, pretty, I think that goes beyond begging
the question. I mean, this is insane and it is

(01:24:37):
an absolute this is this is leftist violence. And you
have people like Keith Oberman who told Scott Jennings quote
your next blank blinker. He was threatening people. Keith Oberman
threatening people on X and then they let this guy go.

Speaker 7 (01:25:04):
No, this is.

Speaker 3 (01:25:06):
Leftist terrorism. I mean, we're getting to the point where
it's not just Antifa. It's not just Antifa. We're getting
to the point where many leftists are kind of adopting
terroristic tactics, very terroristic tactics. And I'm looking at this.

(01:25:32):
You also have this.

Speaker 2 (01:25:33):
I'm gonna pull this up.

Speaker 3 (01:25:37):
The situation, the story of Charlie Kirk has suspected, the
suspected translover of the assassin was kicked out of the
home Lance Twiggs. He was living with the murder suspect.
He was living with the murderer. He was detached and radicalized.
That's how his own family described him. Substance abuse, gender identity, yeah,

(01:26:04):
oh yeah, and all this stuff starts coming to light,
all of this it's getting so insane. Case in point,
apparently the so you know, the LGBTQ. Okay, so apparently
they're kicking out the t's.

Speaker 2 (01:26:21):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:26:22):
This came from LGB International. LGB International describes itself as lesbian,
gay and bisexual people declaring independents. And they have a
video of all of these people from all these different
countries and they are kicking out the trans Wow. I

(01:26:43):
mean some of the graphics that they have are like
scissors separating the T and Q from the LGB and
it is a pretty big group. They are finished, they
are absolutely finished with it. And a lot of the
stuff that I've seen people say that the TQ plus

(01:27:05):
crowd have done irreparable damage. They've hijacked, they're being accused
of hijacking their movement. I man, I think everybody's seeing
how dangerous it is. It's becoming more and more that
it's it seems like it's a hallmark of it to
be violent. That is something else. So all of this stuff.

(01:27:32):
You don't looking at it. You know, the FBI they
arrested this guy. They had to go in, They had
to bring federal charges because local was just gonna let
him walk his social disguised social media accounts filled with
anti Trump stuff. He liked a whole bunch of trains
TIFA stuff. I mean, how much more obvious does it

(01:27:54):
have to be? This is all politically motivated violence, and
more and more you have significant number of the left
that say they're okay with it, probably because you hear
stuff like six audio Somebode six all the damn time.

Speaker 2 (01:28:07):
Case in point.

Speaker 7 (01:28:11):
And right now we are dealing with, as I called
him at my speech on the Ellipse.

Speaker 2 (01:28:17):
A tyrant.

Speaker 7 (01:28:19):
We used to compare the strength of our democracy to
communist dictators. That's what we're.

Speaker 2 (01:28:25):
Dealing with right now.

Speaker 7 (01:28:26):
Donald Trump and these titans of industry are not speaking up.
And perhaps it is because his threats and the way
he has used the weight of the federal government to
take out vengeance on his critics is something that they fear.

Speaker 2 (01:28:47):
And I get that. Just flashback, just flashback.

Speaker 3 (01:28:50):
She's talking about, where are the where are those those
titans at the industry Titans.

Speaker 2 (01:28:55):
Just again, one quick recap.

Speaker 3 (01:28:57):
This is what Mark Zuckerberg and Industry Titans said the
Biden administration did to him.

Speaker 14 (01:29:04):
These people from the Biden administration would call up our
team and like scream at them and curse, and it's like,
these documents are it's all kind of out there.

Speaker 5 (01:29:14):
Did you record any of those phone calls? I don't know.

Speaker 14 (01:29:16):
I don't think. I don't think we were, but but
I think listen, I mean, there are emails, the emails
are published, it's all it's all kind of out there,
and and they're like and basically, it just got to
this point where we were like, no, we're not gonna
We're not gonna take down things that are true.

Speaker 5 (01:29:32):
That's ridiculous.

Speaker 14 (01:29:34):
They want us to take down this meme of Leonardo
DiCaprio looking at a TV talking about how ten years
from now or something, you know, you're going to see
an ad that says, okay, if you took a COVID vaccine,
your eligible you know, you know, like uh for for
this kind of payment, except this sort of like class
action laws. They wanted him to take that down, and
they're like, no, you have to take she's talking about tyranny.

(01:29:55):
That's an example of tyranny. By the way, it just
came in that the Trump assassination attempt. The suspect, I'll
say his name once, Ryan Ruth was found guilty on
all charges. Yeah, exactly, as he should, just found guilty
to all charges. This was the guy that was again,
this was at the golf course, he was at mar

(01:30:16):
A Lago and he tried.

Speaker 3 (01:30:18):
This was not long after the first almost fatal attempt.
So the left needs to.

Speaker 2 (01:30:29):
Get a grip.

Speaker 3 (01:30:32):
Not everyone who disagrees with you is a Nazi, Not
everyone who disagrees with you is a tyrant. I mean,
it's just they've got to slow their role on this rhetoric,
and they need to slow their role in the violence.
They can't even condemn this stuff. This is asinine.

Speaker 2 (01:30:53):
Here's you know.

Speaker 3 (01:30:53):
And the difference was like with the Hortman's, no one
demonized Melissa Hortman. You didn't hear a single conservative go
out there and be like, oh, well, Melis's hertman and
her husband or the other individuals that were targeted and lived.

Speaker 2 (01:31:05):
No one did that. No one demonized her.

Speaker 3 (01:31:06):
No one was demonizing her before either and calling her
Nazi or Hitler or anything like that. So this is
where the left gets it wrong. Stop with your comparisons.
And by the way, the guy who targeted her thought
he was a Waltz appointee who thought he was hearing
Waltz in his head telling him to do it.

Speaker 2 (01:31:25):
Welcome back to the program.

Speaker 3 (01:31:27):
So if you were, if you're just joining us, we
mentioned this before we went to break. This is all
just everything is drama now. So the verdict is in.
In the second assassin, I'll say his name only this
time Ryan Routh, Ryan Ruth who he was the golf
course assassin. So they convicted him, they found him guilty,

(01:31:48):
and as they did, right as that happened, he started
stabbing himself in the neck with a pin like in
the trial. Right after the Florida jury found him guilty
of attempting to assassinate President Trump, he then tried to
stab himself in the neck with a pin.

Speaker 2 (01:32:05):
That's how this trial came to an end.

Speaker 3 (01:32:08):
And then the daughter like ran away and as far
as they were reading the verdict, he tried literally like
stabbing himself. It was only two and a half hours
of deliberations they found him guilty of assaulting Secret Service
agents who got him from his hiding place. Guilty of
three federal gun charges he plugged, not guilty, and now
he faced his life in prison when he's sentenced. He
represented himself and apparently one of the reasons why the

(01:32:30):
trial went so quickly is that he just like didn't
question anybody.

Speaker 2 (01:32:34):
He like wouldn't. I don't think he knew what he
was doing.

Speaker 3 (01:32:40):
The apparently with the jury out of earshot, Rutha then
asked Judge Aileen Cannon he was in this he was monologuing.
She told him to stay within the bounds of the case,
and he was complaining that he wasn't allowed to put
more witnesses on the stand. Then he asked Canon whether
the public defenders who initially represented him could wrap up
his clothes an argument if the judge interrupted him again,

(01:33:02):
and uh wow, he is.

Speaker 2 (01:33:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:33:06):
He began talking about Ukraine and all this other stuff.
He'd monologue for like forty two minutes, so he's uh yeah,
he tried then tried stabbing himself.

Speaker 2 (01:33:16):
In the neck.

Speaker 3 (01:33:17):
That's yeah, that's and then the prosecutor was like, this
is not a who done it?

Speaker 2 (01:33:22):
I mean, it's not.

Speaker 3 (01:33:24):
So wow. He only called three witnesses and he was
done before lunch on Monday.

Speaker 2 (01:33:31):
Wow.

Speaker 3 (01:33:32):
So there's a lot to unpack there. Now one other
quick story. I don't know if you guys saw this
before we run out of time. This has kind of insane.
So this story has to do you guys know Ron Wyden.
So apparently his kids listened to the story New York
Post kids of Oregon Senator Ron Wyden drove his assistant
to a suicide with sexually explicit behavior and slurs. Apparently

(01:33:55):
his Wow, his kids, unlike demons Brandon O'Brien thirty five,
work for Ronden's wife, Nancy Widen, and apparently he had
to care for their kids and they bullied him so
bad that he killed himself. I'll talk more about that tomorrow.
All right, today's stupidity came.

Speaker 5 (01:34:11):
All right, wannas is cut seventeen. Apparently Antifa upset that
they're not getting paid on time, they started chanting their
boss's name. Guess who their boss is?

Speaker 2 (01:34:21):
Oh well, I'm sure.

Speaker 13 (01:34:26):
Sure, so.

Speaker 3 (01:34:31):
Well, I mean, yeah, that's not the first time that
leftist have done something like this, by the way, which
sure isn't.

Speaker 5 (01:34:36):
Yeah, if you think these are organic or grassroots pushbacks
by the public. You could be more wrong. They're financed.

Speaker 2 (01:34:44):
Do you have a bridge too to sell you? To
sell people?

Speaker 10 (01:34:46):
Right?

Speaker 3 (01:34:46):
We each have a bridge we can sell you. Financing
is easy, all right, folks. That does it for today.
Find us over at substack the Loraine's new piece on
the autism press conference from yesterday's Facebook youtubek and subscribe.

Speaker 2 (01:34:57):
Back with you tomorrow. God bless