July 19, 2025 • 15 mins
This recap episode unpacks an interview with James Talarico, a Democratic State Representative in Texas, on The Joe Rogan Experience. Talarico discusses various political and social issues, focusing heavily on his opposition to a Texas bill mandating the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, arguing against it on constitutional, American, and even theological grounds. He also criticises Christian nationalism, detailing how powerful figures and organisations wield influence in Texas politics, often at the expense of public well-being and the separation of church and state. Beyond these specific legislative battles, the conversation explores broader themes such as the impact of social media on societal division, the importance of authentic human connection, and the potential of universal basic income in a future shaped by artificial intelligence, advocating for a shift from "left versus right" politics to a "top versus bottom" understanding of power.
---
We all love The Joe Rogan Experience and much prefer the real thing, but sometimes it's not possible to listen to an entire episode or you just want to recap an episode you've previously listened to. The Joe Rogan Recap uses Google's NotebookLM to create a conversational podcast that recaps episodes of JRE into a more manageable listen.
On that note, for those that would like it, here's the public access link to the Google Notebook to look at the mind map, timeline and briefing doc - https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/3f96611f-9f14-4bbb-a6f9-2d624685fef1 - Please note, you must have a Google account to access.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Welcome to the Joe Rogan Recap, where we take a deep dive into
compelling conversations and is still the most critical
insights. And today we're really unpacking
A fascinating one from the Joe Rogan Experience.
Yeah, this featured James Tellarico.
He's a Texas State representative, but also a
Christian seminarian. Quite the combination.
Absolutely. And he brought some, well,
(00:22):
really unexpected perspectives, challenging conventional wisdom
on things like religious freedomin schools, even the nature of
political power itself. Our mission here is to pull out
those essential Nuggets from this conversation help you
understand the nuances of these pretty highly debated topics.
And hopefully give you some aha moments, you know, clarify
complex stuff without just overwhelming you with
(00:43):
information. Exactly.
So let's dive in. Talarico yeah, Coming from this
unique place, lawmaker and minister in training, he offers
a perspective that really does challenge the usual way of
thinking, especially where faithand public policy meet.
OK, so let's get right into it. The big thing was this bill in
Texas, the one requiring the 10 commandments in public schools.
(01:04):
Right, a real hot button issue. And this is where Talarico's
view immediately grabs you, because he, a Christian training
for ministry, actually stands against it.
He himself said it's a quote. Weird position to be in for
someone with his background. You'd sort of expect the
opposite, wouldn't you? You really would.
And the bill? It wasn't vague.
(01:25):
It mandated displaying the 10 commandments in all public
school classrooms. And it got specific too right?
Like poster size. Yeah, a regular sheet of paper.
It had to be in a conspicuous place and it allowed for
donations to supply these posters.
Which sounds OK on the surface maybe.
Well, Atala Rico pointed out this huge network of Christian
nationalist organizations just ready to, quote, flood every
(01:48):
school with them. So that donation part, it starts
to look a bit less innocent, youknow?
Like an organized push. And this bill had serious
backing. Oh yeah, he said support was
pretty much universal among Republicans in the Texas
Legislature. It failed back in 2023 but then
passed both chambers in 2025. And the argument for it?
What was the justification supporters gave?
(02:10):
The charitable view, Talrico explained, is that it's a
response to, well seeing young people may be losing faith,
rising mental health struggle. A sense that things are adrift.
Kind of, yeah. Growing up in an incoherent
universe without a clear moral structure.
So the idea was this provides that foundation.
OK. So then why would Talarico,
(02:32):
coming from a faith background, oppose that?
What was his core argument? It was layered, he basically
said. It's unconstitutional, UN
American, and, maybe most surprisingly, unchristian.
Unchristian. How do you explain that part?
He really focused on Jesus teachings, particularly about
the outsider, the outcast. His worry was for the kids who
(02:52):
aren't Christian. Like who?
The Muslim kid and the Jewish kid, the Hindu kid, the atheist
kid. He felt they'd feel unwelcome,
alienated by the state basicallymandating this display from
another religion. He.
Had a strong quote about that, didn't.
He he did. He said if Jesus saw that, he
would weep for those students. Really powerful imagery.
Wow. And from a theological
standpoint, beyond the empathy. His view was that forcing people
(03:15):
to display a poster suggests, well, a dead religion, one that
isn't moving hearts anymore. So coercion undermines faith.
Exactly. True faith, he argued, should
lead by example, not by government mandate.
And he brought up history, too. Oh yeah.
What was the historical angle? That actually the staunchest
defenders for the separation of church and state throughout
(03:37):
American history were ProtestantChristians.
Really. Why?
Because they understood the dangers.
They didn't want the government taking over religious roles.
They valued genuine religious freedom.
That's a fascinating point. And he also talked about kids
themselves, right, Having been ateacher.
Yes, the BS detector as he put it.
Kids are smart, you know. He thinks forcing these displays
(03:58):
could totally backfire. It could create a new generation
of atheists, basically kids who see religion as being about
power than it is about love. Not exactly the intended
outcome. No, definitely not.
So moving beyond just this one bill, his own story seems pretty
central to his politics. Absolutely.
His personal journey really informs all of this.
(04:19):
He started as a middle school teacher, underfunded school in
San Antonio teaching that this 45 kids in one small classroom.
Wow, that's sounds incredibly difficult.
He called it a radicalizing experience, and there was one
student's story that really hit him hard, Justin tells.
Us about Justin. Justin was having a tough time
(04:39):
behaviorally, but the school hadtherapy services and it made a
huge difference. He turned things around.
That's great. So, a success story.
It was until the legislature made budget cuts and that
therapy program got eliminated. Justin just regressed
dramatically, and seeing that direct impact, that human cost
of a political decision, that's what made Talarico decide to run
(05:00):
for office. It wasn't abstract ideology.
It was Justin. That's powerful, and that
connects to his decision to go to seminary later.
It does. He talked about hitting a crisis
of confidence during a second term.
He almost quit politics entirely.
Really. He felt he needed to reconnect
spiritually, to love God, as he put it, so he could better love
neighbor through his work. Things like fighting for
(05:23):
affordable prescription drugs, better childcare, justice
reform. So needing that inner foundation
for the public works. Exactly, he stressed, needing
that inner life to sustain the outer work.
Otherwise, he said, you can burnout so easily.
It's a really honest admission about the toll public service
can take. It really is.
And besides the personal side, he also pulls back the curtain
(05:45):
on some, let's say, practical political realities in Texas.
Oh yeah, like voter suppression.He detailed a specific bill
making it harder to vote. No online registration, for
example. And weird rules about ID.
Right, A concealed carry licensethat counts as ID to vote.
But a student ID from a State University?
Nope, doesn't count. That seems targeted.
(06:06):
And you have to re register every single time you move
counties. He pointed out how all these
rules tend to disproportionatelyhit young people and minorities.
Even though the stated reason isusually preventing fraud.
Yeah, preventing voter impersonation fraud, which
Talarico says has vanishingly few incidences.
It definitely makes you questionthe motives.
And then there's the issue of who can even afford to be a
(06:26):
politician. That's another huge point.
He made his own salary as a state representative, $7200 a
year. A year.
A year works out to maybe $400.00 a month after taxes.
I mean, how can a regular persondo that job?
It creates huge barriers, right?Massive systematic barriers, he
(06:47):
argues. It means only trust fund babies
and lawyers and surgeons can realistically run for these
offices. Not teachers, firefighters,
construction workers. And that lack of lived
experience in the Legislature matters.
Hugely. He gave this example of
discussing an eviction bill. A wealthy colleague genuinely
had no conception of how a regular working person might
(07:07):
miss a rent payment just becauseof, say, a car repair.
So these blind spots can lead toreally harmful policies.
Exactly because the people making the laws don't understand
the reality for the people living under them.
This connects to a broader discussion they had about work
itself and its meaning. Yeah, Talarico drew this really
interesting distinction between a career and just a job.
(07:29):
What was the difference for him?He argued humans have this
innite desire to work, you know,to produce, to contribute.
That's different from just having a soul crushing,
meaningless job that doesn't give you any sense of
accomplishment. And that becomes even more
relevant with AI coming. Definitely, he sees AI
potentially eliminating tons of jobs, which turns the whole
(07:50):
question of work into something almost spiritual.
What gives human life meaning iftraditional work disappears?
Did he talk about solutions likeUbi?
He did. He explored universal basic
income as one possibility. Providing for basic needs could
free people up to find purpose elsewhere.
But there's a potential downside, too.
Yeah, he worried about the problem of distraction.
(08:12):
If people have their needs met but no purpose, do they just
fall into, you know, endless social media scrolling, video
games, addiction, It's a real concern.
And Speaking of financial burdens, he really went after
student loan debt. Oh, absolutely.
He called the situation sick, describing the loans as
predatory and often unescapable.Crippling people for decades.
(08:32):
For decades, sometimes even garnishing Social Security
checks. All for degrees that might not
even end up being that helpful career wise.
So he supports debt forgiveness.He does.
He connected it to creating lesslosers in society, fostering
more community spirit by liftingthat burden.
And he also questioned the wholeeveryone must go to college
(08:52):
idea, didn't he? Yes, that fallacy.
He argued that pushing college so hard devalues vital trades.
We need plumbers, electricians, carpenters.
These can be fantastic financially successful careers.
So, shifting gears a bit, he offered a different way to look
at the political landscape itself, beyond just left versus
right. Yeah, this was a really core
(09:13):
part of his analysis. He framed politics less as left
versus right and more as top versus bottom, meaning meaning
that regular people are often deliberately pitted against each
other on cultural issues. As a distraction.
As a distraction exactly to keepattention away from where the
real economic and political power lies.
The people at the top. He need names in Texas, didn't
(09:34):
he? The ones he sees as pulling the
strings. He did.
He pointed to two billionaires from West, TX, Tim Dunn and
Ferris Wilkes, oil and gas guys,but also Christian nationalist
pastors. And their influence is
significant. According to Talarico, they
increasingly run this whole government here in Texas, he
(09:54):
said. They fund almost all Republican
state senators and a majority ofthe House Republicans.
So they're driving policies likethe 10 Commandments bill.
That and things like the school chaplains bill, school vouchers,
the abortion bans, he sees theirfunding behind all of it.
And what does he believe their ultimate goal is?
He stayed it plainly A theocracy, which he called the
(10:15):
most dangerous form of government.
Why so dangerous in his view? Because, as he put it, the only
thing worse than a tyrant is a tyrant who thinks they're on a
mission from God gives them absolute certainty, no room for
compromise or doubt. And part of that strategy
involves public schools. A huge part.
He described their strategy as trying to drive a wedge between
Texans and their public schools,which are generally pretty well
(10:36):
liked. How do they drive that wedge?
By funding controversy, stirringup fights over book stuff,
cultural stuff, creating craziness at school boards.
The goal, he argues, is to systematically defund and close
neighborhood schools and push kids towards religious private
schools, often funded by vouchers.
Wow, that's a pretty stark picture of hidden influence.
(10:59):
But amidst all this, did he offer any sense of hope?
Waze through the division. He really did.
He emphasized the power of connection and actually
listening. And he gave concrete examples of
bipartisan work. Like what?
Well, one was him, a Democrat, changing his mind on a bell.
It was about letting homeschooled kids play public
school sports. OK, why did he change his mind?
(11:19):
A conservative Republican colleague, James Frank, appealed
to a principal, Taller Rico RA already held.
Don't punish kids for the decisions their parents make.
It resonated. So finding common ground on
principle. Exactly.
And it went the other way, too. They work together to pass a
bill allowing Texas to import cheaper prescription drugs from
Canada. Even against pharma lobby
opposition. Yes, because Talarico saw it as
(11:42):
helping people and Frank saw it aligning with his free market
principles. An unexpected win.
Win that. Really shows what's possible.
It does, and Talarico connects this back to his faith, the love
your enemy imperative. He called it a revolutionary
teaching from Jesus. Applying it even to political
opponents. Even figures like Donald Trump,
(12:03):
who he said is still a child of God, he quoted the activist
Dorothy Day. You really only love God as much
as you love the person you love the least.
It's a high bar. Does he practice that himself?
He shared a story about it. Someone was attacking him really
harshly online. Instead of fighting back, he
invited the person for coffee. And they actually met.
They did, and they ended up having a productive
(12:25):
conversation, even finding common ground on gun safety.
His point was about extending anopen hand instead of a closed
fist. Which is the opposite of what
often happens online. Totally.
He talked about the problem withprocessed information,
especially social media and a lot of mainstream media too.
How so? He argued They profit from
conflict, They offer these emptycalories of connection, but it's
(12:47):
not real understanding and he thinks it fuels cancel culture.
What was his take on cancel culture?
He called it toxic and fundamentally diametrically
opposed to core Christian valueslike unconditional love and
seeing the infinite worth in every person.
It definitely makes you think about how these platforms shape
our interactions. For sure.
(13:08):
Do they bring us together or just create more division?
So wrapping up, despite all the challenges, he laid out the
money in politics. The division was his final
message 1 of despair. Not at all.
He acknowledged that, yeah, there are plenty of good reasons
for disillusionment right now, but he strongly believes it
doesn't have to be this way. And the power for change doesn't
(13:28):
lie with politicians like him. That's what he stressed, he
said. The change is going to come from
your listeners, not from me. Empowering regular people.
And he thinks people do have power, even against wealthy
donors. Absolutely.
He pointed out that even the billionaire mega donors are
actually very afraid of the power that the people have when
they organize and unite. Like the coalition that almost
(13:50):
beat the voucher bill in Texas. Exactly.
He used that as proof his final thought was really one of
optimism. He believes that earnestness and
hope and optimism are going to make a comeback.
Well, that was an incredible deep dives.
Really covered a lot of ground. Faith, politics, personal
conviction. Yeah, seeing how one specific
bill like the 10 Commandments bill can open up these huge
(14:13):
questions about religious freedom, political motives, and
the hidden forces shaping society.
James Talarico's journey is quite, quite a reminder, isn't
it, that meaningful change can come from unexpected places.
And that it takes more than justbeing right.
It takes that willingness to listen, to actually connect, and
to bridge divides even with people you deeply disagree with.
(14:34):
It really. Leaves you with something to
think about. If that kind of personal
connection and real dialogue canbreakthrough deep political
divisions like with that prescription drug bill, well,
what else could be possible? What if we, just as individuals
or in our communities, decided to invest more energy and
understanding each other rather than just, you know, scoring
(14:54):
points or being antagonistic? How might that start to change
the very systems that feel so locked in place, so unchangeable
right now? That's the question, isn't it?
Something to definitely Mull over.
Welcome to the Joe Rogan Recap, where we take a deep dive into
compelling conversations and is still the most critical
insights. And today we're really unpacking
A fascinating one from the Joe Rogan Experience.
Yeah, this featured James Tellarico.
He's a Texas State representative, but also a
Christian seminarian. Quite the combination.
Absolutely. And he brought some, well,
(00:22):
really unexpected perspectives, challenging conventional wisdom
on things like religious freedomin schools, even the nature of
political power itself. Our mission here is to pull out
those essential Nuggets from this conversation help you
understand the nuances of these pretty highly debated topics.
And hopefully give you some aha moments, you know, clarify
complex stuff without just overwhelming you with
(00:43):
information. Exactly.
So let's dive in. Talarico yeah, Coming from this
unique place, lawmaker and minister in training, he offers
a perspective that really does challenge the usual way of
thinking, especially where faithand public policy meet.
OK, so let's get right into it. The big thing was this bill in
Texas, the one requiring the 10 commandments in public schools.
(01:04):
Right, a real hot button issue. And this is where Talarico's
view immediately grabs you, because he, a Christian training
for ministry, actually stands against it.
He himself said it's a quote. Weird position to be in for
someone with his background. You'd sort of expect the
opposite, wouldn't you? You really would.
And the bill? It wasn't vague.
(01:25):
It mandated displaying the 10 commandments in all public
school classrooms. And it got specific too right?
Like poster size. Yeah, a regular sheet of paper.
It had to be in a conspicuous place and it allowed for
donations to supply these posters.
Which sounds OK on the surface maybe.
Well, Atala Rico pointed out this huge network of Christian
nationalist organizations just ready to, quote, flood every
(01:48):
school with them. So that donation part, it starts
to look a bit less innocent, youknow?
Like an organized push. And this bill had serious
backing. Oh yeah, he said support was
pretty much universal among Republicans in the Texas
Legislature. It failed back in 2023 but then
passed both chambers in 2025. And the argument for it?
What was the justification supporters gave?
(02:10):
The charitable view, Talrico explained, is that it's a
response to, well seeing young people may be losing faith,
rising mental health struggle. A sense that things are adrift.
Kind of, yeah. Growing up in an incoherent
universe without a clear moral structure.
So the idea was this provides that foundation.
OK. So then why would Talarico,
(02:32):
coming from a faith background, oppose that?
What was his core argument? It was layered, he basically
said. It's unconstitutional, UN
American, and, maybe most surprisingly, unchristian.
Unchristian. How do you explain that part?
He really focused on Jesus teachings, particularly about
the outsider, the outcast. His worry was for the kids who
(02:52):
aren't Christian. Like who?
The Muslim kid and the Jewish kid, the Hindu kid, the atheist
kid. He felt they'd feel unwelcome,
alienated by the state basicallymandating this display from
another religion. He.
Had a strong quote about that, didn't.
He he did. He said if Jesus saw that, he
would weep for those students. Really powerful imagery.
Wow. And from a theological
standpoint, beyond the empathy. His view was that forcing people
(03:15):
to display a poster suggests, well, a dead religion, one that
isn't moving hearts anymore. So coercion undermines faith.
Exactly. True faith, he argued, should
lead by example, not by government mandate.
And he brought up history, too. Oh yeah.
What was the historical angle? That actually the staunchest
defenders for the separation of church and state throughout
(03:37):
American history were ProtestantChristians.
Really. Why?
Because they understood the dangers.
They didn't want the government taking over religious roles.
They valued genuine religious freedom.
That's a fascinating point. And he also talked about kids
themselves, right, Having been ateacher.
Yes, the BS detector as he put it.
Kids are smart, you know. He thinks forcing these displays
(03:58):
could totally backfire. It could create a new generation
of atheists, basically kids who see religion as being about
power than it is about love. Not exactly the intended
outcome. No, definitely not.
So moving beyond just this one bill, his own story seems pretty
central to his politics. Absolutely.
His personal journey really informs all of this.
(04:19):
He started as a middle school teacher, underfunded school in
San Antonio teaching that this 45 kids in one small classroom.
Wow, that's sounds incredibly difficult.
He called it a radicalizing experience, and there was one
student's story that really hit him hard, Justin tells.
Us about Justin. Justin was having a tough time
(04:39):
behaviorally, but the school hadtherapy services and it made a
huge difference. He turned things around.
That's great. So, a success story.
It was until the legislature made budget cuts and that
therapy program got eliminated. Justin just regressed
dramatically, and seeing that direct impact, that human cost
of a political decision, that's what made Talarico decide to run
(05:00):
for office. It wasn't abstract ideology.
It was Justin. That's powerful, and that
connects to his decision to go to seminary later.
It does. He talked about hitting a crisis
of confidence during a second term.
He almost quit politics entirely.
Really. He felt he needed to reconnect
spiritually, to love God, as he put it, so he could better love
neighbor through his work. Things like fighting for
(05:23):
affordable prescription drugs, better childcare, justice
reform. So needing that inner foundation
for the public works. Exactly, he stressed, needing
that inner life to sustain the outer work.
Otherwise, he said, you can burnout so easily.
It's a really honest admission about the toll public service
can take. It really is.
And besides the personal side, he also pulls back the curtain
(05:45):
on some, let's say, practical political realities in Texas.
Oh yeah, like voter suppression.He detailed a specific bill
making it harder to vote. No online registration, for
example. And weird rules about ID.
Right, A concealed carry licensethat counts as ID to vote.
But a student ID from a State University?
Nope, doesn't count. That seems targeted.
(06:06):
And you have to re register every single time you move
counties. He pointed out how all these
rules tend to disproportionatelyhit young people and minorities.
Even though the stated reason isusually preventing fraud.
Yeah, preventing voter impersonation fraud, which
Talarico says has vanishingly few incidences.
It definitely makes you questionthe motives.
And then there's the issue of who can even afford to be a
(06:26):
politician. That's another huge point.
He made his own salary as a state representative, $7200 a
year. A year.
A year works out to maybe $400.00 a month after taxes.
I mean, how can a regular persondo that job?
It creates huge barriers, right?Massive systematic barriers, he
(06:47):
argues. It means only trust fund babies
and lawyers and surgeons can realistically run for these
offices. Not teachers, firefighters,
construction workers. And that lack of lived
experience in the Legislature matters.
Hugely. He gave this example of
discussing an eviction bill. A wealthy colleague genuinely
had no conception of how a regular working person might
(07:07):
miss a rent payment just becauseof, say, a car repair.
So these blind spots can lead toreally harmful policies.
Exactly because the people making the laws don't understand
the reality for the people living under them.
This connects to a broader discussion they had about work
itself and its meaning. Yeah, Talarico drew this really
interesting distinction between a career and just a job.
(07:29):
What was the difference for him?He argued humans have this
innite desire to work, you know,to produce, to contribute.
That's different from just having a soul crushing,
meaningless job that doesn't give you any sense of
accomplishment. And that becomes even more
relevant with AI coming. Definitely, he sees AI
potentially eliminating tons of jobs, which turns the whole
(07:50):
question of work into something almost spiritual.
What gives human life meaning iftraditional work disappears?
Did he talk about solutions likeUbi?
He did. He explored universal basic
income as one possibility. Providing for basic needs could
free people up to find purpose elsewhere.
But there's a potential downside, too.
Yeah, he worried about the problem of distraction.
(08:12):
If people have their needs met but no purpose, do they just
fall into, you know, endless social media scrolling, video
games, addiction, It's a real concern.
And Speaking of financial burdens, he really went after
student loan debt. Oh, absolutely.
He called the situation sick, describing the loans as
predatory and often unescapable.Crippling people for decades.
(08:32):
For decades, sometimes even garnishing Social Security
checks. All for degrees that might not
even end up being that helpful career wise.
So he supports debt forgiveness.He does.
He connected it to creating lesslosers in society, fostering
more community spirit by liftingthat burden.
And he also questioned the wholeeveryone must go to college
(08:52):
idea, didn't he? Yes, that fallacy.
He argued that pushing college so hard devalues vital trades.
We need plumbers, electricians, carpenters.
These can be fantastic financially successful careers.
So, shifting gears a bit, he offered a different way to look
at the political landscape itself, beyond just left versus
right. Yeah, this was a really core
(09:13):
part of his analysis. He framed politics less as left
versus right and more as top versus bottom, meaning meaning
that regular people are often deliberately pitted against each
other on cultural issues. As a distraction.
As a distraction exactly to keepattention away from where the
real economic and political power lies.
The people at the top. He need names in Texas, didn't
(09:34):
he? The ones he sees as pulling the
strings. He did.
He pointed to two billionaires from West, TX, Tim Dunn and
Ferris Wilkes, oil and gas guys,but also Christian nationalist
pastors. And their influence is
significant. According to Talarico, they
increasingly run this whole government here in Texas, he
(09:54):
said. They fund almost all Republican
state senators and a majority ofthe House Republicans.
So they're driving policies likethe 10 Commandments bill.
That and things like the school chaplains bill, school vouchers,
the abortion bans, he sees theirfunding behind all of it.
And what does he believe their ultimate goal is?
He stayed it plainly A theocracy, which he called the
(10:15):
most dangerous form of government.
Why so dangerous in his view? Because, as he put it, the only
thing worse than a tyrant is a tyrant who thinks they're on a
mission from God gives them absolute certainty, no room for
compromise or doubt. And part of that strategy
involves public schools. A huge part.
He described their strategy as trying to drive a wedge between
Texans and their public schools,which are generally pretty well
(10:36):
liked. How do they drive that wedge?
By funding controversy, stirringup fights over book stuff,
cultural stuff, creating craziness at school boards.
The goal, he argues, is to systematically defund and close
neighborhood schools and push kids towards religious private
schools, often funded by vouchers.
Wow, that's a pretty stark picture of hidden influence.
(10:59):
But amidst all this, did he offer any sense of hope?
Waze through the division. He really did.
He emphasized the power of connection and actually
listening. And he gave concrete examples of
bipartisan work. Like what?
Well, one was him, a Democrat, changing his mind on a bell.
It was about letting homeschooled kids play public
school sports. OK, why did he change his mind?
(11:19):
A conservative Republican colleague, James Frank, appealed
to a principal, Taller Rico RA already held.
Don't punish kids for the decisions their parents make.
It resonated. So finding common ground on
principle. Exactly.
And it went the other way, too. They work together to pass a
bill allowing Texas to import cheaper prescription drugs from
Canada. Even against pharma lobby
opposition. Yes, because Talarico saw it as
(11:42):
helping people and Frank saw it aligning with his free market
principles. An unexpected win.
Win that. Really shows what's possible.
It does, and Talarico connects this back to his faith, the love
your enemy imperative. He called it a revolutionary
teaching from Jesus. Applying it even to political
opponents. Even figures like Donald Trump,
(12:03):
who he said is still a child of God, he quoted the activist
Dorothy Day. You really only love God as much
as you love the person you love the least.
It's a high bar. Does he practice that himself?
He shared a story about it. Someone was attacking him really
harshly online. Instead of fighting back, he
invited the person for coffee. And they actually met.
They did, and they ended up having a productive
(12:25):
conversation, even finding common ground on gun safety.
His point was about extending anopen hand instead of a closed
fist. Which is the opposite of what
often happens online. Totally.
He talked about the problem withprocessed information,
especially social media and a lot of mainstream media too.
How so? He argued They profit from
conflict, They offer these emptycalories of connection, but it's
(12:47):
not real understanding and he thinks it fuels cancel culture.
What was his take on cancel culture?
He called it toxic and fundamentally diametrically
opposed to core Christian valueslike unconditional love and
seeing the infinite worth in every person.
It definitely makes you think about how these platforms shape
our interactions. For sure.
(13:08):
Do they bring us together or just create more division?
So wrapping up, despite all the challenges, he laid out the
money in politics. The division was his final
message 1 of despair. Not at all.
He acknowledged that, yeah, there are plenty of good reasons
for disillusionment right now, but he strongly believes it
doesn't have to be this way. And the power for change doesn't
(13:28):
lie with politicians like him. That's what he stressed, he
said. The change is going to come from
your listeners, not from me. Empowering regular people.
And he thinks people do have power, even against wealthy
donors. Absolutely.
He pointed out that even the billionaire mega donors are
actually very afraid of the power that the people have when
they organize and unite. Like the coalition that almost
(13:50):
beat the voucher bill in Texas. Exactly.
He used that as proof his final thought was really one of
optimism. He believes that earnestness and
hope and optimism are going to make a comeback.
Well, that was an incredible deep dives.
Really covered a lot of ground. Faith, politics, personal
conviction. Yeah, seeing how one specific
bill like the 10 Commandments bill can open up these huge
(14:13):
questions about religious freedom, political motives, and
the hidden forces shaping society.
James Talarico's journey is quite, quite a reminder, isn't
it, that meaningful change can come from unexpected places.
And that it takes more than justbeing right.
It takes that willingness to listen, to actually connect, and
to bridge divides even with people you deeply disagree with.
(14:34):
It really. Leaves you with something to
think about. If that kind of personal
connection and real dialogue canbreakthrough deep political
divisions like with that prescription drug bill, well,
what else could be possible? What if we, just as individuals
or in our communities, decided to invest more energy and
understanding each other rather than just, you know, scoring
(14:54):
points or being antagonistic? How might that start to change
the very systems that feel so locked in place, so unchangeable
right now? That's the question, isn't it?
Something to definitely Mull over.
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.