Delusional Propagandists

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
You are entering the freedom hunt. Trump's deep state enemies
are running for cover as he calls them out over
the weekend and says, it's time for answers. Why were
they spying on the Trump campaign? How were they spying
on the Trump campaign? Department of Justice seems to think
that it is independent of the rest of government. That

(00:33):
is false. Will discuss what it all means. Plus, Starbucks
now has a new bathroom policy that I don't think
it's gonna work out very well for the huge company.
And we're going to talk about what is going on
with China and trade and a whole bunch of other issues.
Much more coming up. This is the Buck Sexton Show,

(00:55):
where the mission or mission is to decode what really
matters with action intelligence. Make no mistakes, you're a great
American Again the Buck Sexton Show begins. No, indeed, welcome

(01:16):
to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody live from the swamp Washington,
d c our Nation's capital. Actually starting to get acclimated
down here. I mean it's still swampy, don't get me wrong,
but at least it's not something of a monsoon, which
is what it was for for days and days last week.
I I'm reaching a point now where I'm wondering some

(01:39):
of the next moves that the deep state, anti Trump
left has in store for us. I can see them
coming a mile away, and I've been trying to prepare
you for a while with don't think that just because
we get to the truth that we will get justice.
They will completely disregard any sense of fairness, fair play,

(02:00):
a decency, honor, integrity when they're finally caught. And we're
seeing a little bit of I think a panic that
is setting in among some of the media who have
been running with this fairy tale for going on two
years now, and a lot of former Obama administration senior

(02:22):
government officials who have some explaining to do, at a minimum, Uh,
the issue of the possibility of a spot. I mean,
it's been reported all over the place. People are naming
the informant. We'll just refer to him as the informant
guy who was meeting with Page and Papadopoulos, and that

(02:45):
that he was trying to ingratiate himself with some of
these Trump campaign officials, that he was pushing some of
these issues. This is entrapment. This is an intelligence operation.
That's what was being run to hear against people tied
to a presidential campaign. There's no way around this anymore.

(03:09):
And that's why you've seen a remarkable shift, unbelievable really,
from if you think. I mean, this was a year
ago when people like you and me were saying that
it looked like somebody was spying on Trump and there's
oh no, it's crazy. It was a crazy thing to say.

(03:30):
It was an irresponsible thing to say a year ago.
Now here we are and all of a sudden, the
anti Trump left is like, yeah, sure they were spying.
Of course there were spying. No big deal. Are we
supposed to pretend that we don't know that? A year
ago we were crazy to think that was happening, and

(03:51):
now we're told we'd be crazy not to think that
was happening. You see what they're doing here. You see
how the propaganda is just constantly evade responsibility for their
delusions there, myth making their dishonesty. Because that's what's happening, right.

(04:14):
They just keep changing the story as it as it
moves along, as it fits their political needs, not as
it pertains to the reality of what has come before it.
What do they have to say today? That's what they'll
say whatever works, whatever gets them through another twenty four
hour news cycle, but uh, this is very serious stuff. Also,

(04:34):
note that the leaks that came out about this informant
reported in a whole bunch of different places. Uh, New
York Times Daily Caller actually been doing and and hat
tip to them, fantastic work on this one. And they're
just down the street here for me in d C.
Daily Caller has been doing some great stuff on this

(04:55):
getting answers. But we know that the has been going
on now for a few days. We know that this
information gets out there, and now you have the sanctimonious
anti Trump left after using these police state tactics, which
is what this is. I mean, this is the there's

(05:16):
a reason, folks, and I try to remind all of
us at this from Tim and Tom, I try to
bring it into our conversation. The reason that a lot
of countries, the most feared apparatus in the country is
not in fact the military all that's the single greatest
concentration of force, But the most feared apparatus is the
intelligence agency or agencies, and sometimes in fact the country

(05:44):
ends up being run by the person who had previously
occupied the job. Of top top spy, Vladimir Prutins one example,
but Saddam Hussein. You go through history, plenty of cases
of either the person running the country was formerly running
the intelligence agencies, or really the most powerful person in

(06:08):
reality in the country was in fact the one running
the intelligence agency, not the president of the prime minister
of whomever. Because the ability to spy, to gather information,
especially when you're talking about by extra legal nice way
of saying illegal means, gives tremendous power. As we know,
power corrupts, and that's what you see happening here. They

(06:35):
are now acting like this was all fine, this was necessary,
There were plenty of reasons to do this spying on
the Trump admistry. After telling us we were crazy before,
now there's plenty of reasons to have this spying on
the Trump administration. And oh, by the way, they also
think that they that they can play this game of

(06:57):
league information about the informant to get ahead of the
story and then act like, how dare anyone talk about
this informant? I mean, I'm seeing people with a straight
face who are prominent government officials. Here's here's your Senator
Mark Warner is a perfect example play clip seven. When
individuals want to try to reveal classified information about the

(07:21):
identity of an FBI or c I a source that
is against the law. And I find it outrageous that
the president's allies are in effect playing uh fast and
loose with confidential information and don't take my work. Take
the president's own FBI director Mr. Ray, who said, if

(07:41):
you go out and start exposing classified information about informants,
that you will make America less safe. I I am,
I find this totally outrageous. On some of the actions
of these albums. Who do we think expose this reported source? Uh,
we know who did near times anti Trump newspapers relying

(08:03):
on government as they say, believe them, take it or
leave it, government officials. So I need someone who explain
to me who's the one who's then endangering the source.
By the way, based on who we think the source
is not in danger at all. It's a complete and
utter lie. This is so flimsy. But you'll notice there's
a lot of hiding behind there's there's there's a lot

(08:25):
of um hiding behind the bureaucracy going on here. A
lot of all the sort of sources and method sources
and methods. Oh, now we're going to play that game
right now, We're going to play the All classified information
is sacrosancing can never, can never be justified to be released,
even when it's a question about should the president even

(08:49):
be under investigation? Right now? Don't we think that these
are competing competing goods? Right? Uh? Should we know the
truth about this one source so that we know if
this whole investigation of Trump is a sham put on
by senior Obama administration officials. That's what this is, folks.

(09:10):
Obama's guys and a few gals that I can think
of may have been the ones it almost it seems
certain they were the ones that created this whole collusion
Russian narrative out of out of almost nothing. I mean,
they were stretching this stretching credulity to its limits in

(09:31):
order to get this thing going. But now it's the
source to source? Please, okay a lot. There are a
lot of sources in a lot of places. There are
no danger whatsoever. And this guy, I mean, especially now
that where we're finding out of this guy is based
on media reports? Are we all? So? Am I not
allowed to talk about the sources? This is this? I

(09:52):
want to know. Senator Mark Warner. I don't want to
ask him. So people like me and allowed to say
that it's been published everywhere. So is that a threat?
You know, there's a real underhanded litigiousness, you know, a
desire to try to ensnare people in the law. It's
kind of like Mueller trying to get people lying on

(10:13):
about non crimes. Officiousness is at the heart of this mentality, right,
Oh no, you can't sources of methods, sources methods. The
sources has been blown all of the media. You all
know who the sources, the sources being written about newspapers
all over the country. You do a Google search, you
see his photos and then everything. So we're just gonna

(10:35):
sit around and be like, can't talk about you can't
talk about the source. Why do you think they really
care about this? Oh, that's right, because of how terrible
it looks that from what we know, this was an
individual who was run at the Trump campaign. This would
be like, think about how easy this is. I'm somebody

(10:55):
who wants to get at Hillary Clinton. Let's just say politically,
I want to. I want to I want to mess
up her campaign. So what do I do? I hire
some people to go and try and talk to some
of Hillary's campaign aids about, uh, you know, hey guys,
you know, do you know, like, do you do you

(11:16):
have any friends you know where This is not a
perfect example, but I'm just trying to put this in
some kind of context. Do you know anybody who might
be able to, you know, help me get some weed?
You know? Think about that, right, Think about easy that
would be. And and by the way, the Hillary's campaign
aids could well say well, you know, no, no, you know,
I don't smoke or I don't do that or you
know whatever. But then I could turn around and I

(11:37):
could say, hey, guys, um, you know, I could talk
to d A and say, you know, there's some senior
Hillary people who are talking about about doing about some
drug deal stuff going on. I think you guys should
really look into this. All of a sudden, there's a
drug investigation Hillary Clinton's campaign aids. Right, That's basically what
we're talking about here. Against the Trump campaign. You get

(11:58):
some guy to be like, hey, do you know anything
about Russia and emails? And you want to talk to
me about that a little bit? And these guys were like, yeah,
I don't really you know, nah, Papadopolis and and Paige
not exactly not to be me, but not the sharpest
tools in the ship. And they're like, non, I got nothing.
Oh there's somebody here talking about Hillary Clinton emails. Guys,

(12:18):
we need to we need to investigate this. You see,
they really fabricated this narrata. That's what we're not just
finding out that they exceeded that that the deep state,
anti Trump left, exceeded their authority, that they abused their power.
All of that is all we know that's true. Now
what we're facing is the possibility, the likelihood I would

(12:39):
say that they basically fabricated this that they did. They
did the equivalent of running a confidential informant up to
somebody to start a conversation and then use that conversation
as the basis for an investigation. Well, I can tell
you because I've been involved in counter terrorism cases, you
can do this with anyone. It's not hard, trust me.

(13:01):
You know, you run somebody a radical of let's just
say any ideology to not make this too political right now,
but you run somebody up to somebody that you know
has pretty unorthodox views on certain things, you say, hey,
you get them engaged in conversation, you can get them
to say things. If you're trained, you know what you're doing,
that would at least create a pretext for further investigation

(13:23):
if you really really want to. But isn't this what
they and I'm not trying to exact, isn't this what
they did with the Stazi? I mean, it isn't that
what you would expect? And in an actual police state,
running informants into people's homes or running you a person
to person human intelligence operations also something I'm very familiar with.

(13:46):
And then use that interaction as the basis for remember
not a criminal investigation, a counterintelligence investigation, which needs an
even looser pretext. It's all coming together now, isn't it.
And this is why, by the way, there there's there's
a desperational left to make this go away, to hide

(14:07):
the information. But when I come back, I want to
talk about my other so that the whole informant thing.
People like Mark Warner, all those guy's in Jeopardy, they're liars.
It's a joke. It's preposterous. The name is already out there.
We all know the guy's name. And they need they
need to stop playing these games. Right left. The Democrats
need to stop, but they won't. But even in addition

(14:28):
to that, you have the notion of the independent d
o J. I've the constitutional illiteracy on display from senior
Democrats and major media figures right now. He's a complete
and utter debacle. I will give you details in just

(14:51):
a moment. But long term Republican call me was a
long term Republican. They're all long term Republicans who hated Trump.
So that doesn't help a Trump. You won't have any

(15:13):
doubt about that at the end of this because may
he'll find no but maybe maybe he and Comey are
so close. Their history is so close together that when
you read Comey's book and you see what he has said,
you really wonder about the objectivity of the investigation. Look,
there was never a need for a special counsel. Special

(15:33):
counsel have targets. They're looking to try to find crimes
against people that doesn't serve the interests of America. Get
in there there, love it, there's getting frisky in there.
It was him versus Dan Abrams. I think he's like
an NBC News analyst. But yeah, I hate that talking
about By the way, Oh, these are lifelong Republican and

(15:56):
comy was actually call me is not a lifelong Republican,
or at least not a GOT anymore. He changed his
party affiliation to independent years ago. But it's as though
they the people who say that, expect us not to
ever think about. Oh, there are Republicans who hate Trump
more than any Democrats that I know. There are Republicans

(16:17):
who are people whose names you would all know, Folks
who I know for a fact, are angrier Trump than
a lot of the Democrats I know, because they feel
like Trump has stolen their party, stolen their prerogative, stolen
their power, and they take it very personally the whole
There there are people and never Trump who are crazier

(16:38):
than almost not all, but almost any Democrats I know
in terms of their Trump arrangement syndrome. So how does
this talking point persist? I just want to know how
does this continue on all the Republicans? So what does
that mean? There are Republicans who hate Trump more than
any Democrat. But on the independence of the d o J.

(17:01):
This is my favorite one. You get all these people saying, oh,
Congress can ask the d o J for information about
the investigation. Wrong Trump can't even communicate with the Department
of Justice about any investigation. You can't fire in either wrong.
This is just basic constitutional Well, this is illiteracy when

(17:24):
it comes to the Constitution. This is a lack I
can't even say of understanding. It's not so much that
they misinterpret the Constitution when it comes to DJ Right now,
it seems to be a reminder that there are people
who work in media and in the federal government who
don't really know or respect much the notion of the

(17:44):
Constitution and the whole idea of oversight. Think about what
it would mean if the d o J was beyond
so they can just prosecute anybody for any reason. Right
And there's what is the check on the Department of
Justice if not the Congress? You know what the answer is,
There isn't one. And we're tiring a counter intelligence investigation.

(18:07):
I didn't even have a criminal predicate for this stuff.
They're just saying, oh, you know, we think national security,
YadA YadA, let's do whatever we want, we'll keep it secret.
This is not okay. This is police state stuff, folks.
I mean, I'm familiar with the tools and techniques and
how these things can go. You do not want federal
prosecutors operating at the highest levels of government who don't

(18:32):
have to answer to anybody. But but that's what Democrats
are saying. They want to no, no, all an independent
do o J. You mean, like how the president can
fire all the U S. Attorneys at the start of
his administration independent like that, he's holding the line for America.

(18:59):
Buck Sex is back. If they ran a spy ring
or an informant ring and they were paying people within
the Trump campaign, if any of that is true, that
is an absolute red line. There is not an honest
person in this country who can believe that taxpayer dollars

(19:21):
going to to fund this ring and and operate like this,
like what said in the New York Times. If any
of that is true, this is a red line in
this country. You can't do this to political campaigns. This
was done in in the spring, I mean before the
counterintelligence investigation was even open. If that's true, we need
to know about it. If they paid someone, it's an
absolute red line. And this is over with. This is

(19:45):
over with, He says. Um, we'll have to see if
Devin Nounez is right on this one, and to give
his perspective on this and a lot of other stuff
going on right now with Russia collusion and the Muller
probe and all the rest of it. Andy McCarthy is
with us now. He's a National Review columnists also served
as as an assistant United States Attorney for the Southern

(20:07):
District of New York. Check out his latest column on
National View dot Com and politicized Justice, Desperate times call
for disparate measures. And you're great to have you back,
Great to be with you. Um let's start. I mean,
I really enjoyed your column right it over the weekend
where you just lay out the the enormous differences between

(20:27):
how the Hillary email investigation was handled by the same
people in in in many cases in d O J
versus what's going on with Trump at each at every
stage of the game. But before we get into that
side by side comparison, which I think everybody should be
familiar with and they should read your work on it,
what do you make of this whole, this whole informant situation.
And yet Noon is saying, well, if this happened, it's

(20:47):
a red line. I'm looking around, I'm seeing a lot
of Democrats that are saying well, you know, we maybe
kind of needed an informant because Trump is so dirty
or something. Well that's the problem, bucket's the or something.
You know. Um, I'm not in the same place as
Chairman Nunez of the Intelligence Committee, although I think he's

(21:09):
uh a good right, because I can imagine certain scenarios
as I'm sure you can, where if we had really
strong evidence to believe that a political campaign was in
cahoots with adversarial foreign power, that that would cry out
to be investigated, and I would be you know, it

(21:32):
would be something that you would hope responsible people would
would think long and hard and be sure about it
before they took the what would be a grievous step
of of using our counter intelligence powers, which are meant
not to spy on Americans but to protect the country

(21:53):
from hostile foreign powers, you know, before you would take
the step and use those powers in this kind of
a situation. One would hope that, you know, people would
think long and hard about it. But I could imagine
if there was such evidence uh doing that. I just
don't see that kind of evidence here, right, and and
so what when we look at this though, Andy, I
have to I have to know that there are some

(22:13):
people I think I saw an analysis in the Washington
Post actually saying that if there was, and there's also
a lot of games being played here with well was
there an informant or wasn't there? Right, You've got major
newspapers that are running with what they say or U
S officials, d J leaks about this this individual that
allegedly was reporting on Trump, and there's a lot of

(22:34):
specific details about his name that's already out there all
over the place. Also with the specific people about whom
he met with your Carter page and Papadopolis and with
all that, now I'm seeing people say, well it was
it was to protect Trump, And I'm seeing some desperate
lines out there from the media on this, which which
to me raises even more suspicions because there's just no

(22:55):
way this was to protect Trump. Yeah. Plus, you know,
when when you're gonna do things like we've seen done
in this case, and we know that there were, for example,
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act wire taps that were done. Uh,
it's a part of federal law whether you do with
this on the intelligence side or the or the criminal side,

(23:18):
that before you take a step like that, you have
to consider and in the case of wire taps, show
to a chord that you've that there are alternative investigative
techniques that you've thought about using or tried to use,
and they won't work or don't work, and that's why
you need to do something. You know, this intrusive and

(23:40):
that should back everybody up because there's usually always a
way to to use a more benign procedure, particularly if
you're trying to protect the person, not investigate them. I mean,
and I'm familiar with mafia cases where the FBI has
approached people whose names came up and wire taps to say, uh,

(24:02):
you know, we don't want to blow our investigation here,
but you better be careful, um, because you know you're
you're in cahoots with not nice people and they're yeah,
they're talking about they're talking about your name and sleeping
with the fishes. I get it. Yeah, right. So I
don't know why you rate that kind of a kind
of behavior or that kind of treatment if you're mixed

(24:23):
up with wise guys, But you don't rate that kind
of treatment, you know, if you're running for president of
the United States. So why couldn't they have gone to
the Trump campaign and said, you know, we're a little
concerned here that the Russians are making efforts to infiltrate
your campaign, and we were going to speak to a
couple of people, but we want to alert you that
that there's a problem or you know, you've got a

(24:44):
guy like Carter Paige, who's one of the guys that
this informant evidently spied on. Paige had a prior history
of cooperating with the FBI and the Justice Department in
connection with a Russian investigation where they were trying to, uh,
evidently recruit him to be an informant. So they had
they had standing ties with this guy to the point

(25:06):
where they had used his information in a criminal complaint
against the Russian spy. So why don't you bring Page
in and sit him down at the table and say,
Carter or what's going on here? Um? Instead, it looks
to me like they jumped to the you know, to
the sort of you know, Defcon one where they say, uh,

(25:27):
we need to infiltrate this campaign with spies and we
need to do national security wire taps. And I've been
resisting leading to that conclusion, Buck, because I don't want
to believe that that's what they did. I believe, I
want to believe that if they did those kinds of tactics,
that there must have been, you know, really strong evidence

(25:47):
that Trump or people in Trump's campaign were in some
kind of a nefarious conspiracy with the Kremlin. But I
ain't seeing it. We're speaking to Annie McCarthy. He's at
a National Review. You should read his his it is
work on this issue, especially where he lines up the
pieces in politicized justice, desperate times call for disparate measures.

(26:08):
Read it. I read the more than once. It really do.
Please check it out. But any I want to ask
also about I mean, I got a lot of questions
I want to ask you. I know, we we can't
trespass too much on your time, but oversight, I'm also
seeing a lot of Trump is not Trump is not
allowed to say anything to the d o J. Trump
is not allowed to fire anyone in the d J.
Congress is not allowed to get information from within the

(26:30):
d o J. Who do some of these people running
around it? And you know I'm talking, You've got fine
steins and our fine stign You got others out there
who do they think has oversight over the Department of Justice.
I mean, correct me if I'm wrong. The Department of
Justice was created by an Act of Congress, and it's
an executive practice, executive branch agency. That's exactly right, and

(26:50):
it it answers to the politically accountable political representative. In
the executive branch, it's the president and of course, and
in Congress it's the representatives elected by the American people.
So of course they're supposed to have oversight. And Buck,
I want to make one other point, which is kind
of up the alley, um of of your experience in intelligence. Um,

(27:16):
but is he is getting lost? I think in all
of this talk about how we need the independence of
law enforcement YadA YadA, YadA, um intelligence, especially counter intelligence,
the FBI's um mission to protect the country against foreign threats.
That's not law enforcement activity. That is a mission that

(27:40):
the Justice Department and the FBI have which is completely
to support the president's most important duty to protect the
United States against and and screams for oversight, Andy, because
it's so such a potent weapon in the wrong hands. Yes,
so you know, when the president wants to wants to decide,

(28:02):
you know, should we take this or that measure against
some foreign country? That might be a threat to the
United States or one of our interests. It's a commonplace
through the president to say I want an investigation of
this or I want information about that. This is not
law enforcement, you know, it's it's perfectly well and good
to say in the four corners of a criminal prosecution,

(28:25):
we don't want politics intruding because we want the public
to understand that the rule of law is what governs
us in that realm, and it's not the whims of politics.
But when you're talking about the counter intelligence mission of
the United States, that's holy in service to the president.
So the thought that he can't interfere with it is like, well,

(28:47):
why do we have it? Ben? Yeah? I mean, and
you spend decades at the Southern District of New York
as an assistant U S Attorney. Was is there any
way where if you were working on a case that
was really politic the sensitive and Congress is like, well,
we we want we want to have Andy come down
and talk to us about this, where you could say, Nona, guys, sorry,

(29:07):
the Department of Justice is independent of Congression. Congress. Yeah,
I think Buck. Usually the way these things work out, Um,
Congress is sensitive to the idea that if it asks
intrusive questions about an active investigation or an active prosecution,

(29:30):
like a case that's on trial, it could screw up
the investigation or it can screw up the courtpor sitting,
and it doesn't want to be politically responsible for that.
So generally speaking, Congress is responsible about what it asks for.
And if there's a problem, the Justice Department comes to
them and says, you know, we'd love to be able
to help you here, but here's the you know, here's
the three reasons why it would really hurt our case. Right.

(29:52):
But but but absolutely any but but could they Stone Wall,
I mean, rather, could you have you know, in this
theoretical example, the answer is no. You gotta give Congress
the information they want. That's exactly right. The Justice Department
has an entity within the Justice Department that if you
get if you're a line prosecutor in New York and
you get a question from a congressman, you're supposed to

(30:14):
get in touch with main Justice and they get in
touch with Congress, so that you know, Congress isn't being ignored.
But those things are getting worked out. What about on
the presidentials? And then then we'll let you go any
But on the on the president's side of things, he
put out this tweet he said he wants he wants
the d o J to look into interference, and people
are saying he can't do that. The Department of Justice,
once again is independent. Well, it is part of the

(30:36):
executive branch. So how does that work out when when
push comes to shove, I don't mean when everyone's playing
nice with each other, Well, there is no independent you know,
the the Justice Department, the FBI are not a fourth
branch of the government. There politically accountable there. There they
answer to the president. He's the politically accountable person. And

(30:59):
if they commit misconduct, it's the president who's accountable for it.
So of course they answer to the president. And those
who say that, you know, they have to be totally independent.
There's you know, there's a dark history of law enforcement,
awesome enforcement power being completely divorced from political accountability, and

(31:21):
it usually is the history of tyranny. It's a pretty
dark place. So, you know, I think I understand the
good faith of people who say we have to resist
political interference with law enforcement. And again, I think what
that means is that if there's a prosecution. We don't want,
you know, politics deciding who gets prosecuted, and we don't

(31:43):
want it intruding into a trial or an investigation. But
the thought that these people don't answer to the political
leadership of the executive ranch in our system is just wrong. Yeah. Well,
I'm seeing a lot of that wrongness though right now. People.
H yeah, I think almost you think that they're committing

(32:04):
politics here. Yeah, you get a sense that has nothing
to do with with the laws. Everybody Annie McCarthy on
this stuff has been doing fantastic job. In fact, the
President himself has mentioned Anthony uh and and and he's
writing on this in recent weeks. So check out on
nash review dot com. Andy, thank you so much for
making the time. We appreciate it. Thanks so much fun.
All right, team eight four four to eight to five,

(32:26):
eight four four nine hundred buck. We have much much
more show coming for you, including perhaps discussion of some
foreign policy in the next hour. What the latest is there?
I was right on China. We'll get to that. Stay
with me. Politicizing what is a legitimate activity on the

(32:54):
part and an important one on the part of the FBI.
They use foremant informants and have strict rules and protocols
under this. And but the big, the big thing here
is this is not about spying on on his campaign.
It's about what the Russians are doing. Were they attempting
to infiltrate the campaign? And that was the concern. I mean,

(33:14):
that's the former director of National Intelligence. Is he serious?
They're not spying on the campaign. They're spying on the
Russians who are trying to infiltrate and therefore ally with
the campaign. But that means you're spying on the campaign, right,
I'm not. I'm not just you know, watching the back alley.

(33:39):
I'm watching the back alley to see if the you know,
illegal drug deal goes on. It's like, yeah, of course it.
Oh my gosh, this doesn't even make sense anymore. I also,
I know I asked any about him. I gotta try
to find it. I think it was one of CNN's
analysts and whatever they're paying or it's not enough who

(34:00):
wrote in the Washington Post. I think that if they
were spying on Trump, it was for his own good.
That's the new that's the new hotness, the the old
and busted like no longer cool to say if you're
an anti Trump leftist. Is there was no spying. Now
the new hotness is there was spying, but it was

(34:20):
actually pro Trump spying. Kind of like they'll say, oh,
the FBI investigation shows how favorable they were toward Trump
because there weren't more leaks about the investigation. Meanwhile, that's
because they didn't find anything. If they had found stuff,
they would have ended Trump's campaign. We all get that.

(34:44):
But there's just this desperation of storylines, narratives, talking points
out there that never mind, aren't true, don't make sense.
And the former director of National Intelligence who's a clear
anti Trump partisan, there's no question about it. Same thing
with Brennan. Whether these are people, you know, if you say, oh,
their career, buck their career. Yeah, just like Comey's a

(35:08):
career prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald's a career prosecutor. Just because you
worked in the government forever doesn't mean you're impartial. You know,
maybe that's one of the myths that we have to
just completely tear apart here. Oh so and so we
don't work for you know, Clapper is a career, a career,
whatever career, military, career you name. It doesn't mean you're impartial,

(35:31):
doesn't mean you don't have you can't beat partisan, have
political biases that affect the way you do your job.
But I just have to love that. Yeah, they weren't
spying on Trump. They were spying on the Russians allying
with Trump. Oh well, well in that case, you know,
and now we we We didn't set up a video
camera in your bedroom to watch you. It was to

(35:53):
watch you and your spouse. Oh well, I guess then
it's like, no problem, no big deal. Do they do
they hear themselves when they say these things. I guess
at this point the storylines are collapsing more and more,
and now the presidents saying He's gonna get some answers,
get the truth. He met with Director rat to day
of the FBI, So maybe we'll finally get those answers.

(36:20):
Are you an employer, property manager, or financial company that
needs somebody who you can absolutely trust to do background checks, tenants, screening,
or vetting and investigative services, then you need Global Verification Network.
Global Verification is the only dual certified veteran owned background

(36:40):
investigation and vetting company. They are headquartered here in Chicago.
A lot of the companies in this space. They send
stuff overseas, not just your data, which by the way,
means it's easier for it to get hacked and get
all out there. But also a lot of the work
will be offshore. You want veterans, you want people in
this country working on your case. Global Verification Network is

(37:05):
the best in the business. Go to my GVN dot com.
That's my g VN dot com. Or call eight seven
seven six nine five nine that's eight seven seven six
nine five eleven seventy nine. Leave no stone on turn
buck Sexton mission, decoding the news and disseminating information with
actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American. Ready, great, You're a

(37:31):
great American Again. This is the buck Sexton Show. Analyston, No,
let's call it like it is. The horrifying and action
of Congress Slaughter after slaughter has become a green light
to would be shooters who pervert silence into endorsement. Guns

(37:51):
are probably not that hard to get despite the laws
in place. Oliver Northern's head of the n r A,
they're not a constructive group here. They're just trying to
protect the Second Amendment and use the gun issue as
a proxy for government encroaching on individual rights. The only
difference between us and everybody else is our gun culture.
But this is just straight out of their traditional n

(38:12):
r A playbook. And they want to talk about riddling,
They want to talk about video games, they want to
talk about culture. They want to talk about anything except
easy access to guns. Until the political leadership, you know,
is not the holy opened subsidiary of the gun lobby.
When kids are telling us they know their next we're
doing something wrong. This is just the bottom line. Have

(38:33):
you guys done unspeakable? Have you guys done enos? Not?
Of course not. But it's like every other issue. The
American people are united overwhelmingly gun owners, gun gun owners,
uncommon sense, gun safety legislation, expand background checks. The way
with a gun show doesn't ever pass. It's a three

(38:55):
letter word. It's the n r A, and it's Trump
and the Republicans who don't have the it's to stand
up to these people. And that's pretty pathetic. The n
RA as a boogeyman, and the whole gun debate is
really now just a talking point for stupid people. What
what is well? How is the n r A to
blame for some evil little malcontent stealing his father's guns

(39:19):
illegally right a minor, and possession of firearms illegal, bring
them onto a school property illegal, Killing a bunch of
innocent people, shooting a much of other people, all very
very illegal. Why is this the n race fall? This
is why I always come back to the only policy

(39:40):
that could be advocated that is intellectually consistent. Put aside
for a moment that it's not feasible that it's unconstitutional,
that I think it's a bad idea in a hundred
different ways, But the only one that at least is
work discussing at this point, considering all the gun laws
that are already in place, would be an all out

(40:04):
ban on private firearms ownership. Really, and that's it, because
short of that, how do you stop the guy owns
a hand gunning a shotgun, his kids stole them. I
think he also might have don't quote me on this
when producer might fact check him in this. I think
he also saw down the barrel again illegal. Uh So,

(40:27):
everything else they're talking about is just virtue signaling. It's
just emotion masquerading as policy discussion. Bernie Sanders, by the
Way Center from Vermont, I think they've recently got a
little stricterer. But Vermont has some of the loosest gun
laws in the country and some of the lowest. I
believe it actually might be the lowest per capita violent

(40:50):
crime in the country as well. So it's really easy
to buy a gun in Vermont and there's almost no
crime that is, you know, violent gun crime in Vermont.
So I don't understand what's I thought it was about
the laws, right, Oh, maybe it's not about the laws.
Maybe there's something else going on. Yeah, thanks Mike, Mike,
check me saught off. So add that to the list

(41:11):
of illegal things that this little mass murderer did. So
what are we gonna do? Work on parents better securing
their farms. Sure, you can pass a law that say
it's gotta secure farms in New York and you've gotta
have your gun in a lockbox with a trigger guard
on it in the lock box and separate lock box

(41:32):
for ammunition, which is gonna be great when the burgler comes.
Burgler comes through the door and you can throw not
one but two lock boxes at him because you're not
gonna have time to actually get your weapon. But you
can pass a lall like that. So much dishonest around
this issue. I'm seeing that this one's not gonna last

(41:55):
quite as long though. I think they've got other problems
trying to prop up the whole Russia collusion fantasy narrative
right there. There are other things that the media is
got to exert its energy on right now, then just
bashing the n r A. It is not an overstatement
to say that that are mainstream media in this country
is more comfortable using really harsh language, defamatory language about

(42:23):
the National Rifle Association that they are about hamas or
members of m S thirteen. That's just a fact at
this point. You know, you never see someone in the
media challenge somebody from their side or the Democrat left
side on being too mean about the n r A
on maybe don't call them terrorists. You will see people say, oh,

(42:44):
hold on, I miss their tea, and they're God's children too,
or you know, Gaya's children. I don't want to exclude
people who are pantheists or whatever. So yeah, there's that.
There's that, uh CNN and on others. By the way,

(43:06):
I've been running around, their whole thing is that they're objective,
they're honest, their journalists and look, there are some good
journalists at all these places because it's tough to get
a job in journalism and you gotta go where the
money is if you want to actually support yourself and
make a living. I get that, you know, people like, look,
why do you go work at CNN for a couple
of years because they were gonna pay me and I

(43:26):
wanted to go in there and fight the lines. Then
I didn't realize that every time I went in the
lines then I was gonna have about thirty seconds and
my arms and my legs were gonna be shackled, and
you know, it was never actually a fight, a fair fight. Yeah,
so I left. But you take the opportunities where you
can express your opinions and try to convince and try

(43:48):
to engage in polemical combat where you can. But seeing
in these other places, they they've got a lot of
problems with the truth, as you know, fake news. There
is a reason why they get so upset about fake news.
There's a reason why they will now actually canceled guests
who have ever publicly referred to SENN as fake news.
Think about that. Wow, really really sensitive, you know, really

(44:11):
sensitive indeed. Um, But on this issue of guns specifically,
they just repeat a line now that is so blatant
and so obviously false that it can't be a mistake.
It has to be intentional, and it has to do
with the the the the idea that there have been
twenty two and this was from CNN's official account, twenty

(44:35):
two school shootings. Uh this year, two school shootings. You
might say, Buck, that's that's a lot of school shootings,
and you'd be right that that is a lot of
school shootings. And then you also may see the statistic
where they'll say school shooting since two thousand and nine,
and it's like Mexico eight, South Africa six, Russia one.

(44:56):
By you believe that Russian number, I don't think so
Russia in Germany one, Japan, Switzerland, Netherlands, etcetera. Zero, the
United States two eight, oh my gosh, eight, more than
a bunch of other countries like Japan. They want to
show us. Okay, what's the truth of this number they
keep putting out there. Let's just focus on this year

(45:19):
before I get into this. Since two thousand and nine,
they refer to these incidents as school shootings. But what
they mean by a school shooting is someone is shot
by any kind of firearm, I believe, including a baby
gun in one incident. I kid you, not uh anywhere

(45:42):
on a campus of any kind in the United States.
You might say, well, Buck, that sounds like a you know,
school shooting. I said, Okay, just understand that they used
the number of twenty two to make it seem like
there have been twenty two cases like Parkland, like what
just happened in Texas, right, whether you had a mass

(46:03):
casualty event many students killed and wounded. Uh, And and yes,
one of these incidents is too many. But that being
the case, why do they have to lie about how
many incidents there are? And what does that do to
their credibilities news networks? Because what they are saying, you know,
count as twenty two shootings include things like a gang

(46:25):
fight on a university campus, or someone pulls out a
gun and shoots at somebody else. Okay, it's a school shooting,
but not not really it occurred on school grounds somewhere.
They include and this is what really they include completely
legally owned guns but obviously you can't bring them on
school property in most cases, but accidental discharge, including one

(46:49):
incident this year of an accidental discharge in a classroom
by somebody giving a gun safety instruction. There's a very
famous video. I'm sure many of you I've seen it
in my gun safety classes. I've taken many of them
over the years. Very famous video of a guy I

(47:10):
think he's in Florida who pulls out a glock. I
think he was d e A but I you know,
I can't remember what the what the letters were in
his chest. I think it was a d age and
he's giving a lecture in front of a class and
you know, with with a glock, many of you know
where this is going. You can remove the magazine. I
still have one of the chamber, right, so he uh

(47:35):
if members, I think he cleared his weapon, but then
rack the slide and then pulled out the magazine and
there was one of the chamber or he might have
actually just pulled the magazine out and left one of
the chamber forgot, but anyway, and then he goes to
a holster's weapon and finger on the trigger and blows
off his kneecap basically or part you know, shoots himself

(47:57):
in the knee. They include kind of incident here as
a school shooting. Okay, so now if you have a
professional law enforcement person who shows up at a school
and happens to have an a D, which, by the way,
is pretty terrible. I mean in terms of safety issues.
I mean, you really an a D at a school.

(48:18):
You're there to teach safety anyway, Yeah, it was it,
Mike says, it was a D. A guy. Yeah, that's
where I thought. I remember that video very well. I
think that guy tried to sue, By the way, I
forget who he. I think he tried to sue the
school or something didn't work. But they're including accidental discharges.
They're including people getting hit with BB guns. They're including
gang fights on Some universities are sprawling huge campuses. So

(48:40):
if anyone at a at a you know, the university
of huge, huge state school somewhere, pulls out a gun
and shoots at somebody, even if it's like a robbery
in the middle of the night, they call that a
school shooting. And that's how you get to twenty two.
If you want to know how many shootings there are
that you would think of a school shootings this year
where somebody has gone into a cool to kill students.

(49:02):
I think the number is either three or four. I
think it's four for the year for too many. I
get it, but four is not twenty two. So while I, oh,
that's right, because they're not really journalists on this issue,
they are activists. They're openly pushing an agenda and for
a place like CNN. As I said, they put this

(49:23):
out from their official Twitter account, this line number or
this very misleading maybe put it that way. Number of
twenty two just goes to show you that they're not
willing to just deal with the facts as they are.
They have they feel the need to stack the deck
on this one for policy change purposes, or they just
want or the expression additional ammunition to go after the

(49:45):
n r A. We want to make the number twenty
two so we can really hammer the n r A.
Would also note that they have to be aware of
the fact that the n r a's donations from its
membership go up when the media completely trash Is the
n r A right that it's a fundraising bonanza for
the n r A When Democrat politicians like Pelosi and

(50:07):
others are out there talking about how the problem here
is the n r A. They have to know that too, right,
But you know, I'd be okay with c N and
saying we are a we are a d n C
media operation. Basically, I'd be okay with that in terms
of at least there's on I mean, I think it's

(50:28):
bad and pushing bad ideas, but least there's honesty. No,
they act like we're we're big j journalists. But they'll
then run the twenty two number. It's a lie. We've
already been here by the way after park when they
were lying about the number. Again, they just keep doing
it and it camp be an accident. But they do
the whole apple banana thing when they want to tell
us about how they're objective and just the facts right,

(50:50):
it's preposterous. Uh, there's not gonna be any gun control
legislation that comes out of us because no one can
think of any gun control legislation that would have stopped
what happened in Texas. That's a pretty straight for discussion.
And there already is a lot of gun legislation on
the books. And this kid, this little murderer, violated many
many laws in another law. I'm not gonna do anything.

(51:15):
This is actually not that hard when you break it
down to the reality of what's going on. All right,
I've got a lot more on this. I know I
got deeperness than I thought. We'll be right back, team.
Stay with me. If you're hiring, I know what you're
going through right now because I've been going through it
in the last few weeks, and I know there's a
lot of different ways you can go about this. You
can hope to go word of mouth, you can post

(51:37):
something in your local grocery store bulletin board, or you
could get the best candidates the fastest way. That's what
I did. I've hired now multiple candidates, specifically from zip
recruiter dot com, and that's after going through dozens and
dozens of excellent resumes. I now have colleagues that I'll
be working with from the zip cruider pool. Zip recruiter

(52:01):
dot com knows what you're looking for and knew what
I was looking for, and it brought me the right people.
Check it out for yourself. I can tell you from
personal experience it works incredibly well. It is a success.
Try it out good to zip recruiter dot com slash buck.
That's zip recruiter dot com slash buck. You're gonna find
great candidates for those jobs, just like I did. Zip

(52:23):
recruiter dot Com slash buck. This is not an appropriate
call for an investigation by this president. This is a
very autocratic, dictator style move on behalf of this president

(52:44):
who believes that any government agency within his purview can
be used against political opponents. He should go live in
a dictatorship, which it clearly is something that I believe
that he really wants. The way that he has conducted
himself in public underscores just how inept, clueless, out of

(53:06):
the loop, and uninformed he is about how the FBI functions.
Oh man, that's the CNN analyst Rick Cardona. Oh my god,
you want to talk about uninformed? How does you just know?
I mean they put her on TV all the time,
Anderson Cooper, Jake Tapper, very respectful of her. It doesn't

(53:29):
know anything. I mean, just just a could be a
very nice lady. I'm sure she you know, sure has
some lovely qualities. A complete and utter ignoramus, but kind
of sort of sounds sometimes like maybe she knows something
because of all the words strung together, like, you know,
go live in a dictatorship? What how who They're gonna

(53:54):
go on TV with this stuff? It's amazing who you
don't I always tell you that that the big problem
with over at CNN is that they refused to accept
the very obvious reality that they're everybody is left wing.
As MSNBC, Kelly and Conway took him a task on
this one, Kelly and well done, Placlibate. You're trying to

(54:16):
break news here and it's not working. I'm sorry. Did
you just say something that a lot of people on
your side of the isle are not willing to say.
I'm not on the did you vote for Hillary Clinton
and Donald Trump? The president? I left that spot blank
on the ballot that day. But it's not appropriate. Voted
for No, It's all appropriate to ask me things, but

(54:37):
not people. It's a it's that appropriate. It's good. Brad
Stelter doesn't vote. Brian Stoulter doesn't have political opinions. His
objective down the middle. Sarah's journalists, whoa, whoa, whoa, that's
out alive. I mean to see kidding. Stelter is a Democrat,

(54:58):
Tapper is a Democrat, Cooper is a Democrat, Lemon is
a Democrat. Burnett is a Democrat. I mean, am I
proved me wrong? Exactly? I mean, is anyone and forget
about even just being Democrats? Do we think that a
single one of them, if they were not in there,

(55:19):
I don't vote mode would have voted for Trump. I mean,
come on, right, this this is a fiction. This all.
I'm just a journalist. I don't have a pageant. I
don't think about things. I just present the facts. I
love that who'd you vote for? Probably whoa whoa whoa Letty.
That's really personal. It's really personal. Oh my gosh, that

(55:42):
guy who good times? Good times. That's the question I
always want to ask them. I mean, you know, they'll
never they'll never have me on these shows anymore, obviously
because they know what they're in for. Um questions, Yeah, exactly,
But I just want to know, did really think like
like does does Anerson Cooper? Does anyone ever get a

(56:04):
chance to ask him? Hey, do you realize you're you're
opposed to Trump, like you're you're actively working against the
Trump administration, That your editorial and your story choice, your tone,
you're all of it is anti Trump? Or do you
really think that people watching you don't know that? I
think that, you know, the journalists asked questions all the time.
Why don't we get to ask journalists these questions? They

(56:26):
can ask me the question, what do you think? Well, Buck, well,
what do you think our support Trump? Yeah, doesn't mean
I think everything knows great. Doesn't mean I support every
aspect of his policy or everything that he does. But yeah,
supports Trump. And then I give you my thoughts as
somebody's sports Trump. Okay, well, why can't they do that?
We're just churnalists. Excuse me, sir, You're a way out

(56:47):
of line with this. We're not democrats at the CNN.
We're just hn just facts, apples and bananas and stuff
and stuff, that's for sure. Wow, we have a lot.
I was talking about China. Let's get some policy for
a moment here. I've got a little silly we'll get
into that in just a few Well, the framework went

(57:09):
into a number of potential legislative changes. It's a very
all encompassing thing. But for the moment, it's kind of
at the forty thousand foot level. This is not a
definitive agreement. This is a what we hope will be
a path forward. If it doesn't work, the tariffs will

(57:30):
go into effect. So nothing's been lost at all. Trump
and China. I've been telling you guys. Everyone else is
running around, running around saying I shouldn't say everyone else.
A lot of people run around saying, oh my gosh,
the trade wars coming. We're all it's gonna destroy the
stock market. Say goodbye your four oh one k. Everyone's

(57:54):
all upset about it. And what a good old bucks say?
What did what a buck tell you? Other then it's
all in the reflexes. Uh buck told you that sure enough,
this would get worked out, or at least it wouldn't
go in the direction of just a senseless trade war
without any attempt at negotiation. China has been doing bad

(58:19):
stuff for a long time when it comes to intellectual
property theft, when it comes to the terrorists that it
puts in place, and has managed a fantastic amount of
growth in a very short period of time for its people.
But it has been doing so getting a not a
free ride, but riding a little bit on the coattails

(58:39):
of other countries, notably US. Right, and we now have
an administration that sees us for what it is, and
it's saying, well, hold on a second, maybe maybe we
should revisit some of these issues. Maybe we should look
at the trade disparity between our two countries. And you know,
Trump has been saying all along since the early days
of the campaign, and is killing us on trade. They're

(59:01):
they're beating us so badly on trade. Now, I don't
think that a trade deficit is as zero samas Trump
makes it sound. Sometimes. I understand that it's not. But overall,
there are certainly ways to get a better trade deal. Right.
It's it's kind of like the climate change folks. I
know this sounds like a digression, but it's not. They
act like, whatever the temperature is, that's the perfect temperature.

(59:22):
Well maybe the world, like, you know, half a half
a degree celsius warmer is a little bit better. You know,
maybe things actually improve a bit. There's still all the
bad things. Well, yeah, sure, you might have an increase
in microbial growth in some inhabited parts of the world.
You may have greater problem with malaria. You also probably

(59:44):
have a longer growing season. Right, these are not static issues.
These are these are goalposts that do move in fact.
And with China, what's to say that the trade regime
that we've had in place visa be this country that
doesn't gage in a bit of predatory state capitalism here

(01:00:05):
and there. We know about it, right, We're all very
aware of it. Who's to say that the deal can't
be better? In fact, isn't it nonsensical to assume that
whatever our relationship with China has been, that that is
in fact the best way for it to be. No.
Trump has come after this and said, hold on a second,
let's look at this, let's take a different approach. And

(01:00:28):
people are saying, oh, trade war trade When I said no, no,
you can go back and listen to the shows. You know,
I said, I think that Trump's onto something here and
a lot. And this is where I break with some
of my very some very smart friends of mine who
are conservatives in the media world, who are so they said, no, no,
on this one, Trump is just you know, he's out
of his depth. He doesn't understand the trade deals whatever.

(01:00:49):
Oh well, as of right now, we're hearing that there
could be a very constructive conversation between Trump and China
on a whole bunch of things, including agricultural, farm and
agricultural products. Trump tweeted out over the weekend that quote
China has agreed to by massive amounts of additional farm

(01:01:11):
and agricultural products would be one of the best things
to happen to our farmers in many years. Uh and
also said on China barriers and tarroiffs to come down
for the first time. So what if he is opening
up some of those four markets more to our you know,
agricultural output. Right, what are some of the benefits we

(01:01:33):
could see here? It's at least worth of conversation and
more to the point, just as we see with the
way that people criticize him on North Korea, they're not
they're not willing. The Trump critics are not willing to
see how his approach to China, never mind plays out,

(01:01:53):
how it even begins. Really, the moment that he talks
about China and trade, you have all these this whole
echo chamber effect out there of oh, he doesn't know
what he's doing. It's gonna be terrible, he's gonna destroy things,
and ah, no, he's not. He's just not. And don't
you see a recurring theme here? You know, whether you
think trade with China is particularly interesting or not, although

(01:02:15):
I would note it's it's an important up relationship that
it really does affect our economy. So whatever business you're in,
or you know, whatever whatever savings account you have at
the bank, I mean, what's going on with China is
important at a level that we can't really ignore. Economically speaking,
we can't totally ignore it. They buy a lot of
US treasuries, as we know, and we have a whole

(01:02:37):
relationship with them where they're they're buying up treasuries and
buying up treasuries, and we're selling them a lot of
our debt via that that process. But it's just another
reminder that you have this conventional wisdom machinery in place
on immigration, on North Korea, on Iran, on trade with
China that is not only I think, going to be

(01:03:02):
proven wrong in the long term, but is is really
impatient and immature in the short term. They act like
they go way beyond It's one thing to say I
don't like what the end result of what Trump's doing
on any of those issues is going to be, which
I would not. Also require some degree of prognostication. You

(01:03:25):
have to be able to tell what the future is
to know because not the future right pretty straightforward. But
they won't even look at what's happening in the short
term and be honest about it. They act like it's
already a failure. They speak about these things, they speak
about Trump's approach to China on trade as though it's
already a disaster, not that it could be in the future,

(01:03:47):
but oh my gosh, look what he's done. And now
we see that there's the possibility that not only is
not a disaster, but could be yet a yet another
economic boon for America. I saw today that the people
I'm trying to remember what the exact statistic was, but

(01:04:07):
people are more optimistic, more or less about getting a
good job today than they have been in a very
long time. And the sense of prosperity that the American
people have, this is why it just drowns out all
the hating, all the from the left about Trump. It
doesn't drown out hate in this country. Spent two minutes

(01:04:30):
on social media talking about Trump, and you'll see how
nasty everybody can be. But it this is what they
didn't count on. It's one thing to have to struggle
against Trump's messaging and his counterpunching media is still really
twisting up and knots about that. It's another thing to

(01:04:51):
have no answer, no effective countermeasure to Trump's economic results.
My friends, The mid terms loom large in all of this.
If things continue on the trajectory they're on right now.
Not only is the blue wave a myth, you could
actually see Republicans gain seats, mark my words, and gain

(01:05:13):
them we come back. I want to talk about starbucks
new newest bathroom policy and how it could result in
smelliness for all. Stay with me and Starbucks. It's a
story I've been following closely t him. As you know,
there were some allegations of racism a while ago, and

(01:05:35):
Starbucks responded with, well everything that it could at the time,
right it said they're gonna They said they're gonna hold
a a day of diversity training for every single one
of their tens of thousands of employees across the country.
They also said that they were very sorry about the

(01:05:59):
the in students in question. But there's a new policy
now too. Who wants to guess, because you remember the
problem with Starbucks was that they said that some people
were allowed to use the bathroom without a purchase and
others were not, and the claim was that this was
based on race. Well, let me just put this out there.

(01:06:20):
Does anybody right now think that Starbucks is gonna just
let that continue on without taking action? No, of course
not so. Starbucks decided that they are going to now
make all Starbucks is open to people without having to eat,

(01:06:43):
uh drink or buy any well, without having to buy
any food or drink. Quote, any person who enters our spaces,
including patios, cafes, and restrooms, regardless of whether they make
a purchase, is can sidered a customer. So yeah, yeah,

(01:07:04):
eight thousand stores, by the way, are gonna be closed
on May for racial not even diversity training, racial bias
training now here. Here's what he said. He said, we
don't want to become a public bathroom, but we're gonna
make the right decision a percent of the time and
give people the key because we don't want anyone at
star Wucks to feel as if we are not giving

(01:07:24):
access to that bathroom because you are less than we
want you to be more than. This is Schultz, the CEO.
So let me tell you, Yeah, Starucks Chairman, Howard Schultz,
let me tell you something about this. They're gonna be
the public bathroom now, folks. This is gonna be one
of these liberal policies that some C suite group, you know,
the the chairman and a bunch of his buddies are like, yeah,

(01:07:47):
we have a solution and they get to feel like
it's a smart thing. When there are cocktail parties that
can seem very progressive, very forward thinking on the issue
of bathroom usage, which, as you know, on are other circumstances,
can become quite a contentious thing, right, male female bathroom
issue and all the rest of it. Uh, But here

(01:08:10):
what we see is a situation where the Starbucks bathroom
is going to become the closest thing in existence today.
Do you just give it some time, the closest thing
that exists today to a rest stop circuit on the
inner State. Now, a lot of you listening are you know,

(01:08:30):
within let's say, ten to fifteen years of my age,
and so you know what I'm talking about here. With
when your parents would take you on long trips, you know,
and this is before we all had smartphones and even
game boys and all that stuff. There's nothing to do,
but you'd have to stop. If it was a really

(01:08:51):
long drive, you'd have to stop and go to one
of these designated rest stops along on the East Coast here,
which goes all the way from Maine to Florida. It's
basically the Holy East Coast. You go to one of
these rest stops, and I remember, I mean some of
the bathrooms there you go into and they were so gross, right,

(01:09:12):
they were so putrid and filthy and unkempt, uh that
you didn't want to even touch it with your the
bottoms of your shoes. And then you had to make
that I mean as and as a like a teenager,
you know, you're like probably not necessarily the best personal hygiene. Right,
Let's just be honest, folks, Right, teenagers can be a

(01:09:34):
little be a little uh on the sloppy side. I
know I was as a teenager. I mean I was clean,
but you know I could have been cleaner. You go
into that bathroom, though, and you don't want to touch anything,
and then you gotta think yourself, do you even want
to touch the door handle? And you do that thing
where you grab your shirt, you know, and you use
your shirt as a barrier for your hand on the

(01:09:57):
door handle. But then if you're like me and you
get O c D, You're like, oh gosh, but now
whatever is on that door handles on the inside of
my shirt, which is touching my you know, my belly,
and now I'm gonna get some weird skin rash on
my belly. So there's really no way around it. But
the point here is that those rest stops were we're disgusting, uh,

(01:10:18):
And there was a real like you know there here,
like a couple of flies buzzing around. It's just the
whole thing because no one cared. This is not gonna
happen at every Starbucks, not gonna happen at Starbucks in
nice neighborhoods necessarily, but in high traffic and high traffic areas,
people are gonna know they're just allowed to go in
and use the Starbucks bathroom. And that means and by

(01:10:41):
the way, I think that there's also this is just
my opinion, so I could be wrong, but how often
is that really true? That I'm wrong? But when people
are at least paying as customers, they have a different
relationship with the establishment. I just think that there's a
when when you create that connection of capitalism in a place,

(01:11:03):
you're just less likely I'm not saying you won't, but
you're less likely to trash the join and you know,
you know, when you're in the bathroom, you're less likely
to spray all over the place like an elephant, you
know what I mean, You're less likely to just not
I'm talking when you're washing your hands, don't be gross,
but you know you're You're just more likely to be uh,

(01:11:25):
a little more respectful to the place, whereas if you
just walk in and use a restaurant, I feel like
you're less likely to be clean about so you know,
clean about your your habits. But then you also have
the issue of now people are just gonna use Starbucks
forget about the bathrooms. Now people are gonna use Starbucks
as there. I don't know if you know this company
we work, but you can rent office space why. I mean,

(01:11:46):
it's a nice company, but why would you rent office
space If you've got a local Starbucks, you can now
just show up there and set up all day, no
expectation that there has to be commerce going on. Thanks
to the chairman of Starbucks, Howard Schultz, you don't have
to buy your Mocha frapp soy thing. You can just
sit there and hang out. You no longer have any

(01:12:09):
obligation whatsoever to purchase anything to to engage in commerce.
You can just be a squatter. Now. I see this
is where you you get liberals. Very prominent progressive company
run by liberal lots of liberals at the top ranks
of this thing. Probably all liberals, I would guess, but
I don't know that for a fact. And they have

(01:12:32):
this idea that and it sounds good to them. They figure, Hey,
you know, why not give this a shot. Let anybody
use the bathroom, let anyone stay in our place. They
don't have to buy anything at all. And it sounds
really good, right, especially when you feel like you've been
in a in a in a situation where there could
be some bias against you or you know people that

(01:12:52):
rather people think you've engaged in bias. Pardon me, so
I switched that around. Um so deals with that problem.
But now you've got the problem, how do you run
a business when you're not actually conducting business necessarily? And
I think that this is gonna fall by the wayside.
And more to the point, this is gonna mean that
some Starbucks, particularly the bathrooms, are going to be the

(01:13:15):
equivalent of a porta potty at a construction site in
the southwestern United States in mid July that nobody has
done anything about for like many months. That's that's what
it's gonna be like in Sunday Starbucks bathrooms. Very unpleasant,
very very unpleasant. I'm not thinking back the most unpleasant

(01:13:37):
facilities I have ever used, which considering some of the
places I've been overseas, it's kind of amazing. I'm still
here to talk to you actually, all right, um, we're
gonna come back and talk about a really interesting map
of what states hate what foods the most. We got
a Hillary Clinton running around. We should pay for Hillary
to go give speeches and we we should be all

(01:13:58):
about Hillary running round promoting the cult of Hillary, which
is dwindling with each and every day. So we got that,
and then my review of the movie Black Panther, which
I promise will not take too long but will be
worth your worth your time. Uh, that are more coming up.
I love dogs. You love dogs, but you gotta make

(01:14:19):
sure that you keep an eye on what they're up to.
You gotta take care of those little furry fellows, because
if you don't, you could have a problem on your hands.
And digging is one of those issues. My friends. You
got a yard and it's fenced in, that's great, But
what happens if your dog, after a long day of
being cooped up inside, or just because it's got a
little bolt of energy, tries to go under that fence,
or what if predators like foxes or raccoons try to

(01:14:42):
come under your fence. I've got a solution for you
that takes care of all these problems. Dig Defense. Dig
Defense extends the protection of your fence underground. No amount
of digging is going to get under there. It comes
in a bunch of different models and its size is
to fit your needs exactly. You can all with a
hammer and a pair of gloves. It's available online at

(01:15:02):
Loews Menards Wayfair and you can go online to Stop
the dig dot Com. That's Stop the dig dot Com.
Check out dig Defense. You're gonna love it. Welcome to
our three of the Buck Sexton Show. Team Man, it's
flying by today. I gotta say it's a bright and
sunny day in the swamps, so that makes things a

(01:15:23):
whole lot easier. It was just raining cats and dogs.
You know. They don't really know where that expression comes from.
The most widely accepted explanation of raining cats and dogs
is that in London circa nineteen century, the houses in
the poorer areas were thatched roof houses, and when they

(01:15:48):
would get wet, dogs and cats could walk across the
tops of the of the roofs because they were so
close together. But when we get wet, sometimes they would
walk on part of the thatched right the grass that
they would use for roofing, and and it would let
them fall down. This sounds way too cute to be real,
but they don't have an actual better explanation for it

(01:16:10):
than that. So so here we are. Um but but
back to uh the swamp. I've got some news for you.
This is not important, by the way, and I keep
holding off on my big announcement because I have to
What can I tell you, folks? You know I've I've
got I've got bosses. Uh buck Buck is a little
has to be a little corporate. Sometimes it's not because

(01:16:31):
I mean to put it off, but we're just waiting
to get some things aligned on our announcement and it's
coming soon though coming very soon, I'm told this week,
but I can't be certain about that. But as an
acide of that, what did I have no idea how
they get this information? And this is not an important story,

(01:16:52):
but it's a fun story. So I just want to
switch gears. We're gonna talk about Hillary coming up in
just a little bit. And then because she's out there still,
that's right. Um. And also Black Panther, the movie which
I saw. I will give you my review of it.
It will not take along, and then we'll get into
some roll call. But I found this chart and it
comes from Mental Flaws. It could be complete nonsense. I

(01:17:15):
don't know how they could possibly do this, but this
is a um a shared This is what they say
on mental flaws. A shared hatred of something has a
funny way of bringing people together. That's the idea behind Hater,
a dating app launched earlier this year. The app might
match users based on their mutual disdain for certain pop stars,

(01:17:37):
fashion styles, or something. Many of us have strong opinions
about food. According to the Hoffey and post, Hater put
together this map of every states most hated food, using
data collected from it's more than six hundred thousand users.
This was really interesting, folks. I gotta tell you, I

(01:17:58):
don't have time to go through through absolutely all of them,
but some of them were I find totally believable. At
others deserve a high five. First of all, let's get
right to it. So remember this is state by state
the highest concentration of food hatred based on a sample
size of six hundred thousand people across the country. In Texas,

(01:18:23):
you guys know what time it is. You guys know
what's up. Steak cooked well done. And this is the
one place where I cannot defend President Trump at all.
I can't deflect, I can't explain it. You can't do
your steaks well done with ketchup. I'm sorry, we're not barbarians,
but Texas knows that they refused to go with steaks

(01:18:45):
well done. Although, not to be completely left out of
the conversation, Oklahoma hates veggie burgers, and you know what, Oklahoma,
I'll put a point for you up on the board
based on that one. In Florida they say liquor rish,
which I didn't even know anyone still ate liquorice, So
that just strikes me as completely and utterly bizarre. Michigan

(01:19:09):
hates cold pizza. What's I mean? I don't know why
that's so bad. Cold pizzas is can be actually quite delicious.
So Michigan, you get, you get minus points on that one. California,
I think some of you can guess what food does
California hate the most? Think political thing? Political Chick fil a.

(01:19:34):
I know right. Oh, I'm sorry you hate a company
that treats its workers really well, has built an amazing
American franchise and serves people incredibly tasty chicken sandwiches. And
I actually had Chick fil A in my pre bea
well before I knew that I was ciliac. So I
have tasted the glory that is Chick fil A, and
it is it is quite amazing. In the state of Nevada,

(01:19:56):
they hate Lacroix, which is is a fruit flavored but
sugarless soda drink that I will not lie to you.
I have cases of uh back home in New York City.
I think it's quite delicious. So Nevada, I don't know,
maybe you just maybe there's too much Lacroix going on there,

(01:20:16):
but I think it's it's quite excellent. We've got some
other ones here. Oh, New York City hates ranch dressing
on pizzas. For New York State, I should say, Um,
first of all, I didn't know that was a thing
that people really knew about or cared about, but that's
what they say in New York. I think that's quite strange. Um.

(01:20:39):
This is the one that really just upsets me, though,
and this is uh Massachusetts. Oh no, I'm sorry, this
is Connecticut, not Massachusetts. I can't see on this chart
mayonnaise on fries. There's some things about me, team, I
tell you the truth. There's some things about me that
make me seem not particularly American, and this is one
of them. I think mayonnaise is way better with good

(01:21:02):
crispy French fries than catch up. I know, I know, Producer, Mike,
don't don't give me the look. It's there's nothing I
can do about it. Man, It's just good. Mayo with
French fries is amazing. Yes, it's very very French. I
get it. But I I now do actually go to
the extent of ordering ordering my French fries with a

(01:21:26):
side of mayo, so I can't pretend to hate on
that one. Um. Who oh, Virginia, I'm sorry, West Virginia
here hates tofu, which is fine, except I feel like
that's about twenty years behind the food trend because tofu
is not a particularly new thing. Um, and it's not

(01:21:47):
a particularly popular thing these days. But hey, I'm with you,
as Virginia. Tofu is disgusting and people shouldn't eat it
unless they like it. In which case, what am I
even talking about? Uh? Then you have in yeah, Montana,
and this is very America pumpkin spice anything, that's right.

(01:22:07):
The state of Montana just hates pumpkin spice, which I
can understand. It's pumpkin spice, of all the flavors you
can think of, has to be among the most fruit
fruit and bougie, So totally understandable, uh for me. And

(01:22:27):
then you have I think this is I can't tell
if the map is pot No, No, it's pointing at Washington,
d C. Turkey bacon. Why do they hate turkey bag?
I mean, obviously it's inferior to bacon, but in a pinch,
you know, it's like Canadian bacon, also inferior to bacon,
but better than no bacon, right, and better than tofu bacon.

(01:22:51):
For example, Pennsylvania. That's right, all my Pennsylvania listeners, what
do you think you hate? Not cheese whiz Chai lattes?
You are chai latte haters, And you know what I'm
gonna go. I'm gonna go with that's okay. Lats are
quite delicious until you find out that they have like

(01:23:11):
forty grams of sugar in them, and well, assuming that
you get the sweeten kind some of you probably drink.
But why do you drink unsweetened chi latte's? That just
seems un American to be Uh. Then I get to
New Mexico, which hates chicken nuggets. New Mexico, seriously, get
it together. What is wrong with you? Chicken nuggets are amazing.

(01:23:32):
This isn't even a There's not even a discussion to
be had here. I don't know what's going on in
New Mexico. I feel like there's a problem. My single favorite, though,
and I really did want to get to this, my
single favorite of all of the options here, gotta tell you,
um was the state of Louisiana. You get congratulations and

(01:23:56):
had a boy in a high five. State of Louisiana
hates cookies with raisins. Totally true. By the way, Oh oh,
you show me a cookie with raisins in it and
you're like, oh, buck, but tasted it's so good. I'll say, oh,
excuse me, excuse me? Would chocolate chips not be better?
You know the answers, Yes, you know the answer. Don't

(01:24:17):
even pretend Mike and John they're with me on this one.
The raisins are, Raisins are gross. Kentucky doesn't like hummus.
I like hummus, although it's it's um kind of sneaky
with how fatty it is. Oh, of course. Washington State,
because we're where Starbucks comes from, we're so fancy. Washington

(01:24:39):
State doesn't like curig k cups because they just like
their French press. They're so they're just all about being
coffee purists. Please please, Washington State. All right, I don't
need to hear about how you're you're too fancy for
your cake cups up there, but makes sense you'd be
you'd be opposed to that one and trying to see

(01:25:00):
who else is on here? Uh? Some people hate In Minnesota,
they hate beans. Is that just because you don't want
to be offensive Minnesota? A Uh? In Iowa they hate Keenwa.
What's wrong with Keemwa? I like Keenwa, I disagree with
I disagree with that one. And in uh, what else

(01:25:22):
do we have her? Main? They hate Asian fusion. That's
just because you don't have any main. Yeah, that's right,
I said it, deal with it. Uh, and and I'll
leave I'll leave it there. But that's your that's your
smattering of food hatreds across the country. This I thought,
this is really interesting. Oh New Jersey hates gas station
wine because it's too fancy. Oh take that, and we

(01:25:46):
got Hillary Clinton up next. Stay with me switching gears
for a second. I want to tell you about our
sponsor this half hour, nine Line Apparel. It's a veteran
owned and operated patriotic lifestyle brand. Now what does that mean?
Go to nine Line up parel dot com and check
them out for yourself. They are relentlessly patriotic, they are
veteran inspired. They've got designs all about support of the

(01:26:09):
Second Amendment, support of freedom, liberty, and love of America.
The conton is incredibly soft. I've got one of their
Veteran Lives Matters t shirts. I wear it all the time.
I'm telling you this is going to be your apparel
company of choice. Go check them out for yourself. Go
to nine line apparel dot com. Use the coupon code

(01:26:30):
buck twenty that I'll get you twenty percent off. That's
a great deal, twenty percent off your next order. That's
nine Line apparel dot com coupon code buck to zero
for twenty percent off your next order. Check them out team.
Just in case you missed it, Hillary Clinton over the
weekend gave a speech at Yale's class day and here

(01:26:54):
was the big joke in front of the assembled grads,
to be a Russian. If you can't beat them, join them.
If you can't beat them, join them. Yeah, Russian hat
because Russia collusion. It gets worse, though, because Hillary is

(01:27:16):
speaking to these young future leaders of America. If you
believe all that crap about where you go to college
and how it matters for the future of you know,
your success or not. Hillary, though, wanted to play kate
their political prejudices as much as she possibly could. No
surprise there, thrilled for all of you, even the three

(01:27:40):
of you who live in Michigan and didn't request your
absentee ballots in time. No, this may seem like a
relatively minor point, but once again, it's this idea that
Democrats are obsessed with that they really won somehow, or
really should have won somehow, that the American people were

(01:28:01):
with Hillary, that it was either stolen from her, or
it was the popular votes fault, or it was Russia's fault,
or it was James Comby's fault, or maybe it was
somehow al Gore's fault for not making a strong enough
case that it was the Supreme Court's fault in two thousand.
I think you catch my drift. Somehow. There's always an

(01:28:24):
excuse for a loss by a Democrat when it comes
to a presidential election, and Hillary likes people to know
that she's going to continue on with that tradition. And
by the way, she also let everybody know that this
isn't an act. This is still a big deal for
her personally. I'm not over it. We know, Hillary, Oh,

(01:28:47):
we know. Indeed, you are not over it. I'm not
over it. That's not surprising. I don't think there's anybody
who would believe for a second that you were over it,
even if you said I'm over it. I'm totally past it.
I'm done. I'm just gonna drink shardonnay and chop a qua.

(01:29:10):
I still think about the election. I still regret the
mistakes I made. Does she really, though, do we believe
that she regrets the mistakes that she made or does
she have yet? So many close at hand excuses as
to why she did not in fact win the second
presidential election for which she was considered inevitable. Seems quite

(01:29:37):
strange to me that we are to believe that there
is a reason other than Hillary's ineptitude as a politician.
This is somebody with no actual record of accomplishment, just
really a record of compiling a record. It was all
built on resume, but the resume was built on the

(01:29:58):
resumes of other people, most notably that of her husband.
She went from first Lady to senator, to secretary of State,
to or to presidential candidate, to secretary of State to
presidential candidate. Nowhere in that whole process do you have
somebody who manages on her own to beat the odds

(01:30:20):
in a fair contest or show in any way that
there is real excellence. Oh eight, you may say, buck,
what about the Senate race. She was running against Giuliani,
as you will recall, and Juliani, because of a cancer diagnosis,
had to back out, so she effectively won that one
without having much of a fight either. But understand that

(01:30:41):
her qualifications were that she had been the first lady,
and I feel like if Milania, as lovely and kind
as she is, were to say that she wanted to
be a senator, a lot of Democrats would have quite
a problem with that, But just the notion that Hilary
somehow makes responsibility for all this I find objection able

(01:31:03):
because to me, at least, it is so very very
clear that she takes absolutely no responsibility in this process,
that she flatly and completely rejects the notion that she's
not in fact the president of the United States because
of anything that has to do with her. And just

(01:31:24):
when you think, well, buck, what about that speech she gave,
she says she took responsibility. How was my fault? Uh?
Then she went on and as you can imagine, she
starts out by putting on a furry Russian hat to
make a joke about Trump and if you can't beat them,
join them, And then speaking to these Yale grads who
have been indoctrinated in leftism for four years at least,

(01:31:47):
she is going to give them a taste of Oh
this is all about you know where this is going
defending our democracy. I still think though, that understanding what
happened in such a weird and wild election in American
history will help us defend our democracy in the future.

(01:32:07):
This has become a mindless talking point. I guess it's
been a mindless talking point all along. But for all
the discussion we hear about how we need to know
what happened with Russia so we can stop it the
next time around, what have we learned that's new in
this process? They say, Russia set up social media accounts
that push certain ideas, so the Russians push propaganda using

(01:32:31):
social media. A lot of people push propaganda using social media.
Unless you're gonna cut the Internet off from or America's
Internet off from the rest of the world. This is
not something that anyone has even begun to come up
with an idea about how to really stop. And for
all the yelling about Russian fake news, there are a
lot of us who said around saying, well, there are

(01:32:53):
major American news media organizations that engage in fake news.
But this is just a facade right the whole Oh,
we have to figure out what went wrong with Russia
to stop the next time or whatever. This is just
a way to keep talking about it and make it
sound virtuous when all this is being sore losers. Hillary

(01:33:15):
is a sore loser, the ultimate sore loser. In fact,
I hate Moses and a lot of Democrats go along
with her because they'd rather cling to the belief that
they are not just on the right side of history,
as Obama says, but on the right side of the law,
on the right side of constitutional norms, on the right

(01:33:37):
side of all of these very important, profound sounding issues,
when in reality they just can't get on the right
side of Hey, this is what's going on, folks. Trump
won the election. Hillary lost. She was a terrible candidate.
There was actually no good reason for there to be
a political momentum behind her, and time to move on.

(01:34:01):
She won't move on, though, She'll continue giving these speeches
that I think are increasingly sounding almost like a cry
for help, because I waited my entire life for this.
The world's gonna start over, I'm gonna burn it all.

(01:34:22):
What happens now, what happens to the rest of the world.
So that's from the movie Black Panther. Now. I'm not
trying to be a hater. Okay, sometimes I get accused
of that because I do enjoy being the guy who,

(01:34:42):
on some issues will be a bit contrarian, Like I
will tell you, for example, that Bruce Springsteen isn't just overrated,
he's not good. I will tell you that nobody should
actually pretend that they enjoy listening to Bob Dylan because
they don't like I will say these things because they

(01:35:05):
are true. Oh, vanilla ice cream is not as good
as chocolate ice cream. This isn't an opinion, this is
a fact. And yet here I am once again in
a position where, despite what I think is the most
objective opinion ever, I feel like there's some controversy around it.

(01:35:25):
So the movie Black Panther, let's get to it. It
rained for days here in d C. Rained for days.
I had very little to do, because well, what are
you gonna do in DC when it's raining, right when
the swamp is so murky already. But I watched Black
Panther over the weekend. And now there is a movie

(01:35:45):
that I went into feeling like, First of all, I'm
I'm open to comic book movies. I have no problem
with comic movies. I tend to like comic book movies.
So there's nothing about this that automatically should be an issue, right.
I like that. I think iron Man is a great movie,
not just a good movie. I think iron Man is
a great movie. I really enjoyed the movie Blade. I

(01:36:08):
like Batman begins, I go to a whole list of
superhero movies. I want to like superhero movies. Okay, I'm
not somebody goes what you have magic powers that understand?
Excuse me, sir, but DELI human dig could actually fly,
so you know I'm not that guy. I'm all right
with superhero movies. I like superhero movies. I like the escapism,

(01:36:32):
so I'm rooting for it to be a good movie
going into it. And I see that Black Panther has
nineties seven percent critics approval on Rotten Tomatoes. I also
see that it had one of the biggest movie openings
of the end of the year and one of the
biggest movie openings I believe of all time. And I've

(01:36:54):
told you I don't go see movies in the theater
for the most part because of people, because people ruin them,
because they talk, because they hold their iPhones up. They
ruin the experience, and I do not enjoy it when
people do that. So I watched things on my own time.
I don't usually go to the movie theater. So I
finally got a chance to watch Black Panther, and I

(01:37:15):
was shocked because it is so bad as a movie
that I don't understand how any critic never mind anyone
of the audience thinks it's a good movie. It's one
thing to say you enjoy it, like there are there
are terrible movies that I enjoy watching, nonetheless for for

(01:37:36):
all kinds of different reasons. But I know that they're bad.
I don't sit there and try to tell you that
that blood Sport is a good movie. I love the movie,
but I know that the acting is is horrific, the
screenplay is garbage, and the whole thing doesn't really make
any sense, including the realism of the fight scenes, which

(01:37:58):
are preposterous. But but I can very clearly pick up
that Black Panther is supposed to be not just entertaining
for some folks, but also a good movie, and it's
just not. I mean, and how can so many people
get this wrong? Why are we all supposed to sit
around and act like this is actually a worthwhile thing

(01:38:18):
for anyone, worthwhile thing for anyone to watch. I mean,
just a few things that come to mind. For example,
I could do this all day. So so Wakanda from
the movie Black Panther is the most advanced, technologically advanced
society on on the face of the earth, Yet they
choose their leader by having a couple of shirtless guys

(01:38:41):
fight to the death in what is basically a kiddie pool.
It's like water up to their ankles or something. That
doesn't strike me as what you would expect from a
society that's so advanced that it could promote peace for
all the rest of the world just based on its knowledge.
It also struck me as a little strange. And look,
I'm a hey with Wakanda, this this place in Africa

(01:39:03):
that has this incredible technology at all. I can buy
into some of the backstory and all that, but the
best weapon they have is a magic rhinoceros that comes
out of the ground and runs people over. I mean,
I'm just telling you what I saw in the movie.
There's no plot, The dialogue is laughable, the action sequences

(01:39:23):
aren't good. There's way too much c G. I I
really ask who can think this is a good movie.
It's not that it's not good. It's bad, but everyone
pretends they like it. Strikes me it's very very odd.
By the way, I'm excited for Deadpool too. That will
be a very good movie. When we've got roll Call
coming up, team, this party is about to get lit.

(01:39:54):
Feel those it's time for roll call now. Don't lie.
You were stamping your foot on that one. You were
enjoying a little bit of those funky, funky roll call beats.

(01:40:16):
You want to be a part of the action, you
know what to do, Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton,
and we will hopefully get a chance to read your thoughts, critiques,
uh praises, high coups, sonnets, all the rest of it
on the air. So thank you so much for joining.
All right, um, let's go. We have first up here

(01:40:42):
Monica who writes iPod subscriber Here, Buck, I guess iTunes subscriber. Yeah,
I've been removed from your automatic subscription three times last month.
Not sure, but you might want to check it out
shields high. Um, all right, I will look into that one. Monica,
don't know what to say. Oh, then we'll have the

(01:41:03):
tech team check it out. Next up here we have Matt,
who writes The thing I love about your show is
that can be a deep dive into history or theory
one hour and something lighthearted the next. I want to
give credit to America now for seeing the potential and
all the work your team is doing to go big.
In the past, you occasionally did science segments more. Please

(01:41:25):
as you fight the dad bod, maybe bring on Dr
Jason Fung, who's questioning a lot of diet conventions. I
work in the Space program, so I'm tempted to say
shields up, but shield's eye sounds better. Matt down in
Texas well, Matt, thank you so much. You know, I
try to come at science from the perspective of somebody

(01:41:46):
who has no scientific background whatsoever, but really likes reading
and learning and thinking through problems. And I have to
tell you it's it's been one of the more interesting
part of my journey, particularly on on health and nutrition,
to just see how often the conventional wisdom has been wrong. Now,

(01:42:10):
not always diametrically opposed right, not always the exact polar opposite,
but not not nearly as correct as they say it is,
and in some cases almost entirely incorrect. I've talked to
you about the food pyramid, for example, and how twelve
servings of grain and rice and bread to day is insane.

(01:42:31):
I mean, it's it's disastrous for anyone. And then also
the war on fat and its replacement with sugar, meaning
the war on fat in food. Throughout my childhood really
remember people always eating these fat free foods and fat
free cookies. We used to have margarine, which was and

(01:42:52):
I knew this as a kid. I'm like, what is
that grotesque, mutant looking neon yellow that they're putting out
a bar of in the middle of the table. I
just want butter. But they gave us margarine in my school,
which is absolutely disgusting. So yeah, I'll try to bring
more of the science segments in where I'm approaching it

(01:43:15):
as a lay person, and we'll have some experts on
when we can. But people who say things like the
science is settled are a lot of times just complete ignoramuses.
They have no idea what they're talking about. Science until
really about the last hundred years or so new very
very little, which is a pretty remarkable thing when you

(01:43:39):
when you consider it, human beings have been around for
a really long time, and we're just starting to figure
stuff out, and we were just mapping human genomes and
and we're just beginning to get some insight into the
full depth and scope of what goes on at the

(01:43:59):
cellular level in the world around us. Anyway, A lot
a lot of stuff, a lot of stuff there, thank you,
So much Matt and Shields high Uh Mark, next up here,
he writes, Buck or Buck Staff. No, it's me, Mark,
I'm here. I'm on the air live from talking to you.
I was wondering if you were going to comment on
the passing of one of the eminent Middle Eastern scholars,

(01:44:21):
Bernard Lewis. I read his Crisis of Islam while in
college and found it equally informative and insightful. The book
was such a good example of responsible and simple scholarship.
He was a rare man in this modern age and
will be missed. Perhaps his passing could be a good
opportunity to chat around the state of Middle Eastern studies

(01:44:42):
on campus and the competing theories and approaches of Orientalism.
I know that as an unpc word by some, but
that's a but that's nonsense, and I'm a bit old school.
I hope you have a great day. Keep up the
great work. God bless Shields high Mark, who also writes
ps more history. Um, well, Mark, I'm I'm working on it.

(01:45:03):
I promise you, I've I'm working on it. I'm just
I'm I'm not gonna lie to you, guys. I'm overwhelmed
these days I've got so many things I'm trying to do,
and the good news is a priority one is always
this show. But I'm launching another video project that any
day now i'll be able to give you guys all
the details of. Uh, we're launching another podcast here which
is gonna be a kind of Buck unplugged segment. We're

(01:45:26):
gonna call it The Freedom Hunt with Buck Sexton, So
you're getting a preview of that. That should hopefully be
out weekly starting in uh about two weeks, and I'm
hoping all of you will download that. We're we haven't
even created don't look for it yet. We haven't even
created the iTunes iTunes landing page, but that will be
coming out as well. Just be an opportunity for me
to kind of fly off the cuff, not be bound

(01:45:48):
by news of the day and do some I don't know,
the kind of biggest thoughts of the week stuff, you
know what's just in general, it'll be like we're all
sitting around hanging out talking. That's that's my You know,
when when Seinfeld pitches their show to show about nothing
where they just do but but it's really a show
about everything. The Freedom Halt with Buck Saxton is just

(01:46:08):
gonna be a shorthand version of here's what I think
is really going on. And if you say about what
the answer is, well, what do you want? What do
you want to talk about? Because it could be anything. Uh.
And oh, as to Bernard Lewis, Yes, he passed away.
I saw that Secretary of State Pompeo made note of
it in a tweet. Um, Bernard Lewis was was probably

(01:46:31):
the greatest contemporary American scholar of the Middle East, so
that I think that there's no more fitting epitaph for
him than that. And I was just talking about him
last week because we had a member of Team Buck
Israel who pointed out and I conceded rightfully that Bernard
Lewis is a far better example of somebody to read

(01:46:54):
on the issue of the Middle East then say Segev
or Freedman or some of the other well known leftists
on this stuff. Uh. Next up, I'm trying to load
this up. Um. This is from Sean he writes book.
It would really meet a lot if you took the
same stance that a number of other news media outlets,
including The Daily Wire, have taken and pledged to not

(01:47:17):
disclose the name or post any photos of shooters and
mass shootings, especially school shootings. The fame just encourages others
to follow in their footsteps. If the media as a
whole would pledge to never show their faces or disclose
their names, I believe it would help cut down on
the glory they feel they receive when committing these heinous acts. Sean,

(01:47:38):
I I agree with the thinking on that. I think
in practice it's very very difficult to do because what
ends up happening, and that's really a function of the Internet.
What ends up happening is people want to see the photo,
and they want to see the name, and so even
if it's really only published in one place, it gets
spread everywhere because of the nature of human interest in

(01:48:01):
these events. And I just don't really think it's possible
to suppress. Now that said, I do think that the
way we cover it can be responsible or irresponsible. I
an example of this would be when Rolling Stone put
uh Jahar Sarneyev, the one of the two Boston Marathon bombers,
on their cover, looking like some kind of young rock star.

(01:48:23):
I mean, that's kind of the that's really the height
of disgraceful and irresponsible coverage of a murdering terrorists psychopath.
So it's clearly possible to go well beyond any journalistic
standards or integrity. So that's my focus with these things.
It's just to try to cover it in a way
where we're being accurate. It's on it's about the facts.

(01:48:45):
It's analysis that is in no way doing anything other
than discussing the event and the ideology behind it from
the perspective of wanting to combat, combat, defeat and destroy it.
So but Sean, I'll think about it. Um, I'll give
it some thought for sure, and I'm not saying it's wrong.
I just I don't know if it's really feasible. I

(01:49:06):
don't know if it is really possible. Next up here
we have William who writes the following that uh here
he writes, after watching Cobra Kai and Donald Trump becoming president,
a lot of folks just don't give a crap anymore.
PC what. It's a dangerous game the left is playing

(01:49:29):
now and it's and when you apologize for racism, you
lose listeners. I'm married with children to a non white
Samoan and have dated lots of minorities. You're playing into
the left when you call folks racist shields high Uh Okay,
William I don't know who I called racist. I mean
there are racists. There are people who are racists. So

(01:49:53):
I'm not really sure who are specifically referring to. But
I appreciate the the note. Thanks for reaching out. We
have hold on one second here, some folks, eric right buck.
We had some protests in Savannah. People were laying down
in front of busses. It got a little harry. We

(01:50:16):
had to escort the busses out of Savannah. Uh oh.
I think the tactical unit was our canine unit. Interesting,
I gotta check this story out. There was a it
was a deportation buss people lying down in front of it.
That's illegal, folks, that's not uh, that's not engaging in
peaceful protests. That's actually breaking the law when you block

(01:50:38):
streets and block cars for moving. I think this is
one of the more annoying tactics the left uses. And
it's so called protest culture or it's protest culture, it's
not so called. We've got a lot more great stuff
in the role call. The good news is we got
it every day this week to get into all the
latest I just want to say thank you to all
of you for joining me here. I have so much
more news and exciting stuff tell you about in the

(01:51:00):
days ahead. Uh. Please do tell a friend or two
about the show when you get a chance this week.
Share it with them. Uh, send them an email with Hey.
Check out this guy Buck Sexton on iTunes. It's how
folks learn about the show. Until tomorrow, my friends, you
know what we all have to do. Shields high,

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Death, Sex & Money

Stuff You Should Know

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Delusional Propagandists

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Dateline NBC

Death, Sex & Money

Stuff You Should Know

All Episodes

Delusional Propagandists

Dateline NBC