September 23, 2021 • 25 mins
New video is out that the feds didn’t want to release of the Jan 6 “insurrection” and it shows people walking around the Capitol and taking selfies. The murder rate increased 30% in 2020, the highest one years increase ever- and BLM is the biggest reason for it. Plus more numbers on the border scam going on, and Hunter Biden is going to sell paintings (peddle influence) for 500K.
Please subscribe to the podcast! And get more exclusive content from Buck at BuckSexton.com.
Find Buck on:
Twitter @BuckSexton
Facebook @BuckSexton
Instagram @BuckSexton
Email the Podcast: TeamBuck@IHeartMedia.com
Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Team, Welcome to the Freedom Hunt. We've got how the
migrant scam at our southern border is actually playing out.
Some footage of the January sixth insurrection comes out that
doesn't look at all like an insurrection. You have Hunter
Biden's artwork for sale and Climate Night comedy stuff going on,
and no surprise, it was not funny at all. Plus,
(00:23):
homicides rose fixed on this by thirty percent in twenty twenty.
Thirty percent rise in homicides, and they're trying to come
up with all these complicated reasons. How could it have
been that we have a thirty percent bump in one year,
the most since they have been recording them at the
national level since nineteen sixty, so we're going on in
(00:46):
seventy years. In twenty twenty we had the biggest rise
in homicides we have ever seen, and we are supposed
to believe that that is because of what exactly, well
we all know what it's really from. Anyway, we'll get
into that in a moment. Born from the tragedy of
nine eleven, the Tunnet of the Towers Foundation carries forward
(01:07):
a legacy of courage and heroism to mark twenty years
Tunnleton Towers is gifting America's heroes and their families with
two hundred mortgage free homes to wander. The fallen Chairman
and CEO, Frank Siller, walks more than five hundred miles
through six states in forty two days from the Pentagon
of Shanksville, culminating at ground zero on nine eleven. Towers
of Light returned to the Pentagon and Shanks' Memorials in remembrance.
(01:30):
For the first time, those we lost to nine to
eleven related illness are being honored at a ceremony on
September twelfth, and on Veterans Day. Another first, the soldiers
we lost the war on Terror are having their names
read aloud the words never forget, require action, do good,
and take action. Now donate eleven dollars a month. That
t twot dot org. That's t the number two t
(01:51):
dot org. So they told us that the migrants at
the southern border would not be let into the US,
that a lot of them would be deported. We've heard
about this, and you've been unable to see a lot
of data on this because the media doesn't want to
give you the data. The numbers don't lie, They can
lie about the numbers, but the numbers don't lie, you know,
(02:11):
scoreboard don't lie. Numbers don't lie. Well, here's what we
know about the Del Rio Bridge crossing as of six
am today Eastern time. Six thousand, seven hundred and twenty
two migrants, four thousand, seven hundred and forty two family units.
This is all from Bill mulugion of Fox News. Fox
(02:33):
Las doing great work down there. One thousand, four hundred
and eighty nine single adult men, four hundred and eighteen
single adult females, seventy three family groups, and three hundred
plus pregnant women. Now, let's do this in reverse order.
Why would pregnant women be living in what is essentially
(02:56):
a makeshift refugee camp on the US Mexico border. That's
not a place where if you were seven or eight
By the way, most of these women are visibly pregnant,
quite pregnant, seven or eight months pregnant. Why would you
do that? Oh, because you know that you will be
led into the United States under the medical exceptions that exist,
(03:17):
and then you will have a child in the US
who will automatically because of birthright citizenship, which basically no
other country in the world has automatically be a US citizen,
and then there will be a permanent tether to the
United States for that individual, for that mother, and the
chance of deportation will go from about you know, point
(03:41):
five percent to zero percent very quickly. This is all intentional,
This is all plotted. People are figuring out how do
I get around the actual immigration system as it is.
I don't want to apply. I don't want to go
through the hoops. I don't want to go through the hurdles.
So this is one way to do it. Four thousand,
(04:04):
seven hundred forty two family units. Family units are overwhelmingly
likely as long as they pass a credible fear test
to be let into the United States. That's what's going on.
They will not remember, they cannot separate families, and so
if one individual claims credible fear or persecution, whatever they
(04:28):
whatever they say in order to get past that first screening,
they are into the US. That's it. Never to have
to really deal with the immigration system again. So we
were led to believe, Oh, it's it's single adult males.
They won't be led into the country permanently or led
into the country at all. Don't worry, this is fine. No,
(04:49):
this was all one big attempt to scam the immigration
system by looking for the loopholes, the weak spots, and
people say, oh, but it's legal. No, crossing to the
US not at a port of entry is illegal. Deciding
that you're going to lie to border patrol agents or
(05:09):
Immigrations and Customs enforcement about your status or the fear
you have, telling some story about oh, if I go home,
I'll be politically persecuted. Why why based on what? Oh,
because that's what the cartels have told me to say.
That's scamming the system. And then not showing up for
the hearing that a lot of them a notice to
appear that they're being given in sixty days, not showing
(05:31):
up that that means you are then illegally in the country.
You are no longer legally in the country. And so
that is the circumstance. That is a situation in which
we find ourselves right now. That's what is going on.
So the numbers, by the way, that are really really
(05:53):
going to blow your mind, the ones that you're really
going to say, hold on a second, that can't be right,
is how many of them? And I'm telling you right now,
I'm talking to you on Thursday morning. The numbers I
think will be released Friday at about four pm Eastern time,
of how many Haitian illegal immigrants legal aliens have been
(06:15):
let into the United States in the last week. It's
not going to be all of them. There have been
some deported, some sent back. The single adult males can
be sent back, But of the family units, I'm going
to go out there and tell you that I think
about sixty to sixty percent or so will have been
led into the US with a notice to appear, maybe
more like seventy percent, and that will be the official number.
(06:36):
Whether you believe that or not, I leave that to you.
I leave that to your discretion. So that's the situation
of the border. That's what we are dealing with right now.
And I would also remind everybody that while we're going
to get a lot of a lot of talk about this, well,
(06:58):
first off, there's a lot of a lot of lying
about it. They're going to do everything they can to
evade the questions that people have, like a whole lot
of Second, what is the plan here? I mean here
is Secretary majorcas talking about the plan. I have been
(07:19):
quite clear that we do have a plan to address
migration at the southern border. We're executing it. It takes time,
and we're starting to see the results. I'd be very
pleased to meet with you and discuss with you some
of the tools that we have employed to actually drive
the results that we saw this past month and we
(07:40):
expect to see in the ongoing months. If he had
a plan that he wasn't trying to hide from the
American people, if he had a plan that didn't seem
like there was a massive scam going on here, wouldn't
he be very open about it. Wouldn't he be telling
everybody about that plan in detail? I mean, what are
(08:02):
the steps, what's really happening, what's really going on? I
don't want to talk about it. Instead, they just refer
to it vaguely and then say, oh, I would love
to give you the details at a later point. I
mean majorcas is in an unwinnable position here in the
(08:23):
sense that he's defending an administration on policy matters when
it comes to the border, specifically, a lot of areas,
though I bide to things at forty three percent approval
right now, a lot of areas where there is no
real defense of this. I mean, you would not be
able to find a way, a credible way to say
the border is going well. But Mayorcas is trying, and
(08:44):
he says things like this, is the border more secure
under your leadership than when you started? I'm Congressman, the
border is secure. We're executing our plan, and I've been
very clear and unequivocal in that regard. The question is
is the border more secure now under your leadership? Congressman?
(09:04):
It is no less secure than it was previously. Oh okay,
that's not true based on the numbers. I mean, that's
just a lie. But words like secure plan, it gives
a lot of leeway. I mean, there are a lot
of places you can go with those terms. And that's
where I think you have people like ma Orcas essentially
(09:25):
hiding on this, and then you also have others who
are just gonna lie about this, I mean openly lie
about what's going on down there. I mean Maxine Waters,
remember of Congress, Remember the controversy for twenty four hours
about they're whipping the Haitian migrants from horseback. Was a lie.
Never happened. No one actually saw it happen, No no
(09:50):
witness believed it happened. But there's a photo with a
border patrol member on horseback with the horse reins in
his hands, and they're saying that they're whipping the migrants.
That's what they were, That's what the claim was from
the media and from the journals. And here you have
Maxine Waters, who can always be counted on to say
(10:11):
the most inflammatory and idiotic things possible, talking about border
patrol at this moment. What the hell are we doing here?
What we witness takes us back hundreds of years. What
we witness was worse than what we witnessed in slavery.
Cowboys with their reins again whipping black people Haitians into
(10:37):
the water where they're scrambling and falling down, and all
they're trying to do is escape from violence in their country.
That's not true. None of it's true. I mean everything
she said is actually untrue. So we can start there.
It is not the case that they're trying to escape
violence in Haiti, for example, because most of them are
(10:58):
coming from Brazil other countries. And if you are a
true refugee or an asylum seeker, you are supposed to
claim asylum in the first country where you are safe,
not the country with the best welfare benefits, not the
country where the existing population is going to give you
the cushiest check in the mail, so to speak. All
(11:22):
the time. That's not the way it's supposed to go.
And I mean that as a function of US law
and as a function, for whatever it's worth, of international law.
Though is international law really a thing? But anyone who
points this out will be told is being racist. Of course,
anyone who talks about this situation is a bad person
if you speak about it. Honestly, I just want to
(11:44):
remind everyone about, you know, the concern the Democrats have
left have for Haitian migrants is particularly interesting right now
considering that their leader, Joe Biden, now the President of
the United States, had this to say back in nineteen
ninety four. A leading editor of a paper in the
Delaware Valley wrote asked their reporters to come down and
(12:07):
talk to me and said, why is Biden so concerned
about Bosnia and not about Haiti? Is it because blacks
are involved in Haiti? Blacks are what at stake in Haiti,
and in Bosnia they are Europeans Whites. There is major
arsenals of nuclear weapons where they have long histories of
national wars where ethnicity dominates. That is a phenomenal potential
(12:33):
consequence of the United States. If Haiti got awful thing
to say, If Haiti just quietly sunk into the Caribbean
or rose up three hundred feet, it wouldn't matter. A
whole lot wouldn't matter, he says, and that was buying,
then he'll be forgiven for it now because he is
their instrument of power. He is the president, and he's
(12:54):
a Democrat. So whatever he has said in the past
doesn't matter. Oh, even the fact that is shown. Hunter
is out there now selling paintings, selling paintings for up
to five hundred thousand dollars up up. And you know
what the White House is saying about this, You know
what their claim is. Oh, but he won't know who's
(13:17):
buying them, so it's fine. Really, how how hard do
you think it is for someone to get in touch with,
you know, meth and crack using Hunter Biden who is
you know, he's got children out of wedlock and the guy,
the guy is such a mess. We all know we
have to get into it. How hard do you think
(13:38):
it is to get on the phone with that guy
and say, Hey, I'm about to purchase one of your
paintings for five hundred thousand dollars. But just remember, you know,
remember who your friends are when I need a meeting
with your dad? And then how are do you think
it is for him to tell his dad, Hey, you know,
I think you should talk to so and so. There's
no there's no way this is going to be enforced
as an ethics as an ethics issue, There's no way
(14:00):
they're gonna have actual transparency on this. So they pretend, Oh,
don't worry, it won't be officially known. Think about this.
They won't be officially known who the buyer of the
painting is. Therefore there's no undue influence, right because it
would be hard to get word to Hunter about who's
actually buying the painting and who's gonna buy the next one,
(14:24):
who's gonna buy the next painting. Well, someone gets on
the phone with Hunter, Biden says, Hey, I love that
five hundred thousand dollars painting, but you know, I really
do need so and so to have a sit down
with your dad. What there's going to be a an
FBI investigation into those phone calls. Please, we all know
what a joke that is These people have no ethics.
You have to remember that. They talk about this all day.
(14:44):
Oh Trump is so awful. They were freaking out about
Trump having an ownership in a hotel, as they said,
it was a violation of the emoluments clause, which all
the journals had to look up they did. None of
them even knew what the emolument's clause was when they
first started this theory of the emoluments clause violation. It's
pretty straightforward. You can't have a president who's getting, you know,
(15:05):
a ten million dollar house given to them by a
foreign government, right, I mean, yeah, you don't want a
foreign government. You have to buy off the sitting president
of the United States. But they were claiming that because
Trump owned a percentage of a hotel in Washington, DC
and foreign diplomats would go buy a cheeseburger at the
restaurant there, that that was I'm not kidding that that
(15:27):
was a violation of the emoluments clause. They did some
whole analysis in the Washington Post of you know, three
hundred thousand dollars they estimated had been spent by foreign
diplomats in the Trump hotel, to which let's say, okay,
so if the Finnished diplomats spent three grand and the
you know, the diplomats from Argentina spent five granded. You
(15:48):
know how much of this money is even going to Trump?
Are the what are the profit margin? How would you
influence the president of that? Oh hey, excuse me, sir,
you need to sign this treaty because our ambassador had
a glass of wine at your hotel a week ago.
That's not how leverage works. Come on, but these I'm
not by the way, that Washington posting that is completely real.
(16:10):
They did a whole analysis of this. It was like
three hundred grand also known as less than one bill
Clinton speech. Look at all the influence peddling that was
done by Democrats for the Clinton machine. And they pretended
like that was all fine. But then all of a
sudden they had all these ethics concerns about Trump. And
now Hunter Biden, the crackhead is selling five hundred thousand
dollars paintings to anonymous buyers. And they say, well, because
(16:33):
they're anonymous to Hunter as well, Sure they are no
problem here, no ethics issue. I used to point out
that Hillary speeches were just a function. We're just a
form of money. Laundering for influence peddling. I say this
all the time, and as part of how I would
explain this to people, I would say, if Bill Clinton
(16:54):
became a painter while Hillary was Secretary of State and
everyone thought she was going to run for president, and
all of a sudden bills you know, well, I'm a
speech is worth like five or six hundred thousand dollars.
You know, I'm sorry, I mean my painting. My painting's
worth five or six hundred grant and you could pay that.
You know, you're a company that's going to give him
a half million dollars from to show up and you know,
(17:16):
read some speech no one's gonna remember in five minutes.
That's a great way to buy influence. Do you think
the Democrats cared about that? Do you think they ever
even we're willing to see it that way? No, of course,
but I would use them. I used the painting example
to prove how easy it would be to launder influence
peddling in that way. And now they're actually just doing it.
It's like I gave them the idea, which I guess
(17:37):
now I feel like I shouldn't have done. But you
get what I'm saying. But they'll do everything they can
to prop Biden up, including avoiding questions about not only
the ethics or lack thereof, of his son, but also
can this guy even really be considered the head of
the United States government? I mean, is he of sound
mind enough that we could say this guy's actually running
(17:58):
the show? Well, there was that moment it was very
embarrassing where the Prime Minister of the UK, Boris Johnson,
was trying to have a conversation trying to speak to reporters,
and White House handlers were like okay, okay, okay, okay,
everybody go go go go okay, you know, yelling over
what they were trying to say, which seemed very strange.
First of all, very rude to an important foreign guest
(18:20):
in the White House, but beyond that, it seemed like
they were just trying to prevent Joe Biden from going yeah, yeah,
no joke. Yeah, it's not a joke, folks, It's not
a joke. You know, Amn track Joe, that anyone voted
for the people should be honestly should be really ashamed
of voting for this this buffoon. But they did, and
(18:43):
they think and not even because I disagree with them,
just because I mean, would they would they vote for
a tree stump in the woods? I mean, would they
vote for a cabbage patch doll? And I'm just wondering
what are the limits? And then have the advisors around
the cabbage patch doll say, Okay, well we're actually calling
the shot. I think they Democrats would gladly do that.
Here's the explanation though, when CBS reporter asked Jensaki about
(19:07):
the shouting down of Boris Johnson, what is your understanding
of what transpired in the Pull Office yesterday when we
were all in there trying to hear from the President
of the Primister which aspect, well, the British Prime Minister
in the American whole office called out British reporters and
then when American reporters trying to call in the American President,
(19:28):
we were escorted out foot it out. Well, I think
in that circumstance and I think our relationship with the
United Kingdom and with Prime Minister Johnson is so strong
in abiding, we will be able to move forward beyond this.
But he called on individuals from his press corps without
alerting us to that intention in advance. Oh, he did
(19:49):
not alert us to that intention in advance, so the
White House employees couldn't figure out, hey, maybe we shouldn't
shout down the British Prime minister. It wasn't about him.
Biden and started to speak, and they're like, okay, okay,
let's go, let's go, let's go. Yeah, they wanted to
shut it down right away because they know they've got
a big problem with the border debacle and Joe saying
(20:12):
anything on the border. Can you imagine, you know, saying
anything on the border situation is just a huge risk,
enormously risky. And yeah, that is the situation. That is
the circumstance that played out there. So we can all see,
we can all understand what happened there. Oh, I mentioned
(20:36):
this at the top, and I want to get to
the January sixth surveillance. So there's tons of surveillance footage
from the January sixth insurrection that, for some reason, the
federal government doesn't want everyone to see, which seems so strange.
I mean, if it's if you have men in balaclavas
with AK forty seven's trying to overthrow the United States government,
(21:00):
we should all see that. I mean that's horrifying, right,
We should all, Oh, but that didn't happen at all. No.
In fact, what you see in the footage, because we've
all seen the footage of cops, you know, fighting, and
we had the cops crying on Capitol Hill from Capitol
Police who said that you know, they were worried they
were going to die. None of them did die, and
none of them actually had anyone open fire on them.
There was no lethal force used against any of those
(21:22):
law enforcement officers. Now, anybody who used force period against
those cops should be held accountable for assault on a
police officer because we actually believe in the rule of
law as conservatives, but we also believe in commensurate punishment.
We believe in the actual laws being enforced for what
was done. Not this make believe it was an insurrection,
nonsense that we're all being forced to sit through and
(21:44):
go through. But I digress. Now, the situation unfolding before
us is that they don't want people to see the
actual footage, right. Why not? Well, it's because when you
look at it and I have to describe it for you,
(22:04):
because obviously this is audio only. You've got a lot
of people who have entered the Capitol who are trespassing.
They should not be there in the capacity they're there,
and they are interrupting a government government proceeding. Fine, not
supposed to do that. Democrats do it all the time.
Democrats will shut down the state House in Wisconsin, and
they'll know, they'll block hallways and and you know, shout
at people and mob senators during the cabin all hearing.
(22:27):
I mean, you know, Democrats can block whatever proceedings they want,
that's all fine. They can riot for BLM all summer,
try to burn down a federal courthouse, burned down police precinct.
I mean, they can do whatever they want, of course.
But the people walking around in the in the Capitol,
you say, they're just kind of walking up, they're taking selfees,
they're just walking around looking at stuff. This is the insurrection.
(22:51):
This was going to overthrow the United States government. I
mean I still sit here and say, you know what
exactly was supposed to be the plan here. They were
going to selfie the Capitol police and the FBI and
the United States Military and all the other federal law
enforcement agencies into submission. No to call it an insurrection
(23:12):
as a lie. Anyone who called it an insurrection is
an idiot. It's not true. We know it's not true.
And the more footage of it you see, the harder
it is from the prop up that lie. That's where
they're trying to hide it from you. It was a riot.
Some people did a dumb thing and should not have
done the dumb thing they did. People that assaulted cops
should be prosecuted for, you know, the serious assault on police.
(23:36):
I want to know how many people that assaulted police
and the BLM riots have been prosecuted though with the
same seriousness. I'm just wondering. I'm sure there are some,
but they're definitely not running around trying to make examples
of people, that's for sure. So yeah, it's a remarkable
circumstance right now to see how they're trying to hide this.
(23:58):
They're trying to change the Oh and since we're talking
about BLM riots, A thirty percent increase in hotness sides
in twenty twenty nationwide, the biggest in seventy years of
keeping those Wait now, I'm sorry, in fifty years. Wait,
since nineteen sixty, so twenty plus forty sixty years, thank you,
sixty years of keeping those statistics. So that's pretty bad.
(24:23):
That's pretty bad. Why did it happen? Oh, it happened
because they decided that police were the enemy, and the
anti police elements in this country were ascendant, and there
was a sense of impunity for the worst criminals in
our society to do what they do. And there was
less law enforcement on the streets, cops were less aggressive.
(24:46):
The Ferguson effect came into play, and a lot more people,
thousands more people died. That is what BLM did. It
did not create massive police reform, It did not make
people safer. It did not end racism, no, none of that.
It was just the mob all over this country marauding
on the streets, destroying people's private property, attacking law enforcement officers,
(25:11):
attacking strangers civilians at some points, and for what. For
what because of one incident with one cop in Minneapolis,
that cop now convicted of murder and likely to spend
the next few decades in prison. But so then the
rest of the country had to go through during a pandemic,
(25:32):
no less, a summer of terror out in the streets
here in New York, the Purge night, all of it. Well,
now we see the results. And by the way, this
is also this year is also up in homicides AHO.
It's not up thirty percent, but it's also a bad
year for all of that, so this is something we'll
continue to focus on. Thank you so much for being
here with me on the Box Actent Show podcast. I
(25:55):
will be back with you all tomorrow. Shields Hie
Team, Welcome to the Freedom Hunt. We've got how the
migrant scam at our southern border is actually playing out.
Some footage of the January sixth insurrection comes out that
doesn't look at all like an insurrection. You have Hunter
Biden's artwork for sale and Climate Night comedy stuff going on,
and no surprise, it was not funny at all. Plus,
(00:23):
homicides rose fixed on this by thirty percent in twenty twenty.
Thirty percent rise in homicides, and they're trying to come
up with all these complicated reasons. How could it have
been that we have a thirty percent bump in one year,
the most since they have been recording them at the
national level since nineteen sixty, so we're going on in
(00:46):
seventy years. In twenty twenty we had the biggest rise
in homicides we have ever seen, and we are supposed
to believe that that is because of what exactly, well
we all know what it's really from. Anyway, we'll get
into that in a moment. Born from the tragedy of
nine eleven, the Tunnet of the Towers Foundation carries forward
(01:07):
a legacy of courage and heroism to mark twenty years
Tunnleton Towers is gifting America's heroes and their families with
two hundred mortgage free homes to wander. The fallen Chairman
and CEO, Frank Siller, walks more than five hundred miles
through six states in forty two days from the Pentagon
of Shanksville, culminating at ground zero on nine eleven. Towers
of Light returned to the Pentagon and Shanks' Memorials in remembrance.
(01:30):
For the first time, those we lost to nine to
eleven related illness are being honored at a ceremony on
September twelfth, and on Veterans Day. Another first, the soldiers
we lost the war on Terror are having their names
read aloud the words never forget, require action, do good,
and take action. Now donate eleven dollars a month. That
t twot dot org. That's t the number two t
(01:51):
dot org. So they told us that the migrants at
the southern border would not be let into the US,
that a lot of them would be deported. We've heard
about this, and you've been unable to see a lot
of data on this because the media doesn't want to
give you the data. The numbers don't lie, They can
lie about the numbers, but the numbers don't lie, you know,
(02:11):
scoreboard don't lie. Numbers don't lie. Well, here's what we
know about the Del Rio Bridge crossing as of six
am today Eastern time. Six thousand, seven hundred and twenty
two migrants, four thousand, seven hundred and forty two family units.
This is all from Bill mulugion of Fox News. Fox
(02:33):
Las doing great work down there. One thousand, four hundred
and eighty nine single adult men, four hundred and eighteen
single adult females, seventy three family groups, and three hundred
plus pregnant women. Now, let's do this in reverse order.
Why would pregnant women be living in what is essentially
(02:56):
a makeshift refugee camp on the US Mexico border. That's
not a place where if you were seven or eight
By the way, most of these women are visibly pregnant,
quite pregnant, seven or eight months pregnant. Why would you
do that? Oh, because you know that you will be
led into the United States under the medical exceptions that exist,
(03:17):
and then you will have a child in the US
who will automatically because of birthright citizenship, which basically no
other country in the world has automatically be a US citizen,
and then there will be a permanent tether to the
United States for that individual, for that mother, and the
chance of deportation will go from about you know, point
(03:41):
five percent to zero percent very quickly. This is all intentional,
This is all plotted. People are figuring out how do
I get around the actual immigration system as it is.
I don't want to apply. I don't want to go
through the hoops. I don't want to go through the hurdles.
So this is one way to do it. Four thousand,
(04:04):
seven hundred forty two family units. Family units are overwhelmingly
likely as long as they pass a credible fear test
to be let into the United States. That's what's going on.
They will not remember, they cannot separate families, and so
if one individual claims credible fear or persecution, whatever they
(04:28):
whatever they say in order to get past that first screening,
they are into the US. That's it. Never to have
to really deal with the immigration system again. So we
were led to believe, Oh, it's it's single adult males.
They won't be led into the country permanently or led
into the country at all. Don't worry, this is fine. No,
(04:49):
this was all one big attempt to scam the immigration
system by looking for the loopholes, the weak spots, and
people say, oh, but it's legal. No, crossing to the
US not at a port of entry is illegal. Deciding
that you're going to lie to border patrol agents or
(05:09):
Immigrations and Customs enforcement about your status or the fear
you have, telling some story about oh, if I go home,
I'll be politically persecuted. Why why based on what? Oh,
because that's what the cartels have told me to say.
That's scamming the system. And then not showing up for
the hearing that a lot of them a notice to
appear that they're being given in sixty days, not showing
(05:31):
up that that means you are then illegally in the country.
You are no longer legally in the country. And so
that is the circumstance. That is a situation in which
we find ourselves right now. That's what is going on.
So the numbers, by the way, that are really really
(05:53):
going to blow your mind, the ones that you're really
going to say, hold on a second, that can't be right,
is how many of them? And I'm telling you right now,
I'm talking to you on Thursday morning. The numbers I
think will be released Friday at about four pm Eastern time,
of how many Haitian illegal immigrants legal aliens have been
(06:15):
let into the United States in the last week. It's
not going to be all of them. There have been
some deported, some sent back. The single adult males can
be sent back, But of the family units, I'm going
to go out there and tell you that I think
about sixty to sixty percent or so will have been
led into the US with a notice to appear, maybe
more like seventy percent, and that will be the official number.
(06:36):
Whether you believe that or not, I leave that to you.
I leave that to your discretion. So that's the situation
of the border. That's what we are dealing with right now.
And I would also remind everybody that while we're going
to get a lot of a lot of talk about this, well,
(06:58):
first off, there's a lot of a lot of lying
about it. They're going to do everything they can to
evade the questions that people have, like a whole lot
of Second, what is the plan here? I mean here
is Secretary majorcas talking about the plan. I have been
(07:19):
quite clear that we do have a plan to address
migration at the southern border. We're executing it. It takes time,
and we're starting to see the results. I'd be very
pleased to meet with you and discuss with you some
of the tools that we have employed to actually drive
the results that we saw this past month and we
(07:40):
expect to see in the ongoing months. If he had
a plan that he wasn't trying to hide from the
American people, if he had a plan that didn't seem
like there was a massive scam going on here, wouldn't
he be very open about it. Wouldn't he be telling
everybody about that plan in detail? I mean, what are
(08:02):
the steps, what's really happening, what's really going on? I
don't want to talk about it. Instead, they just refer
to it vaguely and then say, oh, I would love
to give you the details at a later point. I
mean majorcas is in an unwinnable position here in the
(08:23):
sense that he's defending an administration on policy matters when
it comes to the border, specifically, a lot of areas,
though I bide to things at forty three percent approval
right now, a lot of areas where there is no
real defense of this. I mean, you would not be
able to find a way, a credible way to say
the border is going well. But Mayorcas is trying, and
(08:44):
he says things like this, is the border more secure
under your leadership than when you started? I'm Congressman, the
border is secure. We're executing our plan, and I've been
very clear and unequivocal in that regard. The question is
is the border more secure now under your leadership? Congressman?
(09:04):
It is no less secure than it was previously. Oh okay,
that's not true based on the numbers. I mean, that's
just a lie. But words like secure plan, it gives
a lot of leeway. I mean, there are a lot
of places you can go with those terms. And that's
where I think you have people like ma Orcas essentially
(09:25):
hiding on this, and then you also have others who
are just gonna lie about this, I mean openly lie
about what's going on down there. I mean Maxine Waters,
remember of Congress, Remember the controversy for twenty four hours
about they're whipping the Haitian migrants from horseback. Was a lie.
Never happened. No one actually saw it happen, No no
(09:50):
witness believed it happened. But there's a photo with a
border patrol member on horseback with the horse reins in
his hands, and they're saying that they're whipping the migrants.
That's what they were, That's what the claim was from
the media and from the journals. And here you have
Maxine Waters, who can always be counted on to say
(10:11):
the most inflammatory and idiotic things possible, talking about border
patrol at this moment. What the hell are we doing here?
What we witness takes us back hundreds of years. What
we witness was worse than what we witnessed in slavery.
Cowboys with their reins again whipping black people Haitians into
(10:37):
the water where they're scrambling and falling down, and all
they're trying to do is escape from violence in their country.
That's not true. None of it's true. I mean everything
she said is actually untrue. So we can start there.
It is not the case that they're trying to escape
violence in Haiti, for example, because most of them are
(10:58):
coming from Brazil other countries. And if you are a
true refugee or an asylum seeker, you are supposed to
claim asylum in the first country where you are safe,
not the country with the best welfare benefits, not the
country where the existing population is going to give you
the cushiest check in the mail, so to speak. All
(11:22):
the time. That's not the way it's supposed to go.
And I mean that as a function of US law
and as a function, for whatever it's worth, of international law.
Though is international law really a thing? But anyone who
points this out will be told is being racist. Of course,
anyone who talks about this situation is a bad person
if you speak about it. Honestly, I just want to
(11:44):
remind everyone about, you know, the concern the Democrats have
left have for Haitian migrants is particularly interesting right now
considering that their leader, Joe Biden, now the President of
the United States, had this to say back in nineteen
ninety four. A leading editor of a paper in the
Delaware Valley wrote asked their reporters to come down and
(12:07):
talk to me and said, why is Biden so concerned
about Bosnia and not about Haiti? Is it because blacks
are involved in Haiti? Blacks are what at stake in Haiti,
and in Bosnia they are Europeans Whites. There is major
arsenals of nuclear weapons where they have long histories of
national wars where ethnicity dominates. That is a phenomenal potential
(12:33):
consequence of the United States. If Haiti got awful thing
to say, If Haiti just quietly sunk into the Caribbean
or rose up three hundred feet, it wouldn't matter. A
whole lot wouldn't matter, he says, and that was buying,
then he'll be forgiven for it now because he is
their instrument of power. He is the president, and he's
(12:54):
a Democrat. So whatever he has said in the past
doesn't matter. Oh, even the fact that is shown. Hunter
is out there now selling paintings, selling paintings for up
to five hundred thousand dollars up up. And you know
what the White House is saying about this, You know
what their claim is. Oh, but he won't know who's
(13:17):
buying them, so it's fine. Really, how how hard do
you think it is for someone to get in touch with,
you know, meth and crack using Hunter Biden who is
you know, he's got children out of wedlock and the guy,
the guy is such a mess. We all know we
have to get into it. How hard do you think
(13:38):
it is to get on the phone with that guy
and say, Hey, I'm about to purchase one of your
paintings for five hundred thousand dollars. But just remember, you know,
remember who your friends are when I need a meeting
with your dad? And then how are do you think
it is for him to tell his dad, Hey, you know,
I think you should talk to so and so. There's
no there's no way this is going to be enforced
as an ethics as an ethics issue, There's no way
(14:00):
they're gonna have actual transparency on this. So they pretend, Oh,
don't worry, it won't be officially known. Think about this.
They won't be officially known who the buyer of the
painting is. Therefore there's no undue influence, right because it
would be hard to get word to Hunter about who's
actually buying the painting and who's gonna buy the next one,
(14:24):
who's gonna buy the next painting. Well, someone gets on
the phone with Hunter, Biden says, Hey, I love that
five hundred thousand dollars painting, but you know, I really
do need so and so to have a sit down
with your dad. What there's going to be a an
FBI investigation into those phone calls. Please, we all know
what a joke that is These people have no ethics.
You have to remember that. They talk about this all day.
(14:44):
Oh Trump is so awful. They were freaking out about
Trump having an ownership in a hotel, as they said,
it was a violation of the emoluments clause, which all
the journals had to look up they did. None of
them even knew what the emolument's clause was when they
first started this theory of the emoluments clause violation. It's
pretty straightforward. You can't have a president who's getting, you know,
(15:05):
a ten million dollar house given to them by a
foreign government, right, I mean, yeah, you don't want a
foreign government. You have to buy off the sitting president
of the United States. But they were claiming that because
Trump owned a percentage of a hotel in Washington, DC
and foreign diplomats would go buy a cheeseburger at the
restaurant there, that that was I'm not kidding that that
(15:27):
was a violation of the emoluments clause. They did some
whole analysis in the Washington Post of you know, three
hundred thousand dollars they estimated had been spent by foreign
diplomats in the Trump hotel, to which let's say, okay,
so if the Finnished diplomats spent three grand and the
you know, the diplomats from Argentina spent five granded. You
(15:48):
know how much of this money is even going to Trump?
Are the what are the profit margin? How would you
influence the president of that? Oh hey, excuse me, sir,
you need to sign this treaty because our ambassador had
a glass of wine at your hotel a week ago.
That's not how leverage works. Come on, but these I'm
not by the way, that Washington posting that is completely real.
(16:10):
They did a whole analysis of this. It was like
three hundred grand also known as less than one bill
Clinton speech. Look at all the influence peddling that was
done by Democrats for the Clinton machine. And they pretended
like that was all fine. But then all of a
sudden they had all these ethics concerns about Trump. And
now Hunter Biden, the crackhead is selling five hundred thousand
dollars paintings to anonymous buyers. And they say, well, because
(16:33):
they're anonymous to Hunter as well, Sure they are no
problem here, no ethics issue. I used to point out
that Hillary speeches were just a function. We're just a
form of money. Laundering for influence peddling. I say this
all the time, and as part of how I would
explain this to people, I would say, if Bill Clinton
(16:54):
became a painter while Hillary was Secretary of State and
everyone thought she was going to run for president, and
all of a sudden bills you know, well, I'm a
speech is worth like five or six hundred thousand dollars.
You know, I'm sorry, I mean my painting. My painting's
worth five or six hundred grant and you could pay that.
You know, you're a company that's going to give him
a half million dollars from to show up and you know,
(17:16):
read some speech no one's gonna remember in five minutes.
That's a great way to buy influence. Do you think
the Democrats cared about that? Do you think they ever
even we're willing to see it that way? No, of course,
but I would use them. I used the painting example
to prove how easy it would be to launder influence
peddling in that way. And now they're actually just doing it.
It's like I gave them the idea, which I guess
(17:37):
now I feel like I shouldn't have done. But you
get what I'm saying. But they'll do everything they can
to prop Biden up, including avoiding questions about not only
the ethics or lack thereof, of his son, but also
can this guy even really be considered the head of
the United States government? I mean, is he of sound
mind enough that we could say this guy's actually running
(17:58):
the show? Well, there was that moment it was very
embarrassing where the Prime Minister of the UK, Boris Johnson,
was trying to have a conversation trying to speak to reporters,
and White House handlers were like okay, okay, okay, okay,
everybody go go go go okay, you know, yelling over
what they were trying to say, which seemed very strange.
First of all, very rude to an important foreign guest
(18:20):
in the White House, but beyond that, it seemed like
they were just trying to prevent Joe Biden from going yeah, yeah,
no joke. Yeah, it's not a joke, folks, It's not
a joke. You know, Amn track Joe, that anyone voted
for the people should be honestly should be really ashamed
of voting for this this buffoon. But they did, and
(18:43):
they think and not even because I disagree with them,
just because I mean, would they would they vote for
a tree stump in the woods? I mean, would they
vote for a cabbage patch doll? And I'm just wondering
what are the limits? And then have the advisors around
the cabbage patch doll say, Okay, well we're actually calling
the shot. I think they Democrats would gladly do that.
Here's the explanation though, when CBS reporter asked Jensaki about
(19:07):
the shouting down of Boris Johnson, what is your understanding
of what transpired in the Pull Office yesterday when we
were all in there trying to hear from the President
of the Primister which aspect, well, the British Prime Minister
in the American whole office called out British reporters and
then when American reporters trying to call in the American President,
(19:28):
we were escorted out foot it out. Well, I think
in that circumstance and I think our relationship with the
United Kingdom and with Prime Minister Johnson is so strong
in abiding, we will be able to move forward beyond this.
But he called on individuals from his press corps without
alerting us to that intention in advance. Oh, he did
(19:49):
not alert us to that intention in advance, so the
White House employees couldn't figure out, hey, maybe we shouldn't
shout down the British Prime minister. It wasn't about him.
Biden and started to speak, and they're like, okay, okay,
let's go, let's go, let's go. Yeah, they wanted to
shut it down right away because they know they've got
a big problem with the border debacle and Joe saying
(20:12):
anything on the border. Can you imagine, you know, saying
anything on the border situation is just a huge risk,
enormously risky. And yeah, that is the situation. That is
the circumstance that played out there. So we can all see,
we can all understand what happened there. Oh, I mentioned
(20:36):
this at the top, and I want to get to
the January sixth surveillance. So there's tons of surveillance footage
from the January sixth insurrection that, for some reason, the
federal government doesn't want everyone to see, which seems so strange.
I mean, if it's if you have men in balaclavas
with AK forty seven's trying to overthrow the United States government,
(21:00):
we should all see that. I mean that's horrifying, right,
We should all, Oh, but that didn't happen at all. No.
In fact, what you see in the footage, because we've
all seen the footage of cops, you know, fighting, and
we had the cops crying on Capitol Hill from Capitol
Police who said that you know, they were worried they
were going to die. None of them did die, and
none of them actually had anyone open fire on them.
There was no lethal force used against any of those
(21:22):
law enforcement officers. Now, anybody who used force period against
those cops should be held accountable for assault on a
police officer because we actually believe in the rule of
law as conservatives, but we also believe in commensurate punishment.
We believe in the actual laws being enforced for what
was done. Not this make believe it was an insurrection,
nonsense that we're all being forced to sit through and
(21:44):
go through. But I digress. Now, the situation unfolding before
us is that they don't want people to see the
actual footage, right. Why not? Well, it's because when you
look at it and I have to describe it for you,
(22:04):
because obviously this is audio only. You've got a lot
of people who have entered the Capitol who are trespassing.
They should not be there in the capacity they're there,
and they are interrupting a government government proceeding. Fine, not
supposed to do that. Democrats do it all the time.
Democrats will shut down the state House in Wisconsin, and
they'll know, they'll block hallways and and you know, shout
at people and mob senators during the cabin all hearing.
(22:27):
I mean, you know, Democrats can block whatever proceedings they want,
that's all fine. They can riot for BLM all summer,
try to burn down a federal courthouse, burned down police precinct.
I mean, they can do whatever they want, of course.
But the people walking around in the in the Capitol,
you say, they're just kind of walking up, they're taking selfees,
they're just walking around looking at stuff. This is the insurrection.
(22:51):
This was going to overthrow the United States government. I
mean I still sit here and say, you know what
exactly was supposed to be the plan here. They were
going to selfie the Capitol police and the FBI and
the United States Military and all the other federal law
enforcement agencies into submission. No to call it an insurrection
(23:12):
as a lie. Anyone who called it an insurrection is
an idiot. It's not true. We know it's not true.
And the more footage of it you see, the harder
it is from the prop up that lie. That's where
they're trying to hide it from you. It was a riot.
Some people did a dumb thing and should not have
done the dumb thing they did. People that assaulted cops
should be prosecuted for, you know, the serious assault on police.
(23:36):
I want to know how many people that assaulted police
and the BLM riots have been prosecuted though with the
same seriousness. I'm just wondering. I'm sure there are some,
but they're definitely not running around trying to make examples
of people, that's for sure. So yeah, it's a remarkable
circumstance right now to see how they're trying to hide this.
(23:58):
They're trying to change the Oh and since we're talking
about BLM riots, A thirty percent increase in hotness sides
in twenty twenty nationwide, the biggest in seventy years of
keeping those Wait now, I'm sorry, in fifty years. Wait,
since nineteen sixty, so twenty plus forty sixty years, thank you,
sixty years of keeping those statistics. So that's pretty bad.
(24:23):
That's pretty bad. Why did it happen? Oh, it happened
because they decided that police were the enemy, and the
anti police elements in this country were ascendant, and there
was a sense of impunity for the worst criminals in
our society to do what they do. And there was
less law enforcement on the streets, cops were less aggressive.
(24:46):
The Ferguson effect came into play, and a lot more people,
thousands more people died. That is what BLM did. It
did not create massive police reform, It did not make
people safer. It did not end racism, no, none of that.
It was just the mob all over this country marauding
on the streets, destroying people's private property, attacking law enforcement officers,
(25:11):
attacking strangers civilians at some points, and for what. For
what because of one incident with one cop in Minneapolis,
that cop now convicted of murder and likely to spend
the next few decades in prison. But so then the
rest of the country had to go through during a pandemic,
(25:32):
no less, a summer of terror out in the streets
here in New York, the Purge night, all of it. Well,
now we see the results. And by the way, this
is also this year is also up in homicides AHO.
It's not up thirty percent, but it's also a bad
year for all of that, so this is something we'll
continue to focus on. Thank you so much for being
here with me on the Box Actent Show podcast. I
(25:55):
will be back with you all tomorrow. Shields Hie
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
Death, Sex & Money
Anna Sale explores the big questions and hard choices that are often left out of polite conversation.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.