July 19, 2025 • 33 mins
Carol Roth, 2x NYT Bestselling Author of "You Will Own Nothing" and a Recovering investment banker and Mark Simone, Host of the NY’s #1 Morning Show join to talk about all the news of the day and CBS’s final standoff with radical Stephen Colbert.
Follow Sean and Our Guests on Social Media:
-
Facebook: facebook.com/SeanHannity
-
X (Twitter): x.com/seanhannity
-
Truth Social: truthsocial.com/@SeanHannity
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, thanks Scott chan An hour two Sean Hannity Show,
eight hundred and ninety four one Seawn, if you want
to be a part of the program. So John Solomon
just thenews dot com founder editor in chief, investigative reporter,
put in a Foyer request as it relates to the
Obama administration, and as this all is related to quote
(00:22):
the Russia collusion election interference narrative, and wow, a treasure
trove has come back. Now I see that the DNI
and Tulsey Gabbard apparently declassified these documents showing overwhelming evidence
of how President Donald Trump did indeed win the twenty
(00:43):
sixteen election against Hillary Clinton, and that then President Barack
Obama himself and his national security team laid the groundwork
for what would be the year's long Trump Russia collusion probe.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
We have cut.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
We covered this issue for like three years on this program.
John Solomon, Greg Jarrett, Sarah Carter, Catherine Herridge, and there
were others.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
You know.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
They give examples. December seventh, twenty sixteen, Director of National
Intelligence at the time, James Clapper ourn adversaries did not
use cyber attacks on election infrastructure to alter the presidential
election outcome. Then we have the Presidential Daily Briefing, which
was prepared by the Department of Homeland Security, reporting that
(01:27):
the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, FBI, NSA, Department of Homeland Security,
State Department, Open Sources, etc. For Obama quote, we assessed
that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US
election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.
(01:48):
Russian government affiliated actors most likely compromised in Illinois voter
registration data base and unsuccessfully attempted the same in other states.
And they also said it's highly unlikely the effort would
have resulted in the altering of any state's official vote result.
Criminal activity also failed to reach the scale and sophistication
(02:09):
necessary to change the election outcomes. Now, when you look
at all of this, there's a whole other narrative if
you listen to this show or watch Hannity the TV show,
and that is the communications from the FBI stating that
it should not go forward with the FBI they had
(02:30):
their concerns. Now what was going on behind the scenes. Well,
we know that the Russian dirty disinformation dossier was bought
and paid for by Hillary. We know that James comee
was warmed multiple.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Times not to use it. It was political.
Speaker 1 (02:44):
We know that it became the basis the bulk of
information for not one, but four FIZA applications. And this
reveals that the brief, it just it takes you off
in so many different directions. A meeting including top security officials,
Clap John Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch,
(03:06):
then deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, among them, to all
of them to discuss Russia. That declassified meeting revealed that
principles agreed to recommend sanctioning of certain members of the
Russian military intelligence foreign intelligence chains of command responsible for
cyber operations. How do we get to that point anyway?
John Solomon has a lot more to add to this,
(03:29):
and well, first of all, this was your foyer request.
When did you put in this request?
Speaker 3 (03:34):
Twenty nineteen? So let me tell you the story. It's
an amazing story and the most important document, the bats
of stuff that the D and I is declassifying is
a conversation that's begun right after my foyer comes in
from the Southeastern Legal Foundation, that was our law firm
that we were using and it ASTs for any Steele
Dots materials that might have been used in the intelligence
(03:54):
community assessment that claimed Russia was trying to help Trump
in the election. And at that point, the officers who
had worked on the intelligence community assessment, the career officers,
had no idea that the Steele dossier had been included
and used to make conclusions about the in Russia's intentions
(04:15):
during the twenty sixth election. In fact, most of those
intelligence officers had written an earlier Intelligence Committee assessment in
September twenty sixteen saying Trump that Pewton wasn't trying to
pick a winner, he was just trying to sow chaos.
But then John Brennan takes over the process and it
switches the conclusions to Pewton is directly trying to help
Donald Trump win the election. When in twenty nineteen, when
(04:38):
our Foyer request comes in Sean, all of a sudden,
the career officers find out, wait a second, you didn't
use it Steele Dasia and this did you? Because we
didn't and we didn't consider it credible. We have a problem.
That's one of the lines and his emails. The career
people found out in twenty nineteen that they had been
hoodwinked that in the closed doors where James Clapper and
(05:00):
James Komi and John Brennan were working, they had decided
to hijack the intelligence community's work and polluted with the
Steele Dassi, something that we now know from John Durham's
report and from the FBI z owed analysis. Nothing was
credible in it. It wasn't actionable intelligence. It was bogus
intelligence paid for by Hillary Clinton's campaign. This moment of
(05:23):
self discovery by the intelligence community where they realized their
bosses did something after they finished their work to hijack
the conclusions of the report, polluting it with the dirty
Dassi that we now know as the Steele d'assid It
is a remarkable moment. Now there's another very important document
in these releases that Selsea Gaffert doesn't meant it very important.
(05:44):
In September, there's an earlier intelligence community.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Assessment in that what year are we talking about now.
Speaker 3 (05:51):
Twenty sixteen going into the twenty sixteen election. So the
famous intelligence assessment which is released by Obama's He's going
out the door is December, and that's the one that
says Vladimir Putin infringed on the election and specifically was
trying to help Donald Trump win the election. But just
two months earlier, just two months earlier, the intelligence community
(06:13):
came to a different conclusion. He wasn't. Yes, he was
trying to sew discord in the election, but he wasn't
trying to swing the election to either Hillary or Donald Trump.
It means that the intelligence community believed that until John
Brennan and James Comy had get involved in trying to
(06:34):
hijack this with the Seldass and some secret source that
Brennan has that we still don't know who it is.
I want to point out one other thing in this
release today there is a more declassified version of the
twenty nineteen accusing December twenty sixteen. I say so, that's
the one that Brendan takes over right, he keeps it
just to the FBICIA and NSA. In the newly declassified section,
(06:58):
there is a new revelation that we never knew about.
It said that Russia stopped trying to influence the election
in October. And I want to think about that for
a second. October is when most Americans make up their
mind in election. Most Americans are busy. They don't start
thinking about voting until October. If Russia was truly trying
to swing the election to Donald Trump, why would they
(07:20):
stop that effort. Why would they stop dropping damaging information
on Hillary Clinton? Right around the time that the election
was coming to a crispan the American public were starting
to decide who they were going to pick. That would
be the time you would spend the most time trying
to harm Hillary Clinton. That conclusion, which had been masked
(07:41):
from us, we couldn't see it until Tulci Gabbett released
it today, completely undercut the entire notion of the report.
Anyone who knows anything about politics, including Vladimir Feutin, knows
most people would want to know the dirt in October
when they're making up the mind. If you tried to
knock out Hillary, you dropped the dirt in October. Oddly
Russia stopped that before October. These are extraordinary things, and
(08:04):
they really show that the Intelligence Committee wasn't making assessments
based on real intel. It was making it out of
predetermined political conclusion to save Hillary Clinton's reputation because she
had lost the elections in December. The Intelligence community assessment
is a damaged assessment to protect Hillary Culton, to give
her a plausible reason why she lost to the American public,
(08:25):
and just so doubt about the beginning of the Trump
presidency because in September, just before the Russian stopped their measures,
according to this report, the intelligence community didn't think Vladimir
Reprutin was trying to pick one candidate over the other.
The only change Hillary Clinton loses, the DOSSI comes in
and they have to change the narrative in America. That
(08:46):
is an extraordinarily dark moment in the history of our
spy agencies.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
Let mean, let me see if I can sum this
up a little bit and put emphasis on what you
just laid out for us here, because this is spectacularly corrupt.
And what you're saying is is that our intelligence community, uh.
And then we're talking about rank and file, the career
people that do a good job every day that are
not political, that they and we have very specific comments.
(09:15):
I read some of them that they assessed that Russian
and criminal actors did not impact the presidential election, and
and that was all over presidential daily briefings, et ceter,
all over the place both before and they didn't assess
that there wasn't happening before they assessed, it didn't happen
after then it ends up in the hands of these
(09:36):
Trump hating deep state operatives like Brennan and Clapper and Komi,
and even it went as high as Obama and that
they decided, I'll use your words to pollute and politicize
and hijack what the what the real findings were, and
to basically flip it on its head and and deceive
(09:59):
the American people personally purposely.
Speaker 3 (10:04):
Yes, that's exactly what happened. And remember Barack Obama is
told in late July twenty sixteen that if they have
intercepted information that Hillary is going to pull off a
dirty trick on Donald Trump, try to pretend that he
and Vladimir futen are working together to hijack the election.
That is the steal Dalsay's origin. The government knew that's
what Hillary Clinton was doing before the FBI opened up
(10:27):
Crossfire Hurricanes. Who tells that to the President John Brennan
at the end of the election, when Donald Trump does
the impossible and still beats Hillary Clinton, who is guiding
the Intelligence Committee assessment to make it look like Hillary
Clinton was a victim and Donald Trump was the beneficiary
of a Russian collusion thing. John Brennan, He's the one
(10:48):
character that series us all the way through that six
month period. If you know Hillary Clinton is planting a
fall story, why would you let your FBI continue to
investigate it. Why would you accept the already doosiate, Why
would you accept the information from Susman, the lawyer from
Hillary Clinton's law firm. All of that stuff we now
know turned out to be false, bogus, bad intel. There
(11:10):
was a warning to Bresident Obama and to John Brennan
that this was going to happen, and they let it happen.
Then when it did happen, they continue to keep the
ruse going by using an official intelligence community assessment to
miss lead the American people and cast out on the
beginning of the Trump presidency.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
And meanwhile it was actually contradicted by the real intelligence
that they had access to. Also, that's what makes us
even more spectacular. All right, quick break right back more
with editor in chief, founder and investigative reporter from justinews
dot com John Solomon is with us well more. On
the other side, Tulca Gabbard will comment on this as
well tonight on Television nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
As we continue. Now, we continue now.
Speaker 1 (11:52):
John Solomon is with US founder, editor in chief and
chief investigative reporter just thenews dot com. We now you
broke the story about how the FBI has opened in
the last number of weeks a grand conspiracy investigation covering
the ten years going back to just before the twenty
(12:15):
sixteen election. That would include everything that we're getting here
from your Foyer request that was released today and all
the way through. Jack Smith, tell us where you think
this is going here, because it sounds to me like
you have some of the most powerful people within our
(12:36):
government at the highest levels, taking the good work of
career people in our government, perverting it for political purposes
and propagandizing and even using it as a weapon to
to try and criminalize behavior that they did not take place.
(12:56):
And meanwhile, they knew the entire time that the person
that really had rushed and disinformation and bought and paid
for it was their friend and their candidate.
Speaker 3 (13:05):
That's right, they did. In fact that remember, the CIA
learned at some point that Christopher Steele has been penetrated
by Russian intelligence and they send the warnings to the FBI.
Of course, the FBI doesn't pay attention to because they
weren't interested in the facts of the intelligence. They were
interested in creating the narrative that Donald Trump was a
Russian stooge when he wasn't. The Grand Conspiracy is a
(13:25):
case that's been opened by the FBI under Cash matel.
It treats the period from twenty sixteen to twenty twenty
four as one ongoing conspiracy, one effort by government actors
to avoid the civil liberties of people like Donald Trump
and Carter Page and some of the people in the
raid on mar Lago. And it also and so because
(13:48):
the chiefs is an ongoing conspiracy, the statute of limitations
become a little bit different. You can charge something that
happens in the last five years and say that's one
act of a conspiracy that began all the way back
when Crossfire Hurricane was begun. It was a get jump conspiracy,
and it misused the powers of government to achieve the outcomes.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
Uh, we've known each other a long time, John, and
you're one of the hardest working investigative reporters I know,
and you do a phenomenal job. This is vindication at
its highest level. I mean, this really shows that this
deep state is not some conspiracy theory. That the reporting
that you did that, we did that others. You know,
(14:29):
there were a few of us, there weren't very many,
and you led the way. We're dead on accurate. And
I'm hoping now that this gets fixed immediately, and I
hope that fam Bondi, the Attorney General. I have every
belief she probably will follow your advice and follow through
on this. This is spectacularly scary to me. It just
(14:51):
shows that the weaponization story was real the whole time.
The Russia conspiracy hoax was real the whole time. It
was a hoax, that the Get Trump movement among the
most powerful people in Washington and the swamp was real too.
Great work, John Solomon, just thenews dot com editor in chief,
founder investigative reporter.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
We'll have you back next week. I'm sure to follow
up on this.
Speaker 3 (15:15):
Thank you, sir, good, Thank you.
Speaker 1 (15:17):
Eight hundred and nine to four one seawn our number.
If you want to be a part of the program,
listen right now. The situation in Israel is dire, It
is fragile, things are urgent. You have entire neighborhoods destroyed,
you have tens and tens of thousands of Israelis. Their
homes are gone, they've been displaced. They need every bit
of humanitarian assistance we can provide. They need food, they
(15:38):
need water, they need clothing, they need shelter, they need everything.
And thank goodness, we have partnered with the IFCJ International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews. Whether peacetime or at war,
the people of Israel have been literally fighting for their
very survival every single day. And they also know that
at any moment more ballistic missiles could be fired, and
(16:01):
those sirens sounds. Sometimes you have as little as fifteen
seconds to reach a bomb shelter. Now, not only do
they provide the great humanitarian assistance, the IFCJ has been
working around the clock to place hundreds of concrete reinforced
bomb shelters. We saw that there was a greater need
than they ever knew in Tel Aviv when the Iranians
were pounding them with two thousand pounds ballistic missiles. Anyway,
(16:24):
they're working now to deploy sixty new bomb shelters. They're
also providing the humanitarian assistance and they need your help.
Please go online IFCJ dot org. Please be as generous
as possible and help Israel in their hour of need.
Speaker 4 (16:46):
Driving liberals crazy three hours a day, every day, The
Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
Is back on the air twenty five now till the
top of the hour eight hundred and nine four and
Sean our number this Friday. If you want to be
a part of the program, we'd love to hear from you.
All right, look, let's talk about the time shared nightmare.
Linda will once found herself locked into this mess. If
you are stuck paying endless maintenance fees and they keep
(17:16):
going up every year and you get these special assessments,
Oh it's going.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
To be another ten thousand dollars.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
And you never even use it anymore, You've got to
call my friends at Lone Star Transfer. They have been
shaping the timeshare exit industry now for over a decade
and they are still leading the way with their exclusive solutions.
A Lone Star Transfer makes getting out of your time
share faster and easier than ever before. They will guarantee
(17:43):
in writing when they can get this done for you.
Lone Star Transfer. We know them well. They've been with
us ten years. It's a family owned business. They have
helped tens and tens of thousands of owners break free
of these incredible timeshare financial burdens. Over the last fifth
teen years. They have an A plus rating from the
Better Business Bureau of thousands and thousands of five star reviews. Look,
(18:07):
they've been on this show for ten years and they
have helped so many of our listeners. The only company
that I trust that will deliver results for you. Don't
pay all this money in perpetuity. No, get out of
it now while you can let the professionals handle it.
The great people on top of it get a free
consultation eight three three five nine four zero zero seven
(18:31):
five eight three three five nine fours zero zero seven
to five online is lone star transfer dot com. All right,
we have Mamdani fever pretty much everywhere and this is
now the biggest problem of the Democratic Party. Their leadership
post November fifth, twenty four has emerged and the loudest
(18:54):
voices are Mamdani AOC the squad Grandpa fighting the oligarch
by traveling around the country in a private jet and
justifying all the carbon pollution that he's leaving behind. Meanwhile
talking about the Green New Deal and the need to
tell you what refrigerators, freezers and stoves you can do
(19:17):
use and what cars to put in your driveway anyway,
So it's a little insane. No democrat has the willingness
to take on these radicals at all. What's really depressing
for them, it should be, if they had any brains,
is they have embraced the most radical people in their party.
You know, the latest, of course, is Marxist Mamdani. I
(19:40):
mean you look at this guy. This guy, first of all,
has done nothing of value in his life. He's advocated
for a government band to private property. As a matter
of fact, we've got a list of Mamdani craziness.
Speaker 2 (19:52):
Let's play it. Does that just make you uncomfortable?
Speaker 4 (19:54):
Like the phrase globalizentifanta from the river to the sea,
does that make you come uncomfortable?
Speaker 5 (19:59):
I know people for whom those things mean very different things.
Speaker 6 (20:02):
And to me, ultimately, what I hear in so many
is a desperate desire for equality and equal rights.
Speaker 5 (20:11):
In standing up for palicy and human rights.
Speaker 6 (20:13):
I am in favor of defunding the police. As mayor
New York City would arrest Benjamin Netanyahu. And then it
comes to making buses free and universal childcare, increasing the
top corporate tax rate of New York to match that
of New Jersey that raises five billion dollars, and increasing
income taxes on the top one percent of New Yorkers
who make a million dollars or more a year by
two percent. City run grocery stores. I've proposed a pilot
program of one store in each borough. These are five
(20:35):
stores in total. The total cost of this is sixty
million dollars.
Speaker 5 (20:39):
Do you like capitalism? No, I have many critiques of capitalism.
You're a proud democratic socialist.
Speaker 3 (20:45):
Do you think that is a platform that would work
for other candidates running and other parts of the country.
Speaker 5 (20:51):
Absolutely.
Speaker 7 (20:51):
So.
Speaker 8 (20:52):
Violence is an artificial construction. Right have to be very
clear what is happening here.
Speaker 5 (21:00):
Is violence.
Speaker 9 (21:01):
Do you think that billionaires have a right to exist.
Speaker 6 (21:05):
I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly,
it is so much money. We have to continue to
elect more socialists, and we have to ensure that we
are unapologetic about our socialists.
Speaker 5 (21:18):
But then there are also.
Speaker 6 (21:19):
Other issues that we firmly believe in, whether it's BDS
right or whether it's the end goal of season the
means of production.
Speaker 9 (21:27):
Do you condemn that phrase globalize the intafada.
Speaker 5 (21:30):
That's not language that I use.
Speaker 6 (21:32):
If we want to end the housing crisis, the solution
has to be moving toward the full decommodification of housing.
Speaker 8 (21:39):
We have a budget of close to six billion dollars
for the New York City Police Department, and that is
an astronomical figure. I think in this first year we
need to take a billion dollars out of that budget,
and I think that we need to reinvest that money
into social services.
Speaker 6 (21:54):
Would life be better if we just abolish private property
and transform our society and some more collective, egalitarian one.
Speaker 5 (22:03):
I think it probably would be better.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
Are prisons obsolete?
Speaker 5 (22:07):
What pers do they search?
Speaker 1 (22:09):
I mean this guy, I mean think about this. Oh
we're going to tax especially the whiter neighborhoods. Oh okay,
nobody should own property. We should not have billionaires. Uh oh,
we're going to tax you to death. But you're not
going to leave New York. You're all going to leave
New York. You out of your mind? Now the latest
somebody got a hold of them, because go back just
(22:30):
a couple of weeks ago. He was on Meet the Press,
not once, not twice, but three times. Was he he
was asked to condemn, and on other occasions as well,
the use of the term global atifada.
Speaker 9 (22:43):
Here's his answer, Do you condemn that phrase globalize the inada?
Speaker 5 (22:48):
That's not language that I use.
Speaker 9 (22:50):
Do you condemn that phase globalize the indofada, which a
lot of people here is a call to violence against Jews.
Speaker 6 (22:55):
I've heard from many Jewish New Yorkers who have shared
their concerns with me.
Speaker 5 (22:59):
Quickly.
Speaker 9 (22:59):
For the people who care about the language and who
feel really concerned by that phrase, why not just condemn it.
Speaker 6 (23:07):
My concern is to start to walk down the line
of language and making clear what language I believe is
permissible or impermissible. Takes me into a place similar to
that of the president, who is looking to do those
very kinds of things.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
And now this is mom Nannie today. Obviously somebody said
to him, get better, Finally, condemn global antifada, even though
you're not since here and authentic and you really don't
believe it lis it?
Speaker 6 (23:36):
For some New Yorkers, this phrase is one that refers
to civil disobedience and protests. I was sitting with a
rabbi not too long ago who told me how the
same phrase is heard very differently by her, and it's
heard as a reference to.
Speaker 5 (23:50):
Bus bombings and Haifa.
Speaker 6 (23:52):
That distance between what some intend and what others here
is a bridge that is too far. And it is
why I have not use the phrase, and it is
why I discourage its use.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Uh, why didn't you condemn it the fifty other occasions
that you were asked about it and you just flat
out refuse to Anyway, Betsy McCoy is with us, former
Lieutenant governor of the State of New York. There's a
lot to say about Marxist Mondami and anyway, we appreciate
you being with us. How do you assess the race?
(24:25):
First of all, it's great to have you Beck.
Speaker 7 (24:28):
Well, thank you, Sean, and I'm glad to be with
you today because so many New Yorkers are panicking. You've
even got that billboard in Times Square that humorously vivid
KWAMASLAMI put up saying, Hey, forget Palm Beach, come to Cleveland. Right, Well,
New Yorkers don't have to go to Cleveland. We can
beat Mom Donni in this race, Sean, even with all
(24:50):
the candidates who are currently in the race. That is
so important to underscore. But I clenched the numbers. I
have a piece up in the New York Post that
shows how we can do this, and it's really quite
easy to understand. Mondani won with four hundred and sixty
two thousand votes in the primary. That's the number of
people who picked them first time around, Right, four hundred
(25:12):
and sixty two thousand. Well, it's the turnout in the
general election as low like twenty one percent as it
was in twenty twenty one, the last mayor's race. Well,
then Mamdani will win because four undred sixty two thousand,
that'll be a winning number. But if we push turnout up,
it won't be a winning number. And when I say
(25:32):
push turn it up, I'm not in La La land. Here.
Juliani here he won with fifty seven percent turnout, Dinkins
won with sixty percent turnout, Lindsay won with eighty percent turnout,
And in most presidential years there's over sixty percent turnout
right here in New York City. So Mondaani can win
(25:55):
if nobody bothers to vote. But if New Yorkers decide
they're going to come out and vote because the future
of the city, their own right to own a home,
own a business, send their kids, to a decent school.
All that's on the line. If they turn out, he
won't win. There are I'm going to show you why
he's up against eleven percent of the electures who are Republicans,
(26:17):
twenty percent were independent. And here's the critical number. Listen
to this number. Five hundred and seventy three thousand, six
hundred and eighteen persuadable purples. Those are registered Democrats who
voted for Biden in twenty twenty but did not follow
the leftwood words of their party to vote for Kamala
(26:38):
Harrison twenty twenty four. They won't vote for a progressive,
they won't vote for a radical, and they outnumber the
four hundred and sixty two thousand Mondaney got in the primary.
So if we get all these people out, we can.
Speaker 1 (26:51):
Beat But you've got something else to factor in that
you've not addressed yet, and that is you've got not one,
not two, not three, but you got four people on
the left running, and two are very well known, one
being Andrew Cuomo, the former governor, the other being Eric Adams,
the current mayor, and then some obscure radical leftists. But
(27:11):
then you got one Republican that's running on a Rudy Giuliani,
Donald Trump platform.
Speaker 2 (27:17):
That's Curtis sliwa.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
I mean, could the four Democrats split the voted off
and create a path that Curtis could actually sneak in there?
Speaker 7 (27:24):
Well, the fact is any one of those opponents of
Mam Donnie could sneak in there, because what I did
is I took the electorate in in New York. I
divided in half fifty percent turn out, right, Then I
divided it in four and I got I got five
hundred and eighty two thousand. That's what's needed to win,
(27:47):
not the four hundred and sixty two thousand that Mam
Donnie collected. Now, will we do better than he did
in the primary? That is not a given. And I'll
tell you why. The young voters who turned that for him,
they are fickle voters. They are kiss me today, goodbye
tomorrow voters. In twenty twenty one, over half of the
(28:08):
young people nineteen to twenty nine who voted in the
primary never showed up to the general election. Over half.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
Okay, let's go. I still think he is the odds
on favorite.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 5 (28:23):
Yeah?
Speaker 7 (28:24):
He's the favorite. Not a done deal, and it will
depend on turnout in New York. If all of us listening, shown,
everybody listening to you today, to your great show, if
they turn out and we have sixty percent turnout like
we do in a presidential year, take it to the bank, Mom, Donny.
Speaker 2 (28:41):
Loses, then who wins one of.
Speaker 7 (28:45):
The other three? I cannot predict which one, but you know,
getting those guys out of the race. Look, they're politicians.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
We would it be better.
Speaker 1 (28:54):
Andrew Clomo proposed and I don't think, I don't think.
I think he's doing it for his own political purposes
in September, that there should be some credible poll and
that whoever's number two should get the nod and the
other people should should bow out willingly, and that make
(29:14):
a pledge to do so to save New York City
from Mom Donnie. Now, I don't think I know Curtis
is not going to do it. I don't think. I
don't think Eric Adams is going to do it.
Speaker 5 (29:25):
You know what.
Speaker 7 (29:26):
Politicians are, Shawn, there a legends in their own mind.
Not one of these guys is going to do it.
But what I'm saying is the number show if we
take if we take the initiative and get New Yorkers
to come to the poll as they do in a
presidential year. Sixty and Mom.
Speaker 1 (29:43):
Donnie Music Quick Break more with former New York Lieutenant
Governor Betsy McCoy on the other side, that we'll get
to your calls coming up eight hundred and nine to
four one, Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program.
Speaker 4 (29:53):
As we continue, the final hour of the Sean Hannity
Show was up next, Hang on for Shawn's Conservative solutions.
Speaker 1 (30:09):
Great state of New York, which is deteriorating by the hour. Okay,
So Kathy Hochel speaks to New Yorkers and says I
will be your therapist and tries to reassure people in
New York City that if this guy's elected, that she
will be a check in balance against him, without quite
saying it as strongly as I did. It was very tempered,
(30:31):
not very convincing, and I don't believe it to be true.
Speaker 7 (30:36):
It is not true. The next governor of New York
will have the authority under Section nine of the state
constitutions to remove this mayor.
Speaker 1 (30:47):
And it's never gonna happen, Betsy, It's never gonna happen. Look,
it could happen if Alice Stafonic got in, It could
happen Republican or another Republican got in, fair enough, But
I don't. It's not gonna happen under Hochel. And if
he wants to raise taxes, New York City taxes, he's
got a radical, extreme left wing city council to help them.
Speaker 7 (31:11):
Have another democratic governor in this state. We must elect
a Republican.
Speaker 1 (31:17):
That I'm telling you, Betsy, here's the problem. People like
me left, people like you know every big Wall Street
firm is now also based in Florida. And what they're
gonna do is they're gonna pull the plug on New
York City once and for all.
Speaker 2 (31:34):
They're not gonna put up with it. Am I wrong?
Tell me I'm wrong.
Speaker 7 (31:38):
Let me give you a ray of hope.
Speaker 1 (31:40):
No, it's not a ray of hope for me. I
have plenty of sunshine down here. I'm happy with my decision.
Speaker 3 (31:45):
You do.
Speaker 7 (31:46):
But Ray Kelly and I have launched Save NYC dot org.
Please come to Save NYC seven letters dot org. We
have launched an independent expenditure committee. We are gonna spend
the money to get the turnout in New York needed
to defeat Mom Donnie, and I want our listeners here
to either donate or come be volunteers. The website is there.
(32:09):
This is your opportunity for the taking to be part
of the solution. If you don't want Mom, Donnie, and
you don't want to leave New York, join us Save
NYC dot org. You don't have to just complain.
Speaker 1 (32:21):
Now you have a chance to do something for the
sake of my friends in New York. I don't want
wish this upon them, but it will be great for
the state of Florida, where I live, if in fact,
people pick up their steakes and just you know, pull
up their stakes and leave. But you know what, I
don't wish that. It was once the greatest city in
the world. It's now one of the worst cities in
(32:44):
the world.
Speaker 7 (32:44):
It's awful, and we have an empire state and now
it's the evacuation state. That's what it is. But it
can be true, said sire a Republican governor.
Speaker 2 (32:53):
Okay, and if it doesn't happen, are you moving to Florida?
Speaker 7 (32:56):
No, I'm going to stay and fight, Sean. But I
love being on your radio show.
Speaker 3 (32:59):
It's a public service.
Speaker 1 (33:01):
Appreciate you being with us. Betsy McCoy eight hundred ninety
four one Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program,
All right, thanks Scott chan An hour two Sean Hannity Show,
eight hundred and ninety four one Seawn, if you want
to be a part of the program. So John Solomon
just thenews dot com founder editor in chief, investigative reporter,
put in a Foyer request as it relates to the
Obama administration, and as this all is related to quote
(00:22):
the Russia collusion election interference narrative, and wow, a treasure
trove has come back. Now I see that the DNI
and Tulsey Gabbard apparently declassified these documents showing overwhelming evidence
of how President Donald Trump did indeed win the twenty
(00:43):
sixteen election against Hillary Clinton, and that then President Barack
Obama himself and his national security team laid the groundwork
for what would be the year's long Trump Russia collusion probe.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
We have cut.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
We covered this issue for like three years on this program.
John Solomon, Greg Jarrett, Sarah Carter, Catherine Herridge, and there
were others.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
You know.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
They give examples. December seventh, twenty sixteen, Director of National
Intelligence at the time, James Clapper ourn adversaries did not
use cyber attacks on election infrastructure to alter the presidential
election outcome. Then we have the Presidential Daily Briefing, which
was prepared by the Department of Homeland Security, reporting that
(01:27):
the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, FBI, NSA, Department of Homeland Security,
State Department, Open Sources, etc. For Obama quote, we assessed
that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US
election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.
(01:48):
Russian government affiliated actors most likely compromised in Illinois voter
registration data base and unsuccessfully attempted the same in other states.
And they also said it's highly unlikely the effort would
have resulted in the altering of any state's official vote result.
Criminal activity also failed to reach the scale and sophistication
(02:09):
necessary to change the election outcomes. Now, when you look
at all of this, there's a whole other narrative if
you listen to this show or watch Hannity the TV show,
and that is the communications from the FBI stating that
it should not go forward with the FBI they had
(02:30):
their concerns. Now what was going on behind the scenes. Well,
we know that the Russian dirty disinformation dossier was bought
and paid for by Hillary. We know that James comee
was warmed multiple.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Times not to use it. It was political.
Speaker 1 (02:44):
We know that it became the basis the bulk of
information for not one, but four FIZA applications. And this
reveals that the brief, it just it takes you off
in so many different directions. A meeting including top security officials,
Clap John Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch,
(03:06):
then deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, among them, to all
of them to discuss Russia. That declassified meeting revealed that
principles agreed to recommend sanctioning of certain members of the
Russian military intelligence foreign intelligence chains of command responsible for
cyber operations. How do we get to that point anyway?
John Solomon has a lot more to add to this,
(03:29):
and well, first of all, this was your foyer request.
When did you put in this request?
Speaker 3 (03:34):
Twenty nineteen? So let me tell you the story. It's
an amazing story and the most important document, the bats
of stuff that the D and I is declassifying is
a conversation that's begun right after my foyer comes in
from the Southeastern Legal Foundation, that was our law firm
that we were using and it ASTs for any Steele
Dots materials that might have been used in the intelligence
(03:54):
community assessment that claimed Russia was trying to help Trump
in the election. And at that point, the officers who
had worked on the intelligence community assessment, the career officers,
had no idea that the Steele dossier had been included
and used to make conclusions about the in Russia's intentions
(04:15):
during the twenty sixth election. In fact, most of those
intelligence officers had written an earlier Intelligence Committee assessment in
September twenty sixteen saying Trump that Pewton wasn't trying to
pick a winner, he was just trying to sow chaos.
But then John Brennan takes over the process and it
switches the conclusions to Pewton is directly trying to help
Donald Trump win the election. When in twenty nineteen, when
(04:38):
our Foyer request comes in Sean, all of a sudden,
the career officers find out, wait a second, you didn't
use it Steele Dasia and this did you? Because we
didn't and we didn't consider it credible. We have a problem.
That's one of the lines and his emails. The career
people found out in twenty nineteen that they had been
hoodwinked that in the closed doors where James Clapper and
(05:00):
James Komi and John Brennan were working, they had decided
to hijack the intelligence community's work and polluted with the
Steele Dassi, something that we now know from John Durham's
report and from the FBI z owed analysis. Nothing was
credible in it. It wasn't actionable intelligence. It was bogus
intelligence paid for by Hillary Clinton's campaign. This moment of
(05:23):
self discovery by the intelligence community where they realized their
bosses did something after they finished their work to hijack
the conclusions of the report, polluting it with the dirty
Dassi that we now know as the Steele d'assid It
is a remarkable moment. Now there's another very important document
in these releases that Selsea Gaffert doesn't meant it very important.
(05:44):
In September, there's an earlier intelligence community.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Assessment in that what year are we talking about now.
Speaker 3 (05:51):
Twenty sixteen going into the twenty sixteen election. So the
famous intelligence assessment which is released by Obama's He's going
out the door is December, and that's the one that
says Vladimir Putin infringed on the election and specifically was
trying to help Donald Trump win the election. But just
two months earlier, just two months earlier, the intelligence community
(06:13):
came to a different conclusion. He wasn't. Yes, he was
trying to sew discord in the election, but he wasn't
trying to swing the election to either Hillary or Donald Trump.
It means that the intelligence community believed that until John
Brennan and James Comy had get involved in trying to
(06:34):
hijack this with the Seldass and some secret source that
Brennan has that we still don't know who it is.
I want to point out one other thing in this
release today there is a more declassified version of the
twenty nineteen accusing December twenty sixteen. I say so, that's
the one that Brendan takes over right, he keeps it
just to the FBICIA and NSA. In the newly declassified section,
(06:58):
there is a new revelation that we never knew about.
It said that Russia stopped trying to influence the election
in October. And I want to think about that for
a second. October is when most Americans make up their
mind in election. Most Americans are busy. They don't start
thinking about voting until October. If Russia was truly trying
to swing the election to Donald Trump, why would they
(07:20):
stop that effort. Why would they stop dropping damaging information
on Hillary Clinton? Right around the time that the election
was coming to a crispan the American public were starting
to decide who they were going to pick. That would
be the time you would spend the most time trying
to harm Hillary Clinton. That conclusion, which had been masked
(07:41):
from us, we couldn't see it until Tulci Gabbett released
it today, completely undercut the entire notion of the report.
Anyone who knows anything about politics, including Vladimir Feutin, knows
most people would want to know the dirt in October
when they're making up the mind. If you tried to
knock out Hillary, you dropped the dirt in October. Oddly
Russia stopped that before October. These are extraordinary things, and
(08:04):
they really show that the Intelligence Committee wasn't making assessments
based on real intel. It was making it out of
predetermined political conclusion to save Hillary Clinton's reputation because she
had lost the elections in December. The Intelligence community assessment
is a damaged assessment to protect Hillary Culton, to give
her a plausible reason why she lost to the American public,
(08:25):
and just so doubt about the beginning of the Trump
presidency because in September, just before the Russian stopped their measures,
according to this report, the intelligence community didn't think Vladimir
Reprutin was trying to pick one candidate over the other.
The only change Hillary Clinton loses, the DOSSI comes in
and they have to change the narrative in America. That
(08:46):
is an extraordinarily dark moment in the history of our
spy agencies.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
Let mean, let me see if I can sum this
up a little bit and put emphasis on what you
just laid out for us here, because this is spectacularly corrupt.
And what you're saying is is that our intelligence community, uh.
And then we're talking about rank and file, the career
people that do a good job every day that are
not political, that they and we have very specific comments.
(09:15):
I read some of them that they assessed that Russian
and criminal actors did not impact the presidential election, and
and that was all over presidential daily briefings, et ceter,
all over the place both before and they didn't assess
that there wasn't happening before they assessed, it didn't happen
after then it ends up in the hands of these
(09:36):
Trump hating deep state operatives like Brennan and Clapper and Komi,
and even it went as high as Obama and that
they decided, I'll use your words to pollute and politicize
and hijack what the what the real findings were, and
to basically flip it on its head and and deceive
(09:59):
the American people personally purposely.
Speaker 3 (10:04):
Yes, that's exactly what happened. And remember Barack Obama is
told in late July twenty sixteen that if they have
intercepted information that Hillary is going to pull off a
dirty trick on Donald Trump, try to pretend that he
and Vladimir futen are working together to hijack the election.
That is the steal Dalsay's origin. The government knew that's
what Hillary Clinton was doing before the FBI opened up
(10:27):
Crossfire Hurricanes. Who tells that to the President John Brennan
at the end of the election, when Donald Trump does
the impossible and still beats Hillary Clinton, who is guiding
the Intelligence Committee assessment to make it look like Hillary
Clinton was a victim and Donald Trump was the beneficiary
of a Russian collusion thing. John Brennan, He's the one
(10:48):
character that series us all the way through that six
month period. If you know Hillary Clinton is planting a
fall story, why would you let your FBI continue to
investigate it. Why would you accept the already doosiate, Why
would you accept the information from Susman, the lawyer from
Hillary Clinton's law firm. All of that stuff we now
know turned out to be false, bogus, bad intel. There
(11:10):
was a warning to Bresident Obama and to John Brennan
that this was going to happen, and they let it happen.
Then when it did happen, they continue to keep the
ruse going by using an official intelligence community assessment to
miss lead the American people and cast out on the
beginning of the Trump presidency.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
And meanwhile it was actually contradicted by the real intelligence
that they had access to. Also, that's what makes us
even more spectacular. All right, quick break right back more
with editor in chief, founder and investigative reporter from justinews
dot com John Solomon is with us well more. On
the other side, Tulca Gabbard will comment on this as
well tonight on Television nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
As we continue. Now, we continue now.
Speaker 1 (11:52):
John Solomon is with US founder, editor in chief and
chief investigative reporter just thenews dot com. We now you
broke the story about how the FBI has opened in
the last number of weeks a grand conspiracy investigation covering
the ten years going back to just before the twenty
(12:15):
sixteen election. That would include everything that we're getting here
from your Foyer request that was released today and all
the way through. Jack Smith, tell us where you think
this is going here, because it sounds to me like
you have some of the most powerful people within our
(12:36):
government at the highest levels, taking the good work of
career people in our government, perverting it for political purposes
and propagandizing and even using it as a weapon to
to try and criminalize behavior that they did not take place.
(12:56):
And meanwhile, they knew the entire time that the person
that really had rushed and disinformation and bought and paid
for it was their friend and their candidate.
Speaker 3 (13:05):
That's right, they did. In fact that remember, the CIA
learned at some point that Christopher Steele has been penetrated
by Russian intelligence and they send the warnings to the FBI.
Of course, the FBI doesn't pay attention to because they
weren't interested in the facts of the intelligence. They were
interested in creating the narrative that Donald Trump was a
Russian stooge when he wasn't. The Grand Conspiracy is a
(13:25):
case that's been opened by the FBI under Cash matel.
It treats the period from twenty sixteen to twenty twenty
four as one ongoing conspiracy, one effort by government actors
to avoid the civil liberties of people like Donald Trump
and Carter Page and some of the people in the
raid on mar Lago. And it also and so because
(13:48):
the chiefs is an ongoing conspiracy, the statute of limitations
become a little bit different. You can charge something that
happens in the last five years and say that's one
act of a conspiracy that began all the way back
when Crossfire Hurricane was begun. It was a get jump conspiracy,
and it misused the powers of government to achieve the outcomes.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
Uh, we've known each other a long time, John, and
you're one of the hardest working investigative reporters I know,
and you do a phenomenal job. This is vindication at
its highest level. I mean, this really shows that this
deep state is not some conspiracy theory. That the reporting
that you did that, we did that others. You know,
(14:29):
there were a few of us, there weren't very many,
and you led the way. We're dead on accurate. And
I'm hoping now that this gets fixed immediately, and I
hope that fam Bondi, the Attorney General. I have every
belief she probably will follow your advice and follow through
on this. This is spectacularly scary to me. It just
(14:51):
shows that the weaponization story was real the whole time.
The Russia conspiracy hoax was real the whole time. It
was a hoax, that the Get Trump movement among the
most powerful people in Washington and the swamp was real too.
Great work, John Solomon, just thenews dot com editor in chief,
founder investigative reporter.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
We'll have you back next week. I'm sure to follow
up on this.
Speaker 3 (15:15):
Thank you, sir, good, Thank you.
Speaker 1 (15:17):
Eight hundred and nine to four one seawn our number.
If you want to be a part of the program,
listen right now. The situation in Israel is dire, It
is fragile, things are urgent. You have entire neighborhoods destroyed,
you have tens and tens of thousands of Israelis. Their
homes are gone, they've been displaced. They need every bit
of humanitarian assistance we can provide. They need food, they
(15:38):
need water, they need clothing, they need shelter, they need everything.
And thank goodness, we have partnered with the IFCJ International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews. Whether peacetime or at war,
the people of Israel have been literally fighting for their
very survival every single day. And they also know that
at any moment more ballistic missiles could be fired, and
(16:01):
those sirens sounds. Sometimes you have as little as fifteen
seconds to reach a bomb shelter. Now, not only do
they provide the great humanitarian assistance, the IFCJ has been
working around the clock to place hundreds of concrete reinforced
bomb shelters. We saw that there was a greater need
than they ever knew in Tel Aviv when the Iranians
were pounding them with two thousand pounds ballistic missiles. Anyway,
(16:24):
they're working now to deploy sixty new bomb shelters. They're
also providing the humanitarian assistance and they need your help.
Please go online IFCJ dot org. Please be as generous
as possible and help Israel in their hour of need.
Speaker 4 (16:46):
Driving liberals crazy three hours a day, every day, The
Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
Is back on the air twenty five now till the
top of the hour eight hundred and nine four and
Sean our number this Friday. If you want to be
a part of the program, we'd love to hear from you.
All right, look, let's talk about the time shared nightmare.
Linda will once found herself locked into this mess. If
you are stuck paying endless maintenance fees and they keep
(17:16):
going up every year and you get these special assessments,
Oh it's going.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
To be another ten thousand dollars.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
And you never even use it anymore, You've got to
call my friends at Lone Star Transfer. They have been
shaping the timeshare exit industry now for over a decade
and they are still leading the way with their exclusive solutions.
A Lone Star Transfer makes getting out of your time
share faster and easier than ever before. They will guarantee
(17:43):
in writing when they can get this done for you.
Lone Star Transfer. We know them well. They've been with
us ten years. It's a family owned business. They have
helped tens and tens of thousands of owners break free
of these incredible timeshare financial burdens. Over the last fifth
teen years. They have an A plus rating from the
Better Business Bureau of thousands and thousands of five star reviews. Look,
(18:07):
they've been on this show for ten years and they
have helped so many of our listeners. The only company
that I trust that will deliver results for you. Don't
pay all this money in perpetuity. No, get out of
it now while you can let the professionals handle it.
The great people on top of it get a free
consultation eight three three five nine four zero zero seven
(18:31):
five eight three three five nine fours zero zero seven
to five online is lone star transfer dot com. All right,
we have Mamdani fever pretty much everywhere and this is
now the biggest problem of the Democratic Party. Their leadership
post November fifth, twenty four has emerged and the loudest
(18:54):
voices are Mamdani AOC the squad Grandpa fighting the oligarch
by traveling around the country in a private jet and
justifying all the carbon pollution that he's leaving behind. Meanwhile
talking about the Green New Deal and the need to
tell you what refrigerators, freezers and stoves you can do
(19:17):
use and what cars to put in your driveway anyway,
So it's a little insane. No democrat has the willingness
to take on these radicals at all. What's really depressing
for them, it should be, if they had any brains,
is they have embraced the most radical people in their party.
You know, the latest, of course, is Marxist Mamdani. I
(19:40):
mean you look at this guy. This guy, first of all,
has done nothing of value in his life. He's advocated
for a government band to private property. As a matter
of fact, we've got a list of Mamdani craziness.
Speaker 2 (19:52):
Let's play it. Does that just make you uncomfortable?
Speaker 4 (19:54):
Like the phrase globalizentifanta from the river to the sea,
does that make you come uncomfortable?
Speaker 5 (19:59):
I know people for whom those things mean very different things.
Speaker 6 (20:02):
And to me, ultimately, what I hear in so many
is a desperate desire for equality and equal rights.
Speaker 5 (20:11):
In standing up for palicy and human rights.
Speaker 6 (20:13):
I am in favor of defunding the police. As mayor
New York City would arrest Benjamin Netanyahu. And then it
comes to making buses free and universal childcare, increasing the
top corporate tax rate of New York to match that
of New Jersey that raises five billion dollars, and increasing
income taxes on the top one percent of New Yorkers
who make a million dollars or more a year by
two percent. City run grocery stores. I've proposed a pilot
program of one store in each borough. These are five
(20:35):
stores in total. The total cost of this is sixty
million dollars.
Speaker 5 (20:39):
Do you like capitalism? No, I have many critiques of capitalism.
You're a proud democratic socialist.
Speaker 3 (20:45):
Do you think that is a platform that would work
for other candidates running and other parts of the country.
Speaker 5 (20:51):
Absolutely.
Speaker 7 (20:51):
So.
Speaker 8 (20:52):
Violence is an artificial construction. Right have to be very
clear what is happening here.
Speaker 5 (21:00):
Is violence.
Speaker 9 (21:01):
Do you think that billionaires have a right to exist.
Speaker 6 (21:05):
I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly,
it is so much money. We have to continue to
elect more socialists, and we have to ensure that we
are unapologetic about our socialists.
Speaker 5 (21:18):
But then there are also.
Speaker 6 (21:19):
Other issues that we firmly believe in, whether it's BDS
right or whether it's the end goal of season the
means of production.
Speaker 9 (21:27):
Do you condemn that phrase globalize the intafada.
Speaker 5 (21:30):
That's not language that I use.
Speaker 6 (21:32):
If we want to end the housing crisis, the solution
has to be moving toward the full decommodification of housing.
Speaker 8 (21:39):
We have a budget of close to six billion dollars
for the New York City Police Department, and that is
an astronomical figure. I think in this first year we
need to take a billion dollars out of that budget,
and I think that we need to reinvest that money
into social services.
Speaker 6 (21:54):
Would life be better if we just abolish private property
and transform our society and some more collective, egalitarian one.
Speaker 5 (22:03):
I think it probably would be better.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
Are prisons obsolete?
Speaker 5 (22:07):
What pers do they search?
Speaker 1 (22:09):
I mean this guy, I mean think about this. Oh
we're going to tax especially the whiter neighborhoods. Oh okay,
nobody should own property. We should not have billionaires. Uh oh,
we're going to tax you to death. But you're not
going to leave New York. You're all going to leave
New York. You out of your mind? Now the latest
somebody got a hold of them, because go back just
(22:30):
a couple of weeks ago. He was on Meet the Press,
not once, not twice, but three times. Was he he
was asked to condemn, and on other occasions as well,
the use of the term global atifada.
Speaker 9 (22:43):
Here's his answer, Do you condemn that phrase globalize the inada?
Speaker 5 (22:48):
That's not language that I use.
Speaker 9 (22:50):
Do you condemn that phase globalize the indofada, which a
lot of people here is a call to violence against Jews.
Speaker 6 (22:55):
I've heard from many Jewish New Yorkers who have shared
their concerns with me.
Speaker 5 (22:59):
Quickly.
Speaker 9 (22:59):
For the people who care about the language and who
feel really concerned by that phrase, why not just condemn it.
Speaker 6 (23:07):
My concern is to start to walk down the line
of language and making clear what language I believe is
permissible or impermissible. Takes me into a place similar to
that of the president, who is looking to do those
very kinds of things.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
And now this is mom Nannie today. Obviously somebody said
to him, get better, Finally, condemn global antifada, even though
you're not since here and authentic and you really don't
believe it lis it?
Speaker 6 (23:36):
For some New Yorkers, this phrase is one that refers
to civil disobedience and protests. I was sitting with a
rabbi not too long ago who told me how the
same phrase is heard very differently by her, and it's
heard as a reference to.
Speaker 5 (23:50):
Bus bombings and Haifa.
Speaker 6 (23:52):
That distance between what some intend and what others here
is a bridge that is too far. And it is
why I have not use the phrase, and it is
why I discourage its use.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Uh, why didn't you condemn it the fifty other occasions
that you were asked about it and you just flat
out refuse to Anyway, Betsy McCoy is with us, former
Lieutenant governor of the State of New York. There's a
lot to say about Marxist Mondami and anyway, we appreciate
you being with us. How do you assess the race?
(24:25):
First of all, it's great to have you Beck.
Speaker 7 (24:28):
Well, thank you, Sean, and I'm glad to be with
you today because so many New Yorkers are panicking. You've
even got that billboard in Times Square that humorously vivid
KWAMASLAMI put up saying, Hey, forget Palm Beach, come to Cleveland. Right, Well,
New Yorkers don't have to go to Cleveland. We can
beat Mom Donni in this race, Sean, even with all
(24:50):
the candidates who are currently in the race. That is
so important to underscore. But I clenched the numbers. I
have a piece up in the New York Post that
shows how we can do this, and it's really quite
easy to understand. Mondani won with four hundred and sixty
two thousand votes in the primary. That's the number of
people who picked them first time around, Right, four hundred
(25:12):
and sixty two thousand. Well, it's the turnout in the
general election as low like twenty one percent as it
was in twenty twenty one, the last mayor's race. Well,
then Mamdani will win because four undred sixty two thousand,
that'll be a winning number. But if we push turnout up,
it won't be a winning number. And when I say
(25:32):
push turn it up, I'm not in La La land. Here.
Juliani here he won with fifty seven percent turnout, Dinkins
won with sixty percent turnout, Lindsay won with eighty percent turnout,
And in most presidential years there's over sixty percent turnout
right here in New York City. So Mondaani can win
(25:55):
if nobody bothers to vote. But if New Yorkers decide
they're going to come out and vote because the future
of the city, their own right to own a home,
own a business, send their kids, to a decent school.
All that's on the line. If they turn out, he
won't win. There are I'm going to show you why
he's up against eleven percent of the electures who are Republicans,
(26:17):
twenty percent were independent. And here's the critical number. Listen
to this number. Five hundred and seventy three thousand, six
hundred and eighteen persuadable purples. Those are registered Democrats who
voted for Biden in twenty twenty but did not follow
the leftwood words of their party to vote for Kamala
(26:38):
Harrison twenty twenty four. They won't vote for a progressive,
they won't vote for a radical, and they outnumber the
four hundred and sixty two thousand Mondaney got in the primary.
So if we get all these people out, we can.
Speaker 1 (26:51):
Beat But you've got something else to factor in that
you've not addressed yet, and that is you've got not one,
not two, not three, but you got four people on
the left running, and two are very well known, one
being Andrew Cuomo, the former governor, the other being Eric Adams,
the current mayor, and then some obscure radical leftists. But
(27:11):
then you got one Republican that's running on a Rudy Giuliani,
Donald Trump platform.
Speaker 2 (27:17):
That's Curtis sliwa.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
I mean, could the four Democrats split the voted off
and create a path that Curtis could actually sneak in there?
Speaker 7 (27:24):
Well, the fact is any one of those opponents of
Mam Donnie could sneak in there, because what I did
is I took the electorate in in New York. I
divided in half fifty percent turn out, right, Then I
divided it in four and I got I got five
hundred and eighty two thousand. That's what's needed to win,
(27:47):
not the four hundred and sixty two thousand that Mam
Donnie collected. Now, will we do better than he did
in the primary? That is not a given. And I'll
tell you why. The young voters who turned that for him,
they are fickle voters. They are kiss me today, goodbye
tomorrow voters. In twenty twenty one, over half of the
(28:08):
young people nineteen to twenty nine who voted in the
primary never showed up to the general election. Over half.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
Okay, let's go. I still think he is the odds
on favorite.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 5 (28:23):
Yeah?
Speaker 7 (28:24):
He's the favorite. Not a done deal, and it will
depend on turnout in New York. If all of us listening, shown,
everybody listening to you today, to your great show, if
they turn out and we have sixty percent turnout like
we do in a presidential year, take it to the bank, Mom, Donny.
Speaker 2 (28:41):
Loses, then who wins one of.
Speaker 7 (28:45):
The other three? I cannot predict which one, but you know,
getting those guys out of the race. Look, they're politicians.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
We would it be better.
Speaker 1 (28:54):
Andrew Clomo proposed and I don't think, I don't think.
I think he's doing it for his own political purposes
in September, that there should be some credible poll and
that whoever's number two should get the nod and the
other people should should bow out willingly, and that make
(29:14):
a pledge to do so to save New York City
from Mom Donnie. Now, I don't think I know Curtis
is not going to do it. I don't think. I
don't think Eric Adams is going to do it.
Speaker 5 (29:25):
You know what.
Speaker 7 (29:26):
Politicians are, Shawn, there a legends in their own mind.
Not one of these guys is going to do it.
But what I'm saying is the number show if we
take if we take the initiative and get New Yorkers
to come to the poll as they do in a
presidential year. Sixty and Mom.
Speaker 1 (29:43):
Donnie Music Quick Break more with former New York Lieutenant
Governor Betsy McCoy on the other side, that we'll get
to your calls coming up eight hundred and nine to
four one, Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program.
Speaker 4 (29:53):
As we continue, the final hour of the Sean Hannity
Show was up next, Hang on for Shawn's Conservative solutions.
Speaker 1 (30:09):
Great state of New York, which is deteriorating by the hour. Okay,
So Kathy Hochel speaks to New Yorkers and says I
will be your therapist and tries to reassure people in
New York City that if this guy's elected, that she
will be a check in balance against him, without quite
saying it as strongly as I did. It was very tempered,
(30:31):
not very convincing, and I don't believe it to be true.
Speaker 7 (30:36):
It is not true. The next governor of New York
will have the authority under Section nine of the state
constitutions to remove this mayor.
Speaker 1 (30:47):
And it's never gonna happen, Betsy, It's never gonna happen. Look,
it could happen if Alice Stafonic got in, It could
happen Republican or another Republican got in, fair enough, But
I don't. It's not gonna happen under Hochel. And if
he wants to raise taxes, New York City taxes, he's
got a radical, extreme left wing city council to help them.
Speaker 7 (31:11):
Have another democratic governor in this state. We must elect
a Republican.
Speaker 1 (31:17):
That I'm telling you, Betsy, here's the problem. People like
me left, people like you know every big Wall Street
firm is now also based in Florida. And what they're
gonna do is they're gonna pull the plug on New
York City once and for all.
Speaker 2 (31:34):
They're not gonna put up with it. Am I wrong?
Tell me I'm wrong.
Speaker 7 (31:38):
Let me give you a ray of hope.
Speaker 1 (31:40):
No, it's not a ray of hope for me. I
have plenty of sunshine down here. I'm happy with my decision.
Speaker 3 (31:45):
You do.
Speaker 7 (31:46):
But Ray Kelly and I have launched Save NYC dot org.
Please come to Save NYC seven letters dot org. We
have launched an independent expenditure committee. We are gonna spend
the money to get the turnout in New York needed
to defeat Mom Donnie, and I want our listeners here
to either donate or come be volunteers. The website is there.
(32:09):
This is your opportunity for the taking to be part
of the solution. If you don't want Mom, Donnie, and
you don't want to leave New York, join us Save
NYC dot org. You don't have to just complain.
Speaker 1 (32:21):
Now you have a chance to do something for the
sake of my friends in New York. I don't want
wish this upon them, but it will be great for
the state of Florida, where I live, if in fact,
people pick up their steakes and just you know, pull
up their stakes and leave. But you know what, I
don't wish that. It was once the greatest city in
the world. It's now one of the worst cities in
(32:44):
the world.
Speaker 7 (32:44):
It's awful, and we have an empire state and now
it's the evacuation state. That's what it is. But it
can be true, said sire a Republican governor.
Speaker 2 (32:53):
Okay, and if it doesn't happen, are you moving to Florida?
Speaker 7 (32:56):
No, I'm going to stay and fight, Sean. But I
love being on your radio show.
Speaker 3 (32:59):
It's a public service.
Speaker 1 (33:01):
Appreciate you being with us. Betsy McCoy eight hundred ninety
four one Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program,
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.