November 2, 2025 • 29 mins
The knives are out for Tucker Carlson as neocons, lobbyists, and GOP insiders launch a coordinated smear campaign to silence his America First stance. From Epstein file cover-ups to pushing back against wars in Iran and Venezuela, Tucker’s truth-telling has made him public enemy #1. This episode connects the chilling dots between Charlie Kirk’s mysterious death, October 7th stand-down questions, and the same tactics now targeting Tucker. Speak up, share this, and defend free speech before they take down the last honest voice in mainstream conservative media. Check out my show over on Fountain: https://www.fountain.fm/show/nUTYcMtl4yMuoKHljZWu Become a supporting member of Liberty Lockdown here!: https://libertylockdown.locals.com/ This is where I do monthly AMA's for supporting members only Super valuable stuff! Twitter: https://twitter.com/LibertyLockPod Pickup LL shirts over at https://www.toplobsta.com/products/ll-lakers?_pos=5&_sid=e7319ba4a&_ss=r&variant=40668064186434 NEW DESIGNS JUST DROPPED All links: https://www.libertylockdownpodcast.com/ Linktree: https://linktr.ee/libertylockdown As always, if you leave a five star review on Apple Podcasts with your social media handle I'll read it on next weeks show (audio version only)! Love you long time Liberty Lockdown presents a variety of opinions, sometimes opposing and controversial. They are not representative of the host of the podcast. Guests are encouraged to express their opinions in a safe and equitable environment.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
They love Tucker Carlson. And they love Tucker Carlson because
say what you want about him, and I've had my criticisms.
He is patriotic, he tells the truth, he speaks common sense.
He's not afraid of anybody. He is a true American.
He's not about the bullshit. People love him, and no
(00:21):
one is going to cancel Tucker Carlson because Mark Levin
said so. So people saw that statement and they said,
you know what, it's about time. We're not getting rid
of Tucker Carlson. We're not getting rid of Christ. We're
not going to put America. Second, we're not actually obligated
to support Israel. We can say what we want about them,
(00:41):
and we don't need to like Nick Flentis, but he
should have the same First Amendment rights and people should
be able to talk to him if they disagree. Ninety
eight percent of people agreed with every word of that
and said it's about time.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
It's very rare that I do a show where I
am genuinely concerned about the nature of the time at hand.
I am genuinely concerned. However, when those times arise, I
quickly recognize that I must that I have no choice
but to proceed. And in this episode, I'm going to
connect some dots, some very uncomfortable dots, and some of
(01:15):
you are going to think I'm crazy, and the rest
of you are going to be nodding along the entire time,
going yep, that's exactly what's happening. So what am I
talking about? Well, the knives are out once again for
Tucker Carlson, and the similarities between the cancelation attempt against
Tucker Carlson are eerily reminiscent to what transpired with Charlie
(01:36):
Kirk over the past two years.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
Specifically, it's about time that somebody stood up to the
bullies because we've had enough. Everybody knows this is how
it works. Everybody knows that if you have anything dissenting,
anything critical to say about Israel, you will get these
psychotic berserkers. That's their strategy. Laura Loomer, Josh Ham, Mark Levin,
(02:01):
Ben Shapiro. They will be on your case, bullying you,
trying to intimidate you, working behind the scenes to get
you fired, to get dirt on you, to blackmail you.
That's how they operate.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
Now, before I get there, let me show you what
I'm talking about. First up, we have Randy Fine, a
congressional member out of my great state of Florida, and
a man with a blood type that is Hollandaise sauce.
Speaker 3 (02:29):
Tucker Carlson is the most dangerous anti suommite in America.
Speaker 4 (02:34):
He has chosen.
Speaker 3 (02:36):
He has chosen to take on the mantle of leader
of a modern day Hitler youth, to broadcast and feature
those who celebrate the Nazis, those who call for the
extermination of Israel, to defend Hamas, to even criticize President
Trump for stopping Iran's nuclear ambitions. Friends, make no mistake,
(02:59):
Tucker is not maga.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
Look at that truly organic hatred towards Tucker Carlson with
those well made, professionally made signs saying that Tucker isn't maga. Well,
for the youngsters out there, you may not remember this,
and probably most of you have never even heard of this,
But as I said in my prior episode, Pat Buchanan
was really the I don't know stalwart. He was the
(03:25):
guy when it came to America first, long before Tucker Carlson,
long before Nick Flint does or Dave or myself or
anybody else. He was doing it. He was running for president.
This is what happened to Pat Buchanan back in the nineties.
Speaker 5 (03:45):
I'm not everyone nothing, especially not his crowd that came
in earlier. Nothing's gonna stop us from going forward to
anywhere in a new century about to begin, and we
could go to that her upgradist if we go forward together.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Now the operations have improved in quality, but they haven't
really changed in terms of tactics. It's the exact same thing,
holding up a sign Buchanan as a racist, which by
the way, laid the groundwork for the entire woke mind
virus which took over this country over the preceding thirty years.
So yeah, it's the same thing, and it's for the
same reason. It's because Tucker Carlson is doing what Pat
(04:29):
Buchanan did. He's talking about America first and meaning it,
which is not allowed. And you should really be asking
yourself why that is. Why are you not allowed to
prefer and prioritize your country over a four and one
be that any other country on earth. It should be
a given, as I said before, it should be completely acceptable,
(04:52):
it should be universally understood. But in fact it's treated
as the third rail of politics. It's treated as if
you are instantly one of the most hateful people on
the planet.
Speaker 6 (05:04):
And I just want the anti American, anti Israel, anti
West crowd to understand something. You're gonna have to come
through me and millions of people just like me, and
you're not gonna make it. You think your stupid little podcast,
(05:26):
or your stupid little subscription program, or your little TV
show or maybe you have a little radio show is
going to change the world, Like hell, it is not,
if I and everybody else have something to say about it.
Speaker 2 (05:40):
Hi, Mark Levin Clint Russell, reporting for Liberty Lockdown. Yes,
I do think my stupid little podcast can change the world,
not this one individually, but collectively, people that are telling
the truth, that aren't bought and paid for like you,
People that actually have loyalty to this country, not a
foreign one like you. So yeah, I actually do believe
(06:01):
in free speech, and I do believe in telling the truth,
and I do believe that I will prevail, and I
do believe that if I have to go through you,
I will prevail. Nonetheless, you do not intimidate me. You're
an old man. Why would I possibly be intimidated of you?
It's ridiculous. So you can talk tough, you can bluster her,
you can bluff, but I'm not going to stop. And
I don't think anybody's going to stop, at least I
(06:22):
hope not. We have to proceed. We have to. We
really don't have a choice, so I will. Next up,
we have probably the dumbest member of the seven thousand
dollars Club, and that would be Brandon Tatum.
Speaker 7 (06:33):
I see somebody with a sign said Tucker is not MAGA.
I guess I gotta put his name out there. That's
not maga. When you're on your platform and people are
are acting as if Sharia law it's better than what
we have here in America and the laws that have
given to us by God through faith, you're a silly person.
(06:56):
If you are out here and you don't know whether
or not HAMAS is a terrorist organization or a political organization, you.
Speaker 4 (07:01):
Are a foolish person.
Speaker 7 (07:09):
And since I'm already name dropping, everybody saw that interview.
You have a guy say that he supports Stalin and
that he was a big fan of Stalin on your show.
You can have him on the show, But Dog Gonneer,
you better push back on people like that there's no
way you could say that you're a Christian. There's no
way you can say you believe in God and you
support a person like Joseph Stalin who did not believe
(07:31):
in God, who killed so many people. Enough is enough.
We're not putting up with it anymore.
Speaker 2 (07:38):
I'll agree with Tatum on one part. I do find
it weird that Funt says that he likes Stalin. I
don't understand that. I do wish Tucker had pushed back.
But the primary contention has been that because Tucker was
so adversarial with Ted Kruz when he just absolutely eviscerated him,
which I loved, he should have done this same thing
(08:00):
with Nick Fuenttes. And I think that the point that
needs to be made there is that the reason that
Tucker was so adversarial with Ted Cruz is because in
that very moment, the topic at hand was the bombing
of Iran. It was a war that was about to begin.
It was not a war that happened seventy five years ago.
(08:21):
So the urgency of challenging Fuenttes on his opinion of
Stalin wasn't exactly there. Whereas he had a sitting senator
who had the capacity to actually start that war, talking
about why we should go to war with Iran, and
Tucker was saying, no, we're not doing that, and he
challenged him on a theological basis, and he absolutely eviserted
(08:43):
him and it was beautiful. So when people want to
challenge Sucker as to why he didn't push back, I
think it's because it's a historical discussion that he probably
didn't want to take the conversation in that direction. So
it's his show, it's his prerogative. I think had had
Fontez been talking about, well, let's, I don't know, have
(09:03):
communism again, you know, let's actually have that happen in
real time, Tucker had been like, whoa, whoa, whoa, what
are you talking about? He didn't. He wasn't saying that,
so he didn't challenge him. One more clip and then
I'll get to my point here. This is Donald Trump
at the RJC, which, by the way, all of these
clips are at the Republican Jewish Coalition. That's what this
big siop is located from.
Speaker 4 (09:24):
Hello to everyone at the Republican Jewish Coalition, and congratulations
on forty amazing years. I want to thank your national chairman,
former Senator Norm Coleman, along with your CEO Matt Brooks
and my friend Miriam Adelson and so many other incredible supporters,
distinguished guests. With the help of many of you, we
won all seven swing states by millions of votes, and
(09:47):
very importantly, the RJC helped ensure that we won the
highest percentage of Jewish vote of any Republican since nineteen
eighty eight. I can't imagine we didn't do better than that,
after all I've done for the Jewish vote. I must
be honest with you. But that's okay. Nineteen eighty h
is not that bad.
Speaker 2 (10:06):
That's really the only part of that speech from Trump
that I wanted to get to. He's lamenting the fact
that more Jewish people didn't support him in this election,
and that's true, only approximately thirty percent did so. Yeah,
despite the fact that he is the most pro Israel
president in my lifetime, maybe ever, he is still not
getting even the majority of support from Jewish voters in America.
(10:29):
And I think it ought to, I don't know, maybe
open Trump's eyes and actually open up Mark Levin and
Ben Shapiro and everybody else's eyes to the fact that
Jewish people by and large do not support what's happening.
In fact, most of them don't, so yeah, I don't
think that they This was actually a point that was
made by Tucker Carlson two Nick fuent Is in this
(10:51):
incredibly controversial episode or interview between the two men, and
I thought that it was the probably most important pushback
that needs to be made against Nick Fountes. And despite
the fact that he did so, he's being accused of
having no pushback to Nick, which is false. This clip
that I'm about to play you has received zero traction.
It has been shared by nobody. All of the hit pieces,
(11:13):
all of the smears, all of the blacklisting attempts and
defunding attempts, and going after Heritage and going after that.
This is how crazy it's gotten. They realize that they
cannot cancel Nick funt Does he's got an independent platform.
They cannot really cancel Tucker Carlson. He's got an independent platform.
So what they're doing is they're going after Heritage Foundation,
which has bought ads on Tucker's show to the tune
(11:35):
of a good chunk of money. So they're now going
after Heritage because the CEO of Heritage refused to disavow Tucker,
and then they recognize that it wasn't enough to just
get him. They're now going after the guy who works
for Heritage, who wrote the speech for the CEO of Heritage,
who refused to condemn, the guy who platformed, the guy
(11:56):
who didn't push back against the no no guy. I mean,
that's what we're dealing with. Do you see the similarities
between the entire past decade of woke cancelation attempts. It's
so obvious. I mean, we are almost up to six
full degrees of cancelation. It's no longer Kevin Bacon. It's cancelation.
(12:17):
That's what they're doing. And that's the exact same thing.
They go after people's friends. They go after Matt Walsh.
Why aren't you condemning? They go after Magan Kelly. Why
aren't you condemning Tucker Carlson? Not because of what Tucker
Carlson said, but because of who Tucker Carlson talk to,
talk to. I mean, it's nuts. It's the exact same thing.
(12:38):
It is the woke mind virus. And the reason, as
I explained in the prior episode, is because it's an
identitarian worldview. It's actually an ethno nationalist worldview, which is
ironic because all of the contention against Tucker and Nick
Foontes is because they accuse Nick of being an ethno nationalist.
These people are actual nationalists, and I think they just
(13:01):
don't want competition.
Speaker 8 (13:03):
Not just principle, but like spiritual reality that we have
to defend, which is God created every person as an individual,
not as a group. He no woman gave birth to
a community. Like we hate that kind of thinking. Yes,
collectivest thinking like that, that's identity politics. That's what Dave
Rubin engages. And that's why Dave is like a just
a child. Like you don't pay any attention to Dave
(13:24):
because he's like shallow. But we're not going to be that,
right or No. No, I completely agree with you.
Speaker 2 (13:31):
And I gotta be honest with you. I don't think
this is about Nick Fuentes. I know this is going
to be controversial. I think this is because Tucker started
to tell a whole lot of truth, like the truth
that you're really not allowed to talk about, especially when
you are the top guy, the top GOP commentator. And
like it or not, Tucker is and he will continue
(13:52):
to be that. Tucker started to push back against things
that you really aren't supposed to. I'll give you a list.
First off, well, right now now he's arguing that we
should not be going to war with Venezuela. Many of
you probably aren't even aware that that's happening. We have
an entire armada sailing towards Venezuela. We have CIA operations
that are happening there. It's highly likely that we will
(14:13):
be at war with Venezuela in the next month. So
Tucker is speaking out against that. Tucker also spoke out
and challenged Ted Cruz and tried to prevent the bombing
of Iran. Tucker has also advocated very strongly against the war,
the proxy war against Russia and Ukraine. When you advocate
against the military industrial complex, the neocons, you become public
(14:35):
enemy number one. And they were just waiting. They were
biding their time and waiting for their opportunity to bring
out the knives. When he had the courage to host
someone like Nick Fuentes, they saw their opportunity and they pounced.
And this is a well funded, well coordinated operation to
try and destroy Tucker Carlson. But because he has an
independent platform, they can't really destroy him. So what are
they doing. They're going after his allies. They're going after
(14:58):
his funding sources, they're going after his spon answers, They're
going after any of his friends in the right wing
media sphere. That's what's happening. It's crystal clear. Tucker is
also going after the Epstein file. This is what he
had to say just a month or so ago.
Speaker 8 (15:12):
So let's just assess us logically, they're covering up the DOJ.
The current DOJ under Pambondi is covering up crimes, very
serious crimes by their own description. Why are they doing that? Yeah,
So they're really only two potential explanations that I can
think of. Maybe you've got another. The first is that
Trump is involved, that you know Trump is on the list,
They've got tape of Trump doing something awful. I don't
(15:36):
believe that for two reasons. One, I've talked Trump about
it a lot, and I know him. He's not that,
you know, for whatever his sins, I don't think he's
that guy. Actually, I don't think he likes creepy sex stuff.
That's just my view. But moreover, but more I think
convincing is that this is all information that the Biden
administration had, and if there was evidence that Trump had
(15:58):
been involved in illegal sexual activity, you think that people
who made up Russia Gate wouldn't have read it?
Speaker 5 (16:03):
Right?
Speaker 8 (16:03):
Come on now, So the only other explanation I can
think of, again, maybe you've got another, is that intel
services are at the very center of the story US
and Israeli and they're being protected. I think that seems
like the most the most obvious. I have a history
of this.
Speaker 1 (16:18):
There have been multiple documented cases.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
And there is your mortal sin. You cannot, you absolutely
must not connect the dots between Epstein foreign intel, domestic intel,
and how compromont is built against our politicians. He touched
the third rail. He went there. He didn't just go
there with that either. I already gave you the whole
list of wars that he's opposed. He has just started
(16:43):
to tell the truth too much, and most importantly, to
an audience that is too large. That's his real sin.
He is too big, he is too honest, and that
will not be permitted. Therefore, you have a well funded,
well orchestrated attack mob that is out to destroy Tucker
Carlson and undermine anybody who's affiliated with him, anyone who
(17:05):
likes him, anyone who supports him financially or otherwise. It
couldn't be more obvious. That's what's happening.
Speaker 1 (17:11):
We have all witnessed. This is what has been happening
to Tucker Carlson and Candae Sowens and me for ten years.
And finally somebody stood up and said, you know what, No,
we're not going to cancel Tucker Carlson. Fuck you, We're
not going to cancel Tucker Carlson anytime soon. And even then,
(17:33):
we're gonna do that and pick you over him. You
are insane. He stood on business and people said, it's
about time that someone stood up to the bullying.
Speaker 2 (17:46):
So why do I draw the similarity to what's happening
to Tucker and to Charlie Kirk. Well, a lot of
people haven't seen this clip, so I'm gonna play it
for you. This happened one month after October seventh, and
this was a question that was asked to him and
a response that he gave because he challenged the narrative
over what happened during October seventh, which was obviously not
(18:07):
to be permitted.
Speaker 9 (18:08):
Fact number one Axios article shows that an equivalent of
a council of decision makers were briefed on Friday night
before the attack that there was growing chattern activity on
the Gaza border and there was a deliberate decision not
to put it on high alert. The why we don't
know the what is unmistakable fact number two nineteen seventy three,
(18:33):
fifty years ago. And I'm not saying this is what happened,
but you better know about this. Golda Mayir was briefed
by her military and they said Egypt and Syria are
about to invade. We can strike now and we can
save lots of Jewish lives. And she said, do not strike.
Let them hit first, or else the international community will
be very, very upset with us. That's fifty years ago
(18:55):
to the date that Goldenmayer made that decision. The best
answer and the one that will probably come out, is
Israel got complacent, probably or one that people are not
talking about. Maybe Netanyahu is double crossed within his own government,
maybe that there were not maybe there were spies within
the spy agency. I am going to continue to ask
the question a twenty hour response in a country the
(19:18):
size of New Jersey that that begs a big explanation.
And more importantly, America is significantly underwriting the Israeli government
four billion dollars a year. We'se American taxpayers deserve answers
to this. We deserved answers also if we're going to
get into a regional or world war based on an
INTEL failure, So I mean we pay for this. What
(19:40):
are we buying?
Speaker 5 (19:41):
Right?
Speaker 9 (19:42):
I got smeared as a Jew hater, an anti Semite,
and conspiracy theorist because I said exactly what I just said,
and I refuse to back down despite all the smears
thrown at me, because I learned during COVID. I learned
when they told us that it came from a bat
in the Himalayas. I learned when they told us the
vaccine was safe. In effect, if I learned when they
told us that iver Mecdam was horse paced, that you
(20:05):
better keep asking questions because it's the only thing that
keeps us free.
Speaker 2 (20:09):
Charlie was waking up, That's the truth. Charlie was waking up.
He wasn't all the way awake, but he started to
question things that you simply are not allowed to. And
more importantly, he refused to back down when they started
the smear attack against him. Here's a good example of that.
One week after October seventh, during this entire controversy, right
(20:29):
after Charlie had gone on, Patrick bet David and said
that he was wondering if there may have been a
standown order. This is what Ben Domenich said. This is
the wife of Megan McCain. Sorry I said wife, husband,
but probably probably goes that way anyways. He says, if
Charlie Kirk remains the head of TPUSA, the right has
(20:51):
an anti Semite problem that will follow them into the
coming election. This is my response. One week after October
seventh said, do you have a better answer as to
why there was no real military very presence for seven
hours into the attack? Can you understand why reasonable people
would find that bizarre without it being a somewhow hateful worldview.
I stand by that question. I still have that question.
That question has still not been answered. We still have
(21:13):
no investigation, We still have no disclosures as to why
a country the size of New Jersey would allow for
an attack from a couple hundred jihattis to transpire and
go without any sort of military response for seven hours
in a nation that is basically a police state. I mean,
their borders are probably the most guarded border in the world,
(21:35):
next to North Korea. How did that happen? Charlie Kirk
asked that question. I can ask that question because I'm
a small timer. I also don't have any funding sources
that are tied to foreign nations. I don't have any
funding sources. Actually, this is a purely me operation. Charlie
wasn't in that position. Charlie ran TPUSA. Charlie took major
(21:56):
money from people who have interests in the intel agencies.
Let's just put it like that. He started to ask
questions that he is simply not permitted to do in
the position that he held, and for that reason, the
attack mobs and the smears and the articles started to
get written, and they tried to destroy him for two
straight years. So when Candis Owens talks about the struggle
(22:17):
session that he received in the Hamptons, if you think
she's overstating it, you may not have been paying attention
to what's transpired with Tucker Carlson over the past week
and really over the past couple months. And it's not
just Tucker Carlson, It's not just Candis owns. And it
wasn't just Charlie Kirk. It's also Marjorie Taylor Green, who's
being attacked viciously this week and has been attacked for
many months now. It's also Thomas Massey. What are the similarities?
(22:40):
These people have major differences of opinion when it comes
to all sorts of issues, But the one tie that
binds between all of them is that they all sincerely
mean it when they say America first. They are not
playing around. They are sincere in that that. Maybe they
have other areas of dishonesty, but when it comes to
that particular topic, those are sincere actors in that regard,
(23:04):
and as a consequence, they are all receiving the same treatment.
And I have to connect the most uncomfortable dot of all.
What happened to Charlie Kirk six weeks ago. Well, he
was assassinated. And I've been crystal clear about this. I
don't know who killed Charlie Kirk. I don't, but I
do know this for a fact. There was a motive
to take him out, and it surrounded a foreign country,
(23:27):
and all of the clues, all of the real evidence
of that motive was actively hidden in the wake of
his assassination by Josh Hammer and others. Basically the entire
TPUSA organization stayed totally silent on the fact that just
forty eight hours before his death he said, and I quote,
(23:48):
I have no choice but to leave the prosial cause.
That's what he said. And given the attack and smear
job that was being waged against him for the prior
two years, do you think he said that lightly or
was that said with sincerity? And I want to point
something else out, as Dave Smith has also talked about this,
does Josh Hammer strike you as a guy who's more
(24:11):
capable of defending the pro Israel cause or debating college
kids than Charlie Kirk. Do you think that Charlie Kirk
employed or requested Josh Hammer's advice when it came to
defending the pro Israel cause or was he assigned him?
I want you to really think about that, and it's
an uncomfortable question, but from everything I can see, given
(24:34):
the fact that Charlie was feeding he was feeding Josh
Hammer to Dave Smith, Dave Smith had already debated Josh Hammer.
Dave Smith had already trounced Josh Hammer and Charlie Kirk
said during his penultimate event in July at TPUSA and
Tampa that I'm going to have Dave Smith debate Josh
(24:56):
Hammer again. He knew Josh Hammer could win that debate.
Do you think his donors Do you think the Zionists
appreciated that fact? Do you think they appreciated the fact
that he continued to platform someone like Tucker Carlson at
that same event despite their constant demands that he stopped
doing so. The answer is no, they didn't appreciate it.
(25:17):
They took it very personally, and two months later he
was dead. Those are facts. That doesn't mean that the
dots connect perfectly. But you have to ask that question.
You have no choice but to ask it. You would
be lying to yourself if you don't ask it, if
you don't connect those dots a little bit, if you
don't say I see a clear motive, Because there is
(25:40):
a clear motive. It couldn't be more obvious. And the
exact same thing that happened to Charlie Kirk in the
lead up to his assassination is happening to Tucker Carlson
right now. And it's very important that everybody points it out,
that everybody tells the truth about what they see happening,
and they do not permit this to happen again. It
(26:02):
cannot happen again. We are in a very very dark
world and a dark future if they do something catastrophic
to Tucker Carlson. Pray for Tucker Carlson, Speak out for
Tucker Carlson, Call out the syops against Tucker Carlson. I
don't say any of this lately, but I want you
guys to really recognize what's happening. Randy Fine, a sitting
(26:25):
congressman is in Congress almost exclusively because of APEX support
rjc Apek. Hundreds of thousands of dollars flooded into his coffers.
That's the whole reason he's in Congress. You have a
sitting congressman calling Tucker Carlson the most dangerous anti Semite
in America, not because of what he said, but because
(26:46):
of who he hosted. Sure, I'm sure that's all it is.
I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact
that he's challenging the narrative that Israel is our greatest ally.
I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact
that Tucker Carlson is calling out the war propagand for
what it is and trying to put this country first
for once in my lifetime. I'm sure it has nothing
to do with the fact that Tucker Carlson is an
(27:08):
independent voice who's telling the truth too often and to
too many people right has nothing to do with any
of those things. It's just that he's the most dangerous
anti semi in America. You're treating him like Pap Buchanan.
I see it for what it is. I will not
allow it. I will not go quietly or silently about it.
(27:29):
Tucker Carlson is a national treasure and he will be
defended as such. And if you fucking lift a finger
against Tucker Carlson, you will see a backlash in this
country the likes of which you have never seen before
in your lives. Do not fuck with Tucker Carlson. We
all stand behind him. Randy Fine, a sitting congressman, is
(27:50):
running a foreign influence operation against the most high profile
political commentator on the right wing in a Mariera. That
should be a FARA violation, That should be illegal, actually,
but it's not. So this is the only defense we
have to tell the truth about what's happening, to point
(28:10):
it out to call it out and hope that it
can diffuse it, because if it doesn't, things could get very,
very ugly, and I desperately want to avoid that. If
you guys enjoyed this episode, please do it the like button, subscribe,
share it around, and I've got the biggest episode of
my life coming up later this week. I'll just leave
it at that. I have two men coming on this
(28:31):
show that are going to be Yeah, I'm going to
be on the radar. Let's just say, let's just put
it like that. Talk to you guys soon. Oh and
if you want to support my work, go to at
Liberty log pot on X subscribe there. I'll follow you back.
Or if you don't have any money, to share the
show around, appreciate you guys.
Speaker 1 (28:48):
Pease you saw an avalanche on the timeline of the
seven thousand dollars club, the paid shills, as well as
the two percent, the foreign agents, the fore spot, the
Israel firsters avalanche on the timeline in the quote tweets,
and you would think everything I just said was a
(29:10):
Hitler speech, was a Nazi pamphlet. They said, this is
another Holocaust. I can't believe it's happening again. This is
a dark day. I can't believe it's happening this fast.
They're selling out their principles. What what are you talking about?
Speaker 8 (29:27):
What I do think is bad, just objectively bad and
destructive is the all Jews are guilty or all anybody
is guilty of anything, because that's just like not true
and we don't believe that is Christians. I mean, my
hero in life is Paul, because you call him Saint Paul.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
Not to be that guy and say that thing, but
like my best friend is a Jewish person.
They love Tucker Carlson. And they love Tucker Carlson because
say what you want about him, and I've had my criticisms.
He is patriotic, he tells the truth, he speaks common sense.
He's not afraid of anybody. He is a true American.
He's not about the bullshit. People love him, and no
(00:21):
one is going to cancel Tucker Carlson because Mark Levin
said so. So people saw that statement and they said,
you know what, it's about time. We're not getting rid
of Tucker Carlson. We're not getting rid of Christ. We're
not going to put America. Second, we're not actually obligated
to support Israel. We can say what we want about them,
(00:41):
and we don't need to like Nick Flentis, but he
should have the same First Amendment rights and people should
be able to talk to him if they disagree. Ninety
eight percent of people agreed with every word of that
and said it's about time.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
It's very rare that I do a show where I
am genuinely concerned about the nature of the time at hand.
I am genuinely concerned. However, when those times arise, I
quickly recognize that I must that I have no choice
but to proceed. And in this episode, I'm going to
connect some dots, some very uncomfortable dots, and some of
(01:15):
you are going to think I'm crazy, and the rest
of you are going to be nodding along the entire time,
going yep, that's exactly what's happening. So what am I
talking about? Well, the knives are out once again for
Tucker Carlson, and the similarities between the cancelation attempt against
Tucker Carlson are eerily reminiscent to what transpired with Charlie
(01:36):
Kirk over the past two years.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
Specifically, it's about time that somebody stood up to the
bullies because we've had enough. Everybody knows this is how
it works. Everybody knows that if you have anything dissenting,
anything critical to say about Israel, you will get these
psychotic berserkers. That's their strategy. Laura Loomer, Josh Ham, Mark Levin,
(02:01):
Ben Shapiro. They will be on your case, bullying you,
trying to intimidate you, working behind the scenes to get
you fired, to get dirt on you, to blackmail you.
That's how they operate.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
Now, before I get there, let me show you what
I'm talking about. First up, we have Randy Fine, a
congressional member out of my great state of Florida, and
a man with a blood type that is Hollandaise sauce.
Speaker 3 (02:29):
Tucker Carlson is the most dangerous anti suommite in America.
Speaker 4 (02:34):
He has chosen.
Speaker 3 (02:36):
He has chosen to take on the mantle of leader
of a modern day Hitler youth, to broadcast and feature
those who celebrate the Nazis, those who call for the
extermination of Israel, to defend Hamas, to even criticize President
Trump for stopping Iran's nuclear ambitions. Friends, make no mistake,
(02:59):
Tucker is not maga.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
Look at that truly organic hatred towards Tucker Carlson with
those well made, professionally made signs saying that Tucker isn't maga. Well,
for the youngsters out there, you may not remember this,
and probably most of you have never even heard of this,
But as I said in my prior episode, Pat Buchanan
was really the I don't know stalwart. He was the
(03:25):
guy when it came to America first, long before Tucker Carlson,
long before Nick Flint does or Dave or myself or
anybody else. He was doing it. He was running for president.
This is what happened to Pat Buchanan back in the nineties.
Speaker 5 (03:45):
I'm not everyone nothing, especially not his crowd that came
in earlier. Nothing's gonna stop us from going forward to
anywhere in a new century about to begin, and we
could go to that her upgradist if we go forward together.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Now the operations have improved in quality, but they haven't
really changed in terms of tactics. It's the exact same thing,
holding up a sign Buchanan as a racist, which by
the way, laid the groundwork for the entire woke mind
virus which took over this country over the preceding thirty years.
So yeah, it's the same thing, and it's for the
same reason. It's because Tucker Carlson is doing what Pat
(04:29):
Buchanan did. He's talking about America first and meaning it,
which is not allowed. And you should really be asking
yourself why that is. Why are you not allowed to
prefer and prioritize your country over a four and one
be that any other country on earth. It should be
a given, as I said before, it should be completely acceptable,
(04:52):
it should be universally understood. But in fact it's treated
as the third rail of politics. It's treated as if
you are instantly one of the most hateful people on
the planet.
Speaker 6 (05:04):
And I just want the anti American, anti Israel, anti
West crowd to understand something. You're gonna have to come
through me and millions of people just like me, and
you're not gonna make it. You think your stupid little podcast,
(05:26):
or your stupid little subscription program, or your little TV
show or maybe you have a little radio show is
going to change the world, Like hell, it is not,
if I and everybody else have something to say about it.
Speaker 2 (05:40):
Hi, Mark Levin Clint Russell, reporting for Liberty Lockdown. Yes,
I do think my stupid little podcast can change the world,
not this one individually, but collectively, people that are telling
the truth, that aren't bought and paid for like you,
People that actually have loyalty to this country, not a
foreign one like you. So yeah, I actually do believe
(06:01):
in free speech, and I do believe in telling the truth,
and I do believe that I will prevail, and I
do believe that if I have to go through you,
I will prevail. Nonetheless, you do not intimidate me. You're
an old man. Why would I possibly be intimidated of you?
It's ridiculous. So you can talk tough, you can bluster her,
you can bluff, but I'm not going to stop. And
I don't think anybody's going to stop, at least I
(06:22):
hope not. We have to proceed. We have to. We
really don't have a choice, so I will. Next up,
we have probably the dumbest member of the seven thousand
dollars Club, and that would be Brandon Tatum.
Speaker 7 (06:33):
I see somebody with a sign said Tucker is not MAGA.
I guess I gotta put his name out there. That's
not maga. When you're on your platform and people are
are acting as if Sharia law it's better than what
we have here in America and the laws that have
given to us by God through faith, you're a silly person.
(06:56):
If you are out here and you don't know whether
or not HAMAS is a terrorist organization or a political organization, you.
Speaker 4 (07:01):
Are a foolish person.
Speaker 7 (07:09):
And since I'm already name dropping, everybody saw that interview.
You have a guy say that he supports Stalin and
that he was a big fan of Stalin on your show.
You can have him on the show, But Dog Gonneer,
you better push back on people like that there's no
way you could say that you're a Christian. There's no
way you can say you believe in God and you
support a person like Joseph Stalin who did not believe
(07:31):
in God, who killed so many people. Enough is enough.
We're not putting up with it anymore.
Speaker 2 (07:38):
I'll agree with Tatum on one part. I do find
it weird that Funt says that he likes Stalin. I
don't understand that. I do wish Tucker had pushed back.
But the primary contention has been that because Tucker was
so adversarial with Ted Kruz when he just absolutely eviscerated him,
which I loved, he should have done this same thing
(08:00):
with Nick Fuenttes. And I think that the point that
needs to be made there is that the reason that
Tucker was so adversarial with Ted Cruz is because in
that very moment, the topic at hand was the bombing
of Iran. It was a war that was about to begin.
It was not a war that happened seventy five years ago.
(08:21):
So the urgency of challenging Fuenttes on his opinion of
Stalin wasn't exactly there. Whereas he had a sitting senator
who had the capacity to actually start that war, talking
about why we should go to war with Iran, and
Tucker was saying, no, we're not doing that, and he
challenged him on a theological basis, and he absolutely eviserted
(08:43):
him and it was beautiful. So when people want to
challenge Sucker as to why he didn't push back, I
think it's because it's a historical discussion that he probably
didn't want to take the conversation in that direction. So
it's his show, it's his prerogative. I think had had
Fontez been talking about, well, let's, I don't know, have
(09:03):
communism again, you know, let's actually have that happen in
real time, Tucker had been like, whoa, whoa, whoa, what
are you talking about? He didn't. He wasn't saying that,
so he didn't challenge him. One more clip and then
I'll get to my point here. This is Donald Trump
at the RJC, which, by the way, all of these
clips are at the Republican Jewish Coalition. That's what this
big siop is located from.
Speaker 4 (09:24):
Hello to everyone at the Republican Jewish Coalition, and congratulations
on forty amazing years. I want to thank your national chairman,
former Senator Norm Coleman, along with your CEO Matt Brooks
and my friend Miriam Adelson and so many other incredible supporters,
distinguished guests. With the help of many of you, we
won all seven swing states by millions of votes, and
(09:47):
very importantly, the RJC helped ensure that we won the
highest percentage of Jewish vote of any Republican since nineteen
eighty eight. I can't imagine we didn't do better than that,
after all I've done for the Jewish vote. I must
be honest with you. But that's okay. Nineteen eighty h
is not that bad.
Speaker 2 (10:06):
That's really the only part of that speech from Trump
that I wanted to get to. He's lamenting the fact
that more Jewish people didn't support him in this election,
and that's true, only approximately thirty percent did so. Yeah,
despite the fact that he is the most pro Israel
president in my lifetime, maybe ever, he is still not
getting even the majority of support from Jewish voters in America.
(10:29):
And I think it ought to, I don't know, maybe
open Trump's eyes and actually open up Mark Levin and
Ben Shapiro and everybody else's eyes to the fact that
Jewish people by and large do not support what's happening.
In fact, most of them don't, so yeah, I don't
think that they This was actually a point that was
made by Tucker Carlson two Nick fuent Is in this
(10:51):
incredibly controversial episode or interview between the two men, and
I thought that it was the probably most important pushback
that needs to be made against Nick Fountes. And despite
the fact that he did so, he's being accused of
having no pushback to Nick, which is false. This clip
that I'm about to play you has received zero traction.
It has been shared by nobody. All of the hit pieces,
(11:13):
all of the smears, all of the blacklisting attempts and
defunding attempts, and going after Heritage and going after that.
This is how crazy it's gotten. They realize that they
cannot cancel Nick funt Does he's got an independent platform.
They cannot really cancel Tucker Carlson. He's got an independent platform.
So what they're doing is they're going after Heritage Foundation,
which has bought ads on Tucker's show to the tune
(11:35):
of a good chunk of money. So they're now going
after Heritage because the CEO of Heritage refused to disavow Tucker,
and then they recognize that it wasn't enough to just
get him. They're now going after the guy who works
for Heritage, who wrote the speech for the CEO of Heritage,
who refused to condemn, the guy who platformed, the guy
(11:56):
who didn't push back against the no no guy. I mean,
that's what we're dealing with. Do you see the similarities
between the entire past decade of woke cancelation attempts. It's
so obvious. I mean, we are almost up to six
full degrees of cancelation. It's no longer Kevin Bacon. It's cancelation.
(12:17):
That's what they're doing. And that's the exact same thing.
They go after people's friends. They go after Matt Walsh.
Why aren't you condemning? They go after Magan Kelly. Why
aren't you condemning Tucker Carlson? Not because of what Tucker
Carlson said, but because of who Tucker Carlson talk to,
talk to. I mean, it's nuts. It's the exact same thing.
(12:38):
It is the woke mind virus. And the reason, as
I explained in the prior episode, is because it's an
identitarian worldview. It's actually an ethno nationalist worldview, which is
ironic because all of the contention against Tucker and Nick
Foontes is because they accuse Nick of being an ethno nationalist.
These people are actual nationalists, and I think they just
(13:01):
don't want competition.
Speaker 8 (13:03):
Not just principle, but like spiritual reality that we have
to defend, which is God created every person as an individual,
not as a group. He no woman gave birth to
a community. Like we hate that kind of thinking. Yes,
collectivest thinking like that, that's identity politics. That's what Dave
Rubin engages. And that's why Dave is like a just
a child. Like you don't pay any attention to Dave
(13:24):
because he's like shallow. But we're not going to be that,
right or No. No, I completely agree with you.
Speaker 2 (13:31):
And I gotta be honest with you. I don't think
this is about Nick Fuentes. I know this is going
to be controversial. I think this is because Tucker started
to tell a whole lot of truth, like the truth
that you're really not allowed to talk about, especially when
you are the top guy, the top GOP commentator. And
like it or not, Tucker is and he will continue
(13:52):
to be that. Tucker started to push back against things
that you really aren't supposed to. I'll give you a list.
First off, well, right now now he's arguing that we
should not be going to war with Venezuela. Many of
you probably aren't even aware that that's happening. We have
an entire armada sailing towards Venezuela. We have CIA operations
that are happening there. It's highly likely that we will
(14:13):
be at war with Venezuela in the next month. So
Tucker is speaking out against that. Tucker also spoke out
and challenged Ted Cruz and tried to prevent the bombing
of Iran. Tucker has also advocated very strongly against the war,
the proxy war against Russia and Ukraine. When you advocate
against the military industrial complex, the neocons, you become public
(14:35):
enemy number one. And they were just waiting. They were
biding their time and waiting for their opportunity to bring
out the knives. When he had the courage to host
someone like Nick Fuentes, they saw their opportunity and they pounced.
And this is a well funded, well coordinated operation to
try and destroy Tucker Carlson. But because he has an
independent platform, they can't really destroy him. So what are
they doing. They're going after his allies. They're going after
(14:58):
his funding sources, they're going after his spon answers, They're
going after any of his friends in the right wing
media sphere. That's what's happening. It's crystal clear. Tucker is
also going after the Epstein file. This is what he
had to say just a month or so ago.
Speaker 8 (15:12):
So let's just assess us logically, they're covering up the DOJ.
The current DOJ under Pambondi is covering up crimes, very
serious crimes by their own description. Why are they doing that? Yeah,
So they're really only two potential explanations that I can
think of. Maybe you've got another. The first is that
Trump is involved, that you know Trump is on the list,
They've got tape of Trump doing something awful. I don't
(15:36):
believe that for two reasons. One, I've talked Trump about
it a lot, and I know him. He's not that,
you know, for whatever his sins, I don't think he's
that guy. Actually, I don't think he likes creepy sex stuff.
That's just my view. But moreover, but more I think
convincing is that this is all information that the Biden
administration had, and if there was evidence that Trump had
(15:58):
been involved in illegal sexual activity, you think that people
who made up Russia Gate wouldn't have read it?
Speaker 5 (16:03):
Right?
Speaker 8 (16:03):
Come on now, So the only other explanation I can
think of, again, maybe you've got another, is that intel
services are at the very center of the story US
and Israeli and they're being protected. I think that seems
like the most the most obvious. I have a history
of this.
Speaker 1 (16:18):
There have been multiple documented cases.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
And there is your mortal sin. You cannot, you absolutely
must not connect the dots between Epstein foreign intel, domestic intel,
and how compromont is built against our politicians. He touched
the third rail. He went there. He didn't just go
there with that either. I already gave you the whole
list of wars that he's opposed. He has just started
(16:43):
to tell the truth too much, and most importantly, to
an audience that is too large. That's his real sin.
He is too big, he is too honest, and that
will not be permitted. Therefore, you have a well funded,
well orchestrated attack mob that is out to destroy Tucker
Carlson and undermine anybody who's affiliated with him, anyone who
(17:05):
likes him, anyone who supports him financially or otherwise. It
couldn't be more obvious. That's what's happening.
Speaker 1 (17:11):
We have all witnessed. This is what has been happening
to Tucker Carlson and Candae Sowens and me for ten years.
And finally somebody stood up and said, you know what, No,
we're not going to cancel Tucker Carlson. Fuck you, We're
not going to cancel Tucker Carlson anytime soon. And even then,
(17:33):
we're gonna do that and pick you over him. You
are insane. He stood on business and people said, it's
about time that someone stood up to the bullying.
Speaker 2 (17:46):
So why do I draw the similarity to what's happening
to Tucker and to Charlie Kirk. Well, a lot of
people haven't seen this clip, so I'm gonna play it
for you. This happened one month after October seventh, and
this was a question that was asked to him and
a response that he gave because he challenged the narrative
over what happened during October seventh, which was obviously not
(18:07):
to be permitted.
Speaker 9 (18:08):
Fact number one Axios article shows that an equivalent of
a council of decision makers were briefed on Friday night
before the attack that there was growing chattern activity on
the Gaza border and there was a deliberate decision not
to put it on high alert. The why we don't
know the what is unmistakable fact number two nineteen seventy three,
(18:33):
fifty years ago. And I'm not saying this is what happened,
but you better know about this. Golda Mayir was briefed
by her military and they said Egypt and Syria are
about to invade. We can strike now and we can
save lots of Jewish lives. And she said, do not strike.
Let them hit first, or else the international community will
be very, very upset with us. That's fifty years ago
(18:55):
to the date that Goldenmayer made that decision. The best
answer and the one that will probably come out, is
Israel got complacent, probably or one that people are not
talking about. Maybe Netanyahu is double crossed within his own government,
maybe that there were not maybe there were spies within
the spy agency. I am going to continue to ask
the question a twenty hour response in a country the
(19:18):
size of New Jersey that that begs a big explanation.
And more importantly, America is significantly underwriting the Israeli government
four billion dollars a year. We'se American taxpayers deserve answers
to this. We deserved answers also if we're going to
get into a regional or world war based on an
INTEL failure, So I mean we pay for this. What
(19:40):
are we buying?
Speaker 5 (19:41):
Right?
Speaker 9 (19:42):
I got smeared as a Jew hater, an anti Semite,
and conspiracy theorist because I said exactly what I just said,
and I refuse to back down despite all the smears
thrown at me, because I learned during COVID. I learned
when they told us that it came from a bat
in the Himalayas. I learned when they told us the
vaccine was safe. In effect, if I learned when they
told us that iver Mecdam was horse paced, that you
(20:05):
better keep asking questions because it's the only thing that
keeps us free.
Speaker 2 (20:09):
Charlie was waking up, That's the truth. Charlie was waking up.
He wasn't all the way awake, but he started to
question things that you simply are not allowed to. And
more importantly, he refused to back down when they started
the smear attack against him. Here's a good example of that.
One week after October seventh, during this entire controversy, right
(20:29):
after Charlie had gone on, Patrick bet David and said
that he was wondering if there may have been a
standown order. This is what Ben Domenich said. This is
the wife of Megan McCain. Sorry I said wife, husband,
but probably probably goes that way anyways. He says, if
Charlie Kirk remains the head of TPUSA, the right has
(20:51):
an anti Semite problem that will follow them into the
coming election. This is my response. One week after October
seventh said, do you have a better answer as to
why there was no real military very presence for seven
hours into the attack? Can you understand why reasonable people
would find that bizarre without it being a somewhow hateful worldview.
I stand by that question. I still have that question.
That question has still not been answered. We still have
(21:13):
no investigation, We still have no disclosures as to why
a country the size of New Jersey would allow for
an attack from a couple hundred jihattis to transpire and
go without any sort of military response for seven hours
in a nation that is basically a police state. I mean,
their borders are probably the most guarded border in the world,
(21:35):
next to North Korea. How did that happen? Charlie Kirk
asked that question. I can ask that question because I'm
a small timer. I also don't have any funding sources
that are tied to foreign nations. I don't have any
funding sources. Actually, this is a purely me operation. Charlie
wasn't in that position. Charlie ran TPUSA. Charlie took major
(21:56):
money from people who have interests in the intel agencies.
Let's just put it like that. He started to ask
questions that he is simply not permitted to do in
the position that he held, and for that reason, the
attack mobs and the smears and the articles started to
get written, and they tried to destroy him for two
straight years. So when Candis Owens talks about the struggle
(22:17):
session that he received in the Hamptons, if you think
she's overstating it, you may not have been paying attention
to what's transpired with Tucker Carlson over the past week
and really over the past couple months. And it's not
just Tucker Carlson, It's not just Candis owns. And it
wasn't just Charlie Kirk. It's also Marjorie Taylor Green, who's
being attacked viciously this week and has been attacked for
many months now. It's also Thomas Massey. What are the similarities?
(22:40):
These people have major differences of opinion when it comes
to all sorts of issues, But the one tie that
binds between all of them is that they all sincerely
mean it when they say America first. They are not
playing around. They are sincere in that that. Maybe they
have other areas of dishonesty, but when it comes to
that particular topic, those are sincere actors in that regard,
(23:04):
and as a consequence, they are all receiving the same treatment.
And I have to connect the most uncomfortable dot of all.
What happened to Charlie Kirk six weeks ago. Well, he
was assassinated. And I've been crystal clear about this. I
don't know who killed Charlie Kirk. I don't, but I
do know this for a fact. There was a motive
to take him out, and it surrounded a foreign country,
(23:27):
and all of the clues, all of the real evidence
of that motive was actively hidden in the wake of
his assassination by Josh Hammer and others. Basically the entire
TPUSA organization stayed totally silent on the fact that just
forty eight hours before his death he said, and I quote,
(23:48):
I have no choice but to leave the prosial cause.
That's what he said. And given the attack and smear
job that was being waged against him for the prior
two years, do you think he said that lightly or
was that said with sincerity? And I want to point
something else out, as Dave Smith has also talked about this,
does Josh Hammer strike you as a guy who's more
(24:11):
capable of defending the pro Israel cause or debating college
kids than Charlie Kirk. Do you think that Charlie Kirk
employed or requested Josh Hammer's advice when it came to
defending the pro Israel cause or was he assigned him?
I want you to really think about that, and it's
an uncomfortable question, but from everything I can see, given
(24:34):
the fact that Charlie was feeding he was feeding Josh
Hammer to Dave Smith, Dave Smith had already debated Josh Hammer.
Dave Smith had already trounced Josh Hammer and Charlie Kirk
said during his penultimate event in July at TPUSA and
Tampa that I'm going to have Dave Smith debate Josh
(24:56):
Hammer again. He knew Josh Hammer could win that debate.
Do you think his donors Do you think the Zionists
appreciated that fact? Do you think they appreciated the fact
that he continued to platform someone like Tucker Carlson at
that same event despite their constant demands that he stopped
doing so. The answer is no, they didn't appreciate it.
(25:17):
They took it very personally, and two months later he
was dead. Those are facts. That doesn't mean that the
dots connect perfectly. But you have to ask that question.
You have no choice but to ask it. You would
be lying to yourself if you don't ask it, if
you don't connect those dots a little bit, if you
don't say I see a clear motive, Because there is
(25:40):
a clear motive. It couldn't be more obvious. And the
exact same thing that happened to Charlie Kirk in the
lead up to his assassination is happening to Tucker Carlson
right now. And it's very important that everybody points it out,
that everybody tells the truth about what they see happening,
and they do not permit this to happen again. It
(26:02):
cannot happen again. We are in a very very dark
world and a dark future if they do something catastrophic
to Tucker Carlson. Pray for Tucker Carlson, Speak out for
Tucker Carlson, Call out the syops against Tucker Carlson. I
don't say any of this lately, but I want you
guys to really recognize what's happening. Randy Fine, a sitting
(26:25):
congressman is in Congress almost exclusively because of APEX support
rjc Apek. Hundreds of thousands of dollars flooded into his coffers.
That's the whole reason he's in Congress. You have a
sitting congressman calling Tucker Carlson the most dangerous anti Semite
in America, not because of what he said, but because
(26:46):
of who he hosted. Sure, I'm sure that's all it is.
I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact
that he's challenging the narrative that Israel is our greatest ally.
I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact
that Tucker Carlson is calling out the war propagand for
what it is and trying to put this country first
for once in my lifetime. I'm sure it has nothing
to do with the fact that Tucker Carlson is an
(27:08):
independent voice who's telling the truth too often and to
too many people right has nothing to do with any
of those things. It's just that he's the most dangerous
anti semi in America. You're treating him like Pap Buchanan.
I see it for what it is. I will not
allow it. I will not go quietly or silently about it.
(27:29):
Tucker Carlson is a national treasure and he will be
defended as such. And if you fucking lift a finger
against Tucker Carlson, you will see a backlash in this
country the likes of which you have never seen before
in your lives. Do not fuck with Tucker Carlson. We
all stand behind him. Randy Fine, a sitting congressman, is
(27:50):
running a foreign influence operation against the most high profile
political commentator on the right wing in a Mariera. That
should be a FARA violation, That should be illegal, actually,
but it's not. So this is the only defense we
have to tell the truth about what's happening, to point
(28:10):
it out to call it out and hope that it
can diffuse it, because if it doesn't, things could get very,
very ugly, and I desperately want to avoid that. If
you guys enjoyed this episode, please do it the like button, subscribe,
share it around, and I've got the biggest episode of
my life coming up later this week. I'll just leave
it at that. I have two men coming on this
(28:31):
show that are going to be Yeah, I'm going to
be on the radar. Let's just say, let's just put
it like that. Talk to you guys soon. Oh and
if you want to support my work, go to at
Liberty log pot on X subscribe there. I'll follow you back.
Or if you don't have any money, to share the
show around, appreciate you guys.
Speaker 1 (28:48):
Pease you saw an avalanche on the timeline of the
seven thousand dollars club, the paid shills, as well as
the two percent, the foreign agents, the fore spot, the
Israel firsters avalanche on the timeline in the quote tweets,
and you would think everything I just said was a
(29:10):
Hitler speech, was a Nazi pamphlet. They said, this is
another Holocaust. I can't believe it's happening again. This is
a dark day. I can't believe it's happening this fast.
They're selling out their principles. What what are you talking about?
Speaker 8 (29:27):
What I do think is bad, just objectively bad and
destructive is the all Jews are guilty or all anybody
is guilty of anything, because that's just like not true
and we don't believe that is Christians. I mean, my
hero in life is Paul, because you call him Saint Paul.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
Not to be that guy and say that thing, but
like my best friend is a Jewish person.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.