November 17, 2025 • 33 mins
Is Donald Trump compromised by Israel and burying the Epstein files to protect his donors? Clint Russell exposes how $150M in Israeli propaganda is silencing Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes, MTG, and Thomas Massie—while Trump primaries America First heroes for demanding transparency. From the Butler assassination attempt cover-up to AIPAC’s $22M bounty on Massie, this explosive episode reveals why MAGA is imploding. Clint Russell connects the dots: blackmail, foreign control, and the death of the America First movement. Watch before it’s censored—truth bombs inside! Check out my show over on Fountain: https://www.fountain.fm/show/nUTYcMtl4yMuoKHljZWu Become a supporting member of Liberty Lockdown here!: https://libertylockdown.locals.com/ This is where I do monthly AMA's for supporting members only Super valuable stuff! Twitter: https://twitter.com/LibertyLockPod Pickup LL shirts over at https://www.toplobsta.com/products/ll-lakers?_pos=5&_sid=e7319ba4a&_ss=r&variant=40668064186434 NEW DESIGNS JUST DROPPED All links: https://www.libertylockdownpodcast.com/ Linktree: https://linktr.ee/libertylockdown As always, if you leave a five star review on Apple Podcasts with your social media handle I'll read it on next weeks show (audio version only)! Love you long time Liberty Lockdown presents a variety of opinions, sometimes opposing and controversial. They are not representative of the host of the podcast. Guests are encouraged to express their opinions in a safe and equitable environment.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I had people last year, friends of mine, tell me
you're being disloyal to Trump. No, you've got it wrong.
Trump has been disloyal to us. What more do we
owe this person? Seriously? How many of you got fired
from your jobs, expelled from your school? How many of
you got hit in the face, lost friends because you
(00:22):
supported Trump? How many of you went to jail in
the Capitol, lost a social media account? How much acrimony?
How many problems has the Trump movement created in your
life because you supported him? And how have we been repaid? Well,
let's see, he filled his White House with GOP staffers
(00:43):
who cut taxes for the corporations and moved the embassy
for Israel. He gave Ukraine lethal aid, He let BLM
destroy the cities, He let Pfizer invent the RNA vaccine.
And you say that Trump is owed our allegiance. What
more do we owe this guy? Then he cuts the
(01:03):
core for taxes again, Barry's the Epstein files serves you right,
you trusted Trump? You can't trust Trump. He's not loyal.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
I've gotten criticism lately that i'd like to address. The
criticism primarily circulates around the idea that I am commentating
on commentators too much, So I want to explain exactly
why I'm doing that. It's not because I'm some massive
simp for Candice Owens or Tucker Carlson or Megan Kelly
or any of these people. Most of them I've never met,
(01:34):
none of them what I consider my friend per se,
and I'm not doing it for any ulterior motives. So
let me explain exactly why, because I feel like a
lot of people don't understand exactly how this game is
being played. I'm sure many of you do, so I'm
not trying to condescend to you. But for those that
have said, why are you talking about Frontes and Tucker
and all that, like, this is why, I'll tell you. Okay.
(01:56):
So twenty twenty four, as Israel has already essentially won
the war in Gaza, they can come to the conclusion
that they have totally lost the pr war. So what
gets announced, Well, Israel announces that they're going to be
launching or they did launch a one hundred and fifty
million dollar propaganda campaign targeted at social media, particularly in
(02:18):
the West, but particularly America because we are their primary donor.
I did an episode a couple months ago or maybe
a month ago about Project Esther that was part of it.
It is just a ton of money that's being funneled
to social media influencers, most of which already have kind
of pro Israel allegiance, but some of home probably didn't,
(02:40):
and they are just buying their opinion. They are buying
their influence.
Speaker 3 (02:45):
But I listened to her now and she comes out
and she talks about our government shouldn't be given money
to Israel. We give three point eight billion dollars Israel. Well, hey, woman,
you work in Congress. You know that we don't just
give them a piece of you know, right one check.
They have to purchase military equipment from US, and it's
as military funding. They got to buy all of that
(03:07):
military equipment from the United States of America. We almost
have them on like a like a credit line.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
So the reason that this became such an important topic
for me to cover is once I realized what was happening,
I had no choice but to call it out and
to defend the people that are the victims of this
propaganda campaign. So what am I talking about specifically, Well,
if that program gets announced in twenty twenty four, that
means it gets rolled out in earnest in twenty twenty five,
(03:34):
does it not? Yes, it did. And what happened in
twenty twenty five, Well, what we've seen so far, aside
from the standard cancelation and blacklisting attempts of people like
Nick Flantes, we have now added to those ranks the
likes of Candice Owens and Tucker Carlson Oh. Also MTG.
Thomas Massey, oh, also Matt Walsh, Megan Kelly, not even
(03:57):
particularly for being antagonist towards Israel, but rather that they
are just ambivalent. They're the in between. They won't condemned
Tucker and Candae, and therefore they must also be pressured
to make a decision. Are you with us or are
you with the terrorists? That's kind of the mentality right
throw back to George W.
Speaker 4 (04:17):
Bush.
Speaker 5 (04:18):
Every nation in every region now has a decision to
make either you are with us or you are with
the terrorists.
Speaker 2 (04:28):
So what does this constitute, Well, it constitutes pretty much
all of the major influential voices on the right wing,
but particularly all of the major influential voices on the
right wing who are at least somewhat antagonistic with Israel,
at least somewhat independent of Israel, those that might criticize
(04:49):
them from time to time. I could add that Charlie
Kirk also was facing the same type of pressure campaign,
while his was primarily behind the scenes and via his donors.
It was happening. Nonetheless, it just wasn't as overt as
what we've witnessed with Candice Owns and Tucker Carlson, unless
you include the attack on him, which may have played
a role. I'm not so sure, but what is the
tie that binds all of these commentators together. They have
(05:12):
a decent amount of disagreements, but it's really just this
one thing that they want to put America first, and
I believe strongly that the vast majority of Trump supporters
feel the same way. Unfortunately, Donald Trump has decided he
does not feel that way, so much so that he
has withdrawn his endorsement of Marjorie Taylor Green and he
has been fighting very loudly with Thomas Massey, and Massey
(05:35):
is now facing a twenty two million dollar political bounty
from pro Israel donors to try and oust him. When
people say, Clint, why do you talk about Israel so much? Well,
this is why, Because regardless of how you feel about
Israel or even the war in Gaza. It should disturb
you to your core that they are actively trying to
oust some of the only independent, critical thinking political candidates
(05:59):
are political office holders that we have. MASSI and mtg
are two of the best we've got. There's five hundred
and thirty five people in Congress, and almost all of
them suck. Rand Paul has also faced the wrath of
Donald Trump, but fortunately so far he has not gone
over the top and trying to get him ousted. I'm
sure that's coming next. Matt Gates, another representative that actually
(06:24):
seemed to represent America. He left office last year in
large part because of the same sort of pressure campaign,
in fact, because of a blackmail operation that was ran
against him. I'm not going to go through the details.
You can look it up if you're curious. It's fascinating.
But this is explicitly why I talk so much about
Israel now, because what I realized over the past few years,
(06:45):
and it's unfortunate that it took me this long to
realize it. But I feel like anybody who's honest, anyone
who's actually interested in the truth of how our political
system works, will inevitably come to the same conclusions that
I have, that, in fact, you do not have representation
at the federal level. You're lucky if you have it
at the local level you usually don't, but you certainly
don't have it at the federal level, and the handful
(07:07):
of representatives that attempt to are quickly undermined, oftentimes blackmailed
or thrown out of office or worse assassinations, et cetera.
My audience historically had been almost exclusively, almost one hundred
percent libertarian or at least libertarian leaning. I assume it's
still largely that, but a few of them have been like,
why are you not making a greater distinction between yourself
(07:30):
and Nick Fuentes. You guys have major disagreements. Why don't
you just talk about that all the time. It's like, well,
the reason I don't talk about it is because I
realize that our differences are not very meaningful. Let me
explain they're not meaningful because it doesn't matter because we
don't have any way to change these things at the
federal level. They will not stop because they are compromised
(07:53):
almost entirely.
Speaker 5 (07:54):
Oh.
Speaker 2 (07:54):
Also, this is not a partisan matter. This is bipartisan
let me show you an example of this. There's a
representative out of the Virgin Islands. Her name is Stacy Plaskett. Now,
she doesn't have voting rights, but she is a congressional
member technically, she got elected by them, and she sits
in Congress, and she's able to ask questions. She's able
to write bills, she's just not allowed to vote on them. Well,
(08:16):
in twenty nineteen, during the impeachment hearings against Donald Trump,
she was actually and this is serious, this is legitimate,
proven by the Washington Post, she was receiving text messages
prompting her, coaching her on questions to ask during a
congressional hearing to try and essentially screw Donald Trump. Let
(08:36):
me repeat that, because I feel like maybe it didn't land.
We had a congressional member being coached in real time
in Congress via text message by Jeffrey Epstein. That's a Democrat. Now,
the more partisan thinkers out there will go, yeah, see
Trump's Enderson. This is all of the Democrats. Now, it's
(08:58):
not actually sure Bill Clinton was an There's a lot
of Democrats that were involved, but there's a ton of
Republicans that were involved. Two, and I might add there's
an opportunity right now to try and get full disclosures
of those files so we can actually know who were
the perpetrators, who is innocent, who is guilty, and get
justice for these for the victims of these monsters. Well,
(09:18):
Thomas Massey MTG two of the only representatives in Congress
that do not take money from APEC. Eighty percent. Let
me repeat this, eighty percent of your elected representatives at
the federal level take campaign contributions from APEC or other
Israel affiliated organizations political action groups. That's crazy. So that
(09:40):
means only twenty percent are not immediately under their thumb.
Two of the most prominent MTG and Massey have been
beating the drum very loudly to get those disclosures. They
are now facing the wrath of Donald Trump. Now, why
do you think that is. Do you think it's because
Donald Trump is super mad that Thomas Madge he voted
against the One Big, Beautiful Bill, or do you think
(10:03):
it's because his donors are guilty of really serious crimes
and that they're forcing his hand.
Speaker 6 (10:09):
I have another concern about these investigations that he's announced.
If they have ongoing investigations in certain areas those documents
can't be released. So this might be a big smoke
screen these investigations to open a bunch of them to
as a last ditch effort to prevent the release of
the Epstein files.
Speaker 2 (10:28):
I could go even more conspiratorial and assume that because
Donald Trump had a very long time friendly relationship with
Jeffrey Epstein, that is true, well over a decade, they
were like BFFs, that he was participating in this activity.
I don't have any proof of that, so I'm not
going to go there, and honestly, I don't need to,
because the reality is is that we know that there
(10:49):
are dozens over one hundred actually victims of Jeffrey Epstein,
and we also know that Donald Trump has done everything
in his power. Despite saying, well he was painting that
he would release these files, that he would seek justice,
he has done everything in his power to bury these files.
Same with Cash Hotel, same with Daan Pongino, same with
the entire Trump administration. So the most prominent and loudest
(11:12):
congressional representatives that have been beating this drum also happen
to not take any money from Israel affiliated lobbies, and
they are also facing the wrath of Apec and one
Donald Trump. That ladies and gentlemen is a pattern. That's
not a coincidence, It's not happenstance. It tells you a lot.
And what does it tell you, Well, to make it
(11:33):
very explicit, it tells me you can come to your
own conclusions. It tells me that Donald Trump is compromised.
Why do I say that, Well, let's highlight this incredible
investigative work by Tuck Carlson, who, after over a year
and a half now I think it's been about a
year and a half, has come out with a expose
on the attack on Donald Trump and Butler, Pennsylvania.
Speaker 4 (11:54):
On the day of the attacks, Thomas Crooks got extremely lucky,
miraculously lucky. After he arrived at the Butler County Fairgrounds
on the morning of the shooting, Thomas Crooks conducted surveillance
by flying his drone over the rally site. He flew
that drone for eleven minutes. It just so happened the
Secret Service's anti drone system were down at exactly the
(12:17):
same moment. What are the odds. Later that afternoon, police
officers saw Crooks loitering with a backpack and a rangefinder.
They identified him as a suspicious person, which he clearly was,
but quickly lost track of him, and so Crooks climbed
to the top of the American Glass Research building that
happened to be the only building in the area that
(12:38):
did not have a video surveillance system. It was also
remarkably inexplicably outside the Secret Service's security perimeter, despite the
fact it was very close to the stage. Two local
police officers assigned to the building saw Crooks, but they
didn't report him. A third officer was supposed to be
there left early.
Speaker 2 (12:57):
An attack that came within inches of taking the soon
to be President Alex's life. Both cash matel and Dan
Bongino said that it stunk the high hell. Then they
got into power and they said he acted alone. No
social media footprint, no communications, blah blah blah. Right wrong,
they lied.
Speaker 4 (13:14):
In response to the same video, Thomas Crooks issued what
sounds a lot like a digital manifesto quote. In my opinion,
the only way to fight the government is with terrorism
style attacks. Sneak a bomb into an essential building and
set it off before anyone sees. You track down any
important people or politicians, military leaders, etc. And try to
(13:35):
assassinate them.
Speaker 2 (13:36):
So you need to ask yourself why did they lie?
Why would they lie that Thomas Matthew Crooks had no
social media imprint when we know for a fact that
Thomas Crooks was communicating through encrypted apps to multiple foreign countries. Now,
all grant, I'm connecting some disparate dots here, and you
may be uncomfortable connecting them yourself. And I'm not even
(13:58):
saying definitively, I know this for a fact. I am
connecting dots, I am analyzing, and I am coming to conclusions.
But I will add my track record in doing that
is really fucking good. I get a lot of things
right because I think critically, and I analyze from an
impartial point of view, and I try and figure out
what the fuck is going on, and oftentimes I come
to the right conclusion COVID during the entire like over
(14:20):
the past five years. Just look at my track record.
I usually get these things right. War in Ukraine, Warren Gaza, etcetera, etcetera.
And if you think I'm reaching, I want you to
ask yourself this. If you were Donald Trump and you
came within inches of losing your own life, would you
be totally disinterested in who took a shot at you?
Would you just assume that the FBI or the US
Secret Service which allowed for that sniper to get in
(14:41):
that position and take a clean, multiple clean shots at you.
Would you accept their narrative as to how it transpired.
Would you accept the FBI's narrative saying that he hect
it alone? Would you accept that? Or would you dig
relentlessly until you found out exactly what happened? Who did it?
Speaker 6 (15:00):
And how are you satisfied with the answers that we've
got from the Butler assassination attempt.
Speaker 7 (15:06):
Thomas Crook's twenty years old? Why do we know nothing?
We know nothing?
Speaker 3 (15:10):
Yeah?
Speaker 7 (15:10):
May In fact, I'm not only am I unsatisfied, I'm
wholly pissed off about it, and I remain pissed off
about it. We know nothing. We see a picture of
a kid who looks like he's fourteen years old. Yea,
and we've seen no other pictures of him. We don't
know who he is. We know he had multiple cell phones.
Try to figure out what twenty year old has multiple
cell phones? The kid was cremated like five days or
(15:31):
six days? I give me a break. Like most family
pets to take longer to be cremated. I am very
far away from being conspiracy theorist, but nothing about it
looks right.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
Well, I'll tell you what I think. I think Donald
Trump knows. I think he knows exactly who tried to
kill him on that day, and whether or not Thomas
Crooks was the shooter not really relevant to me. I
think it was an Intel operation. That's my honest opinion,
and my honest opinion as of now is that that's
almost certainly what happened to Charlie Kirk as well. Do
I feel that way? Well, because of his private communications,
(16:03):
because of the fact that he said just forty eight
hours before his life was taken that he had no
choice but to a ban on the prosial cost. Do
I think that that would be a catalyst for them
to take him out?
Speaker 7 (16:11):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (16:11):
I do. Does that mean that I know it, No,
it doesn't. As I said, I'm connecting dots, But I
think that there's a distinct possibility that that attack on
Charlie Kirk was yet another reminder to Donald Trump that
we fucking own you, that we run your shit, and
if you try and act like a real boy, if
you pretend as if you don't have strings attached to you,
we will take out more people that you care about,
(16:34):
that you love. Maybe it'll be you, maybe it'll be
your kids. Who knows, maybe it'll be your allies. You
get the point. And again I'll ask you this. Why
else do you think that Donald Trump would be absolutely
destroying his legacy? Why would he be going back on
almost all of his campaign promises, aside from closing the border.
Why why would he tell the Israelis that you can't
(16:54):
buy them Iran and then have them do it anyways
and just not change anything.
Speaker 6 (17:01):
We basically have two countries that have been fighting so
long and so hard that they don't know what the
fuck they're doing.
Speaker 8 (17:08):
Do you understand that?
Speaker 2 (17:12):
Why do you think he would continue to fund and
arm them despite the fact that he said I'm going
to negotiate peace. Why do you think that he would
allow them to constantly spit in his face and dictate
terms of negotiating peace settlements when in fact they are
totally at our mercy when it comes to our weaponry
or our financing. Why do you think he would try
and primary and oust someone like Thomas Massey or MTG
(17:33):
now sitting Massy Aside, who they have had antagonistic relationships
in the past. Marjorie Taylor Green has been as ride
or die for Donald Trump as anyone in Congress. I
mean that literally. She is the most loyal soldier he
has ever had ever, that includes his kids. She has
never wavered in his support ever. But she is going
(17:53):
to be primaried and have her endorsement with drawn from
Donald Trump for one very specific reason, because she wants
the Epstein files disclosed.
Speaker 8 (18:05):
I do want to ask you about something you posted
just yesterday on x You questioned who and what country
is putting so much pressure on Trump to keep the
Epstein files hidden, and you included a picture about donations
from pro Israel lobbying group at APAC. What are you
trying to say there.
Speaker 9 (18:23):
Well, I think it's the question that many Americans are asking,
especially when we saw information recently come out. In these emails,
we saw Jeffriette Stein with ties to a hood Barack.
We saw him making business deals with them, also business
seals that involved the Israeli government and seems to have
(18:44):
led into their intel agencies. And I think the right
question is to ask is was Jeffrey Epstein working for Israel,
and I'm proud to say I don't take money from APAC,
I don't take money from any special group of people.
I'm just representing my district and the American people. And
(19:04):
so that's what I was referring to.
Speaker 2 (19:06):
Why do I say that that's also israel tide, Well,
obviously because Jeffrey Epstein was an asset of Israel, proven
by drop site news over the past couple weeks. Assuming
you didn't figure it out years ago, which most of
us assumed, but now we know.
Speaker 10 (19:20):
Drop side is just confirming beyond my wildest dreams when
I laid out all of the Israel connections with Epstein.
If I had this stuff, I would have been less
careful of my language. And I'm in like one hundred percent,
I'm willing to just say it out loud. Let's put
his story up here on the screen. Here. He had
a blog. You guys broke this down on a Friday show.
But Epstein helped Israel sell the surveillance state to Cote
(19:42):
de War, an African nation, and some of the allegations
inside of the story are absolutely wild.
Speaker 11 (19:47):
Israeli spy stayed for weeks at a time at Jeffrey
Epstein's mansion. Leaked email show Epstein working on a wire
transfer to Ahoud Barock's top aid, Yoni Korn, who regularly
stayed at his mansion. Yea, dr this guy Israeli military
intelligence officer, high level senior aid to the Defense Minister
(20:07):
then Defense Minister of Israel, Ahood Barock, staying at Jeffrey
Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side for two weeks
at a time, you know, ten days, two weeks while
he's conducting business. I mean it's confirmed, Like it's confirmed
he was an intelligent asset for Israel. Period, Done dusted.
Speaker 8 (20:26):
We know now.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
So assume for a second that I'm wrong that Crooks
acted alone and Robinson acted alone, and I'm just a
tinfol hat wearing nutter. Okay, set all that aside. Still
ask yourself, why is it that Donald Trump would destroy
his entire alliance, getting rid of the vast majority of
his base. I don't think you could come up with
a single serious Trump supporter who didn't want the Epstein
(20:49):
files disclosed, not a single one. Setting aside the paid propagandists,
those people are not relevant. I'm talking about real rider
Die Maga Trump supporters. I think any of them want
the Epstein files to be buried. The answer is no.
So why is Donald Trump doing that? Set aside the
attack on him, the attack on Charlie Kirk, just focus
(21:10):
on this one issue well, because he has no choice.
It has never been more clear that the president of
the United States, a guy who for a time looked
like he might be a real boy, that he's a
billionaire and he's an outsider, and blah blah blah. Maybe
he's got his own volition, Maybe he can stand on
his own two feet. Nope, not when it comes to this, No,
(21:31):
he can't. So it's either violent threats or it's serious,
serious blackmail. It's one or the other. Take your pick.
I don't know which. Or he was a fraud from
the beginning. I don't know. It could be that too,
but I'm leaning towards blackmail or violent threats, and I'm
not even saying specifically towards him. It can be towards
his family. But Donald Trump is hemorrhaging support. He went
(21:52):
from well over fifty percent. I think it was like
sixty percent approval when he first got into office, and
he's like down near thirty now. I mean hemorrhaging support.
He's hemorrhaging support almost entirely because every time he has
to make a choice between America or Israel, he chooses
Israel loudly. Why do you think despite all of her loyalty,
(22:12):
her incredible track record of just being, in my opinion,
honestly too much of a supporter of Donald Trump? Talking
about Marjorie Taylor Green, he wants her gone, but he
wants to support Lindsey Graham, who, in the days and
weeks after January sixth, repeatedly said that he was out
on Trump, that he was moving on. Oh it breaks
his heart, but he's done with Donald Trump.
Speaker 7 (22:33):
Trump and I we've had a hell of a journey.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
I hate it then this.
Speaker 2 (22:37):
Way, Oh my god, I hate it. From my point of.
Speaker 9 (22:40):
View, He's been a consequential president.
Speaker 2 (22:42):
But today, first thing you'll see. All I can say
is count me out. Enough is enough. But who was
Donald Trump golfing with yesterday as he launched nukes at
both Thomas Massey and Marjorie Taylor Green. You guessed it,
Lindsey Graham. So it's not about loyalty. Actually, it's about Israel.
(23:04):
It's about Israel. Every fucking time. It's time someone tells
you the truth about it. Now there are more and
more people that are doing so. I'm not acting as
if I'm the only one doing it, but everybody that
tells you the truth eventually gets attacked. Also not a
coincidence in my opinion, Candice Owen's dangerous conspiracy theorists, and
she's just such a terrible friend, and she's a bigot
(23:26):
and an anti semi and a racist and a hateful
and this, and of that, Tucker Carlson dangerous and conspiracy theorists,
and Auntie sam Martin right go down the list. It's
the same thing every time. Now, are they those things?
Well in case of Tucker Carlson, certainly not. Tucker Carlson
is a very loving person. Every time he talks about
(23:46):
these issues, he makes it very clear that he is
not casting aspersions at entire groups of people. I try
and do the same because I don't have any hatred
in my heart towards any group of people. I am
an individualist still to this day, and I think I
will the same. I'm an individualist, but it doesn't change
the fact that we are all noticing the same thing
that we all see the same thing that Israel aligned
(24:08):
gangsters run this government.
Speaker 3 (24:12):
They do.
Speaker 2 (24:13):
So why don't I harp on my disagreements with someone
like Nick Fuentes or Candice Owns or Tucker Carlson twenty
four to seven Because our differences don't matter, because we
can't change anything about these things unless we actually find
some way to reclaim our power. And I might add
that despite all of the attack mobs and obvious paid
(24:34):
to post propaganda that's being launched and levied against all
of these people that I've named off, it's not working.
These people are ascendant. They're the only ones with any
sort of organic audience, any audience growth whatsoever. On the
inverse of that, you've got Mark Levin who talks to
nothing but elderly people and no one else cares about him,
or Ben Shapiro whose star has just collapsed to the ground,
(24:57):
or any of these other commentators that are pro Israel diminished.
They're all fading. So, yeah, this is the new wave
because people are interested in the truth, because people are
all seeing the same signs, they're all figuring out the
same thing. And again, I don't say any of this
with hate. This is love, love of country, love of
my people, love of the American way. We cannot have it,
(25:20):
we cannot maintain it, and we certainly can't reclaim it
unless we deal with this obvious, imminent threat. Foinez has
talked about forgiving student loans. I reject that socialism garbage
in my opinion. Does that mean that I'm gonna just
constantly blast him about that, as if two political commentators
(25:40):
having a difference of opinion when it comes to economics
or how our government functions is really that relevant right now,
when both of us acknowledge the fact that the federal
government is completely controlled by a foreign one, do you
think our differences of opinion are super significant or more
significant than that? The answer is no, obviously not. So
I'm not going to talk I'm not going to waste
(26:01):
my time with that. I'm going to talk about the
big issues, the thing that's actually preventing us from having
a difference of opinion when it comes to economics or
the structure of our government. That is much more meaningful otherwise,
but we can't do anything about. One of my friends,
Tim Poole, constantly talks about the fact I don't care
about the Middle East. I don't want to talk about
Israel I get it, Tim, I'd rather not too. But
(26:23):
here's the problem. Unless you're willing to acknowledge what I
just described in this opening salvo of their undue influence
on our government, you can't say that you don't care
because everything you do care about is contingent upon this
issue being prevented or ending. You're not going to deal
with the immigration issue. You're not going to deal with
(26:43):
the national debt or ending the wars or anything else,
the culture war, none of it. You can't really prevail
on any of those fronts because almost your entire elected
representative class is dedicated to a foreign government over your concerns.
They don't give a fuck what you have to say,
or me, for that matter, or any of us, because
(27:06):
they don't work for us. And until you're willing to
say that, until you're willing to grapple with that fact,
well then you better care. You better care, because otherwise
it doesn't matter. None of what we do matters unless
we talk about that thing. And is it uncomfortable? Yeah,
I'd rather not. It puts a target on my back.
It makes friends and family look at me weird, as
(27:28):
if I'm like lost my mind. Or become hateful. I haven't.
I just realized what's happening. So that's why I talk
about it, because it matters a hell of a lot.
And that's also the reason that I've been defending all
of these commentators. Why I've been dedicating entire episodes to
the attacks on Tucker, Carls, and Candice Owns, Nick everybody else,
is because it is a foreign influence operation being ran
(27:48):
on American soil by a foreign government, and they don't
even have to fucking register under FARA most of the time.
It's super dangerous. In my opinion, it's treason is particularly
the American participants that take money to propagandize us on
behalf of a foreign government, using probably our tax money. So,
as I've said in prior episodes, I'm being robbed to
(28:10):
propagandize myself and you're not pissed to talk about that
makes me hateful, really, because I feel like I'm the
one that's being hated. I'm the one that's being robbed
and abused with my own money and being mindfucked by
people that don't give a shit about me using my
own government, the one that I pay and fund against
my will to start to create divisions in my country,
(28:35):
to damage my community, to damage my children's future. So no,
I'm not hateful, but I'm mad as hell, mad as hell.
And if you're not, I think you're just not paying attention.
I think you're just not digging deep enough. I think
you're letting the concerns of the general public, or maybe
(28:56):
your advertisers, get in the way of you doing the
deep dive, the actual reasons, the actual analysis that would
bring you to the same conclusion inevitably. And I'm not
just talking to Tim, I'm talking to everybody. I'm talking
to everybody that feels hesitant to do the same thing.
I get it. No one wants to be an outsider,
no one wants to be an outcast. But you have
to care about some things more than that. Just as
(29:18):
I took a very early stand against the war in Ukraine,
I got called a lot of hateful things. I took
a very early stand against the war in Gaza. I
got called a ton of hateful things for that. I
took a very like, instantly angry and oppositional stance against
the lockdowns. I was accused of wanting to kill my
grandmother and everybody else's grandmother and everybody else for that matter.
(29:41):
There was no hate in any of it. I was
right about all of it. And the reason I was
right is because I thought critically and I didn't concern
myself with the reputational damage it might cause me, because
I understood that some things are more important, some things
are bigger than my own ego. You have to get
these things right when they matter, especially if you want
to talk to an audience. And if you can't get
(30:02):
these things right when it matters, you don't deserve to
have an audience. And again, I'm not talking to Tim,
I'm talking to everybody, everybody in our world, everybody at home.
If you go to work every day and you bite
your tongue even though you know this fucked up shit's happening, okay,
just accept the fact that you're never gonna remedy this.
We need to be waking people up. We need to
be telling the truth. Damn the consequences, be fucking honest.
(30:24):
One of the most impressive political coalitions I've ever seen
in my life, the Maga Maha Libertarian Alliance, is on
the ropes. It is imploding right now, specifically because of
this issue. Because everyone that puts Israel first is pretending
as if they're maga. Well, everybody that puts America first
is being ousted and replaced with the Ben Shapiros and
(30:44):
Mark Levin's of the world. And you're going to pretend
that that's at all what you signed up for. No
the fuck it isn't. You're gonna pretend that you owe
loyalty to Donald Trump. I'm sorry, are you British? You
don't owe loyalty to a politician. They owe loyalty to you.
You casted a vote for them so that they would
represent you and your interests. If they fail to do that,
(31:05):
fuck them forever. That includes Donald Trump, obviously. That's it.
Just call it out. Just be honest with yourself, with
your friends, your family, with your audience if you have one.
Just be honest. Just tell the truth. Not asking for
a miracle here, Just do the right thing. I think
we all have that in us. I think we all
(31:26):
want to do that. And just so you know, I
feel really good that I do the right thing every
day that I wake up, and I don't ever have
to lie. No one gets to pay for my opinion,
no one gets to dictate what I say. And they
also don't get to dictate what I don't say. I
speak my mind, I tell the truth. I analyze things honestly,
and I bring you that as best I can. Very
(31:47):
few people get to do that. I'm in a very
very blessed position, and as a consequence, we're doing crazy numbers.
So I want to thank you guys for that. This
is the first month of Liberty Lockdown history that I've
done over a million viewers listeners in a thirty day period, unbelievable.
So we're like doing seventy five to one hundred thousand
per show now, and that is a massive explosion of growth.
(32:10):
Obviously a lot of it's due to Dave Smith and
Ian Carroll, which we're you know, two hundred and fifty
thousand of that, but we're still doing seventy five thousand
per show when they're not on, which is fucking crazy.
So yeah, I just really appreciate you guys, and I
hope we can keep it going. Just so you know,
(32:30):
Nick Wante has got back to us publicly. On his show,
he said this five dollars.
Speaker 7 (32:35):
I started watching the show a few weeks ago, and
I'm loving it. Would you do a show with Dave Smith,
Ian Carroll and Clint Russell. They were talking about you
on Clinch channel and Clint said he waked to you.
Yeah totally.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
I didn't see his text, but yeah, I would do
a show with all them.
Speaker 2 (32:45):
Whoa yo, I'm about to get written up by The
New York Times the libertarian face of White Supremacy or
some shit. Can't wait looking forward to it. Dave Smith
and Ian Carroll is in Let's get it on the
schedule with Nick and let's fucking break the Internet. Hit
the like button, subscribe, leave a comment, share it around.
Love you guys. If you want to support the show
(33:07):
at liberty lockpot on X, subscribe there and I will
follow you back, or at libertylockdown dot locals dot com
or go to my pillow dot com. Used promo code
lockdown to get you some cozy action from Mike Glintdell
my pillo dot com promo code Lockdown.
Speaker 7 (33:19):
Last night, I was on my buddy Clint Russell's podcast
at Liberty Lockdown.
Speaker 2 (33:23):
Clint Russell, by the way, criminally underrated.
Speaker 10 (33:25):
He's great.
Speaker 7 (33:25):
So it was me him and Ian Carroll, uh, and
we did subscribe to Liberty Lockdown. Great podcast.
Speaker 2 (33:32):
Clint is tight,
I had people last year, friends of mine, tell me
you're being disloyal to Trump. No, you've got it wrong.
Trump has been disloyal to us. What more do we
owe this person? Seriously? How many of you got fired
from your jobs, expelled from your school? How many of
you got hit in the face, lost friends because you
(00:22):
supported Trump? How many of you went to jail in
the Capitol, lost a social media account? How much acrimony?
How many problems has the Trump movement created in your
life because you supported him? And how have we been repaid? Well,
let's see, he filled his White House with GOP staffers
(00:43):
who cut taxes for the corporations and moved the embassy
for Israel. He gave Ukraine lethal aid, He let BLM
destroy the cities, He let Pfizer invent the RNA vaccine.
And you say that Trump is owed our allegiance. What
more do we owe this guy? Then he cuts the
(01:03):
core for taxes again, Barry's the Epstein files serves you right,
you trusted Trump? You can't trust Trump. He's not loyal.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
I've gotten criticism lately that i'd like to address. The
criticism primarily circulates around the idea that I am commentating
on commentators too much, So I want to explain exactly
why I'm doing that. It's not because I'm some massive
simp for Candice Owens or Tucker Carlson or Megan Kelly
or any of these people. Most of them I've never met,
(01:34):
none of them what I consider my friend per se,
and I'm not doing it for any ulterior motives. So
let me explain exactly why, because I feel like a
lot of people don't understand exactly how this game is
being played. I'm sure many of you do, so I'm
not trying to condescend to you. But for those that
have said, why are you talking about Frontes and Tucker
and all that, like, this is why, I'll tell you. Okay.
(01:56):
So twenty twenty four, as Israel has already essentially won
the war in Gaza, they can come to the conclusion
that they have totally lost the pr war. So what
gets announced, Well, Israel announces that they're going to be
launching or they did launch a one hundred and fifty
million dollar propaganda campaign targeted at social media, particularly in
(02:18):
the West, but particularly America because we are their primary donor.
I did an episode a couple months ago or maybe
a month ago about Project Esther that was part of it.
It is just a ton of money that's being funneled
to social media influencers, most of which already have kind
of pro Israel allegiance, but some of home probably didn't,
(02:40):
and they are just buying their opinion. They are buying
their influence.
Speaker 3 (02:45):
But I listened to her now and she comes out
and she talks about our government shouldn't be given money
to Israel. We give three point eight billion dollars Israel. Well, hey, woman,
you work in Congress. You know that we don't just
give them a piece of you know, right one check.
They have to purchase military equipment from US, and it's
as military funding. They got to buy all of that
(03:07):
military equipment from the United States of America. We almost
have them on like a like a credit line.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
So the reason that this became such an important topic
for me to cover is once I realized what was happening,
I had no choice but to call it out and
to defend the people that are the victims of this
propaganda campaign. So what am I talking about specifically, Well,
if that program gets announced in twenty twenty four, that
means it gets rolled out in earnest in twenty twenty five,
(03:34):
does it not? Yes, it did. And what happened in
twenty twenty five, Well, what we've seen so far, aside
from the standard cancelation and blacklisting attempts of people like
Nick Flantes, we have now added to those ranks the
likes of Candice Owens and Tucker Carlson Oh. Also MTG.
Thomas Massey, oh, also Matt Walsh, Megan Kelly, not even
(03:57):
particularly for being antagonist towards Israel, but rather that they
are just ambivalent. They're the in between. They won't condemned
Tucker and Candae, and therefore they must also be pressured
to make a decision. Are you with us or are
you with the terrorists? That's kind of the mentality right
throw back to George W.
Speaker 4 (04:17):
Bush.
Speaker 5 (04:18):
Every nation in every region now has a decision to
make either you are with us or you are with
the terrorists.
Speaker 2 (04:28):
So what does this constitute, Well, it constitutes pretty much
all of the major influential voices on the right wing,
but particularly all of the major influential voices on the
right wing who are at least somewhat antagonistic with Israel,
at least somewhat independent of Israel, those that might criticize
(04:49):
them from time to time. I could add that Charlie
Kirk also was facing the same type of pressure campaign,
while his was primarily behind the scenes and via his donors.
It was happening. Nonetheless, it just wasn't as overt as
what we've witnessed with Candice Owns and Tucker Carlson, unless
you include the attack on him, which may have played
a role. I'm not so sure, but what is the
tie that binds all of these commentators together. They have
(05:12):
a decent amount of disagreements, but it's really just this
one thing that they want to put America first, and
I believe strongly that the vast majority of Trump supporters
feel the same way. Unfortunately, Donald Trump has decided he
does not feel that way, so much so that he
has withdrawn his endorsement of Marjorie Taylor Green and he
has been fighting very loudly with Thomas Massey, and Massey
(05:35):
is now facing a twenty two million dollar political bounty
from pro Israel donors to try and oust him. When
people say, Clint, why do you talk about Israel so much? Well,
this is why, Because regardless of how you feel about
Israel or even the war in Gaza. It should disturb
you to your core that they are actively trying to
oust some of the only independent, critical thinking political candidates
(05:59):
are political office holders that we have. MASSI and mtg
are two of the best we've got. There's five hundred
and thirty five people in Congress, and almost all of
them suck. Rand Paul has also faced the wrath of
Donald Trump, but fortunately so far he has not gone
over the top and trying to get him ousted. I'm
sure that's coming next. Matt Gates, another representative that actually
(06:24):
seemed to represent America. He left office last year in
large part because of the same sort of pressure campaign,
in fact, because of a blackmail operation that was ran
against him. I'm not going to go through the details.
You can look it up if you're curious. It's fascinating.
But this is explicitly why I talk so much about
Israel now, because what I realized over the past few years,
(06:45):
and it's unfortunate that it took me this long to
realize it. But I feel like anybody who's honest, anyone
who's actually interested in the truth of how our political
system works, will inevitably come to the same conclusions that
I have, that, in fact, you do not have representation
at the federal level. You're lucky if you have it
at the local level you usually don't, but you certainly
don't have it at the federal level, and the handful
(07:07):
of representatives that attempt to are quickly undermined, oftentimes blackmailed
or thrown out of office or worse assassinations, et cetera.
My audience historically had been almost exclusively, almost one hundred
percent libertarian or at least libertarian leaning. I assume it's
still largely that, but a few of them have been like,
why are you not making a greater distinction between yourself
(07:30):
and Nick Fuentes. You guys have major disagreements. Why don't
you just talk about that all the time. It's like, well,
the reason I don't talk about it is because I
realize that our differences are not very meaningful. Let me
explain they're not meaningful because it doesn't matter because we
don't have any way to change these things at the
federal level. They will not stop because they are compromised
(07:53):
almost entirely.
Speaker 5 (07:54):
Oh.
Speaker 2 (07:54):
Also, this is not a partisan matter. This is bipartisan
let me show you an example of this. There's a
representative out of the Virgin Islands. Her name is Stacy Plaskett. Now,
she doesn't have voting rights, but she is a congressional
member technically, she got elected by them, and she sits
in Congress, and she's able to ask questions. She's able
to write bills, she's just not allowed to vote on them. Well,
(08:16):
in twenty nineteen, during the impeachment hearings against Donald Trump,
she was actually and this is serious, this is legitimate,
proven by the Washington Post, she was receiving text messages
prompting her, coaching her on questions to ask during a
congressional hearing to try and essentially screw Donald Trump. Let
(08:36):
me repeat that, because I feel like maybe it didn't land.
We had a congressional member being coached in real time
in Congress via text message by Jeffrey Epstein. That's a Democrat. Now,
the more partisan thinkers out there will go, yeah, see
Trump's Enderson. This is all of the Democrats. Now, it's
(08:58):
not actually sure Bill Clinton was an There's a lot
of Democrats that were involved, but there's a ton of
Republicans that were involved. Two, and I might add there's
an opportunity right now to try and get full disclosures
of those files so we can actually know who were
the perpetrators, who is innocent, who is guilty, and get
justice for these for the victims of these monsters. Well,
(09:18):
Thomas Massey MTG two of the only representatives in Congress
that do not take money from APEC. Eighty percent. Let
me repeat this, eighty percent of your elected representatives at
the federal level take campaign contributions from APEC or other
Israel affiliated organizations political action groups. That's crazy. So that
(09:40):
means only twenty percent are not immediately under their thumb.
Two of the most prominent MTG and Massey have been
beating the drum very loudly to get those disclosures. They
are now facing the wrath of Donald Trump. Now, why
do you think that is. Do you think it's because
Donald Trump is super mad that Thomas Madge he voted
against the One Big, Beautiful Bill, or do you think
(10:03):
it's because his donors are guilty of really serious crimes
and that they're forcing his hand.
Speaker 6 (10:09):
I have another concern about these investigations that he's announced.
If they have ongoing investigations in certain areas those documents
can't be released. So this might be a big smoke
screen these investigations to open a bunch of them to
as a last ditch effort to prevent the release of
the Epstein files.
Speaker 2 (10:28):
I could go even more conspiratorial and assume that because
Donald Trump had a very long time friendly relationship with
Jeffrey Epstein, that is true, well over a decade, they
were like BFFs, that he was participating in this activity.
I don't have any proof of that, so I'm not
going to go there, and honestly, I don't need to,
because the reality is is that we know that there
(10:49):
are dozens over one hundred actually victims of Jeffrey Epstein,
and we also know that Donald Trump has done everything
in his power. Despite saying, well he was painting that
he would release these files, that he would seek justice,
he has done everything in his power to bury these files.
Same with Cash Hotel, same with Daan Pongino, same with
the entire Trump administration. So the most prominent and loudest
(11:12):
congressional representatives that have been beating this drum also happen
to not take any money from Israel affiliated lobbies, and
they are also facing the wrath of Apec and one
Donald Trump. That ladies and gentlemen is a pattern. That's
not a coincidence, It's not happenstance. It tells you a lot.
And what does it tell you, Well, to make it
(11:33):
very explicit, it tells me you can come to your
own conclusions. It tells me that Donald Trump is compromised.
Why do I say that, Well, let's highlight this incredible
investigative work by Tuck Carlson, who, after over a year
and a half now I think it's been about a
year and a half, has come out with a expose
on the attack on Donald Trump and Butler, Pennsylvania.
Speaker 4 (11:54):
On the day of the attacks, Thomas Crooks got extremely lucky,
miraculously lucky. After he arrived at the Butler County Fairgrounds
on the morning of the shooting, Thomas Crooks conducted surveillance
by flying his drone over the rally site. He flew
that drone for eleven minutes. It just so happened the
Secret Service's anti drone system were down at exactly the
(12:17):
same moment. What are the odds. Later that afternoon, police
officers saw Crooks loitering with a backpack and a rangefinder.
They identified him as a suspicious person, which he clearly was,
but quickly lost track of him, and so Crooks climbed
to the top of the American Glass Research building that
happened to be the only building in the area that
(12:38):
did not have a video surveillance system. It was also
remarkably inexplicably outside the Secret Service's security perimeter, despite the
fact it was very close to the stage. Two local
police officers assigned to the building saw Crooks, but they
didn't report him. A third officer was supposed to be
there left early.
Speaker 2 (12:57):
An attack that came within inches of taking the soon
to be President Alex's life. Both cash matel and Dan
Bongino said that it stunk the high hell. Then they
got into power and they said he acted alone. No
social media footprint, no communications, blah blah blah. Right wrong,
they lied.
Speaker 4 (13:14):
In response to the same video, Thomas Crooks issued what
sounds a lot like a digital manifesto quote. In my opinion,
the only way to fight the government is with terrorism
style attacks. Sneak a bomb into an essential building and
set it off before anyone sees. You track down any
important people or politicians, military leaders, etc. And try to
(13:35):
assassinate them.
Speaker 2 (13:36):
So you need to ask yourself why did they lie?
Why would they lie that Thomas Matthew Crooks had no
social media imprint when we know for a fact that
Thomas Crooks was communicating through encrypted apps to multiple foreign countries. Now,
all grant, I'm connecting some disparate dots here, and you
may be uncomfortable connecting them yourself. And I'm not even
(13:58):
saying definitively, I know this for a fact. I am
connecting dots, I am analyzing, and I am coming to conclusions.
But I will add my track record in doing that
is really fucking good. I get a lot of things
right because I think critically, and I analyze from an
impartial point of view, and I try and figure out
what the fuck is going on, and oftentimes I come
to the right conclusion COVID during the entire like over
(14:20):
the past five years. Just look at my track record.
I usually get these things right. War in Ukraine, Warren Gaza, etcetera, etcetera.
And if you think I'm reaching, I want you to
ask yourself this. If you were Donald Trump and you
came within inches of losing your own life, would you
be totally disinterested in who took a shot at you?
Would you just assume that the FBI or the US
Secret Service which allowed for that sniper to get in
(14:41):
that position and take a clean, multiple clean shots at you.
Would you accept their narrative as to how it transpired.
Would you accept the FBI's narrative saying that he hect
it alone? Would you accept that? Or would you dig
relentlessly until you found out exactly what happened? Who did it?
Speaker 6 (15:00):
And how are you satisfied with the answers that we've
got from the Butler assassination attempt.
Speaker 7 (15:06):
Thomas Crook's twenty years old? Why do we know nothing?
We know nothing?
Speaker 3 (15:10):
Yeah?
Speaker 7 (15:10):
May In fact, I'm not only am I unsatisfied, I'm
wholly pissed off about it, and I remain pissed off
about it. We know nothing. We see a picture of
a kid who looks like he's fourteen years old. Yea,
and we've seen no other pictures of him. We don't
know who he is. We know he had multiple cell phones.
Try to figure out what twenty year old has multiple
cell phones? The kid was cremated like five days or
(15:31):
six days? I give me a break. Like most family
pets to take longer to be cremated. I am very
far away from being conspiracy theorist, but nothing about it
looks right.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
Well, I'll tell you what I think. I think Donald
Trump knows. I think he knows exactly who tried to
kill him on that day, and whether or not Thomas
Crooks was the shooter not really relevant to me. I
think it was an Intel operation. That's my honest opinion,
and my honest opinion as of now is that that's
almost certainly what happened to Charlie Kirk as well. Do
I feel that way? Well, because of his private communications,
(16:03):
because of the fact that he said just forty eight
hours before his life was taken that he had no
choice but to a ban on the prosial cost. Do
I think that that would be a catalyst for them
to take him out?
Speaker 7 (16:11):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (16:11):
I do. Does that mean that I know it, No,
it doesn't. As I said, I'm connecting dots, But I
think that there's a distinct possibility that that attack on
Charlie Kirk was yet another reminder to Donald Trump that
we fucking own you, that we run your shit, and
if you try and act like a real boy, if
you pretend as if you don't have strings attached to you,
we will take out more people that you care about,
(16:34):
that you love. Maybe it'll be you, maybe it'll be
your kids. Who knows, maybe it'll be your allies. You
get the point. And again I'll ask you this. Why
else do you think that Donald Trump would be absolutely
destroying his legacy? Why would he be going back on
almost all of his campaign promises, aside from closing the border.
Why why would he tell the Israelis that you can't
(16:54):
buy them Iran and then have them do it anyways
and just not change anything.
Speaker 6 (17:01):
We basically have two countries that have been fighting so
long and so hard that they don't know what the
fuck they're doing.
Speaker 8 (17:08):
Do you understand that?
Speaker 2 (17:12):
Why do you think he would continue to fund and
arm them despite the fact that he said I'm going
to negotiate peace. Why do you think that he would
allow them to constantly spit in his face and dictate
terms of negotiating peace settlements when in fact they are
totally at our mercy when it comes to our weaponry
or our financing. Why do you think he would try
and primary and oust someone like Thomas Massey or MTG
(17:33):
now sitting Massy Aside, who they have had antagonistic relationships
in the past. Marjorie Taylor Green has been as ride
or die for Donald Trump as anyone in Congress. I
mean that literally. She is the most loyal soldier he
has ever had ever, that includes his kids. She has
never wavered in his support ever. But she is going
(17:53):
to be primaried and have her endorsement with drawn from
Donald Trump for one very specific reason, because she wants
the Epstein files disclosed.
Speaker 8 (18:05):
I do want to ask you about something you posted
just yesterday on x You questioned who and what country
is putting so much pressure on Trump to keep the
Epstein files hidden, and you included a picture about donations
from pro Israel lobbying group at APAC. What are you
trying to say there.
Speaker 9 (18:23):
Well, I think it's the question that many Americans are asking,
especially when we saw information recently come out. In these emails,
we saw Jeffriette Stein with ties to a hood Barack.
We saw him making business deals with them, also business
seals that involved the Israeli government and seems to have
(18:44):
led into their intel agencies. And I think the right
question is to ask is was Jeffrey Epstein working for Israel,
and I'm proud to say I don't take money from APAC,
I don't take money from any special group of people.
I'm just representing my district and the American people. And
(19:04):
so that's what I was referring to.
Speaker 2 (19:06):
Why do I say that that's also israel tide, Well,
obviously because Jeffrey Epstein was an asset of Israel, proven
by drop site news over the past couple weeks. Assuming
you didn't figure it out years ago, which most of
us assumed, but now we know.
Speaker 10 (19:20):
Drop side is just confirming beyond my wildest dreams when
I laid out all of the Israel connections with Epstein.
If I had this stuff, I would have been less
careful of my language. And I'm in like one hundred percent,
I'm willing to just say it out loud. Let's put
his story up here on the screen. Here. He had
a blog. You guys broke this down on a Friday show.
But Epstein helped Israel sell the surveillance state to Cote
(19:42):
de War, an African nation, and some of the allegations
inside of the story are absolutely wild.
Speaker 11 (19:47):
Israeli spy stayed for weeks at a time at Jeffrey
Epstein's mansion. Leaked email show Epstein working on a wire
transfer to Ahoud Barock's top aid, Yoni Korn, who regularly
stayed at his mansion. Yea, dr this guy Israeli military
intelligence officer, high level senior aid to the Defense Minister
(20:07):
then Defense Minister of Israel, Ahood Barock, staying at Jeffrey
Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side for two weeks
at a time, you know, ten days, two weeks while
he's conducting business. I mean it's confirmed, Like it's confirmed
he was an intelligent asset for Israel. Period, Done dusted.
Speaker 8 (20:26):
We know now.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
So assume for a second that I'm wrong that Crooks
acted alone and Robinson acted alone, and I'm just a
tinfol hat wearing nutter. Okay, set all that aside. Still
ask yourself, why is it that Donald Trump would destroy
his entire alliance, getting rid of the vast majority of
his base. I don't think you could come up with
a single serious Trump supporter who didn't want the Epstein
(20:49):
files disclosed, not a single one. Setting aside the paid propagandists,
those people are not relevant. I'm talking about real rider
Die Maga Trump supporters. I think any of them want
the Epstein files to be buried. The answer is no.
So why is Donald Trump doing that? Set aside the
attack on him, the attack on Charlie Kirk, just focus
(21:10):
on this one issue well, because he has no choice.
It has never been more clear that the president of
the United States, a guy who for a time looked
like he might be a real boy, that he's a
billionaire and he's an outsider, and blah blah blah. Maybe
he's got his own volition, Maybe he can stand on
his own two feet. Nope, not when it comes to this, No,
(21:31):
he can't. So it's either violent threats or it's serious,
serious blackmail. It's one or the other. Take your pick.
I don't know which. Or he was a fraud from
the beginning. I don't know. It could be that too,
but I'm leaning towards blackmail or violent threats, and I'm
not even saying specifically towards him. It can be towards
his family. But Donald Trump is hemorrhaging support. He went
(21:52):
from well over fifty percent. I think it was like
sixty percent approval when he first got into office, and
he's like down near thirty now. I mean hemorrhaging support.
He's hemorrhaging support almost entirely because every time he has
to make a choice between America or Israel, he chooses
Israel loudly. Why do you think despite all of her loyalty,
(22:12):
her incredible track record of just being, in my opinion,
honestly too much of a supporter of Donald Trump? Talking
about Marjorie Taylor Green, he wants her gone, but he
wants to support Lindsey Graham, who, in the days and
weeks after January sixth, repeatedly said that he was out
on Trump, that he was moving on. Oh it breaks
his heart, but he's done with Donald Trump.
Speaker 7 (22:33):
Trump and I we've had a hell of a journey.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
I hate it then this.
Speaker 2 (22:37):
Way, Oh my god, I hate it. From my point of.
Speaker 9 (22:40):
View, He's been a consequential president.
Speaker 2 (22:42):
But today, first thing you'll see. All I can say
is count me out. Enough is enough. But who was
Donald Trump golfing with yesterday as he launched nukes at
both Thomas Massey and Marjorie Taylor Green. You guessed it,
Lindsey Graham. So it's not about loyalty. Actually, it's about Israel.
(23:04):
It's about Israel. Every fucking time. It's time someone tells
you the truth about it. Now there are more and
more people that are doing so. I'm not acting as
if I'm the only one doing it, but everybody that
tells you the truth eventually gets attacked. Also not a
coincidence in my opinion, Candice Owen's dangerous conspiracy theorists, and
she's just such a terrible friend, and she's a bigot
(23:26):
and an anti semi and a racist and a hateful
and this, and of that, Tucker Carlson dangerous and conspiracy theorists,
and Auntie sam Martin right go down the list. It's
the same thing every time. Now, are they those things?
Well in case of Tucker Carlson, certainly not. Tucker Carlson
is a very loving person. Every time he talks about
(23:46):
these issues, he makes it very clear that he is
not casting aspersions at entire groups of people. I try
and do the same because I don't have any hatred
in my heart towards any group of people. I am
an individualist still to this day, and I think I
will the same. I'm an individualist, but it doesn't change
the fact that we are all noticing the same thing
that we all see the same thing that Israel aligned
(24:08):
gangsters run this government.
Speaker 3 (24:12):
They do.
Speaker 2 (24:13):
So why don't I harp on my disagreements with someone
like Nick Fuentes or Candice Owns or Tucker Carlson twenty
four to seven Because our differences don't matter, because we
can't change anything about these things unless we actually find
some way to reclaim our power. And I might add
that despite all of the attack mobs and obvious paid
(24:34):
to post propaganda that's being launched and levied against all
of these people that I've named off, it's not working.
These people are ascendant. They're the only ones with any
sort of organic audience, any audience growth whatsoever. On the
inverse of that, you've got Mark Levin who talks to
nothing but elderly people and no one else cares about him,
or Ben Shapiro whose star has just collapsed to the ground,
(24:57):
or any of these other commentators that are pro Israel diminished.
They're all fading. So, yeah, this is the new wave
because people are interested in the truth, because people are
all seeing the same signs, they're all figuring out the
same thing. And again, I don't say any of this
with hate. This is love, love of country, love of
my people, love of the American way. We cannot have it,
(25:20):
we cannot maintain it, and we certainly can't reclaim it
unless we deal with this obvious, imminent threat. Foinez has
talked about forgiving student loans. I reject that socialism garbage
in my opinion. Does that mean that I'm gonna just
constantly blast him about that, as if two political commentators
(25:40):
having a difference of opinion when it comes to economics
or how our government functions is really that relevant right now,
when both of us acknowledge the fact that the federal
government is completely controlled by a foreign one, do you
think our differences of opinion are super significant or more
significant than that? The answer is no, obviously not. So
I'm not going to talk I'm not going to waste
(26:01):
my time with that. I'm going to talk about the
big issues, the thing that's actually preventing us from having
a difference of opinion when it comes to economics or
the structure of our government. That is much more meaningful otherwise,
but we can't do anything about. One of my friends,
Tim Poole, constantly talks about the fact I don't care
about the Middle East. I don't want to talk about
Israel I get it, Tim, I'd rather not too. But
(26:23):
here's the problem. Unless you're willing to acknowledge what I
just described in this opening salvo of their undue influence
on our government, you can't say that you don't care
because everything you do care about is contingent upon this
issue being prevented or ending. You're not going to deal
with the immigration issue. You're not going to deal with
(26:43):
the national debt or ending the wars or anything else,
the culture war, none of it. You can't really prevail
on any of those fronts because almost your entire elected
representative class is dedicated to a foreign government over your concerns.
They don't give a fuck what you have to say,
or me, for that matter, or any of us, because
(27:06):
they don't work for us. And until you're willing to
say that, until you're willing to grapple with that fact,
well then you better care. You better care, because otherwise
it doesn't matter. None of what we do matters unless
we talk about that thing. And is it uncomfortable? Yeah,
I'd rather not. It puts a target on my back.
It makes friends and family look at me weird, as
(27:28):
if I'm like lost my mind. Or become hateful. I haven't.
I just realized what's happening. So that's why I talk
about it, because it matters a hell of a lot.
And that's also the reason that I've been defending all
of these commentators. Why I've been dedicating entire episodes to
the attacks on Tucker, Carls, and Candice Owns, Nick everybody else,
is because it is a foreign influence operation being ran
(27:48):
on American soil by a foreign government, and they don't
even have to fucking register under FARA most of the time.
It's super dangerous. In my opinion, it's treason is particularly
the American participants that take money to propagandize us on
behalf of a foreign government, using probably our tax money. So,
as I've said in prior episodes, I'm being robbed to
(28:10):
propagandize myself and you're not pissed to talk about that
makes me hateful, really, because I feel like I'm the
one that's being hated. I'm the one that's being robbed
and abused with my own money and being mindfucked by
people that don't give a shit about me using my
own government, the one that I pay and fund against
my will to start to create divisions in my country,
(28:35):
to damage my community, to damage my children's future. So no,
I'm not hateful, but I'm mad as hell, mad as hell.
And if you're not, I think you're just not paying attention.
I think you're just not digging deep enough. I think
you're letting the concerns of the general public, or maybe
(28:56):
your advertisers, get in the way of you doing the
deep dive, the actual reasons, the actual analysis that would
bring you to the same conclusion inevitably. And I'm not
just talking to Tim, I'm talking to everybody. I'm talking
to everybody that feels hesitant to do the same thing.
I get it. No one wants to be an outsider,
no one wants to be an outcast. But you have
to care about some things more than that. Just as
(29:18):
I took a very early stand against the war in Ukraine,
I got called a lot of hateful things. I took
a very early stand against the war in Gaza. I
got called a ton of hateful things for that. I
took a very like, instantly angry and oppositional stance against
the lockdowns. I was accused of wanting to kill my
grandmother and everybody else's grandmother and everybody else for that matter.
(29:41):
There was no hate in any of it. I was
right about all of it. And the reason I was
right is because I thought critically and I didn't concern
myself with the reputational damage it might cause me, because
I understood that some things are more important, some things
are bigger than my own ego. You have to get
these things right when they matter, especially if you want
to talk to an audience. And if you can't get
(30:02):
these things right when it matters, you don't deserve to
have an audience. And again, I'm not talking to Tim,
I'm talking to everybody, everybody in our world, everybody at home.
If you go to work every day and you bite
your tongue even though you know this fucked up shit's happening, okay,
just accept the fact that you're never gonna remedy this.
We need to be waking people up. We need to
be telling the truth. Damn the consequences, be fucking honest.
(30:24):
One of the most impressive political coalitions I've ever seen
in my life, the Maga Maha Libertarian Alliance, is on
the ropes. It is imploding right now, specifically because of
this issue. Because everyone that puts Israel first is pretending
as if they're maga. Well, everybody that puts America first
is being ousted and replaced with the Ben Shapiros and
(30:44):
Mark Levin's of the world. And you're going to pretend
that that's at all what you signed up for. No
the fuck it isn't. You're gonna pretend that you owe
loyalty to Donald Trump. I'm sorry, are you British? You
don't owe loyalty to a politician. They owe loyalty to you.
You casted a vote for them so that they would
represent you and your interests. If they fail to do that,
(31:05):
fuck them forever. That includes Donald Trump, obviously. That's it.
Just call it out. Just be honest with yourself, with
your friends, your family, with your audience if you have one.
Just be honest. Just tell the truth. Not asking for
a miracle here, Just do the right thing. I think
we all have that in us. I think we all
(31:26):
want to do that. And just so you know, I
feel really good that I do the right thing every
day that I wake up, and I don't ever have
to lie. No one gets to pay for my opinion,
no one gets to dictate what I say. And they
also don't get to dictate what I don't say. I
speak my mind, I tell the truth. I analyze things honestly,
and I bring you that as best I can. Very
(31:47):
few people get to do that. I'm in a very
very blessed position, and as a consequence, we're doing crazy numbers.
So I want to thank you guys for that. This
is the first month of Liberty Lockdown history that I've
done over a million viewers listeners in a thirty day period, unbelievable.
So we're like doing seventy five to one hundred thousand
per show now, and that is a massive explosion of growth.
(32:10):
Obviously a lot of it's due to Dave Smith and
Ian Carroll, which we're you know, two hundred and fifty
thousand of that, but we're still doing seventy five thousand
per show when they're not on, which is fucking crazy.
So yeah, I just really appreciate you guys, and I
hope we can keep it going. Just so you know,
(32:30):
Nick Wante has got back to us publicly. On his show,
he said this five dollars.
Speaker 7 (32:35):
I started watching the show a few weeks ago, and
I'm loving it. Would you do a show with Dave Smith,
Ian Carroll and Clint Russell. They were talking about you
on Clinch channel and Clint said he waked to you.
Yeah totally.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
I didn't see his text, but yeah, I would do
a show with all them.
Speaker 2 (32:45):
Whoa yo, I'm about to get written up by The
New York Times the libertarian face of White Supremacy or
some shit. Can't wait looking forward to it. Dave Smith
and Ian Carroll is in Let's get it on the
schedule with Nick and let's fucking break the Internet. Hit
the like button, subscribe, leave a comment, share it around.
Love you guys. If you want to support the show
(33:07):
at liberty lockpot on X, subscribe there and I will
follow you back, or at libertylockdown dot locals dot com
or go to my pillow dot com. Used promo code
lockdown to get you some cozy action from Mike Glintdell
my pillo dot com promo code Lockdown.
Speaker 7 (33:19):
Last night, I was on my buddy Clint Russell's podcast
at Liberty Lockdown.
Speaker 2 (33:23):
Clint Russell, by the way, criminally underrated.
Speaker 10 (33:25):
He's great.
Speaker 7 (33:25):
So it was me him and Ian Carroll, uh, and
we did subscribe to Liberty Lockdown. Great podcast.
Speaker 2 (33:32):
Clint is tight,
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.