“COINCIDENCES” IPS Deprogram.

This episode presents an argument that recent, seemingly unrelated events are not mere random occurrences but are “coincidences with intentionality”. The speaker asserts that history itself is not objective but is a “proactive creation” managed by a central coordinating entity referred to as the Psyop Entertainment Complex.
Summary of Key Concepts
The discussion on intentional coincidences is set in the context of “newsbending” and “historybending”. The speaker contends that these events, known as Psyops (simulated/staged events), require planning in advance, thus proving that history is a deliberate construct.
A major part of the discussion revolves around a recent plane crash event, which is presented as deeply integrated with other contemporaneous occurrences:
9/11 Coding: The event is heavily “911 coded”. Examples include the flight number UPS 2976, which is “coincidentally” the number of 9/11 victims, and the updated casualty count: “The death toll has been updated. Nine dead, 11 injured. So to say that this isn’t 911 coded is ridiculous.”.
Contextual Alignments: The plane crash coincided with the death of Dick Cheney (referred to as the “architect of 9/11”) and the election of a Muslim mayor in New York, leading to fear-mongering and the widespread use of 9/11 imagery on social media.
The Infrastructure of Fakery: For these elaborate, interconnected events to occur, the speaker argues that the media must be complicit, acting as part of the creative process rather than objective reporters. This directly challenges the mainstream notion that violence is real, leading to the fundamental assertion regarding Psyops : “The problem with that proposition is thatPsyops could only be accomplished if the media were in fact part of the creative process. actually producing it.”.
Beyond Conspiracy: The speaker differentiates this analysis from typical conspiracy theories, which fall into the category of “MSM plus”. These traditional theories often operate under a “false dilemma”, assuming the event was real (either done by the mainstream villains or alternative scapegoats). The perspective offered here is that the event was fake, regardless of who is blamed: “The common framework for alternative was it’s either real or it’s real and somebody else did it. It’s a false flag. So false flag theory and the mainstream present a false dilemma.”.
The intent behind these intentional coincidences and layered Psyops is to shape the collective worldview and conform the public to a pre-existing narrative. The speaker summarizes the core point of the debate regarding the staged nature of events: “We agree these are coincidences. The question is, is it intentional well, if you say it’s not intentional what is your basis for saying it’s not intentional incredulity is not enough you can’t just say well I find that personally hard to believe”.
Ultimately, the entire world stage is viewed as a “collective Truman show”, where staged events, including the CK (Charlie Kirk) event, are scripted generational Psyops. Those who fail to acknowledge the premeditated nature of history and media manipulation are viewed as having an uninformed, “world stage centric” perspective: “If you’re inside the box and you’re questioning what we’re saying about intentionality, that makes you a media advocate and you’re questioning the devil’s advocates.”.

Five Quotes from the Source
On Intentionality: “But you’re saying it’s a coincidence with no intentionality. And we’re saying these are coincidences with intentionality.”
On History Creation: “So just that alone tells you that the newsbending historybending events are planned in advance. Therefore our history is in fact a proactive creation.”
On 9/11 Coding in the Crash: “The death toll has been updated. Nine dead, 11 injured. So to say that this isn’t 911 coded is ridiculous.”
On Media Complicity: “The problem with that proposition is that Psyops could only be accomplished if the media were in fact part of the creative process. actually producing it.”
On the Distinction from False Flags: “The common framework for alternative was it’s either real or it’s real and somebody else did it. It’s a false flag. So false flag theory and the mainstream present a false dilemma.”