All Episodes

October 30, 2025 • 39 mins

🌌 LIMITLESS HQ: LISTEN & FOLLOW HERE ⬇️
https://limitless.bankless.com/
https://x.com/LimitlessFT

------
NVIDIA's hits a historic $5 trillion all time high, and OpenAI is restructuring  Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) within a decade. We explore the implications of OpenAI's transition to a public benefit corporation and its partnership with Microsoft. Also featured is the OneX Neo humanoid robot for home use, Grokipedia, an AI-driven encyclopedia by Elon Musk's Grok, and the innovative X402 web standard for microtransactions. We conclude with insights on tech stock trends and express our gratitude to listeners.
------
TIMESTAMPS

0:00 Intro
0:47 OpenAI's New Vision
4:53 Microsoft's Strategic Moves
8:53 Navigating AI Investments
10:17 Introducing Humanoid Robotics
18:13 Grokipedia Launches
25:37 x402
30:45 Space Data Centers
37:46 Closing Thoughts

------
RESOURCES

Josh: https://x.com/JoshKale
Ejaaz: https://x.com/cryptopunk7213

------
Not financial or tax advice. See our investment disclosures here:
https://www.bankless.com/disclosures⁠

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Ejaaz: Welcome back to the weekly AI roundup. It's been another huge week. (00:03):
undefined

Ejaaz: NVIDIA became the first company to cross $5 trillion in market value, (00:08):
undefined

Ejaaz: but they're closely followed behind by Apple and Microsoft to cross $4 trillion (00:12):
undefined

Ejaaz: in market cap value. Some big numbers being thrown around. (00:17):
undefined

Ejaaz: OpenAI had a pretty controversial week. They restructured their entire company, (00:20):
undefined

Ejaaz: but they also revealed their secret plans for AGI over the next 10 years. (00:23):
undefined

Ejaaz: Elon Musk decided to release an AI version of Wikipedia called Grokipedia, (00:27):
undefined

Ejaaz: powered by their flagship model Grok. We'll get into that. (00:33):
undefined

Ejaaz: And finally, there is a new humanoid robot available to you for the cheap price of $499 per month. (00:36):
undefined

Ejaaz: Josh, there's a lot to get through to today. (00:44):
undefined

Ejaaz: Starting off with all the open AI news, There's two main things to discuss here. (00:47):
undefined

Ejaaz: They made two big announcements. (00:53):
undefined

Ejaaz: One was their vision for the next 10 years on achieving AGI. (00:54):
undefined

Ejaaz: And the second thing was on the restructuring. Starting with the AGI side of (00:57):
undefined

Ejaaz: things, Sam Altman came on live stream with his chief scientist, (01:01):
undefined

Ejaaz: Jakub, to describe what the vision of OpenAI is. (01:06):
undefined

Ejaaz: And I think this is in response to a lot of people saying, Sam, (01:10):
undefined

Ejaaz: like, do you have your best intentions at heart? (01:14):
undefined

Ejaaz: You keep saying that, but then your actions are kind of producing products that (01:16):
undefined

Ejaaz: might seem kind of consumery and not really big thinking, are you still focused on AGI? (01:19):
undefined

Ejaaz: So this is kind of like clearing the plate here. And there's three main takeaways (01:25):
undefined

Ejaaz: that I got from this that I found interesting. (01:28):
undefined

Ejaaz: Number one, Sam has extended his deadline to achieving AGI. (01:31):
undefined

Ejaaz: He says he's going to achieve it within 10 years, and it's going to be a slower (01:35):
undefined

Ejaaz: transition than initially expected. (01:40):
undefined

Ejaaz: He describes it as achieving AGI gradually over a number of different years. (01:42):
undefined

Ejaaz: This is interesting to me because we're finally achieving a realistic timeline, (01:48):
undefined

Ejaaz: in my opinion, versus some kind of like hype headline where we're just kind (01:53):
undefined

Ejaaz: of like thinking it's going to arrive tomorrow. (01:57):
undefined

Ejaaz: Number two, he's started giving solid milestones on this. (01:59):
undefined

Ejaaz: He says in 2026, the deep learning that OpenAI is conducting internally will (02:03):
undefined

Ejaaz: result in an AGI level science model, which will perform kind of at the caliber (02:08):
undefined

Ejaaz: of an AI research intern. (02:14):
undefined

Ejaaz: And then he says two years later in 2028, they'll have an AI researcher level model. (02:16):
undefined

Ejaaz: So you go from intern to research grade performance, which is super cool. (02:21):
undefined

Ejaaz: And the final point that really interested me was around compute. (02:25):
undefined

Ejaaz: Josh, they've spent or committed around $1.4 trillion on data centers right (02:28):
undefined

Ejaaz: now, which is roughly the equivalent of 30 gigawatts. It's a huge amount of compute. (02:34):
undefined

Ejaaz: But what shocked me the most was he came out and said that his eventual plan (02:39):
undefined

Ejaaz: is to have a factory built every week that produces a gigawatt of power. (02:45):
undefined

Ejaaz: That's about $20 billion of compute per week. (02:50):
undefined

Ejaaz: All really huge numbers kind of took my breath away. Josh, what's your take? (02:53):
undefined

Josh: OpenAI is just doing what everyone kind of knows they were always going to do. (02:59):
undefined

Josh: They very quickly realized they can't be a non-for-profit. They are now becoming (03:03):
undefined

Josh: a for-profit organization. (03:06):
undefined

Josh: In fact, it's a public benefit corporation. So it's a PBC, not an LLC or a Z-Corp (03:08):
undefined

Josh: or anything, which means the intention is to be kind of aligned with public (03:12):
undefined

Josh: interest, but basically it just blows the cap off of everything. (03:16):
undefined

Josh: And this is a really big deal. (03:19):
undefined

Josh: EJ, you mentioned that, or you mentioned to me actually earlier, (03:20):
undefined

Josh: and this was news to me, that Sam Altman expressed interest in going public. (03:23):
undefined

Josh: I think there's a big opportunity here to talk about how much money can be made by. (03:27):
undefined

Josh: OpenAI going public and by kind of restructuring this. So the restructuring deal is interesting. (03:32):
undefined

Josh: Are we ready to talk about that? Can we go into this like crazy chaotic restructuring (03:38):
undefined

Josh: that's happening? Okay. (03:42):
undefined

Josh: This is fascinating to me. So on screen, there is a disastrous diagram with a bunch of arrows. (03:43):
undefined

Josh: A lot of it is kind of hand-waving, not important. The things that matter, (03:48):
undefined

Josh: Microsoft owns a large percentage of the nonprofit. (03:51):
undefined

Josh: The nonprofit quickly realized they needed to become a for-profit. (03:54):
undefined

Josh: They had a capped upside on the previous version, but now they do not. (03:57):
undefined

Josh: So Microsoft was limited previously to a 100x return on their investment. (04:00):
undefined

Josh: Now there is no return on the investment or no limit to the return on the investment. (04:04):
undefined

Josh: And this is interesting for a few things, Ejaz, because one, (04:09):
undefined

Josh: I am very resentful of OpenAI because they are very clearly the fastest growing AI company in the world. (04:12):
undefined

Josh: And I have no way to get exposure to them. That doesn't feel like it's aligned with the public. (04:18):
undefined

Josh: Sam Altman is taking all the money for himself. He's throwing it at GPUs and I get no upside. (04:22):
undefined

Josh: That doesn't feel right. this is open AI, you're a public benefit company. (04:27):
undefined

Josh: Why are you not benefiting me as a member of the public? (04:30):
undefined

Josh: Second to this is that Microsoft now seems to be the best way to get exposure (04:33):
undefined

Josh: because there is this like, (04:38):
undefined

Josh: there is this way of getting access to open AI when they IPO, (04:40):
undefined

Josh: but open AI and Microsoft are now, or Microsoft's not the biggest stakeholder (04:43):
undefined

Josh: in the open AI company at 27% versus the open AI non-for-profit, which is actually 26%. (04:47):
undefined

Josh: So the largest form of exposure is through Microsoft. They have uncapped profits (04:53):
undefined

Josh: and they are reporting earnings, I think, this week. (04:58):
undefined

Josh: So Microsoft might be the best way to get exposure to OpenAI currently, but... (05:01):
undefined

Josh: OpenAI as a whole has kind of disappointed me through this whole process because (05:07):
undefined

Josh: it's all been very hand wavy and not really aligned with, I think, (05:10):
undefined

Josh: the public intention that they stated, just because they've always been this (05:15):
undefined

Josh: big for profit entity disguised as a nonprofit. (05:18):
undefined

Ejaaz: Yeah, I completely agree with a lot of the points you made. (05:21):
undefined

Ejaaz: And to just kind of give the listeners a bit of context here, (05:25):
undefined

Ejaaz: OpenAI founded in 2015 as a nonprofit. (05:30):
undefined

Ejaaz: It was set up as a nonprofit org with this ambitious vision of we are going (05:33):
undefined

Ejaaz: to achieve AGI and we are going to provide it to the people. (05:37):
undefined

Ejaaz: So everyone should have access to this super powerful technology. (05:40):
undefined

Ejaaz: Then four years later, in 2019, they decided, we kind of want to make a bit (05:43):
undefined

Ejaaz: of money from this and we need to raise a lot of capital. (05:48):
undefined

Ejaaz: So in 2019, they set up a for-profit structure, but it was owned by the non-profit. (05:51):
undefined

Ejaaz: So they could still get away with saying, hey, we're a non-profit. (05:56):
undefined

Ejaaz: But it was capped, as you said, Josh, to any investor for 100x, just 100x returns. (05:59):
undefined

Ejaaz: So a lot of feedback they've been getting and a lot of pressure they've been (06:05):
undefined

Ejaaz: getting from future investors or current investors recently is, (06:07):
undefined

Ejaaz: hey, we want to make more money on this deal. (06:11):
undefined

Ejaaz: It's unfair that we're investing billions in you. (06:13):
undefined

Ejaaz: Microsoft invested $13 billion and we want more upside than 100x. (06:16):
undefined

Ejaaz: So Sam went to the drawing board and was like, okay, we can create a new structure (06:21):
undefined

Ejaaz: called a public benefit corporation, which, as you said, now has uncapped gains. It's pretty crazy. (06:26):
undefined

Ejaaz: So now you can just make as much money as you can on a normal private company (06:31):
undefined

Ejaaz: that you were investing in. (06:36):
undefined

Ejaaz: And the biggest point around this is on this diagram here, you'll see if you (06:37):
undefined

Ejaaz: zoom in, if you squint, Microsoft, minority owner, they are now no longer a minority owner. (06:41):
undefined

Ejaaz: Like you said, they are the majority owner, which is just crazy. (06:47):
undefined

Ejaaz: But I'll tell you a few other reasons why Microsoft is a huge winner from all (06:50):
undefined

Ejaaz: of this. It's not just money. (06:54):
undefined

Ejaaz: It's not just the fact that their $13 billion stake is now worth $135 billion. What a crazy return. (06:55):
undefined

Ejaaz: But they still maintain exclusive access and rights to all of OpenAI's research (07:03):
undefined

Ejaaz: IP, which means that any kind of new model that they release, (07:09):
undefined

Ejaaz: Microsoft basically has the first say and exclusive access to provide it to (07:14):
undefined

Ejaaz: their partners, to their customers and any clients and enterprise clients that (07:18):
undefined

Ejaaz: they wanna bring in in the future. (07:21):
undefined

Ejaaz: Secondly, and this was a genius move, Josh, they set a standard. (07:23):
undefined

Ejaaz: They said, listen, OpenAI, We will relieve all our exclusive access and IP access (07:28):
undefined

Ejaaz: only once you've achieved AGI. (07:34):
undefined

Ejaaz: But of course, the obvious question is, what the hell is AGI? (07:36):
undefined

Ejaaz: How do you determine what AGI is? There's so much discussion around what the hell this thing is. (07:40):
undefined

Ejaaz: So they said, we'll leave it to an expert party of third-party analysts. (07:44):
undefined

Ejaaz: So it's a panel which is going to decide and determine OpenAI's fate going forward. (07:49):
undefined

Ejaaz: So the winner of all of this, this restructuring, this OpenAI vision announcement, (07:54):
undefined

Ejaaz: is actually Microsoft, and it's just crazy to see it. (07:58):
undefined

Josh: Okay, so how do you navigate this as a participant who wants to get wealthy off of AI? (08:02):
undefined

Josh: There is a few ways. I think for people who observe public markets, (08:06):
undefined

Josh: you'll know the fact that Apple is sitting at all-time high, (08:10):
undefined

Josh: Microsoft sitting at all-time high, Google, basically across the board, (08:12):
undefined

Josh: everyone is sitting at all-time highs, which I believe is high signal. (08:15):
undefined

Josh: Clearly, things are working. Clearly, a lot is being spent. Clearly, (08:18):
undefined

Josh: there is some sort of a bubble, but the end is not quite near. (08:21):
undefined

Josh: The big question that I have is like, come on, how do I get access to OpenAI (08:25):
undefined

Josh: if you don't, if you're not an accredited investor, if you can't figure out (08:28):
undefined

Josh: how to get private shares, the answer right now is just Microsoft. (08:31):
undefined

Josh: Nobody in the world owns more shares, not even OpenAI themselves, than Microsoft does. (08:34):
undefined

Josh: And Microsoft, like you said, EJS, they have access to their IP, (08:39):
undefined

Josh: they get access to a revenue share, they get access to actual equity within the company. (08:42):
undefined

Josh: And if you believe in the success of OpenAI at a scale that we do, (08:46):
undefined

Josh: which is many, many trillions of dollars of market cap, 27% of that is not to be laughed at. (08:49):
undefined

Josh: And I mean, Microsoft is a $4 trillion dollar company in the case that (08:53):
undefined

Josh: open ai makes it to that level that is another nearly (08:56):
undefined

Josh: trillion dollars in microsoft's pocket which (09:00):
undefined

Josh: is a really big deal so it is unfortunate that (09:03):
undefined

Josh: it gets diluted out through the form of having to buy the same (09:06):
undefined

Josh: company that makes microsoft office which is just like an abomination my (09:09):
undefined

Josh: personal opinion at least but um i think that is the way to kind of navigate (09:12):
undefined

Josh: this forward until we do get the eventual ipo from the open ai team like sam (09:16):
undefined

Josh: allman discussed so that's kind of how i'm thinking about navigating it is like (09:20):
undefined

Josh: i want access sam's being a little a little closed closed with that um but microsoft (09:23):
undefined

Josh: is probably your your path to success there that's. (09:28):
undefined

Ejaaz: So interesting i i read it kind of the uh in (09:30):
undefined

Ejaaz: a different way josh which is the gloves are now finally off (09:34):
undefined

Ejaaz: open ai doesn't have the constraint of having to lop as a non-profit organization (09:37):
undefined

Ejaaz: it's quite clearly a for-profit um the foundation owns equity stake in this (09:41):
undefined

Ejaaz: so i think sam will probably move quite quickly on an ipo because he needs so (09:45):
undefined

Ejaaz: much capital if he wants to get to a gigawatt factory per week, like he says. (09:50):
undefined

Josh: That's probably going to be the biggest IPO ever. (09:55):
undefined

Josh: Right. Like, I think right now, OpenAI and SpaceX are kind of neck and neck (09:57):
undefined

Josh: for most valuable private company in the world. (10:00):
undefined

Josh: And when that company goes public, (10:03):
undefined

Josh: my God, the amount of volume that is going to be traded on day one. (10:05):
undefined

Ejaaz: I'll be buying. (10:08):
undefined

Josh: Shout out to the early employees who got stock in OpenAI. My gosh, (10:10):
undefined

Josh: you are about to buy very, very, very, very luxe houses. (10:14):
undefined

Josh: But I guess that's it for OpenAI. This is a really fun topic that I've been (10:17):
undefined

Josh: dying to talk about, which is human order robotics. (10:20):
undefined

Josh: I love human order robotics. And the first one has hit the market, (10:22):
undefined

Josh: or at least so they say. say. (10:26):
undefined

Josh: We're not entirely sure where this stands. Do you want to introduce everyone (10:28):
undefined

Josh: to the OneX Neo humanoid home robot? What the hell is it? What does it do? How does it work? (10:31):
undefined

Ejaaz: Yes. So if you remember on a previous episode, actually last week, (10:38):
undefined

Ejaaz: we spoke about the new figure humanoid robot where it can enter your home, (10:41):
undefined

Ejaaz: it could do a bunch of things, but it can also do a bunch of like other things (10:45):
undefined

Ejaaz: like manufacturing jobs, service jobs and all that kind of stuff. (10:48):
undefined

Ejaaz: This is the latest humanoid robot to come out of a company called OneX. (10:50):
undefined

Ejaaz: And my first impressions of it Josh can I can I can I be honest with you can I be honest I'd (10:56):
undefined

Josh: Love for you to be nothing but honest. (11:00):
undefined

Ejaaz: It looks like a grown-up Teletubby (11:01):
undefined

Ejaaz: I don't mean that in a demeaning way. Let me skip ahead to show you like a clip of this thing. (11:06):
undefined

Ejaaz: It's kind of like in this soft, it's wearing a soft suit. It's got a very pleasant (11:11):
undefined

Ejaaz: looking face. It's got these kind of like glow up ears. (11:16):
undefined

Ejaaz: It looks like an adult alien Teletubby, but it's comforting to be around. (11:19):
undefined

Ejaaz: And in terms of like what it can do, it's this humanoid robot that can live (11:24):
undefined

Ejaaz: in your home and it can do all the things you would kind of expect a houseware robot to do. (11:28):
undefined

Ejaaz: It can clean your dishes, it can put away the groceries, it can lift things. (11:32):
undefined

Ejaaz: I think it has like a lifting capacity of 55 pounds, which is pretty crazy for (11:36):
undefined

Ejaaz: something that weighs 60 pounds. (11:40):
undefined

Ejaaz: I don't know how those mechanics work. I'm not a physicist, but that is pretty insane to see. (11:42):
undefined

Ejaaz: And this video is like a really high production thing, Josh. (11:46):
undefined

Ejaaz: I don't know how much they invested in this, but if the robot that we eventually (11:50):
undefined

Ejaaz: get in our homes in 2026, for the people that are ordering this for 500 bucks (11:53):
undefined

Ejaaz: or buying it outright for $20,000, which is a hefty price tag, (11:57):
undefined

Ejaaz: if it gets anywhere near something like this, I think it's going to completely change the game. (12:02):
undefined

Ejaaz: I would personally get something like this in my home. Josh, (12:06):
undefined

Ejaaz: have you put down the payment on this? Absolutely. What are you doing here? (12:09):
undefined

Josh: No, not at all. Again, here's the tale of two wolves where I am a techno optimist (12:13):
undefined

Josh: who is rooted in reality. (12:17):
undefined

Josh: And I have been around long enough. I have seen enough of these videos that (12:20):
undefined

Josh: look very beautiful and lovely and very welcoming to have a humanoid robot. (12:23):
undefined

Josh: But EJ, how many people have humanoid robots in their house? A total of zero. (12:28):
undefined

Josh: It just doesn't exist. No one shipped them to market. A few things that are (12:31):
undefined

Josh: important to know about this robot. It is, like you mentioned, $20,000 or $500 a month. (12:35):
undefined

Josh: And it does the following. It is able to do basic tests like laundry, (12:39):
undefined

Josh: possibly the dishes, possibly vacuuming. (12:43):
undefined

Josh: We're not entirely sure. And the problem with that is that if it can't do the (12:47):
undefined

Josh: task, you have to use this thing. I believe they call it expert mode. (12:51):
undefined

Josh: Now, expert mode is the giant red flag waving in the sky for me because expert (12:54):
undefined

Josh: mode is the highest signal that this is not ready to enter the market. (12:59):
undefined

Josh: Expert mode means if it's not able to do the thing you want, (13:05):
undefined

Josh: you can schedule a time with the Neo team and someone from the headquarters (13:08):
undefined

Josh: or wherever they're based will get into this little VR suit and manually walk (13:12):
undefined

Josh: the robot through your home to do the task for you. (13:17):
undefined

Josh: So instead of having a maid come to your house, you get some tech engineer, (13:20):
undefined

Josh: put on some goggles, and he is walking through your personal space doing the (13:24):
undefined

Josh: task that you want to do, that you've scheduled ahead of time in order to make this happen. (13:28):
undefined

Josh: And I believe that is what part of that monthly $500 a month thing is, (13:32):
undefined

Josh: is you're actually, you're paying hours of labor for humans to do the emulated (13:36):
undefined

Josh: version inside of this humanoid robot. (13:42):
undefined

Josh: So that to me is a really big red flag. The second red flag that I want to serve (13:45):
undefined

Josh: before I'll pass back to you, AJ, is the fact that this is a pre-order. (13:48):
undefined

Josh: You're not buying a robot. You are buying the rights to a future robot. (13:52):
undefined

Josh: And there is no guarantees that this robot will ever exist at scale, (13:55):
undefined

Josh: nor will it exist to the extent that it's shown in this video. (13:59):
undefined

Josh: And it's one of those things, and we've seen this with It's like, (14:02):
undefined

Josh: show me, don't tell me. And I'm seeing a lot of these really lovely demos. (14:05):
undefined

Josh: But until this thing is actually produced and until this thing gets shipped (14:10):
undefined

Josh: and until it arrives at people's houses, I am going to be sitting here a little (14:13):
undefined

Josh: skeptical because a lot of the companies like... (14:17):
undefined

Josh: I'll use Tesla as an example. They have a proven track record of building really (14:21):
undefined

Josh: badass manufacturing, hardcore engineering stuff. (14:24):
undefined

Josh: These startups don't really have any track record of manufacturing hard things. (14:27):
undefined

Josh: And a humanoid robot is an incredibly difficult thing to manufacture. (14:30):
undefined

Josh: So when they say pre-orders and delivery in 2026, well, I assume the best case (14:34):
undefined

Josh: is like December 31st, 2026. (14:38):
undefined

Josh: I would be shocked if they deliver these at scale before that. (14:40):
undefined

Josh: But I'm wondering if you have if you have a different take on that. (14:42):
undefined

Ejaaz: Sadly, no, I am not going to pay the equivalent (14:45):
undefined

Ejaaz: of half a month's rent uh well (14:48):
undefined

Ejaaz: maybe not in new york but some in some other state um to (14:51):
undefined

Ejaaz: get some third party that is wearing a (14:54):
undefined

Ejaaz: metamorph suit and acting like a shitty uh version (14:57):
undefined

Ejaaz: of avatar um the movie to navigate my robot and clean my clothes i would rather (15:00):
undefined

Ejaaz: spend that money to get some actual house help to to come in and help me out (15:06):
undefined

Ejaaz: with all the things that we're seeing on this video so far okay i have one simple (15:10):
undefined

Ejaaz: rule if you are going to advertise a next generation humanoid robot that is autonomous, (15:14):
undefined

Ejaaz: it should be autonomous. (15:20):
undefined

Ejaaz: And don't sell me something that it needs to be teleoperated. (15:23):
undefined

Ejaaz: It makes sense in the case of something like self-driving cars. (15:26):
undefined

Ejaaz: Waymo, I know, has a tele operation thing. That makes sense because there's (15:30):
undefined

Ejaaz: a lot of safety and stuff involved. (15:33):
undefined

Ejaaz: But for something that is consumer-friendly, for something that is meant to (15:34):
undefined

Ejaaz: make my life a hell of a lot easier in my most private space ever at home, (15:37):
undefined

Ejaaz: it should be fully autonomous. (15:42):
undefined

Ejaaz: And let alone the home is like the most private place, right, Josh? (15:43):
undefined

Ejaaz: Like I have all my valuables here. I don't want some dude in a third world country, (15:47):
undefined

Ejaaz: sorry, navigating around my house and picking stuff up and putting it down. What if they break it? (15:51):
undefined

Ejaaz: What if they do something wrong? Who's liable for that? Do I get insurance with this thing? (15:55):
undefined

Ejaaz: I have no idea. And then tacking on a $20,000 price tag to buy this thing outright. (15:59):
undefined

Ejaaz: If you are buying this outright for $20,000, I'm going to go ahead and say that (16:04):
undefined

Ejaaz: you are kind of like an idiot at that extent. (16:08):
undefined

Ejaaz: Like, I do not advise doing this. (16:12):
undefined

Ejaaz: And then the second point you made, Josh, I think is the more prescient point, which is, (16:14):
undefined

Ejaaz: this thing hasn't been built yet. This hasn't been produced at scale. (16:19):
undefined

Ejaaz: This thing isn't going to come into your home. It's not even guaranteed to come (16:23):
undefined

Ejaaz: into your home until like sometime in 2026. (16:26):
undefined

Ejaaz: By that time, you're going to have other robot companies like Unitree, (16:29):
undefined

Ejaaz: like Figure, come out with their actual robot, which is being built and scaled. (16:32):
undefined

Ejaaz: I have no idea where 1X is as a manufacturing company. (16:35):
undefined

Ejaaz: You've mentioned several times actually on our show, Josh, that one of the bullish (16:39):
undefined

Ejaaz: cases on Tesla's Optimus robot is the fact that Elon is such a manufacturing nerd. (16:44):
undefined

Ejaaz: He's so good at scaling. And I just don't see this or want to trust this with a robot startup. (16:50):
undefined

Josh: Yeah, I don't want to call people dumb for spending $20,000 because if I had (16:55):
undefined

Josh: a disposable $20,000, I would certainly be an early adopter. (16:58):
undefined

Josh: Maybe we can refer to that. (17:01):
undefined

Josh: One of the weird edge case questions that I have is like, okay, (17:03):
undefined

Josh: you pay $500 a month, then what? Like, what if I don't want it anymore? (17:06):
undefined

Josh: Is there like a repo man that comes? Does the robot walk out of my house? (17:09):
undefined

Josh: How does that work? The teleoperation thing, it's a serious problem. (17:12):
undefined

Josh: Um, granted you can schedule it, but I imagine myself like, Oh, (17:16):
undefined

Josh: you walk out of the shower and here is like some, some dude from like wherever he's from. (17:19):
undefined

Josh: He's just like, like, hi, I'm just cleaning your windows. (17:22):
undefined

Josh: It's this really weird, like intimate distraction. (17:25):
undefined

Josh: Um, and I think the open-endedness of that expert mode relative to the set amounts (17:28):
undefined

Josh: of chores that the robot can do leaves a lot to be desired or just a lot of (17:34):
undefined

Josh: unknowns where if I do spend all this money, I don't actually know what it's capable of doing. (17:39):
undefined

Josh: They say it could do a few things, but there's a lot of edge cases. (17:43):
undefined

Josh: Everyone's houses are different. (17:45):
undefined

Josh: Just a little uncertain on this robot. But again, happy people pushing this (17:46):
undefined

Josh: forward. I think this is great progress. I love the vision. (17:49):
undefined

Josh: If the vision in the video becomes a reality, that is a life that I really am (17:53):
undefined

Josh: excited about. That is a reality that is awesome. (17:57):
undefined

Josh: So like shout out to the One X team for trying. They're pushing the ball forward. (17:59):
undefined

Josh: I am not going to knock it too hard because I just admire their effort in making (18:02):
undefined

Josh: this a reality. And like everything else, we'll see. (18:07):
undefined

Josh: Ship the first robot. Let's see how it performs in homes. (18:09):
undefined

Josh: Let's we'll see how it goes but this is, (18:14):
undefined

Josh: I guess that's it for the robot stuff. Now we get into the cyberspace, (18:16):
undefined

Josh: the world of Grok. Oh, hell yeah. (18:20):
undefined

Josh: And Grokopedia has launched this week, EJ. So why is this a big deal? (18:22):
undefined

Ejaaz: This is a huge deal for me because I grew up on Wikipedia and I used it to help (18:25):
undefined

Ejaaz: me research and write a bunch of essays at high school and at college. (18:32):
undefined

Ejaaz: I still used it up until a few days ago where I would like help me clarify something (18:36):
undefined

Ejaaz: about like learning about some archaic thing, which I wouldn't be able to find (18:41):
undefined

Ejaaz: anywhere. It is the internet's resource knowledge. (18:44):
undefined

Ejaaz: Millions of people use it every single day. (18:47):
undefined

Ejaaz: But there's one issue, which is I don't know whether this source of truth is actually the truth. (18:51):
undefined

Ejaaz: And it's been something that we've been increasingly faced in society as things (18:57):
undefined

Ejaaz: like social media become enveloped around the world, like everyone's making (19:02):
undefined

Ejaaz: TikToks, everyone's learning their news from TikTok, from tweets. (19:05):
undefined

Ejaaz: And so it becomes really murky in terms of like figuring out what that truth is. (19:09):
undefined

Ejaaz: So Elon came out a few months ago, and it's (19:13):
undefined

Ejaaz: crazy to say that this happened a few months ago and he said I think (19:16):
undefined

Ejaaz: AI will be the best source of truth and so (19:20):
undefined

Ejaaz: what I'm going to do as part of building out Grok which is xai's (19:22):
undefined

Ejaaz: flagship AI model is create an AI (19:26):
undefined

Ejaaz: version of Wikipedia so he built that and he probably aptly called it Grokipedia (19:29):
undefined

Ejaaz: so what we're seeing in front of us right now is a demo of Grokipedia looks (19:35):
undefined

Ejaaz: like a simple chat shewiti prompt bar except that you can search for everything (19:40):
undefined

Ejaaz: and anything that you typically would in Wikipedia. (19:44):
undefined

Ejaaz: And when you do so, you get this really neat little concise summary and intro (19:46):
undefined

Ejaaz: on whatever topic, one we're seeing on the screen is the Tesla Cybertruck. (19:51):
undefined

Ejaaz: And then it goes on to kind of dig into its early life, similar that you'd see (19:55):
undefined

Ejaaz: on Wikipedia, how it was originated, and its site sources, Josh, (19:59):
undefined

Ejaaz: throughout the entire thing. (20:05):
undefined

Ejaaz: That to me is the most important part because typically in Wikipedia, (20:06):
undefined

Ejaaz: they do this thing which is kind of hidden behind closed doors. (20:11):
undefined

Ejaaz: Where they restrict the number of sources you can use as legitimate sources for your articles. (20:14):
undefined

Ejaaz: And if you look at that list, and if you compare it to the black list, (20:21):
undefined

Ejaaz: which is the very, very long list of sources which you can't quote, (20:25):
undefined

Ejaaz: it starts limiting what can be factual and what can be opinionated. (20:29):
undefined

Ejaaz: And it starts skewing a lot of people's opinions as to what is the truth or what is not. (20:34):
undefined

Ejaaz: Grok, Grok, Grokpedia and Grok on the other hand is completely unbiased. (20:38):
undefined

Ejaaz: It pulls sources from anywhere and everywhere and it does its own analysis to (20:42):
undefined

Ejaaz: vindicate whether the source is legit or whether it's not. (20:46):
undefined

Ejaaz: It does this in real time and it processes hundreds of millions of articles, (20:49):
undefined

Ejaaz: sources, primary sources, secondary resources every single day. (20:53):
undefined

Ejaaz: So I'm super excited about this because I'm, it's going to be my new research (20:57):
undefined

Ejaaz: tool going forwards in terms of fact checking. (21:01):
undefined

Josh: The purpose of Grok is to seek truth. That's kind of their, their end goal. (21:03):
undefined

Josh: That's their stated goal. The same way that a lot of these other companies like (21:06):
undefined

Josh: OpenAI was to have open source AI. (21:09):
undefined

Josh: Grok's is just to seek truth. And I think with Grok5, they're really making (21:11):
undefined

Josh: an attempt to lean into that because a lot of these traditional models are trained (21:14):
undefined

Josh: on the data of the internet, which is highly opinionated and highly biased. (21:18):
undefined

Josh: And what the Grok team, the XAI team in particular is doing is they're figuring (21:21):
undefined

Josh: out ways to filter through the noise and find as close to source truth as they can. (21:25):
undefined

Josh: And we've kind of seen this work with on the X platform with community notes, (21:30):
undefined

Josh: how generally speaking, they are the closest thing we have to source truth because (21:34):
undefined

Josh: it takes all these opposing opinions and kind of aggregates them and comes to a conclusion. (21:38):
undefined

Josh: Grokipedia is showing us community notes at scale. And it's kind of, (21:42):
undefined

Josh: it's the training set that is going to be used on the next Grok model, (21:46):
undefined

Josh: which is Grok5, but they're kind of offering it to the public as a public good. (21:50):
undefined

Josh: And not only is it a public good, it's an interactive public good. (21:53):
undefined

Josh: So if you go to Grokipedia, you can actually suggest a new page to be generated (21:56):
undefined

Josh: because they're all AI generated. (22:00):
undefined

Josh: And Grok will take the liberty on itself to actually filter your request and (22:02):
undefined

Josh: see if it's worthy or if it's not. (22:05):
undefined

Josh: So if Grokipedia deems your request worthy enough, it will actually go and do (22:07):
undefined

Josh: all the work in order to generate a new Wikipedia page or a new Grokipedia page. (22:11):
undefined

Josh: And I think that kind of collaborative nature is fun, not only for Grok to get (22:15):
undefined

Josh: better training data, but for the public to kind of get their own way. (22:19):
undefined

Josh: And what's funny, Ejaz, is I've seen a lot of larger influencers on X posting (22:23):
undefined

Josh: their Grokipedia page with a thank you letter, because for so long their public (22:28):
undefined

Josh: perception has been skewed in a way that wasn't necessarily true. (22:31):
undefined

Josh: And Grokipedia allows that to change, where now there is a source of truth about the person. (22:35):
undefined

Josh: And when you see slander about someone online, you can check, (22:40):
undefined

Josh: you can reference check this and it at least is trying its best to be truthful. (22:43):
undefined

Josh: So that to me is why Grokopedia is, is this exciting new, important revolution (22:47):
undefined

Josh: in technology that we have as a public good. Thank you to the X team. Yeah. (22:51):
undefined

Ejaaz: Well, Josh, one of those people that posted a thank you about Grokipedia was (22:56):
undefined

Ejaaz: the founder of Wikipedia himself, Larry Sanger, one of the founders of Wikipedia. (23:00):
undefined

Ejaaz: And he goes in this tweet, OK, I finished reading my first long article about (23:06):
undefined

Ejaaz: Grokipedia, the one titled Larry Sanger. That's him. That's his name. (23:11):
undefined

Ejaaz: And he goes on to describe that for a version one for an AI based Wikipedia, (23:15):
undefined

Ejaaz: it's actually really good. and it got a lot of things correct. (23:20):
undefined

Ejaaz: Most importantly, the major things, which are the most controversial things about his biography. (23:24):
undefined

Ejaaz: And he goes on citing a few examples. (23:29):
undefined

Ejaaz: He does have a few criticisms, the one being that it gets a few minor mistakes (23:32):
undefined

Ejaaz: that kind of roll in to become a big problem throughout the article. (23:37):
undefined

Ejaaz: But again, he says, hats off to you, Elon, at the end. (23:41):
undefined

Ejaaz: For everyone, this is amazing. I'm looking forward to seeing 1.0 and 2.0 going forwards. (23:45):
undefined

Ejaaz: I think what a lot of people ended up doing when this product released, (23:50):
undefined

Ejaaz: Josh, was to test a few controversial topics. (23:55):
undefined

Ejaaz: Now, I don't want us to be politically affiliated at all on this podcast, (23:58):
undefined

Ejaaz: but just to give a few examples, there was a side-by-side comparison of RFK (24:03):
undefined

Ejaaz: Jr., which is a big political figure in the US. (24:08):
undefined

Ejaaz: And you notice that one is very explicitly unbiased and less opinionated versus (24:11):
undefined

Ejaaz: the other, Grok being the more unbiased version. (24:16):
undefined

Ejaaz: You've got a side-by-side comparison of Donald Trump, and we had a kind of (24:20):
undefined

Ejaaz: Unbiased adjudicator here in this, Josh, in this experiment where they gave Gemini 2.5. (24:29):
undefined

Ejaaz: I don't know why Gemini 2.5 is the unbiased AI model of choice, but apparently it is. (24:34):
undefined

Ejaaz: And it ended up deciding that Grok was in fact the more unbiased model. (24:39):
undefined

Ejaaz: But there's also a bunch of really cool features that you can do in this as well, Josh. (24:43):
undefined

Ejaaz: You mentioned that you can like submit to Grok an article that you want to get (24:48):
undefined

Ejaaz: generated and have it instantly done. (24:51):
undefined

Ejaaz: You can also fix mistakes in Grok as well. You can kind of highlight a request (24:53):
undefined

Ejaaz: or highlight a thing that you think is wrong, submit it to Grok, (24:58):
undefined

Ejaaz: and it analyzes it in the back end. (25:01):
undefined

Ejaaz: The coolest part about this is you're not reliant on a bunch of (25:03):
undefined

Ejaaz: specific moderators, human moderators that go to bed at night, (25:06):
undefined

Ejaaz: that are awake at different times to get back to you. (25:09):
undefined

Ejaaz: This is just done by an AI all in real time. (25:12):
undefined

Ejaaz: If there's something that you don't understand, you can also just highlight (25:15):
undefined

Ejaaz: it similar to how you would do on your iPhone and click like search and it brings (25:17):
undefined

Ejaaz: you the Grokipedia page of that thing. (25:22):
undefined

Ejaaz: So overall, I think this is a net improvement in what Wikipedia was. (25:25):
undefined

Ejaaz: Do I think it's the best thing? (25:29):
undefined

Ejaaz: No, but I think it's going to get a lot better over time. And I'm super excited (25:31):
undefined

Ejaaz: about this. This thing is open source. Anyone can access it. (25:34):
undefined

Josh: Super cool. Bullish on Grokipedia. And it's actually not the only open source (25:37):
undefined

Josh: public good that we are getting in this week's episode. (25:41):
undefined

Josh: There's a second one that goes by a very weird convoluted name of X402. (25:44):
undefined

Josh: And I want to just briefly outline X402, give you like the 10 second little elevator pitch. (25:49):
undefined

Josh: You can imagine X402, this kind of, it turns the web into a giant vending machine. (25:54):
undefined

Josh: So you just like picture the internet as a vending machine. (25:59):
undefined

Josh: You can walk up to it and you could try to like grab something off of the shelf, (26:02):
undefined

Josh: whether it be a file or a video or a song. (26:04):
undefined

Josh: And if it costs money, the website will say, 402, pay this tiny amount. (26:07):
undefined

Josh: And you could pay it instantly. It's a very tiny amount. Like we're talking fractions of pennies. (26:12):
undefined

Josh: You could pay instantly using crypto stable coins like USDC. (26:16):
undefined

Josh: And then boom, you get the thing. And the amazing perk of this is you don't (26:20):
undefined

Josh: need an account. You don't need a password. (26:24):
undefined

Josh: You just pay for the thing you want and you walk away. Just like a vending machine. (26:26):
undefined

Josh: You want to watch a new video. (26:29):
undefined

Josh: Oh, here's like, give me 10 cents or 10%, one (26:30):
undefined

Josh: tenth of a penny and you get access to this video and you can take it off (26:33):
undefined

Josh: the wall and x402 it's just this open platform kind (26:35):
undefined

Josh: of like http in fact they use part of the http protocol for (26:39):
undefined

Josh: this um that allows the internet to implement this across (26:42):
undefined

Josh: the board so anyone who wants to integrate it (26:45):
undefined

Josh: can integrate it you can kind of imagine i think a lot of people are familiar (26:48):
undefined

Josh: with linux how it's just open source if you want to integrate you can that's (26:51):
undefined

Josh: what 402 is and it's this really awesome thing that allows ai agents in particular (26:54):
undefined

Josh: to start engaging with the internet without needing an account without needing (26:59):
undefined

Josh: a password, without needing to prove that they are humans. (27:03):
undefined

Josh: So you have this big explainer up. Do you want to add anything to that explanation? (27:06):
undefined

Ejaaz: No, I think you did a great job. What I will add is, I love the vending machine example. (27:10):
undefined

Ejaaz: But yeah, to emphasize, this is a new web standard. So you don't have to go (27:16):
undefined

Ejaaz: through a middleman like Stripe or PayPal. (27:22):
undefined

Ejaaz: This is something that you can spin up and integrate into your website or app (27:25):
undefined

Ejaaz: today, right now. And what's cool about this is it unlocks a bunch of really cool use cases. (27:29):
undefined

Ejaaz: So in the previous world, before X402, you would need to set up a PayPal account, (27:35):
undefined

Ejaaz: you would need to set up a checkout system, or enable subscriptions via your own API. (27:41):
undefined

Ejaaz: So if someone wanted to get access to your product, you would query your API, (27:47):
undefined

Ejaaz: and you could either offer them two options. (27:51):
undefined

Ejaaz: Here's all the information in the product that you want for free, (27:53):
undefined

Ejaaz: or you need to subscribe to my thing, which is kind of like, (27:56):
undefined

Ejaaz: think of like a newsletter or a news media corporation in today's world. (27:58):
undefined

Ejaaz: You've got to pay a subscription to get access to the Financial Times, for example. (28:02):
undefined

Ejaaz: Now, you can go to the same app and website and just pay per use, (28:05):
undefined

Ejaaz: which is the coolest part for me. (28:10):
undefined

Ejaaz: Like, Josh, do you know the number of times that I've gone to read an article (28:12):
undefined

Ejaaz: on tech or whatever, and I've just been paywalled? (28:15):
undefined

Ejaaz: I would love to be able to pay like 50 cents or whatever the amount is one time (28:18):
undefined

Ejaaz: and get access to it instantaneously a protocol like this allows you to do it (28:23):
undefined

Ejaaz: and any human can get access to it but the second part is something that you (28:28):
undefined

Ejaaz: mentioned josh ai agents (28:32):
undefined

Ejaaz: I'm firmly of the belief that the future way of digital commerce is not going (28:34):
undefined

Ejaaz: to be via humans or facilitated by humans. (28:39):
undefined

Ejaaz: It's all going to be done digitally through agents. (28:41):
undefined

Ejaaz: You need a standard like this, an open protocol that facilitates payments in (28:44):
undefined

Ejaaz: a matter of microseconds to exist for that world to exist. (28:49):
undefined

Ejaaz: So this is a major, major evolution. (28:53):
undefined

Ejaaz: People probably won't be as excited about this until they start using the product (28:56):
undefined

Ejaaz: themselves. They probably won't have any idea that it's happening in the back end. (28:59):
undefined

Ejaaz: But as a former and current crypto nerd, this is super cool. (29:03):
undefined

Josh: Yeah, well, here's why people should be excited about it because initially it sounds horrific. (29:08):
undefined

Josh: I'm like, wait, I don't want to pay to read an article or to watch a video. (29:11):
undefined

Josh: And that seems like a terrible, terrible, terrible user experience. (29:15):
undefined

Josh: But the alternative has actually been much worse. (29:18):
undefined

Josh: It is the advertising model that gets in the way. (29:21):
undefined

Josh: It's the subscription model that costs $30 a month just to read a couple of articles. (29:23):
undefined

Josh: And what this does is it kind of offloads a lot of the financial burden of a (29:27):
undefined

Josh: company onto like an open source platform. (29:33):
undefined

Josh: So if you don't want to, if you wanted to go read that article, (29:36):
undefined

Josh: EJ, you wouldn't need to pay $20 a month to the New York Times. (29:39):
undefined

Josh: You could just pay a couple cents for that specific article and get a chance (29:42):
undefined

Josh: to get the content that you want and move on with it. (29:46):
undefined

Josh: And I imagine that the net of this probably equals out to be lesser. (29:48):
undefined

Josh: Than what it would be in the traditional sense of things. So that hurts a lot (29:54):
undefined

Josh: of traditional companies where if you are making a killing off of $20 a month (29:58):
undefined

Josh: for people to read five articles, this is probably going to be a little scary. (30:01):
undefined

Josh: But for the rest of the open internet that wants to lean into this, (30:05):
undefined

Josh: that wants to have the AI agents do things on our behalf, if I could give my (30:08):
undefined

Josh: agent a wallet with $100 in it and say, here's your budget for the next couple (30:11):
undefined

Josh: of months, go get me all of the information you need, (30:17):
undefined

Josh: track down all the sources you need to aggregate that for me, (30:19):
undefined

Josh: that is like a huge, huge unlock. (30:21):
undefined

Josh: And most importantly, you just don't need an account or anything. (30:24):
undefined

Josh: It just lowers the friction to use the internet. So this, by all means, great progress. (30:26):
undefined

Josh: Big fan of X402 and just excited to see what comes from it. Normally, (30:30):
undefined

Josh: when we get these protocols, the amount of innovation that happens as a second (30:33):
undefined

Josh: order effect of it is just massive. (30:38):
undefined

Josh: So this has a real chance at really shaping the way the internet looks and how (30:39):
undefined

Josh: we engage with it over the next couple of years. (30:44):
undefined

Ejaaz: Okay, going on to our final topic and arguably the most controversial on the docket this week. (30:46):
undefined

Ejaaz: We want to put data centers out in space. This is something we mentioned last (30:54):
undefined

Ejaaz: week where a company called StarCloud is planning on building an AI compute (30:59):
undefined

Ejaaz: data center and launching it into space. (31:04):
undefined

Ejaaz: Apparently, this is going to make it a hell of a lot more efficient. (31:07):
undefined

Ejaaz: Apparently, beaming compute down onto Earth is way more environmentally friendly (31:10):
undefined

Ejaaz: because it's out in space. (31:15):
undefined

Ejaaz: There's nothing around it. It can just emanate heat, right? (31:17):
undefined

Ejaaz: But Josh, I know you have a lot of strong opinions on this. (31:20):
undefined

Ejaaz: I have this tweet lined up to give an update as to what exactly they're doing (31:23):
undefined

Ejaaz: and how they're achieving it. (31:27):
undefined

Ejaaz: And I have to say, and by the way, this tweet thread was produced by an AI model, (31:28):
undefined

Ejaaz: Perplexity, so shout out to them. (31:33):
undefined

Ejaaz: They give a very compelling case, Josh. There's a few things. (31:35):
undefined

Ejaaz: They talk about the fact that these satellites are probably, (31:38):
undefined

Ejaaz: this hardware is probably not going to be as heavy as people are claiming it to be. (31:41):
undefined

Ejaaz: So it actually makes it kind of efficient or cost worthy enough to launch some (31:45):
undefined

Ejaaz: of these things in space. (31:50):
undefined

Ejaaz: It's going to be the first ever AI model that is going to be launched and trained (31:52):
undefined

Ejaaz: and fine-tuned out in space. That's another one. (31:56):
undefined

Ejaaz: And also they talk about the biggest criticism that they've faced, (31:59):
undefined

Ejaaz: which is around how these data centers in space are gonna emanate heat. (32:02):
undefined

Ejaaz: There is no way to do that in space. Space is a vacuum. (32:07):
undefined

Ejaaz: And they talk about this neat little convection layer that they're gonna like (32:12):
undefined

Ejaaz: kind of film the entire or cover the entire data center with. (32:16):
undefined

Ejaaz: I don't know if that's true. That's kind of like the theory around it. (32:21):
undefined

Ejaaz: But most importantly, the economics are pretty insane. (32:24):
undefined

Ejaaz: On Earth, they claim that it's gonna cost you around $167 million to set up (32:27):
undefined

Ejaaz: the same kind of thing that they're trying to do in space. (32:32):
undefined

Ejaaz: But in orbit, it's only going to cost them $8.2 million. (32:35):
undefined

Ejaaz: Josh, to any kind of businessman looking at these figures, that is an investable (32:39):
undefined

Ejaaz: worthy company. Tell me why I'm wrong. (32:43):
undefined

Josh: This is outrageous. I can't believe we're talking about this. (32:46):
undefined

Josh: See, this is proof that you can't really trust AI agents, really. (32:49):
undefined

Josh: So the cost structure here is pretty outrageous. So like $167 million versus $8.2 million. (32:54):
undefined

Josh: Clearly, there's something wrong there because the cost per kilogram to orbit (32:59):
undefined

Josh: at the moment is $2,000 to $10,000 per kilogram. (33:02):
undefined

Josh: Five or 40 megawatts is an astronomical amount of infrastructure required, (33:08):
undefined

Josh: particularly because in order to cool a five megawatt data center in space, (33:14):
undefined

Josh: because there is no atmosphere, (33:21):
undefined

Josh: it requires 16 square kilometers of radiators and heat dissipation. (33:22):
undefined

Josh: And if you want a 40 megawatt data center up there, that is a very gigantic (33:28):
undefined

Josh: piece of space junk that is not really proven in technology. (33:35):
undefined

Josh: There's a lot of things like shielding that is really difficult because there (33:40):
undefined

Josh: is a lot more solar flare energy. If a single bit gets flipped in any of these (33:43):
undefined

Josh: training runs, it's very difficult to recover. (33:46):
undefined

Josh: You have to do the whole thing over again. So radiation is a problem. (33:48):
undefined

Josh: The cooling is a problem. The cost, I think they must be assuming that the cost (33:52):
undefined

Josh: per kilogram to orbit is like starship final form when it gets down to like (33:56):
undefined

Josh: 10 to 30 kilograms per orbit. (34:01):
undefined

Josh: The reality is it costs several orders of magnitude more to do that today. (34:02):
undefined

Josh: And what this isn't taking into account either is the decreasing cost of electricity over time. (34:06):
undefined

Josh: Since the early 1900s industrial era in the United States, we have not really (34:12):
undefined

Josh: needed to produce that much more energy. (34:17):
undefined

Josh: Like our energy has been kind of gradual, but it's never gone up the exponential (34:19):
undefined

Josh: curve in the same way technology did. (34:22):
undefined

Josh: We are very much at the exponential curve right now where that is changing. (34:23):
undefined

Josh: And I think to assume that energy costs are going to remain this high is fairly (34:27):
undefined

Josh: outrageous because clearly the goal is to get energy costs as close to zero as possible. (34:31):
undefined

Josh: There is no change to this trend. And this whole thing kind of seems outrageous. (34:36):
undefined

Josh: Now, granted, I love the idea that they are experimenting, that they want to (34:40):
undefined

Josh: try to make these fun outer space orbits. But it just seems kind of hand-wavy. (34:44):
undefined

Josh: One of their bragging points is, oh, this is 100 times more compute power than (34:48):
undefined

Josh: the largest GPU that's ever been in space. (34:52):
undefined

Josh: And that's because we don't ship GPUs to space. Like this is just the first (34:54):
undefined

Josh: big one we've ever shipped. And it's one of them. (34:58):
undefined

Josh: And real data centers now need millions of these coherently operating together. (35:00):
undefined

Josh: So to me, it's like, it's a fun science experiment, but I wouldn't take this (35:04):
undefined

Josh: very seriously because there are lots of long time scales and technology breakthroughs (35:08):
undefined

Josh: required in order to make that number realistic. (35:11):
undefined

Ejaaz: All right. Okay. Listen, Josh, all very valid points, but I have one more comment to make. (35:16):
undefined

Ejaaz: You criticize the fact that this company is suggesting to build out like, what is it? (35:22):
undefined

Ejaaz: A 14 kilometer satellite or data infrastructure to actually build it. (35:27):
undefined

Josh: That's just the physics of what it takes to cool it. (35:31):
undefined

Ejaaz: Right. Okay. To cool this, right? Isn't the whole point of space that there's a lot of space? (35:33):
undefined

Ejaaz: Why can't they just launch whatever the hell they want? We have infinite space (35:39):
undefined

Ejaaz: in this thing? Why can't they just do that? (35:42):
undefined

Josh: It turns out like space isn't super infinite and particularly on low earth orbit. (35:44):
undefined

Josh: I imagine there's going to be a large battle for low earth orbit. (35:48):
undefined

Josh: Why low earth orbit? Well, it is low earth. It's close to earth. (35:51):
undefined

Josh: And because of a thing called latency, we want these things, (35:55):
undefined

Josh: we want to be able to communicate with these things faster. (35:59):
undefined

Josh: And unfortunately, the speed of light does have a cap and things cannot, (36:01):
undefined

Josh: we haven't figured out how to make things travel any faster than the speed of light. (36:04):
undefined

Josh: So if your data center is further away, it takes much longer to communicate (36:07):
undefined

Josh: back with Earth. And that becomes a problem. (36:11):
undefined

Josh: What I prefer is instead of putting these like giant 16 square kilometer like (36:13):
undefined

Josh: pieces of things into this precious space, space in space, well, (36:19):
undefined

Josh: wouldn't it be cool to just throw like a lot more of these Starlink V3 satellites (36:25):
undefined

Josh: down there so they can beam direct to cell service back to us? (36:29):
undefined

Josh: I think there's a lot more practical utility of that low Earth orbit versus (36:32):
undefined

Josh: throwing these like gigantic things that require a lot of space. (36:35):
undefined

Josh: You just, if you saw, we talked about the SpaceX launch last week. (36:39):
undefined

Josh: Those satellites are very small. They don't take up a lot of space, (36:42):
undefined

Josh: but they are very high impact. (36:45):
undefined

Josh: These on the other hand are gigantic. And yeah, it doesn't strike me as very (36:46):
undefined

Josh: exciting as a lucrative way of using our limited real estate up there. (36:52):
undefined

Ejaaz: Yeah, I appreciate the boldness of the idea. This team did come out of Y Combinator, (36:57):
undefined

Ejaaz: so I'm presuming that it is quite fitting to the batch and cohort that they're graduating from. (37:02):
undefined

Ejaaz: Y Combinator always launches pretty loony ideas, which end up sometimes becoming world-changing. (37:07):
undefined

Ejaaz: But we are yet to see whether StarCloud will prove their thesis of launching (37:13):
undefined

Ejaaz: Jensen Huang's NVIDIA GPUs into space. (37:18):
undefined

Ejaaz: Speaking of Jensen Huang, $5 trillion market cap. It is an absolute crazy week. (37:21):
undefined

Ejaaz: It is earnings week this week, guys. Stock market is at all-time highs. (37:28):
undefined

Ejaaz: We mentioned Microsoft and Apple. Apple, super randomly, coming out of nowhere. (37:32):
undefined

Ejaaz: I thought AI had beholden them. I thought they had completely skipped the entire phase. (37:36):
undefined

Ejaaz: Somehow they surpassed a $4 trillion market cap. Maybe they're underpriced. (37:40):
undefined

Ejaaz: We'll talk about more of that potentially next week. (37:43):
undefined

Ejaaz: But that is all that we have on our docket today. (37:46):
undefined

Ejaaz: I just want to say from me personally, thank you so much for the support all (37:49):
undefined

Ejaaz: of you guys have shown us. So far, we had like one of our most viewed videos (37:53):
undefined

Ejaaz: ever last week. And we're having an amazing week this time. (37:57):
undefined

Ejaaz: All the comments and feedback that you guys are giving, all the likes, (38:00):
undefined

Ejaaz: all the subscriptions, all the ratings that you're giving us on RSS, (38:02):
undefined

Ejaaz: Spotify, Apple Music, wherever you're listening to this is hugely, hugely appreciated. (38:06):
undefined

Ejaaz: If you haven't done any of that already, that's okay. (38:10):
undefined

Ejaaz: Please do it now. It takes a few seconds. (38:13):
undefined

Ejaaz: And Josh, do you have anything else that you want to share? (38:16):
undefined

Josh: Oh, I have to remind you, we've had a big week in the world of YouTube, (38:18):
undefined

Josh: which is awesome. There's been a lot of new people joining and subscribing. (38:21):
undefined

Josh: Just a reminder that there is an audio version of this available on Spotify (38:24):
undefined

Josh: where you can also watch the video as well as just audio only on RSS feeds, (38:27):
undefined

Josh: basically anywhere where you get podcasts. Spotify is my favorite way to watch the show. (38:31):
undefined

Josh: Sometimes I'll rewatch our episodes and I'll go on my Spotify and it's nice (38:35):
undefined

Josh: because it's a pocket player that does audio, but it also has video built right in. (38:38):
undefined

Josh: So if I'm on the treadmill and I want to watch, I could just watch it (38:43):
undefined

Josh: on my phone or if I just like lock my phone because unless you (38:45):
undefined

Josh: have youtube premium you can't lock your phone and still listen it still (38:48):
undefined

Josh: plays in the background so spotify is my preferred way of watching but yeah just thank (38:51):
undefined

Josh: you all so much for the support and for sharing with your friends and just being (38:54):
undefined

Josh: here for every episode as we travel along the journey and reach all-time highs (38:57):
undefined

Josh: across the board particularly in stocks this week so big earnings season coming (39:01):
undefined

Josh: up i'm sure we'll get into some of that next week but that's been another great (39:05):
undefined

Josh: week on limitless and thank you all for watching as always we'll see you guys next week. (39:08):
undefined
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.

Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

Š 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.