Did the United States End Colonization? - Review Part 1 - NYPTALKSHOW Podcast

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
SPEAKER_01 (00:12):
What's going on, everybody out there?
It's Ron Brown, LMT, thePeople's Fitness Professional,
aka Soul Brother Number OneReporting for Duty.
And this is uh another episodeof NYP Talk Show.
We got Civil Letter in theBuilding, Abdullah, and Yasra
Yes Real.

(00:32):
Tonight we're going to reviewthe uh podcast that we did with
these brothers prior, based onthe United States in
colonialization.
So here's a review.
Before we go into the review,I'm going to run this commercial
and we'll go right into it.

SPEAKER_00 (00:49):
Peace family.
Welcome to NYP Talk Show.
This is more than a podcast.
It's a conscious platform rootedin truth and culture from the 5%
nation, nation of Islam, Moorishmovement, and Masonry.
Our mission is to reclaim ournarrative and uplift the African
diaspora with real stories andreal conversations.

(01:13):
Support us through Super Chatsduring live shows.
Donations on Cash App, GoFundMe,Patreon, or Buzz Sprout.
And by refing our officialmerch, available on our website
and right here on YouTube'smerch shelf.
Every dollar, every super chat,every hoodie builds the

(01:33):
movement.
This is NYP Talk Show.

SPEAKER_01 (01:38):
All right, we're back, we're back, we're back.
Did the United States endcolonialization?
We're going right into thereview.
I'm going to put the slide upright now, and you brothers can
take it, take it away.
All right.

SPEAKER_06 (01:53):
Peace, everyone.
Peace.
Peace.
So the title for today'spresentation is a review of Did
the United States EndColonization?
First, we have this flyer.

(02:14):
Present the 15th annual.
Presents the 15th annual.

(02:38):
Keynote speaker, Dr.
Jesse Fields, Dancers, Drummers,Music, Spoken Words, Special
Guests.
Please donate at PayPal.
C-O-B-I-N-C 216 at A O L dotcom.

(02:58):
HTTPS GoFundMe.
Gofund.me slash 942576 C D D umwhat's this?
Nagu Nguzo Saba.

SPEAKER_03 (03:16):
Saba.
Yeah.

SPEAKER_06 (03:18):
The seven principles.
I'm trying to rub out in thisfucking screen.
Meaning unity.
Kuji Chagulia meaningself-determination.
Kuji Jagalia.

(03:38):
Ujima.
Collect meaning collective workand responsibility.
Ujama meaning cooperativeeconomics.
Nia meaning purpose.
Kumba meaning creativity.
And Imani, meaning faith.

(03:59):
Co-sponsors, Bahami Bahamian,American Association, Big Man in
Entertainment, Brothers inRecovery, Harlem Transformation
Project, Living Redemption, Manof Purpose, Peacemakers Project,
Harmony, Street CornerResources, TBS, New Directions,

(04:22):
You Can Change.
Vendors, call Brother ReggieMitchell at 646-633-7539.
And this event takes placeSaturday, December 27th, 2025,
2025, at St.

(04:43):
Charles Romeo Church at 211-West141, West 141st.
1009 from 12 to 4 p.m.
Um call 212-662-2878 or646-248-3353 for info in

(05:08):
association with the Knights ofPeter Clapp Claver.

SPEAKER_03 (05:13):
I'll be in the house, and then Rod said Ron
said that he'll be in the housetoo.
So I will be there uh vending uhRon uh uh Raheem Abdullah Bay.
Uh there'll be quite a fewconscious moors will be there in
the house, uh, you know,networking, building.
Uh Luisa Flores, she'll be inthe house.

(05:36):
She works with us.
So um I'm excited.
I I attended last year.
That was my for the first time.
I did Vinn.
And uh so I'm excited to um togo back to be so I just wanted
um Israel to put this up so wecan um let people know about the
event and that we'll that wewill be in the house.

(05:58):
Uh we go, we'll we'll dopictures or take pictures and
lives and everything.
So I'm excited.
All right, thank you, Ryan.
You're welcome.
Market this.

SPEAKER_01 (06:10):
Oh no, come on, man.
That's what this is for, man.
This platform is for everybody.
You want to promote whatever youwant to promote.
If you want to promote your youknow, whatever fezes, you're
selling fezes, you're sellingthis, you're selling that,
you're venting, you know, butyou're welcome.
You're welcome.

SPEAKER_03 (06:26):
All right, so I can you know tell you know what why
we'll actually put my books upthere next time, too.

SPEAKER_02 (06:31):
All right, yeah, you can yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_03 (06:33):
So we'll make slides for that.
Yeah, in fact, I got some forthat.

SPEAKER_01 (06:36):
Yeah, yeah, the slides and and what whatever you
have, you're vending.
So you're vending your books andall of that.
Yes, uh-huh.
Yeah, let's put all that upthere.
All right, so I'll get ittogether.

SPEAKER_06 (06:46):
Yeah, we'll definitely get those.

SPEAKER_03 (06:47):
Yeah, we get that.
Thank you, um, Israel.

SPEAKER_06 (06:49):
You're welcome.
All right, excuse me.
So let's get started.
Uh review.
Did the phrase in the UnitedStates, as used in a
geographical sense, come aboutthrough the various landbound
recession treaties withindigenous Moorish tribes,

(07:11):
wherein we agreed to transferour territorial sovereignty
rights to our lands to the newextension of colonial powers
called the United States?
Or did the phrase in the UnitedStates as used in a geographical
sense come about through thevarious landbound recession
treaties, whereby Great Britain,Spain, France, Russia, and the

(07:33):
United States of Mexicotransferred their territorial
sovereignty over our lands tothe new extension of colonial
powers called the United States?
The answer.
The phrase in the United States,as used in a geographical sense,
came about through the variousland boundary cession treaties,

(07:56):
wherein Great Britain, Spain,France, Russia, and the United
States of Mexico transferredtheir territorial sovereignty
over our Moorish lands to theUnited States.
Session treaties are land titlesin international law.
This is a continuation ofEuropean discovery, conquest,
subjugation, colonization of ourlands, and the continued

(08:18):
subjugation of our people.
Article 4, section three of theUnited States Constitution is
how our land is managed underthe authority of the United
States Congress.
So we're gonna get into uhsubsession treaties.
We're gonna read articles of uhtreaties, you know, uh so we can

(08:41):
uh view the same thing thatBrother Abdullah and I view in
order to make these conclusions,to come to our conclusion, to
make these statements, to makethese slides, you know, make
these claims.
So we're gonna review theevidence.
This is the 1762 definitive actof cession of Louisiana by the

(09:02):
King of France to the King ofSpain, and it's also known as
the 1762 Secret Treaty ofFontainebleau.
Uh Lewis, by the grace of God,King of France and Navarre, to
all to whom these presents shallcome, greeting.
Whereas our very dear andwell-beloved cousin, the Duke de

(09:24):
Choice, Peer of our Realm,Knight of Our Orders and of the
Golden Fleece, LieutenantGeneral of our Armies, Governor
of Touraine, Colonel General ofthe Swiss and Grissens,
Grandmaster and SuperintendentGeneral of the Post and Relays
of France, our Minister andSecretary of State for the
Departments of War, and Marineand the correspondence with the

(09:46):
courts of Madrid and Lisbon, didsign in our name with the
Marquise de Grimaldi, Knight ofOur Orders, Gentleman of the
Chamber, in exercise of our verydear and well-beloved brother
and cousin, the Catholic King,and his ambassador extraordinary
near us, a preliminaryconvention whereby, in order to

(10:07):
give to our said brother andcousin a new testimonial of our
tender friendship, of thestrongest interest which we take
in satisfying him and promotingthe welfare of his crown, of our
sincere desire to strengthen andrender indissoluble the bonds
which unite the French theFrench and Spanish nations.

(10:28):
We ceded to him entire andperpetual possession of all the
country known under the name ofLouisiana, together with New
Orleans and the island in whichthat city stands, which
convention had only been signedconditionally and subsparati by
the Marquise de Grimaldi.

(10:50):
And whereas our said brother andcousin, the Catholic King,
animated by the same sentimentstowards us, which we have
invinced on this occasion, hasagreed to the said session and
ratified the conditional acceptacceptation made by his said
ambassador, extraordinary, whichconvention and ratification are

(11:13):
here inserted word for word asfollows.

(12:11):
Whereas on the third day of thepresent month, the preliminaries
of a peace were signed betweenthe crown of Spain and France on
the one part, and those ofEngland and Portugal on the
other.
And the most Christian king madevery dear and well-beloved
cousin, pardon, and my very dearand well-beloved cousin, purely

(12:32):
from the nobleness of his heart,and the love and friendship in
which we live, thought proper todispose that the Marquis de
Grimaldi, my ambassadorextraordinary, near his royal
person, and the Duke de ChoiceChoice, his Minister of State,
should on the same day sign aconvention by which the crown of

(12:52):
France ceded immediately to thatof Spain, the country known by
the name of Louisiana, togetherwith New Orleans and the island
in which this that city stands,and by which said ambassador
agrees to the session, onlyconditionally subsperata,
subsperati, as he is notfurnished with orders to execute

(13:14):
it absolutely, the tenor ofwhich convention is the
following.
Proposes in consequence to actwith his Catholic Majesty at all
times and all circumstances, ina perfect uniformity of

(13:38):
principle, for the common gloryof their house and the
reciprocal interests of theirkingdoms.
With this view, his mostChristian Majesty being fully
sensible of the sacrifices madeby the Catholic King and
generously uniting him, unitedwith him for the restoration of

(14:00):
peace, desires on this occasionto give him a proof of the
strong interest which he takesin satisfying him and affording
advantages to his crown.
The most Christian King hasaccordingly authorized his
minister, the Duke de Choisul,to deliver up to the Marquis de
Grimaldi, the ambassador of theCatholic King, in the most

(14:23):
authentic form, an act wherebyhis most Christian Majesty cedes
in an entire possession, purelyand simply, without exception,
to his to his Catholic Majestyand his successors in
perpetuity, all the countryknown under the name of
Louisiana, as well as NewOrleans and the island in which

(14:43):
that place stands.
But as the Marquis de Grimaldiis not informed with sufficient
precision of the intentions ofhis Catholic Majesty, he has
thought proper only to acceptthe sad session conditionally
and subsperati until he receivesthe orders, until he receives
the orders expected by him fromthe king his master, which, if

(15:06):
conf confirmable, confirmconformable with the desires of
his most Christian majesty, ashe hopes they will be, will be
followed by the authentic act ofsession of the said country,
stipulating also the measuresand the time to be fixed by
common accord, by the evacuationof Louisiana and New Orleans, by

(15:27):
the subjects of his mostChristian Majesty, and for the
possession of the same by thoseof his Catholic Majesty.
In testimony whereof, we, therespective ministers, have
signed the present preliminaryconvention and have affixed to
it the seals of our arms.
Done at Fontainebleau on the 3rdof November 1762, the Duke de

(15:51):
Choice, the Marc de Grimalda,the Marquis de Grimalda,
Grimaldi.

SPEAKER_03 (15:58):
And this this type of study is needed.
You know, as we going throughthe even going through the
treaties, this type of study isneeded.
The chain of custody.
When you look at when you readuh treaty cases, when when

(16:22):
they're dealing with the casesummaries, case summaries of
treaty cases.
And when they're particularlydealing with sessions or a
transfer of land from one stateto another, though in the
treaties, in the beginning ofthe treaty summary, I mean a
case summary, they'll they'll gothrough the history of the the

(16:43):
chain of custody of thatparticular property.
Right.
It's called the chain, the chainof custody or chain of transfer,
variance of the of the power,and that's what we that's what
we're showing.
So so to so to the claim is uhdead to the United States, the

(17:04):
question, did the United Statesin colonization.
As Israel said, that we wantedpeople to look at how we draw
the conclusion.
So as people won't say Abdullahand Israel said, they don't need
to say that.
There's no need to say that.

(17:30):
So we want to we're gonnabecause this this type of study
is very important.
It has not a lot of consciousmorals because they don't know
it.
So they but we have we have tostep our game up.
We have to raise, we have toraise you know the standard.
It's too much, it's too much,so-and-so said.

(17:53):
So-and-so said that is weak.
That is weak.
We cannot continue with that.
We cannot pass that down to ourchildren.
That cannot be a legacy that wegive our children.
Cannot leave that legacy.
We cannot leave so-and-so saylegacy to our children.

(18:13):
We must teach our childrencritical thinking.
There's a book called Asking theRight Question: A Guide to
Critical Thinking.

SPEAKER_01 (18:20):
Yeah, I think we presented that on this.

SPEAKER_03 (18:22):
Yeah, we presented yes, yes.

SPEAKER_01 (18:25):
Yeah, a few episodes ago, like a while ago, actually,
right?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_03 (18:35):
Not not too long ago.

SPEAKER_06 (18:37):
Evidentiary standards, the misconception.

SPEAKER_03 (18:39):
Evidentiary standard, yeah, misconception.
That was about a month ago,yeah.

SPEAKER_02 (18:44):
Yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_01 (18:52):
Okay, so the chain of custody.
This is where we're so the chainof custody in 1760 62 Spain went
from France to Spain, right?
Listen, I'm telling you, thebrother uh uh Morel Smith L.

(19:14):
If you watch his video and youput this video together, and all
the videos that you you youyou've done here, yes, it'll all
tie the information together.
I think you and that brother,you two and that brother.

SPEAKER_03 (19:28):
No, we we won't look at it.
Yeah, we we we got this we andIsrael and I will check it out
that you now that you're sayingthat, yeah.
Because we might we if that'sthat the case, Ron, we might uh
we want to reach out to him,yeah, and we can do we can
collaborate.
Ourself, Israel, and we can allwe can collaborate.
I mean, you know, we we're opento doing that.

SPEAKER_06 (19:54):
All right, so we kind of got the concept of this.
I'll go to the next or to thequestion that he had.
So the question, you know, wejust read the Treaty of
Fontainebleau or the uh 1762definitive act of cession of
Louisiana by the King of Spain.
Um, so did France return theconquered and colonized land to

(20:14):
the indigenous people of thesaid land through this treaty,
or did France continue to keepthe conquered lands under
colonial occupation by ceding itto Spain in this treaty?
And the answer would be Francecontinued to keep the conquered
land under colonial occupationsby ceding it to Spain, as we all

(20:36):
read or view by uh in thistreaty, in the 1762 Treaty of
Pontaine Blue.

SPEAKER_03 (21:25):
So the status of the land never changed.
It there still remained Franceconquered, Spain didn't conquer,
Spain did not conquer, so Franceacquired the land through
conquest.
Spain acquired the land throughcession treaty, meaning transfer

(21:49):
of the land through a legalinstrument, i.e.
treaty.
But Spain's France acquired itthrough conquest.
Spain acquired it from Francethrough cession.
So Spain is not the conqueror ofthe land.
That that Louisiana territory,Spain is not the conqueror,

(22:11):
Spain, uh, France is, and Franceis the one under King Louis XIV
authority.

unknown (22:17):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_03 (22:18):
Spain, France is the one that surveyed France created
the survey map, not Spain's.
Spain didn't create those thesurvey map.
Spain, France created the surveymap.
Spain, which is the title, thetitle for the title for France,
um conquest title for France isthe survey map.

(22:42):
So France transfers now thetitle for Spain is the treaty.
That treat, the treaty we justread, the Fonte Balou treaty is
the title for Spain.
Along with that, so the surveymap, the boundaries are already
set by France, artificialboundaries of the conquest.

(23:07):
So France, so now Spain acquiredterritorial sovereignty through
the through the treaty,Fontabilou.
So on the she was showing thatshe explains explaining the
chain of chain of custody.
That the land, the status of theland is still conquered to this

(23:28):
day, as of today, to uh November26th, November 26, 2025, at 723
Eastern Standard Time.
The land is still conqueredland.
It's in the hands of the UnitedStates now.
The status of the land neverchanged, it's still conquered

(23:50):
land.
Abdullah.
What would we what will removeit from being conquered land?
United States now has to what?
Turn it over to the initial thenative people.

SPEAKER_06 (24:04):
This first part would have to take place.

SPEAKER_03 (24:06):
Yeah, it has to, yeah, other than that, it's
still conquer land.
I mean the United States ain'tthe native people.
The signers of the the uhdeclaration of independence, the
articles of confederation, theuh uh the uh the Northwest

(24:26):
Ordinance of 1787, United StatesConstitution are not the native
autochthonous Aboriginal,original people of the land.

SPEAKER_01 (24:38):
Right.
Okay, so what you're sayingright now is that you the United
States now own that?

SPEAKER_03 (24:47):
And not not um the pop use the proper term,
international term.
We're gonna use theinternational term.
United States has territorialsovereignty.
Has territorial sovereignty,sovereignty through treaty.
Territory.
So territories, the UnitedStates has territorial
sovereignty over the landsthrough the treaty.

(25:07):
Yes, that's the that's the termand international law,
territorial sovereignty.
What that means is the UnitedStates has control over the
defined territory as well as theinhabitants, yeah.
Full control, yeah.
Yeah, full control over thedefined territory as well as the
inhabitants.
That includes us.
They have control over us, yeah.

(25:30):
So United States didn't conquer.
United States is not aconqueror, France is, Spain is,
Great Britain, the Dutch,they're conquerors.
United States is in possessionof stolen land, or it was
transferred into the hands ofthe United States, territory

(25:52):
sovereignty through treaties.

SPEAKER_01 (25:54):
So the brother said, uh, so Spain and Portugal came
first, but France was the firstto survey the land?

SPEAKER_03 (26:01):
No, no, that that portion of the land.
That portion of the land, notall that portion.
Spain had what is now known asthe West Coast.
When Spain conquered the WestCoast, California, Arizona,
Nevada, New Mexico, Utah,Colorado.

(26:24):
That's that was that's NewSpain.
That Spain conquered that.
France had the Louisianaterritory and Canada.

SPEAKER_06 (26:34):
So Spain, yeah, Spain uh surveyed the land.
Yes, for their, you know, fortheir claim.

SPEAKER_03 (26:41):
Yes, for their claim.

SPEAKER_06 (26:43):
Portugal surveyed the land for their claim.
France would survey the land fortheir claim.

SPEAKER_03 (26:47):
And then the Dutch surveyed the land.
The Dutch surveyed the land fortheir claim, and then Great
Britain took over.
Great Britain took over the the1664 when Great Britain defeated
the Dutch.
So that New York, Harlem.
That's that's a Dutch word.
When it was Amsterdam, NewAmsterdam, Harlem, Harlem is a
Dutch word.

SPEAKER_06 (27:07):
Dutch, yeah.

SPEAKER_03 (27:08):
Yeah, New Amsterdam.
So New Amsterdam was changed toYork.
York, New York, Duke of York.
That's the Duke of York.
That's Duke of York is um nowwith King James II.
King James II is Duke of York.
Wait, was Duke of York when hiswhen his father, when his

(27:30):
brother died in 1682, the Dukeof York, King James, that's the
James II ascended to the throneas King James II in 1682.
Of England.
Of England, yes.

(27:57):
That this is the United States,the very claim that they're
making the claim, that this isthe United States.
The maps, 2025 map.
What is their claim based then?
We're showing that.
We're talking today.
This is the basis of their claimthat this is the United States.

(28:30):
We could talk to it, no matterwho they are, because this is
the basis of their claim.

SPEAKER_06 (28:41):
Yeah, similar to similar to uh to a deed to a
house.
Once that deed is transferred,you know, one of the things.

SPEAKER_02 (28:48):
Yeah, same thing.
Chain of custody.
Exactly, chain of custody.

SPEAKER_06 (28:53):
Name the house what they want to name it.

SPEAKER_03 (28:57):
And you go back and use it what they call the title
search, title search, and itshows you, you know, a hundred
years, you know, it's beentransfers exactly through title
search.

SPEAKER_02 (29:11):
Same, same, same concept.
Yeah.

SPEAKER_03 (29:17):
Remember, the people aren't people the the that
includes the Europeans, are notand are not groomed to think
this way because they're groomedcolonization no more.
Colonization ended.
When Great Britain, when theUnited States defeated Great
Britain, no more colonization,colonization is no more.
United States is, you know,yeah, this great country, United

(29:38):
States, colonization isn't allover.
Colonization ended in 17 when inthe revolutionary war,
colonization ended.

SPEAKER_06 (29:45):
When they stopped calling themselves colonies,
yeah.

SPEAKER_03 (29:47):
That's the thing because they stopped using that
word.
Right.
Exactly.
Yeah, you don't go by that.
You go by what we what we're howwe're presenting it.

SPEAKER_06 (29:58):
The elements, the principles.

SPEAKER_03 (30:05):
And that and that's deliberate, though.
This the way how we're teachingthis, it's deliberate because
they don't want people to havethis this this concept that
we're presenting.
And then another thing point Iwant to make in uh I want to say
to you, Ron, I want I wanted tosay at this beginning, is that

(30:27):
there this is a this is aservice to the people.
People conscious that all right,that's conscious more,
unconscious more as Europeans.
They only, some people onlyonly, there's some that's
includes Europeans.
Conscious and unconscious more.
They only see offering serviceto the people as giving them

(30:48):
food.
But this is a service.
Educating people is a service.
You're providing a service, Ron.
We be clear.
Only like because you ain'tgiving out food.
This is food.

(31:10):
This is mental food.
This is a service.
You're providing services.
This is services.
Education is a service.
And then you know what I mean.

SPEAKER_04 (31:24):
No, no, we don't accept they don't know what I
mean.
Education is a service.

SPEAKER_03 (31:31):
Meaning, you mean I'm putting this on equal
footing and people giving theirfood.
I'm putting this on equalfooting and that to that.

SPEAKER_01 (31:42):
We got a creator of boundaries universe.
Thank you for the two dollars.
Much appreciated.
Any any anything given to us, wewe appreciate it.
Absolutely.
A dollar to 20 cents.
It doesn't matter.
Just, you know, your eyes, yourears, whatever.
The brother said uh fraudulentconveyance of title or deed.

(32:05):
Okay.

SPEAKER_03 (32:07):
I guess he's talking about uh this is not a I mean,
what um what that's not a thisis not a fraudulent conveyance
of title or deed.

unknown (32:15):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 (32:17):
That's not I don't think that's going on right now,
brother.

SPEAKER_03 (32:20):
Yeah, yeah.
I'm trying to because he putthat up there for I'm trying for
some reason, but this is not afraudulent fraud.
No, no, I'm saying that we'retalking about conquest now.
This is not it's conquest, butit's not a it wouldn't be all
right, meaning that for fromfrom France to Spain, it's not a

(32:44):
fraud and conveyance of title ofdeed.

SPEAKER_01 (32:47):
Now I want to ask you this.
I want to okay, so let me goahead.
France and Spain, how was the uhUnited States able to acquire
territorial sovereignty of thatarea?
Was it done through paperwork?
Was it done through a deal?

SPEAKER_03 (33:04):
The Louisiana Purchase Treaty, Louisiana
Purchase Treaty, 1803, yes,session treaties, those types of
treaties, session treaties.
Yeah, session treaties, thesession, transfer of one
transfer of land uh from onestate to another, session.
And those treaties become thetitles.
Treaties become title.
That's not a fraudulentconveyance of title, not from

(33:24):
one, not from one to them.
It's still it's conquest, butfrom France to the United States
is not a fraudulent conveyanceof title.
That transfer is not afraudulent conveyance of title
from United States from Franceto the United States.
Now, if he's talking theconquest, yes, we explained

(33:45):
that.
We explained that it's conquestthat France conquered.
We explained all that, but wewill make it clear that the
transfer from France to Spain isnot a fraudulent conveyance of
um conveyance of title or deed.
Right.
We'll make that very clear.

SPEAKER_01 (34:04):
Okay.
Now, uh this says, can you speakbriefly on the United States
versus the corporate UnitedStates, the relationship, the
difference, the significance orlack thereof?
All right.
Let me yes, yes.

SPEAKER_03 (34:21):
Um Israel, we're gonna have to do something, a
presentation, because the theconcepts, they don't have their
concept, proper concepts.

SPEAKER_01 (34:30):
Uh can could we could do it on that?

SPEAKER_03 (34:33):
Yeah, we're gonna, yeah.
I'm gonna give about a minute ortwo discussion, and then we'll
do a whole presentation on it.

unknown (34:38):
Okay.

SPEAKER_03 (34:39):
It's not you know, we'll do a whole presentation on
this.
All right.
What they're calling, that's so1871.
This is where he's going.
1871, 1913, uh Delaware, uh uhFlorida, you know.

(35:01):
All right, so an act ofCongress, the act of Congress of
1871.
So you say corporate UnitedStates.
Congress is a creature of theConstitution.
Clear on that.
So Congress was drafted in the1787, yeah.

(35:25):
Congress was drafted in theConstitution.
For the government, yeah.
Yes, and that it's a creature ofthe Constitution.
Any legislation, a a thecorporate United States, 1871,
is a creature of Congress.

(35:47):
The Constitution does not giveCongress the power to delegate
United States legislative power,United States judicial power,
United States executive power,Article I, Section One of the
United States Constitution.

(36:09):
That's United States legislativepower shall be vested.
United States legislative powershall be vested.
BES, they don't know where theword vested.
That's the key is they don'tknow the word vested.
BES, the key is understandingthe word vested.
That means fixed.
Not invested, vested.
It means fixed, fixed.

(36:33):
So Congress cannot createanother United States and
transfers that vested power thatlies with that's that lies
within the United StatesCongress.

(36:54):
The Article 2 section is not allthat.
It's not all that.
They don't know the principles.
That's all.
Ron, what I'm saying ain't allthat.
They don't understandprinciples.
They're not grounded inprinciples.
I'm not saying anything'scomplicated.

SPEAKER_06 (37:14):
I didn't comprehend it until I started comprehending
the principles.

SPEAKER_03 (37:18):
Tell them, Israel.
Yeah, that's how you got it.
Yeah, foundation.

SPEAKER_01 (37:24):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_03 (37:25):
Thank you.
That's the found that's thefoundation.
They don't, they're not groundedin the foundation, Ron.
It ain't hard.
They ain't stupid.
They ain't dumb.
They ain't slow.
They have been taughtmisconceptions, and they have
not been grounded in thefoundation.
That's all.
They can learn it like that.

(37:47):
They can learn it like that.
Focus on the foundation.
So we the word is vested.
It means fixed, inherited.
So you have the Article 2,Section 1 of the United States
Constitution.
The executive power of theUnited States executive power

(38:10):
shall be vested in thepresidency of the United States
of America.
Article 3, section one.
The United States judicial powershall be vested in one Supreme
Court.
The word is vested.
That's the key word.
So I want to go to theConstitution in the highlight,
circle, red, whatever you needto do, the word vested.

(38:33):
That the most important word inArticle One, Section One,
Article One, Section, Article 2,Section 1, Article 3, the most
important word is vested.
If they understand vested, theygot it.

SPEAKER_06 (38:55):
Somebody put the definition of vested in the in
the comments.
They got it.
Just vested.

SPEAKER_03 (39:05):
Just focus on that vested.
You understand that you got it.
Because you know, byunderstanding that, vested, you
know that Congress cannotlegislate anything, nothing, and
then delegate that power becauseCongress is a creature of the
Constitution.

SPEAKER_04 (39:28):
I mean, that's it.
I just gave foundation.

SPEAKER_03 (39:31):
I don't even say anything else.
The key is foundation.
Once you go to the foundation,you kill everything else.
I killed it by going to thefoundation.
See how simple that is?
I'm showing them that ain't allthat.

(39:55):
They're reading all that becausethey don't have the found, they
don't, they don't understandprinciples.
Congress is a creature of theConstitution.
So those article, the the theact of Congress of 1871 is a

(40:16):
creature of the Cost, it's acreature of Congress.
I don't need to read it.
What I'm gonna read it for.
That const that United Statesain't got more power than the
United States than the thatwhich is in that we like, we the
people of the United States.
Here we go.
We the people of the UnitedStates.

(40:37):
All right, here we go.
Then the preamble, we the peopleof the United States, you got
United States there.
Article one, Article one,section one, you have the United
States there.
In the legislative of the UnitedStates, you have the United
States there.
Article two, section one, yougot the United States there.

(40:58):
Uh the uh the uh executive powerof the United States executive
power should be vested in thepresidency of the United States
of America.
You have the United Statesthere, United States of America.
You have uh Article III, theseletter things, judicial power
shall be invested in one SupremeCourt in the United States, you
got United States there.
So what so and the other UnitedStates don't have constitutional

(41:20):
authority.
You have you have the you haveUnited States in the Articles of
Confederation, United States ofAmerica, the style name should
be United States of America.
You have United States inArticle I of the 1783 Defending
the Peace Treaty, United States,all 13 in name.
Got United States there.
So you mean to tell me thatthese other United States that

(41:42):
created by Congress has moreauthority than that which is
vested, that's vested power?
Then you once you understandCongress.
Oh no.
Yeah, yeah, it's I don't carenothing about I don't care
nothing about those other UnitedStates.
Why should I care?
Why should you care?

(42:04):
You should care about the onethat has constitutional power,
authority.
That's the why y'all worryingabout these other United States
because y'all don't havefoundation.
That's why.
Shouldn't you want to be worriedabout the one that has
constitutional authority?

(42:27):
Huh?
Like, why would you worry aboutthe other United States?

SPEAKER_02 (42:33):
Who gives a crap?

SPEAKER_06 (42:34):
You're gonna worry about congressional authority.

SPEAKER_03 (42:46):
See, once you step off of that foundation, then you
can be had.
Once you don't, because youdon't have that, they don't have
foundation, um Israel.
Yeah, so they get they're caughtup with all the other stuff.
They can be, you can you cantell they can be easily misled.
You can tell.
They can be easily be misled,they can just say anything, they
can just say anything.

(43:13):
Yeah, and that's what theproblem is.
Yeah, we'll definitely uh zoomin on that.
Yeah, we'll zoom in on that,yeah.
But yeah, we can we we can moveon.
I just wanted to go straight tofoundation.
I don't I don't know why I wasthe teacher because it's the
only way.

SPEAKER_06 (43:34):
So uh so this is the 1763 Treaty of Paris between
France and Great Britain.
Article 4.
His most Christian Majestyrenounces all pretensions which
he has heretofore formed ormight have formed to Nova Scotia
or Acadia in all its parts andguarantees the whole of it and

(43:58):
and with all its dependencies tothe King of Great Britain.
Moreover, or moreover, his mostChristian Majesty cedes and
guarantees to his said BritannicMajesty in full right Canada
with all its dependencies, aswell as the island of Cape
Breton, and all the otherislands and coasts in the Gulf

(44:21):
and River of St.
Lawrence, and in general,everything that depends on the
said countries, lands, islands,and coasts, with the
sovereignty, property,possession, and all rights
acquired by treaty or otherwisewhich the most Christian king
and the crown of France have hadhave had till now over the said
countries, lands, islands,places, coasts, and their

(44:44):
inhabitants, so that the mostChristian king seeds cedes and
makes over the whole to the saidking and to the crown of Great
Britain, and that and that inthe most ample ample manner and
form, without restriction, andwithout any liberty to depart
from the said session andguarantee under any pretense or

(45:07):
to disturb Great Britain in thepossessions above mentioned.
His Britannic Majesty on hisside agrees to grant the liberty
of the Catholic religion to theinhabitants of Canada.
He will, in consequence, givethe most precise and most
effectual orders that his newRoman Catholic subjects may
profess the worship of theirreligion according to the rights

(45:29):
of the Roman church as far asthe laws of Great Britain
permit.
His Britannic Majesty fatheragrees that the French
inhabitants or others who havebeen subjects of the most
Christian king in Canada mayretire with all safety and
freedom wherever they shallthink proper, and may sell their

(45:50):
estates, provided it be to thesubjects of his Britannic
Majesty, and bring away theireffects as well as the prep
their persons without beingrestrained in their immigration
under their under any pretensewhatsoever, except that of debts
or of criminal prosecutions.

(46:15):
The term limited for thisimmigration shall be fixed to
the space of 18 months to becomputed from the day of the
exchange of the ratification ofthe present treaty.
Continuation, 1763, Treaty ofParis between France and Great

(46:35):
Britain, but this is Article 6.
So we just read Article 4.
Now we're reading Article 6 ofthe same treaty.
The King of Great Britain seizedthe islands of Saint Pierre and
Maculin, Maculin, in full rightto his most Christian Majesty to
serve as a shelter to the Frenchfishermen.
And his said most ChristianMajesty engages not to fortify

(46:57):
the said islands, to erect nobuildings upon them, but merely
for the conveniency of thefishery and to keep upon them a
guard of fifty men only for thepolice.
This is Article 7 of the sametreaty.
In order to re-establish peaceon solid and durable foundations
and to remove for forever allsubject of dispute with regard

(47:21):
to the limits of the British andFrench territories on the
continent of America, it isagreed that for the future, the
confines between the dominionsof his Britannic Majesty and
those of his most ChristianMajesty in that part of the
world shall be fixed irrevocablyby a line drawn along the middle
of the river Mississippi, fromits source to the river

(47:44):
Iberville, and from thence by aline drawn along the middle of
this river, and the lakesMarepis, Maurapas, and the
Pontchart Ponchartrin, thePonchartrain, Ponchartrain to
the sea.
And for this purpose, the mostChristian king sees in full

(48:05):
right and guarantees to hisBritannic Majesty the river and
port of the Mobile andeverything which he possesses or
ought to possess on the leftside of the river Mississippi,
except the town of New Orleansand the island in which it is
situated, which shall remain toFrance, provided that the
navigation of the riverMississippi shall be equally

(48:26):
free, as well to the subjects ofGreat Britain as to those of
France, and in its whole breadthand length, from its source to
the sea, and expressly that partwhich is between the said island
of New Orleans and the rightbank of that river, as well as
the passage both in and out ofits mouth.
It is farther stipulated thatthe vessels belonging to the
subjects of either nation shallnot be stopped, visited, or

(48:50):
subjected to any pay to thepayment of any duty whatsoever.
The stipulations asserted in thefourth article in favor of the
inhabitants of Canada shall alsotake place with regard to the
inhabitants of the countriesceded by this article.
Then we have Article 6, wherethe most Christian King cedes

(49:11):
and guarantees to his BritannicMajesty and for right the
islands of Grenada and theGrenadade Grenadines with the
same stipulations in favor ofthe inhabitants of this colony,
inserted in the fifth in thefourth article of for those of
Canada, and the part and thepartition of the islands called
neutral as is agreed and fixedso that the so that those of St.

(49:34):
Vincent, Dominico, and Tobagoshall remain in full right to
Great Britain, and that of St.
Lucia shall be delivered toFrance to enjoy the same
likewise in full right, and thehigh contracting parties
guarantee the partition sostipulated.
This is Article 10, same treaty,his Britannic Majesty shall

(49:57):
restore to France the island ofGori and the condition it was
and when it was in whenconquered, and his most
Christian Majesty cedes in fullright and guarantees to the King
of Great Britain the RiverSenegal with the forts and
factories of St.
Louis, Podor, and Galaam, andwith all the rights and
dependencies of the sad riverSenegal.

SPEAKER_01 (50:21):
Peace, y'all hear me?

SPEAKER_06 (50:23):
Yeah, okay.

SPEAKER_01 (50:25):
Yeah, uh my my internet just I don't know what
happened.
Oh man, just a just a lot ofpeople on my internet right now.
Anyway, go ahead.
My bad.
Sorry about that.

SPEAKER_06 (50:39):
Good.
So yeah, so this is article 20of the same treaty in
consequence of the restitutionstipulated in the.

SPEAKER_01 (50:46):
Oh, and I forgot to say, I just want to say this
real quick.
I got trolls in the chat who umjust want to troll because I
know what they're trollingabout.
You can't do nothing, man.
You're a hater.
Stop it.

(51:06):
You gotta stop, man.
You're not gonna stop.
You're not gonna stop me whatI'm doing.
You're a hater.
Keep it going.
Do your uh uh do keep going andkeep just keep trolling.
You can troll as long as youcan, as long as you want.
I'ma just keep blocking you.

(51:29):
You know, when you have a whenyou have when when when you have
a channel and when you're out inthe public, people will like
troll you and it's like come onnow.

SPEAKER_02 (51:43):
Yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_01 (51:45):
Come on now.

SPEAKER_03 (51:48):
They don't have anything to anything positive to
offer.
I mean, add value to what we'redoing.
I mean, like you tearing, whatare you tearing down for?
We trying to use we build it.

SPEAKER_06 (51:59):
Yeah, right.
Any claims, just use evidence tosupport your claims.

SPEAKER_01 (52:04):
That's you know please, please.
If you have if you have any, ifyou have any evidence to support
your claim, please put it upthere because uh my name is my
name Ron Brown is on theinternet like crazy.
I've been with the same peoplefor years, doing the same thing
for years.
So keep going, man, with that.

(52:25):
Come on, man.
What happens is people get uhstuff happens.
Yeah, hold on.
Yeah, I hold on.
Okay, okay.
Drop a link and I will post theinformation.
Post it right in the comments.
I don't even know why I'mentertaining this.
It doesn't even make sensebecause uh I know me and my

(52:49):
history, and everybody around meknow me and my history, so this
foolishness about being an agentis stupid.

SPEAKER_03 (52:58):
Yeah, you ain't no agent, brother.
You ain't no agent.
Hell with that.

SPEAKER_06 (53:01):
I don't think an agent's gonna let us present
this much uh information.
Hell no, hell no, leaving itdown like this in auto, no way,
no way, no way.

SPEAKER_03 (53:14):
We've been on this platform, we've been on this
platform since April of thisyear.

SPEAKER_06 (53:19):
We didn't make the information up, you know.

SPEAKER_03 (53:21):
Yeah, we've been Ron has opened his platform.
In fact, Ron reached out to mein the in March of this year.
He reached out to me and offeredthe platform.

SPEAKER_06 (53:30):
What you say in the last the last episode of do
leave said, bring the FBI on, wecan teach them, they can learn
something.

SPEAKER_03 (53:35):
Oh, yeah, yeah.
Oh, don't know.
They will learn, they don't knowthis.
Oh, they don't know this.
Oh, yeah, they're gonna learn.

SPEAKER_01 (53:42):
Yo, and whoever is that you you do the clowns, you
got nothing else better to do.
You don't have a life, you're aloser, you're a loser with the L
like this on your head.
Oh my god, woman, do somethingwith your life, you clown.
Uh yeah, my bad.

(54:03):
Go ahead, y'all.

SPEAKER_02 (54:04):
Sorry, yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_06 (54:07):
Okay, all right, back to the scheduled program.
Well, article 20 of the sametreaty, you know, 1763 Treaty of
Paris between France and GreatBritain.
Uh, in consequence of therestitution stipulated in the
preceding article, his CatholicMajesty cedes and guarantees in

(54:27):
full right to his BritannicMajesty, Florida, with St.
with Fort St.
Augustine and the Bay ofPensacola, as well as all that
Spain possesses on the continentof North America, to the east or
to the southeast of the RiverMississippi, and in general,
everything that depends on thesaid countries and lands with

(54:48):
the sovereignty, property,possessions, and all rights
acquired by treaties orotherwise, which the Catholic
King and the Crown of Spain havehad till now over the said
countries, lands, places, andtheir inhabitants, so that the
Catholic King cedes and makesover the whole to the said king
and to the crown of GreatBritain, and that in the most

(55:09):
ample manner and form.
His Britannic Majesty agrees onhis side to grant to the
inhabitants of the countriesabove seated the liberty of the
Catholic religion.
He will consequently give themost expressed and the most
effectual orders to his newRoman Catholic subjects, may
that his new Roman Catholicsubjects may profess the worship

(55:32):
of their religion according tothe rights of the Roman church
as far as the laws of GreatBritain permit.
His Britannic Majesty's fatheragrees that the Spanish
inhabitants or others who havebeen subjects of the Catholic
King in the said country mayretire with all safety and
freedom wherever they thinkproper, and may sell their
estates, provided it to beprovided it be to his Britannic

(55:56):
Majesty's subjects, and bringaway their effects as well as
their persons without beingrestrained in their immigration
under their pretense whatsoeverwhatsoever, except that of debts
or of criminal prosecutions, theterm limited for this
immigration being fixed to thespace of 18 months to be
computed from the day of theexchange of the ratifications of
the present treaty.

(56:17):
It is moreover, was it moreoverstipulated that his Catholic
Majesty should have power tocause all the effects that may
belong to him to be broughtaway, whether it be artillery or
other things?
So, question Did France andGreat Britain return conquered
and colonized land to theindigenous people of the said

(56:37):
land, or did France and GreatBritain continue to keep the
conquered lands under colonialoccupation by ceding and
retroceding lands to each otherin Articles 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, and
20, which is what we just what Ijust read, of the 1763 Treaty of
Paris between France and GreatBritain?
The answer is the second part.

(56:57):
France and Great Britaincontinue to keep the conquered
lands under colonial occupationby ceding and retroceding lands
to each other in Articles 4, 6,7, 9, 10, and 20 of the 1763
Treaty of Paris between Franceand Great Britain.
So we're reading in the treatiesthat like we're seeing it with

(57:18):
our own eyes that France, GreatBritain, you know, none of these
colonial powers ceded the landor retroceded uh ceded the land
back to the uh indigenouspeople.
They kept it amongst themselves.
1800 third treaty, uh, thirdtreaty of San Adefonso.

(57:41):
Article III, his CatholicMajesty promises and undertakes
on his part to retrocede to theFrench Republic six months after
the full and entire execution ofthe of the above conditions and
provisions regarding his royalhighness, the Duke of Parma, the
colony of province of Louisiana,with the same extent that it

(58:02):
that it now has in the hands ofSpain and that it had when
France possessed it, and such asit ought to be, according to the
treaty, subse subsequentlyconcluded between Spain and
other states.
So did Spain return theconquered and colonized land to
the indigenous people of thesaid land, or did Spain continue

(58:23):
to keep the conquered land undercolonial occupation by
retroceding it to France inArticle III of the 1800 third
Treaty of San and Defenso?
And the answer is the secondpart Spain continued to keep the
conquered land under colonialoccupation by retroceding it to
France in the Article III of the1800 Third Treaty, in the 1800,

(58:47):
the third treaty of SanEdifonso.
So this is 1783 definitive peacetreaty between Great Britain and
the United States.
Article one.
His Britannic Majestyacknowledges the said United
States, viz.

(59:07):
New Hampshire, Massachusetts,Bay, Rhode Island, and
Providence Plantations,Connecticut, New York, New
Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware,Maryland, Virginia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, andGeorgia to be free and
independent states that hetreats with them as such, and
for himself, his heirs, andsuccessors relinquishes all

(59:30):
claims to the governmentpropriety and territorial rights
of the same and every partthereof.

SPEAKER_04 (59:37):
And this is 1783.

SPEAKER_06 (59:40):
Yeah.
Continuation, this is Article 2of the same treaty, and that all
disputes which might arise infuture on the subject of the
boundaries, the boundaries ofthe said United States may be
prevented.
It is hereby agreed and declaredthat the following are and shall
be their boundaries, viz.

(01:00:02):
From the northwest angle of NovaScotia, viz.
that angle which is formed by aline drawn due north from the
source of St.
Croix River to the highlandsalong the said highlands, which
divided those rivers that emptythemselves into the river St.
Lawrence, from those which fallinto the Atlantic Ocean to the
northwesternmost head ofConnecticut River, thence down

(01:00:25):
along the middle of the river tothe 45th degree of north
latitude, from thence by a linedue west on said latitude until
it strikes the river Iroquois orKetterquit.
Along the middle of Said Riverinto Lake Ontario, through the
middle of Said Lake until itstrikes the communication by

(01:00:47):
water between the lake and LakeErie.
Then along the middle of saidcommunication into Lake Erie,
through the middle of said lakeuntil it arrives at water at the
water communication between thatlake and Lake Huron.
Thence along the middle of saidwater communication into the
Lake Huron, thence through themiddle of said lake to the water

(01:01:08):
communication between the lakeand Lake Superior, thence
through Lake Superior northward.

All Episodes

Did the United States End Colonization? - Review Part 1

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Are You A Charlotte?

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Did the United States End Colonization? - Review Part 1