Coup, Clinton trembles, Congressman Espaillat

On Tuesday night, Rich discusses Peter Schweizer's new book "The Invisible Coup," highlighting how immigration has been weaponized. Then, President Bill Clinton trembles during his responses to tough questions at the Epstein deposition. Plus, NY Congressman Adriano Espaillat joins the cacophony of Democrats spewing constitutionally illiterate arguments over a president's war powers.

Subscribe to "Rich Valdés This Is America" on iHeartRadio and follow @RichValdes on social media, Roku TV, and Rumble.

For branding partnerships, contact [e-mail].

RichValdes.com

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:05):
This is America with Rich Valdez, powered by poliitweek dot com.

Speaker 2 (00:10):
And Rich Valdees is with us former Christian Administration official.

Speaker 3 (00:12):
He worked for Chris Christie.

Speaker 4 (00:13):
You've been follow us each a lot of public service stuff.

Speaker 3 (00:15):
Rich Valdez, calm list now with the Washington Times, this
is America, Richiev.

Speaker 1 (00:20):
You're on the air with the Nation of the Nation
with America with your host, Rich Valdez.

Speaker 3 (00:27):
What's up, America. I am Rich Valdes Valdez with an
s at Rich Valdez on all of the social media.
You're liberty loving Latino amigo right here seventeen blocks away
from Madison Square Garden in New York City. It's a
blessing and an honor to be with you guys each
and every night. This is the Tuesday night edition of
the program, our late night national town hall Conversation, and
you're welcome to join us. Eight seven seven Valdes one,

(00:51):
eight seven seven Valdes one, and I want to jump in.
We got a lot to cover. Spain, Apana. Spain says
no planes here right the head of Spain. I think
he's the Prince. The Prince of Spain said no to
Ed Trompito that we cannot the United States cannot use
their air bases. Now they're apparently a NATO ally, but

(01:12):
they said no, no, no. So what did ed Trompito
do well, he said no, no, no, right back to them.
Watch this.

Speaker 5 (01:19):
Everybody was enthusiastic about in Germany, everybody, and Spain didn't
do it. And now Spain actually said that we can't
use their bases. And that's all right, we don't know.
We could use the basic we want. We could just
fly in and use it. Nobody's going to tell us
not to use it, but we don't have to. But
they were unfriendly, and so I told him we don't

(01:41):
want to. Spain has absolutely nothing that we need other
than great people. They have great people, but they don't
have great leadership. And as you know, they were the
only country that in NATO would not agree to go
up to five percent. I don't think they wouldn't agreed
to go up to anything. They wanted to keep it
at two percent, and they don't pay two So we

(02:01):
we're going to cut off well trade with Spain.

Speaker 3 (02:03):
We don't want anything to do with Spain. Moving right along,
the Iranians have selected I shouldn't say the Iranians, I
should say the IRGC, right, the Islamic Republic of Iran
and the Malas. They have elected a new Ayatola, the

(02:25):
son of the old Ayatola. I guess they were able
to get this done before the Supreme Council was able
to vote. That building and that meeting was leveled. Apparently
a bunch of those guys were killed, but they were
able to get this vote out. They selected the son
of the existing or the former Isatola mosh Taba and

(02:45):
more on him in a little bit. But listen to
this report from the Fox News channel about how they
leveled this building.

Speaker 6 (02:51):
Watch this, you're the scene of one of these cluster
munition impacts just outside of Tel Aviv. But I'm told
by a senior israel official that the Israelis just struck
the Supreme Council gathering where the Iranians were meeting to
choose a new Supreme leader. This is a significant development

(03:11):
and again speaks to the Israeli intelligence about this war.
They just targeted the meeting in Tihran where what's left
of the leadership was gathering to choose a new Supreme leader.
The Iranians are continuing their attacks against Israel. Right now,
we are in the community of Benebrock. It's a religious
community outside of Tel Aviv, and you can see where

(03:33):
the police and first responders.

Speaker 3 (03:36):
Bo Wait, there's more, Yes, Sedterman, John Sedterman, Take three.
Senator John Fetterman, the Senator from the great state of Pennsylvania,
a Democrat. He says, I think that's good that we
leveled this building and we are now up to eighty
dead malas is what he said. Watch this. The top

(03:57):
fifty five of them were killed, and I think they
just blew up eighty of the random's moulays too, which
I mean that was pretty great actually, so all right, Senator.

Speaker 4 (04:09):
Administration officials concluded too.

Speaker 3 (04:12):
Plus there's been more video released, and we've been covering
this Clinton stuff pretty close as it's been available, with
a lot of good guests on both Congress and Mark
Harris waiting on this, Jennifer Kerr's waiting on this just
a couple of days ago. But President Bill Clinton, they
released a clip today where he apparently vindicates edit Trompita.
We're gonna do a little bit on that a little

(04:33):
bit later on towards the end of the show, as
well as the the you know other stuff that I
want to get to. I'm drawing a blank here because
I'm reading my notes. I got my notes right here
in front of me so that you can't see them,
but I can. But I want to get into this.
It's a question why we the United States kills the Ayahtola,

(04:59):
a Islamist fundamentalist dictator who's held Iran under oppression for
forty seven years. Forget about Iran for a moment, has
attacked the United States for that same amount of time.
I remember being a kid and hearing all about how
Iran was holding American hostages and finally let him go
the day that Reagan was you know, taken office, when

(05:23):
his first day in office. We've seen this happen with
Iran for so long, but guess what. Nobody cared, right,
nobody cared, Nobody did anything until right now. That editn't
beat those said you know what, now is the right time. Now.
Iran is not some weak enemy. They have a lot
of ability. Secretary Marco Rubio was giving some comments today

(05:44):
to the media and explaining, this is the weakest they've
ever been, and at their weakest, they're able to crank
out drone after drone after drone after drone. So it
makes sense to me that we should hit them while
they're down right.

Speaker 7 (06:00):
Listen, let me explain to you guys this in simple English. Okay.
Iran is run by lunatics, religious fanatic lunatics. They have
an ambition to have nuclear weapons. They intend to develop
those nuclear weapons behind a program of missiles and drones
and terrorism that the world will not be able to
touch them for fear of those things. And this is
the weakest they've ever been. Now is the time to

(06:20):
go after them. The President made the decision to go
after them. Take away their missiles, take away their navy,
take away their drones, take away their ability to make
those things so that they can never have a nuclear weapon.
That's why the President made this decision. It was the
right decision and the world will be a safer place
when these radical clerics, Nola of them have access to
these weapons.

Speaker 8 (06:38):
You see how they're using.

Speaker 7 (06:39):
Them now, Imagine how they would use them a year
from now they had more of these.

Speaker 3 (06:43):
But some think we should leave Iran alone, that somehow
killing the Iyatola was wrong. The Iotola gets killed, you've
got the Iranians celebrating in the streets, and you've got
Democrats in America protesting in the streets. Why similar to

(07:03):
Maludo being captured Nico las Maludo, another communist dictator, this
one in Venezuela. He gets arrested by the DEA in
an overseas mission taken out of his presidential palace Mitra Flores,
which translates to look at flowers. And again, the Venezuelans

(07:25):
are in the streets celebrating by and large, especially the
ones here stateside. And then like magic, Americans, Democrats protesting
even in the smaller cases, like the guy Kilmar Obrego Garcia.
He was an illegal immigrant that was charged with human

(07:48):
trafficking and beating his wife and was arrested for those
things and let go and never deported. Apparently this man
also was worth protesting in the streets for Democrats love them.
I don't understand what is it that benefits democrats. And again,
I don't want to beat up the Democrats per se.

(08:08):
If you're a Democrat and you're watching this, forgive me
in advance. But why are Democrats in Washington specifically so
fixated on standing up for people that are criminals? For
people that are dictators, for people that hate America. This
is why you've got people many that say the Democrat

(08:29):
Party hates the United States, that they hate America. It's
difficult to argue against that. It's difficult to you to
swallow that pill. If you're a blue collar Democrat, you know,
you're like, hey, look, I just I go to work
every day. I put my pants on one leg at
a time like everybody else. I love this country. But
I'm a Democrat. I would say, you got to look
in the mirror and you really got to examine yourself.

(08:50):
And you could say the same to me and say,
Rich come on, you're a Puerto Rican guy that is
a Trump supporter. You should look in the mirror and
realize what's going on. He threw bounty when he visited
the island that he did, and he had a pretty
pretty good jump shot too. At that. I'm not celebrating
anybody who is killing people, oppressing people, or anything like that.

(09:14):
Trump isn't doing those things. I'm celebrating America. We're in
our two hundred and fiftieth year here in America. On
this show, I like to talk about what's going on
in America. At night. If it happened in America during
the day, we're talking about it right here at night.
That's what this is America is about. Every single night,

(09:35):
That's what we do. But I always do it through
the lens of putting America first. I don't want to
see America last. Why would I? And that's a question
we need to ask. Why are we always in favor
of an open border? Why are we always in favor
of people who hate our country being allowed to be
in our country? And the bigger question becomes, is that

(09:59):
part of a bigger plan? Right? Will we see people
that hate this country lose their ability to be here? Now?
We saw a little bit of that with Macmood Khalil,
the thirty sei year old student from Columbia University that

(10:20):
ignited this whole He plotted this whole riot. Somebody who's
held hostage during that riode a Dominican guy. He's the
janitor at Columbia University. He was held hostage. He wasn't
allowed to leave. Yet they say this is peaceful protest.
It's not peaceful protest. What do you want me to do, lie,
I'm here to tell you the truth, then to tell
you how I see it, and the way I see it,

(10:42):
this was messed up. Yet Democrats can't seem to get
out of their way to cheer on the bad guys.
So now we've got Cuba in our sits, the United
States looking to liberate yet one more another dictatorial regime,
Marxist communist regime. If Cuba falls and they become free
to choose their next lead, no longer under the oppressive thumb,

(11:02):
the oppressive grip of the Marxist regime that controls Cuba,
are we to believe that the Democrats are going to
be in the streets complaining yet again, I'm gonna have
to say they probably will be, and it's a shame
and it brings a question this topic. Chegawabata, all right,
chego Abada was Fidel's right hand man, chief propagandist, a physician,

(11:22):
a motorcycle rider, so many things. It's that security. And
one of the things that is famous for today is
wearing his beret and being on the t shirt of
so many young people that are ignorant. But every now
and again you got a young person that's not so ignorant,
like one that I got at the local. Well, they
guy here not too long ago, and I asked him.
I said, oh, you're a big fan of Chay and
he said yeah, especially in his younger days, not so

(11:44):
much his political stuff, but definitely his motorcycle days. And
I thought to myself, what a croc. This kid probably
watched some documentary, thought it was cool to see this
guy being a rebel and decides, Hey, I like this guy. Now,
all right, no problem. So I didn't take debate. You know,
I didn't want to get into an argument. I just
wanted to hear what he had to say. I heard it,

(12:05):
and I went on, I'm not here to debate everybody,
especially if I'm not getting paid to have these debates.
But it left this impression upon me. Why why do
we fall into these woes? Why do we have these problems?
Why do we have these this angst, this bitterness towards
the United States, where if you are pro America, if
you're a patriot, somehow you're seen as a bende, patria

(12:28):
boot liquor you're the bad guy. Why I don't get it.
I really don't. So the question to me becomes, what
happens when you take the children of chele Vada and
they go to a meeting with the Mullahs in Iran.
Do they get along because one is an Islamo fascist
and the other one is a Cuban Marxist or do

(12:52):
they have conflict because of some other reason. Well, the
answer to that lies in our conversation with Peter Schweitzer.
Peter Schwitzer is the head of the Government Accountability Institute.
He's the author of the best seller that's coming out.
It's already I think it's already out, and you've got
to get a copy of it. He talks about how

(13:14):
immigration is being used as a coup on the United States.
We're going to talk about his book. We're going to
talk to Peter Schwitzer. He's joining us straight ahead. Plus
a little bit later, we're going to talk about Bill Clinton.
Apparently he said a lot of things in these depositions,
and the House Oversight Committee is releasing some of those clips.
We'll be talking about that, as we have in the

(13:35):
recent days. So keep it locked right here, don't go anywhere.
I'm Rich Valdez plus your calls and more. If there's
any coming in, I'm happy to take him. Eight seven
seven Valdez one eight seven seven Valdest one don't move
a muscle.

Speaker 1 (13:47):
This is America.

Speaker 3 (14:06):
What's up America. Welcome back, Rich Valdek keeping your company tonight.
And I want to get into this stuff that I
was telling you about. But well, one of my fasites,
the Government Accountability Institute New York Times number one best
selling author. You would have writen these books since forever.
He knows where the bodies you're buried, and he's telling
us all about it. I mean, this one, he's got
this whole thing figured out. This one's called the Invisible Coup.

(14:29):
Our guest, Peter Schweizer, Welcome sir.

Speaker 2 (14:32):
Great to be with your riches always. Thanks for having
me brother.

Speaker 3 (14:34):
You bet brother. Always good to hear from you, and
you know you. And I don't want to mean to
put down anybody that's a book author out there, but
when you drop a book, I mean, you come with
so many receipts. This is not just allegations, This is
not just political. You guys over at Hoover are really
digging in deep and doing your thing. Talk to us
about this and how you guys are exposing not only
just the weaponization of foreign immigration, but everything else that

(14:57):
falls into it.

Speaker 2 (14:59):
Yeah, I mean, and the fortunate thing is I love
to research more than I love to write or do interviews.
So I'm a digger and we've got a team of
researchers here that are the same mindset, and that is
follow the money, follow the facts. And we operate in
an environment today where the problem is not too little information,
it's too much information. It's trying to separate the whek
from the chaff, and it's trying to figure out how

(15:21):
the dots might be connected. So we spend a lot
of time doing that. And what I've always tried to
do is, you know, use information that can be replicated.
So you can go to my books, you can go
to our reports, and you can see what we're saying.
If you don't believe the fact, you can go find it.
It's going to come from an authoritative source. It's not
an anonymous source. It's not some you know, shaky blog

(15:43):
post or whatever. It's something real and factual, and that
is what we pride ourselves on. And I think the
Invisible Coup fits into that genre quite well.

Speaker 3 (15:53):
Yeah, listen, I agree one hundred percent. And you know,
I think I think the needle has moved, at least
in in our public discourse where a few years back
you might have said, and I'll take this as a
step further me. Not you people were saying, there's anominalies
and elections. No, but they don't cheat. No, we legal
immigrants aren't voting. No, no, none of that. Right for
apportionment and congressional all that, none of that, None of

(16:16):
that was happening. Now I think people are hip to
the fact that, yeah, not only is that happening or
at least a catalyst for some of this, but we
really have seen governments and the cartel's weaponized immigration for
their benefit and our detriment.

Speaker 2 (16:32):
Yeah, no, that's exactly right. I mean there are a
lot of foreign actors that are doing this. I focus
on the government of Mexico, the government of China, and
the Muslim Brotherhood, and then they have domestic advocates who
are supporting them. The domestic people may not support the
complete agenda of the Chinese Communist Party or the Mexican
government or the Muslim Brotherhood, but they see the political

(16:55):
advantage of mass migration. And what's I think important for
us to understand. We need to start viewing immigration the
way that these people do, rather than the way we
think it's actually being conducted. So in the case of Mexico,
for example, they tell us exactly what their view is
of mass migration and why they're doing it. Rich let
me just read, if I could, a couple of quotes

(17:16):
real quick. First one is from a Mexican senator, Felix Salgado.
He's with a Morena Party, the ruling party. He sits
on the National Defense Committee, which is the most powerful
committee in the Mexican Senate. He said this just a
couple of years ago. Quote, Mexicans are in our territory California, Nevada, Texas, Utah,

(17:37):
New Mexico, Arizona, Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, and Wyoming. We're going
to take back the territory that was stolen from us.
And I could literally read dozens of quotes from senior
Mexican officials saying the same thing. And when you first
read this, you think this is crazy. What planet are
they coming from? And yet when you look at the

(17:58):
political infrastrutured that the Marina Party, the left wing party
in Mexico, the ruling party has set up in the
United States, you realize know they're serious about this. So
I briefed people in Washington, d C. And the Senate,
in the White House and elsewhere, and they didn't even
know the fact that right now in the United States
there are more than a dozen senior Mexican officials who

(18:20):
live here who serve in the Mexican Senate and serve
in the Mexican Parliament, and their job is to represent
Mexicans living in the United States before the Mexican government.
This is a massive intrusion into our sovereignty. And by
the way, these political representatives that are living here, they're
organizing anti ice protests, They're getting involved in American political

(18:43):
elections to help open border Democrats to win. So they
are already exerting their sovereignty in the United States in
a very very tangible way, and they tell us what
their goals are. Same thing with the Chinese Communist Party,
same thing with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Speaker 3 (18:59):
Well let's go on this one first before we move
on to the other two, because this one was fascinating
because you know what, I never looked at it from
that perspective. I know not so much about Mexican government officials,
but I know that there are people from Dominican Republic,
for example. I know somebody who's running for president of
Dominican Republic, and he came to me, he said, I
want to go on your show. And I said, why,
how's that going to help you? You know, I reached

(19:20):
a lot of people in America, for sure, and he said, no, no, no,
I have to campaign in the United States because Dominican
citizens can vote at their local embassy or consulate. And
we campaigned actively in the States where there's large communities.
And I was like, oh, okay, you know, kind of
in one ear or not the other, because the Dominican
Republic isn't trying to supplant the United States. However, what

(19:43):
you're talking about. You brought up these anti ice protests.
That was one of the first things I saw is that, yeah,
there were a lot of white liberal karens for lack
of a better word, but there were also a lot
of Hispanics there that said, hey, this was once Mexican
and we want our land back. That to me is
way more problematic than any liberal with a PhD that's
talking crazy, because there's that real connection of saying, hey,

(20:06):
we are representing another country, right, not just criticizing this country,
representing another country, and I think that's hugely problematic. So
when you're having these briefings, what's the response you're getting.

Speaker 2 (20:20):
I think there's a lot of surprise, you know. I
shared the fact that not only does the Mexican government
have these political figures that live in the United States
or are engaging these behaviors, Mexico has a huge network of
consulates in our country. They have fifty three consuls, they
have four just in the state of Arizona. And these
consulates are also getting involved in American politics. They didn't

(20:44):
realize this was going on. And again it starts to
make sense when you consider their mindset. Their mindset is
and the words they use. They view Mexican immigrants in
the United States as a strategic asset for the Mexican
government and by the way, rich what they do is
they ridicule and they attack migrants that come from Mexico

(21:06):
to the United States who want to embrace American values,
want to learn the language, want to become hard working Americans.
They ridicule them, they call them traders to Mexico. They
say Shinbaum agrees with them. They put social pressure on them.
So this is not just sort of a series of
random events. It is an effort to weaponize immigration, and

(21:28):
we need to start understanding this before we can have
the debate about what level of legal immigration we want
in this country. I happen to like immigration, my parents
came here. I think we should have legal immigration, and
I think we should have that debate. But before we
figure that out, we've got to deal with this weaponization
of immigration and deal with it first before we can

(21:49):
figure out what level of legal immigration we want to have.

Speaker 3 (21:53):
I think it was wrong with Peter Schweitzer, New York
Times number one best selling author and his new book.
He's talking about the Visible Coup of brand new book
he's written. Make sure you get a copy, make sure
you get pre order, get one for yourself, get one
for somebody that you want to give this to as
a gift. Now, just one more follow up on that.
Is there a possibility that this is truly not some

(22:14):
massive act to take back New Mexico, California, Arizona and
places like that, But it's more so a ruse just
to keep things the way they are, so that they
have this pipeline of selling people, selling drugs, selling whatever
they want. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (22:30):
Well, I certainly think the cartels are joined at the
hip with the current government, and I talk about that
in the book. The chief of Police and the new
Mexican National Police is somebody that is known to be
try tied to the cartels, and he's close to Shinbaum.
So I think the cartels play a huge role here.
I don't know in their heart of hearts, deep down,

(22:50):
when these officials make this statement, we're retaking it. I
don't know what they mean. But what I do know
is that they clearly see themselves as playing a major
political role in the United States to influence our politics.
One of the things I reported on the book was
that in May of twenty twenty four, we got a
hold of the transcripts of a meeting that was held

(23:12):
at the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Mexican Consulate, and they brought
together consular officials from Los Angeles to Orlando, everybody in between,
and there were also Democratic Party political activists there. And
when you look at the transcript, what is it. What
they're saying is we helped turn California from red to blue.
We turned Arizona from red to blue. We need to

(23:34):
turn other states from red to blue so Trump can't win.
So the point is whether they actually physically believe that
they're going to retake California, or whether they simply are
talking about exerting sovereignty and some level of authority in
the United States. In my mind, ultimately it doesn't matter
because they are getting involved in our politics, they are

(23:55):
causing chaos on our streets. They would not tolerate it
from us, We should certainly not tolerate it from them.

Speaker 3 (24:01):
Yeah. Yeah, And I think you're right based just on
the rhetoric. This goes beyond traditional consular activities that you'd
find in an embassy or a consulate and way into
interfering in the sovereignty and political operation of another country. Now,
before we move on to the next topic, I wanted
to you mentioned two other groups in addition to the

(24:23):
Mexicans and their government, but you mentioned the Muslim Brotherhood
and China. Talk to me how each of those are
factored into this more unique problem of weaponized immigration.

Speaker 2 (24:35):
Yeah. A, China in particular is very sophisticated in the
way they approach it, and what they have done is
essentially on an industrial scale, weaponized and exploited birthright citizenship.
So birthright citizenship, of course, is the idea that if
your mother happens to be in the United States at
the time she gives birth, you are automatically granted US citizenship.

(24:58):
I didn't really think that that much about this issue
until I realize what China was doing and what China
has done at the best of the CCP, by the way,
they've written favorably about this in The People's Daily, their
official mouthpiece. They've created this vast birth tourism industry, and
birth tourism is essentially a company that you pay them

(25:20):
a fee and they arrange for your wife to travel
from China to come to the United States or to
a US territory like Saipan, so that you can give
birth here and your child will be granted citizenship at birth.
You are then flown back to China where the child
will be raised. So this child, when they're eighteen, they're

(25:41):
a US citizen, even though they've lived their entire life
in China, even though they are children of the elite,
even though they've lived grown up in a CCP system.
When they're eighteen, they're going to get to vote in
our elections. And then the question becomes, well, what's the
scale of this problem? Now? Our federal government doesn't track
this data, which is shocking to me. Birth certificates do

(26:01):
not list the nationalities of the parents of the child
that's being born. But the Chinese government and Chinese research
firms have looked at this and the numbers are eye popping.
They believe rich that over the last thirteen years, on average,
every single year, roughly one hundred thousand Chinese babies have

(26:23):
been born in the United States. So what that means
is we have more than a million quote unquote US
citizens that are being raised in China right now, and
that wave is going to start cresting in twenty twenty eight,
twenty thirty, and they're going to start voting in our elections.
So this is a massive, massive threat. They did China

(26:45):
did this for a while in Hong Kong. Hong Kong
got rid of birthrights citizenship because they saw this as
a Chinese subversion, so they ended it back in twenty ten.
But they are doing it here. They're doing it on
a massive scale, and we need to wake up to
the fact that they are doing this, they're exploiting it,
and they are going to use it as a tool
of subversion.

Speaker 3 (27:06):
Peter Schwitz are blowing the lid off of this stuff again,
stuff right in front of our faces, kind of like
these Confucius centers that have been here forever in a
day and oh, it's just culture. We're learning about China.
How nice. Or the secret CCP police stations that we
had in New York City. I saw that in New
York Post and I felt like a putts right, because
we're so non suspecting. We're just not as suspicious people.

(27:30):
And most Americans are like, hey, good for you. You
love America too, all right, you don't go ahead talk
your smack, right, that's what America is all about. I'm
definitely kind of happy, go lucky that way, and I
always appreciate the back and forth. And if you don't
agree with me, that's fine, we can still be friends.
But this is not We're not, you know, disagreeing in
being friends. This is you're trying to take my country.

(27:51):
You're trying to take it through the back door, through
the front door, right legally, which is absolutely wild. And me,
he goes, we' wrong with Peter Schweitzer, author of The
Invisible Coup, exposing foreign immigration and how it's been weaponized
by foreign governments. Thus far, we've talked about Mexico and China.
I want to dig into the Muslim brotherhood and how
they're doing it. I know, for obvious reasons, they've been

(28:12):
using immigration. They've grown their faith by and large historically
through immigration and conquest. Talk to us about how you've
positioned that in the book.

Speaker 2 (28:23):
Yeah, Rich, they view immigration as a weapon because in
their interpretation of the Qur'an, that is what Mohammad intended
immigration to be a weapon deployed against your enemies. And
their argument would be that's one of the reasons that
the faith expanded. So in the context of the United States,
certainly is partly a numbers game, but we don't have

(28:45):
the number of Muslims in the United States that they
have in Europe. But they still believe that they can
achieve political power and political success and transform American society
even with lower numbers. Part of that is politically. I
quote in the book from a conversation that some Islamis
leaders and Mullahs had in twenty twenty one where they said,

(29:07):
if we can get ten or eleven percent of the
population in a living in a given location, we can
elect political leaders that reflect our values. And that's exactly
what they did with Momdani in New York Muslim population
about ten to eleven percent of the population, and what
they described in that video, Rich was that, look, normal

(29:28):
Americans don't vote in primaries. So if we get our
people out in a primary, we can get our guy
in as one of the party nominees, and then we
can win the seat and we can use that political
power in a way that advances our interests. So that's
a big component of it. The other component of it
is their fight to prevent any assimilation by Muslims that

(29:50):
come to the United States. And again, let me just read,
if I could, a couple of plots to highlight this point.
The first one is from the da of Florida Care.
This is a counsel on American Islamic relations. You've talked
about them, Rich on your show. This was in a
speech in twenty twenty five. He says, quote, I mean,
why are we living here in the United States? Have

(30:12):
we ever asked ourselves this question? The only answer I
believe is excusable and justifiable, as if we are living
here to shift this country's political and spiritual direction together
engaging in spreading Islam. Or here's another quote, from one
of the members of the board of directors of CARE,
the national organization quote, Ultimately, we can never be full

(30:36):
citizens of this country, the United States, because there is
no way we can be fully committed to the institutions
of this country. We can only be citizens in the
sense that we try to influence American policy. So this
is how they view immigration. In other words, the goal
is not a civilation. And when they cry, you know,

(30:56):
racism and discrimination in Islamophobia, it's not because they want
Muslims to come here and embrace American values. It's using
those accusations as a weapon because their goal is to
maintain a radicalized Muslim population that they can control and
deploy against us. And as the Islamic leaders will say,

(31:17):
many of the Islamic leaders that are preaching at mosques
in the United States, by the way, are here on
religious visas. They're not from the United States. They were
not educated here, they were not trained here. They will say,
this is about civilizational warfare, this is about defeating the
United States. Those are their words, not mine. And I cannot,
for the life of me understand why we allow radicals

(31:41):
from Iran in some cases to come to the United States.
Having been educated in Iran to come here and preach
aggressively against the United States, against Jews, against our American
way of life, and that's okay because we allow them
to be here on these religion visas. Really ridiculous and
it's a clear cut example of how they weaponize immigration.

Speaker 3 (32:04):
Truly mind blowing. I mean, he goes again. Peter Schweitzer
is the head of the Government Accountability Institute, the author
of this book, The Invisible Coup. He's the New York
Times number one best selling author. And Peter Sweitzer, this
to me is egregious. But I got to tell you,
the guy from care here nothing but honest, right, he
told the truth. They stepped the way kind of like Mamdani.

(32:26):
So hey, at your own risk, beware you want to
be up in the hill, for lack of a better word,
that's on you, right, And it seems like many of
us are just like, okay, well, sure, go right ahead.
But for maybe President Trump and some people in his
administration that are taking this case to the Supreme Court,
this Fourteenth Amendment case, that might have a change on
some of that, but it's wild, that's wild.

Speaker 2 (32:47):
Go ahead, Yeah, you're right, I mean, they tell us this.
This is I think the thing that's truly inexcusable. We
don't have to speculate, we don't have to read between
the lions. They truly tell us this. I would also say,
by the way, there's this red green alliance, you know,
between progressives and Islamists in the United States. And I
would say to any exactly, I would say, to anybody
out there that has a progressive friend or is a progressive,

(33:10):
you should read some of the quotes in the books
from the Islamists what their plans are. They're explicit in
what they are going to do to progressives once they
have achieved their political objectives as Islamists. It's not good.

Speaker 3 (33:24):
Yeah, you know, I've heard this described as Islamo fascism,
but it really sounds like Islamo Marxism. It truly is
what we've seen with Stalin and so many others from
the Soviet Block through Eastern Europe. It's just wild to me,
how you know, when you look at it, it's like, wow,
it's right there today, happening right now, in real time.

(33:46):
Yet I think you think this is happening because of
our own lack of historical literacy or a lack of
patriotism and civic wherewithal I don't know where to place it.

Speaker 2 (33:59):
Yeah, yeah, no, I think it is. You know, look,
this progressive Islamist alliance is an alliance of convenience. I
kind of trace its origins at an official level to
a meeting in two thousand and seven when the adult
children of Chay Gavara, his son and his daughter who
live in Cuba, visited Tehran, Iran and had a meeting

(34:20):
with the Molas. And according to accounts of people that
were at the meeting, it didn't start out well rich
because they started discussing the existence of God, and the
communist chay Gavara children said God doesn't exist. Our father
didn't believe in God, and the Mola said, no, he
does exist in Allah loved Chay. So it got off
to a really rough start. But at the end of

(34:43):
the meeting they were there for a couple of days,
it ended on a positive note because what they came
to the conclusion was we disagree on some things, but
we agree on one thing, and that's that the United
States needs to be defeated and destroyed. That's the one
unifying principle, and that is really the access upon which
this entire alliance spins. So you know, look at at

(35:06):
you know, the Hitler Stalin Pact before Hitler turned on
Stalin in World War Two. There's no problem with people
that disagree on fundamental things working jointly when they view
common enemy, and the common enemy is the United States.
So that is why they work so effectively together. That's
why you see, you know, trans rights activists protesting next

(35:28):
to Islamis it's crazy to our Western eye, but it
makes sense when you realize the operational goals here.

Speaker 3 (35:36):
Peter Schwitzer, this is wild stuff, and I mean it's funny.
You would think that they'd be a match made in
heaven Chay meeting with the Malas. But you're right, this
is that one area where they don't agree on God
because the commedis hate God, that's for sure. So you've
done a brilliant job. I think of laying out the
problems and what is before us, what is a foot?

(35:58):
What is the solution? And there is that one.

Speaker 2 (36:02):
Yeah. I propose a lot of them in the last
chapter in the book, and I've shared those. I did
go the week before the book came out, I briefed
the President's Secretary Rubio and Secretary Besant in the Oval office.
We were there for fifty five minutes. I walked them
through the problems in some proposed solutions. One of those
I think resides with the Supreme Court on this birthright

(36:24):
citizenship case. I mean, if the Court is going to
come back and say you can't put any restrictions on
birthright citizenship, it's basically over. We might as well quit
and go up. If they're going to say that you
simply have to have a big toe across the Rio
Grande or across the Canadian border. If your mother has
her big toe across the board, you are now a

(36:44):
US citizen. We have lost control of the country. I
want to believe that the majority of justices are going
to acknowledge that the Constitution's not a suicide packed and
that there are restrictions that can be placed. And one
of those restrictions should be banning birth tourism and looking
away at which we can walk back some of these

(37:08):
million cases in China. So banning birthright citizenship I think
is a key component of this. I think we need
to ban dual citizenship. A lot of people in the
United States have dual citizenship. I understand sometimes it's a
practical matter, but I think we live in a world
where you don't want to have dual loyalties. I'm certainly

(37:28):
less worried about some countries than I am about others.
But the bottom lines, I think we should ban dual citizenship.
There's a series of other proposals. We should be shutting
down Mexican consulates. A lot of this stuff now is
done online. Migrants to the United States have phones just
like everyone else. We should not allow Mexico to have

(37:49):
these political networks in our country. So there's a series
of twelve policy initiatives that I prescribe. The key rich
is for us, I think begin in the beginning to
simply have the awareness of what is going on and
how they are weaponizing immigration in this way. And I'm
confident that the Trump administration and the half a dozen

(38:12):
people on Capitol Hill, including several senators and powerful members
of the House, will will be taking action on them.

Speaker 3 (38:20):
Outstanding. Now, Peter Schweitzer, I know the book comes out Monday.
Was this coming Monday or was it yesterday Monday?

Speaker 2 (38:26):
I actually came out a couple of weeks ago.

Speaker 3 (38:27):
Oh, perfect, Okay, So where do we get it? How
does everybody get the book?

Speaker 2 (38:31):
You should be able to pick it up Amazon, Barnes,
and Noble any bookstores. We debuted at number one of
the New York Times bestseller lists. You should be available everywhere.
And you can go to the invisiblecoud dot com website
and you can give us comments your thoughts on what
you read in the book.

Speaker 3 (38:48):
The Invisible Coup dot com. The Invisiblecoup dot com Peter Schwitzer.
That's amazing. Now if people want to, you know, get
your updates, sign up for your newsletter, Listen to the
drill Down. What do they do? How do they do it?

Speaker 2 (39:02):
Yeah, I've got a podcast called The drill Down. You
can go to the drill down dot com or you
can subscribe to it pretty much wherever podcasts are located.
You can also just google Government Accountability Institute. You can
see a lot of the research reports and the work
that we do. We're doing investigations all the time, and
we have a tip box there. Please nothing too crazy,

(39:22):
but if you have a tip an idea of something
that needs to be investigated, we do look at it
and we have acted on those tips from time to time.
So please let us know if there's something you think
we should be investigating.

Speaker 3 (39:33):
Outstanding Peter Schwitzer, I want to thank you for writing
this book. I keep my ear to the ground. I
do this stuff every day, and you brought a lot
of things to like for me. So I appreciate that,
and I think a lot of Americans are going to
appreciate this information as well. You are a gentleman, a scholar,
and a Patriots sir. Thank you.

Speaker 2 (39:48):
Great to be with you as always, Rich, Thanks for having.

Speaker 5 (39:50):
Me, brother.

Speaker 3 (39:51):
You bet we'll be right back. Outstanding Peter Schweitzer, You're
the man.

Speaker 5 (39:55):
Brother.

Speaker 1 (39:57):
This is America, This is America.

Speaker 3 (40:14):
He's making podcasting great again.

Speaker 1 (40:17):
This is America with Rich Valdez.

Speaker 3 (40:22):
All right, I mean he goes, welcome back from my Yeah,
Rich Valdez, keeping your company tonight on our program. You
know the number eight seven seven Valdez one. And I
may not have time to get into calls because I
do want to get into a bunch of things. Is
a lot on the agenda here, but I want to
talk about Bill Clinton. President Bill Clinton. President Bill Clinton
was under oath. He was answering questions lots of different

(40:44):
individuals asking him questions members of Congress and this Congressional
Committee that took place in Chappaquah and the House Overside
Committee releasing some of these videos, And one that I
found in particular to be very interesting was the one
where he is being asked about what Jeffrey Epstein meant

(41:05):
when he was on Jeffrey Epstein's airplane and Jeffrey Epstein said, oh,
President Clinton likes him young? What did that mean? And
I'm gonna let you listen to this clip and then
we're gonna talk about it.

Speaker 4 (41:18):
Watch this like them young?

Speaker 9 (41:20):
Why would Epstein say that about you?

Speaker 4 (41:21):
Are you asking his opinion? I'm asking him to think
about why mister Epstein would say something.

Speaker 9 (41:27):
Why would Epstein say that.

Speaker 4 (41:28):
She's asking you to try to be in mister Epstein's
mind and guess at what mister Epstein would have thought
about likes them young referring to girls.

Speaker 3 (41:40):
First of all, that's not true.

Speaker 1 (41:47):
That's not true that I have any.

Speaker 3 (41:53):
Interesting underage.

Speaker 4 (41:55):
I didn't say underage, I said I said young.

Speaker 3 (41:58):
But it's still not true.

Speaker 4 (42:00):
Is an entering young?

Speaker 3 (42:04):
Yes, So you've got President Clinton, these guys I don't know,
close to eighty years old. I didn't google it I
don't know if he's seventy six or eighty two. I
really don't know his age, but I do know maybe
he's seventy four for all I know. But he looks
pretty old. And he was president a long time ago.
Here was forty something when he was president, and he
was president I don't know, close to thirty some close
to forty years ago. I don't know how to do math,
so don't hold me to it. But listen Clinton, I'm

(42:27):
gonna call him an an eighty year old man, and
they ask him, what does it mean to you like
younger women? And I'm gonna tell you right now if
You've ever thought I should get into politics? And they
ask me, as an eighty year old man, do you
like younger women? My answer, especially if I'm married to
Hillary Clinton? My answer a resounding hell, yeah, of course.

(42:47):
I Do you think I like eighty year old women?
I haven't they do? Okay that boss? I really, what
do you think the answer should be? I can't imagine
ever thinking or answering, or asking or presuming that an
eighty year old man is going to find an attraction
other than maybe his wife, you know, or some sort
of longtime love interest that he's just gonna love women

(43:09):
in their eighties. Pretty sure, Pretty sure, a guy in
his eighties is gonna find a woman that's thirty five,
forty five, you know, woman that's still very, very very attractive, attractive.
I mean, that's how that works. There's a reason they
call it the prime of your life, right, and that
prime can last. You know, some people it's the five years,
some people it's ten, twenty fifteen. Some people maintain better

(43:31):
than others. But come on, let's be real unbelievable to
think that. Now. Listen, he answered it well, and he
got all nervous about it. Then you saw his hand
shaking and everything. This is a serious matter, of course.
I'm not promoting President Clinton having you know, sexual relations
with that well let's he put it. But I am saying,

(43:55):
when you talk about liking them young, this is a
question illegally young or just a younger woman. I'm forty
seven years old. I tend to date women in their thirties,
mid to late thirties. I like them. I think they're pretty.
I'm not nearly mature enough for women in my own age, right,
women and even young forties women forty one, forty two,

(44:16):
forty three. They're expecting something from a forty seven year
old man that I'm yet to be able to deliver.
I really am. I make way too many jokes about
too many things where a woman in her thirties tends
to appreciate that more. But these are just observations that
I learned in life. So President Clinton, being a man
of stature, a former president. I'm not saying I'm advocating

(44:38):
for Bill. I'm not saying I'm advocating for Team Epstein
or anything like that. But I am saying, come on,
let's let's be realistic here. Let us for a moment.
A asked the right questions. Did you know any of
these girls arounder age? That question was asked very good.
That's where we need to be on this and again,

(45:00):
and I've said this before, I think there's a really
big difference in getting a girl that's eleven twelve years old,
nine years old, eleven years old, and prostituting them and
trafficking them, and prosecuting someone for these things. Yes, they
should be all day long. But a girl that is
eighteen nineteen, still a teenager, but of legal age, that's

(45:24):
a different thing. This is no longer pedophilia. This is
not somebody getting off on a little girl, on a
girl that's eighteen or nineteen. Now, look, I'm a dad
of two daughters. I get it. I understand that. You know,
I look at my kids and I see little girls.
But I realize that this is the real world and
that you put a dress on a fifteen year old.

(45:45):
I had fifteen year olds that would put on dresses
and say, oh, you're not leaving the house like that.
Why because they didn't look fifteen anymore. So listen, I
get that, and I'm just saying, let's take all of
that into account. Right, this is not a defense of
any of those things. If President Clinton is guilty, let
him be guilty, prosecute him. And again, this isn't even

(46:05):
a criminal proceeding. But to ask questions like do you
like younger women to a man that's eighty years old,
come on? And the words are Joe Biden. I said,
come on, man, do we have that clip that'll be
funny to play? Right when he says, come on, man,
I got hairy legs, Harry leg If you haven't seen it,
it's pretty funny, Joe Buden. If you haven't played the clip,
if you don't, we'll continue.

Speaker 2 (46:26):
I got harry legs that turned that that.

Speaker 3 (46:29):
That that that that turn.

Speaker 8 (46:32):
Blonde in the sun.

Speaker 7 (46:34):
And the kids used to come up and reach in
the pool and rub my leg down, so it was
traded and then watched the hair come back up again.

Speaker 8 (46:43):
They look at it. So I learned about roaches.

Speaker 5 (46:45):
I learned about kids jumping on my lap, and I've
loved kids jumping on my lap.

Speaker 3 (46:51):
I wanted to get into some other stuff. So yesterday
I mentioned with you guys that I was listening to
the radio when I heard an interview on Basil shout
out to them. And what's interesting here is I caught
a clip. There was another part of the interview that
I had missed, and they played it on social media.
It was on Excarlet Molina's Instagram page, and again I

(47:14):
left them another message. This man, not only is he
constitutionally illiterate, but he's playing the game. He's sipping the
kool aid just like the rest of these people. It's
like a rare disease that affects Hispanic politicians. I believe
it's called in the jitis, and he seems to be
suffering from a big time So now he argues that

(47:40):
not only yesterday's argument was that, well, you know, when
people die, it shows that there's a breakdown of diplomacy,
and this is the fault of both sides involved. That
was yesterday. Today, he says, well, listen, under Article one
of the Constitution, Congress has the right to declare war, right,
declarations of a war with Congress. And that is true.

(48:02):
But as a matter of logic and the Constitution, two
things come to mind. Number One, In nineteen seventy three,
Congressman Espayatt, congressman from New York, his colleagues passed something
called the War Powers Resolution of nineteen seventy three. Now,
what did the War Powers Resolution or resolution do in

(48:24):
nineteen seventy three, I'll tell you. It allowed members of
Congress to say, we don't want responsibility for issuing declarations
of war. We want the president as the commander in chief,
and under his rights in Article two of the Constitution

(48:45):
that say that the president is the commander in chief
in chief right now, it's not just commander right so like, hey,
we declare war and then you are the commander of
this war. Now his commander in chief. But irrespective of that,
the issue becomes under Article two. It's very clear that

(49:05):
the president has this ability to protect this country. They
passed this resolution that says that the president now has
sixty days of using military action before they consider it
a war. So if something goes down and the President
wants to use a helicopter or a tank or whatever

(49:27):
the military to do something somewhere, go for it. As
long as it doesn't go beyond sixty days, you're in
good shape. It's no longer an active war. Now, many
argue and say, listen, hold on a second. So you
guys pass a law in Congress, and that's fancy, and
it's all good, fine and dandy. However, look what happens.

(49:49):
There's a constitution, right, The Constitution was ratified by the
founders at the Constitutional Convention. It's regarded as the law
of the land. So does this law supersede the Constitution?
I would say absolutely not, because it's an extra constitutional law.
This War Powers resolution simply says that Congress is giving

(50:12):
the president authority. Since when does Congress give the president authority?
If we have co equal branches of government with a
separation of powers, Congress doesn't give the president authority. The
Constitution does and the people the first three words of
the Constitution, we the people of the United States. That's

(50:34):
where the president's authority comes from. So Congress need not
have to give him authority because and again, the him
could be a she one day. Him I'm talking about
is the current officeholder today it's a Trompito do and all.
This magnus the forty fifth and forty seventh president of
these United States. But that's not always the case. It
was once Barack Obama, it was once Joe A. L.

(50:55):
Babo so maiden. Right, We've had plenty of presidents. This
has to do with the president. See, imagine being president.
Imagine Barack Obama being president. And again he used this
war powers resolution his ability as commander in chief seven
times in his presidency. Right, so he was there for
eight years, seven times he used military action without going

(51:15):
to Congress. Mind you, President Trump assembled a gang of eight, right,
eight eight members of the United States senator of the
US Congress to get them together to say, hey, look,
this is what we're doing. Because imagine if you're president
and somebody says, hey, we're about to blow X, Y
and Z up. Hey we're about to hit your embassy Hey,
we're about to do this. Hey, this is about to

(51:35):
go down, or we have actionable intelligence we found Nico
las Maldulu. Dennis Rodriguez just called us. He said he's here, there,
this and that, but you got to hit right now.
And he says, hold on, let me, let me convene
a joint session of Congress, let me all of this.
Believe me, Believe me. You're gonna love this, right, just imagine.
And then then you have the debate and then they go, well,

(51:56):
you know, I think that because we are a democracy
that I don't think we should Why do you, sir,
believe that we should be going to war? Meanwhile, everybody's
watching this, the enemies, and all this credible and actionable
intelligence that you were given or have or garnered yourself,
it's gone. It's useless. The bad guys know exactly what's
going on. Come on. So it's very clear to me,

(52:19):
very clear that when the founders started this country, they
knew full well that the president needs this plenary authority,
this unilateral authority to defend the country when it comes
to striking the nuclear button. Right, that's what they always
have issues all but Trump is this he's hot headed.
His temperament and forget it. Before that, it was Joe Biden.
Joe Biden's too old. He's seen now. Why because the

(52:41):
president has whomever is the president has the clicker for
the nuclear football, the codes, right, And that's why we
have a twenty fifth Amendment so that we can say, hey,
you're not well, right, you're not well, We need to
get you out of there. So I say all that
to say is in nobody's right mind. Is there ever

(53:03):
a scenario where the president doesn't have the power to
defend his country? Yeah? And Democrats mind, in particular Congressman
Adriano Espaya. And I wish I could play this for you,
but the only clip I had was in Spanish because
he called in to a radio show in New York
City La Mega ninety seven point nine Lemegaega, and he
spoke in Spanish, And I guess maybe I could play

(53:23):
that clip in Spanish and translate the bottom for you.

Speaker 9 (53:26):
No, he says case ilegal to.

Speaker 3 (53:34):
Manido.

Speaker 9 (53:34):
Congressistama Mariane Lai del Present Donald Trumps Permeso del congrea
primiero Carlo Lo co opinion.

Speaker 8 (54:00):
Like Ticolo who knows the Constitution. Del pais like contitu
stipula quarqion de ga belcosa tien primo, bassal at travest
the Congresso, Congresso Real, Mintelao Torrida and loc the Clara
Geva pulta song jack Nos, dis kutio, los pormenors in

(54:24):
la Razones for kule pais temple cradoa ram illegales O,
Casa blanca Mia call thos leaders the Congresso the like
Camala presents Imagiana contos me ambrosi Includienomano.

Speaker 9 (54:47):
Jacko Mohammed.

Speaker 1 (54:52):
And a.

Speaker 3 (54:58):
Procession those you are.

Speaker 8 (55:00):
A tool then presents Irazones termini im possibly attack a minente,
the empire is Iran and contra Americana or now asio

(55:25):
non Presidentago, Traio Talian and Mario the negoses diplomatic as
he lost report Carrio Iraq, remachos, sabian dados alan passo
referencia our programma nuclear the Iran Esa Hill.

Speaker 3 (55:49):
I'm telling you that he's wrong and that democrats that
agree with him are wrong on this. Why because it
doesn't make sense. Who would want to be president? Why
would we want a president that is commander in chief
of all the armed services and can't do anything without mother,
may I in Congress ask yourself that anyway, I've been

(56:10):
dying to get into this segment on wordplay, silly stuff
that doesn't really matter, but I don't have time for
it today. So today I bid you ado and I
tell you to keep it locked right here for tomorrow,
we got another great show for you. Between nine and
midnight Eastern time, depending on where in the country you are,
is when you'll be able to get it. The videos
hit on Rumble. The next day, we're on Roku TV

(56:30):
on Festiva TV. Make sure you're subscribed to that as well.
If you have a Roku check that out. And I
say to you, Asta aprosima, take care, good night, and
God bless you. America. I'm Rich Valdez.

Speaker 1 (56:43):
This is America.

Speaker 8 (57:19):
Now.

Speaker 3 (57:19):
For weeks you've heard me talking about noon dot com slash.
This is America. Noom dot com slash. This is America.
That's n M dot com slash. This is America. I
use Noom dot com slash, This is America to keep
my thoughts in order to follow a plan designed by
psychologists to help me make sure I stay hydrated, to

(57:41):
make sure that I'm tracking my meals, counting the calories,
staying focused on my health, not getting anxious, not overeating.
That's important because sometimes this politics, the news, it gets
me stressed out. First thing I want to do is
grab a cheeseburger.

Speaker 8 (57:57):
So you can do this.

Speaker 3 (57:59):
It's an app. You can do it anytime, anywhere. Now's
the time for you to take control over your health,
mental health, all that. Noom dot com slash this is
America's where you've got to go to check out your trial.
It's a personalized trial. So go to Noom dot com
slash This is America. Noom dot com slash this is America.

(58:33):
We live in a remarkable time in human history right now,
one in which our technology has dramatically improved our living standards.
That's because the people that design and build the modern
wonders that make our lives better are bound by physical reality,
a world in which things either work or they don't work. Unfortunately,

(58:55):
those who oversee our political and educational institutions aren't limited
by these same constraints. Instead, they often implement their agendas
by exploiting people's ignorance on issues like taxes and immigration.
So where do we go to get the facts? Well,
you listen to this as America. But if you're online,
you go to just facts dot com right now and
enter your email. This way you can get free weekly

(59:17):
emails with rigorously documented facts about the most pressing issues
facing our nation, and then share those facts as much
as you can with everyone you know. This is a
time of dire need for truth in America. Our national
dialogue is riddled with fake news and fake facts, and
our country desperately needs a reliable starting point for informed

(59:38):
debate over our nation's future. Our friends at Just Facts
started that organization for such a time as this. So
join the battle for truth by signing up right now
at just facts dot com. That's jus T fac ts
dot com. Just facts dot com SA