November 22, 2024 • 54 mins
Brace yourself for a compelling journey into the world of global economic systems and geopolitical intrigue. What if the very fabric of our financial and political landscape is being manipulated by an elite few? With Beans the Brave by my side, we explore the controversial "Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars" document, tying it to the modern-day impacts of the Great Reset and Agendas 2030 and 21. We unravel the threads of influence BRICS wields on the dollar, the shifts in global payment systems like SWIFT, and ponder the potential ramifications of a Trump return on precious metals markets. Through the lens of history and its lessons, we question the ripple effects of parapolitics on today's economic realities.
As the world teeters on the edge of nuclear tensions, we provide a harrowing analysis of Russia's recent intercontinental ballistic missile test and Putin's revamped nuclear doctrine. From NATO's post-Cold War expansion to the Cuban Missile Crisis, we connect past proxy wars to today's fraught international chessboard, contemplating the dire consequences of missteps with a nuclear power like Russia. Amid escalating geopolitical strains, the need for diplomacy is more urgent than ever to circumvent the specter of catastrophic warfare and preserve global peace.
In a landscape shaken by global uncertainties, we witness the steadfast allure of gold and the meteoric rise of Bitcoin. Gold's resilience as a safe haven contrasts Bitcoin's bold challenge to traditional financial systems, hinting at a seismic shift in monetary dynamics. As the US dollar and Treasury yields gain strength, we interpret these movements as indicators of a revolution against entrenched financial orthodoxies. Our conversation meanders through the storied past of classic American coins, offering insights for collectors and investors alike. This episode promises a thorough exploration of the evolving stage of global finance and geopolitics, unveiling the transformative currents that shape our world.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
Then out spake brave Horatius, the captain of the
gate To every man upon thisearth.
Death cometh sooner or late.
And how can a man die betterthan facing fearful odds for the
ashes of his fathers and thetemples of his gods?
Lord Makalai, you are listeningto the Arterburn Radio
(00:42):
Transmission.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
In conclusion, the objective of economic research
as conducted by the magnates ofcapital, banking and the
industries of commodities is theestablishment of an economy
which is totally predictable andmanipulatable.
In order to achieve a totallypredictable economy, the
low-class elements of societymust be brought under total
(01:32):
control, ie must be housebroken,trained and assigned a yoke and
long-term social duties fromevery early age, before they
have an opportunity to questionthe propriety of the matter.
In order to achieve suchconformity, the lower class
family unit must bedisintegrated by a process of
(01:52):
increasing preoccupation of theparents and the establishment of
a government-operated daycarecenter for the occupationally
orphaned children.
The quality of education givento the lower class must be the
poorest sort, so that the moatof ignorance isolating the
inferior class from the superiorclass is and remains
incomprehensible to the inferiorclass.
(02:14):
With such an initial handicap,even bright lower class
individuals have little, if any,hope of extricating themselves
from their assigned lot in life.
This form of slavery isessential to maintain some
measure of social order, peaceand tranquility for the ruling
upper class.
That's from a document that wasfound in an IBM copier in 1986
(02:39):
at an estate sale estate sale.
It's dated May 1st 1979, andit's a technical manual on the
enslavement of mankind calledthe Silent Weapons for Quiet
Wars, and you can look that uponline for free.
Interesting story, interestingbackground.
It is definitely what the elitehave been doing.
You call them the elite, youcan call them the parasite class
(03:02):
, the upper echelon, lizardpeople whatever your moniker is,
ladies and gentlemen, I thoughtI'd lead with that, because it
doesn't matter what the politicsare of your preferred class or
your team or whatever is goingon in your own mind.
We're still inside the GreatReset, we're still inside Agenda
(03:24):
2030.
We're still inside Agenda 2030.
We're still inside Agenda 21.
That's what's happening.
And you were listening to theYard of Burn radio transmission
broadcasting in defiance ofglobalist goblins, the neocons
and the new world order.
I'm broadcasting from deepwithin the heart of Texas, along
with my co-pilot and co-host,beans the Brave.
We joined David Knight, as wedo every Thursday, to talk about
(03:50):
the ever-changing financialglobal landscape which, even if
you follow it every single day,like me and it's my wheelhouse
and over and over again, what'sgoing on with BRICS, what's
happening to the dollar, what'sthe new payment systems, what's
happening to the SWIFT system?
And then, of course,geopolitical tensions.
(04:10):
And I said, you know, a coupleof weeks ago I said well,
there's a lull in the market.
You know, trump's beenreselected, he's going to have a
new administration, 45 and 47make 9-11.
So we're going to put that intoeffect.
And you know, I knew that therewould be a temporary pullback
(04:31):
in precious metals.
And again, parapolitics andprecious metals folks I mean,
this is my show, that's what wetalk about they all flow
together, believe it or not.
And there was a pullback.
But now you look at theheadlines and you know you can
start with things like Drudge.
But we're going to dig evendeeper.
Russia launches an ICBM whichis an intercontinental ballistic
(04:52):
missile.
I'm sure, as this is alllanguage, I mean, this isn't
like.
You know, they're not testinganything.
They're showing language to therest of the world.
They're showing language to therest of the world.
And if you don't have thebackground in, well, even if
you're not interested, or if youhaven't read like I have, if
you haven't just become like anerd where you just get wonky
(05:14):
and read into you know thegeopolitical movements and
foreign policy going back, youknow, post-world War II, then
all this looks kind of well,it's kind of normal.
Well, it's absolutely not.
It's not normal.
These are.
We've been escalating tensionsover there since well, I mean
long before Russia invadedUkraine.
(05:34):
That was the purpose of it.
The you know.
You can even go back to the endof the Cold War, when Secretary
of State James Baker gave averbal promise to Mikhail
Gorbachev that if they withdrewtheir troops, the Soviet troops,
inside the natural borders ofRussia and let the Soviet Union
peacefully collapse, that wewould not expand NATO, which was
(05:57):
the entire reason for NATOitself.
The North Atlantic TreatyOrganization was based on George
Kennan's long telegram and theTruman Doctrine on containment.
It wasn't necessarily aboutrollback.
It wasn't supposed to beaggressive, it was supposed to
be about containment.
And this became a rollback.
This became an aggressivemovement.
(06:19):
Nato expanded.
We promised we would not expandNATO.
We expanded NATO in their facewhile they were weak, and this
(06:40):
has been a long time coming.
So a lot of these, you know themoves to a new administration.
But the outgoing administrationis saying well, let's see,
let's see if we can escalatethis into Armageddon prior to
the arrival of the newadministration.
So here's what's happening.
Let me put this up on thescreen real quick.
This is Kitco.
(07:01):
Gold surges on geopoliticaltensions and Putin's nuclear
doctrine revision, gold futureshave continued its impressive
gains, marking three consecutivedays of price advances, amid
escalating global tensions andsignificant geopolitical
developments.
The precious metals value hasbeen bolstered by recent
statements from RussianPresident Vladimir Putin, who
(07:23):
has modified Russia's nucleardoctrine, creating ripples of
concern in international markets.
Putin's revised nuclearstrategy introduces a
provocative interpretation ofpotential aggression, suggesting
that any attack supported by anuclear power would be
considered a joint assault onRussia, potentially triggering a
(07:44):
nuclear response.
Now let's just stop right there.
I don't know that that's achange in doctrine, ladies and
gentlemen.
That's why we had proxy wars.
If you go back to the 20thcentury, wars like the Korean
War, that was language youunderstand.
That was a test model, you know, to test the resolve of the
(08:10):
United States and the UnitedNations.
You know ability to roll backcommunism or to thwart the
spread of internationalcommunism, and that was given.
That was a green light by theKremlin for North Korea to
overwhelm the 38th parallel andtake the entire peninsula.
That's what that was for.
And of course, there wasDouglas MacArthur and there was
(08:33):
the Korean War and you have allof that.
You know that history of notnecessarily taking, you know a
taking North Korea back.
It was.
It was a line drawn, and that'sthe argument between MacArthur
and Truman.
Macarthur wanted to drop 70atomic weapons on mainland China
and litter the Yalu River withnuclear waste so that the
(08:55):
communist Chinese troopscouldn't cross the border and
send troops into the house ofSouth Korea.
But the deal is and that's whatthe history shows is that
Truman wanted the containmentdoctrine of not necessarily
rolling back but stopping anyfurther advancement, and that's
why you have that argument.
(09:15):
That's why he fired MacArthurand that's why we still have
troops in South Korea.
That's why we still have the38th parallel and the DMZ.
Same thing with Vietnam.
Vietnam was language.
We fought proxy wars there.
I mean, that's why the Russiansand you can get into there's
also the internationalmultinational banking cartels
(09:38):
like the Rockefellers andRothschilds, who supplied
through US goods and servicesand commodities, supplied the
Soviet Union with the weapons tokill American troops in Vietnam
.
That's, I mean, that'sundisputable fact.
We did that, allowing thesecorporations and others to do
that.
But we fought these wars.
(09:59):
That's what we did.
We fought them on battlefields,not attacking each other
directly.
We did.
We fought them on battlefields,not attacking each other
directly.
That's what the Cuban MissileCrisis was about.
Why do you think the Soviets?
And they parked missiles inCuba.
The same way we parked missilesin Turkey, but we didn't dare
fire weapons made by either oneof us into the sovereign
(10:22):
territory of either one of thosethe United States or their
allies, or anything else.
It was again proxy wars, andthat's the difference.
That's why this is so alarming.
Despite the alarming rhetoric,world leaders and strategic
analysts are cautiouslyinterpreting Putin's nuclear
(10:44):
doctrine update.
Many experts view the change asa sophisticated diplomatic
maneuver designed to intensifydeterrence against Western
intervention, rather than agenuine indication of intimate
nuclear escalation.
Well, the thing is, if you'vegot crazy people like we do, you
(11:05):
may back Putin into a cornerwhere he has no choice, and it's
like if you weren't going tohave a red line.
If you're going to actuallyhave any respect, you're going
to have to do something, and itsometimes will look like and
become escalation.
The financial markets haveresponded predictably by these
(11:27):
mounting uncertainties.
Gold futures have demonstratedremarkable resilience,
experienced substantial gainsthis week.
As of 6 pm Eastern time this isyesterday the December contract
price is 2,631 LuciferianBankster notes for a troy ounce
of the Yeddle Medal that's thefutures price Representing a net
(11:48):
increase of $16.40 or 0.63% thecumulative gains this week have
reached an impressive $86.70,with significant daily
increments of $49 on Monday and$20 the following day.
Well, that's what I said, allthe fundamentals, and this is
(12:10):
just a.
Again, this is a little bit ofchange.
All this was going onbeforehand.
What's interesting is that youhave, like, this schizophrenic
market where I don't know if youguys are watching this, but the
price for Bitcoin $97,356.
(12:31):
We're within striking distanceof 100K.
That's going on while gold ishaving a rebound, so now we're
starting to see things flowtogether.
Synchronicities.
Simultaneously, traditionalfinancial indicators present a
(12:54):
complex economic backdrop.
The US dollar index hasstrengthened, gaining 0.45% and
settling at 106.
Treasury yields have also shownnotable movement and if you
follow the dollar, like I do,these numbers are again
(13:14):
consistent with a reshuffling.
I think, again, people go intodifferent markets depending on
who they perceive or what systemthey perceive to be the most
dominant.
Persistent conflicts in boththe Middle East and Ukrainian
theaters continue to underscoregold's enduring appeal as a safe
(13:35):
haven asset.
As geopolitical uncertaintiespersist and potential resolution
remains distant, investors areincreasingly turning to gold as
a reliable store of value duringturbulent times.
Yeah Well, these are turbulenttimes, ladies and gents, and
that's why I've been advocating,I've been saying that, whatever
(13:58):
your political views, whateveryour team, whatever you think's
going on, all this is going onregardless.
And these geopolitical tensionsand what's happening with the
dollar around the world, thefundamentals and everything that
has made these crazy drives inthe price of things like Bitcoin
(14:23):
and gold, I mean, why do youthink that's really going on?
I mean, yes, there's a lot ofspeculation in Bitcoin, but why
is that?
It is the antithesis of thesystem.
In the Greek mythology, wheneveryou would have something like,
you'd have a character who wouldbecome hubristic.
(14:43):
You had hubris, right Arrogance, like see themselves as God,
like an infallible.
And that's what those who whoespouse the modern monetary
theory, mmt or, as David Knightcalls it, the magic money tree,
that's hubris, folks.
That's what that is.
That's where, oh, nothing likethis has ever worked in history.
(15:09):
It's never worked.
It's always gone to zero, butthis time will be different.
It's like when they trycommunism again and again.
Well, that was different.
That was under Mao, or that'sunder Stalin, or that's under
Khrushchev, or that's underCastro, and that didn't work.
Or that's socialism inVenezuela, that's Chavezism.
That didn't work because ofthat, but in the purest sense,
(15:32):
it works.
It never does.
Fiat currency and Marx, theseare fairy tales.
They're awful, nightmarishfairy tales.
Else they end in mass graves,bloodshed, bankruptcy, you know
apocalypse, now type horror, youknow, to quote Colonel Kurtz.
(15:53):
So this is.
But that's what it is.
It's hubris and in the Greekmythology, whenever you present
hubris, the gods would summonnemesis, which was the total
opposite, which was theirdestroyer.
And that's a lot of whatBitcoin and the.
You realize how fast we'veadvanced in the consciousness of
(16:14):
human beings around the worldto be aware of fiat currency and
the dangers of that.
It wasn't that.
It was 10 years ago.
I was running for congress andtalking about this and it.
It wasn't super popular.
I mean, you'd have some peoplein the crowd going, oh yeah, I
get about the federal reserveand the.
You know, I get that about.
(16:34):
You know fake currency and theinternational banking cartels
and oh, I get that, I'd hearthat.
I, you know they'd raise theirhand, there'd be some spring.
Now it's, it's ubiquitous, it'severywhere.
And there was a couple of yearsafter that I was getting into
the Bitcoin ATMs and theneventually we launched Wise Wolf
, and the reason I did that isbecause this is a trend.
Not only was I interested in it, and that's my passion, but
(16:58):
this is a trend.
What we're watching is historyunfolding.
You're just seeing the very tipof a complete change in the
global financial structure,which will be a complete change
in the, in the, in the world.
It'll be complete change inculture.
It'll be a complete change inpolitics.
Everything, all the powerstructures, will change based on
(17:20):
this, and that's what I'mshowing you.
This is a revolution that'shappening.
It's not just about pricingmodels and it's not just about
commodities, right?
Think about that.
Think about Bitcoin at $100,000.
What does that mean?
That means that the currentfinancial system needs an escape
(17:43):
hatch.
Gold and silver are just money.
Bitcoin has other aspects to it.
I mean you can.
If you go out and trade yourtime for for money, you want to
get something like gold andsilver.
You don't want fiat.
The reason you don't is becausethey're constantly creating new
fiat currency and they'redevalued, so you wouldn't.
(18:04):
You wouldn't want that.
You would want something that'sgoing to withstand things like
inflation or geopoliticalturmoil and have you know it
exists and it's a store ofenergy and it has a 5,000 year
history.
That's why you'd want somethinglike that.
But again, we're talking abouta complete change of global
(18:25):
financial orders.
The hubris has summoned nemesis.
Interesting to watch?
All right, I'm going to.
I will check the chat.
By the way, I'll check the chattoday.
I've got the chat on Rumblepulled up.
I've got a chat on Rockfinpulled up over.
Not a space age.
(18:45):
No, this is the backdrop to.
I thought it was appropriate.
This is the backdrop to NORADin the movie War Games with
Matthew Broderick, where theyhave Joshua, the AI computer
built by Mr Falcon, and that'swhere you get the famous line
(19:09):
about the only way to win is notto play the game.
I will check Rockfin as wellhere shortly, but I want to jump
into some more articles, justkind of off the.
If we stay on the line offoreign policy, because this is
the most important story, wehave to be very careful to
(19:30):
understand this.
Or again it's like oh, it'sover, we have an election, it's
over.
No, it's not over.
Until it's over.
Right, let me stop this screenand we'll pull up this.
This is natural news, just morein the realm of foreign policy.
(19:51):
Moscow promises devastatingresponse if Zelensky strikes
deep in Russian territory.
This is by Ethan Huff missilesdeep into Russia, a move that
(20:15):
Russian Foreign Ministryspokeswoman Maria Zekharova
warns will provoke a devastatingresponse from Moscow.
At a news briefing this week,zakharova addressed a report
from the Telegraph last weekclaiming that the United Kingdom
and France are asking theUnited States for permission to
approve Ukrainian strikes onRussia using storm, shadow and
(20:35):
scalp cruise missiles beforePresident-elect Donald Trump is
installed in January.
If the Kiev regime getspermission for the affirmation
strikes, we will treat it asNATO de facto entering a direct
conflict with Russia.
Entering a direct conflict withRussia, zakharova said the
(20:59):
response to the use of Westernlong-range weapons against the
territory of our nation would beimminent and devastating.
I can't emphasize enough.
And our mainstream media, theteleprompter readers and hairdos
, the dead soul automatons formultinationals, they don't know
this history.
I feel like you know this was.
(21:23):
You know going back to themovie Terminator 2, and you had,
you know, the young John Connorand he's talking to the
Terminator.
He's talking to the terminator,talking to the ai and uh, he
tells them how he gets theystart judgment day.
You know how they launch the,get the world and the human
beings to kill themselves.
(21:44):
You know, with nuclear weapons,or at least to start the chain
of events so they could get ridof human beings.
And basically they launched,launch on Russia.
So Russia will launch on us andand John Connor says, wait,
russia aren't, aren't they ourfriends?
Now, you know this is going backto the uh, early nineties and I
remember watching that as a kidand thinking, well, we avoided.
(22:08):
You know the cold war, it ended.
You know my as a kid, I wasgrowing up there was.
You know the cold war, it ended.
You know my as a kid, I wasgrowing up there was.
You know everything was aboutthe cold war.
You had rambo movies, you hadthings like rocky four.
You know the go and fight.
Ivan drago and I was fascinatedwith the soviet union and, uh,
that history there.
And of course he reached the90s and by december, on
(22:30):
christmas in 1991, gorbachevgives up the ghost and the
Soviet Union disappears off theface of the planet.
It's, I mean, one of the mostepical events in human history.
We don't, I don't think werealize just what a massive
event that was.
And the fact that it wentpeacefully it says a lot about
(22:50):
the you know who Gorbachev was.
I mean, it says a lot aboutGod's intervention, with the
fact that we didn't have theydidn't bring the temple down on
us at the same time.
It could have been a revanchist, very dark period in history,
but it wasn't.
And they were our friends andwe botched it period in history
(23:15):
but it wasn't.
And they were our friends andwe botched it.
Our leaders, like Paul Wolfowitz, with the Wolfowitz Memorandum
in 1992, singled out Russia asthe main enemy and that we would
do everything in our power tomake sure that they were only a
regional power and never wouldexpand to a global power again.
And there was no real—if youread the Wolfowitz memorandum,
(23:35):
there's no real it's not athoughtful scenario where
they've taken it to its logicalconclusion about what Russia
would do if we did launchmissiles inside of their
territory, which were called onby the Wolfowitz memorandum.
So you would think that we hadlong ago patched this up, and
(23:57):
this is what a huge blunder thishas been.
We already knew that theemerging global economy would
require different affiliations,different strategic alliances,
and we just botched it.
We fed and awakened the dragon.
It's something Napoleon saidabout China.
(24:17):
He says China is a sleepingdragon.
It'd be wise to let it continueto slumber.
No, we went and just poked itand woke it up and said hey,
here's all our manufacturing,here's all our technology here,
take it, we'll open our marketsto you.
We won't charge you anythingfor entrance.
It.
We'll open our markets to you.
We won't charge you anythingfor entrance.
You charge us.
Do our old playbook.
So you put on tariffs and we'lltake them off, because that's
(24:40):
what we're.
We're so smart, we have themodern monetary theory, all of
our economists are so brilliant.
So we gave China everything.
We gave them through free tradeagreements and offshoring and
taking our factories out andthen supplying weapons
(25:00):
technology for backroom dealsand bags of cash to the Chinese,
and you know it's kind of anagreed, not you know wink and a
nod built China up and at thesame time, instead of forming
alliances like we did that's thewhole reason.
(25:21):
We opened China was supposedlywas to offset the balance of
power between the Soviet Unionas a whole and Mao's China China
and make it triangulardiplomacy.
That's what it was supposed tobe.
But instead we just went aroundthe world night-sticking people
like a drunk cop, like for thepolicemen of the world, and went
(25:45):
all into the it's funny, right,there's seven countries in five
years.
What does that have to do withthe American security?
Absolutely nothing.
We did all the wrong thingsright.
We just botched this entiredeal.
I happen to believe it was onpurpose right to put the United
States in the position that itis today.
Let's continue down with thisarticle.
(26:10):
Russia has repeatedly said thatlonger-range Western-supplied
weapons are a no-go in Ukraine,at least not when Ukrainian
forces are using them on theirown.
Nato specialists are needed, asis intelligence data obtained
through the bloc's satellitesystems, in order for the
weapons to be used properly.
(26:30):
See, this is where NATO becomesan just back up a minute to
remember.
I remember distinctly he's likewine sipping.
You know the, the folks thatyou find in university towns,
like on social media when Russiainvaded Ukraine, media when
(26:57):
Russia invaded Ukraine and I'msure they have all their
political affiliations are tothe left of Karl Marx.
You know they would say stufflike well, nato's never been an
aggressor, and I rememberthinking I was with NATO.
You know, we bombed Serbia for78 days Not an aggressor.
What about Gaddafi?
(27:18):
You know what about Syria?
We have all sorts of operationsthat NATO's taken part in the
Taliban.
It's like the Taliban didn'tattack us on 9-11.
They got leveled by NATO.
Don't give me that.
I love the way that fauxintellectuals try to reset
(27:42):
history based on their ownignorance.
Possibility that Washingtonwill give Kiev the green light,
like London and Paris are asking.
If that happens, russianForeign Minister Sergei Lavrov
said that Moscow will considersuch an action to be indicative
of NATO joining the conflictdirectly.
(28:02):
If such weapons are used, thatwould mean that not just Ukraine
but NATO nations are openly atwar with Russia.
Yes, that's what that means.
You know.
It is really just ridiculous towatch all this, just all of the
(28:26):
equity that's been built up.
Think about all of the.
You know you go back to JFK'sspeech at American University in
June of 1963, right before hewas murdered by the deep state
and he talks about what genuinepeace is.
They talk about a genuine peace, not the peace of the slave or
(28:49):
the security of the grave, notsimply peace in our time, but
peace in all time.
You know he's talking aboutlaying the foundations for
generational peace.
That's one of the reasons thathe got killed right, because
that's not profitable.
You think about all the equitythat was built up, all the lives
that were given, all of thestrategic moves that were made,
(29:10):
all the treaties that weresigned, all the summits that
were happening between you knowEisenhower riding in an open car
with Khrushchev, for you knowthe back-channel communiques on
the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Or Reagan at Reykjavik endingthe Cold War, and for what?
So we could fast forward to nowand they just like tear off all
(29:32):
the warning signs and all thegovernors and everything.
We just keep marching forwardonward to war.
That's an on purpose thing,folks.
Another this is Putin's changesto Russia's nuclear doctrine.
Another recent development isthe change in President Vladimir
(29:53):
Putin's made to his country'snuclear doctrine Attacks on
Russia by a non-nuclear state,ie Ukraine, that is supported by
a nuclear power, ie the UnitedStates, will be considered by
Russia as a justification for anuclear response.
I don't think that's such ahuge departure from where we
already were.
I mean, think about that IfCuba would have launched
(30:20):
missiles on the United States,president Kennedy said that
would be considered an attack onthe United States by the Soviet
Union, because it de de factois, because it's entering into
sovereign territory by thedueling powers.
That's why we have these proxywars.
It was a way for the militarycontractors to still make their
(30:42):
money right and still have allwe still have the ritual of
death for these psychopaths.
We could still have that alittle bit of outlet for them
without, you know, taking theentire planet and setting it on
fire, and there was a way totest out new toy, all this stuff
.
That's why we had the.
(31:03):
Well, there's a multiple reasonswhy we had, you know, wars in
the middle east wasn't so muchproxy as it was.
You you know it was about aforeign powers lobby.
That's a.
That was a big reason for it.
But you get what I mean.
Just read that again.
(31:24):
America, if the pro-war Westgets its wish, russia is ready
to sandblast the West aspunishment using nuclear weapons
, because we've been hearingthis kind of rhetoric for a
while and eventually somethingis going to break.
There's also talk that Ukrainemight try to cheat by passing
(31:45):
off Western-supplied missiles ashaving been built in Ukraine,
which Tsarkovsky called bloodycheating, mourning that this
could not even be possible forUkraine to pull this off without
US support.
Well, it's so blatantly obvious.
They're a death cult.
I mean these never before evengo back to World War I and a lot
(32:10):
of people don't know thishistory.
But they had something calledthe Von Schlieffen Plan and I
mean you had these like Prussiangenerals you know that coming
out of the Franco-Prussian Warof the late 1870s with Bismarck
and others like very pro-war andthey just really because of the
arms manufacturer Krupp youknow the Krupp family they
(32:31):
really perfected the steel thatmade these cannons, these
long-range cannons and artillerypieces.
This was a huge leap intechnology.
So the Arms of Krupp that's agreat book by William Manchester
, and so they have these newtechnologies and everything.
But they had these old worldthinking.
But they kept redrawing thislike this.
Von Schlieffen was the headgeneral.
(32:52):
He kept redrawing this likethis.
Devon schlieffen was the headgeneral.
He kept redrawing the plans andshelving the plans, so like
what would happen if we wantedto mobilize and we wanted to
take france and the rapid, youknow blitzkrieg and all that.
And france had some plans drawnup, all the everybody had plans
to go to war and then somebodythat lit the fuse.
You had the you know themurdering of the archduke
(33:12):
ferdininand, and that reallywasn't it.
But that's what kind of set off.
You know, all the differenttreaties were pulled between
Austria and Serbia, who joinsthe war and who doesn't, right,
and of course they execute thevon Schlieffen plan at least
they try to, and it doesn'treally work, based off of
(33:33):
technologies that had changedand troop movements.
But at the same time you hadthe Kaiser, the head of Germany.
He actually had a nervousbreakdown and he was trying to
stop it and they couldn't stopit.
None of the statesmen reallywanted it, they just wanted to
(33:53):
flex for a while.
But all these treaties startedfollowing.
It's a domino effect and theycouldn't put the genie back in
the bottle.
And then you have thisbloodletting for four years with
massive leaps in technology,you know, with the airplane
(34:17):
technology.
You know with the airplane with.
You know gas, with mustard gasand chlorine gas, and you know
belt-fed machine guns and allthese other things, but with
like 19th century tactics.
It was just an awful that'swhere you get trench warfare but
they couldn't stop it.
Well, those people were ahundred times better than what
we have today I don't—if youknow anything about history and
you look at the currentheadlines and you read into the
(34:37):
biographies of the people thatare making calls now.
I don't want to be totallyblackmailed or anything, but
it's absolutely terrifying.
Yeah, one day before Zakharovaissued her warning, former
British Prime Minister BorisJohnson, that buffoon, told GB
(34:58):
News in an interview that Londoncould send troops to Ukraine to
try to stop Kiev from beingdefeated by Moscow.
Well, can we get this straight?
That Moscow I mean Russia couldhave already taken Ukraine?
It's not the goal.
It's such a lazy way to look atit.
By the way, I don't have couldhave already taken Ukraine.
It's not the goal.
It's such a lazy way to look atit.
And, by the way, I don't have adog in this fight.
It's just so you don't thinkI'm.
(35:18):
You know, I'm not a ruse.
I've never been to Russia.
I will go someday.
There's too much history therenot to go, but if you know the
background, it's just ridiculous.
And you have these buffoons andpeople like these disheveled
degenerates like Boris Johnsonwho, instead of being a voice
(35:42):
for peace and reason andcompromise or you know real
politic?
This isn't real politic.
This is insanity.
Johnson says there is worrywithin the Western cabal that
Trump might decrease or evenabolish all military aid to Kiev
, which would completelydecimate the deep state in an
(36:03):
instant.
Well, maybe right, maybe right.
Definitely their kitty.
You know what?
You would do well, ladies andgents, to go and look up the
definition of the wordboondoggle.
It's like an unnecessary thing.
(36:25):
Unfortunately, this is a verysatanic boondoggle, if not the
most satanic that's everpresented itself, and it's all
centered around the breadbasketof Europe which is Ukraine.
Russia says it has no plan toattack any NATO member states.
However, should NATO getinvolved in the Russian-Ukraine
conflicts?
(36:45):
All bets are off.
It'd be interesting to enterthe reality of the likes of
Starmer and Macron to understandwhat makes them think that
resorting to such desperatemeasures could force Russia to
yield.
A commander wrote about thesituation.
Yeah, this is the question.
You're backing a nuclear-armedRussia into a corner.
(37:10):
They have what?
10,000 nuclear weapons.
They were first in space.
They still have nuclearsubmarines, massive landmass
natural resource, all thesethings.
Now their economy is about the.
It's not you know the best inthe world, but it's still a
(37:30):
force to be reckoned with andcan trigger massive loss of life
.
That's where you get the termmega-death.
It's for a term of nuclear war,it's the fallout from a nuclear
exchange, that every millionpeople that are killed is called
(37:50):
a mega-death, that everymillion people that are killed
is called a mega-death.
Quote it is plain to see thatRussia is facing a very nasty
and implacable enemy, wroteanother.
In a situation like this,military force is a necessary
and indispensable option.
Boris and Starmer.
British intelligence representsa genuine threat to world peace
, said another.
(38:10):
They are stupid and enmeshed intheir Russophobic fantasies.
They need to be slapped awaylike naughty children.
That's exactly right.
It's like the same ilk asLindsey Graham or one of these
(38:35):
other psychopaths.
This is really hard to watchand you wonder like just hope
cooler heads prevail in the faceof it.
All right, I'm going to checkchat.
And then we've got one morearticle talking about pre-1933
gold coins.
Be sure, and follow theParatrooper podcast.
We just put a new one out withMonica Perez.
(38:57):
That was a great guest.
A lot of fun.
Had Mr Anderson and ChrisGraves on with me as well.
We're going to start doingParatrooper live on Sundays, 5
pm Eastern, 4 pm Central time.
So Rockfin Rumble here on my X.
You can go and check that out.
We'll have guests sometimes,but we're creating a different
(39:22):
format.
We're still going to have thedeep dive shows and do the ones
that are pre-recorded, but Ithought we'd do a lot.
We do audience participationand so much more.
So go check out paratruth.
We'll be doing that as well.
Let me check the rockfin chat.
Let's see we've got uh, oh,it's a healthy chat today.
We got jason barker in the chat.
(39:42):
Uh, jason says he's got megoing over on free world.
Thank you, jason.
Yeah, we need to.
Uh, I need to call you thisweek on free world.
Dustin helms in the chat saystony went to the bunker for his
broadcast.
Yeah, this is the.
This is norad.
I'm in norad.
I thought it was apropos fortoday.
Uh, and chris in the chat.
(40:02):
Good to see you and appreciateyou.
Gardener goldsmith, the greatguard.
Goldsmith, you need to give mea call, brother.
We need to do a show, uh, butwe've put that off too long.
Let's let's jump in and do astream this week.
Uh, let's see what is truth isalso in the chat.
Good to see you.
I'll make sure I didn't missanybody.
Nancy chambers says hi, tony.
(40:22):
Good to see you, nancy.
Yeah, if you want to watch, youcan watch the show.
It's for free over onrockfincom.
Uh, the video is live.
Just making sure I didn't missanybody here.
Yeah, dustin Helms saysEisenhower was born here in
Denison.
They have a huge monument of hishead and the park and town.
Yeah, he was born here inDenison.
(40:44):
So was my son.
My son, houston, was born herein Denison.
I'm broadcasting fromEisenhower's hometown and I'm
broadcasting from Eisenhower'shometown.
Rasha M says Eisenhower'sfarewell speech should be viewed
way more.
I totally agree About thewarning about the military
(41:09):
industrial complex.
And then we're over on Rumbleas well.
Good to see everybody.
Paleo Armory says love the 80stech background.
Thank you.
Yeah, it was one of my favoritemovies when I was a kid.
Always made me think yeah, thisis an interesting time, ladies
(41:38):
and gents.
A lot of things happening allat once.
I try to cover what I think whenI look at the show, look at the
headlines.
I try to cover what I think isthe most pressing matters and
try to stay out of anything.
That's just, and this is what Ihave to do.
When there's so much going on,you need to pay attention to
what is going to be the mostvaluable information.
This is what I think is themost valuable, and a lot of the
(42:00):
politics and the things that areweighing us down, I don't think
that they'll matter and, giventhe big picture, you only have
so much brainpower At least I do, right, I only have so much
brainpower.
All right, let's pull this up.
Let me stop this screen.
There was an article up on ZeroHedge and we'll cover this all
(42:20):
the way to the end.
We'll close out the show thisway.
I won't be able to get to theentire thing, but it does have
some great points in it.
All right, let me pull this up.
This is Zero Hedge eight pointsin it.
All right, let me pull this up.
This is zero hedge.
There we go, the magic ofclassics us gold and silver
coins, and there there's a lotof magic there.
(42:41):
This is by the jesse colombo,the bubble bubble report over on
substack.
There's a great article saysmost gold and silver investors
begin their journey bypurchasing modern bullion coins
such as the American gold andsilver eagles from the United
States Mint, a practical andpopular way to invest in
precious metals.
(43:01):
And how I started as well.
However, I soon discovered thatthe United States Mint once
minted gold and silver coins foreveryday circulation, not just
for investment purposes, liketoday's bullion coins.
As I delve deeper into theseclassic American coins, I
developed a profoundappreciation for their elegance,
historical significance andconnection to a time when the US
(43:24):
dollar was made from and backedby gold and silver.
He you know.
In this article I'm going to gointo what those coins were and
their significance, he says.
For years after the ratificationof the United States
Constitution, congress passedthe Coinage Act of 1792.
This landmark legislationestablished the US dollar as the
(43:48):
nation's standard unit ofcurrency, created the United
States meant and self set forthregulations for coinage.
This act is designated thesilver dollar is the official
unit of money and declared itlawful legal tender.
It also introduced three goldcoins the ten dollar eagle, the
(44:08):
five dollar half eagle and thetwo dollar and 50 cent quarter
eagle eagle, the $5 half eagleand the $2.50 quarter eagle.
It's funny I just bought theother day I bought a $2.50
Indian and I'm going to probablyput it into a bezel for another
necklace.
Those are great little savingsaccounts you can wear because
(44:35):
it's about you know, it's thesize of about a dime, if you
know really about the size ofthe Krugerrand there I have
around my neck and it's worthlike I don't know.
It's over $300 or so of meltvalue, I'm pretty sure, and that
was $2 and 50 cents.
The $20 double Eagle coincontaining 0.9675 troy ounces of
gold was introduced in 1849 asa means to utilize the market as
(45:01):
the significant influx of goldfrom the California gold rush
Remember the 49ers A lot of newgold hit the system.
It's funny, though, even throughbecause the market expanded and
because we had so many, there'smore people, there's more goods
and services and everythingelse, even with the introduction
of new gold hitting the market,prices remain steady.
(45:27):
And because of innovation see,even with gold, new gold hitting
the market and you know again,new units it didn't necessarily
expand the money supply toincrease prices, like fiat
currency does, if that makes anysense Because people were,
(45:48):
because of the technology thatwas being rolled out in the
Industrial Revolution and allthe rest, prices went down.
See prices going up is notnatural.
We should be in a deflationarysystem.
There should be a better widget, a better way to make something
.
And when you have fiat currency, prices go up because they
expand the money supply and theyreward things and institutions
(46:11):
that should not be rewarded.
You see the inverse and theperversion of the markets.
There was no inflation in the19th century.
None Brief periods possibly,but overall.
Like I always say, if you weregoing to see George Washington,
you bought a new suit.
That suit cost the same in 1902.
(46:34):
Let me see.
From 1795 to 1933, the UnitedStates meant produce gold coins
and designed for everyday userather than for investment or
collecting.
During this period, silvercoins were commonly used for
daily transactions.
Why gold coins primarily servedas a means of savings and
(46:54):
wealth preservation.
Gold coins were also used forlarge purchases, such as land
and in commercial transactions.
Due to their high value, goldcoins were typically owned by
the affluent.
In particular, the $20 golddouble eagles were stored in
bank vaults and seldomcirculated in everyday life
(47:16):
because of their substantialvalue.
Well, like I said, $20, so let'slook at this $20, a $20 gold
piece is 0.9675 ounces of gold.
So let's do the math.
Let's see what $20 inpurchasing power.
Today gold is 2,669 LuciferianBankster notes per troy ounce.
(47:38):
So if we want to find out themelt of a $20 gold piece times
0.9675, that's $2,58 dollars formelt on a twenty dollar gold
piece.
Two thousand five hundred andeighty two.
(47:58):
Let's see if your primary goalis to invest in gold while still
enjoying a touch of history, asopposed to collecting rare
coins, focus on common 20-yeargold double eagles from the late
1800s and early 1900s as yourbest bet.
(48:20):
Yeah, here's another tip.
If you're ever somewhere andsomebody is going to give you
you know pre-33 coins, don'tever buy one that says 1933.
There's only like.
The Smithsonian has some.
Some were stolen.
Those are worth.
Well, if they're worth,whatever criminality you'd be in
(48:40):
.
Somebody stole some, right,there were some circulating, but
I've had them.
Come into the shop, you'll havethese people, they'll put them
across the counter and I'll lookat the date and I go uh-oh,
that's really bad that you haveone of those that's fake.
You don't want to buy one thatsays 1933 on it, but that's the
last time we made actual moneyin this country.
(49:05):
As far as classic coins go,these coins typically carry the
lowest premiums over the spotprice for gold.
For instance, brilliant,uncirculated $20 St Godin's
Double Eagles at a 6% premiumover spot.
Well, sometimes I can do betterthan that.
(49:26):
It just really depends Dependson how many you buy.
We buy them all the time and alot of times we'll turn around
and sell them to customers.
I keep a lot in inventory, butthey are fun and they do
constitute a collector.
You are being a collector there, but you still have the gold.
(49:48):
Still have the gold.
Uh, the smaller ten dollar,five dollar and two dollar fifty
cent gold eagle series coinsare certainly fascinating and I
personally own a few, he says.
However, they tend to carrysignificantly higher premiums
compared to the twenty dollargold double eagles.
Well, that's true too.
And but all things fractionaldo folks, I mean all all
(50:10):
fractional gold and fractionalsilver is going to have a
premium.
It just always does.
It's the way.
Even I have to buy it that way.
It's the way it is.
There's an addition to classicamerican gold coins.
I also enjoy investing inclassic american silver coins
which were minted for everydaycirculation between 1794 and
(50:31):
1970.
Well, sparingly, from 1965 to1970, that's where you get the
40% Kennedy halves.
Today these coins are a popularway to invest in silver and
commonly referred to as junksilver.
I don't like that either.
I like constitutional silver.
Pre-1965 silver coins are 90%,40% and 35%.
(50:53):
I like a little bit of the 40%Kennedy Habs if there's a deal
on them, but typically not.
And he is right, they are fun.
And I like the pre-33 gold andpre-1965 silver always fun to
collect and you can get thatthrough Wise Wolf silver always
(51:14):
fun to collect and you can getthat through wise wolf.
You can go through any of ourwebsites.
You can give us a call, you cantext us, you can email us,
whatever you like.
We will help you take some ofyour fake fiat federal reserve
notes, your luciferian baxternotes and turn them into actual
money.
All right, don't forget paratrolive this weekend, sunday, 4 pm
Central Time, 5 pm Eastern.
Have your questions ready.
(51:35):
I will have a lot to discuss,much going on, a little bit of
conspiracy news and always agood time to be with Chris
Graves and Mr Anderson.
You guys take care of eachother.
Always appreciate you joiningus.
Share the links, be sure, andsubscribe to the channel.
Give us a review, if you can,from Beans the Brave and the
crew and myself.
(51:56):
You guys take care of eachother.
End of transmission.
Then out spake brave Horatius, the captain of the
gate To every man upon thisearth.
Death cometh sooner or late.
And how can a man die betterthan facing fearful odds for the
ashes of his fathers and thetemples of his gods?
Lord Makalai, you are listeningto the Arterburn Radio
(00:42):
Transmission.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
In conclusion, the objective of economic research
as conducted by the magnates ofcapital, banking and the
industries of commodities is theestablishment of an economy
which is totally predictable andmanipulatable.
In order to achieve a totallypredictable economy, the
low-class elements of societymust be brought under total
(01:32):
control, ie must be housebroken,trained and assigned a yoke and
long-term social duties fromevery early age, before they
have an opportunity to questionthe propriety of the matter.
In order to achieve suchconformity, the lower class
family unit must bedisintegrated by a process of
(01:52):
increasing preoccupation of theparents and the establishment of
a government-operated daycarecenter for the occupationally
orphaned children.
The quality of education givento the lower class must be the
poorest sort, so that the moatof ignorance isolating the
inferior class from the superiorclass is and remains
incomprehensible to the inferiorclass.
(02:14):
With such an initial handicap,even bright lower class
individuals have little, if any,hope of extricating themselves
from their assigned lot in life.
This form of slavery isessential to maintain some
measure of social order, peaceand tranquility for the ruling
upper class.
That's from a document that wasfound in an IBM copier in 1986
(02:39):
at an estate sale estate sale.
It's dated May 1st 1979, andit's a technical manual on the
enslavement of mankind calledthe Silent Weapons for Quiet
Wars, and you can look that uponline for free.
Interesting story, interestingbackground.
It is definitely what the elitehave been doing.
You call them the elite, youcan call them the parasite class
(03:02):
, the upper echelon, lizardpeople whatever your moniker is,
ladies and gentlemen, I thoughtI'd lead with that, because it
doesn't matter what the politicsare of your preferred class or
your team or whatever is goingon in your own mind.
We're still inside the GreatReset, we're still inside Agenda
(03:24):
2030.
We're still inside Agenda 2030.
We're still inside Agenda 21.
That's what's happening.
And you were listening to theYard of Burn radio transmission
broadcasting in defiance ofglobalist goblins, the neocons
and the new world order.
I'm broadcasting from deepwithin the heart of Texas, along
with my co-pilot and co-host,beans the Brave.
We joined David Knight, as wedo every Thursday, to talk about
(03:50):
the ever-changing financialglobal landscape which, even if
you follow it every single day,like me and it's my wheelhouse
and over and over again, what'sgoing on with BRICS, what's
happening to the dollar, what'sthe new payment systems, what's
happening to the SWIFT system?
And then, of course,geopolitical tensions.
(04:10):
And I said, you know, a coupleof weeks ago I said well,
there's a lull in the market.
You know, trump's beenreselected, he's going to have a
new administration, 45 and 47make 9-11.
So we're going to put that intoeffect.
And you know, I knew that therewould be a temporary pullback
(04:31):
in precious metals.
And again, parapolitics andprecious metals folks I mean,
this is my show, that's what wetalk about they all flow
together, believe it or not.
And there was a pullback.
But now you look at theheadlines and you know you can
start with things like Drudge.
But we're going to dig evendeeper.
Russia launches an ICBM whichis an intercontinental ballistic
(04:52):
missile.
I'm sure, as this is alllanguage, I mean, this isn't
like.
You know, they're not testinganything.
They're showing language to therest of the world.
They're showing language to therest of the world.
And if you don't have thebackground in, well, even if
you're not interested, or if youhaven't read like I have, if
you haven't just become like anerd where you just get wonky
(05:14):
and read into you know thegeopolitical movements and
foreign policy going back, youknow, post-world War II, then
all this looks kind of well,it's kind of normal.
Well, it's absolutely not.
It's not normal.
These are.
We've been escalating tensionsover there since well, I mean
long before Russia invadedUkraine.
(05:34):
That was the purpose of it.
The you know.
You can even go back to the endof the Cold War, when Secretary
of State James Baker gave averbal promise to Mikhail
Gorbachev that if they withdrewtheir troops, the Soviet troops,
inside the natural borders ofRussia and let the Soviet Union
peacefully collapse, that wewould not expand NATO, which was
(05:57):
the entire reason for NATOitself.
The North Atlantic TreatyOrganization was based on George
Kennan's long telegram and theTruman Doctrine on containment.
It wasn't necessarily aboutrollback.
It wasn't supposed to beaggressive, it was supposed to
be about containment.
And this became a rollback.
This became an aggressivemovement.
(06:19):
Nato expanded.
We promised we would not expandNATO.
We expanded NATO in their facewhile they were weak, and this
(06:40):
has been a long time coming.
So a lot of these, you know themoves to a new administration.
But the outgoing administrationis saying well, let's see,
let's see if we can escalatethis into Armageddon prior to
the arrival of the newadministration.
So here's what's happening.
Let me put this up on thescreen real quick.
This is Kitco.
(07:01):
Gold surges on geopoliticaltensions and Putin's nuclear
doctrine revision, gold futureshave continued its impressive
gains, marking three consecutivedays of price advances, amid
escalating global tensions andsignificant geopolitical
developments.
The precious metals value hasbeen bolstered by recent
statements from RussianPresident Vladimir Putin, who
(07:23):
has modified Russia's nucleardoctrine, creating ripples of
concern in international markets.
Putin's revised nuclearstrategy introduces a
provocative interpretation ofpotential aggression, suggesting
that any attack supported by anuclear power would be
considered a joint assault onRussia, potentially triggering a
(07:44):
nuclear response.
Now let's just stop right there.
I don't know that that's achange in doctrine, ladies and
gentlemen.
That's why we had proxy wars.
If you go back to the 20thcentury, wars like the Korean
War, that was language youunderstand.
That was a test model, you know, to test the resolve of the
(08:10):
United States and the UnitedNations.
You know ability to roll backcommunism or to thwart the
spread of internationalcommunism, and that was given.
That was a green light by theKremlin for North Korea to
overwhelm the 38th parallel andtake the entire peninsula.
That's what that was for.
And of course, there wasDouglas MacArthur and there was
(08:33):
the Korean War and you have allof that.
You know that history of notnecessarily taking, you know a
taking North Korea back.
It was.
It was a line drawn, and that'sthe argument between MacArthur
and Truman.
Macarthur wanted to drop 70atomic weapons on mainland China
and litter the Yalu River withnuclear waste so that the
(08:55):
communist Chinese troopscouldn't cross the border and
send troops into the house ofSouth Korea.
But the deal is and that's whatthe history shows is that
Truman wanted the containmentdoctrine of not necessarily
rolling back but stopping anyfurther advancement, and that's
why you have that argument.
(09:15):
That's why he fired MacArthurand that's why we still have
troops in South Korea.
That's why we still have the38th parallel and the DMZ.
Same thing with Vietnam.
Vietnam was language.
We fought proxy wars there.
I mean, that's why the Russiansand you can get into there's
also the internationalmultinational banking cartels
(09:38):
like the Rockefellers andRothschilds, who supplied
through US goods and servicesand commodities, supplied the
Soviet Union with the weapons tokill American troops in Vietnam
.
That's, I mean, that'sundisputable fact.
We did that, allowing thesecorporations and others to do
that.
But we fought these wars.
(09:59):
That's what we did.
We fought them on battlefields,not attacking each other
directly.
We did.
We fought them on battlefields,not attacking each other
directly.
That's what the Cuban MissileCrisis was about.
Why do you think the Soviets?
And they parked missiles inCuba.
The same way we parked missilesin Turkey, but we didn't dare
fire weapons made by either oneof us into the sovereign
(10:22):
territory of either one of thosethe United States or their
allies, or anything else.
It was again proxy wars, andthat's the difference.
That's why this is so alarming.
Despite the alarming rhetoric,world leaders and strategic
analysts are cautiouslyinterpreting Putin's nuclear
(10:44):
doctrine update.
Many experts view the change asa sophisticated diplomatic
maneuver designed to intensifydeterrence against Western
intervention, rather than agenuine indication of intimate
nuclear escalation.
Well, the thing is, if you'vegot crazy people like we do, you
(11:05):
may back Putin into a cornerwhere he has no choice, and it's
like if you weren't going tohave a red line.
If you're going to actuallyhave any respect, you're going
to have to do something, and itsometimes will look like and
become escalation.
The financial markets haveresponded predictably by these
(11:27):
mounting uncertainties.
Gold futures have demonstratedremarkable resilience,
experienced substantial gainsthis week.
As of 6 pm Eastern time this isyesterday the December contract
price is 2,631 LuciferianBankster notes for a troy ounce
of the Yeddle Medal that's thefutures price Representing a net
(11:48):
increase of $16.40 or 0.63% thecumulative gains this week have
reached an impressive $86.70,with significant daily
increments of $49 on Monday and$20 the following day.
Well, that's what I said, allthe fundamentals, and this is
(12:10):
just a.
Again, this is a little bit ofchange.
All this was going onbeforehand.
What's interesting is that youhave, like, this schizophrenic
market where I don't know if youguys are watching this, but the
price for Bitcoin $97,356.
(12:31):
We're within striking distanceof 100K.
That's going on while gold ishaving a rebound, so now we're
starting to see things flowtogether.
Synchronicities.
Simultaneously, traditionalfinancial indicators present a
(12:54):
complex economic backdrop.
The US dollar index hasstrengthened, gaining 0.45% and
settling at 106.
Treasury yields have also shownnotable movement and if you
follow the dollar, like I do,these numbers are again
(13:14):
consistent with a reshuffling.
I think, again, people go intodifferent markets depending on
who they perceive or what systemthey perceive to be the most
dominant.
Persistent conflicts in boththe Middle East and Ukrainian
theaters continue to underscoregold's enduring appeal as a safe
(13:35):
haven asset.
As geopolitical uncertaintiespersist and potential resolution
remains distant, investors areincreasingly turning to gold as
a reliable store of value duringturbulent times.
Yeah Well, these are turbulenttimes, ladies and gents, and
that's why I've been advocating,I've been saying that, whatever
(13:58):
your political views, whateveryour team, whatever you think's
going on, all this is going onregardless.
And these geopolitical tensionsand what's happening with the
dollar around the world, thefundamentals and everything that
has made these crazy drives inthe price of things like Bitcoin
(14:23):
and gold, I mean, why do youthink that's really going on?
I mean, yes, there's a lot ofspeculation in Bitcoin, but why
is that?
It is the antithesis of thesystem.
In the Greek mythology, wheneveryou would have something like,
you'd have a character who wouldbecome hubristic.
(14:43):
You had hubris, right Arrogance, like see themselves as God,
like an infallible.
And that's what those who whoespouse the modern monetary
theory, mmt or, as David Knightcalls it, the magic money tree,
that's hubris, folks.
That's what that is.
That's where, oh, nothing likethis has ever worked in history.
(15:09):
It's never worked.
It's always gone to zero, butthis time will be different.
It's like when they trycommunism again and again.
Well, that was different.
That was under Mao, or that'sunder Stalin, or that's under
Khrushchev, or that's underCastro, and that didn't work.
Or that's socialism inVenezuela, that's Chavezism.
That didn't work because ofthat, but in the purest sense,
(15:32):
it works.
It never does.
Fiat currency and Marx, theseare fairy tales.
They're awful, nightmarishfairy tales.
Else they end in mass graves,bloodshed, bankruptcy, you know
apocalypse, now type horror, youknow, to quote Colonel Kurtz.
(15:53):
So this is.
But that's what it is.
It's hubris and in the Greekmythology, whenever you present
hubris, the gods would summonnemesis, which was the total
opposite, which was theirdestroyer.
And that's a lot of whatBitcoin and the.
You realize how fast we'veadvanced in the consciousness of
(16:14):
human beings around the worldto be aware of fiat currency and
the dangers of that.
It wasn't that.
It was 10 years ago.
I was running for congress andtalking about this and it.
It wasn't super popular.
I mean, you'd have some peoplein the crowd going, oh yeah, I
get about the federal reserveand the.
You know, I get that about.
(16:34):
You know fake currency and theinternational banking cartels
and oh, I get that, I'd hearthat.
I, you know they'd raise theirhand, there'd be some spring.
Now it's, it's ubiquitous, it'severywhere.
And there was a couple of yearsafter that I was getting into
the Bitcoin ATMs and theneventually we launched Wise Wolf
, and the reason I did that isbecause this is a trend.
Not only was I interested in it, and that's my passion, but
(16:58):
this is a trend.
What we're watching is historyunfolding.
You're just seeing the very tipof a complete change in the
global financial structure,which will be a complete change
in the, in the, in the world.
It'll be complete change inculture.
It'll be a complete change inpolitics.
Everything, all the powerstructures, will change based on
(17:20):
this, and that's what I'mshowing you.
This is a revolution that'shappening.
It's not just about pricingmodels and it's not just about
commodities, right?
Think about that.
Think about Bitcoin at $100,000.
What does that mean?
That means that the currentfinancial system needs an escape
(17:43):
hatch.
Gold and silver are just money.
Bitcoin has other aspects to it.
I mean you can.
If you go out and trade yourtime for for money, you want to
get something like gold andsilver.
You don't want fiat.
The reason you don't is becausethey're constantly creating new
fiat currency and they'redevalued, so you wouldn't.
(18:04):
You wouldn't want that.
You would want something that'sgoing to withstand things like
inflation or geopoliticalturmoil and have you know it
exists and it's a store ofenergy and it has a 5,000 year
history.
That's why you'd want somethinglike that.
But again, we're talking abouta complete change of global
(18:25):
financial orders.
The hubris has summoned nemesis.
Interesting to watch?
All right, I'm going to.
I will check the chat.
By the way, I'll check the chattoday.
I've got the chat on Rumblepulled up.
I've got a chat on Rockfinpulled up over.
Not a space age.
(18:45):
No, this is the backdrop to.
I thought it was appropriate.
This is the backdrop to NORADin the movie War Games with
Matthew Broderick, where theyhave Joshua, the AI computer
built by Mr Falcon, and that'swhere you get the famous line
(19:09):
about the only way to win is notto play the game.
I will check Rockfin as wellhere shortly, but I want to jump
into some more articles, justkind of off the.
If we stay on the line offoreign policy, because this is
the most important story, wehave to be very careful to
(19:30):
understand this.
Or again it's like oh, it'sover, we have an election, it's
over.
No, it's not over.
Until it's over.
Right, let me stop this screenand we'll pull up this.
This is natural news, just morein the realm of foreign policy.
(19:51):
Moscow promises devastatingresponse if Zelensky strikes
deep in Russian territory.
This is by Ethan Huff missilesdeep into Russia, a move that
(20:15):
Russian Foreign Ministryspokeswoman Maria Zekharova
warns will provoke a devastatingresponse from Moscow.
At a news briefing this week,zakharova addressed a report
from the Telegraph last weekclaiming that the United Kingdom
and France are asking theUnited States for permission to
approve Ukrainian strikes onRussia using storm, shadow and
(20:35):
scalp cruise missiles beforePresident-elect Donald Trump is
installed in January.
If the Kiev regime getspermission for the affirmation
strikes, we will treat it asNATO de facto entering a direct
conflict with Russia.
Entering a direct conflict withRussia, zakharova said the
(20:59):
response to the use of Westernlong-range weapons against the
territory of our nation would beimminent and devastating.
I can't emphasize enough.
And our mainstream media, theteleprompter readers and hairdos
, the dead soul automatons formultinationals, they don't know
this history.
I feel like you know this was.
(21:23):
You know going back to themovie Terminator 2, and you had,
you know, the young John Connorand he's talking to the
Terminator.
He's talking to the terminator,talking to the ai and uh, he
tells them how he gets theystart judgment day.
You know how they launch the,get the world and the human
beings to kill themselves.
(21:44):
You know, with nuclear weapons,or at least to start the chain
of events so they could get ridof human beings.
And basically they launched,launch on Russia.
So Russia will launch on us andand John Connor says, wait,
russia aren't, aren't they ourfriends?
Now, you know this is going backto the uh, early nineties and I
remember watching that as a kidand thinking, well, we avoided.
(22:08):
You know the cold war, it ended.
You know my as a kid, I wasgrowing up there was.
You know the cold war, it ended.
You know my as a kid, I wasgrowing up there was.
You know everything was aboutthe cold war.
You had rambo movies, you hadthings like rocky four.
You know the go and fight.
Ivan drago and I was fascinatedwith the soviet union and, uh,
that history there.
And of course he reached the90s and by december, on
(22:30):
christmas in 1991, gorbachevgives up the ghost and the
Soviet Union disappears off theface of the planet.
It's, I mean, one of the mostepical events in human history.
We don't, I don't think werealize just what a massive
event that was.
And the fact that it wentpeacefully it says a lot about
(22:50):
the you know who Gorbachev was.
I mean, it says a lot aboutGod's intervention, with the
fact that we didn't have theydidn't bring the temple down on
us at the same time.
It could have been a revanchist, very dark period in history,
but it wasn't.
And they were our friends andwe botched it period in history
(23:15):
but it wasn't.
And they were our friends andwe botched it.
Our leaders, like Paul Wolfowitz, with the Wolfowitz Memorandum
in 1992, singled out Russia asthe main enemy and that we would
do everything in our power tomake sure that they were only a
regional power and never wouldexpand to a global power again.
And there was no real—if youread the Wolfowitz memorandum,
(23:35):
there's no real it's not athoughtful scenario where
they've taken it to its logicalconclusion about what Russia
would do if we did launchmissiles inside of their
territory, which were called onby the Wolfowitz memorandum.
So you would think that we hadlong ago patched this up, and
(23:57):
this is what a huge blunder thishas been.
We already knew that theemerging global economy would
require different affiliations,different strategic alliances,
and we just botched it.
We fed and awakened the dragon.
It's something Napoleon saidabout China.
(24:17):
He says China is a sleepingdragon.
It'd be wise to let it continueto slumber.
No, we went and just poked itand woke it up and said hey,
here's all our manufacturing,here's all our technology here,
take it, we'll open our marketsto you.
We won't charge you anythingfor entrance.
It.
We'll open our markets to you.
We won't charge you anythingfor entrance.
You charge us.
Do our old playbook.
So you put on tariffs and we'lltake them off, because that's
(24:40):
what we're.
We're so smart, we have themodern monetary theory, all of
our economists are so brilliant.
So we gave China everything.
We gave them through free tradeagreements and offshoring and
taking our factories out andthen supplying weapons
(25:00):
technology for backroom dealsand bags of cash to the Chinese,
and you know it's kind of anagreed, not you know wink and a
nod built China up and at thesame time, instead of forming
alliances like we did that's thewhole reason.
(25:21):
We opened China was supposedlywas to offset the balance of
power between the Soviet Unionas a whole and Mao's China China
and make it triangulardiplomacy.
That's what it was supposed tobe.
But instead we just went aroundthe world night-sticking people
like a drunk cop, like for thepolicemen of the world, and went
(25:45):
all into the it's funny, right,there's seven countries in five
years.
What does that have to do withthe American security?
Absolutely nothing.
We did all the wrong thingsright.
We just botched this entiredeal.
I happen to believe it was onpurpose right to put the United
States in the position that itis today.
Let's continue down with thisarticle.
(26:10):
Russia has repeatedly said thatlonger-range Western-supplied
weapons are a no-go in Ukraine,at least not when Ukrainian
forces are using them on theirown.
Nato specialists are needed, asis intelligence data obtained
through the bloc's satellitesystems, in order for the
weapons to be used properly.
(26:30):
See, this is where NATO becomesan just back up a minute to
remember.
I remember distinctly he's likewine sipping.
You know the, the folks thatyou find in university towns,
like on social media when Russiainvaded Ukraine, media when
(26:57):
Russia invaded Ukraine and I'msure they have all their
political affiliations are tothe left of Karl Marx.
You know they would say stufflike well, nato's never been an
aggressor, and I rememberthinking I was with NATO.
You know, we bombed Serbia for78 days Not an aggressor.
What about Gaddafi?
(27:18):
You know what about Syria?
We have all sorts of operationsthat NATO's taken part in the
Taliban.
It's like the Taliban didn'tattack us on 9-11.
They got leveled by NATO.
Don't give me that.
I love the way that fauxintellectuals try to reset
(27:42):
history based on their ownignorance.
Possibility that Washingtonwill give Kiev the green light,
like London and Paris are asking.
If that happens, russianForeign Minister Sergei Lavrov
said that Moscow will considersuch an action to be indicative
of NATO joining the conflictdirectly.
(28:02):
If such weapons are used, thatwould mean that not just Ukraine
but NATO nations are openly atwar with Russia.
Yes, that's what that means.
You know.
It is really just ridiculous towatch all this, just all of the
(28:26):
equity that's been built up.
Think about all of the.
You know you go back to JFK'sspeech at American University in
June of 1963, right before hewas murdered by the deep state
and he talks about what genuinepeace is.
They talk about a genuine peace, not the peace of the slave or
(28:49):
the security of the grave, notsimply peace in our time, but
peace in all time.
You know he's talking aboutlaying the foundations for
generational peace.
That's one of the reasons thathe got killed right, because
that's not profitable.
You think about all the equitythat was built up, all the lives
that were given, all of thestrategic moves that were made,
(29:10):
all the treaties that weresigned, all the summits that
were happening between you knowEisenhower riding in an open car
with Khrushchev, for you knowthe back-channel communiques on
the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Or Reagan at Reykjavik endingthe Cold War, and for what?
So we could fast forward to nowand they just like tear off all
(29:32):
the warning signs and all thegovernors and everything.
We just keep marching forwardonward to war.
That's an on purpose thing,folks.
Another this is Putin's changesto Russia's nuclear doctrine.
Another recent development isthe change in President Vladimir
(29:53):
Putin's made to his country'snuclear doctrine Attacks on
Russia by a non-nuclear state,ie Ukraine, that is supported by
a nuclear power, ie the UnitedStates, will be considered by
Russia as a justification for anuclear response.
I don't think that's such ahuge departure from where we
already were.
I mean, think about that IfCuba would have launched
(30:20):
missiles on the United States,president Kennedy said that
would be considered an attack onthe United States by the Soviet
Union, because it de de factois, because it's entering into
sovereign territory by thedueling powers.
That's why we have these proxywars.
It was a way for the militarycontractors to still make their
(30:42):
money right and still have allwe still have the ritual of
death for these psychopaths.
We could still have that alittle bit of outlet for them
without, you know, taking theentire planet and setting it on
fire, and there was a way totest out new toy, all this stuff
.
That's why we had the.
(31:03):
Well, there's a multiple reasonswhy we had, you know, wars in
the middle east wasn't so muchproxy as it was.
You you know it was about aforeign powers lobby.
That's a.
That was a big reason for it.
But you get what I mean.
Just read that again.
(31:24):
America, if the pro-war Westgets its wish, russia is ready
to sandblast the West aspunishment using nuclear weapons
, because we've been hearingthis kind of rhetoric for a
while and eventually somethingis going to break.
There's also talk that Ukrainemight try to cheat by passing
(31:45):
off Western-supplied missiles ashaving been built in Ukraine,
which Tsarkovsky called bloodycheating, mourning that this
could not even be possible forUkraine to pull this off without
US support.
Well, it's so blatantly obvious.
They're a death cult.
I mean these never before evengo back to World War I and a lot
(32:10):
of people don't know thishistory.
But they had something calledthe Von Schlieffen Plan and I
mean you had these like Prussiangenerals you know that coming
out of the Franco-Prussian Warof the late 1870s with Bismarck
and others like very pro-war andthey just really because of the
arms manufacturer Krupp youknow the Krupp family they
(32:31):
really perfected the steel thatmade these cannons, these
long-range cannons and artillerypieces.
This was a huge leap intechnology.
So the Arms of Krupp that's agreat book by William Manchester
, and so they have these newtechnologies and everything.
But they had these old worldthinking.
But they kept redrawing thislike this.
Von Schlieffen was the headgeneral.
(32:52):
He kept redrawing this likethis.
Devon schlieffen was the headgeneral.
He kept redrawing the plans andshelving the plans, so like
what would happen if we wantedto mobilize and we wanted to
take france and the rapid, youknow blitzkrieg and all that.
And france had some plans drawnup, all the everybody had plans
to go to war and then somebodythat lit the fuse.
You had the you know themurdering of the archduke
(33:12):
ferdininand, and that reallywasn't it.
But that's what kind of set off.
You know, all the differenttreaties were pulled between
Austria and Serbia, who joinsthe war and who doesn't, right,
and of course they execute thevon Schlieffen plan at least
they try to, and it doesn'treally work, based off of
(33:33):
technologies that had changedand troop movements.
But at the same time you hadthe Kaiser, the head of Germany.
He actually had a nervousbreakdown and he was trying to
stop it and they couldn't stopit.
None of the statesmen reallywanted it, they just wanted to
(33:53):
flex for a while.
But all these treaties startedfollowing.
It's a domino effect and theycouldn't put the genie back in
the bottle.
And then you have thisbloodletting for four years with
massive leaps in technology,you know, with the airplane
(34:17):
technology.
You know with the airplane with.
You know gas, with mustard gasand chlorine gas, and you know
belt-fed machine guns and allthese other things, but with
like 19th century tactics.
It was just an awful that'swhere you get trench warfare but
they couldn't stop it.
Well, those people were ahundred times better than what
we have today I don't—if youknow anything about history and
you look at the currentheadlines and you read into the
(34:37):
biographies of the people thatare making calls now.
I don't want to be totallyblackmailed or anything, but
it's absolutely terrifying.
Yeah, one day before Zakharovaissued her warning, former
British Prime Minister BorisJohnson, that buffoon, told GB
(34:58):
News in an interview that Londoncould send troops to Ukraine to
try to stop Kiev from beingdefeated by Moscow.
Well, can we get this straight?
That Moscow I mean Russia couldhave already taken Ukraine?
It's not the goal.
It's such a lazy way to look atit.
By the way, I don't have couldhave already taken Ukraine.
It's not the goal.
It's such a lazy way to look atit.
And, by the way, I don't have adog in this fight.
It's just so you don't thinkI'm.
(35:18):
You know, I'm not a ruse.
I've never been to Russia.
I will go someday.
There's too much history therenot to go, but if you know the
background, it's just ridiculous.
And you have these buffoons andpeople like these disheveled
degenerates like Boris Johnsonwho, instead of being a voice
(35:42):
for peace and reason andcompromise or you know real
politic?
This isn't real politic.
This is insanity.
Johnson says there is worrywithin the Western cabal that
Trump might decrease or evenabolish all military aid to Kiev
, which would completelydecimate the deep state in an
(36:03):
instant.
Well, maybe right, maybe right.
Definitely their kitty.
You know what?
You would do well, ladies andgents, to go and look up the
definition of the wordboondoggle.
It's like an unnecessary thing.
(36:25):
Unfortunately, this is a verysatanic boondoggle, if not the
most satanic that's everpresented itself, and it's all
centered around the breadbasketof Europe which is Ukraine.
Russia says it has no plan toattack any NATO member states.
However, should NATO getinvolved in the Russian-Ukraine
conflicts?
(36:45):
All bets are off.
It'd be interesting to enterthe reality of the likes of
Starmer and Macron to understandwhat makes them think that
resorting to such desperatemeasures could force Russia to
yield.
A commander wrote about thesituation.
Yeah, this is the question.
You're backing a nuclear-armedRussia into a corner.
(37:10):
They have what?
10,000 nuclear weapons.
They were first in space.
They still have nuclearsubmarines, massive landmass
natural resource, all thesethings.
Now their economy is about the.
It's not you know the best inthe world, but it's still a
(37:30):
force to be reckoned with andcan trigger massive loss of life
.
That's where you get the termmega-death.
It's for a term of nuclear war,it's the fallout from a nuclear
exchange, that every millionpeople that are killed is called
(37:50):
a mega-death, that everymillion people that are killed
is called a mega-death.
Quote it is plain to see thatRussia is facing a very nasty
and implacable enemy, wroteanother.
In a situation like this,military force is a necessary
and indispensable option.
Boris and Starmer.
British intelligence representsa genuine threat to world peace
, said another.
(38:10):
They are stupid and enmeshed intheir Russophobic fantasies.
They need to be slapped awaylike naughty children.
That's exactly right.
It's like the same ilk asLindsey Graham or one of these
(38:35):
other psychopaths.
This is really hard to watchand you wonder like just hope
cooler heads prevail in the faceof it.
All right, I'm going to checkchat.
And then we've got one morearticle talking about pre-1933
gold coins.
Be sure, and follow theParatrooper podcast.
We just put a new one out withMonica Perez.
(38:57):
That was a great guest.
A lot of fun.
Had Mr Anderson and ChrisGraves on with me as well.
We're going to start doingParatrooper live on Sundays, 5
pm Eastern, 4 pm Central time.
So Rockfin Rumble here on my X.
You can go and check that out.
We'll have guests sometimes,but we're creating a different
(39:22):
format.
We're still going to have thedeep dive shows and do the ones
that are pre-recorded, but Ithought we'd do a lot.
We do audience participationand so much more.
So go check out paratruth.
We'll be doing that as well.
Let me check the rockfin chat.
Let's see we've got uh, oh,it's a healthy chat today.
We got jason barker in the chat.
(39:42):
Uh, jason says he's got megoing over on free world.
Thank you, jason.
Yeah, we need to.
Uh, I need to call you thisweek on free world.
Dustin helms in the chat saystony went to the bunker for his
broadcast.
Yeah, this is the.
This is norad.
I'm in norad.
I thought it was apropos fortoday.
Uh, and chris in the chat.
(40:02):
Good to see you and appreciateyou.
Gardener goldsmith, the greatguard.
Goldsmith, you need to give mea call, brother.
We need to do a show, uh, butwe've put that off too long.
Let's let's jump in and do astream this week.
Uh, let's see what is truth isalso in the chat.
Good to see you.
I'll make sure I didn't missanybody.
Nancy chambers says hi, tony.
(40:22):
Good to see you, nancy.
Yeah, if you want to watch, youcan watch the show.
It's for free over onrockfincom.
Uh, the video is live.
Just making sure I didn't missanybody here.
Yeah, dustin Helms saysEisenhower was born here in
Denison.
They have a huge monument of hishead and the park and town.
Yeah, he was born here inDenison.
(40:44):
So was my son.
My son, houston, was born herein Denison.
I'm broadcasting fromEisenhower's hometown and I'm
broadcasting from Eisenhower'shometown.
Rasha M says Eisenhower'sfarewell speech should be viewed
way more.
I totally agree About thewarning about the military
(41:09):
industrial complex.
And then we're over on Rumbleas well.
Good to see everybody.
Paleo Armory says love the 80stech background.
Thank you.
Yeah, it was one of my favoritemovies when I was a kid.
Always made me think yeah, thisis an interesting time, ladies
(41:38):
and gents.
A lot of things happening allat once.
I try to cover what I think whenI look at the show, look at the
headlines.
I try to cover what I think isthe most pressing matters and
try to stay out of anything.
That's just, and this is what Ihave to do.
When there's so much going on,you need to pay attention to
what is going to be the mostvaluable information.
This is what I think is themost valuable, and a lot of the
(42:00):
politics and the things that areweighing us down, I don't think
that they'll matter and, giventhe big picture, you only have
so much brainpower At least I do, right, I only have so much
brainpower.
All right, let's pull this up.
Let me stop this screen.
There was an article up on ZeroHedge and we'll cover this all
(42:20):
the way to the end.
We'll close out the show thisway.
I won't be able to get to theentire thing, but it does have
some great points in it.
All right, let me pull this up.
This is Zero Hedge eight pointsin it.
All right, let me pull this up.
This is zero hedge.
There we go, the magic ofclassics us gold and silver
coins, and there there's a lotof magic there.
(42:41):
This is by the jesse colombo,the bubble bubble report over on
substack.
There's a great article saysmost gold and silver investors
begin their journey bypurchasing modern bullion coins
such as the American gold andsilver eagles from the United
States Mint, a practical andpopular way to invest in
precious metals.
(43:01):
And how I started as well.
However, I soon discovered thatthe United States Mint once
minted gold and silver coins foreveryday circulation, not just
for investment purposes, liketoday's bullion coins.
As I delve deeper into theseclassic American coins, I
developed a profoundappreciation for their elegance,
historical significance andconnection to a time when the US
(43:24):
dollar was made from and backedby gold and silver.
He you know.
In this article I'm going to gointo what those coins were and
their significance, he says.
For years after the ratificationof the United States
Constitution, congress passedthe Coinage Act of 1792.
This landmark legislationestablished the US dollar as the
(43:48):
nation's standard unit ofcurrency, created the United
States meant and self set forthregulations for coinage.
This act is designated thesilver dollar is the official
unit of money and declared itlawful legal tender.
It also introduced three goldcoins the ten dollar eagle, the
(44:08):
five dollar half eagle and thetwo dollar and 50 cent quarter
eagle eagle, the $5 half eagleand the $2.50 quarter eagle.
It's funny I just bought theother day I bought a $2.50
Indian and I'm going to probablyput it into a bezel for another
necklace.
Those are great little savingsaccounts you can wear because
(44:35):
it's about you know, it's thesize of about a dime, if you
know really about the size ofthe Krugerrand there I have
around my neck and it's worthlike I don't know.
It's over $300 or so of meltvalue, I'm pretty sure, and that
was $2 and 50 cents.
The $20 double Eagle coincontaining 0.9675 troy ounces of
gold was introduced in 1849 asa means to utilize the market as
(45:01):
the significant influx of goldfrom the California gold rush
Remember the 49ers A lot of newgold hit the system.
It's funny, though, even throughbecause the market expanded and
because we had so many, there'smore people, there's more goods
and services and everythingelse, even with the introduction
of new gold hitting the market,prices remain steady.
(45:27):
And because of innovation see,even with gold, new gold hitting
the market and you know again,new units it didn't necessarily
expand the money supply toincrease prices, like fiat
currency does, if that makes anysense Because people were,
(45:48):
because of the technology thatwas being rolled out in the
Industrial Revolution and allthe rest, prices went down.
See prices going up is notnatural.
We should be in a deflationarysystem.
There should be a better widget, a better way to make something
.
And when you have fiat currency, prices go up because they
expand the money supply and theyreward things and institutions
(46:11):
that should not be rewarded.
You see the inverse and theperversion of the markets.
There was no inflation in the19th century.
None Brief periods possibly,but overall.
Like I always say, if you weregoing to see George Washington,
you bought a new suit.
That suit cost the same in 1902.
(46:34):
Let me see.
From 1795 to 1933, the UnitedStates meant produce gold coins
and designed for everyday userather than for investment or
collecting.
During this period, silvercoins were commonly used for
daily transactions.
Why gold coins primarily servedas a means of savings and
(46:54):
wealth preservation.
Gold coins were also used forlarge purchases, such as land
and in commercial transactions.
Due to their high value, goldcoins were typically owned by
the affluent.
In particular, the $20 golddouble eagles were stored in
bank vaults and seldomcirculated in everyday life
(47:16):
because of their substantialvalue.
Well, like I said, $20, so let'slook at this $20, a $20 gold
piece is 0.9675 ounces of gold.
So let's do the math.
Let's see what $20 inpurchasing power.
Today gold is 2,669 LuciferianBankster notes per troy ounce.
(47:38):
So if we want to find out themelt of a $20 gold piece times
0.9675, that's $2,58 dollars formelt on a twenty dollar gold
piece.
Two thousand five hundred andeighty two.
(47:58):
Let's see if your primary goalis to invest in gold while still
enjoying a touch of history, asopposed to collecting rare
coins, focus on common 20-yeargold double eagles from the late
1800s and early 1900s as yourbest bet.
(48:20):
Yeah, here's another tip.
If you're ever somewhere andsomebody is going to give you
you know pre-33 coins, don'tever buy one that says 1933.
There's only like.
The Smithsonian has some.
Some were stolen.
Those are worth.
Well, if they're worth,whatever criminality you'd be in
(48:40):
.
Somebody stole some, right,there were some circulating, but
I've had them.
Come into the shop, you'll havethese people, they'll put them
across the counter and I'll lookat the date and I go uh-oh,
that's really bad that you haveone of those that's fake.
You don't want to buy one thatsays 1933 on it, but that's the
last time we made actual moneyin this country.
(49:05):
As far as classic coins go,these coins typically carry the
lowest premiums over the spotprice for gold.
For instance, brilliant,uncirculated $20 St Godin's
Double Eagles at a 6% premiumover spot.
Well, sometimes I can do betterthan that.
(49:26):
It just really depends Dependson how many you buy.
We buy them all the time and alot of times we'll turn around
and sell them to customers.
I keep a lot in inventory, butthey are fun and they do
constitute a collector.
You are being a collector there, but you still have the gold.
(49:48):
Still have the gold.
Uh, the smaller ten dollar,five dollar and two dollar fifty
cent gold eagle series coinsare certainly fascinating and I
personally own a few, he says.
However, they tend to carrysignificantly higher premiums
compared to the twenty dollargold double eagles.
Well, that's true too.
And but all things fractionaldo folks, I mean all all
(50:10):
fractional gold and fractionalsilver is going to have a
premium.
It just always does.
It's the way.
Even I have to buy it that way.
It's the way it is.
There's an addition to classicamerican gold coins.
I also enjoy investing inclassic american silver coins
which were minted for everydaycirculation between 1794 and
(50:31):
1970.
Well, sparingly, from 1965 to1970, that's where you get the
40% Kennedy halves.
Today these coins are a popularway to invest in silver and
commonly referred to as junksilver.
I don't like that either.
I like constitutional silver.
Pre-1965 silver coins are 90%,40% and 35%.
(50:53):
I like a little bit of the 40%Kennedy Habs if there's a deal
on them, but typically not.
And he is right, they are fun.
And I like the pre-33 gold andpre-1965 silver always fun to
collect and you can get thatthrough Wise Wolf silver always
(51:14):
fun to collect and you can getthat through wise wolf.
You can go through any of ourwebsites.
You can give us a call, you cantext us, you can email us,
whatever you like.
We will help you take some ofyour fake fiat federal reserve
notes, your luciferian baxternotes and turn them into actual
money.
All right, don't forget paratrolive this weekend, sunday, 4 pm
Central Time, 5 pm Eastern.
Have your questions ready.
(51:35):
I will have a lot to discuss,much going on, a little bit of
conspiracy news and always agood time to be with Chris
Graves and Mr Anderson.
You guys take care of eachother.
Always appreciate you joiningus.
Share the links, be sure, andsubscribe to the channel.
Give us a review, if you can,from Beans the Brave and the
crew and myself.
(51:56):
You guys take care of eachother.
End of transmission.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!