September 10, 2024 • 33 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
It's that time.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
Time, time, time, luck and load.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
The Michael Arry Show is on the air.
Speaker 3 (00:24):
This is a tough business.
Speaker 4 (00:26):
You're a tough guy, jed by this, and we need
to have a leader that is really tough.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
You're never going to be president.
Speaker 3 (00:31):
I insult in your way too.
Speaker 4 (00:33):
Let's see, I'm at forty two and you're at three,
So don't matter.
Speaker 1 (00:35):
I'm doing better.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
Doesn't matter so far, I'm doing better. My friends Star
was born.
Speaker 5 (00:42):
It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of
Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in
our country, because you'd be in jail.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
I'm dead. My friends Star was born.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
I'm going to continue to moving too. We get the
crow Bank.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Total initiative relatives to what we're gonna do with more
border control for more'.
Speaker 4 (01:07):
I really don't know what he said at the end
of this thing is I don't think he knows what
he said.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
He who kind of dead? My friends?
Speaker 5 (01:14):
The star was he didn't use that nine hundred and
sixteen million dollar loss to avoid paying personal federal income taxes.
Speaker 3 (01:20):
But of course I do.
Speaker 4 (01:21):
Of course I do, and so do all of her donors,
or most of her donors.
Speaker 3 (01:25):
I know many of her donors.
Speaker 4 (01:26):
Her donors took massive tax writeoffs, so a lot of
my kids, a lot of my write off was appreciation
and other things that Hillary as a senator allowed, and
she'll always allow because the people that give her all
this money they want it.
Speaker 3 (01:39):
That's why I'm dead.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
My faith star was born.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
One of the things that I think is appealing to
a lot of independent voters who or not party aligned
party supporters, and maybe in many cases not typically very political,
is the idea of bringing in good people with a
(02:16):
core competence and not really competence, far more than that
exceptionalism in passion in a particular field, rather than the
same old, same old political hacks. President Trump has talked
about and committed to, bringing in Elon Musk for a
(02:37):
government accountability and efficiency role. He's talking about Robert F.
Kennedy to come in and restore America's faith in our
medical institutions and get big pharma out of our government.
You know, my biggest complaint I've said this and some
(02:58):
of you don't like to hear it with President Trump
in his first term was the people he surrounded himself with.
And he's been very clear about this that he had
to hire sixty thousand people, and he didn't know what
to do and it ended up being a bunch of
lobbyists and things. People who did not serve him. Are
our country well, and you have to build this organization overnight.
(03:24):
So RFK Junior was on the Full Sinned podcast when
he revealed that President Trump told him that he was
locked in by the swamp in twenty seventeen and he
does not want.
Speaker 2 (03:35):
To do that again.
Speaker 6 (03:36):
President Trump, I think, tried to do that the last time,
to drain the swamp, and he was well intentioned, but
he didn't know how to do it. And he said
that to me. He said, you know, I didn't know
anything about governing. And he said, we won this election
and then all of a sudden, you got to fill
sixty thousand jobs.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
Or something like that.
Speaker 6 (03:58):
And he said, I was surrounded by people by lobbyists
and business interests. We're saying, you gotta point this guy.
You got to appoint that guy. And that's what he did.
And you know, he brought in Scott Gottlieb, who was
a Pfiser business partner, to run the FDA. Gottlieb did
a one hundred billion dollar favor for Pfizer and then
(04:19):
what did he do. He went back to join Pfiser's
board with all the stock you know, dividends, so it's
just a pay you know, revolving d oar payoff. And
there was you know, there was h They brought in
a telecommunications lobbyist to run FCC. They brought an oil lobbyist,
Ryan Zink to run the Department of Interior, a cole
(04:41):
lobbyist to run the EPA, another pharmaceutical lobbyist alex A
Zar to run HHS.
Speaker 3 (04:50):
You go across the.
Speaker 6 (04:51):
Board and all of these agencies were being run and
that's what they all do.
Speaker 3 (04:55):
That's what they all do.
Speaker 6 (04:56):
And Trump the last time locked into that and he
told me, I don't want to do that again. He said,
those are bad guys, and this time we're going to
do something different.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
And he doesn't. He doesn't. He said, you know, last
time he brought John Bolton and to run n s A.
Speaker 6 (05:12):
And he now understands who the neocons are and what
you know what he's any war. He wants to end
the wars. And he did a pretty good gut jobs
last time. There was no you know, us UH combat desk.
Speaker 3 (05:29):
During his during his administration. But uh, you know, I
think that he wants to leave a legacy. He doesn't.
Speaker 6 (05:40):
He's not going to run again. He's a lame duck president.
And yeah, he wants to do something that's good for
this country. And I can help him do that because
I have sued all these agencies. I've sued FDA, CDC, NIH,
I've sued the FCC. I just want a big case again.
It's the FCC in the Court of Appeals aligned to
(06:03):
the American public about the dangers of cell phone radiation
and now they have to redo all of those regulations.
I've sued the USDA, the agriculture and most of the
big agricultural producers. And when you sue these companies, when
you sue these these agencies, you get a PhD.
Speaker 3 (06:22):
And how corporate capture works and how to unravel it.
Speaker 6 (06:25):
And you know, I know how to do that, and
he's as paid I help him do that. So if
we do that, if he does what he says, I'm
very optimistic that we can actually remediate remedy a lot
of this corruption.
Speaker 1 (06:42):
Imagine that, you know a lot of people talk about
politics like they're cheering for a sporting team. They want
the team that wears our jersey to win. These are
the people that get very very mad Joe Montana for
leaving San Francisco and going to Kansas City because he
(07:04):
was supposed to stay with the forty nine ers. It's
a paycheck, man. But we're not talking about playing for
our team and wearing our jersey. We're talking about the
nation we live in and consequential decisions about who's going
to live here. Are we going to have terrorists among us?
(07:26):
Are we're going to have Haitians eating our house pets?
Are we going to have the most criminal element the
world can dump onto us? Or are we going to
be a self sustaining, proud, prosperous nation. Government service should
be like being a deacon at the church, or homeowners
(07:46):
association president or coach of the Little league. It should
be an honor. It should be the sort of thing
that you take on for a brief period of time
to give something back to the community. It should be
public service, not a job, not a career, not an industry.
(08:10):
Not wanting to be rich off of this process. That's
how they're supposed to work. You start bringing in guys
like rfk Jr. Like Elon Musk. You start bringing in
people with great ideas and the ability to make those
ideas happen. That's what government should be. That's what government
(08:35):
can be. Come in, make a contribution, and then go
back and run your business and do it for the
right reasons in the right way. That's what's at stake
in this debate.
Speaker 7 (08:49):
To me, what erst I've been destroying the black community
is to dismantle the black family. Michael Berry show, why
don't we ask missus Willie Brown if Kamala Harris cares
about black families?
Speaker 1 (09:01):
It is the poem before the storm, the big debate
Tonight's and some undercover audio that I think is extraordinarily powerful.
The problem is there are so many big bombshell stories
that all cut in favor of President Trump that you
(09:24):
can't give them all the oxygen to take off as
the wow fire they are. At the same time. Effective
messaging means narrowing that messaging, but it doesn't mean I
can't share it with you. Let's dig back into the
cases against Donald Trump. A senior This happened over the weekend.
(09:48):
A senior Department of Justice spokesman in New York was
secretly filmed criticizing Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg for prosecuting
former President Donald Trump, accusing Brag of using law fair
to advance his political career and to hurt Trump. Nicholas Biassi,
(10:11):
the chief spokesman for the Manhattan US Attorney's Office, was
captured on a hidden camera during a conversation with an
undercover operative from podcaster Steven Crowder's Mug Club, where he
expressed his disapproval of the progressive prosecutor fat Alvin Bragg.
(10:32):
And he doesn't know he's being recorded. This is seven
minutes twenty seconds long. It's undercover audio, so it's not
as good as we would normally like normally play, but
bear in mind that's what you're listening to. But it's
very important to hear it. And that's why we're playing
(10:53):
it now.
Speaker 2 (10:54):
As colonies and nothing stop rumber one.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
So in fact, in morell.
Speaker 3 (11:01):
Is that backfire. Sure Jo and their thing is discussing.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
It is out together. And that's why I like concerting the.
Speaker 3 (11:15):
You know, superverting the justice.
Speaker 1 (11:18):
You start in charge of some rearranging things.
Speaker 8 (11:22):
Just to be a picture because.
Speaker 2 (11:26):
Nonsense. Eight levels of the wild. They're like idiots. They
don't care, and they're all they're like, oh.
Speaker 9 (11:38):
Yeah, this one's prob.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
They're gonna try to look them up.
Speaker 10 (11:41):
There is gonna be, it's gonna be.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
There's sexually getting.
Speaker 11 (11:51):
Honestly, who I've known for shustings the words.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
Before she decided to rescue because you know who was.
Speaker 12 (12:02):
Now I'm not sure bloody watch to be, but I
know he's not happy you just being the DA New
York shouted, Alvin very indial, you're really real estate person?
Speaker 2 (12:13):
What post where he can?
Speaker 1 (12:15):
Nobody's ever been charge with us?
Speaker 2 (12:19):
That's all right. I'm actual show because I sure that.
Speaker 12 (12:25):
You stack in charges and re arranging things just that
it cast us thinks.
Speaker 2 (12:36):
You're really realistic person.
Speaker 3 (12:38):
Thus where he can?
Speaker 1 (12:39):
Nobody's ever been charge with us. That's all right, And
that's why I conservative the bus, you know, perversion of.
Speaker 2 (12:49):
Just those colonies did nothing?
Speaker 3 (12:51):
The stops Trump for running, That's not no.
Speaker 2 (12:55):
In fact, they made him more relevant?
Speaker 3 (12:57):
Is that backfire?
Speaker 2 (12:59):
Sure is?
Speaker 12 (13:02):
And that was was that Alvin bad or?
Speaker 2 (13:07):
What is Alvin very ambitious?
Speaker 5 (13:11):
What you mean.
Speaker 1 (13:15):
You know suffer?
Speaker 12 (13:16):
I don't know what there I'm not surely when he
wants to be, but I know he's not happy just
being the d New yorkality.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
This is like before they decided to dusky Trump because
you know who was Now, what was the point of
you been doing at then? To make him a convict?
Speaker 3 (13:41):
Make him what convicts itself.
Speaker 1 (13:45):
He's so run for presidency and yeah, but it affects
his scanty.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
He's a convicted tone I'm trying to like, I wonder,
like how many are again.
Speaker 3 (14:00):
It's my roun there.
Speaker 2 (14:01):
Yes, that's at that is what they are.
Speaker 7 (14:05):
I mean.
Speaker 2 (14:09):
At the peral level, for hour, there is.
Speaker 12 (14:13):
A ninety day rule where you can't make.
Speaker 3 (14:16):
Any decisions on cases that are going to affect in election.
Speaker 12 (14:23):
That rule does not applying the state level because the
state levels.
Speaker 3 (14:29):
They are like idiots.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
They don't care at all. They all so, yeah, this
one's probably gonna try to look them up.
Speaker 10 (14:40):
There is going to be it's gonna.
Speaker 5 (14:41):
Be a.
Speaker 3 (14:44):
There's st sexual getting.
Speaker 7 (14:51):
How they get away with that.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
It's a different system like the state level, like.
Speaker 2 (15:06):
It's hard to explain, like they're more rules.
Speaker 3 (15:13):
A level and there's like.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
The rush room for prime time.
Speaker 8 (15:21):
Like I said, like the state level is like a
wild muster. It's like very uh, A lot of them.
Speaker 2 (15:32):
Like less Jackson.
Speaker 7 (15:36):
Ellis, I have to try to be against drunk because
you don't You're all the level.
Speaker 9 (15:41):
I don't think I'm like Fanny Well, Fanny will.
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Is Georgis, what do you think of that case? Least
probs the Eustice put it's a backery Jess a j.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
Boyfriend, she.
Speaker 2 (16:04):
Is the stuff.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
It's out together. Who is that out my album?
Speaker 2 (16:10):
Back?
Speaker 11 (16:11):
You guess who I've known for her systems used to
work in my office.
Speaker 1 (16:14):
So here's us.
Speaker 12 (16:16):
There's Alvin who knows county level, and he decided to
do the Hicks from Michael Cohen, who's their star witness
who prospered.
Speaker 3 (16:29):
Because he's like, he's got to stick.
Speaker 12 (16:37):
To York ACTI He's like, he stipulous grows in the
chief of Bula Jeris and I'm Michael.
Speaker 10 (16:43):
He has me.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
This is Michael Cohen.
Speaker 7 (16:45):
I want you guys.
Speaker 3 (16:48):
Like Bakate conviction.
Speaker 8 (16:51):
I'm like, I can't really, I'm not authorized to speechure
victims or defendants because I know it was a pretty
good answer.
Speaker 3 (17:02):
Not knowing news on and I shot the news.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
I was my time, who Patty's teach him? And I
was like the media and he goes, I have one
of the biggest podcasts in the York.
Speaker 2 (17:14):
But I kind of didn't believe that. Yeah, and I
was like, oh, you're so defemini.
Speaker 3 (17:18):
I read that for plus business.
Speaker 10 (17:21):
Don't know for fifteen.
Speaker 1 (17:22):
Years, how well are you know the work with him?
Speaker 11 (17:29):
No, we weren't that, but I mean, like I seen him,
We were like we know which got really well, But like,
do I respect.
Speaker 3 (17:38):
What he's doing?
Speaker 5 (17:39):
You know?
Speaker 3 (17:40):
Is he a nice guy? What about the other people?
Speaker 12 (17:45):
Political perversion?
Speaker 11 (17:47):
Yes, John stuff, Well we suferred out all reinvestigating. Uh,
you know, decided that for one thing.
Speaker 8 (17:59):
And there is President Army of diet is impressed. President
you cannot cannot There's an opposite.
Speaker 2 (18:06):
Way, the lookers pool.
Speaker 12 (18:07):
They can occupy this.
Speaker 3 (18:08):
Cousin which to succeed his ropers to about too.
Speaker 8 (18:12):
So I give its second.
Speaker 3 (18:14):
But the dam the.
Speaker 7 (18:17):
First I've been destroying the black community is to dismantle
the black family.
Speaker 1 (18:21):
Michael Berry's show.
Speaker 7 (18:22):
Why don't we ask missus Willie Brown if Kamala Harris
cares about black families?
Speaker 1 (18:27):
I want to be very clear that President Trump has
a job to do tonight, and there are a lot
of factors at play that he can't control. What are
the anchors going to do. What is Kamala going to do,
What's going to be said afterwards, Will there be protesters,
all the things that go into that. But I want
(18:47):
to be clear that you are not a popcorn eating
passive observer in the game of life. This is your
nation and other people around the world don't get to
have input into the direction of their nation, but you do.
Regardless what happens tonight. You can't just pick your team
(19:09):
Team Trump. I'm for Trump, and then root for him
to do everything. You still need to win the local
races in your community. You still need to win the
statewide races. The two thousand election went down to Catherine
Harris being the Secretary of State in Florida. Had she
not been the secretary of State President Bush, then Governor
(19:33):
Bush would have never had a chance to win and
al Gore would have been the president. It matters what
you do locally, what you personally do. It all adds up,
and it matters. President Trump is appealing the verdict in
the e. Jen Carroll civil case. His attorney Will Sharf
(19:54):
spoke to the media outside the courtroom about this case
and he completely dismantles that case and what I would
like to do. Now is play for you his critique
of that case, because I'll bet most of you haven't
(20:17):
heard this before.
Speaker 5 (20:18):
Oh my name is Will Sharf. I'm one of President
Trump's attorneys. Today we presented an oral argument before the
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in
one of two cases brought against President Trump by Egen Carroll. Now,
it's really important to remember that Egen Carroll's story, at
its heart is an utterly implausible he said, she said story.
(20:39):
There is no corroboration for anything she has ever aimed
about President Trump. There are no corroborating witnesses, as President
Trump alluded to, There is not confirmatory DNA, no police
report was filed at the time of this alleged incident.
She was unable to identify when this incident occurred. Until
quite recently. No surveillance evidence or witnesses have ever been
(21:01):
found or come forward confirming any aspect of Egen Carroll's story.
In light of that, in light of the utter implausibility
of the story that Egene Carroll was attempting to sell
to the jury in this case, her attorneys introduced evidence
that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom
(21:22):
utterly insane efforts to introduce propensity witnesses Jessica Leads and
Natasha Stoinoff, most notably in an unfair and improper effort
to buttress Egene Carroll's failed attempt to assault President Trump.
Jessica Leads' story is instructive here. This is a woman
(21:43):
who claims in the middle of a crowded airliner in
nineteen seventy nine, President Trump assaulted her.
Speaker 3 (21:50):
Leeds has never been able.
Speaker 5 (21:51):
To identify where this plane departed from where it went
to the date of the flight in question, making our
efforts to her testimony extremely difficult. Under the federal rules
of evidence, this story should have never been allowed to
be presented to the jury in this case. The same
is true of Natasha Stoinoff's story, which again lacks any
(22:13):
indici of reliability, any sort of credibility, any sort of
confirmatory testimony from other witnesses, or anything else that would
make you believe that this actually happened. So, on the
one hand, you have a judge who allowed in this
improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in
in our view, that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case,
(22:36):
that presented a story to the jury of a series
of a pattern of conduct that the jury should should
not have been considering. And we think that absent that
propensity evidence, no fair jury could have reached the verdict
that was reached in this case. And as a result,
we believe that this verdict needs to be overturned. But
there's more than that. In addition to this improper propensity evidence,
(22:59):
President Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross
examining Eging Carroll and other witnesses on crucial issues. Crucial
issues in particular relating to political coordination in the political
motivation behind this entire lawsuit. This is a lawsuit that
was instigated in large part by George Conway, a longtime
(23:20):
political foe and adversary of President Trump. This is a
lawsuit that was funded by Reid Hoffman, a key political
ally of the Biden Harris administration and a major Democrat donor.
We were limited in the evidence we were allowed to
present a trial about these crucial facts. We were prevented
from cross examining e Gen Carroll on aspects of that
(23:42):
dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit, and that too unfairly
corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal
of the jury verdicts. I think this political coordination point
is particularly important, though it's important to emphasize because what
we have seen in the last few years is a
weaponization by the Biden administration and by their political allies
(24:06):
of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully,
unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to
run for president. That is a right guaranteed to him
by the Constitution. That is the right that his political
opponents are attempting to strip away from him. We have
seen this in case after case after case, where unfair
(24:28):
political motives have underlay what should be excuse me, serious
legal proceedings. And I think when you look at this
situation in Tode, when you look at what the left,
when you look at what the Biden Harris administration is
attempting to do to President Trump, this is insane. This
is an absolute abuse of our legal system. It's an
(24:49):
absolute abuse of the rule of law. It should be
deeply offensive, not just to political supporters of President Trump,
but to each and every American. With respect to today's
a peace we are hopeful that the Second Circuit understands
what's at stake here. We are hopeful that the Second
Circuit understands what occurred during this trial, which was an
(25:10):
improper use of evidence to buttress E. Gene Carroll's entirely
meritless claims on the one hand, and an improper exclusion
of evidence that would have informed the jury about the
true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would
have resulted in a very different vertical.
Speaker 10 (25:28):
Oh yes, we're going.
Speaker 13 (25:29):
To take your AR fifteen opao, Michael, Oh, yes, yes.
Speaker 1 (25:35):
Senator Tom Cutting, Republicans was on CNN a few days ago,
and he was talking about the lies that the media
engaged in to help Joe Biden in twenty twenty, lies
about Hunter Biden's laptop that over fifty former intelligence officials
(25:58):
said no, no, no, that's Russian dis information. What we
now know those same sources, CNN, New York Times, all
of them say, oh, that really was his laptop, and
what they say was on there really.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
Is on there.
Speaker 1 (26:14):
Well, then, why are the intelligence officials that we were
supposed to trust but not know? Why did they tell us?
Why do they tell us to trust him? Not to
trust him. Why did say trust them and not our
own eyes? One of them was Dana Bash's husband ex husband.
Now that should sort of concern you. Here's what Tom
Cotton had to say, or.
Speaker 9 (26:35):
Should not knowingly take money from the government of Russia
or Iran or China or any other adversarial nation to
try to influence the election.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
But I also think it's fair to.
Speaker 9 (26:43):
Say that a few memes or videos in the vast
seat of political commentary is not going to make much
of a difference in this election, or has it in
past election as well. What didn't make a difference in
the last election is the lies about Hunter Biden's laptop
that more than four dozen former intelligence officials lied about
in the middle of that campaign, and most networks include
this one, bought that livebook line and sinker that didn't
(27:05):
make a difference in the election. But I think a
few videos or commentaries, which again you shouldn't do if
you're out there in the business of commentating on elections,
is not going to make a difference in the vast
sea of commentary we see.
Speaker 1 (27:19):
But they do want to make a difference. They do
want to influence the election. They don't want democracy. They're
the threat to democracy. There are several now debunked lies
that Kamala Harris and the Democrats continue to tell about
Donald Trump. Well, the folks at just the facts. I
(27:42):
don't know the folks at just the facts, but they
have addressed nine of the lies most commonly told about
Donald Trump. And the reason we're playing this is to
give you, is to give you some ammunition if you
find yourself in a situation where you want to defend
(28:04):
President Trump and don't have enough to offer. That being said,
let me explain this. If a known liberal that you're
in the circle of wants to battle you over whether
Trump is an awful person or not, get out of
that situation. There is nothing to be one from it.
(28:29):
If they taunt you, as they often do, and you
get baited into this, they will demoralize you because remember,
they don't care about the truth. If a person in
twenty twenty four is still defending Kamala Harris and attacking
(28:49):
Donald Trump, knowing that your cat could be eaten by
the Haitian that's been dumped on your doorstep, they don't
want the truth, and there's no point in you trying
to deliver the truth. This is for people that are
just not sure, that are low information. They've been told something,
(29:11):
and you're trying to help them get over the hump
and vote for Trump. This again credit to the folks
that just the facts. Nine lies the media has told
you about Donald Trump.
Speaker 10 (29:25):
The media has widely and repeatedly reported Trump's words out
of context in ways that disfigure what he actually said. Now,
it's difficult to tell whether these are honest mistakes or
deliberate lies, but they did this by cutting out words
that He's set in close proximity to one another, sometimes
(29:47):
within seconds.
Speaker 1 (29:49):
Here's nine prime examples.
Speaker 10 (29:51):
One the media widely reported that Trump called immigrants animals.
Speaker 1 (29:57):
In reality, Trump.
Speaker 10 (29:58):
Used the word animals to describe murderous illegal aliens like
MS thirteen gang members, not immigrants in general. Two the
media widely reported that Trump threatened a bloodbath if he
loses the election. In reality, Trump used the term bloodbath
to describe what four more years of Biden's policies would
(30:20):
do to the United States, particularly to the auto industry. Three,
the media widely reported that Trump praised white supremacists as
very fine people. In reality, Trump called them very bad people,
stated that he condemned them and said that the very
fine people were those who showed up to innocently protest. Four.
(30:45):
The media widely reported that Trump said he would use
the FBI and DOJ to go.
Speaker 1 (30:50):
After his political opponents.
Speaker 10 (30:53):
In reality, Trump said that Biden sick the FBI and
DOJ on his political opponents, and this could happen in reverse,
but the people aren't going to stand for it. Five
the media widely reported that Trump told governors to dominate
protesters during the twenty twenty George Floyd ryots, and for
(31:14):
good measure, CNN's Anderson Cooper took it another step further
by saying that Trump seems to think that dominating black
people dominating peaceful protesters is law and order. In reality,
Trump said that he is an ally of all peaceful protesters,
and the governors have a duty to protect innocent people
(31:36):
from professional anarchists, violent mobs, arsonist looters. Six, the media
widely reported that Trump encouraged the Capitol Hill riot by
urging his supporters to fight like hell. In reality, Trump
told his supporters to march over to the Capitol Building
to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard. Seven, the
(32:02):
media widely reported that Trump vowed to be a dictator
on day one. In fact, Trump said that he is
not going to be a dictator except for day one
to close the border and drill, drill, drill. The interviewer
replied that sounds to me like you're going back to
the policies when you were president, and Trump said, that's
(32:25):
exactly right. Eight the media widely reported that Trump called
for Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails. In reality, Trump
repeatedly stated that China, Russia, or an independent.
Speaker 13 (32:39):
Hacker has probably already hacked Clinton's illegal email server, and
if they did, they should release the thirty three thousand
emails that Clinton destroyed after.
Speaker 3 (32:52):
She received the subpoena for them.
Speaker 10 (32:54):
Nine the media widely reported that Trump told Republicans to
vote against the Border Secure Bill because he didn't want
the crisis fixed while Biden was president. In reality, the
bill was loaded with loopholes that permit and reward illegal immigration,
and Trump wrote that he opposes the bill because it
(33:14):
quote only gives shutdown authority after five thousand encounters a day, when.
Speaker 1 (33:20):
We already have the right to close the border now,
which must be done.
Speaker 10 (33:27):
So media outlets report on what Trump says, ask yourself,
What did he say that they didn't report
It's that time.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
Time, time, time, luck and load.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
The Michael Arry Show is on the air.
Speaker 3 (00:24):
This is a tough business.
Speaker 4 (00:26):
You're a tough guy, jed by this, and we need
to have a leader that is really tough.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
You're never going to be president.
Speaker 3 (00:31):
I insult in your way too.
Speaker 4 (00:33):
Let's see, I'm at forty two and you're at three,
So don't matter.
Speaker 1 (00:35):
I'm doing better.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
Doesn't matter so far, I'm doing better. My friends Star
was born.
Speaker 5 (00:42):
It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of
Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in
our country, because you'd be in jail.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
I'm dead. My friends Star was born.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
I'm going to continue to moving too. We get the
crow Bank.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Total initiative relatives to what we're gonna do with more
border control for more'.
Speaker 4 (01:07):
I really don't know what he said at the end
of this thing is I don't think he knows what
he said.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
He who kind of dead? My friends?
Speaker 5 (01:14):
The star was he didn't use that nine hundred and
sixteen million dollar loss to avoid paying personal federal income taxes.
Speaker 3 (01:20):
But of course I do.
Speaker 4 (01:21):
Of course I do, and so do all of her donors,
or most of her donors.
Speaker 3 (01:25):
I know many of her donors.
Speaker 4 (01:26):
Her donors took massive tax writeoffs, so a lot of
my kids, a lot of my write off was appreciation
and other things that Hillary as a senator allowed, and
she'll always allow because the people that give her all
this money they want it.
Speaker 3 (01:39):
That's why I'm dead.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
My faith star was born.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
One of the things that I think is appealing to
a lot of independent voters who or not party aligned
party supporters, and maybe in many cases not typically very political,
is the idea of bringing in good people with a
(02:16):
core competence and not really competence, far more than that
exceptionalism in passion in a particular field, rather than the
same old, same old political hacks. President Trump has talked
about and committed to, bringing in Elon Musk for a
(02:37):
government accountability and efficiency role. He's talking about Robert F.
Kennedy to come in and restore America's faith in our
medical institutions and get big pharma out of our government.
You know, my biggest complaint I've said this and some
(02:58):
of you don't like to hear it with President Trump
in his first term was the people he surrounded himself with.
And he's been very clear about this that he had
to hire sixty thousand people, and he didn't know what
to do and it ended up being a bunch of
lobbyists and things. People who did not serve him. Are
our country well, and you have to build this organization overnight.
(03:24):
So RFK Junior was on the Full Sinned podcast when
he revealed that President Trump told him that he was
locked in by the swamp in twenty seventeen and he
does not want.
Speaker 2 (03:35):
To do that again.
Speaker 6 (03:36):
President Trump, I think, tried to do that the last time,
to drain the swamp, and he was well intentioned, but
he didn't know how to do it. And he said
that to me. He said, you know, I didn't know
anything about governing. And he said, we won this election
and then all of a sudden, you got to fill
sixty thousand jobs.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
Or something like that.
Speaker 6 (03:58):
And he said, I was surrounded by people by lobbyists
and business interests. We're saying, you gotta point this guy.
You got to appoint that guy. And that's what he did.
And you know, he brought in Scott Gottlieb, who was
a Pfiser business partner, to run the FDA. Gottlieb did
a one hundred billion dollar favor for Pfizer and then
(04:19):
what did he do. He went back to join Pfiser's
board with all the stock you know, dividends, so it's
just a pay you know, revolving d oar payoff. And
there was you know, there was h They brought in
a telecommunications lobbyist to run FCC. They brought an oil lobbyist,
Ryan Zink to run the Department of Interior, a cole
(04:41):
lobbyist to run the EPA, another pharmaceutical lobbyist alex A
Zar to run HHS.
Speaker 3 (04:50):
You go across the.
Speaker 6 (04:51):
Board and all of these agencies were being run and
that's what they all do.
Speaker 3 (04:55):
That's what they all do.
Speaker 6 (04:56):
And Trump the last time locked into that and he
told me, I don't want to do that again. He said,
those are bad guys, and this time we're going to
do something different.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
And he doesn't. He doesn't. He said, you know, last
time he brought John Bolton and to run n s A.
Speaker 6 (05:12):
And he now understands who the neocons are and what
you know what he's any war. He wants to end
the wars. And he did a pretty good gut jobs
last time. There was no you know, us UH combat desk.
Speaker 3 (05:29):
During his during his administration. But uh, you know, I
think that he wants to leave a legacy. He doesn't.
Speaker 6 (05:40):
He's not going to run again. He's a lame duck president.
And yeah, he wants to do something that's good for
this country. And I can help him do that because
I have sued all these agencies. I've sued FDA, CDC, NIH,
I've sued the FCC. I just want a big case again.
It's the FCC in the Court of Appeals aligned to
(06:03):
the American public about the dangers of cell phone radiation
and now they have to redo all of those regulations.
I've sued the USDA, the agriculture and most of the
big agricultural producers. And when you sue these companies, when
you sue these these agencies, you get a PhD.
Speaker 3 (06:22):
And how corporate capture works and how to unravel it.
Speaker 6 (06:25):
And you know, I know how to do that, and
he's as paid I help him do that. So if
we do that, if he does what he says, I'm
very optimistic that we can actually remediate remedy a lot
of this corruption.
Speaker 1 (06:42):
Imagine that, you know a lot of people talk about
politics like they're cheering for a sporting team. They want
the team that wears our jersey to win. These are
the people that get very very mad Joe Montana for
leaving San Francisco and going to Kansas City because he
(07:04):
was supposed to stay with the forty nine ers. It's
a paycheck, man. But we're not talking about playing for
our team and wearing our jersey. We're talking about the
nation we live in and consequential decisions about who's going
to live here. Are we going to have terrorists among us?
(07:26):
Are we're going to have Haitians eating our house pets?
Are we going to have the most criminal element the
world can dump onto us? Or are we going to
be a self sustaining, proud, prosperous nation. Government service should
be like being a deacon at the church, or homeowners
(07:46):
association president or coach of the Little league. It should
be an honor. It should be the sort of thing
that you take on for a brief period of time
to give something back to the community. It should be
public service, not a job, not a career, not an industry.
(08:10):
Not wanting to be rich off of this process. That's
how they're supposed to work. You start bringing in guys
like rfk Jr. Like Elon Musk. You start bringing in
people with great ideas and the ability to make those
ideas happen. That's what government should be. That's what government
(08:35):
can be. Come in, make a contribution, and then go
back and run your business and do it for the
right reasons in the right way. That's what's at stake
in this debate.
Speaker 7 (08:49):
To me, what erst I've been destroying the black community
is to dismantle the black family. Michael Berry show, why
don't we ask missus Willie Brown if Kamala Harris cares
about black families?
Speaker 1 (09:01):
It is the poem before the storm, the big debate
Tonight's and some undercover audio that I think is extraordinarily powerful.
The problem is there are so many big bombshell stories
that all cut in favor of President Trump that you
(09:24):
can't give them all the oxygen to take off as
the wow fire they are. At the same time. Effective
messaging means narrowing that messaging, but it doesn't mean I
can't share it with you. Let's dig back into the
cases against Donald Trump. A senior This happened over the weekend.
(09:48):
A senior Department of Justice spokesman in New York was
secretly filmed criticizing Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg for prosecuting
former President Donald Trump, accusing Brag of using law fair
to advance his political career and to hurt Trump. Nicholas Biassi,
(10:11):
the chief spokesman for the Manhattan US Attorney's Office, was
captured on a hidden camera during a conversation with an
undercover operative from podcaster Steven Crowder's Mug Club, where he
expressed his disapproval of the progressive prosecutor fat Alvin Bragg.
(10:32):
And he doesn't know he's being recorded. This is seven
minutes twenty seconds long. It's undercover audio, so it's not
as good as we would normally like normally play, but
bear in mind that's what you're listening to. But it's
very important to hear it. And that's why we're playing
(10:53):
it now.
Speaker 2 (10:54):
As colonies and nothing stop rumber one.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
So in fact, in morell.
Speaker 3 (11:01):
Is that backfire. Sure Jo and their thing is discussing.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
It is out together. And that's why I like concerting the.
Speaker 3 (11:15):
You know, superverting the justice.
Speaker 1 (11:18):
You start in charge of some rearranging things.
Speaker 8 (11:22):
Just to be a picture because.
Speaker 2 (11:26):
Nonsense. Eight levels of the wild. They're like idiots. They
don't care, and they're all they're like, oh.
Speaker 9 (11:38):
Yeah, this one's prob.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
They're gonna try to look them up.
Speaker 10 (11:41):
There is gonna be, it's gonna be.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
There's sexually getting.
Speaker 11 (11:51):
Honestly, who I've known for shustings the words.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
Before she decided to rescue because you know who was.
Speaker 12 (12:02):
Now I'm not sure bloody watch to be, but I
know he's not happy you just being the DA New
York shouted, Alvin very indial, you're really real estate person?
Speaker 2 (12:13):
What post where he can?
Speaker 1 (12:15):
Nobody's ever been charge with us?
Speaker 2 (12:19):
That's all right. I'm actual show because I sure that.
Speaker 12 (12:25):
You stack in charges and re arranging things just that
it cast us thinks.
Speaker 2 (12:36):
You're really realistic person.
Speaker 3 (12:38):
Thus where he can?
Speaker 1 (12:39):
Nobody's ever been charge with us. That's all right, And
that's why I conservative the bus, you know, perversion of.
Speaker 2 (12:49):
Just those colonies did nothing?
Speaker 3 (12:51):
The stops Trump for running, That's not no.
Speaker 2 (12:55):
In fact, they made him more relevant?
Speaker 3 (12:57):
Is that backfire?
Speaker 2 (12:59):
Sure is?
Speaker 12 (13:02):
And that was was that Alvin bad or?
Speaker 2 (13:07):
What is Alvin very ambitious?
Speaker 5 (13:11):
What you mean.
Speaker 1 (13:15):
You know suffer?
Speaker 12 (13:16):
I don't know what there I'm not surely when he
wants to be, but I know he's not happy just
being the d New yorkality.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
This is like before they decided to dusky Trump because
you know who was Now, what was the point of
you been doing at then? To make him a convict?
Speaker 3 (13:41):
Make him what convicts itself.
Speaker 1 (13:45):
He's so run for presidency and yeah, but it affects
his scanty.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
He's a convicted tone I'm trying to like, I wonder,
like how many are again.
Speaker 3 (14:00):
It's my roun there.
Speaker 2 (14:01):
Yes, that's at that is what they are.
Speaker 7 (14:05):
I mean.
Speaker 2 (14:09):
At the peral level, for hour, there is.
Speaker 12 (14:13):
A ninety day rule where you can't make.
Speaker 3 (14:16):
Any decisions on cases that are going to affect in election.
Speaker 12 (14:23):
That rule does not applying the state level because the
state levels.
Speaker 3 (14:29):
They are like idiots.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
They don't care at all. They all so, yeah, this
one's probably gonna try to look them up.
Speaker 10 (14:40):
There is going to be it's gonna.
Speaker 5 (14:41):
Be a.
Speaker 3 (14:44):
There's st sexual getting.
Speaker 7 (14:51):
How they get away with that.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
It's a different system like the state level, like.
Speaker 2 (15:06):
It's hard to explain, like they're more rules.
Speaker 3 (15:13):
A level and there's like.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
The rush room for prime time.
Speaker 8 (15:21):
Like I said, like the state level is like a
wild muster. It's like very uh, A lot of them.
Speaker 2 (15:32):
Like less Jackson.
Speaker 7 (15:36):
Ellis, I have to try to be against drunk because
you don't You're all the level.
Speaker 9 (15:41):
I don't think I'm like Fanny Well, Fanny will.
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Is Georgis, what do you think of that case? Least
probs the Eustice put it's a backery Jess a j.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
Boyfriend, she.
Speaker 2 (16:04):
Is the stuff.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
It's out together. Who is that out my album?
Speaker 2 (16:10):
Back?
Speaker 11 (16:11):
You guess who I've known for her systems used to
work in my office.
Speaker 1 (16:14):
So here's us.
Speaker 12 (16:16):
There's Alvin who knows county level, and he decided to
do the Hicks from Michael Cohen, who's their star witness
who prospered.
Speaker 3 (16:29):
Because he's like, he's got to stick.
Speaker 12 (16:37):
To York ACTI He's like, he stipulous grows in the
chief of Bula Jeris and I'm Michael.
Speaker 10 (16:43):
He has me.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
This is Michael Cohen.
Speaker 7 (16:45):
I want you guys.
Speaker 3 (16:48):
Like Bakate conviction.
Speaker 8 (16:51):
I'm like, I can't really, I'm not authorized to speechure
victims or defendants because I know it was a pretty
good answer.
Speaker 3 (17:02):
Not knowing news on and I shot the news.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
I was my time, who Patty's teach him? And I
was like the media and he goes, I have one
of the biggest podcasts in the York.
Speaker 2 (17:14):
But I kind of didn't believe that. Yeah, and I
was like, oh, you're so defemini.
Speaker 3 (17:18):
I read that for plus business.
Speaker 10 (17:21):
Don't know for fifteen.
Speaker 1 (17:22):
Years, how well are you know the work with him?
Speaker 11 (17:29):
No, we weren't that, but I mean, like I seen him,
We were like we know which got really well, But like,
do I respect.
Speaker 3 (17:38):
What he's doing?
Speaker 5 (17:39):
You know?
Speaker 3 (17:40):
Is he a nice guy? What about the other people?
Speaker 12 (17:45):
Political perversion?
Speaker 11 (17:47):
Yes, John stuff, Well we suferred out all reinvestigating. Uh,
you know, decided that for one thing.
Speaker 8 (17:59):
And there is President Army of diet is impressed. President
you cannot cannot There's an opposite.
Speaker 2 (18:06):
Way, the lookers pool.
Speaker 12 (18:07):
They can occupy this.
Speaker 3 (18:08):
Cousin which to succeed his ropers to about too.
Speaker 8 (18:12):
So I give its second.
Speaker 3 (18:14):
But the dam the.
Speaker 7 (18:17):
First I've been destroying the black community is to dismantle
the black family.
Speaker 1 (18:21):
Michael Berry's show.
Speaker 7 (18:22):
Why don't we ask missus Willie Brown if Kamala Harris
cares about black families?
Speaker 1 (18:27):
I want to be very clear that President Trump has
a job to do tonight, and there are a lot
of factors at play that he can't control. What are
the anchors going to do. What is Kamala going to do,
What's going to be said afterwards, Will there be protesters,
all the things that go into that. But I want
(18:47):
to be clear that you are not a popcorn eating
passive observer in the game of life. This is your
nation and other people around the world don't get to
have input into the direction of their nation, but you do.
Regardless what happens tonight. You can't just pick your team
(19:09):
Team Trump. I'm for Trump, and then root for him
to do everything. You still need to win the local
races in your community. You still need to win the
statewide races. The two thousand election went down to Catherine
Harris being the Secretary of State in Florida. Had she
not been the secretary of State President Bush, then Governor
(19:33):
Bush would have never had a chance to win and
al Gore would have been the president. It matters what
you do locally, what you personally do. It all adds up,
and it matters. President Trump is appealing the verdict in
the e. Jen Carroll civil case. His attorney Will Sharf
(19:54):
spoke to the media outside the courtroom about this case
and he completely dismantles that case and what I would
like to do. Now is play for you his critique
of that case, because I'll bet most of you haven't
(20:17):
heard this before.
Speaker 5 (20:18):
Oh my name is Will Sharf. I'm one of President
Trump's attorneys. Today we presented an oral argument before the
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in
one of two cases brought against President Trump by Egen Carroll. Now,
it's really important to remember that Egen Carroll's story, at
its heart is an utterly implausible he said, she said story.
(20:39):
There is no corroboration for anything she has ever aimed
about President Trump. There are no corroborating witnesses, as President
Trump alluded to, There is not confirmatory DNA, no police
report was filed at the time of this alleged incident.
She was unable to identify when this incident occurred. Until
quite recently. No surveillance evidence or witnesses have ever been
(21:01):
found or come forward confirming any aspect of Egen Carroll's story.
In light of that, in light of the utter implausibility
of the story that Egene Carroll was attempting to sell
to the jury in this case, her attorneys introduced evidence
that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom
(21:22):
utterly insane efforts to introduce propensity witnesses Jessica Leads and
Natasha Stoinoff, most notably in an unfair and improper effort
to buttress Egene Carroll's failed attempt to assault President Trump.
Jessica Leads' story is instructive here. This is a woman
(21:43):
who claims in the middle of a crowded airliner in
nineteen seventy nine, President Trump assaulted her.
Speaker 3 (21:50):
Leeds has never been able.
Speaker 5 (21:51):
To identify where this plane departed from where it went
to the date of the flight in question, making our
efforts to her testimony extremely difficult. Under the federal rules
of evidence, this story should have never been allowed to
be presented to the jury in this case. The same
is true of Natasha Stoinoff's story, which again lacks any
(22:13):
indici of reliability, any sort of credibility, any sort of
confirmatory testimony from other witnesses, or anything else that would
make you believe that this actually happened. So, on the
one hand, you have a judge who allowed in this
improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in
in our view, that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case,
(22:36):
that presented a story to the jury of a series
of a pattern of conduct that the jury should should
not have been considering. And we think that absent that
propensity evidence, no fair jury could have reached the verdict
that was reached in this case. And as a result,
we believe that this verdict needs to be overturned. But
there's more than that. In addition to this improper propensity evidence,
(22:59):
President Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross
examining Eging Carroll and other witnesses on crucial issues. Crucial
issues in particular relating to political coordination in the political
motivation behind this entire lawsuit. This is a lawsuit that
was instigated in large part by George Conway, a longtime
(23:20):
political foe and adversary of President Trump. This is a
lawsuit that was funded by Reid Hoffman, a key political
ally of the Biden Harris administration and a major Democrat donor.
We were limited in the evidence we were allowed to
present a trial about these crucial facts. We were prevented
from cross examining e Gen Carroll on aspects of that
(23:42):
dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit, and that too unfairly
corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal
of the jury verdicts. I think this political coordination point
is particularly important, though it's important to emphasize because what
we have seen in the last few years is a
weaponization by the Biden administration and by their political allies
(24:06):
of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully,
unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to
run for president. That is a right guaranteed to him
by the Constitution. That is the right that his political
opponents are attempting to strip away from him. We have
seen this in case after case after case, where unfair
(24:28):
political motives have underlay what should be excuse me, serious
legal proceedings. And I think when you look at this
situation in Tode, when you look at what the left,
when you look at what the Biden Harris administration is
attempting to do to President Trump, this is insane. This
is an absolute abuse of our legal system. It's an
(24:49):
absolute abuse of the rule of law. It should be
deeply offensive, not just to political supporters of President Trump,
but to each and every American. With respect to today's
a peace we are hopeful that the Second Circuit understands
what's at stake here. We are hopeful that the Second
Circuit understands what occurred during this trial, which was an
(25:10):
improper use of evidence to buttress E. Gene Carroll's entirely
meritless claims on the one hand, and an improper exclusion
of evidence that would have informed the jury about the
true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would
have resulted in a very different vertical.
Speaker 10 (25:28):
Oh yes, we're going.
Speaker 13 (25:29):
To take your AR fifteen opao, Michael, Oh, yes, yes.
Speaker 1 (25:35):
Senator Tom Cutting, Republicans was on CNN a few days ago,
and he was talking about the lies that the media
engaged in to help Joe Biden in twenty twenty, lies
about Hunter Biden's laptop that over fifty former intelligence officials
(25:58):
said no, no, no, that's Russian dis information. What we
now know those same sources, CNN, New York Times, all
of them say, oh, that really was his laptop, and
what they say was on there really.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
Is on there.
Speaker 1 (26:14):
Well, then, why are the intelligence officials that we were
supposed to trust but not know? Why did they tell us?
Why do they tell us to trust him? Not to
trust him. Why did say trust them and not our
own eyes? One of them was Dana Bash's husband ex husband.
Now that should sort of concern you. Here's what Tom
Cotton had to say, or.
Speaker 9 (26:35):
Should not knowingly take money from the government of Russia
or Iran or China or any other adversarial nation to
try to influence the election.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
But I also think it's fair to.
Speaker 9 (26:43):
Say that a few memes or videos in the vast
seat of political commentary is not going to make much
of a difference in this election, or has it in
past election as well. What didn't make a difference in
the last election is the lies about Hunter Biden's laptop
that more than four dozen former intelligence officials lied about
in the middle of that campaign, and most networks include
this one, bought that livebook line and sinker that didn't
(27:05):
make a difference in the election. But I think a
few videos or commentaries, which again you shouldn't do if
you're out there in the business of commentating on elections,
is not going to make a difference in the vast
sea of commentary we see.
Speaker 1 (27:19):
But they do want to make a difference. They do
want to influence the election. They don't want democracy. They're
the threat to democracy. There are several now debunked lies
that Kamala Harris and the Democrats continue to tell about
Donald Trump. Well, the folks at just the facts. I
(27:42):
don't know the folks at just the facts, but they
have addressed nine of the lies most commonly told about
Donald Trump. And the reason we're playing this is to
give you, is to give you some ammunition if you
find yourself in a situation where you want to defend
(28:04):
President Trump and don't have enough to offer. That being said,
let me explain this. If a known liberal that you're
in the circle of wants to battle you over whether
Trump is an awful person or not, get out of
that situation. There is nothing to be one from it.
(28:29):
If they taunt you, as they often do, and you
get baited into this, they will demoralize you because remember,
they don't care about the truth. If a person in
twenty twenty four is still defending Kamala Harris and attacking
(28:49):
Donald Trump, knowing that your cat could be eaten by
the Haitian that's been dumped on your doorstep, they don't
want the truth, and there's no point in you trying
to deliver the truth. This is for people that are
just not sure, that are low information. They've been told something,
(29:11):
and you're trying to help them get over the hump
and vote for Trump. This again credit to the folks
that just the facts. Nine lies the media has told
you about Donald Trump.
Speaker 10 (29:25):
The media has widely and repeatedly reported Trump's words out
of context in ways that disfigure what he actually said. Now,
it's difficult to tell whether these are honest mistakes or
deliberate lies, but they did this by cutting out words
that He's set in close proximity to one another, sometimes
(29:47):
within seconds.
Speaker 1 (29:49):
Here's nine prime examples.
Speaker 10 (29:51):
One the media widely reported that Trump called immigrants animals.
Speaker 1 (29:57):
In reality, Trump.
Speaker 10 (29:58):
Used the word animals to describe murderous illegal aliens like
MS thirteen gang members, not immigrants in general. Two the
media widely reported that Trump threatened a bloodbath if he
loses the election. In reality, Trump used the term bloodbath
to describe what four more years of Biden's policies would
(30:20):
do to the United States, particularly to the auto industry. Three,
the media widely reported that Trump praised white supremacists as
very fine people. In reality, Trump called them very bad people,
stated that he condemned them and said that the very
fine people were those who showed up to innocently protest. Four.
(30:45):
The media widely reported that Trump said he would use
the FBI and DOJ to go.
Speaker 1 (30:50):
After his political opponents.
Speaker 10 (30:53):
In reality, Trump said that Biden sick the FBI and
DOJ on his political opponents, and this could happen in reverse,
but the people aren't going to stand for it. Five
the media widely reported that Trump told governors to dominate
protesters during the twenty twenty George Floyd ryots, and for
(31:14):
good measure, CNN's Anderson Cooper took it another step further
by saying that Trump seems to think that dominating black
people dominating peaceful protesters is law and order. In reality,
Trump said that he is an ally of all peaceful protesters,
and the governors have a duty to protect innocent people
(31:36):
from professional anarchists, violent mobs, arsonist looters. Six, the media
widely reported that Trump encouraged the Capitol Hill riot by
urging his supporters to fight like hell. In reality, Trump
told his supporters to march over to the Capitol Building
to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard. Seven, the
(32:02):
media widely reported that Trump vowed to be a dictator
on day one. In fact, Trump said that he is
not going to be a dictator except for day one
to close the border and drill, drill, drill. The interviewer
replied that sounds to me like you're going back to
the policies when you were president, and Trump said, that's
(32:25):
exactly right. Eight the media widely reported that Trump called
for Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails. In reality, Trump
repeatedly stated that China, Russia, or an independent.
Speaker 13 (32:39):
Hacker has probably already hacked Clinton's illegal email server, and
if they did, they should release the thirty three thousand
emails that Clinton destroyed after.
Speaker 3 (32:52):
She received the subpoena for them.
Speaker 10 (32:54):
Nine the media widely reported that Trump told Republicans to
vote against the Border Secure Bill because he didn't want
the crisis fixed while Biden was president. In reality, the
bill was loaded with loopholes that permit and reward illegal immigration,
and Trump wrote that he opposes the bill because it
(33:14):
quote only gives shutdown authority after five thousand encounters a day, when.
Speaker 1 (33:20):
We already have the right to close the border now,
which must be done.
Speaker 10 (33:27):
So media outlets report on what Trump says, ask yourself,
What did he say that they didn't report
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.