President Trump Sends National Guard as Violent Anti-ICE Riots Erupt in Los Angeles

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
The Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 2 (00:13):
This is the Chad Benson Show. My name is Craig Collins,
filling in, thrilled to be with you. A bunch of
things out there to talk about. Easily, I could talk
to you more about the ongoing trade negotiations between China
and the United States, which will be happening this week.
Those are hopefully going to end well for us, a
meaning that we will both get more from China than
we've ever gotten before because of Donald Trump and his

(00:36):
push there, and also that we'll be able to get
an agreement that won't cause any sort of lasting trade
war to continue between our two countries. That is something
that a lot of us don't want, even if we
understand that a short amount of pain may eventually cause
a lot a lot of happiness down the road if
things go better. That is one thing easily that I

(00:59):
could talk about today. Are several others. Yet you can't,
i think, do a show like this without talking predominantly
about what's going on in Los Angeles right now, and
honestly not just the fact that there's the chaos and
the rioting and the looting, and now the narrative of
whether or not Trump should have sent the National Guard,
but just in general, the way this is becoming so

(01:20):
quickly politicized as it's occurring. You obviously remember I remember
in nineteen ninety two when George H. W. Bush sent
in the National Guard after the Rodney King verdict and
all the crazy stuff that was going on in California.
People were capable of putting politics aside and understanding that
protecting our society means not allowing people to do whatever

(01:43):
they want in the streets, allowing them to fire fireworks
at police officers as part of their quote peaceful protesting.
I will start with some audio of the police chief
in Los Angeles talking a little bit about this and
how crazy it is and simply stating that the police
there are overwhelmed, meaning they need help, they need other
people to come in to fight with them. And the

(02:06):
most rational, obvious decision by the Trump administration, so Barr,
has been the National Guard.

Speaker 3 (02:12):
Night was bad. What we've seen subsequent to that is
getting increasingly worse and more violent. Tonight, we had individuals
out there shooting commercial grade fireworks at our officers that
can kill you. And we have adapted our tactics to
be able to have a chance to be able to
take these people into custody and to be able to

(02:34):
hold them accountable. We are overwhelmed as far as the
number of people out there engaged in this type of
activity and the type of things that they're doing. They'll
they'll take backpacks and the backpack will have a.

Speaker 4 (02:47):
Cinder block in it.

Speaker 3 (02:48):
They have a hammer, and they'll break up the cinder
block and use that pass it around to throw at officers,
to throw at cars, and throw at other people. We've
seen people with hammers, and you've broadcasted breaking the ballards
behind the Federal Building and taking the rocks, if you will,
our pieces of concrete and throwing them at officers. We've
had liquid who knows what description thrown at officers. There's

(03:12):
no limit to what they're doing to our officers. And again,
as I mentioned in my statement, I can't thank our
folks enough and our partner agency police officials for going
out there and taken care of the kise.

Speaker 4 (03:28):
Yes.

Speaker 2 (03:28):
A couple things in reaction to this. First and foremost
what he says at the end, there is something that
we need to be doing on a daily basis, acknowledging
how difficult the job of policing is and what the
police do day in and day out to keep us safe.
They barrel into situations like this, they stand there and
defend as they're being harmed with all kinds of crazy stuff,

(03:50):
cinder blocks and whatnot. And by the way, the other
thing that's ridiculous, and this is the part about politically
retreating into our corners. The police chief in Los Angeles
is telling people how bad it is. And this isn't
all over news media. This is being silenced so that
people can have a discussion about how they think President

(04:11):
Trump is causing these problems, and those people are insane
and on the left. By the way, Trump has said
himself definitively that if politicians and people in power resist
his trying to help get order where there is chaos
in Los Angeles, that they're also going to go to jail.

Speaker 5 (04:29):
I thought this was.

Speaker 2 (04:30):
Fantastic when he was asked about it just before boarding
Air Force one.

Speaker 6 (04:35):
Alif say federal charges that they can in the way
of the deportation, something that pulling me up, you've got this.

Speaker 3 (04:42):
Will stand in the way of law and Audia, they
will face judge, thank you.

Speaker 5 (04:46):
Yeah, thank you very much.

Speaker 2 (04:47):
They will face charges if they stand in the way
of law and order, if they break laws themselves. I
thought that was something you guys wanted. Don't the Democrats
all the time advocate for no one being above the law. Well,
in this case, if you help people pople that are
breaking the law, you are not following it and you
get to be held accountable. That means you're not above it.

(05:07):
I thought that was the whole point.

Speaker 5 (05:09):
Again.

Speaker 2 (05:09):
More audio from this The mayor in LA a very
far left radical person, Karen Bass, who if you dive
into her history and I think a couple different places
on social media have done this, now you see a
myriad of connections to horribly far left ideology and organizations,
and it doesn't look good the further and further you

(05:31):
deep dive into the history of this person. But she
was on CNN talking about how they do not need
any help from anybody as video is being shown of
chaos and horrible things happening in Los Angeles. This was
not something that the CNN person was acknowledging either, but
at least they were showing it how crazy it's been
and they immediately need to blame Trump for something that

(05:52):
was getting out of hand. According to LA Police, almost
immediately that Night one was bad, Night two was worse.
Everything's been getting worse and war because the people are
just being more and more egregious in how they're behaving
and what they're doing to even just civilian vehicles, if
not also police officers, and yet somehow denying this is
the plan for the left try.

Speaker 7 (06:13):
To spread them out a bit. Now obviously they're trying
to disperse them. I'm curious if now that the National
Guard troops are there on the ground, if there is
any urgency on the police department's part to really put
out an even stronger force and a stronger posture to
get this under control so you can and I know

(06:34):
your governor has said that they don't want that. He's
formally requested that the National Guard troops go back, that
they're not needed. Were those things.

Speaker 8 (06:43):
Correlated, Well, I absolutely agree with the governor in asking
that the troops be withdrawn. I don't think that it's
a way to bring peace in Los Angeles.

Speaker 2 (06:56):
I think that our Loyd Okay hell Las Second, So
the person at CNN said, do the police need to
have a more powerful response to what's going on? Does
there need to be more strength. Does there need to
be a more significant demonstration of force from the LAPD
in order to tamp down on the rioting and craziness,

(07:17):
to remove the group of people that's helping you actually
be that force. When the LA police say that they're overwhelmed,
that there's nothing else they can do, there's no more
bodies they can put on this thing, which is what
he just said a moment ago, and then the CNN
people pretend as though LA is not really trying that
hard yet to get this all under control. What I
think about it is just how hilarious all of this

(07:39):
went and how crazy all of this is in the
first place.

Speaker 5 (07:43):
Because to me, and what I won't get.

Speaker 2 (07:45):
Over in any part of the scenario here is that
when you're maximized in effort and you pretend you're not,
you can then say, oh, this person is doing something horrible.
This person is causing us to have, you know, the
negative reaction wordy seeing on the street. When the reality
of your solution is non existent. You're claiming that your
solution can be put into place LA police doing more

(08:07):
so the National Guard can go home and they can't
do it, and they know that this is not a
real solution. They just want you to not think about
that part. Gavenus, some of course also blame President Trump.

Speaker 9 (08:17):
Box News is calling it the la riots.

Speaker 5 (08:19):
Is it a peaceful protest? What's happening?

Speaker 10 (08:21):
And we've seen well, I mean, look, Donald Trump has
created the conditions you see on your TV tonight. He's
exacerbated the conditions. He's lit the proverbial match. He's putting
fuel on this fire ever since he announced he was
taking over on the National Guard in a legal act
and a moral act on constitutional act, and we're going
to test that theory with a lawsuit tomorrow.

Speaker 5 (08:41):
Idiots. Just absolutely an idiot.

Speaker 2 (08:43):
And Gavin Newsom goes on to say how much he
wants to hug everybody out there and get them to
go home by you know, wagging the finger and telling
them that what they're doing is wrong, but not making
them feel any ramifications for their decision to brazenly break
the law, which I think is part of the And
you're seeing so.

Speaker 5 (09:00):
Much of this.

Speaker 2 (09:02):
It's absolutely not lost on me and it shouldn't be
lost on you that something like this is happening in
California and in Los Angeles because for quite a few
years now people have been told in places like LA
that you're allowed to break some of the law, you're
allowed to go a certain amount into the red, as
long as you're a person that's doing it for a

(09:23):
reason that Democrats agree with. If you're breaking the law
because you're fighting racism, or you're breaking the law because
you're doing whatever it might be, as long as your
optics match ours, we're going to go easy on you.
If your optics are the exact opposite of ours, we're
going to attack you with everything we have and even
make you sound worse than you actually are. That's the
plan for us. It's to lean in on one side

(09:46):
and lean out on the other. And who cares how
the actual experience of everyday Americans gets worse. That's not
important to us. Los Angeles and a lot of California
eventually relented on any of the crazy left leaning stuff
the had about homelessness in the area, about what should
and shouldn't be thought of, as you know, too far,

(10:06):
they've eventually tried to clean it up. Their war against
the police defund the police went away when Americans realized
how terrible of an idea that actually was. This is
the latest version of the same thing over and over
again that we're seeing of you advocating for something that
makes things terrible, and then when it goes terrible somehow,

(10:26):
trying to blame the right for all along standing against
your position and now trying to fix it, and then
also saying, but all right, we got to get back
in control.

Speaker 11 (10:35):
Here.

Speaker 2 (10:36):
We swing open the border wide open, everybody can come in.
That causes terrible stuff, and most Americans agree it needs
to be fixed. So let's go ahead and claim we're
now trying to fix the problem we created, and then
try to blame that on Trump too. By the way,
one last piece of audio here before I take a break,
Keith Oberman, wait in and he's still more on too.

Speaker 5 (10:55):
Here's what he.

Speaker 12 (10:56):
Said now on the New Countdown podcast. Donald Trump's terrorist
attack on Los Angeles is terrorist threat against the rest
of America. What else do you call it when you
send in the National Guard and threatened to send in
active marines into a US city to threaten and possibly

(11:19):
shoot civilians who are trying to protect people from being kidnapped, disappeared,
and renditioned to foreign torture centers.

Speaker 2 (11:28):
Yeah, that's all they're doing. They're trying to protect people.
These are good Americans. These are wonderful, lovely people who
are firing rockets and fire Why I shouldn't say rockets
firing fireworks that are akin to rockets at police officers.
That's what's occurring, and the Left needs to describe them
as lovely, wonderful, law abiding citizens. How dare Trump get involved?

Speaker 4 (11:50):
Right?

Speaker 2 (11:50):
That's it A quick break, A lot coming up, Crazy Day,
Crazy Stories.

Speaker 5 (11:54):
Craig Collins filling in on the Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 13 (11:58):
Are you watching the administration to move mountains at the
speed of light? They're working hard to write the country,
but let's be honest, they can't take care of your
personal finances. That's on yield. That's why thousands of Americans
are buying gold now from Birch Gold. And here's why.
In the past twelve months, gold's value has jumped thirty percent.
Central banks are buying record amounts and demand. Well, it's

(12:21):
not slowing down with the Rio reset looming bricks nations
want to unseat the US dollar as the global reserve currency.
But you can find peace of mind in gold. Birch
Gold makes it extremely easy to convert your existing Ira
or four to one k to attack sheltered ira in
physical gold, or you can just buy gold a store
in your home safe. They've helped over thirty thousand Americans

(12:43):
and they have an A plus rating with the Better
Business Bureau and they're trusted nationwide. So text my name
Benson to ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight today to
get your free in focus on gold now obligation, just
useful information, take control and protect your savings with Birch
Gold today.

Speaker 14 (13:15):
To do what can you know how to do?

Speaker 1 (13:17):
Because when you do what you do, what can you.

Speaker 15 (13:20):
Know how to do?

Speaker 16 (13:21):
What you just said is one of the most insanely
idiotic things I have ever heard.

Speaker 1 (13:25):
And then they passed us a baton, and the question
is what will we do with the time we carry
the baton? Was smoking?

Speaker 17 (13:33):
Are you just dumb and hal who doesn't love a
yellow school bus?

Speaker 1 (13:39):
My god, you're Jill As from their cool buff and
go home. I call myself a joyful warrior. The Chad
Benson Show.

Speaker 5 (13:51):
This is the Chad Benson Show. My name is Craig
Collins filling in.

Speaker 2 (13:54):
We will talk more about the craziness that is Los
Angeles in just a few minutes here, but before we
get back to that and all the horrible things happening
in LA And honestly, okay, I said, I'm not going
to talk about it, and I'll do a real quick
thing just to continue going on this. Honestly, the first
thing that keeps running through my mind is if there

(14:15):
isn't a National Guard there, how much worse is it
right now? If the National Guard isn't sent in, what's
the other thing that happens? And like I said, we'll
get to more of that in a bit, but that
continues to be a reoccurring thought that I have every
time I hit open on this microphone. As some might
want to keep talking about but all right, let's do
some sillier things. Let's do a palate cleanser. A couple

(14:36):
says they were in a Starbucks and they were refused
help during a medical emergency because they didn't get in line.
They weren't paying customers, so they're not allowed to have
any sort of support. They said all they needed was
a glass of water for I don't know what version
of medical emergency this was.

Speaker 5 (14:53):
Someone has a kidney issue. Actually I guess that's the issue.

Speaker 2 (14:58):
But here I got a little bit of audio that's
go ahead and play that and react to this accordingly
all involved.

Speaker 15 (15:04):
I could have possibly blacked out, It could have had
a more dramatic impact on my body.

Speaker 7 (15:09):
My kidneys could have possibly.

Speaker 4 (15:11):
Just shut down.

Speaker 15 (15:12):
And he just started sweating. He's like, I don't feel well.
He started leaning over, and then he started vomiting. I
was frantic. I think I was crying at that point.
The employee looked at me and was like, you need
to get in line. And then I repeated what I said.
I'm like, but my husband, he's in kidney, so you
we just need ice water quickly. And he looked at
me again and was like, you need to get in line.

(15:33):
Starbucks had a decision that day to pick policy or humanity,
and they chose policy.

Speaker 2 (15:38):
Idiots chose policy that work at Starbucks. Not that I'm
trying to defend the giant corporation. I just think it's
part of it. If you're vomiting, I think that you
do anything you can to give the person something that
they said is going to make it better. I think
that when the guy first says like bad things could happen,
if that's all, if they're just claiming bad things could happen,

(15:59):
and you're not seeing it in front of you, then sure,
absolutely do whatever you want to say. No, sir, you
can't skip, you gotta pay. But the minute you start
seeing people like throwing up and stuff, the minute you're
seeing examples of the medical emergency in front of you,
I think you go ahead and break that rule and
give them a cup of ice water, and then go
ahead and live your life knowing you did something good

(16:19):
for humanity. This is insane, and honestly, Melissa is the
girl's name. I was quite upset about this. Kevin, her
husband's name is Okay. I did wind up surviving. I
don't know if they actually got in line that part
of the updates not in the story I have, so
I don't know if that's how they finally fix the issue.
But Starbucks definitely decided that they didn't care if a

(16:40):
guy died, and that's horrible. At least a couple people
who worked there, I mean, made that decision. All right,
One other quick thing before we take a break and
get back and talk more about Los Angeles and the
craziness going on there. Apparently we're not only having baby
showers anymore. We're having showers for the grandparents of babies now,
and we're calling them grandma showers, which is a horrible

(17:02):
thing to call them. I would not want to attend
one of these, based predominantly on the name of it,
but grandma's and grandpa's would like to be celebrated as
well when their children are having kids, and they'd like
some gifts given to them.

Speaker 5 (17:15):
At a quote grandma shower. Don't do this.

Speaker 2 (17:18):
People TikTok thinks it's cool. I don't quick break a
lot more. Greg Collins filling in on the Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 4 (17:39):
Such Chad Benson Show, Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 5 (18:03):
filling in. Thrilled to be with you. A bunch of
stuff to talk about.

Speaker 2 (18:11):
The riots in Los Angeles certainly a topic of conversation
for everyone over the last twenty four hours or so.
I think this is probably the kind of thing that
not only have you seen a lot of it covered
on television, it actually began as protests back on I
think Friday. But you've probably even had conversations with people
no matter where you are, whether you're in California or not,

(18:32):
about what's going on. There, let's fire off President Trump first,
and then let's get to a bunch of other people
on this Trump is guaranteeing that people will be facing
charges at the end of all this craziness, lighting stuff
on fire, all the looting, rioting, whatever you want to
call it that's going on there, and all the violence.

Speaker 6 (18:52):
California and the federal target that they can in the
way of the deportation, something that holding me up.

Speaker 13 (18:58):
You've got in the way of law, Audia, they will
face judge, thank you very Yeah.

Speaker 2 (19:03):
He goes on to say, and that question, as you
can tell, is about officials, about politicians, about all the
people that are trying to push Trump and anyone he's
sending like the National Guard out, they'll all face charges too.
So you got to assume that Karen Bass is going
to be at the top of the list of people
who might eventually have some sort of set of charges
dropped at her feet. She has been saying for a

(19:25):
while that they'd need no help in Los Angeles, and
she's a fairly radical person by any standard and any
deep dive into her history. However, let's go ahead and
play this audio. I thought it was really interesting. This
is a CNN conversation she's having where she's saying that
Los Angeles is fine and no need do you know,

(19:46):
pay attention to us or do anything to help us.
And as she's saying it, CNN is simultaneously showing videos
of the chaos and horribleness going on. This would be
a joke if they intended it to be one, which
of course they didn't. But here's some audio and then
just so you know, as they're talking right next to them,
actually the bigger part of the screen is dedicated to

(20:08):
the chaos going on in LA.

Speaker 7 (20:09):
Try to spread them out a bit now, obviously they're
trying to disperse them. I'm curious if, now that the
National Guard troops are there on the ground, if there
is any urgency on the police department's part to really
put out an even stronger force and a stronger posture
to get this under control so you can and I

(20:30):
know your governor has said that they don't want that.
He's formally requested that the National Guard troops go back,
that they're not needed. Were those things.

Speaker 8 (20:39):
Correlated, well, I absolutely agree with the governor in asking
that the troops be withdrawn. I don't think that as
a way to bring peace in Los Angeles.

Speaker 2 (20:52):
I think that now apparently she want stuff to just
remain being lit on fire and chaos to ensue, and
then people can stand to the side and say mostly
peaceful as far as the protest.

Speaker 8 (21:02):
Law enforcement officers can handle this situation. But I just
have to repeat again, it's a feeling here of intentional
chaos in a situation that had not broken out to violence.

Speaker 1 (21:15):
Short of a few people. And there's nothing unusual about that.

Speaker 2 (21:20):
I love what she's saying. She says our police can
handle it. There's nothing unusual about any of this. So
let's jump to the LA Police Chief, who actually also
did an interview and also did a press conference, and
part of the press conference was airing on Fox News,
where he's saying, we're totally overwhelmed.

Speaker 5 (21:36):
We have no ability to handle this.

Speaker 2 (21:37):
Remember the mayor in Los Angeles claimed that the police
are doing great and that the people who came in
the National Guard disrupted things and intentionally made things crazy,
while the LA Police chief is asking for the military
to be sent in, sent in in force.

Speaker 3 (21:53):
We saw the first night was bad. What we've seen
subsequent to that is getting increasingly worse, more violent, tonight,
we had individuals out there shooting commercial grade fireworks at
our officers that can kill you. And we have adapted
our tactics to be able to have a chance, to
be able to take these people into custody and to

(22:14):
be able to hold them accountable. We are overwhelmed as
far as the number of people out there engaged in
this type of activity and the type of things that
they're doing. They'll take backpacks and the backpack will have
a cinder block in it. They have a hammer and
they'll break up the cinder block and use that pass
it around to throw at officers, to throw at cars

(22:35):
and throw at other people. We've seen people with hammers,
and you've broadcasted breaking the ballards behind the Federal Building
and taken the rocks, if you will, or pieces of
concrete and throwing them at officers. We've had liquid who
knows what description thrown at officers. There's no limit to
what they're doing to our officers. And again, as I

(22:58):
mentioned in my statement, I can't thank our folks enough
and our partner agency police officials for going out there
and taking care of the community.

Speaker 2 (23:08):
Yeah, fighting anyway, fighting when you feel completely overwhelmed which
are his words, and he feels as though the craziness
and the violence from day one has been something that was,
you know, already in a place that the people who
are in charge of Los Angeles, as far as the
politicians go, are claiming wasn't happening. They're describing it as

(23:29):
mostly peaceful, when the police officers are saying that it
was bad right away. How interesting is that? How interesting
is it that all the individuals in charge deny the
truth to your face, no matter where you are, no
matter you know what you're seeing happen, So that when
you eventually decide who to vote for, I imagine you'll
just use what you saw and what you remember compared

(23:51):
to the lies you were told. Newsom also did interviews
of course over the weekend, popped up on MSNBC and
a lot of friendly outlets said that they are poor
people that are being treated horribly right now by law enforcement.
As again, you just heard the police chief say that
they're cinderblocks being chucked at people's heads, fireworks being fired

(24:13):
at them that could kill them. This is insanity, and
wanting to defend criminal behavior because you think it's politically
beneficial to do is one of the worst sins of
politicians right now.

Speaker 10 (24:25):
Put your hands off these poor people and just trying
to get live their lives. Man trying to live their lives,
pay their tax has been here ten years. The fear,
the horror, the hell is this guy? Come after me?

Speaker 11 (24:38):
Arrest me. Let's just get it over with.

Speaker 4 (24:39):
Tough guy.

Speaker 10 (24:41):
You know, I don't give a damn, but I care
about my community. I care about this community.

Speaker 2 (24:47):
I'm a tough person who wants to tell you get
your hands off of people who are here illegally, because
that's what's really creating and starting all this fighting and
all the chaos going on, and go ahead and arrest me.
Do you know who Gavin Newsome reminds me of by
the way he reminds me of the kind of guy
that talks really, really tough till the minute he's punched

(25:07):
in the face. And then this is the dude who
immediately starts to like grovel and beg for people to
leave him alone once all of his tough words wind
up actually costing him anything. And honestly, and this is
easy for me to say from afar, and probably easy
for a lot of people to say who haven't been
living in this craziness in Los Angeles or parts of

(25:28):
California for the last few years now. Obviously, Democrats created
their own problem. They let their cities get out of
hand overrun out of control, and they didn't fight back
again and again when crazy stuff happened, when people were,
you know, using public facilities as if they were sidewalks
or whatever. They were doing certain things on the sidewalk

(25:51):
that you wouldn't want to have happened, is the way
I'm trying to say that. But nonetheless, as all of
this is going on, and as Cask gets crazier and crazier,
the people who I think they can run this city
are now actively rioting and going nuts, and the politicians
are once again defending them, and it's the worst possible move.
There's one other piece of audio I have. I just
found this very funny. This is Maxine Waters. She's trying

(26:14):
to get into an ice facility in Los Angeles, demanding
they let her in. Granted, the audio is really just
someone telling her no and you hearing a door close.
The video is kind of better, but the door just
gets slammed in her face and she is absolutely saying,
let me in, let me in.

Speaker 5 (26:29):
How dare you not? And they're saying, we don't care.

Speaker 1 (26:31):
Lady, excuse me.

Speaker 18 (26:33):
I need to get inswer her public approal.

Speaker 3 (26:34):
I need to get in.

Speaker 2 (26:38):
Door slam, and she just turns around and walked away
as all the cameras are watching her.

Speaker 5 (26:43):
I need to get in for what what are you
trying to do in here, ma'am?

Speaker 2 (26:46):
I don't think you're here to help us at all
in any capacity whatsoever. All right, one more time, just
to reiterate before I move on from other things. I
think the biggest reason that California is seeing all the
craziness at seeing is because people have become accustomed in
certain parts of our country to feel as though they
can do anything they want and they're in control, and

(27:07):
the government will stand down and not fight back. So
I do think a tremendous need existed there to demonstrate
that you are not in control, that in fact, the
government or law enforcement actually is, the National Guard is
whoever you need to be there is so that you
tamp down any version of this again in the future.

(27:28):
Because this is just the first video, the first movie
in what's going to be an unfortunate trilogy plus of
moments like this in California if they don't allow people
like President Trump to do what he's doing right now,
to deploy the National Guard and to tell people to
go home and stop being insane. There have been gatherings
in other places too, gatherings in Houston, San Antonio, as

(27:51):
far as Texas is concerned. There's gatherings in d C.
During I guess Pride weekend or whatever was happening. There,
all kinds of stuff going on throughout the country. So
also these videos, this chaos that you're seeing in Los
Angeles might become a template for what people do in
other places, in other crazy you know, parts of our country,

(28:12):
potentially other crazy democratic run cities. If it's not handled
better and handled well right now, and if the politicians
get their way, the Karen Vasses of the world and whatnot,
you're going to see a chaos go completely the wrong direction.

Speaker 5 (28:28):
You know it, and I know it.

Speaker 2 (28:29):
And obviously it's going to be a thing that just
spirals out of absolute control, which a lot of people
I think want, in certain parts of our political structure
or certain other parts of the world in general, they
want this chaos. They want the Antifa to do crazy
things and for it to go absolutely insane, and I
hope that it gets prevented, you know, as quickly as possible.

(28:52):
And I hope President Trump continues to ignore anything the
Democrats are doing to stand in his way. That's my
position on it.

Speaker 19 (28:57):
All.

Speaker 2 (28:57):
Right, on that note, we will take a break. We'll
come back with some lighter stuff again. This is the
Chad Benson Show with Craig Collins filling in.

Speaker 13 (29:05):
If you love your dog like family, listen up, because
most dog food is missing critical nutrients your pup needs
to stay healthy. That's why naturopathic doctor Dennis Black created Roughgreens,
the number one all natural dog supplement in America. Just
sprinkle Roughgreens on your dog's food, no need to switch brands,
and you're giving them a boost of vitamins, minerals, probiotics
and superfoods. It's not a replacement, it's what's missing from

(29:27):
their food. With my own dog, it's night and day difference,
more energy, shiner coat, better digestion, and yes, fewer vet visits.
Pet food is dead food. Roughgreens brings it back to life,
helping you give your dog the best nutrition. Thousands of
five star reviews and millions of happy dogs later, this
stuff works, and right now you can get a free
jumpstart bag to try for your dog. Just go to

(29:47):
roughgreens dot com slash chat use promo code chat. That's
a twenty dollars value free. You just cover the cost
of shipping. Go to roughgreens dot com slash Chad use
the promo code Chad. That's roughgreens dot com promo Oh Chad,
and give your dog the nutrition they deserve with rough Greens.

Speaker 17 (30:14):
Welcome to tribal free radio. Information over affirmation, Facts over fiction.

Speaker 5 (30:21):
It's ridiculous, and I want you to know that.

Speaker 1 (30:23):
You call it ridiculous, we call it reality. Such a
cruck Real over fake.

Speaker 6 (30:29):
God help us.

Speaker 20 (30:32):
The truth.

Speaker 15 (30:33):
You can't handle the truth.

Speaker 17 (30:36):
The Chad Benson Show, Fighting Truth decay the American Way.

Speaker 2 (30:42):
filling in, thrilled to be with you. A bunch of
serious stuff to talk about, mostly involving riots going on
throughout our country in Los Angeles and whatnot, But there's
also silly things out there in the world. A husband
decided to try to win an argument with his wife,
which as a guy that's married, it's always challenged for us.

(31:04):
It's not easy for the misses. Winning an argument involves
a lot of different moves. For a guy, I think
there's only really one strategy at play here, and I
do think this husband is taking it to the extreme.
He tried to show her how you can occasionally occasionally
miss fire when going to the restroom as a man,
by using a hose and a demonstration.

Speaker 5 (31:25):
I have a little bit of audio.

Speaker 2 (31:26):
The video is better than the audio on this thing,
but let's hit play on the audio first, so you
can understand the argument that was ensuing and the way
he was trying to win it by showing how the hose,
even when you're pointing at the right spot, might still
miss a little bit and not hit one hundred percent accurately.

Speaker 20 (31:43):
All right, come on, we'll be doing.

Speaker 21 (31:46):
Shorten it up.

Speaker 5 (31:47):
Shorten it, shorten that thing up.

Speaker 22 (31:49):
You're ready?

Speaker 4 (31:50):
Yeah, all right, showing what you got?

Speaker 5 (31:52):
Yeah, he's coming. Hold on, come on, get it in there,
get in the bucket.

Speaker 4 (32:00):
Oh yeah, I tell you.

Speaker 5 (32:01):
Sometimes it comes out dual streams that'd be shooting out.

Speaker 4 (32:04):
Lift right, you miss You missed the als all over
the backside.

Speaker 12 (32:10):
Of the toilet.

Speaker 2 (32:10):
By the way, case anyone was wondering. He said, shooting
out and she said shoes when they were both using
s words while firing off this you know, hose. So
that's exactly what the husband did. He handed a hose
to the missus. He let her point her hose at
a bucket, and then he asked her to go ahead
and fire all the water into the bucket, and then
he would randomly turn the hose on and off at
different speeds so that some of the water was hard

(32:32):
to control. This was his way to demonstrate that it's
difficult for us men to always hit one hundred percent accurately.

Speaker 5 (32:39):
Into the toilet when standing up and going to the restroom.
I do love this version.

Speaker 2 (32:43):
I do love this guy and just how he sounds
in general, because not trying to, you know, make any
sort of assumptions here, but this is the kind of
gentleman that I would think misses a little more often
than the rest of us. I feel like his accuracy
is even more challenged. And he said that sometimes it
comes as a split stream where it's shooting two directions

(33:03):
at the same time. I can't get over the hilarious
and so I'll play this.

Speaker 5 (33:07):
Again, all right, I'm on them what'll we doing. Shorten
it up, shorten it shorten that thing up?

Speaker 22 (33:14):
You're ready?

Speaker 4 (33:14):
Yeah, I go all right, showing what you got? Yeh
coming hold.

Speaker 23 (33:18):
On, Okay, here's my favorite part of that part of
the audio two is the whoe oh, because I think
every dude at one point in the life might have
made that noise while also doing the thing that they're
demonstrating and not the thing that's actually happening.

Speaker 5 (33:35):
Nonetheless, did he actually win this argument? The answer is
still no.

Speaker 2 (33:38):
He was just told that he should sit down if
he feels like it's going to be crazy, which men
cannot do. We don't understand that suggestion, And how dare
you say? It's We've been given a gift from God
to stand up and go to the restroom, and so
we have to use it all the time. That is
my position on that, regardless of if it might occasionally
allow for a stray. All right, let's move on to
other things. The average person is eight kinds of sauce

(34:00):
in their fridge right now. I doubt that that's true
for producer Phil because he's the kind of man who
knows how to cook things. So I'm gonna guess he
has more than eight sauces in his fridge currently, but
the vast majority of us have about eight. I don't
think I have all of these. I was looking at
a barbecue sauce. Of course, everybody's got that hot sauce.

Speaker 11 (34:21):
You have to.

Speaker 2 (34:22):
I imagine, I'm married to someone who's Latina, so there's
no way that hot sauce will ever not be in
our fridge. You got the basics, he got mustard and
catch up. Those are things that are in a lot
of people's fridge as well. But then you have some
other crazier things that might be in the fridge. These
are things like honey mustard for that's not a crazy thing,
but for you know, chicken nuggets and whatnot. Rob and

(34:44):
noodles with ranch dressing is a thing that people make apparently,
and why they say they have ranch dressing on constant demand.
Tartar sauce, all kinds of stuff, and actually they even
say the most awful converse combinations of sauce plus food
item was a set list they created, including French fries
with tartar sauce, scrambled eggs with barbecue sauce, and pickles

(35:06):
with buffalo sauce. All of these sound absolutely terrible that
do not do these things. But anyway, the average American
has eight kinds of sauce in their fridge right now.
If you're beyond that, you're a foodie, that's what we're assuming.
And if you're under that, you're a guy who hasn't
found a woman to be in a relationship with yet.
All Right, we've got a lot to talk about, a
lot coming up on the show. This is Craig Collins

(35:28):
filling in on the Chad Benson Show. A more coming
up in just a little bit, all right. One other
thing that I should say, though about the sauce in
the fridge discussion, is that there is a right and
a wrong kind of hot sauce.

Speaker 5 (35:43):
I have learned this from the missus who is Latina.
As I said a second ago, when.

Speaker 2 (35:47):
I come home with the wrong hot sauce, it's as
offensive as if I forgot something.

Speaker 5 (35:51):
All right, more than just a bit. Craig Collins filling
in on the Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 1 (36:20):
This is the Chad Benson Show, The Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 5 (36:51):
filling in.

Speaker 2 (36:55):
Thrilled to be with you a bunch of stuff to
talk about, and yet what's going on in California, in
Los Angeles feels like it's dominating a lot of conversations.
I can play a little bit of audio first of
an idiot on the streets, because why not. This is
a guy in LA who was I guess, found by

(37:15):
CBS News in Los Angeles and they asked him what
it was like dealing with getting tear gassed. And this
is actually making the rounds in a lot of democratic places,
this piece of audio, and people are proud of this
guy and celebrating him for his response to it.

Speaker 5 (37:30):
The guy's a moron. I can't say that differently.

Speaker 2 (37:32):
Here's the audio first, and then I'll tell you why
I think this is so ridiculous that it's being celebrated.

Speaker 5 (37:38):
Go ahead and fire that you to me.

Speaker 1 (37:39):
You got caught up in the tear gas as well.

Speaker 12 (37:41):
Describe what happened to you.

Speaker 4 (37:43):
Oh, just taste a little tear gass. Tasted like fascism.

Speaker 5 (37:49):
That's it. That's all he said.

Speaker 2 (37:51):
And he's staring at the camera with a smirk on
his face, saying that the tear gas tasted like fascism
because he thinks that it's fascism when you're not allowed
to light stuff on fire and break everything, and then
you get tear gassed and told you have to leave
because you're breaking the law.

Speaker 5 (38:06):
That's the same thing.

Speaker 2 (38:07):
By the way, many people are actually also playing audio
of the time that President Bush actually sent the National
Guard into Los Angeles to tamp down certain rioting and
craziness that happened in nineteen ninety two. I can play
a little bit of that if we want. The reason
why it makes sense to play this or have a
conversation about this for anyone that forgets, is that it's

(38:29):
the democratic positioning on how Trump is responding to this,
that is trying to convince people that he's acting like
a quote dictator or whatever, or gaslighting you into believing
this isn't the appropriate response from our government to what's
happening right now. So here I will play a little
bit of this. It's kind of weird, but it is
making the rounds everywhere. It's only weird because it has

(38:51):
almost no connection out of what's going on right now.
But just in case you're unaware or don't remember, or
weren't alive, like a lot of young voters, weren't When
this occurred in nineteen ninety two, there were la riots
and President George Bush sent in guards to actually fight
that sort of thing happening there.

Speaker 9 (39:09):
When is the.

Speaker 21 (39:10):
Urgent need to restore order?

Speaker 9 (39:13):
What followed Wednesday's jury verdict in and Robbie King case
was a tragic series of events for the city of
Los Angeles, nearly four thousand fires, staggering property damage, hundreds
of injuries, and the senseless deaths of over thirty people.

Speaker 21 (39:30):
To restore order.

Speaker 9 (39:31):
Right now, there are three thousand National Guardsmen on duty
in the City of Los Angeles, another twenty two hundred
span ready to provide immediate support.

Speaker 2 (39:42):
What's interesting to me when you flash back to this
and play this audio is how the desire to protect
people at a certain point in our society not all
that long ago. Nineteen ninety two is not as long
ago as it might sound some I I imagine to
a lot of people doesn't sound very long ago at all,
But nonetheless not that long ago. Politicians would put politics

(40:04):
aside at moments when protecting people was more important. Right now,
that is impossible for them to do. It is impossible,
mostly for Democrats in these democratic run cities to behave
as though any decision Trump would make is for the
benefit of society, and they need to attack it. They
need to go all in as crazy as possible against it.

(40:26):
So they need to say that this or that is inappropriate,
and it's never happened, and it's unprecedented, and all these
things couldn't be further from the truth. And yet as
all this occurs, the craziest part about it to me
is how obvious it is that media is once again
going to play that game that they constantly play with you.

Speaker 5 (40:42):
And actually to transition for a second from that.

Speaker 2 (40:45):
You might not be aware of this, but ABC suspended
one of its one of its employees, Terry Moran, over
some deleted posts about Stephen Miller, where he called Steven
Miller a world class hater. What I find so interesting
about this whole thing is that these politicians you know,
and these media people don't mind being in cahoots with

(41:08):
each other. They don't mind behaving as though they all
believe and agree on the same things. However, when they
go on television, they want you to pretend as though
they're somehow non biased. They somehow don't let these opinions
that they evidently have affect the things that they say
or do. But Terry Moran put up on social media.
The thing about Stephen Miller is not that he is
the brains behind trump Ism. This is quoting some of

(41:30):
the tweets he put out. Yes, he is one of
the people who conceptualizes the impulses of the trumpst movement
and translates them into policy. Man, I can't figure out
what side of the aisle Terry's on. But that's not
what's interesting about Miller. It's not brains, it's bile. Miller
is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity
for hatred. He's a world class hater. That's something that

(41:51):
someone put up on social media about a current person
in political office that he probably would love to interview
occasionally that gets you suspended by ABC or by anybody else.
To go ahead and just you know, throw your opinions
that wildly into the wind and then hope that no
one seems to care about it.

Speaker 5 (42:09):
And actually, you know what, I'll say something.

Speaker 2 (42:11):
I've talked about this a little bit before, I think
when I'm filled in for Chad, but I'll say it
again here. I've worked in places where you had a
news director or someone else who evidently had a political opinion, who,
if you talk to them, you know, over a beer
outside of the office, would willingly tell you all the
political things they believe, and then would go into the

(42:32):
office and behave as though it wasn't affecting their opinion.
But time and again make decisions where if they weren't
going to report something to you, they weren't going to
give you a detail or a fact about something.

Speaker 5 (42:43):
The person would say that it was really just to
protect people.

Speaker 2 (42:46):
It was to not enhance any of the negative things
that people already think or believe that are out there
in society. And Terry Moran strikes me as someone who's
exactly like that, who gets up on the high horse
of how dare you ever accuse me of doing anything
but being, you know, mister journalists, and then at the
same time do all the things that journalists do now
to demonstrate how little they can actually be trusted, And

(43:08):
in their own brain they rationalize all of it. They
tell themselves they're doing God's work. They're protecting people who
you know, are going to be the victim of us
knowing more facts, knowing more of the truth in certain situations,
which is insane. By the way, the truth should set
you free all the time. It shouldn't be a thing
that causes horrible, terrible stuff to happen. But darn it,

(43:29):
that seems to be the case all the time. All right,
other things going on out there. I do think the
big beautiful Bill still gets to be discussed, And of
course that means you talk a little bit about Elon
Musk and Donald Trump and their quote unquote breakup. I'm
gonna say the most tinfoilly hat thing I can ever
say on the Chad Benson Show, and I promise I

(43:50):
don't know that this is true or truly believe that
there's a chance that this, you know, could be false.
I just can't help but keep thinking it. The media
has so desperately wanted Elon Musk and Donald Trump to
not get along, to fight each other, to say all
the things they've been saying. They've manufactured rifts in that

(44:11):
relationship in the past, this version of one where Trump
and Elon were going after each other, and now it's
more just Elon and Trump seems to kind of be
ignoring it for right now. Something about it to me
almost feels like they're doing it on purpose. They're doing
it because of how much media wanted it and how
much it allows you to have conversations about things that
media otherwise would ignore that may or may not actually

(44:33):
somewhat benefit someone like President Trump.

Speaker 5 (44:36):
I'm not saying I actually believe this.

Speaker 2 (44:38):
I know it's a tinfoil hat conspiracy theory, and it
seems very much to be a genuine disagreement now that
has gone the full set of circumstances as far as
the things they're saying against each other and the things
that Elon has said about President Trump. But as I
say that, I still can't help but realize how much
media wanted this in the first place. Something interesting about

(45:01):
that too, whether or not that ties to talking about
Los Angeles or anything else in the news. Right now,
Elon Musk is the wealthiest man on the planet. Elon
Musk is someone that money would immediately be a welcome
thing if he started handing it to Democrats again. All
that he's done, all that he said, danced on stages

(45:21):
with President Trump while helping him get elected. And if
Elon were willing to cut a check for Gavin Newsom
right now, they'd put their arm around him and smile
into a camera with the guy because they don't care.
All they care about is sweet, sweet, delicious cash and money.
Not that I think Elon is ever going to do that,
and Trump even made a reference to that, I think,
over the weekend. But nonetheless, as I say all of this,

(45:43):
I can't help but think that this is so funny
in such a weird way, because it demonstrates how little
anyone actually cares about any of the things that they
say and do in the world of This guy's the
worst person ever. I mean, honestly, if Donald Trump, who's
a wealthy man, at some point in his life, became
capable of cutting a check to a Democrat again, I'm

(46:05):
not saying that would ever happen, but if it did,
they'd willingly smile into cameras again with him, like they
did in the past when he did that too. Because
there were points in Donald Trump's life where he made
donations to Democrats.

Speaker 5 (46:17):
You know it, I know it. I'm not trying to
say that it means that he actually believed in the
message or whatever with them.

Speaker 2 (46:23):
But nonetheless, it's just hilarious to watch this play out
and watch people like ravel at the feet of an
elon musk to try to get him back into their corner,
especially if they just offer to give him back any
sort of incentives that he was getting through his organizations
to get more electric vehicles to us and get more
people buying electric vehicles, get the tax breaks that you

(46:44):
used to get on those sort of things. If you
give him back that and he just throws money at you,
it shows how crap so many people are in this situation.
And I can't I don't know, I can't stop thinking
about that too. But nonetheless, as I said this again,
to go back to the big beautiful Bill for just
a second, I think that as the Senate actually looks
over this, there's a chance they cut out some of
the pork, some of the fat, and make it a

(47:06):
little bit cleaner, a little bit nicer. There's a tremendous
likelihood that they don't cut out all of it, and
then it gets passed in some fashion. That makes a
lot of people who are truly conservative upset, because it
was the only way to pass the wide majority of
agenda pieces that President Trump had, And I think it's
an indictment of Washington itself. If you're mad about the

(47:26):
Big beautiful bill. If you voted for Trump and you're
mad about it, I think what you really need to
understand is that this is the best possible way for
Washington to get anything done, and that that is truly
the sin, or truly the animal that needs to be changed.
Whether Trump or anybody else is the conduit to get
that done, we'll see. But the fact that you got

(47:47):
to cut deals here, cut deals there, throw this funding
in over here, and then leave a lot of it,
you know, out of the viewpoint of the public and
the average American, all of that is the problem with
these in general, and so that needs to be fixed.
But could the big beautiful Bill do big beautiful things? Yeah,
because one of the biggest beautiful things in it is
a tax break for all of us that last a

(48:09):
long time, and so that is good and that's something
we need right now. Having tremendous tax hikes would be
bad to be a negative. And of course the Democrats
always say it's only on the rich people, and then
for some reason it seems to hit everybody but the
rich people, which always seems weird to me. But all right,
we'll take a break on that note. A lot to
talk about coming up on the show. I'm thrilled to
be here with you on a Monday. This is Craig

(48:31):
Collins filling in on the Chad Benson Show. More coming
up in just a bit.

Speaker 13 (48:36):
The basketball playoffs are wrapping up, but the action is
still heating up on Prize Picks, the best place to
cash in on your favorite sports. With millions of members,
Prize Picks has made daily fantasy sports accessible to all.
The app is really simple to use. Pick two or
more players across any sport, pick more or less on
their projections, and you can win up to two thousand

(48:57):
times your money. This year's playoffs are headed towards crowning
at first time champion in more than fifty years, so
don't miss your last chance to cash in on history
with Prize Picks. Join Prize Picks, America's number one daily
fantasy sports app. Available to play in more than forty
plus states, including California and Texas. So download the Prize
Picks app today and use code Chad to get fifty

(49:18):
dollars instantly when you play five dollars. That's code Chad
on Prize Picks to get fifty dollars instantly when you
play five win or lose. You'll get fifty bucks for
just playing Guaranteed prize picks run your game must be
president certain states. Visit pricepicks dot com for restrictions and details.

Speaker 17 (49:43):
Serving up talk radio medium, rare and dripping with irony.

Speaker 1 (49:48):
It's Chad Benson.

Speaker 2 (49:51):
filling in thrilled to be with you. A bunch of
serious stuff, mostly about riots and the political reas actions
of them to talk about today, but.

Speaker 5 (50:01):
Also some lighter stuff. This is a story out of California.

Speaker 2 (50:04):
A school teacher accidentally gave a five thousand dollars tip
instead of a five dollar tip when buying CBD products. Apparently,
the organization that she gave the five thousand dollars tip
to refused to refund her behaving as though that was
actually something she intended to do. I think Wells Fargo
has since said they're going to give this teacher back
her money plus the interest on it, so she doesn't

(50:26):
have to pay interest on the credit card or whatever
for that. But here there's a little bit of audio
that goes with this of her explaining that she didn't
mean to give them five thousand dollars for some CBD.

Speaker 1 (50:35):
He says, enter a tip.

Speaker 24 (50:37):
Well, when I did, there's no decimal point, and I pushed.
I thought, which was only two zeros, ended up being
three zeros. I said, wait, I want to delete this,
and he said, I don't know how to delete it.
He never erased it. Nothing like five thousand dollars. I
don't have that kind of money, I busted out in tears.
I'm a single mom.

Speaker 1 (50:56):
I have two grown kids.

Speaker 24 (50:58):
My son is graduating college next week. I can't even
buy anything for him because I have a five thousand
dollars outstanding. Now it's fifty five hundred dollars.

Speaker 11 (51:07):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (51:07):
They gave her all fifty five hundred dollars back, apparently,
and told her they're sorry.

Speaker 7 (51:11):
You know.

Speaker 2 (51:11):
It's crazy about this too, by the way, And I
don't know if her version is one hundred percent true,
but it sounds like it could very easily be. Is
the people who very aggressively want you to put that
tip in When they swing the little iPad or whatever
in your direction, they flip it around. They're like, you
don't want to put a tip in? And you're like, no,
I'm good, I don't want to give you a tip
for selling me something and standing here and not actually

(51:34):
creating it in any way, shape or form.

Speaker 5 (51:36):
We don't tip for that. You don't have to tip
for that. People.

Speaker 2 (51:40):
If you purchase something from someone and they don't create
it in front of you, all they do is hand
it to you, pune it into the computer, and tell
you what the price of it is. The tip amount
should be. No, that's what it should be in any
situation like that. If they actually have to do work
based on whatever you're ordering from them, then on your
own discretion, you can choose tip people. But if all

(52:01):
they do is sell you a thing that they already have,
you don't have to tip for that moment unless they
made it by hand themselves.

Speaker 5 (52:08):
I guess, just mere moments before you showed up.

Speaker 2 (52:10):
I guess there's some version of my position that could
be adjusted a bit, but mostly say no to this
stuff people.

Speaker 5 (52:17):
It is insane and I can't believe it's a thing
that happened at all. But all right, well, take a break.
A lot coming up. Creig Collins filling in on the
Chad Benson Show more in just a bit.

Speaker 2 (52:27):
A couple other crazy things out there, though, Do include
Miley Cyrus getting bullied by her fans. I don't know
if I should even talk about this. I don't know
if you care. Miley Cyrus is in some sort of
visual album. She screened it somewhere. It's called something Beautiful.
But when she finished the screening and got up on stage,
I guess the people there were upset because they thought

(52:49):
she was going to do a concert and Miley was
not intent to do a concert of any kind, and
they booed her enough that she sang a song a
cappella and then walked off the stage.

Speaker 5 (52:59):
This is weird. This is a world we live in.

Speaker 2 (53:01):
I'm not a huge Miley Cyrus fan, but I can't
help but think this is strange. I think there's some
audio for this too that sounds like Los Angeles Riots
a little bit to me. I'm kidding mostly about that,

(53:22):
but anyway, continue, Yeah, she acapella, sings one song and
then leaves the stage. I don't think it appeased the crowd,
and actually, to be honest, I don't think it's all
that great when you're just not compelling something, you don't

(53:42):
have a band with you, any of that stuff happening.
But they yelled at her during the discussion about her
visual album that she screened, telling her that they thought
it was a concert and how dare she not actually
sing songs? Darn it, we came here to see you. Dance, monkey,
Now dance all right, quick break, A lot coming up.
Craig Collins filling in on the Chat Benson Show.

Speaker 1 (54:14):
Such Chad Benson Show, The Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 5 (54:39):
filling in. Thrilled to be with you. A bunch of
stuff to talk about. Let's talk a little bit.

Speaker 2 (54:47):
About Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He is being returned to the
United States. He will face charges that would put him
in jail for a very long time in this country
if he's convicted of those charges. Human trafficking the biggest
among them. So he is someone who seems to be
an abuser of women from the things that his wife
had said about him in courtrooms and then pretended they

(55:08):
weren't true when she was on national television. But nonetheless,
if he is found innocent of these charges, he's probably
going back to El Salvador.

Speaker 5 (55:17):
Those are the things they're going to happen.

Speaker 2 (55:18):
First let's play some audio from Pam Bondi discussing the
fact that he is coming back to the United States
to face charges that are significant and important and not
at all the version of a beautiful story that Democrats
had been telling you for a while, where he'd get
to be reunited with his family as the Maryland man
who was wrongly deported, when he actually is a guy

(55:39):
that has a whole lot of serious things potentially you know,
found to be problems in his life that put him
in a jail cell somewhere other than El Salvador.

Speaker 20 (55:48):
Here we go, and conspiracy to commit alien smuggling in
violation of Title AUSC.

Speaker 1 (55:54):
Thirteen twenty four.

Speaker 20 (55:56):
We want to thank President Buquela for agreeing to return
of Brego Garcia to the United States. Our government presented
El Salvador with an arrest warrant and they agreed to
return him to our country. We're grateful to President Buchelea
for agreeing to return him to our country to face
these very serious charges. This is what American justice looks like.

(56:22):
Upon completion of the sentence, we anticipate he will be
returned to his home country of El Salvador. The Grand
Jury found that over the past nine years of Brego
Garcia has played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring.
They found this was his full time job, not a contractor.

(56:47):
He was a smuggler of humans and children and women.

Speaker 2 (56:51):
All right, I want to stop it right there. These are,
of course charges. He will be tried in a court
room and they may see if he winds up guilty
of these things or not. But way different than the
version of person that media has been telling you, that
a Brego Garcia is a loving family man, Maryland man
who just wants to be reunited with the people that
he cares about, and was taken out of this country

(57:13):
and he shouldn't have been sent out of this country
at all, etc.

Speaker 5 (57:15):
Etc.

Speaker 2 (57:16):
They left a lot of pieces of information off the
table when they reported on that in general. So there's
one piece of audio that I do love and react
to this, and it's Scott Jennings on CNN just RiPP
it a Brego Garcia apart a little bit while calling
him Saint a Brego Garcia and making everyone else on
CNN visually very mad. You can see in the faces

(57:38):
of all the other people.

Speaker 5 (57:39):
How dare you say this? You're a racist?

Speaker 2 (57:41):
You're a horrible person for the things you say are
the way you say them. And Jennings is not saying
that he hates everybody that looks like a Brego Garcia
or everyone that comes into this country legally that's from
the same places as a Brego Garcia is from, which
is what democrats here. By the way, when Jennings says
that this guy who's accused of really horrible stuff might

(58:02):
wind up in a jail cell here or he's just
going to get sent back out of the country, because
that's actually following the law of the land, which is
a good thing.

Speaker 5 (58:10):
Here we go.

Speaker 14 (58:10):
I suspect that Maryland Senator Chris van Holland, when he
heard that sant Abrego Garcia was coming back, took a shower,
put on his nice suit, got on open table, found
out what maybe Party of two reservation they could get
for tonight so they could continue the bromance they started
when he went back to visit Santabrego in El Salvador. Look,
he was not deported because he was a bad guy.

(58:33):
He was deported because he was an illegal immigrants living
in the country illegally for fourteen years, who had.

Speaker 2 (58:39):
Been at first I gotta stop it. This is when
the faces of everyone in CNN that he's talking to
start to sour, and all he's saying is an actual
fact that there's a person here who's been illegally here
for a very long time, who doesn't have a right
to be here.

Speaker 5 (58:52):
That's not hate.

Speaker 2 (58:53):
When you send someone who's not allowed to be in
our country based on the law, to another country where
they're supposed to be, even if that country also has
reasons to put him in a jail cell, that's not
really our thing to figure out.

Speaker 14 (59:05):
Did to do process who had an existing deportation order.
It so happens that it turns out he may in
fact well be a really, really bad person that we
would not want in the country.

Speaker 5 (59:16):
He may very well becomes Number One.

Speaker 14 (59:18):
He gets convicted of this stuff and goes to prison
for a long time.

Speaker 5 (59:21):
Number two, he gets acquitted and.

Speaker 14 (59:24):
Goes back to El Salvador, which is what I suspect
the White House would do with him if he somehow
gets out of these charges. Either way, it's what the
White House said all along. There's no future where the
Maryland man goes back to Maryland to live.

Speaker 2 (59:36):
Quietly, right, And that's all that the Democrats wanted to
talk about the entire time as far as Brego Garcia
is concerned, because as they find topics and discussion points to,
you know, go over again and again with us, the
narrative always has to be the same. The evil, horrible,
hateful Republicans, hateful Magas supporters, or Trump himself are doing

(59:59):
something based on race, based on sex, based on whatever
it might be. Honestly, what's going on in Los Angeles
right now, according to the left, is a racist fight
against people that look a certain way. It couldn't possibly
be that what's actually occurring is rioting and craziness in
the streets that are evidently very bad. People are throwing

(01:00:20):
rocks through windows of cars, and you need to stop that.
You need to stop bad behavior, illegal behavior, rioting behavior,
by go ahead and sending in the National Guard. Because
the police say that they're overwhelmed, which as audio I
played before and I'll play again on the show a
little later on, the police chief in Los Angeles says
that they cannot handle this on their own, that they

(01:00:42):
need help, something that the politicians are absolutely saying is
not true, because I guess they're just not listening to
the people in charge of the police department there. But
one more time, what's amazing to me, from the narrative
to the reality is how often the reality of a
situation makes democrats mad. They get mad when you say
all the facts because they want those facts to mean

(01:01:04):
that you're something that you don't have to be. You're
not racist when you say out loud that people who
don't deserve to be in this country legally shouldn't be
allowed to stay.

Speaker 5 (01:01:12):
That's just you saying laws should be followed.

Speaker 2 (01:01:15):
And again, I don't mean to be blue in the
face when I say this, but I can't help it
as someone who is married to someone from another country.
My wife is born and raised in Mexico, now a
legal US citizen. So again I say this as only
I can possibly mean it. When I want people who
are not legally here to be removed, it doesn't mean

(01:01:35):
I want anyone that looks like my wife to be
taken out of the country. That's insane. But that is
what the left here is when you have these conversations.
All right, let's play this audio. This is probably a
deep dive into politics, but it does have a name
in it that you might know David Hogg, the young
man who was not terribly close to although he was

(01:01:58):
much closer than probably many of us were. This is
me being as generous as I can describing this person
if you don't know who he is, to a school
shooting and has then turned that into some sort of
political career talking about it and being an anti gun
guy and popped up on television for years now talking
about that. And again, it wasn't as though he was

(01:02:18):
someone that survived the way he acts as though he
survived a school shooting. But he was at a school
that had a shooting. That's the truth of it. I'm
not going to go any deeper into David Hogg. I
think you know who he is already. But anyway, the
actual chair of the Democratic Party, of the DNC chair
had made a phone call to David where he complained

(01:02:39):
about how high profile David Hog was and how difficult
it made for the chair himself to do his job.
His name is Ken Martin, by the way, And again,
I know this is a deep dive, but I think
is so interesting about this and the thing I can't
get over and I just mean this psychologically, I don't
even mean this.

Speaker 5 (01:02:55):
You left or right version of thinking.

Speaker 2 (01:02:57):
If I were someone that went through some thing emotionally
or mentally difficult or awful, If I was someone who
was at a school where shooting occurred, if I was
outside already and the shooting happened inside whatever, it might be,
the last thing I'd ever want to do. And this
is me personally, and seems to be the vast majority
of people who actually experience this is utilize it for

(01:03:17):
some sort of political career. I would not talk about
it all the time and become the face of some
version of something that then finds my way into being
a vice chair of the DNC of the Democratic Party
as a whole. That's not how I would react to
a moment like that in my life. I wouldn't try
to find the most beneficial version of it for me.

(01:03:39):
And I think that only people who are separated a
little bit from that experience can even do this. I
think if you're someone that's at the front lines of
whatever it might be, couldn't allow themself to turn it
into a politically beneficial thing for them like Hog has.
But nonetheless, let's play a little bit of this audio
where the chair Ken Martin is complaining to him, and

(01:03:59):
this is a leaked phone call about how difficult he's
made the job of the person in charge of the
party because of all the outspoken things he says and does,
and how he just acts like he himself is actually
in charge of the Democratic Party again, something he's been
given an opportunity to do because of his proximity to
a topic that is at the forefront of democratic you know,

(01:04:21):
talking points, not necessarily something that seems to be the
interest of everyday Americans.

Speaker 25 (01:04:27):
But here we go, and I'll say, look, it has
plenty awards and we're all trying to change those for sure.
But the longer we continue this fight, the harder it
is for us to actually do what we all want
to do, which is make a difference in this country.

Speaker 11 (01:04:41):
Again, so.

Speaker 25 (01:04:44):
I deeply respect you, David. I too was looking forward
to working with you, but this has created a situation.
And I'll be very honest with you for the first
time in my hundred days on this job. In Jessica
knows this.

Speaker 5 (01:04:58):
You know it's crazy. I'll stop the audio right here.

Speaker 2 (01:05:01):
He hasn't even actually said the thing he wants to
say yet, And I love that when people are fighting
politically on the same side of the aisle. They pretend
they respect each other, but they don't because I can't
imagine he actually does. I imagine how he actually feels
about David is that this young man who's being disruptive
to his control of his political party is a guy
that he really wants to just go away. That's not
how he's going to say it. He's going to tell

(01:05:21):
him that you've just made it too hard for me
to do my job.

Speaker 5 (01:05:24):
I want to quit.

Speaker 21 (01:05:29):
The other night, I.

Speaker 25 (01:05:30):
Said to myself for the first time, I don't know
if I want to do this anymore. No, No, partly
not because of the stress and all the naysayers. Right,
I'm used to that. I've spent fourteen years as a chair.
I'm used to get him beat up on. But you know,
this is this is really everything you know from this election,

(01:05:51):
this credentials report, and how Malcolm's been treated in this
to you know, the fact the election of self, hel
Shasty and Gino we're treated in this.

Speaker 5 (01:06:01):
No, they all are treated terribly.

Speaker 25 (01:06:03):
Just quite frustrated to be in this position because what
you've done, whether you like it or not, or know
it or not, David is I'm trying to no one
knows who the hell I am.

Speaker 2 (01:06:14):
Right, you see, that's amazing. He also says, no one
knows who the hell I am. You have overshadowed me
to a degree that's an acceptable. But here's the part
that's the problem. Because David Hogg's narrative is that he's
a survivor of a school shooting, the Democratic Party doesn't
want to disagree with him publicly because the logistics or
the optics of that are just not good enough for them.

(01:06:37):
So instead of having a conversation where they try to
out be now politically very very radical individual as someone
that is hurting their party and not helping their party,
they'd be seen as people who are attacking someone who
survived the Stoneman, you know, Douglas High School shooting in
twenty eighteen, and therefore they can't do it. They have
to prop him up as some sort of demonstration of

(01:07:00):
of you know, surviving something and then becoming an advocate
for the things they all want on the Democratic side
of the aisle, And so they create their own animals,
they create their own boogeymen, essentially by then anointing Kilmar
or Brego Garcia or David Hogg as these people that
can't possibly be flawed, and then the minute they are
flawed in a negative way, they have to deny it

(01:07:21):
or pretend it doesn't exist, or make phone calls that
get leaked to the public where they complain privately that
I really need you to shut up, when publicly they
can't do it.

Speaker 5 (01:07:30):
And that's something the right does not have an issue with.

Speaker 2 (01:07:32):
They can disagree with anyone that's within their political party,
because darn it, that's part of everyday life. All right,
I got to take a break. A lot coming up.
This is Creig Collins filling in on the Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 13 (01:07:43):
Everyone's heard of dog, But what if there was a
door department of retirement efficiency? Wouldn't you love to run
your portfolio through it and find waste? Well, the next
best thing getting a second opinion, it's free. Here's Zach Abrahm,
chief mesment officer at Bower Capital.

Speaker 11 (01:07:59):
You should be.

Speaker 22 (01:08:00):
Confident in the composition of your portfolio when it comes
to the strategy and efficiency of your retirement. We offer
that second opinion with our free Know your Risk Portfolio review.

Speaker 5 (01:08:10):
We'll show you a full reveal of.

Speaker 22 (01:08:12):
How bullwork is always looking for opportunities to lower your risk,
lower cost, and give your retirement as much upside as possible.

Speaker 4 (01:08:20):
You only get one retirement. Get a second opinion.

Speaker 13 (01:08:23):
Schedule your free know your Risk portfolio review at no
Your riskpodcast dot com.

Speaker 4 (01:08:28):
Don't put it off.

Speaker 13 (01:08:30):
Go to Know Your Risk Podcast dot com.

Speaker 14 (01:08:32):
Investment advisory services offered through truck Financial LLC and SEC
registered investment advisor.

Speaker 5 (01:08:36):
Investments involved risk and are not guaranteed past performance. Doesn't
guarantee future results. Trrek twenty five to two one seven.

Speaker 1 (01:08:51):
Irreverence Like, Yeah, so what it's the Chat Benson Show.

Speaker 5 (01:08:58):
This is the Chat Benson Show. My name is Craig Collins,
filling in. Thrilled to be with you.

Speaker 2 (01:09:03):
A bunch of stuff out there to talk about in
the world. Let's have a little bit of fun, shall we.
A Bigfoot sighting apparently happened in Monroe, Michigan.

Speaker 5 (01:09:11):
This is according to.

Speaker 2 (01:09:12):
At least Bob with two Bees, who I think did
an interview about the sighting. This also has prompted a
cannabis dispensary in the area to offer a discount on
their products if you have photographic proof of Bigfoot. Not
sure that would be the best way for the Bigfoot
enthusiasts to prove that he's real, to tie it to

(01:09:33):
Cannabis Dispensary. But nonetheless, let's play a little bit of
audio from Bob with two Bees talking about him seeing
the monster Bigfoot, or at least the sighting of it
in general. Oh wait, hold on, let me make sure
you can actually hear this video, hear this audio. So
let's hit this play button one more time.

Speaker 15 (01:09:50):
Man.

Speaker 11 (01:09:50):
Here we first heard about it. I was in Baltimore, Maryland.
I said, oh my gosh, I leave home for a week.
Look what happened. There was what was called the Monroe
Monster years years ago. Someone saw a big creature out
near the Fermi power plant. I think it's really funny
that this was spotted near where that was.

Speaker 5 (01:10:08):
Yeah, the big creature, the Bigfoot.

Speaker 2 (01:10:10):
But anyway, the Cannabis Dispensary is offering you a sweet,
sweet discount on products you're promptly already using. If you're
out there looking for Bigfoot on a twenty four to
seven basis and trying to get photographic proof of him.
That's the big problem with any of this stuff, the
Locknest Monster, the Bigfoot. We all have cameras in our
pockets now, and yet nobody has a clear photo of

(01:10:31):
any of these creatures. Hard to believe they're real. I
am genuinely talking about this because I find it hilarious.
But I love the fact that someone somewhere is like,
I'm using this to promote my company and seeing if
anybody comes along with a photo. And you just know
by the way that a bunch of people are going
to get their friend to dress up in a big
foot costume, go into the forest, take a few photos

(01:10:53):
of their friend, and then show up at the CBD
dispensary and beg them for some product and say, this
is proven, man, this is real. That's not my buddy
wearing a big foot bigfoot costume while we're both already
high on your product. Other things out there that I
saw that I thought were interesting. There is a list
of the ten minor annoyances that stress us out on

(01:11:15):
a constant basis. The number one thing that stresses most
people out, according to a couple different online sources that
did this, is when you run into someone you'd rather
not talk to and you have to talk to them
for a few minutes. I find that hilarious. A knock
at the door when you're not expecting anyone is a
number two stressor for most people, someone talking to you

(01:11:35):
when you're trying to focus or want to be silent.
With number three on this list, essentially the top three
are all having to interact when you don't want to interact.
We are society now that is not used to having
to be in person, and that's not good for us.
This is bad for us, and so the top three
items in this list are, oh man, I have to
see a person face to face and say words to them,

(01:11:57):
and this is bad for me and bad for them.
Number four or your WiFi is slow or goes down,
So once you don't have to interact with people anymore,
you get mad when you can't be online all the time,
like so many of us are. Those are just a
few of the things that stresses out. This is Craig
Collins filling in on the Chad Benson Show. Number five
on this list, though, by the way, was the absolute

(01:12:18):
one that I agree with that definitely got buried on
the list because of our inability to be in person anymore.

Speaker 5 (01:12:24):
Loud chewing.

Speaker 2 (01:12:25):
I am someone who's very annoyed by that, more annoyed
than most people should be. It drives my wife crazy,
even though she's mostly a non loud chewer. But if
she has gum and we're in a vehicle together, there's
going to be an issue at some point.

Speaker 5 (01:12:39):
She knows this, I know this. We don't know how
to fix it, but.

Speaker 2 (01:12:42):
That should have been higher on the list. Baby, Just
interact with people. It's not so bad. Craig Collins filling
in on the Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 1 (01:12:55):
This is the Chad Benson Show, The Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 5 (01:13:26):
filling in. Thrilled to be with you. There actually is
a lot of stuff to talk.

Speaker 2 (01:13:33):
About out there in the world beyond just what's going
on in Los Angeles and California. The US and China,
we'll meet at a very difficult time for them to
talk trade and potential additional trade war stuff. It'll be
interesting to see what the inevitable outcome of this discussion
is for the United States. One of the most important
things is rare minerals. We want all the things we

(01:13:57):
need in order to make sweet, sweet, delicious technology and
the batteries that go into that technology. And China has
a decent supply of that. Also, Ukraine has some of
that and will be getting more from them, So it'll
be interesting to see how that impacts this discussion. But nonetheless,
China in the United States finding a way to agree

(01:14:17):
and not have the ridiculous surplus trade version that's existed
for so long for them and the ridiculous, ridiculous deficit
that's existed for us.

Speaker 5 (01:14:26):
That'd be a good thing, but that is actually going on.
That's in the world.

Speaker 2 (01:14:29):
Also, Greta Thunberg was deported or will be deported from
Israel after trying to sail a ship into Gaza with
aid on it, something that was hilarious because she was
bragging about it on social media that she was doing
it and she was daring people to arrest her, and
then exactly what they said would happen did happen. As
officials warned her she wouldn't make it to Gaza and

(01:14:52):
her activist friends would be sent away along with her
if they continue to try to sail a ship there
which did not work. Things that are in the news
and could be talked about. Nonetheless, what's going on in
La is dominating conversations. I have more audio to get
to so we're going to dive into that. Still police
chief yesterday in Los Angeles had conversations with news media

(01:15:15):
about how crazy things have been, about how out of
control this is. Jim McDonald is the guy's name. I
think it's obvious to anyone watching from AFAR that you
need a stronger response than we've even gotten so far.
And a lot of LA politicians are fighting it. But
if you just listen to the police chief, he's begging

(01:15:37):
for things to get better and warning people that are
making terrible decisions every day by causing all of this
chaos and rioting and whatnot, that they're getting arrested, and
they will very aggressively pursue all of the individuals they
have video of committing crimes.

Speaker 3 (01:15:52):
When you look at the numbers of arrest we've made
pale in comparison to what will be made. There are
video accounts of what happened everywhere on social media, on individuals, cameras, iPhones.

Speaker 4 (01:16:06):
We will go after that.

Speaker 3 (01:16:08):
Very aggressively, go after the all available video, analyze that video,
and hold whoever we can't accountable for the variety of
different types of crimes that have been committed, and that's
something we'll do with a number of different partners with
levels of expertise.

Speaker 2 (01:16:24):
That may be beyond what we have A how dare
they how dare they hold people responsible for crimes they're committing.
I thought this was just about you know, peaceful protesting
and people that we should just love and let stay
in our country even if they're here illegally, and none
of it is actually about the horrible stuff going on
in the streets of LA That's if you listen to
the Democratic narrative on this or the you know, far

(01:16:46):
left version of it, and people like Gavenusom who say.

Speaker 5 (01:16:49):
Stay out of my city or stay out of my state, and.

Speaker 2 (01:16:52):
Karen Bass who says stay out of my city, and
they're insanity and they're very, very radical positions on things.
A little bit more from the police chief in Los Angeles.

Speaker 3 (01:17:01):
And then the National Guard was federalized, so they're working
for the US Army, not for the California State National Guard.

Speaker 9 (01:17:09):
Do we need them?

Speaker 4 (01:17:10):
Do we need them?

Speaker 3 (01:17:11):
Well, looking at tonight, you know this is the thing
has gotten out of control. What there I think Before
I could answer that, I'd have to know more about
what their capabilities are, what their role is. Intended to
be to be able to make that determined.

Speaker 2 (01:17:25):
But yes is what he wants to say, and he
wants to say it as definitively as he can. He
just doesn't want to be trapped in some sort of
weird press version of fighting and political version of fighting.
But his first reaction is do we need the National Guard?
If you look at how crazy things have gotten over
the last couple of days, it seems like it's an
obvious yes from him, and it should be because if

(01:17:47):
they work with you to help, you know, prevent this
chaos from existing on the streets, which is exactly what
they intend to do, then this would be good for all.
A couple other pieces of quick video or audio to play.
This is Tom holl Tom Holman, excuse me. I talked
about the riots in Los Angeles and how the city
is essentially being burnt to the ground right now, and

(01:18:09):
that's a bad thing.

Speaker 21 (01:18:10):
God blessed President Trump for son in the National Guards.
The National Guards heres protect property, protected life, protected our
officers and protective aids. You've seen the video. This city's
burning is out of control because of the weekly leaders
of Democrats here in the state and frankly in the
United States Congress, So I slew President of Trump with
sun National Guard to protect life and property.

Speaker 5 (01:18:32):
Yeah, and also protect ICE agents.

Speaker 2 (01:18:34):
As the acting director of ICE, Tom Holman would like
to know that anyone that he has actually helping remove
people that are here illegally from this country doesn't wind
up being a target and a victim of some sort
of attack themselves. I will ask piece of audio, I'm
just rapid firing through this stuff because I want to
move on to some other topics, but I want to
make sure to continue discussing this because it is of course,

(01:18:55):
by far the biggest story in the country right now.
This is CNN having a discussion about whether or not
it sends the wrong message to arrest people that are
here illegally at courthouses because we know where they are.
They show up there, we know where they are. They're
not allowed to stay, so we arrest them and deport
them to another country. Apparently CNN is worried this could

(01:19:18):
send some sort of chilling effect or message out of
people that are breaking the law and not supposed to
be here.

Speaker 7 (01:19:23):
That also now includes what we're seeing is ICE making
arrests in and around courthouses as well.

Speaker 1 (01:19:29):
What do you think of that move?

Speaker 18 (01:19:34):
Yeah, ok, yeah, A lot of these are us, especially
the arrest inside the immigration courts, don't make a lot
of sense to me. There's individuals who are already in
deportation proceedings who are showing up for court, right, we
don't want to do anything to discourage that, And you're
making an arrest of an individual who's already in the system.
And it just tells me that again from a if
you know, you're doing that just to rack up a

(01:19:55):
quick statistic rather than to provide any public safety impact.

Speaker 2 (01:20:00):
I love the idea that removing someone who's not allowed
to be in this country, even if they're showing up
for a court case where they're going to be told
you're not allowed to be in this country and you
got to leave. I love the idea that that's to
rack up a quick stat According to the left, that
they think that this means that I'm just trying to
juice the numbers and I'm not actually following again the
law and taking people out of the country that shouldn't

(01:20:20):
be here, which is the whole point. And most Americans
agree with this. By the way, most Americans are on
team President Trump as far as all of this decision
making goes, and that's on all sides of the aisle.
Even Democrats, when pulled about this, actually do agree that
we should stop having so many people here illegally in
this country right now, and we need to do things

(01:20:40):
to prevent it. Whether or not they agree with the
you know, sensationalized fear mongering version that they're told about
in news media, I'm sure is up in the air.
But I think it's something like forty percent of Democrats
that think that we're on the right track as a
country when it comes to removing people that shouldn't be
here legally. And that says a lot, of course, a
lot of Republicans, a lot of believe this, but a

(01:21:01):
decent amount of Democrats also seem to think this is
one issue that's going better than media wants it to go.
All right, there's another thing I want to talk about.
This might be another deep dive of a thing, and
I have like a three minute piece of video. I'm
not sure i'll play all of it. I'll certainly interrupt
it as we go here. But Riley Gaines was reacting
to something that Simone Biles said about her, and I

(01:21:22):
thought Riley Gaines did a great job of just posting
a video and reacting to all this stuff. And granted,
sometimes when the left does the thing they complain about.
She body shamed Riley and compared her to a dude,
which was weird. Sometimes I get a little annoyed by
how the right can react to that, because you sound
very like the left. But Riley Gaines absolutely didn't do this.

(01:21:44):
She kept saying how little she cared, but how hypocritical
it was to see these sort of things out there.
But as I said, I got to play a decent
amount of this audio, and Riley sets up the topic herself,
talks about the tweets that are out there from Simone
that caused this weird controversy, and it was sort of
a punch that Riley didn't see coming. She said she

(01:22:05):
had no reason to believe that Simone Biles would take
a shot at her on social media, and then it happened,
and she reacted to it accordingly. But again, I think
a lot of what she says here is really powerful.
So I'm gonna play a lot of it react as
we go, but I have about three minutes audio. Here's
Riley gangs tray.

Speaker 19 (01:22:19):
Simone Biles, the Olympic gymnasts the best of the best,
bar nun. There is no one else even remotely in
her league in women's gymnastics. I guess, in an attempt
to be inclusive and virtuous, decided to sell out all
women and girls who have dreams to achieve and to succeed,
and to specifically personally attack and body shame me. She

(01:22:40):
tweeted this out of the blue, like this came out
of nowhere, and she said, Riley me, you're truly sick
all of this campaigning because you lost a race. First
of all, if she's insinuating I lost to a man,
I've lost several races in my career, duh, that's part
of being an athlete. But if she's saying I lost
to a man, that's factually incorrect.

Speaker 5 (01:22:58):
We tied, okay. I first loved that. I got to
be honest.

Speaker 2 (01:23:01):
Before she even gets into her take on whatever it
is Simone is saying about her, the reference to her
losing to the person that shouldn't have been competing in
the first place actually isn't exactly accurate. I find that
hilarious in and of itself. To make that that's a
very athlete move the first and foremost be like, Look,
I know it doesn't matter, I know it's not important here,
but I just want you to know that I feel

(01:23:23):
proud of myself for tying the dude that I was
in a pool racing during a women's swimming event.

Speaker 19 (01:23:28):
Besides the point, straight up sore loser, you should be
uplifting the trans community and perhaps finding a way to
make sports inclusive or creating a new avenue where trans
feels safe in sports. Let me get something straight.

Speaker 5 (01:23:41):
It's my job.

Speaker 19 (01:23:42):
It's the women's job. This is what someone Biles is saying.
It's the women's job to find a way for the
men's feelings to be validated, no, for their identity to
be affirmed.

Speaker 5 (01:23:53):
It's not my job. It's not actually at all.

Speaker 19 (01:23:56):
So to say I should be doing this is insane.
If she wants to use her platform to uplift men
and women's sports, then by all means, but it's certainly
not my job, and I don't believe it's the job
of any woman.

Speaker 11 (01:24:08):
To do this.

Speaker 2 (01:24:09):
Yeah, I think it ruins women's sports to allow a
bunch of dudes to compete in women's you know, sports
across the board. It ruins all the things that are
supposed to be women's athletics.

Speaker 19 (01:24:20):
She goes on to say, but instead you bully them.
One thing's for sure, no one in sports is safe
with you around.

Speaker 3 (01:24:27):
I don't.

Speaker 19 (01:24:27):
I can't even make.

Speaker 25 (01:24:28):
Sense of that last part.

Speaker 5 (01:24:29):
Actually, that's intane and out of the blue.

Speaker 19 (01:24:31):
She tweeted this, bully someone your own size, which would
ironically be a male, which is hilarious really for two reasons.
Number One, she's acknowledging their differences physiological biological differences between
men and women in saying this. Secondly, I'm five foot five,
which might seem like a giant to someone who's like
four foot seven foot eight, but I'm pretty standard size

(01:24:54):
for a woman.

Speaker 2 (01:24:55):
Yeah, she's like one thirty five and five foot five,
definitely smaller than most of us.

Speaker 5 (01:24:59):
But all right, that's part of it. Maybe I'll play
the rest later.

Speaker 2 (01:25:02):
This is Craig Collins filling in on the chad Beds
and show heavily agreeing with Riley Gains in her weird
random feud with Siman Biles.

Speaker 13 (01:25:10):
More in a bit, dads teach us a lot, So
this Father's Day, let's show our dads that they deserve
the world at a price that even they will be
impressed by. This Father's Day, treat dad to a pair
of everyday earbuds by Raycon because he deserves to relax, recharge,
and enjoy his favorite music, podcasts and calls in crystal
clear sound, with a thirty two hour battery life and

(01:25:31):
a multipoint connectivity that lets him pair two devices at once.
Speaking of battery, with Raycon's quick charge function, just ten
minutes of charging yields ninety minutes of battery. They also
come with active noise cancelation, which is often difficult to
find at such an accessible, dad friendly price point. Raycon's
Everyday earbuds are available in a variety of vibrant colors.

Speaker 4 (01:25:51):
To match your dad's vibe.

Speaker 13 (01:25:52):
And if he's not liking his Raycons, they offer a
thirty day happiness guarantee return policy, No questions asked. Right now,
get up to fifteen percent off sitewide at buyraycon dot
com slash chat. That's up to fifteen percent off site
wide at buyraycon dot com slash Chad.

Speaker 2 (01:26:20):
Chad Benson, Welcome back to the Chad Benson Show. My
name is Craig Collins filling in thrilled to be with you.
There's a story out there, and it's kind of older,
but I think it's still popping up on social media
quite a bit. I think the New York Post originally
put this out at the end of May, but people
are still discussing it, claiming that the real reason that

(01:26:41):
men use certain websites like the one about being fans
of people only fans. All right, I've just said it now,
it's OnlyFans dot com. The reason they use that is
because they miss having just regular human conversations with people.
The survey even claims that men who were asked why
they're on a site like that gave the answer that

(01:27:01):
they talk about their hometown and upbringing. They brag about
work or vent about problems they have there. They send
messages to these models on social media about gaming, cooking, sports,
all kinds of things. I got to be honest, every
time I've seen this story pop up in my own
social media feed, the first thing I've thought is this
is the same version of claiming I read Playboy for

(01:27:22):
the articles that men have been doing forever. Because I
don't necessarily believe this to be true, I just want
to put that out there, but I do think it's
interesting that essentially the claim is that people want the
quote unquote girlfriend experience, but they want the non sialacious
version of it, and they're going to adult websites to

(01:27:43):
get it. I think a lot of people are lonely.
I think a lot of men wind up being lonely,
and there's a bunch of reasons for that. There's actually
another story out there. I wasn't even going to talk
about this one, but now it feels like it's connected
to this story I'm discussing right now, at least partially,
A guy told a girl that he's in a relationship
with that he had quote noticed her and like would

(01:28:04):
pay attention to her in public places before he worked
up the courage to ask her out. That essentially, they
were in some places together more often, like bars and whatnot,
and so he admits within a few months of the
relationship that he had realized she was a human before
she knew he existed, and it took a few different
chance meetings for him to finally decide I'm just going

(01:28:24):
to go ahead and shoot my shot with this young woman.
Most people on social media are now up in arms
saying that he essentially stalked her, saying that this is
a creepy dude who've got to.

Speaker 5 (01:28:35):
Be aware of or be careful around. So that's part
of the problem.

Speaker 2 (01:28:40):
A guy goes to the gym and pays attention to
a woman who's dressed in almost nothing and taking pictures
of herself to go viral and social media, gets attacked
by the woman for being a dirty, horrible dude. He
doesn't do anything, He just looks in her direction, and
that is enough to be horrible. Creig Collins filling in
on the Chad Benson Show to the women that don't

(01:29:02):
want this attention, even though they seem very much to
want it, etc.

Speaker 5 (01:29:05):
Etc.

Speaker 2 (01:29:06):
The way in which women, very quickly, i think, vilify
men for being attracted to them is sort of amazing.
And I've known all kinds of people that take more
than one meeting with someone to actually work up the
courage to ask them out. Maybe you interact with them more.
Maybe it's not that you just notice them in a
place you're in, but you actually talk to them and
become friends with them and then eventually pursue them.

Speaker 5 (01:29:26):
I'm not sure, but.

Speaker 2 (01:29:28):
This guy, you know, not having that courage at first
and gaining it later doesn't feel to me the same
as someone who's stalking you and media reacted the way
they did, or social media reacted the way they did.
Do it all right, one last story. I do think
this is interesting. It's lacious. I'm going to run out
of time on purpose for it. Ozempic apparently has a
side benefit that Reddit is claiming is true. Men are

(01:29:51):
reporting growth in a specific area of the body that
they had not had growth in for quite some time
because of a zempic. It's deleting a lot of the
the you know fat you have in your system, and
it's adding something else.

Speaker 5 (01:30:06):
I see ozempic sales going through the room.

Speaker 2 (01:30:08):
Even if this isn't true, scientists say they need a
study to see if this is actually accurate. They're not
positive about that, just the claim of it. There's a
lot of dudes no weight problem whatsoever, that will be
on ozempic in the very near future if potential growth
in a certain area is likely.

Speaker 5 (01:30:24):
And look at that, I'm out of time on this segment.
Craig Collins filling in on The Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 1 (01:30:50):
Chad Dentson Show, The Chad Benson show.

Speaker 2 (01:31:15):
filling in. Thrilled to be with you. So much stuff
to talk about. Just one last piece of audio to
play for the stuff going on in Los Angeles, which
I have been doing a lot of throughout the show
today and can't help it. This is a reporter for
ABC seven in LA reporting from downtown Los Angeles. I

(01:31:35):
think this was just last night that this happened, or
two nights ago. And while she's talking about like night
two of the chaos, there are people behind her, riders
like yelling at her and screaming terrible things, and she's
saying that everything is mostly peaceful. Well, there's two people
taunting her behind her. She's like, things are great down here. Guys,
don't need to pay attention to this at all. This

(01:31:57):
seems insane, and yet here we go.

Speaker 8 (01:32:00):
Administrations had been going on right outside the Federal Detention Center.

Speaker 1 (01:32:03):
Most of those demonstrators were very peaceful.

Speaker 20 (01:32:06):
They were chanting, they were shining, people were driving by
fronting their horse.

Speaker 2 (01:32:10):
Yeah, by the way, they're giving her middle fingers as
they're standing behind her and pointing at the camera and
television and she's like things a great and.

Speaker 8 (01:32:17):
Again they're expressing their anger about the detention of so
many immigrants at the Federal Center.

Speaker 2 (01:32:23):
They're expressing their anger and they're doing it through peaceful
protesting that involves fire bombing stuff and firing fireworks at
police officers.

Speaker 5 (01:32:32):
All of this incredibly peaceful. You know what's amazing about this?

Speaker 2 (01:32:37):
And it feels stupid to make this comparison because it
honestly feels like exactly the kind of game that both
sides try to play.

Speaker 5 (01:32:45):
But I can't help it. This seems to be the
kind of thing that we're seeing right now.

Speaker 2 (01:32:49):
When the narrative came out, the January sixth was actually
mostly peaceful, meaning that there was video that showed that
a whole lot of what occurred that day wasn't the
ridiculous chaos and horrible moments that they showed us all
over mainstream media. Now, granted those moments did exist. There
were things that were bad that happened, and a person

(01:33:10):
did die. That person was shot by a Capitol police officer,
and that narrative is non existent now in how we
talk about that story. But nonetheless, the fact that there
was a buy and large amount of peace and moments
of chaos that happened that day. Media decided to describe
one narrative and ignore everything else. Now they focus on

(01:33:35):
any version of peace they see within rioting and looting
and craziness. Isn't that insane to anyone out there, whatever
side of the aisle you're on on either of those things.
If you think the January sixth was the most terrific
event in the history of our world or our country,
and you know every moment of it was chaotic and horrible, fine.
If you think that what's going on in Los Angeles

(01:33:56):
right now is chaotic and horrible, also fine. I tend
to agree with you on the Los Angeles one. But nonetheless,
what I find amazing is that there are going to
be moments of peace in all of this, and media
loves to focus on them as long as it fits
the narrative of what side of the aisle they want
to be on. They could easily have had that discussion
about January sixth that they wanted to with the same

(01:34:17):
version of focus that they're having now on the peaceful
moments within the LA riots, and they refuse to do it.
So it just shows how fully motivated by politics, all
of these discussions have become and it's absolutely what makes
people no longer capable of even really watching or paying
attention to the news. And I say this mostly because

(01:34:39):
there's also this story about Terry Moran that's hilarious out
there right now. If you don't know, ABC's Terry Moran,
the guy who did a interview with President Trump recently
where he pushed him on all kinds of things, mostly
a Brago Garcia among them, but pushed him on a
lot of stuff recently put out on social media and
then deleted that one of the people within Trump's administration

(01:35:02):
is a hateful, hateful person by any stretch of the imagination.
By the way he said, I don't have to paraphrase this.
ABC was upset in how Moran talked about Steven Miller,
the White House Deputy chief of Staff for President Trump,
calling him a world class hater who is just full
of bile and all kinds of things. What's amazing about

(01:35:24):
this too, And I think the White House Press Secretary
Carolyn Levitt has now responded to this, saying that it
speaks to a lot of the things that Americans believe
when they watch news and understand that there's bias just
baked into it. Is how comfortable someone in a position
like Moran's is of having what they think is, you know,
personal opinion off to the side. There was a day

(01:35:47):
in society, in journalism or whatnot where you didn't know
the opinions of people that were at the top end
of the food chain, that worked for the organizations that
claim that they were independent, and in the middle you
had no idea. You're like, man, I wonder who this
person votes for. Those days are so long gone and
part of the ridiculous problem for sure, because people now

(01:36:09):
think that they can behave independent at least independent to them,
and that's enough to do their job.

Speaker 5 (01:36:16):
Well.

Speaker 2 (01:36:16):
They don't actually think independently. They don't actually process stories
that they're reading on one side of the aisle. They
absolutely do it within the brain that they have and
the brain that they show us on social media or
anywhere else. But it's just amazing because I think there's
an arrogance to pretending as though you can you turn

(01:36:37):
off whatever part of your brain actually hates the politics
that you're seeing and then turn it back on when
you're on your own or doing something you know, on
a social media page, what have you, and you actually
feel like that's okay in society right now. It's just
amazing because yesteryear individuals would have thought that it was
inappropriate to even show people what they thought in private,

(01:36:59):
I would think because that would contaminate the ability for
them to be taken seriously in public. All right, let's
play something else. This is Tom Holman doing an interview
on MSNBC back and forth discussion about some of the
stuff going on, and Holman is just doing a great
job of saying that ICE is doing good, that the
things they're deciding to act on and the people that

(01:37:23):
are being removed from this country are all within the
edicch given to them by the American people in electing
Donald Trump, and Donald Trump saying what he was going
to do is remove illegal people from this country, and
that a lot of the pushback now is just insane.

Speaker 5 (01:37:38):
Here's a little bit of this back and forth.

Speaker 16 (01:37:40):
It's one of the toughest critics right now is, of course,
California Governor Newsom. We want to give you a chance
to respond. Governor Newsom, in an interview with NBC News,
said that he was said, quote, just get it over
with in terms of you arresting him. He says, quote,
he's a tough guy. Why doesn't he do it? He
knows where to find me, So Tom arrest me.

Speaker 1 (01:38:01):
Let's go.

Speaker 16 (01:38:01):
That was the governor of California talking to you. O.

Speaker 21 (01:38:05):
Look, I'm not biting on that reporter that interviewed me.
Very discided. We did a twenty minute interview and he
clip it makes me and takes my words out of context.
Here's what we said, and he talked about what I
talked about. These people that are the protests and writing
when they cross the line.

Speaker 11 (01:38:22):
They got that.

Speaker 21 (01:38:23):
Here's why I said. They have a right to protest,
said the First Amendment right, but they can't cross that line.
They can't cross that line of impediment. They can't cross
that line of putting their hands on officers. They can't
cross the line of knowing concealing. And they will go
in it because they're all federal crimes. They're in satire
and they will be prosecuted. When he asked the questions
that include Mayor Basset, Governor Newissom, and I was clear,

(01:38:45):
they haven't cross the line, but they're not above the
law either. If they committed crime. They started went after prosecution.
That's what was happening. I never threatened arrest governor. So
I'm not biting off of that. It's reporters dishonest and
let them play the whole twenty minute interview and you
see a whole different discussion.

Speaker 11 (01:39:04):
That we had.

Speaker 2 (01:39:05):
Yes, what I think is really interesting about this is
that mainstream media doesn't learn their lesson after they fix
the interview with Kamala Harris to sound much more coherent
than it actually was. They keep waiting for that moment
where they think they have salacious audio and then they
play it by itself.

Speaker 5 (01:39:21):
And Holman's saying that if Newsome or Bass.

Speaker 2 (01:39:24):
Are to break a law, a federal law, they would
be held accountable like anyone else for that. That's also
a democratic position. Sometimes if it's President Trump and they
think they have something on him, by the way, I
will say this, this is just a dovetail thing and
I can't get over it. And it is when you're
talking about Elon Musk and President Trump right now. Elon

(01:39:46):
in the last few days has made some sort of
I don't know comments about potentially knowing that President Trump
is in files of Epstein clients. The reason I don't
believe that that's going to ever come out as significant
hit on Trump is because Biden would have absolutely put
it out there. Absolutely, they would have sanitized anything about

(01:40:07):
them out of any of this information and just put
negative things about Trump out there. They went as hard
as they could in the paint at trying to throw
President Trump in prison before he was re elected as
president of the United States.

Speaker 5 (01:40:19):
So I think that there's no way.

Speaker 2 (01:40:22):
Something as potentially harmful as being a significant client of
Jeffrey Epstein in some sort of illegal manner was actually
hidden and is still being hidden from public. It would
absolutely be out there because Democrats love to put that
stuff out there.

Speaker 5 (01:40:36):
Of course they'd hide everything else.

Speaker 2 (01:40:37):
So I just think it's interesting that that became a
byproduct of this discussion, and now a whole lot of
Democrats are demanding to see the Epstein files, which is
sort of to me hilarious and kind of the point.
Maybe some version of this fight was intent to get
them to demand that, so the Epstein files can really
be made public and harm a whole lot of people
that aren't President Trump. But it does make me feel,

(01:40:59):
similar to when they hold us for quite some time
that Trump's taxes were going to be bad for him,
And then when eventually some of that stuff came out,
it was a nothing burger of a story because none
of it seemed at all terrible, even in the slightest
which again is hilarious. But we have so many versions
of that happening right now. Holman talking about how his
clips are taken out of context. But if Newsom and

(01:41:21):
Bass break the law, they're going to be arrested, baby,
just like anybody else, kids arrested. Not that he's showing
up at their door today, but I think that's actually good,
And I thought that that was one hundred percent exactly
what media was calling for when they were trying to
get Trump thrown in jail for stuff that seemed ridiculous
and absolutely not a felony anywhere other than in New
York City when it can be inflated to one without

(01:41:43):
a second charge. That was necessary to claim that a
typical misdemeanor is a felony, not whether or not Trump
even was guilty of that thing, but the way they
got it turned into a felony, and the way that
people even say thirty four times convicted felon even though
it's one case and it's all about business trans actions
and the correct way to put those business transactions on

(01:42:04):
a ledger, which is usually always a misdemeanor. That's truly
what the felony crime is for anyone that's unaware of it.
That Trump was found guilty of miscategorizing a payment as
something that was a business transaction when the State of
New York said it wasn't, and then they went after
him harder than that for things that make no sense.
But all right, I'll take a break a little bit.
Coming up, hopefully all of it fun on a very

(01:42:26):
serious Monday. Chad is back tomorrow. This is Craig Collins
filling in on the Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 13 (01:42:32):
If you love your dog like family, listen up, because
most dog food is missing critical nutrients your pup needs
to stay healthy. That's why naturopathic doctor Dennis Black created
Rough Greens, the number one all natural dog supplement in America.
Just sprinkle Rough Greens on your dog's food, no need
to switch brands, and you're giving them a boost of vitamins, minerals,
probiotics and superfoods. It's not a replacement, it's what's missing

(01:42:53):
from their food. With my own dog, it's night and
day difference, more energy, shiner coat, better digestion, and yes,
fewer visits. Pet food is dead food, Roughgreens. It brings
it back to life, helping you give your dog the
best nutrition. Thousands of five star reviews and millions of
happy dogs later. This stuff works, and right now you
can get a free Jumpstart bag to try for your dog.

(01:43:14):
Just go to roughgreens dot com slash chat. Use promo
code Chad. That's a twenty dollars value free. You just
cover the cost of shipping. Go to roughgreens dot com
slash Chad, use the promo code Chad. That's roughgreens dot
com promo code Chad, and give your dog the nutrition
they deserve with Roughgreens.

Speaker 17 (01:43:42):
Podcasts are American is hot Dogs, apple pie, football, and sushi.

Speaker 1 (01:43:49):
No, okay, maybe not sushi.

Speaker 17 (01:43:51):
Next time you have a craving for something sweet and tangy,
download a Chad Benson Show podcast.

Speaker 9 (01:43:57):
More.

Speaker 1 (01:44:00):
Did you get a little bit of sutinous?

Speaker 3 (01:44:02):
If so good?

Speaker 5 (01:44:03):
Because it's swinging salty, I'd say.

Speaker 17 (01:44:05):
Got a taste On iTunes, iHeart or Spotify and binge
to your ears content.

Speaker 1 (01:44:10):
Oh here, you're listening to the Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 5 (01:44:16):
This is the Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 2 (01:44:18):
My name is Craig Collins, filling in love a story
the producer Phil sent me about a door dash driver
who was arrested after trying to threaten a guy at
his house for not giving him enough of a tip.
The doordass driver even pulled out a gun. What's great
is how quickly the homeowner diffused the whole situation. I
think I have a little bit of audio from Fox

(01:44:38):
twelve in Oregon. This happened in Vancouver, Washington. So here's
a little bit of the story.

Speaker 26 (01:44:42):
A wild story out of Vancouver that was caught on camera.
A former DoorDash driver is now facing serious felony chargers
after a tense confrontation outside of a Vancouver home.

Speaker 4 (01:44:54):
We'll take a look.

Speaker 26 (01:44:54):
You can see the homeowner wrestling with the driver, who
police a was armed with a gun.

Speaker 18 (01:44:58):
The homeowner arm tail and remove the bullets from me,
he did before calling police.

Speaker 5 (01:45:03):
Incredibly, no one was hurt.

Speaker 2 (01:45:05):
Okay, what's amazing about this, and again I know you
can't see the video because it's it's radio. You should
look it up for yourself, is how quickly the homeowner
kicked this guy's butt. He shoves him to the ground,
gets the gun out of his hand, pops the clip
out of the gun, pops the last bullet out of
the chamber, and then just looks at the guy on
the ground like, you're an idiot and you shouldn't have
done this. Apparently the reason for the fight his daughter,

(01:45:28):
the homeowner's daughter. That guy's name is Anthony. I bought
one hundred dollars worth of groceries. Did give a tip
to the driver, but it was through the app The
driver wanted a cash tip. He's fifty nine years old.
The guy's name is Robert, So he shows up the
next day after delivering this food saying you forgot my tip,
and he's got a gun in his hand, threatening to
shoot somebody. And again the dude who owns the home

(01:45:49):
just kicked his butt, And that part is amazing.

Speaker 5 (01:45:52):
Just a lesson.

Speaker 2 (01:45:53):
A caution to those out there. I do not show
up at a house demanding a tip if you're not
going to be able to defend yourself when the guy
beats the crap out of you for being an idiot
and actually doing something very illegal, he will be charged
with attempting to harm someone, which obviously is going to
be quite a bit of a felony issue himself. And
I love that they describe him as a former DoorDash driver,

(01:46:15):
because you'd definitely get fired when someone's sends you the
video from their front door of you trying to shoot
them for not giving you the right amount of money
as a tip. All Right, some other things out there
that I saw, maybe the guy in my last story
would actually I love this the homeowner guy. Americans were
asked how much money they'd spend a day for just
peace and quiet, Like, if you had to pay a

(01:46:37):
certain amount of money, what's the upper echelon of the
amount of money you'd pay? The average American would pay
two five and twenty one bucks a day for piece
of quiet. Parents would shell out an additional one hundred
and forty seven dollars for peace and quiet, meaning they'd
pay a total of almost four grand in order to
try to get people to leave them alone for a bit.

(01:47:00):
The biggest barriers to your peace and quiet, according to
this same survey, fifty percent of people said it was
work either getting disrupted in some way somehow by either colleagues.

Speaker 5 (01:47:10):
Or activities that they don't want to do.

Speaker 2 (01:47:12):
At work commitments came up with thirty two percent of
the problem, and financial strain another twenty four percent of
the barriers to having adequate sleep, adequate peace and quiet
went at home a.

Speaker 5 (01:47:23):
Little over half.

Speaker 2 (01:47:24):
The respondent said that the alone time that they need
to survive is way beyond what it currently is, and
they need to find a way to do it. The
average respondent also said nine point five hours per month
of time to themselves is the bare minimum.

Speaker 5 (01:47:38):
This is something again, a lot of people are saying they.

Speaker 25 (01:47:39):
Do not have.

Speaker 5 (01:47:40):
I thought every part of it was.

Speaker 2 (01:47:41):
This part of the story was interesting, and I absolutely
agree that peace and quiet is the kind of thing
that you might shill out some money for because it's
the best thing you get.

Speaker 5 (01:47:51):
Ever.

Speaker 2 (01:47:52):
Luckily, for me, I do have times right now where
there's days and I'm not saying it's anybody's fault, but
there's days where I'm home alone by myself. The missus
is working, I'm not working, so I sit at home alone.
And I love a part of that. I love that
it's not that often, but I love that it happens,
because having some time where you don't have responsibilities, where
you just buy yourself in the house is absolutely a

(01:48:14):
thing we need. All right, one other story out there
before I go. AMC Theaters is going to be adding
another thirty second commercial before movies. A lot of people
seem to think this is a horrible idea and are
mad about it. My reaction was, who cares? Just show
up even later the movie and you won't know. But
AMC says they need money because people don't go to
movies anymore, so they're adding one more trailer at the beginning.

(01:48:36):
And again, I'm barely gonna notice thirty more seconds at
the beginning of a movie.

Speaker 5 (01:48:40):
Who cares? All Right, on that note, that's it for
the show for me today. Thrilled to be with you.

Speaker 2 (01:48:44):
Craig Collins filling in on the Chad Benson Show Chad
back tomorrow. All right, Before I get out of here, though,
I will say one other thing. I thought I was dumb,
but I'm not. About a Walmart story involving a customer
who called the cops after they accidentally charged himself thirteen
hundred bucks. A guy went to Walmart, checked out to
buy an avocado, accidentally put in thirteen hundred dollars is

(01:49:07):
the cost of the avocado. Somehow paid for it without
realizing it was wrong, and then called the cops to
say Walmart was stealing from him. That's a you problem, buddy.
And that's it for the show. Greg Collins filling in
on The Chad Benson Show.

Speaker 5 (01:49:20):
See you next time.

Speaker 1 (01:49:30):
This is the Chad Benson Show.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Are You A Charlotte?

Stuff You Should Know

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}President Trump Sends National Guard as Violent Anti-ICE Riots Erupt in Los Angeles

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Dateline NBC

Are You A Charlotte?

Stuff You Should Know

All Episodes

President Trump Sends National Guard as Violent Anti-ICE Riots Erupt in Los Angeles

Dateline NBC